Agenda Packet 2005-01-25 CITY OF
' ' � ' ' ' � � ' A enda
City Coun�cil g
Tony M.Ferrera Mayor Steven Adams Ciry Manager
Joe Costsllo Mayor Pro Tem Timothy J.Carmel City Attorney
Jim Dickens Council Member �� Kelly Wetmore Ciry Clerk
�.; ICA�IFORNIA �.
Jim Guthrie Council Membe� �16� �' � -
Ed Arnold Council Member F
AGENDA SUMMARY
CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JANUARY 25, 2005
7:00 P.M.
Arroyo Grande City Council Chambers
215 East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande
1. CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL
3. FLAG SALUTE: KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS
4. INVOCATION: PASTOR ROBERT UNDERWOOD, FIRST
UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, ARROYO
GRANDE
5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
5.a Mavor's Commendations Presented to Mitch Chavez and Kord Schmidt
6. AGENDA REVIEW:
6.a. Move that all resolutions and ordinances presented tonight be read in title only and all
further readings be waived.
AGENDA SUMMARY—JANUARY 25, 2005
PAGE 2
7. COMMUNITY COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS:
This public comment period is an invitation to members of the community to present
issues, thoughts, or suggestions on matters not scheduled on this agenda. Comments
should be limited to those matters that are within the jurisdiction of the City Council.
The Brown Act restricts the Council from taking formal action on matters not published
on the agenda. In response to your comments, the Mayor or presiding Council Member
may:
♦ Direct City staff to assist or coordinate with you.
♦ A Council Member may state a desire to meet with you.
♦ It may be the desire of the Council to place your issue or matter on a future
Council agenda.
Please adhere to the following procedures when addressing the Council:
♦ Comments should be limited to 3 minutes or less.
♦ Your comments should be directed to the Council as a whole and not
directed to individual Council members.
♦ Slanderous, profane or personal remarks against any Council Member or
member of the audience shall not be permitted,
8. CONSENT AGENDA:
The following routine items listed below are scheduled for consideration as a group.
The recommendations for each item are noted. Any Council Member may request that
any item be withdrawn from the Consent Agenda to permit discussion or change the
recommended course of action. The City Council may approve the remainder of the
Consent Agenda on one motion.
8.a. Cash Disbursement Ratification (PILLOW)
Recommended Action: Ratify the listings of cash disbursements for the period
January 1, 2005—January 15, 2005.
S.b. Consideration of Cash Flow AnalvsisJAu�roval of Interfund Advance from the
Water Facilitv Fund (PILLOW)
Recommended Action: Receive and file the December 2004 cash report and approve
the interfund advance from the Water Facility Fund to cover cash deficits in other funds
as of December 31, 2004.
8.c. Consideration of Statement of Investment Deaosits (PILLOW)
Recommended Action: Receive and file the report of current investment deposits as
of December 31, 2004.
8.d. Consideration of A��roval of Minutes (WETMORE)
Recommended Actio�: Approve the minutes of the Regular City
CounciVRedevelopment Agency Meeting of January 11, 2005 as submitted.
AGENDA SUMMARY-JANUARY 25, 2005
PAGE 3
8. CONSENT AGENDA(continuedl:
8.e. Consideration of Ac�roval of Final Ma� for Tract 2275 and to Acceot Certain
Easements and Im4rovements for Tract 2275 - Jfm and Evadene Dotson
(SPAGNOLO)
Recommended Action: 1) Approve Final Tract Map 2275; 2) Accept the public water
improvements that were conditioned for Tract 2275, as constructed; 3) Reject the sewer
improvements that were conditioned for Tract 2275, without prejudice as to
future acceptance; 4) Reject the offer of dedication for public sewer easement, without
prejudice as to future acceptance; and 5) Accept the 10% warranty security in the
amount of $40,982.68.
8.f. Consideration of Councll A9r�oi�tments to Various Citv Commissions Boards.
and Committees (ADAMS)
Recommended Action: Approve appointments.
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
9.a. Conslderatlon of a Proc�osed Ordinance Addina Cha�ter 8.38 to Tltle 8 of the
Arrovo Grnnde Munici�al Code Providina for the Licensina of Tobacco Retallers
(TERBORCH)
Recommended Actton: Introduce Ordinance adding Chapter 8.38 to Title 8 of the
Arroyo Grande Municipal Code providing for the licensing and regulation of retailers of
tobacco products.
9.b. Consideration of Co�ditlonal Use Permlt 04-005 - Mixed-Use Prolect with Two (2) !
Retail Units. Three (3) Office Units. and One M) Restdential Unit: 101 Traffic Wav
Ac�ollcant: John Robasclotti (STRONG)
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit 04-005. ?
9.c. Consideratlon of Amended Conditional Use Permit Case No 04-001 to Allow a '
Financlal Institution to Occu�v Buildina J of the Five Cities Sho�oins� Csnter• 911
Rancho Parkwav: Welts Farao Bank (STRONG) ;
Recommended Actlon: Continue the item to the Regular City Council meeting of
February 8, 2005.
9.d. �onsideration of a Pr000sed Ordinance Addlna Cha�ter 13 06 to Title 13 of the ;
Arro�o Grande Munici�al Code Reaardlna Imnlementation of a �ndatorv
Retrofit Proaram and Procedure Uaon the Chanae of Ownershio of Rsal Proc�ertv
(SPAGNOLO)
Recommended Actfon: Introduce Ordinance.
;
9.e. Consideration of Resolution to Adiust the In-Lleu Fee for Off-Street Parkins� in the !
Parklna and Business Im�rovement A�+ea of the Villaae (STRONG)
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution adjusting the in-lieu fee for off-street
parking in the Parking and Business Improvement Area of the Village.
�
AGENDA SUMMARY—JANUARY 25, 2005
PAGE 4
10. CONTINUED BUSINESS:
None.
11. NEW BUSINESS:
11.a. Consideration of Fiscal Year 2005-06 and Fiscal Year 2006-07 Budaet Goals
(ADAMS)
Recommended Actlon: Approve proposed budget goais for FY 2005-06 and FY
2006-07.
12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS:
This item gives the Mayor and Council Members the opportunity to present reports to
the other members regarding committees, commissions, boards, or special projects on
which they may be participating.
(e) MAYOR TONY M. FERRARA:
(1 j San Luis Obispo Courrcil of Governments/San Luis Obispo Regional
Transit Authority (SLOCOG/SLORTA�
(2) South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD)
(3) Other
(b) MAYOR PRO TEM JOE COSTELLO:
(1) Zone 3 Water Advisory Board
(2) County Water Resources Advisory Committee (WRAC)
(3) Air Pollution Control District (APCD)
(4) Other
(c) COUNCIL MEMBER JIM DICKENS:
(1) South County Area Transit (SCAT)
(2) South County Youth Coalition
(3) Other
(d) COUNCIL MEMBER ED ARNOLD:
(1) Integrated Waste Management Authority Board (IWMA) �
(2) California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA)
(3) Other
(e) COUNCIL MEMBER JIM GUTHRIE:
(1) Economic Vitality Corporation (EVC) ,
(2) Other
I
�
�
�
. �
!
AGENDA SUMMARY—JANUARY 25, 2005
PAGE 5
13. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS:
The following item(s) are placed on the agenda by the Mayor and/or a Council Member
who would like to receive feedback, direct staff to prepare information, and/or request a
formal agenda report be prepared and the item placed on a future agenda. No formal
action can be taken.
a) None.
14. CITY MANAGER ITEMS:
The following item(s) are placed on the agenda by the City Manager in order to receive
feedback and/or request direction from the Council. No formal action can be taken.
a) Request from the City of Pismo Beach to explore joint fire services with Pismo
Beach and other South County jurisdictions.
15. rOUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS:
Correspondence/Comments as presented by the City Council.
16. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS:
Correspondence/Comments as presented by the City Manager.
17. COMMUNITY COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS:
This public comment period is an invitation to members of the community to present
issues, thoughts, or suggestions. Comments should be limited to those matters that
are within the jurisdiction of the City Council. The Brown Act restricts the Council from
taking formal action on matters not published on the agenda.
18. ADJOURNMENT
♦�♦�����♦
All staff reports or other written documentation relating to each item of business �eferred to on the
agenda are on file in the Administrative Services Department and are available for public
inspection and reproduction at cost. If requested, the agenda shall be made available in
appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by the Americans with
Disabilities Act. To make a request for disability-related modification or accommodation, contact
the Administrative Services Department at 805-473-5414 as soon as possible and at least 48
hours prior to the meeting date.
♦�������♦
Note: This agenda is subject to amendment up to 72 hours prior to the date and time set for the
meeting. Please refer to the agenda posted at City Hall for any revisions, or call the Director of
Administrative Services at(805)473-5414 for more information.
www.arrovos�rande.or�
S.a.
•
CITY OF
. � • ' .
►
. �
- __
___ - --
- _ _ � � �
�
, ,
CALIFORNIA �, �
- � 9 1 �
�,
, �
0
0
�
O
Preser�ted to
. .
o� m�
On this 25th day of January z o 05
�n R,ecognition of your
�►�lem6ership in the
Platinum Service CCu6
for Service .�l6ove and Beyand '
the CaIC of Duty
�� PRROVp Q99
� tMCORPORAtlD Z
V �
�t ,►u�r f�, 1►» �t
1�� ��• ��Q�Q� ��t]� c4�IFQRW�P
v ��
� CITY OF
�
.
. • � ' �
►
. �
--_ _ _ . _ ---- ----
__ _ __ _ �� �
��,�, ,
CALIFC� RNIA y
� - � 911
/ �
0
0
a
O
Presented to
t
i av¢��
On tFiis zs�h day of January 2 0 os
.�n Recognition of your
�vlem6ersF�ip in the
PCatinum Service Clu6
for Service .�l.6ove and Beyond
tF�e Call of Duty
� a�ROro�
�' �ICEiR�ORATlD�
"' v
-
� r�
ir au�r�o.ss�� *
1�� • ��Qra� OI� c'4G/FOA�`P
� �
� pRROV� �■8■
� c�P
�' INCOFPOqATED 9
l� Z
" " MEMORANDUM
* JULY 10. 1911 *
c4��F ORN�P
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ANGELA PILLOW, DIRECTOR OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
BY: FRANCES R. HEAD, ACCOUNTING SUPERVISO
SUBJECT: CASH DISBURSEMENT RATIFICATION
DATE: JANUARY 25, 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council ratify the attached listing of cash disbursements for
the period January 1-January 15, 2005.
FUNDING:
There is a $764.258.53 fiscal impact. All payments are within the existing budget.
DISCUSSION:
The attached listing represents the cash disbursements required of normal and usual
operations. It is requested that the City Council approve these payments.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
• Approve staff's recommendation;
• Do not approve staff's recommendation;
• Provide direction to staff.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 — Cash Disbursement Listing
Attachment 2 —January 7, 2005, Accounts Payable Check Register
Attachment 3 —January 7, 2005, Payroll Checks and Benefit Checks Register
Attachment 4 —January 11, 2005, Accounts Payable Check Register
Attachment 5 —January 14, 2005, Accounts Payable Check Register
._ �.__._ ..._...,�.....�,.��,._._ ,,,,,,,,,,_..,
ATTACHMENTI
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
CASH DISBURSEMENTS
�°n t�e ��r`°cl ad�a.u*�a�y 1 7larcu�i�l�,�rua�uy t5, 2A05
January 25, 2005
Presented are the cash disbursements issued by the Department of Financial Services for
the period January 1 to January 15, 2005. Shown are cash disbursements by week of
occurrence and type of payment.
WEEK TYPE OF PAYMENT ATTACHMENT AMOUNT
Tanu�y 8,2.005
Accounts Payable Cks 11906�119176 2 � 199�25�54
Payroll Checks and Benefit Checks 3 376,471.71
S 575,729.25
January 15,2005
Accounts Payable Cks 118965-118967 4 $ 11,208.22 '
�
Accounts Payable Qcs 119177-119237 5 $ 177,321.06 �
188,529.28
TWO-WEEK TOTAL $ 764,258.53
U:\MSWORD\CITY COUNCIL FORMS\CASH DISBURSEMENT SCHED�n,EXCEL WIC,S.doc
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
INDEX FOR BUDGET DEPARTMENTS
EDEN COMPUTER SYSTEM
GENERAL FUND(010) SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
City Government(Fund 010) Park Development Fee Fund(Fund 213)
4001 - City Council 4550 - Park Development Fee
4002 - Administrative Services Traffic Signal Fund(Fund 222)
4003 - City Attorney 4501 - Traffic Fund
4101 - City Manager Transportation Fund(Fund 225)
4102 - Printing/Duplicating 4553 - Public Transit System
4120 - Financial Services Construction Tax Fund(Fund 230)
4121 - Taxes/ Insurance/ Bonds 4556 - Construction Tax
4130 - Community Development Police Grant Funds
4131 - Community Building(CDBG) 4201 - Law Enforcement Equip. (Fd 272)
4140 - Management Information System 4202 - State AB3229 Cops Grant(Fd 271)
4145 - Non Departmental 4203 - Federal Universal Hiring(Fd 274)
Public Sa�t�(Fund 010) 4208 - Federal Local Law Enforcmt(FD 279)
4201 - Police Redevelopment Agency(Fund 284)
4211 - Fire 4103 - Redevelopment Administration
4212 - Building&Safety ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Public Works(Fund 010) Sewer Fund(Fund 612)
4301 - Public Works-Admin&Engineering 4610 - Sewer Maintenance
4303 - Street/Bridge Maintenance Water Fund(Fund 640)
4304 - Street Lighting 4710 - Water Administration
4305 - Automotive Shop 4711 - Water Production
Parks F�Recreation(Fund 010) 4712 - Water Distribution
4420 - Parks Lopez Administration(Fund 641)
4421 - Recreation 4750 - Lopez Administration
4422 - General Recreation CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS(Fund 350)
4423 - Pre-School Program 5501-5599 - Park Projects
4424 - Recreation-Special Programs 5601-5699 - Streets Projects
4425 - Children in Motion 5701-5799 - Drainage Projects
4426 - Five Cities Youth Basketball 5801-5899 - Water/Sewer/Street Projects
4430 - Soto Sport Complex 5901-5999 - Water Projects
4213 - Government Buildings
4460 - Parkway Maintenance
U:\MSWORD\CITY COUNCIL FORMS\CASH DISBURSEMENT SCHED wEXCEL WKS.doc
i
ATTACHMENT 2
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119068 1/4/2005 003411 CLEAN SWEEP JANITORIAL 1550 JANITORIAL SERVICES:DEC 2004
JANITORIAL SERVICES:DEC 2004
010.4213.5303 4,587.15
Total : 4,587.15
! 119088 1/7/2005 000209 A B DICK COMPANY T098936 REPLACE A.C.MOTOR ON AB D.P
REPLACE A.C.MOTOR ON AB D.P
010.4102.5603 397.41
Total : 397.41
119089 1/7/2005 002477 ABS DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC 135680-5681 EVIDENCE DELIVERY CHARGES
EVIDENCE DELIVERY CHARGES
010.4201.5324 20.00
Total : 20.00
119090 1/7/2005 001259 AGP VIDEO, INC 675 VIDEO PROD/COUNC.MTGS NOV'
VIDEO PROD/COUNC.MTGS NOV'
211.4101.5330 1,950.00
Total : 1,950.00
I 119092 1/7/2005 003817 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SVCS B083649 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:SEWE
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:SEWE
612.4610.5143 25.69
6663410 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:FIRE D
UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:FIRE D
010.4213.5303 18.68
6663413 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:BLDG
UN I FORMS/TOWELS/MATS:BLDG
010.4213.5303 6.31
6663414 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:CITY H
UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:CITY H
010.4213.5303 8.40
6663415 UNIFORMSrTOWELS/MATS:ENG.D
UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:ENG.D
010.4213.5303 5.00
Page: 1
_ __. _ _ .__ _ _._ •
vchlist Voucher List
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM Page: 2
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
, Bank code: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
-- Description/Account
I 119092 Amount
1/7/2005 003817 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SVCS (Continued)
6663416 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:COM.0
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:COM.0
010.4213.5303 9.45
6663420 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:SEWE
i UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:SEWE
612.4610.5143 5 88
i B663421 UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:STREE
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:STREE
220.4303.5143 20.58
B663422 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:ENG.D
� UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:ENG.D
010.4301.5143 1.47
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:WTR D
640.4712.5143 14.99
6663423 U N I FORMS/TOWELS/MATS:PARKS
U N I FORMSlf OWELS/MATS:PARKS
010.4420.5143 20.58
B663424 UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:BLDG
U N I FORMSlTOWE LS/MATS:B LDG
010.4213.5143 5.00
g663425 UNIFORMSlTOWELS/MATS:AUTO;
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:AUTO�
010.4305.5143 5.00
6666687 UNIFQRMS/TOWELS/MATS:PD
UN I FORMS/TOWELS/MATS:PD
010.4213.5303 10.38
6666689 UNIFORMSlTOWELS/MATS:REC C
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:REC C
010.4213.5303 20.48
6666691 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:STREE '
UNIFORMSlTOWELS/MATS:STREE �
220.4303.5143 20.58 �
�
Page: 2
vchlist Voucher List Page: 3
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119092 1/7/2005 003817 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SVCS (Continued)
B666692 UNIFORMS�TOWELS/MATS:ENG D
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:ENG D
010.4301.5143 1•47
UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:WfR D
640.4712.5143 14.99
6666693 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:PARKS
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:PARKS
010.4420.5143 28.46
6666694 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:BLDG
U N I FORMS/TOWELS/MATS:B LDG
010.4213.5143 2.94
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:CORP 1
010.4213.5303 11.03
6666695 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:AUTO�
UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:AUTO�
010.4305.5143 10.55
666690 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:SEWE
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:SEWE '
612.4610.5143 5.88
6669938 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:FIRE D
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:FIRE D
010.4213.5303 18.68
6669941 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:BLDG
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:BLDG
010.4213.5303 6.31
6669942 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:CITY H
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:CITY H
010.4213.5303 8.40
B669943 UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:ENG.D
UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:ENG.D
010.4213.5303 5.00
6669944 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:COM.0
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:COM.0
010.4213.5303 9.45
Page: 3
vchlist Voucher List Page: 4
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code : bpa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119092 1/7/2005 003817 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SVCS (Continued)
g�9�8 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:SEWE
U N I FO R M S/TOW E LS/MATS:S E WE
612.4610.5143 5,88
6669949 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:STREE
U N I FO RMS/TOWELS/MATS:STREE
220.4303.5143 20.58
6669950 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:ENG D
UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:ENG D
010.4301.5143 1.47
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:WTR D
640.4712.5143 16.46
B669951 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:PARKS
UNI FORMS/TOWELS/MATS:PARKS
010.4420.5143 20.58
6669953 UNIFORMSlTOWELS/MATS:BLDG
U N I F O R M S/TO W E L S/MATS:B L D G
010.4213.5143 5.00
6669954 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:AUTO�
UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:AUTO;
010.4305.5143 5.00
6673197 UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS: PD
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS: PD
010.4213.5303 10.38
6673199 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:REC M
UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:REC M
010.4213.5303 20.48
B673200 UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:SEWE
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:SEWE
612.4610.5143 5.88
6673201 UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:STREE
UN I FORMS/TOWELS/MATS:STREE
220.4303.5143 20.58
Page: 4
vchlist Voucher List Page: 5
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119092 1/7/2005 003817 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SVCS (Continued)
B673202 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:ENG D
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:ENG D
010.4301.5143 1.47
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS;wtr dep
640.4712.5143 12.05
6673203 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:PARKS
UN I FORMS/TOWELS/MATS:PARKS
010.4420.5143 28.46
B673204 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:BLDG
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:BLDG
010.4213.5143 2•94
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:CORP 1
010.4213.5303 11.03
6673205 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:AUTO:
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:AUTO�
010.4305.5143 10.55
6676438 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:FIRE D
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:FIRE D
010.4213.5303 18.68
B676441 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:BLDG
U N I FORMS/TOWELS/MATS:B LDG
010.4213.5303 6.31
6676442 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:CITY H
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:CITY H
010.4213.5303 8.40
6676443 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:ENG.D
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:ENG.D
010.4213.5303 5.00
6676444 UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:COM.0
UNIFORMS/TOWELSlMATS:COM.0
010.4213.5303 9.45
� 6676448 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:SEWE
. UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:SEWE
612.4610.5143 5.88
Page: 5
vchlist Voucher List Page: 6
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code : boa
� Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119092 1/7/2005 003817 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SVCS (Continued)
B676449 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:STREE
UN IFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:STREE
220.4303.5143 20.58
B676450 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:ENG D
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:ENG D
010.4301.5143 1.47
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:WfR D
640.4712.5143 14.70
6676451 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:PARKS
UN IFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:PARKS
010.4420.5143 20.58
6676452 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:BLDG
U NIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:BLDG
010.4213.5143 5.00
6676453 U N I FORMS/TOW ELS/MATS:AUTO:
U N I FORMS/TOW ELS/MATS:AUTO:
010.4305.5143 5.00
Total : 641.47
119093 1/7/2005 002632 API WASTE SERVICES 4C000037 R/O BIN-DUMP/RETURN SVCS.:CR
R/O BIN-DUMP/RETURN SVCS.:CR
010.4213.5303 375.00
4CH00024 R/O BIN-DUMP/RETURN SVCS.:CR
- R/O BIN-DUMP/RETURN SVCS.:CR
010.4213.5303 250.00
Total : 625.00
119094 1/7/2005 003745 ARROWHEAD SCIENTIFIC, INC 18977 INDENTAPRINT REPLACEMENT KI
INDENTAPRINT REPLACEMENT KI
010.4201.5255 121.94
Total : 121.94
119095 1/7/2005 001758 AUTO GLASS CENTRAL 12224 WINDSHIELD 6408
WINDSHIELD 6408
010.4212.5601 174.43
Page: 6
__ _
vchlist Voucher List Page: 7
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119095 1/7/2005 001758 001758 AUTO GLASS CENTRAL (Continued) Total : 174.43
119096 1/7/2005 002180 AVAYA, INC 2720052474 MERLIN PHONES
MERLIN PHONES
010.4145.5403 13.74
Total : 13.74
119097 1/7/2005 001944 BASIC CHEMICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC S14118970 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE:240 GAL
SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE:240 GAL
640.4712.5274 397.54
Total : 397.54
119098 1/7/2005 003074 BENDER&COMPANY, INC, MATTHEW 97483737 MUNICIPAL CODE SUPPLEMENT N
MUNICIPAL CODE SUPPLEMENT N
010.4002.5303 3,210.42
98579401 CODE SUPPL.WEB FORMAT FEES
CODE SUPPL.WEB FORMAT FEES
010.4002.5303 235.50
Total : 3,445.92
119099 1/7/2005 000077 BETTER BEEP,A ACCT 35523 PAGER SERVICES:JAN'05
PAGER SERVICES:JAN'05
010.4201.5606 134.25
Total : 134.25
119100 1/7/2005 000087 BREZDEN PEST CONTROL, INC 23955 QRTLY PEST CONTROL: FIRE STA
QRTLY PEST CONTROL: FIRE STA
010.4213.5303 99.00
Total : 99.00
119101 1/7/2005 000090 BRISCO MILL&LUMBER YARD 122058 LAGS AND SHIELDS
LAGS AND SHIELDS
220.4303.5613 13.80
�22068 SHIELDS, LAGS,WASHERS
SHIELDS, LAGS,WASHERS
220.4303.5613 18.08
Page: 7
vchlist Voucher List Pa9e� 8
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE�
Bank code: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119101 1/7/2005 000090 000090 BRISCO MILL&LUMBER YARD (Continued) Total : 31.88 '!
119102 1/7/2005 000094 BRUMIT DIESEL, INC 75665 MAINT.KIT
MAINT.KIT
010.4211.5601 82.05
Total : 82.05
119103 1/7/2005 000096 BURTON'S FIRE APPARATUS 20429 BATTERIES,FLASHERS,HARNESS
BATTERIES,FLASHERS,HARNESS
II 010.4211.5601 306.46
Total : 306.46
I 119104 1/7/2005 000156 C COAST TAXI-CAB SVCS, LLC 010305 ' TAXI SVC: 12/14-12/31/04
TAXI SVC: 12/14-12/31/04
225.4553.5507 1,051.50
Total : 1,051.50
119105 1/7/2005 000115 CA RESERVE PEACE OFFICERS ASSN 122404 MEMBERSHIP:EGGERS
MEMBERSHIP:EGGERS
010.4201.5503 81.00
Total : 81.00
119106 1/7/2005 000125 CA ST DEPT OF CONSERVATION 123104 S.M.I.P. (OCT-DEC FY05)
S.M.I.P.(OCT-DEC FY05)
010.00002208 1,237.00
ADMIN.FEE-SMIP
010.0000.4801 -61.85
Total : 1,7 75.15
119107 1/7/2005 000110 CA ST DEPT OF CORRECTIONS 5215 CREWS FOR NOV 2004
; CREWS FOR NOV 2004
220.4303.5303 4,257.05
Total : 4,257.05
119108 1/7/2005 003775 CALIFORNIA JPIA 813871 CA JPIA PROPERTY INS.PAYMENT
CA JPIA PROPERTY INS.PAYMENT
010.4145.5579 29,168.00
Page: 8
vchlist Voucher List Page: 9
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119108 1/7/2005 003775 003775 CALIFORNIA JPIA (Continued) Total : 29,168.00
119109 1/7/2005 004548 CARMEL&NACCASHA, LLP 10058 PROF.LEGAL SERVICES:DEC 2004
PROF.LEGAL SERVICES:DEC 2004
010.4003.5304 10,602.00
Total : 10,602.00
119110 1/7/2005 000603 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 082309 NEW BATTERY PW923 ENGINEER
NEW BATTERY PW923 ENGINEER
010.4301.5601 55.64
148-079486 022 BATTERY GEL
� 022 BATTERY GEL
010.4201.5601 149.09
' 148-084529 BACK UP ALARM
BACK UP ALARM
010.4211.5601 66.14
Total : 270.87
119111 1/7/2005 000160 CHAPARRAL 230316 MAINTENANCE 01/03-02/03/05
MAINTENANCE 01/03-02/03/05
� 010.4421.5602 130.00
I OVERAGE COPIES
010.4421.5602 75.28
Total : 205.28
119112 1/7/2005 000164 CHRISTIANSON CHEVROLET 6063 AUTO GLASS CLEANER
AUTO GLASS CIEANER
010.4305.5603 56.50
Total : 56.50
i 119113 1/7/2005 000174 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT 4908573 REPLACE ALTERNATOR ON P11
REPLACE ALTERNATOR ON P11
010.4420.5601 302.00
Total : 302.00
119114 1/7/2005 003599 COMMERCIAL SANITARY SUPPLY 44061214 TISSUE,TRASH LINERS,GLASS CLP
Page: 9
11 �hlist Voucher List Page: 10
1/07/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
_ ,
ank code: boa
unt bucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119114 1/7/2005 003599 COMMERCIAL SANITARY SUPPLY (Continued)
TISSUE,TRASH LINERS,GLASS CLP
24 010.4420.5605 413.88
24 Total : 413.88
119115 1/7/2005 000196 CUESTA EQUIFMENT CO 298572 ROTARY SAW BLADES
ROTARY SAW BLADES
73 010.4211.5603 43.06
Total : 43.06
61 119116 1/7/2005 000204 DAVIS&STANTON 08517 UNIFORM COMMENDATION BARS
UNIFORM COMMENDATION BARS
010.4201.5255 45.00
83 . Total : 45.00
�� 119117 1/7/2005 002697 EARTHLINK, INC 204066959 INTERNET SERVICE 12/21-1/20/05
INTERNET SERVICE 12/21-1/20/05
010.4201.5607 45.90
00 Total : 45.90
00 119118 1/7/2005 000926 ECONOMIC VITALITY CORP 774 PLAT.LEV.INV.-1 OF 2,JUL 1-DEC 3
PLAT.LEV.INV.-1 OF 2,JUL 1-DEC 3
284.4103.5303 2,500.00
50 Total : 2,500.00
119119 1/7/2005 000904 EDEN SYSTEMS, INC 1075 EDEN ANNUAL SUPPORT
50 EDEN ANNUAL SUPPORT
010.4140.5303 22,234•�5
Total : 22,234.75
�� 119120 1/7/2005 000234 ENTENMANN-ROVIN CO 436742 POLICE OFFICER BADGES
POLICE OFFICER BADGES
010.4201.5255 416.55
36 Total : 416.55
t6
119121 1/7/2005 001525 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC 788991 6"CPLGS(4 EA)
� Page: 10
vchlist Voucher List Page: 11
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
I Bank code: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119121 1/7/2005 001525 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC (Continued)
6"CPLGS(4 EA)
640.4712.5610 299.24
Total : 299.24
119122 1/7/2005 000262 FRANK'S LOCK&KEY, INC 21428 BRASS LOCKS&KEY FOR RG PA
BRASS LOCKS&KEY FOR RG PA
010.4420.5605 127.73
� 21485 KEY-VAN
� KEY-VAN
010.4213.5601 1.61
21513 3 KEYS
3 KEYS
010.4201.5601 4.83
Total : 134.17
119123 1/7/2005 004727 GAVIN,JULIE 010505 REFUND BASKETBALL($50 LESS$
REFUND BASKETBALL($50 LESS$
010.0000.4613 40.00
Total : 40.00
119124 1/7/2005 003365 GLOBAL PHONE&WIRELESS SVCS 7101 SERVICE CALL FOR EYE WITNES
I SERVICE CALL FOR EYE WITNES
i 010.4201.5603 32.50
' ���� #22 CAMERA MOUNT,INSTALL CAE
#22 CAMERA MOUNT,INSTALL CAE
010.4201.5603 77.50
�ggg #21 COIL CORD,#12 VCR AUDIO
#21 COIL CORD,#12 VCR AUDIO
010.4201.5603 70.00
7397 #12 REPLACE VCR
' #12 REPLACE VCR
010.4201.5603 568.36
Total : 748.36
119125 1/7/2005 000288 GROVER BEACH, CITY OF 063005 SEWER CHARGES DUE:7/1-06/
Page: 11
vchlist Voucher List Page: 12
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
i
I Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119125 1/7/2005 000288 GROVER BEACH,CITY OF (Continued)
SEWER CHARGES DUE:7/1-06/
612.0000.4751 2,262.00
Total : 2,262.00
119126 1/7/2005 000296 HAMON OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 23771 TRANSMITTER PARTS
TRANSMITTER PARTS
I 010.4213.5603 53.48
Total : 53.48
� 119127 1/7/2005 001237 HANSON AGGREGATES 464366
COBBLE ROCK
COBBLE ROCK
' 220.4303.5613 256.00
I
Total : 256.00
119128 1/7/2005 000301 HEACOCK TRAILERS&TRUCK 17459 026 PLUG&HARDWARE
' 026 PLUG&HARDWARE
010.4201.5601 13.41
Total : 13.41
119129 1/7/2005 004728 HILLIER, MARTY 122704 METER DEPOSIT
METER DEPOSIT
640.0000.2302 180.00
CLOSING BILL-SEWER
612.0000.1110 -12.91
CLOSING BILL-WATER
640.0000.1110 -35.96
CLOSING BILL-LOPEZ
641.0000.1110 -48.63
i CLOSING BILL-SANITARY DIST
' 760.0000.1110 -15.38
Total : 67.12
119130 1/7/2005 002820 INDOFF, INC 86683 OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
010.4421.5201 139.70
Page: 12
vchlist Voucher List Page: 13 '
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# DescriptionlAccount Amount
119130 1/7/2005 002820 002820 INDOFF, INC (Continued) Total : 139.70
119131 1/7/2005 000345 J J'S FOOD COMPANY, INC 152092 ICE-EMPLOYEE HOLIDAY LUNCHE�
ICE-EMPLOYEE HOLIDAY LUNCHE�
010.4101.5319 11.87
Total : 11.87
119132 1/7/2005 000358 JOHNSON, ROBERTS&ASSOCIATES 34171 PHQ REPORT(BROWN-RESERVE)
PHQ REPORT(BROWN-RESERVE)
' 010.4201.5303 15.83
( Total : 15.83
I SPIRAL BINDING COMBS
I 119133 1/7/2005 003949 KERN'S PAPER CONNECTION 13207
SPIRAL BINDING COMBS
010.4102.5255 18.35
13298 ENVELOPES/PAPER
ENVELOPES/PAPER
010.4102.5255 320.46
13361 ENVELOPES/PAPER/NCR
ENVELOPES/PAPER/NCR
010.4102.5255 651.54
Total : 990.35
119134 1/7/2005 000376 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC 2737401 ASSORTED BRASS FITTINGSNVA
� ASSORTED BRASS FITTINGS/WA
�! 010.4211.5603 496.80
Total : 496.80
119135 1/7/2005 000379 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 25419 MEMBERSHIP DUES:2005
MEMBERSHIP DUES:2005
010.4145.5503 5,629.00
Total : 5,629.00
119136 1/7/2005 000383 LIEBERT,CASSIDY,WHITMORE 50834 CENT.COAST MMBRSHP-1/1-6/3
CENT.COAST MMBRSHP-1/1-6/3
010.4145.5501 1,350.00
I
� Page: 13
�
vchlist Voucher List
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM Page: 14
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
j Description/Account Amount
119136 1/7/2005 000383 000383 LIEBERT,CASSIDY,WHITMORE (Continued)
Total : 1,350.00
119137 1/7/2005 000412 MATHE, DAVID L 122904
REIMBURSE TRAVEL EXPENSE
REIMBURSE TRAVEL EXPENSE
010.4211.5501 185.33
� To�� : 185.33
119138 1/7/2005 000419 MIDAS MUFFLER&BRAKE 0008953
� SERVICE TO PW45
I SERVICE TO PW45
220.4303.5601 40.12
0009035 SERVICE TO PW62
SERVICE TO PW62
� 640.4712.5601 25.32
8919 024 UO/F/R&R FUEL FILTER
024 VO/F/R&R FUEL FILTER
010.4201.5601 126.33
8958 021 L/O/F
021 UO/F
010.4201.5601 25.16
8975 022 UO/F INSTALL BATTERY/B.FLU
022 UO/F INSTALL BATTERY/B.FLU
010.4201.5601 145.21
9034 012 BRAKE PADS/BALANCE TIRES
012 BRAKE PADS/BALANCE TIRES
010.4201.5601 123.38
9037 991 UO/F BALANCE TIRE/F.FILTER
991 UO/F BALANCE TIRE/F.FILTER
010.4201.5601 178.06
Total : 663.58
119139 1/7/2005 000429 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC 3657
LUBE SPRAY,BULB,LEVER FLUSH
LUBE SPRAY,BULB,LEVER FLUSH
010.4213.5604 18.19 i
39� WATER SOFT.
WATER SOFT.
010.4211.5255 41.76
Page: 14
vchlist VOUCher Llst Page: 15 ,
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
i 1191 1/7/2005 000429 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC (Continued)
3986 BULB-BUILIDING MAINT.CORP YA
BULB-BUILIDING MAINT.CORP YA
010.4213.5604 11.78
4130 BATTERIES
BATTERIES
010.4211.5255 38.57
i 4163 WASHER
� WASHER
I 010.4213.5604 5.67
4197 PRESSURE GAUGE,COUPLE,SUP
PRESSURE GAUGE,COUPLE,SUP
010.4420.5273 �7.29
4260 FASTENERS
FASTENERS
010.4213.5604 1.16
4764 ADHESIVE
ADHESIVE
I 010.4211.5255 4•82
5q23 HOOKS, BLADE,TOOL HOLDER
HOOKS, BLADE,TOOL HOLDER
010.4420.5273 16.21
, �g TOOLS
� TOOLS
'' 010.4211.5273 10.47
�58 MISC.PARTS
MISC.PARTS
010.4211.5325 2.45
5525 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
' 010.4420.5605 11.41
5545 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
010.4420.5605 2•25
Page: 15
vchlist Voucher List Page: 16
01107/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119139 1/7/2005 000429 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC (Continued)
571 MAILBOX FOR SHOP&BATTERIE
MAILBOX FOR SHOP&BATTERIE
010.4305.5255 57.87
i 5gpg BUILDING MATERIALS
i BUILDING MATERIALS
� 010.4430.5605 9.65
� 6010 ROPE
ROPE
010.4420.5273 15.00
i 6218 USA FLAG
USA FLAG
010.4430.5605 21.43
� g2g5 CLEANING SUPPLIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
640.4712.5255 10.98
6781 JAR MASON
JAR MASON
640.4712.5255 9��
I Total : 306.60
119140 1/7/2005 000438 MORTON PITT COMPANY, F 00081221N NAME PLATE/SERVING SINCE:EG
NAME PLATE/SERVING SINCE:EG
� 010.4201.5255 19.23
Total : 19.23
119141 1/7/2005 004076 MYRON CORP 49865918 FIREFIGHTER GIFTS:FF AWARDS
FIREFIGHTER GIFTS:FF AWARDS
010.4211.5255 172.48
Total : 172.48
119142 1/7/2005 002849 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 933066312-037 CELL PHONE: FIRE AND EMERGE�
CELL PHONE: FIRE AND EMERGE�
010.4211.5403 98•07
BUILDING,LIFE SAFETY DIVISION
010.4212.5403 32.67
Page: 16
vchlist Voucher List Page: 17
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
' Bank code: boa
�
iVoucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119142 1/7/2005 002849 002849 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (Continued) Total : 130.T4
119143 1/7/2005 000468 OFFICE DEPOT 267977292-001 OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
', 010.4212.5201 66.03
' 267994043-001 OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
010.4002.5201 54.94
� YELLOW TONER FOR NTWRK PRN
� 010.4140.5602 111.91
( 267994043-002 OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
010.4002.5201 15.32
268458336-001 OFFICE EXPENSE
I OFFICE EXPENSE
010.4301.5201 190.50
268705556-001 OFFICE EXPENSE
OFFICE EXPENSE
010.43U1.5201 60.34
Total : 499.04
I 119144 1/7/2005 000481 PACIFIC GAS&ELECTRIC CO 12/15-654774 ELECTRIC:FLASHING BEACON
ELECTRIC:FLASHING BEACON
� 010.4304.5402 24.91
12l16-889211 ELECTRIC:CROSS LIGHT
ELECTRIC:CROSS UGHT
010.4304.5402 17.99
12/17-235044 ELECTRIC: ELECT.SVC TO RES#4
ELECTRIC: ELECT.SVC TO RES#4
640.4712.5402 20.16
12/21-019097 ELECTRIC:STREET LIGHTING
ELECTRIC:STREET LIGHTING
010.4304.5402 48.09
12/21-194097 ELECTRIC:STREET LIGHTING
ELECTRIC:STREET LIGHTING
010.4304.5402 14,259.48
Page: 17
vchlist Voucher List Page: 18
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119144 1/7/2005 000481 000481 PACIFIC GAS&ELECTRIC CO (Continued) Total : 14,370.63
119145 1/7/2005 003462 PEPPERBALL TECHNOLOGIES, iNC 129981N RED PEPPER BALLS
. RED PEPPER BALLS
010.4201.5272 860.99
Total : 860.99
119146 1/7/2005 004158 PHOENIX GROUP 112004157 CITATIONS PROCESSED: NOV 200
ICITATIONS PROCESSED: NOV 200
� 010.4201.5303 110.50
Total : 110.50
� 119147 1/7/2005 000498 PITNEY BOWES, INC 361837 SERVICE ON POSTAGE EQUIPME�
SERVICE ON POSTAGE EQUIPME� .
010.4101.5602 204.00
390715 SERVICE ON POSTAGE EQUIPME�
SERVICE ON POSTAGE EQUIPME�
010.4101.5602 136.00
680363 POSTAGE SUPPLIES
POSTAGE SUPPLIES
010.4101.5201 75.06
925192 POSTAGE SUPP��ES:INK CARTRI
POSTAG�SUPPLIES:INK CARTRI
010.4101.5201 257.73
Total : 672.79
119148 1/7/2005 003265 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 12/20-4446 DUI CHECKPOINT SUPPLIES
DUI CHECKPOINT SUPPLIES
010.4201.5255 54.92
12/20-4453 POA CHRISTMAS PARTY EXPENS
POA CHRISTMAS PARTY EXPENS
010.4201.5255 30.15 ;
�
�
Page: 18
vchlist Voucher List Page: 19
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
I
IVoucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119148 1/7/2005 003265 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS (Continued)
12/20-6263 NOV EMPLOYEE OF MONTH
NOV EMPLOYEE OF MONTH
010.4201.5504 40.00
CALENDAR
010.4201.5201 10.18
� REGISTRATION CPCA CONF
010.4201.5501 300.00
12/20-6289 FLASHLIGHT MAINTENANCE
FLASHLIGHT MAINTENANCE
010.4201.5603 98.94
PARTS FOR TASER
010.4201.5603 249.15
12/20-6305 SCHEDULING CALENDAR
SCHEDULING CALENDAR
010.4201.5201 14.25
12/20-6313 EARTHLINK CONNECT-RESOURC
EARTHLINK CONNECT-RESOURC
010.4201.5607 21.95
12/20-6347 CHRISTMAS CARDS
CHRISTMAS CARDS
010.4201.5201 125.28
12/20-6354 LODGING FOR CA ROBBERY INV
LODGING FOR CA ROBBERY INV
010.4201.5501 43.60
12/20-6420 REGISTRATtON CPCA CONF
REGISTRATION CPCA CONF
010.4201.5501 300.00
' MEETINGS(STATE BUDGET&KATC
010.4201.5501 102.32
VOLUNTEER CHRISTMAS PARTY
010.4201.5504
762.20
� OVER CREDIT LINE FEE
010.4201.5501 39.00
Page: 19
vchlist Voucher List Page: 20
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119148 1/7/2005 003265 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS (Continued)
12/20-7583 GASOLINE
GASOLINE
010.4201.5608 35.67
K-9 TRAINING EXPENSES
010.4201.5501 388.64
12/22-2611 GASOLINE
GASOLINE
010.4201.5608 25.26
Total : 2,641.51
119149 1/7/2005 000503 POOR RICHARD'S PRESS, INC 74817 COLOR COPIES-WATER ALTERNA
COLOR COPIES-WATER ALTERNA
010.4301.5255 177.31
76971 INVIT./ENVEL.-RUNELS,LUBIN DINP
INVIT./ENVEL.-RUNELS,LUBIN DINP
010.4102.5306 175.24
Total : 352.55
119150 1/7/2005 002792 PULITZER C COAST NEWSPAPERS 118789 TIMES PRESS SUBSCRIPTION
TIMES PRESS SUBSCRIPTION
010.4212.5503 24.00
118791 ONE YEAR MEMBERSHIP 12/05
ONE YEAR MEMBERSHIP 12/05
010.4301.5201 24.00
118793 1 YR SUBSCRIPTION
1 YR SUBSCRIPTION
010.4130.5301 24.00
Total : 72.00
119151 1/7/2005 000520 QUINN COMPANY 30104746 NEW CUTTING EDGE
NEW CUTTING EDGE
220.4303.5603 299.72
Totai : 299.72
119152 1/7/2005 000523 R&T EMBROIDERY, INC 25874 24 HATS W/CITY LOGO
Page: 20
vchlist Voucher List Page: 21
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
i
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119152 1/7/2005 000523 R&T EMBROIDERY, INC (Continued)
24 HATS W/CIN LOGO
010.4420.5143 197.17
25879 12 HATS W/CITY LOGO
12 HATS W/CITY LOGO
010.4213.5143 108.11
Total : 305.28
I119153 1R/2005 002670 RICOH LEASING 05016330154 PAYMENT(01/15/05)CONT#24-35
� PAYMENT(01/15/05)CONT#24-35
I 010.4421.5602 141.25
Total : 141.25
119154 1/7/2005 002838 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC 0015363 PROF.SERV-COURTLAND/GRAND
PROF.SERV-COU RTLAN D/G RAN D
010.0000.2521 1,203.21
FIVE YEAR IMPLEMENT.PLAN UPD
284.4103.5303 8,800.00
Total : 10,003.21
119155 1/7/2005 004729 SAMANIEGO, MICHELLE 010305 REFUND PRE-PAID.CARD/CHILD.
