Minutes 1991-04-23
._"- .._---~----_... - ---~-~ . _._+._..~---_._~---~-~- -_._---_._..~---_._---_..._- -_.--- .,.--. .-.,~._-
~
382
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, APRIL 23, 1991
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 215 EAST BRANCH STREET
ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA
The city Council of the city of Arroyo Grande met at 7:30
P.M., with Mayor Pro Tem Gene Moots presiding.
1. & 2. FLAG SALUTE AND INVOCATION
Mayor Pro Tem Moots led the Pledge of Allegiance to our Flag,
and the Rev. Jan Armstrong of Arroyo Grande/Five cities
Presbyterian Church delivered the invocation.
"'"'\
3. ROLL CALL
Present were Mayor Pro Tern Moots and Council Members A. K.
"Pete" Dougall, Doris Olsen and B' Ann Smith. Mayor Millis was
absent. staff Members present were city Manager Chris
Christiansen, city Attorney Judy Skousen, city Clerk Nancy Davis,
Public Works Director Paul Karp and Current Planner Scott
Spierling.
4. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
5. CONSENT AGENDA
It was moved by Smith/Olsen, and the motion passed to approve
Consent Agenda Items S.D. and S.F. through 5.J. , with the
recommended courses of action.
S.D. First Quarter, 1991, Departmental Monthly Reports.
Information.
S.F. Progress payment No.1, Arroyo Grande Well No. '9; project No.
60-90-04. Approved.
5.G. Third Annual Arroyo Valley Car Club Show, July 27, 1991.
Approved.
S.H. Agreement Affecting Real Property, 543 Ide street, Robert
Taylor. Approved.
5.J. Agreement with Metromedia paging services, Inc. Approved.
Mayor Pro Tem Moots read the proclamation in Item S.A. "Water
Awareness Month," May, 1991, and presented it to Public Works
Director Karp, who accepted on behalf of the City's Water
Conservation Coordinator.
Mayor Pro Tern Moots read the proclamation in Item S.B. "March
of Dimes Walk America Day," May 4, 1991, and presented it to Mrs.
Jennie Lazzarini. Mrs. Lazzarini thanked the Council and presented ""I
each member with a water bottle. She said Council Member Dougall
was chairperson of this year's walk, and council Member smith is a I
former chairperson. :
Mayor Pro Tem Moots read the proclamation in Item S.C. "Soil
and Water stewardship Week," April 28 through May 5, 1991. He said
the proclamation would be given to Mrs. Ella Honeycutt at a later
date.
Council Member Dougall referred to Item S.D. spring clean-up
Week, May 15 and 17, 1991, and urged residents to take advantage of
the free pickup of unwanted items. He said the items should be
bundled so that one persons could handle it.
It was moved by Smith/Dougall, and the motion passed to
approve Consent Agenda Items S.A, S.B, 5.C and 5.E. , with the
recommended courses of action.
1
--.- - ---..--.-.-.--- .....-..---.--
383
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 23, 1991
6. REGISTER OF CHECKS
It was moved by Smith/Dougall, and the motion passed to
approve the cash disbursements in the amount of $559,150.20, as
contained in the April 18, 1991 Staff Report of Finance Director
David Bacon.
7 . A. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - RANCHO GRANDE PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT: C1A) SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 90-01: (lB} VESTING
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 1834: (2A} PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONE.
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 90-03:
(2B\ VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 1994: (3A}PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
PLAN AND SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 90-04: (3B\ VESTING
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 1997: GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST
SECTION OF CITY BETWEEN CAMINO MERCADO IN THE SOUTH AND THE CITY
LIMITS. AND NOYES ROAD TO THE NORTH: OTTSE. INC.
Mr. Christiansen introduced the agenda item, and said May 1,
1991 is the deadline for the City to act on Rancho Grande. Michael
Multari of Crawford, Multari and starr, Rancho Grande consultants
for the city, referred to his April 23, 1991 memorandum on the
Rancho Grande applications for three tracts, which he said
constituted the second phase of the Rancho Grande development. He
said summary recommendations to the Council were, (1) Introduce the
ordinance approving the PD Rezoning and General Development Plan,
( 2) Approve a minute motion announcing the Council's intent to
certify the Environmental Impact Report and adopt the Resolutions
of Approval for Tracts 1834, 1994 and 1997, and (3) Continue these
items to a special meeting of April 30, 1991.
