CC 2018-10-09_12a Traffic Calming GuidelinesMEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
BEAU PRYOR, CHIEF OF POLICE
SUBJECT: RECEIVE INFORMATION REGARDING CITY NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDELINES
DATE: OCTOBER 9, 2018
SUMMARY:
Information regarding the City’s Neighborhood Traffic Calming Guidelines including a
discussion of traffic calming measures in the Berry Gardens neighborhood.
IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES:
There are no budget impacts resulting from this informational item. Staff resources have
been impacted to various degrees over the last two years addressing traffic calming with
neighborhood residents, compiling data including accident data, conducting directed
enforcement, and preparing this staff report. The 2015 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming
Study cost $11,947.
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file information regarding the City’s Neighborhood Traffic Calming
Guidelines (Guidelines) and their application to the Berry Gardens Neighborhood.
BACKGROUND:
At the September 11, 2018 City Council meeting under Council Communications, Mayor
Hill expressed concerns about traffic issues in the Berry Gardens neighborhood and
requested staff place an item regarding traffic calming measures on an upcoming agenda.
Council Member Brown concurred with the request.
In 2014 and 2015, the Traffic Commission reviewed Neighborhood Traffic concerns in the
Le Point Street at McKinley Street area. After review, the Traffic Commission directed
staff to prepare Neighborhood Traffic Calming Guidelines. In January and March of 2016,
the Traffic Commission reviewed Draft Neighborhood Traffic Calming Guidelines and
recommended that the City Council adopt the Guidelines. On April 12, 2016, the City
Council adopted the Guidelines by Resolution No. 4718 (Attachment 1).
Staff has also received complaints regarding unsafe speeds in the Berry Gardens
neighborhood. The Police Department continues periodic directed traffic enforcement in
the vicinity.
Item 12.a. - Page 1
RECEIVE INFORMATION REGARDING CITY NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC
CALMING GUIDELINES
OCTOBER 9, 2018
PAGE 2
ANALYSIS OF ISSUES:
The Guidelines provide educational and procedural measures to help guide the
Neighborhood Traffic calming process and to elicit an understanding of the benefits and
compromises of traffic calming installations.
In the case of the Berry Gardens neighborhood, the City has received complaints about
speeding and unsafe driving in the area over the last few years. In 2015, the City’s traffic
consultant prepared a Traffic Calming Study (Study) for the neighborhood in response to
a petition received in November of 2014 requesting installation of a stop sign at the
intersection of Boysenberry Street and Cedar Street, citing cut-through traffic and
speeding. The Study reviewed warrants for the additional stop sign installation and
analyzed various traffic calming measures (Attachment 2).
The report concluded that all study intersections were operating at acceptable levels,
there were a total of two (2) accidents (both non-injury) in the previous five years, and it
verified that the warrants were not met for the requested stop sign installation. Further,
the Study discussed implications of various traffic calming measures ranging from sign
placement to road closures. The area identified as the most viable for traffic calming
measures included the stretch of South Courtland between Blackberry Avenue and East
Grand Avenue, as it is wide and straight in comparison to the rest of the neighborhood.
Additional speed limit signs, a radar trailer and police enforcement were recommended
as starting points. Other permanent traffic calming measures identified in the Study, such
as bulb-outs, medians, and speed tables may slow speeds if determined warranted in the
future, but would be expensive and require additional maintenance. There was a speed
limit sign placed northbound on South Courtland but not on the southbound lanes for this
stretch.
The Police Department has previously enforced speeds and has placed the radar trailer
at the Berry Gardens neighborhood on several occasions. Currently, the Police
Department is conducting directed traffic enforcement in the neighborhood and has
issued 40 citations there since January 1, 2018. Due to the lack of a dedicated Traffic
Officer, directed enforcement is used when Command Staff direct patrol officers to
enforce stop sign and truck route violations between other calls for service.
Staff is also currently updating the City’s speed surveys that will enable additional
enforcement on collector and arterial streets in the vicinity, including South Courtland
Street. Since the Study was completed, the People’s Self Help Housing and Trillium
projects have been constructed, which may have changed traffic patterns in the area.
The Guidelines provide for changing circumstances, but certification of speed surveys
and an additional period of education and enforcement must be done before any traffic
calming measures may be considered.
On several occasions, the current and previous City Engineers have met with various
residents of the neighborhood and informed them of the conclusions of the Study. The
Guidelines, once approved, have been given to residents that are interested in traffic
calming issues in the neighborhood. The approval process for implementation of traffic
Item 12.a. - Page 2
RECEIVE INFORMATION REGARDING CITY NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC
CALMING GUIDELINES
OCTOBER 9, 2018
PAGE 3
calming installations are intended to be iterative and require a degree of agreement from
the neighborhood. If there are desired measures that incorporate physical changes to
roadway geometry, such as speed humps, speed tables, chokers, and medians, the
process requires that a petition must be provided to the City containing the names and
signatures of at least 66% of the affected property owners in the project area.
In the case of the Berry Gardens neighborhood, a total of 119 homes would need to sign
a traffic calming plan petition. To date, the City has received correspondence from Ms.
Patsy Lynch, most recently with a petition from eleven (11) residents in the Berry Gardens
neighborhood citing speeding and traffic violation concerns and requesting
implementation of traffic calming measures; however, no specific alternatives were
included (Attachment 3). Ms. Lynch has been advised regarding the Guidelines and the
City’s current enforcement efforts.
It should be noted that once Staff receive a petition requesting a specific traffic calming
measure, the Guidelines require Traffic Commission input, which now will be provided by
the Planning Commission. In addition, according to the Guidelines, should the City
Council approve a preliminary plan, a funding source would be identified which may
consist of City funds, funds from the requesting parties or neighborhood, or some
combination of the two. Funds from the requesting parties or neighborhood must be
strictly on a volunteer basis.
Staff has also heard complaints regarding truck traffic in the neighborhood. There are
designated truck routes through the City, however there are no truck routes through Berry
Gardens. During the directed traffic enforcement efforts in Berry Gardens there were no
truck route violations observed nor warnings or citations issued. Additionally, the City’s
Engineering Inspector has repeatedly addressed potential construction traffic through the
neighborhood with the managers of the Trillium project.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council’s consideration:
1. Receive and file; or
2. Provide direction to staff.
PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENT:
The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City’s website in accordance with
Government Code Section 54954.2.
Attachments:
1. Neighborhood Traffic Calming Guidelines
2. Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study
3. Letters from Ms. Patsy Lynch
Item 12.a. - Page 3
Neighborhood Traffic Calming Guidelines
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ARROYO GRANDE
BY RESOLUTION NO. 4718 ON
APRIL 12, 2016
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
300 East Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5420
ATTACHMENT 1
Item 12.a. - Page 4
Page 2
Table of Contents
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 3
Stop Sign Installation .................................................................................................................................................... 4
Speed Limits .................................................................................................................................................................. 5
Traffic Calming Measures ............................................................................................................................................. 5
Passive Traffic Calming Measures ................................................................................................................................ 6
Active Traffic Calming Measures .................................................................................................................................. 6
Volume Reduction Measures ........................................................................................................................................ 6
Impacts of Traffic Calming Measures............................................................................................................................ 7
Passive Traffic Calming Measures .................................................................................................................. 8
Police Enforcement ....................................................................................................................................................... 8
High-Visibility Crosswalks ............................................................................................................................................. 8
Radar Trailer, Speed Feedback Trailer ......................................................................................................................... 9
Speed Feedback Signs ............................................................................................................................................... 10
Pavement Striping ....................................................................................................................................................... 10
Signed Turn Restrictions ............................................................................................................................................. 11
Truck Restrictions ........................................................................................................................................................ 11
Active Traffic Calming Measures ................................................................................................................... 12
Speed Humps .............................................................................................................................................................. 12
Speed Tables or Raised Crosswalk ............................................................................................................................ 13
Raised Intersection ..................................................................................................................................................... 14
Speed Cushion ............................................................................................................................................................ 15
Neighborhood Traffic Circles ....................................................................................................................................... 16
Mid-Block Chokers ...................................................................................................................................................... 17
Medians ....................................................................................................................................................................... 18
Bulbouts ...................................................................................................................................................................... 19
Chicanes ..................................................................................................................................................................... 20
Volume Reduction Measures ........................................................................................................................ 21
Diverters ...................................................................................................................................................................... 21
Partial Closure ............................................................................................................................................................. 22
Full Street Closure....................................................................................................................................................... 23
Guidelines for Installation or Warrants .......................................................................................................... 24
Passive Traffic Calming Measures .............................................................................................................................. 24
Active Traffic Calming Measures ................................................................................................................................ 24
Volume Reduction Measures ...................................................................................................................................... 25
Approval and Implementation Process .......................................................................................................... 25
Item 12.a. - Page 5
Page 3
Neighborhood Traffic Calming Guidelines
Introduction
“Traffic calming” measures are a means to respond to unacceptable motoring behavior. The Institute
of Traffic Engineers (ITE) define traffic calming as:
“Traffic calming is the combination of mainly physical measures that reduce the negative
effects of motor vehicle use, alter driver behavior, and improve conditions for non-motorized
street users.”