I REFUND PRE-PAID CARD/CHILD.
010.0000.4602 26.25
Total : 26.25
119156 1/7/2005 000570 SAN LUIS POWERHOUSE 17999 REPLACE RELAY IN GENERATOR
REPLACE RELAY IN GENERATOR
010.4201.5603 839.08
� Totai : 839.08
119157 1/7/2005 000575 SANTA MARIA TIRE, INC 526518 FRONT END ALIGNMENT F317
FRONT END ALIGNMENT F317
010.4211.5601 59.95
Total : 59.95
119158 1/7/2005 000479 SBC 12/07-3960 FD SIGNAL CONTROL
Page: 21
I
�
vchlist . Voucher List page: 22
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
�
��I Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119158 1/7/2005 000479 SBC (Continued)
FD SIGNAL CONTROL
010.4211.5403 32.01
I 12/7-7480 271-7480/12/7 TO 1/6/05
I 271-7480/12/7 TO 1/6/05
� 010.4201.5403 65.00
� 12/8-9867 489-9867/12/8 TO 1/7/05
I 489-9867/12/8 TO 1/7/05
010.4201.5403 53.93
�� Total : 150.94
119159 1/7/2005 003108 SBC/MCI 12/11-19�5 473-1935/ALARM
I
473-1935/ALARM
640.4710.5403 2g.g2
T3187597 021-2713/12/1 TO 12/31
021-2713/12/1 TO 12/31
010.4145.5403 289.71
T3237185 473-0379/PAYROLL
473-0379/PAYROLL
010.4145.5403
16.83
T3237190 473-2041/AIARM
473-2041/ALARM
010.4145.5403 14.16
Total : 349.32
119160 1/7/2005 000587 SEBASTIAN OIL DISTRIBUTOR CFN79537 GAS
GAS
010.4211.5608 20.57
CFN79880 GASOLINE 12/1 TO 12/15/04
GASOLINE 12/1 TO 12/15/04
010.4201.5608 gp.g� �'
Total : 81.44 1
119161 1/7/2005 003838 SILVAS OIL COMPANY, INC 288039 PREM.91 GAS/8024 GAL.@$1.81 �
PREM.91 GAS/8024 GAL.@$1.81 �
010.0000.1202 15,631.12
Page: 22
vchlist Voucher List Page: 23 '
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119161 1/7/2005 003838 003838 SILVAS OIL COMPANY, INC (Continued) Total : 15,631.12
119162 1/7/2005 000731 SLO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT 122004 ANIMAL SERV.CONTRACT-OCT-DE
ANIMAL SERV.CONTRACT-OCT-DE
010.4201.5321 13,534.29
Total : 13,534.29
119163 1/7/2005 003343 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 23W12686018 ' TOOLS
TOOLS
i 66.10
010.4211.5273
ITotal : 66.10
119164 1/7/2005 000614 STEFFAN, RANDY 122904 REIMBURSE TRAVEL EXPENSE
REIMBURSE TRAVEL EXPENSE
010.4211.5501 30.54
! Total : 30.54
119165 1/7/2005 000616 STERLING COMMUNICATIONS 19960 SERVICE AGREEMENT-JAN 2005
SERVICE AGREEMENT-JAN 2005
010.4201.5606 974.00
� 19985 VOLUME CONTRAL KNOB
VOLUME CONTRAL KNOB
010.4211.5603 99.74
20007 LABEL AND ESCUTCHEON
I LABEL AND ESCUTCHEON
010.4211.5603 88•68
20015 TWO WIRE SURV.MIC-HT SERIES
TWO WIRE SURV.MIC-HT SERIES
010.4201.5606 214.50
20019 KNOB AND LABEL
KNOB AND LABEL
010.4211.5603 68.47
Total : 1,445.39
119166 1/7/2005 000623 SUNSET NORTH CAR WASH 295 CAR WASHES:POLICE DEPT
Page: 23
vchlist
Voucher List Page' 24
01107/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa I
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119166 1/7/2005 000623 SUNSET NORTH CAR WASH (Continued) CAR WASHES:POLICE DEPT
010.4201.5601 149.09
CAR WASHES:WATER DEPT
640.4712.5601 18.66
CAR WASHES:STREETS
220.4303.5601 18.66
CAR WASHES:PARKS DEPT
j 010.4420.5601 13.55
I CAR WASHES:ENGINEERING DEP
010.4301.5601 18.66
Total : 218.62
119167 1/7/2005 003047 SUPPLY CACHE, INC,THE 53214A MISC.SUPPLIES
MISC.SUPPLIES
� 010.4211.5255 66.05
532146 POUR SPOUT CAP
POUR SPOUT CAR
010.4211.5603 9.00
Total : 75.05
i
E16076 STREAM MAINT. PROJECT
119168 1/7/2005 003457 TENERA ENERGY, LLC STREAM MAINT. PROJECT
220.4303.5303 13,925.00
� E16077 STREAM MAINT.PROJ:2 EXTRA DA
STREAM MAINT.PROJ:2 EXTRA DA
' 220.4303.5303 1,200.00
Total : 15,125.00
119169 1/7/2005 002370 TITAN INDUSTRIAL 1001333 GLOVES
GLOVES
010.4201.5272 128.65
Total : 128.65
119170 1/7/2005 000650 TROESH READY MIX, INC 829�
CONCRETE FOR 653 VICTORIA W
Page: 24
vchlist Voucher List Page: 25
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
iBank code: boa
I
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119170 1/7/2005 000650 TROESH READY MIX, INC (Continued)
CONCRETE FOR 653 VICTORIA W
350.5632.7002 600.76
829�5 CONCRETE FOR 653 VICTORIA W
CONCRETE FOR 653 VICTORIA W
350.5632.7002 482.43
Total : 1,083.19
I119171 1/7/2005 004713 TYE, BARBARA 121704 W/C COMMUNITY CENTER DEPOS
� W/C COMMUNITY CENTER DEPOS
� 010.0000.2206 250.00
W/C COMMUNIN CENTER RENTA
I 010.0000.4355 125.00
Total : 375.00
119172 1/7/2005 000671 UNITED GREEN MARK, INC 3807670-00 SPRINKLERS-HUNTER 140-RG PA
SPRINKLERS-HUNTER 140-RG PA
010.4420.5605 4,207.00
3807720-00 SPRINKLER&VALVE FOR RG PAR
I SPRINKLER&VALVE FOR RG PAR
010.4420.5605 23.39
I Total : 4,230.39
119173 1/7/2005 000666 UNITED RENTALS 45239365 FRESNO/TILT BRACKET
� FRESNO/TILT BRACKET
220.4303.5273 179.99
Total : 179.99
119174 1/7/2005 002137 VERIZON WIRELESS 1909780133 CELL PH:MITCH CHAVEZ(748-49
CELL PH:MITCH CHAVEZ(748-49
010.4430.5605 2g.�2
. 1909828780 ADMIN CELL PH: 11/8 TO 12/07/04
ADMIN CELL PH: 11/8 TO 12/07/04
010.4201.5403 368.17
1909930455 CELL PH:PARKS, REC&FAC(440
CELL PH:PARKS, REC&FAC(440
010.4421.5602 58.62
Page: 25 '
vchlist Voucher List Page: 26
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
I 119174 1/7/2005 002137 VERIZON WIRELESS (Continued)
i 1910133443 CELL PH:PARKS SUPERVISOR
CELL PH:PARKS SUPERVISOR
010.4421.5602 42.61 �
1912420587 MOTORS CELL PH:12/17 TO 1/16
MOTORS CELL PH:12/17 TO 1/16
010.4201.5403 75.20
1914433644 CELL PHONE 459-1757
� CELL PHONE 459-1757
( 010.4301.5403 62.93
CELL PHONE 459-4859
612.4610.5403 62.93
I CELL PHONE 459-5855
010.4305.5403 62.94
Total : 762.12
119175 1/7/2005 002000 VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SVC L5245715EL MONTHLY PAGER: FIRE
MONTHLY PAGER: FIRE
010.4211.5403 17.23
MONTHLY PAGER: BLDG
010.4212.5403 11.20
Total : 28.43
119176 1/7/2005 000685 WALLACE&ASSOCIATES,JOHN L 15389 SERVICES RENDERED 11/1-11/3
� SERVICES RENDERED 11/1-11/3
010.4301.5303 5,251.69
SERVICES RENDERED 11/1-11/3
226.4306.5303 1,040.00
SERVICES RENDERED 11/1-11/3 �
010.4301.5303 2,107.81
SERVICES RENDERED 11/1-11/3
010.4130.5303 50.00
15390 SERVICES RENDERED 11/01-11/
SERVICES RENDERED 11/01-11/
350.5608.7701 330.00
Page: 26
vchiist VouCher List Page: 27
01/07/2005 2:15:33PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
I 119176 1/7/2005 000685 WALLACE&ASSOCIATES,JOHN L (Continued)
15391 SERVICES RENDERED 11/1 -11/3
SERVICES RENDERED 11/1 -11/3
350.5809.7501 5,845.69
Total : 14,625.19
89 Vouchers for bank code: boa Bank total : 199,257.54
89 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 199,257.54
I
I
I
I
Page: 27
__ _ __ _ _ . ..
__� . �...y,.,�, _.. �..,
ATTACHMENT 3 ��� -:.� " �� �
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
DEPARTMENTAL LABOR DISTRIBUTION
PAY PERIOD
12/17/04-12/30/04
01/07i05
FUND 010 337,497.19 Salaries Fuil time 144,584.46
FUND 220 17,180.54 Salaries Part-Time- PPT 21,338.90
FUND 284 1,442.11 Salaries Part-Time-TPT 6,881.06
FUND 612 5,898.17 Salaries OverTime 10,481.67
FUND 640 14,453.70 Salaries Standby 422.42
376,471.71 Holiday Pay 40,007.37
Sick Pay 4,997.99
Annual Leave Buyback -
Vacation Buyback _
Sick Leave Buyback _
Vacation Pay 15,974.30
Comp Pay 4,831.98
Annual Leave Pay 5,779.69 '
PERS Retirement 55,317.45 '
Social Security 18,307.74
PARS Retirement 302.59
State Disability Ins. 1,020.42
Deferred Compensation 725.00
Health Insurance 38,328.01
Dental Insurance 4,439.26
Vision Insurance 986.62
Life Insurance 719,78 '
Long Term Disability _ i
Uniform Allowance _ j
Car Allowance 875.00
Councit Expense _ �
Employee Assistance -
Boot Allowance _
Motor Pay 150.00
376,471.71
ATTACHMENT 4
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
01/11/2005 4:51:02PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
118965 12/22/2004 003175 AQUA-METRIC SALES CO 6112-IN COMPOUND METER CHAMBERS
COMPOUND METER CHAMBERS
640.4712.5207 1,076.70
Total : 1,076.70
118966 12/22/2004 003175 AQUA-METRIC SALES CO 6141-IN 5/8"x 3/4"METERS,2"C METER(R
5/8"x 3/4"METERS,2"C METER(R
640.4712.5207 9,781.67
Total : 9,781.67
118967 12/22/2004 003175 AQUA-METRIC SALES CO 6168-IN COMPOUND TOUCH READ REGI
COMPOUND TOUCH READ REGI
640.4712.5611 349.85
Total : 349.85
3 Vouchers for bank code: boa Bank total : 11,208.22
3 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 11,208.22
�
Page: �
E __ _____ _
ATTACHMENT 5
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
01/14/2005 8:56:18AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
' Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119177 1/10/2005 000822 US POSTMASTER 010705 POSTAGE FOR CITY NEWSLETTE
POSTAGE FOR CITY NEWSLETTE
010.4002.5504 938.76
� Total : 938.76
� 119178 1/11/2005 004730 SCHAFF, PHILIP 011105 TAXI CARD REFUND#2565Ā
TAXI CARD REFUND#2565Ā
225.0000.4777 80.00
� Total : 80.00
119179 1/11/2005 004731 GUTHRIE,JAMES 011105 REIMB.MILEAGE&MEALS/LOCC C
REIMB.MILEAGE&MEALS/LOCC C
010.4001.5501 352.50
' Total : 352.50
119180 1/14/2005 000008 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES, INC 69644 HELMET/SHIELD/BAG (EGGERS)
HELMET/SHIELD/BAG (EGGERS)
010.4201.5272 283.74
Total : 283.74
119181 1/14/2005 000034 APEX SHARPENING WORKS 25010 CASE&BLADES TO REPAIR HEDG
CASE&BLADES TO REPAIR HEDG
I
010.4420.5603 110.96
Totai : 110.96
119182 1/14/2005 000065 BARROW, BRENDA 011005 REIMBURSE PLAYGROUND SUPPL
REIMBURSE PLAYGROUND SUPPL
010.4422.5256 70.69
i Total : 70.69
119183 1/14/2005 000078 BLUEPRINT EXPRESS 27018 COPIES OF PLANS:TRACT 2616
COPIES OF PLANS:TRACT 2616
010.4301.5255 18.05
Total : 18.05
119184 1/14/2005 001917 BOB'S EXPRESS WASH 123104 CAR WASH(11 IN DEC'04)
Page: 1
vchlist Voucher List Page: 2
01/14/2005 8:56:18AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa �
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
I 119184 1/14/2005 001917 BOB'S EXPRESS WASH (Continued)
CAR WASH(11 IN DEC'04)
010.4201.5601 77.00
Total : 77.00
119185 1/14/2005 003453 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC 50026293 EMS SUPPLIES
EMS SUPPLIES
010.4211.5206 683.65
� 50026894 EMS SUPPLIES
� EMS SUPPLIES
� 010.4211.5206 684.17
Total : 1,367.82
119186 1/14/2005 000084 BOXX EXPRESS,THE 1023 UPS SHIPPING CHARGES(DOJ LA
UPS SHIPPING CHARGES(DOJ LA
010.4201.5201 7.63
1024 UPS SHIPPING CHARGES(DOJ LA
UPS SHIPPING CHARGES(DOJ LA
010.4201.5201 7.63
1025 UPS SHIPPING(STREAMLIGHT)
UPS SHIPPING(STREAMLIGHT)
010.4201.5201 8.43
1026 UPS SHIPPING CHARGES
UPS SHIPPING CHARGES
I 010.4211.5201 8.43
1027 UPS SHIPPING CHARGES
UPS SHIPPING CHARGES
010.4211.5201 7.40
1028 UPS SHIPPING CHARGES
i UPS SHIPPING CHARGES
640.4710.5303 24.26
1029 UPS SHIPPING CHARGES
UPS SHIPPING CHARGES
640.4710.5303 12.13
Total : 75.91
Page: 2
i ,
vchlist Voucher List
01/14/2005 8:56:18AM Page: 3
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119187 1/14/2005 000123 CA ST BOARD OF EQUALIZATION DG MT 57-425096
DIESEL FUEL TAX QTR 2:04/05
DIESEL FUEL TAX QTR 2:04/05
� 010.0000.1202 507.67
Total : 507.67
119188 1/14/2005 000603 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 148-085303 DISC PAD B 408
DISC PAD B 408
010.4212.5601 42.11
148-086191 SPARK PLUG
SPARK PLUG
010.4211.5603 �72
Total : 49.83
119189 1/14/2005 003539 CEN-SAN, INC 57944 UST FUEL TANK COVERS
UST FUEL TANK COVERS
010.4305.5603 171.60
Total : 171.60
119190 1/14/2005 000163 CHERRY LANE NURSERY 12104 SOIL BUSTER
SOIL BUSTER
010.4420.5274 428.57
12197 FERTILIZER-RG PARK
FERTILIZER-RG PARK
010.4420.5274 471.47
�222� REPLAC.PLANTS FOR PARK&RI
REPLAC.PLANTS FOR PARK&RI
220.4303.5613 197.84
12253 MIX&MULCH:1080 ROBIN CIRCLE
MIX&MULCH:1080 ROBIN CIRCLE
220.4303.5613 25 27
�22�$ PLANTS-POLICE STATION
PLANTS-POLICE STATION
010.4420.5605 2�$4
12304 PLANTS AND FLOWER FOOD
PLANTS AND FLOWER FOOD �
�
010.4420.5605 98 44 !
!
Page: 3 �
vchlist Voucher List Page: 4
01/14/2005 8:56:18AM CtTY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code : boa
i
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
' 119190 1/14/2005 000163 CHERRY LANE NURSERY (Continued)
12419 FERTILIZER FOR SPORTS COMPLE
FERTILIZER FOR SPORTS COMPLE
010.4430.5274 110.25
12443 ROOT PANELS:579 HALCYON
ROOT PANELS:579 HALCYON
220.4303.5613 162.91
ITotal : 1,522.59
119191 1/14/2005 004440 CHOICEPOINT BUSINESS& AB0001111837 AUTO TRACK XP DEC 2004
I
1 AUTO TRACK XP DEC 2004
010.4201.5303 150.00
Total: 150.00
119192 1/14/2005 000196 CUESTA EQUIPMENT CO 297948 3/8"DR RATCHET
3/8"DR RATCHET
010.4420.5273 40.74
Total : 40J4
119193 1/14/2005 000198 CURTIS&SONS, L N 1067426 BOOTS&MISC. CLOTHING
BOOTS&MISC. CLOTHING
� 010.4211.5272 2,259.22
1067429 VALVE&DEBRIS CARRIER
VALVE&DEBRIS CARRIER
010.4211.5255 718.58
1068259 BALL VALVE
BALL VALVE
010.4211.5255 503.70
Total : 3,481.50
119194 1/14/2005 000199 CUTTERS EDGE 122804-5 REPAIR KITS FOR BULLET CHAW
REPAIR KITS FOR BULLET CHAW
010.4211.5603 179.90
Total : 179.90
119195 1/14/2005 000577 DE LOS SANTOS, LENNY 011005 TENNIS CLASSES-DE LOS SAN
Page: 4 i
_ _ I
vchlist Voucher List Page: 5
01/14/2005 8:56:18AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code : boa
' Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119195 1/14/2005 000577 DE LOS SANTOS, LENNY (Continued)
TENNIS CLASSES-DE LOS SAN
010.4424.5351 334.60
Total : 334.60
119196 1/14/2005 000210 DIESELRO OF SLO, INC 14145 SERVICE TO PW32
SERVICE TO PW32
i 640.4712.5601 538.62
Total : 538.62
,I 119197 1/14/2005 000240 FARM SUPPLY CO 533694 MATERIAL FOR DRIP SYSTEM
MATERIAL FOR DRIP SYSTEM
� 220.4303.5613 99.87
534095 BEST FERTILIZER TABLETS
BEST FERTILIZER TABLETS
010.4420.5274 32.16
Total : 132.03
119198 1/14/2005 001803 FORD QUALITY FLEET GSL401731 REPAIR TO PW44-F250
REPAIR TO PW44-F250
612.4610.5601 452.71
I� GSM400243 981 SERVICE
981 SERVICE
010.4201.5601 129.05
Total : 581.76
119199 1/14/2005 000499 GRAND AWARDS, INC 12312 BRONZE PLAQUE(SHARON CONN
BRONZE PLAQUE(SHARON CONN
010.4421.5255 127.20
12353 PLAQUES(LUBIN& RUNELS)
PLAQUES(LUBIN&RUNELS)
010.4201.5255 210.32 '
DISCOUNT
010.4201.5255 _4.2� �
Total : 333.31 �
1192�0 1/14/2005 004737 HERNANDEZ, MELISSA 010305 METER DEPOSIT �
Page: 5
vchlist Voucher List Page: 6
01/14/2005 8:56:18AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119200 1/14/2005 004737 HERNANDEZ, MELISSA (Continued)
METER DEPOSIT
640.0000.2302 180.00
CLOSING BILL-SEWER
612.0000.1110 -13.63
CLOSING BILL-WATER
640.0000.1110 _37.79
� CLOSING BILL-LOPEZ
641.0000.1110 -11.64
I� CLOSING BILL-SANITARY DIST �
760.0000.1110 _7.78
Total : 109.16
119201 1/14/2005 000311 HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS 0010157-IN SALES TAX-CONTRACT SVCS
SALES TAX-CONTRACT SVCS
010.4120.5303 975.00
SALES TAX-AUDIT SVCS
010.4120.5303 2,021.46
Total : 2,996.46
i119202 1/14/2005 000330 INFORMATION TECH DEPT 3986 DAS SERVICES-WEEKS 43&44
DAS SERVICES-WEEKS 43&44
010.4140.5303 3,863.52
Total : 3,863.52
119203 1/14/2005 000345 J J'S FOOD COMPANY, INC 151534 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES
DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES
010.4212.5255 5.gg
Total : 5.98
119204 1/14/2005 004733 MACMILLAN, DOUG 011105 SOCCER PRACTICE:RAIN OUT 12
SOCCER PRACTICE:RAIN OUT 12
010.0000.4354 92.50
Total : 92.50
119205 1/14/2005 000419 MIDAS MUFFLER& BRAKE 0009213 REMOVE&REPL.ALTERNATOR P
Page: 6
i
vchlist Voucher List Page: 7
01114/2005 8:56:18AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119205 1/14/2005 000419 MIDAS MUFFLER&BRAKE (Continued)
REMOVE&REPL.ALTERNATOR P
010.4301.5601 358.67
Total : 358.67
119206 1/14/2005 004732 MILLER, MICHELLE 010305 REFUND-CHILDREN IN MOTION
REFUND-CHILDREN IN MOTION
010.0000.4602 26.25
Total : 26.25
I COVER GRILL;STRAPS;GROMMET
I 119207 1/14/2005 000429 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC 3288
COVER GRILL;STRAPS;GROMMET
010.4201.5603 51.42
5650 MISC. SHOP SUPPLIES
MISC. SHOP SUPPUES
010.4212.5601 48.65
5710 MISC. SUPPLIES
MISC. SUPPLIES
010.4211.5206 17.24
6267 SUPPLIES-BACK BOARD F107
SUPPLIES-BACK BOARD F107
010.4211.5206 7•8�
6345 PAINT&ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
PAINT&ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
010.4211.5601 12.11
6502 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
010.4420.5605 9�83
' 6530 SPRAY
SPRAY
010.4213.5604 4•$2
6651 TOOLS
TOOLS
010.4420.5273 15.73
Page: 7
I
vChlist VOUCher�ISt Page: 8
01/14/2005 8:56:18AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
I
IVoucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119207 1/14/2005 000429 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC (Continued)
6662 SEALNT;TOWELS;CAULK
SEALNT;TOWELS;CAULK
010.4213.5604 15.52
6680 TOOL HOG;RING SHOAT
TOOL HOG;RING SHOAT
640.4712.5601 12.31
6867 SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
010.4420.5605 56.80
7420 NUTSETTER;HOLE PUNCH;SOCKE
NUTSETTER;HOLE PUNCH;SOCKE
010.4420.5273 32.49
Total : 284.73
119208 1/14/2005 000439 MOSS, LEVY& HARTZHEIM 6150 AUDIT SERVICES
AUDIT SERVICES
010.4120.5303 3,000.00
Total : 3,000.00
119209 1/14/2005 004734 NOWDOCS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 24630 OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
010.4120.5201 ' 22.4g
Total : 22.48
119210 1/14/2005 000468 OFFICE DEPOT 267525933-002 OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
010.4130.5201 5.63
269426444-001 OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
010.4130.5201 74.39
269426444-002 OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
010.4130.5201 26.02
Total : 106.04
119211 1/14/2005 001886 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN 2198J349 OFFICE SUPPLIES
Page: 8
vchlist Voucher List
01/14/2005 8:56:18AM Page: 9
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119211 1/14/2005 001886 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN (Continued)
OFFICE SUPPUES
010.4201.5201 46.60
Total : 46.60
119212 1/14/2005 000481 PACIFIC GAS& ELECTRIC CO 8532998718-5 ELECTRIC
ELECTRIC
010.4304.5402 995.92
ELECTRIC
640.4712.5402 343.11
ELECTRIC
640.4711.5402 5,724.66
ELECTRIC
612.4610.5402 980.91
ELECTRIC
010.4145.5401 7,234.15
ELECTRIC
217.4460.5355 16.03
Total : 15,294.78
119213 1/14/2005 003027 PAPICH CONSTRUCTION CNTRCT PW2003-07
RES. N0.1 REPLACEMENT PROJE(
RES. N0.1 REPLACEMENT PROJEC
350.5905.7001 69,584.11
Total : 69,584.11
119214 1/14/2005 002792 PULITZER C COAST NEWSPAPERS 178969
NOTICE OF PH-ACUP 04-001 WELL
NOTICE OF PH-ACUP 04-001 WELL
010.4002.5301 50.40
178972 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE-DCA 0
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE-DCA 0
010.4002.5301 50.40
178974 SUMMARY OF ORD-MC TITLES 5-9
SUMMARY OF ORD-MC TITLES 5-9
010.4002.5301 31.50
Page: g
vchlist Voucher List ' Page: 10
01114/2005 8:56:18AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119214 1/14/2005 002792 PULITZER C COAST NEWSPAPERS (Continued)
179957 SUMMARY OF ORD-557 DCA 03-
SUMMARY OF ORD-557 DCA 03-
010.4002.5301 55.20
179958 SUMMARY OF ORD-556 MC TITL
SUMMARY OF ORD-556 MC TITL
010.4002.5301 37.95
180944 NOTICE OF PH-APPEAL OF CUP 0
NOTICE OF PH-APPEAL OF CUP 0
010.4002.5301 48.30
180945 NOTICE OF PH-EXTENDING URG 0
NOTICE OF PH-EXTENDING URG 0
010.4002.5301 62.10
� 180946 ORD.559-SOLICITATION
ORD.559-SOLICITATION
010.4002.5301 96.60
180947 SUMMARY OF INTERIM URGENCY
SUMMARY OF INTERIM URGENCY
010.4002.5301 48.30
184595 NOTICE OF PH APPEAL VSR 04-0
NOTICE OF PH APPEAL VSR 04-0
010.4002.5301 55.20
184596 NOTICE OF PH-2005CDBG PRELIM
NOTICE OF PH-2005CDBG PRELIM
010.4002.5301 62.10
184672 NOTICE OF PH-RDA IMPLEMENT.
NOTICE OF PH-RDA IMPLEMENT.
010.4002.5301 499.50
Total : 1,097.55
119215 1/14/2005 000520 QUINN COMPANY 03C187788A FLASHER PW38
FLASHER PW38
220.4303.5603 71.66
03C190292 LAMP/BULB PW38
LAMP/BULB PW38
220.4303.5603 25.09
Page: 10
_ ___
vchlist Voucher List
01/14/2005 8:56:18AM Page: 11
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
I Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119215 1/14/2005 000520 000520 QUINN COMPANY (Continued)
Total : 96.75
119216 1/14/2005 000523 R&T EMBROIDERY, INC 25978 PUBLIC WORK HATS
PUBLIC WORK HATS
612.4610.5143 3g.7�
PUBLIC WORK HATS
640.4712.5143 gg.��
PUBLIC WORK HATS
i220.4303.5143 138.48
Total : 276.96
I 119217 1/14/2005 003363 RIPPY, NINA 011005 BALLET-JAZZ FOR KIDS(JAN 2005)
� BALLET-JAZZ FOR KIDS(JAN 2005)
010.4424.5351 602.00
Total : 602.00
119218 1/14/2005 003031 ROBERTSON SUPPLY 5187 GATORADE FOR CREWS
GATORADE FOR CREWS
220.4303.5255 115.00
5188 GLOVES
GLOVES
220.4303.5255 42.90
I Total : 157.90
119219 1/14/2005 000533 ROBINSON, RANDY 122904 REIMB.COMM.DRIV.LIC($34 LESS$
REIMB.COMM.DRIV.LIC($34 LESS$
220.4303.5303 10.00
Total : 10.00
119220 1/14/2005 000803 SAN LUIS MAILING SVC 28516 UTILITY BILLING MAILING 12/30/04
UTILITY BILLING MAILING 12/30/04
010.4120.5201 910.07
Total : 910.07
119221 1/14/2005 000569 SAN LUIS PAINTS 417753 PAINT FOR SOCCER FIELDS
PAINT FOR SOCCER FIELDS
010.4430.5255 111.50 1
Page: 11
vchlist VouCher List Page: 12
01114/2005 8:56:18AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
li Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119221 1/14/2005 000569 000569 SAN LUIS PAINTS (Continued) Total : 111.50
119222 1/14/2005 003108 SBC/MCI T3213704 267-8633: 12/7 TO 1/10/05
267-8633: 12/7 TO 1/10/05
010.4145.5403 89.44
T3228500 489-2174: 12/1 TO 1/7l05
489-2174: 12/1 TO 1/7/05
010.4201.5403 29.44
T3237191 473-2198: 12/1 TO 1/10/05
� 473-2198: 12/1 TO 1/10/05
! 010.4145.5403 37.15
( T3237198 473-5400-CITY HALL
473-5400-CITY HALL
010.4145.5403 1,667.89
T3237206 481-6944: 12/1 TO 1/10/05
481-6944: 12/1 TO 1/10/05
010.4201.5403 124.21
' Total : 1,948.13
119223 1/14/2005 000587 SEBASTIAN OIL DISTRIBUTOR CFN79947 GAS
� GAS
'� 010.4211.5608 16.98
CFN80287 GASOLINE 12/16 TO 12/30/04
GASOLINE 12/16 TO 12/30/04
010.4201.5608 51.62
Total : 68.60
119224 1/14/2005 004735 SILBERT, DEIDRE 010305 METER DEPOSIT
�
'
Page: 12
'
vchlist Voucher List Page: 13
01/14/2005 8:56:18AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119224 1/14/2005 004735 SILBERT, DEIDRE (Continued)
METER DEPOSIT
640.0000.2302 180.00
CLOSING BILL-SEWER
612.0000.1110 -13.39
CLOSING BILL-WATER
640.0000.1110 -36.92
I CLOSING BILL-LOPEZ
640.0000.1110 -53.43
�� CLOSING BILL-SANITARY DIST
760.0000.1110 -16.90
� To�� : 59.36
119225 1/14/2005 000556 SLO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL IN0035929 ANNUAL PERMIT FEE
ANNUAL PERMIT FEE
010.4305.5303 727.00
Total : 727.00
119226 1/14/2005 000564 SLO COUNTY NEWSPAPERS 565015 HOLIDAY SAFETY MESSAGE
HOLIDAY SAFETY MESSAGE
010.4211.5504 90.00
Total : 90.00
119227 1/14/2005 004393 SP MAINTENANCE SERVICES, INC 9411 STREET SWEEPING FOR DEC 20
STREET SWEEPING FOR DEC 20
010.4303.5303 3,731.42
STREET SWEEPING FOR DEC 20
220.4303.5303 2,385.66
Total : 6,117.08
119228 1/14/2005 000616 STERLING COMMUNICATIONS 19608 SERVICE AGREEMENT: OCT 2004 '
SERVICE AGREEMENT: OCT 2004 �
010.4201.5606 974.00
20026 RADIO REPAIR �
RADIO REPAIR �
010.4211.5603 95.00 �
Page: 13
vchlist
01/14/2005 8:56:18AM Voucher List
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE Pa9e� 14
Bank code: boa
Voucher D�_ Vendor
119228 1/14/2005 000616 STERLING COMMUNICATIONS �n�oice PO#
Description/Account
(Continued) Amount
20039
SERVICE AGREEMENT:JAN 2005
SERVICE AGREEMENT:JAN 2005
010.4201.5606
119229 1/14/2005 000624 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIERS, INC 974.00
31679
Total : 2,043.00
� COPY MACHINE MAINT.AGREEME
COPY MACHINE MAINT.AGREEME
� 010.4212.5602
119230 1/14/2005 000646 TRANS-KING TRANSMISSIONS, INC 208858 229.41
� Total: 229.41
I TRANSMISSION SERVICE:F312
� TRANSMISSION SERVICE:F312
208861 010.4211.5601
TRANSMISSION SERVICE:F317 101.37
TRANSMISSION SERVICE:F317
010.4211.5601
119231 1/14/2005 000660 USA BLUE BOOK 101.37
909453 Total : 202J4
SEWER MANHOLE INFLOW SHIE
SEWER MANHOLE INFLOW SHIE
612.4610.5610
SALES AND USE TAX 2�2.30
612.00002014
119232 1/14/2005 000678 VALLEY AUTO SERVICE -13.21
12952 TO�� � 199.09
TIRE REPAIR 6408
TIRE REPAIR 6408 �
010.4212.5601 �
119233 1/14/2005 004736 VANGUARD VAULTS 20.00
Total : 20.00 �
5692 �
OFF-SITE STORAGE CHARGES
OFF-SITE STORAGE CHARGES �
�
010.4002.5303 �
119234 1/14/2005 002137 VERIZON WIRELESS 60.00
1914186643 T��� � 60.00
CELL PHONE ST.SUPERVISOR �
Page: 14
i
I vchlist VouCher List Page: 15
01/14/2005 8:56:18AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119234 1/14/2005 002137 VERIZON WIRELESS (Continued)
I ENGINEERING
� 010.4301.5403 41.49
PW INSPECTOR
010.4301.5403 41.49
CELL PHONE ST.SUPERVISOR
220.4303.5403 41.50
Total : 124.48
119235 1/14/2005 004097 WELLS FARGO BANK NATL ASSN 011105 DEBT SVC-FIRE STATION GO BON
DEBT SVGFIRE STATION GO BON
470.4850.5802 34,640.00
Total : 34,640.00
119236 1/14/2005 000689 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 807988779 CA CODES ON CD-ROM
CA CODES ON CD-ROM
010.4003.5503 163.58
Total : 7 63.58
119237 1/14/2005 000699 WILSON ELECTRIC COMPANY, LEE 450 RELOCATE TRAFFIC CONTROLLE
RELOCATE TRAFFIC CONTROLLE
350.5812.7001 20,175.00
Totai : 20,175.00
67 Vouchers for bank code : boa Bank total : 177,321.06
61 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 177,321.06
�
Page: 15
8.6.
o� pRROY�c
�
� INCORPORATED �Z MEMORANDUM �
� v
m
# ru�v �o. �ei� ,F
c4��FORN�P
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ANGELA PILLOW, DIRECTOR OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF CASH FLOW ANALYSIS
AND APPROVAL OF INTERFUND ADVANCE FROM THE WATER AND
WATER FACILITY FUND
DATE: JANUARY 25, 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council:
• Accept the December 2004 cash report,
• Approve the interfund advance of $1,526,660 from the Water and Water
Facility Fund to cover cash deficits in other funds as of December 31, 2004.
FUNDING: '
No outside funding is required.
DISCUSSION:
Revenues in individual funds are earned in uneven amounts during each month of the
year; however, expenses in these funds are paid out in fairly consistent amounts.
These differences cause some funds to have temporary cash deficits while waiting for
revenues to equal expenses.
For investment purposes, the City pools cash in individual funds into one bank account.
Since the City pools the cash of all funds, individual fund shortages are not readily
apparent. However, in reality, funds with excess cash are `�nancing" the shortages in '
other funds until revenues equal expenses. This report is prepared to present to the
City Council individual fund shortages and the funds financing those shortages. By
year-end, all funds are expected to have positive cash balances.
i
ALTERNATIVES: ;
The following alternatives are provided for City Council consideration: i
i
- Approve staff recommendation and accept the report; !
- Do not approve staff recommendation and decline the report;
- Modify as appropriate and approve staff s recommendation;
- Provide direction to staff.
Attachment:
A— Cash Balance/Interfund Advance Report
_ __.�.....�.w ...,.�,._...,...�r-.�..�...
ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
CASH BALANCE/INTERFUND ADVANCE REPORT
At December 31,2004
Balance at Recommended Revised
Fund
O10 General Fund Advances Balance
1,510,465 1,510,465
210 Fire Protection Impact Fees 286,912
211 Public Access Television 286,912
27,769 27,769
212 Police Protection Impact Fees 55,464
213 Park Development 55,464
510,545 510,545
214 Park Improvement 274,768
215 Recreation Community Center 274,768
18,059 18,059
217 Landscape Maintenance 33,484
220 Street(Gas Tax)Fund 33,484
9,607 9,607
221 Traffic Congestion Relief 38,701
222 Traffic Signalization 38,701
593,990 593,990
223 Traffic Circulation 335,824
224 Transportation Facility Impact 2 137 980 335,824
225 Transportation ' ' 2,137,980
11,575 11,575
226 Water Neutralization Impact 898 935
230 Construction Taac ' 898,935
62,676 62,676
231 Drainage Facility 42,763
232 In-Lieu Affordable Housing 891 215 42,763
241 Lopez Facility Fund ' 891,215
1,248,975 1,248,975
250 CDBG Fund 18,098
260 Federal Fire Act Grant 18,098
33,000 33,000
271 State COPS Block Grant Fund 52,439
272 Calif.Law Enf.Technology Grant �259 52,439
279 00-01 Fed Local Law Enforcement Grant � � �'259 �
1 1
284 Redevelopment Agency (139,928) 139 928 `
285 Redevelopment Set Aside ' � (
94,571 94,571
350 Capital Projects (1,372,473) 1,372,473
355 Abatement Proceedings 4
(7,000) 7 000 �
470 Fire Station G.O.Bond Debt Svc 123,459 �
612 Sewer Fund 123,459
122,991 122,991
634 Sewer Facility 185,337
640 Water Fund 185,337
641 Lo ez 2,714,713 (332,892) 2,381,821
p 157,830 157,830
642 Water Facility 1,193,768
751 DowntownParking (1,193,768) �
31,145 31,145
760 Sanitation District Fund 99,400
99,400
Total City Wide Cash 12,289,800
0 12,289,800
THE ABOVE LISTING ARE THE CASH BALANCES SHOWN IN THE GENERAL LEDGER
OF TH CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AS OF DECEMBER 31,2004.
.
la low
Director of Financial Services
8.c.
o� PRROyoc
� INCORPORATE Z
� v
m
* .�,�Y ,o. ,9„ ,� MEMORANDUM
c4��FORN�P
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ANGELA PILLOW, DIRECTOR OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
BY: FRANCES R. HEAD, ACCOUNTING SUPERVIS
SUBJECT: STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT DEPOSITS
DATE: JANUARY 25, 2005
Attached please find a report listing the current investment deposits of the City of Arroyo i
Grande, as of December 31, 2004, as required by Government Code Section 53646 (b).
E
�
i
�
�
r
I
I
e
. €
s
�
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
MONTHLY Il�TVESTMENT REPORT
r�d o�Dece.�r6a� 3l. 2AG�4
January 25, 2005
This report presents the City's investments as of December 31, 2004. It includes all
investments managed by the City, the investment institution, type of investment,
maturity date, and rate of interest. As of December 31, 2004, the investment portfolio
was in compliance with all State laws and the City's investment policy.
Current Investments:
The City is currently investing all short-term excess cash in the Local Agency
Investment Fund (LAIF) administered by the State Treasurer. This is a very high
quality investment in terms of safety, liquidity, and yield. The City may readily
transfer the LAIF funds to the City's checking account when funds are needed. At this
time, the City does not hold any other investments. The following is a comparison of
investments based on book values as of December 31, 2004, compared with the prior
month and the prior year.
LAIF INVESTMENT CURRENT PRIOR MONTH PRIOR YEAR
Date: December, 2004 November, 2004 December, 2003
Amount: $ 11,900,000 $ 11,700,000 $ 11,800,000
Interest Rate: 2.13% 2.00% 1.57%
8.d.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIVREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TUESDAY, JANUARY 11, 2005
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 215 EAST BRANCH STREET
ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA
1. CALL TO ORDER
MayodChair Ferrara called the Regular City CounciVRedevelopment Agency meeting to order at
7:00 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
City CounciVRDA: CounciUBoard Members Dickens, Guthrie, Arnold, Mayor Pro Tem/Vice
Chair Costello and Mayor/Chair Ferrara were present.
City Staff Present: City Manager Adams, City Attorney Carmel, City Clerk Wetmore, Director
of Public Works/City Engineer Spagnolo, Director of Financial Services
Pillow, Director of Building and Fire Fibich, and Community Development
Director Strong.
3. FLAG SAWTE i
Charles Howell, Sr. Vice Commander, and Aimee Clayton, Auxiliary President, representing
VFVV 2829, led the Flag Salute.
4. INVOCATION '
Pastor George Lepper, Peace Lutheran Church, delivered the invocation.
5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
None.
6. AGENDA REVIEW
�
i
6.a. Resolutlons and Ordinances Read in Title Only. �
Mayor Pro Tem Costello moved� Council Member Dickens seconded, and the motion passed I
unanimously that all resolutions and ordinances presented at the meeting shall be re�d in titte �
only and all further reading be waived. ;
7. CITIZENS' INPUT. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS
None.
8. CONSENT AGENDA
Council Member Arnold requested that Item 8.d. be pulled.
Mayor Ferrara requested that Item 8.b. be pulled.
Mayor Pro Tem Costello moved, and Council Member Arnold seconded the motion to approve
Consent Agenda Items 8.a. through 8.1., with the exception of Items 8.b. and 8.d., with the
recommended courses of action. The motion camed on the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Costello, Amold, Dickens, Guthrie, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
JANUARY 11, 2005
PAGE 2
8.a. Cash Disbursement Ratification.