He said Council gave direction to Staff on certain unresolved
items and asked staff to prepare the formal ordinance and
resolutions, including the conditions and mitigation, for
consideration at this meeting.
with regard to drainage maintenance along the east fork of
Meadow Creek, he said the maintenance of the on site drainage
facilities would be the responsibility of the Homeowners
Association and an agreement for that is part of the conditions.
He said a condition had been included to require the applicants to
pay over $12,000 for a one-time enhancement of the East Fork.
He said the Council at the last meeting had decided to allow
the streets to be public with a 32 foot curb to curb width with an
integral sidewalk, which is an attached sidewalk on one side. He
said that sidewalk could meander if it would avoid removal of any
trees. He said on the other side of the street there would not be
an attached concrete sidewalk but a pedestrian path that will
meander among any trees that exist there and will have a permeable
surface so that water can get down into the roots and into the
soil. He said there also is a requirement for detailed parking
plans be submitted for each of the tracts sUbject to the approval
of the staff and detailing where the additional parking would be
provided in each of those tracts because there will be parking only
on one side of the street because of the narrow width.
Mr. Multari said that one of the conditions of approval would
be that the applicants pay the entire cost of the improvements to
Brisco Underpass, which is probably in excess of $30,000.
He said that on Tract 1994 across from Rancho Parkway there is
a new condition which requires a view analysis and allows the
Planning Director to impose a 19 foot height limit on those lots as
there are on several other lots in Tract 1994.
He said there will be a $5,000 fine per tree for any tree
removed accidentally or otherwise if it is not to be removed on the
approved plans.
2
__~_ u____. _" ..____ ..________________u~_______ .-.--.---,-------.-.---------~----.-.--..--..- ..--------- .--._"
384
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 23, 1991
Late correspondence was entered into the record by Mr.
Multari. He said one letter from the developer was received on
April 23, 1991 and requested some changes, one of which affected
Mitigation Measure 23A. He said the measure refers to the
dedication of the right of way along Noyes Road for the possible
development of a shoulder there. He said the Planning Director
concurs with the developer's request. He said the developer agrees
to dedicate the 20 feet only when an Environmental Impact Report
says it is all right to put in the shoulder.
He said the other change requested concerned Condition No. 6 ~
of the proposed ordinances. He recommended a language change
adding after the words "by this reference" on line 6, the phrase,
"except as may be modified by a city-approved Specific Development
Plan."
Mr. Multari summarized the April 23, 1991 letter submitted
by Phil Ashley, a Cal Poly professor. Mr. Multari said many of Mr.
Ashley's ideas were made a part of the plan. He said Mr. Ashley's
ideas concerning the preservation of the oak savannas and the value
of ecotones had been considered, but there was disagreement with
his final proposal. Mr. Multari said there was a significant
amount of open space in the sUbdivision, and tree loss was not
great. He said the most sensitive habitats were preserved in the
open space easements.
Mr. Multari referred to the April 22, 1991 letter from Gary
Elms, 1105 Grieb Drive. He said Elms' key issues were drainage,
saving the wildlife habitat, traffic, air quality, lack of a school
site and affordable housing.
"
After Council questions and being assured that the public
hearing had been duly published and all legal requirements met,
Mayor Pro Tem Moots declared the Public Hearing open and said all
persons would be heard regarding the matter.
Expressinq concerns and making suggestions with regard to the
approval of this second phase of the Rancho Grande development, in
addition to MR. ASHLEY AND MR. ELMS, were SARAH CHESEBRO,
California Department of Transportation, who said that traffic
would be heavily impacted by the development; JIM LIDBERG,
California Department of Fish and Game, who made some technical
corrections in the plan, asked for more protection of the oak
trees, pisJt10 Clarkia and badgers, and said an aggressive fire
protection plan was needed; and JOHN KEEN, 298 Elm Street, who said
James way should remain a collector street, and suggested stucco as
a good building material to use in the development.
REUBEN KVIDT, developer of Oak Parks Acres, and MICHAEL
DURKEE, attorney for the developers of Rancho Grande, spoke in '1
favor of the development. !
When no one further came forward to speak, Mayor Pro Tem Moots
closed the hearing to the floor.
