Loading...
Minutes 2002-05-28 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TUESDAY, MAY 28,2002 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 215 E. BRANCH STREET ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Lady called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 7:15 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL City CouncillRDA: Council/Board Members Dickens, Ferrara, Lubin, Mayor Pro TemNice Chair Runels and Mayor/Chair Lady were present. City Staff Present: City Manager Adams; City Attomey Carmel; Director of Administrative Services Wetmore; Community Development Director Strong; Chief of P~lice TerBorch; Director of Building and Fire Fibich; Director of Parks, Recreation & Facilities Hernandez; and Director of Public Works Spagnolo. 3. FLAG SALUTE Jack Gates, representing Arroyo Grande Lions Club, led the Flag Salute. 4. INVOCATION Pastor George Lepper, Peace Lutheran Church, Arroyo Grande, delivered the invocation. 5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS S.a. Proclamation - Attaining the Rank of Eagle Scout - Michael De Leonardis. Mayor Lady presented a Proclamation to Michael De Leonardi congratulating him for achieving the rank of Eagle Scout and recognizing his commitment, diligence, and dedication in undertaking and completing his Eagle Scout Project. 6. AGENDA REVIEW None. 6.a. Resolutions and Ordinances Read in Title Only Mayor Pro Tem Runels moved, Council Member Ferrara seconded, and the motion passed unanimously that all resolutions and ordinances presented at the meeting shall be read in title only and all further reading be waived. 7. CITIZENS' INPUT. COMMENTS. AND SUGGESTIONS James Dodge, 534 Diana Place, expressed concerns that the City's Fire Department staffing was primarily volunteer and he spoke in support of adding full-time paid personnel to the Department. CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES MAY 28, 2002 PAGE 2 Jill Bolster-White, Executive Director of Transitions Mental Health, thanked staff for its assistance in finding a suitable site for its organization. She also thanked the Council for providing them the opportunity to educate the community about mental illness and for supporting mental illness in the community. 8. CONSENT AGENDA Council Member Dickens requested Item 8.e. be. pulled for questions. Council Member Lubin referred to Agenda Item 8.g. and noted that a supplemental memorandum had been issued to the Council with a modification to the April 23, 2002 City Council Minutes, to clarify a statement on Page 11, Item 12.e. (1) that the SCAT Board of Directors approved the 2002-03 Budget, of which Arroyo Grande's portion of the increase is $51,872. Council Member Lubin moved and Mayor Pro Tem Runels seconded the motion to approve Consent Agenda Items 8.a. through 8.i., with the exception of Item 8.e., with the recommended courses of action: 8.a. Cash Disbursement Ratification. Action: Approved the listings of cash disbursements for the period May 1, 2002 through May 15, 2002. 8.b. Consideration of Cash Flow Analysis/Approval of Interfold Advance from the Water Facility Fund. Action: Received and accepted April 2002 Cash Report and approve the interfund advance from the Water Facility Fund to cover cash deficits in other funds at 4/30/02. 8.c. Establishment of Fiscal Year 2002.03 Appropriation Limit. Action: Adopted Resolution No. 3589 establishing the appropriation limit from tax proceeds for Fiscal Year 2002-03. 8.d. Consideration of Award of Contract to DMG-Maximus for Mandated Cost Recovery Services. Action: Adopted Resolution No. 3590 authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with DMG-Maximus for mandated cost recovery services. 8.1. Consideration of Progress Payment No. 3 for the Oak Park Boulevard Widening Project, City Project No. PW.oO.o1. Action: Authorized Progress Payment No. 3 in the amount of $56,928.26 to Souza Construction for work completed on the Oak Park Boulevard Widening project. 8.g. Consideration of Approval of Minutes. Action: Approved minutes for the Special City Council Meeting of April 23, 2002 as submitted and the Regular City Council Meeting of April 23, 2002 as amended. 8.h. Consideration of Resolution of Support for Bike Lanes on Corbett Canyon Road. CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES MAY 28, 2002 PAGE 3 Action: 1) Adopted Resolution No. 3592 supporting Bike Lanes on Corbett Canyon Road; and, 2) Directed the Director of Administrative Services to forward a copy of the report and Resolution of Support to the County of San Luis Obispo for submittal to Caltrans by June 1, 2002. 