PC R 88-116933�
RPSOLUTION NO. 88-1169
A RFSOLDTION OF THti PLANNII�IG ppM1VIIS�iON. OF
THE Cl'I'Y OF ARROYO GRANDE DENYING A VARIANCE�
CASE NO. 88-121, APPLIED FOR BY ANNE ROBE1tTSON
AT 292 GULAR.TE ROAD
WHERLAS, the Planning Corrmission of the City of Arroyo Grande has considered Variance
Application No. 88-121, filed by Anne Robertson, for a Variance from the maxinnun btulding height of
15 feet at 292 Gularte Road in the "R-1" Single Family ftesidentiel District; and
VIIHEREAS, the Planning Conmo.�.sion has held a public hearing on this application in
accordance with the City Code; and
W��AEAS, the Planning (',orrmission �nds that the following cirewrrtances exist:
1. That the adjustment authorized shall constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent
with the limitations upon other properties in the viciruty and district in wtuch the subject
property is situated;
2. That because of special cirewrrtances applicable to the subject property, including size,
shape, topography, location, or surrounc�tings, the strict application of the provisions of
this ehapter is found not to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other
P�Pe� in the vicinity and under identical zone elassifications;
3. That the gcanting of the Variance will be contrary to the intent of this chapter or to the
public safety, health and welfare;
4. That due to special conditions or exceptional characteristics of the property or its
location, the strict application of the �rovisions of this chapter would not result in
difficulties and unnecessary hardship;
5. The granting of the Variance could be materially detrimentel to other properties or land
uses in the area because the views currently enjoyed by the surrounding propertles vvill be
significantly impacted by the proposed development;
6. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circtur�stances npprlicable to the intended ise
that do not apply to other properties in the same zone.
7. The strict application of the ordinance does not deprive such property of privileges
enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity or in the same zones; und
8• The granting of the Variance is not compat�ble with the objectives, policies, and general
land uses specified in the General Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RFSOLVED that the Planning Ca�nmission of the City of Arroyo
Grande hereby denies said Variance.
On motion by Carmissioner Boggess, seconded by Can�rrissioner Flores, and by the following
roll call vote, to wit:
AYLS: Cannissioners Flores, Boggess, Moore, Gerrish, Soto and Chtiirman Carr
NOES: None�
ABSENT: Cairmissioner 01sen
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 19th day of April, 1988.
P ing Canm�.ssion Clerk ��� �"