Loading...
Minutes 2005-08-23 _. -- ---~- . MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, AUGUST 23,2005 COUNCIL CHAMBERS; 215 EAST BRANCH STREET ARROYO GRANDE,CALlFORNIA 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Ferrara called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL City Council/RDA: Council Members Dickens, Guthrie, Arnold, Mayor Pro Tem Costello and Mayor Ferrara were preSent. City Staff Present: City Manager Adams. City Attorney Carmel. Director of Administrative Services/City Clerk Wetmore, Chief of Police TerBorch, Director of Building and Fire Fibich, Director of Parks, Recreation & Facilities Hernandez, Director of Community Development Strong, Associate Planner Heffernon, and Assistant Planner Bergman. 3. FLAG SALUTE Jim Mitten, representing Knights of Columbus, led the Flag Salute. 4. INVOCATION Pastor Paul Jones delivered the invocation. 5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS None. 6. AGENDA REVIEW 6.a. Resolutions and Ordinances Read in Title Only Mayor Pro Tem Costello moved, Council Member Arnold seconded, and the motion passed unanimously that all resolutions and ordinances presented at the meeting shall be read in title only and all further reading be waived. 7. CITIZENS' INPUT, COMMENTS, AND SUGGESTIONS Andy Reichert, VardLoomis Lane, referred to the Lucia Mar Unified School District's decision to I eliminate school bus service and expressed concern regarding SCAT buses using the Strother I Park parking lot as a turn-around. Mayor Ferrara req uested that staff contact Mr. Reichert in response to his concerns and follow-up on the matter. 8. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Ferrara requested that items 8.e., 8.1., 8.h. and 8.j. be pulled. Mayor Pro Tem Costello moved, and Council Member Guthrie seconded the motion to approve Consent Agenda Items 8.a. through 8.k., with the exception of Items 8.e., 8.1., 8.h. and 8.j., as recommended. City Attorney Carmel read the title of the Ordinance in Item 8.k. The motion passed on the following roll-call vote: AYES: Costello, Guthrie, Dickens, Arnold, Ferrara NOES: None ABSENT: None CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 23, 2005 PAGE 2 8.a. Cash Disbursement Ratification. Action: Ratified the listings of cash disbursements for the period August 1 - August 15, 2005. 8.b. Consideration of Statement of Investment Deposits. Action: Received and filed the report of current investment deposits as of July 31,2005. 8.c. Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the Fire Station Expansion General Obligation Bond Property Tax Levy. Action: Adopted Resolution No. 3870 Authorizing The Fire Station Expansion Property Tax . Levy For Fiscal Year 2005-06. 8.d. Consideration of Approval of Final Parcel Map AG 03-0115 Subdividing One (1) Parcel into Three (3) Residential Parcels at 1169 Maple. Action: Approved Final Parcel Map AG 03-0115, subdividing 0.33 acres into three (3) residential parcels. 8.g. Consideration of an Award of Contract to Curt Bailey Masonry, I nc. for Construction of the East Grand Avenue Enhancements at Courtland Street Project, PW 2005-06. Action: 1) Awarded a contract for the construction of the East Grand Avenue Enhancements at Courtland Street Project, PW 2005-06 to Curt Bailey Masonry Inc. in the amount of $23,480.00; and 2) Authorized the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency of $2,348.00 for use only if needed for unanticipated costs during the construction phase of the project. 8.1. Consideration of Authorization to Close City Streets and Use City Property forthe 68'h Annual Arroyo Grande Valley Harvest Festival, September 23-24, 2005. Action: Adopted Resolution No. 3871 Approving Temporary Use Permit 05-015 Authorizing Closure Of City Streets And Use Of City Property For The 68th Annual Arroyo Grande Valley Harvest Festival, Friday And Saturday, September 23-24, 2005 8.k. Consideration of Adoption of an Ordinance Establishing a Historic Resources Committee and a Historic Designation Process for the City of Arroyo Grande. Action: Adopted Ordinance No. 571 Adding Chapter 2.21 to Title 2 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Entitled "Historical Resources Committee", and Amending Chapters 16.04 and 16.16 of Tille 16 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Establishing a Historical Designation Process. 8.e. Consideration of an Award of Bid - Fire Department 4x4 Passenger Utility Vehicle. Recommended Action: Authorize the award of bid to purchase a 2006 4x4 passenger utility vehicle for the Fire Department from Mullahey Ford in the amount of $30,430.00. 8.f. Consideration to Authorize Award of Bid for a Utility Vehicle for the Public Works I Department. , Recommended Action: Authorize the award of bid for a utility vehicle to Mullahey Ford in the amount of $22,439.29. 