The guiding principals of the “Traffic Calming Measures” include:
The design and installation of “Traffic Calming Measures” should use sound traffic
engineering principles.
The development and selection of “Traffic Calming Measures” should encourage and facilitate
public involvement.
Installation of traffic calming measures should minimize diverted traffic to other local or
residential collector streets.
Emergency vehicle access, including safety and response times must be considered.
Traffic calming devices must be designed to minimize adverse impacts to maintenance
activities.
Only State/Federal approved regulatory and/or warning signs may be installed.
Bicycle and pedestrian travel should be enhanced through traffic calming and congestion
relief.
Traffic calming measures are not solutions for all:
Speeding;
Cut-through;
Congestion; or
Traffic safety concerns.
Each neighborhood will have its own unique circumstances that will require an evaluation to identify
appropriate traffic calming options. Residential streets are planned and designed to provide access
to and from our residential neighborhoods. These facilities are neither designed nor intended for the
use of non-local traffic. However, when congested conditions occur on collector and arterial
roadways, local streets will often provide an attractive alternative route.
It is the intent of this program to identify traffic calming measures, which can alter travel behavior to
the betterment of the neighborhoods being affected. The intent here is to improve safety, encourage
Item 12.a. - Page 6
Page 4
bicycle and pedestrian travel, and to positively affect a resident’s quality of life. The objectives of
the local residential streets program are:
Reduce vehicular speed where appropriate
Reduce cut-through traffic
Improve safety for bicycle and pedestrian travel
Enhance the neighborhood environment
Residential areas adjacent to school zone traffic patterns, volumes and needs are different than
other typical residential areas. These residential areas should meet the same basic criteria for
implementation, including evaluation of the potential negative impacts that can result. School zone
traffic tends to be extremely peaked, occurring at the time when children are arriving at or departing
from school. While the condition requiring attention is short term in nature, the impacts of the traffic
calming device extend throughout the day, and continue during school holidays and vacation. Traffic
calming devices must take these issues into consideration and consider the following additional
objectives:
Improve the safety environment for children coming to and from school
Increase awareness of motorist to school sites
Improve safety for bicycle and pedestrian travel
This document outlines some basic traffic calming measures as well as the process for
implementation. It is important to note that after the community agrees upon what is the appropriate
solution, those costs to implement the traffic calming work may be borne by the City, the
neighborhood, or some combination of the two. This determination will be made by City Council
upon plan approval.
Stop Sign Installation
Stop signs are valuable and effective control devices when
used at the right place and under the right conditions. The
intent of stop signs is to help drivers and pedestrians at an
intersection decide who has the right-of-way.
Federal and State guidelines are required to be met prior to
an installation of a Stop Sign. These guidelines take into
consideration, among other things, the probability of vehicles
arriving at an intersection at the same time, the length of time
traffic must wait to enter, traffic delays, and the availability of
safe crossing opportunities. This analysis is called a warrant
analysis.
An unwarranted Stop Sign installation reduces speed in the
vicinity of the Stop Sign, but drivers may accelerate to a speed
faster than they drove before the Stop Sign was installed to
make up for time lost.
Item 12.a. - Page 7
Page 5
Stop signs are not effective for speed control. Drivers tend to ignore unwarranted Stop Signs that,
in their view, are unnecessary. If drivers are required to stop for Stop Signs and rarely see any traffic
on the opposing streets, drivers become impatient and tend to disregard Stop Signs that have no
obvious need.
Traffic generally finds the path of least resistance. If there are alternative routes to get from Point A
to Point B and if these alternate routes have fewer traffic controls, drivers will take them. This may
increase traffic volume on local streets.
Unwarranted Stop Signs increase vehicle fuel consumption. The Stop Sign requires additional
stop/start maneuvers, increasing wear and tear on vehicles.
Noise pollution increases as a result of stops and acceleration due to engine noise and brakes.
Speed Limits
The “Basic Speed Law” means that you may never drive faster
than is safe for current conditions. Other than local residential
roadways where the speed limit is 25 MPH, maximum Speed
Limits are posted with Speed Limit signs. Posted Speed Limits are
determined by measuring the speed of vehicles that use the
roadway based on ideal driving conditions.
These Speed Limits are set near the 85th percentile speed of
vehicles driving on the roadway. That means that 85 percent of
vehicles driving on the roadway drive at or below this speed and
15 percent drive above this speed limit. Periodically, typically
every five years, these Speed Limits are reevaluated and the
Speed Limit adjusted to match the 85th percentile speed.
Adjusting the Speed Limit does not mean that vehicles will drive faster or slower, the adjusted Speed
Limit more appropriately reflects vehicle speeds. As with most laws, Speed Limits depend on the
voluntary compliance of the majority of motorists. Speed Limits cannot be set arbitrarily low, as this
would create violators of the majority of drivers and would not command the respect or compliance
of drivers. Speed Limits that are not set at the 85th percentile speeds are typically not enforceable
and the court system will not enforce the ticket.
Traffic Calming Measures
The tools available for use in resolving neighborhood traffic problems are many and diverse in both
their cost and effectiveness. This program has identified levels of traffic calming measures:
Passive Traffic Calming Measures
Active Traffic Calming Measures
Item 12.a. - Page 8
SPEED
LIMIT
Page 6
Volume Reduction Measures
Traffic calming measures may include devices that do not directly affect driver behavior and are not
self-enforcing. These measures are generally included within the Passive Traffic Calming Measures.
If Passive Traffic Calming Measures do not provide desired results, more restrictive measures may
be warranted. More restrictive traffic calming measures, those found in the Active Measures and
Volume Reduction categories, mandate driver behavior change and may be effective where Passive
Traffic Control Measures have failed.
While this document identifies many Traffic Calming Measures, there are other traffic calming
measures that are not included. This is not intended to restrict the use of other Traffic Calming
Measures. Traffic Calming is an ever evolving area. Site specific analysis should be completed at
the time of Traffic Calming implementation based on the best available current practices and design
guidance.
Passive Traffic Calming Measures
Passive Traffic Calming Measures are intended to regulate, warn, guide, inform, and educate
pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists. They include standard striping and signing measures, minor
roadway design measures to improve visibility and safety, and enforcement by police. Passive Traffic
Calming Measures are used primarily in those areas where traffic impacts have been found and
traffic control and/or education has been determined to be appropriate. Some common Passive
Traffic Calming Measures include:
Education
Police Enforcement
High-Visibility Crosswalks
Permanent Speed Feedback Signs
Permanent Striping
Signed Turn Restrictions
Truck Restrictions
Active Traffic Calming Measures
Active Traffic Calming Measures are traffic control devices and roadway design features primarily
designed to slow traffic. They are employed when the use of Passive Traffic Calming Measures
cannot, or has not, effectively addressed speeding issues. Active Traffic Calming Measures may be
used in conjunction with Passive Measures. Active Measures may have a limited effect on traffic
volume as well. Some common Active Measures include:
Speed Humps
Speed Tables
Raised Crosswalks
Raised Intersections
Speed Cushions
Mid-Block Chokers
Medians
Bulbouts
Chicanes
Volume Reduction Measures
Volume Reduction Measures are traffic control devices and roadway design features primarily
designed to discourage residential street cut-through traffic. Volume reduction devices may be used
by themselves or in conjunction with Passive and Active Measures. Some common Volume
Reduction Measures include:
Item 12.a. - Page 9
Page 7
Diverters
Partial Closure
Full Street Closure
Impacts of Traffic Calming Measures
Prior to installing traffic calming measures, it is important to carefully consider potential impacts.
While many of the measures offer positive results, there are potential problems, which may be more
significant than the original concern. This section attempts to describe some of the possible impacts
of the use of speed reduction or volume reduction traffic calming tools.
Effect on Emergency Vehicle Response Times: Speed, and to a lesser extent, volume traffic
calming measures have potential for negatively impacting emergency vehicle response
because they physically affect speed and maneuvering. Many Active Measures may increase
emergency response time. These concerns should be considered for each location where
Active Measures and Volume Reduction Measures are recommended.
Traffic Diversion: Another concern is the potential for traffic calming techniques to move,
rather than solve, a problem. Proposed Volume Reduction Measures should include an
adequate study to evaluate traffic diversion impacts.
Impacts on Transit and Utility Vehicles: Some Active Measures and Volume Reduction
Measures could potentially impact bus routes. South County Transit and Lucia Mar Unified
School District should be consulted whenever Active Measures and Volume Reduction
Measures options are considered.
Noise Impacts: The noise impact to adjacent residents resulting from vehicles braking and
going over and around traffic calming devices can have an impact on the acceptability of these
devices by residents.
Loss of Parking: It may be necessary to restrict or prohibit on-street parking in the immediate
vicinity of certain traffic calming features. There can also be significant on-street parking
impacts from many speed reduction and volume reduction options.
