Loading...
Minutes 1976-12-14r~VN CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 14, 1976 ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA The City Council met in regular. session with Mayor Gabe de Leon presiding. Upon roll call, Council Members Al Spierling, Matthew Gallagher, Jr., Calvin Schlegel and Mark Millis reported present.. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATION Mayor de Leon led the Pledge of Allegiance to our Flag; and immediately thereafter, Reverend Durham, of the First Southern Baptist Church in Grover City, delivered the invocation. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes for the regular meeting of November 23, 1976, were approved as prepared. APPROVAL OF WARRANTS On motion of Councilman Schlegel, seconded by Councilman Gallagher and unanimously carried, Payroll Warrants No. 7695 through No. 7765, in the total amount of $20,872.72 and Warrants Np. 773 through No. 7859, in the-total amount of $21,651.76; and General Warrants No. 5742 through No. 5790, in the total amount of $11,148.67, were approved and ordered paid. PRESENTATION RE. "YOUTH IN GOVERNMENT DAY" - TIERNEY Sharon Tierney, high school student who had been the Mayor counterpart at today's Youth in Government Day activities, reported on the various actions taken by the students during their mock Council meeting.- She also: thanked all government employees and officials who had participated in the. event. NOTICE RE. POLICE DEPARTMENT PROMOTIONS The Council reviewed a report from Police Chief Jim Clark, outlining the promotions recently affected due to Lt. James Young`s retirement. Sgt. Robert Ripley was appointed Lieutenant; Patrolman Edward Allen was appointed Sergeant; and William Andrews, a 10-year veteran from the San Luis.. Obispo Sheriff's Office was hired. to fill the patrolman vacancy. NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT OF NEW CITY ENGINEER - ESPIRITU The Council reviewed a notice stating that Angel T. Espirito-has been hired as the new City Engineer to replace Joseph C. Garcia, Jr., who has resigned. Mr. Espiritu is a registered, licensed Civic Engineer with the State of California, is presently-the City Engineer for. the City of El Centro, California, and will begin employment with the City of Arroyo Grande on January 3 , 1.977. RECEIPT OF PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AWARD TO CITY - A.A.A. City Administrator Butch displayed a plaque presented to the Gity of Arroyo Grande by the American Automobile Association. The plaque is a Pedestrian Safety citation for no pedestrian fatalities in the City for seven consecutive years. LETTER RE. STATE TRANSPORTATION PLAN - CITY OF S.L.O. The Council reviewed a copy. of a letter directed to the State Transporta- tion Board regarding the Draft California Transportation Plan Policy Element, which indicates that city's Council's concern regarding the vagueness of portions of the. Plan; lack of sufficient time to thoroughly study it and give local input; deficiency of the E.I.:R.; and the costs mandated by the Plana The Arroyo Grande City Council has previously submitted its letter of concern regarding the Plan. LETTER RE. SUPERTANKER PORT - AVILA VALLEY ADVISORY COUNCIL The Council-read a letter from the. Avila Valley Advisory Council stating its concern about the possibility of the development of a supertanker port in San Luis Bay-Avila Beach area and its reasons for apprehension. Said Advisory Council had passed a resolution opposing this development. The City Council discussed the matter, generally agreeing that this City should be kept apprised of the passible development and be included in any agreements because of its proximity to the proposed location. The City Administrator was directed to write to the State, Tom Quinn and SOHIO requesting they keep the City up;ao date regarding the proposed project. 263; i CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 14, 1976 ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA PAGE 2 REQUEST FOR FEE EXEMPT LICENSE FOR CANDY SALES - 1ST APOSTOLIC CHURCH - DENIED The Council read a letter from the First Apostolic Church in Lompoc,. California, requesting a fee-exempt business license for.non-profit organizations, to sell homemade peanut brittle in the City. The Council was. concerned that if this were granted, other non-profit organizations from out of the City would. swarm in. It was pointed out that the local churches selling See's Candy are required to obtain a regular business license for retail saleso After Council discussion, City Administrator Butch was directed to write to the First Apostolic Church in Lompoc, advising. that its request for a fee exempt business license has. been denied as they. are located out of the City. RESOLUTION PROTESTING SALE OF NAMES/ADDRESSES BY DMV - CITY OF CARSON. The Council reviewed a resolution from the City of Carson, protesting. the practice of the Department of Motor Vehicles of selling the names and addresses of citizens upon request by any individual or company so requesting. Carson urged the repeal of the law authorizing this practice.