Minutes 1991-10-22
449
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 1991
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 215 EAST BRANCH STREET
ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA
The city Council of the city of Arroyo Grande met at 7:30
P.M., with Mayor Mark M. Millis presiding.
1. & 2. FLAG SALUTE AND INVOCATION
Mayor Millis led the Pledge of Allegiance to our Flag, and the
Rev. Randy Quimette, Arroyo Grande Fire Department Chaplain,
delivered the invocation.
3. ROLL CALL
Present were-Mayor Millis and Council Members A. K. "Pete"
Dougall, M. P. "Pete" Gallagher, Gene Moots and B'Ann Smith. staff
'", Members present were City Manager Chris Christiansen, City Attorney
Judy Skousen, Deputy city Clerk Mary Ellen Leininger, Planning
Director Doreen Liberto-Blanck, Current Planner Scott Spierling,
Acting Public Works Director Dave Mulkey and Deputy Public Works
Director Avelino Lampitoc.
4. APPOINTMENT OF COUNCIL MEMBER
Mayor Millis said Council Member Gallagher had been appointed
at a special meeting of the city Council on October 21, 1991.
5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None
6. CONSENT AGENDA
It was moved by smith/Dougall, and the motion passed to
approve Consent Agenda Items 6.0. through 6.H. , with the
recommended courses of action.
6.D. October 8, 1991, city Council Minutes. Approved.
6.E. Third Quarter, Departmental Monthly Reports. Information. "
6.F. Letter of Resignation from Harold L. Moore, Member of the
citizens Transportation Advisory Committee. Accepted with Regret.
6.G. Annual Gem and Mineral Show, October 25 - 27, 1991, and Use of
Five Acres for Parking. Information.
6.H. September 16, 1991, parking and Traffic Commission Minutes.
Information.
Mayor Millis presented the following proclamations:
6.A. Proclamation, Honoring Doug Hamp, Director of Building and
Fire. Accepted by Chief Hamp.
6.B. proclamation, VFW Buddy Poppies Annual Sale.
6.C. proclamation, Red Ribbon Week, October 19 - 27, 1991.
_. Accepted by Mrs. Roger Freburg.
7. REGISTER OF CHECKS
It was moved by Dougall/Smith, and the motion passed to
approve Cash Disbursements in the amount of $656,925.76, as listed
in the October 16, 1991 Staff Report of Finance Director David
Bacon.
-'\
1
---------.
--.-.---- .~-~
-----.-
450
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
OCTOBER 22. 1991
8.A. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVAL OF (1) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT: ( 2 } ARCHITECTURAL
REVIEW CASE NO. 90-457: (3 } PARCEL MAP CASE NO. 90-490: ( 4 ) 'I
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 90-479: CENTRAL COAST BOWL. 1524
GRAND AVENUE: VICTOR AND BARCLAY MELLOUIST: ALEXANDER AND EDNA
GAUSS: C. L. HENDERSON AND SUSAN P. READE: CONTINUED FROM COUNCIL
MEETINGS OF SEPTEMBER 24. 1991 AND OCTOBER 8. 1991.
Mayor Millis and Council Member Dougall said they may have
conflicts of interests with this matter and left the room. Mayor
Pro Tem Moots presided.
city Attorney Skousen said the question had been raised as to ~
whether Council Member Gallagher had a conflict of interest which
prohibited him from participating in the hearing on the appeal of
the' Bowling Alley project due to the fact that he sat on the
Planning commission at the time the issue was before the Planning
Commission. She said there did not appear to be any conflict of
interest, and the fact that he was on the Planning Commission was
totally separate from the consideration of the appeal. She said he
could sit and hear the appeal at this meeting.
Current Planner Spierling referred to the September 24, 1991
Staff Report of the Planning Director, and described the proposed
Bowling Alley site, using the overhead projector. He discussed on-
site trees, drainage, traffic control and the Environmental Impact
Report done on the project. He said the Planning commission
recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution upholding the
Planning commission's approval of the Central Coast Bowl project,
certify the Environmental Impact Report, and deny the appeal.
There were Council questions of Staff concerning the
development of the entire site, criteria for number of parking
places, underground drainage, egress from Courtland to the traffic
light at Grand Ave., parking on courtland Street, the completion of
Courtland with curbs, gutters and sidewalks, and drainage ponds and
catch basins.
After being assured that the Public Hearing had been duly
published and all legal requirements met. Mayor Pro Tern Moots
declared the hearing open and said all persons would be heard
regarding the matter.
There was a recess in the Public Hearing from 10:15 P.M. to
10:25 P.M.
Speaking against the project on the basis of its size, its
location, traffic, noise, potential crime in the area, inadequate
EIR and affect on the quality of life were Anne Russell of Diehl "
and Rodewald, Attorneys at Law, representing Mr. Henderson and Ms.