Action: Ratified the listing of cash disbursements for the period December 1, 2004
through December 31, 2004.
8.c. Consideration of Annual Adjustment of Sewer Connection Fees.
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 3805 approving the annual adjustment to the sewer
connection fees based on changes in the Engineering News Record (ENR) Construction
Cost Index.
8.e. Consideration of Rejection of Claim Against City—S. Autry.
Action: Rejected claim.
8.f. Consideration of Modification to the Procedure for Selection of the Mayor Pro Tem.
Action: Approved the proposed addition to the procedure for selection of the Mayor Pro
Tem.
8.g. Consideration of Council Appointment to Planning Commission.
Action: Approved the recommendation of Council Member Guthrie to appoint Chuck
Fellows to the Planning Commission.
8.h. Consideration of Acceptance of the Office of Traffic Safety Grant
Action: Accepted the Office of Traffic Safety Grant in the amount of$250,000.
8.i. Consideration of a Resolution Consenting to the Assi�nment of a Communications
glte Lease Agreement from Cin�ular Wireless to T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 3806 consenting to the assignment of a
Co�nmunications Site Lease Agreement dated January 14, 2004, from Cingular Wireless
to T-Mobile USA� Inc.
g.j. Consideration of Award of Contract to Lee Wilson Electric Company for
Construction of the Creekside Path, Phase III Lighting Project, PW 2004-03•
AcUon: 1) Awarded a contract for the construction of the Creekside Path, Phase I II
Ughting Project� PW 2004-03 to Lee Wilson Electric Company in the amount of $20,676;
2) Authorized the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
of $2�068 for use only if needed for unanticipated costs during the construction phase of
the project; 3) Transferred $10,000 from the Downtown Parking Fund and $10,000 from
the General Fund to the project account; and 4) Directed staff to proceed with fundraising
efforts for Phase II of the°Let There Be LighY' Program, seeking $3,500 per light to install
historic decorative lights along E. Branch Street and committing to budget $500 per light
in City funds for installation.
8.k. Consideration to Approve an Interagency Agreement with the South San Luis
pbispo County Sanitation District for the Administration of the Wa�te Discharge
Requirements Imposed by the Regional Water�uality Control Boerd.
Action: 1) Approved Agreement authorizing the South San Luis Obispo Sanitation
District to administer the development of a monitoring and reporting program as well as to
prepare the annual reports to the Regional Water Quality Control Board on behalf of the
City of Arroyo Grande; and 2)Authorized the Ciry Manager to execute the Agreement.
g.1. Consideratlon to Approve a Consultant Services Ayreement with Wood Rodgers,
Inc. to Prepare a Project Approval and Environmental Determination (PA&ED) for
the Brisco Road-Halcyon Road/Route 101 Interchanye.
Action: 1) Approved consultant services agreement with Wood Rodgers, Inc. to prepare
a Project Approval and Environmental Determination (PA&ED) for the Brisco Road-
Halcyon Road/Route 101 Interchange in the amount of $370,925; 2) Authorized the
Mayor to execute the agreement; and 3) Appropriated $65,925 from the Transportation
Facility Fund.
CITY COUNCIVREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
JANUARY 11, 2005
PAGE 3
8.b. Statement of Investment Deposits.
Recommended Action: Receive and file the report of current investment deposits as of
November 30, 2004.
In response to a request by Mayor Ferrara, staff was directed to research options other than the
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) fo� the City's investments to determine if the City can
obtain a higher interest rate with comparable security.
8.d. Consideration of Approval of Minutes.
Recommended /�tion: Approve the minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of
November 23, 2004; Special City Council Meetings of December 6, 2004 and December
14, 2004; and the Regular City CounciVRedevelopment Agency Meeting of December 14,
as submitted.
Council Member Arnold referred to the City Council minutes of November 23, 2004 and stated
that he was not on the Council at that time so he would like to abstain from voting on the minutes
for that meeting. It was noted that Council Member Guthrie would also abstain from voting on the
November 23, 2004 City Council minutes.
Mayor Pro Tem Costello moved, and Council Member Dickens seconded the motion to approve
Consent Agenda Items 8.b. and 8.d. as recommended (with Council Member Arnold and Council
Member Guthrie abstaining on the Novembe� 23, 2004 minutes only in Item 8.d.). The motion
carried on the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Costello, Dickens, Arnold, Guthrie, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
9. PUBUC HEARINGS
None.
10. CONTINUED BUSINESS
None.
4
�
11. NEW BUSINESS �
11.a. Consideration to Acce t the U �
p pdated City Trafflc Model.
Director of Public Works Spagnolo presented the staff report and then introduced Marty Inouye
from Omr�i-Means Engineers-Planners.
Marty Inouye, Principal, Omni-Means Engineers-Planners, presented the traffic model update
which included information regarding existing daily traffic conditions within the City; evaluating
existing roadway segment levels of service; an overview of how the daily citywide traffic model
was created; an explanation of how the City is divided up into traffic analysis zones and a
presentation of a City map displaying the traffic analysis zones; an overview of a map showing
the City's street network; an overview of the City's current peak hour conditions, existing peak
hour intersection volumes, and existing geometrics and lane control; an overview of the City's
CITY COUNCIVREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
JANUARY 11, 2005
PAGE 4
three phase traffic monitoring work program which includes the citywide traffic model update,
preparation of an annual traffic monitoring report, and preparation of future traffic studies.
Council comments and questions included how peak hour was defined and determined; whether
there was any consideration of the impact of County projects on City traffic; clarification
regarding the status of the County's regional traffic model; ident'rfication of locations which may
have special circumstances as they relate to peak hour traffic (i.e., Fair Oaks and Orcha�d); how
adjustments are made to the traffic model; how it is monitored on an ongoing basis, how it is
� updated and whether the City would have the ability for updating the model in-house.
Mayor Ferrara invited public comments on this item.
Steve Ross, Arroyo Grande, commented that the study shows it is important to have an accurate
General Plan or Housing Element because a Plan that does not project �ealistic growth in certain
areas would affect the traffic model data.
Upon hearing no further public comments, Mayor Ferrara closed the public comment period.
Council Member Dickens stated it would be helpful to review the data in the traffic model report
in more detail. He commented that the data would be important in evaluating future projects and
supported the concept of the traffic model.
Council Member Guthrie asked if the Council would be receiving a copy of the traffic model
document. He suggested conducting a joint meeting/workshop with the Planning Commission
and the Traffic Commission to present this information. He commented on the benefits of having
a traffic model and encouraged that the traffic model data be updated as projects are approved.
Council Member Arnold also stated he would like to review the document in its entirety. He
expressed concern about peak hours used on certain intersections. He agreed that as a whole,
the traffic model would be a useful reference document. He supported the suggestion for
holding a joint workshop with the Planning Commission and Traffic Commission.
Mayor Pro Tem Costello stated the traffic model would be a good tool to help the City evaluate
the potential for traffic impacts. He commented on potential traffic impacts caused by projects
outside of the City. �
Mayor Ferrara expressed concerns about voting to accept the report without having reviewed it
in its entirety. He supported the idea of a joint workshop with the Planning Commission and
Traffic Commission to review the model in more detail. He commented on timing issues,
specifically as they relate to the County's regional traffic model and its impact on the City's traffic
model. He also expressed concern about utility issues, specffically as they relate to the City's
ability to use and update the traffic model in a timely manner to make quick determinations,
without having to rely on consultants. Following clarification regarding the intended use of the
model, Mayor Fer�ara commented that there are already problem traffic situations identified in
the City with a funded capital improvement program to address those existing problems. He said
he hoped that the traffic model would not be used to add new capital improvement projects that
will address problems that future development will bring, but rather to prioritize and make
decisions on whether or not future development in certain areas should l�allowed.
CITY COUNCIVREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
JANUARY 11, 2005
PAGE 5
Following further discussion regarding the traffic model and assurances from staff that the
Council would receive copies of the traffic model in its entirety, Mayor Pro Tem Costello moved
to continue approval of the traffic model to a date uncertain to be set after a joint workshop with
the Planning Commission and Traffic Commission is held to receive a detailed presentation of
the traffic model. Council Member Arnold seconded the motion, and on the following roll-call
vote:
AYES: Costello, Arnold, Guthrie, Dickens, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
11.b. Considerat�on of Resolutfon urovina Fundina Assistance for The Familv Care
Network. lnc.Transitlonal Aifordable Housina Proiect (ADAMS)
[COUNCIURDA)
Executive Director Adams presented the staff report and recommended the RDA Board adopt a
Resolution approving $50,000 in Redevelopment Housing Assistance for the Family Care
Nefinrork, Inc. foster care transitional housing p�oject and the Affordable Housing Agreement.
Bobbie Scott, representing Family Care Network, thanked the Board for its consideration of
funding a portion of this project. She gave a background and history of the Family Ca�e Network
and the transitional affo�dable housing program.
Executive Director Adams and Ms. Scott responded to questions from the Board regarding the
transitional housing program, funding issues, whether the public was notified about this project,
and whether the Police Department was consulted. '
Vice Chair Costello asked what would happen if the affordable housing te�ms of the agreement
were b�eached. Executive Director Adams explained the terms of the agreement and RDA
General Counsel Carmel responded that ultimately the Redevelopment Agency could foreclose
to recover its funds.
Chair Ferrara invited public comments on this item. No public comments were received.
Board Member Arnold also expressed concerns about ensuring that mechanisms are in place to '
get the City's money back if there were a default on the loan. Aside from this concern, he
agreed it was a great utilization of redevelopment funds and a good investment. He supported ;
the project. ;
�
Board Member Guthrie commented that this was a good investment of redevelopment funds and I
supported the project. G
I
Board Member Dickens expressed support of the project as it relates to redevelopment, meeting �
regional housing needs, and from a social standpoint to meet the needs of the students selected '°
for the program. He stated that this service is war�anted and there would be a benefit to the
community.
s
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
JANUARY 11, 2005
PAGE 6
Vice Chair Costerlo supported the project from both a redevelopment and a social needs
standpoint.
Chair Ferrara stated this was a win-win project for the City and the Family Care Network and
supported the project.
Vice Chair Costello moved to adopt a Resolution as follows: "A Resolution of the Arroyo Grande
Redevelopment Agency Approving an Affordable Housing Agreement Between the Agency and
Family Care Network, Inc.". Board Member Dickens seconded the motion, and on the following
roll-call vote:
AYES: Costello, Dickens, Guthrie, Arnold, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
12. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS
None.
1$. CITY MANAGER ITEMS
None.
14. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Council Member Arnold referred to a recent issue of the League of California Cities Priori '
Focus newsletter and requested that staff review the potential benefits of participating in the
State Vehicle License Fee (VLF) loan program. '
15. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
None.
16. COMMUNITY COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS
None.
17. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor/Chair Ferrara adjoined the meeting at 8:55 p.m.
Tony M. Ferrara, Mayor/RDA Chair
ATTEST:
Kelly Wetmore, City CIerWAgency Secretary
(Approved at CC Mtg�) ,
_.�., __...__.�._,.
-...,•----_-...�.--._..._...
Gi��kO�ty�b
8■@■
�r �wu� ,o• �e�i �
c� �
� �+codbod�� as MEMORANDUM
�� �'es�on�c�
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DON SPAGNOLO, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER�'
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF FINAL TRACT MAP 2275 AND TO
ACCEPT CERTAIN EASEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT
2275 -JAMES AND EVADENE DOTSON
DATE: JANUARY 25, 2005
: RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Council:
1. approve final Tract Map 2275;
2. accept the pubiic water improvements that were conditioned for Tract 2275; as
constructed;
3. reject the sewer improvements that were conditioned for Tract 2275, without
prejudice as to future acceptance;
4. reject the offer of dedication for public sewer easement, without prejudice as to
future acceptance; and,
5. accept the 10%warranty security in the amount of $40,982.68.
FUNDING:
There is no immediate fiscal impact. Maintenance of these facilities will be funded from
Public Works maintenance funds in future years.
DISCUSSION:
The City has received Final Tract Map 227"5, owned by James and Evadene Dotson. The '
subject tract is located north of Huasna Road, south of Ptatino Lane, east of Wildwood i
Ranch�nd west of Oro Drive. This map subdivides two existing parcels, with a combined !
area of 7.96 acres, into six(6) residential lots ranging from 42,437 to 83,661 square feet in �
,
size. This Final Map is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map 01-002,
approved by the Planning Commission on May 1, 2001. The applicant was granted the
first one-year time extension on June 1, 2003. The second one-year time extension was
granted on May 18, 2004. The current zoning for this tract is Residential Suburban (RS).
Lot No. 1 has access through a private driveway easement from Huasna Road. Lot Nos.2
through 6 will have access from Platino Lane via a private road named Cindy Way.
During the tentative map approval process,the adjacent residents were concemed that the
large lot sizes may lead to a variety of undesirable uses. To address these concerns, the
-•-----�.,�-...,�,.�,__..._._._.�..�...
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF FINAL TRACT MAP 2275 AND TO ACCEPT
CERTAIN EASEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 2275 - JAMES AND
EVADENE DOTSON
JANUARY 25, 2005
PAGE 2
foltowing provisions were incorporated into the tract CC&R's:
• No further subdivision of the lots may ocxur,
• Secondary dwelling units may not be constructed on Lot Nos. 2-6,
• Large animals will not be permitted on Lot Nos. 2-6,
As allowed by the Subdivision Map Act, the appiicant may choose to construct the
improvements prior to recording the final map to avoid posting improvement securities.
The applicant chose this alternative, and the required improvements are completed and
constructed in accordance with the approved improvement plans for the Tract. Staff has
inspected the improvements and recommends Council acxept the public water
improvements for maintenance.
A sanitary sewer line underneath the private driveway to Huasna Road serviced the
existing residence. The applicant replaced it with a sanitary sewer main to meet City
requirements and extended the main into the site to serve the future residences. An
easement is dedicated on the flnal map for the line within the tract boundaries.
Approximately 375 feet of the sanitary sewer main is offsite underneath the private
driveway until it connects�o the sanitary sev�r main servicing Tract 741,Wilclw�ood Ranch
(See Attachment 2). While the applicant has proposed that they have the right to use the
sewer main due to the existing sewer line in the private driveway, staff has determined that
the existing easement only applies to access. Therefore, staff recommends that the offer
of dedication for the sewer easement and acceptance of the sanitary sewer main be
rejected without prejudice as to future acceptance until the appropriate offsite easement for
sanitary sewer purposes is obtained. '
i
The developer is required to warranty the improvements for a period of one year following j
acceptance of the improvements. The required 10%warranty seQUrity has been submitted `
to the City in the form of a Letter of Credit from Coast Natianal Bank in the amount of
$40,982.68. This security will be released at the conclusion of the warranty period,
provided the improvements are still in satisfactory condition.
S:�PUBLIC WORKS ENGMIEERING SMARED REMS1Devebpment Prcjects�Tract AAap��T���5-DodsonlCouncillStaff Repwt-Tract 2275_Map and
AccePtance.dx
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF FINAL TRACT MAP 2275 AND TO ACCEPT
CERTAIN EASEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 22T5 - JAMES AND
EVADENE DOTSON
JANUARY 25, 2005
PAGE 3
ALTERNATIVES:
The following aiternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
• Approve stafPs recommendation and adopt the resolution;
• Do not approve staff's recommendation;
• Modify staff's recommendation as appropriate and approve;
• Provide direction to staff.
Attachments:
1. Final Map Tract 2275
2. Location of off-site sewer main
�
�
S:�PUBLIC WORKS ENGMEERING SHARED ffEMSlDevebpment Projects\Tract AAapslTract 2275-DodsonlCouncillStaff Report-Tract 2275-Map and
Acceptance.doe
�
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE ACCEPTING CERTAIN
EASEMENTS AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN
TRACT 2275
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map 01-002
on May 1, 2001.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission approved a one year time extension for Vesting
Tentative Tract Map 01-002 on June 3, 2003.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission approved a one year time extension for Vesting
Tentative Tract Map 01-002 on May 18, 2004.
WHEREAS, the developer has constructed the improvements required by the Tract
conditions of approvaL
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande does hereby accept the public water improvements constructed for Tract 2275,
and rejects the sewer improvements constructed for Tract 2275, without prejudice as to
future acceptance and authorize the Mayor to execute a certificate of acceptance.
On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member ,
and by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this day of 2005.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAG E 2
TONY M. FERRARA, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTO�tNEY
' M 15'IY 0!�E 1]/O.N'Y
N 1S'M[17N.iY R-1 CALC
Niriya-Eyx.x.� TRACT 741 � �`�,�
� —N 1S M E 537.{T R-1�, ]1 M A P 3� SZ . ,�,,,.R-,
M tY]D'E S76A0'Mt
� 7!i OR QI PER R-2 79�011♦ PFR R-4 I01.00'C01111[R 70 COlblLll `.� 11S]C CGISQ 70 COI�Q �M�y \
------- ----------- -- --- ------� az�.zY ta�m�cast ustrat �7b
1l1.3Y""_'R00'PUE��
g \# ,�r z �f J��
�'�: � \\ �"��t�n t��; � �,e�' ������ �' � f'��
� ,� �MO`"E•�^�:ir�� �'r � � ��� ��t Lt71' 6 ,,4;,'�!
� a�.0 ar.a�ss
'�` `wt"e Qo�,"r'�+�.1. `�'�'d �'� I� 1 �� � �+ +a�u s�.�r ��
� `� ��,, arn ss.Goam �.
�• ust
� :
'aj� �'�''� �l �y �����\`�� ��ee sr.in � � o� �ia
`� N-��f�'� �,,� f � Wl 2 �` � Y' ��� �� �� �e'zz
� A� \\ , �� ���� � A ::
� �j f��1 � \�\ u.tlf s�.QroSS N,`` � �� $��k!
7� µT7 Sf.IET�1�'} �\� ��`�. �' �.r
� Y�l. � q,s �a � � O' 4� �� � ���
ggg � �.� ��J ';N� '�� o ���, �� � �f
- aQ�,g � SLE oETK BELOM �$�
I a -�1� �`d, �� `0.� `\` �� �_ � g�2
� � ■�
� '� _�.�53.1Y-- " 4
( �� �'�f} `�as3�ys`$ �Q.' _ f �'��:?\`` .
a,' id�' � M.M7 S.f.NET j ` _;��� G M / �\�.
� � �1 \�\ � 1e `"` -`•f_t�- ��37.T� __:��
I •�0,•1 � y ��� �.'� L O Q' 4 � u.z r'tir� � �'�
� �$ �, � '�' ,p s�.raa sr.caa� ���� j s� "i�'�� � '�,
w QY'& � .���� ,� b saesa ss.�r ��, gs �r S •k• .`` ar�4��p�,`A
5�, . . �i'
�i F� cs ��«�",,. :8 �j�� '^' ua�v.aross � �Z`` �''-`, "A
� ' �a �aes ss.�cr
t� � ��.�_� _ ���� �51Q ���� �EQ
�' w� �� �
& •�.��\_ `'- � q�►� �
ae� � ��Aff�—r---_ w ir�w xT[i�'_N-,. � ��
GRAPHIC SCALE �°���� � ����u���urr �0j '2 ��
. �. � �
�F�� i� �S q�4A
� ?
(M�i)
1 W�M M1 � 110At' 2�6.00 N7.00 -
�'.� \ 1p.J0'N- -J CALC C0.7{'11-3 t20D'11-7 !IJ M.7 R-7 �/�.�
y \ 197.JI'Y �n�Y {170'Y lD.M�Y 01.7Y Y 116K Y J
N 75'21'S�'E l020{'Y k�' �'P/�/,1��
- �� y f N 15'7t'E/OI.A'R-1 �� f+'t"�
yl M 1S'2{'[ET.N'R-S � t� J�J
'�j� ��� M S'2s'1f'E R-J 4� 4 �
A N 7I'1f'7!'E 76lK B-1 R�HS . Ni Y�� Q�� ,�.Q` ` 3�
a e- e-u•sr�a- � �S� ��' �s`7��,�►. '�A��,. ,�R A C Y S 5 6
e.x s� x �•w,.x
1.q1.7J C-/R�113
c °�ri a°r'°� °=ae°�'r � y� �''� �`�'3� �t�,�'R� 9 �►A
o e.ts s'x o-�n-as. ��� �''� ��i�
L�17/.IY 0�ZJ {Y �y �
5i �E L.11S.SY xi E-1 R.N6. p _—A
� f M K N E S�.OI �.j K�7,Y W . � �� �
c sz�r
� N IRl7' �-� ���
� �-� °-'r"'°' TRACT 2275
��
e.zr a'w �-��.n uswn�ewsonil m v�aAC Rltl6 A SIldM90M W MRIId14�LOiS il AIO 1J Oi S1EflF'S
�.iu.ir �-=R-� mnuaie�xo mtawx vu IO�MlOtl OI A PART Oi 71E RMIp106 CO�RIL Of 1EDR1l
a ■a ir e azzr �•:�•x,r �n a xo PIlYO Y BOISA OE CIEl�S1l.N 11E CRY OF AItlM10 CR�MOE
�-�~.Sr cau�n a sw ws ais0.n�h as uuasM�s ucaao
ILOT 1 lAT f M!Op(A Of MNS A����pM{�[p�7��}y
� B!\�OF BPARIId(3 R�FRO�iCB4 IBCO� ua rta�s�eo er: ,r oona
� enNC N�r u'x'w eciwcrH rouHO R-+ �ies w —o—ser yz•aeewe w/c�v x z�eoi
wwurons aa+c n+c soun4ar R-: e��vs 2+ .�_cw�o raRwtNr�s rai[o nierwim sr.
ED aor wr YVESTLAND ENGINEERING COMPANY
lN1E 0�1RACT SJ!PFR 9 NAPS 6. II-J 9 YAPS 6
�eo soum Ha�neti wn[�ao.sw wa aesro.u as�m
� DEPAII. (eos)-su-:� +u�c.mm oaon
Mo sc�t
s�ar x a�
iOIICWO 11RF NIitJ
DpSTING s� SEWER TO BE REPUr.rED
! NEW 8' SDR-35 PN� SENIER 18' HDPE CUWERT �� STD. S—t
,.� MANHOIF PER qTY
'' • + 164.18 OUILET
Q w -�
+ + 164.38INLET + °1
+
o° °0 171.74 TOP °� -°�
� � a. _ _. . .. _ w.m . ,
° _" �� ^s s--s �--� �--� �'�—� �—� �---�` S —
s ' °--
� S E �--i s �- � , I , I, I 4, 4 �,. Si I
-, _ �
�. , __ _ . , _. . .1 __ _.: . . � . ._ , _��
CONNECT TO
DqST I�ANHOLE ���'.��\ '\�
t '�' �
�
� '
I ..---r �, 1 �g �
I � - y �
�
EXISTING SEWER �`, SECTION OF OFFSITE SEINER ��N.,�W�.I�T.HOUT ENT.�`'~�..� �
MAIN AND EASEMENT � �, DRNEWAY EASEMENT pER Da�"""�" 799 471 �
i To Hunsw►Rono �'�� `;� ` ROA� l---°�
PER TRACT 741 l ; PLATA � � '
i
#
� �
I
�
�
I `I
�
�
� �
. �
N
`--- -- __... ._._.. ... ... .. . .. .......... . . . .
8.f.
� PRROro
° ��
', 1NCORPOAA7ED 9
� � rn MEMORANDUM
� .x,�r ,o, ,s„ ,�
c�0��FoR�'�P
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGERC�.
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS TO VARIOUS
BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES
DATE: JANUARY 25, 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Council approve the appointments to various Boards,
Commissions, and Committees pursuant to the attached lists.
FUNDING:
There is no fiscal impact.
RECOMMENDATION:
On January 14, 1997, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 481 C.S.
amending the composition of applicable Commissions, Boards, and Committees
from seven to five members and adopted Resolution No. 3192 establishing
Council policy as it relates to the appointment procedure to various
Commissions, Boards, and Committees. The Ordinance states that the Mayor
and each respective member of the Council shall appoint a representative to the
various Commissions, Boards, and Committees subject to the approval by a
majority of the Council. All Commission, Board, and Committee members serve
at the pleasure of the Council.
Council Members have solicited applicants to serve on the various Commissior�s,
Boards, and Committees. The recommended appointments and/or
reappointments of each respective Council Member are attached. Although not
required under the Ordinance or Resolution, copies of the applicants' Reservoir
of Citizens to Serve forms are attached.
Attachment:
1. Recommended Appointments
o� pRROV�C
� INCONPOAATEO Z
V T
�[ ,N1LY 10. 1911 *
c4��FOR��P MAYOR FERRARA
RECOMMENDED APPOINTMENTS/REAPPOINTMENTS
RECOMMENDED
APPOINTMENT/ REAPPOINTMENT
• PARKS AND RECREATION PHILIP LOZANO
COMMISSION
• TRAFFIC COMMISSION GARY L. BORDA
• SENIOR ADVISORY ROSS KONGABLE
COMMISSION
• DOWNTOWN PARKING GREG MOORE
ADVISORY BOARD
• ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW KRISTEN BARNEICH
COMMITTEE
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
RESERVOIR OF CITIZENS TO SERVE .
Planning Commission
�Parks and Recreation Commission
Tra�c Commission Years Lived in Arroyo Grande
Senior Advisory Commission Registered Voter of Arroyo Grande
Special C ' ees Architedural Revi w, .) Yes_� No
NAME
HOME ADDRESS uI'� HONE `T /� -����
PRESENT � � RESENT � , ) '
EMPLOYER , � OSITI ���
OFFICE USINES �Q /
ADDRES� TELEPHONE_���- —
EDUCATIONAL ACKGROUND ' �
High Scho � l � , - College f
ADDITIONAL EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION /��/ •
1
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC INTERESTS
. �
.
- ,
/ � ,
The City Council would like to have the names of three (3)Arroyo Grande References:
NAME DDRES
�.�
.
1. � , i . i � ''
2. ,; � r. ,� ,g, C
3. �� i /,' `� �
ARE YOU WILLING TO SERVE ON THE COMMISSION/COMMITTEE MEETING TIMES SHOWN BELOW:
Planning Commission, First and Thi�d Tuesday of each month, 7:30 p.m. Yes No
Parks and Recreation Commission, Second Wednesday of each month,6:00 p.m. Yes� No
Tra�c Commission, Monday Previous to Third Tuesday of each month,7:30 p.m. Yes No
Senior Advisory Commission, First Wednesday of each month,6:00 p.m. Yes No
Special Committee r.e.Architectural Review C mittee, etc.),Various meeting
times and date Yes No
Sign e
� ' L�/ � Date �_-��l�=,�! -
The Arroyo Grande City C uncil requests' o ation about your interest(and education, if applicable),in serving on
a commission or committee,specifically ou omments and views relative to the role and responsibilities of the
Planning Commission, Parks and Recre ' n Commission,Traffic Commission, Senior Advisory Commission, or a
Special Committee. Please note such information on the reverse side of this foRn. Thank you for your interest.
THIS FORM IS A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD
IF APPOINTED COMPLETION OF A STATE CONFLICT OF INTEREST FORM IS REQUIRED (11/02/98)
_ _ �.,... ...�,_,,...,
C I T Y O F A R R 0 Y 0 G R A N D E �
• . RESERVOIR OF CITItENS T�D SERVE �
. ' Parka and Recreation Co�miseion , � �J�y,y- 40
Driver e Licenae No._
° Planning Commiasion .
` - Yeara Lived in Arroyo�rande_ e�-� �_
_,)[_Parking and TYaffic Cosm;ssion Regiatered Voter of Arroyo Grande
i
. ' � YES ,� NO
Spe�sa� c��ttee . � THIS FORM IS A MATTER�OF PUBLIC RECORD, �
�; 1ire. ; Hisa C.�- � /�11A '
(Please circle one) RESIDENC
HOP� ADDRESS�.("'eP L.JlLI-D hl 1.�/ �.j!t/L O�Yn CR'U-�n_/aQ PHONE �rJ o�-
i
I�SARITAL STANS_� N[Tl�ER OF CHILDREN �
PRESENT /�
EMPLOYEI�H�L f'�A �F_ L..l.r �� PR�SENT /� •
OFFICE . POSITION_ .l�2, i��CD tii./i � �/'�1,�_
ADDRESS� �J- ���.��C� � �. BUSINESS
TeLePxoxe �fo°/-�1�1�
EDUCATIONAL • . ' '
&1CKGROIIND High School�r,� GQr-yJet- College �,d L /�Lv �1./,J6R('/?�. �L�7
ADDITIaNAL � � / �
ED.'L. INFO �r2o�v ra1�A ( � �l�/'..i' s.J/ i�,/ ..P .r � l�f /.✓ .�s, I/.✓ r/�
Are you avare that you may be required to fili out a )� � •
, CONFLICT OF INTEREST Form, YES `� NO
' � EMPIAYA�I9T EXPERIENCE fIf A�olieable)
� • ' �
' I
Do you represeat any epecial 'groupT YEg NO If ao, please_give name of grou
P•
• COMMTNITY AND CZVIC INTERESTS ' f
I
• • i
Yhe City Council vould like to have the Name of three Arroyo Grande Refereaces: . . .
�� DDRE .
. 1•-�.I �A�2/° /� ���. L�. �iQnnJGN .�� �n G�.s.,�i���`
2.�d�/ l�A n�� o r H � �---� -
�P r7 W is_e.n.�J W r �� .
3._t�•1�On�/ .<�.,,,�p • ��n �J�a1Pe�2T I. �,•
i_rautn YoU BE Wr�,LLN� �r► SERVE ON THE COMHISS20N pTTV/� .+r..nn ccr�� —
- a�a na Nl� nGWW'
PARKS b RECRFATION COhAfISSION MEETINGS, 2nd Wed. of Ea. Month YES NO
PIANNING COP4�(ISSION t�ETBiGS, let 7 3rd TLea. of Ea. Honth YES NO
. PARKINC 6 TRppFIC COMIISSION MEETTNCS, Honthly Heetings y� � KO '
SPECIAL COHI�fITTEg� Various •
) YES. NO
DATE / �� /�9 SICNANRE����(/i
The Arroyo Grande Counc3l needs some inFormation aboue your i tereets� (and education, if
applicable) in aerving on a Co�aiegion, epecifieally your ca�ente and vievs relative to .
[he role and reapocu ibilitiea of the Planning Coamiasioa, parka and Becreation Cocmiasion, •
the Parking and ltaffic Coaauleelon or a Special Coamittee. Pleaee note euch iafosma[ion on
the reveree side of [hie form,
' � . CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
� RESERVOIR OF CITIZENS TO SERVE
Planning Commission
Parks and Recreation Commission
T�affic Commission Years Lived in Ar�oyo Grande�
�� Senior Advisory Commission • . Registered Voter of Arroyo Grande
Architectural Review Committee Yes No
Special Committees(Long Range Planning Committee,etc.)
NAME �O S S �� `� � G'�"��-�
ADDRESS � �~� �0��� �� PHONE –'n� a � �
PRESENT EMPLOYER �T'� �`°� POSITION
BUSINESS ADDRESS PHONE
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Hiqh School l�-- Colleqe ��/�--
BDDITIONAL EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION
D C VIC I TEREST �if G L �L2 i�
CO MU ITY A •�
.��-�r R��r-o 2 B� � �?l�28�-��- A P�A/l�I�NJ��9-P`yo.t���✓1 c�3 S
cb -c��� t�.►�
Q �o� �/�-° ,v � , � �
r
The City Council would like to have the names of three(3)Arroyo Grande References:
NAME ADDRESS
,. ' i�� S�;--r� -
2. !/�l OV !���lJ�°
3 �OU -rt' ��°- Sr4l��
ARE YOU WILLING TO SERVE ON THE OMMISSION/COMMITTEE MEETING TIMES SHOWN BELOW:
���� �
� Yes—Na.—_
Pianning Commission, First and Third uesday o each month, 7:00 PM
Parks and Recreation Commission,Second Wednesday of each month,6:30 PM Yes_No
Traffic Commission,the day(Monday)before the third Tuesday of each month, 7:00 PM Yes___No�
Senior Advisory Commission, First Wednesday of each month�3:00 PM Ye�No
A�chitectur evie Committee First Mond of each month,3:15 PM
Special C mittees on n Plannin ommittee�etc.)Meeting dates vary Yes___No--
Signatur � Date � S'a�
The Arroyo Grande City.Council �equests information about your interest(and education, if applicabie), in serving on
commission or committee, specifically your comments and views relative to the role and responsibilities of the Plannln
Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, Traffic Commission, Senior Advisory Commission, Architectural Revie�
Committee or a Special Committee. Please note such information on the reverse side of this form. Thank you for yo�
interest.
THIS FORM IS A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD
IF APPOINTED COMPLETION OF A STATE CONFLICT OF INTEREST FORM IS REQUIREO 04I0211
� CiTY OF ARROYO GRANDE �
� RESERVOIR OF CITI�ENS TO SERVE
� ��.
Planning Commission e�'�Y�����OYO ��,{`�'?L .
Parks and Recreation Commission 04 JUN 16 PN 4' Se Years Ltved in A�ro o Grande�
Treffic Commisslon � Y
Se�ior Advisory Commission • Registered Voter o rroyo Grande
14�chitecturel Review Committee Yes No
[ Spec al Committee (i.ong Range Pia ing ommittee, etc.)
�odu�tawA /�w�� A�Yi�y
NAME �TcG-- /JZ OC� E� -
ADDRESS �2 � G��T T ��N..�d N PHONE �7 g��'% ���
PRESENT EMPLOYER I/V�L L /S � ���/✓L�TT� POSITION ��ES����
BUSINESS AODRE33 I J� � � ����C� � j PHONE �Y^' �3��
Fn��GATIONAL BACKGROUND
Hi h School ��S-S��'�/�/!Z� Ile e �'�-�N'4 sT�T"'L�
— s€' ���,�!/
ADDITIONAL EDI�GATIONAL INFORMATION �-���i¢L $�ilt��J?„S L/GEYY,S�—/LJ�
LI�GEir3'4'j
�l0�'S7�t7� !L1� ��:�'�'S �4�.- E5
k.� —GA , car�'
c:nMM�wirr AND CIVIC INTEREST� d1�'•�/n'L/��4�/�� � �l� /�
. ._..: . , . _ .
���5��2LSG�iBSD�ScoTT3�`�Z Sl�� ����' 6�iYC�iS
� y�i✓�?"T` c� T//12� � �!�/G�
The City Councii would ifke to have the narnes of three(3)Arroyo Orande References:
�� � ADDRE33
,. �0,3 L�t�� . / 33 �. 8��•v�.�-�3��
2. C/f�-t�� f��'��?_.S . 1,�� �- �3��✓� � 93yZc
3 ��� coGr���/ �,�X��y �- �3y2.i
ARE YOU WILLING TO SERVE ON THE COMMi3SION/COMMI'iTEE MEETIN�3 TiMES SHOWN BELOW:
Planning Commission.Ftrst and Third Tuesday of sach month,7:00 PM Yes—Nai.�
Parks and Recreation Commission,Sscond Wednesday of each monti�,6:30 PM Yes�.No�L.
TrafRc Commission,the day(Monday),before the third Tuesday of each month, 7:00 PM Yes,�!No
Senior Advisory Commission.First tAlednesday of each month, 8:00 PM Yes—No_�
Architectural Review Commtttee First Monday of each month�3:15 PM Ye� �
Special Committees(Long Range Planning CornmitCee,etc.)Meeting dates vary Yea— v`—
. � d
Signature
The Arroyo Grande City.Council requests informatlon about your intsrest(and education� if applicable), in serving on a
commisston or committse� specitically your comments end views relative to the role and responsibilities of the Plenning
Commission, Parks and Reareatlon Commission, T�aflic Commission, Sanior Advisory Commiasion� Architecturai Review
Committee or a Special Committee. Please nof,e such informatlon on the reverse side of this form. Thank you for your
interest
_ ___ _ _
THIS FORM IS A MATTER OF Pl18LIC RECORD
IF APPOINTED GOMPLETION OF A STATE GONFLICT OF INTERE3T FORM IS REQUIRED
04102/01
_ .�._.. �..�. .�._�--.-�-.�..
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
RESERYOIR OF CITIZENS TO SERVE
Planning Commission � �`�^ n�
.`
Parks and Recreation Commiss�on� ' `' � '�
Traffic Commission
��:
—� Senior Advisory Cornmission �� �"��,� � � �+E� 9' 8 Years Lived in Arroyo Grande rl�
_�/ Architectural Review Committee Registered Voter of Arroyo Grande
Downtown Parking Advisory Board (must own business in the Viliage area)Yes ✓ No ___
Special Boards/Committees (varies)
NAME ���l� �' '
HOME
ADDRESS �� � C(�I� � w � � " S
PHONE ��
PRESENT EMPLOYER �
BUSINESS ADDRESS
PHONE
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Hi h School � � �f�j�(� �� r� / ,�� I ,
Colle e l� W
�DDITIONAL EDUCATI�NAL INFC�Rn�eT�ON ` � "
� C� ' — (�� / -� �,Lt ;
¢
�
�
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC INTERESTS I YL � r
� �� ��� '2LCd +0 (�Ct,' '
�� �� ��
K °c� c �
� - 2�:0��--
The City Council would like to have the names of three(3)Arroyo Grande References:
NAME
, � � � �� �I� ADDRESS
lA, `z�{,n-� �-vl.. �-t' - 51(�
2. i 4�-e, 50� � �o��� . �g -
0
�1 5(vCoCo
3. I a .
. �- (�i�. '��3- 8�-�-
ARE YOU WILLING TO SERVE ON THE COMMISSION/COMMITTEE/BOARD MEETING TIMES SHOWN BELOW:
Planning Commission, First and Third Tuesday of each month,6:00 PM
Parks and Rec�eation Commission,Second Wednesday of each rrionth,6:30 PM Yes_No
Traffic Commission, the day(Monday)before the third Tuesday of each month, 7:00 PM Yes_No
Senior Advisory Commission,First Wednesday of each month,3:00 PM
Architectural Review Committee First Monday of each month,3:15 PM Yes No �
Downtown Parking Advlsory Board-Meets as needed Yes�C No
Special Boar s/Committees(v ies) , Yes_No
Yes,_No
Signatur ` � � l� �
Date
The Arroyo Grande City Council �equests Information about your lnterest (and educatlon, if applicable), In serving on a
commission or committee, specifically your comments and views relative to the role and responsibilities of the Planning
Commission, Parks and Recreation Commtssion, Traffic Commisston, Senior Advisory Commission, Architecturai Review
Committee or a Special Board/Committee. Please note such informatlon on the �everse side of this form. Thank you for
yourinteres�
IF APPOINTED COMPLETION OF'A STAT CONFLICT O INTE EST
F�RM IS RE UIRED
_ __
' 8I2004
o� pRRO��c
?
� 1NCORPORA7E0 �Z
V �
T
* JULY 10. 19/1 * .
c���FORN�P COUNCIL MEMBER GUTHRIE
RECOMMENDED APPOINTMENTS
RECOMMENDED
APPOINTMENT
• PARKS AND RECREATION RON ADDISON
COMMISSION '
• TRAFFIC COMMISSION JOEL COUSER
• SENIOR ADVISORY PAUL E. TOMS
COMMISSION
• DOWNTOWN PARKING J. IRA HUGHES
ADVISORY BOARD '
�
�
.
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW MICHAEL PEACHEY �
COMMITTEE �
f
�
i
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
RE5ERVOIR OF CITIZENS TO 5ERVE
Planning Commission - -
� Parks and Recreation Commission ';� , �- ��` ,
Tra�c Commission Years Lived in Arroyo Grande �''
Senior Advisory Commission (;j 1;:i;� ?�; �•;; (: � ; Registe�ed Voter of Arroyo Grande
Architectural Review Committee Yes _� No
Downtown Parking Advisory Boa�d (must own business in the Village area)
Special Boards/Committees (varies)
NAME � a �1 � J J /S o.�
HOME Sa-S sT,q2Li �l� 7' L.,a.ve r4, �• . � �/ - '-- �S7
ADDRESS i PHONE
PRESENT EMPLOYER �E-�� �-� POSITION
BUSINESS ADDRESS PHONE
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Hiqh School �� J Collecle �.f�, U, � < ° K�-'� , tit 81f• N�-r�
�c.
ADDITIONAL EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION J�,,i,o.� C.o //e G � 1�/L&�. � 7'
S o �T ld v� fC.sTe.�N (.�.
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC INTERESTS /�'� a s T� Y � � � s2'��'�' r �° �.'�L ,
The City Council would like to have the names of three(3)Arroyo Grande References:
NAME ADDRESS
� „J , ,,., �j v T h�2 / 2 . �7,4�t tr/ !lf Y L,,N e `f�-3 � ?�f�/S
2. 1.3 a r3 �L-� C!1 v � e it e sT.r n. < /��f r L,..fi,�e `f 7 S! -C�3�G zr
3 �-�A-/� v� 9 i %1��J/4 i' t- ,f��1 e S �.•-�.r�y �j�-7 3 - /! 9s-
ARE YOU WILLING TO SERVE ON THE COMMISSION/COMMITTEE/BOARD MEETING TIMES SHOWN BELOW:
Planning Commission, First and Third Tuesday of each month�6:00 PM Yes_No
Parks and Recreation Commission,Second Wednesday of each month, 6:30 PM Yes ✓ No �
Traffic Commission,the day(Monday)before the third Tuesday of each month, 7:00 PM Yes_No
Senior Advisory Commission,First Wednesday of each month, 3:00 PM Yes_No
Architecturai Review Committee First Monday of each month,3:15 PM Yes_No
Downtown Parking Advisory Board-Meets as needed Yes_No
Special Boards/Committees(varies) , • Yes_No
Signature � Date � � � � " a �
The Arroyo Grande City Council requests information about your interest(and education, if applicable), in serving on a
commission or committee, specificaliy you� comments and views relative to the role and responsibilities of the Planning
Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission� Traffic Commission, Senior Advisory Commission, Architectural Review
Committee or a Special BoardlCommittee. Please note such information on the reverse side of this form. Thank you for
your interest.