- After Council. discussion,. Administrator Butch was directed to write to the City°s State Legislators indicating this Council's concern regarding this practiced RESOLUTION RE. REFORM OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM - CITY. OF CHOWCHILLA The Council reviewed a resolution passed by the City of Chowchilla, urging reform of the. Criminal Justice System, particularly in the area of juvenile crime. The Council generally agreed-that reform in this system is necessary, but declined to support the resolution as presented because it lacked concrete suggestions as to how implementation of reform could be accomplished,. After further discussion, the Council directed Administrator Butch to take this matter up with the Office of Criminal..Justice Planning, Region P, of which he is Chairman. PUBLIC HEARING - REZONE ##76-96, GRAND/BRISCO (McCASLIN) - ORD. 1ST READING The Council reviewed a memorandum from Planning Director-Gallop, advising that the Planning Commission has approved a rezoning request by Hm B. McCaslin, to rezone from "P-M" to "H-S", a portion of property located at 1200 Grand Avenue at Brisco Road. Upon being assured by the City Clerk that all. require.- manta as provided by law regarding notification of hearing have been complied with, Mayor de Leon declared the hearing open and all persons would now be heard for or against this rezoning. There being no public discussion on this matter, Mayor de Leon declared. the hearing closed. After Council discussion, a motion was made by Councilman Schlegel, seconded by Councilman Millis and unanimously carried, finding Rezoning Case No. 76-96 to be consistent with the City°s General-Plan. City Attorney Shipley then read the title of an ordinance amending the Municipal Code so as to rezone from "P-M", Planned Industrial Zoned District, to "H-S", Highway Service Zoned District, certain property in the City, thereafter, a motion was made by Councilman Schlegel, seconded by Councilman-Spierling and unanimously carried, to dispense with reading the balance of this ordinance. INFO. RE. S.B® 2082, HOUSING ASSISTANCE IN AaG. - HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SLO The Council read a letter from Ao Ra Chubon, Director of the Housing Authority of the City. of San Luis Obispo, advising that under Senate Bill 2082, provisions will become effective whereby the San Luis Obispo Housing Authority will be able to assist the City in a program of supplemental rent income to low income families. The Council. agreed the program had merit and should be looked into further, which Administrator Butch will do. RECEIPT OF° MONTHLY DEPARTMENTAL REPORT FOR NOZIEMBER, 1976 The Council received, reviewed and ordered filed, the monthly Departmental Report for November, 1976> RESOLUTION ADOPTION - AMENDED LAND USE ELEMENT OF GENERAL PLAN ---- The Council reviewed a resolution prepared by City Attorney Shipley, incorporating the various changes recommended by it and the Planning Council, to the Amended Land Use Element of the General Plana Councilman Millis-requested that clarification be made in Section 1, paragraph A regarding the 1°A" zoning as applied to the tract of land in the northerly part of the City, at Hwy.. 1Q1 and Oak Park Acres. After discussion, the following was inserted into the second sentence of said paragraph: "At present, most of this portion...mwhich is a holding zone. applied to these three large ownerships only, until specific...". After further: Council discussion, City Attorney Shipsey read the title of a resolution adopting the amended Land Use Element; thereafter, a motion was made -- - ~. ~ c _ _ , CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 14, 1.976 ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA PAGE 3 by Councilman Schlegel, seconded by Councilman Spierling and unanimously carr~,ed, to dispense with reading the balance of this resolution. Councilman Millis requested .that the complete resolution be set forth in the minutes. RESOLUTION N0. 1265 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ADOPTING THE AMENDED LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande has prepared a general plan report together with a general plan map and has adopted by Resolution No. 76-469G on October 5, 1976, the amended Land Use Element of the General Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 65501, et seq., the City Council gave required notice and did hold a public hearing on July 27, 1.976, for the purpose of considering the adoption of the amended Land Use Element of the General Plan report and map, and at which public hearing the amended Land Use Element report and map were displayed, explained, and reported upon; and WHEREAS., the Arroyo Grande City Council considered the addition of certain wording to the first paragraph of the proposed amendment to be inserted into the Plan on Page 13, relating to the "P-D" designation of said plan, and referred that wording to the Arroyo Grande City Planning Commission as an amendment to the amended Land Use Element of said General Plan;. and WHEREAS, said proposed amendment to the amended Land Use Element of the General Plan report and map have. been considered by the Arroyo Grande City Planning Commission at its regular meeting of October 19,.1976, and the matter has been referred back to the Arroyo Grande City Council; and WHEREAS, said amended Land Use Element of the General Plan report and map thereof are necessary for sound future community development,. the preservation