PC R 71-192 ZRESOLUTBON N0. 71°192 Z
A RES"OL�T60N OF �H� CETY OF ARROYO GRANDE PLANNBNG
COMM9SS80N RECOMM�ND9NG DENDAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO �HE
MUNOC&PAL CODE OF THE C�TY OF ARROYO GRANDE AS PROVlDED
BY CHAPTER 4 ZONING, ART��LE 21 OF SAGD CODE.
WHEREAS, the Pla�ne�g Commisseon of the Cety of Arroyo G���de, Calefornia has
held a publec heareng on the appleca.tion of James,Dotso� to amend the Munocipal :Code
of the C.aty of Arroyo Gr�nde as provided by C�apter 4, Artocle 21 of sald code, to
rezone all that property described as fo.11ows from R�l to Rm3 District.
"Lots.10,.11 and 12 of the.Jones Tract Subdivesion .in the Coty
of Arroyo Grande, County of San Luos Obospo, State of California,
according to map recorded Febr�ary.9 192T in Book 3 at Page 86
of Maps. EXCEPTBNG therefrom that portoon of Lots.11 and 12 con-
veyed to the State of California by deed recorded July 21 1953
in Book 718 at Page 468 of Official Records".
WH�EREAS, the Planning Commiss.ion feels that the publec interest and general
welfare does not require such an amendment, and
WHEREAS the Commission minutes including��'list of persons who testified at
the Public Hearing summary of fact and..findings and copi.es of any.maps pertinent
to the proposal are attached and hereby:�declared.to be part of said Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said Planning Commission hereby recommends
denial of the amendment as applied for, fo.r the following reasons;
l. Would create additional parking and traffoc problems in the area.
2. Spot zoning. �
On mot.ion of Commissioner Bowles, seconded by.Commissioner Nwnes, and by the
following,roll call vote to wit: J
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners Bowles, Nunes, St. Denis, Schultz, Strother and
Chairman Moss.
None
Commissioner Porter
The foregoeng Resolutio� was adopted this.l6th day of Februar.y,.1971,
ATTEST: �
.�. � - � ��e�.e�� �i/� "Y12�
Secretary Chairman
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Subject; Petition to,rezone.all that property as noted in Paragraph�l
above from R-1 to R�3 District,' �
Name of Applecant:
Public Hearings Held;
James Dotson
[
Number of Persons appearing for:
Planning Commission Recommendation:
1 Against; 14 �
..� �• ;�..
Planning Commission recommends den.ial by
a majority vote.
233