Minutes 1993-02-09
, ..
. 89
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 1993
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 215 EAST BRANCH STREET
ARROyO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA
The City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande me~ at 7:30
P.M., with Mayor Matthew Peter Gallagher, III, presiding.
1. AND 2. FLAG SALUTE AND INVOCATION
Eagle Scout Patrick Irey led the Pledge of Allegiance to Our
Flag and the Rev. Phil Coleman of Oak Park Foursquare Church
delivered the invocation.
3. ROLL CALL
Present were Mayor Gallagher and Council Members Drew Brandy,
Bernard Burke, Gene Moots and James Souza. Staff Members present
were city Manager Chris Christiansen, City Attorney Judy Skousen,
~ City Clerk Nancy Davis, chief of Police Rick TerBorch, Public Works
Director Van Laurn and Current Planner Scott Spierling.
40 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
BILL ANDRADE of 655 South Halcyon Road said he would request
that he be listed on the agenda for the next Council meeting on
February 23, 1993.
50 CONSENT AGENDA
It was moved by Moots/souza, and the motion passed unanimously
to approve Consent Agenda Items 5.c. through 5.h., with the
recommended courses of action.
5.c. January 7, 1993, city council Minutes. Approved.
5.d. January 12, 1993, City Council Minutes. Approved.
5.e. January 26, 1993, city Council Minutes. Approved.
5.f. February 4, 1993, Senior Advisory Commission Minutes.
Information.
5.g. January, 1993, Investment Report. Information.
5.h. Revised Automatic Aid Agreement. Approved.
5. a. Proclamation, Scouting Anniversary Week, February 7 - 13,
1993. Mayor Gallagher presented a proclamation denoting scouting
Anniversary Week to Eagle scout Patrick Irey.
5.b. proclamation, American History Month, February, 1993. Mayor
Gallagher presented a proclamation honoring American History Month
to Phy,llis Mancini of the Daughters of the American Revolution.
60 REGISTER OF CHECKS
It was moved by Moots/Burke, and the motion passed unanimously
to approve cash disbursements in the amount of $741,392.20, as
listed in the February 4, 1993, Staff Report of Finance Director
David Bacon.
'-
70A. PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE 92-501:
REVI$ED PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A (i40 SOUARE-FOOT. SECOND
RESIDENTIAL UNIT OVER AN EXISTING GARAGE: 840 FARROLL AVENUE: ROGER
FULLER
current Planner Spierling referred to the Planning Director's
Staff Report of February 9, 1993, and recommended that the Council
reopen the Public Hearing, accept public testimony, discuss the
project and adopt a resolution either upholding the Planning
Commission's approval of Conditional Use Permit CaBe 92-501, or
upholding the appeal and denying the Conditional Use Permit. Mr.
Spierling discussed the modifications made to Mr. Fuller's plan
-.....-
1
............. .'-
7." ._ ,~ ~...
.'..1 ,
9.0 ~
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
FEBRUARY 9, 1993 " .
, "
..., ..~." - .. "
with the recommendations of the Architectural Advisory Committee.
He explained that the Planning Commission had reached a tie vote on
the matter, and that was why it came back to the city Council.
After being assured that the Public, Hearing had been duly
published and all legal requirements met, Mayor Gallagher declared
the hearing open and said all persons would be heard regarding the
matter.
Speaking against the second residential unit were RICHARD
GRANTHAM of 505 Woodland Drive, DWIGHT CHRISTENSEN of 818 Forest
Glen Orive, ROBERT SANDERS of 541 Woodland Orive, JERRY MARTIN of -
514 woodland drive: REGINA AUSTIN of 509 Woodland Drive, DIXIE
ROYER of 505 Woodland Orive, VERNA MURRAY of 508 Woodland Drive,
MELVIN JOHNSON of 835 Olive street, PATRICIA BRENNER of 509
Woodland Drive, MARLENE JOHNSON, JERRY BOWSER of 510 Woodland Drive
and BETTY GRANTHAM . Their objections were based on damage to
privacy, devaluation of surrounding properties, setting a
precedent, damaging scenic views, alternative sites available to
the applicant and the structure would be out of character with the
neighborhood.