Liability Exposure Implications: Speed reduction and volume reduction traffic calming devices
may result in varying degrees of liability exposure to the City. This exposure stems from the
potential negative impact to emergency vehicle response times. It is also possible that traffic
calming devices themselves could result in damage or injury if improperly used.
Increased Maintenance Costs: Street maintenance costs will increase in two areas. First,
landscaping associated with such devices as neighborhood traffic circles, roundabouts,
chokers and chicanes, etc., will require regular maintenance. Second, devices such as speed
humps will have to be reinstalled each time a residential street is overlaid which will increase
these costs.
Item 12.a. - Page 10
Page 8
Passive Traffic Calming Measures
Police Enforcement
Police enforcement entails the presence of police to monitor speeds and issue citations. This method
is used as an initial attempt to reduce speeds on streets. It is most applicable on streets with
documented speeding problems and the need for quick mitigation. It can also be used during the
learning period when new devices or restrictions are first implemented. For police enforcement,
contact the Police Department.
Positive Aspects Negative Aspects
Effective while officer is actually present
at the location
Can be targeted to specific time periods
that are deemed to be most problematic
Can be implemented on short notice
Targets violators without affecting normal
traffic
It is a temporary measure
Enforcement may be limited by police
availability and other policing duties
Long term financial commitment of police
personnel
It is labor intensive and expensive
Approximate cost: No direct additional cost to the City.
High-Visibility Crosswalks
A high-visibility crosswalk is a crosswalk that incorporates striped patterns, pavement lights or
flashing beacons, and signing to improve the visibility of the crosswalk. This measure is most
applicable on local streets where speed control and pedestrian crossing designation is desired. It
can also be used to discourage cut-through traffic. This type of crosswalk is most appropriate near
schools and recreation facilities, but typically not at signalized intersections.
Item 12.a. - Page 11
Page 9
Positive Aspects Negative Aspects
Slows traffic
Increases driver awareness of crosswalk
Requires minimal maintenance for
striped crosswalks
May require removal of parking in the
vicinity of the crosswalk
May result in significant maintenance for
embedded pavement lights or advance
flashing lights
Approximate cost: $20,000 to $50,000 - (2016 dollars)
Radar Trailer, Speed Feedback Trailer
This is a mobile trailer-mounted radar display that informs drivers of their speed. This measure is
applicable on any street where speeding is a problem.
Positive Aspects Negative Aspects
Educational tool
Good public relations for neighborhoods
Effective for temporary speed reduction
needs
Not self-enforcing
Duration of effectiveness is limited
May require temporary lane closures
Approximate cost: No direct additional cost to the City.
Item 12.a. - Page 12
Page 10
Speed Feedback Signs
This is a permanent-mounted radar display that informs approaching drivers of their speed. This
measure is applicable on any street where speeding is a problem.
Positive Aspects Negative Aspects
Educational tool
Good public relations for neighborhoods
Permanent reminder of travel speed
Not self-enforcing
Duration of effectiveness is limited
Maintenance/theft
Approximate cost: $4,000 to $6,000 – (2016 dollars)
Pavement Striping
Striping is used to create narrow lanes, which give the impression of a narrow street. This makes
the motorist feel restricted, which helps reduce speeds. It is most applicable to long, wide residential
streets where speeding traffic exists.
Positive Aspects Negative Aspects
Easy to install and modify as necessary
Low cost of implementation
May not be self-enforcing
May increase the likelihood of sideswipe
accidents
Approximate cost: $2,500 to $15,000 – (2016 dollars)
Item 12.a. - Page 13
Page 11
Signed Turn Restrictions
Signs may be installed which prohibit certain movements at an intersection, e.g., “No Left Turn”. This
measure is applicable on streets where cut-through traffic exists. This method can be tailored to be
applicable during the most problematic times by defining a time period for the restriction.
Positive Aspects Negative Aspects
Redirects traffic to main streets
Reduces cut-through traffic
May address time-of-day problems
Not self-enforcing
May increase trip length for some
commuters
May redirect traffic to other neighborhood
streets
May confuse motorists unfamiliar with
time-of-day restrictions
Approximate cost: $1,500 to $5,000 – (2016 dollars)
Truck Restrictions
Restricting the entry of trucks into residential neighborhoods can be achieved through the posting of
truck restriction signs. This method is most applicable on residential streets to reduce cut-through
traffic of commercial vehicles.
Positive Aspects Negative Aspects
Redirects commercial traffic through
main streets
Reduces noise and air pollution due to
trucks in residential streets
Not self-enforcing
Approximate cost: $500 to $2,500 – (2016 dollars)
Item 12.a. - Page 14
Page 12
Active Traffic Calming Measures
Active Traffic Calming Measures are primarily designed to lower travel speeds on the streets where
they are installed.
Speed Humps
Speed humps are areas of pavement raised 3 inches in height over a minimum of 14 feet in length.
The combination of different heights, lengths and approach ramps will affect the speed a vehicle can
comfortably go over the hump. Speed humps are marked with signs and pavement markings. Speed
humps are applicable on local streets where speed control is desired or where cut-through traffic is
to be discouraged. Speed humps are not recommended for use on streets designated as primary
response routes for emergency vehicles.
Positive Aspects Negative Aspects
Slows traffic
Self-enforcing
Requires minimum maintenance
May increase emergency response times
May damage emergency response vehicles if
not carefully designed
May increase traffic noise in the vicinity of the
bump
Modern cars with active suspension may be
able to traverse the bumps at increased speeds.
Approximate cost: $3,500 to $5,000 – (2016 dollars)
Item 12.a. - Page 15
Section A-A
J_ 7'
Page 13
Speed Tables or Raised Crosswalk
Raised crosswalks are flat-topped speed humps, 22 feet in length, built as a pedestrian crosswalk,
with vehicle ramps on the approaches. This type of crosswalk is applicable to local streets where
speed control and pedestrian crossing designation are desired. It can be an effective safety tool near
schools and recreation facilities and can also be used to discourage cut -through traffic. Raised
crosswalks are well-marked and may contain special paving or textures.
Positive Aspects Negative Aspects
Slows traffic
Increases pedestrian visibility in the
crosswalks
Requires minimal maintenance
May increase emergency response times
May damage emergency response
vehicles if not carefully designed
May increase traffic noise in vicinity of
crosswalk
May create drainage issues where raised
crossing extends from curb to curb
May require extensive warning signs to
be effective
Approximate cost: $4,000 to $6,000 – (2016 dollars)
Item 12.a. - Page 16
PARABOLIC -----.____ FLAT /.-PARABOLIC
~ b i b::) ==-==---=-=-. 1 "-= l \_ 3· .. _J 6 '--S' 5' ;,
Page 14
Raised Intersection
Like raised crosswalks, the raised intersection is a flat-topped speed hump built over the entire area
of intersecting streets at curb height, creating a flat surface over the entire intersection area. Raised
intersections are constructed with ramps (gentle approaches 1:40) on all vehicle approaches, using
bollards to define the pedestrian zone. They are often constructed with textured materials on the flat
sections and the approach ramps. These are commonly used in area-wide traffic calming
installations. This type of installation is applicable to arterial and collector streets where speed
control and pedestrian crossing designation are desired. It can be an effective safety tool near
schools and recreation facilities and can also be used to discourage cut -through traffic. Raised
intersections are used in locations where loss of on-street parking would be acceptable.
Positive Aspects Negative Aspects
Slows traffic
Increases pedestrian visibility in the
crosswalks
Requires minimal maintenance
No impact on access
May increase emergency response times
May increase traffic noise in vicinity of the
intersection
May create drainage issues where raised
crossing extends from curb to curb
Approximate cost: $25,000 to $75,000 – (2016 dollars)
Item 12.a. - Page 17
Page 15
Speed Cushion
Speed cushions consist of either recycled rubber or asphalt, raised about 3 inches in height. The
length of the cushion is about 10 feet. The spaces between the cushions allow emergency vehicles
to partially straddle the device. These devices are most effective if used in a series at 300’ to 500’
spacing or in conjunction with other traffic calming devices.
Positive Aspects Negative Aspects
Reduces vehicle speed
Can reduce vehicular volumes
No restrictions to on-street parking
Does not restrict access
Requires minimum maintenance
Minimal impacts to emergency response
times
May increase emergency response times
Not aesthetically pleasing
May increase road maintenance costs
Approximate cost: $3,500 to $5,000 for set – (2016 dollars)
Item 12.a. - Page 18
Page 16
Neighborhood Traffic Circles
Neighborhood Traffic Circles are raised island placed in the intersection around which traffic
circulates. Motorist yield to other motorists already in the intersection. Neighborhood Traffic Circles
required motorist to slow to a speed that allows them to comfortably maneuver. The outer ring of
the circle is mountable for large vehicles. The interior of the circle may be landscaped for enhanced
aesthetics.