THIS FORM IS A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD
IF APPOINTED COMPLETION OF A STAT�CONFLICT OF INTEREST FORM IS REQUIREO
8l2004
CIZ'Y OF ARROYO G��ANDE
RESERVOIR OF CITIZEN5 TO SERVE
Planning Commissipn �
Parks and Recreation Commission ' �
—��Traffic Commission 4,_�, ,4�._-_; _� i:;° ^; �,r'_;, Years Lived in Arroyo Grande 6
Senior Advisory Commission Registered Voter of Ar�oyo Grande
Architectural Review Committee Yes _� No ___
Downtown Parking Advisory Board (must own business in the Village area)
Special Boards/Committees (varies)
NAME , �i_,� � .�I, C�>uSc:r
HOME
ADDRESS ��T s��v PHONE y7y -��7,S'�
--PRE�6Ef�tT EMPLOYER ��'��rt� �t�c:�. i� o ��;�:.��-a' f �,';t tnt
i l.+.r-r✓
BUSINESSADDRESS_ /U:;�� S/a.,lr,, /�,,.� F4���.�„N 11'/���, PHONE 7�`F Srj 3 �+�-,t e<<
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Hiah School lr�:,.�l��kd J�b�l �y�.�,�� �J��� S�.c�.�.�i College /Q�.� l 9 7� S�w�.A��Il��r�
ADDITIONAL EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION i`,zt.���,.� ,S-���• �r.�E��;��z.; j,� ; �,r� �-e �
�. _ �iHD��`�
�.�i��.�=:... r�I.�,.��:,� -�e.�: T�� .� E �� �-��y
� , � i � .�e�ry a cr� i�;�� �t.;.,� �NC'Iti/'t �' •%,� .,.,
COMMUNITYAND CIVIC INTERESTS E ai�' f'j,�,,�� �y��,,,t�,t� c� ,�,/� /J�„r�s �ss � i.��,c=s�% yR,�j�, 4
The City Council would like to have the names of three(3)Arroyo Grande References:
NAME ADDRESS �
1. .�.�,� � j'j1��J.�l�.. �'�,F-.��-Z �71�5 /� :�c � 9' �a.v �
L . L�
2. o ' �t � fwl�. �T, � �3 �; � ��� , `1 J' �
r � �
1,•`_ y � .
3�t� � T�/h'1 � ���� IJ/��L�r�/1'Y l/h/- ��� C,►.�
A i•t '17.�._.J=!���n
ARE YOU WILLING TO SERVE ON THE COMMISSION/COMMITTEE/BOARD MEETING TIMES SHOWN BELOW:
Planning Commission,First and Third Tuesday of each month,6:00 PM Yes,.._No
Parks and Recreation Commission,Second Wednesday of each month, 6:30 PM Yes o •
Tra�c Commission, the day(Monday)before the third Tuesday of each month� 7:00 PM Yes�No
Senior Advisory Commission, Flrst Wednesday of each month,3:00 PM Yes_No �
Architectural Review Committee First Monday of each month,3:15 PM Yes_No
Downtown Parking Advisory Board-Meets as needed Yes_No
Special Boa�ds/Committees (variesj • Yes___;No
Signature Date -�2 --
The Arroyo Gr de City Council requests information about your interest (and education, if applicable), in serving on F
commission or committee, specifically your comments and views relative to the role and responsibilities of the Planning
Commission, Parks ahd Recreatfon Commission, Tra�c Commission, Senior Advisory Commiss;on� Architectural Revlew
Committee or a Special Board/Committee. Please note such information on the reverse side of this form. Thank you for
your interest. .
THIS FORM IS A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD
IF APPOINTED COMPLETION OF A�STATE CONFLICT OF INTEREST FORM IS RE UIREO
.
_. ----— 8I2004
___.�-..,�.�� .�% �Y�
. -w��szr�.�/SNC� ..�,�� �� r!q�y+,�,��!
7 /�-
� ct«r�.t�S' --�•/���,+o,'�SH�J�� f��l� ��` �%'0 ��r"''� w...r�/ l.+r p/ (1�, Q-1"
Y�
�"r7c'`"�'.S'Sa �/ � �'�,'7 M.� j�� S�.aa Lt -y��`�t /� `a�C �f`*y,9/�
� � � ✓ �
�j��� � -,���.,� L-�,fr,-�-- � ^��f�` 7�po�s �,� - �f�����
si�. � � t��z!�.�� s.��,y-�r� ��, �r�r�,� f.o Lt�� '�� a�.•a�
� V
O7l, �S�!a��1 �Li tj ,�,v�.� �i� �✓�11" ?' - -..�?�ssi�..riac�'"� -7.� �.�
-t" / / �— v ��
��,, �O_}„ �?�i�n/c%�% C7/ �'/ // 0 �i l��� i
U � /
_ . ____,,,,,,
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
RESERVOIR OF CITIZENS TO SERVE
' P�G�JV:J
���f�i�n{'ng'`G�o�n�rr�i�sibh`
—.0��}��,a��i F�a�r��o�oln Commission
t�c�ebm��s��i Years Lived in Arroyo Grande�
t� Senior Advisory Commission Registered Voter of Arroyo Grande
Architectu�al Revlew Commlttee Yes � No
Special Committees(Long Range Planning Committee, etc.)
NAME �A� � L�. 1 0-r►1 5
HOME -
ADDRESS r � �+- q � �r.2 � �� v� PHONE '� $� ' 'I a �' S�
PRESENT EMPLOYER �r��- �� � �`�_ �v v�--c_- pp ITION /`��%�-�s�F�.l� S�e-�f
BUSINESS ADDRESS �o�� �1.-� y .�� PHONE � � `� � Z v v
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Hiph School � College ✓
ADDITIONAL EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION �✓G-4 �•� { 'I��-.�r,Q � •- �-n �,,•-ti�.
`Y���_i
D . p _ � � �'4/' � _ �d . t'1,a..y��y. �
D e a�'e r e/{ G:✓.r'.-F�{ 9 fsa�-s ►� .-y L.-q s�/$
COMMUNITYAND CIVIC INTERESTS_ f�[�.-� �i�t- - ���� �Tj�4� �i �.o� f4vq ���r.t �-•�•�- !
S��.�'� - � �4-�t � � �- �� �/( v r vf_ :
�
i
The City Councii would like to Mave the names of three(3)A�royo Grande References: E
�.� ADDRESS �
1. �_ �a�-�(ti � _� v tj 4,..E- .�r4.`... 'f��b.-Qe� �.v�.s��- Q6�.-a �Fi�i 14-
2. G��e, l 2rr i� i�j� � c�e— ��
� =� � e'"'� ' ��}.. �
3. � E-ucQ �D-a� d oi I�1 5 ZZ �/tq �.f �livelol•trc • - A . ��
ARE YOU WILLING TO SERVE ON THE COMMISSION/COMMITTEE MEETING TIMES SHOWN BELOW:
Planning Commission� First and Third Tuesday of each month, 7:00 PM Yes_N�
Parks and Recreation Commission, Second Wednesday of each month, 6:30 PM Yes:_No
Traffic Commission,the day(Monday)before the third Tuesday of each month, 7:00 PM Yes�.No
Senior Advisory Commission, First Wednesday of each month,3:00 PM Yes�No
Architectural Review Committee Fi�st Monday of each month, 3:15 PM Ye�JVo
Special Committe (Long Range Planning Committee,etc.)Meeting dates vary Ye�Na—
Signature ��- � Date !�-- Z� - a 3
The Arroyo Grande City Council requests information about you� interest (and education, if applicabie), in serving on a
commission or committee, specifically your comments and views relaGve to the role and responsibilities of the Planning
Commission� Parks and Recreation Commisslon, T�affic Commission, Senior Advisory Commission, Archltectural Review
Committee or a Special Committee. Please note such information on the reverse side of this form. Thank you for yoirr
interes�
THIS FORM IS A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD '
IF APPOINTED COMPLETION OF A STATE CONFLICT OF INTEREST FORM IS R r�i��RFp
04/02/fl'
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
RESERVOIR OF CITIZENS TO SERVE
Planning Commission
Parks and Fiecreation Commission Years Lived in Arroyo Grande_�..��Pf�-t
Traffic Commission Registered Voter of Arroyo Grande
Senior Advisory Commission Yes� No
�Special Committees (i.e.Teen Advisory, Architectural Advisory, etc.)1;v��s� P�:��c.rv�
NAME � �� ���
, PHONE ��9-Sv?� .
HOME ADDRESS %Z03 ��4.:� W�
n PRESENT
EMPLOYER��1F �� S "�l� �-P POSITION ���?-g2c�p� f�
OFFICE BUStNESS q
ADORESS ��w� TELEPHONE �/ ' �6 L�
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
High School �'� �� • _ College � � ��y `� � �.
ADDITIONAL EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC INTERESTS
�„� ;o ,_ I�'c� r�i� �nc�.-!C�?ti►c, .�.ik3a�
—,, -
�'c.cf �r�o��
The City Council would like to have the names of three (3)Arroyo Grande References:
NAME ADDRESS
1 -J�+v�h'"'•�S �/r»�' � �'
2 i�m �P�,���s A �.
3 �C.2,cl� J'�I.c��u�{t�— ����-l! .
ARE YOU WILLING TO SERVE ON THE COMMISSION MEETING TIMES SHOWN BELOW:
Planning Commission, Fi�st and Third Tuesday of each month,7:30 p.m. Yes � No
Parks and Recreation Commission,Third Wednesday of each month, 6:00 p.m. Yes No
Traffic Commission,Monday Previaus to Third Tuesday of each month,7:30 p.m. Yes No
Senior Advisory Commission, First Wednesday of eac nth,7:00 p.m. Yes No
Special Committee (i.e.Teen Advisory,Architectura dvisory, etc.),Various
meeting times and ates Yes�� No
Signature
�� � Date �
The A oy rande City Councit requ i rmation about your interest, (and education, 'rf applicable) in serving on a commission,
specif al your comments and vie ative to the role and responsbilities of the Planning Commission, Parks and Recreation
Comm�ssion,Traffic Commission, Senior Advisory Commission or a Special Committee. Please note such information on the reverse
side of this form. Thank you for your interest.
- THIS FORM IS A MATTER OF PUBUC RECORD
IF APPOIKfED COMPLETION OF A STATE CONFLICT OF INTEREST FORM IS REQUIRED (01/23�3�
_ .. .._.�..,..�.�..�....._....._....,_,.,_..,,,,o.�.�,,,_.,.,.,
. ----�
- ^,.,:- CITY O�F AR,ROYO G
. : ` '_ _� = RESERVUIR OF' CITIZENS T
-- ��.� -- ning Commission . 0 ERVE
�`� `�:'„' ; � �.'� �'P�s and Recreatbn Cornmisabn .
Traffic Comrnisston
3enior Advisory Commtssion Years Live in A�oyo G�ande¢
'✓ A�chitectural Review Committee Re9�stere oter of Arroyo Grande
Oowntown Parking Adv�sory Board(must own business in the Village area)Y ✓ No
Speclai Bosrds/Committees(varies) .
NAME (G 2 •�Qi C
HOME i
ADDRESS �js.�.(l�/la � :
PHONE ' a �
PRESENT EMPLOYER "f' �
�r �t � :
BUSINESS ADDRESS 22
HONE ,� •
EDUCA710NA� R CKGROUND
i h Sch (� a � � • L aa�e,(,ovs � �-�c�,�e
H a ool P� Vl C tvl� �,(MCJVI ��j� Colle e . .
�. �s
ADDITIONAL EOUCATIaN�qL INFOR ATION
;
COMMUNI7YAND CIVIC 1 REST3 � � � �
�b��e au �
� �• � f �- 0 w `
,
The City Councii would ifke to have the names of three(3)Arroyo Gra�de ReferQnces:
� NAME '
1. � s ;
�, Ca��
. 2. � � �
s. (�fi ei � �
ARE YOU WlLLING Tp SERVE ON THE COMMIS310N/COMMITTEE/BpqRD MEET'ING T ES SHOWN BELO •
Planntng Commission�First a�d Third Tuesday af each month�6:00 PM ' W.
Parlcs and Recreatio�Commisslon,Second Wednesday ot each month�5:30 PM YeS—No_ '
Traffic Commission�the d Yes_No_ ; •
ay(Monday)befcre tha th�rd Tuesday of each month.7:00 P Yes`NoT
Senior Advisory Commissio��Frst Wednesday of each month,8:00 PM
Architecturat Rev1e Comm Fi st Monday of each month,8:15 PM Y�—No_ !
OowntoNm Parki s Boa - ee as needed Yes�No �
Special a�d .�(v , Yes,No •
Yes`No
Signature , —
O te
The Arroyo Grande City Co�� °
°D��gsian o�committee.a cific�all eE��n��UOn about your interest(and education, if pplicap�e)� j�serving on a
CQmmission� Parka and Rec� Y Y�com�nents and views�elaUve to the�ote and res sibilities of the Planning
�i�«,a reatbn Commisslon�Traffic Commissio�,genior Adviaory Commi sion�Architectura� Review
Specl�l 6oa�d/Committee. Please npte such EnFormatlon on the reve�side t this focm. Thank yau for
your inte�esti
1 PP IbIS FORM tS A Ii�e7TEa�F pUgLIC R �`�+aD
D C P A E 1 OF
812�4
��d 86ZS-6LG-S06 �T_,.....,9 ..._� �__
o� pRROY�C
� INCORPOAATED Z
v v
�
# .nxr io, ,e>> ,F
c4��FORN�P COUNCIL MEMBER ARNOLD
RECOMMENDED APPOINTMENTS
RECOMMENDED
APPOINTMENT
• PLANNING COMMISSION JOHN KEEN
• PARKS AND RECREATION SCOTT HARRISON
COMMISSION
• TRAFFIC COMMISSION STEVEN ROSS
• SENIOR ADVISORY (PENDING)
COMMISSION
• DOWNTOWN PARKING ROBERT LUND
ADVISORY BOARD
• ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW GARY SCHERQUIST
COMMITTEE
,i
i
�
CITY OF ARROYO GR.ANDE
RESERV4IR OF CITIZENS TO SERVE
Planning Commission _ '
X Parks and Recreation Commission ' '
Tra�c Commission r::_• :.�-� ; �, , • �-., �� Years Lived in Arroyo Grande.�
Senior Advisory Commission U= '-'•� ' � � � �� `-" `�
Registered Voter of Arroyo Grande
Architectural Review Committee Yes .�._ No ___
Downtown Parking Advlsory Boa�d (must own business in the Village area)
Speciai Boards/Committees (varies)
NAME ��.n`�' N-aTr��7r1
HOME
ADDRESS S'�p ��� rv�,,qn L,y� PHONE S�ds ��i[ L����
PRESENT EMPLOYER__ a l�rfq V15� �i0�+��1( �[dltw � L�Vl�- pOSIT1oN lP ub Y1�1v�J i"
BUSINESS ADDRESS_ (0 Ii� 11M �d'a a AVP�, �W GA ��°{DS pHONE $OS - S�jp ��,�d(��
� �
E�UCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Hiph School 1�- 5h�,co, l�`q1� �c�l��o� ' ( F � �
. College �a o�� , � �
,., -
ADDITIONAL EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC INTERESTS ��ou51 h� " il��-i�y` t tt� !Th C�l,e
The City Council would like to have the names of three(3)Arroyo Grande References:
NAME ADDRESS
�. � 3lS' es'�'r` r
2. r��`U� G` �2 D D
3. C.NGfial� �G�I�LttiM�S ��/��D ��131���fG�C �
;
ARE YOU WILLING TO SERVE ON THE COMMISSION/COMMITTEE/BOARD MEETING TIMES SHOWN BELOW:
Planning Commission,First and Third Tuesday of each month,6:00 PM Yes_No
Parks and Recreation Commission,Second Wednesday of each month, 6:30 PM Yes�No '
Traffic Commission,the day(Monday)before the third Tuesday of each month, 7:00 PM Yes_No €
Senior Advisory Commission�Flrst Wednesday of each month,3:00 PM Yes_No � �
Architecturai Review Committee First Monday of each month,3:15 PM Yes_No �
Downtown Parking Advisory Board-Meets as needed Yes_No
Special Boards/Commlttees(varies) • Yes_;No :
Signature�Ai� 1�( /l��lu�, I Z��j"/OL.�
�,o.�—�� ,.��. Date
The Arroyo Grande City Council requests lnformation about your interest (and education, if applicable), in serving on �
commission or committee, specifically your comments and views relaGve to the role and responsibilities of the Planninf
Commisslon, Parks and Recreation Commission, Traffic Commission, Senior Advisory Commission� Architectural Reviev� '
Committee or a Special Board/Committee. Please note such information on the reverse side of this form. Thank you for
your interes� �
THIS FORM IS A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORO
IF APPOINTED.COMPLETION OF A STATE CONFLICT OF INTEREST FORM IS REQUFRED
�• s�i�no4
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
RESERVOIR OF CITIZENS TO SERVE
Planning Commission � -. . - '
Parks and Recreation Commission ' '
�S— Tra�c Commission j.Yyea,r� Lived in Arroyo Grande.�
Senior Advisory Commission �'; �'' !.> '. �: f�i� °Re�istered Voter of Arroyo Grande
Architectural Review Committee Yes �_ No
Downtown Parking Advisory Board (must own business in the Village area)
Speciai Boards/Committees (varies)
NAME_ �'7� V�'-Il� �� , tK-D S S
HOME ,,
ADDRESS_ �. �� ����t��U �� PHONE �F,�J �- � 3 � �
PRESENT EMPLOYER �Iail�� p S ��pv�'� '� ` �� ` �� ppS�r�nN Sj�Q¢ �SSc'_Y}i�L
�
BUSINESS ADDRESS_ �1 �� O�-� Prv1[,2 RI u�� P• ' r �,�µ pHONE � Z�'i - 7 O o v
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
High School PJa:,��i�. � `�-� � College ;� � -�-�.> ���. �tz�; �L
ADDITIONAL EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION Jf E..cL, �z�-� y-���,,� ,,.;` , 5���,,,,^,,,� S y�
J � a -
Lna.�.B��--� t��'�l >.,.� t , �Tf� r'Lt v� '�c��5 cT� Pf� s cx,.� t�9 4-r•,1a ,c�,r• /�/ �
�" , � .
COMMUNITYAND CIVIC INTERESTS ..,1 �.. r}t,2,�[a� ,�t-y, n�,,.,,,�,��,..P � ���N ^Q �� ,
� ,
,
;4 t0 rY�„� S N�uf ���-,u �� v d . . ,
, �� ��. a > n� ��j+ci�'S , � ► 1-t., �
�,Q_,u� � G, ���_�'rz v� ��►�.,
The City Council would like to have the names of three(3)A�royo Grande References:
NAME ADDRESS
�._�'�� ��;�.�i�_� - �i,,�� � `f Z o���-5T � ��,�,�
2. N �`' �o ���� ��j$f 1..�-R c `v ,s,,�.�-i Q � '
3. �j�. P�U� �v ua ���T �zT ��2��1�s�,ri � ,�t �
i
3
ARE YOU WILLING TO SERVE ON THE COMMISSION/COMMITTEE/BOARD MEETING TIMES SHOWN BELOW: 3
�
Planning Commission, First and Thlyd Tuesday of each month,6:00 PM Yes_No �
Parks and Recreation Commission;Second Wednesday of each month,6:30 PM Yes_No �
Traffic Commission,the day(Monday)before the third Tuesday of each month, 7:00 PM Yes�No �
Senior Advisoty Commission,First Wednesday of each month, 3:00 PM Yes No
Architectural Review Committee Flrst Monday of each month,3:15 PM Yes No !
Downtown Parking Advisory Boa�d-Meets as needed Yes No S
Speciai Boards/C mittees(vari � • Yes No
Signature Date Z /3 0
The Arroyo Gra�de City Council requests information about your interest (and education, if applicable), in serving on a
commission or committee, speciflcally your comments and vlews relative to the role and responsibilities of the Planning
Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, Tra�c Commission, Senior Advlsory Commission, Architectural Review
Committee or a Special BoardlCommittee. Please note such information on the reverse side of this form. Thank you for
yourinterest.
THIS FORM IS A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD
IF APPOINTED. COMPLETION OF A STATE CONFLICT OF INTEREST FORM IS REQ IRED
812004
COUNCIL MEMBER ED ARNOLD'S
APPOINTMENT TO
SENIOR ADVISORY COMMISSION
- PENDING -
i
�
�
t
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
RESERVOIR OF CITIZENS TO SERVE
Planning Commission �
Parks and Recreation Commission
Traffic Commission Years Lived in Arroyo Grande
Senior Advisory Commission Registered Voter of Arroyo Grande
1�pecial Committees (Architectural Review, etc.) Yes No_ '�_
NAME �/�b��� � G- u �v
HOME ADDRESS �l� l K-l �'e S y � '��� '/-��f-y�
PHONE �—_��
PRESENT PRESENT /�
EMPLOYER �GG'/,�s ���G POSITION � /"� S oZ�v���'✓�
OFFICE BUSINESS �
ADDRESS �-3 .� � ��`��S` ��� TELEPHONE yT ? �����
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
High School �� College `7"
ADDITIONAL EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION
L��
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC INTERESTS
� i s � /�� �//%� �-i� � ��-�� �,��� ��--�.
�
The City Council would like to have the names of three (3)Arroyo Grande References:
NAME ADDRESS
1. l�o h,� /.���,5 /o / � .�-�----y! ' /'
2. .� � � � ��
�
3. 2 � �° ' C�-
ARE YOU WILIING TO SERVE ON THE COMMISSION/COMMITTEE MEETING TIMES SHOWN BELOW:
Planning Commission, First and Third Tuesday of each month, 7:30 p.m. Yes No
Parfcs and Recreation Commission, Second Wednesday of each month,6:00 p.m. Yes No
Tra�c Commission, Monday Previous to Third Tuesday of each month, 7:30 p.m. Yes No '
Senior Advisory Commission, First Wednesday of each month, 6:00 p.m. Yes No
Special.Committee (i.e.Architectural Review Committee, etc.), Various meeting
times and dates . Yes �No
�
Signature Date �� /2 --�� '
The AROyo Grande City Council requests infortnation about your interest(and education, if applicable), in serving on j
a commission or committee, specifically your comments and views relative to the role and responsibilities of the �
Planning Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, Traffic Commission, Senior Advisory Commission, or a
Special Committee. Please note such information on the reverse side of this form. Thank you for your interest. �
� THIS FORM IS A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD
IF APPOINTED COMPLETION OF A STATE CONFLICT OF INTEREST FORM IS REQUIRED (11/02/98) .
--�.._�-n...�,,.o..�.w,.e_..-.�..�_.._._.�....
CITY OF �ROYO G��ANDE
RESERVUIR OF CITIZENS TO SERVE
Planning Commission
Parks and Recreation Commission - � � �
Traffic Commission
Senior Advisory Commission �'�' �" ��� Z Years Lived in Arroyo Grande 3
��-: ���.. � ! �-,i� ; �
� Architectural Review Committee Registered Voter of Arroyo Grande
Downtown Parking Advisory Board (must own business in the Village area)Yes _� No �_
Special Boards/Committees (varies)
NAME � , ,�
.
HOME
ADDRESS� S -�j PHONE ��� ��
PRESENT EMPLOYER �
BUSINESS ADDRESS� � �y-7 �
� S PHONE "� /� �'�
i
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Hi h School Colle e '
I
ADDITIONAL EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION ����� � ,-��.-�-��.
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC INTERESTS G���, "- `� C
� ���
The City Council wouid like to have the names of three(3)Arroyo Grande References:
NAME ADDRESS
1. �r�15 Zl°l s. �fi�l..� b�� �D
2. 2c�� � . G�- 5� �ct�tcr�rs:
3_� �Y�z. 2.[2 5�tzrT �T' .
ARE YOU WILLING TO SERVE ON THE COMMISSION/COMMITTEE/BOARD MEETING TIMES SHOWN BELOW:
Pianning Commission, First and Third Tuesday of each month,6:00 PM
Parks and Recreation Commissioh, Second Wednesday of each month, 6:30 PM Yes_No �
Traffic Commission,the day(Monday)before the third Tuesday of each month, 7:00 PM Yes._No
Senlor Advisory Commission, First Wednes y of each month,3:00 PM
Architecturai Rev' Committee First on a ach month,3:15 PM Yes_No •
Downtown Par � dvisory Board ee ded Yes'�No
Speciai Boards mittees (vari Yes_No
� Yes_No
Signature
Date
The Arroyo Grande 'y Council �equests 1 rmation about your interest (and education, If applicable), in serving on :
commission or co ittee, specifically your comments and views relaGve to the role and responsibilitles of the Plannin�
Commission, Park and Recreation Commtssion, Traffic Commisston, Senior Advisory Commission, Architectural Review
Committee or a Special BoardlCommittee. Please note such i�formation on the reverse side of thls form. Thank you fo
your interest.
THIS FORM IS A MATTER OF PUBUC RECORD
IF APPOINTED COMPLETION OF A STATE CONFLICT OF INTEREST FORM IS RE UIRED
�-�.. __ ' 8/2004
November 17, 2004
As an architect and a citizen of Anoyo Grande, I am interested in the quality, scale and
design of our built environment. I support the community's efforts to preserve the unique
character of our Village and our cultural heritage.
In 2001,my wife and I relocated to the Village from Pasadena,CA. We purchased a
small home at the comer of Poole and Short Streets with the intention of expanding the
house. Before proceeding with the design, I met with Teresa McClish of Community
Development Dept. to learn of the City's vision for the Village and my propeRy. At the
time our property was located outside of the historic district but was being considered for
inclusion. '
I believe that the resultant design of our expanded home represents my approach to
design for contemporary needs while responding to the contextual needs of the
community. To be in scale w'ith surrounding homes, the house is broken into three,
relatively small wings. The historic yellow stone buildings in the Village inspired the
stone wall at the entry. The steep gables and the large"fish scale" pattem on the gable
ends were intended to reference the historic Victorian homes in the Village. It was also
important for us to save the mature trees on the property.
While in Pasadena, I served on the Design Commission for 7 years and was involved in
the writing of their Design Guidelines. In addition I served 5 years on Pasadena's
Cultural Heritage Commission.
I support Arroyo Grande's incorporation of a Cultural Heritage or Historic Preservation
Ordinance. To minimize the impact on City staff,I believe that the community reviews
required by such an ordinance can be incorporated into the purview of the ARG
If appointed, I would welcome the opportunity to serve my c ity and the City of
Anoyo Grande.
, .
� pRROr�
o ��,
� MiCORPORATE �Z MEMORANDUM
u °
� .,�. ,o. �o„ ,�
c4��FOR��P
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REGARDING AGENDA ITEM 8.F. —
CONSIDERATION OF COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS TO VARIOUS BOARDS,
COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES
DATE: JANUARY 25, 2005
The attached supplemental information was inadvertently not included with agenda
item 8.f. (Council Member Ed Arnold's appointment of John Keen to the Planning
Commission).
_- �
�
' � - � CITY OF ARROYO GRANOE �
' RESERVOIR aF Cff12ENS TO SEAVE . �
' RECEIVLD '�
.X_Planning C�mmission C�TY 0� fi,R�0Y0 G�?;:L�ears Lived in Arroyo Granda �
parks and Rec:eation Commission � �egistered Voter of Arroyo Grancfe
Traffic Commission 57 FE6 2�. :tt`i (�� J� . � Y�� N�
Senior Advisory Comm�ssion .
Special Committees (i.e.Teen Advisory, Architecturat Advisory, etc.)
�AME � C. �e ,
,( ?HONE '7��' ���D �
FiOME AQQRESS �1'� �Ol-/� �Ir" --
���,/_ . PRESct�C� �P��%GO�.
PRES�uT '_ , p�j�Y�F/�-� POSCr10N
EMPLOYER BUSINESS j
OFriCE TELEPHONE
ADGRESS - ,- � .
��UCATIONAL BACiCGROUN� /�
� ' Ir � m On� �/1��l��•� Caltege 1
High School l�rc�ma�c� !'� S /�I � ._._----.__._. -
ADOITIGiVAL E7UCATiONAL(NFOR(�tATiON � � �
COVIVIUVITY AND CiVIC INTEt7EjTS �;
���„ ' �/' o{. :%•G�'.,o�(
�
i he City Council wou(d like to have the names of three (3)Arroyo Ccande References: p,DORESS •
NAME � �
1. .
� .
3. .
ARE YOU WILL!NC TO SERVE ON THE COMMISSION ME=TING TIMEa SHaWN BELOW: '
Yes� No
?lanning Commission. Frst and Third Tuesday of each montt�,7�0,p.m. Yes N�
parics and Flec;eation Cemmission,Third Wednesday ef each mocith. 6:00 p.m.
Traffic Comm'�ssion, Monday Previous to Third Tuesday of each month,7:30 p.rR ��s �a •
Seniar Advisory Commission, Frst�1Vednesday af sach manth,7:40 p.m. �
Special Committee (i.e.Teen Advisory.Architectural Advisory, etc.),Various Yes No
ms�ting times and dates �
Oate �'z �'�
Slgnature ' .
The Arroyo C�anc'e C�ty Council requests informztion abo�t yo�r interest. (znd°ducation, if Zpp��c�b�e) in seNP�R��a�Ce�on
spec'rf i c a l t y y o u r c o m m e n t s a n d v i e or eAc��isat�Comr�mission or a Sp�al Cemrr�tceeP`P leasa n o�e s uch,i c s f Q�a�a n:�� �Ve�e
Commission,Traif;c Commtsston, Se �Y �
side of this form. Thank you for your inte�est. •
TNIS FOAM IS A MATTEA OF PUBLIC FiECORD
�� A�QpiNTtD.CaMPLEii�N OF A STATE CONFL]CT aF 1NTEAEST FORM IS REQUIRF�7
.. - _ n r1 9.a.
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
� CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the City Council of the
City of Arroyo Grande on TUESDAY, JANUARY 25, 2005 at 7 00 p m m the Arroyo
Grande City Council Chambers 215 E Branch Street Arroyo Grande CA to consider the
following item PROPOSED ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 8 38 TO TITLE 8 OF
THE ARROYO GRANDE MUNICIPAL CODE PROVIDING FOR THE LICENSURE OF
TOBACCO RETAILERS '
Applicant City of Arroyo Grande
Proposal In order to discourage violations of laws which regulate or prohibit
the sale or distribution of tobacco products;to mmors within the City
of Arroyo Grande the City Counal will consider a proposed
Ordinance which will require tobacco retailers to obtain a tobacco
retailer s license
Representative Rick TerBorch Chief of Police
Any person affected or concerned about the proposal may submit written comments to
n the Administrative Services Department before the City Council hearing, or appear and
_. be heard m support of or opposition to the proposal at the time of the hearing
Any person interested in the proposal can contact the Admmistrative Services
Department at 214 East Branch Street Arroyo Grande California or by telephone at
(805) 473-5414 dunng normal business hours (8 00 a m to 5 00 p m ) A copy of the
proposed Ordinance is avadable for public inspection at the above address
If you challenge an item in court you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Councii at, or prior to the public heanng
Failure of any person to receive the notice shall not constitute grounds for any court to
invalidate the action of the legislative body for which the notice was given
✓lLe7�� �
Kelly etm e City Clerk
Publish 1T The Tribune Friday January 14 2005
I '
� �
� pRROYO
� CP
� INCONPOR�TED 92 _
u �'_ m �
# �u�r �o is�i q
c4��FORN�P MEMORANDUM
TO CITY COUNCIL
FROM RICK TERBORCH, POLICE CHIEFi�
SUBJECT CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 8 38 TO
TITLE 8 OF THE ARROYO GRANDE MUNICIPAL CODE PROVIDING FOR
THE LICENSING OF TOBACCO RETAILERS
DATE JANUARY 25, 2005
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council consider introducing an Ordinance adding Chapter
8 38 to Title 8 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code providing for the licensing and
regulation of retailers of tobacco products
. ,
FUNDING �
Implementation of the Ordmance will prowde funds to cover the Police DepartmenYs costs
for enforang State tobacco laws and City Municipal Ordinances regulatmg the sale of
tobacco products including enforcing laws and ordinances prohibiting sales of tobacco
products to persons under eighteen (18) year of age
DISCUSSION
On October 12, 2000, the City enacted ordinances currentiy contained in Chapter 8 36 of
Title 8 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code which regulates the sale and distribution of
tobacco products Enforcement of these ordinances is currently conducted by the Police
Department with an annual fiscal impact of approximately $3,248
In March 2004 staff from the Tobacco Control Program San Luis Obispo County Public
Health Department contacted City Staff regarding Councd consideration of a tobacco
licensing ordmance Such an Ordinance would require each of the known eighteen (18)
tobacco retad establishments in the City to obtain a license to sell tobacco products A fee
would be imposed on the licensees to cover the Police DepartmenYs enforcement costs as
well as the City's administrative costs m administenng the program Additionally underthe
proposed Ordmance should a tobacco retailer sell a tobacco product to a minor that
retailer would face the suspension and/or revocation of its license to sell tobacco products
This provision will provide an additional incentive to tobacco product retailers to ensure
their employees and/or agents do not violate tobacco related laws and ordinances -
Many cities in Califorrna have adopted similar ordinances reqwring the licensing oftobacco �
retailers in order to ensure compliance with all federal state and local laws regarding this
product The following public entities have adopted tobacco retad licensing ordinances
n n
n CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 8 38 TO TITLE 8 OF
THE ARROYO GRANDE MUNICIPAL CODE PROVIDING FOR THE LICENSING OF
TOBACCO RETAILERS
PAGE 2
Antioch, Berkeley, Colma, Contra Costa County Daly City Danville East Paio Alto EI
Cernto Lafayette Los Angeles Mdlbrae, Pinole, Pittsburg Pleasant Hill Rancho Mirage
Redwood City, Richmond San Carlos San Mateo San Mateo County San Rafael San
Ramon and Walnut Creek The City of San Luis Obispo adopted such an ordinance in
June 2003 These ordinances have not been directly tested in court to date but appear to
be an appropriate mechanism for a city to enact to ensure to the extent possible that
tobacco distnbution laws are followed and to give a city an enforcement mechanism in
cases where such laws are not followed A 2003 survey taken by the San Luis Obispo
County Tobacco Control Program indicates that in the City of Arroyo Grande 33 3% of
retailers surveyed sold tobacco products to minors, compared with 17 10°/a statewide In a
separate survey 81% of high school�uniors and 63%of high school freshmen stated it was
"easy" to obtain tobacco products m the South County area
The proposed Ordinance is based upon the model ordinance developed by the Techrncal
Assistance Legal Center("TALC') for the Public Health Institute TALC is a pro�ect of the
Public Health Institute and provides assistance to California communities working to limit
tobacco sales marketing, and use through public policy development The City of Arroyo
Grande has long been a leading advocate of tobacco safety and municipal regulation The
�'' Police Department was one of the first in the County to conduct enforcement operations
regarding the sales of tobacco products to minors This Ordinance would continue that
effort, and will enhance the City's efforts to protect mmors from the illegal sales of tobacco
products
Fees imposed by other �urisdictions for tobacco retad licensing range from S50 00 to
$283 00 a year The City of San Luis Obispo adopted a fee of$255 00 Section 8 38 070
of the proposed Ordinance provides that the license fee shall be calculated so as to
recover the total cost but no more than the total cost of license administration and
enforcement including, for example, but not limited to, issuing the license, administenng
the license program retader education retader inspection and compliance checks,
documentation of violation, and prosecution of violators
Penal Code Section 308(a) prohibits the sale of tobacco products to a minor Enforcement
of Penal Code Section 308(a) would include undercover enforcement operations using
minors as decoys According to the San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department
Tobacco Control Program, to be effective the Police Department should conduct at least
four (4) compliance checks per retader each year Section 8 38 100 of the proposed
Ordinance mandates that the Police Department conduct at least four (4) compliance
checks each year There are approximately eighteen (18) known tobacco retaders in the
City that would be sub�ect to the Ordinance The Police Department estimates that it wdl
� reqwre approximately 64 hours of staff time to conduct four (4) compliance checks per
business each year at a total cost of approximately$3,248 00 Additionally it is estimated
'- administration ofthe licensing program bythe Police Departmentwdl reqwre eighteen (18)
hours of staff time per year with a cost of approximately$496 00 Accordingly, the cost to
the City to implement a tobacco licensing program is calculated to be approximately
� �
, CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 8 38 TO TITLE 8 OF �
THE ARROYO GRANDE MUNICIPAL CODE PROVIDING FOR THE LICENSING OF
TOBACCO RETAILERS
PAGE 3
$208 00 per tobacco retader per year ($3 744 00 divided by 18) Should the City Council
approve mtroduction of the proposed Ordinance a Resolution establishing the amount of
the license fee of$208 will be brought to the Councd along with the Ordinance for adoption
at its next regular meetmg
Upon adoption of this Ordinance staff wdl develop application and renewal procedures to
implement the Ordinance
ALTERNATIVES
The followmg alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration
��WAfi6pt the attached Ordmance,
��k` - Modify and adopt the attached Ordinance,
- Do not adopt the attached Ordinance or
- Provide direction to staff
�
�J
. r, n
ORDINANCE NO
` ' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE ADDING CHAPTER 8 38 TO THE,ARROYO
GRANDE MUNICIPAL CODE PROVIDING FOR THE LICENSING
OF TOBACCO RETAILERS
WHEREAS, State law prohibits the sale or furnishing of cigarettes tobacco products
and smokmg paraphernalia to minors as well as the purchase, receipt or possession of
tobacco products by minors (Penal Code § 308) and
WHEREAS, State law requires tobacco retaders to check the identification of tobacco
purchasers who reasonably appear to be under 18 years of age (Business &
Professions Code § 22956) and provides procedures for unannounced onsite
inspections of tobacco retailers using persons under 18 years of age (Business &
Professions Code § 22952) and
WHEREAS, the results of the 2001 California Youth Tobacco Purchase Survey
revealed that 17 1% of retaders surveyed statewide sold tobacco products to minors
however the 2003 local youth purchase survey revealed that 33 3% of the retaders
surveyed in the City of Arroyo Grande sold tobacco products to minors, and
n WHEREAS, the California courts in such cases as Cohen v Board of Superwsors, 40
Cal 3d 277 (1985) and Bravo Vending v City of Rancho Mirage 16 Cal App 4`h 383
(1993) have affirmed the power of the City to regulate business activity in order to
discourage violations of State law, and
WHEREAS, State law prohibits the sale or display of cigarettes through a self-service
display and prohibits public access to cigarettes without the assistance of a clerk but
permits the sale of tobacco products from certain vending machines (Business &
Professions Code § 22962) and
WHEREAS, the City of Arroyo Grande also prohibits the sale or display of cigarettes
through a self-service display and prohibits public access to cigarettes without the
assistance of a clerk and �
WHEREAS, State law prohibits the sale of bidis (hand-rolled filterless agarettes
imported pnmarily from India and some Southeast Asian countnes) except in adult-only
establishments (Penal Code § 308 1) and
WHEREAS, State law prohibits the manufacture, distribution .or sale of cigarettes in
packages of less than 20 cigarettes and prohibits the manufacfure, distribution, or sale
of roll-your-own tobacco in packages contairnng less than 0 60 ounces of tobacco
(Penal Code § 308 3) and
�' WHEREAS, State law prohibits public school students from smoking or using tobacco
products whde on campus, whde attending school-sponsored activities or whde under
the supervision or control of school distnct employees (Educ Code § 48901(a)) and
� �
ORDINANCE NO
PAGE 2
�J
WHEREAS, despite these restrictions minors contmue to obtain agarettes and other
tobacco products at alarming rates Each year an estimated 924 million packs of
cigarettes are consumed by minors 12 to 17 years of age, yielding the tobacco industry
$480 mdlion in profits from underage smokers (Joseph R DiFranza M D & John J
Librett M P H State and Federal Revenues from Tobacco Consumed by Minors 89
Am J Pub Health 1106 (1999)) and
WHEREAS, eighty-eight percent (88%) of adults who have ever smoked tried their first
cigarette by the age of 18 and the average age at which smokers try their first cigarette
is 14'/2 and
WHEREAS, a requirement for a tobacco retailer license wdl not unduly burden
legitimate business activities of retaders who sell or distnbute cigarettes or other
tobacco products to adults It will however allow the City to regulate the operation of
lawful busmesses to discourage violations of federal State, and local tobacco-related
laws
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Councd of the City of Arroyo
Grande as follows
SECTION 1 The above recitals and findings are true and correct i' ��
�J
SECTION 2 Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Chapter 8 38 is hereby added to
Title 8 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code as follows
Chapter 8 38 Licensing of Tobacco Retaders
Sections
8 38 010 Purpose
8 38 020 Definitions
8 38 030 Requirement For Tobacco Retailer License
8 38 040 Application Procedure
8 38 050 Issuance of License
8 38 O60 Display of L�cense
8 38 070 Fees For License
8 38 080 Licenses Nontransferable
8 38 090 License Violation
8 38 100 License Compliance Monitoring
8 38 110 Suspension or Revocation Of A License
8 38 120 Appeal of Suspension And/Or Revocation
8 38 130 Administratrve Fine/Penalties/Enforcement
8 38 010 Purpose ; \
It is the purpose and intent of this Chapter to discourage violations of laws which ��
prohibit or regulate the sale or distnbution of tobacco products to minors but not to
� n n
ORDINANCE NO �
PAGE 3
l ' expand or reduce the degree to which the acts regulated by state or federal law are
cnminally proscribed or to alter the penalty provided therefore
8 38 020 Definitions
The followmg words and phrases whenever used in this Chapter, shall have the
meanings defined m this Section unless the context clearly reqwres otherwise
(a) "Person" means any natural person, partnership, cooperative association,
pnvate corporation personal representative receiver, trustee, assignee, or any other
legal entity
(b) "Propnetor' means a Person with an ownership or managenal interest in a
business An ownership interest shall be deemed to exist when a Person has a ten
percent (10%) or greater interest m the stock, assets, or income of a business other
than the sole interest of secunty for debt A managenal interest shall be deemed to
exist when a Person can or does have, or can or does share, ultimate control over the
day-to-day operations of a business
(c) "Tobacco producY' means" (1) any substance contammg tobacco leaf,
including but not limited to cigarettes cigars pipe tobacco, snuff, chewing tobacco
dipping tobacco, bidis, or an other preparation of tobacco, and (2) any product or
formulation of matter containing biologically active amounts of nicotine that is
� manufactured sold, offered for sale, or otherwise distnbuted with the expectation that
the product or matter wdl be introduced into the human body but does not include any
product specifically approved by the Federal Food and Drug Administration for use m
treating nicotme or tobacco product dependence
(d) "Smoking' means possessing a lighted tobacco product, tobacco
paraphernalia or any other weed or plant (including a lighted pipe, lighted cigar, or
lighted cigarette of any kind), or the lightmg of a tobacco product, tobacco
paraphernalia, or any other weed or plant (includmg a pipe, cigar, or agarette of any
kind)
(e) "Tobacco retader" means any person who sells, offers for sale, or does or
offers to exchange for any form of consideration, tobacco, or tobacco products, `tobacco
retading" shall mean the doing of any of these things
(f) "Licensing AgenY' means a City employee designated by the City Manager
to serve m this capacity
(g) "Enforcement Agency" means the Arroyo Grande Police Department
(h) "Hearing Officer' means the City employee designated by the City
n Manager to serve in that capacity
�J l�-J J
ORDINANCE NO
PAGE 4
8 38 030 Requirement For Tobacco Retailer License �
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to act as a tobacco retader without first
obtaining and maintainmg a valid tobacco retailer s license issued pursuant to this
Chapter for each location at which that activity is to occur
� (b) No hcense wdl be issued to authonze tobacco retadmg at other than a
fixed location itinerant tobacco retading and tobacco retading from vehicles are
prohibited
(c) No hcense wdl be issued to authonze tobacco retading at any location that
is licensed under state law to serve alcoholic beverages for consumption on the
premises (e g , an "on-sale" license issued by the California Department of Alcoholic
Beverage Control) tobacco retading in bars and restaurants serving alcoholic
beverages is prohibited
(d) No person shall sell a tobacco product without first examining the
identification of the purchaser and confirming that the proposed sale is to a purchaser
who is at least the minimum age in state law for being sold the tobacco product
(e) Smokmg shall be prohibited at the location of a tobacco retailer except in
outdoor areas no closer than twenty feet from any door, window, or other opening into a
premises or enclosed space, unless smoking in such areas is already prohibited by ; 1
state or federal law A tobacco retader shall not permit smoking m wolation of this �J
provision and shall post conspicuous "no smoking' signs in all smoke-free spaces
(f) Licenses issued hereunder are valid for one (1) year and each tobacco
retader shall apply for the renewal of his or her tobacco retader's license prior to its
expiration A tobacco retailer license does not confer any new nghts under any other
law and does not exempt any business that otherwise would be sub�ect to the smoke-
free work place prowsions of Labor Code section 6404 5
8 38 040 Application Procedure
(a) An application for a tobacco retader's license shall be submitted to the
Licensing Agent in the name of each Proprietor/Person proposing to conduct retad
tobacco sales and shall be signed by such person or an authorized agent thereof All
applications shall be submitted on a form supplied by the Licensing Agent and shall
contain the following mformation
(1) The name, address, and telephone number of the applicant
(2) The business name, address, and telephone number of each
location for which a tobacco retader's license is sought
(3) Such other information as the Licensing Agent deems necessary �J
for enforcement of this Chapter
n n
ORDINANCE NO
PAGE 5
�
(4) Whether or not any Propnetor has previously been issued a license
pursuant to this Chapter that is, or was at any time, suspended or revoked and, if so,
the dates of the suspension penod or the date of revocation
8 38 050 Issuance of License
The Licensing Agent shall issue a tobacco retailer license unless substantial
record evidence demonstrates one of the following bases for dernal
(a) The application is incomplete or inaccurate, or
(b) The application seeks authorization for tobacco retading by a person or at
a location for which a suspension is in effect pursuant to Section 8 38 110 of this
Chapter, or
(c) The application seeks authorization for tobacco retading in an area that is
in wolation of City zoning pursuant to Title 16 of this Code or that is unlawful pursuant to
any other local, state, or federal law
8 38 060 Display of License
�
Each licensef�shall prominently display the license in a public place at each .
