Loading...
Minutes 2002-02-26 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2002 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 215 E. BRANCH STREET ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Lady called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 7:18 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL City Council: Council Members Dickens, Ferrara, Lubin, Mayor Pro Tem Runels and Mayor Lady were present. City Staff Present: City Manager Adams; City Attorney Carmel; Director of Administrative Services Wetmore; Community Development Director Strong; Chief of Police TerBorch; Associate Planner McClish, and Director of Public Works Spagnolo. 3. FLAG SALUTE Members of American Legion Post No. 136 led the Flag Salute. 4. INVOCATION Pastor Jan Armstrong, First Presbyterian Church, Grover Beach, delivered the invocation. 5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 5.a. Proclamation - Attained the Rank of Eagle Scout: Michael Dorsi. Mayor Lady presented a Proclamation to Michael Dorsi congratulating him for achieving the rank of Eagle Scout and recognizing his commitment, diligence, and dedication in undertaking and completing his Eagle Scout project. 5.b. Measure A-Five Minute Presentation Each by Proponent and Opponent. County Administrative Officer David Edge presented an overview of the Tobacco Settlement Issue Ballot Measure (Measure A) set for the March 5, 2002 Election, summarized what Measure A will do, and discussed why the County Board of Supervisors are opposed to it. Dr. Steven Hansen, Representing Citizens for Healthier San Luis Obispo County, spoke in support of Measure A. He contended that the money raised by this measure would ensure funding for important health care services for low-income citizens. 6. AGENDA REVIEW None. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 26, 2002 PAGE 2 6.a. Resolutions and Ordinances Read in Title Only Council Member Dickens moved, Mayor Pro Tem Runels seconded, and the motion passed unanimously that all resolutions and ordinances presented at the meeting shall be read in title only and all further reading be waived. 7. CITIZENS'INPUT. COMMENTS, AND SUGGESTIONS Otis Page, 606 Myrtle, stated that he had addressed the City Council tonight prior to the Special Meeting (Closed Session) and had requested that Council Members Ferrara and Dickens recuse themselves from any involvement they may have on the Council on the referendum petition lawsuit against the City, as they voted no on the General Plan and were active in circulating the petitions. He stated this was a conflict of interest and requested again that they recuse themselves from participating in the administration of the lawsuit. He further commented that he felt Council Member Ferrara also had a conflict in terms of Rancho Grande Park. Fred Bauer, 212 Short Street, Chairman of the Citizens' Committee Supporting the Council Majority (CCSCM), expressed concems regarding the pending litigation against the City regarding the Referendum petitions. Wayne King referred to the issue of agricultural ground and stated that the records must show that the Vanderveen five-acre parcel is not prime agricultural land and is willing to prove his statements with history and documentation. He also commented that the leading proponent of the referendum petition did not attend any of the Planning Commission or City Council meetings regarding the General Plan Update process to voice any concerns or objections. Ed Dorfman, 285 La Cresta, spoke about the referendum petition which is now the subject of a lawsuit against the City and stated he felt it was misrepresented to the people who signed it. He agreed that Council Members Ferrara and Dickens should not involve themselves in City Council discussions and decisions on this matter. Michael Passarelli, representing the San Luis Obispo County Food Bank, thanked the Council for allocating CDBG funds for its project. He announced invitations would be forthcoming for the Grand Opening of a new South County location at 1820 Railroad Avenue in Oceano on Thursday, March 14,2002 at 10:00 a.m. Lynn Parks, 1146 Maple, spoke in defense of the intentions of Council Members Ferrara and Dickens with regard to the public comments made earlier. Dean Coker, representing Castlerock Development, spoke regarding proposed Tract 1998 and displayed aerial photos of the project site. He explained that the SEIR required that project alternatives be explored and referred to Lot 36 of Tract 1132 as a potential alternative site for their proposed development. He explained that Castle rock was interested in exchanging Tract 1998 for Lot 136, reviewed the merits of the proposal and requested the Council consider suggested that building a City Park on the CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 26, 2002 PAGE 3 land known as Tract 199B. (Submitted letter for the record dated February 26, 2002 outlining the proposal). Nancy Loomis, Arroyo Grande resident, stated she does not want to see Arroyo Grande become overcrowded and agreed with the opinions of Council Members Ferrara and Dickens. She felt the City was headed toward too much growth. Following public comments, Council Member Ferrara indicated an interest in meeting with Mr. Bauer and Mr. Dorfman at a later time to discuss their concerns. 