Agenda Packet 2005-03-08 CITY OF
- .
City Council � ' � � � ' Agenda
Tony Ferrera Mayor Steven Adams Ciry Manager
Joe Costello Mayor Pro Tem p�► Timothy J.Carmel Ciry Attaney
Jim Dickens Coundl Member �� � Kelly Wetmae Ciry Clerk
CALIFORNIA �
Jim Guthrie Councll Msmber �._ � �
Ed Arnold Council Member
AGENDA SUMMARY
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, MARCH 8, 2005
7:00 P.M.
Arroyo Grande City Council Chambers
215 East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande
1. CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL:
3. FLAG SALUTE: CAMP FIRE USA, RAINBOW FOREST
4. INVOCATION: PASTOR RICHARD SCHARN
5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
5.a. Honorarv Proclamation Declarin9 March 17. 2005 as "Absolutelv Mcndib� Kid
Dav„
5.b. Honorarv Proclamation Declarina the Month of March es "Amerfcan Red Cross
Month"
5.c. Mavor's Commendation Presented to Rvan Foster
6. AGENDA REVIEW:
6a. Move that all resolutions and ordinances presented tonight be read in title only and all
further readings be waived.
AGENDA SUMMARY—MARCH 8, 2005
PAGE 2
7. COMMUNITY�OMMENTS AND SUGGE TIONS:
This public comment period is art invitation to members of the community to present
issues, thoughts, or suggestions on matters � scheduled on this agenda. Comments
should be limited to those matters that are within the jurisdiction of the City Council. The
Brown Act restricts the Council from taking formal action on matters not published on the
agenda. In response to your comments, the Mayor or presiding Council Member may:
♦ Direct City staff to assist or coordinate with you.
♦ A Council Member may state a desire to meet with you.
♦ It may be the desire of the Council to place your issue or matter on a future Council
agenda.
Please adhere to the following procedures when addressing the CounciL• i
♦ Comments should be limited to 3 minutes or less.
♦ Your comments should be directed to the Council as a whole and not directed to
individual Councll m�nbers.
♦ Slanderous, profane or personal remarks against any Council Member or member
of the audience shall not be permitted.
8. �ONSENT AGENDA:
The following routine items listed below are scheduled for consideration as a group. The
recommendations for each kem are noted. Any Council Member may request that any
item be withdrawn from the ConseM Agenda to permit discussion or change the
reoommended course of action. The City Council may approve the remai►�der of the
Consent Agenda on one motion.
8.a. Cash Disburs�n nt Ratificetlon (PILLOW)
Recommendad AcUon: Ratffy the listing of cash disbursements for the period February
16, 2005 through February 28, 2005.
8.b. Consideration of Aoorov 1 of Minutes (WETMORE)
R�omms�ded Act�on: Approve the minutes of the Regular City
CounciURedevelopment Agency Meetings of February 8, 2005 and February 22, 2005,
as submitted.
8.c. Consideration of pythoriz�tion to Use Citv Prooertv an Close Ciri � +� +_I,a
Annwl Arrovo Granda a±�W!±•�•y Festival on Mav 28-29 20�5� T� ��.e
Permit No. 05-004 (STRONG)
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution authorizing the use of City property and
dosure of City streets for the Annual Arroyo Grande Strawberry Festival on May 2&29,
2005.
8.d. �nsideretion of an Amendmant t� *t+. cE+e�c ��t�ve A�roemsnt w the
San Lu�s Obfsoo Councll of Govemmar�ts (SPAGNOLO)
Recommsnded AcUon: 1) Authwize the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 6 to the
SHA/STP Cooperative Agreement No. AG-TEA21-01; and 2) Direct the Director of
Administrative Services to submk Amendment No. 6 to the SHA/STP Cooperative �
Agreement No. AG-TEA21-01 to the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments. �
I
II
AGENDA SUMMARY- MARCH 8, 2005
PAGE 3
8. CONSENT AGENDA(continuedl:
8.e. Consideration of a Resolutlon Aaorovin4 the Pavement Cut PolicY (SPAGNOLO)
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolupon approving the Pavement Cut Policy.
g.f. ��nsideration of Reaolutlons Accectina the Pavement Man
Adootin� the Fecleral av Administration (FHWAI Fun�l Str�t
c�e�Hicetion Svstam for the Sfreet Nst�►or�c(SPAGNOLO)
pecommended Actlon: 1) Adopt Resolution accepting the PavemeM Managerr►ent
Program; and 2) Adopt a Resolution adopting the FNWA Functional Strest Classification
System for the Street Network.
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
g,8, � ���tition of Renaminfl'Courtland Streat to North Courtland � �d �uth
Co�rtland Str�t (STRONG)
Recommended Act�on: Adopt Resolution renaming Courtland Street "North Courtland
Street" for the portion noRh of East Grand Avenue and °South Courtland StreeY' for the
portion south of East Grand Avenue.
g,b. Gontinuea Public Fi�rina Gonside�-atlon af Generel Plan Amsndmant Caos No.
04-003• Housina E (STRONG)
Recommsnd�d l�ctlon: Consider P�'oposed amendments to the Housin� Element and
adopt Resolution approving General Plan Amendment 04-003.
9.c. Cantin�e� P�blic Haarina Consideration of Mo�nded CondMior�l Uss Permit
�,�� u„ ..__ �_� �..�!!!..±�.,., te, Mr��nv B��dfera J of tlN Flve
�-�1 to Allow a Fl --�-
�::ies Sho�oina C!+!!t!+�s A11 Ra__ho Parkwav: WeNs Ferao Benk(3TRONG)
1 Recomm�nd�d AcUon: The Plenning Commissi� recommerxis the Cou�l adoPt a
� Resdution approving Amended Co�ditionel Use Pertnit 04-001.
il
� 10. GONTINUED BUSINF�:
, None.
1
�
; 11. NEW B_ESS:
i None.
i
i
i
�
;
i �
i
,
AGENDA SUMMARY— MARCH 8, 2005
PAGE 4
12. rITY COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS:
The following item(s) are placed on the agenda by a Council Member who would like to
receive feedback, direct staff to prepare information, andlor request a forrnel agenda
report be prepared and the item placed on a future agenda. No formal action can be
taken.
a) Request for staff to research altematives on formula business restrictions in the
Village commercial area and place on a future agenda for review and
consideration. (FERRARA)
13. rlTY MANAGER ITEMS:
The following ftem(s) are placed on the agenda by the Ciry Manager in order to receive
feedback and7or request direction from the Council. No forrnal action can be takeri•
a) Request for feedback regarding planning for Joint Meeting with Planning and
Traffic Commissions. (ADAMS)
14. .^�OUNGIL GOMMUNIGATIONS:
� Correspondence/Comments as presented by the City Council.
�
� 15. STAFF COMMUNICATION�:
� Correspondence/Comments as presented by the City Manager.
�
1
a �g, ^^"s,�;,'�Y COMMENT�AND SUGGESTIONS:
j This public comment period is an invttation to members of the community to present
; issues, thoughts, or suggestions. Comments should be limited to those metters that are
j within the jurisdiction of the City Council. The Brown Act restricts the Council from taking
; formal action on matters not published on the agenda.
�
a
i17, sqJOURNMENT to a Special Joint Meeting of the City Council, Planning Commission, and
; T�ific Com�nission on March 14, 2005 at 6:30 p.m. Location of the Special Meeting will be
; posted at CRy Hell and on the City's website at least 24 hours prior to the meeting.
All statf repoete or otl�er w�itten documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the ayenda are
i on file in the AdminiaVative Serv�es Department and are available fw public inspectio� snd reP►oductl°^ at
c�st. If re4uested� ihe agenda ahall be made available in aPP�oP��te aftemative fortnats to P� � a
i disability� as requued bY ihe Americans with Disabiliti� Act. To make a request for dbebi�itY-related
` modificatfon or axommodation. c��� ��a� �� �ent at 805-473-5414 as soon as
' possible and at least 48 hours prior to the meeUny date.
Note: This agenda was prepered and posted pursuant to Govemment Code Section 549`rt•2•
www.anoyoynnde•o►q
5.a.
� CITY OF
►
.
. • • � • �
�
�� CALIFORNIA
� � 9 1 � `�
���
�onora�+ 'P�la�na$ion'R��nizin8
°�b�9�lY � ible 8�1� ��"
(�arch 179 �
WEIEgEAS, March 17, 2005 has been declare,d 1ry CamF F'�� USA, a national Y��
development organization,as"Ab�so/ufe/ylncredible Kid Da,yT';a�
WHEREAS,CamP Fire USA commemorates its Ninth annual"Absolutely Incredible Rid
Day"on this date;and
� W�gEAg,as part of the celebration of children on this day,adults are encouraged to
send letters of love and appreoiation to youttg P�Ple in their lives;and
i �IEggAS, Camp Fire USA mission Pledgeg a firm commitment to bwldu�S can��8+ ,
! confident youth and future leaders, an extension of that commitment is handed to
� caruig adults ttu�ough�event to express their feeli�tgs in a letber or note which has
the pmfound ability to malce a lestin8 and Fwsitive impact on the ckrildren in our
country;and
� �amp Fire USA is commended for the valuable �
WHEREAS, le in the City of ArroYo Grande
I prograrns offered to young PaoF yervices these yow�8
and throu8hout the nafion,and for the xnany �p fire. • *' - *
' people perform for their communities thron8h
' NOW,THEREFORE,BE TC RESOLVED,that I,Tony Ferrara,Mayor of the City of ArroYo
' Grande, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby F�� Merch I7, 2005, as
"ABSOLU7�Y JNCRF.DIBLE KID DA}�'in the City of ArroYo Grande and urge sll
adults to pattioipate in "ASSOLUT6LY INCREDIBLE KlIJ DA}m by sanciut8 letters to
exp�eys geeiings and appreciation W youn8 People in their lives, and ma1dx48 a
difference in the]ife of a child.
, IN �� WIIEgEOF,I kiave hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City
of Armyo Grande W be affixed this 8w day of March 2005. .
Paaoro
p� �9
a MCORMRITlD''f. '
F O
p m
� * �u�r m.nn fi
TONY FERRARA,MAYOR °'9<�FOa`'��
5.b.
� CITY OF
. . ,
►
. - • •
� 'y CALIFORNIA y
� � 9 1 � !�
���
3�fml.arary Procf��tian Recagnizing t�
�larch zoo5 as .�merican RecfCross �lon
WHEREAS,America has been a place of humanitarian action and comyassion-a ptace where
PeOPIe take care af each other,and me ahvays�+n'lling to reach out and talce care of���in
need,whether they are down the bbck or aro�.md the gbbe. TMat Ar^e^�A^ desire to yut our
compassion irrto action is deepN rooted in the.charaaer of�Luis Obispo CountY:and
WHEREAS,for more than 88 years,the Red Cross in San�ssion of he�Ame^�an p�°Pk�
where citizens join toqecher,and the 9enerositY and comPn will sti0 9^re Y�their tlme�
pur�wse. lYs been the place where someone who mM not imow You with sheher. Never has � .
monev, and life-savi^9 sb'lis, scrve Y�u 1*om drowning or Provide Yau lae wreaked
this been more evident than these pas[f�+'Ye���e^the San Simeon Earthquu
havoc on our communitY�a deadA't��^���usN ��hoverwhehning m�mAbers cFase
Luis Obispo CountY respondeA swiT�N �o action;and
their Red Cross as the pk+ce to tur^them ca^^9
� yy�{EREqS,the San Luis Obispo CountY American Red Cross resVonds w o�'So����h
year. Some are large disasters�such as the San Simeon Eart���n to events thac don't
1 threaten commu^ities in the North Counb• �� t� ��s��s our wuntY.
make headfines,such as the numeT°us home{'ires that have dis�'uPt the scene.Pt"��^9 f�, .
� pur Red Cross and its coTPs of Soo volunteers is among the Frs[
{ sheher,9nef c°���g�more;and
� WFIEKEqS, recograzing tlwt sufferin9 lmows no borders, the Red Cross prwides assiscance
during international emergencies. such as the tsunami. TheY have ako spea►1+caded a
camPai9^to immunrze�nm�otlAie�r Prn't o�th��world;andeasles,a disease nemiY fm'9�e^
' in America�but a deadN
� WHEREAS, in America, we maY^°L Q�� �ss, or sound the snrrie, but � pm�rlun
�� we share a common sp'n'it that binds us together when times are tou9h ar�d RW Goss
' unites us in action when someone is suffe�9. L� a mirror on America, . .
the Red Cross shows us the best P��bk *��On °f .°��s. ln ���ai�
� celebratin9 American Red Crosh��5an Luis Obispo �ou^�'A^d all r� .
�p�g�icm pnd volunteer spirit
across America.
� NOW,THEREFORE, BE R RESOLVED,that I,TonY FerTarQ� M°Y°T°f the City of A�'�'W�G*anck�
on behal�of the CitY Counal, do herebY PT«laim March zoo5 as American Red Cross Nbnth�
' and urge all Americans to continue to volunteer their time, and give gmerwslY W the
. Ameri[Grl Red Cross. � PPROYp O
� ixcronron�reo'Z
IN WITNESS WHEREOF.1 have hereuMO set mY hand and caused the Seal o� .
� of the City of Anoyo Grande to be affMed this 8"`day of��h zoo5. � o
o m
�. # .IUIX 10.U1� f
°�uFOe+�P
TONY FER1tARA,NWYOR
;
S.C.
•
CITY OF
• - �
.
. • • • .
' CALIFORNIA
� 9 1 �
� �Vld or's Commend�ation
� y
j �resented to:
�
1
�� 12yan Foster
:
On this 8tk c�ay of�VlarcFc 2005
'; In l�,ecognition of`Your
�em6ership in tFie <1'Catinum Ser�vice CCu6
for SerUice A6ove ancC
' �eyond�tFie CaCCof lnuty
PpROYp
', F�KCO�roe•rto99=
� o
m
ir au�r +o,»,� *
, '1Q1Z'1 �e1�C�1�Q� 9l�tayor C'�G/FOp��P
� pRROYO
O 6',A � ��a�
� INCOqPORATEO �
�j O
* ,,,�� ,o. ,,,, * MEMORANDUM
c4�/FORN�P .
ro: cinr couNCi�
FROM: ANGELA PILLOW, DIRECTOR OF FINANCIAL SERV ES �
BYc FRANCES R. HEAD, ACCOUNTING SUPERVISO
SUBJECT: CASH DISBURSEMENT RATIFiCATION '
DATE: MARCH 8, 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council ratify the attached listing of cash disbursements for
the period February 16 through February 28, 2005.
FUNDING:
There is an $645,966.73 fiscal impact. All payments are within the existing budget.
DISCUSSION:
The attached listing represents the cash disbursements required of normal and usual
operations. It is requested that the City Council approve these payments.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
• Approve staff's recommendation;
• Do not approve staff's recommendation;
• Provide direction to staff.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 —Cash Disbursement Listing �
Attachment 2 — February 18, 2005, Accounts Payable Check Register
Attachment 3 — February 18, 2005, Payroll Checks and Benefit Checks Register
Attachment 4 — February 25, 2005, Accounts Payable Check Register
� � �
i
�
,
ATTACHMENTI
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
CASH DISBURSEMENTS
� r� P�od qy�e�g� �6 7�wa���28 2�5
March 8, 2005
Presented are the cash disbursements issued by the Department of Financial Services for
the period February 16 to February 28, 2005. Shown are cash disbursements by week of
occurrence and type of payment.
WEEK TYPE OF PAYMENT ATTACHMENT AMOUNT
February 18,2005
Accounts Payable Cks 119641-119766 2 $ 214,450.76
Payroll Cliecks and Benefit C1lecks 3 395,91224
S 610,363.00
February 25,2005
Accoimts Payable Cks 114767-119823 4 $ 3,�r�03,�
TwawE��m�rai, s 6as,�.�
�
f
f
�
,
�
�
�
E
�
f
U:\MSWORD\CITY COUNCIL FORMS\CASH DISBURSEMENT SCHED wEXCEL WKS.doc �;
1
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
INDEX FOR BUDGET DEPARTMENTS
EDEN COMPUTER SYSTEM
GENERAL FUND lO10� SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Citu Government(Fund O10) Pazk Development Fee Fund(Fund 213)
4001 - City Council 4550 - Pazk Development Fee
4002 - Administrative Services Traffic Signal Fund(Fund 222)
4003 - City Attorney 4501 - Traffic Fund
4101 - City Manager TransportaHon Fund(Fund 225)
4102 - Printing�Duplicating 4553 - Public Transit System
4120 - Financial Services Construction Tax Fund(Fund 230)
4121 - Taxes/ Insurance/ Bonds 4556 - Construction Tax
4130 - Community Development Police Grant Funds
4131 - Community Building(CDBG) 4201 - Law Enforcement Equip. (Fd 272)
4140 - Management Information System 4202 - State AB3229 Cops Grant(Fd 271)
4145 - Non Departmental 4203 - Federal Universal Hiring(Fd 274)
Public Safefij(Fund 010) 4208 - Federal Local Law Enforcmt(FD 279)
4201 - Police Redevelopment Agency(Fund 284)
4211 - Fire 4103 - Redevelopment Adminish�ation
4212 - Building&Safety ENTERPRISE F[JNDS
Public Works(Fund O10) Sewer Fund(Fund 612) �
4301 - Public Works-Admin&Engineering 4610 - Sewer Maintenance
4303 - Street/Bridge Maintenance Water Fund(Fund 640)
4304 - Street Lighting 4710 - Water Administration
4305 - Automotive Shop 4711 - Water Production
Parks&Recreation(Fund 010) 4712 - Water Distribution
4420 - Parks Lopez Administration(Fund 641)
4421 - Recreation 4750 - Lopez Administration
4422 - General Recreation CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS fFund 35��
4423 - Pre-School Program 5501-5599 - Pazk Projects
4424 - Recreation-Special Programs 5601-5699 - Streets Projects
4425 - Children in Motion 5701-5799 - Drainage Projects
4426 - Five Cities Youth Basketball 5801-5899 - Waber/Sewer/Street Projects
4430 - Soto Sport Complex 5901-5999 - Water Projects
4213 - Government Buildings
4460 - Parkway Maintenance �
U:\MSWORD\CITY COUNCIL FORMS\CASH DLSBURSEMENTSC}�D wEXCEL WKS.doc �
ATTACHMENT 2
vchlist Voucher List Pa9e: 1
OZI18I2005 1:58:SOPM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code : bpa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# DescriptioNAccount Amount
119641 2/14/2005 004775 ARROYO MEDICAL GROUP, INC 1 FIREFIGHTERS PHYS.EXAMS(19)
FIREFIGHTERS PHYS.EXAMS(19)
260.4211.6201 23,275.00
Total : 23,275.00
119642 2/15/2005 000303 HENDRICKS, CRAIG 021405 MEALS EXPENSE-EVOC CONFERE
MEALS EXPENSE-EVOC CONFERE
010.4201.5501 160.00
Total : 160.00
119643 2/15/2005 000297 HANCOCK COLLEGE,ALLAN 021405 REG.FEES-ARREST/CONTROL CO
REG.FEES-ARREST/CONTROL CO
010.4201.5501 1,316.00
Total : 1,316.00
119644 2/15/2005 000088 BRIDGE, F BARRY 021005 REIMBURSE EXPENSES-MGMT CO
REIMBURSE EXPENSES-MGMT CO
010.4201.5501 523.60
Total : 523.60
119645 2/16/2005 000403 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENTS 021505 MEETING FEE:ROBERTO CRUZ
MEETING FEE:ROBERTO CRUZ
220.4303.5501 15.00
Total : 15.00
119646 2/16/2005 004776 JEWELL, MICHAEL 021605 REFUND 2005 BUS.LICENSE FEE
REFUND 2005 BUS.LICENSE FEE
010.0000.4050 30.00
REFUND PARKING FEES
751.0000.4024 132.00
Total : 162.00
119647 2/17/2005 000553 SLO COUNTY CLERK-RECORDER 027505 NOTARY BOND FILING FEE
NOTARY BOND FILING FEE
010.4002.5503 35.00
Page: 1
vchlist Voucher List Page: 2
02N8/2005 7:59:SOPM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bankcode: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invo(ce PO# Description/Account Amount
119647 2/17/2005 000553 000553 SLO COUNTY CLERK-RECORDER (Continued) ToWI : 35.00
119663 2/18/2005 000008 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES, INC 70127 OC SPRAY
OC SPR,4Y
010.4201.5272 127.76
ToWI : 127.76
119664 2/18/2005 000029 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN INC 2000401828 AWWA DUES:SPAGNOLO
AVWVA DUES: SPAGNOLO
010.4301.5503 750.00
Total : 150.00
119666 2/18/2005 003817 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SVCS B085583 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:FIRE D
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:FIRE D
010.4211.5272 27.72
6085590 COVERALL-TONY
COVERALL-TONY
220.4303.5143 0.55
B693112 UNIFORMS/iOWELS/MATS:PD
U N I F O R M S/TO W E LS/MATS:P D
010.4213.5303 10.38
8693174 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:REC C
UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:REC C
010.4213.5303 20.48
8693115 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:SEWE
U N I FO R M S!f O W E LS/MATS:S E W E
612.4610.5143 5.60
B693116 UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:STREE
U N I F O RM S/TO W E LS/MATS:ST R E E
220.4303.5143 19.60
B693117 UNIFORMS/TOWELSlMATS:WATE
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:WATE
640.4712.5143 14.00
UNIFORMS/TOWEIS/MATS:ENG D
010.4301.5143 1.40
Page: 2
vchlist Voucher List Page: 3
02H8I2005 1:59:50PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bankcode: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119666 2/18/2005 003817 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SVCS (Continued)
6693118 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:PARKS
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:PARKS
010.4420.5143 27,qg
8693179 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS
U N I F 0 RM S!f O W E LS/MATS
010.4213.5143 2.80
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:CORP 1
010.4273.5303 11.03
B693120 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:AUTO
U N I FORM S!f O W E LS/MATS:AU TO
010.43Q5.5t43 10.41
g69632� UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:FIRE D
UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:FIRE D
010.4213.5303 �g.gg
B696324 UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATSBLDG
UN I FORMS/TOWELS/MATSB LDG
010.4213.5303 6.31
B696325 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:CITY H
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:CITY H
070.4213.5303 8.40
66963z6 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:ENG D
UNIFORMS/fOWELS/MATS:ENG D
010.4213.5303 5.00
8696327 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:COM.0
U N I FORMS/TOW ELS/MATS:COM.0
010.4213.5303 9.45
B696331 UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:SEWE
UN I FORMS/TOWELS/MATS:S E W E
612.4610.5143 5.60
6696332 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:STREE
U N I FO R M Sf f O W E LS/MATS:STR E E
220.4303.5143 19.60
Page: 3
vchlist Voucher List
02/18I2005 1:58:SOPM Page: 4
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bankcode: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Descriptlon/Account Amount
119666 2/18/2005 003817 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SVCS (Continued)
B696333 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:ENG D
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:ENG D
010.4301.5143 1.40
UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:WATE
640.4712.5143 14.00
B6�3� UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:PARKS
UN I FORMSlf OWELS/MATS:PARKS
010.4420.5143 19.60
��3� UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:BLDG
UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:BLDG
010.4213.5143 5.00
B696337 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:AUTO
UNIFORMS/TO W E LS/MATS:AUTO
010.4305.5143 5�
6899525 UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:PD
UN I FORMS/TO WELS/MATS:PD
010.4213.5303 10.38
8699527 UNIFORMSl1'OWELS/MATS:REC C
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:REC C
010.4213.5303 20.48
66995z8 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:SEWE
UNI FORMS/TOW ELS/MATS:SE W E
612.4610.5143 5.60
6699529 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:STREE
UN IFORMSlfO W E LS/MATS:STREE
220.4303.5743 19.60
B699530 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:ENG D
UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:ENG D
010.4301.5143 1.40
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:WATE
640.4712.5143 14.00
6699531 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:PARKS
U N I FORMSlTO WELS/MATS:PARKS
010.4420.5143 2�48
Page: 4
vchlist Voucher List
02N8I2005 1:59:50PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE Pa9e� 5
Bank code : ppa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
Description/Account Amount
119666 2/18/2005 003817 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SVCS (Continued)
8699532 UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:BLDG
U N I FORM S/TO W E LS/MATS:B L DG
010:4213.5143 Z g�
UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:CORP 1
010.4213.5303 11.03
6699533 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:AUTO
UN I FORMSlfO W E LS/MATS:AUTO
010.4305.5143 10.41
B702712 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:FIRE D
UNIFORMSlTOWELS/MATS:FIRE D
070.4213.5303 20.25
6702715 UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:BLpG
UNIFORMS/fOWELS/MATS:BLDG
010.4213.5303 6.31
6702716 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:BLDG
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:BLDG
010.4213.5303 8.40
B7027� UNIFORMS/TOWEIS/MATS:ENG D
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:ENG D
010.4213.5303 5.00
B702718 UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:COM C
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:COM C
010.4213.5303 9.45
8��2�zz UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:SEWE
UNI FORMS/TOWELS/MATS:S E W E
612.4610.5143 5.60
8702723 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:STREE
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:STRE E
220.4303.5143 19.60
B702724 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:ENG D
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:ENG D
010.4301.5143 1.40
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:WATE
640.4712.5143 �q�
Page: 5
vchlist Voucher List
02118/2005 1:59:SOPM Page: 6
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bankcode: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
Description/Account Amount
119666 2/18/2005 003817 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SVCS (Continued)
B702725 UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:PARKS
UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS:PARKS
010.4420.5143 21.00
B702726 ' UNIFORMS/fOWELS/MATS:BLDG
U NI FORMS/TOW ELS/MATS:BLDG
010.4213.5143 5.00
B��Z�Z� UNIFORMSlfOWELS/MATS:AUTO
UNI FORMS/TOW ELS/MATS:AUTO
010.4305.5143 5.00
Total : 513.68
119667 ?J18/2005 002180 AVAYA, INC 2720504912 MAINT.AGREEMENT
MAINT.AGREEMENT
010.4145.5403 13.74
Total : 13.74
119668 2/18/2005 000072 BEATTIE,ALBERT 013005
REIMBURSE EXP:NTF INVESTIGA
REIMBURSE EXP:NTF INVESTIGA
010.4201.5501 34.53
Total : 34.53
119669 2/18/2005 001917 BOB'S EXPRESS WASH JAN 05 CAR WASH(8 IN JAN'05)
CAR WASH(8 IN JAN'05)
010.4201.5601 56.00
Total : 56.00
119670 2/18/2005 000087 BREZDEN PEST CONTROL, INC 27458
ANTS-SPRAYED BUILDING
ANTS-SPRAYED BUILDING
010.4213.6401 74.00
Tofal : 74.00
119671 2/18/2005 000094 BRUMIT DIESEL, INC 76275
CART 8 SUPPLIES
CART 8 SUPPLIES
010.4211.5601 99.62
Page: 6
vchlist Voucher List
02I78I2005 1:58:SOPM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE Pa9e� �
Bankcode: b0a
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119671 2/18/2005 000094 BRUMIT DIESEL, INC (Continued)
�BZ�6 10 TON PULLER
10 TON PULLER
010.4211.5603 105.38
�62�� BLOWER FAN&LIGHT
BLOWER FAN 8 LIGHT
070.4211.5603 100.69
76280 HEATER ELEMENT
HEATER ELEMENT
010.4211.5601 41.57
Tofal : 347.26
119672 2/18/2005 000095 BURKE AND PACE OF AG, INC 2277446 LUMBER&HARDWARE/MTR BOX F
LUMBER&HARDWARE/MTR BOX F
640.4712.5610 4328
2277708 2 X 4'S
2X4'S
220.4303.5613 35.18
2278030 2 X 4'S
2X4'S
220.4303.5613 3.17
2278135 PLYWOOD
PLYWOOD
220.4303.5613 57 y�
2z�828� LUMBER AND FASTENERS
LUMBER AND FASTENERS
010.4420.5605 �Z�88
2278903 4 X 8
4X8
220.4303.5613 135.19
2279398 2 X 4'S
2 X 4'S
220.4303.5613 9.52
2279448 2 X 12
2X12
220.4303.5613 26.33
Page: 7
vchlist Voucher List
02I18I2005 1:59:50PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE Page: g
Bankcode: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119672 2/18/2005 000095 BURKE AND PACE OF AG, INC (Continued)
2279473 2 X 8
2X8
220.4303.5613 22.07
2280354 2X6 8 4X8
2X6&4X8
220.4303.5613 33.78
ToTal : 493.78
119673 2/18/2005 000156 C COAST TAXI-CAB SVCS, LLC 021505 TAXI SVC:02/07/-02/14/05
TAXI SVC:02/01/-02/14/05
225.4553.5507 687.75
Total : 687.75
119674 2/18/2005 003766 CA EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN'ARROYO E6300007625401 PHYSICAL-ALEX ASPER-NELSON
PHYSICAL-ALEX ASPER-NELSON
010.4211.5315 180.00
Total : 780.00
119675 2/18/2005 000114 CA PEACE OFFICERS ASSN LSP47933 LEG.SERV.PREMIUM:CHIEF TERBC
LEG.SERV.PREMIUM:CHIEF TERBC
010.4201.5303 450�
Total : 450.00
119676 2/18/2005 000129 CA ST EMPLOYMENT DEVEL DEPT 021005 U/INS-DISAL
U/INS-DISAL
010.4211.5142 145.00
U/INS-BOREHA
010.4211.5742 318.00
U/INS-STUMPH
010.4211.5142 _�2�
ToUI : 451.00
119677 2/18/2005 004137 CALIFORNIA USA WRESTLING, INC 020705 PARTIC.REGISTRATION30 X$30
Page: $
vchlist Voucher List Pa9e: e
02N8I2005 7:59:50PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bankcode: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Descriptlon/Account Amount
119677 2/182005 004137 CALIFORNIA USA WRESTLING, INC (Contlnued)
PARTIC.REGISTR,4TION30 X$30
010.4424.5257 900.00
COACHES REGISTRATION: 1
010.4424.5257 25.00
CLUB REGISTR,4TION
010.4424.5257 50.00
ADDITIONAL INSUR,4NCE
010.4424.5257 40.00
ToWI : 7,015.00
119678 2/18/2005 00p603 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 095268 HYDROLIC HOSE 8 FITTINGS:PW
HYDROLIC HOSE 8 FITTINGS:PW
220.4303.5601 47.53
148-079031 BATTERY FOR GENERATOR
BATTERY FOR GENERATOR
640.4712.5603 89.51
748-079032 TORCH HOSE REPAIR
TORCH HOSE REPAIR
640.4712.5603 10.00
148-080385 TRAILER CABLE
TRAILER CABLE
220.4303.5603 �8 ��
148-082012 MISC. PARTS
MISC. PARTS
220.4303.5603 �� �3
148-092053 993 WIPER
993 WIPER
010.4201.5601 10.47
148-092924 032 BATTERY
032 BATTERY
010.4201.5601 149.39
148-40298 STOCK-TIRE SHINE/CENT/WAX
STOCK-TIRE SHINE/CENTM/AX
010.4201.5601 59.14
Page: y
vchlist Voucher List
02118/2005 1:59:SOPM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE Page: 10
Bankcode: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account
Amount
119678 2/18/2005 000603 000603 CARpUEST AUTO PARTS (Continued)
Total : 395.28
119679 2/18/2005 001990 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 020505 MIS CABLE MODEM
MIS CABLE MODEM
010.4140.5303 189.85
Total : 189.85
119680 2/18/2005 002509 CHIEF SUPPLY 354148 BATTERY-RECHARGEABLE
BATTERY-RECHARGEABLE
010.4211.5272 ���y
ToWI : 104.34
719681 2/18/2005 0p4440 CHOICEPOINT BUSINESS 8 AB0001133038 AUTO TRACK XP JAN 2005
AUTO TRACK XP JAN 2005
010.4201.5303 150.00
Total : 750.00
119682 2/18/2005 000171 CLINICAL LABORATORY OF 738729 WATER SAMPLES:JAN 2005
WATER SAMPLES:JAN 2005
640.4710:5310 345.00
Total : 345.00
119683 2/18/2005 003042 COLLEGE TOWING SOUTH 81137 TOWING SERVICE: P-7 TOWING
TOWING SERVICE: P-7 TOWING
010.4420.5601 $s�
Total: 86.00
119684 2/18/2005 002842 COMMERCIAL MAINTENANCE SVC 20405-0205 AG WOMAN'S CLUB FLOOR
AG WOMAN'S CLUB FLOOR
010.4213.6401 525.00
206-0205 CARPET CLEANING-AG CH
CARPET CLEANING-AG CH
010.4213.6401 375.00
Total : 900.00
119685 2/18/2005 OOOt85 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 7605-445804 FAN 6 LIGHT REPAIR: ELM ST
Page: 10
vchlist
02118/2005 7:59:SOPM Voucher List
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE Pe9e' ��
Bankcode: boa
i Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice PO# Description/Account
�1�85 2/18/2005 000185 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST --'4m����
(Continued)
FAN&LIGHT REPAIR: ELM ST
010.4213.6401 281 �
119686 2/18/2005 004777 COX,ANDREW Total : 281.00
021605 COMM.CENTER DEPOSIT 2/1y05
COMM.CENTER DEPOSIT 2/12/05
010.0000.2206 250.00
SUPERVISION 925 HRS�$9
010.0000.4354 -8325
»�8� 2/18/2005 0p0190 CREEK ENVIRONMENTAL LAB M0725 TO�� ' 166.75
WATER SAMPLES:RES#1
WATER SAMPLES: RES#1
350.5905.7001 75.00
���88 2/182005 004778 CROWN Rq�N GUTTERS INC. Total : 75.00
�8282 PARTS 8 LAgpR-RAIN GUTTER P
PARTS 8 LABpR-RAIN GUTTER P
010.4213.5303 185�
119689 2/18/2005 000196 CUESTA EQUIPMENT CO ToWI : 185.00
299501 PARTS FOR PW PUMP ENGINE RP
PARTS FOR PW PUMP ENGINE RP
010.4430.5603 112.47
119690 2/18/20p5 00p201 D G REPAIR ToWI : 172.47
9510 CONTROL COIL ON DUMP BED P-
CONTROL COIL ON DUMP BED P-
9511 010.4430.5601 285.75
982 MASS AIR FLOW SCAN
982 MASS AIR FLOW SCAN
010.4201.5601 22927
119691 2/18/2005 001840 DELL MARKETING LP TO�� � 515.02
D05626307 COMPUTER
Page: 11
vchlist Voucher List Page: 12
02N8/2005 1:59:50PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANOE
Bankcode: boa
Voucher Date Ve�dor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119691 2/18/2005 001840 DELL MARKETING LP (Continued)
COMPUTER
010.4212.5303 891.63
D05935040 19 INCH MONITOR
19 INCH MONITOR
010.4212.5303 373.79
Total : 1,265.42
119692 2/18/2005 000217 DRIVERS LICENSE GUIDE CO 443089 2005 ID CHECKING GUIDE
2005 ID CHECKING GUIDE
010.4201.5255 28 9�
Total : 28.90
119693 2/18/2005 000262 FRANK'S LOCK&KEY, INC 21563 KEYS 8 LOCK MAINT.
KEYS 8 LOCK MAINT.
010.4211.5603 206.81
21745 REPAIR FRONT DOOR
REPAIR FRONT DOOR
010.4201.5604 120.77
Tofal : 327.58
119694 2/78/2005 000267 GALLS, INC 5753160500012 BIKE PANTS(3) (BROMBY ORD)
BIKE PANTS(3)(BROMBY ORD)
010.4201.5255 328.01
5753160500020 BIKE JACKET(4)(BROMBY ORD)
BIKE JACKET(4)(BROMBY ORD)
010.4201.5255 728.92
ToWI : 1,056.93
119695 2/18/2005 000605 GAS COMPANY,THE 2/4-200E GAS SERVICES: 200 E BRANCH S
GAS SERVICES: 200 E BRANCH S
010.4145.5401 108.00
2/4208E GAS SERVICES:208 E BRANCH S
GAS SERVICES:208 E BRANCH S
010.4145.5401 32.83
Page: 12
_ ____
vchlist Voucher List Page: 13
02N812005 1:58:50PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bankcode: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# DescriptioNAccount Amount
119695 2/18/2005 000605 GAS COMPANY,THE (Continued)
2/4214E GAS SERVICES:214 E BRANCH S
GAS SERVICES:214 E BRANCH S
010.4145.5401 74�13
2/4-215E GAS SERVICES:215 E BRANCH S
GAS SERVICES:215 E BRANCH S
010.4145.5401 Z8.�6
2/8-1500W GAS SERVICES:1500 W BRANCH S
GAS SERVICES:1500 W BRANCH S
010.4745.5401 10.52
y�g_g�p GAS SERVICES:910 RANCHO PK
GAS SERVICES:910 RANCHO PK
010.4145.5401 66.60
yg_Zpp ry GAS SERVICES:200 N HALCYON R
GAS SERVICES:200 N HALCYON R
010.4145.5401 288���
Total : 608.95
119696 2/18/2005 003859 GOMEZ,ANDREA 02-0017676 PUBLIC SAFETY WELFARE PERMI
PUBLIC SAFETY WELFARE PERMI
010.0000.4125 115.00
ToWI : 115.00
119697 2/18/2005 004005 GROVER BEACH FIREFIGHTERS 021605 REG.FEE COMMAND 1A:MCLEAN
REG.FEE COMMAND 1A:MCLEAN
010.4211.5501 135.00
REG.FEE COMMAND 16:MCLEAN
010.4211.5501 135.00
Tofal : 270.00
119698 2/18/2005 000297 HANCOCK COLLEGE,ALLAN 021605 REG.FEES:QUINLAN&STEFFAN
REG.FEES:�UINLAN 8 STEFFAN
010.4211.5501 62.00
ToWI : 62.00
119699 2/1 S/2005 001237 HANSON AGGREGATES 468431 COBBLE ROCK
Page: 13
vchlist Voucher List Page: 14
0211812005 1:59:50PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
179699 2/18/2005 001237 HANSON AGGREGATES (Continued) COBBLE ROCK
220.4303.5613 30027
Total : 300.27
119700 2/18/2005 001877 HARVEST BAG, INC 092204 ST PAUL TRAVELERS INS.
ST PAUL TRAVELERS INS.
250.4800.8061 1,355.90
110104 PG&E
PGBE
250.4800.8061 1,024.35
��02� DEWAR
DEWAR
250.4800.8061 40878
Total : 2,789.03
119701 2/18/2005 004779 HICKS,MICHAEL 021405 REFUND FOR MINOR EXCEPTION
REFUND FOR MINOR EXCEPTION
010.0000.4514 z�5•00
Total : 275.00
719702 2/18/2005 004780 HOFSTEE,JIM 021405 REFUND:OVERPAYMENT
REFUND:OVERPAYMENT
640.0000.1110 136.32
Total : 136.32
119703 2/18/2005 004761 HUNTER-GIMPEL,JEANNIE 020905 REPLACE CELLULAR PHONE
REPLACE CEILULAR PHONE
010.4201.5255 10720
Total : 107.20
11g7p4 2/18Y2005 000325 IANNEO,JOSEPH 021105 MILEAGE:376 MI. (c� .34/POST TRN
MILEAGE:376 MI.� .34/POST TRN
010.4201.5501 �Z��
Total : 127.64
119705 2/18/2005 000329 IMPULSE MFG
$�Z�p REPAIR&RETROFIT TO BBQ PIT
Page: 14
vchlist
Voucher List Page: 15
02H812005 7:59:50PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119705 2/18/2005 000329 IMPULSE MFG (Continued)
REPAIR 8 RETROFIT TO BBQ PIT
010.4420.5303 600.83
Total : 600.83
11g7pfi 2/18/2005 004788 INTEGRITY DATA 8 FIBER, INC. 1703 RELOCATE TELECOM CABLES
RELOCATE TELECOM CABLES
350.5410.7001 ������
Total : 1,700.00
119707 2/18/2005 000342 IRA'S BIKE SHOP 020505 BICYCLE HELMETS,GLOVES,HOSE
BICYCLE HELMETS, GLOVES,HOSE
010.4201.5255 215.90
Tofal : 215.90
119708 2/18/2005 000344 J C LANDSCAPWG DECEMBER LANDSCAPE MAINT._DEC
LANDSCAPE MAINT._DEC
010.4420.5303 460.00
LANDSCAPE MAINT:DEC
217.4460.5355 165.00
LANDSCAPE MAINT:DEC
217.4480.5356 125.00
JANUARY LANDSCAPE MAINT:JAN
LANDSCAPE MAINT:JAN
010.4420.5303 460.00
LANDSCAPE MAINT.JAN
217.4460.5355 165.00
LANDSCAPE MAINT:JAN
217.4460.5356 125.00
Total : 1,500.00
119709 2/1 S/2005 000348 J W ENTERPRISES 163220 RENTAL OF PORTABLE TOILET
RENTAL OF PORTABLE TOILET
220.4303.5552 95.73
Total : 95.73
119710 2/18/2005 003547 JACKMAN, MICHELE
20041201 PROF.SERVICES:TEAMBUILDING
Page: 15
vchlist Voucher List Page: 16
0211812005 1:59:SOPM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: boa
Voucher Date Veodor
Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
179710 2/18/2005 003547 JACKMAN, MICHELE (Continued) pROF.SERVICES:TEAMBUILDING
010.4211.5501 1,000.00
Total : 7,000.00
119711 2/18/2005 000367 KEYLOCK SECURITY SPECIALISTS 72630 KEYS(3)
KEYS(3)
010.4201.5604 s�`�
Total : 6.44
11g712 2/18/2005 003818 LITERACY COUNCII 123104 LITERACY COUNCIL:CDBG PO4AGC
LITERACY COUNCIL:CDBG PO4AGC
250.4800.8059 450.00
ToWI : 450.00
119713 2/18/2005 000393 LUCIA MAR UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST 050404 CUSTODIAL CHARGES JUDKINS
CUSTODIAI CHARGES JUDKINS
010.4426.5553 1,206.92
050405 CUSTODIAL CHARGES PAULDING
CUSTODIAL CHARGES PAULDING
010.4426.5553 1,218.53
Total : 2,425.45
119714 2/18/2005 001120 MAXIMUS, INC 1025273002 . 2ND OF 4 INSTALLMENTS
2ND OF 4 INSTALLMENTS
010.4145.5303 1,250.00
Tofal : 1,250.00
119715 2/18/2005 000399 MC CARTHY STEEL, INC 45818 GALV.GRATE-MASON ST DRAIN
GALV.GRATE-MASON ST DRAIN
010.4420.5605 111.00
Total : 171.00
119716 2/18/2005 000400 MC GRAW-HILL COMPANIES 1526335 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL ENR
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL_ENR
010.4301.5503 82.00
--
,,,.�
Page: 16
vchlist Voucher List Page: 77
02N812005 1:59:50PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bankcode: boa
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice PO# DescriptionlAccount Amount
119716 2/182005 000400 000400 MC GRAW-HILL COMPANIES (Continued) Tofal : 82.00
119717 2/18/2005 004782 MCALISTER, KERI 020905 WATER DEPOSIT
WATER DEPOSIT
640.00002302 180.00
Total : 180.00
119718 2/18/2005 004279 MID STATE PLUMBING& 021005 WATER CONS.PROGRAM PHASE I
WATER CONS.PROGRAM PHASE I
350.5409.7001 14,405.85
9290 JET RODDED CLOGGED SEWER L
JETRODDED CLOGGED SEWER L
010.4430.5605 450.00
Total : 74,855.85
11g71g 2/18/2005 000419 MIDAS MUFFLER&BRAKE 9399 021 UO/F WIPERS
021 L/O/F WIPERS
010.4201.5601 46.67
��q 993 UO/F CLEAN BAT CABLES
993 UO/F CLEAN BAT CABLES
010.4201.5B01 50.11
943y 032 REMOVE 8 REPLACE ALTERN/
032 REMOVE&REPLACE ALTERN/
010.4201.5601 304.87
�g 022 UO/F
022 UO1F
010.4201.5601 25.32
�75 011 UO/F FRT BRAKE PADS
011 UO/F FRT BRAKE PADS
010.4201.5601 18��
9506 021 REAR BRAKE PADS/FLAT
021 REAR BRAKE PADS/FLAT
010.4201.5601 214.68
Total : 819.69
119720 2/18/2005 000426 MIER BROS LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS 092897 CONCRETE
Page: 17
vchlist Voucher List Pa9e: 78
0217812005 1:59:50PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
719720 2/78/2005 000426 MIER BROS LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS (Cantinued) CONCRETE
350.5632.7002 ����
093059 CONCRETE
CONCRETE
350.5632.7002 101.35
92928 7 YD GORIALLA HAIR/KINGO PARK
1 YD GORIALLA HAIR/KINGO PARK
010.4420.5605 38.61
93607 24 YDS"TEE MIX"PORTER FIELD
24 YDS"TEE MIX"PORTER FIELD
010.4430.5605 823.68
93674 8 YDS"TEE MIX"PORTER FIELD
8 YDS'TEE MIX"PORTER FIELD
010.4430.5605 Z�4•`.�6
Total : 1,372.26
119721 2/18/2005 004783 MILLER,JANINE 027405 REFUND BASKETBALL:JAKE MILL
REFUND BASKETBALL:JAKE MILL
010.0000.4613 50.00
Total : 50.00
11g722 2/18Y2005 000429 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC 10204 CUTTOFF DISK MASONARY
CUTTOFF DISK MASONARY
010.4420.5603 77.14
���ZZ BUILDING MATERIALS
BUILDING MATERIALS
010.4213.5604 6.22
10849 ELBOW, CLAMP
ELBOW,CLAMP
612.4610.5803 17.28
11031 QUICK CRETE
QUICK CRETE
010.4430.5605 �228
Page: 1 S
vchlist Voucher List Page: 19
02/7872005 1:59:50PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bankcode: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# DescriptioNAccount Amount
119722 2/182005 000429 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC (Continued)
11043 FASTENERS
FASTENERS
010.4420.5605 2.6�
11059 NIPPLE
NIPPLE
010.4420.5605 9.19
11798 HAMMER ROCK PICK,TAPE
HAMMER ROCK PICK,TAPE
640.4712.5273 �•�
�23yq COUPL.,ADAPTER
COUPL.,ADAPTER
010.4430.5605 14.80
13108 RAIN BUDDY
RAIN BUDDY
640.4712.5255 5.89
13334 BLEACH
BLEACH
640.4712.5274 1.92
qsqg HOOK OVER DOOR
HOOK OVER DOOR
010.4213.5604 1.92
Total : 143.89
119723 2/18/2005 000441 MULLAHEY FORD FOCS151574 054 BYPASS SEAT BELT CHIME/CY
054 BYPASS SEAT BELT CHIME/CY
010.4201.5601 199.91
Total : 199.97
119724 2/18/2005 00046G NOBLE SAW, INC 124876 CHAINSAW CHAINS&BAR
CHAINSAW CHAINS 8 BAR �
010.4420.5603 110.36
�Zgpg2 CHAIN AND 4 SHARPENINGS
CHAIN AND 4 SHARPENINGS
010.4420.5605 ��82
Page: 19
vchlist Voucher List pase: Z�
02118/2005 1:59:50PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code : b0a
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119724 2/18/2005 000466 NOBLE SAW, INC (Continued)
126033 CHAINSAW BAR
CHAINSAW BAR
010.4420.5605 . 56.50
126035 EDGER BLADE
EDGER BLADE
010.4420.5603 8.03
126313 BAR/CHAIN/FOR CHAIN SAWS
BAR/CHAIN/FOR CHAIN SAWS
220.4303.5603 401.98
126773 BAR/CLEANER/PLUGS
BAR/CLEANER/PLUGS
220.4303.5603 85.06
Total : 706.75
119725 2/18/2005 000468 OFFICE DEPOT 272955973-001 OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
010.4002.5201 11.99
272963362-001 OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
010.4130.5201 104.03
273164081-001 SELF INKING STAMP FOR RECORC
SELF INKING STAMP FOR RECORC
010.4201.5201 �7,�5
274204575 OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
010.4130.5201 53.81
274318818 OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
010.4130.5201 gy,qg
2�45934�6 OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
010.4130.5201 52.55
274826619-001 OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
010.4002.5201 21.66
Page: 20
vchlist VoUChe�LiSt Page: 21
02H8I2005 1:59:50PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bankcode: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Deacription/Account Amount
119725 2/18/2005 000468 OFFICE DEPOT (Continued)
275009705-001 SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
010.4201.5201 150.83
Total : 504.48
119726 2/18/2005 0p1886 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN 11584200176300 OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
010.4211.5201 180.71
2���� OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
010.4201.5201 gq.pq
Total : 264.75
119727 2/18/2005 004085 OMNI MEANS 23371 TRAFFIC IMPACT:PAD I-5 CIT.CEN
TRAFFIC IMPACT:PAD I-5 GT.CEN
010.00002528 1,601.66
Total : 7,601.66
119728 2/18/2005 000478 PACIFIC APPAREL 8 SPORTS 5656 YOUTH BASKETBALL REF.SHIRTS
YOUTH BASKETBALL REF.SHIRTS
010.4426.6201 �gg.gg
Total : 186.96
119729 2/18/2005 004158 PHOENIX GROUP 12005157 CITATIONS PROCESSED:JAN 2005
CITATIONS PROCESSED:JAN 2005
010.4201.5303 107.00
Total : 107.00
119730 2/18/2005 002792 PULITZER C COAST NEWSPAPERS 09518487-001 POIICE OFFICER(LATERAL)AD
POLICE OFFICER(LATERAL)AD
010.4201.5301 48920
Total : 489.20
119731 2/18/2005 000523 R&T EMBROIDERY, INC 26229 PATCHES&NAMES ON VOL.SHIR
PATCHES&NAMES ON VOL.SHIR
010.4201.5255 �g Zg
Page: 21
vchlist Voucher List Page: 22
02I18/2005 7:58:SOPM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bankcode: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119731 2/1 .
8/2005 00052
3 000523 R&T EMBROIDERY, INC (Continued) Total : 18.23
119732 2/18/2005 002751 RANGE MASTER 102769 FLASHLIGHT BATTERIES
FLASHLIGHT BATTERIES
010.4201.5255 ZZg.75
Total : 228.75
119733 2/18/2005 004784 RILEY,JOEL 021405 PARTIAL REFUND-MIN.EXCEPT.05
PARTIAL REFUND-MIN.EXCEPT.05
010.0000.4514 137.50
ToWI : 137.50
119734 2/18/2005 003363 RIPPY, NINA 021405 BALLET-JAZZ FOR KIDS(FEB'05)
� BALLET-JAZZ FOR KIDS(FEB'OS)
010.4424.5351 y22,p5
Total : 222.25
119735 2/18/2005 000538 S&L SAFETY PRODUCTS 295380 BLOODBORNE SPILL KITS
BLOODBORNE SPILL KITS
010.4213.5604 139.43
295381 SHOP TOWELS
SHOPTOWELS
220.4303.5255 61.67
SHOPTOWELS
612.4610.5255 67.67
SHOPTOWELS
640.4772.5255 61.67
Total : 324.44
119736 2/18/2005 000569 SAN LUIS PAINTS 418888 PAINT FOR TRASH CANS/SOTO C
PAINT FOR TRASH CANS/SOTO C
070.4430.5605 120.39
419421 CONCRETE FLOOR CLEANER/ASH
CONCRETE FLOOR CLEANER/ASH
010.4430.5605 40.65
ToWI : 161.04
Page: 22
vchiist Voucher List
02I18I2005 1:59:50PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE Page: 23
Bankcode: bpa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# DescriptioNAccount Amount
119737 2/18/2005 004785 SANCHEZ, CELINA 021405 REFUND PARK DEPOSIT
REFUND PARK DEPOSIT
010.0000.4354 29.00
Tofal : 29.00
119738 2/18/2005 003108 SBC/MCI T3291973 021-2713:1/1 TO 1/31
021-2713:1/1 TO 1/31
010.4145.5403 290.32
T3318152 267-8633:1/1 TO 2/6
267-8633:1/1 T02/6
010.4145.5403 89�
T3332939 489-2174:1/1 TO 2/7
489-2174:1/1 TO 2/7
010.4201.5403 Zg gg
T3332941 PC PHONE LINE
PC PHONE LINE
010.4145.5403 qq ��
T3341213 4730379
473-0379
010.4145.5403 16.93
T3341217 473-1935:ALARM
4731935:ALARM
640.4710.5403 28.66
T3341219 4732198:1/1 TO 2/10
473-2198:1/1 TO 2/10
010.4145.5403 41.79
T3341224 4735100:DEC&JAN
473-5100:DEC 8 JAN
010.4145.5403 1,476.41
T3341226 47&540p
473-5400
010.4145.5403 � 6� �z
T3341235 481-6944:1/1 TO 2/10
481-6944:1/1 TO 2/10
010.4201.5403 �� ��
Page: 23
vcnlist �
VOUChe�LISt Page: 24
02N8/2005 1:59:50PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
Description/Account Amount
119738 2/18/2005 003108 003108 SBC/MCI
(Continued) Total : 3,729.03
119739 2/18/2005 000587 SEBASTIAN OIL DISTRIBUTOR CFN80752
GAS
GAS
010.4211.5608 9.15
CFN81080 GASOLINE 1/16 TO 1/31
GASOLINE 1/16 TO 1/31
010.4201.5608 �5�
Tofal : 43.72
119740 2/18/2005 004786 SEGOVIA, RICHARD 021405
W/C-COMM CNTER-REFUND OVRP
W/C-COMM CNTER-REFUND OVRP
010.0000.2206 100.00
Total: 100.00
119741 2/18/2005 001876 SISKO, KAREN 020205
PARKING FOR HR MEETING IN SL
PARKING FOR HR MEETING IN SL
010.4101.5501 1.50
020905 MILEAGE TO PARMA:450 MILES
MILEAGE TO PARMA:450 MILES
010.4101.5501 168.75
021505 MILEAGE TO CAWPIA-40 MILES
MILEAGE TO CAWPIA-40 MILES
010.4101.5501 15.00
Tofal : 185.25
119742 2/18/2005 001189 SLO COUNTY FIRE DEPT 021605
MATERIALS FEES: QUINLAN&ST
MATERIALS FEES:QUINLAN&ST
010.4211.5501 30.00
Total : 30.00
119743 2/18/2005 000564 SLO COUNTY NEWSPAPERS 6114654
LATERAL PO AD IN TT
LATERAL PO AD IN TT
010.4201.5301 432.84
Total : 432.84
119744 2/1g/2pp5 000731 SLO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT 020205
BOOKING FEES OCT-DEC'04
Page: 24
-
vchlist Voucher List
02178/2005 1:59:SOPM Page: 25
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank cade : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
Description/Account Amount
119744 2/18/2005 000731 SLO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT (Continued)
BOOKING FEES OCT-DEC'04
010.4201.5323 6,382.50
Total : 6,382.50
119745 2/18/2005 000547 SLOCAPRA �Z�005
COMMISSIONERS WRKSHP:022
COMMISSIONERS WRKSHP: 022
010.4421.5503 75�
Total : 75.00
119746 2/18/2005 002327 SOFTCHOICE CORPORATION 669311 ADOBE MEDIA KIT
ADOBE MEDIA KIT
010.4212.5303 28.85
Total : 28.95
119747 2/18/2005 000602 SOUTH SLO COUNTY SANIT DIST 13105 SEWER SVC COLL-1/05
SEWER SVC COLL-1/05
760.0000.2304 46,655.94
SEWER HOOKUPS-1/05
760.0000.2305 5,000.00
SAN.DIST-203 N RENA 1/OS
010.4145.5401 13.47
SAN.DIST-ASH R/RM-7/05
010.4145.5401 13.47
Total : 51,682.88
119748 2/18/2005 001696 SOUZACONSTRUCTION, INC p�/yZpp,q_p�
BRIDGE RAIL REPLACEMENT PRO
BRIDGE RAIL REPLACEMENT PRO
350.5644.70p1 47,160.00
Total : 47,760.00
119749 2/18/2005 000615 STEINER, LYNN 020505
OBJECTIVE&ESSAY TEST-STOHL
OBJECTIVE&ESSAY TEST-STOHL
010.4201.5303 75�
Total : 75.00
119750 2/18/2005 000616 STERLING COMMUNICATIONS 20152
1998 RANGER:REMOVED EQUIP
Page: 25
vchlist Voucher Li �
02I18/2005 1:59:SOPM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE Pa9e: 26
Bank code: bpa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119750 2/18/2005 000616 STERLING COMMUNICATIONS (Continued)
1998 RANGER:REMOVED EQUIP
010.4201.5601 240.00
20153 054 INSTALL EQUIP:NTF VEHICLE
054 INSTALL EQUIP:NTF VEHICLE
010.4201.6301 1,737.51
20165 SERVICE AGREEMENT:MARCH 20
SERVICE AGREEMENT:MARCH 20
010.4201.5606 974.00
Total : 2,951.51
119751 2/18/2005 000620 STREATOR PIPE 8 SUPPLY 4p8693 PARTS FOR DRINKING FOUNTAIN
PARTS FOR DRINKING FOUNTAIN
010.4213.5604 0.90
409155 2"CONDUIT PIPE-SOTO COMPLEX
2"CONDUIT PIPE-SOTO COMPLEX
010.4430.5605 15.92
Tatal : 76.82
119752 2/18/2005 004045 TALLANT,STEVE 020205 REIMBURSE ICS REG.FEE
REIMBURSE ICS REG.FEE
010.4211.5501 33.00
Total : 33.00
119753 2/18/2005 000637 TEXAS REFINERY CORP 738458 OIL
OIL
010.4211.5608 116.60
Total : 116.60
119754 2/18/2005 002370 TITAN INDUSTRIAL 1002134 ALL PURPOSE WIPES
ALL PURPOSE WIPES
010.4201.5272 77.16
Total : 77.76
119755 2/18/2005 004476 TRAINING NETWORK,THE 1525 TRAINING VIDEOS
TRAINING VIDEOS
220.4303.5303 458$$
Page: 26
vchlist Voucher List
02118/2005 1:59:SOPM Page: 27
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
' Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO#
Description/Account Amount
119755 2/18/2005 004476 004476 TRAINING NETWORK,THE (Continued)
Total : 258.88
119756 2/18/2005 00246g TRIBUNE,THE 6117014
PUBLICATION: ORDINANCE NO.56
PUBLICATION:ORDINANCE N0.56
010.4002.5301 Zg�38
6120029 VTTM 04004&PUD 04-001
VTTM 04-004&PUD 04001
010.4130.5301 106.45
6120034 APUD 04-pp1
APUD 04001
010.4130.5301 97.00
612�� CUP 04008
CUP 04008
010.4130.5301 9�8�
6�23�28 NOTICE OF PH:ACUP 04001-WEL
NOTICE OF PH:ACUP 04-001-WEL
010.4002.5301 77.26
6�23�Z� NOTICE OF PH-PARKING INLIEU F
NOTICE OF PH-PARKING INLIEU F
010.4002.5301 ��Z6
6123728 NOTICE OF PH-TOBACCO RET.OR
NOTICE OF PH-TOBACCO RET.OR
010.4002.5301 77.26
6123735 NOTICE OF PH-MAND.RETROFIT P
NOTICE OF PH-MAND.RETROFIT P
010.4002.5301 84.13
6123738 NOTICE OF PH-CUP 04-005
NOTICE OF PH-CUP 04005
010.4002.5301 ��
6127082 PPR 05-001
PPR OS001
010.4130.5301 94.43
6�2�084 DCA 04007
DCA 04-0p7
010.4130.5301 113.32
Page: 27
vchlist Voucher List
02I18/2005 1:59:50PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE Page: 28
Bankcode: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoiee PO# Description/Account Amount
119756 2/182005 002468 TRIBUNE,THE (Continued)
6131022 NOTICE OF PH-DCA 04006,ZONI
NOTICE OF PH-DCA 04-pO6,ZONl
010.4002.5301 ppg 04
Total : 1,379.36
119757 2/18/2005 000669 UNION ASPHALT, INC 178799 ASPHALT
ASPHALT
220.4303.5613 201.41
PW 20�'� VALLEY GARDEN PAVING PROJEC
VALLEY GARDEN PAVING PROJEC
350.5660.7001 23,564.10
Total : 23,765.57
119758 2/18/2005 000671 UNITED GREEN MARK, INC 3807670-00 SPRINKLER-HUNTER 140
SPRINKLER-HUNTER 140
010.4420.5605 qZ g�
3807720-00 SPRINKLER AND VALVE FOR RG
SPRINKLER AND VALVE FOR RG
010.4420.5605 23.83
3808551-00 FEBCO 825Y BACKFI.OW
FEBCO 825Y BACKFLOW
010.4420.5605 Zg2 g2
380889400 LANDSCAPE FABRIC
LANDSCAPE FABRIC
010.4420.5605 36.38
380894800 VALVE BOX LID
VALVE BOX LID
010.4420.5605 2.52
Total : 388.42
119759 2/18/2005 000666 UNITED RENTALS 45983667-001 SKID STEER,TRAILER/PLAYGROUI
SKID STEER,TRAILER/PLAYGROUI
010.4420.5552 20529
ToWI : 205.29
119760 2N8/2005 002137 VERIZON WIRELESS 1923513735 748-2371-PATROL CELL PH:1/5 TO
. Page: 28 I
vchlist Voucher List
02N8/2005 1:59:50PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE Page: 29
Bankcode: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119760 2/18/2005 002137 VERIZON WIRELESS (Continued)
74&2371-PATROL CELL PH:1/5 TO
010.4201.5403 32529
1924059296 440-6299-HOPKINS CELL:2/7 TO 3
440-6299-HOPKINS CELL:2!7 TO 3
010.4201.5403 44.01
1924399416 748-4974:CELL PHONE CHAVEZ
748-4974:CELL PHONE CHAVEZ
' 010.4430.5805 102.65
Total : 477.95
119761 2/18/2005 002000 VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SVC L5245715F8 PAGERS-FIRE
PAGERS-FIRE
010.4211.5403 17.09
BLDG
010.4212.5403 11.38
L5252720FB MIS PAGER MONTHLY SERVICE
MIS PAGER MONTHLY SERVICE
010.4140.5303 11.35
Total : 39.82
119762 2/18/2005 002609 WATERBOYS PLUMBING 10432 URINAL,VALVE FITTINGS
URINAL,VALVE FITTINGS
010.4430.5605 659.00
10433 DRAIN WORK ON URINAL
DR,41N WORK ON URINAL
010.4273.5303 85 pp
Total : 744.00
119763 2/18/2005 004787 WELDFAB 1324 TOOL BOXES/SANDBLASTED
TOOL BOXES/SANDBLASTED
010.4201.5601 300.00
Tofal : 300.00
119764 2/18/2005 000688 WEST COVINA NURSERIES 66921 PLANTS FOR JOB AT WELL#9
PLANTS FOR JOB AT WELL#9
220.4303.5613 296.01
Page: 29
vchlist
Voucher List
02118/2005 1:59:50PM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE Page: 30
Bankcode: bpa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
PO# Description/Account Amount
119764 2/18/2005 000688 WEST COVINA NURSERIES (Continued)
66�� LIQUIDAMBER TREE
LIQUIDAMBER TREE
010.4420.5308 48.26
67046 REPLACEMENT TREE FOR RODE
REPLACEMENT TREE FOR RODE
72765 010.4420.5308 4826
15 GAL. PLUM FOR TIGERTAIL PAF
15 GAL. PLUM FOR TIGERTAIL PAF
72869 010.4420.5308 4826
15 GAL.LIQUIDAMBER
15 GAL.LIQUIDAMBER
010.4420.5308 48.26
119765 2/18/2005 000697 WILLIAMS,JAMES Ta�� � 489.05
Z20 REIMBURSE GASOLINE
REIMBURSE GASOLINE
010.4201.56p8 30.01
�19766 2/182005 000704 WITMER-TYSONIMPORTS Total : 30.07
T4288 MONTHLY K-9 MAINT.JAN 05
MONTHLY K-9 MAINT.JAN 05
010.4201.5322 160.00
Total : 760.00
7 70 Vouchers for bank code: boa
Bank total : 214,450.76
110 Vouchers in this report
Total vouchers : 214,450.76
Page: 30
ATTACHMENT 3 Zao�_ v�{
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
DEPARTMENTAL LABOR DISTRIBUTION
1 PAY PERIOD
�
� 01/28/04-02NQ/04
i
i 02/78/05
� FUND 010 358,200.17
FUND 220 16,908.85 Salaries Full time 196,714.60
FUND 284 1,630.32 Salaries Part-Time- PPT 19,569.28
FUND 612 4,820.40 Salaries Part-Time-TPT 7,2g2 gg
FUND 640 14;352.50 Salaries OverTime 21,353.16
395 912 24 Salaries Standby 383.28
Holiday Pay 1,020.65
Sick Pay 854.53
AnnualLeave Buyback _
Vacation Buyback _
Sick Leave Buyback _
Vacation Pay 7,609.74
Comp Pay 3,192.53
Annual Leave Pay 20,717.25
PERS Retirement 53,132.12
Social Security 19,973.21
PARS Retirement g2Z 92
State Disability Ins. 1,020.44
Deferred Compensation 750.00
Health Insurance 34,496.85
Dentallnsurance 4,094.89
Vision Insurance 899.55
Life Insurance 735.53
Long Term Disability 1,071.82
Uniform Allowance
Car Allowance 500 00
Council Expense _
Employee qssistance 162.00
Boot Allowance
Motor Pay 75 00
395,912 24
�
€
6
�
1
�
�
R
r�
ATTACHMENT4
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
0212512005 9:44:44AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bankcode: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Desc�iption/Account Amount
119767 2/25/2005 001043 ADVANCE MARKING SYSTEMS I-26716-1 NAME TAGS
SALES AND USE TAX
010.00002014 3.16
NAME TAGS
010.4211.5272 54.18
Total : 51.02
119768 2/25/2005 004791 AFSS-ATTN: LINDA HARLOW 021605 REG.FOR AFSS CONF.: N.HAGLUN
REG.FOR AFSS CONF.: N.HAGLUN
010.4211.5501 250.00
Total : 250.00
119769 2/25/2005 000034 APEX SHARPENING WORKS 25171 MOTOR MOUNT F501
MOTOR MOUNT F501
010.4211.5601 137.82
Total : 737.82
119770 2/25Y2005 002632 API WASTE SERVICES 52A00029 R/O BIN-DUMP/RETURN SVCS.
R/O BIN-DUMP/RETURN SVCS.
010.4213.5303 415.52
ToWI : 415.52
119771 2/25/2005 003175 AQUA-METRIC SALES CO 0008824 METERS(PURCHASE ORDER 860)
METERS(PURCHASE ORDER 860)
640.4712.5207 3,946.15
��2� 2"TURBO TR/PL REGISTER
2"TURBO TR/PL REGISTER
640.4712.5207 17425
Total : 4,720.40
119772 2/25/2005 004252 ARROYO GRANDE COMM HOSPITAL 013105 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
010.4211.5315 g7�.pg
Total : 871.08
119773 2/25/2005 000069 BAUER COMPRESSORS, INC 63928 O-RINGS
Page: 1
VCFIIISt
Voucher List page; 2
02I25/2005 9:44:44AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bankcode: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# DescriptionlAccount Amount
119773 2/25/2005 000069 BAUER COMPRESSORS, INC (Continued)
O-RINGS "
010.4211.5603 27.75
Total : 27.75
119774 2/25/2005 004792 BLACKBURN MFG.CO. C037458-P 1,000 CAUTION FLAGS FOR SPRAl
1,000 CAUTION FLAGS FOR SPRAl
010.4420.5255 83.33
Total : 83.33
119775 2/25/2005 000090 BRISCO MILL&LUMBER YARD 121778 SPRAY PAINT-P74C MOWER
SPRAY PAINT-P74C MOWER
010.4420.5603 7.06
121880 DRILL BIT SET
DRILL BIT SET
010.4420.5273 10.80
121987 ROUTER BITS FOR SHOP
ROUTER BITS FOR SHOP
010.4420.5273 32.16
122040 SLEDGE HAMMER
SLEDGE HAMMER
612.4610.5273 12.32
122107 BRACKETT AND BATTERY FOR PA
BRACKETT AND BATTERY FOR PA
010.4420.5605 27.51
122131 CDX AND SCREWS
CDX AND SCREWS
010.4430.5605 29.79
122155 CEDAR FENCE BOARD-BLDG MAI
CEDAR FENCE BOARD-BLDG MAI
010.4213.5804 2.56
122291 "CLOSED"SIGNS,TAPE
"CLOSED"SIGNS,TAPE
010.4213.5604 7.05
Page: 2
I
vchlist Voucher List Page: 3
02125I2005 9:44:44AM CITY OP ARROYO GRANDE
Bankcode: b08
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# DescriptloNAccount Amount
119775 2/25/2005 000090 BRISCO MILL&LUMBER YARD (Continued)
122319 HARDWARE AND BIT
HARDWARE AND BIT
010.4420.5605 7.56
122376 BLADES;STAMP LETTERS&NUME
BLADES;STAMP LETTERS&NUME
220.4303.5613 157.65
122383 SHOVEL HANDLE
SHOVEL HANDLE
010.4420.5273 16.08
122422 PIPE AND CAPS FOR DRAIN REPAI
PIPE AND CAPS FOR DRAIN REPAI
010.4420.5605 18.41
Total : 328.95
119776 2/25/2005 000094 BRUMIT DIESEL, INC 77033 SMALL TOOLS
SMALLTOOLS
010.4211.5601 352.71
Total : 352.71
I 119777 7J25/2005 000096 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 21401 RING SEAL&INDICATOR
, RING SEAL&INDICATOR
010.4211.5607 96.77
ToWI : 96.77
119778 2/25/2005 000134 CA ST DEPT OF JUSTICE 507411 FNGRPRNTS-PD-CAMERON/WOO
FNGRPRNTSPD-CAMERONNVOO
010.4201.5324 88.00
CITY-N ELSONBI RD/KI NG/W EST
010.4211.5324 128.00
IN/OUT LIST
010.4201.5329 1,417.00
Toql : 1,633.00
119779 2/25/2005 000603 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 148-095313 WIPER BLADES
WIPER BLADES
010.4211.5601 14.84
Page: 3
i
vchlist Voucher List Page: 4
02I25/2005 9:44:44AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bankcode: b08
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# DescriptioNAccount Amount
119779 2/252005 000603 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS (Continued)
148-096127 SPARK PLUGS
SPARK PLUGS
010.4211.5601 7.72
148-097305 WIPER BLADES F317
WIPER BLADES F317
010.4211.5601 17.78
Tofal : 40.34
119780 2/25/2005 004793 CFPI 021705 REG.JUV.FIRESETTER CLASS-STE
REG.JUV.FIRESETTER CLASS-STE
' 010.4211.5501 140.00
Total : 140.00
119781 2/25/2005 000164 CHRISTIANSON CHEVROLET 16036 SMOG TEST F314
SMOG TEST F314
010.4211.5601 35.00
Total : 35.00
119782 2Y25/2005 003411 CLEAN SWEEP JANITORIAL 1011 JANITORIAL SERVICES:FEB 2005
JANITORIAL SERVICES:FEB 2005
070.4213.5303 4,587.15
Total : 4,587.75
119783 2/25/2005 000174 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT 4908766 REPAIRS TO PW9
REPAIRS TO PW9
220.4303.5603 348.52
Total : 348.52
� 119784 2/25/2005 002389 CONAWAY, MARCUS 022205 BBALL LGE.SCORER-CONAWAY
BBALL LGE.SCORER-CONAWAY
010.4424.5352 zz.5p
Total : 22.50
119785 2/25/2005 003652 CONDE,VINCE 022205 BBALL LEAGUE OFFICIAU6 GAME
BBALL LEAGUE OFFICIAU6 GAME
010.4424.5352 108.00
, Page: 4
��
vchlist Voucher List Page: 5
0212512005 9:44:44AM CITY OP ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# DescHpfion/Account Amount
119785 2Y25/2005 003652 003652 CONDE,VINCE (Continued) Total : 108.00
119786 2/25/2005 000195 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER CO 1/31-48519 BOTTLED WATER
BOTTLED WATER
010.4212.5303 1725
14273 BOTTLED WATER
BOTTLED WATER
010.4421.5201 33.00
63949 BOTTLED WATER-SOTO OFFICE
BOTTLED WATER-SOTO OFFICE
010.4430.5605 25.25
70931 BOTTLED WATER-CORP YARD
BOTTLED WATER-CORP YARD
010.4430.5605 11.50
Total : 87.00
119787 2/25/2005 000198 CURTIS 8 SONS, L N 1070177 GAS DETECTOR
GAS DETECTOR
010.4211.5325 128.49
1070990-00 MISC DEPT SUPPLIES
MISC DEPT SUPPLIES
010.4211.5255 554.13
1071928-00 FREIGHT COSTS-RESCUE ROPES
FREIGHT COSTS-RESCUE ROPES
b10.4211.5255 52.05
Total : 734.67
119788 2/25/2005 004164 FEDEX 7-991-80374 OVERNIGHT MAIL TO DAVE PINT
OVERNIGHT MAIL TO DAVE PINT
010.4130.5201 36.62
Total : 36.62
119789 2/25/2005 000250 FIREHOUSE MAGAZINE 5711061-R2 1 YR RENEWAL(FIBICH)
1 YR RENEWAL(FIBICH)
010.4211.5503 30.00
Total : 30.00
Page: 5
�_a
vchiist Voucher List Page: 6
02I25/2005 9:44:44AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bankcode: b0a
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# DascripdoNAccount Amount
' 119790 2/25/2005 001397 FLOYD, DAVID 022205 REIMBURSE BASKETBALLS
REIMBURSE BASKETBALLS
010.4426.6201 108.11
To�l : 108.77
119791 2/25/2005 004790 FLOYD, DEANNA 022205 BASKETBALL LEAG.SCORER/3 GA
BASKETBALL LEAG.SCORER/3 GA
010.4424.5352 22.50
Total : 22.50
119792 2/25/2005 003590 FLOYD, SERENA 022205 BBALL LGE.SCORER-FLOYD
BBALL LGE.SCORER-FLOYD
010.4424.5352 45.00
i Total : 45.00
119793 2/25/2005 000262 FR,4NK'S LOCK 8 KEY, INC 21755 REKEY CAMPER SHELUPW39
REKEY CAMPER SHELL/PW39
010.4301.5601 81.09
Total : 81.09
119794 2/25Y2005 004372 GARING TAYLOR&ASSOCIATES 4895 WELL NO 10/DESIGN 8 CONSTRUC
Ii WELL NO 10/DESIGN&CONSTRUC
' 350.5934.7501 4,675.48
Total : 4,675.48
119795 2/25/2005 004142 GAXIOLA, STAN 022205 B.BALL LEAGUE OFFICIAU6 GAME
B.BALL LEAGUE OFFICIAL/6 GAME
010.4424.5352 108.00
Total : 108.00
119796 2/25/2005 004789 HALE, KRAIG 022205 B.BALL LEAGUE REFEREE/3 GAME
B.BALL LEAGUE REFEREE/3 GAME
010.4424.5352 54.Op
, Total : 54.00
119797 2/25/2005 002405 HARE, CHUCK 022205 BBALL LGE.OFFICIAL-HARE
Page: 6
�
vchlist Voucher List Page: 7
02I25/2005 9:44:44AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bankcode: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# DescripUon/Account Amount
119797 2/25/2005 002405 HARE,CHUCK (Continued)
B/BALL LGE.OFFICIAL-HARE
010.4424.5352 54.00
Total : 54.00
119798 2/25/2005 000301 HEACOCK TRAILERS&TRUCK 17514 TOOL BOXES-PW 2
TOOL BOXES-PW 2
640.4712.6301 922.35
Tofal : 922.35
119799 2/25/2005 003609 HRACC 022205 MEMBERSHIP TO HRACC/K.SISKO
MEMBERSHIP TO HRACC/K.SISKO
010.4101.5503 50.00
Total : 50.00
119800 2/25/2005 000345 J J'S FOOD COMPANY, INC 152428 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES
DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES
010.4212.5255 9.07
152546 COFFEE SUPPLIES
COFFEE SUPPLIES
010.4211.5255 31.86
Total : 40.93
119801 2/25/2005 001793 KELLER 8 ASSOCIATES, INC,J J 005667722 NEWSLETTERS/POSTERS
NEWSLETTERS/POSTERS
220.4303.5255 206.38
Tofal : 206.38
119802 2/25/2005 000393 LUCIA MAR UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST 021605 BUS TRANSP./KNDRGARTEN-JAN:
BUS TRANSP./KNDRGARTEN-JAN:
010.4425.5303 400.00
Total : 400.00
119803 2/25/2005 000417 MELLO&SON'S PUMPS&MOTORS 1483 BOOSTER PUMP REPAIR
BOOSTER PUMP REPAIR
010.4430.5303 616.65
Page: 7
vchlist Voucher List Page: 8
02I25I2005 9:44:44AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bankcode: b08
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119803 2/25/2005 000417 000417 MELLO&SON'S PUMPS&MOTOR (Continued) Total : 676.65
119804 2/25/2005 000429 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC 11645 SPLY/WASHERS
SPLYNNASHERS
010.4213.5604 13.91
11743 TAPE;WIRE CONNECT.;EIECT.SU
TAPE;WIRE CONNECT.;ELECT.SU
010.4213.5604 27.08
11815 SCREWFINDBULBSBIT INSERT
SCREWFINDBULBSBIT INSERT
010.4213.5804 43.90
17861 HARDWARE-DISHWASHER REPA
HARDWARE-DISHWASHER REPA
010.4211.5803 6.97
11919 FLUOR.TUBE
FLUOR.TUBE
010.4213.5G04 32.15
11935 TAPE;PAINT;SANDSPONG
TAP E;PAI NT;SAN DS P ON G
010.4213.5604 81.98
11984 TOOLS
TOOLS
010.4211.5255 24.10
12027 CLIP/ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
CLIP/ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
010.4420.5605 5.86
12071 TOOLS
TOOLS
010.4211.5255 12.83
12084 BATTERIES
BATTERIES
812.4810.5255 46.04
4719 GENERATOR MILLIVOLT
GENERATOR MILLIVOLT
010.4213.5273 27.87
Page: 8
vchlist Voucher List pege: g
02I25I2005 9:44:44AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bankcode: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119804 2/25/2005 000429 000429 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC (Continued) Total : 322.69
119805 2l25/2005 000444 MUSTANG TREE CARE SERVICES 180 SAFETY PRUNING
SAFETY PRUNING
010.4420.5303 1,400.00
182 TIP THINNING 8 SAFETY PRUNING
TIP THINNING 8 SAFETY PRUNING
010.4420.5303 125.00
185 SAFETY PRUNING-POST ROOT RE
SAFETY PRUNING-POST ROOT RE
010.4420.5303 225.00
186 SAFETY TRIMMING-BLACK ACACI
SAFETY TRIMMING-BLACK ACACI
010.4420.5303 475.00
Total : 2,225.00
119806 2/25/2005 004794 NATIONAL HOSE TESTING SPECIALT 102804 HOSE TESTING SERVICES
HOSE TESTING SERVICES
010.4211.5255 5,335.05
Tofal : 5,335.05
119807 2/25/2005 000454 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSN 15362348 MEMB.RENEW:L.REARDON-SMIT
MEMB.RENEW:L.REARDON-SMIT
010.4130.5503 79.00
Tofal : 79.00
119808 2/25/2005 000468 OFFICE DEPOT 275872716 OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
010.4130.5201 5.14
2758811976-001 OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
010.4211.5201 122.90
275998726 OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
010.4130.5201 116.90
Page: 9
vchlist Voucher List Page: 10
, OZI25/2005 9:44:44AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bank code: bOa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# DescriptioNAccount Amount
119808 2/25/2005 000468 OFFICE DEPOT (Continued)
276065999 OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
010.4130.5201 41.64
Total : 286.58
119809 2/25/2005 000481 PACIFIC GAS&ELECTRIC CO 2/14-654774 ELECTRIC-FLASHING LIGHT,JAME
ELECTRIGFLASHING LIGHT,JAME
010.4304.5402 51.34
2/16-235044 ELECTRIC-RES.#4
ELECTRIC-RES.#4
I 640.4712.5402 19.14
Tofal : 70.48
119810 2/25/2005 000526 RADIOSHACK CORPORATION 528403 ANSWER MACHINE
ANSWER MACHINE
220.4303.5255 42.89
Total : 42.89
119811 2/25/2005 000536 ROSE,GREG 022205 B.BALL LEAGUE OFFICIAL/6 GAME
B.BALL LEAGUE OFFICIAU6 GAME
010.4424.5352 108.00
Total : 108.00
' 119812 2/25/2005 004365 RUIZ, DANIEL 022205 B.BAIL LEAGUE SCORER/9 GAME
B.BALL LEAGUE SCORER/9 GAME
010.4424.5352 67.50
ToWI : 67.50
119813 2/25l2005 003649 RUIZ, DON 022205 B.BALL LEAGUE SCORER-9 GAME
B.BALL LEAGUE SCORER-9 GAME
010.4424.5352 67.50
Total : 67.50
119814 2/25/2005 000539 SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS, INC 359141 TANK REFILL SERVICE
TANK REFILL SERVICE
010.4305.5303 144.15
Page: 10
'—_ _ _
vchlist Voucher List Page: 11
02I25/2005 8:44:44AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bankcode: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119814 2/25/2005 000539 000539 SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS, INC (Continued) ToWI : 144.15
119815 2/25/2005 000479 SBC 451-0183 451A183RADI0
451-018&RADIO
010.4145.5403 187.03
48&9816 489-9816-PAY PHONE
' 489-9816PAY PHONE
010.4145.5403 52.15
841-3953 841-3953
841-3953
010.4211.5403 32.03
841-3956 841-3956-ALARM
841-3956-ALARM
220.4303.5303 32.03
841-3959 841-3959-ALARM
841395&ALARM
640.4710.5403 32.03
841-3960 841-3960-FD SIGNAL CONTROL
841-3964FD SIGNAL CONTROL
010.4211.5403 32.03
Total : 367.30
119816 2/25/2005 003108 SBC/MCI T3341218 47&2041/ALARM
47&2041/ALARM
010.4145.5403 14.18
Total : 14.78
119817 2/25/2005 000609 SPEAR, BOB 022205 B.BALL LEAGUE REF/3 GAMES
B.BALL LEAGUE REF/3 GAMES
010.4424.5352 54.00
Total : 54.00
' 119818 2/25/2005 000616 STERLING COMMUNICATIONS 20180 CORP YARD RADIO FAILURE
CORP YARD RADIO FAILURE
, 640.4712.5603 64.50
CORP YARD RADIO FAILURE
220.4303.5603 64.50
Page: 11
vchlist Voucher List Page: 12
0212512005 9:44:44AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bankcode: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Descriptlon/Account Amount
119818 2/25/2005 000616 000616 STERLING COMMUNICATIONS (Continued) Total : 129.00
119819 2/25/2005 002904 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS 20373 UNIFORM
UNIFORM
010.4211.5272 1,663.72
Tofal : 7,663.72
119820 2/25/2005 004609 TROESH RECYCLING, INC 700 RECYCLED MATERIAL
RECYCLED MATERIAL
220.4303.5307 208.09
CIASS S2 BASE
220.4303.5613 638.43
Total : 846.52
119821 2/25/2005 000669 UNION ASPHALT, INC 179145 ASPHALT
ASPHALT
220.4303.5613 200.08
179305 ASPHALT
ASPHALT
220.4303.5613 199.75
179674 CONCRETE FOR WHEEL CHAIR R
CONCRETE FOR WHEEL CHAIR R
350.5632.7002 557.88
Total : 951.77
119822 2/25/2005 002137 VERIZON WIRELESS 1924554971 4447811-P 8 R DIRECTOR CELL P
440-7811-P&R DIRECTOR CELL P
010.4421.5602 48.04
1924764939 CELL PHONE PARKS SUP.
CELL PHONE PARKS SUP.