8.h. Consideration of. Award of Bid for a 3/. Ton Pickup. Truck for the Building Maintenance Division. Recommended Action: Authorize the award of bid for a 0/. ton pick up truck to Mullahey Ford, including a 6 year, 100,000 mile extended warranty for a total bid award of' $25,194.25. I CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 23, 2005 PAGE 3 In response to concerns expressed by Mayor Ferrara regarding the rising cost of fuel, he inquired whether staff had taken into consideration buying trucks with smaller engines or considered the purchase of alternative fuel vehicles. City Manager Adams responded that staff would investigate the use of alternative fuel vehicles in the future, where appropriate. Council. Member Dickens moved to approve staff recommendations for approval of Consent Agendadtems 8.e., 8.1., and 8.h., Council Member Arnold seconded, and the motion passed on the following roll-call vote: AYES: Dickens, Arnold, Guthrie, Costello, Ferrara NOES: None ABSENT: None S.j. Consideration of Adoption of an Ordinanc,e Amending Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Chapters 16.04 and 16.36 of Title 16 to Define Formula Businesses and Restrict Formula Businesses in the Village Core Downtown and Village Mixed Use (VCD & VMU) Zoning Districts (Development Code Amendment Case No. 05-009). Recommended Action: Adopt Ordinance Amending Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Chapters 16.04 and 16.36 of Title 16 to Define Formula Businesses and Restrict Formula Businesses in the Village Core Downtown and Village Mixed Use/Historic Character Overlay Districts (Development Code Amendment 05-009). In response to concerns expressed by Mayor Ferrara relating to the definition of fast food restaurants and subsequent Council discussion, staff was requested to address the issue in the next clean-up ordinance for Title 16 (Development Code). Mayor Pro Tem Costello moved to adopt the Ordinance as proposed. City Attorney Carmel read the title of the Ordinance as follows: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande Amending Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Chapters 16.04 and 16.36 of Title 16 to Define Formula Businesses and Restrict Formula Businesses in the Village Core Downtown and Village Mixed Use/Historic Character Overlay Districts (Development Code Amendment 05-009)". Council Member Dickens seconded, and the motion passed on the following roll-call vote: AYES: Costello, Dickens, Guthrie, Arnold, Ferrara NOES: None ABSENT: None 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9.a. Consideration of Appeal of Planning Commission's Denial of Plot Plan Review 05- 004; Architectural Review Case 05-00S and Viewshed Review Case OS-OS; Applicant: Pace Brothers Construction; Location -135 Whiteley Street. Assistant Planner Bergman presented the staff report and stated the Planning Commission recommended the City Council adopt a Resolution denying Plot Plan Review 05-004, Architectural Review Case 05-008 and Viewshed Review Case 05-008. Staff responded to questions from Council regarding correspondence received from Planning Commissioner Doug CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 23, 2005 PAGE 4 Tait regarding the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and takings of private property; clarification of mitigation measures in the proposed environmental negative declaration as they relate to drainage; clarification on the size of other' houses in the immediate neighborhood, clarification of zoning; and whether there was any public access to the creek. Mayor Ferrara opened the public hearing and invited comments from those in the audience who wished to be heard on the matter. John Belsher, attorney representing the applicant, responded to questions concerning the taking of private property; spoke about the developer's investment expectations; commented on the setback issue; commented on the drainage issue; noted that a creek maintenance easement is a condition of approval for the project; commented on the sizes of the houses in the neighborhood; and stated that the City would have access to the creek via an easement. In response to a question by Mayor Ferrara, Mr. Belsher indicated that they had investigated the possibility of a Lot Line Adjustment; however, it would have created issues that would have reduced the ability to build on the lots. Greq Soto, project architect, reviewed the proposed design of the project with a 5-foot setback; spoke about drainage issues and commented that there was a potential to provide a detention area; explained that following the Planning Commission meeting, the project was redesigned with a 10-foot setback, and explained why the project would not be buildable if the required setback was 10 feet or more. Dan Pace, applicant, distributed and presented a comparable sales analysis (on file in, the Administrative Services Department) which included information on houses in the immediate. neighborhood regarding the year built, transfer date, original size, and parcel size. He commented that some of the houses in the area were bigger than what he is proposing. He also distributed various economic scenarios for a housing development with a 25-foot setback from creek, 20-foot setback from creek, 15-foot setback from creek, and 10-foot setback from creek. John Belsher, attorney representing the applicant, commented further on the various setback options that were presented to the Planning Commission. He also noted that the goal for establishing a setback, as designated in the General Plan, is to protect