8. CONSENT AGENDA Council Member Lubin requested Consent Agenda Items B.b., B.c., and B.d. be pulled for discussion. Council Member Dickens also requested Item B.d. be pulled for discussion. Mayor Pro Tem Runels moved and Council Member Dickens seconded the motion to approve Consent Agenda Items B.a. through B.e., with the exception of Items B.b., B.c., and B.d., with the recommended courses of action: 8.a. Cash Disbursement Ratification. Action: Approved the listings of cash disbursements for the period February 1, 2002 through February 15, 2002. 8.e. Consideration of an Appropriation for an Environmental Consultant to Provide On-Site Monitoring for the Tally Ho Creek K-Rail Project. Action: Approved appropriation in the amount of $3,000 from the General Fund to be used for environmental services during the installation of K-Rail along the City's easement from Tally Ho Road to Tally Ho Creek. AYES: Runels, Dickens, Ferrara, Lubin, Lady NOES: None ABSENT: None There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed. 8.b. Consideration of Approval of Minutes. Council Member Lubin noted that a supplemental memorandum had been issued to the Council with a correction to the February 12, 2002 City Council Minutes (memorandum on file), to omit a reference to Council Member Lubin as he was absent during the item regarding Rancho Grande Park due to a potential conflict of interest. Council Member Lubin moved and Council Member Ferrara seconded the motion to approve the minutes of the Special City Council Meeting of February 12, 2002 and the Regular City Council/Redevelopment Agency Meeting of February 12, 2002, as amended. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 26, 2002 PAGE 4 AYES: Lubin, Ferrara, Runels, Dickens, Lady NOES: None ABSENT: None There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed. B.c. Adoption of Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map of Arroyo Grande from Public and Quasi-Public Facilities (PF) to Residential Suburban (RS) for a 1.40-Acre Portion of Rancho Grande Park; Development Code Amendment Case No. 01-001. Council Member Lubin declared a potential conflict of interest due to property ownership and stepped down from the dais. In response to public comments made earlier, Council Member Ferrara announced that it was his understanding from the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) that he had no conflict of interest with regard to this item. Council Member Dickens moved and Council Member Ferrara seconded the motion to adopt the Ordinance amending the Zoning Map from PF to RS for a 1.40-acre portion of the Rancho Grande Park Site. City Attorney Carmel read the title of the Ordinance. AYES: Dickens, Ferrara, Runels, Lady NOES: None ABSENT: Lubin There being 4 AYES, 0 NOES, and 1 ABSENT, the motion is hereby declared to be passed. Council Member Lubin returned to the dais. B.d. Consideration of Support of Proposition 40 - The Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2002. Council Member Lubin requested a brief explanation of Proposition 40 and subsequent discussion. City Manager Adams gave a brief overview of Proposition 40, explaining that if approved, it would provide $2.6 billion for state and local park projects and recreation facilities. He reported that the City would receive approximately $150,000 for park-related activities, as well as be eligible for a number of competitive grant programs available for individual projects. Council Member Lubin stated that the $2.6 billion would be dedicated primarily to major metropolitan areas and expressed concerns regarding support from the City for the proposition. Council Member Dickens stated he was in favor of supporting Proposition 40, not just for the local benefit, but also for the overall benefit to the citizens. He suggested additional language be added to the Resolution that identifies the allocation CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 26, 2002 PAGE 5 of funds toward water quality projects and watershed protection, projects aimed at reducing air pollution, and farmland protection programs throughout the State. Mayor Lady invited comments from those in the audience who wished to be heard on the matter. Howard Mankins, 200 Hillcrest Drive, spoke of the State's financial situation and expressed concerns regarding the placement of this item on the City Council's Agenda for consideration. There were no further public comments. Council Member Dickens moved and Council Member Ferrara seconded the motion to adopt Resolution No. 3580 in support of Proposition 40. AYES: Dickens, Ferrara, Lady NOES: Runels, Lubin ABSENT: None There being 3 AYES and 2 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed. 9. PUBLIC HEARING 9.a. Consideration of Development