Loading...
08.g. Wood Rodgers Brisco Road Project ApprovalTO: CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM FROM: TERESA MCCLISH, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DNELOPMENT SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR WOOD RODGERS, INC. FOR THE BRISCO ROAD-HALCYON ROADIROUTE 101 PROJECT APPROVAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION (PA&ED) AND PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES (PS&E) DATE: MAY 8,2012 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council approve Amendment No. 7 to the Consultant Services Agreement with Wood Rodgers, Inc., to complete the Project Approval and Environmental Determination (PA&ED) and provide Right of Way Support, for the Brisco Road - Halcyon RoadIHighway 101 Interchange lmprovement Project, for an additional not-to-exceed amount of $1 03,820. IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES: The City's Capital lmprovement Program budget included a total of $560,925 for Wood Rodgers to prepare the Brisco Road-Halcyon RoadIRoute 101 PA&ED and $17,000 to prepare the necessary Design Exception Fact Sheets. On April 12, 201 1, the Council approved Amendment No. 6 for $487,662 for the PA&ED. The proposed amendment includes additional not-to-exceed costs for additional studies needed to complete the PA&ED as required by Caltrans. The total for the project report and the environmental document to complete the PA&ED phase with this amendment is $591,482. There is sufficient funding available in the Transportation Facility Fund. Continued dedication of staff resources will be required. The project is identified as a priority in the Critical Needs Action Plan. BACKGROUND: In 2001, a Project Study Report-Project Development Support (PSR-PDS) was completed to develop alternatives to improve operation of the Brisco Road-Halcyon Road interchange on Route 101. 'The PSR-PDS identified five potential alternatives (includirrg a "no-build" alternative), and recommended four of these, including the "no-build" alternative, for further evaluation. The four alternatives were brought forward to the current phase of project development, Project Approval and Environmental Determination (PA&ED). During PA&ED development, additional alternatives have been identified and analyzed. Alternatives were presented to the City Council at the August 12, 2008 meeting. The City Council selected a preferred alternative and directed staff and the City Council Subcommittee to pursue approval and funding through the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) and Caltrans. 'The 2008 preferred alternative (Alt 3A) included: Agenda Item 8.g. Page 1 CITY COUNCIL AMENDMENT NO. 7 FOR WOOD RODGERS, INC. FOR THE BRISCO ROAD- HALCYON ROADIROUTE 101 PRO.IECT APPROVAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION (PA&ED) MAY 8,201 2 PAGE 2 1) closure of the northbound on- and off-ramps at Brisco Road; 2) closure of the northbound on-ramp at East Grand Avenue; 3) realignment of West Branch Street to intersect East Grand Avenue at the current location of the northbound on-ramp; 4) construction of a new northbound hook on- and off-ramps at Old Ranch Road; and 5) construction of "pork chop" islands on East Grand Avenue to prevent wrong way traffic onto the northbound off-ramp at East Grand Avenue. In May of 2009, the City Council approved Contract Amendment No. 4 with Wood Rodgers, Inc. for preparation of the design exception fact sheets for the Brisco Road-Halcyon RoadIRoute 101 Project Approval and Environmental Determination (PA&ED) in the amount of $17,500. Additionally, the Council authorized the Mayor to send a letter to Caltrans regarding opposition to requests for further analysis and urging support for the City's preferred alternative. In August 2009, the Planni~g Company was contracted to assist in determining a design solution to the Brisco impasse and develop strategies to achieve Caltrans approval. On May 1 1,2010, the Council approved the Contract Amendment No. 5 with Wood Rodgers to include alternative 3B that placed ramps at Old Ranch Road and continue an update of environmental studies and the PA&ED project. However, it was subsequently determined that this alternative had a fatal flaw due to the grade separation between Freeway 101 and Old Ranch Road. On October 26, 2010, the Council approved Alternative 4 to be included in the PA&ED. Alternative 4 involves moving the Brisco northbound on-ramp and off-ramp to Rodeo Drive. Additionally, the Council approved the preparation of supporting information and design exception fact sheets and to provide the public an opportunity to comment at the Traffic Commission and neighborhood meetings. 