of community values, and the promotion of the general health,. safety, convenience and welfare of the citizens of the City of Arroyo Grande; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande has a responsibility to plan for the desirable future growth and development of the City of Arroyo Grande.; NOW, THEREFORE, THE .CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF. ARROYO GRANDE DOES HEREBY- RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande does hereby find and determine that the public interest, convenience and necessity require that the Land Use Element of the General Plan report and map be amended in the following manner: Ao The text of said plan be rewritten to replace the second paragraph on Page 13 relating to Planned Development with the following: "A large rolling tract of land in the north part of the City, northerly of Highway 101 and easterly of Oak Park Boulevard., consisting primarily of three large ownerships, can best be developed through the Planned Development approach. At present, most of this portion of the City is included in the "A" zoning district, which is a holding zone applied to these three large ownerships only, until specific development plans are prepared. Grazing is considered as an interim use of these areaso By directing development into these areas of marginal agricultural value, the most productive land on the valley floor can be reserved for continued agricultural use. The Planned Development Zone presently within the City of Arroyo Grande Zoning Ordinance was originally retained and adapted with the idea. of utilizing it on smaller parcels of land,. more than 10 acres in size, but not to the extent of these three properties. However, the basic concept of Planned Development can be applied to one or more of these properties, with all of the reviews and necessary public input, through a two or three step process, which would still retain all of the controls anticipated in the original "P-D" Zone, but lend adequate necessary flexibility in the processing of large tracts which would be involved in this particular area of the City. The process suggested would be based upon the assumption that any of the permissive. "P-D" uses would be allowed in the area, providing compatibility can be assured and various sensitivities are protected. ~~65_ CITY COUNCIL ARROYO GRANDE, CALIE"ORNIA DECEMBER 14,-1976 PAGE 4 The process-would necessarily involve two or three steps rather than one single "fell swoop", as the "P-D" Zoning provides for. It would be virtually impossible to locate, dimension, design, and provide other amenities and controls set out in the "P-D" District on a 300-400+ acre development. However, these. controls can be required and controlled in the following suggested procedure: 1) the properties be divided. into parcels through a parcel or subdivision map procedure, whereby each parcel is indicated for a primary zone-related land use, and each parcel subject to either (a) additional subdivison approval if the parcel is to be occupied by residential use,. or Cb) any commercial parcel-subject to Commission and Council review and approval prior to development. In other words, each. subdivision would then be required to meet the particular require- ment of the "P-D" Zoned District. It should be noted further that in the conditions of approval of either (1) the parcel map or (2) the subdivision or development plan approval of the parcels, a last additional step may be required, which will consist of architectural approval and compliance in any other area of concern, all of which would be made conditions of the approval in Steps 1 and 2 previously noted. As noted in the "P-D" Zoning, density transfers may be requested by the developer and, under certain conditions, may be advantageous to the land ar~1/or land use, and help implement protection of land and geology as they now exist. Further requirement. of clustering,. condominiums, and retirement restrictions can very well add to the conditions for consideration and. be made a part and parcel of any proposed CC ~ R's placed on the land. It should be expected that the neighborhood shopping facility, which was formerly indicated at the corner of Noyes and Printz Roads, would be included in the general area. of one of the parcels, to serve the immediate day-to-day needs of the people within these developments." B. The text of the School section of said plan be changed to delete the last sentence of the first paragraph on Page 20; that said paragraph conclude with the following: "In view of the present overcrowded conditions in the Lucia Mar Unified School District and the failure of the recent Bond Elections, the present and future citizens and planners of all entities within the School District should recognize their responsibility to provide education facilities and programs for children.-" C. The map be changed to show the light-industrial area (Saruwatari property), westerly of Highway. 