Positive Aspects Negative Aspects
Reduces intersection speed
Reduces mid-block speeds by 10%
Intersection collision reduction
May include planting for increased
neighborhood aesthetics
May increase emergency response times
Increased difficulty of large vehicle
turning movement
May result in bicycle/auto conflicts at
intersections because of narrowed travel
lane
Approximate cost: $10,000 to $30,000 for set – (2016 dollars)
Item 12.a. - Page 19
Page 17
Mid-Block Chokers
Chokers are raised islands in the parking zone that can be detached from the curb line to allow for
drainage. Mid-Block Chokers narrow the roadway and are most applicable on wide streets with
speeding and cut-through problems. Special attention is required during the design of Mid-Block
Chokers to provide for bicycle access.
Positive Aspects Negative Aspects
Speed reduction
Breaks up driver’s sight-line
Reduces pedestrian crossing
Increases pedestrian and motorist
visibility
May require partial or total removal of on-
street parking
Increases maintenance for areas where
street sweeping equipment cannot reach
between the choker and the curb line
Approximate cost: $15,000 to $35,000 – (2016 dollars)
Item 12.a. - Page 20
Page 18
Medians
Medians are raised islands in the center of the roadway that separate traffic directions. Medians are
used on wide streets to narrow the travel lanes, interrupt sight distances down the center of the
roadway, and ease pedestrian crossings.
Positive Aspects Negative Aspects
Narrowed travel lanes can slow vehicle
speeds
Shortens pedestrian crossing
Opportunity for landscaping and visual
enhancements to the neighborhood
Properly placed medians can result in
congestion relief and capacity increases
Congestion Relief
Long medians may interrupt
emergency access and operations
May interrupt driveway access and
result in U-turns at the end of
medians
May require removal of parking
High cost to construct and maintain
Approximate cost: $35,000 to $100,000 – (2016 dollars)
Item 12.a. - Page 21
Page 19
Bulbouts
Bulbouts narrow the street width, and create smaller corner radii, creating a shorter and safer
pedestrian crossing and encouraging drivers to slow down. Construction of bulbouts requires altering
the curb, gutter and sidewalk. Bulbouts may contain special paving or landscaping and are generally
used at intersections where parking is restricted.
Positive Aspects Negative Aspects
Pedestrian crossing distance is reduced
Narrowed roadway section may
contribute to reduction of speeds
Breaks up driver’s sight-line
Opportunity for landscaping and visual
enhancements to the neighborhood
May reduce visibility for cyclists who are
less visible to turning and cross traffic
May require partial or total loss of parking
Could result in a minor increase on
maintenance
Care should be taken to keep motorists
from hitting bulbouts
Approximate cost: $15,000 to $35,000 – (2016 dollars)
Item 12.a. - Page 22
Curb radius: as
determined by
design vehicle
I
t
Length: at least 5 '
beyond extension of
the corner property
line
Width: as
determined by
adjacent lanes
Page 20
Chicanes
A curved street alignment that can be designed into new developments or retrofitted in existing right-
of-ways is called a chicane. The curvilinear alignment requires additional maneuvering and shortens
drivers’ sight-lines, resulting in lower average speeds. This device can be applied to any street where
speed control is desired, provided the street is wide enough to accommodate the curvilinear design.
Positive Aspects Negative Aspects
May slow traffic
Changes the look of the street, making it
more aesthetically pleasing
Has minimal impact on emergency
response
Involves extensive design and
expensive implementation
May require partial or total removal of
on-street parking
Additional maintenance for service
vehicles to maneuver a curvilinear
street
May have little or no impact on cut-
through traffic
May require modification of drainage
features and other utilities
Approximate cost: $35,000 to $100,000 – (2016 dollars)
Item 12.a. - Page 23
am
~
[!l]
~t)
\t \ a fl\! ,
Page 21
Volume Reduction Measures
Volume reduction traffic calming measures are primarily designed to reduce the traffic level on the
streets where they are installed.
Diverters
Diverters are raised areas placed diagonally across a four-way intersection that restrict through
movements and vehicles to turn. Diverters are most applicable to local streets where cut-through
traffic is a major problem.
Positive Aspects Negative Aspects
Reduces cut-through traffic
Channels traffic flow, thus eliminating
conflicts at an intersection
Can be designed to accommodate
emergency vehicles
Opportunity for landscaping and visual
enhancements to the neighborhood
Can accommodate bicycle traffic through
intersection
Will re-direct traffic to other local streets
Causes increased travel time for local
residents
Is a permanent measure, even though
problem may be limited to certain times
of day
High installation costs
May require partial or total removal of
parking near intersection
Needs significant warning and guiding
signs
Approximate cost: $15,000 to $35,000 – (2016 dollars)
Item 12.a. - Page 24
Page 22
Partial Closure
A Partial closure is a physical barrier that restricts vehicles from turning into a street, while still
allowing for bicycle access. The opposite lane is left open to allow vehicle exits. Two-way traffic is
maintained for the rest of the block. Partial closures are applicable to local streets where cut-through
traffic is a concern. It can also be a favorable traffic volume control measure.
Positive Aspects Negative Aspects
Restricts movements into a street while
maintaining full access and movement
within the street block for residents
Reduces cut-through traffic
Pedestrian crossing distance is reduced
through a closure island
Creates a space for street landscaping
May require partial or total removal of on-
street parking
May redirect traffic to other local streets
May increase trip length for local drivers
Is in effect at all times, even if cut-through
problem exists only at certain times of
day
Approximate cost: $10,000 to $30,000 – (2016 dollars)
Item 12.a. - Page 25
Page 23
Full Street Closure
A complete closure of the street blocks both lanes of travel, so that the street becomes a cul-de-sac.
This device eliminates all through traffic and limits street access to local residents. This device is
applicable to local streets with major cut-through concerns where an emergency vehicle response
route does not exist. The closure location may be designed as a pocket park with through bicycle
and pedestrian access.
Positive Aspects Negative Aspects
Restricts all through traffic
Effective volume and speed control
measure
Improves the aesthetic quality of the
street
May re-direct traffic to other local streets
May increase trip length for local drivers
May require partial removal of on-street
parking
Not applicable for designated emergency
vehicle response routes
May result in difficult turnaround
conditions
Approximate cost: $15,000 to $35,000 – (2016 dollars)
Item 12.a. - Page 26
Page 24
Guidelines for Installation or Warrants
Regardless of the traffic calming measure under consideration, a complete evaluation of the existing
corridor’s signage, pedestrian facilities, on-street parking, lighting, speed and traffic volume
information should be completed.
Passive Traffic Calming Measures
Generally, Passive Traffic Calming Measures are lower cost and may be used where analysis
indicates a problem exists and an appropriate Passive Traffic Calming Measures can be installed
with successful results. If it is not likely that the Passive Traffic Calming Measures will be successful
or that the installed Passive Traffic Calming Measure has failed, more restrictive measures may be
appropriate.
Active Traffic Calming Measures
The following guidelines (warrants) are recommended to govern the installation of Active Traffic
Calming Measures, following analysis and study. Some or all of these guidelines may apply,
depending upon the individual street characteristics.
1. The street or street segment should be a two lane residential local or collector street with
continuous curb and gutter, asphalt concrete berm, or curb and gutter or may be constructed
as part of the traffic calming project.
2. The street segment should be at least 500 feet long.
3. The impacts to response time for emergency service vehicles must be evaluated and
determined negligible.
4. Guidelines apply only to streets with a speed limit of 30 miles per hour or less.
5. The 85th percentile speed must be at least seven miles per hour above the posted speed limit.
6. The average daily traffic volume, excluding cut-through traffic, should be more than 500
vehicles per day.
7. The subject location has good visibility;
8. Vertical deflection devices should not be placed on curves.
9. Vertical deflection devices should be located at or near residential property lines and away
from driveways, when possible.
10. Vertical deflection devices should be located near street lights to illuminate them for safe bike
and pedestrian activity at night.
11. Spacing between vertical deflection devices should be as even as possible to produce uniform
speed along an entire street. When placed in a series they should be placed between 200
and 600 feet apart. Spacing should allow at least one installation on each block.
12. Vertical deflections shall not be installed at locations with street grades in excess of 6%,
except under conditions where there are very short sections with grades up to 8%-10%.
13. The installation will not result in diversion of traffic to other residential streets.
Item 12.a. - Page 27
Page 25
Volume Reduction Measures
The following guidelines (warrants) are recommended to govern the installation of Volume Reduction
Measures following analysis and study. Some or all of these guidelines may apply, depending upon
the individual street characteristics.
1. The impacts to response time for emergency service vehicles must be evaluated and
determined negligible.
2. The average daily traffic volume should exceed 500 vehicles per day.
3. Cut through traffic exceeds 10% of total daily and/or peak hour traffic.
Approval and Implementation Process
Neighborhood traffic calming is a term used to describe a process of education, enforcement, and
finally engineering. The education component typically is completed using a neighborhood meeting
in which residents can share concerns and help identify the problem. Additionally, education can
also include physical improvements such as speed limit signs, revised roadway striping, and speed
feedback indicators such as permanently mounted signs or temporally placed trailers to better
identify what drivers should be doing.