010.4421.5602 35.97
Tofal : 84.01
119823 2/25/2005 000687 WAYNE'S TIRE, INC 747460 FRONT TIRES 8 SERV:P59
FRONT TIRES&SERV:P59
010.4420.5601 338.63
Page: 12
vchlist Voucher List Page: 13
0212512005 9:44:44AM CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Bankcode: boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO# Description/Account Amount
119823 2/25/2005 000687 WAYNE'S TIRE, INC (Continued)
747481 REAR TIRES, BALANCE P59
REAR TIRES, BALANCE P59
010.4420.5601 483.18
Total : 827•87
57 Vouchers for bank code: boa Bank total : 35,603.73
57 Vouchers in this repoR Total vouchers: 35,603.73
Page: 13
�
8.b.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 8,2005
COUNCIL CHAMBERS,215 EAST BRANCH STREET
ARROYO GRANDE, CAUFORNIA
1 CALL TO ORDER
MayodChair Ferrare called the Regular City CounciURedevelopment Agency meeting to order at
7:03 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
City CounaURDA: CounciUBoard Members Dickens, Guthrie, Arnold, Meyor Pro TertdVice
Chair Costelb and MayodChair Fe�rara were present.
City Staff Present: City Manager Adams, City Attomey Cartnel, Director of Administrative
Services/City Clerk Wetmore, Director of Public WakslCily Engineer
Spagnolo, Director of Financial Senrices Pillow, Director of Building and
Fire Fibich, Community Development Director Strony, Interim
Neighborhood Services Coa'd'inetor Mso�behere, Associete Planner
Heffernon, Assocfate Plenner McClish, and Assiefant Plenner Foster'
3 FLAG SALUTE
Vem Frederidc, representing Arroyo Grande Lions Club; led the Flag Salute.
4. INVOCATION
Pastor George Lepper, Peace Lutheran Church, Arroyo Grande, delivered the invocation•
� SPECIA6 PRESENTATIONS
5.a. Recognitlon of Outgoiny Commissioners, Comm�ttee,and Boud M�nb�s•
� Mayor Ferrara rec�gnized the folbwing outgoing Commissioners, Commiltee and Board
{ Members and presented those that were present with City plaques acknowledpinp tl�eir service
1 to the community: Planning Commissioners Nan Fowler (2001-2005). Jim Ciulhris (2000-2004),
� and Ed Amold (2002-2004); Traffic Commissioners Scott Me�lf (2003'20�). � PUkington
(1997-2005), Heather Jensen (2001-2003), and Kirk Scott (1999-2005). Mr. � ��ry
� re�gnized for serving as Citlzen Representative to the Gtizens' Trensporta
Committee (2000-2005). Senior Advisory Commissio�e� Hem�an Olave (1997-2005); Parks and
j Recreatlon Commissioners Harlan Silva (2001-2005), and RobeR"Bob" BroMm (2001'2005); and
I Architectural Review Committee Members Melanie Hodyes (2001-2005), Jartue Ohler (1999-
; 2005), and Chudc Fellows (2000-2005.) Former Cit�r Counal Members Tom Runels and Sandy
; Lubin also thanked all the outgoing Commissioners, Committee� end Boerd �Aert�ers, w�° �ey
j had appointed,for their commiUneM and dedication to the va►ious advfsory bodies•
� 5.b. Mayor's Commendation Racoynizinp Kirk Scott tor Coordinatiny. Con���n�
and Overseeinp the South County Historical SocistY's "Bam° P�c�
; Sqwre.
i
; Mayor Ferrara presented a Mayors Commendation recognizing Kirk Scoft for his efforts in
coordinetinp, overseeing and construding the South CouMy Historicel Satiety's"Bem' Pr°lect at
Heritaye Square. Mr. Soott axe�pt oonuibuted to the suxess of the project. of the p►cJect
and recognized all the peraons
CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 8, 2005
PAGE 2
5.c. Proclamation Recognizing February 22, 2005 as "Spay Day USA 2005".
Mayor Ferrara presented an Honorary Proclamation recognizing February 22, 2005 as Spay Day
USA. Cheryl Penkal, a volunteer with Feline Network of San Luis Obispo, explained the purpose
of Spay Day USA and encouraged people to observe the day by having their own dogs or cats
spayed or neutered or by sponsoring the spaying or neutering of another person's dog or cat.
6. AGENDA REVIEW
6.a. Resolutions and Ordinances Read in Title Only.
Mayor Pro Tem Costello moved, Council Member Arnold seconded, and the motion passed
unanimously that all resolutions and ordinances presented at the meeting shall be read in title
only and all further reading be waived.
7. CITIZENS' INPUT. COMMENTS. AND SUGGESTIONS
None.
8. CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Pro Tem Costello requested that Item 8.e. be pulled for comment.
CounciVBoard Member Dickens moved, and CounciUBoard Member Guthrie seconded the
motion to approve Consent Agenda Items 8.a. through 8.i., with the exception of Item 8.e., with
the recommended courses of action. City Attorney Carmel read the title of the Orclinance in Item
8.g. The motion carried on the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Dickens, Guthrie, Arnold, Costeilo, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
S.a. Cash Disbursement Ratification (PILLOW)
Action: Ratified the listing of cash disbursements for the period January i 6, 2005
through January 31, 2005.
8.b. Consideration of Acceptance of Audited Annual Financfal Reports.
[COUNCIURDA]
Action: Received and filed the Audited Annual Financial Reports for the Fiscal Year
ending June 30, 2004.
S.a Consideratton of Approval of Minutes.
Action: Approved the minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of January 25, 2005,
as submitted.
8.d. ConsideraUon of Rejection of Claim Against City—C. Barnes/K. Goodlow
Action: Rejected claim.
8.f. ConsideraUon of Authorization to Purchase Replacement Police Utiliry Patrol
VehiCle.
Action: Authorized staff to purchase one (1) replacement Police utility patrol vehicle from
Christianson Ghevrolet for$29,654.80.
8.g. Consideration of Adoption of Ordlnance Adding Chapter 18.06 to TiUe 13 of the
Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Regardtng Implementation of a Msndatory Retrofit
Program and Procedure Upon the Change oi Ownership of Real Property.
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 8, 2005
PAGE 3
Action: Adopted Ordinance No. 563, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of
Arroyo Grande Adding Chapter 13.06 to Title 13 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code
Regarding Impiementation of a Mandatory Retrofit Program and Procedure Upon the
Change of Ownership of Real Property".
8.h. Consideration to Approve Final Tract Map 2506; Subdivlding a .80 Acre Parcel into
Seven (7) Residential Parcels Located at 325 Alder Street.
Action: Approved Final Tract Map 2506, subdividing .80 acres into seven (7) residential
parcels.
8.i. Consideration of Annual Adjustment of Drainage Fees for Arroyo Grande Drainage
Area No. 1 and Drainage Impact and Utility Fee Study.
Action: 1) Adopted Resolution No. 3811, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Arroyo Grande Adjusting Drainage Fees for Arroyo Grande Drainage Area No. 1 by the
Change in the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index"; and 2) Directed staff
to solicit proposals from qualified consultants to evaluate a storm water utility and
drainage impact fee for the entire City.
8.e. Consideration of Adoption of Ordinance and Resolution Regarding the Licensing
of Tobacco Retailers.
Recommended Actfo�: 1) Adopt Ordinance adding Chapter 8.38 to Title 8 of the Arroyo
Grande Municipal Code providing for the licensing and regulation of retailers of tobacco
products; and 2) Adopt Resolution establishing fees and administrative penalties.
Mayor Pro Tem Costello noted that he was absent from the previous meeting where the
proposed Ordinance had been introduced. He expressed his support for the Ordinance, which
wouid enable the Police Department to better regulate the sale of tobacco products as well as
enforce laws and ordinances prohibiting sales of tobacco products to minors.
Mayor Pro Tem Costello moved to approve staff's recommendation as follows: 1) Adopt
Ordinance as follows: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO
GRANDE ADDING CHAPTER 8.38 TO TITLE 8 OF THE ARROYO GRANDE MUNICIPAL
CODE PROVIDING FOR THE LICENSING AND REGULATION OF RETAILERS OF
TOBACCO PRODUCTS"; and 2) Adopt Resolution as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ADOPTING FEES AND ADMINISTRATiVE
PENALTIES FOR LICENSING AND REGULATION OF TOBACCO F�TAILERS AS
AUTHORI2ED BY ARROYO GRANDE MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 8.38.070 AND 8.88.130".
Council Member Didcens seconded the motion, and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Costello, Dickens, Guthrie, Arnold, Ferrara ' ;
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS :
In response to a request from staff, Mayor Ferrara requested and the Council concurred, to hear
item 9.b. prior to 9.a.
,
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 8, 2005
PAGE 4
9.b. Consideration of Development Code Amendment 04-006 — Proposed Ordinance
Amending the Zoning Map to Rezone Certain Properties for Consistency with the
General Plan.
Associate Planner McClish presented the staff report and recommended the Council introduce
an ordinance amending the Zoning Map to rezone certain properties for consistency with the
General Plan. She explained that the proposed ordinance would result in the revising of zoning
designations on parcels that are located in the vicinity of E. Grand Avenue, E. Branch Street and
Traffic Way from Senior Residential (SR), General Commerciai (GC), Highway Commercial
(HC), and Village Commercial (VC) to current'zoning designations of Public Facilities (PF), Fair
Oaks Mixed Use (FOMU), Single Family (SF), and Highway Mixed Use (HMU).
Mayor Ferrara opened the public hearing, and when no one came forward, he closed the public
hearing.
Following comments in support of the proposed ordinance, Mayor Pro Tem Costeilo moved to
introduce an ordinance as follows, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF A�tROYO GRANDE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP TO REZONE CERTAIN
PROPERTIES FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN (DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT 04-006)". Council Member Arnold seconded the motion, and on the following roll-
call vote:
AYES: Costello, Arnold, Guthrie, Dickens, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
9.a. Continued Public Hearing: Constderation of Amended Conditlonal Use Permit Case
No. 04-001 to Allow a Financial institution to Occupy Building J of the Five Clties
Shopping Center; 911 Rancho Parkway; Welis Fargo Bank.
Associate Planner Heffernon presented the staff report and recommended the Councii adopt a
Resolution approving Amended Conditional Use Pertriit 04-001 subject to condiUons of approval.
Marty Inouye, representing Omni-Means, gave an overview of the traffic study including traffic
counts taken at AM peak hour, mid-day peak Mour, and PM peak hour; traffic count locations,
and recommended mitigation for roadway improvements.
Director of Public Works Spagnolo presented additional traffic mitigation alternatives for the
CounciPs review.
Council Member Arnold proposed several additional traffic mitigation altematives which would
involve a "right tum in" and "right turn ouY'from the driveway on the Trader Joe's (Phase 2) side;
adding a right tum only lane on Rancho Parkway going into Phase 1 and widening the driveway
entrance to accommodate additional turning lanes; and the potential addition of a driveway =
entering the rear of the center from Camino Mercado.
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 8, 2005
PAGE 5
Council and staff discussion ensued regarding the original traffic study for the Five Cities Center
and acknowledgment of the City's policy changes with regard to the use of spec'rfic traffic study
data.
Mayor Ferrara opened the public hearing.
Carol Florence, Principal Planner with Oasis Associates and representative for the applicant,
acknowledged the existing deficiencies with regard to traffic. She commented that the applicant
is committed to constructing the appropriate improvements and is willing to anelyze the proposed
alternatives presented this evening and come back at a future meeting with the most appropriate
alternative.
Nathan Alvarado, Branch Manager for A.G. Edwards (Building L in Phase 2), suggested that
ingress from Rancho Parkway into Phase 2 of the Five Cities Center be a one-way configuration
so that traffic exits out of the northern driveway. He also expressed concems about early
moming truck deliveries to Trader Joe's. -
Upon hearing no further public comments, Mayor Ferrara closed the public hearing.
Council Member Dickens said that it was important to apply appropriate mitigation to this
particular application for the bank to address the cumulative effects on Phase 2 as it interacts
with Phase 1. He stated he was unable to move forward with the altemative proposed in the
staff report and favored a continuance for the opportunity to review and study the other proposed
alternatives presented this evening.
Council Member Guthrie commented there was the consideration of the difference between a
retail use and a financial use. He,felt the financiai use generates more trips than the retail use
and some consideration should also be given to the sales tax loss issue. He acknowledged
short and long-term traffic generation issues on all of the intersections in the area and
commented that he did not think this part of the development of Phase 2 should be responsible
for all of those intersections. He said for the short term, he concurred that the proposed
mitigation would not have been functional and expressed concerns about whether there is a
mitigation that is functional that will make cross traffic possible between Phase 1 and Phase 2.
He stated that the suggestion for one way in and one way out of Phase 2 could work. He stated
he could not support approving the change in use at this time without a solution for traffic
problems. He supported continuing the item for further study.
Council Member Arnold stated it was important to solve the traffic issue before moving forward.
He did not support any of the proposed alternatives as functional, with the exception of the
alternative he had proposed, and possibly the placement of a stop sign near the northern Phase
2 exit or at Via Vaquero. He concluded by stating that he did not feei comfortable evaluating a
project for this building or for Pad I until the traffic issue is solved first. He supported
continuance of the item. .
Mayor Pro Tem Costello stated he could not support the proposed aiternative or any mitigation
that impedes traffic from Phase 1 to Phase 2. He commented that one of the issues that was
brought up in terms of bringing in Welis Fargo was that it would service the entire Center. He
stated there needed to be a smooth transition for circulation between Phases 1 and II. He
commented on some of the altematives presented and stressed the need for a solution to
address short and long term traffic issues. He supported continuing the item for further study.
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY S, 2005
PAGE 6
Mayor Ferrara supported a 30-day continuance to review additional alternatives. He recalled
that when the traffic study was first done, it was determined that a signal or.stop sign would not
be appropriate because of its proximity to the W. Branch Street intersection. He referred to the �
suggestion for a stop sign at the upper driveway on Rancho Parkway and commented that the
line of sight issue on Rancho Parkway is crucial and Rancho Parkway continues to be a very
busy collector street. He did not support closing off access or instatling a raised median from
Phase 1 to 2, nor did he support channeling traffic back through the shopping center as an
option. He supported a portion of Council Member Arnold's recommendation that he would like
to look at further is another access at the back of the Center; however, he stated that this would
have to include feedback from the surrounding neighborhood. He referred to Camino Mercado
and expressed concern about a circulation fix that would impose any more traffic on Camino
Mercado. He also commented about being careful about the traffic fiow between the driveways in
Phase 2 and the potential for backing up of traffic if restricting ingress and egress to one-way.
He suggested re-examining the potential for continued reduction of intensity of use in Phase 2 by
looking at existing vacant areas in Phase 1. As far as the proposed financial use, he commented
that although the building has been vacant for a while, retail sales tax generation was a condition
of approvai for the Center, and is also reinforced by the City's General Plan Economic Element.
Council Member Guthrie commented that a soiution that includes making use of the main
entrance on W. Branch Street into the Five Cities Center should be encouraged.
Mayor Pro Tem Costello moved to continue the item to the regular City Council meeting of March
8, 2005. Council Member Arnold seconded the motion, and on the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Costello, Arnold, Guthrie, Dickens, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
Mayor Ferrara called a break at 9:05 p.m. The Council reconvened at 9:17 p.m.
10. CONTINUED BUSINESS
None.
11. NEW BUSINESS
11.a. Consideratlon of Pre-Application Case No. 04-017: Revision to Pad "I" in the Five
Cities Center; 811 Rancho Parkway.
Assistant Planner Foster presented the staff report and recommended the Council review and
comment on the proposed project. Staff responded to questions from Council concerning
accommodations tor truck deliveries, proposed public access at the rear of the buildings; intent ,
for monument signs and signage on the rear of the buildings as it reiates to the Planned Sign
Program; and clarification regarding the design of the tower element.
Paul Poirier, project architect, gave an overview of the proposed site plan, reviewed site ;
circulation for traffic and pedestrians, and presented elevation and Iandscape designs. Mr.
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 8, 2005
PAGE 7
Poirier responded to questions from Council concerning the proposed layout of the buildings and
issues related to truck circulation and delivery.
Mayor Ferrara invited public comments on this item, and when no one came forward, he closed
the public comment period.
Council Member Dickens commented that the issue of traffic and circulation, as previously
discussed, must be dealt with, especially as the potential use in Phase 2 is increased. He =
suggested reducing the square footage of the buildings as much as possible. As far as truck
loading, he encouraged obtaining input from the surrounding residents, and favored the Mayor's
idea for creating an area between the buildings that would still allow for access around the back
of the buildings. Me did not feel the amount of parking provided behind the building would be
utiiized effectively. He did not feel there was a need for more signs and did not favor placing a
monument sign at W. Branch Street. He suggested utilizing and expanding the existing
monument sign at the entrance to Phase 2; and commented that the proposed sign on the tower
facing the freeway is appropriate. He commented that the architectural detail is consistent with
the area and he appreciated the architecYs design element to deter swallows and other birds
from nesting there and suggested providing more trees to mitigate that particular impact. He
emphasized that the major issues regarding traffic and circulation would need to be addressed
before moving fonvard.
Council Member Guthrie referred to the parking in the back of the building and stated that
historically it is underutilized. He expressed concerns about truck access and suggested leaving
the proposed PETCO building as it is and moving the multi-tenant retail building back into the
corner and eliminating the second truck access completely. As far as signage, he supported the
proposed signage on the tower element and stated there would be a need for additional signage
at the front of the property to identify other tenants.
Council Member Arnold stated the timing of this project is not good, as the traffic issue needs to
be resolved first. He stated that two buildings as proposed is appropriate; however, he would
like to see the project built in phases. He expressed concern that the Center will be under
parked and that the parking in the back would not be used. He suggested angling the buildings in
such a way that there is more frontage; and adding tree screening on the backside of the
property. He opposed to the freeway sign and expressed concern about the angle of the tower
element as far as its visibility from the surrounding neighborhood. He said two major anchors for
Phase 2 have major traffic impacts and would not approve a project until traffic impacts are
mitigated.
Mayor Pro Tem Costelio agreed that traffic impacts must be addressed first. He stated that in
terms of the design of the buildings and the parking in the rear,he felt it would be wasted space.
He supported the design of two buildings instead of one, and supported the idea for moving one
of the buildings back at an angle to allow a wider space for truck access, deliveries, and
unloading; opposed signs on the back of the building which would be visible from the freeway;
liked the way the building design incorporates measures to counteract the birds from nesting;
emphasized that circulation wouid be a significant issue to solve; opposed the placement of a
monument on the corner of W. Branch and Rancho Parkway, and favored incorporating
additional signage on the existing monument sign.
f
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 8, 2005
PAGE 8
Mayor Ferrara agreed that parking at the rear of the buildings is wasted space. He favored the
concept of breaking one larger building into two smailer buildings; favored the position of the
anchor building and suggested sliding the position of the smaller building farther back to create
more distance between the buildings to allow for a safety lane for circuiation of service trucks. He
suggested reversing the placement of small tenants with the larger tenant to maximize the use of
the truck aisle. He did not feel there was a need for a "loading dock" and suggested creating a
"loading area" located on the side instead of the rear of the building. As far as traffic impacts, he
agreed that an environmental review would be necessary prior to any approvais for Pad I, and he
emphasized the need for using actual traffic counts and current data. With regard to
architecture, he commented that it was consistent with existing architecture and he supported
design elements that would discourage nesting birds. He concluded by stating he opposed a
freeway visible sign.
Mayor Pro Tem Costello also suggested that if the buiiding could be positioned in such a way so
that the truck delivery traffic could flow in a clockwise direction and never have to back up.
Council Member Dickens also suggested to the applicant that perhaps Trader Joe's may be
interested in moving into the bigger building to give them increased space.
Upon conclusion of Council comments, Mayor Ferrara ensured that the applicant had received
sufficient feedback and direction with regard to the proposed project.
There was no formal action on this item.
11.b. Consideration of Approval for Code Enforcement Citation Program.
Director of Building and Fire Fibich introduced Interim Neighborhood Services Coordinator Jon
Ansolabehere, who presented the staff report and recommended the Council approve the
proposed Code Enforcement citation program. Staff responded to questions from Council
concerning the number of existing cases, whether there would be an increase of the City
Attorney's time on enforcement cases, and clarification that the citation authority currently exists
and that the proposed process is being established to put guidelines in place for issuing citations
for non-compliance of code enforcement cases.
Mayor Ferrara invited public comments on this item, and when no one came forward, he closed
the public comment period.
Council Member Guthrie spoke in support of the proposed citation program.
Council Member Dickens supported the program as proposed. He stated it was prudent for the
City to have a process in place that is fair and stressed the importance of eduEating the public
about compliance. He suggested that a component be included to provide feedbadc to the
reporting party as to the status of code enforcement cases.
Council Member Arnold supported the citation program and commented that the process
includes generous noticing efforts by the City to request compliance. He suggested that spec'rfic
fines/dollar amounts be incorporated in the Notice to Appear.
I
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 8, 2005
PAGE 9
Mayor Pro Tem Costello supported the citation program, which has an emphasis on voluntary
compliance. He stated that there would be a small percentage of non-compliance cases where
the citation program would be usefiul. He supported the suggestion for incorporating specific fine
amounts in the Notice to Appear.
Mayor Ferrara supported the proposed citation program. He supported including language
regarding specific fines on the Notice to Appear and also suggested that the same language be
included in the two preceding Notice to Abate letters. He commended staff for putting together
the citation program and stated that the Interdepartmentai Task Force component was a very
good aspect of the program.
Council Member Arnold moved to approve the proposed Code Enforcement citation program
with the stipulation that fine amounts and information are added to the Notice to Appear citation
form and to the Notice and Order to Abate letters. Councii Member Guthrie seconded the motion,
and on the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Arnold, Guthrie, Dickens, Costello, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
. 11.c. Consideration of Request from the City of Pismo Beach to ParNcipate in Study on
Joint Fire Services.
City Manager Adams presented the staff report and recommended the Council approve
participating in a study of joint fire services with the City of Pismo Beach, City of Grover Beach
and the Oceano Community Services District.
Mayor Ferrara invited public comments on this item, and when no one came forward, he closed
the public comment period.
Council comments included support for participating in the study to gather information regarding
potential joint fire services; however, Council members expressed a desire to ensure that the
City of Arroyo Grande's staff time and high level of service is not negatively impacted.
Council Member Dickens moved to approve participating in a study of joint fire services with the
City of Pismo Beach, City of Grover Beach and the Oceano Community Services District. Mayor
Pro Tem Costello seconded the motion, and on the foliowing roli-call vote:
AYES: Dickens, Costello, Guthrie, Amold, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES,the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
12. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS
Mayor Ferrara referred to the concems expressed earlier relating to truck deliveries to shopping
centers and requested that steff follow up on current laws and conditions of approval regarding
time restrictions on truck deliveries to shopping centers.
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 8, 2005
PAGE 10
Mayor Pro Tem Costello referred to vacancies on several of the City's commissions, committees,
and boards and encouraged citizens to apply for these opportunities. Director of Administrative
Services/City Cierk Wetmore confirmed that there were currently two vacancies on the Senior
Advisory Commission, one vacancy on the Traffic Commission, and one vacancy on the
Citizens' Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC).
13. CITY MANAGER ITEMS
None.
14. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
15. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
City Manager Adams announced that a Specia� City Council Meeting to consider the preliminary
bi-annual budget was being scheduled for Wednesday, May 18, 2005 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council
Chambers. He also reported that staff had tentatively scheduled April 181 as the date to meet
with Assembly Member Blakeslee.
16. COMMUNITY COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS
8teve Ross, Arroyo Grande, referred to traffic going through the Village and the potential
hazards for pedestrian crossing and inquired about the status for obtaining lighted crosswalks.
City Manager Adams gave an update on the status of the grant fund application for this project.
17. ADJOURNMENT
Council Member Dickens moved, Council Member Arnold seconded, and the motion passed
unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 10:59 p.m. in memory of Mike Titus.
Tony Ferrara, Mayor/Chair
ATTEST:
Kelly Wetmore, City CIerWAgency Secretery
(Approved at CC Mtg_�
I
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22,2005
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 215 EAST BRANCH STREET
ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor/Chair Ferrara called the Regular City Council/Redevelopment Agency meeting to order at
7:00 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
City CounciVRDA: Council/Board Members Dickens, Guthrie, Arnold, Mayor Pro TemNice
Chair Costello and Mayor/Chair Ferrara were present.
City Staff Present: City Manager Adams, City Attorney Carmel, Director of Administrative
Services/City Clerk Wetmore, Chief of Police TerBorch, Director of
Financial Services Pillow, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Spagnolo, Associate Planner Heffernon, Assistant Planner Foster, and
Planning Intern Andrew Bursan.
3. FLAG SALUTE
Members of Boy Scout Troop 26 led the Flag $alute.
4. INVOCATION
Jean Bowser, Bahai Faith, delivered the invocation.
5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
5.a. Mayor's Commendation RecogNzing Larry Schmidt for Outstanding Service and
Contributions to the City of Arroyo Grande Organization and Community as
Buildtng Official with the City of Arroyo Grande
Mayor Ferrara presented a Mayor's Commendation to Larry Schmidt for his outstanding service
and contributions to the City of Arroyo Grande as Building Official with the City of Arroyo Grande.
6. AGENDA REVIEW
6.a. ResoluUons and Ordinances Read in Title Only
Council Member Arnold moved, Council Member Dickens seconded, and the motion passed
unanimously that all resolutions and ordinances presented at the meeting shall be read in title
only and all further reading be waived.
7. CITIZENS' INPUT. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS
Jerrv Bunin, Government Affairs Direc[or, Home Builders Association of the Central Coast, �
submitted a letter for the record (on file in the Administrative Services Department) requesting
extra not'rfication beyond what is required by State law to review any documentation concerning
proposed increases to the City's development impact fees.
Garv Andreini, Cafe Andreini, said that word is out that a large well-known coffee retailer was
interested in opening a coffee business ln the Village Center. He requested to be notffied of any
hearings regarding a request for establishment of a new coffee business in the Village.
,
f
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 22, 2005
PAGE 2
8. CONSENT AGENDA
Director of Public Works Spagnolo responded to questions from Mayor Ferrara and Council
Member Dickens regarding Item 8.c. relating to acceptance of easements for Tract 2207, Vista
Del Mar.
Council Member Guthrie moved, and Council Member Dickens seconded the motion to approve
Consent Agenda Items 8.a. through 8.f., with the recommended courses of action. City Attorney
Carmel read the title of the Ordinance in Item 8.d. The motion carried on the following roll-call
vote:
AYES: Guthrie, Dickens, Arnold, Costello, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
8.a. Cash Disbursement Ratification.
Action: Ratified the listings of cash disbursements for the period February 1, 2005 —
February 15, 2005.
8.b. Consideration of Statement of Investment Deposits.
Action: Received and filed the report of current investment deposits as of January 31,
2005.
8.a Consideration of Acceptance of Easements, Right of Way and Public
Improvements for Tract 2207—Vista Del Mar—JH Land Partnership.
Action: 1) Accepted the public improvements, as constructed, that were conditioned for
Tract 2207; 2) Adopted Resolution No. 3812, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City
of Arroyo Grande Accepting Certain Easements, Rights of Way and Related
Improvements within Tract 220T'; 3) Adopted Resolution No. 3813, "A Resolution of the
City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande Accepting Certain Easements, Rights of Way
and Related Improvements Off-site of Tract 2207"; 4) Continue to reject, without
prejudice as to future acceptance, the offer of dedication for road purposes over Lot No.
40; and 4) Accepted the 10% warranty security in the amount of$350,320.40.
S.d. ConsideraUon of Adoption of an Ordinance Amending the Zoninp Map to Rezone
Certain Properties for Consistency with, the General Plan (Development Code
Amendment 04-006). �
Action: Adopted Ordinance No. 564, "An Ordinance of the Ciry Council of the City of €
Arroyo Grande Amending the Zoning Map to Rezone Certain Properties for Consistency
with the General Plan (Development Code Amendment 04-006)".
S.e. ConsideraUon of Adoption of a Resolution Approving a One-Year Time Extension
for Conditional Use Permit 89-013 and Variance 01-001; Camino Mercado and West
Branch Street; Applied for by Stephen CooL
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 3814, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Arroyo Grande Approving a One-Year Time EMension for Conditional Use Permit 99-013
and Variance 01-001; Camino Mercado and West Branch Street; Applied for by Stephen
CooP'.
8.f. Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Approving a One-Year Time Extension
for Amended Conditional Use Permit 03-004; 1220 Farroll Avenue; Applied for by
Coastal Christlan $chool.
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 3815, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Arroyo Grande Approving a One-Year Time EMension for Amended Conditional Use
Permit 03-004; 1220 Farroll Avenue; Applied for by Coastel Christian School". !
I
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 22, 2005
PAGE 3
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
9.a. Consideratlon of Appeal of Planning Commission Interpretatlon that Auto Parts
Sales Without Installation Services is not an Allowed Use ln the Gateway Mixed-
Use(GMU)Zoning District.
Assistant Planner Foster presented the staff report and recommended the Council adopt a
Resolution denying the appeal and upholding the Planning Commission's interpretation that auto
parts sales without installation services is not an allowed use in the Gateway Mixed-Use (GMU)
zoning district.
Mayor Ferrara opened the public hearing.
Johan Scharin, appellant, commented that since purchasing the property approximately two
years ago, he has been able to fill most of the vacant spaces; however, it has been difficuit to fill
the remaining spaces. He stated the building in question has been vacant for five years and
there have been extensive marketing efforts to find a tenanf. He commented that as a site for an
auto parts retailer, this site sits about 200-300 feet back from Grand Avenue and is an in-line
shopping center space, therefore he felt the use was appropriate. He referred to previous
discussions and concerns expressed about customers changing oil in the parking lot and
commented that other retailers in the center sell motor oil and felt that should not be a factor to
deny the use. He also commented on the time and money spent to look for an appropriate way
to fill in the retention basin without success; however, they are still willing to work with staff on
this issue to improve the site. He stated that due to the problems with the location and layout of
the center, it was difficult to attract tenants, and tax revenues and rent was being lost. He
commented that constructing another building in the location of the retention basin with the
existing building still vacant would become a burden. He requested the Council consider an auto
parts sales retailer without installation as an acceptable use.
Upon hearing no further public comments, Mayor Ferrara closed the public hearing.
Mayor Ferrara referred back to an earlier appiication through which AutoZone wanted to locate
across the street. He recalled that when the Council denied that request, there was a focus on
the issue of service uses adjacent to a retail outiet. He stated that he thought the language
regarding allowable uses along the Gateway segment of Grand Avenue had been updated, and
that auto parts Stores would not be allowed in the Gateway section of the City. He said that in
iooking at other auto parts stores, working on vehicles after purchasing parts is common
behavior and if it was prohibited, it would be difficult to regulate. He commented that within a
linear mile, there is a line of auto parts stores along Grand Avenue and adding another store in
the middle would not generate additional sales tax, but would divert sales from other stores. He t
emphasized the intent for the Gateway segment was to create an environment that welcomes
pedestrian traffic. He acknowledged the appellanYs difficulty in attracting tenants; however, he
referred to a recent demographic and marketing study undertaken by the City and said he would
endorse an aggressive campaign to use the study results to assist in attracting more desirable
tenants to this Center. He supported the Planning Commission's interpretation that auto parts
sales without installation services is not an aliowed use in the Gateway Mixed-Use (GMU)
Zoning District.
�
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 22, 2005
PAGE 4
Council Member Arnold acknowledged the appellanYs difficulties in securing a tenant for this
vacancy; however, he had looked at the center and the specific location and the City's desire to
upgrade this area. He said that allowing an auto parts store into this Center would not achieve
that goal and supported the Planning Commission's interpretation and decision.
Council Member Dickens asked for a status update on the Buxton Company retail study which
was referred to earlier and when the Council would receive the results of the study. City
Manager Adams responded that the study had been completed, a draft list had been prepared,
and staff had engaged in ongoing discussions with the appellant to provide retail contacts from
that list. He stated that staff had received a final list and The Buxton Company is preparing final
information packets to send out to retailers with letters. Additionally, staff was working
independently with prospective retailers to direct them to this center.
In response to concerns expressed by Council Member Dickens conceming economic impacts,
City Manager Adams stated he would have to analyze the City's Economic Development
Strategy to determine potential economic impacts. Council Member Dickens stated that he had
been opposed to approving an auto parts store when it was proposed across the street in a new
development facing Grand Avenue. He acknowledged that this situation was different, with a
vacancy within an existing shopping center set back from Grand Avenue, and that there may be
an obligation to move forward. He said he could not support the Planning Commission's
interpretation and would uphoid the appellanYs appeal.
Council Member Guthrie commented that when this issue was discussed at the Planning
Commission level, the concerns expressed were related to the installation component. He stated
he looked at auto parts sales as any other retail activity; however, he did not see this use as
appropriate on the street frontage where the City was trying to develop a specific pedestrian
oriented streetscape. He commented on mixed use zoning where pedestrian orientation is
encouraged; however, it also encourages providing certain services adjacent to residential uses.
He supported locating an auto parts store in this area of the City as long as it wasn't located
directly on the street frontage.
Mayor Pro Tem Costello clarffied that the issue was whether auto parts sales wkhout instailation
services is or is not an allowed use in the Gateway Mixed Use District. He stated that at the
specific location proposed, it was not in the direct line of sight, was not intrusive, end may be a
good location for the proposed use. However, he stated if this use was allowed at this location, it
would aliowed in other Gateway Mixed Use areas which was not desired. He supported the
Pianning Commission's interpretation that auto parts stores without installation is not an ailowed
use in the Gateway District; however, he would support making it an allowed use subject to a
Conditional Use Permit. He aiso asked staff 'rf there were any mechanisms that could be utilized
to enforce the prohibition of installation activities. City Manager Adams responded that the
Council could adopt an Ordinance prohibiting repair and maintenance of vehicles in commercial
parking lots, which could then be enforced by the Police Department.
In response to a question by Council Member Guthrie, steff clarified that there was also a "PED"
zoning designation in the Development Code, which does not permit certain uses in pedestrian
orie�ted storefront locations on ground floors facing E. Grand Avenue.
Mayor Pro Tem Costello moved to i) Adopt a Resolution Denying Appeal 05-002 and Upholding �
the Planning Commission's Interpretation that Auto Parts Sales Wkhout Installetion Services is
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 22, 2U05
PAGE 5
not an Allowed Use in the Gateway Mixed-Use (GMU) Zoning District; 2) To direct staff to return
to Council with a Development Code Amendment that allows auto parts sales without installation
as an allowable use in the Gateway and Fair Oaks Mixed Use Districts subject to a Minor Use
Permit (MUP/PED), but not within 200 feet of E. Grand Avenue; and 3) To direct staff to return to
Council with an Ordinance prohibiting repair and maintenance of vehicles in commercial parking
lots within the City. Council Member Guthrie asked for clar'rfication that Mayor Pro Tem Costello
meant Minor Use Permit instead of Conditional Use Permit. Mayor Pro Tem Costello said he did
say Minor Use Permit, as that was the designation for other pedestrian oriented uses. Council
Member Guthrie seconded the motion, and following further discussion and ciar'rfications, the
motion passed on the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Costello, Guthrie, Dickens, Arnold
NOES: Ferrara
ABSENT: None
9.b. Consideration of Establishing a Historic Resources Commfttee and a Hlstoric
Designation Process for the City of Arroyo Grande.
Community Development Director Strong presented the staff report and recommended the
Council consider the recommendations of the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) and the
Planning Commission regarding formation of a Historic Resources Committee (HRC) and
establishing a process for local historic designation of eligible resources in the City of Arroyo
Grande. Director Strong responded to questions from Council conceming State versus local
historic designations; clarification regarding the appointment process for the HRC; and
clarification concerning proposed tax relief incentives.
Mayor Ferrara opened the public hearing.
The following members of the public spoke in support of the formation of a Historic Resources
Committee and the establishment of a process for designating local historic resources:
Chuck Fellows, Arroyo Grande resident, ARC member for four years, current Planning
Commissioner, and Chairman of Preserve the Village.
Jan Scott, Arroyo Grande resident and Curator of the South County Historical Society.
Gordon Bennett, Arroyo Grande resident.
Susan Flores, Arroyo Grande resident
Upon hearing no further pubiic comments, Mayor Ferrara closed the public hearing.
Council comments included support for creating a Historic Resources Committee (HRC) with
defined roles and responsibilities; acknowledgement that there are many qualified people in the
community available to serve on the HRC; support for the development of criteria for designation
of local historic resources; support for creating financial incentives for historic restoration; a
suggestion that the HRC be expanded and not limited to five (5) people; another suggestion that
the HRC should have structure as a core group with the ability to create an ad-hoc element; and
a suggestion for an amendment in the policy language as follows: "Owners of resources
recommended or nominated by the HRC for inclusion on a local historic register sheuld must be
not'rfied°.
r
i
i
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 22, 2005
PAGE 6
Mayor Pro Tem Costello moved to direct staff to develop the appropriate documents for
consideration by the Council at a future meeting for the establishment of a Historic Resources
Committee (HRC) and the establishment of a historic resource designation process including the
development of criteria for locai designation of historic resources; establishment of a review
process for designating historic resources for listing on a local register; the expansion and
update of the 1991 Historic Resource Survey; and the creation of incentives for historic
preservation, restoration and reuse. Council Member Arnold seconded the motion, and on the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Dickens, Guthrie, Costeilo,Arnold, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
Mayor Ferrara called a break at 8:47 p.m. The Council reconvened at 8:57 p.m.
9.c. Consideration of General Plan Amendment Case No. 04-003 - Housing Element
Amendment.
Associate Planner Heffernon presented the staff report and recommended the Council adopt a
Resolution approving General Plan Amendment 04-003. Staff responded to questions from
Council concerning SB 1818, which made significant changes to the State's density bonus law,
effective January 1, 2005.
Mayor Ferrara suggested that staff check with the League of Calffornia Cities Housing Task
Force regarding the status of SB 1818. He referred to the most recent general government report
from the Legislative AnalysYs office, which declared the original housing legislation to be an
unfunded State mandate, and recommended it be eliminated or changed. He-stated he saw
similar characteristics with regard to an unfunded State mandate in SB 181 S.
Mayor Ferrara opened the public hearing.
Jerrv Rioux, representing the Housing Trust Fund, encouraged adoption of the Housing Element
Amendments in order to have a certified Housing Element which will allow the City to qualify for
certain State housing program funds and also to protect the City from potential lawsufts for not
having an adequate General Plan.
Jerrv Bunin, representing Home Builders Association, stated that although he agreed that SB
1818 is complicated, he has had extensive discussions with the State Depertment of Housing
and Community Development (HCD) and gave an overview of his understanding of their
interpretations of SB 1818. He suggested coming back with altemative inclusionary housing
requirements that has a different incentive that appeals to builders.
Jane Sedek, stated she is purchasing property at 1136 E. Grand Avenue. She referred to SB
1818 which raises many questions about inclusionary housing requirements and results in more
restrictive requirements for developers. She requested the Council take more time to review SB
1818 before approving the Housing Element.
Pam Dennev, attorney representing S8S Homes, referred to Jasmine Piace, which includes
seventeen (17) affordable housing units, of which only four(4) units have been sold to date. She
�
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 22, 2005
PAGE 7
spoke about how difficult it is to qualify for these units and that the affordability restrictions are
onerous.
Bill Sedek, 1136 E. Grand Avenue, said he was a small developer trying to build quality units.
He expressed concerns about the changes in the affordable housing requirements.
Upon hearing no further public comments, Mayor Ferrara closed the public hearing.
Council Members Guthrie, Dickens, Arnold, and Mayor Pro Tem Costello supported the Housing
Element Amendments as proposed; and acknowledged that there were unknowns with regard to
SB 1818; however, the City's goal is to adopt a Housing Element to be in compliance with State
law.
Mayor Ferrara requested the Council consider postponing the approval of this item for a short
time in order to conduct further research on the potential impacts of SB 1818 and noted that the
League of California Cities is in the process of drafting substitute housing legislation and looking
for a sponsor for the bill. He stated that he would like to defer this item until staff could receive
clarification on the League's position concerning SB 1818.
Council Member Arnold moved to continue this item to the next regular City Council meeting of
March 8, 2005. Council Member Guthrie seconded the motion, and on the following roll-call
vote:
AYES: Arnold, Guthrie, Dickens, Costello, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed. $
10. CONTINUED BUSINESS
None.
� E
11. NEW BUSINESS f
11.a. ConsideraUon of a Resolution Establishing Speed Limits on Huasna Road. �
;
Director of Public Works Spagnoio presented the staff report and recommended the Council i
adopt a Resolution establishing the posted speed limits at 40 mph on Huasna Road from
Highway 227 to Stagecoach Road and 45 mph on Huasna Road from Stagecoach Road to the '
easterly City limit. Director Spagnolo and Police Chief TerBorch responded to questions from i
CounciL
i
Mayor Ferrara invited public comments on this item. I
Dean Clark, Arroyo Grande, asked questions about the results of the speed survey, expressed �
concerns about raising the speed limit, and commented that the City should stick with the 40
mph speed limit and enforce it.
Pattv Walsh, Arroyo Grande, spoke about public safety issues and stated that the speed limits �
should be enforced as posted. ,
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTE3
FEBRUARY 22, 2005
PAGE 8
Brian Tallv, emphasized the public safety issues and stated he would like to see lighted
crosswalks on Huasna Road.
Hearing no further public comments, Mayor Ferrara closed the public comment period.
Council comments included support for adjusting the speed limits so that they can be effectively
enforced; suggested finding ways to encourage reduction of speed on Huasna Road, such as
installing lighted crosswalks, additional botts dots, and increased speed limit and enforcement
signage. There was a�so a suggestion to direct staff, as well as the citizens, to send a letter to
the Court's Traffic Commissioner explaining the unique road conditions as related to public
safety.
Council Member Arnold moved to adopt a Resolution as follows: °A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY GOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS ON
HUASNA ROAD", and directed staff to study the potential for additional traffic calming devices
near Strother Park including, but not Iimited to a lighted crosswalk, addftional botts dots,
increased signage, and drafting a letter to the Court's Traffic Commissioner relaying the
concerns of the neighborhood. Council Member Dickens seconded the motion, and on the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Amold, Dickens, Guthrie, Costello, Ferrara �
NOES: None i
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed, �
11.b. Consideration of Fiscal Year 2004-05 Mtd-Year Budget Status Report. �
[COUNCIURDA] �
Director of Financiai Services Pillow presented the staff report and recommended the f
CounciVRDA Board of Directors: 1)Approve detailed budget adjustments and recommendations; �
2) Approve (Deny) requests for additional appropriations in the General Fund as detailed; and 3) �
Approve Schedules A through E included in the Mid-Year Budget Status Report. I
MayodChair Ferrara invited public comments on this item. No public comments were received. �
i
Following Council/Board comments, Mayor Pro TemNice Chair Costello moved to 1) Approve `
detaifed budget adjustments and recommendations; 2) Approve requests for additional �
appropriations in the General Fund as detailed; and 3) Approve Schedules A through E inciuded G
in the Mid-Year Budget Status Report. CounciVBoard Member Dickens seconded the motion, �
and on the following roll call vote:
i
i
AYES: Costello, Dickens, Guthrie, Arnold, Ferrara p
NOES: None 4
ABSENT: None `
i
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed. ;
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 22, 2005
PAGE 9
12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
a. MAYOR TONY M. FERRARA:
(1) San Luis Obispo Councii of Governments/San Luis Obispo Reylonal Transit
Authority (SLOCOG/SLORTA). Reported on impacts to transportation and
transit funding for San Luis Obispo County, which include the Brisco/HalcyoN101
Intersection and the EI Campo/101 Intersection project. Processing of these
projects has ceased until funding is restored, possibly in 2008 or beyond.
(2) South San Luis Obispo County Sanitatfon District (SSLOCSD). Discussed
administrative and maintenance issues; reported that there is an upcoming
meeting relating to the status of the Sanitation District in the Zone 1/1A
assessments for Arroyo Graniie Creek flood control area. •
(3) Other. 1) Attended Mayor's meeting in Morro Bay where Assembly Member
Blakeslee presented information on legislation he is going to sponsor. 2) Attended
League of California Cities Channel Counties meeting. Will distribute information
shared at that meeting relating to upcoming meetings and events.
b. MAYOR PRO TEM JOE COSTELLO:
(1) Zone 3 Water Advisory Board. No report. Next meeting is Marchr�l7�'"�. 9oals for
(2) County Water Resources Advisory Committee (WRAC). App
upcoming year.
� (3) Air Pollution Control District(APCD). No repot. Next meeting is March 23rd.
i (4) Other. Attended Fire Department Oversight Committee; cooperative efforts with
j the City of Grover Beach continue to go well; training is continuing to improve,
with participation from Oceano Community Services District Fire Department.
� Discussed Ciry of Pismo Beach request for joint study to examine cooperative
! efforts with that City.
i
i c. COUNCIL MEMBER JIM DICKENS:
j (1) South County Area Transit (SCA�. Reviewed budget assumptions; reviewed
! item presented by City of Grover Beach for transportation improvements relating
to their Ramona Gardens Community and Cukural Specific Plan. Reported that
SCAT will now be conducting their meetings on a quarterly basis.
(2) South County Youth Coalition. Presentation received on the First Five Funding
Program for Pre-School in Oceana
(3) Other. None.
d. COUNCIL MEMBER JIM GUTHRIE:
(1) Economic Vitality Corporation (EVC). No report. Next meeting is February 23"'.
(2) Other. None.
e. COUNCIL MEMBER ED ARNOLD:
' (1) Integrated Waste Management Authority Board (IWMA). No report.
' (2) California Joint Powers insurance Authority(CJPIA). No report.
(3) Other. None.
' 13 CiTY COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS:
None.
g
I
I
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 22, 2005
PAGE 10
14. CITY MANAGER ITEMS•
None.
15. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS• �
Mayor Ferrara reported that he attended the Zone 1/1A meeting today to discuss the DWR Work
Plan on the Arroyo Grande Creek.
16. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS•
City Manager Adams announced that a groundbreaking ceremony for the Rotary Bandstand
project would be held Wednesday, February 23rtl at noon; and a dedication ceremony would be
held at the Arroyo Grande Police DepartmenYs Community Resource Center at 2:00 p.m. He
also announced that a date and time had been confirmed for April 1, 2005 at 3:00 p.m. to meet
with Assembly Member Blakeslee.
17. COMMUNITY COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS:
None.
18. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor/Chair Ferrara adjourned the meeting at 11:10 p.m.
Tony Ferrara, MayoNChair
ATTEST:
Kelly Wetmore, City CIerWAgency Secretary
(Approved at CC Mtg_�
�
�
R
F
I
t
i
1
�
8��� �
�
pitROy�
o`� �,� MEMORANDUM
� INCORPORATE TZ � �
t1 T
# Ju�r m. n�1 *
c���FORN�P
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROB STRONG, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECT�S
BY; AARON BROWNWOOD, PLANNING INTERN
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORI2AT�ON TO USE CITY PROPERTY AND
CLOSE CITY STREETS FOR THE ANNUAL ARROYO QRANDE
STRAWBERRY FESTIVAL ON MAY 28-29, 2005; TEMPORARY USE
PERMIT NO. 05-004
DATE: MARCH 8, 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council consider the request from the Arroyo Grande
Village Improvement Association and adopt a Resolution authorizing the use of City
property and closure of City streets for the Annual Arroyo Grande Strawberry
Festival on May 28-29, 2005 (Attachment 1►.
FUNDING:
There is no direct funding impact as a result of this event. Event organizers are
required to reimburse the City for the costs of police, fire, public works and other
City services used to conduct this event.
DISCUSSION: I
The Arroyo Grande Village Improvement Association has requested the following
items for the Annual Arroyo Gra�nde Strawberry Festival on May 28-29, 2005:
1 . The closure of Branch Street from Traffic Way to Mason Street from 6:00
am to 6:00 pm on Saturday, May 28, 2005 and Sunday, May 29, 2005.
(This will iequiie the Police Department to apply to CalTisns for street
c%sure authorization).
2. The closure of Short Street from Branch Street to Olohan Alley from 6:00
pm Friday, May 27, 2005 to 6:00 pm Sunday, May 29, 2005.
3. The closure of Bridge Street from Branch Street to the driveway at
McLintock's parking lot from 6:00 am Saturday, May 28, 2005 to 6:00
pm Sunday, May 29, 2005.
i
i
CITY COUNCIL
STRAWBERRY FESTIVAL
MARCH 8, 2005
PAGE 2 �
4. The closure of Bridge Street from McLintock's driveway to Nelson Street
from 6:00 am to 6:00 pm, Saturday, May 28, 2005 and Sunday, May
29, 2005.
5. The closure of Bridge Street from Nelson Street to Tratfic Way from 6:00
am Saturday, May 28, 2005 to 6:00 pm Sunday, May 29, 2005.
6. The closure of Nelson Street from Mason Street to Traffic Way from 6:00
am to 6:00 pm on Saturday, May 28, 2005 and Sunday, May 29, 2005.
7. The use of the parking lots along Olohan Alley from Mason Street to
Bridge Street from 6:00 pm Friday, May 27, 2005 to 6:00 pm Sunday,
May 29, 2005.
8, The use of the Car Corral from 10:00 pm Friday, May 27, 2005 to 6:00
pm Sunday, May 29, 2005.
9. The use of the parking area from the Car Corral to and including the
Brisco parking lot from 6:00 am Saturday, May 28, 2005 to 6:00 pm
Sunday, May 29, 2005.
10. The use of the lawn on Nelson Street between Mason and Short Streets
from 6:00 pm Friday, May 27, 2005 to 6:00 pm Sunday, May 29, 2005.
11 . The use of Hart-Collett Park between Bridge Street and Traffic Way from
6:00 am Saturday, May 28, 2005 to 6:00 pm Sunday, May 29, 2005.
12. The use of the five-acre lot next to the Arroyo Grande Woman's Club on
� West Branch Street for shuttle bus parking on Saturday, May 28, 2005
and Sunday, May 29, 2005.
Upon City Council authorization to use City property, the Community Development
� Department will issue a Temporary Use Permit for the event. There are no proposed
changes in scale or use from the 2004 event.
�
j ALTERNATIVES:
� The following alternatives are provided for the Council's c onsideration:
� - Adopt the attached resolution;
Modify as appropriate and adopt the attached resolution;
i - Do not adopt the attached resolution;
; - Provide direction to staff.
i
� Attachments:
Letter from the Arroyo Grande Village Improvement Association, dated
December 10, 2004.
�
't
!
1
1
1 �
�
RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
AUTHORIZING THE CLOSURE OF CITY STREETS AND USE OF CITY
PROPERTY FOR THE ANNUAL STRAWBERRY FESTIVAL, MAY 28-29, 2005
WHEREAS, the Arroyo Grande Village Improvement Association (AGVIA), organizers of the
Strawberry Festival, have requested closure of certain City streets and the use of City
property as outlined below, for the purpose of craft exhibits, displays, food booths and
entertainment, and similar activities; and
WHEREAS, members of the AGVIA will be responsible for traffic control, cleanup, and
payment of all related fees and costs for use of City property and City employee time
related to the event.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande as
follows:
1 . That the Arroyo Grande Village Improvement Association is hereby granted the use of
certain City streets and property as follows:
Strawberry Festival — Saturday & Sunday, May 28 & 29, 2005
A. "No Parking/Tow Away Zone" in the following areas in the City of Arroyo Grande
for the period of 6:00 am to 6:00 pm, Saturday, May 28 and Sunday, May 29,
2005: both sides of Branch Street (Highway 227) from Traffic Way to Mason
Street; Bridge Street from Branch Street to Traffic Way; Nelson Street from
Traffic Way to Mason Street; Mason Street from Poole Street to Le Point Street;
and Poole Street from Traffic Way to Mason Street.
B. "No Parking/Tow Away Zone" for fire/emergency access in the following areas in
the City of Arroyo Grande for the period of 6:00 am to 6:00 pm, Saturday, May
28 and Sunday, May 29, 2005: both sides of Nevada Street from Branch Street
to Le Point Street; Le Point Street from Nevada Street easterly through the Tally
Ho curve; Crown Terrace from Crown Hill Road to Le Point Street; and East
Branch Street from Garden Street to Huasna Road.
C. The closure of Branch Street from Traffic Way to Mason Street from 6:00 am to
6:00 pm on Saturday, May 28 and Sunday, May 29, 2005. (This wi/l require the
Police Department to apply to CalTrans fo�street c%sure authorization).
D. The closure of Short Street from Branch Street to Olohan Alley from 6:00 pm
Friday, May 27, 2005 to 6:00 pm Sunday, May 29, 2005.
R�SOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
E. The closure of Bridge Street from Branch Street to the driveway at McLintock's
parking lot from 6:00 am Saturday, May 28; 2005 to 6:00 pm Sunday, May 29,
2005.
F. The closure of Bridge Street from McLintock's driveway to Nelson Street from
6:00 am to 6:00 pm, Saturday, May 28, 2005 and Sunday, May 29, 2005.
G. The closure of Bridge Street from Nelson Street to Traffic Way from 6:00 am
Saturday, May 28, 2005 to 6:00 pm Sunday, May 29, 2005.
H. The closure of Nelson Street from Mason Street to Traffic Way from 6:00 am to
6:00 pm on Saturday, May 28, 2005 and Sunday, May 29, 2005.
I. The use of the parking lots along Olohan Alley from Mason Street to Bridge Street
from 6:00 pm Friday, May 27, 2005 to 6:00 pm Sunday, May 29, 2005.
J. The use of the Car Corral parking lot from 10:00 pm Friday, May 27, 2005 to
6:00 pm Sunday, May 29, 2005.
K. The use of the grass area on Nelson Street between Mason and Short Streets
from 6:00 pm Friday, May 27, 2005 to 6:00 pm Sunday, May 29, 2005.
L. The use of Hart-Collett Park between Bridge Street and Traffic Way from 6:00 am
to 6:00 pm on Saturday, May 28, 2005 and Sunday, May 29, 2005.
M. The use of the five-acre lot next to the Arroyo Grande Woman's Club on West
Branch Street for shuttle bus parking on Saturday, May 28, 2005 and Sunday,
May 29, 2005.
2. That the AGVIA will adhere to all requirements and conditions of approval as set forth
in Exhibit " A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member ,
and on the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 8`" day of March, 2005.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 3
TONY FERRARA, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
�
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 4
EXHIBIT " A"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT NO. 05-004
STRAWBERRY FESTIVAL (May 28-29, 2005)
General Conditions
1 . The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all State, County and City
requirements as are applicable to this project.
2. The event shall occur in substantial conformance with the application and plans
on file in the Community Development Department office.
3. The event organizers shall comply with all the conditions of the City Council
Resolution adopted on March 8, 2005. (Reference attachment.)
4. The applicant shall agree to defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless, at
his/her/its sole expense from any action brought against the City, its agents,
officers, or employees because of said approvai, or in the alternative, to relinquish
such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents,
officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such
action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the
defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of
his/her obligations under this condition.
Parks Recreation and Facilities Deaartment Conditions
5. The event organizers shall notify the Parks and Recreation Department of the
number and placement of waste containers prior to May 23, 2005.
� 6. AGVIA is responsible for providing trash bags and restroom supplies for the
festival. Any supplies the Parks and Recreation Department may need to provide
� will need to be reimbursed by AGVIA.
7. The event organizers shall have an individual designated to periodically inspect the
restrooms and areas around the food vendors and waste containers. That
� individual shall be responsible for maintaining the cleanliness of these areas and
� gathering and disposing of ati debris.
8. The event organizers shall reimburse the City for electrical costs associated with
� special events. Specificaliy, costs for the outlets by the gazebo, Bridge St.,
� Olohan Alley, and behind City Hall shall be reimbursed.
9. The event organizers shall reimburse the City for the costs of any Parks and
Recreation City services required for this event, including, but not limited to,
restroom maintenance, trash, etc.
� 10. The event organizers shall remove any tape placed on streets and parking areas
I after the event.
1
i
:
a
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 5
Public Works Deaartment Conditions
11 . Restroom facilities, barricades, signing and detour routes shall be provided by the
applicant as required.
12. The event organizers shall place an advertisement in the Five Cities Times-Press
Recorder just prior to the event to advise residents of street closures.
13. The event organizers shall provide a 51 ,000,000.00 insurance policy naming the
City as additional insured.
14. The event organizers shall reimburse the City for the costs of Public Works
services and any other City services required for this event.
15. The event organizers shall contact the Public Works Department 72 hours prior to
the event to check on the status of street maintenance/construction activities.
The Public Works Department may require the event organizers to provide '
temporary construction (orange plastic) fencing around areas designated as
potentially hazardous.
Buildina and Fire Department Conditions
16. All food,booths (cooking) must comply with the Fire Department guidelines, and
must have County Health Department approval. AGVIA will inform booth
applicants of Fire Department guidelines, and will ensure total compliance of
booth operators. AGVIA will not allow non-compliant booths to operate.
17. The project shall comply with the most recent edition of the California State Fire
're Codes as ado ted b the
and Building Codes and the Uniform Building and Fi P Y
City of Arroyo Grande. Specifically, all temporary-wiring provisions of the N.E.C.
must be met.
18. The Building and Fire Department must inspect all food booths, generators and
temporary electrical service prior to the opening of the event. In lieu of requiring a
building permit for temporary electrical service, AGVIA will collect a fee of S 15
per every booth utilizing an electrical connection. This fee will be itemized by
� booth number and submitted to the Department of Building and Fire within 15
; days of the end of the Festival.
i 19. Emergency access must be maintained to the satisfaction of the Director of the
� Building and Fire Department. A detailed chart or map will be provided to the
� Department of Building and Fire for approval prior to the event, showing
1 placement of all booths, to include actual dimensions of access pathways for fire
Iapparatus and emergency vehicles.
i 20. Per the approval of the Fire Chief, there will be ambulance service dedicated to
� the event.
9 21 . The use of generators must be reviewed and approved by the Director of the
3 Buiiding and Fire Department.
22. Ali fire lanes must be pos'ted and enforced in accordance with Police and Fire
Department guidelines. Fire lanes and access must be approved by the Fire Chief.
�; 23. The applicant shall identify an individual to act as liaison with the Fire Department
for the purpose of maintaining life artd safety.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 6
24. Prior to opening the event, the fire access road shall be posted. The applicant
shall provide continuous enforcement of the fire access road during the event.
25. AGVIA will coordinate with and be responsible for costs associated with San Luis
Ambulance to provide standby personnel and equipment for Bike Medic and golf
cart transport for entire duration of FestivaL
26. AGVIA shall pay Department of Building and Fire costs for members and
equipment assigned to the event.
Police Deaartment Conditions
27. The event organizers shall pay Police Department costs for officers assigned to
the event.
28. All temporary "No Parking" signs shall be posted a minimum of 24 hours prior to
event setup (by 6:00 am, Friday, May 27, 2005).
29, A minimum of four (4) private "licensed" security personnel wili be provided by
AGVIA. AGVIA will present to the Arroyo Grande Police Department two (2)
weeks prior to the evenL•
a. The name of the security agency
b. A schedule of security coverage
c. Location and hours of security assignments
Minimum required security is one (1) officer stationed at Nelson & Bridge Street,
two (2) officers assigned to the Swinging Bridge, and one (1 ) officer for patrol
throughout the evening hours on Saturday, May 28, 2005.
30. Failure to provide private licensed security will result in AGPD Officers being
assigned with expenses billed to the AGVIA.
Special Conditions
; 31 . Notification of all streets subject to closure must be posted a minimum of 24
hours prior to closure, stating the dates and times of closures.
� 32. The AGVIA shall distribute State Board of Equalization forms to all vendors to
report the sales tax collected during the Festival, and shall notify them that a list
� of vendors wili be supplied to the City to verify payment of sales tax.
� 33. The AGVIA shall provide to the City's Financial Services Department a list of all
� vendors participating in the festivai. The list will be used to verify that sales tax
; was collected and reported as earned in Arroyo Grande.
1 �
,
i
j
i
�
�
1
1
I
C � ATTACHMENT1 �
,
� Arroyo Grande Village Improvement Association
� l�� • � •. ?_'�!f�� P.O. Box 1526 • A[royo Grande. CA 93421
� � � � h � i :�'.^''�`.� PhOI10: (805) 473-2250 • FH7C: (805) 473-0345
' cx ARRown Gr�nnn�
o _
December 10, 2004 � n� � '
� �. eti�r� o tb ,� , ;
Steve Adams,Ciry Manager � ;
City of Arroyo Grande �D�J+����' -:
P.O. Box 550 �"" �� �/��� �
Arroyo Grande,CA 93421 /-�i s-�a.�f-1'IG,n.��
Ck�p���) N
Dear Steve: f�-�i�t I�
I am submitting the items below for deparpnental scrutiny. Please send me the necessary forms
to apply for the use permits and have the meetings scheduled that are necessary with the involved
departments.
Arroyo Grande Strawberry Festival- Saturday and Sunday,May 28&29,2005
Item #1 will require a resolution from the City Council. Also, the Police Department will
have to apply to Cal Trans for authorization.
1. The closure of Branch St. from Traffic Way to Mason St. from 6 am to 6 pm on Saturday,
May 28 and Sunday,May 29.
2. The closure of Short St. from Branch St.to Olohan Alley from 6 pm Friday,May 27,to 6
pm, Sunday,May 29.
3. The closure of Bridge St. from Branch St.to the driveway at McLintock's parking lot from 6
am on Saturday,May 28 unH16 pm on Sunday,May 29.
4. The closure of Bridge St. from McLintock's driveway to Nelson St. from 6 am to 6 pm,
Saturday and Sunday,May 28 and 29.
5. The closwe of Bridge St. from Nelson St.to Traffic Way from 6 am Saturday,May 28 to 6
pm on Sunday,May 29.
6. The closure of Nelson St.from Mason St.to Traffic Way on Saturday and Sunday,May 28
and 29, from 6 am to 6 pm.
7. The use of the pazking lots along Olohan Alley from Mason St.to Bridge St. from 6 pm
Friday,May 27 through 6 pm Sunday,May 29.
8. The use of the Caz Corral from 10 pm Friday,May 27 to 6 pm, Sunday May 29.
I
, _ �: _
� �
9. The use of the parking area from the Car Corral to and including the Brisco parking lot from 6
am Saturday to 6 pm Sunday.
10. The use of the lawns between ShoR St. and Mason St. on Nelson St. from 6 pm Friday, May
27 until 6 pm Sunday,May 29.
11. The use ofthe Collette Park between Bridge St. and Traffic Way from 6 am Saturday, May 28
ito 6 pm on Sunday, May 29.
� 12. The use of the five-acre lot next to the Woman's Club on West Branch St. for shuttle bus
1 parking on Saturday,May 28 and Sunday,May 29.
� The Arroyo Grande Village Improvement Association will provide the proper insurance policy to
� the City by April l, as our current policy is good through then.
The A.G.V.I.A. will compensate the City for any extra expenses incurred as agreed upon.
The A.CLV.I.A. will provide private police for all areas that need monitoring.
The A.G.V.I.A.will abide by all rules and regulations that will be discussed and agreed upon.
The A.G.V.I.A.will provide all barricades and signs,an arrow board,as we have done in the past.
� The A.G.V.I.A.will provide all "No Parking"delineators and the proper"No Parking" signs.
� The A.G.V.I.A. will install all delineators with "tow away,no parking" signs, as we have done in
the past. They will be installed on Thursday,May 26 on all streets as outlined by the Police Dept.
I on Branch St., Bridge St.,Nelson St. between Traffic Way and Mason St.;Mason St. from LePoint
� St.to Poole St.;Poole St. from Mason St.to Traffic Way;Nevada St.;a portion of LePoint St.as
1 outlined by the Police Dept.;Crown Terrace between LePoint St.and Crown Hill; a portion of
; Highway 227 as outlined by the Police Department;the comer of Allen St.and Mason St,two
i pazking spaces in from the corner in all directions. Short St. from the Swinging Bridge to Nelson
St. Also,the off ramp exit to North HWY. 101 from Branch Street should have four delineators.
We will also install delineators in all parking areas we have authority to use.
The A.G.V.I.A. will maintain a private pairol to replace delineators that are stolen,misplaced, or
vandalized.
i
i
� The A.CxV.I.A.will provide Swinging Bridge security as needed.
1
; The A.G.V.I.A. will provide and place all barricades.
�
�
' Thank you for your consideration. I would appreciate a response as soon as possible.
�
a Sincerely,
������__1------�
Bob Lund,Executive D'vector
Arroyo Grande V'illage Improvement Association
S.d.
� pRROYp
� CA
� NJCOflPORATED y2 MEMORANDUM
u m
# ,u�r ,o. �e„ *
c9�/FOR��P .
To: cinr couNCi�
FROM: DON SPAGNOLO, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER � j
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE SHAISTP
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE SAN LUIS OBISPO I
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (SLOCOG)
DATE: MARCH 8, 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the CounciL•
1. authorize the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 6 to the SHA/STP Cooperative
Agreement No. AG-TEA21-01 with SLOCOG; and,
2. direct the Director of Administrative Services to submit Amendment No. 6 to
SLOCOG.
�
FUNDING: ',
Amendment No. 6 includes $165,000 of Regional SHA funds for the Brisco Road- i
Halcyon Road/Route 101 PA&ED and $176,000 of Urban SHA funds, which represents
the first two years of the City's six-year allocation from TEA-3. Fifty-thousand of these
Urban SHA funds are to be used on the recently completed Vatley Ga[dens pavement
improvement project. Future amendments will include the remaining four years
allocation of Urban SHA funds when the funds become available.
DISCUSSION:
On August 28, 1999, the City and SLOCOG entered into SHA/STP Cooperative
Agreement No. AG-TEA21-01. Since this time, there have been five amendments as
outlined on Exhibit "A" of the agreement. Amendment No. 6 includes funding for the
Brisco Road-Halcyon Road/Route 101 PA&ED and the first two years of the City's six-
year allocation of Urban SHA funds from TEA-3.
The Cooperative Agreement is a general agreement between SLOCOG and the City
regarding the responsibility of each agency. The specific projects are referenced and
attached to allow for future actions such as the transfer of funds between the various
projects or the addition of replacement projects. A resolution must be adopted by the
City that clearly identifies the official authorized to execute the SHA/STP Cooperative
Agreement. On June 2, 1999, the City Council adopted Resolution. No. 3375 which
authorized the Mayor to execute SLOCOG's SHA/STP Cooperative Agreement.
_ �
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE SHA/STP COOPERATIVE
AGREEMENT WITH THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMEIVTS
MARCH 8, 2005
PAGE 2
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are presented for the Council's consideration:
• Authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement;
• Do not authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement;
• Modify as appropriate and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement;
• Provide direction to staff.
Attachment:
1. SHA/STP Cooperative Agreement, Amendment No. 6 to Agreement No. AG-TEA21-
01. �
3
;
�
�
jep:M:�232-Arroyo Grande�232-0405-General ConsultingN9-Administration\SHA.STP Cooperative Agreement 3.S.OS.doc �
San Luis Obispo Council of Governments
Agreement No. AG-TEA21-01
SHAISTP COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
Amendment No. 6 to Agreement No: AG-TEA21-01
THIS AGREEMENT, is between the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments, referred to
herein as "SLOCOG", and the
CITY OF Arrovo Grande
a political subdivision of the
State of California, referred
to herein as the "CITY".
WHEREAS, The CITY and SLOCOG entered into Agreement No. AG-TEA21-01 on
6-28-99, and
WHEREAS, Said agreement is now being modified to reflect SLOCOG Board actions
on 2-4-04 (agenda item B-2) and on 4-7-2004 (agenda item B-3), and
WHEREAS, An advance of$23,185 of TEA-3 funds was provided to backfill a 6%
reduction of the Federal High Prioriry Award for the completed Grand Avenue Reconstruction
Phase II project in June of 2003, and
WHEREAS, A reserve of$22,600 of local choice STIP funds was created from the
2002 STIP.
WHEREAS, This agreement is hereby revised from the prior list of projects as
Exhibit A as attached hereto, effective 1-4-2005, and �
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AGREED i
SLOCOG hereby amends Agreement No. AG-TEA21-01 per the attached Exhibit A ��
amended on 1-4-2005, for the projects specified in Exhibits A-9, A-14, A-15, and A-16.
The TEA-3 advance and the STIP reserve, which are generally equivalent, negate
each other and neither shall be carried forward henceforth.
Use of$234,000 RSHA funds for Grand Avenue identified in Exhibit A-14 -originally
considered a short-term loan- is now considered repaid through the deprogramming of STIP
funds.
Page 1 of 2
�
SHA/STP COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
Amendment No. 6 to Agreement No. AG-TEA21-01
BE IT FURTHER AGREED
The remaining Terms and Conditions of the original agreement (AG-TEA21-01) shall
remain in full force and effect. I
SIGNATURES:
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE SAN LUIS OBISPO
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
By: By:
Tony Ferrara, Mayor Ronald L. De Carli, xecutive Director
Date: Date: I/ oS
i ATTEST
i
� By.
Kelly Wetmore, Director of Administrative Services
�
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL EFFECT:
By: By: C
Timothy J. Carmel, City Attomey Ja Crawford,SL OG Counsel
Date: Date: 'L )� •�
Page 2 of 2
` HA71ie ubray32eplanal Ranners�CoopereUVe Apree�ronbWroyo 6rende�2-coop amenO/orAG 1i-0S.tloc
i
�
EXHIBIT A
APPLICABLE PROJECTS
for
Agreement No. AG-TEA21-01
EXHIBIT PROJECT NAME PROJECT#(s) . Funding Balance
Exhibit A-1 2 g 5 Pavement Maintenance-Selected City PUAG01 $225,174 $50,000
Streets
Exhibit A-2 Pavement Management Program Plan PUAG02 $28,000 $0
Exhibit A-3 Bridge Street Bridge Rehabilitation PUAG03 $49,500 $44,593
Exhibit A-4 Creekside Pedestrian Path Phase I PUA004 $2,000 $0
Exhibit A-5 ' Brisco Rd.-Halcyon Rd/Rte 101 Project PRAG01 $52,626 $O
Study Report
Exhibit A-6 Grand Avenue/East Branch St./Rt. 227 PRAG02 $10,000 $O
Corridor Study
Exhibit A-7 3 EI Campo Rd/Rte 101 Project Study Report PRAG03 $56,933 $O
/Project Development Support
y Exhibit A-8 5 Paulding Middle School Bike Lanes PRAG04 $111,113 $0
I
� e Grand Avenue Reconstruction Project
� ExhibitA-9 PRAG05 $148,185 $0
Phase II
� Exhibit A-10 5 Creekside Pedestrian Path Phase II PUAG05 $50,257 $0
� ExhibitA-17 285 Rodeo Drive Repairs PUAG06 $20,613 $0
I Exhibit A-12285 Creekside Pedestrian Path Phase III PUAG07 $46,879 $0
I
; Exhibit A-13° South County Park and Ride Upgrade PRAGO6 $15,000 $0
� Exhibit A-14 6 Grand Ave. Rehab& Enhancements PRAG07 $234,000 $0
�t Exhibit A-15' Brisco Road/Grand Ave/Route 101 Project pR-AG-08 $165,000 $165,000
Development
� Exhibit A-16' Valley Gardens Improvements PU-AG-09 $50,000 $50,000
� Exhibit A-17� Various FAU Eligible StreeURoad Rehabs PU-AG-10 $126,000 $126,000
' TEA-21 1,050.280 $94,593
' TEA3 USHA(first 2-years only) $176,000 $176,000
� TEA-3(USHA unprogrammed balance) $351,000 $351,000
� 1 Amended 4-11-01 to reflect$2626 in added funding to original funding amount of$50,000
2 Administratively amended 6/20/01 (AG correspondence June 5,2001)
3 Amended 11-15-01 to reFlect$31,933 in added fundi�g to original funding amount of$25,000
4 Administratively amended 11/15/01 (AG correspondence Oct. 25, 2001)
� 5 Administratively amended 8/7/02 (AG correspondence Aug. S;2002)
6 Administratively amended 4/2/03 and 6/4/03 (AG corcespondence June 12, 2003)
�� 7 SAFETEA projects amended 1/4/2005 as per Board Actions 2/4l04&4/7/04 (AG correspondence 1/5/05)
� H:\TMLMrarylRaplorialPlanron�COOpwaGwApn�nbWnyoOnnE�U•AOeoop�zhlbll•modHIW7-WSAx
Exhibit A-9
(to Agreement No. AG-TEA21-01)
Project Number: PRAG05 Grantee: Citv of Arrovo Grande
Project Title: Grand Ave. Reconstruction Proiect Funding Type: Reqional SHA ($148,1851
Work Implementation Period: Oct 6, 1998 to Jun 30, 2003 Approved: October 6, 1998
Amended: June 4, 2003
Project Schedule and Funding Summary: January 4, 2004
Grand Avenue ReconsUuction P 'ect Phase II
4'�!�#�.'�. tvh}...�� .Y
Z. t;i
�,�_ � .,. FUNDING �
Fiscal Year RSHA USHA Local(1) Local(2) Other(1) Other(2) TOTAL ���
Milestones
Fed oemo- (date canpete)
7E/121
i FY98/99 $ 113�300 $ 113�300 Design-4/99
AHard Bid-&89
Cmst Sqrt-759
� FY99/OOro $ 125,000 $ 1,397,200 $ 351.815 $ 1,874,015 Const.End-01roo
r FY03/04 $ 23,185 $ 23,185
! Total $ 148,185 $ - $ t,51o,500 $ - $ 351,815 $ - $ 2,010,500
I
� ���e 7.4% 0.0% 75.1% 0.0% 17.5% 0.0% 100.0%
� ❖ June 2003 - $23,185 advance of future TEA-3 funds to backfill reduction of Fed Demo funds.
