Loading...
CC 2016-08-09_12a Reject All Bids_Council Chambers Project MEMORANDUM TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: GEOFF ENGLISH, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR BY: JILL MCPEEK, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO REJECT ALL BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENT AND AUDIO, VIDEO AND SOUND SYSTEM PROJECT, PW 2015-14 DATE: AUGUST 9, 2016 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council: 1. Receive a presentation by Ravatt Albrecht & Associates, Inc. and Jensen Audio Visual presenting the overall project; 2. Reject all bids and direct staff to solicit new bids after modifications are made to the design. IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES: The FY 2015/16 Capital Improvement Program Budget includes $410,000 for the subject project which includes $160,000 of Public Access Television (PEG) funds. The total cost of the project, if the current project were to be awarded, would as follows: Construction (Base Bid = $396,544, Add No. = $16,759) $ 413,303 Construction Contingencies (20% ADA, 10% AV) 66,682 Const Mgt/Inspection/Advertise/Reproduction 57,865 Startup/Training of AV Equipment 3,450 Design (already awarded under a separate agreement) 45,571 Total $586,871 BACKGROUND: The City Council Chambers originally served as a Fire Station for the City. Currently, the ground floor of the building houses the City Council Chambers, a conference room, a shared bathroom facility, and a small kitchen. The configuration of the facility is less than optimal and there is a need to provide accessible facilities for those who are physically, hearing and/or visually impaired. Item 12.a. - Page 1 CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION TO REJECT ALL BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENT AND AUDIO, VIDEO AND SOUND SYSTEM PROJECT, PW 2015-14 AUGUST 9, 2016 PAGE 2 To address this, monies were included in the City’s capital improvement program budget for a project with the primary intent to reconfigure the current ground floor layout to provide accessible restroom facilities, and to purchase and install new audio-visual equipment and a broadcast system that meets accessibility needs. Without a detailed design, an estimated amount was budgeted based on historical square footage prices and the amount of PEG funds available. Following a competitive RFP process, architectural and audio-visual design firms were procured and the design process was initiated. Input during the design process was provided by various stakeholders including Council members, the City Manager, and staff from the Legislative & Information Services, Building, Public Works, Community Development and Police departments. The design goals generally consisted of providing separate accessible men’s and women’s restroom facilities, a closed session room, accessible access to the dais, upgraded broadcasting, sound systems and video displays inside the Council Chambers, and an upgraded operator workstation. In addition, cabling for future security cameras and outside speakers, and relocation of artifacts to new locations within the Council Chamber or other City locations that may be more appropriate were included. Upon completion of the design plans, a final opinion of probable costs was provided. Staff evaluated the costs and determined that with the amount budgeted for the project, to reduce costs some items could be accomplished utilizing in-house staff and some items could be included as bid additive items. The remaining items, which do reduce the ability of the project to address the needs of the project, were identified as the base bid and advertised to potential contractors. A non-mandatory pre-bid meeting was held to ensure all prospective bidders were informed of the objectives of the project and to highlight key components of the audio-visual improvements. ANALYSIS OF ISSUES: On July 26, 2016, one bid was received for the project with a base bid amount of $396,544, and bid additives totaling $82,026. Staff has reviewed the bid documentation and has determined that the bidder is responsible and that the bid is responsive. An award, if made, would be based on the Base Bid proposal. However, it is recommended that additive no. 1 be included due to the challenges of reinstalling existing carpet over the assisted hearing loop system in the Council Chambers. This results in a budget shortfall of $176,871. It is recommended that the project be reevaluated with an architect to see if there are any further areas that can be trimmed, investigate alternative design options, and to rebid the project at a later date in an effort to receive a lower bid. Item 12.a. - Page 2 CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION TO REJECT ALL BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENT AND AUDIO, VIDEO AND SOUND SYSTEM PROJECT, PW 2015-14 AUGUST 9, 2016 PAGE 3 However, should the Council award the bid, staff would work with the contractor to attempt to identify and agree on additional potential areas for saving. The work would begin in September and be completed in December. During this time, meetings scheduled to be held in the Council Chambers will be relocated to other facilities as shown in Attachment 2. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are provided for the Council’s consideration: 1. Approve staff’s recommendation to reject all bids, investigate alternative design options, and direct staff to solicit new bids; 2. Reject all bids and direct staff to solicit new bids with the current design plans; 3. Award a construction contract consisting of the Base Bid and Additive No. 1 to Quincon, Inc. and appropriate $176,871 from General Fund reserves; or 4. Provide direction to staff. ADVANTAGES: Rejecting the bid and allowing design modifications to the project may reduce construction costs without significant impacts to the project objectives. DISADVANTAGES: Rejecting the bid will delay the project and result in higher design costs. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15301(a). PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS: The agenda was posted at City Hall on Thursday, August 4, 2016. The agenda and staff report were posted on the City’s website on Friday, August 5, 2016. No public comments were received as of the time of preparation of this report. Attachment: 1. Bid Opening Log Sheet 2. Relocation of Council Chamber Meetings Item 12.a. - Page 3 Attachhment Noo. 1 Item 12.a. - Page 4 ATTACHMENT 2 RELOCATED COUNCIL/COMMISSION/BOARD MEETINGS CITY COUNCIL September 13: Meeting at the South County Regional Center September 27: Meeting at the South County Regional Center October 11: Meeting at the South County Regional Center October 25: Meeting at the Woman’s Club November 8: Meeting Cancelled (No facilities available on election night) November 22: Meeting at the South County Regional Center December 13: Meeting at the Woman’s Club December 27: Meeting Cancelled (Historically due to holidays) PLANNING COMMISSION: September 6: Meeting at the South County Regional Center September 20: Meeting at the Woman’s Club October 4: Meeting at the Woman’s Club October 18: Meeting at the Woman’s Club November 1: Meeting at the Woman’s Club November 15: Meeting at the Woman’s Club December 6: Meeting at the Woman’s Club December 20: Meeting at the Woman’s Club TRAFFIC COMMISSION: September 19: Meeting at the Woman’s Club October 17: Meeting at the South County Regional Center November 21: Meeting at the South County Regional Center December 19: Meeting at the South County Regional Center PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION: September 14: Meeting at the Elm Street Community Center October 12: Meeting at the Elm Street Community Center November 9: Meeting at the Elm Street Community Center December 14: Meeting at the Elm Street Community Center Item 12.a. - Page 5 SOUTH SLO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT: September 7: Meeting at Oceano Community Services District Boardroom September 21: Meeting at Oceano Community Services District Boardroom October 5: Meeting at Oceano Community Services District Boardroom October 19: Meeting at Oceano Community Services District Boardroom November 2: Meeting at Oceano Community Services District Boardroom November 16: Meeting at Oceano Community Services District Boardroom December 7: Meeting at Oceano Community Services District Boardroom December 21: Meeting at Oceano Community Services District Boardroom SOUTH COUNTY AREA TRANSIT: October 19: Meeting at the Pismo Beach City Council Chambers Item 12.a. - Page 6