After the education phase is complete, enforcement activities are typically implemented. In this
phase, the drivers should now be well informed and compliance is now achieved through moneta ry
penalties in the form of traffic tickets. Enforcement work is highly effective to calm traffic speeds
when officers are present to enforce. Since it is not feasible to devote officers to one area for a
prolonged duration, lasting results will vary.
The last course of action is engineering. This phase would incorporate physical changes to roadway
geometry, which might include speed humps, speed tables, chokers, and medians.
The Neighborhood Traffic Calming process is designed and intended to be a “grass roots” effort.
With this in mind, notification of Neighborhood Traffic Calming needs comes from the neighborhoods.
1. Neighborhood representative writes letter requesting consideration, obtaining as many
neighbors’ signatures / support as available.
2. Staff receives and evaluates the request. Staff agendizes the request for a future Traffic
Commission Meeting date.
3. Staff writes a letter to residents to notify them of the Traffic Commission meeting date.
4. Traffic Commission meets to evaluate the request and determine if continued processing of
the requested traffic calming should be considered. If Traffic Commission determines
continued processing of the request is warranted, staff will begin data collection and the
review process.
Item 12.a. - Page 28
Page 26
5. If the concern relates to speed, data will be collected using the Speed Feedback Trailer. This
allows for data collection as well as informing motorists of current travel speeds.
6. After the Speed Feedback Trailer has obtained the data and been removed, if the data
indicates the need, increased speed enforcement will be implemented.
7. If increased enforcement is implemented, additional speed data may be obtained.
8. Staff will evaluate speed and enforcement data and prepare a report to present to the Traffic
Commission.
9. Staff writes a letter to residents to notify them of the Traffic Commission meeting date.
10. The Traffic Commission meets to review the data results and to determine if continued
processing of traffic calming should be considered or if the actions taken have achieved
desired results.
11. If the Traffic Commission determines continued processing is needed, staff will return and
bring forward traffic calming alternatives. This process is iterative until a amenable plan is
developed.
12. A Preferred alternative is selected by the Traffic Commission with input from the
neighborhood. The requesting parties circulate a petition within the project area. This petition
must be circulated by the requesting parties, and returned containing the names and
Enforcement
Counting
Tubes
Speed
Feedback
Trailer
Staff Develops
Options
Traffic
Commission
Meets
Neighborhood
Provides
Feedback
Item 12.a. - Page 29
Page 27
signatures of at least 66 % of the affected property owners in the project area. This petition is
limited to one signature per household.
13. Once Staff receives the petition, Staff will prepare a staff report for the City Council with the
Traffic Commission's recommendation and notify the neighborhood of the City Council
meeting date.
14. City Council reviews preliminary plan.
15. If City Council approves the preliminary plan, staff will request direction of City Council as to
funding of the improvements. The funding source may be City funds, funds from the
requesting parties or neighborhood, or some combination of the two. Funds from the
requesting parties or neighborhood, must be strictly on a volunteer basis.
16. If the City Council approves the preliminary plan with City funding, a budget request will be
prepared for consideration for the next Capital Improvement Plan budget.
17. If the budget is approved, design and construction of the improvements will be completed
based upon the funding delivery timeframe.
Item 12.a. - Page 30
Berry Gardens
Traffic Calming Study
Prepared for:
City of Arroyo Grande
Prepared by:
ATTACHMENT 2
Item 12.a. - Page 31
• omni -means
ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS
Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study
Prepared for:
City of Arroyo Grande
300 East Branch Avenue
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
Prepared by:
Omni-Means, Ltd.
669 Pacific Street, Suite A
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
(805) 242-0461
April 2015
65-1275-34
R1985RPT001.docx
Item 12.a. - Page 32
Page i Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 1
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................................... 1
III. DATA COLLECTION ........................................................................................................................................ 2
ACCIDENT DATA ............................................................................................................................................................. 2
TRAFFIC VOLUMES.......................................................................................................................................................... 3
APPROACH SPEEDS ......................................................................................................................................................... 4
SIGHT DISTANCE ............................................................................................................................................................ 4
IV. CEDAR STREET/BOYSENBERRY STREET INTERSECTION ................................................................................... 7
A. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ......................................................................................................................................... 7
Warrant 1: Eight Hour Vehicular Volume ............................................................................................................. 7
Warrant 2: Four Hour Vehicular Volume .............................................................................................................. 7
Warrant 3: Peak Hour .......................................................................................................................................... 8
Warrant 4: Pedestrian Volume ............................................................................................................................ 8
Warrant 5: School Crossing .................................................................................................................................. 8
Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System ................................................................................................................. 8
Warrant 7: Crash Experience Warrant ................................................................................................................. 8
Warrant 8: Roadway Network .............................................................................................................................. 8
Warrant 9: Intersection Near a Grade Crossing .................................................................................................... 8
B.MULTI‐WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS ‐ GUIDANCE ......................................................................................................... 8
Criterion A: Traffic Control Signals are Justified .................................................................................................... 9
Criterion B: Accident History ................................................................................................................................. 9
Criterion C: Traffic Volumes .................................................................................................................................. 9
Criterion D ........................................................................................................................................................... 10
C. MULTI‐WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS – OPTIONAL CRITERIA .......................................................................................... 10
Criterion A: Control Left‐Turn Conflicts ............................................................................................................... 10
Criterion B: Control Vehicle/ Pedestrian Conflicts ............................................................................................... 10
Criterion C: Sight Distance .................................................................................................................................. 11
Criterion D: Intersection of Two Residential Collector Streets ........................................................................... 12
V. NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING .............................................................................................................. 13
TRAFFIC CALMING OPTIONS ........................................................................................................................................... 13
Basic Measures ................................................................................................................................................... 13
Intermediate Measures ....................................................................................................................................... 15
Extreme Measures .............................................................................................................................................. 18
EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES ............................................................................................................... 19
IMPACTS ..................................................................................................................................................................... 20
Effect on Emergency Vehicles Response Times ................................................................................................... 20
Traffic Diversion .................................................................................................................................................. 21
Impacts on Transit and Utility Vehicles ............................................................................................................... 21
Considerations for Other Roadway Users ........................................................................................................... 21
Noise Impacts ...................................................................................................................................................... 21
Loss of Parking .................................................................................................................................................... 21
Liability Exposure Implications ............................................................................................................................ 21
Visual Impacts and Aesthetic Concerns............................................................................................................... 21
Increased Maintenance Costs ............................................................................................................................. 21
VI. COURTLAND STREET PARTIAL OR FULL CLOSURE .......................................................................................... 22
ALTERNATIVE #1 ‐ PARTIAL CLOSURE (SOUTHBOUND LANE) ................................................................................................. 22
Item 12.a. - Page 33
Page ii Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
Effect on Emergency Vehicles Response Times ................................................................................................... 25
ALTERNATIVE #2 ‐ PARTIAL CLOSURE (NORTHBOUND LANE) ................................................................................................ 25
Effect on Emergency Vehicles Response Times ................................................................................................... 27
ALTERNATIVE #3 ‐ FULL STREET CLOSURE ......................................................................................................................... 28
Effect on Emergency Vehicles Response Times ................................................................................................... 30
VII. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................... 33
CEDAR STREET/ BOYSENBERRY STREET INTERSECTION ......................................................................................................... 33
NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING ................................................................................................................................. 33
COURTLAND STREET PARTIAL OR FULL CLOSURE ................................................................................................................. 33
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP ..................................................................................................................................................... 1
FIGURE 2: BERRY GARDENS STREET NETWORK ......................................................................................................................... 2
FIGURE 3: EXISTING LANE GEOMETRIES .................................................................................................................................. 5
FIGURE 4: EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES .................................................................................................................. 6
FIGURE 5: CORNER SIGHT DISTANCE .................................................................................................................................... 11
FIGURE 6: STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE .................................................................................................................................. 12
FIGURE 7: POTENTIAL BARRICADE LOCATIONS FOR LIMITING ACCESS ON COURTLAND STREET ......................................................... 22
FIGURE 8: ALTERNATIVE #1 PEAK HOUR VOLUMES ................................................................................................................. 24
FIGURE 9: ALTERNATIVE #2 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ..................................................................................................... 26
FIGURE 10: ALTERNATIVE #3 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ................................................................................................... 29
FIGURE 11: FIRE RESPONSE DISTANCES FROM STATION 1 ........................................................................................................ 31
FIGURE 12: FIRE RESPONSE DISTANCES FROM STATION 2 ........................................................................................................ 31
FIGURE 13: POLICE RESPONSE DISTANCES FROM ARROYO GRANDE POLICE DEPARTMENT .............................................................. 32
FIGURE 14: POLICE RESPONSE DISTANCES FROM GROVER BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT ................................................................ 32
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLIST VOLUMES ........................................................................................................................ 3
TABLE 2 EXISTING INTERSECTION LOS .................................................................................................................................... 3
TABLE 3 EXISTING ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS ........................................................................................................................... 4
TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF EIGHT HOUR WARRANT ....................................................................................................................... 7
TABLE 5 SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES ............................................................................................................................. 10
TABLE 6 EFFECTIVENESS OF BASIC MEASURES ........................................................................................................................ 19
TABLE 7 EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERMEDIATE MEASURES ............................................................................................................ 20
TABLE 8 EFFECTIVENESS OF EXTREME MEASURES ................................................................................................................... 20
TABLE 9 ALTERNATIVE #1 INTERSECTION LOS ........................................................................................................................ 23
TABLE 10 ALTERNATIVE #1 ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS ............................................................................................................. 23
TABLE 11 ALTERNATIVE #2 INTERSECTION LOS ...................................................................................................................... 27
TABLE 12 ALTERNATIVE #2 ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS ............................................................................................................. 27
TABLE 13 ALTERNATIVE #3 INTERSECTION LOS ...................................................................................................................... 30
TABLE 14 ALTERNATIVE #3 ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS ............................................................................................................. 30
APPENDIX
1. Accident Data
2. Traffic Volume Data
3. Resident Petition for All-Way Stop at Cedar Street/Boysenberry Street Intersection
Item 12.a. - Page 34
Page 1 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
I. Introduction
In November 2014, the City of Arroyo
Grande received a letter and petition to
install an all-way stop at the intersection of
Boysenberry Street and Cedar Street, citing
cut-through traffic and speeding creating
potentially dangerous conditions.