After Council discussion, Mr. Multari outlined the amendments
he suggested be made as a result of the public comments at this
meeting.
Under condition of Approval No.6, he recommended a language
change which would add the following clause in the appropriate
place noted previously in the minutes, "except as may be modified
by a city-approved Specific Development Plan."
He recommended that in Exhibit B of the Mitigation Measures
and in future conditions on the tracts, wherever "streambed
3
I
\
-, 385
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 23, 1991
alteration permit" is used, it should read "streambed alteration
agreement."
Referring to Mitigation Measure 14 that speaks about the
removal of small oak trees, the action should be conducted by an
experienced company or individual approved by the planning
Director.
Mr. Multari said that on Mitigation Measure 20, there should
be a language change, as suggested by the representative of the
California Fish and Game Department. He said it should read,
"Prior to recordation of the final map," and "the applicants shall
have the project site surveyed by a qualified botanist familiar
with rare, threatened and endangered species of the San Luis Obispo
area." He said that in the second paragraph it should be changed
to "This mitigation shall not be construed so as to preclude
reducing the number of lots." He said this wording was required so
that the kind of lot line adjustment which may be necessary could
occur.
He said on Mitigation Measure 34 referencing the Vegetation
Management Program, there should be added, "Said plan shall be I
subject to review and approval of the Fire Chief, and the plan '
shall be submitted to the Department of Fish and Game for review
and comment."
Mr. Multari recommended that Mitigation Measure 23A read, "The
applicant shall offer to dedicate to the City or to another public
entity, as directed by the city, a strip of land up to 20 feet in
width for construction of a shoulder on the east side of Noyes
Road. The city may restrict the use of said strip for such purpose
until after assessment of the environmental impacts is performed
and the feasibility of the installation of the shoulder is ,
evaluated to the satisfaction of the city. The applicant shall 1
have no resPQnsibility for any environmental or feasibility study
or for such shoulder construction unless the Specific Plan for Lots
10 and 11 allows for access to either of those lots directly or
from Noyes Road."
Mr. Christiansen read the title of the Ordinance Approving the
PD-Rezone No. 90-221 and a General Development Plan for the
Portions of the property previously Designated as "Unplanned Areas"
in the "Rancho Grande" Planned Development, with the amendments
listed by Mr. Multari. It was moved by Smith/Dougall, and the
motion passed to dispense with further reading of the Ordinance.
Mayor Pro Tem Moots said that constituted the introduction and i
first reading of the Ordinance.
It was moved by smith/Dougall, and the motion passed to
announce the council's intent to certify the Environmental Impact
Report and adopt the resolutions of approval for Tracts 1834, 1994
and 1997.
It was moved by smith/Dougall, and the motion passed to
continue this agenda item to a special meeting of April 30, 1991 at
7:30 P.M.
THE COUNCIL RECESSED AT 9:27 P.M. FOR FIVE MINUTES
7. B. PUBLIC HEARING - RECONSIDERATION OF DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT
CONDITIONS PLACED ON WALNUT VIEW ESTATES PROJECT: LOT SPLIT CASE
NO. 85-498: SOUTH OF CHERRY AVENUE BETWEEN LOS OLIVOS LANE AND
BRANCH MILL ROAD: COKER ELLSWORTH AND VICK PACE
City Attorney Skousen said because of some problems with the
notice of public hearing Staff is requesting that this agenda item
be continued to the next meeting. She recommended that the Public
Hearing be opened so that anyone who could not attend the next
4
386 -
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 23, 1991
meeting could testify at this meeting.
After being assured that the public hearing had been dUly
published and all legal requirements met, Mayor Pro Tem Moots
declared the hearing open.
Expressing concerns about the drainage problems which could
occur from development of the property on Cherry Avenue between Los
Olivos and Branch Mill Road were DONALD BARNES of 307 Noguera
Place, IRENE HILL of 611 Cherry Avenue, JIM DICKENS of the Dixon
Ranch property, C.S. KUREK of 603 East Cherry, MEL LUSARDI of 530
Los Olivos, CLARK MOORE of 1180 Ash Street, D. G. PORTER of 541 Ide ~
Street, and MIKE LEES of 610 Myrtle, who showed photographs to the
Council of the drainage ditch next to his home.