Speaking in favor of the second residential unit was ROGER
FULLER of 840 Farroll Avenue, the applicant. He said most of the
neighbors objecting to the project lived in two-story homes that
looked over other homes, or lived 200 feet away from his structure.
He said he had moved the second story design 12 feet west and put
in privacy windows. He said he would consider changing colors,
changing pitch of the roof and changing the overhang if the project
were approved. He said he had property rights also and asked the
Council to recognize that.
There being no further discussion on the matter, the Mayor
closed the hearing to the floor.
council Member Brandy said he felt Mr. Fuller was within his
property rights and legally speaking he had met all the
requirements to build the second unit. He said he supported the
project and did not feel it would devalue the properties.
council Member Burke said the greatest impact would be on the
Woodland Drive residents and it is caused by the high ground level
that Mr. Fuller's property is on. He said privacy and view are not
grounds in themselves enough to deny a Conditional Use Permit, but
but they do have a big bearing on devaluing the property. He said
this proposed unit would devalue the property and would not be in
character with the neighborhood.
Council Member Souza said he agreed with Council Member Burke,
and the impact on the neighborhood is fairly substantial especially
because of the height of the FUller property. He encouraged Mr. -.
Fuller to look for a one-story spot on his property for the second
unit.
Council Member Moots said he concurred with Council Members
Burke and Souza. He said that is a hilltop, and the character of
the whole neighborhood would be affected. He said there are -,
alternatives to building a second story.
Mayor Gallagher said if there was no other alternative, if
there was not property and if this was a lot of smaller
proportions, the mitigation measures and the proposals that were
adopted by the Architectural Advisory committee and the
modifications to the original concept would be of significant
mitigation to allow him to support the project. He said, however,
he could not support the project because Mr. Fuller does have an
2
,
, 91
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
FEBRUA,RY 9, 1993
alternative and has other options.
The city Attorney listed findings for upholding the appeal and
denying the Conditional Use Permit, as follows:
1. The proposed structure would unreasonably and unnecessarily
interfere with the scenic view from other properties, and there are
alternatives that would permit complete use and development of the
property on which the proposed structure or expansion is to occur.
The basis for the finding is that because the property is so
large there are other areas on the property that would allow
construction of the proposed second residential unit. This finding
is also based on the Council's observation of the property and the
size of the lot.
-
2. The height and design of the current building, on Which the
proposed structure would be added, would cause the proposed
structure to be out of character with the neighborhood.
Therefore the proposed structure does violate the intent of
Development Code Section 9-03.130 in that it is not consistent with
the established scale or character of the neighborhood and it will
unreasonably and unnecessarily affect views of the surrounding
properties when there are alternatives.
3. The building style of the garage does not lend itself to
addition of a second story that is in character with the
neighborhood.
It was moved by Burke/Souza (4-1-0, Burke, souza, Moots and
Gallagher voting aye, Brandy voting no) to approve Resolution No.
2970 Upholding the Appeal of the Planning Commission's Approval of
conditional Use Permit Case No. 92-501 and the Associated
Architectural Review, Applied for by Roger FUller, for a Second
Residential Unit, Located at 840 Farroll Avenue, and Denying Said
Conditional Use Permit and Associated Architectural Review.
8.A. APPpINTMENT OF WILLIAM DEVINY TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION: TERM
EXPIRES JUNE 30, 1995
Mayor Gallagher nominated Mr. Deviny to the Planning
commission and the council approved.
8.B. APPOINTMENT OF EDDIE HATCHETT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSIoN: TERM
EXPIRES JUNE 30. 1995
Mayor Gallagher nominated Mr. Hatchett to the planning
Commission and the council approved.
s.c. APPOINTMENT Of DENNIS KEIHN TO THE PARKS AND {U:CREATION
COMMISSION: TERM EXPIRR~ JUNE 30. 1993
Mayor Gallagher nominated Mr. Keihn to the Parks and
Recreation Commission and the Council approved.