Code Amendment Case No. 01-003, Revision of the "Design Guidelines for Historic Districts". Associate Planner McClish presented the staff report and responded to questions from Council. Staff recommended the Council introduce an Ordinance amending Title 16, Chapter 16.08 of the Municipal Code and Design Overlay 2.4 to revise the Design Guidelines for Historic Districts. Mayor Lady announced that several letters had been received (on file in the Administrative Services Department) requesting further public review of the proposed Design Guidelines for Historic District. He referred to a request by the Chamber of Commerce requesting a continuance in order to conduct some informational workshops for those residents, property owners, and business owners located in the designated historic district who would be affected. Mayor Lady opened the Public Hearing and stated all members of the public were invited to come forward and speak on the matter. Chuck Fellows, 507 Le Point Street (reviewed and submitted a letter dated February 5, 2002 into the record with suggested changes to the proposed document). CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 26, 2002 PAGE 6 Roy Burke, 971 Bennett, stated that he took exception to what was being proposed. He suggested the Council talk to all the business owners before making any decisions. Robin McDonald, 424 Orchard, expressed concerns with regard to the proposed guidelines relating to signage. She stated the guidelines needed to be clearer. Jacqueline Pontavelli, 508 Le Point, agreed with comments made by Mr. Fellows and added that the proposed guidelines would preserve the character of the Village. Richard DeBlauw stated the guidelines were too restrictive, making it too difficult and expensive for improvements or development. He said they should be treated as guidelines and not incorporated into the Development Code. He referred to various provisions in the guidelines that he felt should be better defined and requested that no decision on the document be made tonight. Howard Mankins, 200 Hillcrest, expressed concerns that the proposed guidelines did not receive enough hearings and encouraged the Council to accept the invitation by the Chamber to conduct workshops and additional hearings to obtain additional public input. Scott Wachenheim, Preserve the Village member, (referred to letter dated February 21, 2002 in the staff report and reviewed the comments and suggestions). He complimented staff for coordinating the work on this document over the past year. Heather Jensen, CEO of the Arroyo Grande Chamber of Commerce, commended staff for hours of work done on the document; however, expressed concerns that informal research in the business community showed the majority of people were uninformed about the proposed guidelines. She said it was important to get additional public input in order to make it a success and suggested workshops be held similar to those conducted for E. Grand Avenue. She submitted a letter dated February 26, 2002 for the record. Eddie EI-Helou, representing the Village Improvement Association (VIA), stated he thought the existing Village design guidelines were good. He expressed concerns with the new proposed guidelines and requested the item be postponed for further review. Doug LeSage, Miller Way, representing the VIA and South County Historical Society Board of Directors, complimented Robin from Avila Signs and Design for signs she made for the schoolhouse. He agreed that more time should be given for review of the proposed guidelines. Erin O'Connor, 224 McKinley, stated she loves the historical nature of the community. She supported revising the guidelines and stated the language should be strengthened. Lynn Parks, 1146 Maple, stated she was in favor of revising the guidelines for the Village. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 26, 2002 PAGE 7 Mike McConagle, 529 E. Branch, felt the issue required further study and suggested including Cal Poly students to provide design ideas, similar to what they provided for the E. Grand Avenue project. Hearing no further public comments, Mayor Lady closed the Public Hearing. Mayor Lady called a break at 9:55 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 10:08 p.m. Following considerable public comment and Council discussion, staff was directed to develop a plan for conducting workshops to obtain additional public input regarding the "Design Guidelines for Historic Districts" and report back on the plan within the next month. 