PC R 11-2121 . i
� � RESOLUTION NO. 11-2121
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
I CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DENYING APPEAL TO
PLANNING COMMISSION CASE NO. 10-001 AND
, APPROVING ADMINISTRATIVE SIGN PERMIT 10-017 AS
CONDITIONED TO PROHIBIT PLACEMENT OF SIGN AT THE
MAIN ENTRANCE TO THE FIVE-CITIES CENTER, APPLIED
FOR BY DAVE PINTARD � ASSOCIATES FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 911 RANCHO PARKWAY (FIVE CITIES .
CENTER)
WHEREAS, on November 16, 2010 the Community Development Department accepted
an application for an Administrative Sign Permit 10-017 applied for by Petco Inc. The
location of the property is within the Regional Commercial Zoning District and is within
the Five-Cities Center Phase II area located at 911 Rancho Parkway; and
WHEREAS, on December 6, 2010 the Architectural Review Committee considered the
application and recommended approval of Administrative Sign Permit 10-017 with an
conditional of approval to prohibit placement of a sign panel at the main entrance to the
Five-Cities Center; and
WHEREAS, on December 7, 2010, the Director of Community Development approved
the Architectural Review Committee's recommendation by ,approving Administrative
Sign Permit 10-017 with an condition of approval to prohibit placement of a sign panel at
the main entrance to the Five-Cities Center; and
WHEREAS, on December 20, 2010, the applicant's representative filed an appeal with
. the Community Development Department; and �
WHEREAS, on February 15, 2011 the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande
has held a public hearing on Appeal to Planning Commission Case No. 10-001 and �
Administrative Sign Permit 10-017 in accordance with the Cit�r Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds, after due study, deliberation and public
.hearing that the following circumstances exist:
Administrative Sign Permit Findings:
1. The proposed sign is consistent with the goals, objectives, policies and programs
of the Arroyo Grande general plan and any applicable design guidelines;
. The proposed signage is inconsistent with the goals, objectives, .
policies and programs of the Arroyo Grande general plan, speci�c
plan, and any applicable design guidelines or approvals and has
been reviewed by the Architectural Review Committee and was
found fo be inconsistent with section 16.60 of the Development
Code; and �
RESOLUTION NO. 11-2121
FEBRUARY 15, 2011
PAGE 2 OF 2
2. The proposed sign conforms to applicable development standards and will not be
. detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare;
. � � The proposed signage does not conform to applicable development
� � standards and provisions of Municipal Code as the sign is
� � , considered an off-site sign and potentially could be detrimental to �
� � the public health, safety and welfare; and
3. The physical location or placement of the sign is compatible with the surrounding �
neighborhood and does not pose a safety risk.
: The physical location or placement of the signage is not compatible
� . � with .the surrounding neighborhood and could potentially pose a
� safety risk. .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of
Arroyo Grande�hereby denies Appeal to Planning Commission 10-001 and Administrative
Sign Permit 10-017 based on the above findings.
AYES: Commissioners Barneich, Keen, Ruth and Sperow
NOES: Commissioner Martin
ABSENT: None _
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 15th day of February, 2011.
' . ATTEST: � � �
_ . • _ �
DEBBIE WEICHINGER ELIZABETH RUTH, CHAIR �
SECRETARY TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
AS TO�CONTENT: �
. �
�—
TER SA Mc ISH �
�DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVE�.��IIAENT �