101, southerly of the commercial district on Grand Avenue, and northerly of the Arroyo Grande Creek, to agriculture. D. Add. the following as the second paragraph on Page 20 under Schools: "Any new schools which are constructed within the Lucia Mar Unified School District and within the City of Arroyo Grande must meet State minimum standards. These standards dictate minimum acreage for any site in relationship to the minimum number of students to be accommodated, and additional acreage required in ratio to students over minimum. In any cafe, when the District proposes to build a new school facility, be it elementary, secondary,. or high school, the School District would have to abide by these minimum site requirements for any construction." E. The text of said plan be written to insert at Page 18 of the General Plan as the last paragraph under Light Industrial, as follows: "There.. are small areas of spot zoning. which are r.on-conforming due to problems arising prior to the adoption of the General Plan in 1967, and these areas still remain on the Zoning Map, but are not reflected in the Land Use Plan because of their small. effect on the abutting properties." F. The map be changed to show existing medium residential density to office-professional use on a small area at the northwest corner of the inter- section of South Halcyon and Fair Oaks Avenue. G. The map be changed to show the removal of the existing neighborhood- commercial land use designation at the corner of Noyes and Printz Roads. H. The map be changed to-show the existing medium density residential. designation north of Tally Ho Road, from James Way west to the intersection of Tally Ho with Le Point, to a low density designation. -- - CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 14, 19?6 ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA PAGE 5 On motion of Councilman Spierling, seconded by Councilman Gallagher and vn the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Councilmen Spierling, Gallagher, Schlegel, Millis and Mayor de Leon NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was passed and. adopted this 14th day of December, 1976. RESOLUTION ADOPTION - ABANDON PORTION OF LE POINT STREET Administrator Butch reviewed the matter previously before the Council, regarding the proposed abandonment of the southerly ten feet of Le Point Street between Crown Terrace and Highway 227. The Council reviewed a copy of a letter which had been sent to all property owners involved, clarifying the proposed abandonment and stating that the Assessor's Office had indicated that the addition of the ten feet to adjacent properties would have a negligible affect on single family residences. The City Engineer reviewed a map indicating the line of abandonment and proximity of existing houses. He also pointed out other houses, beside those owned by Don Stickler at 5U8 and 512 Le Point, which would require variances if the abandonment is not accomplished, due to little set back. After Council discussion, City Attorney Shipsey read the title. of a resolution ordering the abandonment of a portion of a city street;. thereafter, a motion. was made by Councilman Schlegel and seconded by Councilman Spierling,-to dispense with reading the balance of thss resolution. Councilmen Gallagher and Millis dissented to approval. of the motion, therefore, City Attorney Shipsey read. the. resolution in full. RESOLUTION NO. 1266 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF-THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ORDERING THE ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF LE-POINT STREET (STREETS & HIGHWAYS CODE SECTION 8323, ET SEQ.) On motion of Councilman Schlegel, seconded by Councilman Spierling and on the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Councilmen Spierling, Schlegel and Mayor de Leon NOES: Councilman Millis ABSTAINED: Councilman Gallagher ABSENT:. None the. foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 14th-day of December, 1976. REPORT - RECENT PRE-MASTER PLAN CONFERENCE RE. REGIONAL GOVT CENTER - SPIERLING Councilman Spierling reported on the recent conference held regarding a pre-master plan for the County Regional Library and other facilities.- He had brought forth to them some of this City'"s concerns, indicating :the need for traffic monitoring, consideration of traffic problems in the EIR, as well as to deve op adequate parking. The question was raised of the possible fire station relocation. to the government center,. to which Councilman Spierling-had responded that the bottleneck at the Brisco Road underpass would restrict valuable use of the fire station location here, because of this access problem. Father O'Sullivan.. of St. Patrick's School will poll his students to see how many would use a walkway from Wes Branch Street across the front of the property to the school. Discussion was also held regarding a zone change for the area. The County would not have to apply for a zone change, but-the School District would. At the meeting the: City `s. lack of a zone to cover-governmental agencies was.noted and'he therefore now recommended that the staff be instructed to start work on an ordinance. to cover zoning for use by governmental agencies to include our own civic center as well as the regional facility and school districts. The County does not have to apply for a zone change, but` he School District would, because of no pre-existing contiguous public school uses in that area. The next meeting regarding the Regional Center will be in January at the School District Office when the site will be walked over. After Council discussion, a motion was