Reade: Ms. Reade of 332 North Oak Park Blvd.; Don Schmelzer of 1231 l
Brighton Ave., who presented a petition to the Council with 332
signatures: Mr. Henderson of 332 North Oak Park Blvd.; Walter
Weidman, who read a letter from Peace~utheran Church; Mr. Melquist
of 1380 Brighton; Eunice Cook of 170 Fairview; Mr. and Mrs. Gauss .
of 221 North Elm st.; Faye Thompson of 266 Elm St.; Randy Garacci
of 322 ,Courtland, and Andy Tennant of 913 Brighton Ave.
There were letters to the council from Howard and Maureen Drew
of 179 Fairview and Charles and Lisa Nichols of 350 Courtland
opposing the project.
Paul Torigian of 1223 Montego st. presented a petition to the
Council with 108 signatures opposing a traffic barricade at
Courtland and Brighton or any restriction of two-way traffic on
Courtland.
2
- ---~------'-"--- -~-,.-
451
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
OCTOBER 22, 1991
Also submitted to the Council were photographs showing the
environmental settings and impacts of bowling lanes in the
neighboring cities of Atascadero, Paso Robles, pismo Beach, San
Luis Obispo and Santa Maria.
Speaking in favor of the project on the basis of the need for
recreational facilities for all ages, improvement to the city, the
elimination of truck traffic going north of the market on
Courtland, and the additional revenue for the city were George Hill
of 936 Woodland Drive, who presented petitions with 2,000
signatures; Merilee Peck Newdoll of 2755 Coastview Drive, developer
of the project; Bernie Burke of 1227 priscilla Lane; Bill Clawson
of 679 Corral Place; Mark Williams of Oceano; Sandy Lubin of 128
Via Bandolera, speaking for the Arroyo Grande Chamber of Commerce;
Mrs. Williams; Duane Peck of 216 Crown Hill; Kimberlee Mitchell of
Nipomo: Bob Wood of 471 Walnut; Jim McGillis of San Luis
Engineering; camay Arad of 548 Allen; Madelyn Burke of 1227 " !
Priscilla Lane: David watson, a representative of the developers;
Mark vasquez, architect on the project, and Doris Troll of 804
covington Drive.
When no one further came forward to speak, Mayor Pro Tem Moots I
closed the hearing to the public. ;
Council Member smith asked questions and expressed concerns I'
about drainage, the service bar, business hours, sound wall,
location of the building in relation to courtland, driveways, I
parking places, signage, location of the bowling alley on the lot, I
and the fact that only the partial project is being put forth at !
this time. She said she was against any closing of Brighton or
Courtland.
At the request of Council Member Gallagher, Keith Higgins,
traffic engineer on the project, discussed the quality of life
impacts by traffic on the collector streets of Courtland and
Brighton streets and the arterial streets of Grand Ave. and Oak
Park Blvd. He said the project would be mitigating the traffic it
creates.
Council Member Gallagher asked the city attorney to discuss
the "Goleta III" court case, and Ms. Skousen said that "Goleta III"
said that you need not consider as a viable alternative a piece of
property not owned by the developer.
Council Member Gallagher said he was convinced that the city
Manager and the Police Chief were satisfied that the crime issue
was adequately covered.
Council Member Moots said the city will make sure that the
future developers of the front part of the lot will have adequate
parking, although he would like to see a little more. He said he
is not in favor of closing any streets. He said the issue of
traffic on Courtland has been resolved. He said Arroyo Grande and
~" Grover City will be working to solve traffic problems on Oak Park
Blvd. .
,
Council Member Gallagher asked Mr. Vasquez to discuss the
sound impacts on Peace Lutheran Church. Mr. Vasquez said employee
parking would be next to the church, and there would be a six-foot
sound wall and landscaping to buffer the noise.
Mr. Christiansen read the title of the proposed resolution
approving the project. It was moved by Smith/Gallagher, and the
motion passed to dispense with further reading of the resolution.
It was moved by Smith/Gallagher to approve Resolution No. 2893
Upholding the Planning commission's Approval of Tentative Parcel
3
.
-- - ---~------'.-_._.~~-----
---~- -.---- -~-
'452 "
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
OCTOBER 22, 1991
Map Case No. 90-490, Conditional Use Permit Case No. 90-479,
Architectural Review Case No. 90-457, and certification of the
Environmental Impact Report for the Central Coast Bowl project, and
Denying the Appeal of the Above Decisions. Council Members
Gallagher and Moots voted aye, Council Member Smith voted no, and
Council Member Dougall and Mayor Millis were absent. The motion
passed.
Mayor Millis and Council Member Dougall returned to the dais.
8.B. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - DETERMINATION OF EXISTENCE OF
PUBLIC NUISANCE AND TO ABATE IN WHOLE OR PART; 513 BAKEMAN LANE '1
Ms. Skousen ' said the affected party had requested a
continuance. It was moved by Moots/Smith, and the motion passed to I
approve the request. Mayor Millis directed Staff to notify the ,
residents in the area before the meeting at which this item will be
discussed.
B.C. PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PLACED BY
PLANNING COMMISSION ON A PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING. ARCHITECTURAL
REVIEW CASE NO. 89-444; 122 LE POINT STREET. ARROYO GRANDE; MICHAEL
C. THOMAS
Mayor Millis and Council Member Dougall said they may have
conflicts of interests and left the room. Mayor Pro Tern Moots
presided.