'The Traffic Commission considered the project alternative on January 10, 201 1 and a well attended neighborhood meeting was held on February 24, 201 1. Project accomplishments include completion of the Purpose and Need document, established performance criieria and the traffic analysis with concurrence from Caltrans District 5 Traffic Operations. In April 2011, the Council approved Amendment No. 6 with Wood Rodgers to update environmental studies and continue preparation of the PA&ED documents. Most of this work is complete except that Caltrans reviews have required more revisions and effort than was anticipated for Amendment No. 6. Draft funding recommendations for the project were approved at the February, 2012 San Luis Obispo Council of Government Board of Directors meeting. In March 2012, the California Transportation Commission approved the project for funding. Table 1 outlines the project schedule. Agenda Item 8.g. Page 2 CITY COUNCIL AMENDMENT NO. 7 FOR WOOD RODGERS, INC. FOR THE BRISCO ROAD- HALCYON ROADIROUTE 101 PR0,IECT APPROVAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION (PA&ED) MAY 8,201 2 PAGE 3 (_ - _- _ _ - ~___ I Table 1 - PROJECT SCHEDULE 1 I I- - -- - - - - - - -- -- -- - -- --- - I - -- - - - - -- - -- - - - - -- - - -- - -- - - -p - - - - rT-- , Env~ronmental (admin draft February, 2012 - February, 201 3 1 completion- final) I Lp- - -!. - . - -- 1 Project Report April, 201 3 , , Right of Way 1 December, 201 3 - -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - ~. - - - - - - .- - - - -. . - - - -- --- . r-- i Ready to bid for construction ( August, 2014 l1 I L -- - - --- - - - -- -1.- - - - - ---- - - - - -- - - - I Construction (dependent upon 2014 - 201 6 state funding) ANALYSIS OF ISSUES: Obtaining Caltrans approval for improvements to the Brisco RoadIHalcyon Road-Highway 101 Interchange has proved to be a difficult task given the inability to address deficiencies with an older roadlhighway system while meeting Caltrans design standards. Given concurrence between the Crty and Caltrans on the Alternatives to be studied in the PA&ED documents, staff and consultants are ready to complete the PA&ED. Issues identified by the public include potential impacts to the Rodeo Drive neighborhood, St. Patrick's School and County properties and the cost benefit of Alternative 4 in comparison to the very long range potential of having to widen the underpass. Alternative 4 requires realignment of Rodeo Drive and would utilize some of the lot originally acquired for the Police Building Project. It would also impact a small portion of County and St. Patrick's School properties. Staff and consultants have met with representatives from the school, the County, and neighborhood groups and have identified mitigation factors to be included in the PA&ED document, including a bus turnout and pedestrian facilities for the school, a realignment of Grace Lane at Rodeo Drive to address neighborhood circulation concerns and revised parking lot design and access for the County property. It also should be noted that the Alternative 4 does correct operational deficiencies and provides for long term circulation benefits. It is recognized that additional work, including widening the underpass may be necessary beyond the 30-50 yr. planning horizon. However, alternatives that include widening the underpass as a part of this project have been determined to be infeasible due to both cost and the fact that the benef~ gained from Agenda Item 8.g. Page 3 ClN COUNCIL AMENDMENT NO. 7 FOR WOOD RODGERS, INC. FOR 'THE BRISCO ROAD- HALCYON ROADIROUTE 101 PROJECT APPROVAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION (PA&ED) MAY 8,2012 PAGE 4 widening the underpass is realized only if the Brisco ramps are moved. A copy of the consultant's work plan and proposal for the PA&ED is attached as Exhibit "A to proposed Consultant Services Agreement Amendment No. 7. The amendment includes Right of Way Support that is typically part of the design phase (Plans, Specifications and Estimates.) However, staff recommends the City start the initial steps in order to shorten the overall anticipated design phase in the event that construction funds are made available earlier than programmed. The proposal for the remaining Phase II (PS&E) will be considered after distribution of the draft environmental document. Work to date included updating and augmenting previous environmental studies that were not considered valid and had to be re-analyzed per Caltrans requirements. Additionally, the major changes are required from Caltrans for conceptual design of both project alternatives I and 4 since both are required to be studied as part of the PA&ED. These include geomet~ics and design standard compliance and structure planning and are outlined as part of Exhibit "A to the proposed contract amendment. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration: Approve Amendment No. 7 to the Consultant Services Agreement with Wood Rodgers in the not to exceed amount of $103,820; Do not approve Amendment No. 7 to the Consultant Services Agreement with Wood Rodgers; Provide direction to staff. ADVANTAGES: Proceeding with completion of the PA&ED through an amendment will provide the greatest likelihood of obtaining project approval from Caltrans for a project alternative that achieves the goals of the City and to complete the process expeditiously. DISADVANTAGES: Approval of the recommendation will increase costs to the City for additional studies. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: A detailed environmental review is performed during the PA&ED phase of project development. A draft Project Report (PR), an engineering report that describes the work and possible project alternatives is prepared in parallel with the environmental studies. Following circulation of the Draft environmental document (the public review period), a public hearing is held. After analyzing the public hearing comments, a preferred alternative is normally selected, which allows the preparation and approval of the final environmental document which is attached to the PR. It is anticipated that the draft document will be published in August. Agenda Item 8.g. Page 4 CITY COLlNClL AMENDMENT NO. 7 FOR WOOD RODGERS, INC. FOR THE BRISCO ROAD- HALCYON ROADIROUTE 101 PROJECT APPROVAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION (PA&ED) MAY 8,201 2 PAGE 5 PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS: The Agenda was posted in front of City Hall on Thursday, May 3, 2012. The Agenda and staff report were posted on the City's website on Friday, May 4, 2012. No public comments were received. Agenda Item 8.g. Page 5 CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 7 This Seventh Amendment ("Seventh Amendment") to Consultant's Services Agreement ("CSA") by and between the CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE and WOOD RODGERS, INC. is made and entered into this day of May 2012, based on the following facts: WHEREAS, the parties entered into a CSA dated January 11, 2005, to prepare a Project Approval and Environmental Determination (PA&ED) for the Brisco-Road- Halcyon RoadIRoute 101 Interchange; and WHEREAS, the parties entered into a First Amendment to CSA dated November 8, 2005, to include the environmental studies for the Brisco Road-Halcyon Road/Route 101 PA&ED; and WHEREAS, the parties entered into a Second Amendment to CSA dated November 14, 2006, to include a northbound auxiliary lane in the Brisco Road-Halcyon RoadIRoute 101 PA&ED; and WHEREAS, the parties entered into a Third Amendment to CSA dated June 24, 2008, to include additional analysis in the Brisco Road-Halcyon RoadIRoute 101 Project Approval & Environmental Document (PA&ED); and WHEREAS, the parties entered into a Fourth Amendment to CSA dated May 26, 2009, for preparation of the design exception fact sheets for the Brisco Road-Halcyon Road/Route 101 Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED); and WHEREAS, the parties entered into a Fifth Amendment to CSA dated June 16, 2010 for preparation of the Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED) for the Brisco Road-Halcyon RoadIRoute 101 lnterchange lmprovements Project; and WHEREAS, the parties entered into a Sixth Amendment to CSA dated April 12, 201 1 for additional preparation required for the Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED) due to revised alternatives for the Brisco Road-Halcyon RoadIRoute 101 lnterchange lmprovements Project; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to further modify the CSA as set forth herein. NOW THEREFORE, for valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. To include the additional services at the increased cost as specified in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. That the contract term is extended to February 28, 2013 Agenda Item 8.g. Page 6 3. Except as modified herein, all other terms and conditions set forth in the CSA, as amended, shall remain unchanged. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY and CONSULTANT have executed this Seventh Amendment the day and year first above written. WOOD RODGERS, INC. CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE By: TONY FERRARA, MAYOR Agenda Item 8.g. Page 7 Exhibit "A" WOOD RODGER3 Ms. Teresa McClisti, AlCP Director of Community Development City of Arroyo Grande PO Box 550 2 14 E. Branch Street Arroyo Grande, CA 9342 1 April 23, 2012 RECEIVED APR 26 2012 ClW Of ARPOYO Subject: Request for Amendment No. 7 - Consultant Services Agreement for COMMUNllY DEVELOMM Brisco Road Interchange Improvements Project Project Approval and Environmental Document Dear Ms. McClish: Wood Rodgers, Inc. has been diligently pursuing preparation of the Project Report (PR) and Environmental Document (ED) to complete the Project Approval and Environmental Documentation (PA&ED) phase of the Brisco Road Interchange Improvements project under Amendment No. 6 to our Consultant Services Agreement, which was entered into in April, 201 1. As you are aware, Caltrans reviews have required more revisions and effort than anticipated at the time the budget for Amendment No. 6 was developed. It has now become apparent that additional time, effort, and budget will be required to complete the PAIED for this project in the following areas: 1. Project Management: The existing contract scope and budget was based on the assumption that project management would be needed for a period of approximately 16 months, commencing in April 201 1. Although we have provided timely, quality submittals and prompt responses to Caltrans reviews, we still have not obtained Caltrans concurrence with the project features (design exceptions) and geometries. It now appears that an additional five (5) months beyond the 16 months originally anticipated will be required to complete the PA&ED. In addition, we anticipate three (3) additional meetings. Thus, we will need additional budget to provide project management for an additional five (5) months, as follows: Project Manager (PIC 11) 80 hrs @ $150 = $12,000 Project Engineer (Engr lI1) 18 hrs @ $1 40 = $2,520 Design Engineer (Engr TI) 10 hrs @ $120 = $1,200 Administrative Assistant 20 hrs @ $ 70 = $ 1,400 . Reimbursables (Mileage, Reproduction, Mail) $ 1,360 Project Management Budget: Add: $18,480 2. Conceptual Geometries & Design Standards Compliance: At the time the budget for Amendment No. 6 was developed, it appeared that obtaining Caltrans concurrence with the features of Alternatives 1 and 4 would be relatively straightforward, and would not require significant changes from the then-existing concept drawings. In actuality Caltrans reviews have required very significant revisions to the conceptual design of both project alternatives and re-preparation of the Design Checklists. For Alternative 4 the changes have included major changes to the horizontal and/or vertical alignments of the proposed ramps and adjacent West Branch Street and Rodeo Drive, and widening Grand Avenue at the southbound ramp intersection. For Alternative 1 the changes have included adding the widening of the northbound off-ramp to Grand Avenue, widening of West Branch Street at Ca~nino Mercado, and widening Grand Avenue at and between the ramp intersections. Also, Design Exception Fact Sheets (DEFS) are typically prepared only for the selected project alternative, but for this project Caltrans has required submittal of DEFS for both project alternatives, and more cycles of review than anticipated Agenda Item 8.g. Page 8 Brisco Road Intcrchanpe Improvcmcnts PA&ED - Amendnicnt No. 7 &S3 April 23. 21312 Pagc 2 Y WOOD RODGER3 mm".Lm.,.a 0.. rn...,". ma..-. .a."..a.. have been (and will be) required. Thus, we will need additional budget to continue to make revisions and sub~nittals to obtain Caltrans concurrence with the features of the project alternatives, as follows: Project Manager (PIC 11) 12 hrs @ $150 = $ 1,800 Project Engineer (Engr 111) 60 hrs @ $140 = $8,400 Design Engineer (Engr IT) 112 hrs @ $120 = $13,440 Assist. EngrICAD Tech 88 hrs @ $ 95 = $8,360 Administrative Assistant 8 hrs @ $ 70 = $ 560 Conceptual Geometrics Budget: Add: $32,560 3. Structure Planning: The existing contract scope and budget included the preparation of an Advance Planning Study (APS) for the structure to cany the planned on-ramp over Brisco Road in Alternative 4. No new structures were anticipated in Alternative I. However, Caltrans has now requested that Alternative 1 include an APS for the widening on both sides of the Grand Avenue Overcrossing in Alternative I. Because of existing non- standard features and constraints, those widenings are anticipated to require special construction