made by Councilman Gallagher,- seconded by Councilman Spierling and unanimously carried, referring to the Planning Commission the recommendation that a zone be created covering uses: by governmental. agencies, in the City of Arroyo Grande. PROGRESS REPORT - PARKING & BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT. ADVISORY BOARD The Council reviewed a report and minutes from the Parking and Business Improvement Area Advisory Board, reviewing a parking lot redesign for development of the property south of the alley between Bridge and Short in Arroyo Grande Village, for which the-Board has. approved an expenditure of $25U0,-$300U. -. - 2 '?' CITY COUNCIL ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA REVIEW OF INFORMATION FROM LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES DECEMBER 14, 1976 PAGE 6 The Council reviewed various information from the League of California Cities, relating to the federal mandate for unemployment compensation insurance for all local and state government employees; information regarding the new League headquarters' office building; and the latest Legislative Bulletin, APPOINTMENT OF PARKING & TRAFFIC COMMISSIONER - JONES Mayor de Leon reviewed that a vacancy exists on the Parking & Traffic Commission and recommended Andy Jones for the position. After Council discussion,.. a motion was made by Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Spierling and carried, appointing Andy Jones,. 1431 Sierra Drive, to the Parking & Traffic Commission, with his term to expire June 30, 1978. COURT RULING ON REZONING AT TRAFFIC WAY EXTENSION - LAWLER The Council reviewed an order rendered by Judge Kirkpatrick of the San Luis Obispo County Superior Court, denying the petition for Writ of Mandate filed by Betty M. Lawler against the City when the Council declined to approve a rezoning request made. by Mrs. Lawler for her property at Traffic Way Extension. Councilman Spierling distributed a list he had compiled last spring of 15 conditions for a zone change with a "D" override for the subject property, stating it will still be an issue in R-A-B-3 zoning and the Council now needs to indicate alternatives available. He recommended that the Planning Commission and City Staff be directed to explore a possible solution to the Lawler property problem. The Council discussed the matter and held off further action,- until the property owners come in for a zone change REPORT - RECENT ANIMAL REGULATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING The Council reviewed a report and information from Police Chief Clark regarding a recent meeting of the Animal Control Committee. .The annual rabies clinics have been scheduled for January 15, 1977 between 1 and 3 p.m. and will cost $2.50 per vaccination. Also reviewed were proposals on spay-neutering of cats and an amended county ordinance on impounding and disposition of stray or abandoned cats. AUTHORIZE REALLOCATION OF FUNDS FOR PARK MAINTENANCE MAN Administrator Butch reported that the City has received the amount of $3,949 from the Federal Government for its share of the Title II Antirecession fiscal assistance program. The Council reviewed a memorandum from Parks Director Gallop, requesting that these funds be used to enable the continued employment of a Park Maintenance Man whose funds under the CETA program have run out. With the addition of several new park areas in the past year, he stated that a loss in the present park maintenance crew would be a real problem.- After Council discussion,.. a motion was made by Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Spierling and unanimously carried, authorizing the reallocation of funds received from the Antirecession Fiscal Assistance Program to continue the employment of a Park Maintenance Man for approximately thirty weekso- ORDINANCE 1ST READING - ADOPT MANDATORY GARBAGE COLLECTION IN CITY Administrator Butch reported that research is continuing by the City Attorney to determine whether the City can charge a 5~ franchise fee or is limited to a 21; fee when it awards a franchise contract to a firm to collect garbage in the City. .City Attorney Shipley explained that the Council needs to first adopt the Ordinance approved by the City's voters in November, before a call for bids for the contract is doneo He then read in full, for its first reading, an ordinance amending the Municipal Code regarding garbage and refuse collection in the City.- NOTICE RE. PUBLIC HEARING SET - PUBLIC BUILDINGS ELEMENT OF GEN. PLAN: 1/11/76 The Council was informed that a public hearing will be set for the Council's-next regular meeting.,. to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the Public Buildings Element of the General .Plan be adopted. The hearing is set for January 11, 1976 at 8:.00 P.M. Mrs. E11a Honeycutt, 560 Oak Hill Road, expressed her objections to certain statements in the minutes of the Planning Commission's meeting of November 16th, and asked they be corrected as the minutes become permanent public records.