10. CONTINUED BUSINESS None. 11. NEW BUSINESS 11.a. Housing Allocation and Housing Element Discussion. Steve Devencenzi, San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG), presented an overview of the Regional Housing Needs Assessment Analysis, a state mandated effort to address the need for affordable housing. He reported that the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has developed a methodology for distributing housing growth to local jurisdictions. He explained that the HCD housing allocation formula sets a target of 18,892 new housing units for the County of San Luis Obispo. Of those units, he added, the City of Arroyo Grande would be expected to contribute 1,683. Determined that the HCD formula is impossible to meet, SLOCOG has developed an adjusted formula that would reduce the housing allocation to 10,360 units County-wide, with a City share of 939 units, he concluded. Council questions and comments followed. The following members of the public made comments: Chuck Fellows, Michael Passarelli. Community Development Director Strong presented a status report on the City's Housing Element and stated it was required by State law to be updated by December 2003. He reviewed several concepts for the Housing Element preparation work program and stated that staff would integrate any Council direction into the Fiscal Year 2002-03 budget work program for Housing Element preparation. Council and staff discussion ensued regarding the recommended concepts. With regard to the formation of a technical and/or citizen advisory committee of housing industry representatives to consider constraints and opportunities to refine implementation programs, staff was encouraged to broaden the membership to include citizens and other interested parties; and start cooperative efforts right away with Grover Beach, Pismo Beach and County of San Luis Obispo to evaluate housing conditions, South County demographics, and CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 26, 2002 PAGE 8 housing market data. With regard to the consideration of an additional intern and/or limited consultant assistance for Housing Element preparation, Council agreed to reconsider the recommendation at a later date should the need arise. 12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS a. MAYOR MICHAEL LADY (1) South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD). Met in Closed Sessions to discuss litigation issues. No reportable action at this time. Discussed major budget items in regular session; began processing the chlorine contact and affluent pump project update; and resolved various issues with regard to the operation of the plant. (2) Other. On February 5th, in conjunction with the Chamber of Commerce, attended the Business Roundtable held with business owners in the Oak Park Plaza. Also attended the Mayors City Selection Committee Meeting. b. MAYOR PRO TEM THOMAS A. RUNELS (1) Zone 3 Advisory Board. Attended the Zone 3 Technical Committee Meeting and discussed the upgrade of the water treatment plant; and gave a status report on the Lopez Dam seismic retrofit project. (2) County Water Resources Advisory Committee (WRAC). No report. (3) Other. None. c. COUNCIL MEMBER JIM DICKENS (1) Community Recreation Center Subcommittee. Meets tomorrow. (2) Economic Opportunity Commission (EOC). Met last week; EOC is working on a identifying a homeless shelter site in N. County. (3) South County Youth Coalition. Announced that Arroyo Grande Police Officer lanneo is heading up the "Every 15 Minutes" program that will be conducted this year at Arroyo Grande High School to educate youth on the consequences of drinking and driving. (4) Other. None. d. COUNCIL MEMBER TONY M. FERRARA (1) Integrated Waste Management Authority Board (IWMA). No report. Next meeting is March 13th. (2) Air Pollution Control District (APCD). Next meeting is March 2ih. New APCO is Larry Allen. (3) San Luis Obispo Council of Governments/San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority (SLOCOG/SLORTA). Meeting topics included status of STIP funds and proposed projects to be funded by STIP funds, such as the Brisco/Halcyon/101 project; and future planning for unmet transit needs. (4) Other. None. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 26, 2002 PAGE 9 e. COUNCIL MEMBER SANDY LUBIN (1) South County Area Transit (SCAT). Did not meet last month; however, the Board will be reviewing route designations and how transportation needs for the South County are being handled. (2) Economic Vitality Corporation. City of Arroyo Grande was spotlight City at last meeting; Rob Strong represented the City and gave a report, Bob Lund represented the Village and Lund's and gave a report. Additionally, the EVC voted to support low-income needs without the financial requirements that were requested. (3) Other. None. 13. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS Mayor Lady acknowledged the letter submitted by Dean Coker, Castlerock Development regarding the property for Rancho Grande Park and requested that staff bring the proposal fOlWard to a future meeting and agendize the issue. He stated he would like to see what the community has to say about the concept. 14. CITY MANAGER ITEMS None. 15. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS None. 16. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS None. 17. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Lady adjourned the meeting at 11 :20 p.m. : --~. /#$ ,7 Michael A. Lady, MaY~ ATTEST: .1Jv2--- Kelly W tmo e, Director of Administrative Servicesl Deputy City Clerk