Loading...
PC R 79-718 Z345 RESOT�UTION NO. 79-718 Z FIHEREAS, the Planning Comn?ission of the City cf Arroyc Grande, California has held a public hearing on the anplication of the City of Ar,royo Grande to amend the Municipal Code of the City of Arroyo Grande as provided by Chapter 4, Article 32, of said Code to rezone all that property described as follows from "A" Agricultural District to "R-S" Resiuential Suburban District: In the City of Arroya Grancie, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, those properties generally located in the area ef Printz Road, and listed below by Assessor's Parcel Numbers are being considered to be rezoned from. "A" Agricultural District to "R-S" Residential Suburban District: 7 7 7 7 7 WHEREAS, the Commission minutes including a list of persons who testified at the public heari:�g, summary of fact and findings, and copies of any r,�aps pertinent to the proposal are on file and hereby declared to be part of said Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of the amendment as applied for, for the following reasons: l. Zone change from "A" District to "R-S" District would be in keeping with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. 2. Change would be compatible to and in keeping with the surrounding developments and zoning. . On motion by Commissioner Fischer, seconded by Commissioner Moots, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: RESOrUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AIQ AMEND- MENT TO fiHE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AS PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 4, ZONING, ARTICLE 32 OF SAID CODE. Commissioners Carr, Cole, Fiscner, Moots, Sebastian and Chairman Gorsline None Commissioner Simmons the foregoing Resolution was adopted this � ATTEST: Secretary REPORT TO THE CI`. Subject: Petition to rezone all that property as noted in Paragraph 1 above "A" Agricultural District to "R-S" District Name of Applicant: City of Arroyo Grande Public Hearings Held: 1 Number of Persons Appearing for: 3 Against: O Other: O Planning Commission Recommendation: Planning Commission recommends approval by a majority vote.