- She wished clarification of the fallowing statements: 1) that the growth rate of the City is less than anticipated.; and 2) that there are no R-1 lots available in the City. She contended that the City is growing at 7~ and the Land Use Element calls for 3$; and that the City has about 500. R-1 lots at the present time. ~s~ CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 14, 1976 ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA PAGE 7 NOTICE OF JOINT"STUDY SESSION WITH PLANNING COMMISSION: 1/10/77, 7:30 P.M. The Council received notice that a joint study session has been set by the Planning Commission, with the Council, for Monday, January 10, 1.977 at 7:30 P.M. to review proposed zone changes. APPROVE PARCEL MAP AG 74-293., RUTH ANN WAY (JONES) City Engineer Garcia reviewed with the Council, Parcel Map AG 74-293., reflecting a two-parcel lot split (Case No. 74-206) located on the westerly side of Ruth Ann Way near that street's north end, requested by Jones, et al. After COUriCll diSCUSSlOn, a motion was made by Councilman Spierling, seconded by Councilman Gallagher and unanimously carried, finding Parcel Map AG 74-293. to be consistent with the City's General Plan and Zoning, and approving said Parcel Map. COUNCILMAN SCHLEGEL EXCUSED HIMSELF FROM THE COUNCIL TABLE DUE TO A POSSIBLE CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND IS NOW ABSENT. DISCUSSION'RE. PARCEL MAPS AG 76-433 & 434, STAGE COACH ROAD (KUDEN, ET AL)-TABLED City Engineer Garcia reviewed. with the Council Parcel Map AG 76-433 and 434, being two lot splits-located on the easterly side of Stage Coach Road, northerly of Huasna Road and the total number of parcels created. in the two maps being nine,. varying in size from 18,582 square feet to 9,414 sq. ft. A variance has been granted by the Planning Commission for the lots under 10,000 sq. ft. because of a seven foot street dedication- requirement on Stage Coach Road. Street and easement dedications. are included on the Map, approval of which is being requested by Kuden Grant, Nelson, et al. Lengthy discussion was-held by the Council regarding said maps, with Councilman Millis requesting the Parcel Maps be given the Counci]. before meetings for study, and objecting to the flag. lots and access to them because of the-slope of the property. City Engineer Garcia explained that the Council has only the right. to find that said maps are consistent with the-General Plan and Zoning, but has no right to deny approval of a Parcel Map that has already been appraved by the Subdivision Review Board and granted a variance by the Planning Commission. Council discussion was also held regarding review of E.I.R.'s and Negative Declarations, the latter. of which had been reviewed by the Planning Commission for the subject developments. Several citizens present commented on the matter including an adjacent property owner who disputes a property line in the subject area. After Council discussion, Councilman Spierling made a motion to accept, on behalf of the City, the street dedication and Public Utility Ease- ment shown on Parcel Maps 76-433 and 434. After further Council discussion, he withdrew his motion. The Council requested that research be done to see whether there is any way not to approve these parcel maps. Councilman Gallagher then made a motion, which was seconded by Councilman Spierling, to table this matter until the Council's next regular meeting. Motion carried. COUNCILMAN SCHLEGEL IS NOW PRESENT Councilman Gallagher then made a motion that henceforth the utilization of street dedication for lot size not be utilized by the Planning Commission. He did not feel that street dedications should be used for lot size because they are separate of each other and street dedication should be street dedication and the street is utilized for that purpose and should not be used to enable owners of lots to get the additional size to meet lot criteria through street dedication. Councilman Millis stated he would second the motion if it were to be amended to include a request. that the staff review the City's present procedure for approving parcel splits to see. how it can be corrected in the future so this won't come up. He feels that apparently authority has been delegated by the Council to certain committees and commissions, that in this instance, if the Council had had the final say and not delegated that authority this problem would not have occurred. Councilman Spierling suggested that Councilman Millis' suggestion be added onto the agenda of the joint study session with the Planning Commission on January 10th, stating there may be some things the Council is not aware of. Councilman Gallagher accepted the amendment to his motion which Councilman Millis then seconded. Councilman Gallagher repeated his motion that the utilization of street dedication being included in lot size, that this poh.cy not be continued. That the street dedication is going to have to stand for the street itself and the lot size is going to have to meet the measurements of the lot and not have the street dedica- tion inclusive for the purpose of getting maximum or meeting the criteria for minimum lot size. Discussion continued, with Councilman Spierling stating he is not opposed to the motion on the surface, but feeling that the Council may be voting on something that it does not have full information on and suggested that the motion be acted on after the study session. Councilman Spierling then made a motion to --26~ CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 14, 1976 ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA PAGE S table the foregoing motion until the Council's next regular meeting. Said motion was seconded by Councilman Millis and carried on the following roll call vote, to wit: AYE5: Councilmen Spierling, Gallagher, Millis and Mayor de Leon; NOES: Councilman Schlegel; ABSENT: None. The matter will be on the Agenda for the Council's next regular meeting. Councilman Gallagher also requested that clarifica- tion of all E.I.R.'s be placed on the next Council's agenda, stating he does not feel the City Council should delegate this responsibility to any other entity, but that the Council should have final say on all E.I.R.'s and Negative Declaratipns. AUTHORIZE FINAL PAYMENT FOR STREET PAVING PROJECT - SULLY-MILLER City Engineer Garcia repot e a e s ee esur acing Project No. 90-76-~ has been completed to the City's satisfaction and requested final payment be made to the contractor. After Council discussion, a motion was made by Councilman Schlegel, seconded by Councilman Gallagher and unanimously carried, authorizing payment in the amount of $87,670.78 as first and final payment to Southern Pacific Milling (Sully-Miller), for Repaving Project No. 90-76-3. APPROVE USE OF FAU FUNDS FOR VALLEY ROAD IMPROVEMENT City Engineer Garcia gave a progress report on the City-County cooperative project to improve Valley Road and displayed a diagram showing the realignment of the sharp curve in said road. The County°s estimate for the total project, including engineering, right of way acquisition and improvement of the curve, is $93,000. The City Engineer stated that Federal Aid Urban (FAU) funds could be used to pay for the $73,000 estimated actual construction costs. If the project is approved, it could be scheduled for construction in the summer of 1978. After Council discussion, a motion was made by Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Millis and carried, approving use of the City's allocation of FAU funds for the Valley Road Improvement Project to be done jointly with the County, and directing that the Board of Supervisors be notified that the City agrees with the proposed plan. APPROVE PLACEMENT OF "ADVISORY" QUESTION ON MARCH BALLOT RE. TRANSIT DISTRICT Councilman Spierling, President of the Transit District Formation Steering Committee, reported. that said Committee has recommended the placement of an "advisory°' question on the March county election ballot, to ascertain whether the county residents wish to have a transit district formed to provide public transportation services in the County, with the district to have revenue raising powers. After Council discussion, it gave general consent to Councilman Spierling to convey the City's approval of placement of the "advisory" question on the March county election ballot. DISCUSSION RE. DEVELOPMENT ON LE POINT TERRACE - ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW #75-127 The Council read a letter from B'Ann Smith, 548 Crown Hill, who requested, further study be made of Architectural Review Case No. 76-127, a development of apartment and townhouse units on Le Point Terrace. She felt the additional traffic would be hazardous, and an Environmental Impact study should be done on the property. The Council also reviewed a report from Planning Director Gallop stating that review of the proposed development plans by the City Departments have found them to meet all requirements and the zoning ordinance. A report from City Engineer Garcia was reviewed, outlining a radar survey and collision diagram prepared on Crown Street analyzing the traffic problems, which he felt indicated the street, although not a safe one, was capable of handling more than it is handling currently, and the speed limit should remain at the posted 25m.p.h. B'Ann Smith was present .and asked if anything will be done about her request for an E.I.R. City Staff informed her that this development is categorically exempt from the City's E.I.R. guidelines. Bruce Dodson, representing the owners of the development, displayed the plans for the development,. including a scale model of the completed project. He also pointed out that three public hearings had already been held on this project, which has been approved by the proper commis- sions and committeeso Several persons in the audience also commented on the matter. The Council discussed the development at length, generally agreeing that it is too late to do anything about the project now, as all the City's rules and regulations have been met. OBJECTION TO STATEMENT IN PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MILLIS Councilman Millis read from the Planning Commission minutes of November 1Fa, 1976, citing his objection to the statement made in the 1st sentence, first paragraph of Page 3, regarding the number of R-1 lots in the City. X70 CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 14, 1`976 ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA PAGE 9 CANCEI,~ATION OF 12/28/76 MEETING AND ADJOURNMENT ~~~ On motion of Councilman Spierling, seconded by Councilman Schlegel and una;iimously carried, the regular meeting of December 28,.1976 was cancelled, and the meeting adjourned at 11:-00 P.M. until Monday, January 10, 1.977 for a joint study session with the Planning Commission. ATTEST : ''=ss~~:~C~1~r c i ~' _ C~~-~i CITY. CLERK MAYOR