! :• Jan. 2005 —Advance negated with $22,600 local choice 2002 STIP funds reserve.
� Project Description: The project will consist of pavement reconstruction and spot repair of curb,
� gutter, sidewalks, and cross gutters where needed along Grand Avenue between Halcyon Road and
j Elm Street. The existing water main wiil be replaced with a 12-inch water main, new fire hydrants will
be installed in areas that are currently deficient, and all services will be replaced as well as most
i meters boxes. The existing sewer main will be replaced with a 8-inch sewer main and laterals
i servicing each property will be replaced or a new lateral installed. Storm drain inlets and an existing
� CMP drainage culvert will be replaced. The project provides conduit and other facilities necessary to
underground existing overhead utilities and possibly additional conduits to accommodate future fiber
� optic cable.
� Billing Period: Reimbursement of this project may begin upon the San Luis Obispo Council of
i GovernmenYs (SLOCOG) receipt of the signed cooperative agreement. The CITY may submit
� invoices on a monthly basis during the Work Implementation Period, and must submit certification of
� project completion and a final invoice within 2 months after the Work Implementation Period. Costs
' incurred outside the Work Implementation Period are ineligible for reimbursement.
!
', Special Provisions:
i
j 1. Equipment purchases not identified herein, must have written approval prior to purchase.
� 2. Reimbursement of costs from funding sources administered by SLOCOG shall be provided on a
pro rata basis determined by the percentage share each source is of the totai project cost. The
total funding contribution from SLOCOG for this project is not to exceed the amounts identified in
i the table above under RSHA and USHA totals.
3. Opportunities for enhancing bicycle and pedestrian travel in the project area should be considered
and implemented, where appropriate and feasible, as part of the project.
Exhibit A-14
(to Agreement No. AG-TEA21-01)
Project Number: PUAG08 Grantee: Citv of Arrovo Grande
Project Title: Grand Ave. Rehab & Enhancements Funding Type: Urban SHA ($234,000)
Work Implementation Period: May 1, 2003 to July 1, 2004 Approved: April 2, 2003
Amended: February 4, 2004
Project Schedule and Funding Summary:
Grand Ave Enhancements-Short-term loan--Re aid. .
vF� �. �� ry�. F����},
�+� �'.0 .y .i��. uF�f,
„���`:�, FUNDI�NG
Fiscal Year RSHA USHA Local (7) Local(2) Other(1) Other(2) TOTAL Expected
Mileatones
(dale complete)
FY 02/03 5 234,000 5 234,000
Consiruct 09/03
� FY 03/04 $ z34,o00 5 (234,OOO) S -
� Total S 234,000 $ - 5 - $ - $ - $ - $ 234,000 �
Reimburse- 100.0%
1 ment Rate
i ❖ Apri12003—Loan of$234,000 to be repaid by STIP Authorization,Urban TEA-3,or other Federal or State funds.
.• Feb.2004—Cog Board deprogrammed$234,000 STIP thereby negating need for repayment.
Project Description: There are two projects with the same project limits; one for enhancements
programmed in the 2002 STIP and one for an overlay programmed in the 2000 STIP. Engineering
plans were developed to construct both projects at the same time, for economy of scale and financial
responsibility. The City must award a contract by May 2003 for the Grand Avenue Overlay. The City
j requested an early allocation for the Enhancement funds, but was denied. The City requested an
� A6872 to begin reimbursable work - using local funds - and was approved. The City has authorized
the solicitation of construction bids to construct both pieces. The City had concerns of allocation
� delays continuing into the 03/04 fiscal year and requested an interim use of SHA funds to close the
; City's gap in the event that allocations are delayed for an extended amount of time.
j Billing Period: Reimbursement of this project may begin upon the San Luis Obispo Council of
i GovernmenYs (SLOCOG) receipt of the signed cooperative agreement. The CITY shall submit no
� more than two invoices and a certification of project completion. Costs incurred outside the Work
� Implementation Period are ineligible for reimbursement.
' Special Provisions:
1. Equipment purchases not identified herein, must have written approval prior to purchase.
2. The total funding contribution from SLOCOG for this project is not to exceed the amounts
i identified in the table above under RSHA and USHA totals.
!
� 3. This use of SHA funds would be temporary and repaid immediately after receiving STIP allocation
� reimbursement. If necessary, due to unforeseen circumstances conceming STIP allocation
delays, $234,000 of Arroyo Grande's TEA 3 USHA allocation may be held until the loan payment
! is received by SLOCOG. All borrowed funds shall be repaid without interest on or before
December 31, 2004. Submission of documentation for STIP reimbursement is the responsibility of
the City.
4. As per Board action, 2/4/04, which deprogrammed $234,000 of STIP funds, the loan is considered
repaid.
Exhibit A-15
(to Agreement No. AGTEA21-01) ,
Project Number: PR-AG-08 Grantee: Citv of Arrovo Grande
Project Title: Brisco Rd/Grand Ave/Rt 101 Funding Type: Reaional SHA ($165,000)
Proiect Development
Work Implementation Period: May 1, 2004—Aug. 31, 2008 Approved: April 7, 2004
Project Schedule and Funding Summary:
Brisco Road/Grand Ave/Route 101 Pro'ect Develo ment
i
� , M,
'' ' FUNDING ` �'
;,
Fiscal Year RSHA USHA Local (1) Local(2) Other(1) Other(2) TOTAL Expected
Milestones
(date complete)
FY 04/05 $ 165,000 $ 150,000 $ 315,000 PDT Meetings
. 2005-2008
FY 05/06 $ Completion of ED
FY O6/07 $
Total $ 165,000 3 - $ 150,000 $ - S - S - $ 315,000
Reimburse- 52.4% 0.0°/a 47.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
ment Rate
SLOCOG reimbursement as indiwted above;not to exceed 3765,000.
Project Description: Project development and environmental analysis for the interchanges at Grand
Avenue and Brisco Road and for two NB auxiliary lane improvements between Grand and Brisco and
� between Brisco and Oak Park.
Biiling Period: Reimbursement of this project may begin upon the San Luis Obispo Council of
� GovemmenYs (SLOCOG) receipt of the signed cooperative agreement. The CITY may submit
invoices on a monthly basis during the Work Implementation Period, and must submit certification of
, project completion and a final invoice within 2 months after the Work Implementation Period. Costs
1 incurred outside the Work Implementation Period are ineligible for reimbursement.
Special Provisions:
i
� 1. Equipment purchases not identified herein, must have written approval prior to purchase.
2. Reimbursement of costs from funding sources administered by SLOCOG shall be provided on a
pro rata basis determined by the percentage share each source is of the total project cost. The
total funding contribution from SLOCOG for this project is not to exceed the amounts identified in
i the table above under RSHA and USHA totals.
3. Opportunities for enhancing bicycle and pedestrian travel in the project area should be considered
� and implemented, where appropriate and feasible, as part of the project.
';
;
1
s
Exhibit A-16
(to Agreement No. AG -TEA21-01)
Project Number: PU-AG-09 Grantee: Citv of Arrovo Grande
Project Title: Vallev Gardens Improvements Funding Type: Urban SHA ($50.000)
Work Implementation Period: Jul 1, 2004 to Jun 30, 2006. Approved: April 7, 2004
Project Schedule and Funding Summary:
Valle Gardens Im rovements
� F rr
p ���
FUNDING
Fiscal Year RSHA USHA Local (1) Local(2) Other(1) Other(2) TOTAL Expected
Milestones
(date complete)
r
� FY04/OS $ 50,000 $ 190,000 . . $ 240,000 Repairandoveday
as identified by PMP
FY OS/06 $
Total 3 - $ 50,000 3 190,000 a - a - a - s 240.000
� Reimburse- 0.0% 20.8% 79.2% 0.0°k 0.0% 0.0% '
j ment Rate
a
' Project Description: An annual apportionment of USHA funds for the maintenance of City streets as
I presented in the City of Arroyo Grande's Pavement Management Program Plan. PSSR identified
�. need of USHA as no FAR projects are available.
iBilling Period: Reimbursement of this project may begin upon the San Luis Obispo Council of
� GovernmenYs (SLOCOG) receipt of the signed cooperative agreement. The CITY may submit
invoices on a monthly basis during the Work Implementation Period, and must submit certification of
project completion and a final invoice within 2 months after the Work Implementation Period. Costs
incurred outside the Work implementation Period are ineligible for reimbursement.
Special Provisions:
1. Equipment purchases not identified herein, must have written approval prior to purchase.
2. Reimbursement of costs from funding sources administered by SLOCOG shail be provided on a
pro rata basis determined by the percentage share each source is of the total project cost. The
total funding contribution from SLOCOG for this project is not to exceed the amounts identified in
the table above under RSHA and USHA totals.
3. Opportunities for enhancing bicycle and pedestrian travel in the project area should be considered
and implemented, where appropriate and feasible, as paR of the project.
Exhibit A•17
(to Agreement No. AG -TEA21-01)
Project Number: PU-AG-10 Grantee: Citv of Arrovo Grande
Project Title: Various FAU Eliqible Street/ Road Rehabs Funding Type: Urban SHA ($126,0001
Work Implementation Period: Jul 1, 2004 to Jun 30, 2010. Approved: April 7, 2004
Project Schedule and Funding Summary:
Various FAU Eli ible StreeURoad Rehabs
x tt.' �
,� .,� �FUNDING
Expected
Fiscai Year RSHA ,USHA Local (7) Local(2) Other(1) Other(2) TOTAL Milestones
. (date complete)
FY 04/05 $ 126,000 $ 126,000 ouinua�Maintenance
CAfISfNC110f1
$ _ Projecls
1 FY 05/06 $
i
i
; FY O6/07 $
�
� FY 07/08 $ -
� Tatal 5 - 5 t26,00o S - S - E - S - S t26,000
Reimburee- 0.0% 100.0% 0.0°k 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% '
ment Rate
ProJect Description: An annual apportionment of USHA funds for the maintenance of City streets as
presented in the City of Arroyo Grande's Pavement Management Program Plan. Specific streets and
,
roads include: James Way, Oak Park Bivd., EI Camino Real, and Brisco Road
Billing Period: Reimbursement of this project may begin upon the San Luis Obispo Council of
GovernmenYs (SLOCOG) receipt of the signed cooperative agreement. The CITY may submit
s invoices on a moMhly basis during the Work Implementation Period, and must submit certification of
project completion and a final invoice within 2 months after the Work Implementation Period. Costs
incurred outside the Work Implementation Period are ineligible for reimbursement.
Special Provisions
1. Equipment purchases not identified herein, must have written approval prior to purchase.
' 2. Reimbursement of costs from funding sources administered by SLOCOG shall be provided on a
' pro rata basis determined by the percentage share each source is of the total project cost. The
total funding contribution from SLOCOG for this project is not to exceed the amounts identified in
' the table above under RSHA and USHA totals.
3. Opportunities for enhancing bicycle and pedestrian travel in the project area should be considered
and implemented, where appropriate and feasible, as part of the project.
8.e.
o� pRROYpC
� INCORPOAATEO z
O
J m
�l JULV 10, 1911 * MEMORANDUM
P
4�/FORN�
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DOM SPAGNOLO, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER �
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PAVEMENT
CUT POLICY
DATE: MARCH 8, 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council adopt a resolution approving the Pavement Cut Policy.
FUNDING:
There are no initial fiscal impacts. However, there could potentially be long-term cost
savings due to a decrease in pavement maintenance costs.
DISCUSSION:
In response to previous City Council concerns regarding pavement cuts to new asphalt ,
overlays, staff has developed a pavement cut policy to address future pavement cut
requests. Concerns were raised in the past regarding the timing of pavement cuts in
streets that have just b�een overlayed.
During the preparation of the Pavement Management Program,staff noted that streets with
pavement cuts degraded more rapidly than streets that did not receive pavement cuts.
Studies performed around the nation on streets in the cities of Austin, Kansas City,
I Burlington, Cincinnati, Los Angeles, Sacramento, Phoenix, and San Francisco, all
; concluded that excavations in paved streets degrade and shorten the service life of the
� street surface. Furthermore, studies performed on streets in the cities of Los Angeles, San
' Francisco, and Sacramento concluded that this degradation occurs no matter how well the
excavation is restored.
Local agencies were also contacted regarding pavement cut policies. The City of
Atascadero was the only agency with a formal policy. Atascadero has a two-year
moratorium on all pavement cuts following roadway construction or overlay operations.
,
� .
i
i
a
�
i
�
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PAVEMENT CUT POLICY ;
MARCH 8, 2005
PAGE 2
The proposed policy will prohibit all types of pavement cuts within the roadway surface for i
a period of five years following road construction or placement of asphalt-concrete overlay.
As part of the policy,the Public Works Department will develop and publish annually a five
(5)year paving history to specifically list the street segments where asphalt pavement work
has really been completed. Concurrently, the Public Works Department will also issue a
five (5) year schedule for projected roadway maintenance. Annually, a capital
improvement project schedule will be distributed to utility companies and to help schedule
their operations and to developers planning specific projects. Staff meets quarterly with
representatives of the utility companies to mutually plan future work schedules.
At the discretion of the Public Works Director/City Engineer,this restriction may be lifted for
emergency, safety and utility repairs or work mandated by the State of California. Copies
of the Pavement Cut Policy,the five-year paving history and the five-year projected paving
schedules will be made available to the public at the Public Works Department and can
also be accessed from the City's intemet website.
ALTERNATIVES:
iThe following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
�' . Approve by resolution the Pavement Cut Policy;
. Do not approve the Pavement Cut Policy as presented;
. Modify as appropriate and approve staff's recommendation; or
. Provide direction to staff.
�
,
,
�
i
i
RESOLUTION NO. _
{
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE ADOPTING A PAVEMENT CUT
POLICY
WHEREAS, Section 13.20.010 of the City of Arroyo.Grande Municipal Code enables
the City Council to establish, by resolution, the rules, regulations, and specifications for
construction within the City; and,
WHEREAS, the Council has had concerns regarding the deleterious effects of allowing
pavement cuts in streets that have been recently overlayed.
WHEREAS, the City has developed a Pavement Cut Policy to prohibit pavement cuts in
recently paved streets.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande hereby adopts the City of Arroyo Grande Pavement Cut Policy, a copy of which
is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein.
On motion by Council Member , seconded by Council Member
, , and by khe following roll call vote, to wit:
,
i
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
j 2005.
; the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this day of
1
I
E
RESOLUTION N0.
PAGE 2
TONYFERRARA, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, CITY CLERK
I
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
�
�
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
�
i
i
� TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
;
City of Arroyo Grande
Pavement Cut Policy
All pavement cuts, defined as any activity that penetrates through the asphalt-
concrete pavement surface, shall be prohibited in the roadway surface for a
period of five (5) years following the placement of a new asphalt concrete
surFace. The Public Works Department will annually publish a five (5) year
paving history of streets where the proMibition is in force, and a projected five (5)
I' ' t utilit com anies, developers and contractors to
� year paving schedule to assis y p
� schedule their projects.
� At the discretion of the Public Works Director/Gity Engineer, this restriction may
1
� be lifted for emergency, safety and utility repairs or work mandated by the ta e
i
; of California. In the event the pavement cut is allowed, the roadway shall be
', repaired to the condition prior to the cut, in accordance with City of Arroyo
� Grande Standard Plans, and all pavement markings and markers shall be
replaced in kind.
i
a.i.
� PRROy�
o �,p
hINCOPPORATE ZL
° " MEMORANDUM
• �,�. ,o. ,o„ *
c,��FOaN�P
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DON SPAGNOLO, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER �
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PAVEMENT
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION ADOPTING
THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION (FHWA) STREET
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR THE STREET NETWORK
DATE: MARCH 8, 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council:
1. adopt a resolution accepting the Pavement Management Program; and,
2. adopt a resolution adopting the Federal HighwayAdministration (FHWA)Functional
Street Classification System for the Street Nefinrork.
FUNDING:
Two budget projections were performed during the preparation of the Pavement
Management Program. The first projection sought to maintain the current overall condition
of the street network and the second projection sought to improve the street network above
the existing condition.
I
As indicated in the Pavement Management Program, the average pavement condition '
index(PCI)for all the streets within the City's street network is 68. In order to maintain the �
street network at the current condition,the City will have to allocate$200,000 to$250,000
each fiscal year. To improve the street.network to the recommended PCI of 75, the City
will have to allocate $300,000 to $350,000 each fiscal year. The curcent capital '
improvement program (CIP) budget allocates roughly$180,000 per year forpreventative
maintenance resulting in a shortfall of $75,000 needed per year to maintain the current !
condition of the street network. Additional funding may be necessary for corrective
maintenance projects, particularly if projected State and Federal funds is not available.
The breakdown of the budget can be found in the Section IV — Pavement Management I
Plan and Budget of the Pavement Management Program.
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY
ADMINISTRATION (FHWA) STREET CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR THE STREET
NETWORK
MARCH 8, 2005
PAGE 2
DISCUSSION:
In 1998 the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) required each local
agency to submit evidence that the agency is using a computer based Paveme�t
Management Program as a condition of receiving funds for local roadway projects. This
requirement was made to objectively evaluate the current conditions of local roads. Similar
requirements exist at the State and Federal level.
In February 1999, the first Pavement Management Program was prepared and accepted
by the Council. SLOCOG requires regular updates to each agency's Pavement
Management Programs to demonstrate progress in pavement maintenance. This is the
second update to the Pavement Management Program; it was updated once before in
June 2001.
The 2005 Pavement Management Program, prepared by the Public Works Department,
establishes criteria for evaluating the current condition of City streets. It is also utilized as a
financial planning tool to highlight funding needs for present and future conditions, as well
as in determining a schedule for pavement maintenance based on need and economic
feasibility.
The Pavement Management Program simultaneously offers the potential for improved road
conditions and reduced pavement maintenance costs, as well as an efflcient way to
organize and evaluate the current condition and make predictions regarding the usefui
service of a roadway network. The program is used by the Public Works Department to
oversee the maintenance and repair of City streets that provides for comfortable driving
conditions at the lowest possible cost.
The Pavement Management Program uses proprietary computer software to catalogue the
physical characteristics, construction history, and cuRent condition for each segment of
roadway in the City. Every street is individually inspected for pavement defects including;
rutting, cracking and weathering. The information is entered onto an inspection form with
numerical ratings assigned for each condition. Upon entering the data, the computer
software calculates a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) for each roadway segment. The
PCI number is the primary basis for determining the appropriate maintenance procedure
and the relative timing for its application.
Results of the updated Pavement Management Program indicated that the condition of the
city's streets have improved significantly since the programs inception. When the program
was first developed in February 1999,the average PCI of the street network was 60. Upon
completion of the second update in June 2001,the average PCI was 65. This most recent
update indicated that the current PCI is 68. The Asphalt Instftute recommends that a street
network be maintained at a minimum PCI of 75.
I
--- _ —- _ _- - _ �
cinr couNCi�
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY
ADMINISTRATION (FHWA) STREET CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR THE STREET
NETWORK
MARCH 8, 2005
PAGE 3
Also included in the Pavement Management Program is a Pavement Management Plan,
which is a plan that identifies and outlines a preventative and corrective strategies for each
section of street in the street network. Preventative strategies usually include the use of
surface treatments which are categorized as non-aggregate seals and aggregate seals.
The non-aggregate seals are usually either a fog seal, or a rejuvenator seal, while the
aggregate seals take on names such as chip seals, slurry seal, mirco-paving, seal coat,
armor coats, and oil mats (other names vary depending on which part of the country you
are located). CoRective strategies include asphalt overlays, extensive recycling, and/or
reconstruction, which involves the complete removal and replacement of a failed
pavement. The Pavement Management Plan produced from this update can be found in
Section IV— Pavement Management Plan and Budget.
Currently there is a five-year slurry seal preventative maintenance program. Overthe next
two years, the program focuses maintenance efforts on completing the slurry seal
prevention program. During this time the program will also provide for micro surfacing
several of the collector streets that are not scheduled for an asphalt overlay.
The first two years of the maintenance programs are as follows:
Year 1
Street From To SF Treatment Estimated $
James Wa Colina Street Tall Ho Road 39,990 Micro-Surfacin $8,797.80
James Wa Oak Park Blvd E uestrian Wa 67,500 Micro-Surfacin $14,850.00
James Wa Rodeo Drive Colina Street 70,200 Micro-Surfacin $15 444.00
Total $39 091.80
Year 2
Street From To SF Treatment Estimated$
Branch Street(W) Oak Park Blvd Camino 84,500 Micro-Surfacing $23,590.00
Mercado
Brench Street Camino Mercado Brisco Road 144,000 Micro-Surtacin $34,680.00
Grand Avenue E Halc on Road Bamett Street 134,400 Micro-Surtacin $37,128.00
James Wa Jenn Place Rancho Parkwa 102,600 Micro-Surtacin $24,572.00
James Wa E uesUian Wa Jenn Place 91,500 Micro-Surfacin 320 130.00
James Wa Rancho Parkwa Rodeo Drive 72,500 Micro-Surfacin $20,450.00
Oak Park Blvd West Branch James Way 65,000 Micro-SurFacing $14,300.00
Street
Total 5174 850.00
The first identified corrective maintenance projects to be performed are Brisco Road, EI
iCamino Real and FaROII Avenue. Timing of these projects are identified in the Capital
� Improvement Program, but may be adjusted based upon funding availability.
1
I
� _ _ _ __ - -- __ --
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY
ADMINISTRATION (FHWA) STREET CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR THE STREET
NETWORK
MARCH 8, 2005
PAGE 4
A new component of the Pavement Management Program update is the addition of a cross
reference to correlate the FHWA standardized functional classification system to the Citys
standard street classifications. FHWA developed the standardized functional classification
system for use in planning highway systems, determining the jurisdictional responsibility,
developing fiscal planning,and determining the eligibility forfederal-aid funding. Therefore,
in order to be eligible for grant funding and able to receive Federal emergency aid, it is
recommended the corresponding FHWA street classifications be assigned to the existing
City street network.
The City's current street network contains six(6) street classifications, as outlined on the
City's Standard Plan 166-AG and the City's General Plan. The street network is based on
the roadway design width and the zoning districts when the street was originally built. The
FHWA functional classification system of streets categorizes the individual street sections
according to the character of senrice they provide and defines the natu
re and role that
each street section plays in serving the flow of individual trips. By adopting the FHWA
classification system,each street section in the street nefinrork will receive a corresponding
FHWA Classification, in addition to its City classification.
The FHWA considers the Ciry of Arroyo Grande as an Urbanized Area, which consists of
the following functional classifications: principal arterials, minor arterial streets, collector
streets, and local streets. The appropriate FHWA Street Class�cation is assigned to each
street section using the guidelines prescribed by the FHWA Functional Classification
System published in the FHWA HighwayFunctional Class�cation—Concepts, Criteria,and
Procedures manual. The Pavement Management Program has also been coordinated with
the City's Traffic Model and the General Plan.
Copies of the Pavement Management Program will be made available to the public through
the Public Works Department. The information can also be accessed from the City's
internet website.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following altematives are provided for the Council's consideration:
1 . Adopt the resolution for the Pavement Management Program;
� . Do not adopt the Pavement Management Program as presented;
I . Adopt the resolution for the FHWA Functional Street Classification System;
, . Do not adopt the resolution for the FHWA Functional Street Classification System;
� . Modify as appropriate and approve stafPs recommendation; or
j . Provide direction to staff.
iAttachment:
1. Pavement Management Program (on file in the Public Works Department)
l — _ _ — — ___ _
�
� RESOLUTION NO. _
a
J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
� OF ARROYO GRANDE ADOPTING THE FEDERAL
HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION (FHWA) FUNCTIONAL
; STREET CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR THE STREET
NETWORK
WHEREAS, Section 13.20.010 of the City of Arroyo Grande Municipal Code enables
the City Council to establish, by resolution, the rules, regulations, and specifications for
construction within the City; and,
WHEREAS, the City has updated the Street Network to reflect changes based on the
updated Traffic Model and Pavement Managemenf Program.
WHEREAS, the City has assigned a corresponding FHWA Functional Street
Classification for each street in the Street Neiwork.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande hereby adopts the attached FHWA Functional Street Classifications for the City
of Arroyo Grande Street Network.
On motion by Council Member , seconded by Council Member
, and by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this day of 2005.
,
;
-- _ _ �
RESOLUTION NO.
� PAGE 2
�
TONYFERRARA, MAYOR
� ATTEST:
�
i
i
� KELLY WETMORE, CITY CLERK
� APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
{
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
I TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
RESOLUTION NO. _ �
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE ADOPTING THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
PAVEMENT MAI�AGEMENT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Section 13.20.010 of the City of Arroyo Grande Municipal Code enables
the City Council to establish, by resolution, the rules, regulations, and specifications for
construction within the City; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Arroyo Grande is required by the San Luis Obispo Council of
Governments (SLOCOG) to update the Pavement Management Program on a regular
� basis; and,
{ WHEREAS, the City has updated the Pavement Management Program to reflect recent
� Capital Improvement Program projects and additions to the street network which have
occurred due to development projects.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Ciry Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande hereby adopts the updated City of Arroyo Grande Pubiic Works Pavement
� Management Program, a copy of which is on file in the Public Works Department.
� On motion by Council Member , seconded by Council Member
i , and by the following roll call vote, to wit:
j AYES:
I NOES:
� ABSENT:
' 4he foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this day of 2005.
�
;
,
RESOLUTION N0.
PAGE 2
TONY FERRARA, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
FHWA Functional Street Classifications for the City of Arroyo Grende Street Network
Resolutlon No.
� March 8,2005
FHWA FHWA FC
Street Name From To Zone Funetlonal Number
SVest
Acom Drive E uestrian Wa E uestrian Wa Rancho Grende Local 19 �
Alder SVeet Cameron Court Fartoll Ave Sunset Local 19
Alder Street Fair Oaks Ave East Grend Ave Sunset Local 19
Alder Street Farcoll Ave Fair Oaks Ave Sunset Local 19
Allen Street Traffic Wa Garden Street Westem Additlon Local 19
AI ine Street North East Grend Ave Faeh Ave Westem Addition Local ig
PJ ine Street SouM Cerro�sta CIrGe East G2nd Ave Woodland Lacal 1 g
Mdre Drive Jenn Place � Matthew Wa � Rancho Grande Local 19
Mdre Drive Matthew Wa End of Cul-de-Sac Rancho Grande Locel 1g
Arablan CirGe � Visq Drive End of CultlaSac Rancho G2nde Local 1g
Arro o Ave PII dm Wa West Che Ave Hi h Schaol Local 19 -
Ash Street Cf Limit South Elm Street Psh Sfreet CdlecWr 17
Ash Street South Elm Street PJder Street Ash Street Local 1 g
Asilo Street La Canada La Canada Rancho Grande Local 1g
� Asilo S7eet �sta Drive . La Canada Rancho Grande Local tg
As n Street Ash Sfreet P lar Stre9t Be Gsrdens Local 1 g
Avenida de Diamante Via Bandolero Vla 8anddero Five Citles Lacal 19
� Bakeman Lane Fartdl Ave Farroll Ave Parkside Lacal 1 g
Bambi Court TI Tail�Drive End of Cul-de-Sac Valle Gardens Local 19
Bamett Street East Grand Ave EI Camirro Real Westem Additlon Mina Arterial 19
Bedloe Lane West Che Lane Fair Oaks Ave Vllla Local 19
9eechStreet FartdlAve FairOaks�Ave � Sunset Local tg
Bell Street East Grand Ave EI Camino Real Westem Additlon � Loca1 1 g
Bennett Ave Hal n North EI.Camino Real Westem Addition Loal 19
BennettAve LlndaDrive Hal North OceanView Loca1 1g
Befa Court � Bri hton Ave End of Cul-de-Sac Ocean�ew Local 1 g
Bladcbe Avenue Bo nbe Street CouNand Street Be Gardens Lacal 1g
Blackbe Avenue Courtland Street Cranbe Street Gardens � Local 1g
, Bluebe Avenue Bo senbe Street Courtland Street Be Gardens Local 79
Bo enbe Street Ras be qve Cedar SVeet Be Gardens� Local 1 g
Bo senbe Sheet CedarStreet Strawbe Ave B Gardens Lacal 1g
� Branch Mill Road East Che Ave G Lim(t Branch Mill Cdlecbr 17
Brench Street est Brlaco Road Vemon S6eet Brench Mill Minor Ar�rlal 76
Branch Street est Camino Merpdo Brfsco Road ' Brench MIII Mirror Arterlal 16
Branch Street est Oak Park Blvd Camino Mercado Branch MIII Minor Arlerial 16
Brench Street est Vemon Street East Grand Ave U r Vllla Minor Arterlal 16
� Brid Street Branch SVeet East Trafflc Wa � Villa Local 19
Bri htan Ave CouNand Street Elm Street Norfh Ooean View Local 19
Bri hton Ave Oak Park BNd Courtland Street � Ooean View Local 19
Brisco Road - East Grand Ave Linda Drive Ocean View Mirwr Merial 16 �
Brisco Road EI Camino Real West Brech Street Ocean Vlew Minor Arterial 16
Brisco Road Linda Drive EI Camino Real � Ocean View Minwlulerial 16
BhNan Avenue . Elm Street South Carrin ton Place Sunset Loca1 1 g
Cartin ton Place Bhdan Avenue� End of Cul-deSac Sunset � Lxa1 tg
Ham ton Place BriMan Avenue End of Culde-Sac Sunset Local 19 �
Califomia Street West Ch Lane Fair Oaks Ave H h School Local 19
Calle Cartnan Vfa Banddero � End of Cul-de-Sac Flve Citles Local 19
Calle Cuerva Via Las uilas End of Cul�de-Sac Rancho Grende Local 1 g
Callie Court Huasna Road � End of Cul-0eSac s coach Local 19
Cameron Court Alder Street Hal Sauth Sunset L.oca� qg
Camino Mercado West Branch Street Rancho Parkwa Five Citles Cdlector 17
Cam ana Place � Gularte Road End of CuldeSac S ch Local 1 g
Can on Wa Tall Ho End of Cul-de-Sac Rancho Grande Local 1 g
� Cardinal Court Robin Cirde End of Cul-de-Sac Rancho Grande� La;al tg
Cartnella Drive Carol Place Fartdl Ave Parkaide Lacal 1 g
Carol Place Cartnella Drive Fartdl Ave parkside Lpp� 1g
Castillo Court �sfa Drive End of CuWeSac Rancho Grande Local 19
CastiAo del Mar Orchard Ave End of Street HI h Schod Lwai 1 g
Castlllo del Mar Orchard Ave A.G.H h School H School� Locsl 1 g
CedarSVeet Bo senb S4'eet S ce Street Be Gardens Laal 1g
Cedar Street Caurtland Street � Bo nbe SVeet Be Gardens Local 19
Paqe 1 Of 7
FHWA Functional Street Classifications for the Cily of Arroyo Grande Street Nehvork
Resalution No.
March 8,2005
F�p' FHWA FC
. Street Name From � To Zone Fundiooal Number
SW�t
Cedar Street S ruce Street As n Street Be Gardens Local 19 �
Certo�sha Cirde PJ ine Street South Certo Vista Lane Woodland Local 19
Cerro VisTa Lane AI ine Street South Cerro Vista Circle Woodland Local 19
Cha artal Lane End of Cul-de-Sac Grece Lane Miller Wa Local 19
Cha arral Lane Grace Lane S niah Moss Lane Miller Wa Locel 19
Chelsea Lane End of Cul-de-Sac � B hton Ave Ocean Vlew Local 79
� Che Avenue East Brench MIII Road End of Cul�de-Sac Villa e � Cdledor 17
Che Avenue East End of Cul�e-Sac Coach Road Vllla e Cdleda 77
Che Avenue East Tratfic Wa PC Railwa Place Villa Colleda 17
Che Avenue est Bedloe Lane Tratfic Wa vlla Lad 19
Che Avenue est CaliTOmia Street o Ave Vllla e Lotal 19
Chilton Ave Oak Park Blvd Robles Road � Ocean View Local 19
Clarence Ave End of Cul-de-Sac Huasna Road Villa Loca� 19
Clinton Court James Wa End ot Culde-Sac Rancho Grande Cdlector 17
� Coach Road Branch Mill Road Flara Road 82nch Mill CdbcOw 17
� Coach Road Flore Road End of Cu4de-Sac Branch Mill Cdledw 17
Cobre Place Gularte Road End of Cul-0e-Sac S ch Cdbcbr 17
Colina Street Vla La Barranca James W Miller Wa Cdbdor 17
bCOD
Collado Corte - Avenida de Dlamante EM of Cul-deSac Flve Cities Cdbclw 17
Corbett Can Road Route 227 � CI Limit Carbett Can Raad ArMrial 16
Comwall Ave
Hal n NorM Bamett Streel Weatem Additlon Local 19
Corona del Tierta B htan Ave End of CuldeSac Ocean Vlew Local 19
Cortal Place Co�bett Can Road End of Culde-Sac S ch La�l 19
CouNand SVeet � Ash Street Ras be Ave Be Garclens Cdleclor 17
Courtland Streel Bri hron Ave N rt Ave Ocean View Calbclor 17
Courtland Street Grand Ave � Bri ton Ave Be Gardens Cdbcla 1�
Courtland Street Ras be Ave Stra Ave Be Gardens Cdl�ta 17
Courtland Street Strawbe Ave East Grand Ave Be Gardens Cdkda 17
Cranbe Street Ras Ave Bladc Ave Gardens Wcal 19
Creekside Drive Erb of Cul<leSac Woodland Drive Woodland La�l 19
Cross Street Allen Street � Ide Street Villa Lonl 19
Crown Hill Easl Bianch Street End W Cul-0e-Sac ' U Vfll Local 19
Crown Temace Crown Hill Le Pdnt Street U r Vllla Local 19
Crown Terrace Le Pdnt Street Ma Street U r VII e Locel 19
Cuerda Corte Avenida de Diamante End M Cul-de-Sac Five Citles Local 19
� Cuesta Place Via La Barranca End of Cul-de-Sac MIIIer Wa L.acal 19
Deer T211 Cirde End of Cul-0eSac E uestrlan Wa Rancho Grande. Local 19
Del Sd Street The Pike End of Cul�de-Sac Parkside Locel 19 -
Diamond Cirde End of Cukie-Sac Leanna Drive Valle Gardens Lacal � 19
Diana Place End of Cul-deSac Farroll Ave Sunset Local 19
Dixson Street Oak Park 91vd End of Cul-de.Sac PaAcsMe Loca� 19
p���Wa Alder Street Hal Road Sunset Loa� 19
ppdson Wa Hal AI ne Street SouM Woodland Laal 19
pos Cerroa � Vla Las uilas End of Cultle-Sac Flve CiBes L.ocel 79
EI Camina Real Brisco Road Hal Road EI Camirw Real Mina Arterial 16
EI Camino-Real CI Limit Oak Park Blvd � EI Camirw Real MNwr Artetial 16
EI Camino Real Hal Road � Bame@ Street EI Camino Real Mina Arledal 16
EI Camino Real Hillcrest Drive Brisco Roed EI Camino Real Minor ArteMal 16
EI Camino Real Oak Park Blvd Hillcrest Drive EI Camino Real Minor Arterfal 16
Elm Street NoAh Brl hWn Ave � End of Cul-de-Sac Ocean View Cdbdor 17
� Elm Street Natl� East Grand Ave Bri ton Ave Elm Street CoNedor 17
Elm Street South Agh Street Grand Ave Elm Street AMna Nbrial 16
Elm Street South CI Limit The Pike Elm Street Mlna Artmial 16
Elm Street Soufh Farroll Ave Ash Streel Elm Street Mina ArEerial 16
Elm S7eet South The Pike � Fartdl Ave Elm Street Minor Arteiial 16
Eman Court AI ine Street South End of Cul�laSac Woodland Local 19
Emerald Ba East � Radeo Drive End of Cul-0e-Sac Miller Wa Lonl 19
Emereld Ba est End of Cul-deSac Rodeo Drive Miller Wa Local 19
E uestrian Wa James Wa Vista Cirde Rancho Grande Cdlecta 17
E uestrian Wa Vista GrGe No Roed Rancho Grande Cdlecta 17
Faeh Ave Hal Road North EI Camino Real Westem Additlan Local 19
�
�. � Pege 2 of 7
i
�— ... .. . . —______._--___.. _____ ._._ .__..___
FHWA Functional Street Classifications for the City of Arroyo Grande Street Network
Resolution No.
March 8,2005
FHWA FHWA FC
Street Name From To Zone Funetional Number
Stnst
Fair Oaks Ave Elm Street South Pepn Street Fair Oaks Ave Cdledor 17
Fair Oaks Ave � Hal on Road South Woodland Drive Fair Oaka Ave Mina Arterial 16
Falr Oaks Ave Orchard Ave Trefilc Wa Fair Oaks Ave Mina Arterial 16
Fair Oaks Ave Pecan Street Ha on Road South Fair Oaks Ave Cdledw 17
Fair Oaks Ave Valle Road OrchaM Ave Fair Oaks Ave Mirror Arterial 16 �
Fair Oaks Ave � Woodland Drive Valle Road Falr Oaks Ave Mirwr Arterial 16
Fair Vlew Drive Bri h�n Ave End W CuFde-Sac Ocean View Loce� 19
Fair Vlew Drive East Grand Ave � Bri hton Ave Ocean Vlew Local 19
Farmhouse Place Grove Court Hillside CouA Vill Lacal 19 '
Fartdl Avenue CI Limlt Elm Street South Fartdl Avenue Caqedor 17
Farroll Avenue Elm Street South Pecan Street � Fartdl Avenue CdbcWr 17
Farroll Avenue Hal on Roa South End of Cul-deSac Farroll Avenue local 17
Farroll Avenue � Pecen Street Hal on Roed SouN Partdl Avenue Cdlecbr �7
Fieldview Poace Grove Court Hillside Court Ville Lacal . 19
Flara Road . Coach Road End of CuWe-Sac Branch Mfll Road Local 19
Forest Glen Drive End of Cul-deSac Woodland Drive Woodland Laal 19
Fortuna Court End M Cul-de-Sac PlaBno Lane 6 ch Lacal 19
Garden Street East Che �Ave Grove Court Vllla Loca� 19
Garden Street - East Che Ave Ide Street Vil L.oa� 19
Garden Street End of Streel Creek East Branch Street VII Local 79
Gafield Place The Pike End of Cul-de-Sac Sunset Lo�l 19 �
Ga fair Tertace The Pike Farroll Ave Su�set Lonl 19 .
Golden West Place Farroll Ave � End of Cul�Sac Parkside Locel 19 _
Grace Lane Radeo Drive � Cha rtal Larre Miller We Lonl 19
G2nd Avenue East CI Limit � Elm Street Grand Avenue er Prind I A 14
Grdnd Avenue East Elm Street Hal Road Grand Avenue Pri I Arte 14
Grand Avenue East � Hal on Road Bamett Streel Grand Avenue r ' I 14
Greenwood Drive Flora Road End W Cul-deSac Branch MIII Road Loal� 79
Grove Court Fartnhouse Place Fieldvlew Place Villa Lacal 19
Gularte Road Corbett Can Road S ch Road S ch ►.oca� 19
Gularte Road Sta coach Road End of Cul�e-Sac S ch Laca� 19
Hal on Road NaAh Grand Ave EI Camino Real Hal Road er P' I Arte 14
Hal Road South Fair Oaks Ave Eaat Grend Ave Hal on Road Pri I Arts 14
Hal Road Soufh The Pike Fair Oaks Ave Hal Rosd her Pri I Arte 14
Harden Street Masan Street NoAh East Brandi Street U Vllla Local 19
Hartison Street McKinle Street End of CuldaSac U Villa Loral 19
Hart Wne End of Street Nevada�Street U VIII Local 19
Hawkins Court End of Cultle-Sac Croas Street � Vill Loca� 19
Hillcrest Drive Mon o Street EI Camino Real� Ocean Vlew . Locel 19 '
Hillcrest Drive � Sierra Drive Mon Street n View Locel 19
Hillside Court Fieldview Place Los Oliwa Lane Villa Locel 19
H es Road E uestrian Wa Slevenson Drive Rancho Grarnle � Local - 19
Hod Road Stevenaon Drive End of Cul�leSac Randio Grande Local 19
Huasna Road Crest Drlve CI Llmit Huaena Road AAlnor NOerial 16
Huasna Road Raute 227 � Sfa ch Road Huasna Road Minor Arte�ial 16
Huasna Road Sta ch Road Crest Drive Huasna Road Minor Mte�ial 16
Hucklebe Avenue Cren Street �Courtland Streel Gerdens Wca� 19
Ide Street Whitele Streel Garden S4eet S ch Loce� 19
Ikeda Wa Huasna Road VaN Loomis Lane S ch Loca� �9
James Wa Colina Street Tal Ho Road Jamee Wa CoNecda 17
James Wa E uestrlan Wa Jenn Place Jamea Wa � Cdlector 17
James Wa Jenn Place Rancho Parkwa Jamea Wa Cdbctor 17
James Wa Oak Park Blvd E u�trlan Wa Jamea Wa CdbcWr 17
� James Wa Rancho Parkwa Rodeo Ddve James Wa Cdleclor 17
� James Wa Radeo Drlve Cdina Street James Wa Calbda 17
Jenn Pla� Mdre Drive End W Cu4de-Sac Rancho Grande Local 19
Jenn Pla� James Wa Mdre D�1ve Rancho Grande Lxal 19
Juni r Street P lar Street Grand Ave CaaMens Local 19
La Canada James Wa Roseme Court Randw Grande Local 19
La Canada Rosema Court Vista Drtve Rancho Grande Local 19
La Cresfa Drive Platino Wne Platlno Lane Sta ch Loca� 19
i
�
Pege 3 of 7
FHWA Functional Street Classifications for the City of Arroyo Grende Street Network
� Resolution No.
. . March 8,2005 �
FNWA FHWA PC
Street Name � From To Zone Punctlonal Number
Stre�t
La Cresta Drive Platlno Wne Huasna Road Sta ecoach L.oce� �9
La Paz Cirde PlaUno Lane End of Cu4de-Sac Sta ecoach Loca� �9
La Vista Court The Pike End of Cul-de-Sac Parkside ��a� �9
Ladera Place Vla La Bartanca End of Cul-de-Sac Miller Wa Local 19
Lancaster Place The Pike Elm Street South Parkside Local 19
Larchmont Drive Vemon Street Wesle Street U r Villa Loca� 19
Launa Lane End of Street Los Olivos Lane Vllla e �� �9
' Le Point Street Crown Tertace Route Y27 U r VIII e le�r 17
Le Point Street Mason Street North Tall Ho Road U r Vill e Cd�edor �7
Le Pant Street Nevada Street Mason Street U r Vllla Local �9 �
Le Pdnt Tertace Crown Hill End of Street U r Villa �ocal �9
Le Pant Tertace East Branch Street Crown Hill U Villa Local 19
Leanna Drive CI Limit Valle Road Valle Gardens Loca� 19
Ledo Place Bri hton Ave ErW oT Cul-de-Sac Ocean Vlew Lxe� 19
Linda Drive Brisco Road � Bennett Ave Ocean View Lacal . 19
Linda Drive , Elm Street North Brisco Road Ocean View Laca� �9
L anbe Avenue Cranb Street Courtland Street Be Gardens Local 19
���N� Puesta del Sd End of Cul-0e-Sac Rancho Grande Local 19
Los Cenos � Puesta del Sol Vista Drive Rancho Grande Local 19
L���,� Ysta�Drive End W CultleSac Rancho Grande Local 19
Los Olivos Lane End of Street Launa Lane Vllla �e� �9
Los Olivos Lane Launa Lane East Che Ave Vill e �� �9
Ma nolia Drive S camore Drive End W Cul-de-Sac Sunset Laca� �9
Ma le Street � Elm Street South Walnut Street Sunset Loca� 19
M le Street ' Walnut Street Alder Street Sunset Laca� 19
Mari Cirde Platlno Lane End W Cul-0�Sac Sta coach Loal 19
Masan Street North East B�anch Street Le Pdnt S4eet U r VIII e Cdleclor 17
Mason Streel South Allen Street Nelsan Street VII �Local 19
Mason Street South Nelson Street Branch Street est U r Vllla Colleda 17
Madhew Wa Andre DAve � LaCanda Rancho�Grande Lacal 19
Ma Street Crown Terrace McKinle Street U VIII Loca� 19
McKinle Street Crown Hill Ma Street U r VIII �e� �9
Meadowlark SVeet � Oak Park Blvd Robin.Grde Rancho Grende Local 19
Mercedes Lane Old Ranch Road End of Culde-Sac Mlller Wa Local 19
Mercedes Lane Rodeo Drive Old Ranch Raad Miller Wa Loce� 19
Mesa Drive TI er Tail DAve End of Cul-0e-Sac Val Gardens loca� 19
Mes uite�Lane Cha arral Lane James Wa Mlller Wa �e� �9
Miller Cirde Mlller Wa End of Cul-de-Sac Miller Wa Loca� 19
Miller Wa Le Point Street End of Street Mlller Wa Lacal 19
Mon Streel Hlllcrest DAve End of Cul-0e-Sac Ocean View Lacal 19
I Momin Rise Lane End of Street Fartoll Ave � Sunset Local 19
� Mulbe Lane Ma dia Drive S camae Drive Sunset Local 19
Musfan CirGe E uesMan Wa End of Cul-de-Sac Rancho Grende Loce� 19
M e SUeet � Garden Steet End of SUeet Vlla � L I 19
Nelson Street � Brid Street Masan Street South VIN e �� � �9
Nelson Street Mason Street South End of Cul-de-Sac Vllla Lxal 19
Nevada Street East Brench Street Le Point Street U r Vllla � �9
Newman Drive AI ine Street South End of Street Woodland Loce� 19
N ' Avenue Courtland Street Mon Street Ocean Vlew La�l 19
Noel Ave End of Cultle-Sac Oak Park BNd Parkside �� �9
N uera Place End of Cul�de-Sac � M e Street Vflla �� �9
� No es Road � Oak Park Blvd Ci Limtt Rancho Grande Lace� �9
Oak Hill Road Peanvood Ave End of Street S eooach Locel 19 .
Oak Park Bauleward � End of Street Peanvood Ave Oak PaMc Boulevard Minw Arte�ial 14
Oak Park Boulevard Fartoll Ave CI Limit Oak Park Boulevard Mirror Ar4erial 14
Oak Paiic Baulevard James Wa N Road �Oak Park Boulevard Minor Nteria� 14
Oak Park Boulevard Sierra Drive EI Camino Real Oak Park Boulevard Mfnor NteAal 14
Oak Park Boulevard West Branch Street � Jamea Wa Oak PaAc Boulevard Minor Arterial 14
Oak Street � East Grand Ave EI Camino Real Wesfem Addltion Local 19
Oakleaf Cirde E uesMan Wa End W Culde-Sac Rancho Grande Locel 19
f
Old Ranch Road Wesl Bwnch Street Mercedes Lane Miller Wa Lacal 19
's
Pege 4 Of 7
FHWA Functional Street Classifications for the City of Arroyo Grande Street Network
Resolution No._
March 8,2005
. FHWA FHWA FC
� Street Name From To Zone Funetlonal Number
Strs�t.
Olive Street Hal on Road Suite Woodland Drive Woodland Local �9
Olohan PJIe Brid Street Mason Street South Vllla Lax� 19
�G� End of Cul-0e-Sac Leanna Drive Valle Gardens Local 19
Orchard Ave PII rim Wa Castlllo del Mar HI h Schod Local 19-
Orchard Ave Pil rim Wa West Che Ave HI h School Local 19
Or6hard Ave West Che Lane Falr Oaks Ave H' h Schaol Local 19
Oro Road Huasna Road Platlno Lane S ch �oca� �9
Oro Road . Platino Lane Gularte Raad Sta coach � Loca� �9
Outland Drive End of Culde-Sac Gularte Road Sfa ch Loca� �9
Padfic Pointe Wa Elm SVeet South Elm Street South Sunset Local 19
Palm Court
� EndoTCul-de-Sac WalnutStreet Sunset �oal �9
Palos Secos Rancho PaAcwa End of Cul-de-Sac Five Cities Local 19
� Paraiso Asilo End of CW-0e-Sac Rancho Grende Local - 19
Park Wa Hal on Road South Rena Street South Woodland �� �9
Paseo Street Ma Street Route 227 U Vllla Lxal 19
Paul Street The Pike Elm Street South Parkside ��� �9
PC Railwa Place Allen Street End of Street VIII .Lxal 19
PC Railwa Place East Che Ave Allen Street Villa ��� 19
p��p��e Leanna Drive Leanna Drive Valle Gardens Laca� 19
Pearwood Ave Huasna Road Oak hlll Road Sfa ch �aca� �9
Peqn Street farroll Ave Fair Oaka Ave Sunaet Loca� 19
Pil rim Wa Orchard Ave Arto o Ave H h School Local 19
Pine Street Ma le Street End of CulEe-Sac Sunset Local 19
Plafa Street � End of Cul-0e-Sac Oro Drive Sfa ch Loca� �9
Platino Lane Sta coach Road Le Cresta Drive S eooach Lacal 19
�� Platino Lane Tem Cirde Sta ewach Road � S ch Loce� �9
Plomo CouR End W CulEe-Sac S coach Road S coach � Loca� �9
Paole Street Mason Street South YVhiEele Street W �e� �9
Poole Street Treflic Wa Mason Street South Vil �� 19
Po lar Street Juni r Street Elm Street Swlh B � Gardens Loca� 19
P2dere CouA la Cresta Drive End oT Culde-Sac S� coach Local 19
Priscilla Lane Ruth Mn Wa End of Cul-0e-Sac Ocean Vlew Loce� 19
� Puesta del Sd Los Cervos Visfa Drive Rancho Grande Local 19
Quail Court End of Cul-0eSac Robin Cirde Rancho G2nde Wcal 19
� Rancho Parkwa Camino Mercado Via Poca Rancho Parkwa CaNedor �. 17
Rancho Parkwa Via Poca Jamea Wa Rancho Parkwa Cdbcbr 17
� Rancho Parkwa West Branch Street Camino Mercado Rancho Parkwa Cdledor 17
� Ras be Avenue CouNand Street B Street Gardena Loca� 19
j Ras Avenue Crenb Street CouNand Street B Gardens - I 19
� Refu b Place End of Culde-Sac Rancho Parkwa FNe Gtles Local 19
Rena Street NoM ' East Grand Ave Bennett Ave Weatem Additlon Loce� 19
� Rena Street South Dodson Wa Grand Ave Waodland Local �9
V Rice Court End of Cul�e-Sac Bakeman Lane Parkside �� �9
; Wd eview Wa White Court Tall Fb Road Rancho Grande Lonl 19
i Robi�Grde Meadowlark Drive Oak PaAc Blvd Rancho Grande Locel 19
� Robles Road Slerra Drive EI Camino Real Ocean View Loca� 19
Rodeo Drive Emerald Ba Drive James Wa � Rodeo Drive Cdbcbr �7
Radeo Drive James Wa � End of Cultle-Sac Rodeo Drive � Cdledw 17 �
Rodeo Drive Merc�des Lane Eme2W Ba DAve Rodeo Orive � Colbcbr 17
Rodeo Drive Weat Branch Street Mercedes Lane Rodeo Drive Collecto� ��
R ers Court End of Cul�eSac Victaia Wa Sunset Local 19
Rasema CouA La Canada End of Culde-Sac Randro Grande Locel 19
Rosema Lane Sombrlib Salida del Sd Rancho Grande Local 19
Rosewaad Lane Huasna Road End W Cul-de-Sac Rancho Grende Local 19
Russ CouA Paul Place End of Culde-Sac Parkside � La�l 19
RuM Mn Wa North Bri hton Ave End of Cul-deSac Ocean Vlew Locel 19
Ruth Mn Wa South End of Cul{le-Sac B�i hton Ave Ocean Vlew �oca� �9
Sa e Street S ruce Street n Street Gardens La�l 19
I Salida del Sd James Wa End of Cul-0e-Sac Randw Grarnle Locel 19
� Sandahvood Ave Alder Street Hal on Road South Sunset Loca� �9
Scenic CIrGe E uestrian Wa End W Culdo-Sac Rancho Grande Locel 19
Page 5 of 7
FHWA Functional Street Classifications for the City of Arroyo Grande Street Nelwork
Resolutlon No._
� March 8,2005
FHWA FHWA FC
Street Name From To Zone Fundional Number
Strest
Seabri ht Avenue Oak Park Blvd Cranbe Street Be Gardens La;al 19
Short Slreet � Allen Streel Nelson Street Ylla e �� �9
Short Street East Branch Street Le Point Street Villa e ��� �9
Short Street End of Street East Bronch Sheet Villa e Local 19
Short Street Nelson Street End of Street �Ila e ` �� �9
Sferta Drive Oak Park Blvd Hfllcrest Drive Ocean Vfew Loca� �9
Sombrillo Rosema Court Salida del Sol Rancho Grande Local 19
S nish Moss Lane Cha rtal Lane M ulte Lane Miller Wa � Local 19
S nice Street Ash Street � Cedar Streel Be Gardens Local 19
S ruce Street Cedar Street P lar Street Be Gardens Loca� 19
SNa ecoach Road Huasna Road Platino Lane Sta ch Road Lacal 19
Sfa ecoach Road Platlno Lane End W Street Sfa ch Road Lad 19
Sfanle Ave End of Street Creek Huasna Road Villa Local 19 �
Stanle Ave M e SVeet End of Street creek � Vllla e Lxal 19
Station Wa Fa
Ir Oaks Ave
Traffic Wa Villa �
I 19
Sfarf ht Lane Farroll Ave End-ofStreet Sunset L.axl 19
Stevenson Drive James Wa H es Roed Rancho Grende Locel 19
Strawbe Avenue CouNand Street be STreet Be Gardens Local 19
Sunset Ddve Elm Street SouM Alder Street Sunset Local 19
S camore Court End of Cul-0aSac more Drive Sunset Local 19
S camoreDrive Ga nfalrTerrace Ha onRaad South Sunset ��e� �9
S camae Drive Ma nolla Drive Ga nfair Tertace Sunset Local 19 �
Tall Ho Road Le Pant SVeel Route Y17 Tall Ho Road �Lxal 19
Tall Ho Road Le Point Street James Wa Tall Ho Road Local 19
Tanner Lane Branch MIII Road . Fbra Road B2nch Mill Road Local 19
Ta a Place fU ine Sheet South End of Street Woodland � Local 19 -
The Pike CI Limk � Elm Streel South The Pike Local 19
The Pike Elm Street South Hal on Roed South The Pike Loca� 19
Tlena Street The Pike End of Street Parkside Loca� 19
TI r Tail Drive Valle Raad End of Cul-0eSac Valle Garclens Local 19
Tadd Lane Hal �n Road South Fair Oaks Ave Woodland Local 19�
To on Place - End of CuWe-Sac S eooach Road S ecoach Lacel 19
TraiRc Wa Falr Oaks Ave Route 101 Villa e Minor Arterial 16
7rafic Wa West Branch SUeet Fair Oaks Ave VIII Minor Arterlal 16
Traffic Wa Extension 7ratfic Wa Trini Ave Villa �e� �9
Trinl Ave T2flic Wa End W Street Vflla L.6ca� 19
Tu uoise Drive Leanna DrNe Leanna Drive Valle Gardens Local 19
Valle Road CI Limit Fair Oaks Ave Valle Road Minor Arterial 16
Valle Road C' Limit Near Los.Be C' Limk Near Sun Valb Road Minor Ar�lal 18
� Vard Loomis Court Vard Loomis Lane End of CuWe-Sac � Sfa coach Locel 79
� Vard Loomis Lane Huasna Road End of Culde-Sac Sta ch Loca� �9
Verde Place The Pike End M Culde-Sac Sunset Loca� 19
Vemon Street Larchmont Drive End of Street U r Vllla Lacal 19
Vemon Street West Bianch Street Larchmont Drive U r Vllla e Loca� 19
� Via Avante Castllb del Mar End oT Cul-de-Sac HI h Schod Locs� 19
I Via Bandolero Vla Va uero AvenWa de Diamente FWe CIUes Loca� 19
] Via Belmonte Court North Castillo del Mar End of Cul-0e-Sac H h Sdiool Lacal 19
i Vla Belmonte Court South Castlllo del Mar End of Cul-0e-Sac HI h School Local 19
� Via gerros Valle Road G Limit Valle GaMens Local 19
� wa Firenze Caurt North Castllb del Mar End of Cul�de.Sac HI h�Schod� Local 19
Via Firenze Court Sauth Cas81b del Mar End of Cul-de-Sac H h Schod L.oce� 19
Via la Bartanca Tall Ho Road End of Street� Mlller Wa � Loql 19
� Via las uilas Camino Mercado Palos Seoos Flve Cltles Local 19
� Via las ullas Palos Secas End of Street Five Citles Loca� 19
1 �a Paca Rancho Parkwa Via Banddero FNe Gtles Local 19
iVia Va uero Avenida de Dlamante Via Banddero Five Citles Local 19
� Va Va uero Rancho Parkwa Avenida de Diamante Five Gtles Lacal 19
j Victoria Wa rs Court Garfleld Place Sunset Local 19
� Villa e Court Trini Ave End of Cul-de-Sac � YII Locel 19
VI ina Ddve Hal on Raad Soulli WoodlarM Drive �Woodland � Local 19
i �sta Cirde End of Cu4deSac E uestrian Wa Rancho Grande Local 19
I
�
�
. � Page 8 ot 7
J
1
FHWA Functional Street Classifications for the City of Arroyo Grande Street Network
Resolutlon Na._
March 8,2005
F��' FHWA FC
Street Name
From To Zone F�S��� Number
E uestrian Wa La Canada Rancho Grande ��� 19
Vista Drive Local 19
Vistorfan Court End of Cul-deSac Fartoll Ave �Sunset �I 19
Walnut Street Ash Street End of Street Sunset �' 19
Walnut Street Farroll Ave Ash Street Sunset .19
Wesle Street East B2nch Street Wrchmont Drive U Villa e ��
����rt End ot Culde-Sac Rid vlew Wa Ra�cho Grande �i ;9
Whitel Street Pode Street Nelson Stret Villa L�1 19
Whitle SVeet End W Street � Poole Street �I� �� 19
Whitle Street Nelson Street End of Streat aeek Villa �� t9
Willow Lane Hal on Road South Woodlend Drive Waodland �I 19
Wllson Court End of Cul-de-Sac Bakeman Lane Parkside L�' t9
Wilton Place Vemon Street End of Street U r Villa �I �9
Wood Place Dodso�Wa End of Cul-0e-Sac Sunset L�I 19
Woodland CouR End of Cul-0e-Sac Woodland Drive Woodland �� 19
Woodland Drive Certo Vista Cirde End oT Street W��^d �I �9
1 Woodland Drive Creekside Drive Fair Oaks Ave Woodland � 19
; Woodland Drive End of Cul-0e-Sac Creekside Orive � Woodland �I 19
I. Z ata Wa Gularte Road Sm ��R� P��� �� � N/A
!�h SVeet Bathrooms Parkin Lot YII e Parki Lot NA
Car Conal Parkin Lot Lower Villa PaMci Lot �
� Car Corral Parkin Lot U r Vllla e Partcl Lot NA
� CI Hall Parkin Lot py�q�de_ � parki Lot �
{ tion Yard Parkin Lot p� � NIA
�I Elm Street Communl Center Drivewa Ash Street Rec Parkin Lot P�ae perk� Lot N/A
Elm Street Communi Center Parkin Lot� ��� p� �p� NA
Olohan Alle Parkin Lot paAci Lot WA
Soto Com lex Parkin Lot North East Gate � Soto Com lex Offices��� P� �� N/A
Soto Com lex Parkin Lot Soufh Soto Oifices End MIIIer Wa PaAci Lot N/A
Women's Club Parkin Lot Lower Miller Wa Parkin l.ot N/A
Women's Club Parkin Lot U r
i
�
i
I
i
Page 7 of 7
�CITY OF
►
. - • ' ` ,
,
,� �;
;� CALIFORNIA
�� ' s � + �
Pavement
Management
Program
Public Works De�partment
March 2005
,
Table of Contents
Listof Tables .............................................................................................................................i
Listof Figures............................................................................................................................i
Introductlon...............................................................................................................................ii
Section 1 —Overview of Pavement Management Program....................................................1
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT DEFINED............................................................................................1
Pavement Management Program.........................................................................................1
Pavement Management System...........................................................................................2
PavementManagement P/an...............................................................................................2
PRESENT CONDITION OF ARROYO GRANDE STREET NETWORK....................................................2
Tra�c Indices.......................................................................................................................5
InspectionPlan...................................................................:.................................................6
Development Projects Construction Practices......................................................................6
Public Works Maintenance Strategies..................................................................................7
SECTION 11— Development of Pavement Condition Ratings.................................................8
PAVEMENTCONDITION (NDEX ....................................................................................................8
PAVEMENT DETERIORATION THEORY..........................................................................................8
DEFINITIONS OF PAVEMENT DISTRESSES..................................................................................14
AlligatorCracking...............................................................................................................14
Bleeding/Flushing...............................................................................................................14
BlockCracking...................................................................................................................14
Bumpsand Sags................................................................................................................15
Corrugation........................................................................................................................15
Depression.........................................................................................................................15
EdgeCracking....................................................................................................................15
Joint Reflection Cracking....................................................................................................16
Lane/Shoulder Drop-off......................................................................................................16
Longitudinal and Transverse Cracking...............................................................................16
Patching and Utility Cut Patching.......................................................................................16
PolishedAggregate............................................................................................................17
Potholes............................................................................................................................. 17
RailroadCrossing............................................................................................................... 17
Rutting................................................................................................................................ 17
Shoving.............................................................................................................................. 17
SlippageCracking.............................................................................................................. 17
Swell...................................................................................:.............................................. 17
Weathering/Raveling.......................................................................................................... 18
FIELDINVENTORY....................................................................................................................18
PAVEMENT CONDITION RATINGS COMPUTATIONS USING MICROPAVERTM..................................19
Section III— Pavement Maintenance Strategies....................................................................20
OVERVIEW AND CLASSIFICATIONS............................................................................................20
CrackFilling.......................................................................................................................20
FogSea1.............................................................................................................................21
SealCoat...........................................................................................................................21
S/urry seal..........................................................................................................................22
ChipSeaL...........................................................................................................................23
Cape Sea/(Chip Seal and S/urry Seal Combined)..............................................................23
MicroSurfacing............................................................:......................................................24
Thinoverlay...................................................................................................................:....24
Thickover/ay......................................................................................................................25
Reconstruction...................................:...............................................................................25
SELECTING PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES...................................................................25
Section IV— Pavement Management Plan and Budget........................................................28
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN USING THE EXISTING CIP BUDGET............................................28
Year1 —FY 2004/2005......................................................................................................29
Year2—FY 2005�2006......................................................................................................29
Year3—FY 200C✓2007......................................................................................................30
Year4—FY 2007/2008......................................................................................................31
Year5—FY 2008i2009......................................................................................................32
Corrective Maintenance Projects........................................................................................32
BUDGET REQUIREMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS...................................................................33
Section V— Funding Strategies and Alternatives.................................................................35
GENERALOBLIGATION BONDS.................................................................................................35
CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION.............................................................................................35
PAYAS YoU GO ............................................:........................................................................36
GeneralFund Contribution.................................................................................................36
ParcelTax..........................................................................................................................36
ASSESSMENTDISTRICT...........................................................................................................37
STATE AND FEDERAL SOURCES OF FUNDING............................................................................38
APPENDIX `
APPENDIX A-STREET INDEX
APPENDIX B-SECTION CONDITION REPORT
APPENDIX C- BRANCH LISTING REPORT
APPENDIX D-WORK HISTORY REPORT
, APPENDIX E- STREET NETWORK ZONE MAP
APPENDIX F- PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT INSPECTION FORM
APPENDIX G- FHWA STREET CLASSIFICATION MAP
APPENDIX H - BUS AND TRUCK ROUTE MAP
Appendix I — Pavement Management Plan Year-to-Year Maps
�
List of Tables
Table 1 — Street Classifications...................................................................................................3
Table 2— Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Ratings....................................................................3
Table 3— Pavement Condition Index(PCI) ratings of streets grouped by Street age..................3
Table 4— Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Ratings grouped by Surface Area (SF)....................4
Table 5—Average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) ratings grouped by FHWA Functional Street
Classification........................................................................................................................4
Table 6 - Proposed Traffic Indices for Design.............................................................................6
Table 7— Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Ratings....................................................................8
Table 8—Traffic Index versus ESAL's......................................................................................11
Table 9 - Rehabilitation Strategy associated with PCR's...........................................................26
Table 10—Typical cost associated with Typical Pavement Management Strategies ................27
Table11 - Budget Summary.....................................................................................................28
Table 12—Source Funding Breakdown....................................................................................28
Table 13—Year 1 of Pavement Management Plan...................................................................29
Table 14—Year 2 of Pavement Management Plan...................................................................29
Table 15—Year 3 of Pavement Management Plan...................................................................30
Table 16—Year 4 of Pavement Management Plan...................................................................31
Table 17—Year 5 of Pavement Management Plan...................................................................32
Table 18— Recommended Corrective Maintenance Projects....................................................33
Table 19- Budget Requirements and Recommendations.........................................................34
List of Figures
Figure 1 - Present Pavement Condition Ratings (PCR's) of Arroyo Grande................................4
Figure 2—Typical road cross-sections........................................................................................9
Figure3—Wheel load...............................................................................................................11
Figure 4—Comparative Vehicle Pavement Stress....................................................................12
Figure 5—Structural Section based on Native Soil R-value......................................................12
Figure 6—Typical Deterioration Curves....................................................................................13
Figure 7— Impact of Truck Axle Weight................:...................................................................13
�
i
j
Introduction
Through community partnerships, local leadership, supportive citizenry and committed staff, the
City of Arroyo Grande Public Works Department - Engineering Division, under the direction of
the Public Works DirectodCity Engineer, has developed the Pavement Management Program to
maintain and address the needs of our roadway infrastructure.
Approved by the Arroyo Grande City Council by Resolution No. on March S, 2005, this
Pavement Management Program contains an aggressive Pavement Management Plan (PMP)
and provides recommendations pavement maintenance strategies for the upcoming five (5)
Fiscal Years beginning on July 1, 2005 and ending on June 30, 2009 as well as
recommendations for specific capital improvement projects. City staff is dedicated to this
strategy and committed to improve the quality of roads within the network over time.
Current price for additional copies of this book may be obtained by contacting the City of Arroyo
Grande, Public Works Department- Engineering Division.
City of Arroyo Grande
Public Works Engineering Department
P.O. Box 550
208 E. Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
Phone: (805)473-5440
Fax: (805)473-5443
Website: www.arroyogrande.org
i�
i
Section 1 — Overview of Pavement Management Program
Pavement Management De�ned ,
Pavement management is the process of overseeing the maintenance and repair of a nerivork
of roadways and offers the potential for improved road conditions and reduced pavement
maintenance costs, simultaneously. The goal is to maintain streets and roads in good
condition, rather than allowing roadway sections to deteriorate to the point where extensive
rehabilitation or reconstruction becomes necessary. Pavement Management Programs offer
an efficient way to organize and evaluate the current condition and make predictions regarding
the useful service of a roadway network.
Pavement Management Program
Under a pavement management program, local highway or public works departments regularly
surveyed for distresses, such as cracking, potholes, and settlement. Information coBected from
the road condition survey is entered into a computer-based pavement management system and
the results are then used for planning and scheduling preventative maintenance operations and
capital improvement projects. This process enables the City to provide well maintained roads
and comfortable driving conditions at the lowest possible cost and maintain the street network
at a desired level within a given budget.
Pavement Management Programs can also be used as a financial planning tool by providing
the ability to define funding needs for the present and future, as well as to schedule
maintenance work. Using this approach helps to avoid the "squeaking wheel" or "reactionary"
maintenance approach in which the streets that receive the most complaints receive the
greatest attention. In summary the major benefits of a Pavement Management Programs
include, but are not limited to the following:
• Inventory the pavement network
• Plan and schedule present and future roadway maintenance
• Forecast major reconstruction projects
• Determine funding needs
• Archive work history of roadway sections
implementing a pavement management program requires the following steps:
• Inventory of all the streets within a jurisdiction
• Create a pavement network index, also known as a Street Index
• Perform field investigations to identify distresses on each street
• Enter all infortnation into the Pavement Management System (PMS)
• Calculate a Pavement Condition Index (PCI)for each street section using Yhe PMS
• Create a Pavement Management Plan (PMP) and budget
As mentioned above in the steps for implementing a Pavement Management Program, two
major components are:
1. Pavement Management System (PMS)
2. Pavement Management Plan (PMP)
Page 1 i
Pavement Management System
Pavement management systems are most commonly a computer-based soflware package that
provides a framework for storing information regarding the street network. The PMS stores a
historical record of pavement conditions and work history on each roadway section with a
specific pavement network. This data facilitates the identification and development of a
preventative maintenance schedule and identification of major roadway rehabilitation and
reconstruction projects. The computer-based software packages commonly utilize a structured
method that makes decisions about pavement management. Use of these systems requires a
long-term commitment to make it a part of the routine management process and affect the
decisions being made.
In 1999, when the Pavement Management Program was originally developed for the City,
MicroPAVERTM was selected primarily due to its ability to integrated with a Geographical
Information Systems (GIS) and for its capabilities for viewing and presenting pavement
inspection and work plan information. MicroPAVERT"'was used during this most recent update
of the Pavement Management Program.
Pavement Management Plan
The Pavement Management Plan (PMP) is specific plan, produced from the PMS, which
outlines a maintenance schedule for a specific time frame. The PMP is usually produced for a
five (5) year period. In addition to creating a maintenance schedule, specific capital
improvement projects are identified. The PMP can also used during budget preparation and
used as a planning guide during the establishment of an overall governing agencies budget.
The PMP produced from this update can be found in Section IV— Pavement Management Plan
and Proposed Budget.
Present Condition of Arroyo Grande Street Network
The City of Arroyo Grande's street network consists of approximately 70 centerline miles. The
present value of the entire street network is estimated at$36 million. This figure is based on the
present day replacement value of the entire street network.
The current street network contains six (6) street classifications, as outlined on City of Arroyo
Grande Standard Plan 166-AG and the City's General Plan, and is based on design width and
zoning districts when the street was originally built. The Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) has developed a standardized functional classification system to be used in planning
highway systems, determining the jurisdictional responsibility, and developing flscal planning.
According to the FHWA, Arroyo Grande is considered to be an Urbanized Area. For urbanized
areas, the FHWA recognizes the following functional classifications: other principal arterials,
minor arterial streets, collector streets, and local streets. Therefore using the recently updated
Traffic Model, Pavement Management Program, General Plan, and using the guidelines
prescribed by the FHWA Functional Classification System published in the FHWA Highway
Functional Classification — Concepts, Criteria, and Procedures manual, the Public Works
Department has assigned a corresponding FHWA Street Classifiption to each street section in
the street network. Refer to the Appendix A — Street Index, for individual street section
classifications. Table 1 lists the respective percentage (by square feet) of each of the FHWA
Functional Street Classifications in the City of Arroyo Grande street network.
Page 2 ,
�
— i
Table 1 — Street Classifcations
Other Princi al Arterial 6%
Minor Arterial 2p�/a
Collector 16%
LoCal 58%
Calculations performed by the Pavement Management System (PMS) establish a Pavement
Condition Index (PCI) for each roadway section within the street network. Ratings range from
"0" to "100", "0" indicating a street in need major reconstruction and "100" indicating a newly
constructed or well-maintained street section. A detailed explanation of how PCI's are
calculated can be found in Section II — Development of Pavement Condition Ratings. Table 2
list typical qualities if a roadway section based on the PCI value.
Table 2— Pavement Condition Index PCI Ratin s
Excellent 86-100 No Si nificant distress
Very Good 71-85 Little distress, slight cracking, or
atchin
Good 56-70 Moderate weathering, slight to
moderate distress, or atchin
Fair 41-55 Server weathering, slight to moderate
or load-related distortions
P�� 26-40 Moderate to severe or load-related
distortions
Very Poor 11-25 Severe distress, heavy or severe
alli ator crackin
Failed 0-10 Total failure, be ond rehabilitation
The average PCI for all of the street section within the City of Arroyo Grande's street network is
currently at 68. Table 3 lists the average PCI's by ages of streets. Tables 4 and 5 further
summarize the findings.
Table 3— Pavement Condition Index PCI ratin s of streets grouped by Street age
0-2 g5
3-5 86
6- 10 7g
11 — 15 87
16- 20 68
21 —25 g2
26 —30 56
31 —35 65
36—40 5g
Over 40 60
ALL 68
Page 3 �
As demonstrated in Table 3, younger street sections tend to have higher the PCI, conversely
older street sections tend to have lower PCI's unless they have been reconstructed. Pavement
conditions will deteriorate significantly over time if inadequate or no maintenance is performed.
An in-depth description of Pavement Deterioration Theory explained in Section II –
Development of Pavement Condition Ratings.
Table 4— Pavement Condition Index PCI Ratin s rou ed b Surface Area SF
Excellent 86-100 4,756,535
Ve Good 71-85 3,280,177
Good 56-70 2,229,324
Fair 41-55 1,740,850
Poor 26-40 904,021
Ve Poor 11-25 1,045,818
Failed 0-10 443,342
At the present time, 33% of the streets with the City of Arroyo Grande's pavement network are
in excellent condition; however, 16% are in need major reconstruction. Figure 1 illustrates the
present rating of the street areas in the City of Arroyo Grande by surFace area.
■Exceuenc
■Very Good
� ����-� OGood .
�Fair
■Pow
■Very Poor
■Falled
Figure 1 - Present Pavement Condition Ratings (PCR's) of Arroyo Grande
Table 5 lists the average PCI's by Street Classification. As demonstrated in the table, streets
which experience higher average daily volumes of traffic, such as Frontage, Arterials, and
Collectors tend to have lower PCI's, conversely streets which experience lower average daily
volumes of traffic, such as local streets and rural streets tend to have higher PCI's.
Table 5 — Average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) ratings grouped by FHWA
Functional Street Classification
Other Princi al Arterial 69.8
Minor Arterial 57.1
Collector 70.9
Local 60.6
Page 4 ,
�
—__ �
Future Conditions and Recommendations
Analysis of the previously pertormed maintenance and repair suggests that the overall condition
of the network has improved greatly over the past years. This increase in street quality is a
direct result of the preventative street maintenance that has been perFormed during the past
several years as well as a number of capital improvement projects. However, the City can
expect the overall network condition to decline over the next five years if maintenance in
deferred and a Pavement Management Plan is not adopted.
The City is approaching build-out and during the next five years several housing tracts will be
completed and their streets will need to be added to the pavement network:
• Tract 2310 - Parkside Homes (on Farroll.Avenue, between Golden West Place and Oak
Park Boulevard)
• Tract 1998—Rancho Grande, Phase IV Addition (off La Canada)
• Tract 2653 - Cherry Creek Estates (off East Cherry Avenue, near Liery Lane)
• Tract 2470—Strawberry Fields (extension Strawberty Avenue)
• Tract 2236—Grace Lane (off Grace Lane)
With the addition of the above listed residential developments, the street nehnrork will increase
by 633,600 SF and 3 centerline miles. Following the completion these residential housing tracts
the remainder of the deve�opment projects will be infill housing projects. Infill housing projects
do not increase the square footage of the street network significantly, however they do impact
the pavement network due to the increased traffic.
During the next five years the City is expected to increase commercial development along East
Grand Avenue. Commercial projects, just as housing infill project, rarely increase the size of
street network; however, they impact the street network significantly due to the increased tr�c
volume on adjacent streets.
Therefore, in addition to adopting the Pavement Management Plan, the following are
recommendations to maintain the existing pavement network:
• implementation of a Pavement Cut Policy
• increased traffic indices for design
• increased to current inspection plan
• revision to development projects construction practices
• adoption of the FHWA functianal street classification system
Traffic Indices
As described in Section II — Development of Pavement Condition Ratings, Tra�c Indices are
used to design street pavement sections. The Tra�c Indices used during design directly affects
the strength and service life of the roadway section. The current Traffic Indices used during
design are found at City of Arroyo Grande Standard Plan 136-AG. It is recommended that the
City revise the tra�c indices used for street pavement design thereby increasing the useful life
of the new or rehabilitated streets. The recommend traffic indices are found in Table 6 below.
Page 5
Table 6 - Pro osed Traffic Indices for Desi n
Rural 5.5 6.0
Local/Residential Street 6.5 7.0
Collector 7.0 7.5
Minor Arterial 7.5 8.0
Ma'or Arterial/ Fronta e 8.0 g,p
Inspection Plan
It is recommended that the City increase its commitment to its yearly inspection schedule. This
requires periodic examinations of each street section vuithin the street network and
corresponding database management. A more consistent and accurate inspection schedule
would dramatically increase the reliability of the data produced by the PMS software. Data entry
should be pertortned on a quarterly basis and updated for crack sealing and pothole repair. In
conjunction with the re-inspection, the network should be periodically (every 2-3 years) re-
inventoried. As the City grows, the street network increases and it becomes necessary to verify
the completeness of the database.
That commitment entails regular inspections every year of the entire street network as well as a
dedicated effort to maintain the database. Entering maintenance and repair information as it is
completed and updating budget figures ff and when they change are critical to maximizing
results.
Theoretically, as the City performs accurate field surveys and makes a concerted effort to
update the PMS software will help to highlight problem areas and circumstances to help prolong
pavement life. Furthermore, it can produce detailed information that will be invaluable in
establishing future budget necessities and communicating with the public.
Development Projects Construction Practices
It is also recommended that the City alter a number of practices that are common in the
construction industry for the road construction. These are:
• Require developers to design and construct streets to bear construction equipment
loadings
• Require developers to slurry seal new streets upon completion of housing construction
and prior to city acceptance of the public right-of-way improvements.
• Require the reconstruction or asphalt concrete overlay from developers on streets
adjacent to new developments whenever possible
• Require design engineers to evaluate the use of pavement fabrics of new streets
Requiring developers to design and construct streets to bear construction equipment loadings is '
recommended because construction equipment damages the asphalt concrete, aggregate base,
and sub base sections. The theory behind this further explained in Section II. Essentially, the
about half the ESAL's of the service life have been consumed, therefore the service life has
been cut in half
Requiring developers to apply a Type II slurry seal surface treatment upon completion of
residential housing tracts and prior to city acceptance of the public right-of-way improvements.
Page 6 �
. �
The primary reason for this is that many residential tracts take five (5) years to complete. Five
years after the original construction of the road, the Asphalt Institute (AI) recommends applying
a slurry seal application on the surface to subdue the aging process by adding a wearing
surtace. Requiring the contractor to perform the slurry seal application removes that street from
the pavement management plan for another five years, which allows the city to spend money on
other streets.