�.
location where tobacco retadmg occurs
8 38 070 Fees For License
The fee for a tobacco retailer's license shall be established by Resolution of the
City Councd •The fee shall be calculated so as to recover the total cost, but no more
than the total cost, of license admmistration and enforcement, including, for example,
but not limited to, isswng the license, admirnstenng the license program, retader
education, retader inspection and compliance checks, documentation of wolation, and
prosecution of violators The fee for tobacco retailer s license shall be paid to the
Licensing Agent
8 38 080 Licenses Nontransferable
A tobacco retader's license is nontransferabie to a different person or a different
location For example if a Proprietor to whom a license has been issued changes
business location, that Propnetor must apply for a new license pnor to acting as a
tobacco retader at the new location Or if the business is sold, the new owner must
apply for a license for that location before actmg as a tobacco retader
8 38 090 License Violation
n It shail be a violation of a license for a licensee or his or her agents or employees
to wolate any local, state, or federal tobacco-related law
8 38 100 License Compliance Monitoring
ORDINANCE NO � �
PAGE 6
�
Compliance with this Chapter shall be monitored by the Arroyo Grande Police
Department At least four compliance checks of each tobacco retader shall be
conducted dunng each twelve-month penod The cost of compliance monitoring shall
be incorporated into the license fee
8 38 110 Suspension or Revocation Of License
(a) In addition to any other penalty authorized by law, a tobacco retailer's
license may be suspended or revoked if the City fmds, after notice to the licensee and
opportunity to be heard that the licensee or his or her agents or employees has wolated
the conditions of the license imposed pursuant to this Chapter
(1) Upon a finding by the City of a first license violation within any five-
year period, the license shall be suspended for thirty (30) days
(2) Upon a findmg by the City of a second license violation withm any
five-year period, the license shall be suspended for ninety (90) days
(3) Upon a finding by the City of a third license violation within any five
i year penod, the hcense shall be suspended for one (1) year
(4) Upon a finding by the City of a fourth license violation within any �/
froe-year period, the license shall be revoked
(b) A tobacco retader's license shall be revoked if the City finds, after notice
and opportunity to be heard, that one of the following conditions exist The revocation
shall be without pre�udice to the fding of a new application for a license
(1) The application is mcomplete for fadure to provide the mformation
required by Section 8 38 040
(2) The mformation contained in the application, including
supplemental information, if any is found to be false m any material respect
(3) The application seeks authonzation for a license for tobacco
retading that is unlawful
8 38 120 Appeal of Suspension And/Or Revocation
(a) A decision of the City to revoke or suspend a license is appealable to a
Heanng Officer and must be fded with the Hearing Officer at least ten (10) working days
prior to the commencement date of the license suspension or revocation An appeal
shall stay all proceedings m furtherance of the appealed action Following appeal, the �
deasion of the Hearing Officer may be appealed to the City Manager or his/her
designee A deasion of the City Manager or his/her designee shall be the fmal decision
of the City
n n
ORDINANCE NO
PAGE 7
n (b) During a period of license suspension, the tobacco retader must remove
from public wew all tobacco products and shall not display any advertisement relating to
tobacco products that promotes the sale or distribution of such products from the
tobacco retader's location or that would lead a reasonable consumer to believe that
such products can be obtamed at the tobacco retader's location
8 38 130 Admirnstrative Fine/Penalties/Enforcement
(a) Any wolation of the provisions of this Chapter by any person is a cnme
and is punishable as provided in Chapter 1 16 of this Code Any wolation of the
provisions of this Chapter by any person is also sub�ect to administratrve penalties as
adopted by a Resolution of the City Councd
(b) If the City finds, based on substantial record ewdence that any unlicensed
person has engaged in tobacco retailing activities in violation of Section 8 38 030 of this
Chapter, the City shall fine that person Each day that an unlicensed person offers
tobacco products or tobacco for sale or exchange shall constitute a separate wolation
and wdl�ssessed a penalty as established by Resolution of the City Councd
�
(c) Violations of this ordinance are hereby declared to be a public nuisance
(d) In addition to other remedies prowded by this Chapter or by other law, any
� wolation of this Chapter may be remedied by a ciwl action brought by the City Attorney,
including but not limited to administrative or �udicial nwsance abatement proceedings,
civil or cnminal code enforcement proceedings, and suits for m�unctive relief The
remedies provided by this Chapter are cumulative and in addition to any other remedies
avadable at law or in eqwty
SECTION 3 If any section, subsection, subdroision, paragraph, sentence,
clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable,
such invalidity or unenforceabdity shall not affect the validity or enforceabdity of the
remaining sections, subsections, subdiwsions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or
phrases of this Ordinance or the rules adopted hereby The City Councd of the City of
Arroyo Grande hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection,
subdiwsion, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespectroe of the fact that
any one or more other sections, subdiwsions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or
phrases hereof be declared mvalid or unenforceable
SECTION 4 A summary of this Ordmance shall be published in a newspaper
published and circulated in the City of Arroyo Grande at least five (5) days prior to the
City Councd meeting at which the proposed Ordinance �s to be adopted A certified
copy of the full text of the proposed Ordinance shall be posted m the office of the City
Clerk W�thin fifteen (15) days after adoption of the Ordinance, the summary with the
� names of those City Counal members voting for and against the Ordinance shall be
published again, and the City Clerk shail post a certified copy of the full text of such
adopted Ordinance This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect thirty
(30) days after its passage
� �
ORDINANCE NO
PAGE 8
On mot�on of Councd Member , seconded by Counc�l �
Member , and on the following roll call vote, to wit
AYES
NOES
ABSENT
the foregoing Ordinance was passed and adopted this day of
, 2005
�
�J
rn �
ORDINANCE NO
PAGE 9
(�
TONY M FERRARA, MAYOR
ATTEST
KELLY WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT
�
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM
TIMOTHY J CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
n
� � --
�
I �
�
�
9.b.
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
� CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Councii of the City of Arroyo Grande will hold a
Public Hearing on TUESDAY, JANUARY 25, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Arroyo Grande City
Council Chambers, 215 E. Branch Street, Arroyo Grande, CA, to consider the following
item:
CASE NO. Conditional Use Permit 04-005
PROPOSAL: Review of mixed-use project comprised of finro (2) commercial
retail units, three (3) office units, and one (1) residental unit.
LOCATION: 101 Traffic Way
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION: Mitigated Negative Declaration
APPLICANT: John Robasciotti
REPRESENTATIVE: Mark Vasquez
Any person affected or concerned about the proposal m�y submit written comments to
the Community Development Department before the City Council hearing, or appear
and be heard in support of or opposition to the proposal at the time of the hearing.
Any person interested in the proposal can contact the Community Development
Department at 214 East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande, California, or by telephone at
(805) 473-5414 during normal business hours (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.).
If you challenge an item in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Failure of any person to receive the notice shall not constitute grounds for any court to
invalidate the action of the legislative body for which the notice was given.
��i
Kelly Wet ore ity Clerk
Publish 1T, The Tribune, Friday, January 14, 2005
� pRROy�
° ��
� INCORPORATED 92
" " MEMORANDUM
� JUIY 10, 1911 *
c4��FORN`P
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROB STRONG, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR�S
BY: JIM BERGMAN, ASSISTANT PLANNER
SUBJECT: MIXED-USE PROJECT WITH TWO RETAIL UNITS, THREE OFFICE
UNITS AND ONE RESIDENTIAL UNIT, LOCATED AT 101 TRAFFIC WAY
DATE: JANUARY 25, 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the attached Resolution
approving Conditional Use Permit 04-005, applied for by John Robasciotti.
FUNDING:
No fiscal impact.
DISCUSSION:
The applicant proposes to construct a mixed-use building with finro retail units and an
office unit on the ground floor, and finro office units and a residential unit on the second
floor. The proposed project is located at West Branch Street and Traffic Way, which is a
prominent entry to the Village of Arroyo Grande. The property is located within Design
Overlay District 2.4 and is subject to the Design Guidelines and Sfandards for Historic
Districts. Approval or denial of this Conditional Use Permit rests with the City Council due
to the applicant's proposed use of portions of the City owned right-of-way on Traffic Way.
Exterior
The exterior incorporates shiplap siding of longwearing and low maintenance materials
that resembles wood, a stone veneer at the base of the building and painted corrugated
steel roofing at window and boardwalk overhangs. The roof is flat with capped parapets
that will screen rooftop heating and air conditioning equipment. Downstairs retail windows
are grouped in a series and include transoms. Office and residential units utilize single
hung windows that occasionally have transoms. Window eyebrows, balconies and a
covered boardwalk add depth to the faCade. The exposed sub-floor at the rear of the
building will contain vented basement windows and a recessed vented door to provide air
circulation beneath the building.
Pedestrian and Automobile Circulation
Main entrances to the building are on West Branch Street and Traffic Way. The West
Branch Street entrance is emphasized by a breezeway connected to a boardwalk, while
steps leading to double doors, which are covered by a canvas awning, highlight the
CITY COUNCIL
MIXED-USE PROJECT WITH TWO RETAIL UNITS,.THREE OFFICE UNITS AND ONE
RESIDENTIAL UNIT, LOCATED AT 101 TRAFFIC WAY
JANUARY 25, 2005
PAGE 2 OF 4
Traffic Way entrance. Patrons who utilize the rear parking area can enter the building
through an arched entrance that leads to stairs rising to the main level. Pedestrian and
disabled circulation for the project will utilize existing but improved public sidewalks and
internal concrete walkways from the parking areas. Parking is accessed from Traffic Way
at a relocated driveway at the south end of the public right-of-way frontage.
Landscaqinq and Retaininq Walls
Landscaping include trees along Traffic Way, shade tolerant plants and sod on the north
side of the building, and vines to soften split face block retaining wall at the eastern
property line. Plant colors will emphasize yellows and purples to enhance the green
building. A three-foot stonewall is proposed to screen the view of the parking area from
Traffic Way.
Use of Public Right-of-Way
The subject parcel, which is located on the corner of West Branch Street and Traffic Way
is small in size (5,512 square feet), triangular in shape and is visually exposed on three
sides. These site constraints have the ability to hinder a potentially important architectural
landmark and fitting entrance to the Village and Traffic Way areas. In order to maximize
positive character attributes indicated in the goals of the Guidelines for Historic Districts
and the Village Core Downtown Design Standards of the Municipal Code, the project
designer proposes to continue the use of the City owned right-of-way on Traffic Way. Use
of the right-of-way would allow three on-site parking spaces, landscaping and a
patio/entry to the building. The applicant's proposal can also help guide future
development on the finro adjacent properties by providing for shared parking access
opportunities. This forethought will decrease the number of driveways entering on Traffic
Way. Staff proposes conditions of approval related to the use of the right-of-way, '
including rebuilding of sidewalks to ADA standards, installation and continued
maintenance of landscaping and a revocable encroachment permit that will allow the City
the ability to utilize the right-of-way in the future. In the event that the use of the right-of-
way is ever revoked, the applicant has designed the building to function without the
patio/entry and the extensive landscaping.
Parkinq
Required parking for this project totals 11.5 spaces. The applicant wishes to utilize
Municipal Code Section 16.56.050, which allows a 20 percent mixed-use parking
reduction. This mixed-use reduction lowers required parking to 9.2 spaces. The applicant
proposes 5 onsite spaces, which will leave a parking deficiency of 4.2 spaces. The
Planning Commission recommends that the applicant receive credit for 2 parking spaces
for the dedication to the City of 240 square feet (55 linear feet) of property frontage for
the future widening of West Branch Street. Currently, the only option available to the
applicant to satisfy the remaining parking deficiency, is to obtain, by contract or purchase,
2.2 offsite parking spaces within 500 feet of the project property. Staff however, is in the
process of bringing two additional parking options to the Council which could be utilized
i
_ _ --.-.�..�......_.��____.___.�._..._...
CITY COUNCIL
MIXED-USE PROJECT WITH TWO RETAIL UNITS, THREE OFFICE UNITS AND ONE
RESIDENTIAL UNIT, LOCATED AT 101 TRAFFIC WAY
JANUARY 25, 2005
PAGE 3 OF 4
by the applicant, (1) enlargement of the Downtown Parking and Business Improvement
District and adjustment and use of in-lieu fees based upon current land and improvement
costs and (2) use of parking in-lieu fees based upon current land and improvement costs
for all mixed use areas throughout the City. Although these finro options are beyond the
scope of this project, staff has created a condition of approval (see condition 26) that
would allow the use of either of these options ifi they were authorized prior to the issuance
of a building permit for this project. The applicant has indicated that he would prefer to
satisfy the remaining 2.2 required parking spaces by paying an in-lieu fee if the option
becomes available.
Plannin Commission and Architectural Review Committee
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 7, 2004 and adopted a
Resolution recommending the City Council approve the project with the conditions of
approval setForth in Exhibit "A" of the attached Resolution.
The Architectural Review Committee reviewed the project on November 1, 2004 and '
recommended approval of the project. The Architectural Review Committee amended '
and recommended approval of the landscape plan on December 9, 2004 and
recommended approval of minor exterior changes in material on January 6, 2005.
Environmental Determination ;
Staff has reviewed the project in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and has subsequently prepared an Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative !
Declaration (Attachment 6). Impacts that are potentially significant unless mitigated
include water, air quality, transportation/circulation and noise. These impacts are
discussed in detail in the attached Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the
mitigation measures described therein have been incorporated into the Conditions of
Approval as shown in Exhibit "A".
ALTERNATIVES:
The following altematives are presented for Council consideration: �
�
- Adopt the attached Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit 04-005.
- Do not approve the project and direct staff to return with a Resolution denying i
Conditional Use Permit 04-005.
- Provide direction to staff.
Attachments:
1. Project Plans
2. Minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of December 7, 2004
3. Minutes from the Architectural Review Committee meeting of November 1,
2004
$
CITY COUNCIL
MIXED-USE PROJECT WITH TWO RETAIL UNITS, THREE OFFICE UNITS AND ONE
RESIDENTIAL UNIT, LOCATED AT 101 TRAFFIC WAY
JANUARY 25, 2005
PAGE40F4
4. Minutes from the Architectural Review Committee meeting of December 9,
2004
5. Draft minutes from the Architectural Review Committee meeting of January
6, 2005
6. Mitigated Negative Declaration
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO
GRANDE ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION,
INSTRUCTING THE CITY CLERK TO FILE A NOTICE OF
DETERMINATION, AND APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE
NO. 04-005, LOCATED AT 101 TRAFFIC WAY, APPLIED FOR BY JOHN
ROBASCIOTTI
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande has considered an application
for Conditional Use Permit Case No. 04-005, filed by John Robasciotti, to construct a
3,706 square foot mixed-use building with two commercial units, three office units and a
residential unit; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing on this application in accordance
with the City Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this application in
accordance with the City Code on December 7, 2004 and adopted Resolution 04-1946
recommending approval of Conditional Use Permit 04-005; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has found that this project is consistent with the General
Plan and the environmental documents associated therewith; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed this project in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the Arroyo Grande
Rules and Procedures for Implementation of CEQA and has determined that a Mitigated
Negative Declaration can be adopted; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds, after due study, deliberation and public hearing, the
following circumstances exist:
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit Findings:
1. The proposed use is permitted within the Village Core Downtown (VCD) district
and complies with all applicable provisions of the Development Code, the goals
and objectives of the Arroyo Grande General Plan, and the development policies
and standards of the City.
;,
2. The proposed use will not impair the integrity and character of the district in which �
it is to be established or located because the proposed use is similar to �
surrounding uses and conforms to the intent of the Design Guidelines and i
Standarols for Historic Districts. k
3. The site is suitable for the type and intensity of use or development that is
proposed because all the necessary easements, setbacks, circulation and parking
requirements will be provided.
{
4. There are adequate provisions for water, sanitation, and public utilities arod '
services to ensure the public health and safety.
RESOLUTION NO.
RAGE 2
� 5. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or
materially injurious to properties and improvements in the vicinity because the
proposed project conforms to the Development Code and will be subject to the
conditions of approval as outlined in Exhibit "A".
Required CEQA Findings:
1. The City of Arroyo Grande has prepared an initial study pursuant to Section 15063
of the Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), for
Conditional Use Permit Case No. 04-005.
2. Based on the initial study, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for
public review. A copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and related materials
is located at City Hall in the Community Development Department.
3. After holding a public hearing pursuant to State and City Codes, and considering
the record as a whole, the City Council adopts a negative declaration and finds
that there is no substantial evidence of any significant adverse effect, either
individually or cumulatively on wildlife resources as defined by Section 711.2 of the
Fish and Game Code or on the habitat upon which the wildlife depends as a result
of development of this project. Further, the City Council finds that said Mitigated
Negative Declaration reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande hereby adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration, instructs the City Clerk to file a
Notice of Determination, and approves Conditional Use Permit Case No. 04-005, with the
above findings and subject to the conditions as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference.
On motion by Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and by
the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 25�' day of January 2005.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAG E 3
TONY M. FERRARA, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 4
EXHIBIT "A"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 04-005
ROBASCIOTTI BUILDING
101 TRAFFIC WAY
COMMLINITY DEVELOPM NT D PARTII� I�T
GENERAI C'ONDITION
This approval authorizes the construction of a 3,706 square foot mixed-use building with
two commercial units, three office units and a residential unit.
1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all Federal, State, County and City
requirements as are applicable to this project.
2. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Conditional Use
Permit Case No. 04-005.
3. This application shall automatically expire on January 25, 2007 unless a building f
permit is issued. Thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the approval, the
applicant may apply for an extension of one (1) year from the original date of
expiration.
4. Development shall occur in substantial conformance with the plans presented to '
the City Council at the meeting of January 25, 2005 and marked Exhibits "B1."
5. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action brought i
against the City, its present or former agents, officers, or employees because of ?
the issuance of said approval, or in anyway relating to the implementation thereof,
or in the altemative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the
City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attomey's fee's
which the City, its agents, officers or employees may be required by a court to pay
as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its
own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not
relieve applicant of his/her obligations under this condition.
DEVELOPMENT .OD
6. Development shall conform to the Village Core Downtown (VCD) zoning
requirements except as otherwise approved.
7. Signage shall be subject to the requirements of Development Code Chapter 16.60
and conditions of approval for a Planned Sign Program to be considered in the
future.
8. Setbacks, lot coverage, and floor area ratios shall be as shown on the
RESOLUTION NO.
PAG E 5
� development plans except as specifically modified by these conditions.
NOISE
9. Construction shall be limited to between the hours of 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. Monday
through Friday, and befinreen 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday.
I IGHTWC
10. All lighting for the site shall be downward directed and shall not create spill or glare
to adjacent properties.
WATER
11. All new construction shall utilize fixtures and designs that minimize water usage.
Such fixtures shall include, but are not limited to, low flow showerheads, water
saving toilets, instant water heaters and hot water recirculating systems. Water
conserving designs and fixtures shall be installed prior to final occupancy.
SOLID WASTE
12. Solid waste pick-up location as identified is acceptable. Trash enclosures shall be
screened from public view with landscaping or other appropriate screening
materials, and shall be made of masonry or concrete with an exterior finish that
complements the architectural features of the main building. The trash enclosure
area shall accommodate recycling container(s).
13. Trash enclosures shall be reserved exclusively for dumpster and recycling
container storage. Miscellaneous tires, auto parts, boxes, bins, racks, etc., will not
be allowed within the enclosure.
PRIOR TO ISSUING A BUILDING PERMIT:
14. The applicant shall submit an exterior lighting (photometric) plan for parking area
lighting.
15. A landscaping and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape
architect subject to review and approval by the Community Development
Department and the Parks & Recreation Department. The landscaping plan shall
include the following:
a. Tree staking, soil preparation and planting detail;
b. The use of landscaping to screen ground-mounted utility and mechanical
equipment;
c. The required landscaping and improvements. This includes
1. Deep root planters shall be included in areas where trees are within five '
feet (5') of asphalt or concrete surfaces and curbs;
,
RESOLUTION NO. ;
PAGE 6 '
�
� 2. Water conservation practices including the use of low flow heads, drip �
irrigation, mulch, gravel, drought tolerant plants and mulches shall be (
incorporated into the landscaping plan; and t
3. An automated irrigation system.
4. The selection of groundcover plant species shall include native plants.
5. Linear planters shall be provided in the parking area.
6. Street trees shall be a minimum of 24"-box size.
PRIOR TO ISSUING THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY:
16. Development shall comply with Development Code Sections 16.48.070, "Fences,
Walls and Hedges"; 16.48.090, "Lighting"; 16.48.120, "Performance Standards";
and 16.48.130 "Screening Requirements".
17. All electrical panel boxes shall be installed inside the building.
AR .HIT T 1RA REVIEW OMII�ITT F
18. All ducts, meters, air conditioning equipment, and other mechanical equipment,
whether on the ground, on the structure or elsewhere, shall be screened from
public view behind the parapets, or with materials architecturally compatible with
the main structure.
19. The canvas awning over west elevation shall not be stretched taught and shall
have a loose valance.
20. The metal over eyebrows and boardwalk shall conform to ARC recommendations
of January 6, 2005.
21. Stone material shall conform to ARC recommendations of January 6, 2005.
22. Planting changes per Architectural Review Committee of December 9, 2004.
PRIOR TO ISSUING A BUILDING PERMIT:
23. Prior to issuance of Building Permit the applicant shall return with sample of
actual stone veneer and a sample of split-face rock for final approval by the
Architectural Review Committee.
24. Prior to issuance of Building Permit the applicant shall return with painted hardy
plank (green color paint needs to be grayer than sample presented at the
November 1, 2004 ARC meeting)for final approval by the Architectural Review
Committee.
25. Individual tenant signs must be reviewed by the ARC.
_ . .•------...__�
""'°_-"---------_....
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 7
26• Prior to issuance of a buildin
required parking spaces per he Munichpal Code nt shall satisfy the remaining
PRIOR TO ISSUING A BUILDING PERMIT:
27• The applicant shall submit an exterior lightin I
g p an for Police Department approval. k
PRIOR TO ISSUING THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY:
28 equiremelnts.nt Shail post handicapped parkin ,
9 per Police Department
�1LD1�IG AND FIR� n �-
29• Project shali have a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute f
hours. or a duration of two (2)
30. Prior to bringing combustibles onsite, fire hydrants shall
Department and Public Works Department standards, be instailed, per Fire
�E�lBITY KFY RnY
31. Prior to occupancy applicant must provide an approved "securi
Building and Fire Department guidelines. ty key vault," per
FIRF �pRini�� �o�
32• Prior to occupancy all buildings must be fuily sprinklered per Buildin and Fir
Department guidelines. 9 e
33. OPTIC(� n n����r��
34. An opticom traffic signal pre-emption device shall be installed that mee
and Fire Department requirements at (Branch and Freeway 101). ts Building
35. Prior to issuance of a grading permit or buildin
first, applicant shall show proof of properly abandon�ingeall non-conform ng tems
such as septic tanks, wells, underground piping and other undesirable con ' '
ditions.
DEMO ITIOI` pco����-
----r._.._.._..._....._..,
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 8
� 36. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a demolition permit must be applied for,
approved and issued. Development fees resulting from demolition will be
appropriately credited to the property.
OTHER APPRO�/A S
37. Prior to issuance of a building permit, County Air Pollution Control Board
approval is required for a Demolition Permit.
FEES TO B PAID PRIOR TO I Sl1Af� F OF A B 111 I71NC; PFR�AIT
38. Water Meter, service main, distribution, and availability fees, to be based on
codes and rates in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
39. Water Neutralization fee, to be based on codes and rates in effect at the time of
building permit issuance.
40. Traffic Impact fee, to be based on codes and rates in effect at the time of
building permit issuance.
41. Traffic Signalization fee, to be based on codes and rates in effect at the time of
building permit issuance.
42. Sewer hook-up & facility Permit fees, to be based on codes and rates in effect
at the time of building permit issuance.
43. Building Permit fees, to be based on codes and rates in effect at the time of
building permit issuance.
44. Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (SMIP) fee, to be based on codes and '
rates in effect at the time of building permit issuance in accordance with State
mandate.
45. Park Development fee, to be based on codes and rates in effect at the time of �
building permit issuance. �
46. Park . �
Improvements fee, to be based on codes and rates in effect at the time of �
building permit issuance. €
47. Street Tree fees, to be based on codes and rates in effect at the time of building
permit issuance.
48. Fire Protection fee, to be based on codes and rates in effect at the time of
building permit issuance.
49• Police Facilities fee, to be based on codes and rates in effect at the time of
building permit issuance.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 9
50. Affordable Housing in lieu fee, as conditioned for this project.
SPEGIAL CONDITIONS/G�MM NTS
51. Prior to building permit a Revocable Encroachment PermiULicense Agreement that
is acceptable to the City Attorney must be established over the Public Right of
Way for Disabled Access. and for the development of landscaping, parking spaces
and the outdoor patio/building entrance. The agreement shall require the applicant
to provide replacement disabled access on-site and either in-lieu fees or off-site
parking acceptable to the Community Development Director in accordance with
City Code provisions.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
GENERAL GONDITI�N
52. Clean all streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks at the end of the day's operations
or as directed by the Director of Community Development or the Director of
Public Works.
53. Perform construction activities during normal business hours (Monday through
Friday, 7 A.M. to 5 P.M.) for noise and inspection purposes. The developer or
contractor shall refrain from performing any work other than site maintenance
outside of these hours, unless an emergency arises or approved by the Director
of Public Works. The City may hold the developer or contractor responsible for
any expenses incurred by the City due to work outside of these hours.
IMPROV M NT P AN
54. All project improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with
the City of Arroyo Grande Standard Drawings and Specifications.
55. Submit three (3) full-size paper copies and one (1) full-size mylar copy of
approved improvement plans for inspection purposes during construction.
56. Submit as-built plans at the completion of the project or improvements as
directed by the Director of Public Works. One (1) set of mylar prints and an
electronic version on CD in AutoCAD format shall be required.
57. The following Improvement plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil ':
Engineer and approved by the Public Works Department:
■ Grading, drainage and erosion control, '
■ Street paving, curb, gutter and sidewalk,
■ Public utilities,
■ Water and sewer,
■ Landscaping and irrigation,
■ Any other improvements as required by the Director of Public Works
58. The site plan shall include the following:
■ The location and size of all existing and proposed water, sewer, and storm '
drainage facilities within the project site and abutting streets or alleys. '
RESOLUTION NO.
PAG E 10
• The location, quantity and size of all existing and proposed sewer laterals.
■ The location, size and orientation of all trash enclosures.
■ All existing and proposed parcel lines and easements crossing the property.
• The location and dimension of all existing and proposed paved areas.
■ The location of all existing and proposed public or private utilities.
59. Improvement plans shall include plan and profile of existing and proposed
streets, utilities and retaining walls.
60. Landscape and irrigation plans are required for landscaping within the public
right of way, and shall be approved by the Community Development and Parks
and Recreation Departments. In addition, The Director of Public Works shall
approve any landscaping or irrigation within a public right of way or otherwise to
be maintained by the City.
�LILAIEB
61. Construction water is available at the corporate yard. The City of Arroyo Grande
does not allow the use of hydrant meters. '
62. Existing water services to be abandoned shall be properly abandoned and
capped at the main per the requirements of the Director of Public Works.
63. Each building shall have separate water meters.
64. The applicant shall complete measures to neutralize the estimated increase in
water demand created by the project by either:
■ Implement an individual water program consisting of retrofitting existing high-flow
plumbing fixtures with low flow devices. The calculations shall be submitted to
the Director of Public Works for review and approval. The proposed individual
water program shall be submitted to the City Council for approval prior to
implementation; OR,
■ The applicant may pay an in lieu fee of$2,200 for each new residential unit. r
;
65. The applicant shall install fire hydrants along the project frontage in accordance
with Public Works Department and Fire Department guidelines.
�EIaCEB
66. All sewer laterals within the public right of way must have a minimum slope of
2%.
67. All sewer mains or laterals crossing or parallel to public water facilities shall be
constructed in accordance with California State Health Agency standards.
68. Existing sewer laterals to be abandoned shall be properly abandoned and
capped at the main per the requirements of the Director of Public Works.
69. Obtain approval from the South County Sanitation District for impacts to and use
of district facilities.
PL1B IC 11Tll ITIF�
70. Underground all new public utilities in accordance with Section 16.68.050 of the
Development Code.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 11
� 71. Submit all improvement plans to the public utility companies for approval and
comment. Utility comments shall be forwarded to the Director of Public Works
for approval.
72. Prior to approving any building permit within the project for occupancy, all public
utilities shall be operational.
73. The applicant shall have the public utility companies sign the improvement plans
prior to approval.
ST�
74. All trenching in City streets shall utilize saw cutting. Any over cuts shall be
cleaned and filled with epoxy.
75. All street repairs shall be constructed to City standards.
76. Street structural sections shall be determined by an R-Value soil test, but shall
not be less than 3" of asphalt and 6" of Class II AB.
CURB, GUTTER, AND SID WA K
77. Remove and replace any cracked or broken curb, gutter and sidewalk.
78. Install curb, gutter and sidewalk along the Traffic Way frontage where sidewalk
currently does not exist.
79. Remove and replace the existing wheelchair ramp at the south east corner of
Traffic Way and East Branch Street if it does not meet current ADA and city
standard.
80. Utilize saw cuts for all repairs made in curb, gutter, and sidewalk.
81. Install tree wells for all trees planted adjacent to curb, gutter and sidewalk to
prevent damage due to root growth.
82. The applicant shall red curb those portions of the curb.in front of fire hydrants.
GRADING
83. Perform all grading in conformance with the City Grading Ordinance. !
84. Submit a preliminary soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and '
supported by adequate test borings. All earthwork design and grading shall be
performed in accordance with the approved soils report.
85. Submit all retaining wall calculations for review and app.roval by the Director of '
Public Works for walls not constructed per City standards.
DRAINAGE
86. All drainage facilities shall be designed to accommodate a 100-year storm flow. !
87. All drainage facilities shall be in accordance with the Drainage Master Plan. '
88. The project is in Drainage Zone "B". Storm water runoff may be directed to the
creek.
89. Drop inlets shall include filters and design of outlet to creek shall be acceptable
;
RESOLUTION NO.
PAG E 12
to Public Works and Department of Fish & Game.
DEDICATIONS AND EA R�Ff�T
90. All easements, abandonments, or similar documents to be recorded as a
document separate from a map, shall be prepared by the applicant on 8 1/2 x 11
City standard forms, and shall include legal descriptions, sketches, closure
calculations, and a current preliminary title report. The applicant shall be
responsible for all required fees, including any additional required City
processing,
P RMIT
91. Obtain an encroachment permit prior to performing any of the following:
■ PerForming work in the City right of way,
■ Staging work in the City right of way,
■ Stockpiling material in the City right of way,
■ Storing equipment in the City right of way.
92. Obtain a grading permit prior to commencement of any grading operations on
site.
EEE�
93. Pay all required City fees at the time they are due.
94. Fees to be paid prior to plan approval:
■ Plan check for grading plans based on an approved earthwork estimate.
� ■ Plan check for improvement plans based on an approved construction cost
estimate.
■ Permit Fee for grading plans based on an approved earthwork estimate.
■ Inspection fee of subdivision or public works construction plans based on an
approved construction cost estimate.
ACREEMENT
95. Inspection Agreement: Prior to approval of an improvement plan, the applicant
shall enter into an agreement with the City for inspection of the required '
improvements. '
96. Improvement Removal and Relocation Agreement: Prior to approval of an
improvement plan, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City as
approved by the City Attorney and Director of Public Works for the removal and
relocation of all new improvements within the public right of way at the expense
of the applicant. ;
IMPROVEMENT C:URITI S ;
�
97. All improvement securities shall be of a form as set forth in Development Code �
Section 16.68.090, Improvement Securities.
98. Submit an engineer's estimate of quantities for improvements for review by the �
Director of Public Works. �
99. Provide financial security for the following, to be based upon a construction cost ?
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 13
estimate approved by the Director of Public Works:
. Faithful Performance: 100% of the approved estimated cost of all improvements,
. Labor and Materials: 50% of the approved estimated cost of all improvements,
. One Year Guarantee: 10% of the approved estimated cost of all improvements.
This bond is required prior to acceptance of the improvements.
PRIOR TO IS 11N A FRTIFI AT OF O 11PANC`Y
100. All utilities shall be Qperational.
101. All essential project improvements shall be constructed prior to occupancy. Non-
essential improvements, guaranteed by an agreement and financial securities,
may be constructed after occupancy as directed by the Director of Public Works.
MITIGATION MEASURES
A negative declaration with mitigation measures has been adopted for this project. The
following mitigation measures shall be implemented as conditions of approval and shall
be monitored by the appropriate City department or responsible agency. The applicant
shall be responsible for verification in writing by the monitoring department or
agency that the mitigation measures have been implemented.
Mitigation Measures:
MITIGATION MEAS R
Water
1. The applicant shall complete measures to neutralize the estimated
increase in water demand created by the project by either:
Implementing an individual water program that utilizes fixtures and '
designs that minimize water usage. The calculations shall be '
submitted to the Director of Public Works for review and approval. '
The proposed individual water program shall be submitted to the
City for approval prior to implementation; or paying an in lieu fee.
Monitoring: Review of individual water program or
payment of the in lieu fee
Responsible Department: Public Works Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
2. All new construction shall utilize fixtures and designs that minimize water i
usage. Such fixtures shall include, but are not limited to, water saving a
toilets, instant water heaters and hot water recirculating systems. Water
consenring designs and fixtures shall be installed prior to final occupancy.
Monitoring: Review of building plans
Responsible Department: Building and Fire Department �
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
�
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 14
3. All landscaping shall be consistent with water conservation practices
including the use of drought tolerant landscaping, drip irrigation, and mulch.
To the greatest extent possible, lawn areas and areas requiring spray
irrigation shall be minimized.
Monitoring: Review of landscaping and irrigation
plans
Responsible Department: Parks and Recreation Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
4. All runoff water from impervious areas shall pass through a fossil filter and
be conveyed through impervious conduits to existing storm drain facilities.
A drainage plan, which incorporates the above, shall be submitted to the
City prior to the issuance of any permits.
Monitoring: Review of drainage/grading plans
Responsible Department: Public Works Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of a grading permit
Air Quality
5. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut
or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems are to be used to prevent
dust from leaving the site and to create a curst after each day's activities
cease. '�'
�
�
6. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep
all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving
the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the
later morning and after work is completed for the day and whenever wind
exceeds 15 miles per hour. ;
7. Soil stockpiled for more than finro days shall be covered, kept moist, or
treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation.
Monitoring: Review of grading and building plans and site
inspections
Responsible Department: The Building and Fire Department shall inspect
plans, and the Community Development
Department shall spot check the field
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of grading permit
Transportation/Circulation
8. The applicant shall pay the Traffic Signalization Impact fee.
Monitoring: The applicant shall pay the fee
Responsible Department: Building & Fire Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of Building Permit
_
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 15
9. The applicant shall pay the City's Transportation Facilities Impact fee.
Monitoring: The applicant shall pay the fee
Responsible Department: Building & Fire Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
10. The applicant shall pay its fair share of the cost of a Opticom traffic signal
pre-emption device at the intersection of Branch Street and Freeway 101.
Monitoring: The applicant shall install the improvements
Responsible Department: Building & Fire Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
11. The applicant shall mitigate for parking deficiencies by either:
Providing by written contract, off-site parking within 500 feet of the
proposed project equal to the number of parking spaces required by the
Municipal Code of the City of Arroyo Grande but not developed on site;
. Payment of an in-lieu fee at the current established rate multiplied by the
number of parking spaces required by the Municipal Code of the City of
Arroyo Grande but not developed on site if the project location is
incorporated into the Downtown Parking and Improvement District.
In the event of changes to the property or parking contracts by either the
applicant or the City of Arroyo Grande that reduces the number of on-site
or-off site parking spaces provided, the applicant must utilize one or more of
the mitigation options to make up for the lost spaces. In-lieu fees will be '
based upon rates in effect at the time of the change to the parking situation.
Monitorin '
9� The applicant shall install the improvements
Responsible Department: Community Development Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit or ;
subsequent elimination of revokeable ;
encroachment permit !
t
�
Noise
12. All construction equipment shall be provided with well-maintained,
functional mufflers to limit noise.
13. Construction shall be limited to befinreen the hours of 8 a.m. and 6 p.m.
Monday through Friday, and between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. on Saturday and
Sunday.
14. To the greatest extent possible, grading and/or excavation operations at
- •--�...�.�-----._._._._r..
RESOLUTION NO.
. PAG E 16
� portions of the site bordering developed areas should occur during the
middle of the day to minimize the potential for disturbance of neighboring
noise sensitive uses.
Monitoring: Notes shall be placed on the construction plans
referencing the above measures.
Responsible Department: Public Works Department
Timeframe: During construction
i
i
�
. �
MINU7ES �
P�-ANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 7, 2004 ATTAC�-{�AE�ur �
MINUTES ATTACH�AENT 2
PLANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 7, 2004
A disc 'on on the voting procedure, when only three Commissioners are present, took
place. Strong referred to Resolution 03-1908, F.2 & F.3 of the Planning
Commission -laws stating that this specific type of project can be passed by a 2 to 1
vote.
Commissioner Fowler de a motion, seconded by Commissioner Keen, to approve
the CUP 04-003 and Lot ger 04-003 and adopt:
R OLUTION NO. 04-1945
A RESOLUTION OF THE P ING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE ADOPTI A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
INSTRUCTING THE SECRET TO FILE A NOTICE OF
DETERMINATION, AND APPROVIN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
CASE NO. 04-003 AND LOT MERG CASrE NO. 04-003, FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF AN OFFICE BUILDIN N PROPERTY LOCATED
AT NORTH HALCYON ROAD AND FAEH S ET, APPLIED FOR BY
THE OPERATING ENGINEERS UNION, LOCAL
The motion was approved on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Fowler and Keen
NOES: Commissioner Brown
ABSENT: None ;
�
the foregoing Resoluti was adopted this 7�' day of December 2004.
C. HOUSING ELEMENT U • APPLICANT — CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE; '
LOCATION — CITYWIDE
Staff recommended continuance of this item January 18, 2005 regular meeting of
the Planning Commission to enable review commen m HCD prior to considertion.
Commissioner Keen made a motion, seconded by Commission wler to continue this �'
item to the meeting of January 18, 2005, on a 3/0 voice vote. r
�
i
D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 04-005; APPLICANT — JOHN
ROBASCIOTTI; LOCATION —TRAFFIC WAY AND BRANCH STREET
Assistant Planner, Jim Bergman presented the mixed-use proposal for retail, office and
residential uses located on the southeast corner of West Branch Street and Traffic Way
and subject to the Design Guidelines and Standards for Historic Districts; ARC
recommendations have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval and on
December 9, 2004 a sample of the stone and split face rock, color sample of siding
material and planting plan will retum to the ARC for final review. Staff has also �
requested that the ARC have final review of the screening of roof equipment. In �
conclusion, Mr. Bergman stated that staff recommended that the Planning Commission
adopt a Resolution recommending City Council approve the CUP.
MINUTES PAGE 5
PLANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 7, 2004
Commission comments:
Fowler:
• Would like to know height of the billboard.
• Does not like the look of"rusty tin"for the roofs over the windows ("eyebrows").
• Would this building be higher than the "Village Center" buildings?
