PC R 74-338 ZRESOLUTION N0, 74 -338 z
has held a public hearing on the application of A. Swimmer to amend the Municipal
Code of the City of Arroyo Grande as provided by Chapter 4, Article ?.l of said
Code, to rezone all that property described as follows from "A" Agricultural
District to "R-A-B-3" Residential Agricultural District;
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO
THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRAND� AS
PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 4 ZONING, ARTICLE 21, OF SAID CODE.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande, California
"Parcels A, B, C, and a portion of Parcel D of Parcel Map
de Piedra, Pismo and Bolsa de Chamisal",
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission feels that the public intPrest and
general welfare does require such an amendment, and is�in keeping with the
Land Use Plan, and
WHEREAS, the Commission minutes including list of persons who testified
pertinent to the proposal are �ttached and hereby declared to be part of said
Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said Planning Commission hereby
recommends approval of t.he amendment for the following reasons:
1. Zone change to R-A-B-3 Would be compatible to and in keeping with
surrounding developments, zoning and Land Use Plan.
Zone change to be effective after annexation has been finalized.
On motion of Commissioner Ries, seconded by Commissioner Sandoval, and
at the Public Hearing, summary of fact and findings and copies of any maps
on the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
CO-73-219, plus Lots l, 2 and 3 of Lot 7 of the Ranchos Corral
Commissioners Mathews, Moots, Ries, Sandoval, Cole and Chairma�n
Calhoon.
None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing Resolution was adopted this 6th day of August, 1974,
� � /� �
ATT E $ T : �-�-� °� ` � ✓1 � � ��--�
-,.$ecretary -- Chairman - '
, � , . ,. .
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL '
Subject: , Petition to rezone all that property as noted.in Paragraph 1 above from
"A" District to "R-A-B-3" District
NAME OF Applicant; A. Sw:immer ,;; Public Hearings Held 1
Number of Persons Appearing for: 2.�� Against; 0
�� �
�
Planning Commission Recommendation; Planning Commission recommends approval by
a unanimous vote,