riparian vegetation, which does not exist or apply in this case. He further addressed the setback issue, and the feasibility of the project based on the actual costs for the project and actual expense for the land. Chuck Fellows, Planning Commissioner, expressed concern about legal issues related to the project. He questioned the validity of the economic figures that were presented by Mr. Pace based on his extensive experience in the local real estate industry and suggested that an appraiser look into it. He referred to the Soils Report that was reviewed by the Planning Commission and suggested the Council review it in more detail. No further public comments were received and Mayor Ferrara closed the public hearing. Council Member Guthrie inquired if creek setback distances could vary along the project. Director Strong indicated there were only provisions within the Development Code to allow variable setbacks in a particular zone with a minor exception, unless a variance is applied for. Council Member Guthrie commented that the sales prices presented were very low; commented that there were a lot of other design possibilities where the intent of the General Plan to protect the riparian vegetation and creek corridor could be achieved. He felt a feasible project could be built with some adjustment to the creek setback to maximize the buffer and maximize the building envelope with a variable creek setback. He suggested continuing the item. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 23, 2005 PAGE 5 Council Member Dickens expressed concern that there are inadequate mitigation measures to address potential impacts to biological resources. He felt the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration could not be supported as it relates to what impact the house will have on the creek. He suggested a biological report/analysis is needed. He supported the Planning Commission's action. He supported continuing the item for further. environmental analysis or denial of the applications without prejudice. Council Member Arnold stated he did not believe this is a taking. He commented that if a lot line adjustment had been done earlier, this project could have worked. He said he drove by the project and was overwhelmed by the size of the house being built on the adjacent parcel. He suggested tandem garages might be an option. He supported the concept of variable setbacks along the creek. He stated that the Planning Commission interpreted the Code correctly and felt that denial was appropriate. Mayor Pro Tem Costello commented on the setback issue and believed that a project is feasible on this site. He supported denial of the appeal and upholding the Planning Commission's decision. Mayor Ferrara observed that older homes in the surrounding area are at least 25 feet from the edge of the bank. He spoke about drainage issues and the proximity of homes to the creek and stressed the high level of sensitivity to the creek. He recognized that the lot shape was not typical and stated that all lots should have been reviewed to maximize residential land use. He stated that the size of the two proposed homes were not consistent with the direction the City i~ going. He commented on the economics of the project and concurred that the sales prices as presented are too low. He supported denying the appeal. Council Member Arnold moved to adopt a Resolutio'n as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DENYING PLOT PLAN REVIEW 05- 004, ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 05-00S AND VIEWSHED REVIEW 05-00S (LOT 4 ONLY); 135 WHITELEY; APPLIED FOR BY PACE BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION". Discussion ensued clarifying that the motion included denial of the appeal and that the Resolution includes language to deny the project applications without prejudice. Council Member Guthrie seconded, and the motion passed on the following roll-call vote: AYES: Arnold, Guthrie, Dickens, Costello, Ferrara NOES: None ABSENT: None Mayor Ferrara called for a break at 9:05 p.m. The Council reconvened at 9:16 p.m. 9.b. Consideration of Amended Conditional Use Permit 05-001 to Remove a Deed Restriction and Allow a Second Dwelling Unit on the Second Floor of an Existing Carriage House; Applicant: Terry Fowler-Payne; Location - 212 Miller Way. Assistant Planner Bergman presented the staff report and stated the Planning Commission recommended the City Council adopt a Resolution denying Amended Conditional Use Permit Case No. 05-001. Staff responded to questions from Council. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 23, 2005 PAGE 6 Mayor Ferrara opened the public hearing and invited comments from those in the audience who wished to be heard on thematter. John Belsher, attorney representing the applicant, referred to the Conditional Use Permit for the Bed & Breakfast which was previously approved by the Council and has not yet been implemented. He referred to a neighboring Bed & Breakfast and demonstrated the similarities between the two projects with a unit above the garage from which to operate the Bed & , Breakfast. He stated this application does not increase the number of bedrooms that could be rented; however, it would allow the Bed and Breakfast caretaker to live in the second unit. He stated that State law has changed with regard to second dwelling units and demonstrated various ways that the proposed unit is less than 1,200 square feet. He stated that the external architectural features would not be altered; however he acknowledged that the interior improvements were not permitted and the applicant has to apply for permits and pay the appropriate fees. He concluded by stating that a Bed & Breakfast is a good use with the upstairs of the carriage house as a separate unit. Terry Payne, applicant, responded to questions from Council regarding the actual square footage of the home (2,838.5 sq.lt., excluding the carriage house); how the fourth bedroom is being used (fourth room downstairs was originally used as a study and then a bedroom; intended use for Bed & Breakfast is to use as a sitting room/den.) She explained that she wanted to use the carriage house as a separate unit. She gave an overview of the history of the house. No further public comments were received and Mayor Ferrara closed the public hearing. Council Member Arnold asked if State law concerning second residential units could compel the City to remove the deed restriction. City Attorney Carmel responded no. Council Member Arnold stated he was looking at the intensity of use for the neighborhood. He stated that Miller Way is a residential district and he was concerned about increasing the intensity of use in the neighborhood. He said he would like to talk to the neighbors. He stated he would support denial of the Amended Conditional Use Permit. Council Member Dickens referred to Planning Commission Resolution No. 01-1812 which approved creation of a bed and breakfast use for the'residence, and highlighted the findings in the Resolution, which stated the intent of the Bed and Breakfast use would be subordinate to the primary use as a single-family residence. He said the issue now is adding a second residential dwelling unit and that the same findings could not be made if the deed restriction was removed. He supported the Planning Commission's decision regarding this case. Council Member Guthrie stated that while on the Planning Commission, he had expressed concern that a second dwelling unit could be created. He said he was told then that it was not planned. He said he would not have approved a Bed and Breakfast with a separate caretaker unit. He supported the Planning Commission's denial of the Amended Conditional Use Permit. Mayor Pro Tem Costello inquired whether State law could compel the City to permit the secondary unit. City Attorney Carmel responded no. Mayor Pro Tem Costello recalled consideration of the Bed and Breakfast while on the Planning Commission. He referred to the deed restriction approved in 1991, which prohibits plumbing fixtures in the second storY of the ' -- carriage house; and prohibits conversion of the garage carriage house to living quarters and noted that this was in place when the Bed and Breakfast was approved. He felt that the intensity CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 23, 2005 PAGE 7 of use was too great to have both the Bed and Breakfast and the secondary dwelling unit. He supported denying the Amended Conditional Use Permit to remove the deed restriction. Mayor Ferrara asked how the City's Neighborhood Services Coordinator was advised of this situation. Assistant Planner Bergman responded he understood there was' a call from a concerned citizen that was referred to the Neighborhood Services Coordinator. Mayor Ferrara referred to the staff report, which stated the applicant ignored the recorded deed restriction and made substantial alterations without permits. He referred to the five findings in the Resolution to deny the Amended Conditional Use Permit and agreed with all five findings, specifically #2, the project will impair the integrity and character of the district...; #3, the proposed project is accessed from a street that slopes steeply and has potential sight distance problems; and #5, the primary purpose of the RR district is to provide for and protect rural atmosphere and lifestyles. He supported denial of the Amended Conditional Use Permit. Mayor Pro Tem Costello moved to adopt a Resolutiqn as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DENYING AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 05-001 WHICH ENTAILS NOT AUTHORIZING THE REMOVAL OF A DEED RESTRICTION AND NOT ALLOWING A SECONDARY DWELLING - LOCATED AT 212 MILLER WAY, APPLIED FOR BY TERRY FOWLER-PAYNE". Council Member Arnold seconded, and the motion carried on the following roll-call vote: AYES:, Costello, Arnold, Guthrie, Dickens, Ferrara NOES: None ABSENT: None 10. CONTINUED BUSINESS None. 11. NEW BUSINESS 11.a. Consideration of Pre-Application Review Case No. 05-004 for a Mixed-Use Development ("Ladera Plaza"); Applicant: Jim Motter and Mark London; Location - 1200 East Grand Avenue. Associate Planner Hefferhon presented the staff report and recommended the Council review the project plans and provide suggestions and comments to the applicant. Staff responded to questions from Council concerning the driveway entrance from E. Grand Avenue; whether Brisco Road would be widened to create a turn lane (yes); synchronization of traffic signals to address potential traffic impacts; how tandem parking works; and including a traffic signal at Brisco Road . and E. Grand Avenue. Mayor Ferrara invited comments from those in the audience who wished to be heard on the matter. Mark London, applicant, agreed with the need for a traffic signal at Brisco and E. Grand; explained the concept of tandem parking; confirmed that the project would include widening of Brisco Road; and responded to the question regarding the driveway location on E: Grand. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ,AUGUST 23, 2005 PAGE 8 John Keen, Planning Commissioner, stated he lives near the project and noted he had stepped down when the Planning Commission considered this project. He noted that the General Plan is not satisfied in several areas. He referred to the goal for providing mixed-use with residential above commercial uses. He felt the project did not meet the intent of the Mixed Use district designation. He commented that three-story townhouses do not match the rural character of Arroyo Grande and the project was not appropriate for Arroyo Grande. He stated the traffic study does not address improving Grand Avenue at Halcyon. He expressed concern about how this project would look and said this site has the potential to be a model for future mixed-use projects. Hearing no further public comments, Mayor Ferrara closed the public comment period. Council Member Arnold's comments included the following: . Will have to look at traffic impacts carefully; . Concern about how the Linda/Brisco stop sign will impede traffic; . Provide 3-D model as it is difficult to tell from blueprints how the project will look; . Favors project on this site; . No decks; . Consider underground garages; . Do not like design of commercial or residential buildings; . Do not like access off of E. Grand; . Consider loading/noise impacts; . Suggested lining up road (Unda to Elm); . Not as concerned with separating residential and commercial uses; . Suggested talking to the neighbors in the area. Council Member Guthrie's comments included the following: . Asked if future modifications to Brisco were factored into the project;, . Have trouble with driveway on Grand (as it relates to loading); . Not comfortable with commercial portion; . No problem with tandem parking; . The reality of mixed-use projects is not very successful (as it relates to residential above commercial); . Traffic will be an issue; . Need to weigh benefits of improvements Council Member Dickens' comments included the following: . Acknowledged unusual site layout; . Opportunity for unique development proposals; , . Not comfortable with this proposal; . Comfortable with some higher density; . Housing component is different and very urban (i.e. 3 stories, tandem parking); . Need to have increased open space to help create more rural character; . Look at retaining wall and incorporate landscaping to soften look; . Traffic will be an issue; if synchronization would work, would be doing now; . Support signal at Brisco and E. Grand; , : . Must weigh pros and cons; '- . Supports higher intensity of use on the site; . Innovative housing; CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 23, 2005 PAGE 9 . Commercial - Create architectural design to soften look; . Difficulty with access from Grand, additional driveway and staging of loading dock; . Seeing trend where uses are separated. Mayor Pro Tem Costello's comments included the following: . Acknowledged unique layout of property; . Opportunity to set new standards; . No problem with intensity of use; to preserve agricultural, must increase density elsewhere; . With high density comes traffic and circulation problems - traffic light at Brisco and Grand is a must; . Would like to see better mix of commercial and residential; . Loading dock - problem with access; . Acknowledged mixed use trends (separate); . Seek neighborhood input and involvement. Mayor Ferrara's comments included the following: . Project proposal is a good start; . Addressed mixed use principles and smart growth; . Commercial design needs work; . Suggested bringing structures to front and put parking in back; . Smaller version of commercial; . Disagreed with notion of increasing density; density proposed is too great; . Trip generation; traffic impacts need to be studied; . Does not like three and four residential units in one building; . Supports space between residential units; . Reduce commercial, add space for residential, reduce density; . Commented on tandem parking and need for behavioral change; . Suggested micro-lot approach - covered space and garage; . Likes pedestrian feel of commercial portion. . Concern with size, scale and intensity. Upon conclusion of Council comments, Mayor Ferrara ensured that the applicant had received sufficient feedback and direction with regard to the proposed project. There was no formal action on this item. 11.b. Consideration of Pre-Application Review Case No. 05-007 for' a Mixed-Use Development; Applicant: Jason Blankenship/Catholic Healthcare West (C.H.W.); Location: Fair Oaks Avenue (Vacant Property Adjacent To and East of Arroyo Grande Hospital). Associate Planner Heffernon presented the staff report and recommended the Council review the project plans and provide suggestions and comments to the applicant. Staff responded to questions from Council concerning whether there was a Street Master Plan; whether Woodland Drive was planned to go through, and the project's distance to agricultural uses. Mayor Ferrara invited comments from those in the audience who wished to be heard on the matter. