PC R 80-787 Z421
RESOLUTION NO. 80-787 Z
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT
TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
AS PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 4 ZONING, ARTICLE 32, OF
SAID CODE.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande, California
has held a public hearing on the application of L. C. LaVine to amend the
Municipal Code of the City of Arroyo Grande as provided by Chapter 4, Article
32, of said Code to rezone all that porper.ty described as follows from the
"RA-B3" Residential Agricultural District to "RA-B2" Residential Agricultural
District:
In the City of Arroyo Grande, County of San Luis Obispo,
State of California, Parcel A and a Portion of Parcel B
of P.M. AG 77-461. Also identified by Assessor's Parcel
No. 7-021-87 and a portion of 7-021-88.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission feels that the public interest and
general welfare does require such an amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Commission minutes including a list of persons who testified
at the public hearing, summary of fact and findings, and copies of any maps
pertinent to the proposal are on file and hereby declared to be part of said
Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said Planning Commission hereby
recommends approval of the amendment as applied for, for the following reasons:
l. Zone change from "RA-B3" District to "RA-B2" District would be
in keeping with the Land Use Element of the General Plan.
2. Change would be compatible to and in keeping with the surrounding
developments and zoning.
�On motion by Commissioner Gerrish, seconded by Commissioner Sebastian, and
by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Gerrish, Cole, Moots, Pilkington, Sebastian
and Chairman Gorsline
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Fischer
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 2nd
� `
ATTEST:
Secretary
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Subject:
Petition to rezone all that property as noted in Paragraph 1
above from "RA-B3" to "RA-B2".
Name of Applicant: L. C. LaVine
Public Hearings Held: 1
Number of Persons Appearing for:
Planning Commission Recommendation:
2 Against: 0 Other: 1
Planning Commission recommends approval
by a unanimous vote.