~ 8.D. APPOINTMENT OF EDWARD GARNETT TO THE SENIOR ADVISORY
COMMISSION: TERM EXPIRF.~ JUNE 30. 1993
Mayor Gallagher nominated Mr. Garnett to the Senior Advisory
commission and the Council approved.
a.E. APPOINTMENT OF LOUIS DELANEY TO THE SENIOR ADVISORY
COMMISSION: TERM EXPIRES JUNE 30. 1994
Mayor Gallagher nominated Mr. Delaney to the Senior Advisory
Commission and the Council approved.
.~, y- ... -:- Mayor Gallaqher said there would be another vacancy to fill on
the senior Advisory Commission, with the resignation of Norma~
stevens.
3
-__.____._____.n__ .~.___~
" ,
92
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
FEBRUARY 9, 1993
8.F. APPOINTMENT OF WARREN HOAG TO THE ARCHITECTURAL ADVISORY
COMMITTEE: TERM EXPIRES JUNE 30. 1993
Mayor Gallagher nominated Mr. Hoag to the Architectural
Advisory committee and the Council approved.
8.G. FEASIBILITY STUDY TO SHARE POLICE SERVICES: ARROYO GRANDE AND
GROVER BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENTS
Mr. Christiansen said it was recommended that the city Council
approve a feasibility study regarding shared police services
between the cities of Arroyo Grande and Grover Beach. He said if
the feasibility study were approved, the completed study would be -
sent to the Council in six to eight weeks. He said there would be
concentration in four areas, as follows:
1. Economy of scale.
2. Maximum use of resources.
3. Dedicated field supervision.
4. Elimination of duplicate administrative support services and
maximum cost effectiveness.
Chief of Police TerBorch said the city administrators of both
cities, the police chiefs of both cities and the finance directors
of both cities would be doing the feasibility study.
Mayor Gallagher said he would like to see analysis of the
deli very of ser1Tices, the accountability and the expediency of
response time, and the enhancement of services. He said this would
not be a first step to unification of the two cities, and would not
result in a loss of identities for the cities.
council Member Moots said the council's main job is to provide
for the public safety, and he would like to see more cops on the
beat and also save money.
Council Member Brandy asked if there would be an opportunity
for the public to speak on this issue or send written comments.
chief TerBorch said yes, and he felt the study should be presented
for pUblic input.
council Member Burke said he would be wary of getting into
additional financial problems. He said Arroyo Grande has a good
police Department and he didn't want that to deteriorate. He said
the study should be all encompassing, and the City should not rush
into anything.
Council Member Souza said the level of service should be the
number one priority. ~
It was moved by Moots/Brandy, and the motion passed
unanimously to approve II feasibility study regarding shared police
ser1Tices between the cities of Arroyo Grande and Grover Beach.
8.H. REOUESTS OF ERNEST SARINA. 435 LE POINT. ~~r.AQnING PAVING LE
POINT. DRAINAGE CONTROL. BRIDGE ACROSS "'ATAtIV HO CREEK . VISUAL
OBSTRUCTION AND RED CURBING
On request of the applicant, this item was removed from the
aqenda.
9. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
None.
4
.' ~. . .,~. 9 3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
FEBRUARY 9, 1993
10. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
11. ~LOSED SESSION
On the unanimously approved motion of Moots/Souza, the council
adjourned at 8:40 P.M. to a Closed Session on an appeal by Kingo
and Tatsumi Kawaoka, Case No. 90-4465 KN (Ex); pendinq litigation:
Coker Ellsworth and Vick Pace Construction Co. v. city of Arroyo
Grande, San Luis Obispo Superior Court Case Nos. 68739 and 60060: 'I
and potential litigation: Government Code section 54956.9 (b) (1).
12. At>JOURNHEN~
The council reconvened at 9:15 P.M., and immediately
adjourned, on the unanimously approved moti n of Burke/Brandy.
-
ATTEST: ThAll'" a. ~
NANCY A. AVIS, CITY CLERK
~