Loading...
PC R 82-925�s4 RESOLUTION NO. 82-925 ,� RESOLUTION OF THE PLP.NNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 1043 "EQUESTRIAN ESTATES",.ALdD REFERRP.L TO THE CITY COliNC.IL FOR INFORMATIUNAL PURPOSES ONLY. WHEREAS, the Arroyo Grande Planning Commission, on September 21, 1982, held a public hearing on the request for approval of a tentative map of ,�:�:,.r ; '- � , ,�:; � .. .::: ==- -- r... _,_:�; �Y;�._=.. ,. _�' .. '',,.. Subdivision No. 1043, "Equestrian Estates", filed by Busick/Gearing Development Company in February of 1982, for a 40 unit residential subdivision on property generally located easterly of Pilgrim Way and the Arroyo Grande High School property, north2asterly of Valley Road and abutting Highway 101 on the easterly property line; and WHEREAS, all governmental and utility agencies affected by the development of this land have been notified and given the opportunity to respond thereto; and WHEREAS, + Arroyo Grande Planning Commission has certified that ti�e Supplement keport and Environmental Impact Report for the project are ccmplete; and WHERF'�S, this has considered the effects that approval of this subdiviaio� would have on the housing needs of San Luis Obispo County; and WHEREKS, �.:�e map has been reviewed by the San Luis Obispo Planning Department SL3-� azd found to..be_in conformance with the subdivision regulations in all respects. NOW, � Y.�:.�?CP.E, BE IT RESO�VED that the Arroyo Grande Planning Commission cer����es that the Environmental Impact Report and Supplement nave been prepa-r� in compliance with CEQA, S�ate ana City Guidelines and �..hat it has re;r��wed and cor_sidered the information contained therein; and BE IT Fti��ER RESOL'VED that the Planning Commission finds that none greater than any negati��e effect the subdivision wauld have on fiscal and envirenmental resources; and BE IT FURTHER FtESOLVED that the Tentative Map of Subdivision No. 1.043 be approved subject to tne below listed conditions: � of the conditiens deseribed in Government Code, Section 66474, Subsections (a) through !g; inclusive; exists with respect to said subdivision; and B� IT._ � URrsER_.?,r^,SOLVED. that tr�s Arroyo �.rande P1:�nning Commission after reviewing the proposed subdivision, together with its design and irnprovements, tinds said subdivision to be consistent with applicable general and.specific plans and with the zoning on the property; and BE IT FU.°.THER RESOLVED that the benefits of additional housing is .�1,:.�..: _... . - . , ,=.:,. �.: -• ,. -:'_:,..t-.:: �.:�_. . . . . , -. . _ _ ... . - .` . . . _ _ �_ ....���,.�� �., RESOLUTION NO. 82-925 September 21, 1982 1. Drainage �0 �6 5. Page 2 - . :'; : �:; .� A. Tf�at a. dra i nage d i tch of suff i ci ent s i.ze and. construc,t i on to carry � the 100 year flood discharge from land tributary to the project be constructed with the project across tf�e entire length from the sou-therty Ctty limi_��.to the westerly right of way Tine of the p ropased. callector. B. Thaf�on water be retarded through construction of appropr.iate drainage structures so as to not impact peak flow volume-. or dura_tion projected for the major drainage channel with the watershed in condition. C. locatiQn-af the on structures shall be chosen so as not tQ irrReril present or future development downhill from the structures. D. Cond�itioRS to be satisfied prior to tract improvement design: 1• - Ap�licant_shoulct finalize the drai.nage study into a master drainage plarr fo.r area.for adoption by fihe City. This plan sFould indicate wE� be financialjy responsible to construct tti° 6ackbone faci_1=�t.�:es ultimately ar�d what developments wilt �: igg.zr eact�.st�g�.oT _con-s�-�.uct-i-on-of- the p�anned faci 1 ity ias pzr reeommenda�:ion of 9-16-80 memo from City Engineer to P1��rning Directoc - copy� attached). Z- ��►-��- �o preparati_o� of improvement plans For the tract the �'�.