8.i. Consideration of Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program (DBE) for Federal Fiscal Year 2002-03. Action: 1) Approved the FFY 2002/03 DBE Program with "proposed" Overall Annual DBE Goal and submit to Caltrans by June 1, 2002; 2) Directed the Director of Administrative Services to publish a public notice in the local media in accordance with Section XIV of the DBE Program; and 3) Directed staff to return to the Council with a summary of public comments and approval to submit the FFY 2002-03 DBE Program with "established" Overall Annual DBE Goal to Caltrans by September 1, 2002. AYES: Lubin, Runels, Dickens, Ferrara, Lady NOES: None ABSENT: None There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed. 8.e. Consideration of Contract with Conrad Business Services, Inc. for GASB 34 Infrastructure Inventory and Valuation Project. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 3591 authorizing the City Manager to enter into a binding agreement with Conrad Business Services, Inc. for a comprehensive infrastructure inventory and valuation service to comply with the requirements of Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 34 (GASB 34). Council Member Dickens inquired whether GASB was a State or Federal Agency and if so, was mandated cost recovery available to recover contract costs; asked for clarification on whether the City has information regarding its infrastructure assets on hand; whether the infrastructure inventory and valuation project is required every year; and whether mandated cost recovery services could be included in the proposed contract. Director of Financial Services Snodgrass gave a brief background of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles; stated that th~ Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is an independent agency which establishes the City's accounting practices; explained that GASB Pronouncement 34 mandates that governmental entities include information about infrastructure assets as part of its financial statements; and explained that the infrastructure inventory and valuation project would only have to be completed once by a professional valuation firm to compile all the information, value the infrastructure, and prepare a depreciation schedule for these assets. She stated that the City would then be able to maintain the data in-house in the future. With regard to -- .- CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES MAY 28, 2002 PAGE 4 mandated cost recovery services, she explained that this activity does not qualify for reimbursement. Council Member Ferrara supported the proposal and stated it would be helpful to have this information available should there ever be a FEMA disaster. Council Member Dickens moved and Council Member Ferrara seconded the motion to approve Consent Agenda Item 8.e., with the recommended course of action: AYES: Dickens, Ferrara, Runels, Lubin, Lady NOES: None ABSENT: . None i There being 5 A YES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9.a. Consideration of Amended Conditional Use Permit Case No. 02..Q02; Amendment of Conditional Use Permit 01..Q10 to Convert 20 One-Bedroom Units to Two-Bedroom Units; 579 Camino Mercado; Central Coast Real Estate Development. Community Development Director Strong presented the staff report and recommended the Council adopt a Resolution approving Amended Conditional Use Permit Case No. 02-002. Council Member Dickens spoke regarding the issue of marketability and supported the proposed amendment to the Conditional Use Permit. Council Member Ferrara clarified that modifications would only be made to the interior of the units and the exterior square footage would not change. He supported the proposed amendment. Council Member Lubin, Mayor Pro Tem Runels, and Mayor Lady supported the proposed amendment. Council Member Dickens asked the applicant questions regarding the financing for the project as well as the issue of providing affordable housing within the project. Mayor Lady opened the Public Hearing and stated all members of the public were invited to come forward and speak on the matter. Gary Young, applicant, explained that all of the funding for the project would come from private financial institutions and that 25% of the total number of units would still be reserved as moderately affordable units; however, they would all be two-bedroom units. CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES MAY 28, 2002 PAGE 5 Hearing no further public comments, Mayor Lady closed the Public Hearing. Council Member Ferrara moved to adopt a Resolution approving Amended Conditional Use Permit Case No. 02-002, located at 579 Camino Mercado, Applied for by Central Coast Real Estate Development, Inc. Council Member Dickens seconded the motion, and on the following roll-call vote, to wit: AYES: Ferrara, Dickens, Runels, Lubin, Lady NOES: None ABSENT: None There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed. 9.b. Consideration of Request for Amendment to Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity - Grover Beach Taxi. Director of Administrative Services Wetmore presented the staff report and recommended the Council consider public comment and adopt a Resolution authorizing the requested modifications to the Certificate .of Public Convenience