• Asked for confirmation on the in-lieu fee for parking. Mr. Strong said the recommended
$12,000 per space could be considered by Council in January or February of 2005; the
applicant is prepared to pay the in-lieu fees.
Brown: .
• Re the perspective of the building, it looked taller when we reviewed the Pre-App; he
would like to see more clearly what this would look like when it goes to Council.
• Re the parking reductions: Can this be revisited in the future if there is not enough
parking? Mr. Strong said the Commission can include a provision to revisit at a later
date if necessary; staff supports the project as proposed with the mixed-use parking
reduction and the credit for the widening of Branch Street (there is no proposed
compensation to the applicant for the property offer of dedication to the City); in the
event of loss of on-site parking spaces due to Tra�c Way widening; the lost spaces
could be replaced by the in-lieu fee.
• Re the right-of-way usage, the City is not receiving anything in return. Mr. Strong said
this is a matter for Council determination based on Commission recommendation.
Vice Chair Brown opened the hearing for public comment.
Mark Vasquez, representative, addressed concems:
• The height of billboard is 21 feet above sidewalk level.
• Clarified the building height relative to Village Centre.
• Re "eyebrows" after research on the era a proposal to have a metal roof was suggested
and would fit with style of the building.
• Re the parking reduction, this is a difficult site, but we think we have the solution to make
it viable.
• Re the right-of-way, this will benefit the City, as we will be planting the area, also
maintaining it and enabling a shared driveway to access adjacent property.
• We are hoping to emulate the stone on the building with that on the bridge rail
construction.
• This project will go before the ARC again on December 9th to decide on the colors.
John Robasciotti, applicant, addressed right of way issue; stated primary goal is to
create a property that the City can be proud of; over last 75 years most of this property
has been given to the City; 240 sq. ft. is proposed for dedication to tMe City for the future ;
widening of Branch Street (Hwy 227); re colors and roof material not yet decided; he
wants the ARC to be the final approvers. '
Chuck Fellows, ARC, stated his approval of the building and that the ARC would be
reviewing it again at their next meeting; liked the fact that the Traffic Way frontage right-
of-way would be landscaped.
MINUTES PAGE 6
PLANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 7, 2004
Steve Ross, 211 Garden Street, stated re right of way and future use, the City did
approve rebuilding of the non-conforming bridge rail and Mr. Spagnolo had confirmed
that future widening would only take place on one side; this building will be a great
improvement to the Village.
Jens Waggoner, tenant in the present building, stated the most benefit will be gained by
the improvement of the view as you enter the Village.
Pearl Cole, resident 137 W. Branch Street, stated she is very glad to see living quarters
included and may be good for older citizens who want to be close to conveniences and
hope that this will be considered with the new overlay.
Vice Chair Brown closed the hearing to public comment.
Commission Comments: �
Fowler:
• Likes the project; it will be a very nice entrance to the Village.
• She will never like the "rusty tin" look. ;
• She approved of the parking issue
Keen:
• Agreed with Commissioner Fowler, did not approve of the "rusty metal" look —
totally against it; would rather see galvanized metal or some other material that
meets the time period.
• Re inconsistency in Conditions of Approval re opticom device, Page 6, No. 32 & ;
Page Page 13, No. 10, asked for clarification. !
• He liked the project and stated it was appropriate for the site and would not look �
same as the building across the street because it was not stucco. good job. �
Brown:
• Happy about the project. �
_
• Still has a concern with private use of right-of-way.
• Did not think it will be underparked.
• Re the rust look, he would not want to see corrugated painted metal roofing and
� would be happy to see some other type of inetal.
• He could vote to recommend approval to Councif.
Mr. Devens stated the applicant had requested re-wording of Condition No. 77, and staff
will add condition No. 94 re an encroachment agreement recorded against property for
removal and relocation of improvements.
Commissioner Keen made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Fowler to recommend
approval to City Council of Conditional User Permit Case No. 04-00, including 1)
Rewording of Condition No. 77; 2) Recording of an agreement (No. 94) for relocation of
improvements and 3) that the ARC address Commission concerns with the "rusty tin"
look and adopt:
MINUTES PAGE 7
PLANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 7, 2004
RESOLUTION 04-1946
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, INSTRUCTING THE
SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION TO FILE A NOTICE OF
DETERMINATION, AND APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE
NO. 04-005, LOCATED AT 101 TRAFFIC WAY, APPLIED FOR BY
JOHN ROBASCIOTTI
The motion was approved on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Keen, Fowler and Vice Chair Brown
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 7�' day of December 2004.
IV. N-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS:
Item ad after Agenda preparation:
*PRE-APPL TION CASE NO. 04-018, HAMPTON INN & SUITES; LOCATION —
CAMINO MER DO AND WEST BRANCH STREET.
Revised plans an raft copy of December 14, 2004 City Council staff report were
presented to the Co ission for their review. Mr. Strong asked for Commission
comment, but stated tha e applicant was not present to answer questions.
Comments:
Keen:
• He still found it difficult to visu ' e the building heights and asked how much
taller was this than the parking lot o e motel above. Mr. Strong stated that he
had suggested a model to include su nding buildings to allow envisioning of
the building height, when the formal applic ' ns are submitted.
Brown:
• He concurred with Keen.
• He was not comfortable commenting and having jus eceived the revised plans
tonight.
• He would like to see a grading plan with heights include • the height is a big
issue; does not like CAD drawings.
• Re their corporate identity and the tower extension, he believe anges could ',
be made.
In reply to a final question from Commissioner Brown, Mr. Devens stated th after
review of the intersection plans he did not think there would need to be y
reconfiguration necessary.
ARC Notes ATTACHMENT 3
November 1, 2004
C1 ADMINISTRATIVE SIGN PERMIT ASP 04-029 & COMMUNITY
VELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT CDBG 04-006; APPLICANT — Arroyo
G de Flower Shop; REPRESENTATIVE — Kurt Schroeder; LOCATION —
150 Branch Street
A motion s made by Chuck Fellows and seconded by Melanie Hodges to
reopen Item 2., due to the fact that no representative had been present
when discusse arlier, this would expedite the project without delaying it to
the December me 'ng, and there had been no public comment previously.
Motion approved: 5 voice vote.
Robin McDonald, of Avif ign and Design, presented comments. She
understood they wanted to lo the sign, but she made it stick up over the top
on purpose, because 1) it's an u top and 2) if goes down too much further,
there's an arbor with flowers and it wi scure the bottom of the sign. In regards
to shortening the length, she was trying give roundness to the sign, which is
ve.ry short, but it's a nice detail and position he center of the windows.
The ARC had the following comments and questio •
• The sign looks too large,for the building, so the p ment makes sense, but
ARC still wanted a reduced length.
A motion was made by Chuck Fellows and seconded by nie Hodges to
amend the prior motion, leaving 10% reduction in the lengt f the sign,
proportionately reducing the size vertically, but to eliminate loweri it to the
bottom of the mansard. Motion approved: 5/0 voice vote. '
ARC took a five minute break from 2:40 to 2:45 P.M.
D. PRE-APPUCATION CUP 04-005; APPLICANT — John Robasciotti;
REPRESENTATIVE — Mark Vasquez; LOCATION — 101 Traffic Way
The project was presented by Assistant Planner, Jim Bergman. It is a mixed-use
building with two retail units on the first floor, two office units and a residential
unit on the second floor. The exterior is shiplap siding of longwearing materials.
Because of the sloping site, the sub-floor is visible from the rear. That is mostly
used for ventilation. Parapets will cover rooftop equipment (HVAC for upper
offices). The bottom of the building is trimmed out in stone. ;
�
�
Mark Vasquez noted he returns with these project changes after initial meetings ''
with advisory bodies on the Pre-Application and additional meetings (to discuss
the changes) with committee and Council members. This is a difficult site. He
tried to make it fit Design Guidelines, while still scaling it appropriate to the site.
One of the City's requests was street widening, and he had to keep the building
accessible for ADA compliance. The window "eyebrows" are there for texture,
dimension, and also heat control. The corner space might be a coffee shop/ cafe
. �
ARC Notes Page 6
November 1, 2004
for people to sit and enjoy the Village. Materials selection was —though he can't
get native stone - to get close to the stone of the IOOF Hall. They have provided
onsite parking as much as possible, and may purchase additional spaces
through the parking district. The billboard sign obscures part of the building, but
in planning for when it goes away, instead of leaving a blank wall, he pulled the
building back a little bit, and added window treatments and landscaping, and a
pedestrian walkway for some visual relief.
The ARC had the following comments and questions:
• Chuck Fellows said, "It's really a nice entrance to the Village."
• Chair Hoag and Melanie Hodges liked the prior project, but this suits the
surrounding area better and is a more appropriate architectural entrance
to the Village.
• Can they use stone instead of split face on the trash enclosure? It won'� be
as visib/e, because there will be wall there. Also, when these properties
develop, they'll need a combined access, so one ramp could service bofh
properties. There's a retaining wall needed for s/ope and to mainfain the
billboard sign and the trash enclosure will be buried.
• ARC likes the eyebrows and the patio. Mr. Robasciotti noted the fa�ade of
the patio would accommodate lettering on the stone face (like "Welcome
to City ofAG'; efc.)
• Chuck Fellows' comments:
■ He requested they use plants that thrive in this area, such as London
Plane or Coast Redwood. Josie, the /andscape architect was present for
input. They intend to come back later with a planting plan.
• Keep trees away from corner for sight distance.
• Plant shrubs or something to soften parking area.
• What is in planting boxes under eyebrows? Vines.
■ Regarding split face block - he prefers slump. (Chair Hoag is fine with split
face and historically, ARC has required it.)
■ He requested lites and mullions for an older look over the windows (even if
there's clear glass on the bottom).
• No consensus from ARC. There are already transoms, so additional
detail could soften building or could make it too busy.
■ He also suggested that one of the windows be made lower on the false
balcony to resemble a door. This was patterned after hotel on Branch St.
■ The canvas awning shouldn't be stretched taught, rather it should have a
valance and hang loose. (ARC consensus on valances.)
■ What is the material over the eyebrows? Metal, like on the Historical
Society's barn. (galvanized metal).
• What is the material covering the windows? They will have ironwork on
the outside and a screen behind (like a heavier mesh, so people can'�see
through).
• Does the glass on the entrance doors go all the way down? Mr. Vasquez
replied if doesn'� go all the way to the bottom, buf will be a large expanse
of glass. They will be wood (frame) doors—not aluminum storefront.
ARC Notes page 7
November 1, 2004
• Is a color board available? They plan colors similar to whaf Robasciotti has
now-greens and whites, with earth fone stone.
• What he has is too light for such a large building.
• He might use a more gray shade of green. It's a little bright, too bluish.
Mr. Robasciotti suggested bringing a samp/e painted on the actual
material, because it's not as bright on the hardy plank.
• Chuck Fellows suggested using real stone. The actual stone is larger
fhan the color board sample (this was the closest they could get).
• Jamie Ohler said the site plan is fine. The elevations are "always up for
debate". The corner needs a nice building and something needs to happen.
Robasciotti needs a little encouragement.
A motion was made by Chuck Fellows and seconded by Melanie Hodges to
approve CUP 04-005, with the following conditions: 1) the canvas awning over
west elevation not be stretched taught and have a loose valance, 2) metal over
eyebrows be similar corrugated metal to Historical Barn, 3) retum with sample of
actual stone veneer, 4) retum with painted hardy plank (because green color
paint needs to be grayer than sample), 5) actual signs need to be reviewed by
ARC, 6) bring back planting plan, and 7) bring back sample of split face block (3-
7 before building permit is issued). Motion approved: 5/0 voice vote.
ARC consensus was to hear item F next, since the applicants were from out of
town and needed to get on the road.
F. E-APPLICATION PRE 04-017; APPLICANT — Paul Poirier; LOCATION —
91 ncho Parkway ,
The project s presented by Ryan Foster. The applicant is moving to replace
building pad `I', construct finro buildings (instead of one large one). It would
have roughly the sa square footage (just a little less), but it will have different
massing. It will accom ate a drive-through for Wells Fargo if it passes. Also,
it will require an amendmen the Planned Sign Program, since Petco wants a
tower element with a sign facin wards the 101 freeway. As far as elevations,
it basically matches the existing desi in the center.
Paul Porier and Joel Jennings (architects) present, along with Dave Pintard
(Investec). Mr. Poirier noted that originally, building was 36,000 sf, and
they're now proposing 33,200 sf. One potentia nant is Petco, who has
requested a smaller size building and freeway visibi The nearby houses
won't be able to see the signage and it's better than havin ' on the back of the
building. They're proposing some new monument signs in co t (no drawings ;
available) to list tenants. Dave Pintard's concept for leasing is ave smaller
tenants, with more of a local mix. The existing buildings have pr ems with
swallows, so rather than continue that architectural style, they have p ed up '
outlying buildings (this will look more like Trader Joes' and AG Edwards).
_ _ i
ARC Notes ATTACHMENT 4
December 9, 2004
o Second bu e word "shall" instead of"should".
o Fourth bullet, ma t to add word "alleys" at end of sentence
for clarification.
A motion was made by Melanie Hodges and se ed by Chuck Fellows to
recommend approval of TTM 04-002, PUD 04002, an 04-001, subject to
the above revisions to the Design Guidelines. Motion a ved: 4/0 voice
vote.
C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 04-005; APPLICANT — John
Robasciotti; REPRESENTATIVE — Mark Vasquez; LOCATION — 101
Traffic Way
The project was presented by Assistant Planner, Jim Bergman. This is a
presentation of landscape plans for a project previously conditioned. Mr.
Vasquez has also brought stone and color samples.
Josie Joosten, landscape architect, presented the landscape plan. The trees
are from the City-approved street tree list. There's a retaining wall that she
covered with plants. The color theme is yellow and purple, since the building �
is green with a yellow sign. She used several yellow roses, daylilies, and i
purple leaf plum trees. There is some sod, but the narrow strip on the side
could easily be covered in shrubs instead. To screen the billboard, she used '
a tall canary island pine tree.
ARC had the following comments and questions:
• Will existing landscaping plants be moved or used elsewhere? Neither,
as it would be too expensive.
• What does "Aaron's Beard" look like? It's about a foot tall, with a �
glossy green leaf and yellow flowers, which is good for erosion control.
Mark Vasquez presented colors and stone samples. The cultured stone will
also be used on the bridge railing project.
ARC had the following comments and questions:
• Will the stone be grouted? It probably could be, depending on
installation requirements.
o ARC would like the stone grouted in a medium color grout. The
stone itself was found acceptable.
• In response to Mr. Vasquez's question about possibly changing the
paint color after test patching a large portion, ARC agreed to have at
least one member come by to check it. The current paint color was
found acceptable.
• Further discussion was held on the landscape plan:
ARC Notes Page 6
December 9, 2004
o The north side will be shady, and some shade plant suggestions
would be impatiens, large-leaf begonias, and camellia
sasanquas. Also, be careful #o use a shade variety of sod.
o Chair Hoag liked the Canary Island Pine, and suggested using
another one along Branch Street to frame the parking lot and
screen the view on the back of the billboard.
o Chuck Fellows suggested alternating Brisbane Box and
Flowering Plum Trees. The owner is concerned that Brisbane
Boxes drop a lot of plant material.
o How tall is the wall by the trash enclosure, and will vines be
trained up on the wall? The wall goes from zero fo five feet tall,
and vines tend to climb and spread, but can be manually
aftached.
A motion was made by Chuck Fellows and seconded by Melanie Hodges to
recommend approval of CUP 04-005, subject to the following conditions 1)
use shade plants on the north side of the building, and 2) trees along Branch
should include a Canary Island Pine and finro new Brisbane Boxes.
Discussion was held about centering Brisbane Box Trees about 6' in from
the sidewalk. Ms. Joosten expressed concem that it wou/d encroach on
fhe building, whereas the other trees are pretty upright and re/atively
small. ARC consensus was not to use Brisbane Box Trees after all.
Motion was modi�ed by Chuck Fellows and seconded by Melanie Hodges to
recommend approval of CUP 04-005, subject to the following conditions 1)
use shade plants on the north side of the building, 2) add one Canary Island
Pine Tree to the left side of the driveway (and remove finro Flowering Plum
Trees), 3) stone is approved, but with matching grout, 4) color and material
choices from board are hereby approved.
Mo ' n approved: 4/0 voice vote
D. ADMINIS IVE SIGN PERMIT ASP 04-032; APPLICANT — Shelly
Arnold; REP NTATIVE — Robin McDonald, Avila Sign and Design;
LOCATION — 142 . anch Street
The project was presented b sistant Planner, Jim Bergman. This sign is
for a new salon called "Reflection cated in the Village. There are some
budget concerns, so the sign only re "Salon". It is within limits of the
Planned Sign Program and municipal code. e sign will be mounted flat on
the building, but letters are one inch thick and wi ve depth.
Robin McDonald of Avila Sign and Design describe e project. The '
lettering is the same high-density polyurethane as Chicago ' e. Hailey J's ;
sign is mounted off the building, artd the letters look too blurry w the sun
ATTArHMENT 5
DRAFT
NOTES
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ARC)
THURSDAY, JANUARY 6, 2005
The meeting of the City of Arroyo Grande Architecturai Review Committee was called to
order at 3:18 P.M. by Committee Chair Hoag.
ROLL CALL: Present were Committee members Fellows, Miltenberger, Ohler and �
Chair Hoag. Melanie Hodges was absent.
APPROVAL OF NOTES: Notes from December 9, 2004, with the following chan es:
✓ Change day from Monday to Thursday, and from "regular" to "special" meetin .
✓ Page 3, change from "plywood"to "wood". g
Chuck Fellows moved and Jamie Ohler seconded approval of minutes. Voice vote:
4-0.
�• PUBLIC COMMENT: None.
��• PROJECTS
A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 04-005; APPLICANT — John
Robasciotti; Representative — Mark Vasquez; LOCATION — 101 Traffic
Way
The project was presented by Assistant Planner, Jim Bergman. After
ARC's request for matching grout (to the stone) at the last meeting, the
applicant has since found that grout cannot be used for this particular stone
product. Also, Planning Commission asked ARC to further discuss the metal
material to be used for the roof and "eyebrows".
Mark Vasquez explained that the manufacturer won't allow grouting of their
project. If they did, it would void the product warranty. The applicant
requests to use this stone without grout. The City is using the same stone on
the nearby bridge so it would match, and the stones fit snugly together so
there wouldn't be large gaps.
ARC had the following comments and questions:
• Could the applicant look for other stone similar to what will be on the
bridge? Mr. Vasquez did research other options, but didn'� find
anyfhing that matched or stacked as tightly. Mr. Robasciotti added that
the structure of the stone creates its own shadow.
ARC DRAFT Notes Page 2
January 6, 2005
. Will the stone be used on the parking lot side? Yes, and it starts fo
show on the Traffic Way side. On Branch Street you'll see it below the
windows, but the bulk of the stone is on the back of the building.
. Where will the stone be on the bridge? It will be along the streetside,
and it goes up several feef all along the bridge.
• Consensus was reached by ARC on using the stone without grout.
Mark Vasquez next discussed his further research on the metal roofing
material. The manufacturer doesn't warrant the material for exterior siding or
roofing, because it continues to rust and could stain the side of the building,
stones, sidewalks, etc. He proposed using the same corrugated metal
roofing, but with a painted finish in "patina green" color (that won't stain).
. Is the color as "olive" as the sample? He hasn'� received fhe sample,
so doesn'�know, but added if will contrast with the off-white frim below.
• Is it about half an inch in size? Yes, that's what they're looking at.
A motion was made by Amy Miltenberger and seconded by Chuck Fellows, in
regards to Conditional Use Permit 04-005, to approve the stone without grout,
but for applicant to return to ARC with actual samples of the new painted
meta� roofing material before getting a building permit.
Discussion: Further concern was expressed on the roofing color. Mr.
Robasciotti suggested terra cotta, which more resembles the rust look.
An amendment to the motion was made by Amy Miltenberger and seconded
by Chuck Fellows to add that both color samples be brought back to ARC.
Motion approved: 4/0 voice vote.
B. HITECTURAL REVIEW 04-006 AND MINOR EXCEPTION 04-011;
AP ANT — Valerie Kline; REPRESENTATIVE — Same; LOCATION —
411 Alle treet
(Chuck Fellows ped down, as he owns property 280 feet away from this
site. Jamie Ohler he was not stepping down. Although his property is
on the same street, it's feet away and there is no conflict of interest.)
The project was presente ssistant Planner, Jim Bergman. It is a
proposed secondary dwelling u ' a enclosure of an existing covered porch.
(By enclosing the porch, they ha e h square footage to allow for the
secondary unit.) Color and materia es were presented, along with
color photos of the existing house (which ely screened from the street
by trees and will be painted the same color as condary unit).
Charles Crotser., Architect, discussed the colors an ed the secondary
dwelling would also be almost invisible, due to the surroun landscape.
� pRROy�
� �� ATTACHMENT 6
� INCORPORATED �Z
V T
� JULY 10, ,s„ ,� CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
c4��FORN�P INITIAL STUDY AND
DRAFT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
1. Project Title: Conditional Use Permit 04-005
2. Lead Agency Name & Address: City of Arroyo Grande
P.O. Box 550/214 E. Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
3. Contact Person & Phone #: Jim Bergman
(805) 473-5420
4. Project Location: 101 Traffic Way
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
����.,
�
�,�;�_ #:, \
.�
�y
:
..:. �� .
. �a�,r�,� � ,,r
A+��p�«7 � �
S
!/ / �/ 1,
i'
.r-'' ! ��
�- ���;���,;
\� ���:��
3 �
�;
5. Project Sponsor's Name & Address: John Robasciotti
101 Traffic Way
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
6. General Plan Designation: Village Core Downtown (VCD)
7. Zoning: Village Core (VC)
1
8. Description of Project:
Conditional Use Permit 04-005 to construct a mixed use building (3,706 square feet) with two (2)
commercial units, three (3) office units and one (1) residential unit.
9. Other agencies whose approval is required (and permits needed):
None.
�
;
�
�
�
2
DETERMINATION.
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have
been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X
I find that the.proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposal MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has
been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been
addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the
effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated". An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be
addressed.
Signature Date
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a
"POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT" or "POTENTIALLY IS SIGNIFICANT UNLESS MITIGATED", as indicated by the checklist on
the following pages.
❑ Land Use and Planning ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Public Services
❑ Population and Housing ❑ Energy and Mineral Resources ❑ Utilities and Service Systems
❑ Geophysical O Hazards ❑ Aesthetics
✓Water ✓ Noise ❑ Cultural Resources
❑Air Quality ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance ❑ Recreation
✓Transportation/Circulation
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1. A brief exp/anation is required for all answers except "No /mpact"answers that are adequately supported by the information
sources a/ead agency cites in the parentheses fol%wing each question. A "No Impact" question is adequately supported if the
referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project
falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project specific factors as '
well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific
screening analysis).
2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-
level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operations impacts.
3. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if an effect is significant or potentially significant, or is the lead agency lacks
information to make a finding of insignificance. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the
determination is made, an EIR is required.
4. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from
"Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures
and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier !
Analyses", may be cross referenced.►
5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been . '
adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c1(3►ID►. Earlier analyses are discussed in Section
XVII at the end of the checklist.
6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g.,
general plans, zoning ordinancesl. A Source List should be attached and other sources used or individuals should be cited in the
discussion.
3
Potentia//y
Potentia/ty Sign�cant Less Than
Issues(and Supporting Information Sources): Significant Un/ess Significant No
/mpact Mitigated /mpact /mpact
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Wou/d the pioposa/.•
a► Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
(source#Is1: 1,2,3,4) X
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies
adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project?
(source#Is1: 1,6,7) X
c) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., impacts
to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land
usesl? (source#Is1: 9, 111 X
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including a low-income or
minority community�? (source#Is1: 2,4,11) X
11. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Wou/d the proposa/.-
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population
projections? (source#Is1: 1,5,9) X
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area
or extension of major infrastructure►? X
(source #Is1: 9,10)
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing?
(source#Is►: 9,10,11) X
III. GEOPHYSICAL: Wou/d the proposa/resu/t in oi expose
peop/e to potentia/impacts invo/ving:
a) Seismicity: fault rupture? (source#Is1: 5,6) X
b) Seismicity: ground shaking or liquefaction?
(source#Is1: 5,6) X
c) Seismicity: seiche or tsunami? (source#Is1: 5,6) X
d) Landslides or mudslides? (source#�s1: 5,6) X
e) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soils
conditions from excavation, grading or fill?
Isource #Is►: 101 X
f) Subsidence of land? (source #Is1: 5,6) X
g) Expansive soils? (source #Is1: 5,6) X
h) Unique geologic or physical features? (source#Is1:
5,6,10,11) X
i
IV. WATER: Wou/d the pioposa/iesu/t in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, or the '
rate and amount of surface runoff? (source#Is1: 10) X '
b) Exposure to people or property to water related hazards
such as flooding? (source#Is): 8) X
c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of
surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved
4
�
Potentia/ty
Potentia//y SigniFcant Less Than
Issues(and Supporting Information Sources): Sign�cant Un/ess Signilcant No
/mpact Mitigated /mpact /mpact
oxygen or turbidity? (source #Is): 9) X
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body? (source#(s1: 9, 10) X
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements? (source#(s): 9, 10) X
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X
(source#Is►: 9, 10) �
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
(source#Is►: 9, 10) X
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (source#�s1: 9,10► X
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise
available for public water supplies? (source#�s): 6)
X
V. AIR nUALITY: Wou/d the proposa/.•
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation? X
(source#Is1: 7, 12)
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (source #Is►:
10, 11) X
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause
any change in climate? (source#�sl: 9) X
d) Create objectionable odors? (source#(s►: 9,10) X
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Wou/d the proposa/ ;
result in:
a) Inc�eased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (source
#Isl: 121 X
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp '
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses �
(e.g., farm equipmentl? (source#Is►: 9, 10) X �
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby sites? j
(source#Is1: 9, 10► X �
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (source X �
#(s1: 3, 9, 10)
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (source i
#Isl: 9, 10) X
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? '
(source #Is1: 9, 10) X
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal�esu/t in
impacis to:
a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects,
animals, and birds? (source#(s): 6) X
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage treesl?
(source#Is1: 10, 11) X
S
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., oak forest,
coastal habitat)? (source#Is1: 10, 11) X
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and vernat pooll?
(source#Is►: 9, 11►
X
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
(source#Is1: 11) X
VIII.ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would ihe proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
(source #(s1: 1, 6) X
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner? (source #Is►: 9, 10) X
IX. HAZARDS. Wou/d the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation? (source#Isl: 9) X
b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation plan? (source#(sl: 9, 10)
X
c) The creation of any health hazard or potentiat health
hazard? (source#Is1: 9, 10) X
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards? (source#Is1: 9,10,11) X
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, or trees? (source#Is1: 10, 11) X
X. NOISE. Wou/d the proposa/resu/t in:
a) �ncreases in existing noise levels? (source#Is►: 1, 9) X
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
Isource#Is): 9, 10) X
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposa/have an effect
upon, or resu/t in a need for new or alte�ed government
services in any of the fo/lowing areas:
a) Fire Protection? (source #Is): 6) X
b) Police Protection? (source#�s1: 6) X
c) Schools? (source #Is►: 6) X
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads, sewer ,
system? Isource#Is1: 61 X
e) Other governmental services? (source #Is1: 6) X
XII. UTIUTIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Wou/d ihe proposal
result in a need for new systems, or substantial a/terations
to the fol%wing utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? (source#Is1: 9, 10) X
b) Communications systems? (source #Is1: 9, 10) X
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities? (source#Isl: 6) X
d1 Storm water drainage? (source#Is): 6) X
e) Solid waste disposal? (source#Is1: 6) X
XIII. AESTHETICS. Wou/d the proposal.•
6
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
(source #Isl: 1, 10, 11) X
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
(source #Is►: 9, 10, 11) X
c) Create light or glare? (source #Is): 9,10) X
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Wou/d the proposal.•
a) Disturb paleontological resources? (source#Is►: 6, 11) X
b) Disturb archaeological resources (source #(s1: 6, 11) X
c) Affect historical resources? (source #Isl: 6, 11� X
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (source #(s1:
11) X
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area? (source #Is): 10, 11) X
XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal.•
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks
or other recreational facilities? (source #Isl: 1, 3)
X
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities?
Isource#Isl: 1, 51 X
XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or X
prehistory?
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-
term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental
goals? X
c) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental eftects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects.) X
d) Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly? X
XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES.
Earlier analyses may be used whers, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have
been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 150631c1131(D►. In this case, a discussion should
identify the following on attached sheets:
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and
adequately analyzed by earlier documents.
. c► Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "potentially significant" or "potentially significant unless mitigated", •
describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to
7
which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
SOURCE LIST:
1. City of Arroyo Grande General Plan
2. City of Arroyo Grande General Plan Land Use Map
3. City of Arroyo Grande Development Code
4. City of Arroyo Grande Zoning Map
5. City of Arroyo Grande Existing Setting and Community Issues Report
6. City of Arroyo Grande General Plan EIR; Sewer Master Plan
7. Air Pollution Control District Clean Air Plan
8. FEMA - Flood Insurance Rate Map
9. Project Description
10. Project Plans
11. Site Inspection
12. San Diego Association of Governments Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING:
The project site is approximately 5,512 square feet in size and is located on the corner of Traffic Way and West
Branch Street in the Village Core Downtown (VCD) zoning district and Village Core (VC) land use category. The
project site is a prominent entry to the commercial district know as the "Village," however, the sole adjacent use
is a residence. The property is mostly flat and paved, is currently developed with a 917 square foot office building.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project evaluated by this initial study is the construction of a mixed use building (3,706 square feet) with two
(2) commercial units, three (3) office units and one (1) residentrial unit. The project statistics are summarized in
the table below.
Area (s.f.) Buildin Hei ht Parkin Required Parkin Provided
Mixed Use 3,706 29'6" 8 spaces 5 spaces
Building (total) .
Retail 1,475
Office 1,518
Residential 713
EXPLANATIONS TO INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST:
111. GEOPHYSICAL
The project site currently is developed with a 917 square foot office building. Existing paving covers nearly
the entire property and needed grading will be minimal.
The City Grading Ordinance regulates and controls grading, clearing and erosion on private property. If the
Grading Ordinance and all building codes and city regulations are followed during grading and compaction for
the project, impacts will remain below a significant level.
Based on the General Plan and review of the Alquist-Priolo Zone Fault maps, the proposed project is not
located on a known earthquake fault subject to rupture. The proposed project will be subject to the effects of
8
__._� •�_�....�.r...._.___-
periodic seismic events in the region, including ground shaking. However, exposure of people to these events
can generally be mitigated to an acceptable level of risk by following Uniform Building Code development
standards.
Analysis of Significance: Less than significant impact.
IV. WATER/DRAINAGE
Water. Development of the proposed project would require water for both domestic use and landscape
irrigation. Projected water demand is approximately 0.64 acre-feet of water per year for the mixed use
building.
The City has not estabfished thresholds of significance for water demand. Although the proposed project is
consistent with the General Plan, and water demand for the project can be accommodated within existing City
supplies, the estimated water consumption would further reduce the City' s supply of available water. This
impact could be mitigated using water-conserving designs, fixtures and landscaping.
Analysis of Significance: Potentially significant unless mitigated.
Mitigation Measures:
1. The applicant shall complete measures to neutralize the estimated increase in water demand
created by the project by either:
Implementing an individual water program that utilizes fixtures and designs that
minimize water usage. The calculations shall be submitted to the Director of
Public Works for review and approval. The proposed individual water program
shall be submitted to the City for approval prior to implementation; or,
Paying an in lieu fee.
Monitoring: Review of individual water program or payment of the in
lieu fee
Responsible Department: Public Works Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
2. All new construction shall utilize fixtures and designs that minimize water usage. Such '
fixtures shall include, but are not limited to, water saving toilets, instant water heaters and
hot water recirculating systems. Water conserving designs and fixtures shall be installed prior ;
to final occupancy. �
Monitoring: Review of building p�ans �
Responsible Department: Building and Fire Department �
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
3. All landscaping shall be consistent with water conservation practices including the use of
drought tolerant landscaping, drip irrigation, and mulch. To the greatest extent possible, lawn
areas and areas requiring spray irrigation shall be minimized.
Monitoring: Review of landscaping and irrigation plans
Responsible Department: Parks and Recreation Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
Drainaae. Since the project site is currently paved, changes to existing drainage patterns, absorption rates
and amount of surface runoff will be negligible. The current development as well as the proposed project
directs surface runoff to the nearby Arroyo Grande Creek. The collection and filtering of runoff can improve
9
_ � ..�,.,,...WW�____....,.�..�.
the quality of storm water entering the Arroyo Grande Creek.
Analysis of Significance: Potentially significant unless mitigated.
Mitigation Measure:
4. All runoff water from impervious areas shall pass through a fossil filter and be conveyed
through impervious conduits to existing storm drain facilities. A drainage plan, which
incorporates the above, shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of any permits.
Monitoring: Review of drainage/grading plans
Responsible Department: Public Works Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of a grading permit
V. AIR aUALITY
The San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (APCD) has issued significance threshold criteria to
evaluate the potential impacts of proposed projects within the County. Consistent with thresholds developed
by the APCD in the Guide/ines for Assessing the Air Qua/ity /mpacts for Projects Subject to CEQA Review,
projects generating less than ten (10) pounds per day of ROG, NOx, PM,o or SOZ emissions do not require
mitigation. Based upon the Screening Criteria of the APCD Guide/ines, the proposed project is not anticipated
to generate greater than ten (10) pounds of emissions per day directfy from construction activities and
indirectly from motor vehicle emissions. However, to mitigate cumulative air quality impacts, the dust control
measures fisted below shall be followed during construction of the project, and shall be shown on grading and
buildings plans:
Analysis of Significance: Potentially significant unless mitigated.
Mitigation Measures: The following mitigation measures are necessary to reduce air quality impacts:
5. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials, '
water trucks or sprinkler systems are to be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a curst
after each day' s activities cease.
6. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle
movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting
down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day and whenever wind exceeds 15
miles per hour.
7. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to '
prevent dust generation. �
Monitoring: Review of grading and building ptans and site inspections j
Responsible Department: The Building and Fire Department shall inspect plans, and the �
Community Development Department shall spot check the {
field
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of grading permit
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION
The primary access to the project site is by means of one commercial driveway off of Traffic Way. The
estimated increase of trips generated by the proposed project is below the threshold to warrant a traffic
study.
The project may contribute to cumulative traffic impacts that potentially could be significant. This project will
therefore be required to contribute its proportional share of the City' s Traffic Impact fee and Traffic
Signalization Impact fee, as well as specific project traffic mitigations.
10
Due to the small size of the subject parcel, provision of on-site parking is difficult and could be potentially
significant unless mitigated. The Community Development Department is in the process of proposing an
expansion of the existing Downtown Parking and Improvement District. The proposed expansion would
incorporate the subject parcel and allow for the provision of off site parking within 500 feet or the payment of
an in lieu fee for the establishment of shared parking facilities.
Analysis of Significance: Potentially significant unless mitigated.
Mitigation Measures:
8. The applicant shall pay the Traffic Signalization Impact fee.
Monitoring: The applicant shall pay the fee
Responsible Department: Building & Fire Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of Building Permit
9. The applicant shall pay the City' s Transportation Facilities Impact fee.
Monitoring: The applicant shall pay the fee
Responsible Department: Building & Fire Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
10. The applicant shall pay its fair share of the cost of a Opticom traffic signal pre-emption device
at the intersection of Branch Street and Freeway 101.
Monitoring: The applicant shall install the improvements
Responsible Department: Building & Fire Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
11. The applicant shall mitigate for parking deficiencies by either: ',
Providing by written contract, off-site parking within 500 feet of the proposed project
equal to the number of parking spaces required by the Municipal Code of the City of
Arroyo Grande but not developed on site; ',
Payment of an in-lieu fee at the current established rate multiplied by the rwmber of '
parking spaces required by the Municipal Code of the City of Arroyo Grande but not �
,developed on site if the project location is incorporated into the Downtown Parking �
and Improvement District.
�
t
In the event of changes to the property or parking contracts by either the applicant or the City �
of Arroyo Grande that reduces the number of on-site or-off site parking spaces provided, the '
applicant must utilize one or more of the mitigation options to make up for the lost spaces. In-
lieu fees will be based upon rates in effect at the time of the change to the parking situation.
Monitoring: The applicant shall install the improvements
Responsible Department: Building & Fire Department
Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit
X. NOISE
Existing noise levels would be increased temporarily during the construction phase of this project. Noise
resulting from construction activities will be short-term, and is subject to the City's Noise Ordinance.
Analysis of Significance: Potentially significant unless mitigated.
11
Mitigation Measures:
12. All construction equipment shall be provided with well-maintained, functional mufflers to limit
noise.
13. Construction shall be limited to between the hours of 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. Monday through Friday, and
befinreen 8 a.m.and 5 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday.
14. To the greatest extent possible, grading and/or excavation operations at portions of the site
bordering developed areas should occur during the middle of the day to minimize the potential for
disturbance of neighboring noise sensitive uses.
Monitoring: Notes shall be placed on the construction plans referencing the
above measures.
Responsible Department: Public Works Department
Timeframe: During construction
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES
The proposed mixed-use development is consistent with the 2001 General Plan designation for the site.
Adequate schools, fire and police services exist in the community to serve the project as well as needed
infrastructure such as sewers. Cumulative impacts on public services are offset by standard impact fees.
Analysis of Significance: Less than significant impact.
XIII. AESTHETICS
The proposed project does include decorative light poles at four locations to provide for illumination of parking
and pedestrian areas.
Analysis of Significance: Potentially significant unless mitigated.
Mitigation Measures: ,
15. The applicant shall follow Section 16.48.090 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code entitled
°Lighting."
Monitoring: Construction plans shall be reviewed. '
Responsible Department: Public Works Department '
Timeframe: During construction
i
�
i
i
�
�
I
12 ;
9.c.
. CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the City Council of the
City of Arroyo Grande on TUESDAY, JANUARY 25, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Arroyo
Grande City Council Chambers, 215 E. Branch Street, Arroyo Grande, CA to consider the
following item:
Applicant: Wells Fargo Bank
Proposal: Amended Conditional Use Permit 04-001 - The City Council will
consider a proposal for a full service bank in Phase II of the Five
Cities Center.
. Location: 911 Rancho Grande Parkway
In compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the Community
Development Department has determined that the project is categorically exempt under
section 15305 of the CEQA guidelines. If the City Council does not feel that this
categorical exemption is appropriate, project approval will not be considered.
Any person affected or concerned by this application may submit written comments to the
Community Development Department before the hearing, or appear and be heard in
support of or opposition to the project and the environmental impacts at the time of
hearing.
Any person interested in the proposal can contact the Community Development
Department at 214 E. Branch Street, Arroyo Grande, California, during normal business
hours, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The project application is available for public inspection at
the above address.
If you challenge an item in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written .
correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Failure of any person to receive the notice shall not constitute grounds for any court to
invalidate tfie action of the legislative body for which the notice was given.
Kelly W or , City Clerk
Publish 1T, The Tribune, Friday, January 14, 2005
� pRROyO
o ��,
� INCORPORATEO 9Z
" T MEMORANDUM
* JULY 10, 1911 *
C4��FORN,P
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROB STRONG, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR �S
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE
NO. 04-001 TO ALLOW A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION TO OCCUPY
BUILDING `J' OF THE FIVE CITIES SHOPPING CENTER; 911
RANCHO PARKWAY; WELLS FARGO BANK
DATE: JANUARY 25, 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council open the public hearing advertised and noticed
for the January 25 regular meeting and continue it to the regular meeting of February 8,
2005, at which time the completed traffic study and proposed traffic mitigation measures
associated with revised pad "I" and bank occupancy of Building "J" will be presented.
The ARC and Planning Commission previously recommended that the Council approve
the Amended Conditional Use Permit, subject to conditions.
FUNDING:
Some potential reduction of sales tax revenues may occur by changing from retail to
financial service use.
DISCUSSION:
The Five Cities Center was approved by the City Council by CUP 96-541 in July 1996,
including 14 commercial buildings in finro phases. The approved plans for Phase II
Buildings I, J and K were allocated for retail uses, and Buildings L and M were designated
for restaurant use. In December 2001, the Council approved use permit amendments for
Buildings J, M, and L, which changed building L from restaurant to a financial services
office and altered the site plan; allowed 4,100 s.f. of restaurant space in building J and
accessory outdoor patio seating between buildings J and K; decreased building M
restaurant space from 6,000 to 5,000 s.f. and allowed up to 1,175 s.f. of outdoor patio for
this restaurant.
Building J has a total of 11,700 s.f. of lease space, 4,550 of which has remained vacant
since construction. The Wells Fargo Bank proposes to occupy this space with minor ;
exterior modifications for walk-up ATMs and interior improvements to create a full service ,
financial office. ;
Concurrently, Investec has submitted a Pre-Application reconfiguration of Pad "I",
proposing two sub majors of approximately 10,000 s.f. each and a series of smaller retail ;
stores totaling 33,500 s.f., (rather than a single large retail anchor store of 36,000 s.f. as
S:\COMMLTNITY DEVELOPMENTICITY COUNCIL�2005\01-25-OS\Wells Fargo SR 01-25-OS.doc
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF AMENDED CUP CASE NO. 04-001 TO ALLOW A FINANCIAL
INSTITUTION TO OCCUPY BUILDING `J' OF THE FIVE CITIES SHOPPING
CENTER; 911 RANCHO PARKWAY; WELLS FARGO BANK
JANUARY 25, 2005
PAGE 2
originally approved). Petco is identified as the middle sub major with Trader Joe's on one
end and an unspecified sub major on the other end of the reconfigured line of stores. The
Pre-Application is separately scheduled for the February 8 City Council discussion as a
non-public hearing item.
A comprehensive traffic study was required by the City Council when Wells Fargo Bank's
initial trip generation comparison with retail use was determined inadequate for
Conditional Use Permit approval. Omni-Means will be in attendance to present the
findings of this study, which addresses the bank occupancy of existing building "J", as
well as eventual potential traffic impacts of Pad "I" reconfiguration completing Phase II.
A more detailed staff report and proposed resolution for Amended Conditional Use Permit
No. 04-001 approval for the Wells Fargo Bank will be submitted with the February 8, 2005
City Council agenda, including parking analysis and traffic mitigations. A draft Mitigated
Negative Declaration will be prepared and presented based on the initia! traffic study
findings at that continued hearing. The Pad "I" reconfiguration Pre-Application requires
no action at this time, but will retum as a formal public hearing after a complete
Conditional Use Perrnit Application has been submitted by InvestecJPetco.