Requiring reconstruction or asphalt concrete overlay from developers on streets adjacent to new
developments whenever possible is justified because new developments add tra�c to adjacent �
streets which have already have a reduced service life. In addition, during construction,
construction equipment and trucks are constantly using the adjacent roads during the delivery of
construction materials. This extra traffic reduces the service life of the adjacent streets
prematurely.
For new residential developments, it is recommended that the city require homeowners
associations to maintain the new streets whenever possible. Essentially, these new street
would be added to the street network, and therefore the city would not need to spend funds on
these new roads and would not add work to the Public Worics Streets Maintenance Division.
The alternative is to increase the annual streets maintenance budget and to add personnel to
the Streets Maintenance Division.
Require design engineers to evaluate the use of pavement fabrics of new streets can extend the
service life of the roads. Pavement fabrics are installed between the asphalt concrete pavement
and the aggregate base. Pavement fabrics protect the aggregate base from water intrusion,
which as documented is the leading factor in sub grade failures.
Public Works Maintenance Strategies
Pavement maintenance is the routine work performed to keep a pavement, under normal
conditions of tra�c and normal forces of nature, as close as possible to its as-constructed
condition. Pavement maintenance includes effective crack filling, surtace sealing, patching of
broken areas and potholes, surtace recycling, and surtace leveling (smoothing). Maintenance
work requires proper supervision, skilled workers, and good workmanship. Unless all three are
employed, some repair work will be poorly done and will have to be redone.
Asphalt concrete is used in most pavement repairs, maintenance personnel, especially
supervisors and managers-need a thorough knowledge of this material. They must know which
asphalts are available and how to use them most effectively. The Arroyo Grande Public Works
Street Maintenance Division pertorms most of this routine preventative maintenance.
Finally, the maintenance budget should be increased to provide routine maintenance crack
filling and pothole repair when required and leave the streets in the worst condition to fix later.
Following these strategies and recommendations will result in more preventative work and less
reactionary repairs.
Page 7
I
�
SECTION II — Development of Pavement Condition Ratings
The following section provides an outline of the processes utilized in creating the Pavement
Management System (PMS) and developing the Pavement Management Plan (PMP).
Pavement Condition /ndex
Identification and development of a preventative maintenance schedule and identification of
major roadway rehabilitation and reconstruction projects is achieved through the implementation
of a rating system, known as the Pavement Condition Index (PCI). Field investigations of each
roadway section in the pavement network helps to establishes a pavement condition rating
ranging from "0" to "100", with "0" being a street in need of major reconstruction, and "100"
being a new or well-maintained street.
Each type and amount of pavemeM distress observed in the roadway sections results with a
deduction from "100". Pavement conditions will deteriorate over time if no maintenance is
performed.
Table 7— Pavement Condition Index PCI Ratin s
Excellent 86-100 No Si nificant distress
Very Good 71-85 Little distress, slight cracking, or
atchin
Good 56-70 Moderate weathering, slight to
moderate distress, or atchin
Fair 41-55 Server weathering, slight to moderate
or load-related distoRions
Poor 26-40 Moderate to severe or load-related
distortions
Very Poor 11-25 Severe distress, heavy or severe
alli ator cradcin
Failed 0-10 Total failure, be ond rehabilitation
Pavement Deterioration Theory
As a pavement progresses through its service life, it changes along the way. A pavemenYs
appearance and functionality decrease with time. This aging process begins immediately after
construction, though these first changes are impossible to see. After awhile we begin to notice
that the asphalt is not staying black, but is tuming grayer. This is a chemical oxidation process
_ and is often called "aging" or "age hardening." The chemical changes, in the asphalt binder,
make the pavement more brittle and subject to wear, along with susceptibility to cracking. The
following information provides infortnation about the how street roadway sections are designed
and how pavement deteriorates over time.
Page 8
�i
--- i
The pavement of a road or parking area for all-weather use by vehicles should have the
following:
(1) a suitable subgrade or foundation,
(2) proper drainage,
(3) a top surtace that is smooth, skid resistant, and resistant to wear, distortion, and
deterioration by weather and deicing chemicals,
(4) be able to prevent the penetration or internal accumulation of moisture, and
(5) a total thick-ness and internal strength sufficient to carry expected traffic loads.
Figure 2 illustrates typical roadway cross-sections for the following Flexible Pavements, Full-
depth Asphalt Concrete, and Rigid Pavement. The figure illustrates the different components
imolved in a pavement section.
Asphalt Concrete Surface
o Op�p�O�popO�p�0 0.� �j�� Aggegate Base
Aggregate Sub-Base
Native Sub-Grade
FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS .
Asphalt Concrete Surface
Narive Sub-Base
FULL DEPTH ASPHAI.T CONCRETE
Portland Cement Surface
Cement Treated Base
Native Sub-Grade
RIGID PAVEMENTS
Figure 2 —Typical road cross-sections
Pavement is usually described by the type of surtacing used, such as: (1) asphalt, including
asphalt surtace treatments, penetration macadam, cold plant-mixes, and hot plant-mixes
(asphalt concrete); (2) portland cement concrete (PCC); and (3) brick or stone block.
An asphalt pavement structure consists of all courses above a prepared sub-grade or
foundation. It may consist of a relatively thin asphalt-wearing surface (from less than one inch
Page 9
-- ,
to several inches thick) placed over an aggregate base or sub-base layer. Or, it may be a Full-
Depth asphalt pavement in which the entire pavement structure consists of asphalt-aggregate
mixtur.es Full-Depth is generally considered the most modem and dependable type of asphalt
pavement for present-day traffic.
A variety of bases and sub-bases are used in asphalt pavement structures. Usually bases and
sub-bases consist of compacted granular materials (such as crushed rock, slag, gravel, sand, or
a combination of these) or stabilized soil. One of the major advantages of asphalt pavements is
the economy achieved by using locally available materials. Sometimes materials other than
asphalt are used to treat or stabilize granular base and sub-base materials or selected soils.
These are portland cement, lime, calcium chloride, or salt (sodium chloride).
Portland cement concrete pavements are usually placed over a prepared subgrade. Such
subgrades are frequently treated with cement, lime, or asphalt to enhance load resistance
capability and reduce the danger from pumping (erosion of soil from under the individual slabs).
Brick and stone block are embedded in a sand, sand-asphalt, or portland cement slurry bedding
on aggregate bases or subbases. Such pavements, used extensively near the beginning of the
twentieth century and sometimes today for aesthetic reasons, are noted for the rough ride they
give and for their high maintenance requirements.
The asphalt condition is result of the following circumstances:
• Strength of Underling Soil (R-Value)
• Quality of Original Construction (Material, Quality of Construction Technique)
• Weather and Environmental effects (Temperature, Precipitation, Heat, Moisture, Freeze-
Thaw conditions)
• Traffic (Axle Loads and Repetitions, Load related fatigue)
• Age
• Maintenance
Figure 3 illustrates a diagram of the transmission of the wheel load to the pavement structure.
The wheel load, W, is transmitted to the pavement surtace through the tire at an approximately
uniform verticai pressure. The pavement then spreads the wheel load to the sub�rade so that
the maximum pressure on the sub�rade is only. When proper pavement materials are used
and pavement thickness is adequate, it will be small enough to be easily supported by the sub-
grade.
Page 10 '
Loading
(ESAL=Traffic Index or Tn
Pavement Structure
�
Soils
(R-Value)
Figure 3 —Wheel load
Figure 3 demonstrates how pavement distress starts - the wheel load is transmitted through the
tire into the asphalt concrete pavement. The pavement spreads the wheel load down to the
sub-grade material. If either the pavement or sub-grade material is inadequate or faulty, a
distress occurs.
The subgrade ultimately carries all traffic loads. Therefore, the structural function of a pavement
is to support a wheel load on the pavement surface and transfer and spread that load to the
subgrade without overtaxing either the strength of the subgrade or the internal strength of the
pavement.
Equivalent Single Axle Load (ESAL). ESAL's are an indication of the life of the roadway section.
ESAL can be thought of as a bank. Mathematically ESAL is calculated as the Axle
WeighU18,0001bs)°Z. The higher the Traffic Index (TI)the longer the I'rfe can be expected. TI is
calculated as 9.0(Total EAL)°19/(108). Table 8 lists corresponding ESAL's for common TI's.
Every time a vehicle travels over a street section ESAL are deducted. Figure 4 depicts
comparative vehicle pavement stress.
Table 8—Tra�c Index versus ESAL's
Traffic Index ESAL
4.5 2,954
5.0 7,160
5.5 15,950
6.0 33,136
6.5 649,24
7.0 121,020
7.5 216,092
8.0 371,676
8.5 618,596
9.0 1,000,000
Page 11 '
2.Aade Truck 442
3 Axle Truck 1526
4 Axle Truck 2606
5 Axles Truck 4526
B� 7774
Gazbage Truck 9343
5 Axles Truck 14708
(I.oaded)
Equivalent Single Axle I,oad
Figure 4— Comparative Vehicle Pavement Stress
The R-Value indicates the resistance value of the soil. With a higher the R-value the shallower
the aggregate base section thickness required to obtain the same Tra�c Index(TI).
Aspnak
Concrete=3"
Asphalt
Concrete=3"
Asphalt
Concrete=3"
R-Value=5 R-Value=25 R-Va1ue=50
Figure 5— Structural Section based on Native Soil R-value
Curves developed by the PMS reflect the deterioration and associated PCI rating accordingly
thorough time. Figure 6 illustrates how the PCI will decrease over time for Arterials, Collectors,
and Local/Residential Streets and how the future condition of a street may be projected at any
Page 12 ;
i
—_._ I
time interval. The future condition of a street may be projected at any time interval, which is
useful in establishing funding demands.
100 i
80
60
C)
a 40
20
0
Time (Years)
Arterial ----- Collector — Local/Residential
Figure 6—Typical Deterioration Curves
2.5
2
� 1.5
�
w �
0.5
0
Single Axles Weight (Ibs)
Figure 7— Impact of Truck Axle Weight
Page 13
I
— __._ I
I.
Definitions of Pavement Distresses
Distortions, disintegration, and cracking are general classifications of pavement distress. Each
form of distress must be identified in order to determine the correct rehabilitation. There is no
maintenance procedure that will fix all types of pavement distress, unless one considers
complete reconstruction. Therefore, it is important to recognize the different types of distress
and know the correct remedy for each. Only then can the proper maintenance for a street
section be established. Several types of pavement distress were evaluated. There are:
• Alligator Cracking (Fatigue) • Longitudinal/Transverse Cracking
■ Bleeding/Flushing ■ Patching and Utility Cut Patching
• Block Cracking ■ Polished Aggregate
• Bumps/Sags • Potholes
• Corrugation • Rutting
• Depression ■ Shoving
• Edge Cracking ■ Slippage Cracking
• Joint Reflection Cracking • Swell
• Lane/Shoulder Drop-Off ■ Weathering Raveling
Alligator Cracking
Alligator cracking is associated with loads and is usually limited to areas of repeated traffic
loading. Most load related cracking of this type begins as a single longitudinal, discontinuous
crack within the wheel path that progresses with time and loads to a more branched pattem that '
begins to interconnect. The stage at which several discontinuous �ongitudinal cradcs bagin to
inter-connect is defined as alligator cracking. Eventually the cracks interconnect sufficiently to
form many pieces, resembling the pattern of alligator hide.
On narrow, two-lane roads, alligator cracking may fortn along the centerline rather than in the
customary wheel paths. Almost always, the pattem of the cradcing (the longer dimension of the
connected cracks) is parallel to the roadway or direction of vehicle travel. However, alligator
cracking occasionally occurs in a pattem transverse to the roadway because of poor trench
compaction, sett�ement, or frost action.
Bieeding/Flushing
Bleeding (or Flushing) is indicated by an excess of bituminous material on the pavement
surface, which presents a shiny, glass-like reflective surtace that may become sticky in hot
temperatures.
Bleeding should always be recorded when it is severe enough to reduce skid resistance.
At the lower severity levels, the extents "localized" and "wheel path" may be difficult to
differentiate; however, as the severity increases, "wheel path" becomes more well defined.
Wheel path refers to the tire tracking area and may be used to represent the condition of only
one wheel track if it js heavily involved.
Block Cracking
Block cracks divide the pavement surtace into nearly rectangular pieces with cracks that
intersect at about 90 degrees. This type of distress differs from alligator cracking in that
alligator cracks form smaller, irregular shaped pieces with sharp angles. Also, alligator
cracks are caused by repeated traffic loadings and are, therefore, generally located in
traffic areas (i.e., the wheel paths).
Page 14
_ �
i
�
�
IBlock cracking is caused principally by shrinkage of the asphalt concrete and daily
temperature cycling. It is not load-associated, although load can increase the severity of
individual cracks. The occurrence of block cracking usually indicates that the asphalt
has hardened significantly through aging. Block cracking normally occurs over a large
portion of the pavement area, including non-traffic areas. However, various fatigue
related defects may occur in the same segment.
Bumps and Sags
This distress category also covers forms of surtace distress that are not limited to the wheel
path, although they generally include the wheel paths. The distress usually occurs in isolated
areas of the roadway surface.
Bump are small, localized, upward displacements of the pavement surtace. They are different
from shoves in that shoves are caused by unstable pavement. Bumps, on the other hannd, can
be caused by several factors including: (1) Bluckling of bulging of underlying PCC slabs in AC
overlay over PCC pavement. (2) Frost heave (ice, lens growth). (3) Infi�tration and buildup of
material in a crack in combination with traffic loading (sometimes called "tenting").
Sags are small, downward displacements of the pavement surtace. If bumps appear in a
pattem perpendicular to traffic flow and are spaced at less than 10 ft, the distress is called
corrugation. Distortion and displacement that occur over large areas of the pavement surface,
causing large and/or long dips in the pavement should be recorded as "swelling." '
Corrugation
This distress category covers a general form of surface distress that is not limited to the wheel
path, although they may occur in the wheel path. The distress may occur in isolated areas, such
as at intersections, or it may occur over a large part of the roadway surtace.
Corrugations and waves are regularly occurring transverse undulations in the pavement
surFace. Corrugations oxur as closely spaced ripples, while waves are undulations whose
distance from peak to valley is more than 3 feet.
Depression
Depressions are localized pavement surface areas with elevations slightly lower than
those of the surrounding pavement. In many instances, light depressions are not
noticeable until after a rain, when ponding water created a "birdbath" area; on dry
pavement, depression can be stored by settlement of the foundation soil or are a result
of improper construction. Depressions cause some roughness, and when deep enough
or filled with water, can cause hydroplaning.
Edge Cracking
Edge cracks are pallel to and usually within 12" to 18" of the outer edge of the
pavement. This distress is accelerated by tra�c loading and can be caused 4y frost-
weakened base or sub-grade near the edge of the pavement. The area between the
crack and pavement edge is classified as raveled if it is broken up (sometimes to the
extent that pieces are removed).
Page 15
�
�
�
�
1
Joint Reflection Cracking
This distress occurs only on asphalt-surfaced pavements that have been laid over a
PCC slab. It does not include reflection cracks from any other type of base (i.e. cement-
of lime-stabilized); these cracks are caused mainly by thermal- of moisture-induced
movement of the PCC slab beneath the AC surface. This distress is not load-related;
however, traffic loading may cause a breakdown of the AC surface near the crack. If
the pavement is fragmented along a crack, the crack is said to be "spalled." Knowledge
of the slab dimension beneath the AC surface will heips to identify distresses.
Lane/Shoulder Drop-off
Lane/shoulder drop-off is a difference in elevation between the pavement edge and the
shoulder. This distress is caused by shoulder erosion, shoulder settlement, or by
building up the roadway without adjusting the shoulder level.
Longitudinal and Transverse Cracking
Longitudinal cracks run roughly parallel to the roadway center line. Longitudinal cracks
associated with the beginning of alligator cracking are generally discontinuous, broken, and
occur in the wheel path. However, any longitudinal crack that is clearly within the travefed lane
should be rated. Joint reflective cracking from overlaid PCCP slabs and other rigid pavements I
within the lane is rated.
Transverse cracks run roughly perpendicular to the roadway center line. They may be due to I
surtace shrinkage caused by low temperatures, hardening of the asphalt, or cracks in the
underlying pavement layers such as PCCP slabs. They may extend partially or fully across the
roadway. Count only the transverse cracks that cut across most of at least one full wheel path
in the rated lane (2 feet minimum crack length).
Patching and Utility Cut Patching
In general, patches are smaller than typical rehabilitation in size and scope. They are
less than full roadway width and/or are less than project length. Some agencies may
have patches as long as the work defined by another agency as rehabilitation. Caltrans
defines a lane with new surtacing as a patch if it is less than about half a mile in length.
Definition of minimum rehabilitation versus maximum patch length is a matter of agency
policy.
Temporary patches, as well as localized permanent repairs (dig-out repair) are included
in this distress category. The patches or repairs that are obviously the result of utility
work is the exception and is not included as part of the patching values. While
appropriately done repairs are an asset rather than a liability to the life of a segment of
pavement, the fact that they were required (other than for utility work) generally
indicates some failure in the pavement structure.
If any patch (including a utility patch) shows surface defects, such as alligator cracking,
accumulate those defects also and include them in the overall segment rating.
Page 16 ,
—___ i
�
,
�
�
�
Polished Aggregate
This distress is caused by repeated traffic applications. Polished aggregate is present
when close examination of a pavement reveals that the portion of aggregate extending
above the asphalt is either very small, or there are no rough or angular aggregate
particles to provide good skid resistance. When the aggregate in the surface becomes
smooth to the touch, adhesion with vehicle tires is considerably reduced. When the
portion of aggregate extending above the surface is small, the pavement texture does
not significantly contribute to reducing vehicle speed. Polished aggregate should be
counted when close examination reveals that the aggregate extending above the
asphalt is negligible, and the surtace aggregate is smooth to the tough. This type of
distress is indicated when the number on a skid resistance test is low of has dropped
significantly from a previous rating.
Potholes
Potholes are small — usually less than 30 in. in diameter — bowl-shaped depressions in
the pavement surface. They generally have sharp edges and vertical sides near the top
of the hole. When holes are created by high-severity alligator cracking, they should be '
identified as potholes, not as weathering.
Railroad Crossing
Railroad crossing defects are depressions or bumps and/or between tracks.
Rutting
A rut is a surtace depression in the wheel paths. Pavement uplift may occur along the sides of
the rut, but, in many instances, ruts are noticeable only after a rainfall when the paths are filled
with water. Rutting stems from a permanent deformation in any of the pavement layers or sub-
grades, usually caused by consolidated or lateral movement of the materials due to traffic load.
Shoving �
Shoving is a permanent, longitudinal displacement of a localized area of the pavement surtace
caused by traffic loading. When tra�c pushes against the pavement, it produces a short, abrupt
wave in the pavement surtace. This distress normally occurs only in unstable liquid asphalt mix
(cutback or emulsion) pavements.
Slippage Cracking
Slippage cracks are crescent of half-moon shaped cracks, usually transverse to the direction of
travel. They are produced when braking or tuming wheels cause the pavement surface to slide
or deform. The distress usually occurs in overlaps when there is a poor bond between the
surFace and the next layer of the pavement structure.
Swell
Swell is characterized by an upward bulge in the pavemenYs in the pavemenY surtace-a long,
gradual wave more than 10 ft long. Swelling can be accomplished by surtace cracking. The
distress is usually caused by frost action in the sub-grade or by swelling soil.
Page 17
_. II
I
i
�
Weathering/Raveling
Weathering and raveling are the wearing away of the pavement surface due to a loss of asphalt
or tar binder and dislodged aggregate particles. These distresses indicate that either the
asphalt binder has hardened appreciably or that a poor-quality mixture is present. In addition,
raveling may be caused by certain types of tra�c, e.g. tracked vehicles. Softening of the
surface and dislodging of the aggregates due to oil spillage are also included under raveling.
Fie/d/nventory
Before pavement management can be properly implemented, the paved areas within any given
Jurisdiction must be divided into components and the components numericalfy identified
These components are: (1) network, (2) branch, (3) section, and (4) sample unit.
The "network" is all the paved areas used by ground and air traffic with an agencies
jurisdiction. This includes alls roads, streets, parking areas, hardstands, and airport
facilities.
A"branch" is an identifiable part of the network a single entity that has a distinct function.
For example, numbered roads, named streets, and individual parking areas are separate
branches of a pavement network. Similarly, ai�eld runways, taxiways, and aprons are
distinct branches.
A "section" is a division of a branch. The paved area throughout its area or length will
have similar characteristics. These characteristics are pavement structural section
(materials and thickness), construction history, and traffic.
A "sample unit" is a portion of section that is used for evaluation purposes when
pertorming field inventories.
During June, July, and August of 2004, every street, maintained by the City of Arroyo Grande in
the street network, was inventoried to establish the pavement management system's database.
The street network was divided into several zones. Each zone was given a spe�c name.
Major streets were designated their own zone. The zones can be found on the map in Appendix
E–Street Network Zone Map.
Several housing tracts were completed since the PMP was last completed in June 2001, these
included:
• Tract 2260–Berry Gardens (Courtland/Grande Ave)
• Tract 2207–Vista del Mar(Orchard Ave behind A.G High school)
• Tract 1834–Rancho Grande (off James Way)
• Tract 2217–CockeNEllsworth (off East Cherry Avenue)
The streets in these tracts where added to the street network prior to completing the field
inventory.
Using a pavement field inventory inspection form the quantity, type, and severity of distresses
were recorded for each roadway section in the pavement network. A sample of the form can be
found in Appendix F.
;
Page 18
—__ _ . I
�
I
1
,
�
�
Pavement Condition Ratings Computations using MicroPAVERr"'
Using the pavement field inventory inspection forms, the data was input into the MicroPAVERT""
pavement management system soHware. The type, extent, and severity of each distresses
found on the roadway sections are entered into the PMS database and used for calculating the
PCI.
MicroPAVERT^" computes the PCI by using the follows factors age of pavement, work history,
type, quantity and severity of distresses found during the field inspection. The PCI calculation
is based on the deduct values —weighing factors from "0" to "100" that indicate the impact each
distress has on pavement condition. A deduct value of"0" indicates that a distress has no effect
on pavement performance, whereas a value of"100" indicates an extremely serious distress.
The calculation procedures is as follows: Totals for each distress type at each severity are
totaled and then divided by the quantity of each distress type at each severity level by the total
area of the sample unit: This value of multiplied by 100 to obtain the percentage of density per
sample unit for each distress type and severity. A deduct value is then assigned for each
distress and severity level combination. The summation of all deduct values is deducted from
"100", which determines the PCI. Results of the computations can be found in Appendix B —
Section Condition Report.
Page 19
i
,
_ ;
�
Section III — Pavement Maintenance Strategies
Overview and C/assifications
Pavement Management Strategies can be classified as either"preventative" or "corrective." As
highway funds become depleted or deficient to meet our needs, local agencies are forced to
become more aggressive in adopting and utilizing more economical "preventive" maintenance
strategies and addressing pavement needs earlier rather than ignoring roadway sections until
more expensive "corrective" strategies become necessary.
Preventative strategies usually include the use of surface treatments which are categorized as
non-aggregate seals and aggregate seals. The non-aggregate seals are usually either a fog
seal, or a rejuvenator seal, while the aggregate seals take on flames such as chip seals, slurry
seal, mirco-paving, seal coat, armor coats, and oil mats (other names vary depending on which
part of the country you are located). Corrective strategies usually include asphalt overlays,
extensive recycling, and/or reconstruction, which involves the complete removal and
replacement of a failed pavement.
MicroPAVERT"" has the capability to assign repair strategies to particular roadway section based
on the field inspection information and computer pavement condition ratings. Formed on
information entered into the PMS and suggestions from the program, a list of maintenance
activities has been compiled to be associated with different levels of distress. There are several
preventative maintenance and rehabilitation strategies that are commonly used throughout the
nation. Eight of the most common strategies are as follows:
• Crack Filling • Cape Seal
• Fog Seal • Micro Surtacing
• Seal Coat . Thin Overlay
• Slurry Sealing • Thick Overlay
• Chip Seal . Reconstruction
Crack Filling
Joint and crack sealing is done for several reasons. It prevents surface water seepage, protects
joint fillers, and keeps out foreign matter. At one time, asphaft cement with or without mineral
filler was the most commonly used sealing material. Rubber-asphalt compounds have gained
favor because they have fewer tendencies to become brittle in winter or to soften under traffic in
summer. Equipment used for sealing joints and cracks varies. Truck-mounted or trailer-
mounted pressure applicators with hand wands are preferred.
Before any sealer is used, joints and cracks must be cleaned out. Air compressors, sand
blasters, and power routers make this job much easier. Just enough sealing material is placed
in the joint or crack to fill it. Hot sealer may shrink somewhat on cooling. When that happens,
enough additional sealer should be added to fill the opening flush with the surface. If the
pavement is to receive traffic immediately after sealing, the material must be protected against
pickup by tires. Dusting the filled joints and cracks with fine sand, mineral filler, or similar
material does this.
Service Life and Pertormance Limitations
Crack sealing does not in affect extend the expected service life of roadway section. By sealing
the cracks in the roadway section, water is prevented from falling between the asphalt concrete
Page 20
I
- I
�
�
�
I section and into the sub-grade section. Water in the sub-grade is the primarily reason for
cracking on the asphaft concrete surface.
Fog Seal
A fog seal is an application of diluted asphalt emulsion without a cover aggregate, used to seal
and enrich the asphalt pavement surface, seal minor cracks, prevent raveling, and provide
shoulder delineation. An asphalt distributor is normally used to apply the fog seal.
Fog seals are used on both low-volume and moderate-volume roads. Its primary use on high-
volume roads has been to prevent raveling of open-graded friction courses and to delineate
between the mainline and the shoulder. Its wider use on heavily tra�cked roads is restricted
because the pavement friction may be reduced until traffic wears some of the asphalt from the
surface.
Service Life and Pertormance Limitations
Expected life depends on the properties of the underlying pavement and its exposure to
sunlight. The pertormance life of this type of treatment is fairly short, ranging from one to two
years. Under adverse weather conditions it may be several hours before the road can be
opened to traffic. For these reasons, fog seals are most often used on shoulders and in parking
lots where the potential for reduced pavement friction is not a concem. Fog seals should only
by used where the existing pavement is sufficiently porous to absorb a substantial amount of the
emulsion and is best applied when temperatures are warm or hot. Cool temperatures require
longer curing times prior to opening the roadway to traffic. Do not use in areas with cracks
larger than hairline. It should also be noted that fog seals should used with caution on high-
volume roadways.
Seal Coat
A seal coat is an application of asphalt followed immediately with an aggregate cover.
Applications with two layers are referred to as a double chip seal. Rapid-setting asphalt
emulsions are normally used when placing a seal coat. Seal coats can waterproof the surtace,
provide low-severity crack sealing, and restore surtace friction. You can seal coat at any time
in a pavemenYs life.
The primary reason to seal coat an asphalt pavement is to protect the pavement from the
deteriorating effects of sun and water. When an asphalt pavement is exposed to sun, wind, and
water, the asphalt hardens, or oxidizes. This causes the pavement to become brittle, cracking
the pavement. A seal coat provides a waterproof inembrane that not only slows down the
oxidation process but also helps the pavement shed water, preventing it from entering the base
material.
A secondary benefit is an increase in the surface friction, which happens when the cover
aggregate adds additional texture to the pavement. A seal coat can increase surface texture on
a raveled pavement.
Pavements that are dry and raveled are good candidates for seal coating. Some agencies also
choose to seal coat pavements in good condition as a preventive maintenance technique.
Seal coating should be performed between May 15th and August 31st, and only during daylight
hours, when the pavement and air temperature are 600F or greater. In addition, relative
humidity should be less than 75 percent. In addition, do not conduct seal coat operations in
Page 21 �
'
fog y or rain weather. Traffic shoul
9 Y d not be permitted on the sealed road surtace until after all
rolling has been completed and the bituminous material has set and will not pick up on tires.
Service Life and Pertormance Limitations
The expected service life of a seal coat is approximately three (3) to six (6) years. The primary
limitations of seal cost are loose chips not embedded in the asphalt membrane will become
airborne and possibly damage vehicle windshields. Excessive binders or wet aggregates could
cause flushing. Traffic noise will also increase after application of a chip seal. Although seal
coats provide effective sealing and friction, the possibility of loose chips and broken windshields
along with excessive noise has prompted some states to restrict use of chip seals to low-volume
roads.
Seal coats are affected greatly by weather conditions, especially during construction. A warm,
sunny day with low humidity is the ideal condition. Humidity and cool weather will delay the
curing time and keep the seal cow tender for a longer period of time, making it more susceptible
to damage traffic. Rain can cause major problems when seal coating. If the asphalt has not
cured, it can become diluted and rise above the top of the cover aggregate. After the water
evaporates, asphalt may cover the entire surtace causing tires to pick up aggregate or tradc the
binder across the surface.
Siurry seal
A Slurry Seal is a cold mixed asphalt. It consists of a graded aggregate, a binder , fines and
additives. It is a hard wearing surtacing for pavement preservation. Slurry Seals are for sealing
aged and raveled pavements, filfing minor cracks, restoring skid resistance and restoring
aesthetic appeal. It may be used on freeways, residential streets, parking lots, driveways and
any area that needs the pavement to be preserved. �
Slurry Seals come in many different types. Different stone sizes give different surface textures.
Type I is fine and is for parking lots and runways. Type II is coarser and general purpose it is
used for all applications including arterial roads, residential areas and highways. Type III is the
coarsest and is used on freeways and high speed roads and industrial estates. Different types
of aggregate will give lighter or darker results. Slurry seals may be polymer modified for longer
wear and better resistance to tra�c and cradcing. This mod�cation includes latex rubber, crumb
rubber and other polymers.
Service Life and Pertormance Limitations
The expected life of a slurry seal is three (3) to five (5) years. Factors affecting pertormance
include tra�c loading, environmental conditions, existing pavement condition, material quality
and mix design, and construction quality. Slurry seal should not be used on high-volume roads
since friction initially may be reduced until traffic wears some of the asphalt from the surface.
Slurry seal will not perform we�l if the underlying pavement is cradced. Use only where the
existing surtace is stable with low-severity cracking.
A curing period is necessary before allowing traffic on the treated surtace. Therefore, use of a
slurry seal may not be appropriate where traffic must be allowed very soon after application. In
warm weather, slurry seals require at least two hours to cure, depending on the ambient air
temperature, humidity, and type of emulsion. Adjusting the mineral filler will help reduce the set
time of the slurry mixture but may hamper workability.
1
�
�
i
Page 22
�
i
' Chip Seal
Chip seals are a relatively inexpensive preventative maintenance techni ue desi ned to seal
9 9
small surface imperFections, water roof the avement and r t
P P es ore skid resistance.
Conventional chip seals are usually placed on relatively low volume roads. Chip seals are
economical surtace treatments designed to protect and prolong the lives of pavements. In a
single chip seal, an asphalt binder is sprayed on the pavement, then immediately covered by a
single layer of uniformly sized chips. The new surFace treatment is then rolled to seat the
aggregate, and broomed to remove any loose chips: There are also variations of the technique,
used for special needs.
Chip seals can be used to protect new pavements, to increase macro-texture, and to prolong
the life of a pavement that is structurally sound but is beginning to age and may have some
surtace distress. Traditionally, chip sealing is most common on low-volume roads, but with the
development of improved materials and technologies, chip sealing on high-volume roads is
becoming more popular.
Chip seals improve surtace texture, waterproof the surface, protect the underlying pavement
from oxidation, aging and traffic wear, give new life to dry, weathered surtaces, seal small
cracks and impertections, improve surtace texture, and are a relatively fast resurtacing method.
The smooth, chip sealed road surtace improves riding comfort and decreases road user costs
by decreasing vehicle maintenance costs, fuel costs, and traveling time.
Service Life and Pertormance Limitations
Chip seal should be pertormed in cool or damp weather and should not be used on a rutted
surface or over a bleeding asphalt pavement. Chip Sealing requires knowledge and
experience. Many consider it more of an "art" rather than a science.
Cape Seal (Chip Seal and Slurry Seal Combined)
A Cape Seal Surtace is an Asphalt surface that has been Chip Sealed, fol�owed by a Slurry
Seal. Cape seal uses the advantages of two sealing and rehabilitation methods combined. It is
the application of a chip seal followed within a few weeks by a slurry seal. A cape seal is
applied when the pavement deterioration is greater than what a siurry seal is designed to
correct, yet has not deteriorated to the point of requiring an expensive asphalt overlay. A cape
seal prevents water penetration reducing subsequent damage to the roadway section, along
with providing a new wearing surtace. Cape seals are used on residential streets due to its
ability to provide the strength of a chip seal with the smoothness of a slurry seal.
Typically, these are streets that a slurry seal alone would no longer be effective. Each street is
then researched for other pending utility projects (water, sewer lines, etc.). Finally, each
potential street is field-ver�ed for condition and community value and added to the annual
contract as budgeted funds allow.
Service Llfe and Pertormance Limitations
Used with crack sealing and surface patching, a cape seal significantly extends the life of a
neighborhood street. Loose chips not embedded in the asphalt membrane will become airborne
and possibly damage vehicle windshields. Excessive binders or wet aggregates cause flushing.
Traffic noise will also increase after application of a chip. Other Iimitations include a limited life
or premature failure if the chips are not properly designed or constructed, and prolonged tra�c
disruption (-construction and curing.
Page 23 '
I
_ I
�
,
3
�
i MicroSurtacing
Micro-surfacing is a mix of polymer-modified emulsion, well-graded crushed mineral aggregate,
mineral filler (normally Portland cement), water, and chemical additives that control the break
time. The aggregate, mineral filler emulsion, and water are mixed in a truck-mounted traveling
plant, which is deposited into a spreader box.
Micro-surfacing is sometimes incorrectly referred to as a polymer-modified slurry seal. The
major difference is that the curing process for micro-surFacing is chemically controlled, whereas
slurry seals and chip seals use the thermal process. Micro-surFacing was designed for use as a
rut-filling material in Europe in the 1970's and introduced to the United States in the 1980's.
Since then, many states have used this treatment for both surtacing and rut filting on roads with
moderate to heavy-volume traffic.
Micro-surFacing is most effective when ruts exceed 3�4� or friction drops to unacceptable levels.
No compaction is needed and, under normal environmental conditions, traffic may be allowed
over the application with 1 hour after placement.
It can be used as preventive maintenance technique to prolong pavement life when oxidation
becomes moderate to severe on pavements with minor cradcing. As a preventive maintenance
or surFace treatment for an existing AC pavement, micro-surtacing provides a skid-resistant
surtace and reduces the amount of water that enters the pavement layers through the pavement
surtace. Micrasurtacing restores the transverse cross-section profile and may also be used to
fill ruts.
Service Life and Pertormance Limitatlons
The expected service life is approximately seven or more years for when used on roadway
sections with high-volume and considerably longer for low to moderate-volume roadway
sections. It shouid be noted that the expected service life is dependent on the condition of the
pavement at the time of micro-surtacing placement. Factors affecting pertortnance include the
following: traffic loading, environmental conditions, existing pavement condition, material quality,
mix design, and construction quality. Micro surtacing should not be applied on roadway section
pavements with moderate to heavy cracking.
Thin overlay
Thin hot-mix asphalt (HMA) overlays are blends of aggregate and asphalt cement. Generally
they are a single course of asphalt concrete applied to an existing roadway section. This type of
work is typically considered to be major maintenance. Thin overlay consists of placement less
than 1" of less asphalt concrete and may be accompanied with a leve�ing course to correct €
contour and profile problems in the roadway section. Pavement Fabric may be used in areas
with severe alligator cracking. A thin overlay should be pertormed prior to the onset of fatigue-
related pavement distress.
Thin asphalt overlays are used on all types of roadways for functional improvements.
Functional improvements are those improvements that enhance the smoothness, friction, and/or
profile of the roadway while adding little or no additional load-carrying capacity. These are
particularly suitable for high-volume roads in urban areas where longer life and relatively low-
noise surFaces are desired. These applications are used in all climatic conditions.
�
Page 24
�
� Service L1fe and Limitations
� The expected service life of a "thin" overlay is varied, but is expected to last an average five (5)
� to eight (8) years. Some states report as low as 2 to 4 years; others report as many as 10
years. Thin overlays add little structure capacity to the existing roadway sections and are
� generally not considered to be acceptable maintenance strategy on roadway sections showing
structural distress or deterioration, unless the distresses are Corrected first. Deteriorated cracks
�I
and localized pavement failures will quickly reflect through the new surtace.
{ Thick overlay
; On overlay is generally considered to be "thick" when an asphalt layer greater then 1" is placed
� on the roadway section. Thick overlay are usually designed as a structural improvements to the
� roadway section. In preparation of pertortning a thick overlay, a taper grind is pertormed on the
I outer 6' edge of the roadway section, a leveling course is placed to correct profile problems, and
� dig-outs are pertormed to correct any failed roadways sections. Often this rehabilitation strategy
� is often accompanied by a secondary treatment such as pavement reinforcing fabric.
Service Life and Limltations
Asphalt concrete overlays with proper preventive maintenance strategies will provide
approximately twenty(20) years to the service life of the roadway.
Reconstruction
Reconstruction is chosen for the roadway sections with the lowest pavement condition ratings in
the pavement network. Reconstruction implies removal of the pavement and the sub-base to a
predetermined depth and replacing both the base and the surface asphalt. These projects can
quickly account for an entire pavement management budget. These strategies must remain
general in nature in order to evaluate the entire pavement network.
Service Life and Limitations
Since the nature of reconstruction project is to remove all existing elements of the roadway
section, the expected service life is considered to be equal to the design service life, which is
usually 30 years.
Se/ecting Pavement Management Strategies '
Once a pavement section has been rated it is possible to project the time-rating curve to the
future and predict when the pavement condition is likely to pass below some limiting value. As
described in Section II, this is calculated by assuming the PCI rating to be "100" when a
roadway section is newly construction or rehabilitated. Then, plotting the present condition
rating on the time sca►e, and projecting along an idealized curve to the future date when the
condition rating is determined to have reached the limiting value established, a rehabilitation
strategy can be determined. After a pavement section has been rated two or three times, it is
possible to make a better prediction. As mentioned above, future weather severity and traffic
variations will affect the accuracy of these projections.
Other information that can be assembled from the pavement condition rating data is the average
weighted condition ratings for all roadway sections within a street classification category or
specific area within the pavement network. This information is useful for making decisions
during the preparation of future budgets. For example, a steadily declining pavement condition
rating for certain roadway sections would suggest that not enough funding is being allocated for
preventive maintenance measures.
Page 25
The pavement condition rating data can be used to prepare a list of projects that range from
those with the lowest ratings to those with the highest ratings. This list helps the engineering
staff identify major reconstruction and rehabilitation projects for inclusion the capital
improvement project lists.
The road or street with the lowest rating would be considered first, the next lowest rated road or
street would be considered second, and so forth. Using the pavement distress information
collected during the field inventory phase and pavement condition ratings calculated by the PMS
are used as the basis for determiriing the appropriate pavement management strategy.
Perhaps nothing needs to be done. If work is needed, the type and extent of maintenance will
be indicated or the need for rehabilitation or reconstruction is indicated.
Sometimes a street with the lowest pavement condition rating may be bypassed for immediate
action because the PCI rating has been low for several years without serious detriment.
Furthermore, such a roadway section might be delayed in PMP because funds are restricted
and would be better spent prevent rapid deterioration of other portions of the system. Using the
PMP, budget preparation is easily developed in advance, prior to making financial
commitments. Table 9 lists a guide for planning pavement maintenance and rehabilitation.
Table 9 - Rehabilitation Strate associated with PCR's
all Cradc fillin and Pothole re air as uired
95 to 100 Fo Seal
90 to 100 Seal Coat
81 to 95 Slur Sealin
71 to 90 Chi Seal
55 to 80 Ca e Seal
51 to 70 Micro Surfacin
41 to 60 Thin Overla 1" of less
21 to 40 Thick Overla reater than 1"
0 to 20 Com lete Reconstruction
The Asphalt Institute (AI) suggests that pavements with ratings above 80 would usually receive
"preventative" strategies. Those roadway sections with ratings between 20 and 60 should
receive "corrective" strategies. When the pavement condition is below 20, reconstruction may
be the best option. When the condition rating drops below 50, engineering analysis is usually
required.
Strategies selected for individual roadway sections will vary based on the type and severity of
distresses existing in individual roadway sections. Other factors affecting the treatment
selection may include traffic volume, environmental conditions, and desired surface texture of
the completed product.
Page 26
Table 10 —T ical cost associated with T ical Pavement Mana ement Strategies
;
Crack fillin and Pothole re air as r uired $0.50 LF
Slur Sealin $0.15 SF
Micro Surfacin $0.35 SF
Ca e Seal $0.45 SF
Di -Outs $5.00 SF
Pavement Fabric $.95 SF
As halt Pre-Level Levelin Course ' $0.23 SF
As haltOverla 1.0" ' $0.36 SF
As halt Overla 1.5" ' $0.54 SF
As halt Overla 2.0" " $0.72 SF
As halt Overla 2.5" ' $0.90 SF
As halt Overla 3.0" " $1.08 SF
Com lete Reconstruction $4.00 SF
' Calculated using a cost of$55/ton of asphalt.
Page 27
;
Section IV — Pavement Management Plan and Budget
The following section presents the Pavement Management Plan using the budget allocated in '
the current capital improvement program (CIP). In addition, recommendations are made
regarding budget requirements to maintain the street network and the current condition as well
as improving the street network to a desired level. :
Pavement Management P/an using the existing CIP Budget
The current CIP - Pavement Management Program has specific budgets allocated for the next
four years. Funding data for FY 2008/2009, was created based on projected estimate of
revenue sources, in order to be able to produce a five-year plan.
Table 11 - Bud et Summa
Fiscal Year Bud et
Year 1 FY 2004/2005 $45,472
Year 2 FY 2005/2006 $180,000
Year 3 FY 2006/2007 $185,000
Year 4 FY 2007/2008 $265,000
Year 5 FY 2008/2009 $225,000
It is extremely impoitant to recognize that these budget figures do not constitute the total
amount of money being used on the street network in a given year. Minor street repair such as
crack sealing and pothole patching falls under the Street Division's operating budget.
Furthermore, corrective maintenance projects in which strategies such as asphalt concrete
overlays and roadway reconstruction is employed on principal arterial and minor arterials streets
are listed as separate capital improvement projects in the CIP budget. Whenever possible, they
are funded by Federal and State monies. Recommendations for corrective maintenance
projects are listed below separately in Table 1 S.
A breakdown of revenue sources for each Fiscal Year is listed in Table 12.
Table 12 — Source Fundin Breakdown
Source Fund FY 2004/ FY 2005/ FY 2006/ FY 2007/ FY 20081
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
USHA $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
Traffic $55,000 $60,000 $65,000 $75,000
Congestion
Relief
General Fund $15,472 $75,000 $75,000 $100,000 $100,000
Traffic
Circulation
Transportatio $30,000
n Fund $50,000
LTF
Total t45,472 $180,000 5185,000 ;265,000 5225,000
� The budget fi�ures allocated in the CIP projects budget for each year are entered into the
� MicroPAVERT pavement management system software. The PCI's generated using the
i
Page 28
MicroPAVERT"' are matched with an appropriate maintenance strategy and using the historical
cost data listed in Section III, and a plan is prepared to fit within the yearly budget. Tables 13 i
through 17 list the proposed preventative maintenance schedules and budget for the City for the
next five years. It should be noted that these schedules were produced using the
MicroPAVERn"' pavement management system software that utilizes the Best-FirsttWorst-Last
theory.
The Best-First/Worst-Last theory states that the best roadway sections should be maintained
first before addressing the roadways sections is worst condition. This process prioritizes
preventative maintenance of the network's higher quality roads over the rehabilitation and
reconstrudion of its poorer quality sections. This is not necessarily the most intuitive approach
in that the poorest quality roads need the most attention and one would assume they should
take top priority. Roadways sections the worst condition should be set aside and reconstruction
should be addressed as capital improvement projects. The dramatic benefit on a few
devastated roads ultimately leads to the preventable deterioration on a greater number of higher
quality roads. Conversely, preventative maintenance, with the occasional reconstruct, will
sustain the higher quality roads and slowly bring the poorer roads up to acceptable standards.
Year 1 — FY 2004/2005
Table 13 —Year 1 of Pavement Mana ement Plan
Street From To SurFace Treatment Estimated
Area Cost
SF
James Wa Colina Street Tall Ho Road 39,990 Micro-SurFacin $8,797.80
James Wa Oak Park Blvd E uesVian Wa 67,500 Micro-Surfacin $14,850.00
James Wa Rodeo Drive Colina Street 70,200 Micro-Surfacin $15 444.00
Total 539,091.80
Year 2 — FY 2005/2006
Table 14—Year 2 of Pavement Mana ement Plan
Street From To Surtace Treatment Esdmated
Area Cost
SF
Branch Street Oak Park Blvd Camino Mercado 84,500 Micro-Surfacin $23,590.00
Branch Street Camino Mercado Brisco Road 144,000 Micro-Surfacin $34,680.00
Grand Avenue E Halc on Road Barnett Street 734,400 Micro-Surfacin $37,128.00
James Wa Jenn Place Rancho Parkwa 102,600 MicraSurfacin $24,572.00
James Wa E uestrian Wa Jenn Place 91,500 Micro-Surfacin $20,130.00
James Wa Rancho Parkwa Rodeo Drive 72,500 Micro-Surfacin $20,450.00
Oak Park Bivd West Branch Street James Wa 65,000 Micro-Surfacin $14,300.00
Total :174,850.00
In order to achieve economies of scale it recommended that Year 1 — FY 2004-2005 and Year 2
FY 2005-2006 be combined.
Page 29
I
— _ _ _—�
Year 3 - FY 2006/2007 I
Table 15-Year 3 of Pavement Mana ement Plan
Straet From To Surface Treatment Estimated
Area SF Cost
Allen Street Treffic Wa Garden Street 76,248 Slu Seal $9,149.76
Bennett Ave Hal on NoRh EI Camino Real 44 000 Slu Seal $5 280.00
Bennett Ave Linda Drive Hal on North 40,000 Slu Seal $4,800.00
Bri hton Ave Courtland Street Elm Street North 76,000 Slu Seal $9,120.00
Bri hton Ave Oak Park Blvd Courtland Street 27,120 Slu Seal $3,254.40
Che Avenue E Traffic Wa PC Rallwa Place 38 135 Slu Seal $4 576.20
Che Ave Califomia Street Arto o Ave 29,900 Slu Seal $3,588.00
Che Ave Bedbe Lane Traffic Wa 14 280 Slu Seal $1,713.60
Clarence Ave End of Cul-de-Sac Huasna Road 20 672 Slu Seal $2,480.64
Crown Hill East Brench Street End of Cul-daSac 56 700 Slu Seal $6 804.00
Dodson Wa Alder Street Halc on Road 24,276 Slu Seal $2,913.12
Elm Street Norlh Bri hton Ave End of Cul-deSac 9 600 Slu Seal $1 152.00
Farmhouse Place Grove Court Hillside Court 15 200 Slu Seal $1,824.00
Fieldview Place Grove Court Hillside Court 10 624 Slu Seal 1 274.88
Garden Street East Che Ave Ide Street 49,760 Slu Seal $5 971.20
Garden SUeet End of Street EastBranch Street 4 800 Slu Seal $1576.00
Garden Street East Che Ave Grove Court 3,808 Slu Seal $1456.96
Grove Court Fartnhouse Place Fieldview Place 10 624 Slu Seal $1 274.88
Harden Street Mason Street N EastBranch Street 18 000 Slu Seal $2,180.00
Harrison Street McKinle Street End of Cul-de-Sac 9 100 Slu Seal $1 092.00
Hart Lane End of Street Nevada Street 6,010 Slu Seal $172120
Hiliside Court Fieldview Place Las Olivos Lane 19 328 Slu Seal $2 319.36
Le Paint SUeet Crown Terrace Route 227 41 536 Slu Seal $4 984.32
Le Point Street Mason Street N Tall Ho Road 8,400 Slu Seal $1,008.00
Le Point Terrace Crown Hill End of Street 5,865 Slu Seal $1703.80
Le Point Terrace East Branch Street Crown Hill 3 750 Slu Seal $1450.00
Ma Street Crown Tertace McKinle Street 27 792 Slu Seal $3 335.04
McKinle Street Crown Hill Ma Street 22 080 Slu Seal $2 649.60
Mont o Street Hillcrest Drive End of Cul-de-Sac 37,692 Slu Seal $4 523.04
Momin Rise Lane Starli ht Lane Farroll Ave 32 000 Slu Seal $3 840.00
N rt Avenue Courtland Street Mont o Street 43 780 Slu Seal $5 253.60
Pearwood Ave Huasna Road Oak hill Road 41 760 Slu Seal $5 011.20
Rid eview Wa White Court Tall Ho Road 25,840 Slu Seal $3100.80
Robles Place Sierra Drive EI Camino Real 6,700 Slu Seal $1804.00
Sta ecoach Road Huasna Raad Platirw Lane 41 040 Slu Seal $6 670.00
Stanle Ave End of Street Huasna Road 19 200 Slu Seal $2 304.00
Starli ht Lane Farroll Avenue Momin Rise Ln. 26 000 Slu Seal $4 200.00
Sunset Drive Elm Street Sauth Alder Street 86,960 Slu Seal $10 43520
Trini Ave Traffic Wa End of Street 34 450 Slu Seal $4 134.00
Vemon Street Larchmont Drive End of Street 5 760 Slu Seal $289120
Vemon Street West Branch Street Larchmont Drive 17 640 Slu Seal $2116.80
Victorian Court End of Cul-de-Sac Farroll Ave 29,200 Slu Seal $3 504.00
Vill e Court Trini Ave End of Cul-da-Sac 5 850 Slu Seal $1678.00
White Court End of Cul-de-Sac Ri eview Wa 9,390 Slu Seal $1 426.80
Whitel Street Poole Street Nelson SVeet 23 300 Slu Seal $2 742.00
WhiUe Street End of Street Poole Street 14,400 Slu Seal $2 720.00
Whitle Street Nelson SVeet End of Street 15 120 Slu Seal $2 814.40
Total 5161,802.00
Page 30
Year 4 - FY 2007/2008
Table 16-Year 4 of Pavement Mana ement Plan
Street From To Surface Treatment Estimated
Area Cost
SF
Ash Street South Elm Street Alder Street 86,548 Slu Seal $10,385.76
Blackber Avenue Courtland SVeet Cranber Street 13,120 Slu Seal $1,574.40
Blackber Avenue Bo enber Street Courtland Street 21,942 Slu Seal $2,633.04
Bluebe Avenue Bo enbe Street Courtland Street 15,500 Slu Seal $1,860.00
Bo enber Street Ras be Ave Cedar Street 14,400 Slu Seal $1,728.00
Bo enbe Street Cedar Street Strawber Ave 14,400 Slu Seal $1,728.00
California Street West Che Lane Fair Oaks Ave 17,340 Slu Seal $2,080.80
Castillo Court Vista Drive End of Cul-de-Sac 9,600 Slu Seal $1,152.00
Castillo del Mar Orchard Ave A. G. Hi h School 6,520 Slu Seal $782.40
Castillo del Mar Orchard Ave End of Street 52,480 Slu Seal $6,297.60
Cedar Street Courtland Street Bo enbe St 18,252 Slu Seal $2,19024
Clinton Court James Wa End of Cul-de-Sac 11,600 Slu Seal $1,392.00
Courtland Street Grand Ave Bri hton Ave 40,830 Slu Seal $4,899.60
Courtland Street Ash Street Ras be Ave 13260 Slur Seal $1,59120
Courtland Street Strewber Ave East Grand Ave 27900 Slur Seal $3,348.00
Courtland Street Ras be Ave Strawber Ave 39254 Slu Seal $4,710.48
Courtland Street Bri hton Ave Ne ort Ave 15,000 Slur Seal $1.800.00
Cranbe Street Ras be Ave Blackbe Ave 25740 Slur Seal $3,088.80
Dodson Wa Halc on AI ine SVeet S 24,276 Slur Seal $2.913.12
Grand Avenue E Cit Limit Elm Street 173,500 Micro-Surfacin $32,081.00
Grand Avenue E Elm Street Halc o� Road 210,000 Micro-Surfacin $34.677.34
Hucklebe Ave Cranber Street Courtland Street 16660 Slu Seal $1,999.20
Jenn Place James Wa Mdre Drive 11,600 Slu Seal $1,392.00
Jenn Place Mdre Drive End of Cul-de-Sac 17,600 Slu Seal $2,112.00
La Canada James Wa Rosema Court 25,500 Slu Seal $3,060.00
La Canada Rosema Court Vista Drive 42,126 Slu Seal $5,055.12
Le Point Street Nevada Street Mason Street 39,450 Slu Seal $4,734.00
Lo anbe Ave Cranbe Street Courtland Street 15980 Slu Seal $1,917.60
Los Cervos Puesta del Sol Vista Drive 11,104 Slur Seal $1.332.48
Los Cervos Vista Drive End of Cul-de-Sac 70,560 Slu Seal $1,26720
Los Cervos Puesta del Sol End of Cul-de-Sac 17,376 Slur Seal $2,085.12
Los Olivos Lane End of Street Launa Lane 8,500 Slur Seal $1,020.00
Los Olivos Lane Launa Lane East Che Ave 18,700 Slu Seal $2,244.00
Orchard Ave Pil rim Wa Castillo del Mar 10,200 Slu Seal $1,224.00
Puesta del Sol Los Cervos Vista Drive 45,216 Slu Seal $5,425.92
Ras be Avenue Cranbe Street Courtland Street 1428 S�u Seal $171.36
Ras be Avenue Courtland Street Bo enbe St 20400 Slu Seal $2,448.00
Rosema Court La Canada End of Cul-de-Sac 10,880 Slu Seal $1,305.60
Rosema Lane Sombrillo Salida del Sol 20640 Slu Seal $2,476.80
Salida del Sol James Wa End of Cul-de-Sac 20,384 Slu Seal $2,446.08
Seabri ht Avenue Oak Park Blvd Cranber Street 7668 Slur Seal $920.16
Sombrillo Rosema Court Salida del Sol 28,832 Slu Seal $3,459.84
Strawbe Avenue Courtland Street Bo enbe St 20672 Slur Seal $2,480.64
Valle Road Ci Limit Ci Limit 161,300 Micro-Surtacin $37,450.00
Valle Road Cit Limit Fair Oaks 160,950 Micro-Surfacin $36,300.34
Via Avante Castillo del Mar End of Cul-de-Sac 8,848 Slu Seal $1,061.76
Page 31
Via Belmonte N Castillo del Mar End of Cul-de-Sac 5,664 Slu Seal $679.68
Via Belmonte S Castillo del Mar End of Cul-de-Sac 20,000 Slur Seal $2,400.00
Via Firenze N Castillo del Mar End of Cul-de-Sac 11,040 Slur Seal $1,324.80
Via Firenze S Castillo del Mar End of Cul-de-Sac 11,840 Slur Seal $1,420.80
Vista Circle End of Cul-de-Sac E uestrian Wa 16,480 Slur Seal $1,977.60
Vista Drive E uesVian Wa La Canada 48,000 Slur Seal $5,760.00
Wesle Street East Branch Street Larchmont Drive 2,000 Slu Seal $240.00
Women's Club Parkin Lot Lower 40,000 Slu Seal $4,800.00
Women's Club Parkin Lot U er 240,000 Slu Seal $28,800.00
Total S2g1,063.557
Year 5 - FY 2008/2009
Table 17 -Year 5 of Pavement Mana ement Plan
Street From To SurPace Treatment Estimated
Area Cost
SF
Ash Street Cit Limit South Elm Street 92,400 Micro-Surtacin $11,088.00
Branch Street t Vernon Street East Grand Ave 24,000 Micro-Surfacin $6,880.00
Corbett Can on Rd Route 227 Cit Limit 47,180 Micro-Surtacin $7,659.20
Fair Oaks Ave Pecan Street Halc n Road S 84,000 MicroSurfacin $14,080.00
Fair Oaks Ave Elm Street South Pecan Street 71,400 Micro-Surfacin $10,568.00
Fair Oaks Ave Orchard Ave Traffic Wa 35,880 Micro-Surtacin $6,305.60
Fair Oaks Ave Valle Road Orchard Ave 129,840 MicraSurfacin $9,580.80
Fair Oaks Ave Woodland Drive Valle Road 156,000 Micro-SurFacin $22,720.00
Fair Oaks Ave Halc on Road S Woodland Drive 47,400 MicraSurfacin $7,688.00
Huasna Road Sta ecoach Road Crest Drive 119,700 Micro-Surfacin $6.364.00
Huasna Road Crest Drive Cit Limit 181,120 MicraSurtacin $32,734.40
Huasna Road Route 227 Sta ecoach Road 181,120 Micro-Surfacin $32,734.40
Oak Park Blvd. Farroll Ave Cit Limit 35,200 Micro-Surfacin $16,800.00 '
Station Wa Fair Oaks Traffic Wa 50,080 Micro-Surfacin $10,341.00
Traffic Wa West Brench Street Fair Oaks Ave 113,950 Micro-Surfacin $26 674.00
Tr�c Wa Fair Oaks Ave Route 101 63,650 Micro-Surtacin $14 638.00
Total 5236 855.40
In order to achieve economies of scale it recommended that streets slated for Micro-surfacing in
Year 4— FY 2007/2008 be performed in Year 5— FY 2008/2009.
Corrective Maintenance Projects
In addition to the preventative maintenance project listed above, the following corrective
maintenance projects were identifled. Table 18 lists the street sections and suggested
maintenance strategy. As stated above, corrective maintenance strategies such as asphalt
concrete overlays and roadway reconstruction on principal arterial and minor arterials streets
are generally funded by Federal and State grant monies whenever possibie.
Page 32
Table 18 - Recommended Corrective Maintenance Pro'ects
Street From To Surface Treatment Estimated
Area Cost
SF
Brisco Road East Grand Ave Linda Drive 30,000 Overla $55,000
Brisco Road Linda Drive EI Camino Real 54,000 Overla $91,000
Brisco Road EI Camino Real WestBrench Street 12,000 Overla $28,000
Coach Road Flora Road End of Cul-de-Sac 44,000 Overla $76,000
Coach Road Branch Mill Road Flora Road 29,720 Overla $54,580
EI Camino Real Brisco Road Halc on Road 42,000 Overla $83,000
EI Camino Real Oak Park Bivd Hillcrest Drive 59,120 Overla $98,680
EI Camino Real Halc on Road Bamett Street 90,000 Overla $145,000
EI Camino Real Hillcrest Drive Brisco Road 100,000 Overla $176,000
EI Camino Real Ci Limit Oak Park Blvd 3,800 Overla $25,700
Farroll Avenue Cit Limit Elm Street South 73,700 Overla $135,550
Farroll Avenue Pecan Street Halc on Road South 63,000 Overla $94,500
Farcoll Avenue Elm Street South Pecan SVeet 57,600 Overla $86,400
Farroll Avenue Hal on Road South End of Cul-de-Sac 9,600 Overia $34,400
Flore Road Coach Road End of Cul-de-Sac 25,440 Overla $58,160
Greenwood Drive Flora Road End of Cul-de-Sac 26,900 Overla $60,350
Larchmont Drive Vernon Street Wesle Street 6,600 OveMa $27,00
Launa Lane End of Street Los Olivos Lane 22,338 Overla $16,680
Nevada Street East Branch Street Le Point Street 7,800 Oveda $12,556
Orchard Ave Pil rim Wa West Che Ave 37,910 Oveda $24,549 I
Orchard Ave West Che Lane Fair Oaks Ave 35,264 Overla $24,231 '
Pil rim Wa Orchard Ave Arro o Ave 12,600 Oveda $31,512
Tanner Lane Branch Mill Road Flora Road 26,320 Overla $49,480
Tre�c Wa Ext. Tra�c Wa Trini Ave 29,700 Overla $47,550
Total S7,S08,905.00
Budget Requirements and Recommendations
Two additional budgets projections were performed using the MicroPAVERT"" pavement
management system software. The first projection seeks to maintain the current overall
condition of the street network and the second projection sought to improve the street network
to a desired condition. The results of these budget projects are listed below in Table 19.
Page 33 I
J
Table 19 - Bud et Re uirements and Recommendations
Fiscal Year Budget Required Budget Required to Allocated
to maintain current improvement condition Budget
condition to PCI 75
Year 1 FY 2004/2005 $198,012 $307,812 $45,472
Year 2 FY 2005/2006 $226,444 $320,298 $180,000
Year 3 FY 2006/2007 $254,224 $358,301 $185,000
Year 4 FY 2007/2008 $236,094 $346,816 $265,000
Year 5 FY 2008/2009 $217,644 $318,384 $225,000
As indicated in the Pavement Management Program, the average pavement condition index
(PCI)for all the streets within street network is 68. In order to maintain the street network at the
current condition, the City will have to allocate $200,000 to $250,000 each fiscal year. To
improve the street network to the recommended PCI of 75, the City will have to allocate
$300,000 to $350,000 each fiscal year.
,
Page 34
Section V — Funding Strategies and Alternatives
Four main financing alternatives have been identified that can be considered for street
maintenance:
• General Obligation Bonds
• Certifications of Participation
. Pay As You Go
• Assessment District
• Other Sources of Funding
Genera/ Obligation Bonds
Cities have the authority to issue General Obligation Bonds under the Califomia Govemment
Code. General Obligation Bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the City through a
guarantee that authorizes a City to levy an "ad-valorem" tax to pay the bonds. General
Obligation Bonds carry a lower interest rate, do not require a reserve fund, and are generally
viewed favorably by investors. General Obiigation Bonds require a 2/3"'-voter approval.
Advantages
. Debt paid through property taxes
• Requires voter approval
• Costs spread over 20 years
• Corrects the street problems in a comprehensive manner
• Provides issuers with the lowest borrowing costs
. Viewed more favorable by bond raters and buyers
. Does not require a reserve fund
Disadvantages
• 2/3rd voter approval required
• Requires voter education
• Election process creates a longer time flame for financing
• Interest costs associated with the bond
. Requires a financing team of professionals
• There are costs related to issuing the debt instruments
Process for Approval
. City Council Resolution must be passed by a 2/3rd City Council vote determining the
necessity of the municipal improvement
• An Ordinance must be adopted by a 2/3'd City Council vote of submitting the General
Obligation Bond issue to the voters I
• Publication of the ordinance is required
• If 2/3'" of the electors voting on the proposition vote in favor of it, the bonds may be
issued
Certificates of Participation �,
Certificates of Participation are required to pledge an asset to guarantee repayment, which '
would make using a Certificate of Participation for street improvements complicated but not
impossible to structure. If a Certificate of Participation is used for street improvements, it is
likely that the City would need to use a City asset (such as City Hall, Fire Station, Police Station,
etc.)as a security. Certficates of Participation do not require voter approval.
Page 35
Advantages
• Approval process is generally faster than General Obligation Bonds
• 2/3'd voter approval is not required
. Costs spread over 20 years
• Corrects the street problems in a comprehensive manner
Disadvantages
• Typically carry a higher interest rate than General Obligation Bonds
• A Certificate of Participation may require pledging an asset to guarantee a sufficient
revenue stream to satisTy repayment
• Interests costs associated with the bond
• Requires a financing team of professionals
• Unlike Pay As You Go, there are costs related to issuing the debt instruments
Process for Approval
. Requires a City Council Resolution authorizing the sale of the ceRificates by a 4/5"' City
Council vote.
. Preparation of the legal documents to that include the lease agreement, loan agreement,
payment schedule and trust agreement
• Certificate of Participation are then sold to investors
Pay As You Go �
Under Pay As You Go, the City would raise additional revenues to pay for the needed street
improvements. Pay As You Go requires no interest payments or issuance costs. There are two
options for Pay As You Go:
• General Fund contribution
• Parcel Tax.
General Fund Contribution
This is the City's current funding alternative. This option consists of an annual General Fund
contribution to the capital improvement program for ttie purpose of pavement management.
This option consist of an annual General Fund contribution to the capital improvement program
for the purpose of pavement management.
The FY 2004/2004 approved budget includes a $14,472 General Fund contribution. The budget
also identifies contributions $75,000 for FY 2005/2006, $75,000 for FY 2006/2007, and
$100,000 for FY 2007/2008. For FY 2008/2009 a contribution of$100,000 was estimated.
Parcel Tax
A Parcel Tax is generally based on either a flat per parcel rate or a variable rate depending on
the size or number of units on the parcel. if the revenues are used for a specific purpose, a 2/3`d
voter approval is required and the use of the, revenues is restricted to those services specified
on the ballot measure.
Parcel Tax A Parcel Tax is generally based on either a flat per parcel rate or a variable rate
depending on the size or number of units on the parcel. If the revenues are used for a specific
purpose, a 2/3`d voter approval is required and the use of the revenues is restricted to those
services specified on the ballot measure.
Page 36
I — ------
Advantages
• No interest costs
• No issuance costs
• Incremental approach that allows for changes to be made as needed
Disadvantages
• The street solution is not comprehensive
• Requires 2/3`d voter approval
• Improvements would take longer to implement, which could result in higher costs
• Maintenance costs will continue to increase because the solution is incremental
Process for Approval
• A General Fund Contribution requires a consistent revenue to be utilized for the purpose
of pavement management
• A Parcel Tax may require a 2/3'"voter approval.
• Authority to implement a Parcel Tax is provided for in Govemment Code Section
37100.5 and 50075.
Assessment District
An Assessment District can be formed either City-wide or in smaller geographical areas. Any
formation of an Assessment District is subject to Proposition 218, which was passed by the
Califomia voters on November 5, 1996. Proposition 218 applies to all assessments which it
defines as "any levy or charge upon real property by a public agency for a special benefit
conferred upon the real property." Assessment Districts do incur higher incidental costs than
other types of financing due to the engineering and legal costs needed to fortn the district. There
are two options for financing the formation costs: use funds from the General Fund or use bonds
paid by the affected parties.
Advantages
• The costs for the public improvements is precisely established
• The costs of improvements can be paid over time
• A maximum interest rate of 12% can be assessed
• Does not require a formal election
Disadvantages
• Engineering and legal fees are typically higher than other types of funding
• Higher incidental costs other types of financing
. Improvements are limited to that allowed in during the established of the district
Process for Approval
• Agency identifies all parcels which will receive special and estabiishes "proportionate
benefit"for each parcel
• Record owner of each parcel receives mailed notice of assessment along with a ballot
• Public hearing held 45 days from date of mailing
• Ballots are tabulated at public hearing
• Assessment may not be imposed if there is a majority protest
. In the event that a court determines that voters who are not property owners have a right
to vote on assessment, assessment shall require 2/3`d-voter approval in addition to
approval of property owners through majority protest provisions
Page 37
_ -- I
State and Federal Sources of Funding
State and Federal funding sources for street improvement including the Regional State and
Highway Account (RSHA) are through the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments
(SLOCOG). RSHA funding applications submitted by the City will need to be for projects
considered regional in nature and will compete with other jurisdictions' process using rating
criteria adopted by the SLOCOG Board on August 6, 1997. Other State and Federal grant
sources have varied applications and funding processes.
Because grant funds are not a guaranteed funding source to the City, it is recommended that
these funds be pursued during each funding cycle as a means to save some of the financing
altemative funds being recommended for the 5-year maintenance program.
f
�
�
�
;
;
r
�
i
1
�
i
i
1
I
�
�
�
9
i
�
I
;
3
�
1
;
�
' Page 38
t
Append'oCA—S�treet IrK1eX
�
�
�
1
I
i
� �
,
,
r ��"s�a�W����
m ����������#3������������m�������a����m����
9
.
CLL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL
] NNNNNfONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN4JN�4�ONNNNNNyHNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN $
� , °s�smR���R�ax�o:„ �8�� �gN���s�_$���m� ���$$`��8$� ����
i`nA$an`a$$�aRm'BmS��`�' �-'O'�3`v5S ��SciF3n!'i$�$� a�Ra
? J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J
� ee�.$'�45�.°<3SF.33M��+�°e3S3°�3°<$$�+bY�`oS' �fd:��53�lSS3SS���7fe$,$$9'B��S9�+
� J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J�J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J
m�mm ��o �s ����:3�g�$€�$���� ���E��_���5���$m . �_�G�
� N
1`�P� W � C � tONN�
�ON�ON� Y ION�N��W�
�
� � N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N(V N N N N N N N tV N N N tV N N N N N N N N N N N tV N N N N N N N tV N N
�
N
a
� U
LL
� S� mmmmwwwwwwwnwwwawawwwmawmmmaaawnmmmmwaammrowwwmwwwwnmma
Q �2
t
� I
o�� ������������������������������������������������� �����
�
�s� yfr, � c$� g$� E$ yg �" gs�����
� ^�a a� �nrYl-��YYp�$$ '� ���N�N� ��3 �76Td��� 3� Z•-
�i m s� ggR $$� SSSd� �LL
� ~ pLL �3�� �����
� F
� � �° ��at�J(W5� ��c�3� � �� ���y����� ��� �5��� �(�i
, ���
_ ���������� ���� €�>� �� � _
LL � � � $ s
� <a < ��<� `��i ��«������� i � � ��d < �<i
� yg �� � � � � � � ��C��
q gCpCL5aVAp $ y= [� E gC�LL
F ��W����1 W W�W��J 6 S�W�LL LL�� � �� ���111 � 1�11 W � W
� @ 0 � @E
� � Y � 6t� � £<� 6 ����< ` ��� � <� � � � $O
� LL ��:������������������� �` �� �> ��m��4< 3'� g��3
� W LLLLf
� 8
� �� �� ������ � ���� ��� ��
' � ����������a�����a �����«�«< ������«���< � �
, ����� � ��� ���� ���� � ��� �� ��� ��
g !� !�Yx ;
� �XiFXiKi���$m$ w�^m$���mw�a^w�wF� �CiF.�iwm�affim&o�'•w$a8&��$ a$&3�'� 1
� ! 5
CLL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LLLL LL LL LL LLy,LLLL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LLLL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL Y
� NNN(9NNNNNNfqNNNNNNNNNf/1NNlfqNNNNNNNNNNNNNbNNNUlNNNNNNNNNNN�/1N41 a
_ �tVR "1�s � ���p ��m�Rq�y°s��$� �p � q�^s$ro�m �a^ �� �"���G�GRp���
� O�NIO�mN�W�Omb1�ONth�SCNRI�NY��WfromN��SRfY��NNWNm1�`yNh��NNO�yOJqOY1PN
.CLLIJLLLLLLLLLLLLLIJLLLLLLLLLLLLLIJLLLILLLLLLLLLIJLLLLLLLLLLLLLIJL j jJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
� J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J�l J J J J
� ClSOl�lWl9!lIOYOVf�N�t9�C�lOSfl0l9{ONOSI�WWOIW!lfSfl�NO!ll�IWSSS(�l�l�lm��S<SV
7 J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J
� t�s'O�iR�M�<�+� !!R�'�RrO�SYN�'Y�P��E���A�E (ONYG��1`���I�MASg�„��� .
� J ��� ��� � � �
Z 2
3 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N H N N N N N N N N N N
�
N
a
� U
LL S
(� <z mqqmmWmwWWWnwnWmWanrrrnrmmmmn�nnnWWwWaWm mWWwwWWWmmm
q �_
Q
���m ����������������������������������������$�������� � � �����
��� LL
��� Fa
� g � n � N N i�N N N � €� ��p S���N Tj W
� � ���p������& ����'���� $ � �� ¢ �$ �m
U � v � Fi �6�� �
� a
" B � fr � � �����
; s ������g9� � y ��� ���� ��g ��a� � � `� � � ��
3 �x ����Ss s ��s��� ���� tS m »>� >�� �aw���w
x q
� LL H � E����9��3<� S�A<�4'U�U�S�¢���`«<ca�y ��p U� tl• <� � ������<
. Zt � ��� �. S �p � Ay �ic
'$ . e '6 $ {3�ZqS¢@ 1sS�s6 �s6 3 '76I$s C7 ap'6 s '$s a 'a �aR a � as
� � �v�N W�6F fL21�1�1�1��.1� �Illl� � SYW� YlW � LLY� � ��I�m
� WWQ
LL �� �� � ��`� � °� � 3� � �" � �� ���<°
, �E ���������� �� ���95� < << � ��� ���� � � �
� ��� � �w�w�����sw ������ �� � ������ ����� _ �
a
�'$¢ =a�� �g�g;��� �� � �<a��� ���<����������_�� ������ �������
N �o�N��yy � <46<6 K �
=s= .
�������� � ����������������� ��� ����$ � o� ��w
Y
m ������#�����m�� �w�ww�w���m��m��m��� ���5��� � �3a£�����
5 ��������������� �«��������������� «���« � ������
i
� NNNNNNWNNNN�NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN�NNNHNNNNNNNNNNNNNNyNULLI �
e�s�� �s�s �°� � g�������$$�R ���3g� s��� � �� ° � RRs
� �F.$wa���n�na.����r$�n�i°'g°�mci�Y'�a�>°i'^�iG��i°O��i`fu�$ma�onR'iaW�.�mmw
� J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J�J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J
� `�' S`�d' `�' $S$°e3��S$�5�8$'R�SS���`�' $93e�+$«93$$��n°<b7lRb4$°e3.�.A+«$o+`o7f.�d.333`�3
7 J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J
g ox'� �+p � $x g� _° � Qg �l�!ro�y���Y�a���������� � �xi�t� � �„��
j I�` �Y�H��'���NN���� '•�WIDr NN� �NN
� N
� � O N Y Y N N N N N N N N f N O Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N�Y O N N N N N Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N
� s
�
�
� °
LL
(' � �O�Ob�DO�WWh1�O1MN�C1��0�00101M1�1�1`MWWWNTOIO�TWOWOVfNO1WWfY�bmOPO1PWWN
� Z
�z�� a� ���������������������������������� ���� �� ���������
m ���� � � � �� � � .�#� � � a �:�
oa� " ���� �� ��� ���
� �
� � o s��<=� � n$ $$p��"s�����p ��x� ���m 5� � p�c
� �U@ y �'
C
41 a
� s ����9� `j�Q����ay�ay���� ���� � � ���� ��� �� �����
N sC�51C9 q� q ['' �� ��������
3 W�WW�Z�IG��ILLLLLLLLL�� W��LL �
LL
� �� $� g �<g <z�� �� ��� � u<�� � �� �` �� � �� �
a�6° <3�3��a � � n���3��� � e���$� � �$¢3� �� � �� 8g
�Fduwu'I��z���� �>ul��u-i�ulx�u'I�� 'U��wSU� � �w� ulu���ulul u'I 3mul U
� a
� a
� � � � � « � � � � �
� ,�
< � ��
� �a6��������<��g<�Y������a� ���<� ��� � << ���� �
�'����w��=w���>� �� w ���w���w��LL� � ��� �� �� w ���
� � � ���
� � ���� �; � � � � � ���� ����� �������;� � � ������� �� ���������
� a<a<aa s
�� ��g�aJgry$ <a�saaa�y����������� �� �&�� �� � (
�� �� [ [ E yif yp a � xSxxxx2
�j�y�jy��y �LLLLIL�LLILLLLLLLLLLLILLL LLLL
Y gg
a m Ym ��N����RR�WWW���W �W�����$������4���� ������lW�WW
m 8 W W q 0 P T
a N�
1
CLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL Y
� N N h N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N y N N N N N N N N W N W N N N N N N a
� � � ��� ��"s �� �"�g�� g $go�a�^$��m�� ��_� ���� $�mm�g
m�mnm��n°n��n�aRi°�Y�e�am��^���a����m�Y$�°������N���� ��m
7 J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J
� A°e�<gS��S3$���������$��3$�R 3S3�n�����33�A��S��S°<$$$���3
? J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J
m � �$$�
� a��w � �c�� �'�"x������„�������.�����°�����m�������__«_
,{ J
� � N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
� �
h
� LL
o Q W W�r r n�n r W�W b�W�W��W W W n r W W W N W 0 0 0 P m�0 0 0 W W W A W A P m�P W W W W N W O T
� �Z
U=I� ��������������������������������������g�g������ ����� �� ��
��� LL
C��
��
� � � �m�� ������������=�� ���� R���������� ���;�����„�
e �� ���
Uf 'j' V LLu
�
N
� � �ss� � ��a� m � y ����5���� � � � �5�
3 N�����i�� �� N ��� O ��� ��� � �i v�
= 7 > >7»
LL �
� ��' � � � ������ � � ��� ���� � � ��� �
~ gy���� � � < �� �aa� 9����=��`� 4���< �S � � � �a�`-
� �� g� �a� eaa t � e a e �
� ��>��� ��w������w���;����w�>���������������� a������
�� � ��� 3 $�� `� � .� � � ���_� <����� ������� � ������� ���g�
�� €� ��3�3 g� g6�� ��� � ����w� �� u�� � � �3iw
� S€=� a
����a� ������>������ � a � � �
m
� � � w3#�#3 ��� ����`�������������,�� 95������� ���l����� �a
�s��� ���� ��9������9��s`s�°s���� 9999� ��� � ���
___ _ _—
�
m ��� �����m� �aa�� ���� ��������#����������ww������a���� "
a �
�_� _�____� �_«_ _«_ �_�_��_�__�_..__��_�_��__�_�_.-�_
CLL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL�y LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LLLL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LLLL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL
� NNNNNNNN�/1NNHNNNNNNNNNNtl1NfI1�1NNNN4INN�IINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN �
� ��r��^�����$� �������� on �= nm�Rgx ����N��„�r��RS�m ��
�,7frv ����'�. ISaR��'���r�i'Rm..m'$iR$+$�����i:<�vde'�$�`�' �°aR $0O&<°�e
? J J J J J J J J�!J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J
� WS�WOINFiOIOWNNNO�RNNt+lS�SNSOIWtOWWC1W0'ItlOIOSrRlJ�IOWM�t91D011lWllfSSO�YS��
j J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J�J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J�J J J J J�J J J J�J
5o �p NO bWy�OpOO �b� ^� eSA O 1� eN0 00{y�yp �qy YS+p $+p q$
$ my�1�8 ^ O^ 8N��� {� w �O�IO��N{V� YF1O��1 �
C 1(�qA01NO I�CINNNN��N {ON 1G��W� �A�m�tl1�'N<'
• �I�IWl1W10!lN�V! N
� J
Z �
N N N N N N N N N N N N N O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
� Z
N
m
0
N Y
(� <� wwwwwwwawmwaaava+awaawammmmmmamaawaaaammwwwwwmwaaawmmarr
� �_
Q i
� I� `� �����g�������������������� ���������� ���$ �
mfrm � �����9����$��i�a� � i� ��
J J J J J
r 9� LL 2 2��i
C��
� ; �: -s ��� <����������� ��_ „ �����3�����-������
m H �� �S 'u W
U �
�
� s � � � ������� � � � � � a�
� ��s s� ��Sa ��������3 a��� ����� � > ��� ���a
rr �9 A! � gg g $$ �
LL F �����g���� �a gd a�9o���<� aa���c�������a<i� �n�a� � ��� �3
n
��w���w � ����=��a� � ����������w� ������ ��� ������
����� �a � �� � �� a g�aa< �� � ��� U .