and Necessity issued to Grover Beach Taxi as follows: 1) Immediate addition of a second taxicab, 2) change of ownership from sole proprietorship to a corporation as of January 1, 2003, and 3) addition of a third taxicab as of May 1, 2003. Mayor Lady opened the Public Hearing and stated all members of the public were invited to come forward and speak on the matter. Hearing none, Mayor Lady closed the Public Hearing. Council Member Lubin expressed support for the additional taxicabs and commented that competition in the area was needed. He stated that the senior taxi program would benefit seniors as well as the community. Council Member Dickens acknowledged there had been no complaints about taxi services and supported the requested modifications. Council Member Ferrara noted that the population was increasing and that services within the community must increase to meet the needs. He supported the requested modifications. Mayor Pro Tem Runels expressed support for the proposal; stated competition among the taxi companies is healthy; and that seniors in the community would be the primary beneficiary. Mayor Lady supported the requested modifications stating there would better service for the community by filling unmet needs; and commented that part of free enterprise is growth. CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES MAY 28, 2002 PAGE 6 Council Member Lubin moved to adopt a Resolution approving modifications to the Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity Issued to "Grover Beach Taxi", Leland and Amy Simpson, Owners. Mayor Pro Tem Runels seconded the motion, and on the following roll-call vote, to wit: AYES: Lubin, Rune/s, Dickens, Ferrara, Lady NOES: None ABSENT: None There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed. 10. CONTINUED BUSINESS 10.a. Consideration of Recommendations from the RRM Design Group Expansion Feasibility Report for the Fire Station. Director of Building and Fire (Chief) Fibich presented the staff report and briefly highlighted the design options. He then introduced John Turchin from RRM Design Group. Mr. Turchin presented an overview of the City of Arroyo Grande Fire Station No. 1 Expansion Feasibility Study; displayed existing elevation photographs of the Station; reviewed the Feasibility Study goals; reviewed Station expansion priorities; reviewed existing Station deficiencies with regard to sleeping quarters, lack of storage area for the firefighters' turn-out gear, limited training classroom space, undersized shop and storage spaces, lack of existing site storage; and deficiencies in the existing apparatus bay. He reviewed proposed site plans, floor plans, and renderings for design Option 1 and Option 2; reviewed the conceptual Station expansion budget for each Option and stated that the Team Recommendation was for Option 1. City Manager Adams reviewed funding options for the project and recommended the Council direct staff to proceed with steps necessary to place a General Obligation Bond Measure on the November 5, 2002 ballot to fund the proposed Fire Station expansion project, explaining that the bond measure would require a 2/3 favorable vote. Council questions of staff included what the total cost to the City would be; clarification regarding the contingency issue related to the proposed contracts; clarification on the proposed set-up for sleeping quarters; what the current balance is in the Fire Facility Impact Fee account and whether it could be included in the proposed funding; clarification that the proposed $1,500 for a rendering of the expansion project would be a direct cost to the City; how much more it would cost to incorporate the extended apparatus bay in Option 2 into Option 1 and whether it made sense to include that now; clarification on the retrofit requirements and costs for the Station; whether there was potential for FEMA funding and whether the Station could be used as an EOC. __n____ -------- CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES MAY 28, 2002 PAGE 7 Mayor Lady invited comments from those in the audience who wished to be heard on the matter. Stephanie Painter, 541 Mesa View Drive, inquired what magnitude of an earthquake the Fire Station would withstand following the proposed retrofit; and asked if the Fire Station could be relocated to the site formerly allocated to the YMCA on W. Branch Street. Hearing no further comments, Mayor Lady brought the item back to Council for consideration. Council Member Dickens supported staffs recommendations and encouraged staff to obtain further public feedback on the proposed bond measure. Council Member Ferrara supported Option 1 with the additional consideration of looking at incorporating components of Option 2 to adequately house costly apparatus to minimize wear and tear. Council Member Lubin supported Option 1 to include the component in Option 2 that extends the existing apparatus bay; commented on bond pricing and was cautious about