Loading...
PC R 10-2111 RESOLUTION N0.10-2111 I N N C MMISSION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE PLAN I G O THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL DENY SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 10- 001, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 10-001 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 10-001; LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EAST GRAND AVENUE AND SOUTH COURTLAND STREET; APPLIED FOR BY NKT COMMERCIAL WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande has considered applications for Specific Plan Amendment 10-001, Tentative Tract Map 10-001 and Conditional Use Permit 10-001 to amend the Berry Gardens Specific Plan as it relates to the development of Subareas 3 and 4, subdivide a 4.47-acre property into three lots and construct a 4,028 square-foot commercial building, a 4,535 square-foot restaurant and a 50,881 square-foot commercial building at a public hearing on September 7, 2010 in accordance with the Municipal Code of the City of Arroyo Grande; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed this project in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the Arroyo Grande Rules and Procedures for Implementation of CEQA and has reviewed a draft �� mitigated negative declaration; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds, after due study, deliberation and public hearing, the following required findings cannot be made in an affirmative manner: Specific Plan Amendment Findings: . 1. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, policies and programs of the General Plan. � � The proposed Specific Plan Amendment conflicts with the General Plan; specifically policies LU 5-2, LU 11-1.2, LU 11-1.3 and 11-2.2 (Land Use Element). 2. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment will not adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare or result in an illogical land use pattern; � The proposed Spec�c Plan Amendment will create an i!logical land use pattem by allowing a commercia/ building to be placed on the property line (0 rear yard setback) adjacent to a residential area, which does not provide an adequate buffer between the two uses, nor does it comply with the Califomia Fire Code. 3. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is necessary and desirable in order to implement the provisions of the General Plan; The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is neither necessary nor desirable RESOLUTION NO. 10-2111 SPA 10-001; TPM.10-001; CUP 10-001 OCTOBER 5, 2010 . PAGE 2 of 3 � to implement the provisions of fhe General Plan, as it does not require development to inc/ude an adequate buffer area between the commercial and residentia/ areas, nor does it require the incorporation of design elements as required by the East Grand Avenue Enhancement Plan and Design Guidelines and Standards for Mixed-Use Districts. 4. The development standards contained in the proposed Specific Plan Amendment will result in a superior development to that which would occur using standard zoning and development regulations. The development standards contained in the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not resulf in a superior development to that which would occur using standard zoning and development regulations as it does not provide an adequate buffer between commercial and residential uses. Conditional Use Permit Findings: 1. The proposed use would not impair the integrity and character of the district in which it is to be established or located. The proposed use would impair the infegrity and character of the Gateway Mixed-Use (GMU) zoning district as it is not consistent with adjacent development wifh regard to mass and scale. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande hereby recommends the City Council deny Specific Plan Amendment 10- 001, Tentative Parcel Map 10-001 and Conditional Use PeRnit 10-001 based on the inability to make the above findings in an affirmative manner. _ On motion by Commissioner Barnreich, seconded by Commissioner Ruth, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Barnreich, Ruth and Brown NOES: Commissioners Keen and Martin ABSENT: . the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 5th day of October, 2010. RESOLUTION NO. 10-2111 SPA 10-001; TPM 10-001; CUP 10-001 OCTOBER 5, 2010 PAGE 3 of 3 ATTEST: 1�� � � _ DEBBIE WEICHINGER, TIM BRO , CHAIR SECRETARY TO THE COMMISSION AS TO CONTENT: � �,. V V L � V TERESA MCCLIS ' COMMUNITY DE LOPMENT DIRECTOR