PC R 92-1390247
RESOLUTION NO. 92-1390
RESOLUTION OF TH� CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT
A NEGATIVE D�CLARATION, IlVS'TRUCT TT-IE CITY CLERK TO FILE
A NOTIC� OF llETERMINATION AND AMEND VARIOUS SECTIONS
OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (REZON� CASE NO. 92-225)
WHEREAS, the City of Arroyo Grande has conducted environmental review for Rezone
Case No. 92-225 and has found that a negative declaration is appropriate; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the Development Code, which became effective
June 13, 1991 at which time all interested persons were given the opportunity to be heard; and
WH�REAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information and
public testimony presented at the public hearings and in the proposed document and staff report.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City
of Anoyo Grande hereby recommends to the City Council adoption of the amendments outlined
in Attachment "A" based on the following findings:
1. The proposed development code amendment is consistent with the goals,
objectives, policies, and programs of the General Plan, and is necessary and
desirable to implement the provisions of the General Plan.
2.
3.
4.
The proposed development code amendment will not adversely affect the public
health, safety, and welfare or result in an illogical land us pattern.
The proposed development code amendment is consistent with the proposed and
intent of Title 9.
The potential environmental impacts of the proposed development code
amendment are insignificant.
On the motion of Commissioner Souza, seconded by Commissioner Tappan, and by the
following roll cal vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners Moore, Souza, Tappan and Acting Chairman Soto
None
Commissioner Carr and Chairman Brandy
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 6th day of October, 1992.
ATTEST:
Mona L. Prelesnik, Commission Clerk
��
�
John oto, cting 'rman
� �{
A'TTACHM�NT "A"
Amend Section 9-03.050 (b) (2) of the Development Code as follows:
2. Use proposed is same or similar in character to existing use, as determined by the
Planning Director based on the following "use categories". Exceptions may be
allowed if the Planning Director can determine that the new use is less intensive
than the existing use:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g•
h.
i.
J•
k.
1.
Professional Office/Retail Commercial
Industrial/Research and Development
Dor.,: r,,.,,.,,o,-,.:.,� Convenient Store/Banks /Savings & Loans
Restaurant
Fast-food Restaurant
Bars/Cocktail Lounges
Hospitals (including convalescent hospitals and animal hospitals)
Automobile sales
Auto-related repair and service (including gas stations); and
Public/Quasi-Public Uses
Residential Uses
Unclassified Uses
Amend Section 9-03.120 of the Development Code adding as follows:
5.
C�
Parking
In any district, the Planning Director may waive strict adherence to the parking
standards contained in Chapter 9-12 when a change or expansion in use is
proposed in an existing building or an addition or enlargement of an exiSting
single family residence is proposed and it is no feasible to provide sufficient on-
site parking on the parcel.
A minor exception may also be granted for parking space size of un to two feet.
Minor Items
A Minor Exception may be consid�red for other minor deve.lopment regulations.
If the minor development regulation is not listed above, the Plannin� Commission
may make an inter�retation. The Plannin� Commission must make the findings
that such a reauest is compatible with ad'o� inin� uses, is consistent with the goals
and objectives of the General Plan and intent of the Develo�ment Code, and that
the item is minor in scale.