Loading...
PC R 90-1312� o�� RFSOLiITI�i NO. 90-1312 A RFSOIATIO�TT OF 7� PLA@INING �1ISSION OF T� CITY OF AR1�lY0 C�E DIIVYING �NDITI�IL USE PII�IIT CA.SE NO. 90-478, APPLI� FOR BY JANIES P. DOT90�i, 801 HUA.S� R�AD, � LF7GITIMIZE A PARTIALLY QO[dSIR(JCl�'A 630 9Q[TARE F00►P S�OD�iD RESIDIIHTIAL UNIT AND FARM OFFICE ATOP A Q�RA�GE �FAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande has considered an application by James P. Dotson to legitimize a partially constructed 630 square foot second residential unit and farm office atop a garage at 801 Huasna Road in the RA-B3 zone; and WI�d2F1�i.S, the Planning Comnission finds, after due study, deliberatio�, and public hearing, the following circ�ur�tances exist: � 1. Building of the proposed use was co�m�enced without a building permit and without a Conditional Use Permit in violation of the City's Municipal Code and in violation of the Uniform Building Code. 2. If the appropriate pernuts had been applied for as required by law, the project would have been conditioned to require placemeazt in a different location to allow the applicant full use of his property but still respect the views of existing development. 3. Applicant is not precluded fram applying for this use in a better location on his property. � 4. Z'he proposed use is not consistent with Policy 7.2 of the General Plan Land Use Eleqnent beeause it does not respect views of existing development. In particular, Implementation Actions (d) of Policy 7.2 require that new developmerits be designed so as to respect the views of existing development. If the project had been reviewed prior to construction, alternative locations on the 8 acre site would have been reviewed in order to comply with the provisions of the General Plan. 5. The proposed use will have an adverse effect on the use of surrounding property because of the reduction of views. N(7W, Tf�ORE, BE IT RF�OLVF� that the Planning Coamiission of the City of Arroyo Grande hereby denies said Conditional Use Pernnit. On motion by Coamussioner Gallagher, seconded by Co�tm.issioner Brandy, and by the following roll.call vote, to wit: AYFS: CoaYmissioners Brandy, Gallagher, Souza, and Chairn�ui Carr NOFS: Boggess ABSENP: CoQtmissioners Moore and Soto r='o the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 6th day of November, 1990. ATT�: �_C� � ` � ��i�iVL� Pearl L. Phinney Robert W. Carr Planning CoamLission Secretary Chairmazl