underestimating the cost of bonds; encouraged extensive public education in this effort and ensuring that clear cost factors are provided to the public; and felt that modernizing the existing Station was the best approach to addressing the current deficiencies. He supported moving forward with staffs recommendations. Mayor Pro Tem Runels and Mayor Lady expressed support for staffs recommendations. Council Member Ferrara moved to support staffs recommendation to select Option One as the preferred alternative for the Fire Station expansion project, with the modification of the expansion of the service bays to accommodate the vehicle stock; 2) direct staff to proceed with steps necessary to place a General Obligation Bond Measure on the November 5, 2002 ballot, with the expectation that initial steps will include extensive public hearings and public feedback to the extent possible, and that the item will be placed on the June 25, 2002 City Council Agenda for formal approval; 3) authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with Stradling, Yocca, Carlson, & Rauth for bond measure counsel services not-to-exceed $20,000 plus out-of-pocket expenses, contingent upon voter approval of the bond measure; 4) authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with A.M. Miller & Co. for financial advisor services not-to-exceed $25,000, contingent upon voter approval of the bond measure; and 5) appropriate an additional $1,500 from Fire Facility Impact Fees'for the preparation of a color rendering to be used for public presentations. Council Member Lubin seconded the motion, and on the following roll-call vote, to wit: CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES MAY 28, 2002 PAGE 8 AYES: Ferrara, Runels, Dickens, Lubin, Lady NOES: None ABSENT: None There being 5 A YES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed. 11. NEW BUSINESS 11.a. Consideration of Third Quarter Budget Status Report. [COUNCIURDA] Director of Financial Services Snodgrass preseoted the staff report and recommended the Council: 1) Approve detailed budget adjustments and recommendations as shown on Schedule B; and 2) Approve Schedules A through E included in the Third Quarter Budget Status Report. Council/Board Member Lubin referred to page 1 of the staff report and inquired whether it should state that there is a $76,800 "increase" to the General Fund Balance and not a "decrease". Director Snodgrass acknowledged the clerical error and stated Council/Board Member Lubin was correct. Council/Board Member Ferrara referred to page 2 of the staff report and asked for clarification in the summary of key Third Quarter points. Director Snodgrass explained Budgeted Fund Balance versus Estimated Fund Balance. Council/Board Member Ferrara referred to the last sentence on page 9 of the Third Quarter Budget Status Report regarding the statement that it is imperative that the City discover ongoing revenue sources that are not dependent on the economy and the State and asked if staff knew what those sources would be. He stated that Redevelopment was the only source he could think of. Mayor/Chair Lady invited comments from those in the audience who wished to be heard on the matter, and upon hearing none, brought the issue back to Council for consideration. Council/Board Member Lubin moved to approve staffs recommendations. Mayor Pro TemNice-Chair Runels seconded the motion, and on the following roll-call vote, to wit: Council AYES: Lubin, Runels, Dickens, Ferrara, Lady NOES: None ABSENT: None There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed. ----.~- . -- CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES MAY 28, 2002 PAGE 9 RDA AYES: Lubin, Runels, Dickens, Ferrara, Lady NOES: None ABSENT: None There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed. Mayor Lady called for a break at 9:25 p.m. Mayor Lady reconvened the meeting at 9:35 p.m. 11.b. Consideration of Pre-application Review Case No. 02-002; Proposed Subdivision of a 10-Acre Site into 25 Residential Lots and Dedication of a 1.23-Acre Portion for a Park; Farroll Road; Don McHaney. Community Development Director Strong presented the staff report and responded to questions from Council regarding the site relating to access to the Soto Sports Complex, a suggested landscape easement, disclosure to potential homebuyers regarding activities/lights at the Sports Complex, potential collection of park in-lieu fees, the potential for second residential units and their relation to qualifying as affordable housing units, and a proposed street name change for the extension of Dixson Street. Mayor Lady invited comments from those in the audience who wished to be heard on the matter. Jeffrey Emerick, EDA, spoke on behalf of the applicant in support of the project. Hearing no further comments, Mayor Lady brought the item back to Council for consideration. Mayor Lady expressed concerns that second residential units would not meet the affordable housing