� �3 S 4
����� �����<���& ���� ��� � ���< � �� ��%g€�
w3 ��a�w�8�w���#� � w #�� ��w�� �����LL � � �-.9����Ss
€ EEE�E
�
� � g������ � � ������ �$� ! T � ��r� � ���`�� ����� � �� �
� y �Uy����<����a�������������&& ���$���xx��� � ���a�
9
�
Q
T
2
�
D
r
c
�
�
w
N
�
n
�
3i
�g
���
m��
:m
�I s
�
�
c�
a
�
N
�
2
m
�
T
2
f
D
T
C
�
S
�
N
�
O
�
�
�
��
� �
5
m� a
:m
�I s
�
�
a
�
a
m
N
�
Z
m
�
�
i
i
�I
I
� � FHWA Functional Street Gass�cations for the Ciry ot Arroyo Grende Street NetwoAc
. Reedufion No.
MBrdi B.2005
I
F�A FNWAFC
� $trwtlYm� From To Zona Tnct FunctlOn�l N��� �+M+ U�qN UnR WIdN Unft An� UnX YwrBUiR
tnst
� $pb P Ld EMGe�e SoOD exqRCesPa11Wtl8 PeMI Lot WA NIA WA LF WA LF St SF 1982
$ob P Lol SOOOqfltes Entl Pelkeltle Perkl Lat WA WA WA LF WA LF ZO8.�0` SF 1982
WonienYqubPerkl Lol MNhIW Lat NIA WA WA LF NIA LF 10000 SF 1975
WonienkpubPe�ki 'LOl U � MIIIafW Pe�kN LM NIA NIA NIA LF N/A LF 240000 SF 1985
Pape8o18
Append'oc B—Section Cor�dition R�eport
I
�
�
Section Condition Report
Date: 3 /1/2005 Page 1 of 16
Pavement Database: NetworklD:AGrande
Ao•
Breneh ID 3aetlon ID Surface Usa Renk 4nas Trua Awe pt
(SqFt) Inspectlon
00010(ACOm Dme) 10 AC � ROADWAY L 2 57,200. �Z
00020(Alder Street) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 27,040.0 43
00020(PJOer Street) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 25,802. 43
00020(PJderStreet) 30 AC ROADWAY L 2 80,332. 43
00030(Allen Sireet) � 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 76,248. - 1Z
00040(Alpine Street(South)) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 89,372. 40 �
00045(PJpine Street(NOrth)) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 225. 40
00050(Mdre orive) � 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 40,000. 3
0005o p4ndre orive) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 18,800. 3
00060(Arabian Cirde) 10 AC ROADWAY � L 2 25,320. 7
OOWO(ArroyoAvenue) 10 �AC ROADWAY L 2 20,638. 38
00080(Ash Street) � 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 92,400. 38
00080(ASh Streeq 20 AC ROADWAY L 2� 88,548. �
00085(Psilo SVeet) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 81,696. 7 '
00085(Asilo Streeq 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 41,024. 6
00090(ASpen Streeq 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 54,492. Z8
00100(AveniCa de Diamente) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 112,500. 12
OOt10(eakeman Lane) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 62,880. �7
00120(Bambi Court) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 15,520. ZZ
00130(Bamett Street) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 19,080. Z9
00740(Betlloe Lane) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 6,592. s
00150(eeech Street) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 25,992. 45
00160(Bell Street) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 47,280. 40
00170(Bennett Avenue) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 40,000. 31
00170(Bennett Avenue) 20 AC �ROADWAY L 2 44,000. 37
oot80(eeta Coun) 10 AC� ROADWAY L � 2 7,400. �
i
i_ _� .. . . _.__.._._— — __. _ . ..._. __ . .. .__. —
Section Condition Report pa e 2 of 16
Date: 3/1/2005 9
Pavement Database: NetworklD:AGrande
Apa
Branch ID Sectlon ID Surfaea Uss Rank Lanea Tru�Ans At
. (SqFt) Inapactlon
00785(8lackberryAVenue) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 21,924. 3
00785(BladcberryAvenue) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 13,120.0 3
00187(BluebertyAvenue) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 15,456. 3
00788(eoysenberty Street) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 74,400.. 3
00788(BOysenberty Street) 20 AC ROADWAY L 0 14,400. �
00190(Branch Mill Road) 10 AC ROADWAY C 2 99,990. �
00195(Branch Street(West)) 10 AC ROADWAY B 2 84,500. 24
00195(Brench Street(Westp 20 APC ROADWAY B 2 144,000. 5
00195(Branch Street(West)) 30 AC ROADWAY� B 2 123,300. 24
00795(Branch Street(West)) 40 AC ROADWAY B 2 24,000. 24
00200(BriCge Sdeet) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 33,984. 27
00270(BrightonAvenue) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 27,720. 32
00210(Briphton Avenue) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 76,000. �8
pp22p(edsco Road) 10 AC ROADWAY C 2 30,000. 20
00220(Brisco RoaC) 20 AC ROADWAY C 2 54,000. 22
00220(edsco Road) . 30 AC ROADWAY C 2 12,000. ZZ
00230(Califomia Street) 10 AC ROADWAY C 2 17,340. 2�
� 00240(Calle Certnen) 10� AC ROADWAY L 2 10,000. 19
00250(Calle Cuervo) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 208,800. 12
00260(Callie Court) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 .8,550. 24
00270(Cameron Court) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 24,�60. 28 �
00280(Camino Mercado) 10 AC ROADWAY C � 2 101,200• 19
0p2go(Campana Place) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 20,232. 26
00300(Canyon Way) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 48,060• 54
00370(Cardinal CouA) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 6,000. 17
� 00320(Cam�lla Dmre) 10 AC ROADWAY� L 2 35,480. �Z
�i 00330(Caro�Place) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 21,508. 19
i
I, . -.. — _.._ __. __ . . _. . .. ._
Date: 3/1/2005 Section Condition Report Page 3 of 16
PavementDatabase: NetworklD:AGrande
Aa•
Bnnch ID Saetlon ID BuMu Us� Renk Lenas True Ana pt
(gypy InapaUOn
00335(Castillo Court) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 9.600. 6
00336(Castillo del Mar) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 52,480. 2
00336(Casdllo del Mar) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 6,520. Z
00340(Cedar Street) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 , 9,600. 41
00340(CedarSireet) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 27,200. 41
OOa40(Cedar Streeq 30 AC ROADWAY L 2 18,252. 3
00350(Certo Ysta Cirde) 10 .AC ROADWAY L 2 � 25,740. 24
00360(Certo Vista lana) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 19,296. 24
00370(Chapamal Lane) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 18,400. 17
00370(Chapartal Lane) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 18,000. 17
OW80(Chelsea Court) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 6,336. 17
00385(CherryAvenue(West)) 10 AC ROADWAY C 2 29,852. 24
00385(Cherty nvenue(Wesq) � 20 AC ROADWAY C 2 14,280. . 24
00390(Chinon Avenue) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 57,000. 34
00400(Clarence Avenue) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 20,672. . 17
00415(Ginton CouA) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 17,800• 3
Opa30(Coach Road) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 29,720. 40
ooa3o(coacn Road) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 44,000�• 4�
0p44p(Cobre Place) 10 AC ROADWAY l 2 17,424. 28
00450(Colina Street) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 15,660. 25
OOa80(Collado Courte) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 9.938. 19
00470(Coibett Canyon Road) � 10 AC ROADWAY A�, 2 47,180. 31
00480(COmwall Avenue) 10 AC ROADWAY L � 2 62,M0. 28
00490(Corona del Tierta) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 18,880. 33
00500(Comal Place) 10 AC ROADWAY L - 2 28,350. 29
00570(Coun�and Street) 10 06/01/1981 AC ROADWAY C 2 40,830.00 06�02/2004 23 77.00�
I
�I 00510(CouNand Street) 20 Ofi✓Ot/1981 AC ROADWAY L 2... 15,000.00 OB/02/2004 23.... .. 100.00 .
Section Condition Report Page 4 of 16
Date: 3/1/2005
Pavement Dafabase: NetworklD:AGrande
Ao•
Braneh ID SxGon ID SuAaa Uae Rank Lanes True Ana At
� ' (BqFt) Insp�ctlon
00510(Courdane Street) 30 AC ROADWAY L 2 13,260. 3
00510(CourNand Street) 40 AC ROADWAY L 2 39,254.0 3
00510(CouNand Street) 50 AC ROADWAY C 2 27,900. 3
00520(CreeksiCe Drive) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 18,160. Z9
00525(CranberryAvenue) � 10 AC ROADWAY L 0 25,740: 3
00530(Cross Street) 10 �AC ROADWAY L 2 � 26,400• �
00540(Crown Hill) 10 AC ROADWAY L . 2 56,700. �
00550(Ciown Tertace) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 19,950. ZZ
00550(Crown Terrace) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 3,360. 22
00580(Cuerda Corte) 10 AC ROADWAY L � 2 8,000. 19
00570(Cuesta Place) � 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 7,416. 11
00580(Deer 7wA Ciicle) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 �27.200• 34 ,
00590(Del Soi Streeq 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 24,208. 27
OOB00(Diamond CircAe) 70 AC ROADWAY L 2 7.000• �
00670(Diana Place) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 43,580. 27
00620(Dixson Street) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 14,800. 11
00630(Dotlson Way) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 24.276. 0
0pe30(Dadson Way) 20 AC ROADWAY� L 2 24,276. 1
ppgqp(pos Cefros) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 9,030. 0
00650(Cherty Avenue(East)) 10 AC ROADWAY B 2 38,135. �
00850(Cherty Avenue(Easq) 20 AC � ROADWAY B 2 52,650. 22
00650(Cherty Avenue(East)) 40 AC ROADWAY B 2 51�000. �
00870(EI Camlrw Real) 10 AC ROADWAY A 2 3,800• 51
00670(EI Camino Reap 20 , APC ROADWAY A . 2 59,120. 51
00870(EI Camira Real) 30 APC ROADWAY A 2 60,050. 40
00670(EI Camlrro Real) 40 APC ROADWAY A 2 � 42,000. 40
00870(EI Camino R�p 50 APC ROADWAY A 2� 90,000. 40
�
Section Condition Report Page 5 of 16
Date: 3/1/2005
PavementDatabase: NetworklD:AGrande
A9•
Bnnch ID Sectlon ID Surface Uw Rank La�es True Ana At
(gqF�) Inspaetlon
OOfi80(Elm Street(SOUth)) 10 � AC ROADWAY L 2 30,240.0 40 �
00680(Elm Street(South)) 20 AC ROADWAY L 4 91,760. 40
00680(EIm Street(SOUthp 30 AC ROADWAY L 4 90,582: 4�
00680(Elm Street(Southp 40 AC ROADWAY L 4 �125,860. 40
00690(Elm Street(NOrth)) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 51,920. 24
0p690(Elm Street(Nath)) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 9,800• 24
00700(Eman CouA) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 � 19,200. 44
00710(Eme21d BaY Drive(West)) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 17,200. �B
00720(Emerald Bay Drive(Eastp 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 17,840. 16
00730(Equestrian Way) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 102,600. 24
00730(E4ueslrian WaY) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 74,760. 24
00740(Faeh Avenue) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 19,080. 42
00750(Fair Oaks Avenue) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 �� 71,400. 36
00750(Fair Oaks Avenue) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 84,000. 24
00750(Fair Oaks Avenue) 30 AC ROADWAY L 2 47�<00. 2z
00750(PalrOaksAvenue) 40 AC ROADWAY L 4 156,Q00• �
00750(Fair Oaks Avenue) 50 AC ROADWAY L 4 129,840. �
007W(FairOaksAvenue) 60 AC ROADWAY L 4 � 35,880. �
00760(Fair View Dnve) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 40,248. 47
00760(Fair View Drive) 20 AG ROADWAY L 2 7,580. 4� .
00765(Faimhouse�P�ace) 10 AC ROADWAY L 0 15,200. 5
00770(Fairoll Avenue) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 73,700. 34
00770(Farroll Avenue) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 57,600. �
00770(Farioll Avenue) 30 AC ROADWAY L 2 63,000. �
0
00770(Fartoll Avenue) 40 AC ROADWAY L 2 9•600• �4
� 00775(Fleidview Place) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 10,624. 5
7
� 00780(Flaa Road) . 10 AC ROADWAY l 2 25,M0. � 41
Section Condition Report
Date: 3/1/2005 Page 6 of 16
Pavemenf Database: NetworklD:AGrande
npe
Bnnch ID Saetlon ID SuAau Us� Rank Lanw Trua Aroa q�
(gyF�) Inspactlon
00790(Faest Glen Drive) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 16,600. 27
00800(FOrtunaCouA) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 21,600.0 Z6
008t0(GaNenStreep 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 49,760. 33
00810(Garden Sheet) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 4,800. 33
00810(GaNen Street) 30 AC ROADWAY L 2 3,808. 5
00820(Garfield Place) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 49,720. 30
00830(GaymairTertace) .10 AC ROADWAY L 2 � 64,000. 4�
008a0(Golden West Place) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 24,398. 34
00850(Grace Lane) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 5,400. i6
00860(Grend Avenue(East)) 10 AC ROADWAY A 4 772,748. 1
00860(GrarW Avenue(Eas�)) 20 AC ROADWAY A 4 209,988. 5
00860(Grand Avenue(East)) 30 � AC ROADWAY A 4 134,368. �
00870(Greenxrood Drive) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 26,880. 4�
Ooe75(Grove Court) � 10 AC ROADWAY L 2� 10,624. 5
00880(Gularte Road) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 83,936. 17
00880(GuWrte 2oad) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 27,792. 17
00890(Halcyon Road(Southp 10 AC ROADWAY A 4 112,500. 44
00890(Halcyon Road(South)) 20 AC ROADWAY A 4 132,098. 44
00900(Halcyon Road(NOrth)) 10 AC ROADWAY A 2 63,600. 44
00905(Harden Streeq 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 18,000• 24
00910(Hartison Street) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 9,036. 22
00920(Hart Lane) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 8,003. z4
00930(Hawkina Court) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 5,320. 20
00940(Hillcrest orive) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 41,118. 58
f
� 00940(Hillcrest Drive) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 29,856. 56
i
��� 00945(Hiliside Court) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 19,328. 5 �
� 00850(FwdpesROad) 10 OB/01N980 AC ROADWAY � L 2 35,380.0009�0?/2004 24 74.00
�ate: s ni2oos Section Condition Report
Pavement Database: NehvorklD:AGrande Page 7 of 16
Braneh ID Saation ID SuKau Up Renk Lanq Trus Aroe �°
(SqFU Inapeetlon
00950(HOdpes Road) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 14,800. 24
00980(HuasnaRoad) 10 AC ROADWAY C 2 181,120.0 37
00960(HUasna Road) 20 AC ROADWAY C 2 119,700. 37
00980(Huasna Road) 30 AC ROADWAY C 2 181,12p. 37
00985(HucklebarryAVenue) . 70 AC ROADWAY L 2 16.660. g ..
00970 pde Streery 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 38,400. 23
00980(Ikeda Way) 10 AC ROADWAY L . 2 16,380. 23 �.
Oos90(James Wav) 10 AC � ROADWAY C 2 87,500. 29
00990(James Way) 20 AC � ROADWAY C 2 91,500. yg
00990(JamesWaY) .30 AC ROADWAY C 2 702,800. 29
00990(James WaY) 40 AC ROADWAY C 2 72,000. 29
00990(James Way) 50 AC ROADWAY C 2 70,200. 29
00990(James Way) 60 AC ROADWAY C 2 39,990. pg
01000(Jenny Place) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 11,600. 3
01000(Jenny Place) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 17,600. 3
01010(JunlperStreeq 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 51,072. 24
i
01020(W Canada) 70 AC ROADWAY L 2 25,500. q
01020(La Canada) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 qp,lyg, 4
01030(La Cresta Drive) 10� AC ROADWAY L 2 qg,5bp, pg
07030(La Cresta Drive) 20. AC ROADWAY L 2 20,596. 26
Oto40(Ladera P�ace) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 4,536. qg
01050(Lancaster Dnve) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 38,890. 45
Ot080(La Paz CirGe) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 4,896. 28
01 Wo(Larchmont Drive) 10 qC ROADWAY L 2 6,800. �
Ot08o(Launal.ane) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 22,33g, py
Ot090(la Vista Court) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 12,352. 17
01100(Leanna Drive) 10 AC ROADWAY L, � 2 58,240. p I �...
--- ..._ _.. . . ._. . � � � I
Section Condition Report pa e 8 of 16
Date: 3/1/2005 9
PavementDatabase: NerivorklD:AGrande
N•
Bnneh ID Saetlon ID Surtau Us� Rank Lanq Trua Ana At
(gqF�) Insp�ctlon
01110(Ledo Place) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 70,880. 2<
01130(Le Point Street) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 39,450: 19
01130(t»Pdnt Street) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 8,400. �9
ON30(Le Point Streeq 30 AC ROADWAY L 2 41,536. 19
01140(Le Point 7errace) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 3,780. �
07140(Le Pdnt Tertace) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 5,865. ZZ
01180(Linda orive) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 43,920. 23
Ot 160(Linda Dnve) 20 AC ROADWAY C 2 43,800. 23
Ott&5(LOSCervos) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 17,376. 6
01165(LoganberryAvenue) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 15,980. 3
ON&5(LOSCervos) 20 AC ROADWAY C 2 11,104. 6
01185(Los Cervos) 30 AC ROADWAY C 2 10,560. B
Ot 170(Los Olivos Lane) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 8,500. 2z
Ot 170(I..os Olivos tane) _ 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 18,700. 22
01780(Magnolia Drive) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 41,952. 41
01190(Maple Street) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 40,000. 37
0��90(Map�eStreet) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 38,240. 37
01200(Mariposa Cirde) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 4,860. 26
01210(Mason Street(SOUth)) 10 � AC ROADWAY L 2 33,408. 22
01210(Mason Street(Southp 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 � 22,272. 22
01220(Mason Sveet(North)) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 12,690• 22
01230(MaHhew Way) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 33,200. 3
01240(MayStreet) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 27,792. 24
07250(Mdcinley Street) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 22,080. 28
� 01270(Meadowlark Drive) 10 AC ROADWAY . L 2 21,600. 19
� 01280(Mercedes Lane) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 58,000. 7 �
i
01280(Mercedes tane) � ZO AC ROADWAY L 2 23,800. 16
i
Section Condition Report Page 9 of 16
Date: 3/1/2005
Pavement Database: NefworklD:AGrande
npe
Brsnch ID S�ctlon ID SuAaea Uae Rank Lenes Tru�Ana p�
. . (SQFt) Insp�ctlon
i
07290(Mesa Drive) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 39,760.0 29 '
i
07300(MesquBe Lane) 10
AC ROADWAY L 2 49,720. 19 ;
ot3t0(Mi1lerCirGe) - 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 8�284• 2�
01320(Miller Way) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 77,616. 2�
i
07330(Montego Street) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 37.692. 45
01335.(MOming Rise Lane) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 32,000. 22 :i
3
01950(MUlbeny lane) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 72,692. 4�
01360(Mustang Cirde) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 14,200. 24
0�370(MyrtieStreet) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 1A,112. �
01380(Nelson Street) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 34,920. �3
Ot380(Nelson Street) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 24,876. 13
0�390(Nevada Streeq 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 7,800. 45
01q00(Newman Drive) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 18,886. 24
07410(NewportAvenue) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 43,750. �
01420(Noel Streeq 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 14,800. »
0�430(Nopuere Placel 10 . AC ROADWAY L 2 13,896. 32
01440(NOyes Roed) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 35,200. �
0�450(oak Hill Road) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 8,003. z4
07480(Oak Leaf Cirde) � 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 10,000. 24
Ota70(Oak Park eoulevard) 10 AC ROADWAY A 4 35,200. �
01470(Oak Paiic BoulevaM) � 30 AC ROADWAY A 2 13,500. �
01470(Oak Pai1c Boulevard) 40 AC ROADWAY A 2 65,000. �
01a70(Oak Park ea,�evard) 50 AC ROADWAY A 2 147,500. �
01470(Oak Park Boulevard) 60 AC ROADWAY A 2 25,000. �
01480(Oak Street) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 26,800. �
01500(Old Ranch Road) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 73,800. �
i
�I
. — _...:-------- . . ._....
I ._ _. ..---�—� -- -------
Section Condition Report Page 10 of
Date: 3/1/2005
PavementDatabase: NetworklD:AGrande +c
na•
Braneh ID SMlon ID Surtsu Use Rank Lan� Tn�e Area Insp�cUon
(SqFy
i
01510(Olive Street) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 26,960. 13 ;
i
Ot520(ObhanPJley) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 � 26,400. �Z ��i
!
07590(Opai circAe) , 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 6,880. 0 '
i
01540(Orchard Avenue) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 10,200. 4�
01540(Orohard Avenue) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 37,910. 40
01540(Orchard Avenue) 30 AC ROADWAY L 0 10,200. 2 �
1
E
ot58o fOro Drive) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 50,688. 29
01580(Oro Drive) � 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 44,748. �
01570(Ouuand Court) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 4,860• »
Ot580(Padfic Polnte Way) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 30�288• �
07590(PalmCourt) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 17,176. �2
07800(Pabs Secos) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 18,900. 10
01810(Park Way) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 � 15,120. �
07815(Paraiso) 10 AC . ROADWAY L 0 5,184. B
01820(Paseo Sveet) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 7,400. 17
0�6a0(Paul Piace) 10 AC� ROADWAY L 2 40,680. »
01640(PC Railway Place) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 14.760. 22
01640(PC Railway Place) 20 AC ROADWAY l �' 2 4.200. 15
07850(PeaA Drive) 10 AC ROADWf�Y L 2 45,000. 0
01660(Pearwood Avenue) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 41,760. �
01880(Pecan Streat) 10 AC ROADWAY L � 2 25,982. �
01690(Pilgrim Way) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 ' 12,580. 40
07700(Pine Sireet) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 22,538: 17
017t0(Plata Road) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 13,212. 31
01720(Pladno Lane) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 20,520. �
. 01720(Platirw Lane) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 43,510. � .
Section Condition Report Page 11 of '
Date: 3/1/2005
PavemenLDatabase: NefworklD:AGrande a c
Aa•
Brench ID Sactlon ID Surtaea Uw Rank Lanes True Ms pt
(SqFU InspscUon
01730(Plomo Court) 10 AC ROADWAY l 2 7,344.0 �26 .
017ao(Poole Street) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 36,000.0 48
o17a0(POOIe Street) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 4,824. 48
01750(POplar Street) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 16,720. �
01760(PratleraCOUrt) � 10 AC ROADWAY L � 2 10,760. 1Z
01770(Pdsdlla Lane) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 21,360�. 28
01n5(Puesta de�Soq 10 AC ROADWAY L 0 45,276. 6
On80(�ua�l CouA) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 10,400. 19
01790(Rancho Paikway) 10 AC ROADWAY C 2 75,600. 12
017s0(Rancho Parkway) 20 AC ROADWAY C 2 84,600. 12
07790(Rancho Parkway) 30 AC ROADWAY C 2 45,900. 12
07795(Raspberty Avenue) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 20,400. 3
01795(RaspberryAvenue) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 14,280. 3
01&10(Refugb Place) � 10 AC ROADWAY � L 2 16,200• �2
07810(Rena Street(SOUth)) 10 AC ROADWAY L . 2 42.908. 28
Ot820(Rena Street(North)) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 15,600. ZS
Otaso(wcecoun) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 5,600. �7
O�sao(wdgeviewway) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 25,840. 26
07850(Robin Grde) 10 AC ROADWAY l . 2 82,800. 19
01880(Robles Road) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 6,896. ZZ
01870(Rodeo Drive) 10 AC ROADWAY C 2 43,200. 16
01870(Rodeo Drive) 20 AC ROADWAY C 2 83,200. 16
01970(2oaeo Drive) 30 AC ROADWAY C 2 58,400• �6
01870(ROdeo Drive) , 40 AC ROADWAY C 2 16,800. 16
07880(ROgersCOUrt) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 79,920. 28
OtBSO(ttosemery coun) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 10,880. 3
01895(Rosemary Lane) 10 01/01N999 AC ROADWAY L 2 20,640.00 Ofl�29/2004 5 90.00 .
Section Condition Report
Date: 3/1/2005 Page 12 of
Pavement Database: NetworklD:AGrande �c
Braneh ID SaGlon ID Surhu Usa Rank Lanas 7fu�Ana ��
At
(gqFt) InapacUOn
01900(ROSewood Lane) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 18,900. 46
01910(RUSS Court) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 8,480. 17
01920(Ruth Mn Way(South)) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 16,800. 28
01930(Ruth Mn Way(NoAh)) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 18,800. 28
01940(SapeStreet) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 77,120. 48
01945(Salida de Sd) 10 AC ROADWAY L 0 20,384. 6
01950(Sandalwootl Avenue) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 23,200. � 52
01980(ScenicCirda) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 14,800. 24
01985(SeabrightAvenue) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 7,688• 3
07970(Short Street) . 10 AC � ROADWAY L 2 32,904. 22
01970(Short Street) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 10,980. 22
07s70(ShoA Street) 30 AC ROADWAY C 2 6,800. 22
01970(Short Street) 40 AC ROADWAY C 2 2,400. 22
01980(Sierra Drive) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 52,488. 35
01985(SOmbdllo) � 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 28,832. 6 �!
01990(Spanish Moas Wne) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 46,000. 16
02oo0(SpruceStreet) 10 �AC ROADWAY L � 2 28,894. 28
02000(Spnxa Street) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 23,800. 28
02010(Stapecoach Raad) 10 AC ROADWAY � C 2 41,040. 28
02010(Sragecoach Road) 20 AC ROADWAY C 2 49,896. 28
02020(SWnley Avenue) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 12,800:0 22
02020(StanleyAv�ue) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 19,200. 17
02030(Slation Way) 10 AC ROADWAY B 2 50,080. 22
02035(Strawberty Avenue) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 20,872. 3
02040(Stevenson orive) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 14,280. 28
I 02050(Sunrise 7ertace) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 74,404. 33
Date: 3/1/2005 Section Condition Report Page 13 of
Pavement Database: NefworklD:AGrande �c
Bnneh ID Saetlon ID Surtace Usa Rank Lanq True Aroe �•
At
� � (gqF�) Insp�ctlon
02060(Sunset Driva) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 86,960. 51
02070(Sycamore Court) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 4,032. 41
02080(Sycamore Ddve) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 30,OOOA �7
02080(Sycamae Drive) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 35,200.0 3
02090(Tally Fb Road) 10 AC ROADWAY C 2 59,472. 27
02090(Tally Ho Roatl) 20 AC ROADWAY C 2 127.944. 27
02700(Tanner lane)� 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 26,320. 22
02110(Tayla Place) . 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 26.280• 25
02730(The Pike) 10 AC ROADWAY C 2 71,238. 31
02130(The Pike) 20 AC ROADWAY C 2 160,140. 31
02740(Tierra Streeq . 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 38,218. 17
02150(TiperiailOrive) 10 � AC �ROADWAY L 2 36,600. 30
02180(Todd Lane) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 25,270. 22
02170(TOyon Place) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 7,200. 29
02780(7raific Way) 10 AC ROADWAY B 2 113,920. 51
02�ao(irar�c way) 20 AC ROADWAY B 4 63,616. 35 ,
� 02190(Tiaific way Extension) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 29,700. 17
02200(7riniryAvenue) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 34,440. 22
02210(Turqudse Drive) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 43,760. 0
02220(Valley Road) 10 AC ROADWAY C 2 161.280. 37
02220(Valley Road) 20 AC ROADWAY C 2 160,920. 37
02230(Vard Loomis Coun) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 4,248. 22
02240(Vard Loomis Lane) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 .28,080. 22
02250(Verde Place) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 13,314. 40
02260(Vemon Sheet) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 17,640. 40
02260(Vemon Street) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 5,76p. 40
Date: 3/1/2005 Section Condition Report Page 14 of
PavementDatabase: NetworklD:AGrande +c
Ao•
Bronch ID Sectlon ID 8urhu Use Rank Lanu Trua Ma pt
(gqF�) InspoeNOn
02265(Via Avante) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 8,820. 2
02270(Via Bandolero) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 136,400. 12
02275(Via Belmonte Court(Nath)) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 5,664. 7
02278(Yia Belrtronte Court(SOUth)) 10� AC ROADWAY L 2 20,000. �
02280�a Berms) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 73,650. 40
02285(Via Firenze(North)) � 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 11,040. Z
02287�a Firenze(South)) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 11,840. 2
02290(Via La earrenca) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 44,588• 3
02300(Via Las Aquilas) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 50,430. 12
02300(Via Las Aquilas) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 28,020. 12
023�0�a Poca) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 7,992. 12
02320(Via Vaquero) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 80,800. 1z
02320(Via Vaquero) 20 � AC ROADWAY L 2 24.000. 12
02330(Y�cMria Way) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 34,440. 30
02340(Victorian Court) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 29,200. 3
02350(vlllage court) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 5,610. 3
02380(virginia Drive) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 32,908. 46
023�0�ata Cirde) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 16,480. 24
02380(Vista Drive) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 48,000. 6
02400(Walnut Street) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 52,668. 37
02400(Walnut Streeq 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 � 47,120. 46
02410(Wesley Street) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 2.000. 22
02440(WhiteCourt) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 9,384. 17
02450(whneley Streeq 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 14,400. 24
I 02450(WhiteleySireet) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 23,258. 24
� 02aso(wnneleyS�reeq 30 AC ROADWAY L 2 15,f20. 24
�
'
'
� ---'
Section Condition Report
Date: 3/1/2005 Page 15 of
Pavement Database: NetworklD:AGrande ,c
�o
Bnneh ID Seetlon ID Surfaee Use Rsnk Lanes Trua Ana p�
(SqFq Inspsction
02470�IIrnrLane) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 28,500.0 27
02480�Ison Court) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 5,600. 17
02W0(WOOd Place) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 24,276. 40
02510(woodland Coun) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 � 6,840. 18
02520(WOOdland Drive) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 15,352. 17
02520(WOOdland Drive) 20 AC ROADWAY L 2 102,280. �
02520(Woodland Drive) 30 AC ROADWAY L 2 6,480. � 19
02530(ZOpata way) 10 AC ROADWAY L 2 35,676. �
03000(Elm Street Comminty Center 10 AC � PARKING P 0 12,555. 24
2025(Sqrlight Lane) 10 AAC ROADWAY L 0 16,000. �
225(Brittany Avenue) 10 AAC ROADWAY L 0 8,000. 0
335(Carrinpton Place) 10 AAC ROADWAY L 0 8,000. p I
50010(Ash Street eathrooms Parking 70 AC PARKING P 0 9,000. 12
50020(Car Cortal PaAcing Lot(LOwer)) 10 AC � PARKING P 0 .19,200. 17 .
50030(Car Cortal Parkinp Lot(Upper)) 10 AC PARKING P 0 14,400. �2
50040(Ciry Hall Parking Lot) 10 AC PARKING P 0 21,700• 24
50050(Corporatim Yard Parkinp Lot) 10 AC PARKING P 0 18,000. 32
50060(Elm Street Comm.Center 10 AC PARKING P 0 15,825. z2
50070(Ololhan Alley Parking LM) 10 AC PARKING P 0 54,000. �2
50080(Soto Comqeu Paiking lot 10 AC PARKING P 0 34,144. ��
50090(Solo Complex Parkin8 Lot(Easl)) 10 AC PARKING � 0 20,650. �
50700(WOmen's Club Parking Lot 10 AC PARKING P 0 40,000. 29
50110(women's Gub PaAting Lot 10 AC ROADWAY P 0 24,000. � 19
902(Hampton Place) 10 AAC ROADWAY L 0 7,500. 0
, _.__. _ —. ._ ._ . _ _. _ _...--
�i _ .. _ . .. . .. . . .
Date: 3/1/2005 Section Condition Report Page 16 of
AC
Pavement Database:
Arithmatle PCI WN9hbtl
Awnya Stendard Av�npa
� Awnye Total Numhar PCI Devletlon PCI
AY° Aq�pt Aroa of
- �a�°G°rY InspKtlon (SqFt) Sactlons
0-02 0.83 673,064.0 23 94.91 5.64 95.18
03-05 3.50 1,045,062.0 36 87.64 5.26 86.74
06-10 6.67 985,986.0 24 80.08 18.17 77.92
»-�5 12.07 1,286,214.0 29 82.93 16.50 87.21
��20 17.55 1,349,070. 49 72.49 23.61 68.42
21-25 yy,g6 2,607,275.8 88 66.03 25.49 62.40
26-30 27.82 1,964,176. 51 64.18 25.50 56.50
3t-35 32.87 951,608.0 23 64.74 27.29 65.59
3s-ao 3g,gg 2,100,453. 33 51.82 27.07 5835
over4o 46.03 1,488,670.0 40 60.38 23.24 60.06
An 22.29 14,451,578.8 396 70.49 25.10 68.10
Date: 3/1/2005 Branch Listing Report Page 1 of 12
Pavement Database:
AGrande 00010 Acom Drive ROADWAY 1 57,200.00
AGrande 00020 fUderStreet ROADWAY 3 133,174.00 �
AGrande 00030 Allen Street ROADWAY 1 76,248.00
AGrande 00040 Alpine Street(South) ROADWAY � 1 69,372.00
AGrande 00045 Alpine Street(North) ROADWAY � 1 225.00
AGrende 00050 Mdre Drive ROADWAY 2 58,800.00 ����
AGrande 00060 fvabian CirGe ROADWAY 1 25,320.00
AGrande 00070 Arroyo Avenue ROADWAY 1 20,638.00
AGrande 00080 Ash Street ROADWAY 2 178,948.00
AG2nde 00085 Asilo Street ROADWAY 2 122,72�•00
AGronde 00090 Aspen Street ROADWAY 1 54•492.00
AGrande 00100 Avenida de Diamente ROADWAY 1 112•500•00
AGrande 00110 Bakeman Lane ROADWAY 1 62,880.00
AGrande 00120 Bambi Court ROADWAY 1 15,520.00
AGrande 00130 Bamett SUeet ROADWAY 1 19,080.00
AGrdnde 00140 Bedloe Lane ROADWAY 1 6,592.00
AGrande 00150 Beech Street ROADWAY 1 25,992.00
� AGrande 00160 Bell Street ROADWAY 1 41,280.00
� AGrande 00170 Bennett Avenue ROADWAY � 2 84,000.00
AGrande 00180 Beta Court ROADWAY 1 7,400.00
AGrende 00185 Bladcberty Avenue ROADWAY 2 35,044.00
AGronde 00187 Blueberty Avenue ROADWAY 1 15,456.00
� AG2nde 00188 Boysenberty Street ROADWAY 2 28,800.00
i
I AGrande 00190 Brench Mill Road ROADWAY 1 99•990.00 _
1
� AGrande 00195 Brench S}reet(West) ROADWAY 4 375,800.00
� AGrende 00200 Bridge SUeet ROADWAY 1 � 33,984.00
AGrande 00210 Brighton Avenue ROADWAY 2 103,120.00
�. AGrande 00220 Bdsw Road ROADWAY 3 �.0�.�
Date: 3l1/2005 Branch Listing Report Page 2 or�z
Pavement Database:
AGrande 00230 Califomia Straet ROADWAY 1 17,340.00
AGrende 00240 Calle Cartnen ROADWAY 1 10,000.00
AGrande 00250 Calle Cuervo ROADWAY 1 208,800.00
AGrande 00260 Callie Court ROADWAY 1 8,550.00
AGrande 00270 Cameron CouA � ROADWAY 1 24,760.00
AGrande 00280 Camino Mercado ROADWAY � 1 101,200.00
AGrande � 00290 Campana Place ROADWAY 1 20,232.00
AGrande 00300 Canyon Way ROADWAY 1 48,060.00
AGrande 00310 Cardinal Court ROADWAY 1 6,000.00
AGrande 00320 Carme�la Drive ROADWAY 1 35,480.00
AGrande 00330 Carol Place ROADWAY � 2��`.�08'00
AG2nde 00335 Casdlio Court � ROADWAY 1 9,800.00
AGrande 00336 Castlllo del Mar ROADWAY 2 59,000.00
AGrande 00340 Cedar Street ROADWAY 3 55,052.00
AGrande 00350 Cerro Visfa Circle ROADWAY 1 25,740.00
AGronde 00360 Certo Vista Lane ROADWAY 1 19,296.00
AGrende -00370 Chaparral Lane ROADWAY Z ��4�•�
AGrande 00380 Chelsea Court ROADWAY 1 6,336.00
AGrende 00385 Cherty Avenue(West) ROADWAY 2 44,132.00
AGrende 00390 ChilWn Avenue ROADWAY 1 57,000.00
AGrande 00400 Clarence Avenue ROADWAY 1 20,672.00
AGrande 00415 Clinton Court ROADWAY 1 11,600.00
AGrande 00430 Coach Road ROADWAY 2 73,720.00 .
AGrande 00440 Cobre Place
ROADWAY 1 17,424.00
i AGrande 00450 Colina Street ROADWAY 1 15.680.00
� AGrande 00460 - Collado Courte ROADWAY 1 9,936.00
I
± AGrande 00470 Corbett Canyon Road ROADWAY 1 47,160.00
I ROADWAY 1 62,440.00
�� AGrande 00480 Comwall Avenue
oate: 3i�i2ooe Branch Listing Report Page 3 of 12
Pavement Database:
AGrande 00490 Corona del Tierra ROADWAY 1 18,880.00
AGrende 00500 Corral Place ROADWAY 1 28,350.00
AGrande 00510 Courtland Street ROADWAY 5 136,244.00
AGrande 00520 Creekside Drive ROADWAY 1 �8��60•00
AGrdnde 00525 C2nberty Avenue ROADWAY 1 25,740.00
AGrande 00530 Cross Streat ROADWAY 1 26,400.00
AGrande � 00540 Crown Hill ROADWAY 1 56,700.00
AGrende 00550 Crown Tertace ROADWAY 2 23,310.00
AGrande 00560 Cuerda Corte ROADWAY 1 8,000.00
AGrande 00570 Cuesfa Place ROADWAY 1 7,416.00 �
AGrande 00580 Deer Trail Cirde ROADWAY 1 27,200.00
AGrande 00590 Del Sol Street ROADWAY 1 24,208.00
AGrande 00600 Diamond Cirde
ROADWAY 1 � 7,000.00
AGrande 00610 Diana Place ROADWAY 1 43,560.00
AGrande 00620 Dixson Street ROADWAY 1 �4�800•00
� AG2nde 00630 Dodson Way ROADWAY 2 48,552.00
AGrande 00640 Dos Cerros ROADWAY 1. 9,030.00
AG2nde 00650 Cherty Avenue(East) ROADWAY 3 141,785.00
AGrande 00670 EI Camino Real ROADWAY 5 254,970.00 �
AGrande 00680 Elm Streel(South) ROADWAY 4 338,442.00
AGrande 00690 Elm Street(NORh) ROADWAY 2 61,520.00
AGrande 00700 Eman Court ROADWAY 1 19,200.00
AGrande 00710 Emereld Bay Drive(West) ROADWAY 1 17,200•00
AGrande 00720 Emerald Bay Drive(East) ROADWAY 1� 17,840.00
{ AGrande 00730 Equestrian Way
ROADWAY 2 177,360.00
tl AGrande 00740 Faeh Avenue ROADWAY 1 19,080.00
� AG2nde OW50 FairOaksAvenue ROADWAY 6 524,520.00
�
� ROADWAY 2 47,808.00
� AGrande 00760 Fair View Drive
Date: 3/1/2005 Branch Listing Report Page 4 of 12 r
,
Pavement Database:
AGrande 00765 Fartnhouse Place ROADWAY � 1 15,200.00 �
AGrande 00770 Farroll Avenue ROADWAY 4 203,900.00
AGrande 00775 Fleldview Place ROADWAY 1 10,624.00
AGrande 00780 Flora Road ROADWAY 1 25,440.00
AGrande 00790 Forest Glen Drive ROADWAV 1 16,800.00
�AGrande 00800 FortunaCourt ROADWAY 1 21,600.00 �
AGrande 00810 Garden SVeet ROADWAY 3 58,368.00
AGrande 00820 Gafield Place ROADWAY 1 49,720.00
AGrende 00830 GaynfairTertace RQADWAY � �'0�'�
AGrande 00840 Golden West Place ROADWAY 1 24,396.00
AGrande 00850 Grace Lane ROADWAY 1 5,400.00
AG2nde 00860 Grand Avenue(East) ROADWAY 3 517,104.00
AGrande 00870 Greenwood Drive ROADWAY 1 26,880.00
AGrande 00875 Grove Court ROADWAY 1 10,624.00
AGrande 00880 Gularte Road ROADWAY 2 91,728.00
AGrande 00890 Halcyon Road(South). ROADWAY 2 244,596.00
AGrande 00900 Halcyon Road(NOrth) ROADWAY 1 63,600.00
AGrende 00905 Harden SVeet ROADWAY 1 18,000.00
AGrande 00910 Hartison Street ROADWAY 1 9,036.00
AGrande 00920 Hart Lane � ROADWAY 1 6,003.94 .
AGrande 00930 Hawkins Court ROADWAY 1 5,320.00
AGrende 00940 Hillcrest Drive ROADWAY 2 70,974.00
AGrande 00945 Hillside Court ROADWAY 1 19,328.00
AGrande 00950 Hodges Road ROADWAY 2 50,160.00
AG2nde 00960 Huasna Road ROADWAY 3 481,940.00
AGrande 00965 Huckleberty Avenue ROADWAY 1 16,660.00
� AGrande 00970 Ide Street ROADWAY 1 38,400.00
AGrande 00980 Ikeda Way ROADWAY . 1 16.380.00
Date: 3/1/2005 Branch Listing Report Page 5 of 12
Pavement Database:
AGrende 00990 James Way ROADWAY 6 443,790.00
AGrande 01000 Jenny Place ROADWAY 2 29,200.00
AGrande 01010 Juniper Street ROADWAY 1 51,072.00
AG2nde 01020 La Canada ROADWAY 2 87,626.00
AGrande 01030 La Cresfa Drive ROADWAY 2 87�148•00
AGrende 01040 Ladera Place ROADWAY 1 4,536.00
AGrande 01050 Lanpster Drive ROADWAY 1 36,890.00
AGrande 01060 La Paz CirGe � ROADWAY 1 4,896.00
AG2nde 01070 Larchrtront DAve ROADWAY 1 6,600.00
AGrande 01080 Launa Lane ROADWAY 1 22,338.00
AGrande 01090 La Visfa Court ROADWAY 1 12,352.00
AGrande 01100 Leanna Drive ROADWAY 7 58,240•00
AGrande 01110 Ledo Place ROADWAY 1 10,880.00
AGrande 01130 Le Pdnt Street ROADWAY 3 89,386.00
AGrande 01140 LePdntTertace ROADWAY 2 9,645.00
AGrande 01160 Linda Drive ROADWAY 2 87,520.00
AGrende 01165 Loganberty Avenue ROADWAY 1 15,980.00
AGrande 01165 Lw Cervas ROADWAY 3 � 39,040.00
AG2nde 01170 Los Olivos Lane ROADWAY 2 27,20�•00
AGrende 01180 Magnolia Drive ROADWAY 1 41,952.00
� AGrande 01190 Maple Sveet ROADWAY 2 78,240.00 �
AGrande 01200 Maripasa Cirde ROADWAY 1 4•880.00
AGrande 01210 Mason Street(South) ROADWAY 2 55,620.00
AGrande 01220 Mason Street(North) ROADWAY 1 12,690.00
AGrande 01230 Matlhew Way ROADWAY 1 33,200.00
AGrende 01240 May Street ROADWAY 1 27,792.00
AGrande 01250 Mckinley Street ROADWAY 1 22,080.00 �
. AGrande 01270 Meadowlark Drive ROADWAY 1 21.BOO.OU
e
Date: 3/�/2005 Branch Listing Report Page s or�2 ;
f
Pavement Database:
AG2nde 01280 Mercedes Lane ROADWAY 2 81,600.00
AGrende 01290 Mesa Drive ROADWAY 1 39,760.00
AGrande 01300 Mesquite Lane ROADWAY 1 49,720.00
AGrende 01310 Miller CirGe ROADWAY 1 8,264.00
AGrande 01320 Mlller Way ROADWAY 1 77,816.00
AG2nde 01330 Montego Sireet ROADWAY 1 37,892.00
AGrande 01335 Moming Rise Lane ROADWAY 1 32,000.00
AGrande 01350 Mulberty Lane ROADWAY 1 12,892.00
AGrande 01360 Mustang Cirde ROADWAY 1 14,200.00
AGrande 01370 MyAle Street ROADWAY 1 14,N2.00 '
AGrande 01380 Nelson Street � ROADWAY 2 59,796.00
AGrande 07390 Nevada Street ROADWAY 1 7,800.00
AGrande 01400 Newman Drive ROADWAY 1 18,666.00
AG2nde 01410 NewportAvenue ROADWAY 1 43,750.00
� AGrande 01420 Noel Street � ROADWAY 1 14,800.00
AGrande 01430 Noguera Place ROADWAY 1 �3•8��00
AGrande 01440 Noyes Road ROADWAY 1 35,200.00
AGrende 01450 Oak Hill Road ROADWAY 1 6,003.94
AGrande 01460 Oak Leaf Circle ROADWAY � t � 10,000.00
AGrande 01470 Oak Park Boulevard ROADWAY 5 288,200.00
AGrande 01480 Oak Street ROADWAY 1 26,800.00
AGrende 01500 Old Ranch Road � ROADWAY 1 73,800.00
AGrdnde 01510 Oliva Street ROADWAY 1 26�960�00
AGrande 01520 Olohan Alley ROADWAY � 1 26,400.00
AGrande 01530 Opal Cirde ROADWAY 1 6•880.00
1 AGrande 01540 Orchard Avenue ROADWAY 3 58,310.00
� ROADWAY 2 95,436.00
1 AGrande 01560 Oro Drive .
' AGrande 01570 OuUand Court R�ADWAY � 4'860'00
�a�e: sivzoos Branch Cisting Report Page �of�z ;
�
Pavement Database:
AGrande 01580 PaGfic Pointe Way ROADWAY 1 30,286.00
AG2nde 01590 Palm Court ROADWAY 1 17,176.00
AG2nde 01800 Palos Secos ROADWAY 1 18,900.00
AG2nde 01610 Park Way ROADWAY 1 15,120.00
AGrande 01615 Paraiso . ROADWAY 1 5,184.00
AGrande 01620 Paseo SVeet ROADWAY 1 7,400.00
AGrande 01630 Paul Place � ROADWAY 1 40,680.00
AGrande 01640 PC Railway Place ROADWAY 2 18,960.00
AGrande 01850 PeaA Drive ROADWAY 1 45,000.00
AGrande 01660 Pearwood Avenue ROADWAY 1 41,760.00
AGrande 01880 Pepn Street ROADWAY 1 25,992.00
AGrande 01690 Pilgrim Way ROADWAY 1 � 12.580.0�
AGrande 01700 Pine Street ROADWAY 1 22,536.00
AGrande 01710 Plata Road ROADWAY 1 13,212.00
AGrande 01720 Platlno Lane ROADWAY � 2 64,030.00
AGrande 01730 Plomo Court � ROADWAY 1 7,344.00
AGrande 01740 Poole Street ROADWAY 2 40,824.00
AGrande 017W Poplar Street ROADWAY 1 16,720.00
AGrande 01760 Pradere Court ROADWAY 1 10.760.OU
AGrande 01770 Prisdlla Lane ROADWAY 1 21,360.00
AGrande 01775 Pueata del Sd ROADWAY 1 45,216.00 !
AGrande 01780 Quail Court ROADWAY 1 10,400.00
AGrende 01790 Rancho Parkwaq ROADWAY 3 206,100.00
AGrande 01795 RaspbertyAvenue ROADWAY 2 � 34,680.00
AGrande 01800 Refugio Place ROADWAY 1 16,200.00
AGrande 01810 Rena Street(Soutti) ROADWAY 1 42,908.00
AGrende 01820 Rena Street(North) ROADWAY 1 15,600.00
i AGrende 01830 Rice Court ROADWAY 1 5,600.00
�ate: siv2oos Branch Listing Report Page s or�z
Pavement Database:
AGrande 01840 Rldgeview Way ROADWAY 1 25,840.00
AG2nde 01850 Robin Circle ROADWAY . 1 82,800.00
AGrande 01860 Robles Road ROADWAY 1 6,696.00
AGrande 01870 Rodeo Drive ROADWAY 4 201,600.00
AGrande � 01880 Ropers Court ROADWAY 1 19,920.00
AGrande �01890 RasemaryCourt ROADWAY 1 10,880.00
� AGrande 01895 Rosemary Lane ROADWAY 1 20,640.00
AGrande 01900 Rosewood Lane ROADWAY 1 18,900:00 ��
AG2nde 01910 Russ Court ROADWAY 1 � 8,480.00
AGrande 01920 Ruth Mn Way(South) . ROADWAY 1 16,800.00
AGrande 01930 Ruth Mn Way(NOrth) ROADWAY 1 16,800.00 ��
AGrende 01940 SageS7eet ROADWAY 1 ����Z�•00
AGrande 01945 Salida de Sol ROADWAY 1 20,3&4.00
AGrande 01950 Sandalwood Avenue ROADWAY' 1 23,200.00 .
AGrande 01960 Scenic CirGe ROADWAY 1 14,800.00
AGrande 01965 Seabright Avenue ROADWAY 1 7,668.00
AGrande 01970 ShoR Street ROADWAY 4 53,084.00
AGrande 01980 Sierta Drive ROADWAY 1 52,488.00
AGrande 01985 Sombrillo � ROADWAY 1 28,832.00 �
AGrande 01990 Spanish Moss Lane ROADWAY 1 46,000.00
� AGrande 02000 Spruce Street . � ROADWAY 2 ��6�•�
�
AGrande 02010 Stagecoach Road ROADWAY 2 90,936.00
AG2nde 02020 Stanley Avenue ROADWAY 2 32,000.00
AGrende 02030 Station Way ROADWAY 1 50,080.00
� AGrande 02035 Strawberty Avenue ROADWAY 1 20,672.00
{ AGronde 02040 Stevenson Drive ROADWAY 1 14,280.00
I
j AGrande 02050 Sunrise Terrace ROADWAY 1 14,404.00
i
AGrende 02060 Sunset Drive ROADWAY 1 86,960.00
oace: 3ni2oos Branch Listing Report Page s or�2
Pavement Database:
AGrande 02070 Sycamore Court ROADWAY � 4,032.00
AGrande 02080 Sycamore Drive ROADWAY 2 65,200.00
AGrande 02090 Tally Ho Road ROADWAY 2 187,416.00
AGrende 02100 Tanner Lane ROADWAY 1 26,320.00
AGrande 02110 Taylor Place ROADWAY 1 26,280.00
AGrende 02130 The Pike ROADWAY 2 231,378.00
AGrande 02140 Tierta Street ROADWAY 1 38,218.00 �
AGronde 02150 Tiger Tail Drive ROADWAY 1 36,600.00
AGrande 02160 Todd Lane ROADWAY 1 25,270.00
AGrande 02170 Toyon Place ROADWAY 1 ��200•00
AGrande 02180 � TreTfic Way ROADWAY 2 177,536.00
AGrande 02190 Traflic Way Extension ROADWAY 1 29��00•00
AG2nde 02200 Tdnity Avenue ROADWAY 1 �•���� .
AGrande 02210 Turquoise Drive ROADWAY 1 45,160.00
AGrande 02220 Valley Road R�/�DWAY 2 322'Z00'00
AGrande 02230 Vard Loomis Court ROADWAY � 4�z48•00
AGrande 02240 Vard Loomis Lane ROADWAY � Za•0�•�
AGrande 02250 Verde Place ROADWAY 1 13,314.00
AGrande 02260 Vemon Street ROADWAY 2 23,400.00
AGrande 02265 Via Avante ROADWAY 1 B•82�.00
AGrande 02270 Via Bandolero ROADWAY 1 136,400.00
{
3
AGrande 02275 Vla Belmonte Court(North) R�ADWAY � 5���
� AGrande 02278 Vfa Belmonte Court(Soulli) ROADWAY 1 20,000.00
:� AGrende 02280 Via Bertos ROADWAY 1 13.650.00
I
AGrande 02285 Via Firenze(North) ROADWAY 1 »•����
AGrande 02287 Via Firenze(South) � ROADWAY 1 � »���•�
i AGrande 02290 Via La Bartanca ROADWAY 1 44�568•00 �
3
� � AGrende 02300 Vfa Las Aqullas ROADWAY 2 78,450.00
Date: 3/1/2005 Branch Listing Report Page �oor�z
Pavement Database:
AGrande 02310 Via Pop ROADWAY 1 7,992.00
AGrande 02320 Via Vaquero ROADWAY 2 84,800.00
AG2nde 02330 Victoria Way ROADWAY 1 34,440.00
AG2nde 02340 �ctorian Court ROADWAY 1 29200.00
AGrande 02350 Village Court ROADWAY 1 5,610.00
AGrande 02360 Virginia Drive ROADWAY 1 32,908.00
AGrande 02370 Visfa Circle ROADWAY 1 16,480.00
AG2nde 02380 VisMa Drive ROADWAY 1 48,000.00 ,
AG2nde 02400 Walnut Street ROADWAY 2 ����•� �
AGrende - 02410 Wesley Street ROADWAY 1 2,000.00
AGrande 02440 White Court ROADWAY 1 9,384.00
AGrende 02450 Whiteley Street ROADWAY 3 52,776.00
AGrande 02470 Willow Lane ROADWAY� 1 28,500.00
AGrende 02480 Wllson CouR ROADWAY 1 5,600.00
AGrande 02500 Wood Flace ROADWAY 1 24,278.00
AGrande 02510 Woodland Court ROADWAY 1 6,840.00
AGrande 02520 Woodland Drive ROADWAY 3 124,112.00
AGrande 02530 Zogata Way ROADWAY 1 35,676.00 �
AGrande 03000 Elm Street Comminty Center PARKING 1 12,555.00
Driveway
AG2nde 2025 Stadight Lane ROADWAY 1 16,000.00 �
AG2nde 225 Brittany Avenue ROADWAY 1 8,000.00
AGrande 335 Cartington Place ROADWAY 1 8,000.00
AGrande 50010 Ash Street Ballirooms Parking PARKING 1 9,000.00
Lot
AGrande 50020 - Car Cortal Parking Lot(Lower) PARKING 1 19,200.00
AGrande 50030 Car Corral Parking Lot(Upper) PARKING 1 14,400.00
AGrande 50040 City Hall Parking Lot PARKING 1 21,700.00
� AGrande 50050 Corporatian Yard Parking Lot PARKING 1 �8•����
Date: 3/�/p005 Branch Listing Report Page >> or�z
Pavement Database:
AGrande. 50060 Elm Street Comm.Center PARKING 1 15,825.00
Parking Lot
AGrande 50070 Oldhan Alley Parking Lot PARKING 1 54,000.00
AGrande 50080 Soto Complex Parking Lot PARKING 1 34,144.00
(West)
AGrande 50090 Soto Complex Parking Lot PARKING 1 20,650.00
(East)
AGrande 50100 Women's Club Parking Lot PARKING 1 40,000.00
(LOwer)
AGrande 50110 Women's Club Parking Lot. � ROADWAY 1 24,000.00 .
(Upper)
AGrande 902 Hampton Place R�/�DWAY � �•5�'�
a
�
i
d
�
;{
1
�
i
;
I
�
Date: Mar/1/2005 Branch Listing Report (Summary) Page �zor�z
Pavemenf Database:
Total Number of Networks: �
Total Number of Branches: 286
Total Number of Seclions: 396
Total True Area: 14,451,578.88 SqFt
Average Branch True Area: 50,530.00 SqFt
I
�
1
a
�
�
i
4
�
�
�
i
I
i
append'oc u —woric Hisbory Rsport
i
�
1
i
�
i
;
i
�ate:os�o��2oos WO�k HistOry RepOrt Paae 1 of 46
Pavement Database:
Natwork: AGrande eranch: 00010 (ACOm Drive) Sxtlon: 10 Surtacs: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1992 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 1,430.00 Ft Witllh: 40.00 Ft TrueArea: 57200.00 Sq
WO� MaJor
Code Cost Mgp .
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGrende Branch: 00020 (PJderStreet) Sectlon: 10 SuAace: AC
L.C.D.: OB/01/1961 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanyth: 676.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrueArea: 27.040.00 Sq
Work M��
Cod� Cost MiR
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL True
Nelwork: AGrande Bnneh: 00020 (AlderStreet) B�cUon: 20 8urtau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1961 Uw: ROADWAY R�nk:L L�npM: 679.00 Ft Witlfh: 38.00 Ft TrwAru: 25.802.00 Sq
Wo� MaJor
Cotle Cost M�
STSS SO False
INITWL 7�
Network: AGrande Broneh: 00020 (AlderStreet) Ssetlon: 30 Surfaa: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1961 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L L�nyN: 2,114.00 Ft Wldth: 38.00 Ft Tn�aArac 80.332.00 SG
Work . Myor
Cods Cost M�
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL True
NNwoAe: AG2nde Breneh: 00030 (Alien Sheet) S�etlon: 10 Surlau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1992 Usa: ROADWAY ��k:L l.�npth: � 2,118�.00 Ft WIdN: 38.00 Ft 7meAnr. 76.248.00 Sq -
Work M�Jor
Cod� Cost M8R
INITIAL True
NNwork: AGrende Bnnth: 00040 (Alpine Street(Southp . Sxtlon: 10 SuA�u: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1964 Use: ROADWAY qa�k:L Lenyth: 1,927.00 Ft WIdN: 36.00 Ft TrwArae: 69.372.00 Sq
Work MaJor
Cotle CosS M8R
HI-AG Tnro
NetwoAc: AGrande Bnneh: 00045 (Alpne Street(NOrth)) Ssetlon: 10 Surfeee: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1964 Wa: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenpth: 75.00 Ft Witlth: 15.00 Ft TruaAree: 225.00 Sq
Work M�Jor
Code Cost M8R
STSS y0 Palae
INITWL SO True
Network: AGrande Branch: 00050 (Mdre Orive) Seetlon: 10 SuAxa: AC
L.C.D.: 0&01/2001 Ute: ROADWAY Renk:L Lenyth: 1.000.00 Ft WIdN: 40.00 Ft 7nuAne: 40.000.00 Sq
Work Myp�
Cotla Cw! MiR
INITVIL 7�
Nriwork: AGrende Bpneh: 00050 (Mdre Drive) 8�etlon: 20 SuMee: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/2001 Use: ROADWAY ��k;� Lx�yN; 470.00 Ft Wldth: 40.00 Ft TrwAre�: 18.800.00 Sq
Work Majp�
Code Cost M�
INITIAL True
— �
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paae 2 of 46
Pavement Database:
Nstwork: AGrantle Bnnch: 00060 (Araelan Cirde) � S�etlon: 10 Surfaa: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1997 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L LsnpN: 633.00 Ft WIdN: 40.00 Ft 7ruaArec 25,320.00 Sa
Work MeJor
Cotle Cost M8R
STSS $0 False
INITIAL TNg
NNwoAc: AGrande Bnneh: 00070 (ArroyoAvenue) � Saetion: 10 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.:� 06/01N966 Uw: ROADWAY Rank:L L�nptb: 607.00 Ft Width: 34.00 Ft TrueArea: 20.638.00 Sa
Work M�jor
Coda Coa MiR
INITIAL T�
Network: AGrende Broneh: 00080 (ASh Street) � S�enon: 10 Su�u: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1986 U�e: ROADWAY Rank:L L�npth: 2.100.00 Ft Wldth: 44.00 Ft � TrueMa: 92.400.00 Sa
Work M�Jor
Cods Cost MiR
INITIAL Tru9
Natwork: AG2nde Bnneh: 00080 (Ash Streeq Saetlon: 20 Surhea: AC
L.C.D.: 0&01/1966 We: ROADWAY Rank:L Unpih: 1,967.00 Ft WIdN: 44.00 Ft TrueA�u: 86.548.00 Sa
Work Myor
Cods Cost M8R
INITIAL Tna i
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 00085 (ASib Street) 8�etlon: 10 BuAau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N997 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenpth: 2.553.00 Ft WIMh: 32.00 Ft irwMa: 81.696.00 Sa
Work M�or
Coda �o« M8R
INITIAL True �
NNwork: AGrande Bnneh: 00085 (Asilo Street) S�etlon: 20 SuMu: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01N998 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L lwnpth: 1282.00 Ft Width: 32.00 Ft TrueAros: 41.024.00 Sa
WoAc
Cod� Cos! N�
INITIAL $0 True
Network: AGrande . Broneh: 00090 (ASpen Street) 8�etlon: 10 BuAaa: AC
LC.O.: O6/01N976 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 1.434.00 Ft Wltlth: 38.00 Ft TrueArsa: 54.492.00 Sa
Work M�
Code Cost M�
ST-SS y0 Falae
INITWL Tnre
Nstwo�ic: AGrende Bnneh: 0p100 (Avenida de Diartrente) Saetlon: 10 Surfau: AC
�.C.o.: O6/01/1992 U�e: ROADWAY Rank:L LsnpM: 3.125.00 Ft Wldth: 36.00 Ft 7ruaMa:112.500.00 Sa
Work MeJor
Code Cost M�
STSS $0 False
INITL4L True
Natwork: AGrande eraneb: 0p110 (Bekemen Lane) . Ssetlon: 10 SuAau: AC �
LC.D.: O6/Ot/1987 Use: ROADWAY Wnk:L lsnpth: 1.572.00 Ft WIdN: 40.00� Ft TrueAm: 62.880.00 Sa
Work � hYJor
Coda Cost MiR
ST-SS EO Falae
INITIAL True
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paqe 3 of 46
Pavement Database:
Network: AGrentle Bnneh: 00120 (BamDi Court) Saetlon: 10 SuAaea: AC
L.C.D.: 06/01/1982 wa: ROADWAY rtank:L unpth: 388.00 Ft width: 40.00 Ft 7ruanres: 15.520.00 Sa
Wo� M�Jor
Cods Cost M8R
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL T�
Natwork: AGrande Bnnch: 00130 (Bamett Street) Saetlon: 10 8urhu: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1975 Use: ROADWAY Rank;L� L�n9th: 530.00 Ft WIAth: 36.00 Ft Tru�Aroa: 79.080.00 Sa
Wa� Myor
Code Cos! M�
STSS �0 False ��.
INITIAL 7�
Natwork: AGrande Bnneh: 0p140 (Bedloe lane) Ssetlon: 10 SuAaa: AC
LC.D.: 06/01N998 Uw: ROADWAY Rank:L L�nyth: 412.00 Ft Wldth: 16.00 Ft 7n�eAree: 6.592.00 Sa
Wa* MaJor
Cotla Cost M�
CR-AC 30 True
INRWL Tiue
NatwoAc: AGrende Bnneh: 00150 (Beech Street) S�etlon: 10 SuA�a: AC -
L.C.D.: O6/01/1959 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 684.00 Ft Width: 38.00 Ft 7rwAru: 25.992.00 Sa
Work Myor
Cod� �o« MiR ..
STSS y0 Fabe
� INITIAL True
NNwork: AGrande Bnneh: 00160 (8ell Street) 8�etlon: 10 Swiaw: AC
L.C.o.: Ofi/Ot/1964 Use: ROADWAY R�nk:L L�npth: 1.032.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft 7ru�Anc 41.280.00 Sa
WoAc Mlypr
Coda Cos! NiR
STSS SO Fabe
INITIAL True
Network; AGrande Bnneh: 00170 (Bennetl Avenue) � S�etlon: 10 SuMa: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1973 Usr. ROADWAY R�nk:L L�nyth: 1.000.00 Ft Wldth: 40.00 Ft TruaArN: 40.000.00 SO
Work M�jor
Cod� CoM M�
� INITL4L � True
NaMrork: AGrande BnneU: 00770 (BennetlAvenue) S�etlon: 20 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: OB/01N967 Usa: ROADWAY R�nk:L L�npth: 1.100.00 Ft 1Mdth: 40.00 Ft TrueAra: M.OW.00 Sa
WoAc Myor
Cod� Cw! MiR
INITWL True
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 00180 (Beta Court) BMIOn: 10 surhea: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1982 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L I.�npSh: i85.00 Ft WIdN: 40.00 Ft. 7�u�Arsa: 7.400.00 Sa
Work MeJor
Cods Cost M�
INITIAL True
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 00185 (BlackbeiryAvenue) S�etlon: 10 SuMu: AC �
L.C.D.: 01/01/2001 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L LenOM: 608.00 Ft WItlN: 36.00 Ft TruaAne: 27.924.00 Sa
Work M�Jor
Cod� Cw! MiR
INITIAL SO True
oate:os�o��2005 WO�k HiStory RepOrt Paqe 4 of 46
Pavement Database:
NNwork: AGrande Bnneh: 00185 (8lackbeiry Avenue) Saellon: 20 SuAacs: AC
LC.D.: 01/01/2001 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L LsnpM: 410.00 Ft � Width: 32.00 Ft TrueA�as: 13.120.00 Sq
Wo� MaJor
Cod� Cost M8R
INITIAL $0 True
Nstwork: AG2nde Broneh: 00187 (BluebarryAvenue) Sectlon: 10 SuAaa: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/2001 Uae: ROADWAY Renk:L L�npth: 483.00 Ft Width: 32.00 Ft 7rueAres: 15.456.00 Sa
Wo�ic M�Jor
Cods Cost M�
INITWL SO True �
N�Uwork: AGrande Branch: 0p188 (Boysenberty Street) 8�ctlon: 10 SuAaes: AC
LC.D.: 01/01/2001 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenyth: 450.00 Ft Witllh: 32.00 Ft TmeAna: 14.400.00 Sa '�
Work MaJor
Cotla Cost M8R
INITIAL EO Tiue
NaMrork: AG2nde Bnneh: 00188 (Boysenberrystreet) S�etlon: 20 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/2003 Uae: ROADWAY Renk:L Lenpth: 450.00 Ft WItlN: 32.00 Ft 7rwAroe: 14.400.00 So
Work M�
Coda Cost M�µ
INITIAL $0 True
Network: AG2nde Bnneh: pp190 (Branch MIII Roa� S�etlon: 10 Surfau: AC
L.C.D.: OB/20/2003 Use: ROADWAY Rank:CL�npM: 3.333.00 Ft Widlh: 30.00 Ft TrwAm: 99,990.00 Sa
M/ark MI�Jor
Cod� Cost Myg
CR-AC $0 True
iNIT1AL �True
NNxrork: AGrande Bnneh: 00195 (Branch Sireet(West)) S�etlon: 10 SuAaer. AC
L.C.D.: O6/07/1980 Use: ROADWAY Rank:B L�npth: 1,690.00 Ft Wldth: 50.00 Ft TrueMa: 84.500.00 Sa
Work
Coda Cost M�
INITWL True
Natwork: AGrande Bnneh: 00195 (Brench Street(Weatp 8�etlon: 20 SuAau: APC
4C.D.: 05/17N999 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:B UnyM: 2.880.00 Ft Width: 50.00 Ft Tn�eArec144.000.00 Sa
Work M�Jor
Coda CoK M8R
SR-AC $0 True
INITIAL T�ue
Network: AGrande �Braneh: 00195 (Branch Street(W�t)) S�etlon: 30 Surlau: AC
_ L.C.D.: O6/Ot/1980 Use: ROADWAY Renk:B Lenpth: 2.740.00 Ft Width: 45.00 Ft 7rueAna:123.300.00 Sa
Work Myo�
Cod� Cost M8R
INITWL 7Np
Nehvork: AG2nde Bnneh: 00195 (eranch Street(Wesq) S�etlon: 40 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1980 Use: ROADWAY Rank:B �enpth: 800.00 Ft Wldth: 30.00 ft 7rueAns: 24.000.00 Sa
work �
Cods Cost M�
INITWL True
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paqe 5 of 46
Pavement Database:
Network: AGrande Bnnch: 00200 (Bridpe Street) � 8ectlon: 10 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: 06/01/1977 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L LsnpM: 944.00 Ft Widlh: 36.00 Ft 7rueAna: 33.984.00 Sa
Wo� Myor
Cod� Cost MiR
INITUIL True
Natwork: AGrande Bnneh: 00210 (Brighton Avenue) Saetlon: 10 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1972 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L LenpN: 678.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrueArea: 27.720.00 Sa
work � M�jor
Cod� Cwt M�
INITIAL 7Np
Netwo�fc: AGrande Braneh: 00210 (BrigMon Avenue) S�etlon: 20 Swtau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1986 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L L�npth: 1,900.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrueMa: 78.000.00 Sa
Work .M�Jor
Coda Cost MiR
INITIAL 7� �
Network: AGrande Bonch: 00220 (B�isco Road) S�etlon: 10 SuHaw: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1984 Use: ROADWAY Rank:Cl.�npN: 750.00 Ft Wldth: 40.00 Ft 7ruaNw: 30.000.00 Sa
Wa� Myor
Cods Cost M�
INITIAL True
Network: AGrende Bpneh: 00220 (Briaco Road) S�etlon: 20 SuMer. AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N982 We: ROADWAY Rank:CLanpM: 1.350.00 Ft WIAth: 40.00 Ft 7rueAru: 54.000.00 Sa
Work M�Jor
Cod� Cost MiR
INITIAL True �
Natwork: AGrende Braneh: 00220 (Briaco Roed) S�etlon: 30 Su�iaa: AC
LC.D.: OB/Ot/1982 Uae: ROADWAY Renk:C I.�npth: 300.00 Ft WWth: 40.00 Ft TrueAm: 12.000.00 So
work Myo�
Code Cost �M�
INITWL Tru9
NNwo�1c: AGrande Bwnch: 00230 (Califomia Street) Saetlon: 10 Surfau: AC
L.C.o.: 0&01/1983 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:CLenpN: 510.00 Ft Wldth: 34.00 Ft 7rueMe: 17,340.00 Sa
Wa� Myor
Cods Cost Myp
INITIAL True
NetwoAc: AGrande Bnneh: 00240 (Calle Carmen) S�etlon: 10 Surf�a: AC
et
L.C.D.: O6/01/1985 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L L�npth: 250.00 Ft WIdN: 40.00 Ft 7rwAne: 70.000.00 Sa
Work Myor
Cod� Coat M8R
STSS y0 False
INITWL .7�p
Nelxrork: AG2nde Bwnch: 00250 (Calle Cuervo) 8ktlon: 10 SmNa: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01N992 We: ROADWAY Rank:L LsnpM: 6.960.00 Ft WIdN: 30.00 Ft Tru�Arr208.800.00 Sa
Work �
Code Coat M�
ST-SS $0 Felae
INITIAL §0 Tiue
�
_ __ . �
- . . - ._.._. � . . �
Date:03/01/2005 Work HlstOry Report Paae s of 46
Pavement Database:
NeMrork: AG2nde Branch: 00260 (Callie CouA) Seetlon: 10 Surfau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1980 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L LenpN: 190.00 Ft Widlh: 45.00 Ft TrueAres: 8.550.00 Sa
Work MeJor
Cod� � Cost M8R
IPNTL4L True
Nahvork: AGrande Bnneh: 00270 � (CameronCourt) 8�etlon: 10 8urtau: �AC
L.C.D.: O6/O7/1976 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L Lan9m� 619.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TruaArea: 24.760.00 Sa
Work Mejor
Coda Cost M8R
ST-SS SO False
INITWL True
Netvro�lc: AGrande Bnneh: 00280 (Camirw Mercado) S�etlon: 10 Surhp: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1985 Use: ROADWAY Rank:CL�npM: 2,530.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft 7rueAnc101.200.00 Sa
Work M�
Coda Cost M�
ST-SS SO False
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGrende Bnneh: 00290 (Campena Place) Ssetlon: 10 Surfau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N9Z8 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L L.�npM: 582.00 Ft Witlth: � 38.00 Ft 7rue A�w: 20232.00 Sa
Work M�Jor
Coda Cost MiR
STSS SO Palae
INITIAL TnM
Network: AGrande ereneh: 00300 (Canyon Way) S�etlon: 10 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/Otl1950 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L Lanpth: 1.335.00 Ft Wldth: 36.00 Ft 7rusAre�: 48.060.00 Sa
Work M�
Cod� Cost M�
ST-SS $0 Falfe
INITIAL True
N�Uwork: AGrande Bnneh: 00310 (Cardlnal CouA) SKflon: 10 BuRaa: AC
L.C.o.: 06/01/1987 U�e: ROADWAY Rank:L L«�ptA: 150.00 Ft Vlndth: 40.00 Ft TrueAm: 6.000.00 Sa
Mbrk M�Jor
Cod� Cost M8R
INITIAL True
Natwork: AG2nde enneh: 00320 (Camiella Drive) Sxtlon: 10 SuMa: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1992 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L. LanpM: 887.00 Ft Width: � 40.00 Ft 7rueArea: 35,480.00 Sa
work �
Coda Cost M8R
ST-SS SO False
INITWL True
NNwoAc: AGrande Broneh: 00330 (Caml Place) S�etlon: 70 BuMu: AC
L.C.D.: OB/01N985 Uae: ROADWAY Renk:L Unpth: 568.00 Ft Wldth: 38.00 Ft . 7nuAna: 27.508.00 Sa
Work
Cods Cost M�
STSS $0 False
INITWL True
Natwork: AGrande Bruieh: 00335 (Castilb Coun) �S�etion: 10 SuAaa: AC
L.C.D.: Ot/01N998 Uw: ROADWAY R�nk:L l.�npth: 300.00 Ft WIdN: 32.00 Ft Tru�Anc 9.600.00 Sa
WoAc M�Jor {
Cod� Cost M8R
i�
_ i
Date:03/01/2005 Wo�k History Report paae � of4s
Pavement Database:
INITIAL $0 True
Network: AGrande Breneh: 00336 (Castillo del Ma� Saetlon: 10 Surfaee: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/2002 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L lenpth: 1.312.00 Ft wideh: 40.00 Ft 7rueArea: 52.480.00 Sa
Work Major
Coda Cost MSR
INITWL $0 True
Natwork: AGrende Bnneh: pp336 (CastlllodelMar) Sectlon: 20 SuRsca: AC
L.C.D.: Ot/01/2002 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L LenpN: 163.00 Ft WIdN: 40.00 Ft TrueArea: 6.520.00 Sa
work .M�jor
CoAa Cost M�
INITWL $0 True
Network: AGrende Bnnch: 00340 (CedarStreeq Saetlon: 10 SuAau: AC
LC.D.: OB/01/1963 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L Lenyth: . 300.00 Ft Widlh: 32.00 Ft 7rueAree: 9.600.00 Sa
Work M�Jor
Cods Cost M8R
ST-SS $0 Falae
INITWL Tn�e
Network: AGrende eraneh: 00340 (CedarStreet� S�etlon: 20 SuAaer. AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N963 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanyth: 850.00 Ft Width: 32.00 Ft 7rueAree: 27.200.00 Sa �
Work M�
Coda � Cost M�
STSS - $0 Falae
. INITIAL True
NNwoAc: AGrande Bnneh: 00340 (CedarStreet) S�etlon: 30 Sur4a: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/2007 Use: ROADWAY ttank:L L�npth: 507.00 Ft Width: 36.00 Ft 7ru�Ane: 18.252.00 Sa
Work h4Jor
Code Cost M8R
INITL4L• � EO True
NeMrork: AGrande eranch: 00350 (CerroYwtaCircAe) S�etlon: 10 Surfw: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1980 Uw: ROADWAY Renk:L Unpth: 715.00 Fl Width: 36.00 Ft 7rueAn�: 25.740.00 Sa
WoAc �pr
Coda Cost � M8R
ST-SS ZO False
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGrande Bnneh: 00360 (Cerro vista Lane) Saetlon: 10 Sur(aea: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1980 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L LenpN: 536.00 Ft Wldth: 36.00 Ft TrueMe: 19.296.00 Sa
Work Myor
Cotle Cost M�
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL True
N�twork: AGrande Bnneh: 00370 (ChapartalLane) S�ctlon: 10� Surher. AC
LC.D.: Ofi/Ot/1987 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L l.�npth: 410.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrueAnr. 76.400.00 Sa
Work
Code Cosl, M�
ST-SS SO Falae
INITIAL 7�
oate:os�o��2oos WOI'k HistOry RepOPt Paqe 8 of 46
Pavement Database:
NNwork: AGrande Braneh: 00370 (Chapartal Wne) Sxllon: 20 SuAxa: AC
LC.D.: 06/01N987 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L LenpM: 450.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TruaAree: 18,000.00 Sa
work Myor
Cotls Cost M�
INITIAL True
NatwoAc: AGrende Branch: 00380 (Chelsea Court) Sectlon: 10 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N993 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L lenpth: 144.00 Ft 'Witllh: 44.00 Ft 7rueAree: 6.336.00 Sa
Work MeJor
Cod� Cost M8R
INITL4L True
Network: AGrande Bnnch: 00385 (ChertyAvenue(West)) Seetlon: 10 SuAaa: AC
LC.D.: 06/01N980 Usa: ROADWAY R�nk:CLmpth: 878.00 Ft Width: 34.00 Ft TruaAna: 29.852.00 Sa '
Work WJor
Cod� Cost MiR
INITIAL True �
Natwork: AGrande Bnneh: 00385 (Cheny Avenue(West)) S�etlon: 20 Surlaq: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1980 Use: ROADWAY Rank:CL�npN: 420.00 Ft 1MUtb: 34.00 Ft 7rueMa: 14280.00 Sa
Wa� Myor
Coda Cost M�
INRIAL True
. Network: AGrande Bnneh: 00390 (Chilton Avenue) S�etlon: 10 Surf�u: AC
L.C.D.: OB/01N970 Uss: ROADWAY Rank:L l.�npth: 7.500.00 Ft . WIdN: 38.00 Ft TrwArw: 57,000.00 Sa
Work Myor
Cotls Cost M� �
INITIAL TNp
NaMrork: AGrande Bnneh: 00400 (ClerenceAvenue) S�etlon: 10 SuM�a: AC
L.C.D.: 06/07N987 Use: ROADWAY �Rank:L L�npM: 648.00 Ft Wltlth: 32.00 Ft 7meAna: 20.672.00 Sa
Work
Cod� Cost M�
INITIAL True
Network: AGronde Bnneh: 00415 (CliMOn Court) BKtlon: 10 Surfau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/2001 Ute: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanyth: 290.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrueMu: 11.600.00 Sa
. Work AAyor
Cod� Cost M8R .