techniques. We anticipate that the design will accommodate construction of a CWPS box girder superstructure on high falsework, then removal of falsework and lowering on jacks into final position. The columns in the median of the freeway wou Id be constructed through the superstructure while it is still supported on jacks. Therefore, we anticipate a more extensive review of the APS for the widenings of the Grand Avenue Overcrossing than is typical. Thus, we will need additional budget to prepare the additional APS and respond to Caltrans review comments, as follows: Project Manager (PIC II) 4 hrs @ $150 = $ 600 Project Engineer (Engr Ill) 16 hrs @ $140 = $2,240 , , Senior Structures Engineer 66 hrs @ $150 = $9,900 Principal Structures Engineer I 1 hrs @ $175 = $ 1,925 Assist. EngrICAD Tech 60 hrs @ $ 95 = $5,700 Administrative Assistant 6 hrs @ $ 70 = $ 420 Structure Planning Budget: Add: $20,785 4. Environmental Documentation: a) Previously-approved Reports: SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) has previously obtained Caltrans approval of most of the technical reports for this project. However, the recent addition of the widening of the Grand Avenue Overcrossing in Alternative 1 will require those previously-approved reports to be revised to include an updated project description and re-circulated for Caltrans review and approval. This will involve the following seven reports: " Archeological Study Report " Historic Property Survey Report " Historic Resources Evaluation Report " Noise Study Report " Community Impact Report " Air Quality Report " Water Quality Assessment Report Agenda Item 8.g. Page 9 Brisco Road Interchange Iniprovcnicnts PA&ED - Aniendmen~ No. 7 April 23, 20 12 Page 3 WOOD RODGERS mm.m.-.,.a ,..-...,.. --.,a. .-L",,a.. Revising and obtaining Caltrans approval of these previously-approved reports is anticipated to involve the following additional effort and budget: Project Manager/Biologist 2hrs @ $110=$ 220.00 Technical Editor 17.5 hrs @ $ 79 = $ 1,382.50 Adn~inistrative / Clerical 3.5 hrs @ $ 68 = $ 238.00 Reimbursables $ 353.50 Ulxlute Pre~~ioirsI~~-ul~prod Repot-ts Budget: Add: $ 2.194 b) Drafi Reports: Three environmental technical reports are still in the review process. An updated project description will need to be incorporated in all of them. Nutirrul Etivimitnetir Sndy - The NES can be updated in the course of the normal review process, and no additional budget is required. Visirul It~ipuct Assesstttettr Report - Due to the addition of the widening of the Grand Avenue Overcrossing on both sides to Alternative I, an additional visual simulation of that structure will need to be prepared and incorporated, based on design information to be provided by Wood Rodgers. The revised VIA will then be submitted to Caltrans for review and approval. This will require the following additional budget: Project ManagerIBiologist I hr @ $110 = $ 110.00 Environmental Planner 4hrs @ $79=$316.00 GISICAD Specialist 8 hrs @ $121 = $ 968.00 Technical Editor 2.5 hrs @ $ 79 = $ 197.50 Administrative / Clerical 0.5 hr @ $ 68 = $ 34.00 Reimbursables $ 50.50 Updure Vis~rul 111ipact Assesstnetit B~rdget: Add: $ 1,676 Puleotirolonical Evul~rurioti Report - Caltrans has previously requested and reviewed the Paleontological Identification Report (PIR) for this project. However, Caltrans has now requested that a more detailed Paleontological Evaluation Report (PER) be prepared instead. Neither a PIR nor a PER was included in the existing scope and budget. Preparation and processing of a PER will require the following additional budget: Project ManagerIBiologist I hr @ $110 = $ 110.00 Paleontologist 8 hrs @ $121 = $ 968.00 GISICAD Specialist 8 hrs @ $121 = $ 968.00 Technical Editor I hr . @ $ 79 = $ 79.00 Administrative / Clerical 0.5 hr @ $ 68 = $ 34.00 Reimbursables $ 50.00 Upd~rre Visual It?tpucr Assesst~ietir Budget: Add: $ 2,209 Total Change, SWCA Environmental Budget: Add: $ 6,079 5. Right of Way Support: Three parcels adjacent to Rodeo Drive (future Grace Lane) are anticipated to be affected by right of way acquisition that may affect current or planned land uses: St. Patrick's School (APN 007-787-005), the South County Government Center (APN 007-01 1-050) and the vacant Skyland Partnership parcel north of the existing Rodeo DrivelGrace Lane intersection (APN 007-01 1-041). The City of Arroyo Grande has requested that the Wood Rodgers Team provide additional planning and support services with respect to the potential right of way acquisitions from these three parcels beyond what is included in the existing contract scope and budget, as follows: Agenda Item 8.g. Page 10 Brisco Road ln~crchangc Iniprovcmcnts PA&ED - Aniendlnent No. 7 April 23, 2012 Page 4 9 WOOD -0DGERS 0 .... 