�e-i.oRer sha=k�--st�k�m€-fi for review and for approval, a master ---Urat�r p}an for t�re area. The plan shall address transmission, dist�i��t:on, aRCk-pressure requirements for the area. At a m���+���►�, the Genera calls for eventual construction of a r�s�rvoir and trar,smission line to feed the reservoir with a mini�um oF l_" in undeveloped areas and 14" rainforcing in Gereioped areas adjacent to the freeway. 2 . �r!a c e r ;: �1. T;act r„ust be:serviced a water system H�hich meets City stan@ards in reg3_;�+s-to pressure (minimum domestic pressure shall be �+0 p.s_i. at meter; and-volume-rmi:�imum volume for iire flow purposes shall be )004 ga.;io,�s per minute with a 20 p.s.i. residual pressure at any hyclrant this volume must be satisfied for a minimum period of t�r�o ho�ts (this requirement reflects minimum fire flow5 only}. �. ';rat:�r ;ystem �_shal ] be yravi ty source in periods of elect� ical or other mechanical failures. The aforementioned minim�m standards shall be maintained in such an event. C. Deve3eoer shall dzdicate a reservoir site for future construction at approxirnate elevation of 265 feet above sea level. D. Develaper shall build transmission line facilities as appropriate to meet rninimum standards to-meet minimum pressure and volume (on and off-s i te as o-ie l l as any fac i 1 i t i es �rfi th i n the fi ract deemed necessary to conform with the General Plan for the area). �_ q}) }� s�l�ll be p�ovided water service with c�nnectians; appropriate easemeRts sha.l} be �edicated. F. Tha� fire-hydrants be installed by the applicant as required by the Fire Chief and shall meet the minimum fire flow req�irements. �� Enabling_palicies. adopted by the City Council as listed in 10-9-80 memo from Ci.ty Eng-ineer entitled Water Supply. � �- . , _ . . _.. .i. .��. _F-;� <<;.. -_ r ._ _ . . . . , _ .. .. _ , =:�.£ .� ��''.,�::' � V V RESOLUTION NO. 82-925 September 21, 1982 3. Streets a�� Circulation � Page 3 � .H:.,J�- . . VaT1ey �oad = Ae.'r�e Pt, Improvem.ents. Relocate intersection o� collec'�':=� . .. F_._ '^- and Vall?y Raad_30Q feet south of the.proposed intersection. Provide •' .- : apµr rigE�.t of Fray 64 � wide for the collector and any additional : right a� s�ray necessary to construct the left turn Tand on Vailey Road_ as r�ccrnm?nded 6y tF�e traffic report in supplement to the EIR_ Aer�e-Pl. with.in tract boundaries shall be d�signed within a 64` right of way wifih a minimum width of 44' curb to curb and a minimurr► section of 2!' A.C. over 8" of Class tl base. Both sides shall have -conGre�e and gutter, with easterly frontage.shall'fiave=a 6' wide corrcretz integral sidewalk, outside tract boundaries. Aerie P1. shalT be cons.tructed to a minimum width oF 28' over the appropriate str-uc�ur.al section with the aforementioned minimums. All approp.riate drainage�structures--a�d temporary berms will be constructed as � off-si;? reyuirements. Aerie P1. beyond Orchard Lane sha)1 be coctstructed full width between � tract boundary and a point southerly of the proposed orchard Lane - --- -- Aerie-intersection adequate to provide appropriate barricades. Design for *emporary improvements may be required for unfinished portions of Aerie P1. be�tween Orchard Lane and sautFterly tract boundary_ �_ � B. Orcha-r-d_Avenue. Orchard shal} be constructed to a 28' minimum sec�;on- trac� b�undary and existing street. Planning and design :`oc ultimate development in tF►is portion of Orchard shall be f�r a 46' pavement ��idth with a concrete curb, gutters and s i c�e��a-l=scs on both si des. As i n the case of Aer i e P1 ., devel opers sha;? be.required to construc.t.the appropriate bridging over the drainage ditch for the entire right of way width. Minimum pavement secticn �hall be a 2" A.C. over 8" of Class.11 base. Wi .r-act b.o«nd�ry, Orchard Lane s.hall be developed with a minimum wi��h o.