R 3966
RESOLUTION NO. 3966
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO
GRANDE APPROVING AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE
NO. 06-002 TO MODIFY CONDITION OF APPROVAL NUMBER 23 OF
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP CASE NO. 05-003 AND CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT (SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN) CASE NO. 04-009
ALLOWING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A HOTEL AND RESTAURANT;
LOCATED AT 1400 WEST BRANCH STREET, AS APPLIED FOR BY
STEPHEN COOL AND GARY WHITE
WHEREAS, on July 26, 2005, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande adopted
Resolution No. 3867 approving Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 05-003 and Conditional
Use Permit Case No. 04-009 to construct a hotel and restaurant; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande has considered Amended
Conditional Use Permit Case No. 06-002 filed by Stephen Cool and Gary White, to
modify Condition of Approval Number 23; and
WHEREAS,the City Council has held a duly-noticed public hearing in accordance with
the Development Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and considered the information and public
testimony presented at the public hearing, staff report, and all other information and
documents that are part of the public record.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande hereby approves Amended Conditional Use Permit Case No. 06-002 modifying
condition of approval number 23 of Conditional Use Permit (Specific Development Plan)
Case No. 04-009, related to the construction of a hotel and restaurant; located at 1400
West Branch Street, applied for by Stephen Cool and Gary White, as shown in Exhibit
"A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all other conditions of approval outlined in Resolution
No. 3867 remain in full force and effect.
On motion by Council Member Arnold, seconded by Council Member Costello, and by the
following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Arnold, Costello, Dickens, Guthrie, and Mayor Ferrara
None
None
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 24th day of October 2006.
RESOLUTION NO. 3%&
PAGE 2
;~
TONY F~YOR
,".
ATTEST:
~{It~
KELLY W TMO , CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
ST~i~~TY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~ ~/)1;,--- ~/~
TIM THY J. EL, CITY ATTORNEY
RESOLUTION NO. 3966
PAGE 3
EXHIBIT "A"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
23. The applicant shall supply a landscape/tree preservation plan, subject to approval by
the Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities and the Community Development
Director. Proposed removal and mitigation of Oak trees shall be consistent with the
following table:
SIIMI nF nn'" Ir 'T TRFF IONS
Ir.ee TRUNK HEIGHT CANOPY VIGOR CONDITION ARBORIST PROJECT
t1 DIAMETER DENSITY RECOMMENDATION PROPOSAL
1 14.7" 20'-25' 75% Fair Good Save Save
2 38.2" 50'+ 25%-30% Good Poor Remove Save
3 24.2" 20'-25' 80% Good Good Save Remove 1
4 32.0" 20'+ 75% Fair Poor Remove Remove 1
5 23.5" . 15'-18' 15% Poor Poor Remove Remove 1 ..
5a' 5.2" at 18" 8' 100% Good Good No Transplant"
above Recommendation
orade
6 4.0",5.2", 15' 90%-95% Good Poor Remove Remove 1
6.0" 8.4"
7 11.2" 16'-18' 90%-95% Good Good Save Transolant"
7a' 1.2" at 18" 4' 15% Poor to Poor to fair No Remove
above fair Recommendation without
arade mitiaation4
8 15.4" 20' 75%+ Fair Good Save Transolant"
9 10.5",10.8", 20' 60% Poor Poor Possibly Remove Remove5
13.0"
10 14.4" 14.5" 25'+ 75% Good Good Save Remove"
11 11.0" 20' 80% Good Good Save Remove5
12 4.4",4.9", 10' 100% Good Good Save Remove 1
5.8" 6.0"
1 Mitigation at 3:1 with specimen trees per City selection; Replacement trees shall be a minimum of
36-inch box. 50% of trees to be replaced shall be 48-inch box.
2 A sapling in the initial arborist report. now considered a tree in the addendum.
3 Transplant to locations shown on revised landscape plan .
· Remove without mitigation: small size exempt from mitigation requirements
5 Mitigation at 3:1 with large (72" box or greater) specimen oak replacement tree plus 2 or more 36"
and 48" box trees which may be other tall, fast growth species per ARC recommendation. and
Parks, Recreation and Facilities Director and Community Development Director approval of revised
landscape plan.
OFFICIAL CERTIFICATION
I, KELLY WETMORE, City Clerk of the City of Arroyo Grande, County of San Luis
Obispo, State of California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the attached
Resolution No. 3966 is a true, full, and correct copy of said Resolution passed and
adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Arroyo Grande on the 24th day of October 2006.
WITNESS my hand and the Seal of the City of Arroyo Grande affixed this 26th day of
October 2006.