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 23, 2005 PAGE 10 Garv Younq, applicant, noted that the Code requires the submission of a Hospital Facilities Plan. They have been working with Arroyo Grande Hospital, which has been struggling to ascertain their needs to develop a coherent Plan, and they want to utilize the maximum amount of square footage of property that they can get to build. The project as designed includes an extension of Woodland and creates a separation from the hospital use. He said conceptual Phase 1 includes thirty (30) residential units; conceptual Phase 2 includes underground parking. He commented ,that the Oak trees are protected; a traffic study has been commissioned but is on hold until Council input is obtained on square footage for the medical office; commented on the water availability issue; stated there is a small piece of agricultural land which is located about 140-150 ft from the top of the creek bank, however, there is a small section of land on the west side of the creek that is not currently being farmed and cannot be accessed (he asked for Council direction on this issue); and to address archeological issues, there would be monitoring during grading operations. Rick Castro, President of Arroyo Grande Community Hospital (Catholic Healthcare West), confirmed that the hospital is working on a Strategic Plan and stated that the hospital requires additional time to determine its 100ig term needs. He indicated they are comfortable with the amount of space allocated, but commented that it could not be known for sure until a specific plan is created. Leonard Grant, architect, responded to a question regarding the parking structure and confirmed that there would be two stories of subterranean parking for the commercial portion. Hearing no further public comments, Mayor Ferrara closed the public comment period. Council Member Arnold's comments included the following: . Likes proposed plan; . When traffic study is done; consider mitigation measures if Woodland goes through; . Trees need to be saved and should be worked around or should be moved; . Architectural style is appropriate; . Supports 50-50 split between residential and hospital; . Allows hospital room to grow. Council Member Dickens' comments included the following: . Appropriate land use; . Allows appropriate expansion of hospital; . Area is in need of a full service hospital; . Residential layout is appropriate; . Must maintain buffers between agricultural and ,residential uses; . Likes incorporation of recreational use/pedestrian paths; . Supports Woodland extension; needs compelling reasons not to put through - will create better traffic circulation. Council Member Guthrie's comments included the following: . Concurred with agricultural buffer requirement; . Traffic study should include potential for 120,000 sq. ft. of commercial use; . Supports extension of Woodland Drive; . Unsure whether 120,000 sq. ft. was buildable; however, acknowledged underground parking component; . Likes residential component; . Likes incorporation of pathway and additional pedestrian access. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 23, 2005 PAGE 11 Mayor Pro Tem Costello's comments included the following: . Supports split of proposed uses; . Traffic mitigation to address additional parking; . Supports extension of Woodland Drive; . Research impact to triangular piece of agricultural land that was referred to; . Acknowledged archeological issues and need for monitoring; . Good opportunity for hospital to expand and provide additional housing. Mayor Ferrara's comments included the following: . Acknowledged CHW and observed improvements made to date; . Likes layout, site plan; . Supports amount of green space provided/recreation paths; . Area can support density; . Supports Woodland Drive extension/continuation to improve circulation; . Maintain agricultural buffer. . Expressed concern about runoff from project and potential impacts to creek; (referred to Zone 1/A drainage issue). City has heightened duty to responsibly manage its creek corridors. . Regarding small agriculture piece of land, suggested contacting LDS Church to suggest a temporary use for the land to enhance the residential area and also accentuate the agricultural use of the adjacent agriculture use. He referred to the City of Irvine website for an idea regarding a community garden project. Upon conclusion of Council comments, Mayor Ferrara ensured that the applicant had received sufficient feedback and direction with regard to the proposed project. There was no formal action on this item. 11.c. Consideration of Pre-Application Review Case No. 05-009 to Construct a One-Story Building with