� 28' of pavenent with concrete curbs and gutters on each s-�d�e�_ Ai i n-imum- st ructura 1 sect i on sna 1 i be 2" A. C. over 6" of the -• reduc�c� �,avement width the final map shall carry set6ack lines shorri:rG- a- 3Q` minimum-from a 34' rigl oF way. Within setback ar�a� cn _each f-ron�age of Orchard Lane, a reservation for future road--;�.;��ning shal! be shown witi- a minimum width of 9' on each frontage.. Pto-ya��s sha�l be installed to bar circulation. Developer may proao�z:_*or Planni D-irector review and approval, an entry at both ?nds oF Tract (without gate) which will visually discourage t�ir���c�� t� ar"ri c. ' , C. OtFter lnternal Roads. Internal roads shall be ConStruCted on a 34'' rigks-� of ��ay w;th reservations for future widening on each frontage �s stipu TOi Orcnard Lane. Al1 frontages shall be sh�wn on the map-wit:h a 30'� setback-from the right of way with the exception of thos� lots :�ih'sc� ahve less than a.90' frontage. Those lots shall have a m i n i mum se t 6ack. sho��n on the__map. of .50'___ M i n i mu"m sect i on on those - streets shall be 28' feet from concrete curb and gutter to concrete curb and gutter �nd sha_l.l be constructed with a minimum structural section o; 2" A.C. over-6" of Class 11 base. Cul-de-sac bulbs shall be construc��d 4•�ith a minimum r�dius of 46 feet to curb face. D. Generai Street Requirements. Street lights shall be installed on al] fron�ages within the tract and at the intersection of Val]ey Road �nd r;eri ., P i. i n con rormance �•ri th P. G. � E. stanciards on ornamenta 1 poles. °edestrian and bicycle tr�ffic circulatio� shail be discussed in a.s°parat° mas��r plan for the development ��hich shall be presented .� to tne �tanrring Cornni;sion For approvai prior to recordation or the map_; Pi.:bl i c Sewer F�. A11 lots shall be sewered. Sewers shail be constructed within public streer.s on approved, dedicated public rights of way. Developers shall�- provide any flow calculations deemed necessary by the Director of Publie�- blorks. = ' �. . - . . , � �. = .... ...... . - .. . _ ...• .,..i....t . . ...r ... ._a... .. .. .... . ..."�_— ... . . .. . .__".' _. ._...___�._ . ..... _. .. . .'•SF.� 4�� ����-n', R�.SOLUTION NO. 82-925 September 21, 1982 - 5. General Requirements Page 4 A. Developers shall provide the following plans for approval by the . Plan"ning Commission prior to'recardation of the finaT map: 1. Open Space maintenance and fencing plan. 2. Street maintenance. 3- Pedest�ian, bicycie and equestrian circulation pTan. 4. Landscape treatment, if appropriate, to protect public anc! v�suaT reduce impact of drainage structures. S. Pr.00e r:y excFranse-with Schooi District shail be effected pr�ior to.r-ec�r-dation and-s'�a11 be shown on the final tract map to be wit tF�e 6ourrdaries of iract to43 6. - T��-Dianning Com�ission.shall make findings as required by the Zo+�-i r�g Ord i nance .to approve tE►e Opt i ona 1 Des i gn S tanda rds of the- Tract. 7. -Deve-�opers sha.tl comply with the requirements of the Regional tYarer Quali.�y Board at time of grading and construction_ 8.. T-F�► p?anni.ng Comrrr'ission shall find tf�e project consistent with t�e.�eneral P1an af tf�e City and Zoning Ordinance. 067 9- T�-�a r.ia�n�ng Comm:ission shall find that the EIR and supptement _�a�e .oeen- revi.ewed and that appropriate mitigation measures have into *he conditional approval of this tract. On moticn by Cor,�missioner Cole, seconded by Commissioner Benhardt, and by the_foIlow_ng ro�l call vote, to wit: ^ ' AYES: Commissioners Benhardt and Cole NOES: Commissioners-Carr,-r;oor2;-Moots, Pilkington and Chair_nan Gerrish ABSENT: None The foregoing Resolution was defeated this 21st day of Septe 1982. � ; ` -- ATTEST:. < Secr_etar_y haircnan _ _ _ . . . .. �5: .. ' , .- � . . ..,. - . . , .. . ��... , .�_..v.'..i .. ' . .. ,.. i.::.r'. :.. .,. � ..� : .: .,�:;'..1'. �' . . . . ...,.... _. . ... . ... ..__ . . : .. � - .. , ... . .