COKER ELLSWORTH, 129 Bridge Street, an owner of the property,
said he is trying to solve the drainage problem, which is created
upstream. He said it is a four-way lot split drainage problem.
DON GULLICKSON of 513 East Cherry Avenue said he had waited
two hours and did not understand how City Staff could fail to
notify some of the neighbors of the public hearing.
LARRY TURNER of 323 Noguera Place said he agreed with Mr.
Ellsworth that he is trying to solve the drainage problem. He
presented the Council with photographs of the road culvert under
Branch Mill Road, and said he was concerned about blockage of the
culvert.
When no one further came forward to speak, Mayor Pro Tem Moots
continued the Public Hearing to May 14, 1991. '
~C. PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDERATION TO AUTHORIZE SUBMITTAL OF A
~ APPLICATION FOR UP TO S500. 000 TO THE 1991 SMALL CITIES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FOR ACOUISITION AND
REHABILITATION OF AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING: PEOPLES' SELF-HELP
HOUSING
Mayor Pro Tem Moots said he had a possible conflict of
interest and left the room. Council Member Smith became acting
Mayor Pro Tem.
Mr. Christiansen referred to the April 16, 1991 Staff Report
of the Planning Director, and said Staff recommends the Council
takes testimony at the public hearing, and adopt the authorizing
resolution.
After being assured that the public hearing had been duly
published and all legal requirements met, the acting Mayor Pro Tem
declared the hearing open and said all persons would be heard
regarding the matter. ~
JEANNETTE DUNCAN, executive director of peoples' Self -Help i
Housing, said she had been working with the city's Senior Advisory
commission. She said the State grant would be for acquiring
property with units already on it. She said the units would be
repaired and brought up to health and safety standards and
Peoples' Self-Help Housing would manage them as affordable housing.
When no one further came forward to speak, acting Mayor Pro
Tern smith closed the hearing to the floor.
It was moved by Dougall/Olsen (3-0-2, Dougall, Olsen and Smith
voting aye, Millis and Moots absent) to approve Resolution No. 2461
Approving an Application and Contract Execution for Funding from
the General Allocation of the State CDBG program, Authorizing the
Execution of a Grant Agreement with the State of California for
5
----.--- ....-
- 387
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 23, 1991
the Purposes of This Grant, and Approving the Waiver of Program
Related Permit and Inspection Fees and the Contribution of Program
Related Audit Expenses.
Mayor Pro Tem Moots returned to the room.
7. D. PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF
VARIANCE CASE NO. 91-156 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 91-
483: DENIAL OF A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A TWO-STORY. SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE THAT EXCEEDS BY SEVEN FEET FROM THE NATURAL GRADE OR
THREE FEET FROM THE GRADED PAD THE 30-FOOT HEIGHT LIMIT. AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO EXCEED HEIGHT LIMIT FOR ACCESSORY
BUILDING FROM 14 FEET TO 24 FEET TO ALLOW ~TORAGE/SHOP AREA ABOVE
GARAGE: 212 MILLER WAY: RICHARD AND TERRY PAYNE
Current Planner Spierling said that the project had been
denied by the Planning Commission because of a split 3 to 3 vote.
He said the applicants have received a grading permit and have
begun grading. He said if the appeal is denied the applicant will
still use the grading permit, but reduce the height of the house
and garage.
After being assured that the pUblic hearing had been duly
published and all legal requirements met, Mayor Pro Tem Moots
declared the hearing open and said all persons would be heard
regarding the matter.
RICHARD PAYNE, the applicant, presented petitions to the
Council in support of the paynes' appeal. He read from his April
29, 1991 letter to the Council. TERRY PAYNE also' spoke to the
Council in favor of the appeal.
O.F. NOSS of 246 Miller Circle said he was there to represent
Dr. Jerold Litoff, owner of a home next to the paynes' proposed
home. He said the new home would block some of the view from the
Litoffs' home.
Mrs. Payne showed a photo to the Council of her property in
relation to the Litoff home, and said her house would not be
obstructing anyone's view.
When no one further came forward to speak, the public hearing
was closed to the floor.
Council Members discussed view corridors, height of the
structures, grading, and colors for the house, and indicated they
would approve the appeal. There was Council concern about the two
story garage becoming living quarters some time in the future, and
~ members said that issue should become a deed restriction.