Drive-up Window for a Financial Institution; Applicant: Coast Hills Federal Credit Union; Location -1570 West Branch Street. Associate Planner Heffernon presented the staff report and recommended the Council review the project plans and provide suggestions and comments to the applicant. Mayor Ferrara invited ,comments from those in the audience who wished to be heard on the matter. Jeff York, President, Coast Hills Federal Credit Union, (formerly Vandenberg Air Force Credit Union) currently located at 1452 E. Grand Avenue, commented that the proposed location is a more visible location to serve the community. Hearing no further public comments, Mayor Ferrara closed the public comment period. , Council Member Dickens' comments included the following; . Extensive discussion regarding parking and architectural style held for previous project ,-, (The Parable); . Proposal is consistent with prior proposal; land use is not more intense; . No problem with design of drive-up window; CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 23, 2005 PAGE 12 . Biggest issue is with southwestern look; doesn't see as southwestern; . Needs to blend in with existing shopping center; . No issue with land use; . Farmer's Market held in area should not be an impact. Council Member Guthrie's comments included the following: . Appropriate land use; . Banking use is less intense than retail as far as parking; . Architecture should be reviewed by ARC; Council Member Arnold's comments included the following: . Favors financial institution at this location; . No issue with drive-through; . Concern with main entrance; not sure with flow; . Very little parking near main entrance. . Supports proposal. Mayor Pro Tem Costello's comments included the following: . Never liked structure in this location - would prefer if moved to other side; . No issue with land use - good fit; . No issue with drive-through; . Expressed concern with exit onto W. Branch at Quarterback; . Difficult to picture southwestern architecture; ARC should review. Mayor Ferrara's comments included the following: . Use will compliment what is already there; . Will be positive addition to center; . Likes layout; may encourage pedestrian traffic to restaurant; . Reconfigure ingress/egress to widen driveway at Quarterdeck if possible (soften corner at exit); . Concern about proposed architecture; . Supports land use. Upon conclusion of Council comments, Mayor Ferrara ensured that the applicant had received sufficient feedback and direction with regard to the proposed project. There was no formal action on this item. 12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS a. MAYOR TONY M. FERRARA: (1) San Luis Obispo Council of Governments/San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority (SLOCOG/SLORTA). No report. (2) South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD). Supervisors Achadjian and Lenthall were present; discussed Zone 1/1A issues. (3) Other. Attended Zone 1/1A taskforce advisory committee meetings. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 23, 2005 PAGE 13 ( b. MAYOR PRO TEM JOE COSTELLO: (1) Zone 3 Water Advisory Board. No report. (2) County Water Resources Advisory Committee (WRAC). No report. (3) Air Pollution Control District (APCD). No report. (4) Fire Oversight Committee. Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant application process is progressing and is close to being approved. Coordination between the two Fire Departments working well. (5) Other. None. c. COUNCIL MEMBER JIM DICKENS: (1) South County Area Transit (SCAT). No report. (2) South County Youth Coalition. No report. (3) Other. None. d. COUNCIL MEMBER JIM GUTHRIE: (1) Economic Vitality Corporation (EVC). No report. Meets tomorrow. (2) Other. None. e. COUNCIL MEMBER ED ARNOLD: (1) Integrated Waste Management Authority Board (IWMA). No report. (2) California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA). No report. (3) County Water Resources Advisory Committee (WRAC). No report. (4) Other. None. 13. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS: None. 14. CITY MANAGER ITEMS: None. 15. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS: Mayor Pro Tem Costello requested that staff follow-up on the public comments regarding the bus turn-around at Strother Park. Mayor Ferrara gave background on SLORTA's effort to add a bus route,to benefit the residents of the adjacent senior mobile home park. City Manager Adams also indicated that the added route was to also benefit Paulding Middle School students. Mayor Ferrara reported that he spoke to Billie Swigert today who agreed to partiCipate in a walking tour of historical buildings in the City. Mayor Pro Tem Costello suggested videotaping the tour. Council Member Dickens suggested that a Boy Scout Troop could videotape the tour. 16. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: None. 17. COMMUNITY COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS: None. 18. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the City Council, Mayor Ferrara adjourned the meeting at 12:05 a.m. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 23, 2005 PAGE 14 TO"Y~ ATTEST: ~ Ity Clerk (Approved at CC Mtg 10 -11-1. 005 )