INITIAL Tnie
Network: AGrande Braneh: 00430 (Coach Road) Ssetlon: 10 SuAaa: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N964 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L Lsnyth: 743.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrueAnc 29.720.00 Sa
Work �p�
Coda Cost M�
INITVIL True
Natwork: AGrende Bnnth: 00430 (Coach Road) S�etlon: 20 SuA�a: AC �
L.C.D.: O6/01N964 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L LanpN: 1.100.00 Ft Wltith: 40.00 Ft TrueAra: 44.000.00 Sa
Work M�Jor
Cods Cost My�
INITIAL True
i
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Pape 9 of 46
Pavement Database:
Nstwork: AGrende Bnnch: 00440 (Cobre Place) � 8ectlon: 10 Surtaa: AC
LC.D.: OB/01N978 Use: ROADWAY q��k;� �o�y�ry; 484.00 Ft WIdN: 36.00 Ft TrueArea: 17.424.00 Sq
Wo* Major
Cod� Cost M�
STSS $0 Falae
INITWL True
N�twork: AG2nde Braneh: 00450 (Cdina Street) S�etlon: 10 Surfaq: AC
I.C.D.: OB/01/1979 Wa: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenpth: 435.00 Ft Wldeh: 36.00 Ft TrueArea: 15.660.00 Sa
Woiic MaJor
Cod� Cost M�
STSS $0 Falae
INITIAL � 7�
Nstwo�lc: AGrande Bnneh: 00480 (Cdlado Courte) � Saetlon: 10 surfw: AC ����
�.C.D.: OB/01N985 We: ROADWAY Rank:L L�npth: 276.00 Ft Width: 36.00 Ft 7rwAns: 9.936.00 Sa
WoAc MaJor
Cod� � Co�t MiR
STSS SO False
INITIAL 7�p �
NaMrork: AGrande. Bnneh: 00470 (Co�bett Canyon Roa� S�etlon: 10 SuAaa: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1973 Uu: ROADWAY Rank:A l.�npth: 1,965.00 Ft Wldth: 24.00 Ft TnuAroe: 47.160.00 Sa
Work M�Jor
Coda Coat M8R
INITIAL True
Natxrork: AGrdnde Bruieh: 00480 (Comwall Avenue) S�etlon: 10 Swfau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N976 Uw: ROADWAY� Rank:L L�npM: 1,561.00 Ft WMN: 40.00 Ft 7rueNw: 62.440.00 Sa
Work MaJw
Coda Cost M�
ST-SS $0 Falae �
INITWL True
Network: AGrende Bnneh: 0049p (Corone dd Tlerra) S�etlon: 10 Surhu: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N971 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L L�npth: 472.00 Ft WIAN: 40.00 Ft TrwAru: 18.880.00 Sa
Work .M�Jor
Coda Coat M8R
STSS SO False
SS-RE y0 False
INITWL True
Natwork: AGrande Braneh: 00500 (Cortal Place) S�dlon: 10 Surfur AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1975 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L Lx�yN: 830.00 Ft WIAlh: 45.00 Ft 7rueAra: 28.350.00 Sa
Work Myor
Cods Cost M8R
STSS $0 Felse
INITIAL True
N�twork: AGrande enneh: 005W � (CaurtlandStreeq S�etlon: 10 � SuAaer. AC
L.C.D.: 0&01/1981 Use: ROADWAY Rank:C L�nptlr. 1.361.00 Ft w�dth: 30.00 Ft 7rwAnr. 40.830.00 Sa
work M�
Cods Cost M�
INITIAI True
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paqe 10 of46
Pavement Data6ase:
NNwork: AGrande Bnneh: 00510 (CouNand Street) Ssetlon: 20 BuAau: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1981 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanath: 500.00 Ft Width: 30.00 Ft TrusAroc 15.000.00 SG
Work Major
Code Cost M�
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGrande Bnneh: 00510 (Courtland Street) Sectlon: 30 Surhu: AC
LC.D.: 01/01/2001 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L LanpN: 390.00 Ft WIMh: 34.00 Ft Tn�eArea: 13.260.00 Sa
Work M��
Cod� Cost M�
� INITIAL 30 True
NaMrork: AGrande Bnneh: 00510 (CouNand Street) S�etlon: 40 Surfau: AC '
L.C.D.: 01/01/2001 Use: ROADWAY ��k;� u�0�; 1,033.00 Ft Width: 38.00 Ft � TrwAru: 39,254.00 Sa
Work M�
Cod� Cost Myµ
INITIAL §0 True
Natwo�lc: AGrende Bnneh: 0p510 (CouNaiM Street) Saetlon: 5p SuAsu: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/2001 Use: ROADWAY Rank:C LanpM: 775.00 Ft Width: 36.00 Ft TruaAroa: 27.900.00 Sa
Work
Cotle Cost M�
INITIAL $0 True
Natwork: AGrende Bnneh: 0p520 (Creekside Drive) Saellon: 10 SuAaa: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N975 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L Lenyfh: 404.00 Ft WIdN: 40.0p Ft TrwAree: 16.160.00 Sa
Work � MsJor
Cods Cost M8R
srss ao Faiae
INITL4L 7�
N�Bwork: AGrande Bnneh: 00525 (CranbenyAvenue) S�etlon: 10 SuAaa: AC
LC.D.: 01/01/2001 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L L«�pth: 775.00 Ft Vlndth: � 36.00 Ft TrueMa: 25740.W Sa
Work
Cod� Coat M�iR
INITIAL SO True
N�Mrork: AGrande Bnneh: 0p530 (Cross Street) S�etlon: 10 SuASa: AC
L.C.D.: 06/01/1975 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L lsnpth: 680.00 Ft Witltlr. 40.00 Ft TruaAnc 26.400.00 Sa
WoAc M�
Cod� Coa M�
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL T�
Nelwork: AGfande Braneh: 0p540 (Crown Hilq S�ctlon: 10 BuA�er. AC
L.C.D.: 0&Ot/1982 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L Unpth: 1.620.00 Ft Witlth: 35.00 Ft 7ruaAna: 56.700.00 Sa
Work �
Coda Cost M�
INITWL 7'Np
N�hvork: AG2nde Bwneh: 005$p (Crown Tertace) � Sktlon: 10 Surfaer. AC
I.C.D.: O6/O7/1982 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L Unyth: 665.00 Ft WIAN: 30.00 Ft T�voAro�: 19.950.00 Sa
work Myor
Code Cort M8R
ST-SS SO Felse
INITIAL Tnie
I
-- - �
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Repart Paqe 11 of46
Pavement Database:
Network: AGrdnde Bnneh: 00550 (Crown Tertace) Sxtlon: 20 Surlacr. AC
L.C.D.: O6/Ot/1982 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L LanpM: 210.00 Ft Width: 16.00 Ft True Aree: 3.360.00 Sq
W�� MeJor
Cotle Cost M�,µ
STSS . g0 False
INITIAL 7�
NNxro'1c: AGrande erench: 00560 (CueNa Corte) Ssetlon: 10 Surha: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N985 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L LenpN: 200.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft irueArea: 8.000.00 Sa
Work �Major
Coda Cost M�
ST-SS � $0 False '
INITIAL 7�
Natwork: AGrande Bnneh: 00570 (CUeata Place) 8aetlon: 10 8urtaa: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N993 Ute: ROADWAY Renk:L Lenpth: 206.00 Ft Wldth: 36.00 Ft Tn,eMa: 7.416.00 Sa
Work M�jor
Cotla Cost 'M6R
ST-SS SO False
INITIAL Tnre
Network: AGrande Braneh: 00580 (DeerTrailCirGe) S�etlon: 10 BuAau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N970 Use: ROADWAY R�nk:L Unpth: 800.00 Ft WkHh: 34.00 Ft 7rueAn�: 27.200.00 Sa
Work Myo�
Cods Cos! MiR
STSS $0 False
INITIAL True
Ndwork: AGrande Branch: 00590 (Del Sol Streeq Saetlon: 10 Swfaw: AC
L.C.D.: O6/O1N977 Uw: ROADWAY Rank:L 4n9N: 712.00 Ft Wldth: 34.00 Ft T�uaAra: 24.208.00 Sa
Work MaJor
Coda Coat M8R
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGrende Braneh: 00600 (Diamond Cirde) SKtlon: 10 8unc�r. AC
L.C.D.: 11N5/2005 We: ROADWAY Rsnk:L Lanpth: 175.00 Ft WIdN: 40.00 Ft TrwAroe: 7.000.00 Sa
Work � M�Jor
Cod� Coat M� �
o�-ns Eo Ttie
INITWL True
Network: AGrende Bnneh: 00610 (Diana Place) Seetlon: 10 Surlau: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1977 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L l.�npth: 1.089.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft 7ru�Ana: 43.560.00 Sa
Wo�lc MaJor
Coda Cos! � M8R
STSS SO False
INITWL True
Network: AGrande enneh: 00620 (D'ason Street) S�ctlon: 10 Surtau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N993 Wa: ROADWAY Rank:L Lsnpth: � 370.00 Ft Wldth: 40.00 Ft 7rusAra: 14.800.00 Sa
Work Me�p�
Cotle Cost M�
ST-SS SO False
INITIAL True
�
i
I
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paqe 12 of46
Pavement Database:
NMVOrk: AG2nde Bnneh: 00630 (Dotlson Way) S�ctlon: 10 SuAau: AC
LC.D.: 05/01/2004 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenpth: � 714.00 Ft Wldth: 34.00 Ft 7rueArea: 24276.00 Sa
Work MaJo�
Cotla Cost MgR
CR-AC SO True
INITIAL � � True
NNwork: AG2nde Braneh: 00630 (DOdson WaY) Saetlon: 20 Surfaes: AC
L.C.D.: OS/01/2003 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lsnpth: 714.00 Ft Widlh: 34.00 Ft TrueArea: 24.276.00 Sa
Work M�Jor
Cotls Cost M8R
CR-AC SO True
INITIAL T�
Network: AGrande Broneh: 0p640 (Doa Certos) S�etlon: 70 8m(aa: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1994 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L LenyN: 301.00 Ft NnrMh: 30.00 Ft 7iveAroa: 9.030.00 Sa
Work Myor
Cod� Cost M�
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL True
Network: AGrande Braneh: 00650 (Cherry Avenue(Easq) S�etlon: 10 Surlau: AC
LC.D.: O6/Ot/1982 Use: ROADWAY R�nk:B LanpM: 1,315.00 Ft Widfh: 29.00 Ft Tru�Anc 38.135.00 SO
Work M�
Coda Cost y�
INITWL True
Natwork: AGrande Bnneh: 00650 (ChertyAvenue(East)) S�etlon: 20 Surlau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1982 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:B Lanpth: 1.170.00� Ft WIMh: 45.00 Ft TrueAres: 52.850.00 Sa
WoAc � MaJor
Code Cost w� -
INITIAL True
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 0p650 � (CnertyAvenue(Eastp S�etlon: 40 � 8urfau: AC
LC.D.: 06/01/1982 Use: ROADWAY Rank:B LanpN: 1.500.00 Ft Wldth: � 34.00 Ft 7n�eAra: 51.000.00 Sa
Work MsJor
Cods Cost M�
INITWL . True
NNwork: AG2nde Bnnch: 0p670 (EI Camino Reaq 8�dlon: 10 Surfau: AC
L.C.D.: O6I01/1953 Use: ROADWAY Rank:A 4npN: 95.00 Ft Wldlh: 40.00 Ft � 7nwAroa: 3.800.00 So
Work Mya�
Cotla Cost My�
INITIAL True
NaMrork: AGrande Bnnch: 00670 (EI Camino Real) Saetlon: 20 8urf�u: APC
L.C.D.: 06/07/1953 Uw: ROADWAY Rank:A Lenpth: 1,478.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrwAnc 59.120.00 Sq
Work M�Jor
Cotla Cost M8R
INITWL � True
NetwoAc: AGrande Bnnch: 00670 (EI Camino Reap S�eflon: 30 Surf�a: APC �
L.C.D.: O6/01/1964 Ut�: ROADWAY R�nk:A L�npth: 2.500.00 Fl Width: 24.02 Ft 7rwAna: 80,050.00 Sa
Work Myor �
Cods Cost M8R
INITIAL Tme �
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paqe 13 of 46
Pavement Dafabase:
Nwwork: AGrande Bnnch: 00670 (EI Cemirw Real) S�etlon: 40 SuMce: APC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1964 Use: ROADWAY Rank:q Lanplh: 700.00 Ft Width: 60.00 Ft TrueA�ea: 42.000.00 Sa
WO* Myor
Coda Cort M�
INITIAL True
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 00670 (EI Camino Real) Sxtlon: 50 Surtaa: APC
LC.D.: O6/01N984 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:A Lenyth: 1.500.00 Ft Widlh: 60.00 Ft TrueArea: 90,000.00 Sa
Wo� MaJor
Coda Cos! M8R
INITWL True �
NeMrork: AGrdnde Broneh: 00680 (Elm Street(South)) Saetlon: 10 SuMeu: AC
L.C.D.: O6/Ot/1964 Uw: ROADWAY Rank:L l�npth: 756.00 Ft Wldth: 40.00 Ft TruaAna: 30.240.00 Sa
work My�
Cotls Coat M�y
INITIAL True
Network: AGrende Braneh: 00680 (Elm Street(South)) S�ctlon: 20 SuAxa: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1984 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 1.480.00 Ft WIMh: 62.00 Ft 7rueArw: 91.760.00 Sa
Work Myor
Cods � Cost y�
INITIAL 7�p
Natwork: AGrande Bnneh: 00680 (Elm Street(Southp � Ssetlon: 30 SuAau: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1964 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L LxipN: 1.461.00 Ft Wldth: 62.00 Ft TnuAna: 90,582.00 Sa
Work MeJor
Coda Cost M�
INITIAL True
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 0p880 (Elm Street(South)) S�etlon: 40 SuA�u: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1964 Uaa: ROADWAY Rank:L l.�npth: 2.030.00 Ft Width: 82.00 Ft 7rueAres:125.880.00 Sa
Wo�ic MaJor
Coda Cos! y�
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGrande Bnneh: 00690 (Elm Street(NOrthp S�etlorr. � 10 Surfau: AC
LC.D.: 06101N980 Uss: ROADWAY yok:L LanOUv 1.298.00 Ft Wldth: .40.00 Ft 7rwAm: 51.920.00 Sa
Work Myor
Coda Cost M�
INITIAL 'True
Nehvodc: AGrande 8nnch: 0p690 (Elm Street(North)) S�etlon: 20 " 8urha: AC
L.C.D.: 06/01N980 Wa:�ROADWAY Rank:L L�nOM: 240.00 Ft WIdN: 40.00 Ft 7rus Arw: 9.600.00 Sa
Work Mtjor
� Cod� Cos! MiR
INITIAL � Tn�e
Nstwork: AGrdnde Braneh: 00700 (Emen Court) S�etlon: 10 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: 0&01/1960 Wa: ROADWAY Renk:L L�npN: 480.00 Ft Wldth: 40.00 Ft 7rueAroa: 19200.00 Sa
Work M�
Cod� Cost MyR
INITUIL True £
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paqe 14 of46
Pavement Database:
NMVOrk: AGtande Bnneh: 00710 (Emerald Bay Drive(West)) Sectlon: 10 SuMee: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N988 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L LenpN: 430.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrueArea: 17.200.00 Sa
Wa� Major
Cod� Cost Mgg
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL True
NstwoAc: AGronde Bnneh: 00720 (Emereld Bay Drive(East)) Seetlon: 10 Surfaq: AC
LC.D.: OB/01N988 Use: ROADWAY Wnk:L L�npM: 446.00 Ft Wltlth: 40.00 Ft TrueArea: 17.840.00 Sa
Work M�
Code Cost M�
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL True
NMmAc: AGrende Bnneh: 00730 (Equeatrian Way) � S�etlon: 10 Surfur AC I
� L.C.D.: O6/01/1980 Usa: ROADWAY Renk:L l.�npth: 2.565.00 Ft WIdN: 40.00 Ft TrueAnc102.600.00 Sa
Work Mypr
Code Cost M8R
STSS $0 False
INITIAL True
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 0p730 (Equestrian Way) Saetlon: 20 SuAaa: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1980 U�e: ROADWAY yok:L L�nOM: 1.889.00 Ft Vlndth: 40.00 Ft .7ruenna: 74.760.00 Sa
Work M�Jor
Cod� Cost My�
INITIAL Tn»
NetwoAc: AGrende Bnneh: 00740 (Paeh Avenue) � S�etlon: 10 SuAat�: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1962 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpm: 530.00 Ft wiath: 36.00 Ft TrueAne: 19.080.00 Sa
Work
Cotle � Cost M�r
ST-SS $0 Falae
INITIAL True .
NNwork: AGrande Bnneh: 00750 � (FairOaksAvenue) S�etlon: 10 SuAaes: AC .
L.C.D.: O6/01/1968 U�e: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanyth: 1.190.00 Ft Witlth: 80.00 Ft 7ruenree: 71.400.00 Sa �
Work M�Jor
Cod� Cost M8R
INITNL Tiue
Nelwork: AGrande Bnneh: 00750 (FairOaksAvenue) S�etlon: 20 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1980 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L L�npM: 1.400.00 Ft Width: 60.00 Ft TrwArw: 84.000.00 SO
Work � MaJor
Cotla � M8R
INITIAL True
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 00750 (FairOaksAvenue) Saetlon: 30 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N982 Use: ROADWAY � Rank:L lsnpth: 790.00 Ft Width: 60.00 Ft 7ru�Ana: 47.400.00 Sa
Work �jp�
Cods Cwt N�
INITIAL True
NeMrork: AGrende Bnnch: 00750 (FairOaksAvenue) S�etlon: 40 Surhu: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N982 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L L�npth: 2.600.00 Ft Width: 60.00 Ft TrwAiw:156.000.00 Sa
Work MaJw
Cod� Cost MiR
INITIAL True
�
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paqe 15 of 46
Pavement Data6ase:
Network: AGfande Braneh: 0p750 (FairOaksAvenue) SxUon: 50 Surtsu: AC
L.C.D.: 0&07/1982 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L L�npth: 2,164,00 Ft Width: 60.00 Ft TrueArea:129.640.00 Sa
Wa� Major
coa. co:� MaR
INITWL True
Network: AGrende Bnneh: 00750 (FairOaksAvenue) 8aetlon: 60 Surtsu: AC
L.C.D.: OB/01/1982 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 598.00 Ft Width: 60.00 Ft TrueArea: 35.880.00 Sa
Wo�1c M�Jor
Code Cost M6R
INITWL True
NHwork: AGrande Bruieh: 00760 (Fair View Drive) S�ctlon: 10 Surfaa: AC �
L.C.D.: O6/01/1957 Uae: ROADWAY Renk:L L.�npM: 1.118.00 Ft Width: 38.00 Ft TruaArer. 40248.00 Sq
Work MaJor ��
Cod� Cost M8R
INITIAL True
NeMrork: AGrende Bnneh: 00760 (FairViewDrive) 8�etlon: 20 SuAaa: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1957 Use: ROADWAY R�nk:L L�npth: 210.00 Ft WIMh: 36.00 Ft TruaNw: 7.560.00 Sa
WoAc My�
Cod� �w� MiR
INITULL True �
Nehvork: AGrende Bnneh: 00785 (Farmhouse Poace) S�etlon: 10 SuMer. AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1999 Uw: ROADWAY Rank:L LanpM: 380.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrueAnc 75200.00 Sq
Work MaJor
Cod� � MiR
INITIAL y0 Tnre
N�Mrork: AG2nde Bnneh: 00770 (Famoll Avenue) S�etlon: 10 Surher. AC
�.C.o.: O6/01N970 We: ROADWAY Rank:L Lsnpm: 1,675.00 Ft Witltn: 44.00 Ft 7rwnnc 73.700.00 Sa
Work Myor
Coda � M8R
STSS y0 Falae
INITWL True
Natwork: AGrande Bnneh: 00770 (Farrd�Avewe) S�etlon: 20 BuAau: AC
L.C.D.: 06/01/1970 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L lsnpth: 1,280.00 Ft Wldth: 45.00 Fl 7rueAna: 57.600.00 Sa
WoAc MaJw
Cod� Cos! y�
INITIAL True
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 00770 (Farmll Avenue) � SKtlon: 30 Surhu: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N970 Uae: ROADWAY Wnk:L l.�npth: 1,400.00 Ft witlfh: 45.00 Ft 7rwAnc 63.000.00 Sa �
Work Myor
Cotle �o« M8R
INITIAL Tiue
Network: AGrande eraneh: OW70 (FamdlAvenue) S�ctlon: 40 SuMu: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1970 Uta: ROADWAY R�nk:L Lanpth: 300.00 Ft Width: 32.00 Ft TrwAru: 9.600.00 Sa
Work Mbor
Cod� Co�t M�
INITIAL True
Date:03/01/2005 Wo�c History Report paae �s of 4s
Pavement Database:
Nahvork: AG2nde Bnneh: 00775 (FieldWew Place) 8sctlon: 10 SuMsu: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1999 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L LanyN: 332.00 Ft Width: 32.00 Ft TrueMa: 10.624.00 Sa
�'a� Major
Code Cost MbR
INITIAL $0 True
Nahwork: AGrende Breneh: 00780 (Flora Roed) � 8ectlon: 10 SuA�ea: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N963 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenpth: 638.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TruaArea: 25.440.00 Sa
Work MeJor
Coda Cost M6R
INITIAL Tme ''
Network: AGrande Braneh: 00790 (Forest Glen Drive) S�etlon: 10 Surlau: AC �
L.C.D.: 0&/01/1977 Uar. ROADWAY R�nk:L L�n9tiv 415.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft Tru�A�w: 16,600.00 Sa
Work M�
Cod� Cost M3R
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL True
Network: AGrende Braneh: 0p800 (FOrtuna Court) � S�etlon: 10 Surf�p: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1978 Ute: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 540.0p Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrueAna: 21.800.00 Sa
Work M�Jor
Cods Cost My�
STSS SO �Falae �
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGrande Bnneh: 00810 (Garden Street) S�etlon: 10 Surhu: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1971 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L lsnpth: 1244.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrueAna: 49.760.00 Sa
Woiic MaJor
Cotla Cost M8R
STSS y0 False
INRIAL � True
� NNwork: AGrande enocb: 00810 (Garden Street) S�etlon: 20 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: 06/01N971 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L l.�npth: 200.00 Ft Witlth: 24.00 Ft TrwAn�: 4.800.00 Sa
Wo�lc MaJw
Coda �� MiR
INITIAL TnM
Natwork: AGrande Bnnch: 00810 (Garden Straet) . S�etlon: 30 SuA�er. AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1999 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L L�npM: 119.00 Ft Width: 32.00 Fl TrwAn�: 3.808.00 Sa
Work MI�Ja
Cods Co�t y�
INITIAL EO True
Natwork: AGrande Branch: 00820 (GarfieW Place) Saetlon: 10 SuAw: AC
4C.D.: 06/01/1974 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L LanpM: 1,243.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft 7rusAru: 49.720.00 Sq
Work MaJa
Cod� � Cwt M3R
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGrende Braneh: 00830 � (GayMair7ertace) S�etlon: 10 BuAau: AC �
L.C.D.: O6/01N963 Uw: ROADWAY ynk:L L�nOtiv 1.800.00 Ft w�tlth: 40.00 Ft Tnwaw: 64.000.00 Sa
Work M�
Cotls Cwt M�
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL True
i
... _ . . . _—. __ � _ .l
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report paae �� of4s
Pavement Database:
NMVOrk: AG2nde eraneh: 00840 (Golden West Place) SxUon: 10 Surtaea: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1970 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenyth: 642.00 Pt width: 38.00 Ft TrueAm: 24.396.00 Sa
WO� MaJor
Code Cost M�
ST-SS SO False
INITIAL True
N�twork: AGrendB Bnneh: 00850 (Grece Lane) 8�ctlon: 10 SuAau: AC
LC.D.: OB/01N988 We: ROADWAY Rank:L LanOth: 135.00 Ft Widlh: 40.00 Ft 7rueArea: 5.400.00 Sa
Work M�Jor�
Cod� Coat My� i
STSS SO False
INITWL 7�
Nwwork:� AG2nde Bnneh: 0p860 (Grend Avenue(Eastp Saetlon: 10 Sur6u: AC
L.C.D.: 11/01/2003 Uss: ROADWAY Rank:A L�npth: 2.273.00 Ft Width: 76.00 Ft TrueArsr.172.748.00 Sa
Wo�1c Myor
Cod� Cost M8R
OL-AS SO True
INITWL True
NNwork: AG2nd8 Bnneh: 00860 (GrendAvenue(Eaet)) SMlon: 20 SuAau: AC
LC.D.: 0&01/1999 Uw: ROADWAY Renk:A Lenpth: 2,783.00 Ft Wldth: 76.00 Ft TrueNw209.988.00 Sa
Wa� Ma�or
Cod� Cost� MiR
OL-AS $0 True
INITIAL True
Nstwork: AG2nde Bnneh: 00860 (Grend Avenue(East)) Saetlon: 30 SuMu: AC .
LC.D.: 06/01/1997 We: ROADWAY Rank:A Lenpth: 7.768.00 Ft Width: 78.00 Ft TrueArw:134.368.Op Sa
Work M�Jor �
Cod� Cost MiR
OL-AS SO True
INITIAL True
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 00870 1Greenwootl Dnve) S�etlon: 10 SuMaes: AC
L.C.o.: O6/OtN963 UN: ROADVIIAY Renk:L Lenpeh: 672.00 Ft width: 40.00 Ft 7nwAnc 26.880.00 Sa
Work MeJor
CoAa Cost M8R
INITIAL True
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 00875 (Grove CouA� Seetlon: 10 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1999 Wa: ROADWAY Renk:L Lsnpth: 332.00 Ft Width: 32.00 Ft 7rwAns: 10.624.00 Sa
Work MaJor
Cods � Cos! M8R
INITWL SO True
Network: AGrande Bpneh: 00880 (GulaAe Road) Seetlon: 10 SuAace: AC
LC.D.: OB/01/1987 Uaa: ROADWAY R�nk:L Lsnpth: 1.776.00 Ft Width: 38.00 Ft 7rueAnc 63.936.00 Sa . �
Work M�
Cotla Cost M3R
STSS $0 Falae
STSS $0 False
INITWL True
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paqe 18 of 46
Pavement Database:
Nehwrk: AG2nde Bnnch: 0088p (Gularte Road) Ssetlorc 20 Surhu: AC
L.C.D.: OB/01/1987 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L Lenpth: 772.00 Ft Wldth: 36.00 Ft 7rueArea: 27.792.00 Sa
WO* MaJor
Coda Cost M6R
ST-SS $0 False
INITWL True
Natwork: AGrande Bnneh: 00890 (Halcyon Road(South)) Sectlon: 10 Surhq: AC
LC.D.: O6I01/1960 Usa: ROADWAY qa�k;q ���yW; Z,p50.00 Ft Wldth: 50.00 Ft TrueArea:112.500.00 Sa
Work �a�
Cod� Cort MiR
IPllTIAL True
Network: AGrande Braneh: 00890 (Halcyon Roatl(Southp Saetlon: 20 Surtau: AC
L.C.D.: 06/01N960 Use: ROADWAY Rank:A Lenyth: 2.064.00 Ft Widfh: 84.00 Ft 7n»Aros:132.096.00 Sa
Wo�ic Myor
Cod� Cost y�
INITUIL 7�
Natwork: AGrande Bnneh: 00900 (Halcyon Road(Nath)) S�enon: 10 Surlau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1960 Uw: ROADWAY � �Rank:A L�nOM: 1.590.00 Ft width: 40.00 Ft TrueAra: 63.600.00 Sa
Work MaJor
Cod� Cost MyR
INITIAL True
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 009p5 (Harden Street) S�ctlon: 10 Sunc�r. AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/798(1 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenpth: 500.00 Ft Width: 36.00 Ft TrueArer. 18.000.00 Sa
Work M�Jor
Cods Cost MiR
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGrende � Bnneh: 00910 (Hamson Street) � Saetlon: 10 Surfeea: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1982 Uae: ROADWAY Renk:L l.�npth: 251.00 Ft Width: 36.00 Ft 7rwAnc 9.036.00 Sa
work Myor
Code Cost M�
INITWL True
Network: AG2nde Broneh: 00920 (HaA Lane) S�eHon: 10 Surlau: AC �
LC.D.: 08/01/1980 Uaa: ROADWAY Renk:L Lenpth: 250.00 Ft Wldth: 24.02 Ft 7rueMa: 6.003.94 SO
Work M�
Code Cos! M�
INITWL TnM
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 00930 (Hawkins CouA) E�won: 10 Surha: AC -
L.C.D.: O6/01/19&4 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L LanyM: 133.00 Ft Width:� 40.00 Ft TrueAnc 5.320.00 Sa
i
Work M4Jor �
Cod� Cost MiR
STSS SO False
INITWL True
NNwork: AGrende Bnneh: 00940 (Hlllcrest Drive) S�etlon: 10 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1548 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L La�pN: 1.889.00 Ft Wldfh: 22.00 ft TrwArae: 41.718.00 Sa
work M� ?
Coda Cost M�
INITIAL True
I
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paqe 19 of 46
Pavement Database:
Natwork: AGrende Bnnch: 0p940 (Hillcreffi Dnve) S�etlon: 20 SuAaa: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1948 We: ROADWAY Rank:L Lsnpth: 1244.00 Ft Widlh: 24.00 Ft 7rueArea: 29.856.00 Sa
WO� MaJor
Coda Cost M8R
INITIAL True
Network: AGrende Braneh: 00945 (Hillsitle Court) S�etlon: 10 Surlsea: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01N999 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L LanpSh: 604.00 Ft Width: 32.00 Ft TrueArea: 19.328.00 Sa �
Wo� MaJor
Code Cost M�
INITIAL SO True
Netwo'Ic: AG2nde Braneh: 00950 (Hodpes Road) Saetlon: 10 Surhea: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1980 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 1,040.00 Ft Widlh: 34.00 Ft TruaArea: 35.360.00 Sa
Work MaJor
.Code Cost M�
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL 7�
NaMrork: AGrande Broneh: 00950 (Hadges Roatl) Ssetlon: 20 SuRw: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1980 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L L�n9M: 370.00 Ft Wldth: 40.00 Ft TrwAree: 14.800.00 Sa
W�� Msjor
Cod� � Coat M8R
ST-SS SO False
INITIAL 7�
NNwork: AGrande Broneh: 00960 (Huasna Road) S�etlon: 10 Surfaes: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1967 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:CLanpth: 2,830.00 Ft Width: 64.00 Ft TruaAnc187.120.00 Sa
Work �
Cods Cost M�
INITIAL T�
Natwork: AGtande Bnneh: 00960 (HUasna Road) S�etlon: 20 SuAau: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1967 Uaa: ROADWAY Rank:C Lanpth: 1.900.00 �Ft Widlh: 63.00 Ft TruaMa:119700.00 Sa
Work M�Jor
Cods Cost M�
INITIAL � TNp
Natwork: AGrande Breneh: 00960 (HUasna Road) Swuon: 30 � Surfacs: AC
�.C.D.: O6/Ot/1967 Use: ROADWAY Rank:C L�npth: 2,830.00 Ft Width: 64.00 Ft 7rue Ana:781.120.00 Sa
W�� MeJor
Coda Cost M8R
INITIAL True .
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 00965 (HucklebertyAvenue) 8setlon: 10 8urfau: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/2001 We: ROADWAY Renk:L L.�npM: 490.00 Ft Width: 34.00 Ft TrueArq: 16.860.00 Sa
Work Myor
Cod� Cost M�
INITIAL $0 Trus
NeMrork: AG2nde � Bnneh: 0pg70 � pde Streeq S�etlon: 10 Surhu: AC
e
L.C.D.: O6/01/1981 Uaa: ROADWAY R�nk:L lsnpth: 960.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrwAru: 38.400.00 Sa t
Work ' M�
Cotle Cost M�
ST-SS $0 Falae
INITIAL True
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paqe 20 of 46
Pavement Dafabase:
Nstwork: AGrande Bnneh: 00980 (Ikeda way) Saetlon: 10 BuMau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1981 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L Lenpth: � 455.00 Ft width:� 36.00�Ft TruaArea: 18.380.00 Sa
We� MeJor
Cotla Coat N�
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL True '�
Natxrork: AG2nde Bnneh: 00990 (James Way) Sactlon: 10 Surfeu: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N975 Use: ROADWAY Rank:Cl�npN: 1,350.00 Ft WIdN: 50.00 Ft TruaAres: 67.500.00 Sa
Work M��
Coda Cost M�
INITWL True
Natwork: AGrande Broneh: 00990 (James Way) S�etlon: 20 BuAacs: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N975 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:CLanON: 1.830.00 Ft Wldth: 50.00 Ft TrueArea: 91.500.00 Sa
Work MeJor
CoM Cost M�
MISF . y0 Falae�
INITWL True
Nalwork: AG2nde Bnneh: 00990 (James Way) S�ctlon: 30 Sarhea: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N975 Use: ROADWAY Rank:C LanOth: 7.710.00 Ft Width: 60.00 Ft 7rueArea:102,600.00 Sa�
Work Myor
Code Cost M8R
INITIAL Tnro �
NaMrork: AGrande Bnneh: 00990 (James way) S�etlon: 40 BuAace AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1975 Use: ROADWAY Renk:C Lanpth: � 7,200.00 Ft Width: 60.00 Ft 7rueMa: 72.000.00 Sa
Work Myor
Cotle . Cost M8R
INITIAL True
NahvoHc: AGrdnde Bnneh: 00990 (James Way) 8eetlon: 50 SuAaes: AC
L.C.D.: OB/01/1975 We: ROADWAY Wnk:C l.�npth: 1,170.00 Ft Width: 60.00 Ft TruaArea: 70.200.00 Sa
Work Ms�or
Cods Co�t M3R
INITIAL Tnre
Network: AGrende Braneh: 00990 (James Way) 8xtlon: 60 SuAaee: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N975 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:C LenpM: 930.00 Ft Width: 43.00 Ft 7ruaArea: 39.990.00 �Sa
Work M��
Code �of� MdR
INITIAL True
Network: AG2nde Bnneh: 01000 (Jenny Place) S�etlon: 10 SuAaa: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/2001 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L LanpM: 290.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrueNu: 11.600.00 Sa
WoAc Map�
Cods � Cost M�
INITWL True
Natwork: AGrande Bnnch: 01000 (Jenny Place) Saetlon: 20 BuAau: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/2001 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L LenpM: 440.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrueArae: 1�.600.00 Sa
M�a� MaJor
Code � MiR
INITIAL � True
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paqe21 of46
Pavement Database:
Netvrork: AGrende Bnnch: 01010 (JuniperSVeet) Saetlon: 10 Surtace: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1980 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanath: 1,344.00 Ft Width: 38.00 Ft 7rueArea: 51,072.00 Sa
Work M�jor
Cotle Cost MiR
STSS $0 False
INITWL True
Natxrork: AGrande � eranch: 01020 (La Canada) S�etion: 10 Surha: AC . ��
L.C.D.: O6/01/2000 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 750.00 Ft Width: 34.00 Ft 7rwAna: 25.500.00 Sa
WoAc Myp�
Cotle Cost M�
INITWL 7�
Natwork: AG2nde Bnneh: 01020 (La Canada) SaeGOn: 20 SuAau: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/2000 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L l.�npth: 1.239.00 Ft Width: 34.00 Ft TrueArae: 42.126.00 Sa
Wo� Myor
Coda ,Cos! M8R
INITIAL � 7�
Network: AGrande Bnnch: 01030 (La Cresta Drive� S�etlon: 10 SuAw: AC
L.C.D.: 06/01/1978 Uw: ROADWAY Rank:L LanOth: 1,225.00 Ft vnmh: � 38.00 Ft Tn,aAna: 46.550.00 Sa
Work MeJor
Code Cost M�
ST-SS $0 Fabe �
INITIAL 7�yp
Netvrork: AG2nde Bnneh: 01030 (La Cresta Drive) BMIon: 20 Surfaea: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N978 Use: ROADWAY Rsnk:L Lenpth: 542.00 Ft Witllh: 38.00 Ft TrwAne: 20.596.00 Sa
WoAc NeJor
Code Cost Mgp
ST-SS SO Falae�
INITIAL True
N�NVOrk: .AGrande Bnneh: 01040 (Ladera Poace) 8aetlon: 10 � SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1959 Uw: ROADWAY Rank:L l.�npth: 128.00 Ft Nntlth: 36.00 Ft TruoArp: 4.536.00 Sa
Work ���
Cod� Cost M�
ST-SS . $0 False
INITIAL True
Nstxrodc: AGrende Branch: 07050 (Lancaster Drive) S�etlon: 10 SuAaa: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1959 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L l.�npth: 1.085.00 Ft Witlth: 34.00 Ft Tru�Na: 36.890.00 Sa
WoAc � . MaJor
Coda Cost M�
ST-SS $0 Falae
INITWL 7�
a
Netxrork: AG2nde Bnneh: 01080 (LaPazCircle) S�eNOn: 10 SuRUS: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1978 We: ROADWAY Rank:L Lan01h: 136.00 Ft Width: 36.00 Ft . irueAna: 4.896.00 Sa
Work
Cods Cost� M�
ST-SS $0 Felse
INITIAL True
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 01070 (WmhmoM Drive) S�ctlon: 10 Surfaa: AC
L.C.D.: O6/07/19ffi Uw: ROADWAY R�nk:L lwnpth: 220.00 Ft Witlfh: 30.00 Ft TrueAnc 6.600.00 Sa
Work MaJa
Cod� Cos! M�
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paqe 22 of46
Pavemenf Dafabase:
INITIAL True
Natwork: AG2nde Bnneh: 01080 (Launa Lane) Seetlon: 10 SuAaee: AC
L.C.D.: O6/Oi/1982 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenyth: 657.00 Ft Wldth: 34.00 Ft TrueArea: 22.338.00 Sa
Wo� Major
Code Cost MgR
INITIAL � True
NatxroAc: AGrende Branch: 01090 (La Vista Court) Saetion: 10 BuAaes: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1987 We: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenpth: 386.00 Ft WIdN: 32.00 Ft 7rueMa: 12.352.00 Sa
Work Mejor
� Cotle Cost MiR
INITIAL True '�
Natwork: AGrende Bnneh: 01100 (leanna Drive) 8�etlon: 10 BuAaa: AC
L.C.D.: 11/15/2004 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lan9M: 1.456.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft Tn�eArea: 58240.00 Sa
Work MeJor
. Code Cost My�
OL-AS $0 True
INITWL True
Natwork: AG2nde Bnneh: 01110 (Ledo Place) 8�ctlon: 10 Surfau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1980 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L Lenpth: 272.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TruaArea: 10.880.00 Sa
Woiic y�Uor
Cods Cost M�
INITWL True
NNwork: AGrande Bnneh: 01130 (Le Point Streeq Ssetlon: 10 SuAaa: AC
LC.D.: 08/01/1985 We: ROADWAY Renk:L L�nyth: 1.315.00 Ft Width: 30.00� Ft TrueAroa: 39.450.00 Sa
Work Myor
Cod� Coat M8R
INITIAL 7�
Nshvork: AGrende enneh: 01130 (La Polnt StreeU Seetlon: 20 SuAaa: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N985 Usa: ROADWAY Rsnk:L Lenpth: 210.00 Ft Wldth: 40.00 Ft 7rueArea: 8,400.00 Sa
Work M�
Cotle Cort M�
INITL4L Tnu
Natwork: AGrande Bnneh: 01730 (LePointStreet) Saellon: 30 Surfsu: AC
L.C.D.: OB/01N985 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L LenpM: 1,298.00 Ft Widlh: 32.00 Ft 7rueAree: 41.536.00 Sa
Work �y�p� .
Cod� Cost M8R
INITIAL � True
N�hvork: AGrande Bnneh: 01140 (Le Point Terrace) S�etlon: 10� SuMu: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N982 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 126.00 Ft Width: 30.00 Ft 7rueArea: 3,780.00 Sa
Work Major
Cotla - Cost M6R
INITIAL 7�
Nwwork: AGrande Braneh: 01140 (Le Point 7errace) S�ctlon: 20 Surfaa: AC
L.C.D.: 0&01N982 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lsnyth: 345.00 Ft Width: 17.00 Ft TrueArea: 5.865.00 Sa
Work Msjor
Coda Cost MiR
INITWL Tme �
. .. .___. _ _ � I
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paqe 23 of 46
Pavement Database:
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 01160 (Llntla Drive) SeeGOn: 10 SuAaea: AC
L.C.D.: 0&O1N981 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanyth: 1.098.00 Ft Wldth: 40.00 Ft 7rueArea: 43.920.00 Sa
W�� MaJor
Coda Cost MgR
INITIAL True
Network: AGrande Braneh: 01160 (Linda Drive) Sxtlon: 20 Surfap: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1981 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:CLan9th: 1.090.00 Ft Wldth: 40.00 Ft TrueArea: 43.600.00 Sa
Wo''k MeJor
Code Cost My�
INITIAL True
Natwork: AG2nde Bnneh: 01165 (LaganbertyAvenue) Seetlon: 10 SuAau: qC
L.C.D.: 01/01/2001 Use: ROADWAY Rank:�L LanpM: 470.00 Ft Width: 34.00 Ft TrueArea: 75.980.00 SO
Wo�ic MaJp�
Code Cost M�
INITIAL $0 True
� INITWL $0 True
Natwork: AGrende Braneh: 01165 (LOS Cervos) 8�etlon: 20 Surfeu: AC
L.C.o.: 01/01N998 Use: ROADWAY Rank:C �enpth: 347.00 Ft Widfh: 32.00 Ft 7rueAna: 11.104.00 Sa
work Myor
Cod� Cost M6R
INITIAL SO True
NehvoAc: AGrande Braneh: 01165 (Los Cervos) S�ctlon: 30 SuAw: AC �
L.C.o.:� 01/01/1998 Uaa: ROADWAY R�nk:C unpth: 330.00 Ft Wldth: 32.00 Ft True Aroa: 10.560.00 Sa
Work MaJor
Code Cost M�
INITWL � $0 True
NNVrork: AGrende Bnneh: 01170 (LOS Olivos Lane) 8�etlon: 10 Surhu: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1982 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lsnpth: 250.00 Ft Width: 34.00 Ft TrusAnc 8.500.00 Sa
Work M��
Coda Cost M�
INITIAL 7�
Natwork: AG2nde Bnnch: 01170 (Los O�Nos Lane) S�etlon: 20 8urfaa: AC �
LC.D.: O6/01/1982 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L L�npth: 550.00 Ft Width: 34.00 Ft TrwNw: 18.700.00 Sa
Wo� MaJor
Cods Cos! M� �
INITL4l. True
Natwork: AGrande Bnneh: 01180 (Ma9rwlia Drive) S�etlon: 10 . Surfeu: AC
I.C.D.: O6/01N963 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L L�npth: 1,104.00 Ft V1ntllh: 38.00 Ft TrwAne: 41.952.00 Sa
Wa� AMJor
Cods Cost M�
ST-SS $0 Falae
INITIAL 7�y
Natwork: AG2nde Broneh: 01790 (MapleStreet) 8�etlon: 10 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N967 Use: ROADWAY R�nk:L L�nOtiv 1.000.00 Ft WIdN: 40.00 Ft 7rueAnc 40.000.00 Sa
work Myor
Cods Cost My�. i
INITIAL True
(
il
i
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paae 24 of 46
Pavement Database:
NNwork: AG2nde Brsneh: 01190 (Maple Street) S�etion: 20 Surfaa: AC
L.C.D.: O6/07N967 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenyth: 956.00 Ft Widlh: 40.00 Ft 7rueAree: 38,240.00 Sa
work Major
Coda Cost M�
INITIAL True
NaMrork: AGrande Braneh: 01200 (Mariposa CimJe) Ssetlon: 10 8urhes: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N978 Uw: ROADWAY Rank:L LenpM: 135.00 Ft Width: 36.00 Ft 7ruaArea: 4.860.00 Sa
work Myor
Cods Cost �
STSS $0 Felae
INITIAL T�ue
Natwork: AG2nde Bnneh: 01210 (Mason Straet(South)) S�etlon: 10 Surhu: AC
LC.D.: 0&01N982 Use: ROADWAY �� Renk:L Lenpth: g2g.00 Ft Width: 36.00 Ft TrusAna: 33.408:00 Sa �
Work MaJor
Coda Cost MiR
ST-SS EO False
INITIAL True
NaMroAc: AGrande Bnneh: 01210 (Mason Street(SOUth)) Swtlon: 20 � Surfau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1982 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 817.00 Ft Witllh: 36.00 Ft Tru�Mw: 2221�2.00 Sa
Work MbJor
Code Cost M��
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGrdnde Bnnah: 01220 (Mason Street(NoM)) Swtlon: 10 �surfw: AC
L.C.D.: 06101N982 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenyth: 423.00 Ft WIdN: . 30.00 Ft TrwAna: 12.690.00 Sa
�Work � MaJor
Cod� Cost Myg
INITIAL True
Nwwodc: AGrande Bnneh: 01230 (Matlhew Way) S�eqon: 10 SuAau: AC �
L.C.D.: O6/01/2001 Usa: ROADWAY R�nk:L Lanyth: 830.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TnwAnc 33200.00 Sq
Work AAyor
Cod� Coa M8R
INITIAL True�
Nstwork: AG2nde Bpnch: 01240 � (May Streeq S�etlon: 10 Surlau: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/198f1 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L L�nOM: 772.00 Ft Width: 36.00 Fl 7rueArw: 27.792.00 Sa
Work M��
Cod� Cost N�.
INITULL True
Natwork: AGrande Bnneh: 01250 (MCkinleyStreet) S�WOn: 10 Surfw: AC .
LC.o.: O6/01N976 Uaa: ROADWAY Rank:L L«�yth: 736.00 Ft Vlndth: 30.00 Ft� 7rue aw: 22.080.00 Sa
Work MeJor
Code Cost M8R
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGrande Bnneh: 01270 (M�dowlark Drive) Swtlon: 10 SuMu: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1985 Use: ROADWAY R�nk:L Unyth: 540.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrwAna: 21.600.00 Sa
work MUor
Code Cost M8R
INITWL True
i
I
�
�aee:osiov2oos Work History Report Paae 2s of as
Pavement Dafabase:
Natwork: AGrande Bnnch: 01280 (Mercedes Lane) S�etlon: 10 Surfau: AC
L.C.D.: 06/01/1997 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L Lanpth: 1.450.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrueArea: 58,000.00 Sa
Work � MaJor
Cod� �n M3R
ST-SS $0 Falae
INITIAL True
Nstwork: AGrande Broneh: 01280 Rdercedes Lane) Seellon: 20 Surfaes: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1988 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L UnyM: 590.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrueArea: 23.600.00 Sa
Work NWw
Code Cost �
INITIAL 77ue
Netrvork: AGrande Braneh: 07290 (Mesa Drive) Sxtlon: 10 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N975 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L Lanpth: 994.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft 7rueAns: 39.760.00 Sa
Work M�jor
Code Cost Myg .
STSS SO False
INITIAL True
NeMrork: AGrande Bnneh: 01300 (Mesqulta Lane) 8�etlon: 10 SuA�a: AC
L.C.D.: 0&01/1985 Use: ROADWAY Rank:l LenpN: 1243.00 Ft Widlh: 40.00 Ft 7rueAree: 49.720.00 Sa
Work Myor
C�� Cost �
STSS EO False �
INITIAL Tme �
Nstwork: AGrande Bwneh: 01310 (Miller Circle) S�etlon: 10 SuM�a: AC
LC.D.: 0&01/1977 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L LenpN: 174.00 Ft WIdN: 36.00 Ft TrueAna: 6.284.00 Sa
WoAc CoM M�yr
Cod�
STSS $0 Falee
INITIAL True
Network: AGrende Bnneh: 01320 (Mlller Way) Saetlon: 10 8urtaee: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1977 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 2,156.00 Ft WIdN: 36.00 Ft 7rueAna: 77.616.00 Sa
Work Myor
Coda Cost MiR
STSS 50 Falas
INITIAL True
NaMrork: AGrende Braneh: 01330 (Montepo Street) Saetlon: 10 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N959 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L LenpM: 1.047.00 Ft Widlh: 38.00 Ft 7nuAna: 37.692.00 Sa
Wo� ' Cost ��r
Cotle
INITIAL TruB
Natwork: AGrande 8raneh: 01335 (Maninp Wse Lane) S�etlon: 10 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: 06/01N982 Uta: ROADWAY Renk:L Lsnpth: 800.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrueAree: 32.000.00 Sa
work Myor
Cotla Cost ��yµ
INITWL True
Natwork: AGrande Bnneh: 01350 (MUlberty Lane) 8�etlon: 10 Surtau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/Ot/1963 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenpth: 334.00 Ft Widlh: 38.00 Ft TrwAne: 12.692.00 Sa
Work M�jor
Coda Cost M8R
ST-SS $0 Falae
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Pape 26 of 46
Pavement Database:
INITWL True
Neiwork: AGrende Branch: 01360 (Mustang Cirole) Ssetion: 10 Sudau: AC
L.C.D.: 06/01/1980 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L LenOth: 355.00 Ft Width: � 40.00 Ft 7rueAree: 14.200.00 Sa
Work Major
Coda Cost M8R
STSS SO False
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGrande � Branch: 01370 (Myrtle Street) Saetlon: 10 SuAaea: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1972 Usa: ROADWAY Renk:L Lanyth: 392.00 Ft Widlh: 36.00 Ft TrueArsa: 14.112.00 Sa
. Work M�jor
Cotla �� M8R
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL TNe
NaMrork: AGrande ereneh: 07380 (Nelsan Street) Ssetlon: 10 SuASee: AC
LC.D.: 0&01/1991 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L L�npth: 970.00 Ft Widlh: 36.00 Ft TrueAres: 34.920.00 Sa
Work Mejor
Cods Cwt M�
ST-SS SO False
INITWL True
Metwork: AGrande Braneh: 01380 (Nelson Street) Seetlon: 20 BuAau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/OtN991 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L UnOth: 691.00 Ft Wldth: 36.00 Ft 7ru�Ana: 24.878.00 Sa
Work � MaJor �
Cotla Cos! MiR
INITWL True
NaMrork: AGrande Braneh: 01390 (Nevada Streeq 8setlon: 10 Surfacs: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1959 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L LanpM: 325.00 Ft Wldth: 24.00 Ft TrueMa: 7.800.00 Sa
Work Myor
Cod� �n M6R
INITIAL True
NeMrork: AGrende Braneh: 01400 (Newman Dnve) 8setlon: 10 SuAaa: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1980 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L L�npth: 549.00 Ft Width: 34.00 Ft 7ruoMa: 18.688.00 Sa
work NuJor
Code Cost My�
INITIAL True
N�twork: AGrende Bnneh: 01410 (NewpoAAvenue) 8ectlon: 10 Surtaos: AC
L.C.D.: 08/01/1982 Uea: ROADWAY qank:L L�npth: 1.250.00 Ft Width: 35.00 Ft TrueAna: 43.750.00 Sa
Work Myor
Cods �� M8R .
INITNL True
Natwodc: AGrande Bnneh: 01420 (NOelStreet) � S�etlon: 10 SuAau: AC
LC.D.: 0&01N993 Wo: ROADWAY Rank:L L�npth: 370.00 Ft Wldth: 40.00 Ft Tru�Ma: 14.800.00 Sa
WoAc MsJa
�o Cost M8R
ST-SS $0 Falae
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGrande Branch: 01430 (NOguera Place) Saetlon: 10 Surlau: AC
LC.D.: O6I01N972 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L Lan9N: 386.00 Ft Width: 36.00 Ft TrwAroa: 13.896.00 Sa
Work Myor
Code Cost � M�
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paqe 27 of 46
Pavement Database:
ST-SS $0 � False
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGrande Bmnch: 01440 (Noyes Roa� SeeUon: �10 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1982 Use: ROADWAY R�nk:L Lanpfh: 550.00 Ft WIdN: 64.00 Ft 7rueAna: 35200.00 Sa
yyo� MeJor
Code Coat M8R
INITIAL True
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 01450 (Oak Hill Road) 8eetlon: 10 Surteu: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1980 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenpth: 250.00 Ft Widlh: 24.02 Ft TrueArea: 6.003.94 Sa
M or
W�* Cost MiR
Cods
INITIAL T�
N�twork: AG�ande Bnneh: 01460 (Oak Leaf Circle) 8eetlon: 10 Surhu: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1980 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L UnOth: 250.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft Tru�Arec 10.000.00 Sa
Work M�
�e Cost M8R .
STSS $0 False
INITIAL T�
Network: AGrdnde Bnneh: 01470 (0ak PaAc Boulevard) 8eetlon: 10 SuAacr. AC
L.C.D.: 06/01N997 We: ROADWAY Rank:A UnyM: 550.00 Ft Wldth: &4.00 Ft TrueArec 35.200.00 Sa .
Wo�lc M��
Cod� �Cost M8R
��INITIAL T�
Network: AG2nde Bnnch: 01470 � (Oak Park Boulevard) S�atlon: 30 BuMu: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1997 Use: ROADWAY Rank:A l.�npth: 270.00 Ft Wldth: 50.00 Ft 7ruaArw: 13.500.00 Sa
Wo* MaJor
Code Cos! MiR
INITIAL True
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 01470 (Oak Park BoulevaM) Sxtlon: . 40 SuA�ea: AC
LC.D.: O6/01N997 Use: ROADWAY Renk:A Lanpth: 1.300.00 Ft Mlidlh: , 50.00 Ft TrwAros: 85.000.00 Sa
or
Work Cost MiR
CoM
INITWL True
NNwork: AG2nde Bnneh: 01470 (Oak Park 8oulevaM) 8setlon: 50 Surtus: AC
L.C.D.: 0&01/1997 Use: ROADWAY Rank:A Lenpth: 2.950.00 Ft Width: 50.00 Ft TruaArac147.500.00 Sa� .
c a �On �
INITIAL T^�
Network: AGrande Broneh: 01470 (OakParkBoulevard) S�Won: 60 Surfw: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1997 We: ROADWAY Rank:A l.�nyth: 500.00 Ft w�dth: 50.00 Ft 7rueArea: 25.000.00 Sa
Work M��
Cotla Cost Y8R
INITIAL T�
Netrvork: AGrande enneh: 01480 (Oak Street) 8eetlon: 10 Surfau: AC
LC.D.: 0&01/1982 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L l.�npth: 670.00 Ft W�dlh. �40.00 Ft Trw Mw:�26.800.00 Sa
or
Code C� M�BR
INITIAL True
I
Date:03/01/2005 WOrk History Report Paae 28 of 46
Pavement Database:
Natwork: AG2nde erench: 01500 (Old Ranch Road) Saetlon: 10 SuAaee: AC
L.C.D.: 0&01/1997 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenpth: 1.840.00 Ft width: 40.00 Ft 7rueArea: 73.600.00 Sa
Wa� Major
��o Cost M8R
STSS $0 False
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGrande Bnnch: 01510 (Olive Street) Seetlon: 10 SuAaw: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N991 We: ROADWAY Renk:L LanOth: 674.00 Ft Wldth: 40.00 Ft 7rueAree: 26.960.00 Sa
Work M�O� j
Coda Cost � M8R
STSS SO Felae�
INITWL True
Nstwork: AG2nde Bnneh: 01520 (Obhan Alley) Sxtlon: 10 Surhu:� AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1992 Use: ROADWAY fLnk:L LsnO�� 1.100.00 Ft Widtlr. 24.00 Ft TrwArs�: 28.400.00 Sq
Work Major
Cods Cort M8R
ST-SS . $0 False
INITIAL T�
Nstwork: AGrande Braneh: 01530 (Opal Cirde) Ssclion: 10 Surfau: AC
L.C.D.: 11N5/2005 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L Lxipth: . 172.00 Ft WIdN: 40.00 Ft 7ruoAroe: 6.880.00 Sa
Work �Of
�e Cort MdR
OL-AS $0 True
INITIAL T�
NatwoAc: AGrande Bnneh: 01540 (Orc.haM Avenue) Seetlon: 10 Surtau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/Ot/1964 Uae: ROADWAY Renk:L Lenpth: 300.00 Ft WIdtA: 34.00 Ft TruaAree: 10.200.00 Sa
Work MsJor
�o Cos! M3R
INITIAL T�
NNwork: ACarande Bnnch: 01540 (OrchaM Avenue) � S�etlon: 20 SuAaa: AC
L.C.D.: OB/O1N964 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L lwnpth: 1.715.00 Ft Width: 34.00 Ft TrueArec 37.970.00 Sa
Work Melor ��
�o Cost MiR
INITIAL T�
Nwwodc: AGrande enneh: 01540 (Orc.hard Avenue) S�alon: 30 SuAau: AC �
L.C.D.: Ot/Ot12002 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 300.00 Ft Width: 34.00 Ft 7rueAree: 10200.00 Sa
Work 111M1w
Cod� Cost M8R
INITIAL $0 True
Nstworlc: AGrande Bnneh: 01560 (Oro Drlve) Ssetlon: 10 Surfau: AC
LC.D.: O6I01/1975 Uae: ROADWAY Rsnk:L L�npN: 1.408.00 Ft WIAN: 36.00 Ft TrueAroa: f�0•888.00 Sa
Wa� Myor
. Code Cost � M8R
ST-SS $0 Fabe
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGrende Bnnch: 01560 (Oro Drive) . S�etlon: 20 Surhe�: AC
LC.D.: O6I01/1975 Uae: ROADWAY Renk:L l.�npth: 1243.00 Ft WIdM: 36.00 Ft TrueArw: 44.748.00 9n
Wo� MeJor
Coda Cost MiR �
INITIAL True
I� . . .. -.._ .. _.. ._. ._.. . .... . __ �
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paqe 29 of 46
Pavement Database:
Network: AGrande Broneh: 01570 (Outland Court) Seedon: 10 Surfea: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1987 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenyth: 135.00 Ft Width: 36.00 Ft 7rueArer. 4.860.00 Sq
Wo� Major
Coda Cost M8R
STSS $0 Felse '
INITIAL True
Netwo�ic: AGrende Bnneh: 01580 (Pa�c Pdnte Way) Sxtlon: 10 SuAsee: AC
L.C.D.: O6/Ot/1971 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L Lan9U+� 797.00 Ft Width: 38.00 Ft 7ruaAree: 30.286.00 Sa
Wo� Major
Coda Cost M8R ..
ST-SS SO Falae
INITIAL � True
Network: AGrende Bwneh: 01590 . (Palm Court) Saetlon: 10 SuMa: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1992 Uw: ROADWAY Rank:L Unyth: 452.00 Ft W�dth: 38.00 �Ft 7rusAnc 17.176.00 Sa
Work M�
Code Coat MiR
ST-SS 50 False
INITW. T�
Network: AGrande Braneh: 01600 (Pabs Seoos) S�etlon: 10 SuRau: AC
LC.D.: O6/01N994 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenyth: 630.00 Ft Widlh: 30.00 Ft TrwArea: 78•900.00 Sa
Wo� Cost Md�iR
Coda
ST-SS $0 Falae
INITIAL T�
Network: AGrende Bnneh: 01610 (Park Way) Ssetlon: 10 SuAxa: AC
L.C.D.: O6/Ot/1958 Use: ROADWAY Rsnk:L LenpN: 378.00 Ft VYltlth: 40.00 Ft TrueAna: 15.120.00 Sa
WoAc M�Of
Cod� Cost .MiR
SU-AC $0 Falae
INITWL True
Nwwork: AG2nde Bnnch: 01615 (Paraiso) Ssedon: 10 Sur(au: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1998 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L l.�npth: 162.00 Pt MIIdN: 32.00 Ft . TruaAnc 5.184.00� Sa .
WoAc Nl�lor
Cod� Cost M8R
INITIAL SO True
NNwoAC: AGrende ennch: 01620 (Paseo Street) Saetlon: 10 SuA�u: AC
L.C.D.: O6/O1N987 Usa: ROADWAY Renk:L LanpN: 185.00 Ft Mlidlh: 40.00 Ft Tn�eAree: 7.400.00 Sa
Work MeJor
�• Cost M8R
INITL4L T�
Network: AG2nde Braneh: 01630 (Paul Place) S�etlon: 10 Surfau: AC
L.C.D.: OB/01N987 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L Lx�ptn. 1.017.00 Ft �M�dN: 40.00 Ft TruaArec 40.680.00 Sa
Work lMjor
Cod� Cost M8R
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL True
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Pape 30 of 46
Pavemenf Database:
Network: AGrande Braneh: 01640 (PC RailwaY Place) Sxtlon: 10 SuRaa: AC
L.C.D.: O6/O1N982 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Unpth: 410.00 Ft Width: 36.00 Ft TrueAree: 14.760.00 Sa
Work Malor
Code �O� M�
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL Ttue
Netwo'1c: AGrende Branch: 01640 (PC Railway Place) 8eetlon: 20 � SuRau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/Ot/1989 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Length: 210.00 Ft Widtl�: 20.00 Ft TrueAree: 4200.00 Sa
Wo� Mejor
Code Cost M8R
STSS $0 Falee
INITIAL True
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 01650 (Pead Drive) . S�WOn: 10 Surha: AC �
LC.o.: 11N5/2005 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L LanpM: 7.125.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft irwAroc 45.000.00 Sa
Work MsJor
�s Cost M6R
OL-AS $0 True
INITIAL Tnie
N�twork: AG2nde Bnneh: 01860 � (Peaiwood Avenue) S�etlon: 10 SuAau: AC �
L.C.D.: O6/01/1960 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L Lenpth: 1.160.00 Ft Nlldth: 38.00 Ft Tn�aNw: 41.780.00 Sa
Work Cod M�BR
Code
INITIAL T�
NNwork: AGrande Bnneh: 01680 (P�Streeq S�etlon: 10 � SuA�er. AC
LC.D.: O6I01/1982 Usa: ROADWAY Rsnk:L�lenpth: 684.00 Ft Widtlr. 38.00 Ft TrusAna: 25.992.00 Sa
Wo� M�or
��� Cort M8R
ST-SS � F818e
INITIAL T�
Nelwoflc: AGrande Bnneh: 01690 (Pilgrim WaY) S�ctlon: 10 Surfau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1964 Use: ROADWAY Rsnk:L unpN: � 370.00 Ft Width: 34.00 Ft TrusNw: iz•`.�80.00 Sa
Work MUor
Coda Cost M8R
INITIAL T� .
NNwork: AGrande Braneh: 01700 (Pine Street) Ssetlon: 10 SuAan: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1987 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenpth: 626.00 Ft Wldth: 36.00 Ft TrueMa: 22.538.00 Sa
Work Cori M�BR . .
Cotla
INITIAL Tiue
Natwork: AGrande Bnneh: 01710 (P�eta Roed) eeetlon: 10 Surhu: AC �
L.C.o.: O6/01/1973 Wa: ROADWAY Rank:L L�nO�: � 367.00 Ft Wldlh: 36.00 Ft TruoAroa: 13212.00 Sa
Work ��w
�� Cost M8R
ST-SS $0 Falae
INITIAL Tnie
Natwork: AGrende Bnneh: 01720 (Platino Lane) SseNon: 10 SuA�es: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1997 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L Lanpth: 540.00 Ft 1Mdth: 38.00 Ft TrwAroc 20.520.00 Sa .
work MUor
Code Cost MiR �
ST-SS SO False
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report paae 3� of 4s
Pavement Database:
INITWL True
Network: AG2nde Bnneh: 01720 (Platino Lane) Saetlon: 20 Surtace: AC
L.C.D.: 0&Ot11997 Use: ROADWAY Rsnk:L LsnOth: 1.145.00 Ft� W�dth: 38.00 Ft True Area: 43,510.00 Sa
work Major
Coda Cost M&R
STSS SO Falx
INITIAL True
Network: AGrande Braneh: 01730 (Pbmo Courq � Sactlon: 10 Surtau: AC
L.C.D.: 06/01/1978 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenyth: 204.00 Ft Width: 36.00 Ft 7rueAree: 7.344.00 Sa
Work Melor
�o Cost M3R
STSS $0 False
INITIAL � True
� Network: AGwnde Braneh: 01740 (POde Street) S�ctlon: 10 SuMu: AC
LC.D.: O6I01N956 U�e: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenpth: 7.000.00 Ft W�dMc 36.00 Ft 7ru�Aroc 38•000•00 Sa
Work .hNJor
��o Cort MiR
ST-SS $0 Falae
INITIAL T�
NNxrork: AGrande Bnneh: 01740 (Poole Street) SseUon: 20 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1956 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L Lwipth: 134.00 Ft WIdN: 36.00 Ft Tn�aArac 4.824.00 Sa
W� r
Cod� Cost MiR
INITIAL T�
N�twoiic: AG2nde Bnneh: 01750 (POplarStreat) Saetlon: 10 � BuA�u: AC
L.C.D.: O6/O1N951 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L lsnyth: 418.00 Ft YYldth: 40.00 Ft 7rueArea: 16.720.00 Sa
Wo� Major
Code Cost M8R
ST-SS SO False
INITIAL T�
NNwork: AGrande Bnneh: 01760 (Pradera CouA) S�eUOn: 10 SuAaa: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1992 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lxipeh: 269.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrusAroe: 70.760.00 Sa
Wa* IMjor
Cotla Cwt M6R
STSS $0 Falae
INITIAL Tnie
Natwork: AGrande Braneh: 01770 (Prisdlla Lene) Seetlon: 10 Surhn: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1976 We: ROADWAY Rank:l Lenpth: 534.00 Ft Wldfh: 40.00 Ft 7rueMa: 21.360.00 Sa
Work MUw
Code Cost M8R
INITIAL True
Network: AGrende Bronch: 01775 (Puesla del Soq Saetlon: 10 Surfacr. AC �
L.C.o.: 01/01/1998 We: ROADWAY Rank:L L�npth: 7.413.00 Ft Width: 32.00 Ft 7rwAree: 45278.00 Sa
Work hYlor
Cotla Cost M8R
INITIAL $0 True
,
a
4I
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paae 32 of 46
Pavement Database:
Nelwork: AGrende Bnnch: 01780 (4uall Court) Sxtlon: 10 Surface: AC
L.C.o.: O6/01/1985 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 260.00 Ft Wldth: 40.00 Ft TrwAree: 10.400.00 Sa
Wo* . Major _
Code Cost M8R �
INITIAL True
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 01790 (Rancho ParkwaY) Sactlon: 10 8urlace: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1992 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:CLangth: 1.880.00 Ft � Wldth: 45.00 Ft TrueArea: 75.600.00 Sa
Work MaJor
�e Cost MiR
ST-SS $0 Felse
INITIAL � T�
NNwork: AGrande Bnneh: 01790 (RanchoParkway) S�Won: 20 SuA�a: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1992 Use: ROADWAY Rank:CLanpth: 1.880.00 Ft Width: 45.00 Ft TruaAnr. 84.600.00 Sa
Work Melor
Code Cost MiR
STSS SO False
INITV+L Tnie
Network: AGtande Bnnch: 01790 (Rancho Parkway) S�ctlon: 30 Surlsu: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1992 Use: ROADWAY Rank:Cl.�npM: 1.020.00 Ft Wldth: 45.00 Ft TrueArea: 45.900.00 Sa
Work M�
Cod� Cost M8R
ST-SS � � $0 False
INITIAL T�
NetwoAc: AGrande Bnneh: 07795 (RaspbertY Avenue) Seetlon: 10 SuAaa: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/2001 Uaa: ROADWAY Rank:L UnpN: 600.00 Ft WIAth: 34.00 Ft TrueMa: 20.400.00 Sa ��
Work Malor
��o Cost M3R
INITIAL $0 True .
NMvork: AGrande Bnneh: 01795 (RasP�RY Avenue) 8wtlon: 20 Surha: AC
LC.D.: 01/01I2001 Uaa: ROADWAY R�nk:L L�npth: 420.00 Ft Width: 34.00 Ft TrueAroe: 74280.00 Sa
Work IA�lor
Code Cost M3R
INITIAL SO True
NWwoAc: AG2nde Bnneh: 01800 (Refugio Place) Sectlon: 10 SuAaa: AC
L.C.D.: 0&Ot/1992 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L UnpN: 540.00 Ft Wldtlr. 30.00 Ft TrwArw: 18.200.00 Sa
W� Myor
Code �� M�
ST-SS SO False
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGrande Bnnch: 01810 (Rena Street(Sautnp Seetlon: 10 Surha: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1978 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L Unpth: � 7282.00 Ft Width: 34.00 Ft TrwAns: 42.908.00 Sa
Work M�lor
Code Cost MiR
INITIAL T�
Natwork: AG2nde enneh: 01820 (Rena Street(Nortn)) S�etlon: 10 SuASea: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1979 Use: ROADWAY nank:L Lenpth: 390.00 Ft Wldthc 40.00 Ft Truenroa: 15.600.00 Sa
work Myor
��� Cost M6R
� STSS $� Truee
i INITIAL
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paqe 33 of 46
Pavement Database:
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 01830 (Rice CouA) Swtion: 10 SuASU: AC
LC.D:: O6/01/1987 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenyth: 140.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrueArea: 5.600.00 Sa
Wo� Major
Coda Cost M8R
ST-SS $0 False
INITWL True
Netwodc: AGrande Bronch: 01840 (Rid9eviewWay) � .S�etlon: 10 SuAaw: AC
L.C.D.: 0&01I1978 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L L�npN: 760.00 Ft Wfdth: 34.00 Ft TrueArec 25.840.00 Sa
Work MaJor
Code Cost M6R
INITIAL T�
Netwodc: AG2nde eruwh: 01850 (�bin CIrGe) . SMlon: 10 Surfeu: AC
L.C.o.: O6I01/1985 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L L�nOth: 2.070.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrueAna: ffi.800.00 3a
Work AMlor
�� Cw! MiR
INITIAL � T�
NNwork: AG2nde Braneh: 01860 (RObles Roa� Swtlon: 10 8urf�a: AC
L.C.D.: .O6/01I1982 We: ROADWAY Rank:L Unpth: 279.00 Ft WIdN: 24.00 Ft TrueMa: 8.896.00 Sa
Wo* Mejor
�d� Cost MiR
1NITIAL T�
Network: AGrende Braneh: 01870 � (ROdeo Drive) Sxtlon: 10 SuAaa: AC
L.C.D.: O6/Ot/1988 Usa: ROADWAY Renk:C L.�n01h: 1.080.00 Ft W1dth: 40.00 Ft Tru�Area: 43200.00 Sa
WoAc ��
Cod� Cost M8R
ST-SS � Fa��
INI7IAL T�
Natwo�lc: AGrande Bnneh: 01870 (Rodeo Drive) Saetlon: 20 SuAaea: AC
L.C.D.: 0&Ot/1988 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:C l.anpth: 2.080.00 Ft VVIdN: 40.00 Ft TrueAros: 83200.00 Sa
Work �
Code Cost MiR
ST-SS SO False
INITIAL T� �
Ntlwork: AGrande Bnnch: 01870 (Rodeo Diive) � SKtlon: 30 Surha: AC.