Growth in the area has prompted concerns
from existing residents about increased
traffic. An apartment/townhome complex has
recently been constructed on the west side
of Courtland Street north of Strawberry
Avenue, and a planned 4-acre commercial
development at the southwest corner of East
Grand Avenue and Courtland Street is
currently in the development review process.
This memorandum summarizes an
evaluation of traffic circulation and potential
traffic calming options within the Berry
Gardens neighborhood, including:
1. Evaluation of all-way stop intersection control at Boysenberry Street and Cedar Street;
2. Potential traffic calming improvements along Courtland Street between Ash Street and
Strawberry Avenue; and
3. Options and evaluation of limiting access into or out of the neighborhood on Courtland
Street just north of Strawberry Avenue.
II. Existing Conditions
Berry Gardens is a neighborhood located southeast of the intersection of Oak Park Boulevard
and East Grand Avenue (Figure 1), and is comprised of about 167 single family dwellings.
There are four access points to this neighborhood: Seabright Avenue to the west, Cedar Street
to the east, and Courtland Street to the north and south. Seabright Avenue connects to South
Oak Park Boulevard, which provides access to Highway 101. Cedar Street services residential
neighborhoods to the east and connects to Ash Street via Spruce Street and Cedar Street.
Courtland Street is a north/ south collector street between Ash Street and Newport Avenue and
provides access to East Grand Avenue north of Berry Gardens.
Courtland Street is a north/south road through the neighborhood and provides connections to
seven east/ west streets as depicted in Figure 2. Cranberry Street and Boysenberry Street are
the other two north/ south streets in the neighborhood. At the center is Kingo Park with a small
play structure and scattered picnic tables and benches.
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Item 12.a. - Page 35
Page 2 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
Figure 2: Berry Gardens Street Network
III. Data Collection
Accident Data
Recent 5-year accident data was obtained from the City Police Department and Statewide
Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the study area. Copies of the accident data are
included in the appendix. There were two total accidents within the study area during the period:
1. November 15, 2013: A vehicle turning left onto northbound Courtland Street was hit by a
vehicle travelling west on Ash Street.
2. January 24, 2015: Cyclist ran off road at the intersection of Courtland Street and
Blackberry Avenue.
Item 12.a. - Page 36
Page 3 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
Traffic Volumes
Traffic volumes were obtained from counts performed by Metro Traffic Data on February 26,
2015. Copies of the provided traffic count data are included in the appendix. The volumes
reported for existing AM and PM peak hours are summarized in Figure 4.
Regarding pedestrian and bicyclist volumes, they are summarized in Table 1 below. More
detailed pedestrian and bicyclist data is included in the appendix.
TABLE 1
PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLIST VOLUMES
Intersection Pedestrian Volumes Bicyclist Volumes
ID
No. Streets AM Peak
Total
PM Peak
Total
AM Peak
Total
PM Peak
Total
1 Seabright Avenue & South Oak Park Boulevard 4 7 2 6
2 Cedar Street & Courtland Street 7 3 1 1
3 Cedar Street & Boysenberry Street 6 12 3 3
4 East Grand Avenue & Juniper Street 5 29 11 8
5 Cedar Street & Spruce Street 8 10 0 0
Existing AM and PM peak hour intersection traffic operations were quantified utilizing the
existing intersection lane geometries (Figure 3) and control and the existing traffic volumes
(Figure 4). Table 2 contains a summary of the existing intersection LOS conditions, with
roadway LOS conditions contained in Table 3.
TABLE 2
EXISTING INTERSECTION LOS
# Intersection
Control
Type
Target
LOS
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Delay LOS Delay LOS
1 Grand Avenue & Oak Park Boulevard Signal C 23.2 C 30.6 C
2 Grand Avenue & Courtland Street Signal C 20.4 C 22.4 C
3 Grand Avenue & Juniper Street TWSC C 15.7 C 23.5 C
4 Oak Park Boulevard & Seabright Avenue TWSC C 12.0 B 13.3 B
5 Cedar Street & Courtland Street TWSC C 8.7 A 9.0 A
6 Cedar Street & Boysenberry Street TWSC C 8.9 A 9.3 A
7 Cedar Street & Spruce Street TWSC C 9.1 A 9.4 A
8 Ash Street & Courtland Street TWSC C 11.4 B 13.2 B
Notes:
1. TWSC = Two Way Stop Control
2. LOS = Delay based on worst minor street approach for TWSC intersections, average of all approaches for signal
Item 12.a. - Page 37
Page 4 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
TABLE 3
EXISTING ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS
# Roadway
Roadway Type Target
LOS
ADT
Volume V/C LOS
1 Courtland St just north of Berry Gardens Two Lane Collector C 2,631 0.22 A
2 Courtland St between Huckleberry Ave & Cedar St Two Lane Collector C 2,142 0.18 A
3 Courtland St between Ash St & Jasmine Pl Two Lane Collector C 1,759 0.15 A
4 Cedar St between Boysenberry St & Spruce St Two Lane Collector C 435 0.07 A
5 Cedar St between Boysenberry St & Courtland St Two Lane Collector C 365 0.06 A
6 Boysenberry St between Cedar St & Blackberry Ave Two Lane Collector C 84 0.01 A
7 Boysenberry St between Cedar St & Blueberry Ave Two Lane Collector C 94 0.02 A
8 Seabright Ave between Oak Park Blvd & Cranberry St Two Lane Collector C 590 0.10 A
Notes:
1. Based on Highway Capacity Manual, Fourth Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2000
2. All volume thresholds are approximate and assume ideal roadway characteristics. Actual thresholds for each LOS
listed above may vary depending on a variety of factors including (but not limited to) roadway curvature and grade
As presented in Tables 2 and 3, all of the study intersections are currently operating at or above
acceptable LOS C conditions.
Approach Speeds
The posted speed limit along Courtland Street is 25 mph, and the other streets in the
neighborhood have a prima facie speed limit of 25 mph per CVC §22352(b)(1) for residence
districts.
Sight Distance
Available intersection corner sight distance (CSD) and stopping sight distance (SSD) were
plotted in plan view and field verified for the intersection of Cedar Street and Boysenberry
Street. The resulting available CSD and SSD are shown on Figure 5 and Figure 6.
Item 12.a. - Page 38
Item 12.a. - Page 39
-
1 2 E Grand _3 Ave
~ ,,j.,)
~ ,,j.,) ti) ti)
~ 't1 ~ ~
s::: .S4 a:s r----a:s c.. ;J s:::
~ ~ ~ ~ '-:,
Pop~ar a:s 8 0
Strawberry Ave
/
,,j.,)
5Cedar St ("I)
riehi 4 6 t Seab
A ve ' ~
.Q
A ~
flJ
Raspberry Ave ~ -c:i
I
I I I
.. 8 Ash St ....
Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study
Existing Lane Geometries
4/1/2015 8:47 AM \\70.3.250.26\C0MM0N\PRJ\7985\7985EX001.DWG
-
7
~ ...,
i:::
(")
(I)
("I)
t"I-
1 ~ 3
~t ll ~ ...__ ...__ ...__ ..-
---3 STOP -------. ir -------. I ---.. ---..
'AST GRAND AVENUE EAST GRAND AVENUE 'AST GRAND AVENUE
4
St ~tl ~4-~ ~}-+ 4-dOlS
-+ij -+ STOP
iir r t
SEABRIGHT A VENUE CEDAR STREET
6 7
+ ~4-E-, + ~
~ ..-~ dOlS
t,j
~ ---3 STOP -+ij :::i
t ~ ---.. t t,j
ASH STREET
Item 12.a. - Page 40
-
1
~
~
~ a:s r----c..