0.s.- *..-...#.= --.,-. .OL"W,O.. N) Right of Wuy PI-ocess Cori.sirltatiori - Bender Rosenthal, Inc. will provide advice and consultation with City staff regarding the legal and procedural aspects of various Right of Way activities under the Uniform Act. This is expected to include reviewing provided exhibits and documents, answering questions and providing reco~n~nendations via telephone or e-mail, without travel or participation in on-site meetings. This work is expected to require the following additional budget: Senior Appraiser 24 hrs @ $125 = $3,000 ROW Process Consultatio~i: Add: $ 3,000 b) hnd Planning Corisirltutiori - Wood Rodgers will prepare conceptual plan exhibits regarding the modification of existing facilities on the affected parcels adjacent to the roadway modifications to assist City staff in co~nmunicating to the affected parties how potential impacts on the existing land uses will be mitigated by the project. For St. Patrick's School, this is anticipated to include modification of the entrance driveway, adjacent sidewalks and pedestrian paths, bus stop(s), parking facilities, and security fencing. For the South County Government Center, this is anticipated to include planning for modification of existing parking lots, construction of retaining walls and replacement parking spaces, associated pathways, and landscaping and frontage improvements. For the Skyland Partnership parcel, this is anticipated to include construction of a retaining wall or engineered slope, frontage improvements, and landscaping. In all cases, the exhibits will be prepared at a planning level of detail, and feedback provided by the landowners or City staff will be incorporated to revise these exhibits so that decisions regarding the concepts can be made. At this time the number of rounds of revision required to reach decisions regarding the concepts (to be designed in a subsequent phase of project development) is uncertain, but the budget amounts listed below assume that not more than four (4) submittals of the exhibit for each parcel will be required. Wood Rodgers will attend meetings with City staff andlor landowner representatives in Arroyo Grande on up to 3 days. This work is expected to require the following additional budget: Project Manager (PIC U) 24 hrs @ $150 = $3,600 Project Engineer (Engr III) 16hrs @ $140=$2,240 Design Engineer (Engr 11) 80 hrs @ $120 = $9,600 Assist. EngrICAD Tech 40 hrs @ $ 95 = $3,800 Reimbursables (Travel & Exhibit Reproduction) $ 1.560 hnd Plcrnning Consultution: Add: $20,800 c) Legal Descril>tions crnd Plats - After land planning consultation is complete and decisions regarding the right of way areas have been made, Wood Rodgers will prepare an accurate CAD plan of right of way areas required from the three subject parcels (APN 007-0 1 1-04 I, APN 007-0 1 1-050, and APN 007-787-005) and transmit it to Wallace Group. Wallace Group's surveyor will prepare a legal description and plat for each right of way areas to be acquired from these three parcels for the City's use. This work is expected to require the following additional budget: Senior Land Surveyor ll 14hrs @ $154=$2,156 Legal Descriptioris and Plats: Add: $ 2,156 Total, Right of Way Support: Add: $25,956 Agenda Item 8.g. Page 11 Brisco Road Inlcrchangc lmprovcmenrs PA&ED - Arncndmen~ No. 7 April 23. 20 12 WOOD RODGERS Paec 5 m=v=Lo.B.- ,.. ow...w. om..a. .o.u..o.. Su~rtntary of Birdget Revisiorts 1. Project Management: Add: $18,480 2. Conceptual Geometrics: Add: $32,560 3. Structure Planning: Add: $20,785 4. Environmental Documentation: Add: $ 6,079 . 5. Right of Way Support: Add: $25,956 TOTAL: $103,820 Wood Rodgers views the above changes as an increase in its scope of work and requests authorization for additional budget in the anlount of $103,820, changing the not-to-exceed contract aniount from the $487,662.50 established by Amendment No. 6 to a new total of $591,482.50. In addition, we recommend that the end date of the contract be changed to February 28,2013. We look forward to our continued service to the City, and request approval of the scope and budget so that we can immediately initiate project activities consistent with the schedule outlined by the City and Caltrans. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (9 16) 440-8 13 1, or email at mravback @woodrod~ers.com. Sincerely, WOOD R RS, IN Mark Rayback, PE Principal 8095 M)J\Bnsco Amnd 7 Reqursl 20120123 doc Agenda Item 8.g. Page 12