The item was originally expected to be ready for Council consideration at this meeting per
the request of the applicant. However, staff s comments on the traffic study had not been
fully addressed at the time of distribution of the agenda packets. Therefore, continuance
is recommended.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following altematives are provided for the Council's consideration:
- Continue the public hearing to February 8, 2005 to enable completion of the traffic
study report and for concurrent discussion of Pad "I" reconfiguration.
- Continue to another later date certain after open hearing to allow any additional
input requested by the Council from Wells Fargo Bank, Investec or Omni-Means.
- Take tentative action to deny the ACUP and direct staff to prepare appropriate
resolution for Council action on February 8�' or thereafter, if the Council finds the
bank use to be inappropriate.
Attachments:
1. Planning Commission minutes of May 4, 2004.
2. City Council minutes of May 25, 2004.
3. City Council minutes of October 26, 2004.
S:�COMMUNITY_DEVELOPMENT�CIIY_COUNCIU2005\01-25-05\Wells Feroo SR 01-25-05.doc �
ATTACHMENT 1
MINUTES PAGE 5
PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 4, 2004
The Commission unanimously approved the recommendation to make Certificates of
Compliance an administrative or procedure and asked staff to come back with a
Development Code Amendment to address this requested change.
The Commission had no further concerns.
Chair Guthrie opened the hearing for public comment and hearing none closed it
Commissioner Keen made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Brown approving
Certificate of Compliance Case No. 04-001 and adopting:
RESOLUTION 04-1924
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVING CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE CASE
NO. 04-001 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 439 EAST BRANCH
STREET AND 426 CROWN HILL, APPLIED BY GREG & DEBRA
KLOSINSKI
The motion was approved on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Keen, Brown, Arnold, Fowler and Chair Guthrie
NOES: None .
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 4�' day of May 2004.
B. AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 04-001; APPLICANT —
WELLS FARGO BANK; LOCATION — 911 RANCHO PARKWAY. Staff report
prepared and presented by Associate Planner, Kelly Heffernon.
Ms. Heffernon explained that this was a proposal to consider an amended Conditional
Use Permit (CUP) Case No. 96-541 by allowing a financial office use in a portion of
Building "J", of Phase II, of the Five Cities Shopping Center in Planned Development
PD 1.2. Ms. Heffernon described the proposed changes:
� Change on existing doors- replace with full glass windows;
• Enlarging the front door;
• Installing stucco in place of glass for the ATM machines;
• The back of the building will remain unchan�ed;
• The ARC has recommended approval of two 31-square foot signs (#his does not
include any signage on the back of the building); the signage will not be
approved until the ACUP has been considered. �
The primary concern raised by the CUP Amendment is how the parking and circulation
will be affected within Phase II of the shopping center. The parking study shows that
the proposed change in use for lease space from commercial retail to financial '
institution would not adversely impact the parking configuration or the ability to provide
MINUTES PAGE 6
PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 4, 2004
sufficient parking for Phase II. Traffic congestion is also a concern as the SANDAG trip
generation chart shows that approximately three times the trips (over retail generated
trips) could be generated with a "stand alone" bank. However, staff does not believe
this use will generate much more traffic, as this shopping center will be used for multiple
purposes. When an application comes forward for Pad 'I' (final pad), staff will look at a
more detailed parking and traffic analysis, including the problematic driveway
intersection of Phases I and II on Rancho Parkway.
In reply to a question from Commissioner Fowler, Ms. Heffernon stated that this building
has been vacant for four years.
Commissioner Arnold stated it is well known that there is a problem with the circulation
(getting in and out of the finro sides, Phase I and Phase II), and asked if there had been
consideration of closing one entrance on Phase II where it aligns with Phase I? Ms.
Heffernon said this could be addressed at the Traffic Commission if requested.
Chair Guthrie asked if trip generation had been included for the finro ATM's? Ms.
Heffernon replied that she did not have this information, but if further environmental
review was required this could be done.
Chair Guthrie opened the hearing for public comment.
Susan Ambrosia, Wells Fargo Bank, explained details of the proposal and said she
would be happy to answer any questions.
Commission Comments:
Keen:
• Does the existing parking lot lighting meet the standards for ATM's? Ms.
Ambrosia replied that they would have to do a photometric study and modify the
existing if required.
• Was there any discussion with the Police Department re the placement of the
ATM's? Mr. Strong replied this was discussed at the SAC meeting.
Dave Pintard, Investec, stated they would have their architect address the circulation of
traffic from Phase I and II when Pad 'I' comes forward for consideration and they were
aware that the cross traffic is a problem. In addition, he stated he had a letter from the
State Board of Equalization (copy given to staffl showing that in 2002 the Five Cities
Center generated retail sales tax revenue in the amount of $719,120 for the City, and
� this figure does not include Pad 'I'. This was substantially more tax revenue than
projected when the shopping center was being considered originally (3$55,000
estimated).
Chair Guthrie closed the hearing for public comment.
Commission Comments:
MINUTES PAGE 7
PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 4, 2004
Keen:
• The parking lot lighting around the ATM machines should be addressed.
Arnold:
� No further concerns.
Fowler:
• The Hallmark store in the center will be delighted if the bank goes in because
they would like to see more foot traffic.
Brown:
• He would like to see this go forward even though he is aware of past sensitivity to
this area.
Chair Guthrie:
• He had no problem with the substitution of the bank for retail since it has been
sitting vacant; on the traffic generation in terms of the entire project he did not
think it would be a big enough issue to require another study at this time. When
the last project goes in he would like to see further study for better solutions for
the two driveways on Rancho Parkway.
Victor Devens, Public Works, state the City has not yet accepted the improvements, as
the developer has not yet fulfilled their obligations (provided "as built" drawings of all
improvements), so if there is an adverse situation the City has means to correct it.
Commissioner Brown made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Arnold to
recommend that City Council approve the Amended Conditional Use Permit Case No.
04-001 and adopt: '
RESOLUTION 04-1925
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL '
APPROVE AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 04-001, �
APPLIED FOR BY WELLS FARGO BANK, LOCATED AT 911 RANCHO �
PARKWAY (FIVE CITIES SHOPPING CENTER, PHASE II) �
,
�
The motion was approved on the following roll call vote: �
AYES: Commissioners Brown, Arnold, Fowler, Keen and Chair Guthrie
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 4�' day of May 2004.
C. AMENDED CUP CASE NO. 04-002; APPLICANT - LDS CHURCH; LOCATION -
751 S. TRAFFIC WAY. Staff report prepared and presented by Planning Intern,
Andrea Koch.
Mr. Strong said this project has been withdrawn indefinitely.
ATTACHMENT 2
CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES.
MAY 25, 2004
PAGE 3
8.b. Consideration of Confirmation of Assessments.
Recommended Action: 1) Adopt Resolution confrming landscaping assessments of
forty dollars ($40) for all parcels within Tract 1158; and, 2) Adopt Resolution confirming
landscaping and lighting assessments of one hundred dollars ($100)for all parcels within
Tract 1769.
Mayor Pro Tem Lubin moved to approve staff's recommendations, Council Member Dickens
seconded, and the motion carried on the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Lubin, Dickens, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: Runels, Costello
9. PUBLIC HEARING
9.a. Consideration of Amended Conditional Use Permit Case No. 04001 to Allow
Financial Institution to Occupy Building "J" of the Five Cities Shopping Center;
911 Rancho Parkway; Wells Fargo Bank.
Associate Planner Heffernon presented the staff report aid stated the Planning Commission
recommended the Council adopt a Resolution approving the proposed project. She responded '
to questions from Council regarding future occupancy in Phase II, traffic generation figures,
employee parking, automatic teller machine (ATM) lighting standards, loss of sales tax revenue, '
and overall parking impacts.
Mayor Ferrara opened the public hearing.
Susan Ambrosia, Wells Fargo Bank Project Manager, stated this would be a traditional bank and
responded to questions regarding employee parking, ATM lighting standards, the issue of sales !
tax revenue, and stated that banks typically locate in shopping centers and Wells Fargo would �
offer banking services for businesses located in the Five Cities Center. k
Dave Pintard, Investec, siated that the use would be an asset to the Center and stated retailers G
currently located in the Center supported a bank at this location. f
Craiq Machado, Via Bandolero, stated that the project impacts his home; spoke about the
existing excessive noise level at Trader Joe's; opposed any use that intensifies the traffic and ;
noise levels; and stated he would like to see a new traffic study conducted and the noise issues �
addressed before approving this project. �
(
Upon hearing no further public comments, Mayor Ferrara closed the public hearing. �
Council Member Costello stated that Wells Fargo would probably be a good addition to the
Center that would service the existing commercial facilities in the Center; however, there would
be a trade-off with the loss of sales tax revenue. He stated the bank would draw customers to
the existing retail stores in the Center. He expressed concems about the project related traffic '
and its impact on Rancho Parkway, and stated that he would like to see a new traffic study
before considering the project further.
Council Member Dickens referred to the current projections for sales tax revenue and stated that
a bank could be a benefit to the Center. He stated that he sees a bank as a better use in Phase
CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
MAY 25, 2004
PAGE 4
1 of the Center due to the traffic and parking problems the use would create in Phase 2. He
stated that there was a need to conduct a traffic analysis and that he was not prepared to make
a decision until further information was received.
Mayor Pro Tem Lubin stated that Wells Fargo would not be a high volume bank; commented that
the ATM lighting issue was based on State regulations; commented that the building proposed
for occupancy by Wells Fargo has been vacant for more than five years; said he did not want to
assume that this use would impact Pad I; and that the existing parking was adequate. With
regard to the noise factor, he agreed that there were ordinances in place to address high noise
level impacts and that these issues should be referred to the Police Department or City Manager.
In response to questions regarding past and current sales tax revenue projections, City Manager
Adams reported the figures provided by the Financial Services Director for fiscal years 2002-03
and 2003-04.
Mayor Pro Tem Lubin acknowledged that traffic issues exist and stated that the issue was
whether a bank would benefit the City. He said the bank would benefit the City in this location,
on this side of the freeway. He commented that the traffic generation and parking impacts would
be the same or less compared to any retail use.
Mayor Ferrara stated that a bank would be more suitably located in other locations within Phase
1 of the Center and not at the proposed location in Phase 2. He spoke about the traffic problems
and impacts going across Rancho Parkway from Phase 1 to Phase 2. He suggested that
Investec talk to Wal-Mart representatives for locating a bank in Phase 1 in the empty space next
to Wal-Mart. He said there was a need for low intensity uses in Phase 2. He also requested that
an expanded traffic study be conducted for the entire Center that included driveway counts at
peak periods.
Council Member Costello moved that consideration of Amended Conditional Use Permit Case
No. 04-001 to allow a financial institution to occupy Building J of the Five Cities Shopping Center;
911 Rancho Parkway, Wells Fargo Bank be postponed to a date uncertain until such time a
traffic study is conducted of conditions on Rancho Parkway and W. Branch Street that takes into
consideration impacts from the proposed project. Council Member Dickens seconded the motion,
and requested further discussion. He stated he had concerns with parking and stated he would
like to see the traffic analysis for Phase II include assumptions for Pad I, as well as include
parking assumptions for Pad I. Council Member Costello agreed to amend his motion to include
a review of tra�c and parking issues based upon a plan for the entire Phase II site, including
proposed modifications to Pad I. Council Member Dickens seconded the amended motion, and
on the following roll-call vote, to wit:
AYES: Costello, Dickens, Ferrara '
NOES: Lubin
ABSENT: Runels
There being 3 AYES, 1 NO, and 1 ABSENT, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
I
�
I
t
--_._. �.____�-__._.,...s
�...._"'""`_--_..�---�-.....
ATTACHMENT 3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
OCTOBER 26, 2004
PAGE 3
$•k• Consideration of Acceptance of the Fire Station Expansion Pro'
Action. 1) ,a�cepted the project improvements, as constructed by DJM/Bo
Venture, in accordance with the plans and specifications for the F,e�' PW 2003-05.
Project, 2) Directed staff to file a Notice of Completion; and 3 A �bon, a Joint
retention thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion has b 're Station Expansion
have been filed. ) uthorized release of
een recorded, if no liens
;
$•e• Consideration of Resolution Su f
Disabilities Act to Require Notice Prior to Filing �ega�q��on.
pporting Legislation Amending the Americans With
Recommended Action; Adopt Resolution supporting legislation that woul
Americans with Disabilities Act to require notice prior to filing a lawsuit.
d amend the
Council Member Costello referred to the Americans VI/ith Disabilities A
intended to protect people's rights in employment and transportation a
access to services. He commented that the Act is good law, and it h ct and stated it was
equal access to all people who have disabilities. He felt that mqst busi nd to provide equal
compliance with the law and to provide access to people with disabiliti sS a purpose to provide
notified of non-compliance, he felt that most businesses would make a nesses desire to be in
He favored legislation that would provide a grace period for busines He stated that when
compliance. He stated the proposed legislation was a legitimate genuine effort to comply.
solvmg the problem. He stressed the importance of educatin the ses upon notification of non-
that they are liable and will have to corrip�y vyith the q�, He and reasonable approach to
take to help educate the community and to facilitate compliance �mmunity and businesses
supported all efforts the City could
with the ADA.
Council Member Costello moved to adopt a Resolution supporting legislation that w
the Americans with Disabilities Act to require notice prior to filing a lawsuit. Coun '
Runels seconded the motion, and on the following roll ca11 vote: ould amend
cil Member
AYES: Costello, Runels, Dickens, Lubin, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
9. PUBLIC HEARING
9.a. Consideration of Amended Conditional Use Permit (ACUP) 04001 to Allow a
Financial Institution to Occupy Building J of the Five Cities Shopping Center; 911
Rancho Parkway; Well Fargo Bank.
Community Development Director Strong presented the staff report and recommended the
Council adopt a Resolution approving Amended Conditional Use Permit 04-001. Director Stron
responded to questions from Council regarding the original traffic study for the Five Cities
Center; and clarification of the Council's previous direction regarding the request for a
comprehensive traffic study, including a parking analysis.
Mayor Ferrara opened the public hearing.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
OCTOBER 26, 2004
PAGE 4
David Pintard, Director of Leasing, representing Investec Real Estate Companies, stated the
Planning Commission gave unanimous approval to this project on May 4, 2004. He gave an
overview of the City Council's review of the project on May 25, 2004 and stated the question was
raised whether a bank would generate an equal or greater amount of traffic than the allowed
retail use. He stated that Investec paid the City approximately$2,000 to complete a traffic study.
Mr. Pintard stated that the report concluded that the current project trip generation with the
addition of a Wells Fargo Bank located in an existing 4,500 square foot space would not
significantly alter the overall trip generation from what was originally projected, and actually
appears to be less. Mr. Pintard provided additional comments regarding parking, traffic, and
noise impacts and spoke regarding the overall benefits of locating a bank in Phase II.
Luis Rustia, representing Wells Fargo Bank Corporate Real Estate, noted that Wells Fargo plans
to hire 10-15 people in the community; believes that the traffic report shows a negative impact to
the Center and its effects are minimal; Wells Fargo prefers to be at this location to serve its
customer needs and it is an excellent site. He commented that Wells Fargo wants to be in
Arroyo Grande; however, time is an issue and if there is a delay, they may need to move on to
another community.
Mark Carella, Central Coast District Manager for Wells Fargo Bank, stated that this Five Cities
Center was the best area to serve their customers. He reviewed the proposed hours of
operation and stated they would not compete with other businesses in the Center. He
addressed the trip generation findings and stated that some of the trends in the banking
business show that over the counter transactions have been reduced by 40% in the last five
years based on doing business over the intemet, phone banking, and direct deposits. He stated
that foot traffic would continue to be on the decline.
Steve Ross, Arroyo Grande, stated he was a long time Wells Fargo Bank customer and he
commented that having a bank on the east side of the freeway would lessen the impact of traffic
going through Brisco Road to Grand Avenue to get to the west side of the City. He spoke in
support of the proposal.
Upon hearing no further public comments, Mayor Ferrara closed the public hearing.
Council Member Dickens acknowledged that there was an empty retail space available;
however, there were unknowns with regard to the future size of Pad "I", the site configuration,
and how the parking and traffic generation impacts are going to affect Phase II of the Five Cities
Center. He referred to existing traffic impacts due to the success of the Center. He stated he
would like to see actual traffic counts, and how the configuration of Pad "I" is going to affect and '
interact with the proposed bank configuration. He felt that not enough information was available
with regard to traffic and parking at this time to make good decisions and that a more
comprehensive approach needed to be taken to review Phase II in its entirety. He stated he
could not move forward with approval until adequate information. is provided, as previously
requested by the CounciL '
Council Member Costello acknowledged that the Amended Conditional Use Permit application
was to allow a use that is not permitted at this location. He spoke about economic impacts, and
stated that the Center was designed to be a retail center. He stated he would like to go back and
review the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the shopping center. He expressed concem
about not knowing what the actual traffic counts are as opposed to what was projected. He
acknowledged the existing impacts to the intersections that are greater than what was '
anticipated. He said he needed more adequate data to evaluate and that there was a need to :
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
OCTOBER 26, 2004
PAGE 5
evaluate the intersection impacts. He stated he was not prepared to move forward at this time
until more information was provided.
Council Member Runels stated that the original approval was for a retail center; however, he
acknowledged that a bank would soften the use and generate less traffic than retail use. He also
acknowledged that there were traffic problems in this area that needed to be mitigated; however,
he preferred a retail use rather than a bank so he could not support the proposal.
Mayor Pro Tem Lubin observed that there were numerous retail uses that were not permitted;
however, there were numerous retail uses that were permitted that could be established without
any approval process, regardless of their traific generation. He commented that this proposal
was not a freestanding bank and it would not generate as much traffic�. He spoke about
technology advances and agreed that lobby traffic will continue to decrease. He stated he did not
believe traffic was an issue. He stated this was an opportunity to reduce the traffic impact and to
fill a space that has been vacant for almost five years. He referred to AG Edwards, which is a
non-traffic generator. He said it was important to recognize from an economic standpoint that
there are vacancies in all centers in the City and to acknowledge the impacts to existing
businesses if buildings remain vacant. He supported moving forward and approving the
proposal. He further commented that when a plan for Pad "I" is developed, there will be an
opportunity to do a comprehensive traffic study and review all of the impacts at that time.
Mayor Ferrara stated that the finro issues were traffic and economics. He recalled that the
previous direction from the Council in May was for the completion of a comprehensive traffic
study. He stated this could have been done by now and would have provided the Council with
information that was needed in order to make an informed decision and instead the Council
received a much briefer version of the traffic study that did not address the issues. He referred
back to the original action the Council took when the Center was approved and stated the
Council at that time recognized that traffic would be a significant issue in and around the Center. ��I
He stated that the Council decision had required a Statement of Overriding Considerations to
accept adverse traffic impacts for economic benefits. He stated that it was unknown whether
traffic projections have been exceeded. He further addressed potential traffic mitigation needed
for traffic control across Rancho Parkway. He stated that he would like to have Wells Fargo in
Arroyo Grande and commented that discussion had been held at the previous meeting about the
potential for locating in Phase 1. He questioned why Phase II has been empty all this time and
suggested there could be other factors such as lease costs. He concluded by stating that he
hoped that Wells Fargo would locate in Arroyo Grande and wait for a comprehensive traffic study
to be conducted. He said he was not prepared to support the proposal at this time. '
Council Member Dickens moved to defer action and refer the application back to the Planning
Commission for further study and recommendation concurrent with Pad "P' configuration after a !
complete traffic study is provided. Council Member Costello seconded the motion, and on the
following rol�call vote:
AYES: Dickens, Costello, Runels, Ferrara
NOES: Lubin �
ABSENT: None
There being 4 AYES and 1 NO, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
. f
f
i
�
f
9.d.
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
� ' CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the City Council of the
City of Arroyo Grande on TUESDAY, JANUARY 25, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Arroyo
Grande City Council Chambers, 215 E. Branch Street, Arroyo Grande, CA to consider the
following item: PROPOSED ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 13.06 TO TITLE 13 OF
THE ARROYO GRANDE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING ESTABLISHMENT OF A
MANDATORY RETROFIT PROGRAM AND PROCEDURE UPON THE CHANGE OF
. OWNERSHIP OF REAL PROPERTY
Applicant: City of Arroyo Grande
Proposal: The City Council will consider a proposed ordinance adding Chapter
13.06 to Title 13 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code which will
establish a program requiring replacement (retrofit) of conventional
plumbing fixtures with low water using plumbing fixtures upon the
change of ownership of real property.
Representative: Don Sp�gnolo, Director of Public Works
Any person affected or concerned about the proposal may submit written comments to
the Public Works Department before the City Council hearing, or appear and be heard
in support of or opposition to the proposal at the time of the hearing.
Any person interested in the proposal can contact the Public Works Department at 208
East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande, California, or by telephone at (805) 473-5440 during
normal business hours (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.). , A copy of the proposed Ordinance is
available for public inspection at the above address.
� If you challenge an item in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Failure of any person to receive the notice shall not constitute grounds for any court to
invalidate the action of the legislative body for which the notice was given.
Kelly We mor , City Clerk
Publish 1T, The Tribune, Friday, January 14, 2005
o� PRROyoc ,
� INCOqPORA7E0 Z
u � ° MEMORANDUM
� JUIY 10, 19/1 *
c���FORN�P
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DON SPAGNOLO, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKSJCITY ENGIN�ER�
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 13.06 TO
TRLE 13 OF CRY MUNICIPAL CODE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF
A MANDATORY RETRQFR PROGRA�IA AND PROCEDURE UPON THE
CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP OF REAL PROPE�tTY
DATE: JANUARY 25, 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
it is recommended the City Council introduce the attached ordinance adding Chapter
13.06 to Title 13 of the Municipal Code to create and implement a mandatory water
conservafion and retrofit program in instances involving residential property at the time
of change in property ownership and requiring said property to be retrofitted with low
water-use plumbing fixtures.
FUNDING:
Under the proposed mandatory retrofit program, before the close of escrow for any
change in ownership of residential prbperty, the seller must retrofit the property's
plumbing fixtures to meet the criteria of low-water use. The seller can perform this
retrofit on their own or they can request a retrofit thraugh the City's existing plumbing
retrofit program if funds are available.
The FY 2004-05 project�d year-end fund balance for the Water Neutralization Impact
fund is $692,410 to be us�d for the implementation of water cons+ervatior� measures.
DISCUSSION:
On November 23, 2004, the Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance to implement
a mandatory retrofit program for residential properties that change ownership. This
ordinance would aid in the achievemen#of water effiaency throughout the City.
A similar ordinance t�as been in effect in the City of San Luis Obispo that places the
burden of compliance on the seller of the property. Once a property is listed for sale and
is ultimately sold, the seller mus� retrofit its plumbing fixtures to meet the criteria of low-
water use. The seller must obtain a Water Conservation Certificate prior to the close of
escrow. If the seller does not comply within the escrow period, the responsibility then
falls to the buyer. The City reserves the right to prosecute fo� non-compliance with the
Ordinance.
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ADDIMC CHAPTER 13.06 TO TITLE 13 OF
THE MUNICIPAL CODE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A MANDATORY
RETROFIT PROGRAM AND PROCEDURE UPON tHE CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP
OF REAL PROP�RTY
JANUAI�Y 25, 2005
PAGE 2
The Cities of Santa Barbara, Grover Beach, Morro Bay and Cambria Community
Services District also have similar programs. The City of Santa Barbara requires retrofit
for new construction, and follows a sligh�y dif�erent set of standards. Each agency listed
above of�ers a rebate or inc;�ntive to promote retrofit by property owners. The process is
aCCOmplisMed by the owner installinglor having installed water conserving fixtures, then
completing a form, and flnatly, pas�ing an inspection. Once the propgrly is determined
to be in compliance, the owner receives a c�rtification acknowledging that installation of
water conserving piumbing fixtures has been completed.
The City's propo�ed program is vQry simiiar #o the ptogram used by the City San Luis
Obispo. Once a property is listed for sale, t�e owner must retrofit its plumbing fixtures
ta meet the criteria of low water use. The seller must ob�in a Water Conservation
Certificate from the City prior to the dose of escrqw. The owner can reques# a retrofit
through the City's existing plumbing retrofit program as ou�ined in the City's Water
Conservation Program. This program al�ows�or the Eost of the retrofit to be paid by the
City if funds are available. The Ci#y reserves the right to prosecute for non-compliance
with the Ordinance.
The replac,�ment of high flow toilets and other plumbing fixtures will help address the
long range goal of reducing wa#er consumption throughout the City. ;
ALTERNATIVES:
The following altematives are presented for the CounciPs consideration:
• Adopt the attached ordinance as written;
• Do not app�ove stafFs recommendations;
• Direct staff to modify the ordinanve; or
• Provide further dire�tion to stai�. :
I
;
;
;
,
�
E
f
i
I
� ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO
GRANDE ADDING CHAPTER 13.06 TO TITLE 13 OF THE ARROYO
GRANDE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING IMPLEMENTATION OF A
MANDATORY PLUMBING RETROFIT PROGRAM AND PROCEDURE
UPON THE CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP OF REAL PROPERTY
WHEREAS, the City has found and determined that it is in the best interest of the City
and its inhabitants to provide plumbing retrofit standards for the conservation of potable
water supplies. Retrofit of existing plumbing fixtures will lessen consumption of limited
potable water resources available to the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: Chapter 13.06 is hereby added to Title 13 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal
Code as follows:
Chapter 13.06 Mandatory Retrofit Program
13.06.010 Definitions.
A. "Change of ownership" means a transfer of a present interest in real property.
Every transfer of properry shall qualify as a "change of ownership", except transfer of
title from one spouse to another, whether the transfer is voluntary, involuntary, by
operation of law, by grant, gift, devise, inheritance, trust, contract of sale, addition or
deletion of an owner, property settlement, or any other means. "Change of ownership"
effected other than by a contract of sale shall be deemed to occur at the time of actual
transfer of title. A "change of ownership" resulting from a contract of-sale or similar
instrument shall be so regarded only if escrow is opened or a contract of sale is
executed, whichever occurs last, on or after the effective date of this chapter.
B. "Low-water-use plumbing fixtures" means any toilet using a maximum of one
and six-tenths (1.6) gallons per flush.and shower heads designed to emit a maximum of
two and one-half (2.5) gallons per minute (gpm) of water.
C. "Retrofit" means the replacement of a conventional plumbing fixture with low-
water-using plumbing fixtures.
D. "Water conservation certificate" means a certificate acknowledging that
Installation of water-conserving plumbing fixtures has been completed. ',
;
13.06.020 Retrofit upon sale. ;
i
A. Before the close of escrow for any change of ownership, defined by this
chapter, of real property within the City, the selling owner(s) or an authorized agent shai@
ORDINANCE NO.
PAGE 2
certify compliance with the retrofit requirements of this chapter by obtaining a water
conservation certificate in accordance with § 13.06.040. No property transfer shall be
recorded until verification has been received by the City and a water conservation
certificate has been issued to the seller.
B. Pursuant to the authority vested to the City of Arroyo Grande under Civil Code
Section 1102.6a, the City hereby requires disclosure of the retrofit requirements of this
chapter, in transaction, transfer, or change in ownership subject to the provisions of this
chapter.
C. No liability shall arise nor any action be brought or maintained against any
agent of any party to a transfer of title, including any person or entity acting in the
capacity of an escrow, for any error, inaccuracy, or omission relating to compliance with
this section. However, this section does not apply to a licensee, as defined in Section
10011 of the State Business and Professions Code, where the licensee participates in
the making of the certification required to be made pursuant to this section with actual
knowledge of the falsity of the certification.
13.06.030 Cost of Retrofit
The cost of retrofit shall be borne by the owner of the property. The owner can
request a retrofit through the City's existing plumbing retrofit program as outlined in the
City's Water Conservation Program. This program allows for the cost of the retrofit to
be paid by the City if water conservation funds are available.
13.06.040 Verification.
A. Upon retrofitting with water-conserving plumbing fixtures, the seller, prior to
the change of ownership, shall obtain from the utilities department a "water conservation
certificate," in accordance with administrative procedures established by the
department, verifying that water-conserving plumbing fixtures have been installed. The
seller shall allow an inspection of property by City staff.
B. "Water conservation certificates" shall also be available to those who
voluntarily install water-conserving plumbing fixtures or have installed water-conserving
plumbing fixtures prior to the effective date of this chapter.
13.06.050 Notice of correction.
Whenever the Director of Public Works determines that there is a property where
low-water-use plumbing fixtures have not been installed as required by this chapter or
where such fixtures have been removed since initial installation and replaced with other ,
than low-water-use fixtures, the Director may serve a notice of correction on the
owner(s) of the property on which the violation is situated and any other person
responsible for the violation. The owner of record shall have ninety days to take
corrective action. Failure to take corrective action within ninety days shall constitute a
violation of this chapter.
ORDINANCE NO.
PAGE 3
13.06.060 Exemptions.
The Director of Public Works may exempt facilities from the provisions of this
chapter, and impose reasonable conditions in lieu of full compliance herewith, if the
Director determines that there are practical difficulties involved in carrying out the
provisions of this chapter. The Director may exempt facilities from the provisions of this
chapter when low-water-using fixtures are not available to match a historic architectural
style. The Director shall require tha# sufficient evidence or proof be submitted to
substantiate any exemption or acceptance of alternatives.
13.06.070 Appeals.
A. Content of Appeals. An appeal may be made to an appeals board, consisting
of representatives from the Community Development Department, Financial Services
Department, and Utilities Department, by any person aggrieved by a decision of the
Director of Public Works pursuant to this chapter. The appellant must specifically state
in the notice of appeal:
1. The name and address of the appellant and the appellant's interest in
the decision.
2. The nature of the decision appealed from and/or the conditions
appealed from.
3. A clear, complete, but brief statement of the reasons why, in the opinion
of the appellant, the decision or the conditions imposed were unjustified or
inappropriate.
4. The specific facts of the matter in sufficient detail to notify the City. The
appeal shall not be stated in generalities.
B. Acceptance of Appeal. An appeal shall not be accepted by the City unless it is
complete.
13.06.080 Penalties; infraction.
It is unlawful to fail to comply with the retrofit requirements of this chapter or to
alter or replace low-water-use plumbing fixtures required by this chapter with fixtures
other than low-water-use plumbing fixtures. Violation of the provisions of this chapter
shall constitute an infraction. Each day any violation of this chapter continues shall be
considered a new and separate offense.
13.06.090 Remedies cumulative.
The decision of the City to pursue either a civil or criminal or abatement action
against a person violating any provision of this chapter shall not preclude further relief
by use of any other remedy provided herein, or by common law, statute, or ordinance.
ORDINANCE NO.
PAG E 4
SECTION 2: If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unlawful, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or any
part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section,
subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase thereof, irrespective of
the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence,
clause or phrase be declared unlawful.
SECTION 3: A summary of this Ordinance shall be published in a newspaper published
and circulated in the City of Arroyo Grande at least five (5� days prior to the City Council
meeting at which the proposed Ordinance is to be adopted. A certified copy of the full
text of the proposed Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk. Within
fifteen (15) days after adoption of the Ordinance, the summary with the names of those
City Council members voting for and against the Ordinance shall be published again,
and the City Clerk shall post a certified copy of the full text of such adopted Ordinance.
SECTION 4: This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect thirty (30)
days after its passage.
On motion of Council Member, seconded by Council Member
and on the following roll call vote, to wit: �
AYES: .
NOES:
ABSENT: '
the foregoing Ordinance was passed and adopted this day of
2005. '
,
i
i
i
ORDINANCE NO.
PAGE 5
TONY M. FERRARA, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
�i
�
I
�
;
,
4
9.e.
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
. CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the City Council of the
City of Arroyo Grande on TUESDAY, JANUARY 25, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Arroyo
Grande City Council Chambers, 215 E. Branch Street, Arroyo Grande, CA to consider the
following item:
Applicant: City of Arroyo Grande
Proposal: The Council will consider a proposed Resolution increasing the
in-lieu fee for off-street parking in the Parking and Business
Improvement Area of the Village.
Representative: Rob Strong, Community Development Director
In compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the Community Development
Department has determined that the project is categorically exempt under section 45273 of
the CEQA guidelines. If the City Council does not feel that this categorical exemption is
appropriate, project approval will not be considered.
Any person affected or concerned by the proposal may submit written comments to the
Office of the City Manager before the City Council hearing, or appear and be heard in
support of or opposition to the proposal at the time of the hearing.
Any person interested in the proposal can contact the Financial Services Department at
214 E. Branch Street, Arroyo Grande, California, or by telephone at (805) 473-5430 during
normal business hours (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.). The pro.posal will be available for public
inspection at the above address.
If you challenge an item in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written ;
correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. �
�
�
Failure of any person to receive the notice shall not constitute grounds for any court to �
invalidate the action of the legislative body for which the notice was given. �
��
Kelly Wet or City Clerk
Publish 1T, The Tribune, Friday, January 14, 2005
o� pRROy�c
� INCORPORATE i
" T MEMORANDUM
i� �u�r io, i9ii *
c4��FORN�P
TO: CITY COUNCIL ,
FROM: ROB STRONG, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR �7
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO ADJUST THE IN-LIEU FEE
FOR OFF-STREET PARKING IN THE PARKING AND BUSINESS
IMPROVEMENT AREA OF THE VILLAGE
DATE: JANUARY 25, 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution increasing the in-lieu fee for
off-street parking in the Parking and Business Improvement Area of the Village. The
attached resolution increases the fee (established in 1981 with provisions for periodic
cost adjustments) from the current amount of $4,057 to the proposed amount of
$12,000, as recommended by the Downtown Parking Advisory Board (DPAB) and
Planning Commission, to recover the estimated costs of land acquisition and one half
the basic grading, paving and other estimated improvement costs per space.
FUNDING:
There is no cost to the City and this will increase future revenue in the Downtown Parking
fund.
BACKGROUND:
Concurrent with establishment of the Village Area Parking and Business Improvement
Area in 1969-70, the City's parking requirements were amended to allow issuance of "in-
lieu" certificates to represent the cost of one off-street parking space. The in-lieu fee was '
intended to be "based on the land value and not less than one half the construction costs
of a top grade parking lot," and said revenues were to be a special fund "to be used to
establish public off-street parking." By Resolution No. 1484, adopted in 1981, the City
Council established the value of each in-lieu off-street parking space at $3,000 reflecting
estimated cost of improvements, including grading, paving and landscaping.
In 1997, the City Council amended the Development Code parking and loading .
requirements, including when parking in-lieu fees may be permitted, and adopted
Resolution No. 3251 adjusting the amount of the in-lieu fee to $3,500 per space. Since
then, the cost has been adjusted periodically to reflect increased cost of construction, but
not the more dramatic increased cost of land acquisition. During the last three years, the '
DPAB has been reviewing comprehensive Development Code amendments and related '
planning for off-street parking utilization and proposed improvements as part of a Village '
Parking and Business Improvement Area expansion study. One of the prerequisite
S:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTICITY COiJNCIL�2005\O1-25-OS�Parking In lieu fee increase SR 01-25-OS
final.doc �
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO ADJUST THE IN-LIEU FEE FOR OFF-
STREET PARKING IN THE PARKING AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA OF
THE VILLAGE
JANUARY 25, 2005
PAGE 2
recommendations of the DPAB to the Planning Commission and City Council is that the
in-lieu fee be increased to at least $12,000 to enable additional land acquisition at
appropriate perimeter locations in the Village, as well as the. construction of surface
parking improvements.
Other DPAB recommendations regarding prior parking credits and expansion of the
Village Parking and Business Improvement Area to the west, north, east and south are
being scheduled for Planning Commission public hearings in March 2005. After these
hearings, the Commission recommendations will be forwarded to City Council for public
hearings in April or May. The most critical concem of the staff and DPAB is that the
obsolete and inadequate parking in-lieu fee of$4,057 NOT be utilized for any pending or
potential future private projects. Land costs have more than tripled during the last 20
years and recent appraisals indicate that Village area undeveloped properties, when
available, will cost more than $18 per s.f. If buildings must also be acquired and
removed, the cost could easily more than double. Recognizing that an efficient surFace
parking lot design typically requires 350 to 400 s.f. per space, the current land acquisition
cost is estimated from $6,300 to $10,000 per space. Grading, paving, landscaping and
lighting are conservatively estimated to cost approximately $4,000 per space ($10 per
s.f.)
Combining the land acquisition appraisal for unimproved vacant commercial land and
estimated parking lot construction costs reveal that the in-lieu fee should be at least in
the range of $10,000 to $14,000, exclusive of design, construction administration or
other related costs. The estimated mid-range of $12,000 per space would triple the
current in-lieu fee and prevent pending private projects from contributing less than one-
third the actual cost of potential public parking space development.
There are at least four pending projects within the Village area which plan to partially
utilize a combination of on-site private parking and payment of in-lieu fees for ,
supplemental public parking to comply with Village area parking standards. The City is
currently negotiating to acquire an undeveloped Village property in the vicinity of Le �
Point Street to enlarge an existing City parking lot near Miller Way. The actual cost of �
land acquisition and improvement costs will be established by this or an alternative �
parking lot project in the Village area and divided by the number of new spaces created {
to determine any future additional adjustment if necessary. The increased fee is !
necessary to assist in #unding these proposed improvements. �
In the future, �
however, it wilt be more difficult to find undeveloped properties appropriate
for public parking and the land acquisition costs will likely increase substantially. During
this interim period, the in-lieu fee of at least $12,000 recommended by the DPAB and
Planning Commission is an economical altemative to scattered private off-site parking
which is difficult to secure in small quantities. The four pending projects may contribute
S:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENIICITY COUNCIU2005\01-25-05�Parking In lieu fee increase SR 01-25-05 final.doc
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO ADJUST THE IN-LIEU FEE FOR OFF-
STREET PARKING IN THE PARKING AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA OF
THE VILLAGE
JANUARY 25, 2005
PAGE 3
toward a total of 20 spaces, during the next two years (approximately $240,000),
assuming implementation of this in-lieu fee increase.
It should be noted that the appraisal and construction cost estimates are also valid in
other Mixed-Use and Commercial areas. It is staff's intent to integrate the in-lieu fee
option, subject to Planning Commission and City Council approval, into a Development
Code Update of City-wide parking standards and zoning regulations. Staff will propose
the parking in-lieu fee funds be reserved for specific geographic districts such as the
Village; Traffic Way; and Highway, Fair Oaks and Gateway segments of East Grand
Avenue. The funds will be for development only and recommended only when there is
a maintenance agreement or district such as the VIA to sustain the public parking
maintenance, management and repairs.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
- Adopt the Resolution increasing the parking in-lieu fee from $4,057 per space to at
least $12,000 per space as recommended by the DPAB and Planning
Commission.
- Direct staff to retum with more detailed land acquisition proposals and appraisals
and design and cost estimates for improvement to implement a higher average fee
and other public parking development programs. ;
- Provide other direction to staff, DPAB and Planning Commission study.
Attachments:
1. DPAB report, July 15, 2004 '
2. Planning Commission minutes, '
�
�
�
�
�
�
S:\COMMUNITY_DEVELOPMENIICITY COUNCIL�2005\01-25-05�Parking In lieu fee increase SR 01-25-05 final.doc
RESOLUTION NO.
� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO
GRANDE ARKING NANDHBUSINESSF MPROVEMENTT AREA OF KTHE
IN THE P
VILLAGE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande adopted Ordinance 489 C.S.
(codified in Arroyo Grande Municipal Code section 16.56.020.B) establishing the option of
�payment of an in-lieu fee for off-street parking spaces (hereinafter referred to as the
parking in-lieu fee") in the Parking and Business Improvement Area for the Village
(hereinafter referred to as the "Village Improvement Area"); and
WHEREAS, land acqhave' been documented by recent�app assals'alnd land sales;�ande
Improvement Area and
WHEREAS, land improvement costs have increased substantially and have been .
documented by recent city contracts; and
WHEREAS, the Downtown Parking Advisory Board and the Planning Commission has,
after thorough study, recommended that the City Council increase the parking in-lieu fee
to $12,000; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande has held a public hearing on
this matter in accordance with State law and City Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande hereby establishes the in-lieu fee for off-street parking spaces in the Village �
Improvement Area at$12,000 per space.
On motion by Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and by
the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 25"' day of January 2005.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
TONY M. FERRARA, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
�
�
i
i
C
�
I
s
�
��.r..._..,
o� PRROyoc ATTACHMENT 1
� INCORPOAATED �
v �� O
m
i� �u�r io. �s�i „�
c4��FORN`P MEMORANDUM
TO: DOWNTOWN PARKING ADVISORY BOARD
FROM: ROB STRONG, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF VILLAGE PARKING AND BUSINESS
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT REFORMATION PROPOSALS
DATE: JULY 15, 2004 �
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is recommended that the Downtown Parking Advisory Board recommend that the City
Council:
. A) Resolve "parking credits" by PBIA dissolution and reformation with specific
assignment of major credits and dismissal of minor credits as tentatively outlined
herein.
B) Amend parking requirements to eliminate exceptions for changes of use in existing
buildings and expansions of less than 25% and instead allow mixed use parking !
reduction to 80% or up to 70% of the required standard subject to a parking study '
showing that the shared uses have different hours of operation and would not �
conflict in their time of use. ;
C) Increase Parking In-lieu fees from $4,000 to at least $10,000 to include the �
estimated cost of land acquisitions as well as improvement costs. �
D) Enlarge Parking and Business Improvement Area to include all Village Core
Downtown (VCD) and Village Mixed-Use (VMU) zoned areas within new district
shown on the attached map.
BACKGROUND:
During the last two years the Downtown Parking and Advisory Board (DPAB) has been
studying the history, current conditions and potential improvements to Village area parking.
At the beginning of the study, staff provided a "concept plan"to serve as a common vision
of how and where new buildings could be accommodated and where circulation and
parking should be provided to maintain and enhance economic vitality. (See pages 1-4,
Attachment 1, Arroyo Grande Village Concept Plan and map.)
A brief summary of the history of parking .requirements in the Village Commercial and
downtown area was also included to provide a basis for considering current changes. (See
pages 5 and 6 of October 2002 Concept Plan report.) �
A Village parking study was conducted to evaluate parking conditions in a twelve block
area which indicated about 202,400 sq. ft. of existing floor area in the northern seven
DOWNTOWN PARKING ADVISORY BOARD
JULY 15, 2004
PAGE 2
blocks served by 641 public and private off-street parking spaces and 164 on-street
spaces. Generally, there does not appear to be an existing deficiency in parking, but the
concept plan reveals potential to almost double existing building area in the seven-block
area, to approximately 400,000 sq. ft. which indicates a need for about 1,320 spaces
compared to 800 existing on and off-street in the seven-block area. (See pages 7 through
11 of Village Parking Study Inventory Projections.)