L.C.D.: 0&01/1988 Uu: ROADWAY Rank:C L�npfh:� 1.460.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft Trw Arec 58•400•00 Sa
Work hMJor
�do Cost M8R
STSS $0 False
INITIAL Tnie
Network: AGrande Bronch: 01870 (R���) S�ctlon: 40 SuA�u: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N988 Use: ROADWAY Rank:CLanyth: 420.00 Ft Widtlr. 40.00 Ft TrwAna: 16.800.00 Sa
Work MsJor
��o �Cost M8R
ST-SS SO Falae
INITIAL True
Network: AGrande Bnnch: 01880 (Ro9ers Court) S�ctlon: 10 SuAsea: AC
L.C.D.: O6IOt11976 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L L.�nyM: 498.00 Ft Widlh: 40.00 Ft TrueAres: 19.920.00 Sa
W� M�Jor
Cod� Cost M3R
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paae 34 of 46
Pavement Databese:
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL True
NstwoAc: AGrende Bnneh: 01890 (Rosemary CouA) � Saelion: 10 Surhu: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/2001 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 340.00 Ft Wfdth: 32.00 Ft TrueAroa: 10.880.00 Sa
Work M+Uor
Code Cort M8R
INITWL True
NNwork: AGrande Braneh: 01895 (ROSemary Lane) Seetion: 10 Surfaee: AC
L.C.D.: 01I01/1999 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L lsnyN: 645.00 Ft WitlM: 32.00 Ft 7rueAree: 20.640.00 Sa
Work Malor
�� Cost M6R
INITIAL � T� �
Nwwork: AG2nde Bnneh: 01900 (ROSewood Lane) Ssetlon: 10 Surfses: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1958 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L Lenpth: 525.00 Ft WIdN: 38.00 Ft TruaArea: 78•900.00 9a
Work M�Jor
��o Cost M8R
STSS $0 False
INITIAL True
Network: AG2nde Bnnch: 01910 (Russ CouA) - S�etlon: 10 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1987 We: ROADWAY Rank:L l.�npth: 212.00 Ft Wldth: 40.00 Ft TruaAree: 8.480.00 Sa
Work ��
��o Cori M6R
STSS 30 Felse
INITIAL T�
Ndwork: AGrande Bnneh: 01920 � (Ruth Ann WaY(South)) S�etlon: 10 Surfau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/Ot/1976 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L lanpN: 420.00 Ft VY�dth: 40.00 Ft TrueArea: 76.800.00 SO
Work N41or
Code Cos! M8R
INITIAL T�
Nstwodc: AGrande Branch: 01930 (RUth Mn Way(NOAh)) 8setlon: 10 Surt�a: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1976 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L L�npth: 420.00 Ft NIIdN: 40.00 Ft TrwArec 16•800.00 Sa
Work AA�lor
Cods �n M8R
INITIAL True
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 01940 (Sage Streeq Ssetlon: 10 SuAaw: AC
L.C.o.: 06/01N956 We: ROADWAY Rank:L LenO�� 535.00 Ft WIdGr. 32.00 Ft 7ruenroa: 17.120.00 Sa
Work N4kr
Coda Cost. M8R �
ST-SS $0 Falae
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGrende Bnneh: 01945 (Salida tle Soq � S�t:tlon: 10 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: Ot/Ot/1998 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L 1.anpM: 637.00 Ft VNdN: 32.00 Ft TrwArec 20.384.00 Sa
WoAc AA�lor
Code . Cost MiR
INITIAL SO True
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 01950 (SandalwooC Avenue) ' . S�etlon: 10 SuMu: AC
L.C.D.: O6/0111 9 5 2 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L l.�nyth: 580.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrueArer. 23200.00 Sa
Work MUor
Coda Cost MdR
Date:03/01/2005 WOCIf HISt01�/ R@�Drt Paqe 35 of 46
Pavement Database:
ST-SS 30 False
INITIAL True
Network: AGrende Bnnch: 01960 (Scenic Circle) Seetion: 10 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: O6I01/1980 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L LenyM: 370.00 Ft WIdUc 40.00 Ft 7rueArea: 14.800.00 Sa
Wo* MsJor
�e Cost MSR
STSS $0 False
INITIAL Tnle
Natwork: AC,2nde Bnnch: 01965 (SeabrlphtAvenue) Saet�on: 10 SuAaes: AC
L.C.D.: Ot/01I2001 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L LanpN: 213.00 Ft Wktth: 38.00 Ft TrueArea: 7.668.00 Sa
Wo* MaJor
Cod� Cost M8R
INITIAL $0 True
N�twork: AGrande Bnneh: 01970 (Shat Street) � S�cUOn: 10 Surfaa: AC
L.C.D.: OB/01/1982 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 914.00 Ft Width: 36.00 Ft TruaAree: 32.904.00 Sa
Work M�Jor
��o Cost M8R
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL T�
Natwork: AGrande Brsneh: 01970 (ShoA Street) Ssetlon: 20 Surfau: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1982 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Unpth: 305.00 Ft Widlh: 36.00 Ft TrueAre�: 10.980.00 Sa �
Work MeJor
Code Cost M8R
STSS $0 False
INITIAL Ttue
Nstwork: AGrande Braneh: 01970 (Short Streeq Ssetlon: 30 SuAaer. AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1982 Use: ROAOWAY Rank:C L�npth: 200.00 Ft Wlddc 34.00 Ft TrueArea: 6.800.00 Sa
Work Myor
Coda �n M8R
ST-SS SO Fe�°8
INITIAL � True
Network: AGrande Bnnch: 01970 (Snort Street) S��tlon: 40 $��u� ?C
L.C.D.: 0&01/1982 We: ROADWAY Rank:CUnO�� 75.00 Ft Width: 32.00 Ft 7ruaAna: 2.400.00 Sa
Work 641or
Code Cwt M8R
STSS � $0 Falae
INITIAL T�
Network: AGrende Bnneh: 01980 (Sierra Drive) Saetlon: 10 Su�: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1969 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L LanpM: 2.187.00 Ft Wldtlr. 24.00 Ft 7n�aNa: 52.488.00 Sa
Work ��a
Cods Cost ��MiR
INITIAL True
Natwork: AG2nde Braneh: 01985 (SOmbrlllo) Seetlon: 10 SuAau: AC
LC.D.: 01/01N998 Usa: ROADWAY Renk:L l.�npth: 901.00 Ft Wldth: 32.00 Ft TrueAna: 28.832.00 Sa
Work �
�o Cori M8R
INITIAL $0 True
{
I
i
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Pape 36 of 46
Pavement Database:
NeMrork: AGrande Bnnoh: 01990 (Spanish Moss Lane) 8aetlon:. 10 Sudau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/Ot/1988 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 1.750.00 Ft Wldth: 40.00 Ft TrueAna: 46.000.00 Sa
Wo* Major
Code Cost M8R
STSS $0 False
INITIAL True
NeMrodc: AG2nde Bnneh: 02000 (Spruce Street) . S�atlon: 10 8urfaee: AC
L.C.D.: 0&01N976 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L Lanpth: 791.00 Ft VVidM: 34.00 Ft Tru�Arer. 26.894.00 Sa
or
W�* Cost M6R
Cod�
STSS SO Felse I,
INITWL True '
NNwork: AGrende Bnnen: 02000 (Spruce Street) S�etlon: 20 suA�er. AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1976 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L lanpN: 700.00 Ft Wldth: 34.00 Ft TrueAru: 23.800.00 Sa
M or
Coda Cost M8R
ST-SS � F��
INITIAL TNB�
Network: AG2nde Brench: 02010 (Stegecoach Road) S�etlon: 10 Surhu: AC
LC.D.: O6/01N976 We: ROADWAY Renk:C LanpCr. 7.140.00 Ft Width: �36.00 Ft Trw Aree: 41.040.00 Sa
r
Work Cost MiR
Code
MITIAL T�
NeMroAc: AG2nde Bnneh: 02010 (Stagetwadi RoeE) Saetlon: 20 Surha: AC
I.C.D.: 06/01/1976 We: ROADWAY Rank:C Lanyth: 1.386.00 Ft Widlh: 36.00 Ft 7rueAnc 48.B96.00 Sa
Cods . Cost M�iR
ST-SS SO Fabe
INITIAL � Tme
NNwork: AG2nde Braneh: 02020 (Stanley Avenue) Ssetlon: 10 8urlau: AC �
LC.o.: O6I01/1982 Ua: ROADWAY Rank:L UnpN: 200.00 Ft WIAlh: 64.00 Ft 7rueAnc 12.$00•00 Sa
or
Work Coat MiR
Cod�
INITIAL T�
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 02020 (SNanleyAvenue) SMlon: 20 Surhu: AC
LC.D.: 0&01/1987 U�e: ROADWAY Rank:L LanyM: 860.00 Ft Width: 20.00 Ft TrueArec 19200.00 Sa
or
c a �Of� �
INITIAL T�
Network: AGrande Breneh: 02030 (Statiai Way) BseUon: 10 SuRaw: AC
L.C.D.: 0&01/1982 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:Blenpth: 1.252.00 Ft Widlh: 40.00 Ft TrwAnc 50.080•00 Sa
or
Coda . Cost MiR
INITUIL � T�
NsMroAc: AGrande Bnneh: 02035 (StrewbertyAvenue) S�WOn: 10 Surhd: AC �
L.C.D.: 01/Ot/2001 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L LsnOth: 608.00 Ft Width: 34.00 Ft TrueAna: 20.672•00 Sa
yye� Myor
Coda Cost M8R
INITWL $0 True
�
�
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paae 3� ot4s
Pavement Database:
Natwork: AGrande Bnneh: 02040 (Stevenson Dnve) Seetlon: 10 Surtace: AC
LC.D.: O6I01/1978 Uae: ROADWAY Renk:L lsnpth: 420.00 Ft Width: 34.00 Ft TrueAree: 74.280.00 Sa
Work MsJor
Coda Cost M8R
ST-SS $0 False
INITWL True
Network: AGrende Bnneh: 02050 (SunAse Terrace) �S�ctlon: 10 Surhu: AC
L.C.D.: O6/Ot/1971 Use: ROADWAY �Renk:L Lenpth: 277.00 Ft Width: 52.00 Ft TrueAroa: 14.404.00 Sa
or
Work Cost M8R
Cods
�INITIAL True
Network: AGrdnde Bnnch: 02060 (Sunset Drive). 8eetlon: 10 Suri�u: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N953 We: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 2.174.00 Ft Width: � 40.00 Ft 7rueAree: 86.960.0� So
Wo* Myor
�• Cost M8R
INITUIL TNB
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 02070 (Sycamore Court) 8eetlon: 10 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/Ot/1963 Uw: ROADWAY Rank:L Unpth: 112.00 Ft Wldth: 36.00 Ft TrueAroa: 4.032.00 Sa
or
W�� Cost MER
CoEa
� ST-SS SO Felae
INITIAL � Tme
NNwork: AG2nde Bnnch: 02080 (Sycertwre Drive) � S�ctlon: 10 BuAaer. AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1987 Uac ROADWAY Rank:L Lenyth: 750.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrueAnc 30.000•00 Sa
yyo� MaJor
Code Cost MiR
STSS � $0 False
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGrende Braneh: 02080 (Sycartare Drive) S�.WOn: 20 Surha: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/2001 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L LenpM: 880.00 Ft Witlth: 40.00 Ft TrwArea: 35.200.00 Sa
WoAc ��
Code � �� M6R
INITIAL True
STSS $0 False
Network: AG2nde Bnneh: 02090 (7aly Fb Road) 8xflon: 10 8uMer. AC
L.C.o.: 06/01/1977 Use: ROADWAY Rank:C Unpth: 1.652.00 Ft YVN1N: 36.00 Ft 7ruoArea: 59.472.00 Sa
or
��o Cost M�BR
INITIAL True
N�twork: AGrande Broneh: 02090 (Tally Ho Roatl�. S�etlon: 20 Surha: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1977 We: ROADWAY Rank:C Lanpth: 3.554.00 Ft Width: 36.00 Ft 7ru�Are�:127.944.00 Sa
or
Cods �Ox �
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGrande enneh: 02100 (7annerlane) Seetla�� �� $��� AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1982 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L L�npN: 858.00 Ft Width: . � 40.00 Ft TrusArn: 26.320.00 Sa
Code C°st MBRr
INITIAL True -
Date:03/01/2005 WOrk HlstOry RepOrt Pa4e 38 of 46
Pavement Database: '
Nstwork: AGrende Bwnch: 02110 (Taylor Place) SaeUOn: 10 SuA�cs: AC
L.C.D.: O6I0111979 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 657.00 Ft Wftlth: 40.00 Ft TrueAraa: 26,280.00 Sa
yyo* MaJor
�• Cost M&R
INITIAL True
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 02130 (The Pike) Seetlon: 10 Surha: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1973 Uw: ROADWAY Renk:C UnOth: 1.149.00 Ft Width: 62.00 Ft TrueArea: 71238.00 Sa
M or
��� Cost MiR
INITIAL T�
Natwork: AGrende eraneh: 02130 � (The Pike) S�ctlon: 20 SuAaea: AC
L.C.D.: 0&01/1973 Use: ROADWAY Rank:CLanpth: 2.669.00 Ft Wldth: 60.00 Ft 7ruaAna:160.140.00 Sa
Work MaJor
Cotla Cort MSR
INITIAL True
Natwork: AG2nde Bnneh: 02140 (Tlerra Street) S�etlon: 10 $��� AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1987 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L LenOth: 1.124.00 Ft Width: 34.00 Ft 7ruaAroa: 38.216.00 Sq
Work Nl�lor
�a Cos! MdR
ST-SS SO False
INITL4L True
NNwork: AG2nde Bnneh: 02150 (TigerTai�Drive) Ssetlon: 10 SuAsea: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1974 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L LsnpN: 915.00 Ft Wldth: 40.00 Ft TrueAree: 36.600.00 Sa
Work MeJor
��o Cost M8R
ST-SS $0 Falae
INITIAL T�ue
N�twork: AGrande Bnnch: 02160 (T�0��) S�WOn: 10. Surhu: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1982 We: ROADWAY Rank:L l.�npth: 665.00 Ft Wldth: 38.00 Ft TrusAroa: 25.270.00 Sa
WoAc Melor
Coda Cost M3R
ST-SS $0 Falsa
INITIAL True
NaMrork: AGrande Bnneh: 02170 (Toyon Place) Sxtlon: 10 BuAau: AC
L.C.D.: 0&01/1975 Use: ROADWAY � Rank:L L�npth: 200.00 Ft Width: 36.00 Ft 7rwAree: 7.200.00 Sa
Work ���
�• Cost M8R
ST-SS $0 Felse
INITIAL T�
NatwoAc: AGrande Broneh: 02180 (Traffic Way) S�etlon: 10 Surha: AC
L.C.D.: 0&01N953 Use: ROADWAY Rank:B l.�nyth: 1.780.00 Pt Wldth: 64.00 Ft TrueAree:113.920.00 Sa
Work Mt�Jor
Cod� Cost MdR �
MISF $0 False
INITIAL Tae
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 02180 (7raffic Way) 8�etlon: 20 SuMea: AC
L.C.D.: O6/Ot/1969 Use: ROADWAY Rank:BLanpth: 994.00 Ft Width: 64.00 Ft Tn»Aree: 63.616.00 Sa
Work MNa
Code Cost MdR
� MISF � SO Felse
Date:03/01/2005 Wo�k History Report Paae 3s of 46
Pavement Database:
INITWL Tnie
Network: AGrende Branch: 02190 (Traffic Way Extension) SscUon: 10 SuAace: AC
L.C.D.: 0&01N987 Usa: ROAOWAY Rank:L Lanyth: 825.00 Ft Width: 36.00 Ft TruaArea: 29.700.Q0 Sa
yyo� Major
Code �n M8R
INITWL T�ve
NNwork: AGrande Breneh: 02200 (Triniry Avenue) Seetlon: 10 SuAace: AC
LC.D.: O6/01N982 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenpth: &40.00 Ft Wldth: 41.00 Ft TrueAree: 34.440.00 Sa
.. Work Malor
Code Cost MiR
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGtande Broneh: 02210 (Turqudse Drive) . Saetlon: 10 SuAus: AC
L.C.D.: 11N5/2004 Usa: ROADWAY Rsnk:L LenOM: 7.129.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrueArea: 45.160.00 Sa �
Wo'Ic Cwt Md,Rr
Cotle
OL-AS . $0 True
INITIAL True
Netwo�ic: AG2nde Braneh: 02220 (Valley Roed) . 8eetlon: 10 Surlau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/0111967 Use: ROADWAY Rank:C Lanpth: 2.688.00 Ft WIAlh: 60.00 Ft True Ana:181280.00 Sa
Work �la
Cpd� Cust M8R
INITIAL True
Network: AG2nde Bnneh: 02220 (Valley Road) Sxtlon: 20 BuAau: AC
�.C.D.: 06/01N987 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:CLxipN: 2.682.00 Ft Width: 80.00 Ft 7rusArea:180.920.00 Sa
Work ��
Code �� M8R
� INITIAL �T�
NetwoAC: AGrande Bnneh: 02230 N�d Laomis CouN S�etlon: 10 � BuAaer. AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1982 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L LenyM: 118.00 Ft Wldth: 36.00 Ft TnwArea: 4248.00 Sa
work M4Jor
Code Cort M8R
STSS $0 False
INITIAL T�
Network: AGrande Branch: 02240 (VaM Loomis Lane) Ssetlon: 10 Surfau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1982 Usa: ROADWAY Wnk:L Unpth: 780.00 Ft Width: . 36.00 Ft TrueArw: 28.080.00 Sa
WoAc IAyor
Cods Cost M8R
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGrande Broneh: 02250 N�e Place) S�ctlon: 10 Surfw: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1964 Uae: ROADWAY Wnk:L Lsnpth: 317.00 Ft Mlidtlr. 42.00 Ft 7rueAna: 13.314.00 Sa
work Mnjor
Cod� CoN M8R .
STSS EO False
INITIAL True
NeMrork: AGrande Broneh: 02260 (Vemon Streeq � S�eNon: 10 SuAaa: AC
L.C.D.: 0&01N964 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 490.00 Ft . Width: 36.00 Ft TrueArer. 17.640.00 Sa
yyo� MaJor
Code Cost M�
1
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paqe 40 of 46
Pavement Database:
INITIAL Ttue
Natwork: AG2nde Braneh: 02260 (Vertwn Street) , Sactlon: 20 Surhu: AC
� L.C.D.: O6/01N964 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanyth: 160.00 Ft Widlh: 36.00 Ft 7rueArea: 5.760.00 Sa
yyo� Myor
�de Cost M&R
INITWL True
Natwork: AG2nde Bnnch: 02265 �a Avante) Seetlon: 10 Surher. AC
L.C.D.: 01I01/2002 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 245.00 Ft Wldth: 36.00 Ft 7rwAree: 8.820.00 Sa
Work IAMIor
Cods �°°t M8R �
INITIAL $0 True
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 02270 �a Banddem) � Ssetlon: 10 SuMa: AC
L.C.D.: O6I01N992 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L LenOW� 3.410.00 Ft Widlh: 40.00 Ft TrueArea:136.400.00 Sa
Work M+lo�
Code �n M3R
ST-SS $0 False
INITWL T�
Netwo�ic: AGrende Bnneh: 02275 �a Belrtante Court(NOAh)) Saetlon: 10 SuA�te: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/2003 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 177.00 Ft Width: 32.00 Ft TrueAnc 5.884.00 Sa
Wo�ic Malor
Code �n M8R
INITIAL $0 True
Nahwdc: AGrande Bnneh: 02278 Ma BelrtaMe Coun(South)) Sectlon: 10 SuAau: �AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/2002 Uaa: ROADWAY Rank:L L�npth: 825.00 Ft Nndlh: 32.00 Ft 7rwArer. 20.000.00 Sa
WoAc MNa
Code ��s� M�
INITIAL SO True
NNwork: AGrende Bnneh: 02280 (V�a Bemos) 8setlon: 10 Surf�a: AC
L.C.o.: 0&01/1964 Use: ROADWAY Wnk:L L�npth: . 455.00 Ft Width: 30.00 Ft 7rueAres: 13.650.00 Sa
Work Mejor
Cod� Cwt MiR
ST-SS SO False
INITWL True
Network: AG2nde Bnnch: 02285 (Via Firenze(Nath)) Seetlon: 10 Surf�a: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/2002 Uae: ROADWAY- Rank:L LanpN: 345.00 Ft Width: 32.00 Ft TrueArea: 11.040.00 Sa
Work MsJor
Coda �n M8R
INITIAL EO True
Nahro�lc: AGrande Braneh: 02287 Ma Firenze(South)) S�etlon: 10 BuMu: AC
LC.D.: 01/01/2002 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L LanpM: 370.00 Ft Wldth: 32.00 Ft TrueAres: 11.840.00 Sa
Work Major
Cod� �� M8R
INITWL SO True
Natwork: AGrende Breneh: 02290 Ma La Barranca) . Sxtlon: 10 Surtau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/2001 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 1.238.00 Ft� WIdN: 36.00 Ft TnwMa: 44.568.00 Sa
Work M��Jor �
Cods Cos! M3R
ST-SS $0 False
� INITIAL True
�
�
( �
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paqe 41 of 46
Pavement Database:
Natwork: AG2nde Bwneh: 02300 (Via Les Aquilas) Seetlon: 10 Surhu: AC
L.C.D.: O6/Ot/1992 Uaa: ROADWAY Rsnk:L Lenpth: 1.681.00 Pt Width: 30.00 Ft TrueArea: 50.430.00 Sa
yya� . MaJor
Code Cost M8R
ST-SS SO False
INITIAL True
NNwork: AGrande Branch: 02300 (Via Las Aquilas) Saetlon: 20 Surhu: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1992 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L �an9th: 934.00 Ft Width: 30.00 Ft TrueArea: 28.020.00 Sa
work Myor
Cod� Cost � M6R
INITNI True
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 02310 (Via Poca) 8eetlon: 10 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/t992 We: ROADWAY Wnk:L L�nyth: 222.00 Ft Witlth: 36.00 Ft TrueAres: 7.992.00 Sa
work Myor
Coda �� M8R
ST-SS 80 False
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGrande Bnneh: 02320 (Via Vaquero) Seetlon: 10 Surfau: AC
L.C.D.: 0&01/1992 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenpth: 1.520.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TruaA�w: 60.800.00 Sa
WoAc MrJor
Coda �OH �
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL True -
NNxrork: AG2nde Bnneh: 02320 (Via Vaquero) � Swtlon: 20 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: OB/01/1892 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 600.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft. TrueArea: 24.000.00 SO
yya* MaJor
Code �� MiR
ST-SS SO False .
INITWL True
Netrvork: AGrande enneh: 02330 Maoria way) S�etlon: 10 SuAxa: AC
� LC.D.: 0&01/1974 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L L�npN: 820.00 Ft WIdM: 42.00 Ft TrueAree: 34.440.00 Sa
WoAc M4w
Code �� MRR
ST-SS SO Falae
INITWL True
NetwoAc: AG2nde Bnneh: 02340 (Victorian CourQ S�etlon: 10 BuAw: AC
LC.D.: 06/01/2001 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L L�npth: 730.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrwArer. 29.200.00 Sa
Work ��
Cods � MiR
INITWL True
Natwork: AGrande Brsneh: 02350 (Villepe CouA) Ssetlon: 10 SuAan: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/2001 U�e: ROADWAY Rank:L Lmyth: 165.00 Ft Width: 34.00 Ft TrwAna: 5.610.00 Sa
Work NUlor
Code �OH �R
INITL4L Tiue
Network: AGrande Bnneh: 02360 (Vlrglnia Drive) 8eetlon: 10 SuAaee: AC
LC.D.: 0&01N958 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L L�npth: 866.00 Ft Width: 38.00 Ft TrwArea: 32.908.00 Sa .
Wo� MaJot
Code �0�� M�
STSS . $0 Falae
i
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paqe 42 Of 46
Pavement Database:
INITIAL True
Network: AGrande erench: 02370 (Vista Cirde) Sxtlon: 10 Surtaa: AC
LC.D.: O6/01N980 Usa: ROADWAY Rank:L Unpth: 412.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TrueArea: 16.480.00 Sa
Work M+lor
Cotla Cost M6R
STSS $0 False
INITIAL True
Nanwork: AGrande Bnneh: 02380 �sta DrNe) � 8w41on: 10 8urtaa: AC
L.C.D.: 0 8/0111 99 8 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L LanpN: 1200.00 Ft Wldth: �40.00 Ft True Area: 48.000.00 Sa
Work N4jor
Coda Cost MdR
ST-SS SO Falae
INITWL True
NNxrork: AGrdnde Bnneh: 02400 (Walnut Streeq � SMlon: 10 Sw/au: AC �
LC.D.: O6/01N967 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L L�npth: 1.386.00 Ft Width: 38.00 Ft TrusArac 52.888.00 Sa
Work ' My°� �
Coda �� M3R
ST-SS � SO Falae
INITIAL T�
Network: AGrande Braneh: 02400 (walnut Street) 3�etlon: 20 SuAau: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1958 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L UnOth: 1240.00 Ft Width: 38.00 Ft TrueArec 47.120.00 Sa �
Work ��
Code Cost MiR �
INITIAL T�
Natwork: AGrande Bnnch: 02410 (wesley Streeq Sktlon: 10 �� Surhu: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1982 Us+: ROADWAY R�nk:L Unpth: 100.00 Ft Wldth: 20.00 Ft TrwNw: 2.000.00 Sa
Work AMlor
Code Cost MiR
INITIAL T�
Network: AGrande � Bnneh: 02440 (White CouA) S�etlon: 10 Surhu: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N987 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L Unpth: 276.00 ft Wldth: 34.00 Ft TruaArea: 9.384.00 Sa
Work Wlor
Code Cost M�
STSS SO Fabe
INITIAL � T�
Matwork: AGrande Bnneh: 02450 � (WhlteleyStreet) � . S�etlon: 10 Surha: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1980 Usec ROADWAY ILnk:L Unpth: 400.00 Ft Width: 36.00 Ft TrwAroa: 14.400.00 Sa
yya� 14Jor
Cod� .COSt MRR
INITIAL � True
NNwork: AGrande Bnneh: 02450 (Whiteley Street) ' 8aetion: 20 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1980 use: ROADWAY Rank:L Unpth: 646.00 Ft Width: � 36.00 Ft Trueaw: 23.256.00 Sa
Work �da
Cotla Cost MiR
INITIAL T�ue
NatwoAc: AGrande Bnnch: 02450 (WhiteleyStreet) 8setlon: 30 SuAau: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1980 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 420.00 Ft Width: 36.00. Ft Trw Aree: 15.120.00 Sa
Work �la
Cod� Cost M8R
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paae 43 of 46
Pavement Database:
INITL4L True
Network: AGrande Bnnch: 02470 �Ilow Lane) Saetlon: 10 Surtau: AC
L.C.D.: 06/Ot/1977 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenptlr 750.00 Ft �Wldfh: 38.00 Ft TrueArea: 28.500.00 Sa
or
W�� Cost MdR
Cods
ST-SS $0 False �
INITWL True �
NaNVOrk: AGrande Bnneh: 02480 (Wllson Court) Sxllon: 10 Surfacs: AC
LC.D.: 06/01N987 �Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lanpth: 140.00 Ft Width: 40.00 Ft TruaAna: 5.600.00 Sa
or
WO� Cost MiR
Coda
ST-SS � Fa1�
INITIAL T�
NelwoAc: AGrande enneh: 02500 (Wood Place) 8eetlon: 10 Surhw: AC �
L.C.D.i O6/01/1964 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Un9th: 714.00 Ft Wldth: 34.00 Ft TmaAna: 24278.00 Sa
Work M�Jor
�� Coat M8R
� INITIAL T�
NNxrak: AG2nde Bnneh: 02510 (Woodland CouA) 8wtion: 10 SurNU: AC
LC.D.: 0&01/1986 Uw: ROADWAY � Rank:L L�npeh: 180.00 Ft Wieth: 38.00 Ft TrueAnc 6.840.00 Sa
or
Work Cost MiR
Coda
STSS � $0 Falae
INITIAL T�
Network: AGrdnde Braneh: 02520 (WOOdland Dnve) S�Won: 10 Surha: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1987 Wa: ROADWAY Rank:L Ls�Wth: 404.00 Ft Width: 38.00 Ft 7rueAroa: 15.352.00 Sa
r
Coda C� M�dR
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL T�
Nstwork: AGrdnde Bnnch: 02520 (Woodland Drive) Swtlon: 20 SuAaa: AC
L.C.D.: O6/Ot/1975 Uae: ROADWAY Rank:L Lsnyth: 2.557.00 Ft Wldth: 40.00 Ft 7ru�Ma:102.280.00 Sa
or
��a Cost M�BR
ST-SS SO Falae �
1NITWL True
NatwoAc: AGrende Bwneh: 02520 (Woodlantl Drive) . S�etlon: 30 SuA�a: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1985 Uae: ROADWAY Renk:L LanOth: 180.00 Ft YV�dN: 36.00 Ft TrueAroe: 6.480.00 Sa
or
W�� Cost MiR
Code
STSS $0 False
INITIAL True
Natwork: AGtande Braneh: 02530 lZagate Way) Saetlon: 10 Surfaa: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01N982 Uae: ROADWAY Ranki L Unpth: 997.00� Ft M�Wth: 36.00 Ft TrueArac 35.676.00 Sa
work Myor
Coda �� M&R
STSS $0 Falae
INITIAL True
�ate:o3io�izooe Work History Report paqe 44 of 46
Pavemenf Database:
Natwork: AGrande Brsnch: 03000 (Elm Street Comminry Center Drivewa» Saedo^: 10 SuMu: AC
L.C.D.: O6IO1I1980 Uae: PARKING Rank:P Lanyth: 465.00 Ft Width: 27.00 Ft TrueArea: 12.555.00 Sa
Wo� MaJor
Code Cost MiR
ST-SS $0 False
INITIAL True
NeMrork: AGrande Bnneh: 2025 (SWdightLane) SseUon: 10 surfau: AAC
L.C.D.: 07/01/1999 Uae: ROADWAY Renk:L Len9ti+� 500.00 Ft Wldth: 32.00 Ft TrueMa: 16.000.00 Sa
WoAc NNJor
Code Cort M6R
INITIAL � Trye i.
NMvork: AGrande Bnneh: 225 (BrittanyAvenue) Seetlon: 10 Surhu: AAC
L.C.D.: 07/01/1999 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L Lenpth: 250.00 Ft W�dth: 32.00 Ft TrueAtee: 8.000.00 So
Work M��
Cods CO� M�
INITIAL $0 True
Natwork: AGrande Bnneh: 335 (Cartington Place) Sxtlon: 10 SuA�ea: AAC
L.C.D.: 07/01/1999 Use: ROADWAY Rank:L UnyM: 250.00 Ft W�dth: 32.00 Ft TrueAm: 8.000.00 Sa
Work IMIw
Code �� M�
INITUIL � T� �
Nelwork: AG2nde Bnneh: 50010 (Ash Streel Bathrooms Parking LM) 8eetlon: 10 SuMu: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1992 Use: PARKING Rsnk:P Lenpth: 150.00 Ft YVldth: 60.00 Ft 7rueArec 9.000.00 Sa
Work °f
Code Cost M8R
ST-SS SO False
INITIAL True
NNwork: AG2nde eronch: 50020 (Car Corral PaAcing Lot(LOwer)) S�etlon: 10 Surha: AC
L.C.D.: 06/01N987 U�e: PARKING Rank:P L�npth: 320.00 Ft Width: 80.00 Ft 7rusAres: 19200.00 Sa
Work MWor
��a Cort MiR
INITIAL - T�
Nwwork: AGrende Bnnch: 50030 (Car Comal Parkinp Lot(Upperp 8setlon: 10 SuAau: AC
� L.C.o.: O6/01/1992 Uw: PARKING Rank:P LwnpM: 240.00 Ft W�dth. 60.00 Ft 7ruaAna: 14.400.00 Sa
Wo'Ic MeJor
�s Cost MiR
INITIAL T�
�
NMVOrk: AGrande Braneh: 50040 (city Hall Parkinp La) 8aetlon: 10 surfaa: AC
? I.C.D.: O6/01/1980 Use: PARKING Rank:P L�npN: 310.00 Ft Width: 70.00 Ft TrusAm: 21700.00 a
Work M�lor
Code Cost M8R
INITIAL � T�
Network: AG2nde Branoh: 50050 (CaPOreUon Yard Parkinp Loq S�etlon: 10 Surhu: AC
{ L.C.D.: O6/01N972 Uae: PARKING Rank:PLanyM: 250.00 Ft Width: 72.00 Ft 7rueAree: 78.000.00 Sa
� Myor
Work Cori M8R
� Cod�
� ST-SS � 50 Falae
; INITIAL True
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report Paqe 45 of 46
Pavement Database:
NNwork: AGrande Bronch: 50060 (Elm Street Comm.Center Parking Lot) Seetlon: 10 Surfau: AC
LC.D.: O6/01/1982 We: PARKING Rank:PLanpth: 211.00 Ft Width: 75.00 Ft 7ruaNsa: 15.825.00 Sa
yyo* Myor
��o Cost M8R
INITIAL True
Netxrork: AGrande Bnneh: 50070 (Ololhan PJley Paiking Lot) 8eetlon: 10 Surtsca: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1992 Use: PARKING Rank:P LenOth: 450.00 Ft WitlN: � 120.00 Ft 7rueArea: 54.000.00 Sa
WoAc M�lo� .
Code Cort MiR
STSS $0 Felse
INITIAL Ttue
Network: AGrande Broneh: 50080 (SoW Complez Parking lot(West)) Saetlon: 10 SuAan: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1982 Use: PARKING Renk:P Lanpth: 388.00 Ft Width: 88.00 Ft TrueMa: 34.144.00 Sa
yyo� Myor
Cod� Cost M8R
ST-SS SO Fa1�
INITIAL TNB
Nahvork: AGrende Bnnch: 50090 ISoto ComPlex Parkirg Lot(Eastp � S�etlon: 10 Surf�u: AC �
LC.D.: O6/01/1982 Uae: PARKING Rank:P L�npth: � 350.00 Ft Width: 59.00 Ft TruaArea: 20.650.00 Sa
Wo� Msjor
Cod� � Cost M8R
ST-SS SO False
INITIAL True
Netrvork: AGrande Broneh: 50100 (Women's Gub PaAting Lot(Lower)) � SMlon: 10 SuAaa: AC
L.C.D.: O6/01/1975 Use: PARKING Rank:P l.�npth: 200.00 Ft Widfh: 200.00 Ft TrueArea: 40.000.00 Sa
yya� Myor
Coda Cost MdR
INITIAL T�
NeMrork: AGrende Broneh: 50110 (Women's CIUD PaAcing LM(Upper)) Seetlon: 10 Surhu: AC
L.C.D.: O6/OtN985 Uae: ROADWAY Rsnk:P LenpM: 400.00 Ft WIdN: 60.00 Ft TrusNw: 24.000.00 Sa
Work MaJor
Codo � Cort M�'
INITIAL T�
Natwork: AGrende Branch: 902 (Hampton Plece) Saetlon: 10 BuAau: AAC
L.C.D.: 07/Ot/1999 Use: ROADWAY Renk:L Lanpth: 250.00 Ft Wldth: 30.00 Ft TnuMa: 7.500.00 Sa
Work Malor
Cods ��n M8R '�,
INITIAL SO True
� ' _: ._ -__. -------_.. . . . . .._ -_--�
Date:03/01/2005 Work History Report paae 46 of 46
Pavement Database:
Summary:
Seetlon AraaTOfal ThlcknsuAVp e ness �
Work DascripUOn Count (SqFU UN (�°)
Complete ReconsWCtlon-A 4 155,134•00 .00 .00
DefaultConstructlon 35p� 13,438,247.88
Initlal ConsWcfion 45 �,959•� .00 .00
Miao SurfaGng 3 269,038.00 � .00 .00
New ConsWCtlon 1 89,372.00
Overlay-AC Structural g 679,384.00 .00 .00
� Surface Course-AC 1 15,120.00 .00
• �_p� 144,000.00 .00
Surface Reconstruc6o 1
Surface Seal-Rejuvenatlng � � 18,880.00 •�
SurfaceTreatment-SlurrySeal �gq 5,134,272.00 .00 .00
!
i
�
i
1
i
i1
I
�
!
i
i
i
Apper�a E —�reet Ne4w�o�7Ane Map
I
,I
i
�
�
�
,i
;
I
�
I
;
i
,
;
d W U q W �ic, � �y, �
.�
~ p !d � �� �f � YS! 1 �Y ��Y,,��!�`�,,CI 1 II � � tl! � ��� 1 � C •r
!�!l4���o�� ' "`� ����lli���.�l�i��n�ili� � �''�I��"+� ��� i •
�7 > /iii3iitl/ �� .� � I
/l666ltlHtlf 0! dOStllW�tl�iHitl MHl�M[ti��lptlilM i!lC�i�/��! a :u�an•uivaauriew� !CW{/Upyy I
.�
� qj�ye y� �� F� '�� e � u{y�� ���s �Y��i �f� '�ydY ��!i �s� tl �i �� - �I '
S���ii�����a���Y��31�!!l��i���� i� OJ���aL��� I
eaeaaeareaae ay mae � �uuu�eemo�wnu� �eeweq�raw�me eiee�ea weeaaEew� mueume�
O '" p � 1� I! �����i � � "��i ���� e's.. �e�.i� �� 1 i � �� y y i � o
<i��li�i. '" " ����� s p O��W�� 4�t!
e�:tne� a:ew+++a��+ew eawru�wwreaee�meuerww�awaot i+iaea aserea ae+twea �re�eee
� � W
•\
A �
` �
1� ��9� . "� ,� s � a
°° � + �l..� � g J °'� Q � E � .
16 �II � � '�"+ � s ¢
u � � �'i °�. : � �� z � � '"
' � a p � � �
m ��
� � n
�
�
` � 1
m � .. �1
�� q��_,• ,� m
�
R� , i ,,�,
�
� d
u� 3 M �
! � �� x \
� � c� �
.� = N �
� � �
I � / �
� •• ' ' /
( � � (` � �
�� o �
W i J I
� � � �,
� � 1 b '
LL
���
� o� , �
� o �
~ '�9� O ��r���. } y ��� ' �
ti 0 , y
y �;: d
� ; �3�Pd� a �
i
� � � ���/,��°�00 /�°�7 + � � �
����l�Il�l�n,�t �
e aa ' � a � w w c� , x .. �
Apperxlbc F — Pavernent Management Ir�ection Form
II
'i
i
i
�
i �
I
;
,� C1TY oF pavement Management
� � ^ •
Inspection Form
s9 �e Date:
� LU/,5+ OBISPO COU�SY' �
From: «From »
Street Name: «Street Name»
To: «ro»
Designation: «Classification» Zone: «Zone»
DISTRESS INFORMATION UNIT LOW MED HICaH
01 Alligator Cracking SF
02 Bleeding SF
03 Block Cracking SF
04 Bumps/Sags FT
OS Corrugation SF
O6 Depression FT
07 Edge Cracking FT
08 Joint Reflection Cracking SF
�Q LongitudinaVTransverse FT
Cracking
11 Patch/Utility Cut SF
12 Polished Aggregate SF
13 Pothole #
15 Rutting SF
16 Shoving SF
17 Slippage Cracking Sf
19 Weathering Raveling SF
Apperxl'a G — FHWA Furx:tional Str+ee�Cla9sifica�tion Map
. ♦
♦
•
� ,
•^
. � + �
��
� � � �
� � �� �� ����/�j
+ r '' ��, j �l
;��+�,�,r �r
,� �;/ ,
E �� �
I� �� ;
` � r'. �
�!' � �,��+� � �,
�� � � '�� i��.��� n;�� �
,% '"�r�l. �
�� � �
� � � .�
� � � r
� � �� �� �
�� _� /, � ��1�� �n
/�� � ci� 1
� �
� ` '' '� - i �iF� , .—'-_=-_
L� , �41Yi�'i��-#�-"��.,--�� ,r"�'
��� � �
Apper�d'oc H — &s Roube and Trtx:k Roube
• ��
�
< < � �"
II�� ''� . �
� � ,
.�� w �� � �
� � �� � �
�-1 .,...�.� .�
��� � '�',., �,�r�:�
r� , . ,
�. ��, . _
� ��` �
'°' � .��-
�e ;, . �,,� �
r �p
�� \�►-��.+� .✓���t ��
,_ ��� ������,iR��� �������1
����� �,f� ��`�
rl!'••...Cr� � � ° \`
7h �� � � �� � .
�f� ��
����� w� y
,, ��� �\
'�`�� ��l���' �5 :
. � . '' E I :;- i � �� ,
i! I � �L �;,�"'. 1 �.�,� - •
J� � , U �a � ��� . . -
W.
,
/
' ��
�
I��� � ,
n� � � �
•,t� �► � �,� �
� � � �
;� :�� � ���
��-� •r �'',•► ,�Ir�
.ia r� "� ,`" �+ '
'�� \ ���r A
�ie . . � , � ��� � ��=
� - ♦
'��iE�� � �.��►•�!'�'-�
�`,•�;i�-♦ �'����+�'�'��
���'!�� �►�` ��►�►.�'
r��-�•�C.� � A ° �
�I� �r � � �� �
�,�, �f� �
����� �� �
,\,, ���i �\
'��� �il���
� � . i� E I -�. � � �� , �:- .
;i� � � ^ wY �� � �` -
..:� - .
:J� � � �' `
w. �
Appendix I — Pavement Management Plan
Year-to-Year Maps
i
_ _ _ �
/
' ��
�
�
e 1 a
I���, � ' � � / t
..^� �, .� Q
� , � c�� � '�
�:_ .,�1 �
�� � � � �'',•► �1r�� :
, � .� �
o����� .�- �� � ��� � � -
�. � _.�
�� � > > - �� ,� ��'- � .
����� �.:\�_.��•,;���►
---_:�� ���•�:���� `�� �+�'�i�
_�' �, �\ 1s� ��`i►�'
��.�C� '�__� � ��
y �� � �, �:; �
ai. �I'� �
�����
��� ,iA�' " ^\
,
�i'� E ' ��l��;r;r
,'. .. � � ..� ' � .
�
'�. � �� :� � �.
� 1 �� ,,,,� _ ��,�.� �
�� . . , � ,
� w.
. ,
/
� ��
�
�
II�� ,� � � / ,
��t� w � � �
� � � �� � �
,, � •�
�
��, � � ��� ��� ,
o��+ � � ��9 � _
�. � _.�
„� ,�•_
���
. � , .
\� �
� �
� �, �_..�� • 1l
��.`- --,-\ �si�`���_-I ���+,�+►�i*
i�_ ���►'' ��±•�
■���.� � '� ���
��M `
���� � ��I'� � �\�, c
�4�,.���
� , ,
��� ��i' � \
.
'���� �il��� � =
� . '! E I :;� � � �;�
I � w� i;,'�"". _ ����� �
J1 i
�
��„��u��
. ,
' ��
�
�
���� ;� � - � � ,
�.,I � �� � � � 1
.�e , ✓ �,� ,. .
� � �
_.� ._,r.,� ./
, 1�' �
� �� � ''�'' :� ,
. r .+ . �•►� .. ,�,�
v � � -<� �� •►
_ .� \ _I�
�� �•-
�,
f�� '. � ��w�� �,,,q ��`�� � .
_-� ♦
� -
• t`� � ♦ Dt
_��� �'����--��ss� �,,,�►� �
■. �� �,-
r��•,w � � ��� ,���
� �"= ��I�
��.��I �� .
��� ��
�,� ;.:�� � _
'�i�� ��il�t= �
c Y � � .
. � . ,I` E I .w � � �� �
�
il� 1 � ; . �: .�;,.�' �"- _ ��,�� �
J� � �
w. .
,
� �
�
�
II�� � / ,
�� , � �� �� � . �
•,�t� �► � _ . �,� . � � �
� `_ .� � �
, � � � ;.
� �� ; .� , �''�•► . ,��� ,
��� _, `�°� � -
� \ _.�
��� , � � ��.� ��• �
'�IiiE�� �-��-. -�"�'-��'`��''�
�►,••�•1�.- ♦ � ��'�iw
—�' �, �►s� �'�+.,f
r ,
'�`".� .i �� , A ;�� .
71� w�rr �i�� �\
,���.��� -
�`� '�A�' `` � - _
� � � -
'�i�� ���il����°�� � -
� . �;: E � �� � � ��
i � ..,
;!:� � w�� :a '�` - ��'
.�.� � <
.� _. ��� , , , . �
li � t � �� "
,
/
' � !
��
II�� ,,� �
�� � � �
��� , � � �� �
� ;�, � _ ,,, ��
_ _ � ��yl�
��� � ��� ��� �
���r� � �, �����
o� � r=
�� ;; �
� - � .�
r �. / �'�'!�
����� ���.�� ���
�,i` ���,.��-.--� �.��
�� --��\�� ����t� ���� i*
� � � �� �- �
�It-w�� �������� �� .
'yli ��irr ��� � �,�: �
- f��
��,����.
��� �������A��� `" � _ - -
'� � � �����,,,"il����' � : � .
� . ii : E � �� � � �.,":� �-.,
''� I �. �� �� ""' - � -
;�� .� ����
J� �� W:,.
,
. r
9�8� I
I
�
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ¢
CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the m�tYin theclCounc I
City of Arroyo Grande on TUESDAY, MARCH 8, 2005 at 7:00 p•
Chambers, 215 E. Branch Street, Arroyo Grande, to consider the following item:
REQUEST TO CHANGE STREET NAME:
COURTLAND STREET TO
NORTH COURTLAND STREET AND SOUTH COURTLAND STREET
The City Council will consider a proposal to change the name of the portion of
Cortioln of Corur.tland Street sout of East GrandtAvenuehto 'South Courtland Steet
P
No house or business address numbers would�change.
j Based on Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Section 12.04.060, change of street names
� shall be approved by Resolution of the City Council. Public hearings must be held by
j both the Planning Commission and the City Council. The Planning Commission
� considered the issue at its regular meeting on February 15, 2005 and has made a
� recommendation to the City Council.
Any person affected or concerned about the proposal may submit written comments to
the Community Developof or oDeositioneto t e p oposaCat he timellof the heanng ppear
and be heard in support PP
Any person interested in the proposal can contact the Community �elephoneeat
(805) 473-5420 duri g normal bus'nerss h urs (8:00 a.m. t 5a00 p.m.�or by
If you challenge an item in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone' else raised at the publiC hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Failure of any person to receive the notice shall not constitute grounds for any court to
invalidate the action of the legislative body for which She notice was given.
`
�I,C R.�Z.�----
Kelly We mo , City Clerk
Publish 1T, The Tribune, Friday, February 25, 2005
PRROyp
o� �,p
� INCORPORATED �
° "' MEMORANDUM
� JULY 10. IY11 *
c,��FORN�P
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROB STRONG COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR�
BY: RYAN FOSTER, ASSISTANT PLANNER �j
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RENAMING COURTLAND STREET TO NORTH
COURTLAND STREET AND SOUTH COURTLAND STREET
DATE: MARCH 8, 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council adopt the attached Resolution renaming Courtland
Street to North Courtland Street for the portion north of East Grand Avenue and South
Courtland Street for the portion south of East Grand Avenue.
FUNDING:
No fiscal impact.
DISCUSSION:
Backaround
Courtland Street runs north/south between Newport Avenue and Ash Street parallel to
Oak Park Boulevard. Unlike other roads that cross East Grand Avenue (Elm Street,
Halcyon Road), Courtland Street does not have a north/south designation, distinguishing
the portion north of East Grand Avenue from the portion south of East Grand Avenue.
The lack of a north/south designation on Courtland Street has become an issue due to
recently approved developments (Jasmine Place and Courtland Senior Apartments). As
these projects move towards completion, they need to be assigned street addresses that
are consistent with the City's addressing system. Consistent addressing is vital to
ensuring accurate and timely emergency response to all properties in the City. If both of
these developments are to be addressed consistently with adjacent properties, they
would both be assigned addresses in the 200 bbck of Courtland Street. Without
designation of a North Courtland Street and a South Courtland Street, this will not be
possible, as it would create duplicate street addresses in the City.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for Council consideration:
■ Adopt the attached Resolution renaming Courtland Street to North Courtland
Street and South Courtland Street; or
■ Do not adopt the attached Resolution; or
■ Provide direction to staff. f
�
�I�
—. ,
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE RENAMING COURTLAND STREET TO
NORTH COURTLAND STREET AND SOUTH COURTLAND
STREET
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande has recommended
that the City �Council rename Courtland Street to North Courtland Street and South
Courtland Street; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande has considered this
recommendation request at a public hearing on March 8, 2005 in accordance with the
Municipal Code of the City of Arroyo Grande; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds, after due study and deliberation, that the following
circumstances exist:
1 . Consistent addressing of properties is vital to ensure accurate and
timely emergency response to all properties within the City of
Arroyo Grande.
2. Changing Courtland Street to North Courtland Street and South
Courtland Street is necessary to maintain consistent addressing
within the City of Arroyo Grande.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande hereby renames Courtland Street to North Courtland Street for the portion north
of East Grand Avenue and South Courtland Street for the portion south of East Grand
Avenue.
On motion by Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and by the
following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 8�" day of March 2005.
;
- —
RESOWTION NO.
PAGE 2 of 2
TONY FERRARA, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
� STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
i
APPROVED AS TOPORM:
! TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
i
!
�
i
!
;
I
1
i
I
1
;
;
� __ _—__
1
9.b.
O� pRROYpc .
� INCONPONATE Y=
* ,,,�. ,,. ,,,, * MEMORANDUM
C���FORN�'
To: crrr couNCi� S
FROM: ROB STRONG, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR��
BY: �j�• KELLY HEFFERNON,ASSOCIATE PLANNER
SUBJECT: CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING —CONSIDERATION OF GEWERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT 04003; HOUSING ELEMENT AMENDMENT
DATE: MARCH 8, 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Council:
1. Open the public hearing and receive public comment on the proposed
amendments to the Housing Element; and
2. Adopt a Resolution approving General Plan Amendment 04-003.
FUNDING:
There is no initial financial impact to the City. Community Development Department staff
worked with the Local Housing Task Force, Planning Commission and City Council to
formulate amendments for the Califomia Department of Housing and Community
Development (HCD) review. After State certification, staff may seek consultant assistance
to prepare changes to the Affordable Housing Ordinance and agreements to comply with
SB 1818 and other State mandates.
DISCUSSION:
Backaround
The Ciiy Council considered proposed amendments and clarifications to the 2003 Housing
Element on February 22, 2005 and conveyed suppoit of stafPs recommendation (the staff
report is included as Attachment 1 for reference). However, in recognizing the complexity
of SB 1818 and its potential impact to Housing Element policies, the item was continued to
allow further research into the new legislation and receive clarification on the League of
Califomia Cities' position conceming SB 1818. As a result, staff consufted with both a
member of the League of Califomia Cities' Housing Policy Committee and League of
Califomia Cities' staff assigned to state housing legislation.
Leaaue of Calffomia Cities and SB 1818
The goal of the League of Califomia Cities' Housing, Community and Economic
Development (HCED) Policy Committee is to increase the production of new housing,
while protecting local control. The Committee is working in cooperation with the Califomia
Builders' Industry Association (CBIA) to draft legislation that will give landowners and
builders certainty of housing density while helping cities achieve their housing goals. The
draft legislation also intends to replace the current Regional Housing Needs Assessment
ciTV couNCi� j
HOUSING ELEMENT AMENDMENT ADOPTION
MARCH 8,2005
PAGE 2
(RHNA) process with a more regional approach that would allow cities and counties to
plan for their own growth based on available resources.
A copy of the draft proposal is included as Attachment 2. Under the proposal, cities would
work with the Council of Govemments (COG) to identify a supply of land to address needs
for a 20-year period. Each city would then prepare a specific plan for that land to address
a 10-year period. The Housing Spec�c Plan (HSP) would include the components
currently required, including distribution of land use, transportation/circulation,
infrastructure planning, a public facilities and financing program and a phasing component.
The plan should be updated each five (5) years and would not be subject to referendum
for the first five (5) years. The idea being that the HSP was developed with community
input and thus be protected from initiative and referendum for a set period of time.
A General Plan sub-committee of the HCED Policy Committee is meeting with CBW ,
representatives to analyze the draft legislation. One of the items being debated is how
related infrastructure would be financed to accommodate the project housing needs. The
HCED Committee hopes to finalize their recommendations within the next few months.
Therefore, it is unlikely that new legislation could be approved by the State until much later
in the year. The plan would also not replace the existing Housing Element until July 1,
2008.
With regard to SB 1818, the League of California Cities provided a copy of an analysis of
SB 1818 from special counsel and the legislative summary, both of which appear to
support staff's interpretation that the density bonus provisions will not impact the City's
inclusionary housing requirements. A copy of each is attached. However, as stated at the
Febnaary 22, 2005 meeting, this is an issue thaf will likely require additional clarification
and potentially court interpretation.
As stated at the February 22, 2005 meeting, the information regarding SB 1818 was noted
because it could potentially cause the proposed affordable housing inclusionary
requirements to trigger additional density bonuses and concessions beyond that proposed
for a given project. This would occur on projects of certain sizes if the inclusionary units
were considered in the awarding of a density bonus. Staff's initial interpretation is that the
density bonus would only apply to affordable units that the developer voluntarily proposes.
Therefore, it would only be for units above that required by the inclusionary regulations.
If this is interpretation is upheld, it will make the legislation much easier to implement. If
this interpretation changes due to additional State guidelines or court rulings, or 'rf
legislative changes occur, staff may recommend revisiting the inclusionary requirements at
that time. Since any such changes are not likely to occur in the immediate futuroe, if
Council is in agreement with the proposed provisions of the Housing Element, staff
recommends it be approved and later reevaluated in response to potential impacts
ident�ed above.
arr couNCi�
HOUSING ELEMENT AMENDMENT ADOPTION
MARCH 8,2005
PAGE3
ALTERNATIVES:
The following altematives are provided for CounciPs considecation:
1. Approve the Planning Commission's recommendation and adopt the Resolution;
2. Modify the Planning Commission's recommendation and adopt the Resolution; or
3. Do not adopt the Resolution and provide direction to staff.
Attachments:
1. City Council Staff Report of February 22, 2005 (less attachments)
2. Draft Overview of New Housing Oppo�tunity Element and Specific Housing Plan,
dated October 16, 2004
3. Memorandum regarding SB 1818 from Betsy Strauss, Special Counsel for the
League of Califomia Cities to Dan Carrigg, Legislative Representative for the
League of Califomia Cities, dated October 15, 2004
4. SB 1818 Analysis
S:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENiWROJECTSISPECIAL�2003 HOUSING ELEMEN7LLocal Housing Task ForceV�Aeetings103-08-
0.5 CC Me&ingW3-OB-05 HE Amandment.dx � '
I
�
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE AMENDING THE HOUSING ELEMENT
OF THE GENERAL PLAN (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
04-003)
WHEREAS, Section 65302(c) of the California Government Code requires all cities and
counties to prepare a General Plan Housing Element; and
WHEREAS, the City of Arroyo Grande adopted the 2003 Housing Element on November
25, 2003; and
WHEREAS, the City received a letter dated December 30, 2004 from the State of
California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) stating that it
finds the 2004 revisions to the adopted 2003 Housing Element in full compliance with
housing element law and will certify upon City adoption and re=submittal; and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission of the
City of Arroyo Grande on February 1, 2005, at which time all interested persons were
given the opportuniry to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the information and public
testimony presented at duly noticed public hearings held on February 22, 2005 and
March 8, 2005 and the information contained in the proposed amendments to the
adopted 2003 Housing Element and staff reports; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed amendments to the 2003
Housing Element in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
and has determined that the negative declaration previously adopted for the 2003
Housing Element is adequate for the proposed amendments and therefore no
additional environmental review is necessary.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande does hereby adopt amendments to the 2003 Housing Element; copies of the
Housing Element, as amended, are on file in the Community Development and
Administrative Services Departments. Said action is taken based on the following
findings of fact:
1. The amendments to the Housing Element are consistent with the goals,
objectives, policies and programs of the General Plan and will not result in any
internal inconsistencies within the General Plan.
2. The amendments to the Housing Element will not adversely affect the public
health, safety and welfare because it will help the City achieve housing for all
economic segments of the community.
3. Based on the initial study and all the comments received, the potential
environmental impacts of the Housing Element are less than significant.
�
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member ,
and by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this day of 2005.
I
''
I
I
--- --- — �
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE3
TONY FERRARA, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
�I
I
� TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
I
I
I
;
,
I
i
l
i
's
�
�
,
1
�
�
�
�
,
,
a
�
__ . �
�
o� PRROVO� ATTACHMENT 1 ;
�k
� 1NCORPORATE �
O
# Nn� +o, �a+� * MEMORANDUM
c,�/FORN�P .
To: cinr couNCi�
FROM: ROB STRONG, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
gy; KELLY HEFFERNON,ASSOCIATE PI.ANNER
SUBJECT: GENFRAL PLAN AMENDMENT 04-003; HOUSING ELEMENT
AMENDMENT
DATE: FEBRUARY 22, 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Council:
1. Open the public hearing and receive public comment on the proposed
amendments to the Housing Element; and
2. Adopt a Resolution approving General Plan Amendment 04-003.
FUNDING:
There is no initial financial impact to the City. Community Development Department staff
worked with the Local Housing Task Force, Planning Commission and City Council to
formulate amendments for Housing and Community Development (HCD) review. After
State certification, staff may seek consultant assistance to prepare changes to the
j Affordable Housing Ordinance and agreements to comply with SB 1818 and other State
� mandates.
� DISCUSSION:
iBacks�round
; In March of 2004, the City received a letter from the State Department of Housing and
i Community Development (HCD) outlining deficiencies in the City's Housing Element. In
response to HCD comments, the City Council considered amendments to the Housing
Element on September 28, 2004 (see Attachment 1 for meeting minutes). The
amendments involved expanding the Housing OppoRunity Sites Inventory (Table 15)
through a tiered density framework and supplemental sites, updating the City's Mixed Use
districts to allow higher densities, clarifying the City's permit processing timeline, reducing
I' govemmental constraints for disabled persons, strengthening the City's commitment for
farmworker housing, tightening schedules for implementation of particular goals and
policies, and basic clean-up. Council discussion focused on concems of including certain
properties within the Housing Opportunity Sites Inventory and projected densifies. The
General Plan Amendment was referred back to the Planning Commission with direction to
delete the Arroyo Linda Crossroads Spec�c Plan Area from the Housing Opportunity Sites
' Inventory and identify additional aRernative affordable housing sites to meet the City's
CITY COUNCIL
HOUSING ELEMENT AMENDMENT ADOPTION
FEBRUARY 22,2005
PAGE 2
Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) within other mixed-use or muftiple-family
residential districts.
During October and November of 2004, the City corresponded with HCD regarding
cert�cation of the Housing Element. Based on existing land use and zoning, the City
demonstrated a sufficient inventory of land area to meet the City's RHNA numbers for
lower income housing and Table 15 was subsequently revised (see Attachment 2). HCD
followed up with a review letter, dated December 30, 2004, of the City's proposed
revisions to the Housing Element (see Attachment 3). As stated in the second paragraph,
HCD finds the proposed 2004 revisions to the adopted 2003 Housing Element in full
compliance with housing element law and will certify upon City adoption and re-submittal.
The proposed amendments are presented as Exhibit 'A' of the Resolution.
Housina Element Amendments/Clarifications
One HCD suggestion, contained in the third paragraph of the letter, is that the City monitor
the effect of the Conditional Use Permit requirement for new multi-family development and
consider removing or mitigating this requirement. An aRemative might be a Minor Use
Permit and/or Architectural Review Committee approval.
Another policy issue that requires clarification prior to adoption is the City's Inclusionary
Housing program. The attached matrix is a simplfied comparative analysis of current
code, the 2001 General Plan, the 2003 Housing Element Update and proposed 2004-05
Housing Element Amendments (see Attachment 4). Staff recommends that�he proposed
2004-05 Housing Element Amendment policies be implemented by subsequent revision to
Municipal Code Chapter 16.80, the Affordable Housing Requirements.
During the February 1, 2005 Planning Commission public hearing, several Commissioners
requested that staff review the Density Bonus regulations outlined in Program A.11-1 on
page 9 and 10 of the 2003 Housing Element (see Attachment 2 for meeting minutes).
After meeting with Home Building Association representative Jerry Bunin (also a former
member of the Local Housing Task Force) and City Attomey Tim Carmel, staff detertnined
that SB 1818, adopted by the State in September 2004, supercedes the poirrts outlined in
Program A.11-1 (see Attachment 5 for letter from Jerry Bunin dated February 22, 2005
and discussion of SB 1818 below). Therefore, staff recommends the following additional
change: Delete the text of A.11-1 on pages 9 and 10 and insert the following:
"The City shall modiy the Affordable Housing and Density Bonus provisions of the
Municipal Code to implement the adopted Housing Element Amendments and SB
1818, subject to environmental constraints per CEQA.
Responsible agency/department: Community Development
Timeframe: 2005
Funding: General Fund (City initiated
Development Code Amendment)
S:�GOMMUNfTY_DEVELOPMENTPROJECTSI.SPECWU2003_HOUSING ELEMEN7LLocal Houaing Taek ForceWleethgs�02-22-05
CC MeetingW2-22-05 HE MiendmeM.doc
�
�
� aTx couNCi�
� HOUSING ELEMENT AMENDMENT ADOPTION
i FEBRUARY 22,2005
I PAGE 3
�I Expected Outcome: Increased densities and incentives
to enable more affordability and to
comply with State law."
It should be recognized that these 2004-05 Housing Element Amendments would NOT
assure or achieve the RHNA goals for actual production of affordable units. Production
would need to almost double and be composed of more than half very low and low-income
units for the City to approach such goals.
In stafPs opinion, it is unrealistic if not infeasible to expect very low-income households in
ownership housing. Even low-income households will require assistance to occupy either
rental or ownership housing given current costs. City, RDA and non-profit housing
production should focus on very low and low-income rentals or low and moderate-income
ownership units.
Upon further review of the proposed amendments to the Housing Element after Planning
Commission consideration, staff determined that a clarification is needed regarding
affordability restrictions required for projects located within the RDA area. Policy F.1-7 has
subsequently been added, which states 'The City shall assure that at least 15% of all units
constructed within the RDA project area shall be affordable units and at least 40% of those
are restricted for very low income."
SB 1818
SB 1818 made significant changes to the State's density bonus law, which went into effect
on January 1, 2005. Clearly, it makes the approval process for projects with affordable
housing extremely complex and reduces the City's control over many issues involving the
project. Many of its provisions are confusing and are undergoing eutensive review and
analysis by cities, counties and the building industry. The legislation requires cities and
counties to modify their ordinances to bring them into conformance with new State
mandates. The previous law allowed for a 25% density bonus when housing projects
provided between 10-20% of the units affordable. In addition, cities and counties needed
to provide at least one "concession," such as financial assistance or a reduction in
development standards. The new law considerably reduces the amount of units that a
developer must provide in order to receive a density bonus and requires cities and
counties to provide between one to three concessions, depending upon the percentage of
affordable units that the developer provides. It also imposes a new land donation rule and f
statewide parking standards. The major provisions of the law are provided below. f
• Density Bonus. The number of affordable units that a developer must provide
in order to receive a density bonus is significantly reduced from prior law. If at
least 5% of the units are affordable to Very Low income households or 10% of
the units are affordable to Low income households, then the project is eligible
for a 20% density bonus. If 10% of the condominium or planned development
units are affordable to Moderate income households, then the project is eligible
to receive a 5% density bonus. In addition, there is a sliding scale that requires:
f
S:�COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENIIPROJECTSISPECIAL�2003 HOUSING ELEMENTLLocal Housirg Taqk ForceNAeetings102-22-05 �
CC Meeting�02-22-05 HE MiendmeM.doc �
1
�
� ciTr couNCi�
� HOUSING ELEMENT AMENDMENT ADOPTION
� FEBRUARY 22,2005
PAGE4
- An addition °
al 2.5/o density bonus for each additional increase of 1% Very
Low income units above the initial 5% threshold;
- A density increase of 1.5% for each additional 1% increase in Low income
units above the initial 10% threshold; and
- A 1% density increase for each 1% increase in Moderate-income units
above the initial 10% threshold.
These bonuses reach a maximum density bonus of 35% when a project
provides 11% Very Low income units, 20% Low-income units, or 40%
Moderate-income units. Therefore, it is important to note that as a resutt of
these density bonus requirements, the City's inclusionary requirements may
trigger an increase in density allowed beyond the City's density bonus.
• Continued Affordability. The continued affordabiliiy requirements for Very
Low and Low-income units have not changed. However, the requirements for
Moderate-income condominium and PUD units have changed significantly. The
new law spec�es that the city or county must ensure that the initial occupants of
Moderate-income units meet the income qualifications. However, upon resale
of the units, the seller retains the down payment, the value of any
improvements, and the sellers proportionate share of appreciation. The ciry or
county recaptures its proportionate share of appreciation and those funds must =
be used within three years to promote Lower or Moderate income home
ownership. It is unclear whether these units must be sold at market rate or if a
city or county can limit appreciation. This may require changes to the City's
affordable housing agreements in the future.
�
• Concessions and Incentives. Cities and counties must grant more
"concessions or incentives" reducing development standards, depending on the
percentage of affordable units provided. "Concessions and incentives" include
reductions in zoning standards, other development standards, design
requirements, mixed use zoning, and any other incentive that would reduce
costs for the developer. Any project that meets the minimum criteria for a
density bonus is entitled to one concession from the local govemment agency,
increasing up to a maximum of three concessions depending upon the amount
of affordable housing provided. For example:
- For projects that provide either 5% of the units affordable to Very Low
income households, 10% of the units affordable to Lower Income
households, or 10% Moderate Income condominiums, then the developer is
entitled to one concession.
- When the number of affordable units is increased to 10% Very Low income
units, 20% Lower income units, or 20% Moderate-income units, then the �
developer is entitled to two concessions. ;
S:�COMMUNIT`!_DEVELOPMENTPR0.IECTSISPECL4U2�HOUSING ELEMENTLaeal Housing Taak FaceWAeetinga102-22-05 �
CC MeetingW2-22-05 HE Nnendment.doc �
cm couNCi�
HOUSING ELEMENT AMENDMENT ADOPTION
FEBRUARY 22,2005
PAGE 5
- When the number of affordabie units is increased to 15% Very Low income,
30% Lower income, or 30% Moderate-income units, then the number of
concessions is increased to three.
• Waivers and Modifications of "Development StandaMs". A city or county
may not impose a "development standard" that makes it infeasible to construct
the housing developmerrt Hrith the proposed density bonus. In addition to
requesting "incentives and concessions", applicants may request the waiver of
an unlimited number of "development standards" by showing that the waivers
are needed to make the project economically feasible. The bill defines
"development standards" as "site or construction conditions".
• Land Donation. Additional density is available to projects that donate land for
residential use. The land must satisTy all of the following requirements:
a) Have the appropriate general plan designation and zoning to permit
construction of units affordable to Very Low income households in an
amount not less than 10% of the units in the residential development;
b) Be at least one acre in size or of sufficient size to permit development of at
least 40 units; and
c) Be served by adequate public facilities and infrastructure.
The base density bonus is 15%, with increases in 1% increments for each
percentage increase in the units that can be accommodated above the
minimum 10% of the units described in (a), up to a maximum of 35%. The
maximum combined density bonus is 35% under all rules. When the land is
transferred, it must have all of the permits and approvals necessary for the
development of the Very Low income housing units. The land and affordable
units must be subject to deed restrictions ensuring continued affordability. The
city or county may require that the land be transferred to a developer instead of
the city.
• Parking Standards. If a project qualifies for a density bonus, the developer
may request (and the city or county must grant) new parking standards for the
entire development project. The new standards are:
- 0 to 1 bedroom: 1 on-site parking space.
- 2 to 3 bedrooms: 2 on-site parking spaces. F
- 4 or more bedrooms: 2.5 on-site parking spaces. d
€
These numbers are inclusive of guest parking and handicapped parking and �
may be tandem or uncovered. The parking standards may be requested even if r
no density bonus is requested. A copy of SB 1818 is provided as Attachment 7.
I
I
!
f
S:�COMMUNfT`/_DEVELOPMENPPROJECTSISPECIAU2003 HOUSING ELEMENTLLOCaI Housing Task ForceNAeetinps102-22-05 '
CC MeetingW2-22-05 HE Miandment.doc � �
cinr couNCi�
HOUSING ELEMENT AMENDMENT ADOPTION
FEBRUARY 22,2005
PAGE6
ALTERNATIVES:
The following aRematives are provided for Council's consideration:
1. Approve the Planning Commission's recommendation and adopt the Resolution;
2. Modify the Planning Commission's recommendation and adopt the Resolution; or
3. Do not adopt the Resolution and provide direction to staff.
Attachments:
1. City Courrcil Meeting Minutes of September 28, 2004
2. Housing Element Table 15 - Revised
3. Letter from Calffomia Department of Housing and Community Development dated
December 30, 2004
4. Comparative Matrix—Affordable Housing (Inclusionary) Requirements
5. Letter from Jerry Bunin, Govemment Affairs Director of the Home Builders
Association of the Central Coast, dated February 22,2005
6. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of February 1, 2005
7. SB 1818
S:�COMMUNITY_DEVELOPMENiWR0.1ECTS\SPECIAL�2003_HOUSING_ELEMENTLacal Housing Task ForceVU�ingsW2-22-05 `
CC AAeetingW2-22-05 HE Amendmentdoc � ,-
�
October 16, 2004 ATTACHMENT 2
OVERVIEW oA
NEW HOUSING OPPORTLJNITY ELEMENT It��
AND SPECIFIC HOUSING PLAN �
Timelines
• Housing Opportunity Element adopted every ten years in conjunction with the
census. First HOE identifies 20 yeaz land supply. Ten year review makes
adjustments to maintain 20 year land supply.
• Specific Housing Plan adopted every ten years. Identifies sites to meet 10 year
housing need pmjection for all income levels.� '
. Pernussive,not mandatory,review of SHP every five years. Possible revisions to
location and density of sites to meet original 10 yeaz housing need project Z
Housing Opportunity Element
• Replaces Housing Element effective July 1,2008
. All jurisdictions required to adopt HOE by September 1,2008 if sufficient state
funding available
• Mandatory components(see section 65650)—one mandatory component is
idenrificarion of land for residential use to accommodate needs over twenty yeaz
period(within sphere of influence). Another mandatory component is Specific
Housing Plan.
. HOE reviewed every ten years. Maintain 20-yeaz land supply.
• LAFCO laws must accommodate desi�ation of 20-year land supply.
• Land use designations on land within 20-year land supply but not within SHP are
subject to existing law(legislative body can make changes).
'uri 'ction initiates action ursuant to
; • Within 60 days of adoption of Element,� sdi P
� CCP 860 asking the court to determine validity of Element. Court may not order
building moratorium if Housing Opportunity Element is deternrined to be invalid.
Spec�c Housing Plan
• Sites necessary to meet jurisdiction's 10—yeaz housing needs must be included in
Plan at densities calculated to acltieve housing for all income levels.
� • Mandatory components(see section 65651).
� • SHP adopted every ten years.
• SHP optional review every five years to update plan. Possible changes to location
or sites(see footnote number 1).
'Identification of sites for 10 year housing needs may be challenging for certain communities with
inadequate public improvement infiastructure.
Z Discussion continues about(1)whether the 5-year review should be mandatory or permissive;(2)whether
new growth projec[ions should be made at Uils interval;and(3)the nature of the review.
I
October 16,2004
• Significandy expanded notice to neighbors. Real Estate Discloswe Statement(of
SHP)to prospective purchasers.
Determining 10-yesr Housing Need
. Each jurisdiction"plans for its own."
• Regional housing need deternvned by COG every ten years in accordance with
"Lowenthal"formula as adjusted for job creation projections
. To ensure region's entire housing need is distributed,COG distributes additional
units if region's"planning for your own"dces not equal regionai need.
. HCD may challenge COG's regional housing determinadons
Effect of Specific Housing Plan
• Project that is consistent with SHP cannot be required to receive any legislative or
quasi-legislative approval but procedures wlrich ensure consistency between
pmject and SHP aze anticipated(e.g. design review).
. Project that is consistent with SHP cannot be denied or conditioned on density
reduction below minimum density in SHP except by 4/5 vote of legislative body
after making certain findings.
• No change can be made in the SHP during the ten-year period(except for possible
five-yeaz review)except by 4/5 vote of legislative body after making certain
findings.
� Referendum
. Referendum on Housing Opportunity Element at 10 yeaz intervals
• Referendum on Specific Housing Plan at 10 yeaz intervals
• Referendum on SHP at 5 yeaz review only on changes in sites—either in location
or density ranges. No referendum on previously adopted SHP
• SHP may not be adopted or amended by initiative
i
CEQA Comp6ance
• EtR when HOE and SHP adopted(every ten years)
• EIIt/ND at five-yeaz review of SHP if new sites or changes in density
Issues for Continued Discussion
. Amount of discretion/protection suailable in"outer ten year"area. "Outer ten
year" azea is that part of the twenty-yeaz land supply that is not within the specific
housing plan.
' . Coordinating the statutory obligation of LAFCO to pmmote orderly growth and
development and to determine jurisdictional boundary lines with the obligation of
each tocal agency to provide a twenty-year land supply.
2
October 16, 2004
. The number of times the voters may file a referendum against the specific housing
plan ot housing opportunity element.
• The eactent of CEQA review when a development project is consistent with the
specific housing plan.
State Regulatory Coordination of Conflicting State Policies with w6ich Cities and
Counties must Comply
Appropriation of State Funds to Prepare Specific Housing Plans
Tax credits and other incentives to construct higher density housing
G.O.Bonds for infrastructure improvements and housing construcNon with 55%
vote
NOTE: Changes will be required to existing housing element law to incorporate this
new system. HCD process will be subject to sunset concurrent with implementation of
new system.
3
ATTACHMENT 3
MEMORANDUM
October 15,2004 � ;
r
TO: Dan Carrigg i
Legislative Representative �
League of California Cities :
k
FROM: Betsy Strauss
Special Counsel
League of California Cities
g�; SB 1818/Chapter 928 2004 Statutes
Density Bonus Law Amendments
This memorandum responds to your request for an analysis of the changes made to
density bonus law by SB 1818 (Ho1linQSworth .
Changes Made by the Amendments
. Projects that qualify for a density bonus
In order to qualify for a density bonus a"housing developmenY'must include a certain
percentage of units for low,very low or moderate income households. The amendments
reduce the required percentages by one-ha1f.' A density and incentives or concessions
must be granted if ten percent of the total units aze for lower income households; five
; percent aze for very low income households; or ten percent are for moderate income
� households in a condominium project or planned development?
a
� . Additional density for projects that qualify calculated differen y
'
Under existing law"density bonus" is a density increase of 25%,unless a lesser
percentage is requested by the applicant. The new law re-defines"density bonus" as a
density increase of 20%. However,for each 1% increase abtohve d nsty bonus isincreased
percentage of units affordable to lower income households,
by 1:5%to a maximum of 35%. For each 1%increase above 5% in the percentage of
units affordable t 35�a 1 A c ndomin um proJect or plann d development thatd es not�
' to a maximum of ualifies for a density bonus of 10%.
' qualify for a density bonus under the basic rules, q
The new law changes the density bonus to 5%but awazds an additional l%density bonus
'Gov't Code 6591p5(b)�1)• �s a e of common interest development with
z"planned develo ment'(defined in Civil Code§ 1351(k) � �'P
an awners association.
1
�---_ _ _
for each 1 percent increase above 10 percent to a maximum of 35 percent.
. Occupancy of afFordable moderate-income units
Existing law requires the city to ensure that moderate income units in a condominium
project that qualifies for a density bonus remain affordable to moderate income families.
The new law requires that the initial occupant of the moderate-income units (in a
condominium project or planned development)be a moderate-income family. The
required the unit to be affordable but did not require the unit to be occupied by a
moderate-income family. When the unit is sold,the seller retains the value of any
improvements,the downpayment, and the seller's proportionate share of appreciation.
The local government recaptures an amount equal to the difference between the fair
mazket value of the unit and the nutial sales price. Those funds must be used within three
yeazs to promote low or moderate income home ownership 3
• Required number of concessions and incentives
The applicant is entided to a density bonus and certain concessions and incentives. The
number of concessions and incentives is related to the percentage of the project devoted
to affordable housing: (1) One incentive or concession for projects that include at least
10 percent of the total units for lower income households, at least 5 percent for very low
income households, or at least 10 percent for moderate income families. (2)Two
incenrives or concessions if 20 percent of the units are for lower income households; 10
percent for very low income households; or 20 percent for persons and families of
moderate income. (3)Three incentives or concessions if 30%for lower income
households; 15 percent for very low income households, or at 30 percent for persons and
families of moderate income.
• New land donation rules
Additional density is available to projects that donate land for residential use. The land
must(1)have the appropriate general plan designation and zoning to pernut conshuction
of units affordable to very low income households in an amount not less than 10%of the
units in the.residential development; (2)be at least one acre in size or of sufficient size to
permit development of at least 40 units; (3)be served or will be served by adequate
public facilities and infrastructure. The density bonus is 15%with increases in 1%
increments for each percent above the minimum 10%of the units described in(1),up to a
maximum of 35%. 35%is the maximum combined density bonus under the basic rules
and the land donation rules. When the land is transferred it must have all of the permits
and approvals necessary for the development of very low inwme housing units. The land
and affordable units must be subject to deed restrictions ensuring continued affordability.
The city or county may require that the land is transferred to a developer instead of the
city.
'Gov't Code section 65915(c)(2). '
2
• New definition of"development standazd"
A city or county may not impose a"development standard"that makes in infeasible to
construct the housing development at the proposed density. The applicant may request
the waiver of"development standards." The bill limits the types"development standazd"
"site or construction conditions."
• New maacimum parking standards
The bill establishes new maximum parking standazds for a housing development that
qualifies for a density bonus, imposed at the request of the developer: Zero to one
bedroom—one onsite pazking space;two to three bedrooms—two onsite pazking spaces;
four and more bedrooms—two and one-half parking spaces. These numbers aze inclusive
of guest parking and handicapped pazking.
Planning Considerations
A city or county may wish to consider the following suggestions when implementing the
new law:
1. A density bonus is granted when the applicant for a housing development seeks and
agrees to construct certain percentages of very low, low,or moderate income housing
units: Include in the list of what constitutes a complete application the information that is
necessary for the city/county to evaluate whether a density bonus must be granted.
Require the developer to enter into an enforceable written ag=eement to construct the
housing including the terms and conditions under which the units will be maintained as
affordable.
2. T'he city/county must"ensure" continued affordability of all lower income density
bonus units for 30 yeazs or more(or longer period if required by construction or mortgage
fmancing assistance program): Include in a resolution adopting density bonus
procedures,the mechanism for ensuring continued affordability (e.g. CC&Rs; deed
restricrion; penalties for failure to maintain affordability).
3. 1'he lower income bonus density units must be affordable at a rent that does not
exceed 30 percent of 60 percent of area median income; or 30 percent of 50 percent of
azea median income for very low income units: These percentages aze maximums. A
city/county may require lower rents.
4. The city/county must"ensure"that the initial occupants of moderate income units
related to the density bonus aze moderate income families: Include in the resolution
adopting density bonus procedures a requirement that the developer propose the
mechanism for ensuring that the initial occupant qualifies; identify the units that aze
restricted; record deed restrictions relating to the limitation on recapture of appreciation;
and formulate the program by which the"proportionate share of appreciation" calculated;
3 _�
and the city or county is notified of the sale of the restricted units. Because these
programs of limited appreciation aze sometimes subject to legal challenge,the city/county
may wish to consider requiring an indemnity from the developer.
5. The applicant submits a proposal for specific incentives or concessions: Include in the
resolution adopting the density bonus procedures the list of incenUves or concessions that
are"reductions-in site development standards or modifications of zoning code
requirements or design requirements that result in"identifiable, financially sufficient, and
actual cost reductions."' Require the applicant to demonstrate how the incentives or
concessions result in"identifiable, financially sufficient, and actual cost reductions"that
a11ow the affordable units to be constructed.
6. The applicant receives a number of concessions or incentives based upon the
percentage of units that aze affordable. This requirement is subject to the restriction
identified in number 5 above. The applicant does not automatically receive, for example
three concessions or incentives. The applicant must demonstrate how the incentives or
concessions result in"identifiable, financially sufficient, and actual cost reductions"that
allow the affordable units to be constructed.
7. The city is required to waive or modify development and zoning standards that would
otherwise inhibit uUlization of the density bonus on specific sites. Include in the
resolution adopting the density procedures the list of development and zoning standazds
which are"site and construction" conditions that may be waived or modified.
8. The applicant is entitled to an additional density bonus for land donation. Include in
the resolution adopting density bonus procedures how the city/county will implement this
provision: (a) at what point in the development process the land must be donated; (b)
whether the land must be located within the proposed housing development or may it be
located within '/.mile of the development; (c)a procedure requiring the applicant to
identify a developer to whom the land is transferred if the city/county does not wish to
accept the donation; (d) a requirement that the entitlements for the very low income units
be processed concurrently with the other units in the housing development.
9. M�imum pazking requirements upon request of developer: If compliance with the
maximum parking requirements does not provide sufficient parking, in the opinion of the
city/county, it may be necessary to include within the city/count}�s resolution a
requirement that notification be provided to residents of housing that qualifies for a
density bonus of the inadequacy of the pazking.
Financial considerations
II SB 1818 (Ho1linQSworthl provides that no reimbursement is required for the mandate
imposed by these changes because a city/county has the authority to"levy service
charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service
� °Gov't Code 65915(IXl).
�
4
�
t
mandated by"the changes in the law. The mandates imposed include (1)the cost of
updating local ordinances and resolutions to conform to the changes in the state law; and
{2)the wsts incurred by the city/county due to increases in densities beyond those
provided for and analyzed in the general plan. These costs might include additional
infrashvcture costs and additional public safety costs for increased population.
The ConstituUon requires the State to reimburse local governments for mandates. If
Proposition lA passes,the legislature will be required to appropriate money for a
mandate or suspend the mandate. Although a city/county may have the authority to
impose a fee to recover the costs of complying with the mandates in this bill, such a fee
seems counterproductive to the ob,jective of the bill: lowering housing costs. If a
city/county does not impose a fee to recover its costs for the mandates in this bill,then it
has incurred costs which the Constitution requires the State to reimburse. An
appropriation is required or the mandate is suspended.
I hope this information is helpful. Please let me know if you have any questions.
I
i
1
1
i
5
SB 1818 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis
ATTACHMFNT 4
SB 1818
Page 1
SENATE THIRD READING .
.SB 1818 (Hollingsworth)
As Amended August 23, 2009
Majority vote �
SENATE VOTE :38-0 �
HOUSING 8-0 LOCAL GOVERNMENT 9-0
------------------------------------------�---------------------
IAyes: ILOwenthal, Dutton, IAyes: ISalinas, Lieber, Daucher, I
I ICogdill, Dutra, Kehoe, I IGarcia, I
I IMullin, Runner, Salinas I ILa Suer, Leno, Mullin, I
I I I ISteinberg, Wiggins � I
I-----+--------------------------+-----+-------------------------- I
I I � � �
-----------------------------------------------------------------
APPROPRIATIONS 13-2 �
----------------------------------------------------------------
IAyes: IChu, Runner, Berg, I I �
I IFirebaugh, Goldberg, I I �
I IHaynes, Keene, I I �
� �Leno, Negrete McLeod, I I �
I IOropeza, Ridley-Thomas, I I �
I IWesson, Wiggins I I �
I I I I �
I-----+--------------------------+-----+-------------------------I
INays: ILaird, Yee I I � � �
I I � � �
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY : Makes various changes in the law relating to the
provision of affordable housing and density bonuses.
Specifically, this bill .
1)Lowers the number of housing units required to be provided at
below market rate in order to qualify for a density bonus as
follows:
� a) From 208 to 10� of the total units of a housing
development, for lower income households;
b) From 108 to 58 of the total units of a housing
development, for very low income households; �
❑
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/03-04/bilUsen/sb_1801-1850/sb_1818_cfa_20040823_225120_as... 3/2/2005
SB 1818 Senate Bill-Bill Analysis Page 2 of 7
SB 1618
Page 2
c) From 50� of the total units for seniors to any senior
citizen housing development as allowed under existing law;
and,
d) From 20� to 108 of the units in a condominium
development, for moderate-income households.
2)Lowers the density increase from 25� to 208 for low, very low
or senior housing and lowers to 58 for moderate income, with
respect to the number of extra units that may be included over
the otherwise maximum allowable residential density under the
lqcal zoning ordinance.
3)Requires that the density bonus increase incrementally
according to the following:
a) For each 1� increase above 108 for lower income
households, the density bonus shall increase by 1.5� to a
maximum of 35�;
b) For each 18 increase above 5� for very low income
households, the density bonus shall increase by 2.5� to a
maximum of 35�; and,
c) For each 18 increase above 10� for moderate-income '
households, the density bonus shall increase by 18 to a
maximum of 358.
4)Requires local governments to provide a developer the
following number. of incentives or concessions if below, market
rate units are included within the project:
a) One incentive or concession if the project includes at
least 108 of the total units for low-income, or 58 very
low-income, or 10� for moderate-income households;
b) Two incentives or concessions if the project includes at
least 208 of the total units for low-income, or 108 very
low-income, or 208 for moderate-income hoµseholds; and,
c) Three incentives or concessions if the project includes
at least 308 of the total units for low-income, or 15� very
low-income, or 308 for moderate-income households.
5)Requires that the local government ensure that the initial
II ❑
(
ISB 1618
� Page 3
1
� � occupants of the moderate-income units are actually moderate
I
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/03-04/bilUsen/sb_1801-1850/sb_1818_cfa_20040823_225120_as... 3/2/2005
SB 1818 Senate Bill -Bill Analysis Page 4 of 7
government result in identifiable, financially sufficient, and
actual cost reductions.
12)Clarifies that local governments may still grant density
bonuses greater or lower than what is provided under these ��
� provisions.