needs. Council Member Ferrara stated he did not support any type of pass-through or access connection to the Soto Sports Complex; stated he liked the flow and general layout of the proposed project; favored the circulation system throughout the project; commented that there were maintenance issues to work through; favored utilizing open space areas and suggested some sort of pedestrian enhancement at the entrance to the project; favored the proposed intersection alignment; and requested more information with regard to the affordability issue. Council Member Lubin favored the suggestion of a landscape strip on the east side of the project; did not support the connection or access of the project to the Sports Complex; requested more information with regard to how the second residential units could qualify as affordable housing units; stated that parking and traffic issues need to be taken into consideration with the addition of second residential units; stated that it CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES MAY 28, 2002 PAGE 10 was important to align the street; and suggested that it would make more sense to extend the name of Bakeman Lane into the project. Council Member Dickens stated he felt the lots were too big; the City needed more affordable workforce housing, and encouraged different planning to provide tangible affordable housing at this location. He did not support providing second residential units as affordable housing units; stated that a pocket park should be included within the project; suggested that a Homeowners Association be created to maintain a pocket park; addressed the street name and drainage issues; supported buffer efforts on the northern edge of the project, and supported the inclusion of language to alert potential homebuyers of impacts related to Soto Sports Complex. There was further discussion regarding proposed lot sizes. Mr. McHaney, applicant, stated that 6,000-8,000 square foot lots were originally preferred; however, due to the General Plan designation, he was limited to 12,000 square foot lots. Mayor Pro Tern Runels commented that he did not favor flag lots; agreed that the lots are a little large; and suggested that second residential units and homes on flag lots be sprinkled. Mayor Lady stated he would favor a reduction in the size of the lots. Director Strong reviewed several alternatives that included requests for a density bonus, which would provide a commitment for affordable housing, or the applicant requesting a General Plan Amendment. Mayor Lady ensured that the applicant had received sufficient feedback and direction with regard to the proposed project. There was no action taken on this item. 11.c. Consideration of Pre-application Review Case No. 02-003; Proposed Subdivision of a 29.5-Acre Site Into 15.Residential Lots and an Open Space Parcel; Lot 182 of Tract 1390, Located on Rodeo Drive. Community Development Director Strong presented the staff report and responded to questions from Council regarding the site relating to slopes, soil conditions, and landscaping. Mayor Lady invited comments from those in the audience who wished to be heard on the matter. Carlo Alfono, representing James Land Partnership, stated the applicant would be amenable to raised foundations on steep lots; however, most of the other lots were flat. He also stated that the soil was suitable for compaction. CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES MAY 28, 2002 PAGE 11 Hearing no further comments, Mayor Lady brought the item back to Council for consideration. Council Member Dickens stated the biggest asset for the City's gain is the proposed Grace Lane extension. Director Strong respol'lded to questions regarding the street design. Council Member Dickens expressed concerns with regard to soil erosion. He requested a minimum use of retaining walls; supported the requirement that open space be privately maintained; and inquired whether second residential units would be included in the project. Council Member Ferrara referred to the opportunities for open space areas and recreation facilities in Planned Developments and asked if there had been any thought to providing recreation facilities in the development. Director Strong replied that no active use was planned and that the collection of in-lieu fees would go toward improvement of Rancho Grande Park. Council Member Ferrara favored some trail enhancements to use as a pass-through to the park. Council Member Lubin expressed concern with the configuration of the driveways, specifically with regard to vehicles backing up into Grace Lane. Discussion ensued with regard to the alternatives for driveway design. Mayor Lady ensured that the applicant had received sufficient feedback and direction with regard to the proposed project. . There was no action taken on this item. 12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS a. MAYOR MICHAEL LADY (1) South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD). Reported