The five-block area south of Arroyo Grande Creek is a lower intensity Village Mixed-Use
area with approximately 96,000 sq. ft. building area existing and only 39,000 sq. ft. of
estimated additional potential. (See page 12 of Village Parking Study.)
DISCUSSION:
A) "Parking Credits"
Between 1970 and 1983, in order to obtain property and voluntary contributions for
improvement of existing parking lots within the PBIA, the City allowed, "parking credits".
Apparently, one credit was allowed on the basis of one space per 200 sq. ft., (10' x 20'was
the minimum stall size without consideration of driveway or aisle space), or per $1,000
contributed (at the time $5.00 per sq. ft. was the approximate value of commercial land).
The donations were by business operators, individuals and some property owners, but the
"credits" were not associated with specific properties. It should be noted that a business
license tax, double that outside the PBIA was the other source for revenue for parking
acquisition or improvements and that no property tax assessment has ever been collected.
Unfortunately, the inventory of parking credits did not identify specific properties or uses
which would be assigned the credit. This has become a deterrent to PBIA expansion as
well as an issue of equitable treatment when considering "in lieu fees" per space for future
parking development.
Most of the businesses and ind�iduals who contributed less than $1,000 prior to 1983,
more than twenty years ago, are no longer active and other new businesses in the interim
have paid annual license fees of a similar amount (20 x$50 = $1,000).
It should be recognized that the purpose of the cash contributions made for partial credits
was to temporarily improve public parking lots on either City land or private leased
properties. After twenty years most of the temporary improvements are fully used. In any
event, it would be difficult for the City or any successor claimant to prove who should be
compensated or how much value if any remains.
Proposal No. 1 �
That the City Council thank any known successors and dismiss these partial credits of less
than one space. .
This would be achieved by dissolving the 1970 PBIA and reforming a new one. Section
36081 of the Streets and Highways Code, the law used to establish the PBIA states:
DOWNTOWN PARKING ADVISORY BOARD
JULY 15, 2004
PAGE 3
"Upon disestabiishment of an area, any proceeds of the tax or assets
acquired with such proceeds shall be subject to disposition as the City
Council shall determine."
If Proposal No.1 is approved by the City Council the following credits would be
dismissed (See Table A-1, Partial Parking Credits).
TABLE A-1
Name . Amount ,' , . 'Credit -
_ _ :
Peggy's Dress Shop $500 1/2
Arroyo Grande Flower Shop $500 1/2
Arroyo Grande Realty $250 1/4
Rae Anderson $500 1/2
Sharp Construction Company $800.86 4/5
Christianson Chevrolet $500 1/2
Don's Variety $500 1/2
Carlock's Bakery $250 1/4
Buzz Bartier and Beauty Shop $400 2/5
Louis Ralph Dress Shop $250 1/4
Maury Brennan Ford $250 1/4
Arroyo Liquor 800 � 4/5
Don Rowe, CPA $500 1/2
� Baxter's $500 1/2 .
E.C. Loomis & Son (Insurance) $750 3/4 '
E.C. Loomis & Son (Feed) $750 3/4
L.A. Brisco $500 1/2
Virginia Rohen $500 1/2
The dismissal of these 18 partial credits would allow staff to concentrate efforts on the
remaining 21 larger potential claims for parking credits based on land donations or$1,000
or more in cash contributed between 1970 and 1983: (See Table A-2, Summary List of
Larger Parking Credit Contributors.)
E
�
' f
. i
k
f
t
V
DOWNTOWN PARKING ADVISORY BOARD
JULY 15, 2004
PAGE 4
DOWNTOWN PARKING ADVISORY BOARD
JULY 15, 2004
PAGE 4
TABLE A-2
Name Cash/Land (sq. ft.) Credits
_
Y 9 P Y $1,000 1 :
Arro o Dru Com an
R.D. Grant 1,000 s.f. 7
F. Byron Grant (from Vaughn 1,020 s.f. 2 (of 5)
Jewelry)
Bank of America $1,600 1.6
Biils' Cleaners $1,000 & 1,672 s.f. 9
J.O. and Geraldine Pence $500 &205 s.f. 1.5
Wilma C. Dixson $1,000 & 3,140 s.f. 16.7
David and Gould $1,450 & 1,471 s.f. 9.2
Coker Elisworth (104 E. Branch) $5,000 5
Kuden & Elisworth (104 E. Branch) $4,000 4
Joseph Shimandle (118 Nevada) $3,000 3
David and Gould 6983 s.f. 34.9
Bennett Grocery and G.D. Bennett $500& 1,525 s.f. 7.6
Vaughn Jewelry (see Grant also) 1,020 s.f. 3 (of 5)
Eula M. Turney 388 s.f. 1.9
Robert H & Carolyn J. Hizey 480 s.f. 2.4 .
Chester D. Porter {Restaurant) 1,879 s.f. 9.4 (0.5 additional from
"Kelsey 5/12/77".)
Martin Polin & Polin Truchan & $2,000 2
Cooper
Martin Polin & Polin Truchan & $3,000 3
Cooper
� Martin Polin & Polin Truchan & $4,500 4.5
Cooper
Martin Polin & Polin Truchan & $2,000 2 '
Cooper '
�
Proposal No. 2 �
That The City Council notify the 21 larger potential claimants and apparent successor !
property owners or current businesses and consider any specific written claims and =
evidence provided to warrant a. parking credit assignment to any property within the
proposed PBIA district. The City Council would schedule a public hearing to consider
dissolution of the 1970 PBIA, formation of a 2004 PBIA and to resolve all potential claims
for credits and proposed assignment to specific properties. Otherwise prior credits would
become unassigned assets of the City.
_- �......�.._.r,_,--_..........
DOWNTOWN PARKING ADVISORY BOARD
JULY 15, 2004
PAGE 5
PRELIMINARY RESEARCH FINDINGS
Based on City staff research most of these larger credits were used during the last thirty
years for buildings that were expanded or changed in use to require more parking at the
time.
Specifically, the 7 credits noted for R.D. Grant and the 2 credits held by F. Byron Grant
(from Vaughn Jewelry) were reportedly utilized to enable expansion of the Porter Building
at 126 E. Branch Street (APN 007-491-049).
Bill's Cleaner's property at 109 E. Branch Street with 9 parking credits and one of the
properties formerly owned by David and Gould, at 119 E. Branch with 9.2 parking credits
were subsequently acquired by Eddie and Dorthy EI-Helou. Construction of the Broadway
Jewelry at 119 E. Branch including upstairs offices, utilized 9 spaces of these 10.2
potential credits. The remaining potential claim for 9.2 credits should be assigned to the
future redevelopment or expansion of existing buildings between 109 and 119 E. Branch
Street (APN's 007-192-055, 056 and 061).
Bank of America's 1.6 parking credits, Coker Ellsworth's 5 credits and Kuden and
Ellsworth's 4 credits obtained by cash contributions alt were apparently utilized in the
remodeling of 102 and 104 E. Branch Street, the Village Emporium (APN 007-491-002).
J.O. and Geraldine Pence's 1.5 credits were associated with the property now owned by
Jens Wagner at 134 E. Branch Street, recently remodeled for Willis and Bennett
Fumishings (APN 007-491-051).
Wilma C. Dixson's 16.7 credits and Arroyo Grande Drug Company's 1 credit should be
assigned to the Dixson Trust properties at 130 and 132 E. Branch Street (APN 007-491- �
050). The 17.7 space credit would enable 5310 sq. ft. of retail or office use, the '
approximate size of the existing building which would be considered conforming to parking �
requirements.
Joseph Shimandle's acquisition of 3 parking credits was recently determined to be
associated with 118 Nevada Street, outside the existing PBIA now owned by Teresa
Winters (APN 007-192-041), used to enable a residence converted to office use to
supplement on-site parking.
The contribution of David and Gould, et al, of a portion of the City's Car Corral, which was
credited 34.9 parking credits cowld be assigned to the adjacent APN 007-192-059, 101
and 103 E. Branch Street where Village Grill and the Sport Card Shop are located.
Approximately 7 credits were apparently utilized by this 1991 change of use from retail to
restaurant while 28 credits remain for future redevelopment or expansion. Attomey
Andrew David also owns APN 007-192-035 where his office is located and APN 007-192-
, 060, a portion of the car corral, where some of these credits could be assigned to future
redevelopment or expansion. 4then�vise, the unused credits need to be assigned or
negotiated by mutual agreement between the City and Mr. David. (A new two-story
-- .��.�.�.,,_.�.�,__._,��
DOWNTOWN PARKING ADVISORY BOARD
JULY 15, 2004
PAGE 6
structure on the portion of the parking lot would utilize approximately 21 credits while the
existing single story office building would require approximately 9 spaces to be legally
conforming.
The 7.6 credits of Gorden D. Bennett and Bennett Grocery should be assigned to 122 E.
Branch Street where Stephanie's is located (APN 007-491-046), owned by the Bennetts,
and the building considered conforming to required parking.
Staff research indicates that Henri DeGroot is the current owner of 126 E. Branch Street
(APN 007-491-049), successor to Chester D. Porter, where the Village Antique Mart and
Ardvark Antique Store are located. As noted above the 9.4 credits, including 6.5 "from
Kelsey 5/12/77", were apparently utilized when the Porter Building was expanded.
Robert H and Carolyn J. Hizey were prior owners of the Arroyo Grande Meat Co., 120 E.
Branch Street (APN) 007-491-044) which should be assigned 2.4 credits toward future
redevelopment or expansion.
Coker Ellsworth and Kuden and Ellsworth's 9 credits were purchased to enable expansion
of 104 E. Branch Street where the Village Emporium is located (APN 007-491-002).
Martin Polin and Polin, Truchan and Cooper similarly purchased 11.5 credits apparently
used to enable reuse of 100 E. Branch where Lightening Joe's and upstairs offices are
located (APN 007-491-039).
Eula M. Turney was a prior owner of 124 E. Branch Street where Desire is now located
(APN 007-491-047) now owned by Elaine F. Waiters. Turney's 1.9 credits should be
assigned to this property toward future redevelopment or expansion.
B) Parking Exception and Parking Reductions: '
Section 16.55.020 B of Municipal Code parking requirements provides three exceptions for j
the area within the Village Parking and Business Improvement Area:
1. "For changes in use in existing buildings, no off-street parking facilities or payment �
of in-lieu fees shall be required.
2. Outdoor dining areas, limited to 25% or less of the total gross square footage of the
enclosed area of.the use, shall be excluded from the requirements to provide off-
street parking facilities or to pay in lieu fees... Any outdoor dining area in excess of
25% of the total gross square footage of the enclosed area of the use shall be
required to provide only the additional number of parking spaces for the incremental
square footage over the 25%.
3. Existing buildings that are remodeled_or enlarged shall not be required to provide
parking if the increase in the square footage is less than 25% of the floor area
before the addition ..."
DOWNTOWN PARKING ADVISORY BOARD
JULY 15, 2004
PAGE 7
Section 16.56.050 allows common (shared) parking facilities in all districts, subject
to the following:
"Common parking facilities may be provided in lieu of individual
requirements if the total number of parking spaces is the sum of the
requirements for individual uses and the parking facilities are located
within two hundred (200)feet of the associated use.
1. The total parking requirement may be reduced to seventy (70)
percent of the required standard if a parking study, prepared by a
licensed engineer or architect, can clea�ly show that the shared uses
have different hours of operations and would not conflict in their time
of use. A Conditional Use Permit shall be required to be reviewed
and approved by the Planning Commission for such a reduction.
2. As a condition of allowing common parking facilities, parties using
common parking facilities shall provide evidence of such joint use by
a proper legal agreement approved by the City Attomey. Such
agreements when approved shall be filed with the Planning and
Building Departments and recorded with the County Recorder."
Staff has proposed a pending Development Code Amendment No. 03-008 that would
delete exception one and limit exception three to existing building enlargements of less
than three hundred (300) square feet rather than twenty-five (25) percent of the floor area '
before the addition. The code amendment would also enable common parking facilities
located within five hundred (500) feet of the associated use rather than finro hundred (200)
feet, and provide for two levels of parking reduction for mixed-use developments:
1. "The total parking requirement may be reduced to eighty (80) percent of the
required standard for mixed-use developments or up to seventy (70) percent
of the required standard if a parking study, prepared by a licensed engineer
or architect, can clearly show that the shared uses have different hours of
operation and would not conflict in their time of use. A conditional use ;
permit shall be required to be reviewed and approved by the planning i
commission for such a reduction." (
�
These proposed changes are intended to encourage mixed-use developments and �
common parking facilities both inside and outside the Village Parking and Business ;
Improvement Area (PBIA). If the City also wants to encourage public parking facilities
within the PBIA, these parking reductions could be allowed when in-lieu fees are
contributed, subject to Conditional Use Permit (CUP) approval.
Preliminary research indicates that very few cities allow required resident parking to be
considered as part of a mixed-use parking reduction, but staff believes that visitor parking
could be shared with office or commercial use requirements, subject to CUP. In most
cases 20 to 30% is the maximum reduction considered.
�� ,__�a�.__.__�._�_y.__..
DOWNTOWN PARKING ADVISORY BOARD
JULY 15, 2004
PAGE 8
C) Parking In-Lieu Fees
As previously noted, the IVlunicipaf Code Section 16.56.020. B and C allows payment of in-
lieu fees within the Village Parking and Business Improvement Area and Village Mixed-
Use district, subject to conditional use permits. In 1981 the City Council established an in-
lieu fee of $3,000 with provisions for cost escalations for construction which is now
approximately $4,000.
Although the in-lieu fee was apparently supposed to encompass the cost of land and at
least half the grading and improvement costs of creating a parking space, the current fee
is approximately adequate to cover only the construction expenses. Land costs have
more than tripled during the last twenty years.
Recent appraisals indicate that Village area undeveloped properties, when available, will
cost more than $18.00 per sq. ft. and if improvements must also be acquired and
removed, the cost could typically exceed $25.00 per sq. ft. Recognizing that an efficient
surface parking lot design would typically require 350 to 400 sq. ft. per space, the land
costs would range from $6,300 to $10,000 for each space. Combining estimated
construction costs of$4,000 per space would indicate that the in-lieu fee should be at least
$10,300 to $14,000 per space. It should be noted that although the estirnated mid-range
of $12,000 per space would be triple the existing in-lieu fee, no such fees have been
allowed or collected during the last twenty years.
Once increased, however there are at least four pending projects within the proposed
expansion area of the PBIA which plan to utilize a combination of partial on-site private
parking and payment of in-lieu fees to meet the Village parking standards. There may be
some mixed-use parking reductions proposed, but none of the projects will be able to
develop as proposed without use of in-lieu payments. Additionally, it should be noted that
these projects are all currently outside the exis#ing 1970 PBIA district and therefore also ;
subject to the expansion of the district discussed in 'D' below. ;
E
After the in-lieu fee is increased and the PBIA district is expanded it is recommended that
the City pursue an immediate undeveloped property acquisition to enlarge the Le Point
Street lot near Miller Way. The actual cost of land acquisition and construction costs
would be divided by the number of new parking spaces created to verify that the in-lieu
fees are adequate or the fee could be increased if it is demonstrated to be inadequate. In
the future, however, it will be more difficult to acquire undeveloped properties as most
Village area parcels contain structures. Therefore, an in-lieu fee which is based on land
value and construction costs alone, without allowing some value for existing buildings and
costs of relocation or demolition will be less than the probable cost of future parking
development. For this reason, staff suggest that the in-lieu fee be increased to the mid or
upper end of the estimated cost range: $12,000 to $14,000.
D) Enlarge Parking and Business Improvement Area
Previous discussions have identified possible annexations to the west, north, east and
south of the exisfing 1970 PBIA district boundaries, with priority toward western expansion.
...
DOWNTOWN PARKING ADVISORY BOARD
DOWNTOWN PARKING ADVISORY BOARD
JULY 15, 2004
PAGE 9
Three pending projects are proposed in the western area: Roboscotti, Anderson/Clark
and Le Point/Nevada, each involving mixed-use commercial or office and residential with
some on-site parking. Each also proposes some in-lieu fee payment to satisfy parking
requirements rather than off-site private parking subject to conditional use permit.
There are three additional project proposals in the western area which staff expects will be
submitted as Pre-Applications or Conditional Use Permits during 2004-05, also dependent
on partial in-lieu fee parking provision: 144 Bridge Street (007-481-015), 139 W: Branch
Street (007-481-008), and 120 W. Branch (Amanda's) (007-191-036). The Bridge Street
project and possible Nelson Street projects south of Arroyo Grande�Creek would be part of
a southern expansion area previously discussed. Two prior projects, Green Vase
Antiques and an insurance office mixed-use proposal on Short Street also proposed in-lieu
payments.
Most of the lots zoned VMU south of Arroyo Grande Creek are too small for on-site
parking, and unless the City enables in-lieu parking payment or off-site private parking,few
would be able to convert existing residences to office or commercial potential. This is also
the case on Mason, Nevada, Le Point and Mason Streets north of the existing PBIA.
Similarly, the East Village Plaza adjoining Crown Hill at the east edge of the Village is
zoned VMU, but it is outside the PBIA. It is also composed of ten relatively small lots
involving an approved Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development including shared driveways
and common private parking facilities. A potential deficiency of on street parking along E.
Branch Street restricted development of finro lots until Mixed-Use proposals are resolved
�on the other eight lots. Thus in-lieu fee payment and inclusion in the PBIA may also
benefit this area.
Rather than process separate annexations to the west, north, east and south, it appears
. more appropriate to reform a new larger PBIA to include all these areas. It should be
noted that the business license tax associated with the PBIA does not affect residential
uses, so the existing residential property owners would not be expected to oppose the .
expansion. In any event, a public hearing to consider dissolution of the existing 1970 PBIA
and reformation of a new 2004 PBIA would notify all property and business owners within
the proposed boundaries of the district.
Staff considered inclusion of six lots zoned VMU on the west side of Traffic Way as well as
the block containing Bank of America west of Wesley Street, but recornmends these
properties be excluded� due ta-physical separation from the core of the Village and
dependence on private parking facilities.
Assuming the expansion or enlargement of the PBIA as recommended, staff has also
identified three general locations considered appropriate for public parking facility
development. More discussion of each of these three locations will be scheduled before
any specific properties are acquired.
� • _ _ �
� pRROYO
O C�
� �NCORVOA�TEO ��
� � v
m
* JULY 10, 1911 * �
C4��FORN�P
Meeting Notes
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
DOWNTOWN PARKING ADVISORY BOARD
from
THURSDAY, JULY 15, 2004
7:30 A.M. - 9:30 A.M.
DOWNTOWN PARKING
ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERS: J. Ira Hughes, Chair Robert Lund
Gary Andreini, Vice Chair Eddie EI-Helou
Greg Moore
ROLL CALL - All members present
I. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
No oral communications received. �
II. DISCUSSION: � �
The Downtown Parking Advisory Board discussed the following topics as
presented by staff. See attached staff report.
A. Parking "Credits" History and Settlement Proposals
The board continued ongoing discussion related to the history of and recommendations to
the City Council related to parking credits that have been collected since 1970. The
Board recommended by voice vote that staff prepare a draft letter to those business
owners and successors of interest �holding parking credits asking them to present
documentation at a September hearing that may warrant a parking credit assignment to
any property within the proposed expansion of the parking district. The draft letter will
also state the DBAP will recommend the City Council recognize and publicly thank all
holders of less than one parkinq credit (see table A-1 in the staff report) for their suRpnLt
of the parking district over the last 34 years and consider the contribution used in routine
maintenance and improvement of the district since its creation. The Board also direc ed
sta to prepare a draft letter to the remaining 21 o ders or successors of interest of one
or more parkina crer��r� i�QO Tab e - o staff report) to present written claims and
evidence to warrant a parking credit assignment to any�prope y wi in t e proposetl
-- .
expansion of the arkin�� �district.�The DBAP would recommend that an unclaimed c�edits
P g --------.._ . - ---Y_._�_._.__..
become unassigned assets o the City upon the disestablishment of the existing district
and reformation of a new expanded PBIA. '
B. Parking Exceptions and Parking Reductions:
The DPAB recommended by voice vote that the City Council amend Section 16.55.020 B '
of the Municipal Code eliminating parking exceptions for changes of use in existing i
buildings within the district and to limit enlargements of existing structures within the �
district to less than 300 square feet without having to provide additional parking or in lieu ?
fees.
C. In-lieu fees,
The DPAB recommended by voice vote that the City Council increase in lieu parking fees
to S 12,000 per space based upon estimated property acquisition costs and at least half
of the parking lot improvement costs. The DPAB recommends that it should re-evaluate in
lieu fees annually at their July meeting and make appropriate recommendations the City
Council.
D. Recommended Village Parking and Business Improvement Boundaries
The DPAB recommended by voice vote that the City Council expand the district
boundaries as presented in the map attached to the staff report.
III. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS/STAFF COMMENTS
No written or staff comments
IV. ADJOURNMENT — To a date uncertain in August to consider other.proposed Mixed Use
parking requirements included in pending Development Code Updates (e.g. residential and
commercial use categories). The September meeting of the DPAB would be a joint public
hearing with the Planning Commission to consider proposals A through D.
�
�
Title 10 VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC
Chapter 10 12 TRAFFIC VISIBILITY OBSTRUCTIONS
10.12.010 Obstruction of visibility of driveways or intersections.
In any R district, any hedge, shrubbery, tree, fence, or other obstruction growing, erected or maintained in a
parkway or on private property in the vision triangle, as defined in Section 10.12.020 of this chapter,which
hazard obstructs the view of any driveway or intersection, or any traffic upon the streets approaching such
driveway or intersection, is declared to be a public nuisance. Such hazards may include any structure,
fence, landscaping, or other obstruction more than two feet in height above the level of the sidewalk or
ground elevation, whichever is higher, in an area called a vision triangle, except that trees may be allowed
when no foliage is closer to the ground than seven and one-half feet unless otherwise approved. (Prior code
§4-10.01)
i
_ --�°�-'—___._.r�
Title 10 VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC
Chapter 10.28 RECREATIONAL VEHICLES
10.28.030 Parking on private property.
Recreational vehicles may be parked on private property within any residential zone in the city, so long as
such vehicle does not obstruct visibility at an intersection or otherwise cause a traffic hazard, as follows:
-� A. On recreational vehicle pads or on designated residential driveways where vehicular access to the
required garage is not obscured and where the recreational vehicle is placed or located not less than five
feet from any building located on an adjacent property;
B. In side or rear yards where the recreational vehicle is placed or located not less than five feet from any
building located on an adjacent property;
C. In a legally constructed, enclosed building;
D. Recreational vehicles may not be parked on residentially zoned property that is not developed with a
residence except as follows:
1. One recreational vehicle may be stored on a vacant residentially zoned parcel for a period not to exceed
ninety (90) days, provided the lot owner is the registered owner of the recreational vehicle. If a lot owner
obtains a building permit within the ninety (90)day period, the recreational vehicle may continue to be
stored on the lot pursuant to the provisions of this title, or
2. Pursuant to Sections 10.28.040 and 10.28.050 of this title. �
A minor exception, pursuant to Section 16.16.120 may be applied for in cases where, due to existing
conditions, it is not feasible to meet the setback requirements of this section. (Prior code§6-5.03)
�
;
f
i
---�--
Title 10 VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC
Chapter 10.28 RECREATIONAL VEHICLES
10.28.040 Occupancy limited--Exceptions.
No person shall use or occupy, nor shall the owner or tenant of any real property permit the use or
occupancy of, any recreational vehicle for living, sleeping, or housekeeping purposes on private property in
the city except as specified below.
A. Within an approved recreational vehicle park;
B. A tenant or owner of real property, that is improved with a dwelling lawfully occupied by the tenant or
owner, may allow a recreational vehicle to be parked and used for living and sleeping.purposes upon the
property, provided such occupancy shall not exceed thirty (30)days in any one year period. Convenient and
adequate sanitary and toilet facilities shall be available to the recreational vehicle occupants at all times.
The provisions of this subsection shall not permit more than one recreational vehicle to be so used on a
property at any one time;
C. Subject to the issuance of a temporary or conditional use permit, and the provisions of Chapter 16.16,
trailer coaches and mobile-homes may be used for living, sleeping and housekeeping purposes. (Prior code
§6-5.04)
Z
Remove hic hliyhtiny,
Title 16 DEVELOPMENT CODE
Chapter_16.48 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
16.48.070 Fences, walls and hedges.
Unless otherwise provided in the applicable zoning district, the following standards shall apply to fences,
walls and hedges. In addition to the regulations set forth in this section, all fences,walls or hedges shall be ;
.,�
..
constructed and maintained so that they,do;not constitute_a f�aza�d to traffic;-persons or propeiiy.
A. Residential Districts. � �
1. In any required front yard, a wall, hedge or fence shall not exceed three feet in height; provided,
however, that wall or fences may be permitted up to a maximum height of six feet if the portion of the fence
or wall above three feet in height is ninety (90)percent light emitting wrought iron, chain link or other similar
materiaL
2.A wall, hedge or fence not more than six feet in height may be maintained along any interior side yard,
rear yard or street side yard;
provided, that such wall, hedge or fence does not extend into the required front yard.
3. For double frontage Iots, it is generally recommended that a wall or fence three feet in height may be
located along any street rear yard unless othenNise approved by the architectural advisory committee.
4.A visibility clearance area shall be required on corner lots in which nothing shall be erected, placed,
planted or allowed to grow exceeding two feet in height. Such area shall consist of a triangular area as
described in Section 10.12.020.
B. Commercial Districts.
1. In any required front or street side building setback area, a wall, hedge or fer�ce shall not exceed three
feet in height.
2.Walls for the purpose of screening commercial and industrial activities from more sensitive land uses and
for sound attenuation shall be required. The height, placement and design.of such walls shall be considered
on the basis of required sound attenuation and/or the need for visual screening. In some instances, site
specific conditions may require a variance to maximum wall height requirements in order to meet the
provisions of this subsection.
3. In any required rear or interior side building setback area, except as provided in subsection (B)(2)of this
section, walls and fences shall not exceed six feet in height. (Prior code§9-10.070)
ATTACHMENT 2
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 21, 2004
IV. NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS:
A. DOWNTOWN PARKING B�ON�APDPLICANTNDCBTY OF ARROYO GvRANDE;
DISTRICT (BID) REFORMA ,
LOCATION —VILLAGE OF ARROYO GRANDE.
Members of the DPAB present:
Ira Hughes, Chair Greg Moore, Member
Eddie EI Helou, Vice Chair Gary Andrieni, Member
Absent: Bob Lund, Member
Mr. Strong presented the staff report stating that this was an informal discussion and
that staff was recommending that the Public Hearings be deferred until early next year,
after the holidays. Mr. Strong explained that basically there were three sets of
recommendations and gave details of them:
• History and Settlement Proposal regarding Parking Credits (1)
• Parking Exceptions and Parking Reductions (2)
• Parking In-Lieu Fees(3)
Mr. Strong further stated that if all three of the recommendations are resolved, the
DPAB recommends a reformation of the District to enlarge the Parking and Business
Improvement Area. He concluded by stating that this had been a very difficult task for
the DPAB and gave them credit for coming up with the consensus of recommendations.
Ira Hughes, Chair DPAB, stated concern for Recommendation No. 3, Parking In-Lieu
Fees: How can we best serve the Village; how can we let the Village grow and still be
viable; parking is a requirement and important to the Village businesses; we need to
clean up Recommendation No. 2; we are trying to balance very old rules. In reply to
Commissioner Guthrie, Mr. Hughes stated he thought $12,000 was an inadequate in
lieu-fee for today's property values.
Commissioner Keen asked at what point do new fees start to deter new businesses
away from the Village area? Mr. Hughes stated he did not believe property owners
would be deterred.
Commissioner Arnold stated it may help cap prices if parking has to be included. Are all
the businesses that are operating today in compliance with their parking needs?
Mr. Hughes stated from staff studies done for DPAB, the parking district now has
adequate parking for the existing businesses, although many properties are legally non-
conforming to individual parking requirements.
Greg Moore, DPAB, owner of Willis & Bennett, stated if these recommendations had
been in place it would have had no impact on their decision to come into the Village; he
explained the safeguards that are in place, such as for changes in existing buildings
there are no fees; customers are able to park close to stores as compared to San Luis
Obispo; he could not see negative impacts with this; parking really can effect the
MINUTES PAGE 7
PLANNING COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 21, 2004
viability of the Village. Mr. Strong clarified that if the change in existing buildings was
from an office or retail use to a restaurant (generating additional parking requirement)
there would have to be revision or payment of in-lieu fees; previous change of use has
been allowed, but an increase that triggered different parking requirements would
require in-lieu fee after these amendments.
There was further detailed discussion on parking fees with Commissioner Brown asking
if the collection potential for the District being created would be sufficient? Mr. Strong
stated that studies revealed that there is not a major parking deficiency with the existing
square footage (counting on-street as well as off-street). The expanded district had
lower parking utilization than the existing core area.
Eddie EI-Helou stated that businesses in the Village are thriving; that there are small
remedies that can be done now without spending a lot of money; he would like to get
the parking credits resolved first; he suggested that all employers and employees of
businesses in the Village park away from their own business; they are occupying many
spaces and this would save 30% of the parking spaces at no cost; he would like to see
a study done for diagonal on-street parking for Branch Street with maybe parking
garages as well, as there is enough land.
In reply to questions from Chair Guthrie, Mr. Strong said on a mixed-use project we are
trying to provide an incentive for shared parking reduction; the parking studies for the
expanded areas of the Village did not find the parking utilization problems as obvious as
in the Village Core.
Arnold:
• Very supportive of the recommendations.
Keen:
• He was also very supportive.
• Would like to see the recommendations move forward as fast as they can.
Mr. Strong said the current in-lieu fee ($4,000) does not compensate the cost of
acquiring property and constructing a space. In staff s opinion it should be befinreen
$10,000 -14,000.
Fowler:
• Commended the DPAB on doing a great job.
• She would like to see the parking credits cleared up.
• In-lieu fee for small businesses are difficult and may chase them away from the
area.
• Supportive of the rest of the document.
Brown:
• He was also supportive, but stated in-lieu fees are only part of the problem.
Guthrie:
• He would like to see the parking credits cleared up.
• Before going to the business community harder numbers will have to be
presented for the in-lieu fee per space; $12,000 may be too low.
MINUTES PAGE 8
PLANNING COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 21, 2004
• He cautioned re diagonal parking for Branch Street as there is a lot of traffic.
In reply to Chair Guthrie re diagonal parking, Mr. EI-Helou stated the "need of the many
outweigh the need of the few"; the center lane goes nowhere and loading and unloading
of delivery trucks could be via the access in back of the businesses; eliminating the
center turn lane could create space for the diagonal parking. Mr. Strong stated that
Branch Street is a State Highway and the City is precluded from changing this. In
conclusion, he suggested that this be further studied befinreen now and January 2005, to
find out the number of spaces that might be created; the Planning Commission and
Council could then consider this.
Mr. Strong then asked the Members of the DPAB to consider action on using $6,000 of
their funds to pay for a stamped asphalt demonstration decorative brick walk pattern
down the center of Olahan Alley (not the full cost, but the portion that the contractor has
requested be reimbursed from the City). In addition, he stated that there was a change
in the cost estimates for the lighting system from PG&E which had not been resolved;
donations for the hardware had already been collected, but he would like action taken
on the DPAB for $10,000 for the lighting system installation and conversion adjoining
Olohan Alley parking lot.
Greg Moore stated that the decorative walk pattern would benefit the whole Village; he
would also like to see trees planted along Branch Street.
After discussion the DPAB agreed to the following motion:
Eddie EI Helou made a motion, seconded by Ira Hughes, that the DPAB not assist with
payment for the decorative walk on Olohan Alley, but that they pay $10,000 from the
DPAB funds to assist with the lighting with the condition that an effort be made to
reimburse the fund from additional donations or from the General Fund. The motion
was unanimously approved by a 4/0 voice vote, Bob Lund being absent.
The Commission had no further comments or concerns.
V. DISCUSSION ITEMS:
None.
VI. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS AND CO ENTS:
None.
VII. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN IRECTOR COMMENTS AND FOLLOW�UP:
None.
VIII TENTATIVE AGEN A ITEMS FOR OCTOBER 5, 2004 MEETING:
No discussion.
IX. ADJOURN�iIAENT:
11.a.
� p,RROYO
� c�
� INCORPOqATED 9
ti 2
v m
� ,w�Y �o, �e�� ,f MEMORANDUM
c���F oRN�P
TO: CITY COUNCIL
/�FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER�'
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF FY 2005-06 AND FY 2006-07 BUDGET
GOALS
DATE: JANUARY 25, 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Council approve proposed budget goals for FY 2005-06 and
FY 2006-07.
FUNDING:
There is no direct cost impact from the recommendations at this time. There may be
costs associated with budget goals established, but those will be identified and
addressed as part of the budget process. '
DISCUSSION:
Background
The budget goals are established as the first step in the budget process to provide
for initial City Council input to assist staff in preparing the budget. It does not address
funding availability at this time, but provides staff with direction on how to prioritize
the proposed allocation of available funding. Recommendations are consistent with
the existing 10-Year Long-Range Financial Plan. Goals that cannot be achieved in
the annual budget will then be identified as needs in the long-range financial plan if
not already programmed.
Initial projections for the upcoming year again appear to provide significant
challenges to maintain a balanced budget. Unfortunately, the majority of budget
priorities identified for this budget cycle are negative budget impacts outside the
control of the City. Therefore, the primary focus will continue to be on addressing ,
potential shortfalls rather than allocating increases in revenues. Given the cost
cutting items implemented over the past few years, it is becoming more and more
difficult to address these issues without impacting service levels. However, some
limited service level and programmatic increase items are identified as priorities if
funding strategies can be identified. As a result, goals are presented this year in finro
categories based upon whether they are discretionary or non-discretionary items.
CITY COUNCIL
FY 2005-06 AND FY 2006-07 BUDGET GOALS
JANUARY 25, 2005
PAGE 2
The following priorities have been agreed upon by the Department Directors and are
recommended to the City Council:
Non-Discretionary Items
• State Budget Impacts — Proposition 1A was passed by the voters in November
2004, which adopted a budget compromise established through negotiations
between the LOCAL Coalition and the Govemor. The result will be a decrease
in revenue to the City of approximately $244,000 in FY 2004-05 and FY 2005-06
and a reimbursement of approximately $320,000 in FY 2006-07. The City's goal
has been to address this financial impact over the course of the three-year
period by budgeting for the difference befinreen the loss and reimbursement and
utilizing reserves to fund the remainder of the temporary loss. Therefore,
approximately $56,000 needs to be budgeted each of the three years to fund
the difference between the money lost and the reimbursement amount.
• Citizens' Option for Public Safety Program (COPS) Funding - The City receives
$100,000 annually in COPS funds from the State of California. While the City is
projected to continue to receive this funding, State regulations limit the time
period in which it can be used to fund any single budget item. Beginning in FY
2000-01, COPS funds were used to fund a needed addition of one Police
Sergeant and to upgrade two Police Officer positions to Senior Police Officer
positions. It has been determined that FY 2004-05 will be the last opportunity to
fund these personnel costs from this revenue source. Therefore, it will be
necessary for the General Fund to assume these costs.
• PERS Retirement Rate Increases - The City has been notified that PERS
retirement rates will continue to increase in FY 2005-06 due to losses in their
investments as a result of the poor stock market over the past few years. This '
has resulted in a cost of approximately $350,000 to the General Fund during the
past year. In FY 2005-06, an additional cost increase of$325,000 is projected.
Staff is also developing a proposed financial policy to better address long-term
PERS cost fluctuations in the future, which will be presented to City Council for
consideration within the next two months.
• Existing Memorandum of Understandings (MOUs) with the Arroyo Grande
Police Officers Association and the Arroyo Grande Career Firefighters
Association - The City has existing MOUs in place with both the Police and Fire
employee associations. The Agreements set forth cost of living adjustments for �!
both associations for FY 2005-06 and in FY 2006-07 for Fire. In addition, the '
Firefighter's MOU specifies increased PERS retirement benefits to be provided f
at the end of FY 2005-06. �
�
�
S:\CITY MANAGER\STEVE\Council Reports�Budget Goals 1.25.OS.doc
CITY COUNCIL
FY 2005-06 AND FY 2006-07 BUDGET GOALS
JANUARY 25, 2005
PAGE 3
Discretionary Items
• Maintain Existing Service Levels — Staff believes the City is currently providing a
good level of service to the community. Given the financial issues that need to
be addressed, one of the primary goals recommended is simply to address
these issues without negatively impacting these services.
• Street Improvement Program — An increased investment in infrastructure
maintenance has been an ongoing goal in both the Long-Range Financial Plan
and the annual budget process. The pavement management system developed
by the Public Works Department indicates an increase in infrastructure
maintenance is needed to maintain the City's street system in the most cost
efficient manner. This need will likely continue to increase given the impact on
funding the City is experiencing due to the State budget shortfall. Over the past
four years, staff has recommended gradually increasing General Fund monies
appropriated for an annual street improvement program until the appropriate
funding level is reached. Staff recommends the continuation of this practice
remain a high priority this year.
• Employee Salary Adjustments — The MOU with the Service Employees
International Union (SEIU) expires at the end of this fiscal year and
management compensation is reviewed on an annual basis. Since maintaining
salary and benefits that are competitive within the County is an important
objective established by the City, projections for some cost increases should be
planned for.
• Vehicle Replacement Fund — The one City financial policy that has not yet been
achieved is funding an equipment replacement fund, which would budget
depreciation of all the City's rolling stock on an annual basis. This would enable '
the City to annually budget appropriately for equipment replacement. In '
development of the City's Long-Range Financial Plan, it was established as a
goal to begin reserving funds annually over the ten-year period until the
appropriate funding amount is achieved. Therefore, it has been identified as a
goal to begin this process. i
;
• Public Works Maintenance Worker Position for Street Maintenance — As �
identified above, an increased investment in maintenance of the City's �
infrastructure has been an ongoing priority. In 1991, three full-time positions ?
were eliminated in the Street Division. Since that time, despite an addition of `
over 7.5 miles of roads, only one of the positions has been returned. Therefore,
this position has been identified as the staffing priority if any personnel are
added.
• "Let There Be Light Program" - The City Council recently authorized staff to
proceed with fundraising efforts for implementation of Phase II of a program to
S:\CITY MANAGER\STEVE\Council Reports�Budget Goals 1.25.OS.doc
_ . __
CITY COUNCIL
FY 2005-06 AND FY 2006-07 BUDGET GOALS
JANUARY 25, 2005
PAGE 4
replace the existing street lights in the Village with historic decorative lights.
The cost of each light and installation is projected to be $4,000. It was agreed
to seek private contributions in the amount of $3,500 for each light and the City
would subsidize the remaining $500 for a portion of the installation expense.
Therefore, it will be necessary to budget $6,000 in order to complete the next
phase of 12 lights.
• Upgrade of the City's Computer Operating System — The City has been notified
by the County, who currently maintain the City's computer system, that they will
be migrating to new operating system software. As a result, they will be phasing
out their ability to support the City's existing system. Staff is currently assessing
options available to the City and potential costs. While no recommendations
have yet been formulated, the issue has been identified as a future potential
cost impact.
• Street Tree Maintenance — One of the efforts currently under way by the City '
has been increased emphasis on the preservation and maintenance of the ;
City's street trees. Within the next few months, staff will be presenting ;
recommendations to the City Council on revisions to the City's overall tree
program and ordinance. However, as this program is implemented, a gradual ;
increase in costs for tree maintenance is projected. The majority of tree
maintenance is currently performed by in-house crews. It is recommended that
this be supplemented with some additional funding budgeted for contract tree ;
trimming.
• GIS System Expansion — Since the base system is now complete and functional
in the Public Works Department, staff is working on plans to expand access and
utilization of the system Citywide to all departments by nefinrorking the system
through a common server.
• City Hall Project — This past year, a five-year plan was approved to fund the i
renovation of the existing City Hall building and the construction of a new i
adjacent City office building. The funding recommendations call for a �
combination of sale of existing City property, bond financing to be repaid
through new revenue generated by economic development efforts, and �
increased reserves. Therefore, it is proposed to reserve funds to finance a
portion of the costs of the project each fiscal year during the course of the five-
year period.
Attached to the staff report is the proposed schedule for preparation of the Bi-Annual
Budget. According to the schedule, the Budget Study Session will be held on May
18, 2005. This will allow sufficient time for staff to incorporate any requested
changes prior to adoption at the first meeting in June or second meeting if necessary. �
}
S:\CITY MANAGER\STEVE\Council Reports�Budget Goals 1.25.OS.doc
CITY COUNCIL
FY 2005-06 AND FY 2006-07 BUDGET GOALS
JANUARY 25, 2005
PAGE 5
Please mark your calendar for the Budget Study Session or notify staff if you have a
conflict.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
- Approve the budget goals as proposed;
- Make changes to the budget goals as appropriate;
- Provide direction to staff.
Attachments:
1. Proposed FY 2005-06/ FY 2006-07 Bi-Annual Budget Schedule
�
i
�
�
�
�
E
�
S:\CITY MANAGER\ST'EVE\Council Reports�Budget Goals 1.25.OS.doc
.� -�--� ___._--�._._,__..�...
ATTACHMENT A
FY 2005-06/FY 2006-07
BI-ANNUAL BUDGET
SCHEDULE
Task Date
Preparation of recommended budget goals January 11, 2005
City Council approval of budget goals January 25, 2005
Prepare payroll projections January 31, 2005
Prepare revenue estimates January 31, 2005
Budget instructions and forms to departments February 8, 2005
PW submit CIP recommendations February 28,2005 '
Departments submit budget recommendations March 11, 2005
CIP budget meeting with Public Works March 17, 2005
Department budget meetings March 21, 2005 —April 1, 2005 .
Commissions review depariment budgets March 30, 2005 '
Departments submit revisions Apri18, 2005 �
I
Finalize budget recommendations April 15, 2005 �
Prepare budget message Apri122, 2005
Planning Commission reviews CIP May 3, 2005
Print budget documents May 9, 2005
Draft budget submitted to City Council May 10, 2005
City Council budget study session May 18, 2005
City Council adoption of budget June 14, 2005