13) Provides that, upon the developer's request, the local
government may not require parking standards greater than the
following (the developer may, however request additional
parking incentives or concessions) :
a) Zero to one bedrooms: one onsite .parking space;
b) Two to three bedrooms: two onsite parking spaces; and,
� c) Four or more bedrooms: two and one-half parking spaces. . �
EXISTING LAW (Government Code Section 65915) :
1)Requires local governments to grant a density bonus and at
least one identified incentive or concession if a developer
includes the specified percentage of affordable units within
the project, unless it makes written findings that the
additional incentive is not necessary in order for the rents
to be affordable, or if the development would have an adverse
effect on health, safety, environment or an adverse impact on
any property listed in the California Register of Historical
Resources. �
2)Specifies that development concessions or incentives may
include the following:
a) A reduction in site development standards;
b) A modification of zoning code requirements (including a
reduction in setbacks, square footage requirements, or
parking spaces, or architectural design requirements that
exceed the minimum building standards) ;
�
❑
SB 1818
Page 5
c) Approval of mixed use zoning in conjunction with the
housing project if commercial, office, industrial, or other
land uses will reduce the cost of the housing development,
� and if such nonresidential uses are compatible with the
project; or,
d) Other regulatory incentives or concessions proposed by
the developer or the city or county that result in
I,
identifiable cost reductions.
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/03-04/bilUsen/sb_1801-1850/sb_1818_cfa_20040823_225120_as... 3/2/2005
, .._�
SB 1818 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis Page 5 of 7
FISCAL EFFECT . Unknown
COMMENTS . � To help address the affordable housing shortage, the
Legislature enacted the density bonus law to encourage
development of more low and moderate income housing units.
Under existing law, a local government is required to grant a
density bonus or other housing incentive or concession of
equivalent value to a developer who agrees to construct housing
that is affordable for persons of very low or low income, unless
the city finds that the density bonus or housing incentive or
concession is unnecessary for specified reasons.
According to the sponsors of this measure, density bonus law
could potentially play a stronger role in meeting our state's
. housing needs, but the law is not as effective as it could be
and needs to be strengthened.
Nothing in this bill affects or otherwise seeks to preempt local
ordinances which may require the inclusion of affordable (low,
very low or moderate-income) units within a housing development.
_ Arguments in support:
1)Added flexibility: According to the sponsors, California
Association of Realtors, California Rural Legal
Assistance Foundation, and, Western Center on Law and Poverty,
SB 1818 increases the flexibility and usefulness of density
bonus law by both reducing the minimum percentage of targeted
units needed to obtain a density bonus and by increasing the
amount of density bonus that can be obtained when the
percentage of targeted units is increased. Current law
provides a flat 258 density bonus if the applicant includes
208 low, 108 very low or 508 senior housing in the development
and a flat 10� density bonus if the applicant includes 20$
❑
SB 1816
Page 6
moderate-income units in a condominium development. The `
sponsors also assert that SB �1818 makes the density bonus more
accessible by reducing those percentages to 208 density bonus ;
� for 108 low, 58 very low or senior housing and a 5� density �
bonus for 108 moderate. The bill also expands density bonus
law by incrementally increasing the amount of the density
bonus, up to a maximum of 35�, if the applicant increases �the
percentage of targeted units. �
� Current law limits the moderate-income density bonus to .
condominium developments. SB 1818 expands that to include
moderate income planned unit developments. The bill, according
to the sponsors, adds flexibility to the law by requiring the �
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/03-04/bilUsen/sb_1801-1850/sb_1818_cfa_20040823_225120_as... 3/2/2005
I
---- _ __ _ �
SB 1818 Senate Bill -Bill Analysis Page 6 of 7
first occupant of such units to be moderate income rather than
requiring a 10-year term of affordability by moderate-income
households.
2)Cost reductions: Current law requires local governments to
provide applicants for density bonuses with incentives and
. concessions in addition to a density bonus, but the law does �
not quantify the value of the incentives and concessions that
must be offered. SB 1618 requires that the incentives and
concessions "result in identifiable, financially sufficient � �
and actual cost reductions. "
3) Incentives for land donation: To further expand the
usefulness of density bonus law, say supporters, SB 1816
creates a new land donation density bonus that provides an
incentive for donation of land to local governments for
affordable housing. Under the bill, for example, if an
applicant for a 1, 000 unit development donates five acres of
land within that development sufficient to permit construction
of 100 very low- or low-income units, the applicant would be
entitled to a 158 density bonus, or 150 units. The land
donation density bonus could be increased incrementally up to
a maximum of 358 if the applicant increases the amount of land
donated, and could be used in conjunction with the general
density bonus, up to a combined maximum of 358.
_ Arguments in Opposition:
_ 1)Costs: Opponents express concerns over the costs implied by
SB 1818. They state that the bill fails to provide sufficient �
funding to pay up front for the costs of revising existing
local density bonus ordinances.
❑
SB 1818
Page 7
I
2)Bonus is too high: Local governments also object to the
high-density bonuses in relation to the small percentage of
affordable housing. They claim that a 208 density bonus is
too high given what is provided in affordable units has been
reduced in half from the original density bonus law
� requirements.
3)Mandated concessions: The opponents note that the bill
includes a new mandate requiring the city and county to grant
one, two or three concessions, depending on the amount of
affordable housinq provided or risk being sued by the
developer. It also removes a provision of existing law that
allows a city or county to make a written finding, based on �
substantial evidence that the concession is not necessary.
This will require, according to� the opposition, local
governments to give the developer whatever the developer
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/03-04/bill/sen/sb_1801-1850/sb_1818_cfa_20040823_225120_as... 3/2/2005 i
--_ _ J
SB 1818 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis Page 7 of 7
wants.
9) Price controls on moderate-income housing: The local
governments object to having to manage price controls on sale
of moderate-income condominiums. They state that existing law
regarding the continued affordability of the moderate-income
units for 10 years should remain. It allows local agencies to
choose how to maintain affordability of moderate-income units
rather than specifying a method requiring a resale share.
Analysis Prepared by . Hubert Bower / H. & C.D. / (916)
319-2085
FN: 0008105
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/03-04/bilUsen/sb_1801-1850/sb_1818_cfa_20040823_225120_as... 3/2/2005 I
I
� pRROYp . ��C�
O c,p
FINCORPORATE 92
u �°n
# .u�v io, ic+t * �
Q��/FO�N�p MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROB STRONG �
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR�
BY: �,�. KELLY HEFFERNON
ASSOCIATE PLANNER
SUBJECT: CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDERATION OF AMENDED
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 04001 TO ALLOW A
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION TO OCCUPY BUILDING "J" OF THE FIVE
CITIES SHOPPING CENTER; 911 RANCHO PARKWAY; WELLS
FARGO BANK
DATE: MARCH 8, 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends the Council adopt the attached resolution approving
the proposed project.
FUNDING:
tt is uncertain what the net financial benefit or loss would be to the City by allowing a bank to ,
occupy what is currently a retail-approved lease space. The subject property has not been �
occupied to date and therefore has not generated any sales tax revenue for the City. There
would be a potential future loss in sales tax revenue by allowing a non-retail use. Secondary
financial benefits could be gain�d from the bank drawing more people to the Five Cities
Center to shop.
DISCUSSION:
Backaround
The City Council considered this item on February 8, 2005. Discussion focused on various
traffic mitigation alternatives for the lower driveways on Rancho Parkway that cuRently operate
at an unacceptable Level of Service (LOS) 'D'. The Council continued the item to March 8,
2005 to allow the applicanYs traffic engineer and the City's consulting engineer to provide
additional traffic mitigation aftematives and analysis. r
Based on information presented to staff by Orosz Engineering Group, Inc. (OEG) and Omni
Means, the following mitigation is recommended with approval of ACUP 04-001:
Prior to issuing a Certificate of Occupancy, a designated right tum lane at the eastbound phase 1
driveway shall be designed, and a conceptual design for the proposed signalization at the
Phase 1/Phase ll driveway shall be submitted to the City for review and approvaL The applicant
shall bond for the right tum lane improvements prior to occupancy, with construction to follow
I�� within ninety(90) days of occupancy.
;
I
cirv couNCi�
ACUP 04-001
March 8, 2005
PAGE 2
The Resolution of approval has been revised to include this language.
With the development of Pad I, the applicant would be required to fund, design and construct a
traffic signal for the southern Phase II driveway at Rancho Parkway. The design would include
the traffic signal, pavement markings along Rancho Parkway related to the new traffic signal,
and the connection with the W. Branch Street traffic signal. The applicant would also prepare a
roundabout feasibility study for the intersection of Rancho Parkway and Via Vaquero.
The installation of a right turn lane at Rancho Parkway from Phase I was determined to mitigate
the existing condition, which is primarily congestion at this exit due to the majority of vehicles
tuming right when exiting the parking lot. Installation of a traffic signal is the only measure
determined to address the projected impacts of Pad I development. Therefore, while other
improvements were found to improve the existing c�ndition, they were not proposed because
they would not ultimately be consistent with the traffic signal design. The right tum lane was
recommended because it will both improve the existing condition and be necessary with the
future traffic signal.
Attachment 1 is a Memorandum from Omni Means Engineering, which includes recommended
design of improvements to address the existing conditions, a determination that a signal will
ultimately be required, and the associated data. Attachment 2 is a Memorandum from OEG, the
applicanYs traffic consultant. It includes an analysis and summary of the other options reviewed
and the proposed mitigations in response to the Omni Means study. A copy of the staff report
prepared for the February 8, 2005 City Council meeting is also attached for reference as
Attachment 3.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
Staff has reviewed this project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, and
has found that the project is exempt per section 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, staff
does not anticipate that this project will have an adverse effect on the environment. Because
the use occupies an existing building, it is not necessary that a Mitigated Negative Declaration
be prepared or filed, but based on the traffic study, the recommended mitigation is a condition of
approval.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are presented for the Council's consideration:
- Approve the Planning Commission's recommendation and adopt the resolution;
- Modify the Planning Commission's recommendation and adopt the resolution; or,
- Take tentative action to deny the project application and direct staff to prepare an
appropriate resolution for City Council action.
If the Council selects alternative 3, staff will return with the appropriate resolution at a later
meeting.
CITY COUNCIL
ACUP 04-001
March 8, 2005
PAGE 3
Attachments:
1. Memorandum from Omni Means Engineering, dated February 25, 2005
2. Memorandum from OEG, Inc., dated February 26, 2005
3. Staff report prepared for the February 8, 2005 City Council meeting (less attachments)
I
S:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENMROJECTS\CUP�Five Cities Center�Welis Fargo�3-8-05 ACUP Wells Fargo CC Rpt.dot
�
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING AMENDED
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 04-001, APPLIED
FOR BY WELLS FARGO BANK, LOCATED AT 911
RANCHO PARKWAY (FIVE CITIES SHOPPING CENTER,
PHASE 11)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande has considered Amended '
Conditional Use Permit Case. No. 04-001, filed by Welis Fargo Bank to amend
Conditional Use Permit 96-541, as previously amended, by allowing a financial use in '
Building "J" of the Five Cities Shopping Center; and
WHEREAS, on May 4, 2004 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this !,
application in accordance with the City Code and recommended the City Council approve '
the project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing on this appiication in accordance
with the Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has found that this project is consistent with the General
Plan and the environmental documents associated therewith; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has found that this project is categorically exempt under
Section 15305 of State CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds, after due study, deliberation and public hearing, the
foilowing circumstances exist:
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit Findings:
1. The proposed use is permitted within the Rancho Grande Planned Development
(PD 1.2) pursuant to Section 16.16.050 of the Development Code, and complies
with all applicable provisions of the Development Code, the goals and objectives of
the Arroyo Grande General Plan, and the development policies and standards of
the City.
2. The proposed use will not impair the integrity and character of the district in which
it is to be established or located because the building is already constructed and
the proposed use is similar to other surrounding uses.
3. The site is suitable for the type and intensity of use or development that is
proposed because all the necessary easements, circulation, parking and setbacks
will be provided.
4. There are adequate provisions for water, sanitation, and public utilities and
services to ensure the public health and safety. The building was constructed and
issued a temporary certificate of occupancy in 2000, verifying that all necessary
utilities and provisions were installed to ensure public health and safety.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
5. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or
materially injurious to properties and improvements in the vicinity, because the
tra�c impacts identified in the recent tra�c study are mitigated by conditions of
approval. The building is already constructed and the existing parking is sufficient
to accommodate the use.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande hereby approves Amended Conditional Use Permit Case No. 04-001, with the
above finding5 and subject to the conditions as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference.
On motion by Council Member , seconded by Council Member ,
and by the following roll call vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this day of 2005.
�
�
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 3
TONY FERRARA, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
'
i
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 4
EXHIBIT "A"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 04001
AGRA, LLC
FIVE CITIES CENTER, PHASE II
GOh"6"LIWITY DE��EL�PMENT DFPARTMENT
This Amendment to Conditional Use Permit 96-541 authorizes a financial institution to
occupy Building "J" of the Five Cities Shopping Center (lease space is approximately
4,550 square feet).
rFNFRAI �ONDITIONS
1. All conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit 96-541, as amended, shall
remain in full force and effect as indicated in City Council Resolution 3157
approved on July 9, 1996.
�'� 2. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all Federal, State, County and City
� requirements as are applicable to this project.
i3. The applicant shall comply with,all conditions of approval for Amended Conditional
i Use Permit Case No. 04-001, as recommended by the Planning Commission.
4. This application shall automatically expire on March 8, 2007 unless a building
permit is issued. Thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the approval, the
j applicant may apply for an extension of one'(1) year from the original date of
i expiration.
1
!; 5. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action brought
against the City, its present or former agents, o�cers, or employees because of
Ithe issuance of said approval, or in anyway relating to the implementation thereof,
� or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the
j City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attomey's fee's
; which the City, its agents, officers or employees may be required by a court to pay
' as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its
own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shail not
relieve appiicant of his/her obligations under this condition.
GPECIA G�ONDITIONS
6. Development shall occur in substantial conformance with the plans presented to
the City Council at the meeting of March 8, 2005 and marketl Exhibit "B". Prior to issuing
a Certificate of Occupancy, a designated right turn lane at the eastbound phase I
driveway shall be designed, and a conceptuai design for the proposed signalization at the
Phase I/Phase II driveway shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The
, applicant shall bond for the right turn lane improvements prior to occupancy, with
construction to follow within ninety (90) days of occupancy.
______ �
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 5
7. Prior to issuing a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall submit a letter
from the property owner (Investec) verifying that the existing trash receptacles
within the existing trash enclosure and the proposed frequency of trash pick ups is
adequate to accommodate the proposed use in addition to existing uses.
8. The employee parking for Wells Fargo Bank shall be restricted to the extreme E
southwest comer of the existing parking lot.
9. Prior to issuing a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall submit an
exterior lighting plan and site lighting footcandle plan subject to review and
approval of the Community Development and Police Departments that complies
with Section 16.48.090 of the Developmenf Code.
F3LIILDII�C AWD FIRE DFPARTMENT
10. The project shall comply with the most recent editions of all California Building and
Fire Codes, as adopted by the Prior to issuing a Certificate of Occupancy, City
of Arroyo Grande.
11. The project shall provide complete compliance with State and Federal disabled
access requirements.
12. Prior to issuing a Certificate of Occupancy, all buildings must be fully
sprinklered per Building and Fire Department guidelines.
13. Two (2) exits are required from the public area.
14. The vault"structure" shall be independent from existing building structure.
15. Existing fire sprinkler and alarm system shall be revised as required for new
construction and occupancy.
I�
I
i
�
1
I
j
�
I
;
�
S:\COMMUNIT'Y_DEVELOPMENTIPROJECTS\CUP�Five Cities Center�Wells Fargo\CC reso.doc
�
..,..o..� p;�..�.� �-,�- .�-.�.— -�. ,� ,oxus•u,��
^, _/� /��` " ..,,..
� ,� o.,.....�,.� ___�
�,"�'� �; —' � �� .�,..,.,m �
�QV - - - - ---� :�.,.e � '•� '-^ �.�:..
— i,.x..
.�. � `A° t
— ,�..�...,... , � ,—,
�v.....a.,. �....a.�i A�.:: m.�' \ .�� .a�
.,.a ' �`�� � .,,.� ' `�.�.4.
(G�NOR�lLNATION �w� �B�iw. wveYlDTlLCJATION .
m y
�
m �m��...w - ., �� ._ _ � . " .
_""""""_'_"""""'""'"_"_'. .-_. ,
= i �� � �,n i � �y_':
x �� WEL13
w '� . �� _ �.0� FAROO
�
� 9�•9F n..w�r�
✓
: . rn.m '"" _....
��
J l_J effi
J °�
. �- � p _ � °A ^.�.
�� �
� o - Q -
>- � p � 0 0 �
( T D � � . O _ ��."�
1 �=tl
.d."'.� i
e...�.... � �.� � �z�a �� ��°'°.w��
e� Q i �.s .uu ..
����1'►���, .,,m; ,,,�,
;�� 0
APR 2 9 2d04 ,�-�
CITY UF A,RROY/J G°ANQE
�C�A1�,r�,.�°—°R n.w -
COMMUNITY DtVFS''.0?iw�NT DEPT.
ATTACHMENT 1
� l'.•= ^ , �;�. , �
VJ!J .1'� � �:u� � �'
E N G I N E E R 5 P L h N N E R 5
MEMORANDUM
To: Ciry of Arroyo Grande, Communiry Date: February 25, 2005
Development and Planning
Attn: Mr. Rob Strong, Project: Five Cities Shopping Center
Community Development Director
From: Marty Inouye, OMNI-MEANS
Andrew Lee
Re: Project Driveway Mitigations Job No.: 25-1275-08
File No.: C833MEM011.DOC
CC: Don Spagnolo,Public Works Director, Steve Orosz, Orosz Engineering; Carol Florence, Oasis;
This memorandum presents recommended mitigation measures to alleviate unacceptable Levels-of-
Service (LOS) at the Rancho Parkway/Five Cities Shopping Center driveway intersection, as part of the
Traffic Impact Study (TIS) for the Five Cities Shopping Center expansion. The intersection services
residential traffic north of West Branch Street and commercial tm�c entering and leaving the Phase 1 I
and Phase 2 portions of the Five Cities Shopping Center. The delay at the intersection during the PM
peak hour results in unacceptable LOS "D" traffic conditions. With the addition of the proposed Wells
Fargo Bank and with the possible Pad "I" expansion in the future, the delay at the intersection will likely
continue to increase.
Eaisting Plus Approved/Pending Projects with Wells Fargo Bank
The critical movements at the southerly Rancho Parkway/Five Cities Shopping Center driveway
intersection are the through and teft-tum movements out of the shopping center driveways. The traffic at
these driveway approaches conflicts with free-flowing t�affic on Rancho Parkway. To alleviate delay at
the intersection in the short term, it is recommended that the westbound driveway approach be limited to
entering traffic only and that the northern driveway provide rivo-way access into and out of the Phase 2
portion of the shopping center. The fopowing intersection geometrics are recommended at the southem
intersection:
• Northbound Rancho Pazkway — conshuct a left-turn pocket and channelize the right-tum
movement such that the approach has one left-tum lane,one through Iane,one free-right-tum lane
• Southbound Rancho Parkway—construct a left-turn pocket such that the approach has one left-
tum lane, one through lane,and one right-turn lane.
• Eastbound driveway—Widen the approach to allow for an additional right turn lane such that the
approach has one left-tum lane and one through-right tum lane.
• Westbound driveway — Channelize drive�vay to prohibit outbound movement onto or across
Rancho Parkway. Widen inbound movement to allow for free inbound right-turn lane and merge
transition.
The attached figure is a modified version of an original figure created by Orosz Engineering Group, Inc.,
changed to reflect the intersection geometrics described above.
Restricting the southern drive�vay at Phase 2 to entrance-only access reduces delay caused by esiting
� traffic conflict with through-tra�c on Rancho Par}.�vay. The channelization of the northbound right-tum
1
943 Reserve Drive, Suite 100, Rosevilie, CA 95678 - (916)782-8688 fax(916)782-8689
I
February 25, 2005
movement is projected to reduce traffic conflicts with both southbound lefr-tum tra�c and eastbound
through traffic entering the Phase 2 portion of the shopping cenrer. With the recommended mitigations,
the intersection is projected to operate at the cusp of LOS "C/D".
The northem Phase 2 driveway currently services low volumes of traffic. However, there are safety
concerns involving exiting traffic conflicts H•ith high-speed traffic traveling sou[hbound on Rancho
Parkway. It is recommended that a roundabout be installed at the Via Vaquero/Rancho Parkway
intersection as a traffic calming mitigation measure. Attached is a proposed design of a roundabout at the
Rancho ParkwayNia Vaquero intersection.
2025 Cumulative with Wells Fargo Bank and Pad I
Over the long term, traffic volumes at the Rancho Parkway/Five Cities Shopping Center southerly
driveway intersection are projected to necessitate the installation of a tra�c signal to accommodate
projected traffic volumes with Pad I at acceptable LOS. With signalization at this southerly driveway,
two-way movement from the westbound (Phase 2) driveway can be restored. The signalization of this
driveway intersection should be interconnected and coordinated with the West Branch StreeURancho
Parkway intersection. The northerly Phase 2 driveway can be maintained as it is currently designed.
Because of the neighborhood speeding issue on Rancho Parkway, the roundabout at the Via Vaquero
intersection shouid remain.
I
2 ,
943 Reserve Drive,Suite 100, Roseville,CA 95678 - (916)782-8688 fax(916)782-8689
_ 111 l�_i_i_i_i_i_�.�_�..__ � / �x �� ` �� \ �
� I�— ���I .:' / � • � �%/��j ��� �/��j �� \���\��� \ ��\ �
� - 3'---_ ,. i ,��j� i �\ �
� � s------�___. � _ �. _ e, / `� .♦.// i�x// �i \ \\\\\�
� �\
� `�------_-'� ��; � '?_-. /�i ,; I I I I i I I I I I I� ��''"\ _ � II
� �� � _ �
I � ■ l ' ` �' -- ^'�p�H / � ,.
� � .. ., -� �` ... a Q / \ , il
� ,.., � � � �kW�r . .itr.'....-,
/ CY
(�� I
i � � I� 1[%��I � � `' ` ,C° , � � II
I N � � w I
I . p �r�1('p _ � � � . � �� / '
. I1I� '^ — ,. �i + \ �
� ' 's � � ' � � �
I'� y AR,�9V�`' ���\ '�\ it. � \ � � /
I �,' __ \ 1 \� � . 51 � _ ..
i � '::�� ��,� ' \ � � - . _
� �� ����� ��������� .. � . . . ' �� . . . . '.
I . �
_�-�—.-x..�-- . . 'i
i i
.."°'O`�.,:��'.�M�.°L� . � � �I
I� � – ... ?....�_....=
...�.....��........ v....�,�...
',y��.�w..�. �..e.�.....�,�
— " -- __ _
�...�. , `► �. — .�.— m.>..m�.�..�... ..v.,.N
._o._,,..,.. .0 .. o. � �"— .���..o..,
\
\
. ,\
.
\�,
.� ..,� �
..
, . ..,. .
� . .�` .
, ....
. .
. �� . ..... �
, , � ��
. .. .,,.,
��. •.� ...��....... _ �
....
, , , .
, ........�, . , , �
. -�... .
\ , '_, ��
,
, . , �..
� ...
� , � _
. . .
���, ��-.. � .. '��.�,.�_, �.-. ...___ ._.,,__.___._.
.. . �.
��\ ``' 'P'"ro '\ `�..�, - _.. I -� --- '
. �. , ._ _
\,N� .. . �� . "��. ..
,.
P . �-_
� . �. �, � -.. ...._..� _.
� , �y_ 1
\,`��` � �M,r� ��� � 1 j i ..,� 431p1 `�'.. II
,\\ � �
� ry�\�. .....
� �•.`\`\` \` ^:. II
�,
- �42 � \ •�. �\/. H .-� w.o
;` - _ I
� � / ' _ '�--� �,-------
_ -----
, ; , � �� '�-- I
�� , ' � �
,
� a �� / ?
�� ; �
; -
';�,� ' i , i
� �' � ? �
' ��
� � ; �
� i! £ i
( � �
, i, i � i
i '
Ii� i y
.i " � � �--.
� � - � '
� : ti I i
� :
�; �� ��
� .' 'I
��,S �
'� i .
' I '` '
I "6
j� � RANCHO PARKWAY / VIA VApUERO RWNDABWT omni•meons "��"� ��5 �
��FlVE CITIEU�oro cen�E t�uior+w�PAN510N Ss=�. �• o�,,,�
F�7��
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2004+gANK, MITIG
10: Driveway south & Rancho Parkway PM PEAK
.� _-. � { .-- � �, t � `► 1 �
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL NBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations � '� � T r �i '� �
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Volume(vehlh) 57 45 141 0 0 0 202 152 0 9 323 73
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate(vph) 62 49 153 0 0 0 220 165 0 10 351 79
Pedestrians
Lane Width(ft)
Walking Speed (ff/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream 'signal(ft) 303
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 975 975 351 1153 1054 165 430 165
vC1,stage 1 conf vol
vC2,stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 975 975 351 1153 1054 165 A30 165
tC, single(s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
tC, 2 stage(s)
tF(s) 3.5 4A 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 22
p0 queue free% 68 76 78 100 100 100 81 99
cM capacity(veh/h) 195 201 692 94 181 879 1129 1473
_ _.. _. _ ___. _ ... _. .. _..
Direction, Lane# .' �: EB 1 �iEB 2 :NBs'�� '`NB 2� �NB 3� �`SB��^I .�SB 2���SB 3 ` �'��
Volume Total 62 202 220 165 0 10 351 79
Volume Left 62 0 220 0 0 10 0 0
Volume Right 0 153 0 0 0 0 0 79
cSH 195 435 1129 1700 1700 1413 1700 1700
Volume to Capacity 0.32 0.46 0.19 0.10 0.00 0.01 0.21 0.05
Queue Length 95th (ft) 32 60 18 0 0 1 0 0
Controi Delay(s) 31.8 202 9A 0.0 0.0 7.6 ' OA 0.0
Lane LOS D C A A
Approech Delay(s) 23A 5.1 0.2
Approach LOS C
]ntersection'$ummary.;.';' �.±> '�� ?.,, � `
Average Delay 7.4 � � �
Intersection Capecity Ufilization 49.2°h ICU Level of Service A �,
Analysis Period(min) 15 '
I
K:1PRJ18331t833\T833q01�2004+gANK_PM.sy7 Synchro 6 Report
Omni-Means Page 1
I
HCM Unsignalized Intersection CapacityAnalysis 2004+gANK, MITIG
17: Driveway north & Rancho Parkway PM PEAK
r '� t � `► 1
Movament ' WBL` WBR NBT NBR` SBL SBT
Lane Configurations ►� 'N ►� }
Sign Control . Stop Free Free
Grede 0% 0% 0%
Volume(veh/h) 123 100 178 45 31 283
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rete(vph) 134 109 193 49 34 308
Pedestrians
Lane Width(ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage '
Right turn flare(veh)
Median iype None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal(ft) 576
pX, plaroon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 593 218 242
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 593 218 242
tC,single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1
tC, 2 stage(s)
tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2
p0 queue free°� 71 . 87 97
cM capacity(vehlh) 456 822 1324
birection,Iane#.„=n� �WB i:�":"NB 1 .SB;'F', �g�'��"' `
�.
Volume Total 242 242 34 308
Volume Left 134 0 34 0
Volume Right 109, 49 0 0
cSH 570 1700 1324 1700
Volume to Capacity 0.43 0.14 0.03 D.18
Queue Length 95th (ft) 53 0 2 0
Cantrol De�ay(5) 15.9 OA 7.8 OA -
Lane LOS C A
Approach Delay(s) 15.9 0.0 ' 0.8
Approach LOS C
_ ...�: x -�..;rt ��- � � �.�"'.�' N-,�-x.- -�- ..� �� �, .. .
��1�BBBCTIOOd$URIRI�(�7-?: .r �.,�t � 3. at�.,r•�^`�� h.��i., d"'., .�rSE�ac ,�'.,, >r.��t M +',t , �� ' >.r' .
Average Delay 5.0
lntersection Capacity Ufilization 38:4% ICU Level ofService A
Analysis Period(min) 15
K:�PRJ�833\t833\T833q01�2004+gANK_PM.sy7 Synchro 6 Report
Omni-Means Page 1
I
ATTACHMENT 2
o = G
Orosz Engineering GrouR h�c ' .
MEMORANDUM
To: Rob Strong/Kelly Heffernon
City of Arroyo Grande
From: Steve Orosz
Orosz Engineering Group, Inc
Subject: Information for Staff Report on Five Cities Center— Rancho Parkway
Improvements, Wells Fargo Project
Date: February 26, 2005 OEG Ref 20205
The memorandum has been prepared to assist you in the preparation of the staff report to
present the work that has transpired since the last City Council Meeting on this project.
At the last public hearing on the Wells Fargo Project,an existing level of service deficiency was
identified for the southerly Phase.II (Wells Fargo side) driveway at Rancho Parkway. Various
mitigation measures were discussed at the last public hearing. At the request of Council, Staff,
the City's traffic consultant on the projed—Omni Means, and the applicanYs agent and traffic
engineer— Orosz Engineering Group met to discuss the merits of the various intersection
improvements suggested at the last public hearing.
Attached is a table listing of the various improvements that were presented and a brief listing of
pros and cons for each measure. During the discussion on the project, the City Council gave
input on the specific criteria that was important to them. The criteria consisted of the following:
• Maintain cross movement between Phase I and Phase IL
• Retain multiple turning movements.
• Improve Cevel of Service (LOS) along Rancho Parkway
• Improve safery aspects of roadway
Based on discussions with the consultant team, Orosz Engineering Group developed a
geometric plan that could address the issues expressed by the Council and could address the
level of service concern along Rancho Parkway. This plan is presented in exhibit A. This plan
was reviewed by staff and the City's consultant. Omni-Means responded with the memorandum
attached dated February 25, 2005.
Omni-Means found that the Orosz Engineering plan did not mitigate the poor intersection level
of service enough to obtain a level of service C or better. Omni-Means modified the Orosz
Engineering Group Plan and presented it in their February 25, 2005 memorandum: Omni=
Means did develop a plan that would meet the level of service desired by the Ciry at LOS C or
better.
Omni-Means continued in their analysis to briefly discuss the potential of the development of
Pad "I". In the Pad "I"discussion, it was noted that ultimately with the additional development
of Pad "I"a traffic signal would be required at the southern driveway access to Phase II. Staff,
Omni-Means, and Orosi Engineering Group agree that if a traffic signal may be required
ultimately, it is not reasonable to complete all of the significant modifications noted on the
Omni-Means Plan (Exhibit B) in the near term, only to have them replaced with a traffic signal.
Therefore, staff's recommendation reflecks a distinction between the Wells Fargo Conditional
Use Permit (CUP) and the potential build-out of Pad "I". The miGgation required for the CUP
would include the design and construction of a designated right turn lane at the eastbound
Phase I driveway. A conceptual design for the proposed signalization at the Phase I/Phase II
driveway would be included with this phase. Occupancy of Wells Fargo would be contingent
upon bonding for the improvement, with construction to follow.
With the development of Pad "I", the applicant would be required to fund and complete the
design of a traffic signal for the southern Phase II driveway at Rancho Parkway. The design
would include the traffic signal; pavement markings along Rancho Parkway related to the new
traffic signal, and the connedion with the W. Branch traffic signal. The applicant would also
prepare a roundabout feasibility study for the intersection of Rancho Parkway and Via Vaquero.
— — J
ALTERNATIVE REFERENCE & DESCRIPTION ATTRIBUTES A & CONSTRAINTS C)
1. Install roundabout at intersection of Phase I & II = Improves Level of Service.
C = Gradient too steep for improvement.
. Signalize the intersection of Phase I and Phase II at = Improves Level of Service.
Rancho Parkway =Would improve safety along Rancho Parkway.
C = Signal volume warrants not met.
3. Install designated right turn pocket from Phase I = Reduces queue for movements from Phase I to
(south to West Branch) Phase II and right turn movements down Rancho
Parkway.
= Improves Level of Service.
C = Requires additional right-of-way on private
ro e
. Close access on Phase I and prohibit cross = Improves Level of Service.
movements from Phase I to Phase II C = Prevents cross movements between Phase I and
II.
C = Encourages more tra�c to Phase I driveways on
. Branch.
5. Install planted median in the center of the = Improves Level of Service.
intersection to prohibit cross movements from = Prevents cross traffic between Phase I and II.
Phase I to Phase II and left turn movements from C = Limits turning movements.
both Phase I and Phase II. = Encourages U turns in Rancho Parkway, Via
aquero and Camino Mercado.
C = Encourages more traffic to use Phase II upper
rivewa .
6. Install median in the center of the intersection to = Improves Level of Service.
prohibit cross movements from Phase I to Phase II. C = Prevents cross movements between Phase I and
Install raised medians to allow for eastbound left II.
turns from Phase I and prohibit westbound left tums C = Limits Cuming movements.
from Phase II. = Encourages more traffic to upper Phase II
riveway.
. Install median to provide for left turn pocket = Improves Level of Service.
northbound into Phase I. =Allows for cross movements between Phase I and
Allow for right turn only (northbound) into Phase II. II.
Allow for left and right out only at Phase II north = Calms traffic southbound on Rancho Parkway.
access. = Eliminates need for U tum movements and
Install median (southbound)to prohibit left turn mproves safety aspects.
movements into north Phase II access. C = Creates significant grading at roundabout at Via
Install median to provide for left turn pocket aquero.
southbound into Phase II. = Impacts sight distance due to merging of exiting
Install roundabout at Via Va uero intersection. Phase II traffic de ends on median desi n .
8. Install multi-way STOP at Phase I, Phase II = Improves Level of Service.
driveways at Rancho Parkway. C =Warrants not met.
= Does not control s eed on Rancho Parkwa .
. Install additional access to Camino Mercado at the = Provides short cut for traffic using Camino
rear of Phase I. Mercado.
=Avoids other congestion.
= Ma removes truck traffic from other drivewa s.
10. Signaiize upper Phase II driveway. = Addresses sight distance problem with exiting
raffic from upper driveway.
= Provides gaps in traffic for cross traffic at Phase I
riveway and Via Vaquero.
= Provides safe merge for Phase II exiting traffic onto
Rancho Parkway.
= Increases potential for rear end collisions due to I
eed of traffic on Rancho Parkwa . !,
— _ - _--_ __ J
i _ �� �_ �� �� _ '��"�,����' ��� � �� , ,�
� ' �' � �\ ( \_�`ti . � � �, �� � ,
� ��'� ��'` �`� ' � �� ,�'����' `Aa;,A
� � _ �� . �
/ � �� - ��;�'�-�,� � � ��;��� �
� ���c: =� "`�- �, �. , , �� �
�44� � \ `.
� � � � � ,
,! �� ��� � ( . _ ���p�'��\� �' � �.����
� i� ��� . ���: '�... �� V `�� �� �� .
! 6 ��\�i .li ti-/ � _��\, . �
! @l ` � , ��.�\
_ p � � �
� i � ` � p � �/ ���/' � `J ' ���\ `\��
`� 1.
� n ��
J
s � � � ���
■ ■ \ N'yM�P �.
�
� \ � �'�Y f
s �
i j �
M H
m b � � �
� o
w
p �� �r �
� � /
_ � �• �m�o ��
�
m � N � " � �
d
s�` �!
_ J+ . �0 <
.
�� �
0
� 0�9 � LfPa X
N N e n I =
\\ � , �\�� '' , �\���\4 � . �\\ � ` , D
.�:. �---z-�— _
� ' ,r
�..�..,��.�.a..�........,............ . n�.o�w
u»uuo...�.� �.$—o.a.. e.�.o�a o�.�n c.rou�..
- — ' coecnm��
o^�^.� ��� �u m w-mr � _ w. YCq�H IbMOKYCNIS �
_ xo��
v rc M
wro .
� 'a�wr�..n f�r"�i.-aa—eN:_— MNCMO PMKWAY °
. w•�"�"M'� �`v.r. �cc am A � rs .._...eu.__._ ram urc.ueaax eo�wn..i
i�_
�.1�' � . ���%. . . ;, ..�..,� / . . �,� .. '
y� � .. t� ..... . . ' ... :
{ ' w � ` ��+� � ALTERNATIVE 1 �
. z-- ' .. +
'�!'�.'�►!'e' •.��'�`' 4 . -
,�lL� �, .` ^�ti�� • �S • *� 'A� � - . '.
G �,�. F i'°e: • c I/��, '�, � �- .� ,�
` , :. ' .�
`� � . .,,�; ( r . � / h - .
'� � . �� / ..>. ' . � � } � � ^=..
�''`?��¢ ' .��r E:- �' F��'�Y��•. ` C . ' ��f .'�`� .�` '�i'''� �..
°��f . ,�}R. fj� 'y .�,.�"e�' /i .Y+,�. � ` r�.� , y,
t� � ' .i •.'�' •�7e� r 7 . '�.. 'r: s�'` �
�t . � ��. �� � �� � �. . 3 ., � r
: �ti_ � -� ! � � " �' r
et �( . 1
4�1 � ✓�.'''� �.. / � +d°.
. . .`� � � ,�y���,•: �� �
..� ,�•
� �"' ��'�� y �;i :. � 'I.�' e7 .w`�, •/!
�i. . ./ ,, � .�l'
� t �' ��,� � �. .i
. +'k ,.
r.. ��. , t/ `•µ . :�� �� .,
, .. _. . � � � ��
y, , �y
, � . ��.�'..
. �4. � `
i � i— � ,,�
' -`=.:i / \� \3�.�s
i y� ♦
� � �r =:^�,.i' � � - �.
;� 1 O I � �, ,
y � ,
`'\�' � .,•'�� '` \�- -�/ #�! ` 1'C' - ej i�
\i ��,�.. ... . �� 1f��4�� � �
, ��;lo�} � . ., �. .�� t�ii�'f1�'��TyI ' .� �
I :. r .. �r� t�t lJt. ...;,'F,i�
� i �. ' 4rr� ���r
� x �- rY fi�aJ:��1 {e
��� i f �p�i�fT �1:,�[ ��
� Syy HRb�g.� Ir. N � �K �' ' rtf
ai� *l� : � 5 F�' •�. �.� r' :� A
� 'y', �.� �� `
, �*v�a �v��,. � � t � , � \ � •
�
�r _ r .- a
r' ;'�x ,,,.�' ��# �;:r ' ..
.
� '';
�' , + ' '
, �,
� . . , 1.�:
�r (�'�,{� � � � �
; - ,� , a � .
� � � �F' rtNy� ^ ��r y ;•' ,� `^�3 1•.. i �
r �£'�
1��'� ? ' �� � � � '� 4 ��`
fi- . C H . .. �r,f{ �Cf}'Y _
� ". s R nJj � �.
. dt t.a� ,; r eR� 1 �4, :"'�. � �;
r Ai rrs� r' . �:. ,.i:s.
✓4.,,-, 1 . � . �.� .r;�g' �
:� ,r� .. - . . ? � �
� - r ` M r
�� ' . �; R, L L ' � ,� ,�' J
,�'e �- i a„ : _:�e;.
+ , .,, , , r. � �, � �:
, ` .
� ` �J 5,� , r
�r y n ���yk ,���� -S �
��.* � �i!��'� 7,�� ���wlt 5�$i.lrbi�dt�v'i�,�� ~�a�'-£
1" ♦ L.,w
.f: k,� �',�� � . ,�v'� �i}'r � at r1 i 1�.h
y
f�
�r�,.
.v,
�` �.t
;;v
r '' —
` -
i �:; :: —_
�!' ���/ . . .. . `+a,:� / _
..t� �>� `�� ' � • , `� .
III� � I �� � l� .. .. l�.a , �
� �` ALTERNATIVE 2
�'�fif+:i °' �� : ,, ai� � 4 .y��,: 3
.`t y:�� Y . f : -'1.�., .'y�. $
.'�� /�'�� • . n f j`^ i4 a�
��.1• n ,��. � .�' • � . {� .Y �1�` '`.....� '. .'�
��-�� ' 4.f� .`.. . t /�t . : t '. _
/ ' J r: �� � ' '�
�y:�� 1 � � L. / �,�. ! �;+� �� i '
i� . � A - I �. . .V
�. G. ' .� ...,� � .'�,�� • �r .,�, �. �
I l FT . i•i'. �:� . . ,, � :/ .� „�Y::. t�,•,` �^
'��� ' � � r '�' t','�'' �.
Y •• . �.y t .[�`�� 5� t. � r
,. . . (,Lr . ` ,�' 2 r •.• ,. � . . ,c�-' ._ , :
r��{` y �
, �� �,p., r�', f
' � � r�t s� , _
f' ' '.�`•� � • �� X° ' •,../
t� ' ��
� � .:'� .r � �' {�� i
.�. t/ _.I�� �� y�.;i
� �
:�. �, � � ,�� f;
.*s-:�! ' �' � �:"` �' .
�1 �r :'� � � �!� ���`
� � �'r� t .
; t .� ��. -. -
,f'� � ,•,.
� �� < .r3 � } ����.�� s�L� �
, �� r
:7 ,� � � - � �,� ,���' ��t�' � �� '
. , � � � t� `� �� �e ��� . 1�.;�.
� - > �. ��i ��r x `4. t
tir� r.�'
�� .. � C,A..^.f f f I
/ ZT )�A��'��41�4 Y �I
�� � l f ����� ������y.t ��, iF� 't 1yM(
L���'�.�SR' -i .
, � a �� -'_ 1p�t�2`'�! .. � ��6 � � � %'`
� i r:��. .� �.._ . _r�: �'�
y.s� P >�� �,f* n� '�i \ � .
t 'S:
i ..� �f , � M ���'�'
f .( �F ' �.. � J. � � M ��.
I . '�`�« * � •' . � �
! �4� i !
A
�' �
I , w.. h » �, ��� ' � � ;�� . �� :{ �. .
4 „r .•,�. �,x.i. . rr s;}7�1� �.ri�,+t..��. �t� .
I : .a• r p,i �i^ .�.. n
� ��f r:"� {C '
� �.�.. tr.. ! � . . . �.� 4ti:�. .
. �,.� '^ •�•y � ._ . . � ,, � �
�r
;/ � . .L L 'L � ' � �� k
�,��s L � t . ' �„ ,r;::'
'� . " •-
�. „:'i 4 a � r. ;; '�` �`
i � �y;�:� ;.;,� , ,L, �.,,,a. y���r� ,� '
f.+ i2,+wKi�Y�'� ;5 �C��fr,'�rt t T��r:.. . � �
,a � �^J ;'�, S 1{*aY`i: '}` 1,'
},� i.� �.� r li r �, )4 ?
I `A! y
� �
f
.!a�LF
rr- � �
{.�
J✓
� -,
� � �� � � �. ,� ,, �
l` � � � :;. ,- ��� � w���
C
\ t ��� ' Z�'�''��,o-cr-� F . ` +� ' �'` '-o,,� ALTERNATIVE 3
�\. I�,. `" ' �. `��. `;+.�,ri ' � � ' ��
r `; �,� ,�y� �. . ' ry .
. { `"` �.M�� '4' o. �� ��
.� £+w I ~� � 6 � t ��+� `n` G„ y.
� . g �� . ' ,2s - `• � � �b,
,�F'" ,
� tl' • "4- �
.
s •- ' :;►�.� M.•� �
__� �*n ., c r�`, , L � ,��` : r
�k ��, • ��. ~ � � `'�a�' .
�` �';1. � � a.�a ` ' * r r'•�� i
^-� _:<.i( . . �, . .
/ l M1
�.1 /� ' � x ' L �s s� s�/ •i�l
��`,.�. �� �� '# �. J ' 1� �� .
� ;'yt� / ' y: .. S i�� � 7e' i
�� h ;��,c �- .•.. �' - . ��. � � � ` :
�: Y .:� �s . _
.<� �a A.. ' �..� � ,.
�- x r � .r,.
� ?Lz '^ � �
� �� �1 K I � ' ' /�
��� , :��
�� ��� �� � . ,,�:
� � ,,� � .,� •
�. � . :,
' ,,J .� . `�� �q . �",� : �r
� , .� : .��Y'a, t '; I�a �" �� �'�
'�� :��. _ � .' s �
� �� '''�:: � ��*�
, : ; .� � . ��,�.�r;�',
� �`"'�, �, ��'�,,,, � �' �. , ` � i; ',�
�
� �
+ . .�"�,J'' .`t :��y
�... !
� �':;' . ' , : .. .
�' �' � `:' �' s�it •:;'
�r: :� � � S` 3�J `�!. �
Y. �`
i
.\' ��< ,1 �� sF~� ,�.� � , � �i��i�R��i� � "+'����
��t �t� { t� .Rii
��<s � � , ��t, �;.,rr .s„F, �r,
/• �� � � '� l`,t���r: �r
�'� " . . 1'h ,,..� � �.y�"�'a!'�: \� �n.� �'J !'ii�tf
1i } .. � K� • . _
r � r �''� �� +
, � �
��., � � ,}l � ��' .�c � � \ ..�� .��
e,� � �.sy: � -�
I ' 4 � � f �:�y,�� ` \ �
: .qf d�J a � ,yy, �'�1 � ��� I I
+ � � •
� � � �' �p .��+i+� '. �
��' � � �
i .�r �,3�� ' r �i � ���� ��� � .1 i:�t., -��-:
R �.i'.,y . ` ~ * r� � 'yM �
. A` r•P��v,_ ... �a ; � n� y,� �'j�'ry ��3< `� � 9'° ��'lr ., .. w
��, '�� �.�. a .Y.1 ' ����
r s F �
G i�� r , � • � \ '��:�.
.. �.� � ..YI:�� S.. �4 . .._ . A � ,,
''y ,A � l ,�� _ W�� �,,�r � .
/ � . . 1. � � � '� �< i ,,
r I�t�� ',�� •�'x• C t: ; +� ;:.
+�!r� ,, ...<�, � ' �j� ; I ,�
,;, .+ ,y � ` :..rrir+,��l �� oyf�ti`�v„p�^t��'�.�`��'���+Sr�"�7+k' �.�.
�'YI ` .�� �.� ,.: ' . �i'� 7��� ��1 .'.r. �¢F'1tYJ �1�.�'.' ".�,
.� .` ✓. .�.. � y '4 .
� �.:��4
. . � . . ._�._
..A
I
, .
. . . . . .� :L ��� . � -
.k .}
, � —a �` {
� ' � t� ` ` �,: � . � ,�,��i ` �'.,.J""', d f"�� � �' ��°� ' _..s�:..J
� - ,�.+ t . s... � .....�em.��"`
�; .�,.�. � �� ,
��,� � m t � y� .� � '� � . . . . _
� ��"'+�� ' �l� ,� . �e�: . . �r _ ... ..
t r , . _
.. � {���,�.r'�.°?e.au. ��;'�'r'"Rx=T+'
'� �__�=-� t �� - i °'� � ,,�-�"Y._ —��
J,
1M 7!. �' � '�' � � � .
.. �- �,i '..� ' ,,:r �
�
— — �- �— — °•-' }
4 �''�r. '�,' . � d r,'
-a A.. [�
�7`--�i s . ,%
� �tr� � �yv �. - � �'vA . �
� � � ' � �C � { � �" , . .� � .
�. j ' ,:,.. �-_.r t�� �...,, ''� F '' ,;.+��
. `� � � � � �� � _ �} d � �.'�.� '
� � � i,�� �'y� � F .
i
� � � 1
I ' � � V
t ' :
.�<^ -., � - '�pf.'..�� � . .
� _ i � . � ���;
c.. ' ��� �: I . � /• c. .nr f,
. .'�.,.l.. , +r
� � ��.
<. ��� 1 V N
���. ;
��� � • _ . �
��� ��.,., . ', ;�,
� �� y _<
, :
�, � � , � �
.
�, r„ , �
� � .�
e� 1�� • 4 . �� ' � � �� �� ��� �.� ��� ��n
'� �. q,. . '.. �;,;
� �`., '� �pu � '.,�{ 9:d , _,•'.
I %• \ �K I
�� ��, � , � � ;
�� ..rr ' � - � ' `',� ,,� . "`_�;� i1 a-��
� f�� � y �
�'= a �
- ,� ' � i.F?i M�l r .a'
� �f J ' � �Y � 1 +1�.� yna'�p.��_
� . � at � �
.. ' *`� � �n � 'i r 'T !'
,`��, �. 1 e`/ .' � �} �� ai (.au�k4�9d
c�� 4 � s��i��,t,�h� ', .�w� �,�r}�- ,
� '�i �y-T�}' . � � y .
�w � , .
� j> ��. A�..: � ?r,lR a'r.<< ' +�4 � .•{_ � e
'.� y�
� (, *� � }�x ��.
..d; , . k i 1, ..v.;^�'
/r e' w :��=
i � �:r � �a.
� � � ,t �.i�yt
✓ �% ` 'E{, , =�-� ,�t ,� d• '�, 1R
t�V'-�k 5� ) `� �
� �. :, . ;�,.; � '
� ii �
' n � � , st 'J�' � ��.ti� .�.. o
i\;. . .. y,�f ,,a � r Y�
`„ I ';�.y i I�
� J , 6 . . "�-' � a,Y �"• f_"
� 1 �� " t.� �' �� rw� � � ��Y # y � � � �
�`f �, ���4�3 �� ,- . �
�, i , ��. r• `�./f ty; �'.
' 4 ��
� :�J� , ° �'} v� `l���!�y+�«r`` •z�,T ¢
� p'�'_..� �"' \ •
L C L � � w:. ,�. `?_� �x. .,
� (�! r .1 � �� �� ?� ;- `�;C�.
�� \ �� �',`�* r ��� ��
} r �".�� ALTERNATIVE 5
-�"��2fitr��.'./�1 • . � . '
,r1` �'1fi�'' +1Q ��. :c?����- Y�� + � ' _ ���'* ��'� ry' .
, nIJ :.,\ f . w.�- e. "�'�- � }{��� .. � ..
r � : . v� �,.. . �# �t �.-�
� , ... . .r..�'. �C :�.' �{ �
� ~ �l''• ` "a,_FT' , �i .._� _S '�' �
� A
?� 'S�� • �'.
:li�
� }�
`�, ,�- . � �= .
�
.�
i :-L��,+�'���� '' ; �: � ` �/` " s � �'.`: ' x � , � ,-�
,
- , `�-� �
�..y�� # .
i � '� •, ��'�; , � .;s '� �r.
( .;�:� .��'�;���r -� . . +��r /�'�� . � � �,•, .
I tL �"`� �y'�r '7 '`✓ �,,r� (/ ` �'�', .•'J
�� J �^'� �•� y �►. � - �.
� �ti:� �„ '� •• >� : �' $�t: t
' �" :�,' � '`� yt . � �` ✓,,,•
� � ° �� *�„�.�; � � � �
� � �,i � � �'� ���„�' � -
� p/� ✓ ;* ,�
,� ' w,��` �\ . ���:�T-; ' ` � w i-� .:.. �^ ..;r =, ,
� � �,��� 1- , �
`r �/: � ��, _ � � t` ..iSi � ,/..
� =n .
� '` -��. ' / r �„ ' • � I'
I � ''a� 1��,•,y"- ' , - '� fl; . ��� �
'� x '
; r-, . a,r`
, �y , i��� �J � �� � `• �`:
! �� � " ,
I �"�r: , '�" �: #' �;.,� ��i� :r;�`
+��. � ��� i`?����,: , � � �
� ':? � r�� ..+,�^'" - �e� "S 1 � � -.G
/ .... �b 'M ' � ii:� i: j 4M . Y ��:
., , :
*4 � , �G i��.,
� a ;.s�'� r ,,,FaA �
��i .. ... ', � � . .�. `� ` 1. ..
f '�Y. � � ` '�� �� • '��� `\�,�� �t
.Y"�*.. t 'e � ;,x� � � ;,='
, ' , j ..• • ,.s�... <<..
�
� ��fi� .., i
.
... �� � k �l'f .'�- ` r ' ,� ��
af
� - ' , � �s,» ��� -t iPf. •
s �`� �ti ff ., �� .I�
Y � �• y '�.� �j.�• . .
a � ,E`� t,.; ± ,� " ��
��r � ..a f � , x� .
` y ,,}}��II��� ' ,/ �� ,�-
� �N {�•Y�r � �%x '+ ��)3���.r Y hi�r`3,�� ir .
�. ,r•} j' 4, -.i �)f:�r i�+ �, F'
��+ �.�,
.xi;•,. Ni.��4� r � � �`.i' �`�
. � a.'�i� � � ��. � '�� , � � . P
�.
`.� �
� ♦ � � - L .L ,t ,(,` . �' ,
i .�,�� :- �..: $ � Y � �+'
� �i .Y � My � � 1. ? } S .. �. � �u1
� •� } f 7 �, ' ,�� � 1 ( ,. � �� .� ",� '1
.� . , . � �� 7 .. . .{ S � j�:,.
' i:� i` w . . . �'. ,! f,.� C1 v� /�p�¢��A ''f/�4{'� 1i �4r.
i i � ,✓+'w�• • „ ,�� YI, +�.`�•.��f �i,r �' ` ^''
_y �� � � f '�.
1 � �
f %
t � , 5�3
_ _
\\ � , � �
v ALTERNATIVE 6
/
�
�n
a � �,e
� �� g �c`
; �
; Q
> �
� � � ��
i � �� �
� �-�
;
1
�
s
� z
;
�
; ,, �<
,;
�
� � �
� �� � ���
��
� � � �
O r �
. � � /
� �
� ':p•: ��
ti
.x ti,�.,
CONCEPTUAL
MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS
•�� RANCHO PARKWAY
� ARROYO GRANDE. CALIFORNIA
Orosz Engineering Group, Inc. �
20205 20205ezOt.dwg i�� � ��
�_ _ _ -
�- --� � � � ,
_ - __,_ �
_-__ - __ _ - rt_ _. � � �% ,
- F . __ : -� f .. � -,
_ , �_
- —+-- —� � _- � � � i�� �� � j %!�i
i
� !I f✓ �♦
� h ; '
, � ; � � � � � � � °�� ���`
-- 1 ," ',, ��
_� , ;. �� , �.
� / d �' ' '��`�' ` ' ';, \ , '
',� � _ _ - ,�/ � � �" �
'� ,
�. . - _ -�, '� i' �;� �\� '���<. .
, � � �
��t�- - - - � .
, ,-- -
__
-- ,_ ,
( . . _ \� a �, 'e,�.�,� j.
,
� .�n---i °�xµ'�y � �'
i , \��� ` � � �� ' �_ .
J \\ c�
�
I � i i ,,H,��� � � , �\�-� - �
- , � ,... �� ..
K
�.
, ( „a
�.
�
,, ;1 m ,'sro;�_ ! �% ° :� �
� _ _._— . z ..
� _ _ � ;
, � - _ ��i " .._ . . - . .
�. I � -. _ . . .� �,,,�' _ • ' w � .
� �. n _
. C� - _.. '_ w,R . .
^� . � .1'.. .
.�4... Y � �.. �
,\...'\ y 4
i �' i
' � �� o`t'y� �
� ��' ,.,� . _
�Y
� \t y
�
,, , m
� �a p /1`I^\y� ��'. D
�\ � �� � �` � <
� m
t�----x.�-- �
.m ,��.,.. _ �........�_.�.,...,..�..�.,
�—
___
., i . � .��... ' . . . . . .. mr u✓nro ara.w�ww CONC[PIWL xmos
. i . i .... �=� ... YEdAN IYPROVCYCNiS
MNLHO PIRNWIY
. : .1 ___ �. . .... . . , ..
I
\\ v�• ����� .\�� '�\f/ � �
� � \ \�� � � � � � N
w � �� -� ���% �
' �� \ � �� � � 'O��-�:%' "�~
Z � � i � � i , �.
W � �<� ��� .-� -����\ �
� � � �. ��
J
a /j�-' 8� � ^ 6
.�� C )
, y N �
����� �
�__
— � -� p g� :� ._
_�. �,1� . .
--- ---- `_'` . ��
_ __�_ • � �
- ----- _ _`_+ . . . . ': H HI
-��� \\''
_-� '��� i
• •,
O
, `�
\P--�
,. �:—_---__ . � ,�°� `�1
�j�\ '�� � -c r
/�
� s� ��—
., �
���- �� \
, i �, ��-.___
, �7 � � '
v � , , . �, . .. �
: '� 'C�. �` -- -
� .' � . � , �-,:_:-;=�:���,-�-1:a,-:.
I
,
ALTERNATIVE 9
'\ / \ s` \u v / � '(' L\
�\ � � .�°� ���` � /,, `• ,
`�, � � �' ��,��
�
,
�� ,� �� �� �,�,, ;;
- � � � '� � `;
� \ �, � -,
� � �� .
�%i �� .�,-�
� _:�~ �
��
��.
w ��
�i�
�
�
i
i
do 1--.
� O �s
" � �
; � �
i �
; � �
� �
; \ �
G� ,
� �
O \� ��
�' �\ �'�`,
� / \ ,.
� 4� � ,,
�����
�b \,. ���
� . �,, ,�
'\\ i
t.
��\��
1'�
..\ •
'�,
5,\y
C
ALTERNATIVE 10
�\�. \ �\ � ; ! ;1 � 1�\�\ �,
.: �i � T� �r I '
: � � �,
, - ; ; ; � i ,
,,� , �. � � ,,� /
�, � � ��; - � �
`� � � ; ? ,\ i
; �
� �i. � '� � ` � �
� /
I� % f / � �
, �, � \ � �
I � /` � ���
' � ° ' � �
� / � -
�
.,�
��
� � � �� ,
j �� �
,
! ., i
; �
i . � � .
' s--"�/� r
i � /' �
; o �� .
i \ `�, � '
; �
i �', aa ✓
i , . �� ��
; 'j . ��� �
! I .� � /
i � �I � '" i
.�J ° �`�`„` �`
� � , � �:r,: �`�,: ';`,��j $
� � � .�. � i , ��
� r I ��
� �� �,, ,�
�`• / i � ,, �
,
J ,�r / I x , I ' � \ ��'�� :
!r � f / � = l) l � �,'�, ;Fi �'
�-
t � ,� ,
� �A °
i w
:r k
R
�)
,'+�: �
�
/
`
1 F-
�; , . �, _ ��
J � ,� � ;:n::,.�.
. � ,
� - �. •
°�_�
, , ,
# ° '
� �
�
. �#. _. . . �� .. « ,ris
. .``� },�. � »...;� � :.
�;.� �:.....� �. ..
�'t�g' ��14 I� . . . � r , l F �
� �,.',4�
� , .^^ @,,�: F��.. '.e �' . d S 5j
� '"�^ " 4 � i ��. .ei ` � 4
+ � -s.�—'"��_r::o.�'n.
� z � x
"�� >� .� �... �., 9
.. - �
_.�,�` . � �
, ... :�
. �.E h
� ���
, ��; _
{� � �,
y, .� .
,`� �%� ��
�
�; . • ti
3 � � r '
+� _'�i� ,
' 7F�f. � -' \� .
� ■ � \� '_
��.� � ` �� �'� � � .
� - r �� . .. � 4�`. . \,� .. _. .
� � �. . � � . ��� . �
�f . "',��- , .l :*�►'�.\ ��. -�:ti.'t
� ��. *� �„ �'
� ' • �r� �,�� .
_� ,-
• „ . :y
� ��.� �� r , �,�-
' � � "�� �� ���'�
; � • �� �(�
� n
i �
[ .
I ��q�y � �
�::.T..�. �� ;
i .� � . '.�ry�4,.� .. � � .
f t° �
. . � � . - . ��w. ''w"s ,��"% ' q�§,,� � m a
�,� ti
.+'�'•'"�� � ����.,� � ' � ".. �
�, ` ' � �
� � �� � �
;� �
� ��� ��-�
n'
' '�� �"s�., % +'
��y � .l.�``' �' ,� �� '"���� ; ,.y.. +� � ' g* ��
-•^ r
.f. �.., : A�' �:: �
� �ii .� .� / .' .XY�,���4 � 'N
� � ,
p� � � � � 1. y...
�, M
f � » �
{ J�
� ♦
�Y ' /
l
�,°`� �!'�,�. '`.�.
= .....-..d..--^_�-„ �;
''�f� W� ` },"•.; p tl • ." -A
/ -'' �; �.
�,. . �
�
. �„
� ,��` � � ;., �.
� . ,.:.
� ` � .� � . � Y�' ,
Y
.x . - - .. , .�
��s.1. ; �d�. .. , .�� .
�
as x 11�
4
�
Y �
� � �
r �r ` ,,'i .;_. . .... '��iG,r ' ". p ''n,.x � _ ._. .
��, ...�,_ e � ..
�a� �1�h. ��� .1 � � '.�. .
�� ���� ��� �
r .
, �
. � � �1 � � � � . v. . t�.
�C� - �:'%
.a:�,,, .s.�'• � `�:� �., ,
'�' ' -• .titi,�: ; � :�
`�r�,k ; -��>� `'� .��'�`'.. �
�,. , �
.
.,.., � r_ e �,
�� � ' r , . �.
+F._ �y F l' }*�..- ♦ ti� �
n)r" ,, °'�� �,��'^„`�� • ,
� f .
� � � '1
�r --�-' , . . � {� �;�
., � k
o _ <��'�/�;,.�.. ^'r�� {, f. .
I �:
��d' rr,r ��`�'�•�� �~
\,4 "
'��,;� t.
, ,. ,z�f
� — —_ �„ K
J y P
G e. '
� `� 'T�W� � \
�,�d' ��.,u� ~�
Y' Y �\
.i° � "�.. � � ' �k 1�^� �Y,
`
3
.h�a� . .. q�
•�.�t. � \ �t .
� � ��,+� � , ��t j�� �� � �.
_ _`
•
� / y�4.
�1 f/
� 'i� � � �� � R '�,; . �
,� + m . � . „.. .. ♦
n�r ! / ,/. /, 4 � � x.�• '� . � _,�.�i
��. � �� r � � . :�
' �� 4
�.� �
� � ��. � �.Y... � y.' �' .� .
� � �
�- LL�4,
;� y
,:+'� . y'"�' , �. "w� ;�?�.
�" �, �
�. �v
" � ,J . fi� . .Mt
/'
^ *
f'� �� . � . . £ R���
p 3j ��.1" . .. .M�'c�°'� �F I ` � �� r. ��
���� � + ���..
'r .f. � .. �+��" � qa -
�l` a �k �'
�., � i� �' ,
, a i i � � �s
� p '
�� y t �,'f" " /. � �p iyj
.f p � t� Fj ��
�`g �� t1 '
.y�r gr�
3�.� � '"�� '�.
�� . . , ��� `Z..
t;,> � �':
� � 1! ' � I . ..
� ) � F ,
�
m
t, �, - F
�� � a :, ` ,� .
If,qr . �z� �� 9,�` �
~, �
� � �
� ti
fi� t 9 •,�.
� �
a
!;:
;3 „ �
� '���
�� ,,� •�{ " I '
� k �
j,p "- �
� v
� �
�� � � , � „,� �"
,, t+ �.A � '�i .- ��
�� r . � _, . . ' .�� y' �
, ,° l
r 4'": y .#� . ' - . ..- . . ..r-.
• � � �"�' `�ir
P . �t� �
p'?^
�+ _� �r
' \ ,i`/
.. ,�. d,.+'.. ' j ". ,�.�� xi
, �` . . . . � � . . � �! f���. `�
. .: � �'w � ��a�,:,
,� ` � �� w, �. r i� ,
'" � 1'a
4� ' } p�" `••y^�•� dr
., � J� �/
� ++�`
♦ .' ��
:�,
I " �!'
� , \
,
i �. � �f � . s 3d`, � \
�` , s '� � , _��, � �`'-.
��
.�� � ��'� � �)
y �y. � 4
�'� 9 . .~� , � ��V f+g� � Q� f��_�.
� j d+K+r� . ��'.'y;''d: � ,
� f Y ,..
tf ;� ��Y1y�f .��`, �
��'�. .�' .
_.. � ,� , `
. , ��. ."' lr l. �
J
�� ,�•�,�,} :4i:� i
G
• � � � i
6P.. +i:.T `h':» � y� xU,
���.�� � ���� ' '� 7 1 .. '1 f: '�/7 s�
r �,�. •; ," r � w
7 � r
t` _' �� � � ,� f,
c +"�Mi�?I�„` _ . + "^.�' .
I�: �� ��� � a.�.
. �:, � +�m
. ` .` �S p�y��d � .. . d� �
.. � � i 1�•�2 �• �
. � . . `�'� °, ��
� � ., ��
,�� Y�
� � {
��,�� �� . � � � }.�.5,�'9 �� �►
,� ��R ~•� I ,` �1l . ... �./ ��
�� � � ��J
ir � '�. � � ��.a ' ., . Y
�� � A
��
�?��
U
'i`.
�
��3�� ��4' �� 'd
� / {�
" +_AMe.� .�'F Y
�.n,tiv....r.:.a ,
�Y/��, � �%r�l� . �`•
/�:
�
,�'"�' ` � : � ;,
a
�� �
�
g ;�`<
b� . . � M:" . .. .
// )� .
l' .�� _ N ' . �5��
i.;��. � �'�i
r
� �
{
I � �3
`�
' �� • „
� ` , ALTERNATIVE 6
/
�
�
�
�
� � ���
�
�� � a�`
Q
/ ��
�`' �? �n
�� �
s
� �
'' �<
� � �
� �� � ���
��
� � > � ;
�
� O Yv / �
� !
� � I
� ':O: �� E
_
s ;
yl- �
CONCEPTUAL �
•=� MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS i
RANCHO PARKWAY �
� ARROYO GRANDE. CALIFORNIA
Orosz Engineering Group, Inc. 1
20205 20205sx01.dwq 1" � Sp' �
—_ .— J
__ _ _ -----_. __ _ _ ---- _- __._..___ _
„�.�_�<u�. - �
_ , AqUYIW OIpMYtl -�.• _ . � ��:��• •=a
�. ... S�. �� .. � :.
..,• S1M311lAOYdY11 NYIP311 0":"�• •, •a �.`• ur.. .e. —.. . _ —.
z��
lYllld3'JW'J _ - .— . -
mwvm'»nw wmx'n uo - �. � _. ` .
_ � _
cz �=�� =.� .._. . „ ___. ._—_ L
� �
� � . .i �nns -
; ���
Q � - l
...� �� � -_ �• �, � �y� "
� � ___ . , �� . �
LL � � , ,k� � �� -� ��Q �i �� �
: — - � . � �— �� �� a�' �+6. � , i
H � . '. ,. .•. � � � "
� . , � � � i
J \ � �
` r.
Q �� ` \ � �� �"�,�� ��
� � � ,
> �
�,
� , t�� � - - � " ' � � ���
, b
�
, y
. ,- < �
% � � i / � ."
+\ �_ �, __-. —� ' ° \ � a 6�� � _ _ = II
-- � �� ,«. �� --- �
_ m '',
, 5
� �\ .e�0., � 1 i ''� ',� ��;��� �� S6 !� ',
/, .,- ..._.., ' ... ��° � ' - _
__ ____
r
.,
� f _ _ — —---_ °��� a� � ,
/ � `� � �� �� � � �
/ � � , , r '�
� /,-/ , , �� �� �
�'� .. �,,, , , �
'� , "u"'�d �� -, � , �, � ��,I
� � i �, �� �"""� ��� � � ' '
� � �
Y
� . ��,���f� �_ ' � . _� _-- i
. � . ` � � � —_— "
. // � ��\ \� — s
. . / j Ci�� � �� � � r
�.� � �j ��/ / � � ��� �� i —
�
V� � � / . �j•„ �'.,r � � � ��� � a
� � V ��� ��A, / �� 'X �i �.,% � '.
\ ` �- � � .. � � .� T�
._ ,
� � /
� ✓/ �
�, � �/ � ' � , /O%. .� � i I �I '�, i I '� �I �I ''.
� � �'� /, �' /, � � � i �
�`�� �� . / �/ �/ �� ' I', —
� � • � ���" ��� � � � e I - _
i �� � �\ �� / �� —J —.
�/ _�' � :�' — � __
i _ _ _
� i, ' '
�. . � .." �� , , . _ � �` .— ,—_
,
_ � _ �� ; , � � .�i „ . �—� -- — �- --
ALTERNATIVE 8
'� � � � �, 1f 'f � �
\\ '� , i
\�� _5
� . / �
.
� ;
�� �,�
o ��' C
, ��� ,
,
,
�
,,
�
. � ��
� �� "�
� � 'i
� . �
. r �
-� r �
� � o �� . �
,:
� do� ` i
� � � �
� • �� ,
��, • ��� � �
. / ;
,
��; � � _ . _ ;
, ,�P � �, �
� . �
��� . o � � � I
�� ��, ✓ ��, �
�J �` / � --� ':t�: �� .�,� � ��� �
, � ,-�, i��� �;,.� �2i
_ �, „ ✓J �
, r s ,
�� z I �� �. .'�. E
r lr� : i . � 1 I � �. ., , ' �
- , �.!�� ��
ALTERNATIVE 9
� � ��- .
� �� ° i
v �`,� -,.
� �^ ��=-.
, ,
� �;.
;
.
,
-�^'"
�
��
G
�
�
>
0 �� �/
�s
�
�
�
��
��
O/ � � �
y \ `�,\
o � �
/ �� \�� ,
� � ���• �
� � , �
., i
� �' � I
�� ,. �
�., �� �
,
.
�,,, 4
�, �
,, �
'��`�• i
` �
,�
„
i
;
;
ALTERNATIVE 10
e, � � \ � � , � �
���:: �v � � , �� �
� �
� � t ,
�
�
�
�, ���
''' C
,,�
° � ��� ,
�
;
. �� �,� �
''i
- �
. ^ ��
�
�� �
'\--� � ,�
'� ° �� � I
;
�) ,
,�'� � v i
>a �� � � �
I � � I
� ,, �
YI � . , ;
o � �
, ,
�� � �`�,� � �� �
%` '' �� � � � �:��� � i`�'�� �� ��$ ';
.,, / � ,
, � � , ?, � ,
_ � ,� ';\ �� � ;
( i! �/ � � �
� [; � � '��1� ''` �� �
r - ' ��� i
;
o� pRROY�c
� INCORFON�TEO Z ATTACHMENT 3
� o
�
# .nxr m, ie�i *
c9��FORN`P MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROB STRONG
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
BY: KELLY HEFFERNON
ASSOCIATE PLANNER
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
CASE NO. 04-001 TO ALLOW A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION TO
OCCUPY BUILDING "J" OF THE FIVE CITIES SHOPPING
CENTER; 911 RANCHO PARKWAY; WELLS FARGO BANK
DATE: FEBRUARY 8, 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends the Council adopt the attached resolution
approving the proposed project.
FUNDING:
It is uncertain what the net financial benefit or loss wouid be to the City by allowing a
bank to occupy what is currently a retail-approved lease space. The subject property
has not been occupied to date and therefore has not generated any sales tax revenue
for the City. There would be a potential future loss in sales tax revenue by allowing a i
non-retail use. Secondary financial benefits could be gained from the bank drawing �
more people to the Five Cities Cente�to shop. j
t
DISCUSSION: ;
Backaround
The City Council approved Conditional Use Permft 96-541 to construct the Five Cities
Center in July 1996, which included the construction of fourteen (14) commercial buildings i
in two phases. The site plan approved as part of the conditional use permit designated the
location, maximum building size and uses for each building. As shown on the approved '
site plan for Phase II, Buildings I, J and K were designated for commercial retail uses, and
Buildings L and M were designated for restaurant uses (reference Attachment 1). ;
In November and December of 2001, the City Council approved amendments allowing a �
4,100 s.f. portion of Building J as a restaurant with outdoor patio, instead of retail, and �
decreasing the size of the restaurant in Building M from 6,000 to 5,000 s.f. with a 1,200 s.f.
patio. A.G. Edwards & Sons, a financial institution, was alfowed to occupy Building L, '
originally planned for restaurant then retail use. I
The City Council first received this application for Conditional Use Permit Amendment on
May 25, 2004 with the Planning Commission recommending approval (without a
cirr couNCi�
ACUP 04-001
FEBRUARY 8, 2005
PAGE 2
supporting traffic study). The Council deferred a decision and requested a traffic study.
The proposal was heard again on October 26, 2004 when a trip generation comparison
between retail and bank use was presented for preliminary review. The Council again
deferred a decision and requested a comprehensive traffic study including new counts,
comparison with original 1996 EIR projections, Pad `I' reconfiguration cumulative impacts,
and recommended mitigation measures for any deficient intersections. The traffic study
was not compieted in time for the January 25, 2005 hearing, so the item was continued to
February 8.
Building J has a total of 11,700 square feet of lease space, 4,550 square feet of which has
been vacant since it was constructed. The bank proposes to occupy this remaining lease
space, rendering all of Phase II as completely occupied, except for Building I which has yet
to be constructed. Originally, Pad 'I' was planned as a single 36,000 s.f. retail anchor
building in Phase II. The proposed Pre-Application for Pad 'I' reconfiguration was
submitted in November 2004 (Attachment 2), and was used to evaluate probable
devefopment impacts including traffic prior to separate Conditional Use Permit application.
Parkina Repuirements
The main issue raised by this proposed CUP Amendment is how the parking and
circulation will be affected within Phase II of the shopping center. The parking calculations
summarized in the table below show that the proposed change in use for lease space from
commercial retail to financial institution will not adversely impact the parking configuration
or the abilit�r to provide sufficient parking for Phase II, exclusive of Pad 'I' reconfiguration
which will be subject to a subsequent CUP application.
SUMMARY OF PARKING REQUIREMENTS
No. Parking Spaces
Existin Parkin 263
Parkin Demand:
Wells Fa o or retail use 18 �
Ba'a Fresh Zg
Coldstone Creame 15
Hallmark �2
Trader Joe's 47
AG Edwards 16
Vi neto Restaurant 50
Total rkin re uired 184
Attachment 3 is a Memorandum dated January 31, 2005 from Omni-Means (the
transportation consultant who prepared the City's 2005 traffic model), the concurrent Pad
'I' reconfiguration traffic impact study report (TIS), and the prior trip generation comparison.
The tra�c model report and Pad 'I' reconfiguration TIS report are also transmitted as
separate items of consideration, and they can be utilized for more detailed background
and findings related to this ACUP hearing.
S:\COMMUNITY_DEVELOPMEM�PR0.IECTS\CUP�Five Cities Center�Wells Fargo�2-22-05 ACUP Walls Fargo CC Rpt.doc '
cirr coun►ci�
ACUP 04-007
FEBRUARY 8,2005
PAGE 3
The memorandum concludes that the driveways on Rancho Parkway nearest the
intersection with West Branch Street into Phase I and II are currently operating at Level of
Service (LOS) 'D', an unacceptable level, during the weekday PM peak hour. The memo
(pages 2 & 3) also addresses weekend peak hour comparison with weekday peak by a
recent additional count sampling. Table 2 summarizes the findings which are generally
higher on weekend than weekday, but do not enable conclusions beyond the locations
studies. The memo suggests and depicts a traffic channelization median which would
enable left tums into both phases, but preclude cross traffic or left turns from either phase.
It would still be possible to cross Rancho Parkway by right turn and `U' tum movements or
utilizing the upper driveway senricing Phase II or other routes from Phase I. (See Figure I
of Memo).
Staff has inserted a condition of approval that would require this channelization mitigation
with detailed design engineers' cost estimate and improvement security deposited to
assure construction prior to Wells Fargo occupancy and completion as soon thereafter as
feasible. It should be understood that the City would NOT allow new building Pad "I"
reconfiguration occupancy without his mitigation being completed, and that other mitigation
may also be a prerequisite for any new buildings.
Planninq Commission
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed financial use on May
4, 2004 and recommended approval after discussing issues of parking, traffic and
lighting (see Attachment 4 for Meeting Minutes).
It should be noted that the Planning Commission, SAC and ARC recommendations a
were all prior to. the City Council requirement for a comprehensive traffic impact study.
The TIS memo reveals an unacceptable Level of Service 'D' at the Rancho Parkway
driveway during weekday PM peak hour (and higher weekend counts at this nearest
problem intersection), as well as three other unacceptable Level of Service (LOS)
locations more distant but impacted by the proposed project.
White the report proposes intersection channelization as possible mitigation to the
driveways peak hour LOS problems, it is the City Council's determination that would
enable this or other alternate as a condition of approval or required mitigation, and the
significance of this impact on other locations. If the City Council wants the earlier
Planning Commission recommendation clarified to address the traffic impact study, it
would be necessary to continue this hearing and refer the matter back for additional
consideration.
Staff Advisorv Committee (SAC)
The SAC considered the project on March 31, 2004 and discussed issues relating to
adequate garbage capacity within the existing enclosure to handle the added use, onsite
utilities, sufficient lighting for the ATM, and employee parking (see Attachment 5 for
Meeting Notes).
E
�
S:\COMMUNITY_DEVELOPMEM�PROJECTS\CUP�Five Cities Center�Wells Fargo�2-22-05 ACUP Wells Fargo CC Rpt.doc �
..__. __. _..�
I' cmr couNCi�
( ACUP 04-001 �
FEBRUARY 8, 2005
PAGE 4
Architectural Review Committee (ARC)
The ARC considered the sign application for the bank on May 3, 2004 and
recommended approval as submitted (see Attachment 6 for Meeting Notes). Two wall
signs are proposed that meet the requirements for the Five Cities Planned Sign
Program. No signage is proposed on the back of the building.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
A public notice was sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the proposed project, and
a public notice was placed in The Tribune on January 14, 2005. Staff has not received
� any commen#s or correspondence to date.
l,
; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
i Staff has reviewed this project in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act,
'� and has found that the project is exempt per section 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines.
Therefore, staff does not anticipate that this project will have an adverse effect on the
environment. Because the use occupies an existing building, it is not necessary that a
Mitigated Negative Declaration be prepared or filed, but based on the traffic study, the
� recommended mitigation is a condition of approval.
� ALTERNATIVES:
j The following alternatives are presented for the Council's consideration:
�
! 1. Approve the Planning Commission's recommendation and adopt the resolution;
i 2. Modify the Planning Commission's recommendation and adopt the resolution; or
3. Take tentative action to deny the project application and direct staff to prepare an
� appropriate resolution for City Council action.
, If the Council selects alternative 3, staff will return with the appropriate resolution at a
! later meeting.
Attachments:
1. Original Site Plan for the Five Cities Shopping Center
2. Pre-Application site plan for Pad 'I' reconfiguration
�` 3. Omni-Means memo of January 31, 2005
� 4. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of May 4, 2004
5. SAC Meeting Notes of March 31, 2004
6. ARC Meeting Notes of May 3, 2004
7. City Council Meeting Minutes of May 25, 2004
i 8. City Council Meeting Minutes of October 26, 2004
��. S:\COMMUNITY_DEVELOPMEN'T�PROJECTS\CUP�Five Cities Center�Wells Fargo�2-22-05 ACUP Wells Fargo CC Rpt.doc
--. .. _.. ----- �----- _. _---
� _ _