~ a:s
0
riehi 4 Seab
A ve '
-
/
I
2 E Grand Ave _3
,,j.,)
,,j.,) ti) ti)
't1 ~ ~
s::: .S4 a:s
;J s:::
~ ~
~ '-:,
Pop~ar St 8
Strawberry Ave
-
,,j.,) 7 5Cedar St ("I)
6 t ~ ~ .Q
A
...,
i::: ~ (") flJ
Ave ~ (I)
Raspberry ("I) c:i t"I-
I I I
.. 8 Ash St ....
Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study
1 ,_N-:;--
~~N ~g¥ L111(163) t0N~
.J i l ._268(490) r n( 117)
124(181l_J it i 296(507-+
20( 46 7 ~ sj-U")I"")
~N-r-------.,,
N~N
n-
4
7
CEDAR STREET
LEGEND :
~ ~
l"")~U") -r---si-~ L18(51) si--r---
.J i l ._419(630)
r-27(76)
57(94l_J it i 420(755-+
14(37 • ~
<Ol"")N
~ si-n-
~ en
N~
~-<D
L15(14)
O~N ~si-~
Ql"")IX)
.J i l ._o~o~ ro2
Tl_J iti 0 0-+
0 0 7 ~ ~U")~
o~N
0
<D
'---CEDAR STREET
8
0 8 r---~U"l i'¥~ L12(21)
I I l ._118(134)
_.J + r-10(21)
26(37l _J i t i 92(160-+
28(24 7 5'w
~U")sj-
;:;:; -
ASH STREET
xx -AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
(xx) -PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
4/1/2015 8:48 AM \\70.3.250.26\C0MM0N\PRJ\7985\7985EX001.DWG
~ 000 Lo(o) 000 ~
.J i l ._440(709) ~ r-21(23) 1:/J
O(OlJ it i ~ 490(737-+ ~ 22(47 7 ~ 1s N~I"") ~a~ ~ ~ ....
I\ ~ I'\
IE-
[;j
~ ::,;
~
~ ~
§
c::,
8-:=''r0' Lo(3)
~
000 ~
.J i l ._18(13) 1:/J
ro(7) :,.,
ll:;
1(0l_J it i ~ 11(28-+ ~ 0(0 7 ~
~~ ~ _,.,.,,.,.,
:,.;;
~ I~
'-CEDAR STREET
Page 7 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
IV. Cedar Street/Boysenberry Street Intersection
A. Traffic Signal Warrants
The term “signal warrants” refers to the list of established criteria used by public agencies (in
this instance City of Arroyo Grande) to quantitatively justify or ascertain the need for installation
of a traffic signal at an otherwise unsignalized intersection location. The signal warrant criteria
are based upon several factors including volume of vehicular and pedestrian traffic, location of
school areas etc. The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and
Highways (MUTCD, 2012 Edition) indicates that the installation of a traffic signal should be
considered if one or more of the signal warrants are met.
Applicable traffic signal warrant criteria were used as a basis for evaluation of the intersection of
Cedar Street and Boysenberry Street. Specifically, applicable warrants could be evaluated
based on the collected accident data; traffic volumes; the 85th-percentile approach speeds; two-
lane approach configurations on both the major and minor streets; and the urban condition
applied for all applicable warrants.
Warrant 1: Eight Hour Vehicular Volume
Twenty-four hour traffic volumes were measured on February 26, 2015 for the intersection of
Cedar Street and Boysenberry Street. According to the MUTCD Section 4C.02, the eight-hour
vehicular volume warrant requires significant traffic volumes on the major and minor streets, for
any eight hours of an average day. See summary provided in Table 4 below. There was not one
hour where this warrant was met.
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF EIGHT HOUR WARRANT
Major Street Traffic
Volumes (veh/hr)
Minor Street Traffic
Volumes (veh/hr)
Hour of the Day Cedar Street
(EB+WB Approaches)
Boysenberry Street
(NB+SB Approaches)
8-9 AM 30 7
11 AM-12 PM 24 3
1-2 PM 26 4
2-3 PM 32 5
3-4 PM 47 9
4-5 PM 37 6
5-6 PM 48 8
6-7 PM 25 4
Warrant 2: Four Hour Vehicular Volume
Warrant 2 requires traffic volumes for the busiest four hours to plot above the applicable curve
in Figure 4C-1 of the MUTCD. This warrant requires higher volumes than the eight-hour
vehicular volume warrant, but only over the course of four hours. Based on the data provided in
Table 2, there are no hours for which the volumes meet this warrant.
Item 12.a. - Page 41
Page 8 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
Warrant 3: Peak Hour
The peak hour warrant is only applied in unusual cases where there are facilities which attract
or discharge large numbers of vehicles over a short time. Based on the data provided in Table 2
noted under Warrant 1, Warrant 3 is not currently satisfied for this intersection.
Warrant 4: Pedestrian Volume
Cedar Street and Boysenberry Street are local roads within the Berry Gardens neighborhood,
and there are no major pedestrian traffic generators in the vicinity. Pedestrian volumes for this
intersection are low, with only 12 pedestrians at the intersection during the peak hour
Based on the volume of Cedar Street traffic, to meet signal warrant for pedestrian crossings the
MUTCD requires 107 PPH (Figure 4-C5) or 75 PPH at the 70% level (Figure 4-C6) and
therefore Warrant 4 is not currently satisfied for the study intersection.
Warrant 5: School Crossing
There are no schools in the vicinity of this intersection; therefore Warrant 5 is not currently
satisfied for the study intersection.
Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System
There are no adjacent traffic control signals; therefore, Warrant 6 is not currently satisfied for the
study intersection.
Warrant 7: Crash Experience Warrant
Based on the available data, Warrant 7 is not currently satisfied for the study intersection.
Warrant 8: Roadway Network
This intersection is not between two major routes; therefore, Warrant 8 is not currently satisfied
for the study intersection.
Warrant 9: Intersection Near a Grade Crossing
There are no adjacent rail crossings; therefore, Warrant 9 is not satisfied for the study
intersection.
B. Multi-Way Stop Control Analysis - Guidance
The MUTCD covers all-way stop (a type of "multi-way" stop) application in Section 2B.07 Multi-
Way Stop Applications: "Multi-way stop control can be useful as a safety measure at
intersections if certain traffic conditions exist. Safety concerns associated with multi-way stops
include pedestrians, bicyclists, and all road users expecting other road users to stop. Multi-way
stop control is used where the volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approximately
equal." It offers the following guidance on the application of multi-way stop control:
A. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim
measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are
being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.
Item 12.a. - Page 42
Page 9 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
B. Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to
correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn
and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.
C. Minimum volumes:
1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major
street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least
300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and
2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume
entering the intersection from the minor street approaches
(total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour
for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street
vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the
highest hour, but
3. If the 85
th-percentile approach speed of the major-street
exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are
70 percent of the values provided in Item 1 and 2.
D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1 and C.2 are all
satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from
this condition.
Criterion A: Traffic Control Signals are Justified
As discussed above, a traffic signal is not warranted; therefore, Criterion A does not apply.
Criterion B: Accident History
A review of the recent available 5-year accident information indicates that there were no
reported accidents at or near the study intersection of Cedar Street and Boysenberry Street.
The minimum number of accidents required to meet this warrant is five within a 12 month
period, the installation of a multi-way stop would not be warranted at this intersection based on
accident history.
Criterion C: Traffic Volumes
The vehicle volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both
approaches) is 48 vehicles per hour for the evening peak hour. This is far less than the 300
vehicles per hour needed for any 8 hours of an average day. The speeds through this
Item 12.a. - Page 43
Page 10 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
intersection are less than 40 miles per hour; therefore Criterion C.3. cannot be used. The traffic
volume warrant is not met for this intersection.
TABLE 5
SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Hour of the
Day
Traffic Volumes
(veh/hr)
Minimum
Volume Warrant
Warrant
Met?
Traffic Volumes
(veh/hr)
Minimum
Volume Warrant
Warrant
Met?
Major Street (Cedar Street) Minor Street (Boysenberry Street)
8-9 AM 30 300 (240) No (No) 7 200 (160) No (No)
11 AM-12 PM 24 300 (240) No (No) 3 200 (160) No (No)
1-2 PM 26 300 (240) No (No) 4 200 (160) No (No)
2-3 PM 32 300 (240) No (No) 5 200 (160) No (No)
3-4 PM 47 300 (240) No (No) 9 200 (160) No (No)
4-5 PM 37 300 (240) No (No) 6 200 (160) No (No)
5-6 PM 48 300 (240) No (No) 8 200 (160) No (No)
6-7 PM 25 300 (240) No (No) 4 200 (160) No (No)
( ) – Values or results for evaluation of Criterion D
Criterion D
A multi-way stop could be warranted where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B,
C.1 and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are
not satisfied at 80% of the minimum values and therefore Criterion D isn't satisfied.
C. Multi-Way Stop Control Analysis – Optional Criteria
Section 2B.07 of the MUTCD includes four other criteria that may be considered in an
engineering study to determine if the installation of multi-way stop control is warranted at an
intersection:
A. The need to control left-turn conflicts;
B. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian
volumes;
C. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to
negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and
D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collectors (through) streets of similar design
and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational
characteristics of the intersection.