that there were $10.8 million in reserves; City of Pismo Beach is not pursuing annexation with the District and is pursuing other avenues; the Budget process is underway; and the Plant continues to run well. (2) Other. Attended County Mayors luncheon in Pismo Beach on May 10th; walked down the new Promenade (Boardwalk connecting Pismo Beach and Grover Beach), and received presentation from host (Pismo) regarding major projects in their City. b. MAYOR PRO TEM THOMAS A. RUNELS (1) Zone 3 Advisory Board. Council Member Dickens attended as the Altemate and on behalf of Mayor Pro Tem Runels, he reported that the Board had received a presentation on the water treatment plant upgrade; CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES MAY 28, 2002 PAGE 12 approved an option on how to proceed; and issued a Statement of Qualifications. (2) County Water Resources Advisory Committee (WRAC). No report. (3) Other. Reported that 1,000 stone columns have been installed at the Lopez Dam project, to date. c. COUNCIL MEMBER JIM DICKENS (1) Economic Opportunity Commission (EOC). Sites in North County are being sought for a new shelter. An invitation was issued to an EOC fundraising event called "Afternoon of Epicurean Delight" to be held in Shell Beach on Sunday, June 2, 2002. (2) South County Youth Coalition. No report. (3) Other. A brief newsletter has been published and distributed to the Community Recreation Subcommittee and interested parties regarding the status of the proposed project. d. COUNCIL MEMBER TONY M. FERRARA (1) Integrated Waste Management Authority Board (IWMA). Met May 2nd; Gave presentation recognizing 50 years of service for a number of individuals who were the original owners of San Luis Garbage Company and the landfill; City of Paso Robles was allowed membership in the JPA; Election of Officers was held, Council Member Ferrara reported he was nominated as President. (2) Air Pollution Control District (APCD). Meeting was held to discuss concerns regarding Burn Rule 501 for rural areas of San Luis Obispo County, including Nipomo and the Mesa; the Board extended provisions of Burn Rule 501 in the Nipomo-Mesa area for another two years for lot sizes 3/4 of an acre or greater. (3) San Luis Obispo Council of Governments/San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority (SLOCOG/SLORTA). Met May 8th; Discussed issues pertaining to housing and existing housing legislation; received presentation from David Mullinex, League of California Cities, on the LOCAL Coalition; Council Member Ferrara distributed information he received regarding Housing Element reform to the Community Development Director. (4) Other. None. e. COUNCIL MEMBER SANDY LUBIN (1 ) South County Area Transit (SCAT). No report. Next meeting is in June. (2) Economic Vitality Corporation (EVC). Met May 22nd; Discussed status of substantial healthcare issues in the County with some of the major providers going out of business or filing bankruptcy; the EVC will look at healthcare issues along with economic issues and determine if the EVC can assist. The EVC held its annual event at the Cliffs, which was widely attended and very successful. He reported that a large City within San Luis Obispo County currently has a hiring and travel freeze in place. CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES MAY 28, 2002 PAGE 13 (3) Other. Reported on attendance at Legislative Action Days held in Sacramento. 13. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS None. 14. CITY MANAGER ITEMS City Manager Adams reported that the City Engineer has received Parcel Map AGPL 01-052, .owned by the City of Arroyo Grande. The subject parcel is located south of James Way, east of Avenida de Diamante, and north of Collado Corte. This map subdivides approximately 10 acres into 3 separate residential lots of 0.4, 0.4, and 0.64 acres each, and a remainder public lot of 8.6 acres. The current zoning for the 3 residential lots is residential suburban (RS), and the zoning for the public lot is public facility (PF). Unless appealed, the City Engineer will approve the Final Map within ten days following the date of this Agenda. 15. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS None. 16. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS . City Manager Adams announced the following three items: 1) The City Council will. conduct a Special Meeting on May 30, 200~ at 6:30 p.m. to review the Preliminary FY 2002-03 Annual Budget; 2) The Planning Commission will conduct a Special Meeting on June 4, 2002 at 6:00 p.m., to receive a presentation from the Cal Poly City and Regional Planning Department of concepts for Traffic Way; and 3) The City was notified that it was awarded a $437,000 grant for the construction of Rancho Grande Park. 17. ADJOURNMENT Mayor/Chair Lady a urned the meeting at 11:35 p.m. ( Michael A. L: y, IChair e, Director of Administrative Servicesl Deputy City Clerk/Agency Secretary ----