The Planning Director said the applicant had apparently left
because of the late hour.
It was moved by smith/Gallagher, and the motion passed to
continue this agenda item to November 26, 1991.
Mayor Millis and Council Member Dougall returned to the dais.
9.A HOOK RAMPS AT CAMINO MERCADO
Mr. Christiansen said that Caltrans has awarded the bids, and
hopefully the work will begin by December 1, 1991.
"
9.B. UPDATE ON COUNTY PROJECTS AFFECTING THE CITY
No Report
10.A. REOUEST OF OTTSE. INC.. TO COMMENCE GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION
OF TRACT 1994 PRIOR TO FINAL MAP RECORDATION; PHASE II (OCTOBER
1991-APRIL 1992)
Mr. Christiansen said the applicant had requested that this
item be continued to the next council meeting. The council agreed.
11.A. LETTER OF REOUEST FROM DAVID P. CANTRELL REGARDING
INTERPRETATION OF A SECTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE; SPECIFICALLY.
INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE l
Mayor Millis and council Member Dougall said they may have
conflicts of interests and left the room. Mayor Pro Tern Moots
presided.
Mr. Christiansen referred to the october 4, 1991 letter from
David'p. and Robinette cantrell. He said when the new Development
Code was adopted, side-yard setbacks were increased five feet;
specifically, the requirement is now five feet on one side and ten
feet on the other. He said prior requirements were five and five.
He said this new requirement has basically made numerous single
family homes throughout the city non-conforming, including Mr. and
Mrs. Cantrell's home. He said Mr. and Mrs. Cantrell wish to
enclose an area that is already under-roof and feels that the Code
does not ~pply in this instance because it is already under-roof,
although not enclosed.
4
-~~-- -_._--~--
453 !
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
OCTOBER 22, 1991
It was moved by Smith/Gallagher (3-0-2, Smith, Gallagher and
Moots voting aye, Council Member Dougall and Mayor Millis absent)
to approve the applicant's request and make the interpretation that
the Cantrells are not encroaching into the setback, that the home
is already there and that the Council makes an exception to the law
in this case only.
There was Council discussion of the new Development Code
setbacks, and there was consensus that requests to make setback
changes by owners of existing lots of record should be decided by "
the City on a case by case basis.
Mayor Millis.and Council Member Dougall (Corrected 11/26/91)
returned to the dais.
I
~ 11.B. 1991-1992 ANNUAL TRANSPORTATION FUND CLAIM I
It was moved by Smith/Dougall (5-0-0, smith, Dougall,
Gallagher, Moots and Mayor Millis voting aye) to approve Resolution
No. 2894 Approving the 1991-1992 Annual Local Transportation Fund
Claims to the San Luis Obispo Area Coordinating Council.
11.C.(1I NO PARKING AT 104 AND 119 IKEDA WAY (HUASNA ROAD FRONTAGE\
It was moved by smith/Dougall (5-0-0, Smith, Dougall,
Gallagher, Moots and Millis voting aye) to approve Resolution No.
2895 Establishing a "No Parking" Zone on a Portion of Huasna Road
(Huasna Road Frontage of 119 and 104 Ikeda Way).
11 . D. ( 2 \ LIMITED PARKING AT 540 TRAFFIC WAY (INCLUDING DOWER
WAYSIDE PARK\ (l-HOUR PARKING}
It was moved by Dougall/Moots (5-0-0, Dougall, Moots,
Gallagher, Smith and Millis voting aye) to approve Resolution No.
2896 Establishing a Sixty Minute Parking Zone on a Portion of
Traffic Way (540 Traffic way Including Dower Wayside Park Frontage)
Encompassing a Minimum of Eight Parking Spaces.
12. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
None
13. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Mr. McGillis, Mr. Vasquez and Bob Montgomery of 1130 Vard
Loomis Lane spoke to the issue of the new Development Code setbacks
and how they apply to existing lots of record. Council Members
directed Staff to place this item on the next Council meeting
agenda. Staff was also directed to meet with Mr. McGillis, Mr.
Vasquez, Mr. Montgomery and members of the Ikeda family to discuss
this issue.
Mayor Millis announced that it was his intention to appoint at
the next meeting Camay Arad to the City's Teen Advisory Committee.
14. CLOSED SESSION
The City Attorney requested that Council adjourn to a Closed
Session pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9a to discuss
pending litigation concerning Ellsworth/Pace vs. City of Arroyo "
~ Grande, and Kawaoka vs. city of Arroyo Grande. It was moved by
smith/Moots, and the motion passed to adjourn at 12:20 A.M.
15. ADJOURNMENT
The Council reconvened, and on the unanimously approved motion
of Moots/Douga", '..ed'at.,y adjourned at ""~
~ ~ ~.A1~~
~ a ~ MA K M. MILLIS, MAYOR
ATTEST: .
NANCY A. VIS, CITY CLERK
5
__...._... ..._,.__~ ___.__ _______.. ..........u..._. _ ... _ _'m
.-.---.-.------