It was moved by Dougall/Smith (4-0-1, Dougall, smith, Olsen
and Moots voting aye, Millis absent) to approve Resolution No. 2462
Granting a variance, Case No. 91-156, Applied for by Richard and
Terry Payne at 212 Miller Way to Construct a Two Story single
Family Residence that Exceeds the 30 foot height limit, Adopting a
Negative Declaration and Instructing the City Clerk to File a
Notice of Determination.
It was moved by Dougall/Olsen (4-0-1, Dougall, Olsen, Smith i
and Moots voting aye, Millis absent) to approve Resolution No. 2463 ,
Approving Conditional Use Permit Case No. 91-483, to Exceed Height I
Limit for Accessory Building from 14 Feet to 24 Feet, Applied for
by Richard and Terry Payne at 212 Miller Way, Adopting a Negative
Declaration and Instructing the City Clerk to File a Notice of
Determination, and as amended with Condition No. 17 which read as
follows:
6
,
I
~-_.. - -- --~--------.---_..---------~. -------._-----------~--~------~----~-,.----------~. ----._- --- ---
388 -
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 23, 1991
"17. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant
shall record a deed restriction and an agreement affecting real
property regarding the garage/carriage house that prohibits
plumbing fixtures in the second story and prohibits the conversion
of the garage/carriage house structure to living quarters."
8.A. HOOK RAMPS AT CAMINO MERCADO
No Report.
8.B. UPDATE ON COUNTY PROJECTS AFFECTING THE CITY
No Report.
-...,
9.A. REOUEST OF ARROYO GRANDE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REGARDING
PRESENTATION ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
sandy Lubin, 138 Via Bandolero, member of the Arroyo Grande
Chamber of Commerce Board, spoke to the Council about the current
Recession in the Country and said the Chamber is concerned about
the lack of potential commercial and industrial development in the
city. He asked for the city's cooperation in seeking out viable
commercial and corporate entities to locate here. He suggested
that the City could annex land for open space and commercial
development. He listed ways in which the Chamber assists the city.
He said the Chamber Board of Directors, in the best interests of
the city, had voted to forego its annual funding from the city in
order to reduce the potential for any reductions in city Staff.
Council Members thanked the Chamber for its action.
9.B. RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES IN ITS
EFFORTS TO REPEAL SENATE BILL 2557 AND IMPLEMENT THE V.L.F.
SOLUTION , ,
I It was moved by Olsen/Smith (4-0-1, Olsen, smith, Dougall and
Moots voting aye, Millis absent) to approve Resolution No. 2464
I Supporting the League of California Cities in its Efforts to Repeal
Senate Bill 2557 and Implement the V.L.F. Solution.
9.C. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING LANDMARK TREES AT 468 CAMPANA PLACE
It was moved by Smith/Dougall (4-0-1, Smith, Dougall, Olsen
and Moots voting aye, Millis absent) to approve Resolution No. 2465
Designating Landmark Trees No. 91-59.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIOHQ
Mr. Christiansen said that it was Mayor Millis' intent to
reappoint all city commissioners whose terms would be expiring June
30, 1991. He said they are Clark Moore and M.P. "Pete" Gallagher,
Planning Commission; Judy Tappan and Patricia sanger, Parks and
Recreation Commission; Gary L. Borda and Cleo Silva, Parking and
Traffic Commission; Katherine "Kay" Silva and Aurora Kurek, Senior
Advisory commission, and Mark Clark, Marlin Harper and Anne
Waiters, Downtown Parking Advisory Board. '1
Council Members said they approved Mayor Millis'
reappointments.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Council Member Dougall said he attended a meeting at the
Police Department at which 16 of the city's Police Officers
received commendations from the Auto Club for their safe driving
abilities.
Council Member smith said she had received numerous complaints
about large 18-wheel trucks parking on private property on Huasna
Road. She asked Staff to resolve the problem.
I CLOSED SESSION
None.
7
- ,________n______"_______ ___..__ __ ___
-
389
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 23, 1991
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Dougall/Smith, and the motion passed to
adjourn the meeting at 11:12 P.M.
.J:1~ /1l;~ ~
GENE MOOTS, MAYOR PRO TEM
~ ATTEST: ~ a. ~L~
NANCY A. VIS, CITY CLERK
~
I
I
I
8
0-.----.---------