Criterion A: Control Left-Turn Conflicts
Based on a field review, left-turn conflicts do not appear to be an issue, nor were any accidents
involving a left-turning vehicle reported at the study intersections during the past 5 years.
Criterion B: Control Vehicle/ Pedestrian Conflicts
The intersection of Cedar Street and Boysenberry Street do not experience a significant amount
of pedestrian activity. No pedestrian or bicycle conflicts were reported during the 5-year period.
Based on existing conditions and data, Criterion B is not satisfied.
Item 12.a. - Page 44
Page 11 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
Criterion C: Sight Distance
The Caltrans Highway Design Manual (HDM) Table 405.1B lists which types of sight distance
are evaluated for various types of intersections. For the intersection of public streets, corner
sight distance and stopping sight distance are evaluated.
Corner Sight Distance
Corner sight distance is the distance needed to provide 7.5 seconds for the driver on the
crossroad to complete the necessary maneuver while the approaching vehicle travels at the
assumed design speed of the main road. The speed limit on Cedar Street and Boysenberry
Street is 25 miles per hour, requiring a minimum sight distance of 275 feet per the HDM. As
shown on Figure 5, corner sight distance is available of at least 275 feet.
Figure 5: Corner Sight Distance
Stopping Sight Distance
The available stopping sight distance on Cedar Street approaching the study intersection is
greater than the distance required for a speed of 25 miles per hour (see Figure 5).
Item 12.a. - Page 45
Page 12 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
Figure 6: Stopping Sight Distance
Criterion D: Intersection of Two Residential Collector Streets
Cedar Street and Boysenberry Street are both functionally classified as local streets; therefore,
Criterion D is not satisfied.
Item 12.a. - Page 46
Page 13 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
V. Neighborhood Traffic Calming
Potential traffic calming measures for Courtland Street between Strawberry Avenue and Ash
Street were also evaluated. Berry Gardens is a residential neighborhood made up of a network
of local, residential streets. Residential streets are planned and designed to provide access to
and from the residential neighborhoods. These facilities are neither designed nor intended for
the use of non-local traffic.
When congested conditions occur on collector and arterial roadways, these local streets may
provide an attractive alternative route, or “cut-through”; the geometrics of the neighborhood
street system can lead to increased speeds as well. These potential problems, individually or
collectively would result in a reduction in neighborhood safety for homeowners, pedestrians, and
bicyclists.
Although the current volumes and speeds of traffic don't appear to warrant installation of traffic
calming measures at this time, it is the intent of this study to identify various traffic calming
options, which may be implemented in the Berry Gardens neighborhood should conditions
change or it be desired by the neighborhood and City.
The objectives of installing traffic calming measures on residential streets are to:
Reduce vehicular speed where appropriate
Reduce cut-through traffic
Promote conditions that encourage bicycle and pedestrian travel
Enhance the neighborhood environment
Traffic Calming Options
The tools available for use in resolving traffic problems in a residential neighborhood are many
and diverse in both their cost and effectiveness. This study has identified three levels of traffic
calming measures:
Basic Measures
Intermediate Measures
Extreme Measures
Traffic calming measures may include devices that do not directly affect driver behavior and are
not self enforcing. These measures are generally included within the “Basic Measures”
category; if they fail, more restrictive measures may be warranted.
The “more restrictive” traffic calming measures, those found in the “intermediate” and “extreme”
categories, mandate driver behavior change and, as a result, may be effective where “basic
measures” have failed. These measures generally require either/both:
Obstacles to be mounted - Vertical Deflection
Roadway narrowing/closures/obstacles to be circumvented - Horizontal Shift
Basic Measures
Basic traffic calming measures are traffic control devices and programs implemented on a day-
to-day basis to regulate, warn, guide, inform, and educate pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists.
Item 12.a. - Page 47
Page 14 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
They include standard striping and signing measures as found in the State of California Traffic
Manual, minor roadway design measures to improve visibility and safety, enforcement by police
and photo-radar, and safety education programs. Basic Measures are used primarily in those
areas where traffic impacts have been found not to be excessive or serious, but where traffic
control and/or education has been determined to be appropriate. Some Basic Measures which
could be considered for the Berry Gardens neighborhood are described in the following
sections.
Safety Education Programs
Safety education programs are an important component of a comprehensive traffic calming
program. Safety education programs include efforts to make the public more aware of their own
driving behavior and the impact it has on others. Pedestrian and bicycle safety programs alert
and educate pedestrians and bicyclists on road safety. Driver safety information and education
on existing laws can help improve driver behavior.
Police Enforcement
Police enforcement entails the presence of police to
monitor speeds and issue citations. This method is used as
an initial attempt to reduce speeds on streets. It is most
applicable on streets with documented speeding problems
and the need for quick mitigation. It can also be used
during the learning period when new devices or restrictions
are first implemented.
Radar Trailer
This is a mobile trailer-mounted radar display that informs
drivers of their speed. This measure is applicable on any
street where speeding is a problem.
Radar trailers are good educational tools, and they are
good public relations for neighborhoods and effective in
temporarily reducing speeds. However, they are not self-
enforcing, the duration of effectiveness is limited, and they
may require temporary lane closures.
High-Visibility Crosswalks
A high-visibility crosswalk is a crosswalk that incorporates
striped patterns, pavement lights, improved signing or
advance flashing beacons to improve the visibility of the
crosswalk. This measure is most applicable on local
streets where speed control and pedestrian crossing
designation is desired. It can also be used to discourage
cut-through traffic. This type of crosswalk is most
appropriate near locations experiencing high pedestrian
traffic, such as near schools, parks, and recreation
facilities.
Item 12.a. - Page 48
Page 15 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
These crosswalks slow traffic, increases driver awareness of crosswalk, and require minimal
maintenance for striped crosswalks. In some situations, these crosswalks may require removal
of parking in the vicinity and may result in significant maintenance for embedded pavement
lights or advance flashing lights.
Pavement Striping
Striping is used to create narrow lanes, which give the impression of a narrow street. This
makes the motorist feel restricted, which helps reduce speeds. Striping can be at curb end or in
the middle of the street to create a median. It is most applicable to long, wide residential streets
where speeding traffic exists.
This measure is easy to install and modify as necessary and has a low cost of implementation.
One drawback is that it may not be self-enforcing.
High-Visibility Signs
High-visibility signs may include larger speed limit signs on
the streets to ensure visibility to motorists. This measure is a
basic method aimed at slowing traffic through visual
reminders of the speed limits or other regulations. It can be
applied to most streets that have speeding or other problems,
and it provides context for enforcement efforts. However,
signs are typically not self-enforcing, and larger signs provide
a negative impact on the aesthetics of the street.
Truck Restrictions
Restricting the entry of trucks into residential neighborhoods can be
achieved through the posting of truck restriction signs. This method is
most applicable on residential streets to reduce cut-through traffic of
commercial vehicles.
Intermediate Measures
Intermediate measures are traffic control devices and roadway design features primarily
designed to slow traffic. They are employed when the use of basic measures cannot, or has not,
effectively addressed speeding issues and it has been found that speeds and/or accidents
exceed the thresholds identified later in this document. Intermediate measures are often used in
conjunction with basic measures, and may have a limited effect on traffic volume as well.
Speed Humps
Speed humps are areas of pavement raised 3-4 inches in
height over a minimum of 12 feet in length. The combination of
different heights, lengths and approach ramps will affect the
speed a vehicle can comfortably go over the hump. Speed
humps are marked with signs and pavement markings.
Item 12.a. - Page 49
Page 16 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
Speed humps slow traffic, are self-enforcing, and
require minimum maintenance. However, they may
increase emergency response times, damage
emergency response vehicles if not carefully designed,
or increase traffic noise in the vicinity of the bump.
Minor Bulbouts
Minor bulbouts narrow the street width at intersections
creating smaller corner radii, shorter and safer pedestrian
crossing, and encouraging drivers to slow down. Bulbouts
may be striped or may be curbed islands containing
special paving or landscaping. Corner bulbouts are
typically used adjacent to intersections where parking is
restricted.
Some positive aspects of minor bulbouts are that
pedestrian crossing distance is reduced, narrowed
roadway section may contribute to reduction of speeds,
and they break up driver’s view path. Unfortunately,
they may create a hazard for bicyclists who are less
visible to turning vehicles and cross traffic, require
partial or total removal of parking, could result in
increased maintenance costs, and care must be
exercised to keep motorists from hitting bulbouts.
Gateway Treatments
A gateway is a special entrance that reduces the width of a travel way, often through the use of
islands. It is usually placed in a roadway to define the entry to a residential area and/or to
narrow each direction of travel and interrupt the view path
along the center of the roadway.
Gateway treatments provide high visibility to motorists to
notify change in roadway nature, may discourage cut-
through traffic, and help slow traffic. On the other hand, they
will increase need for maintenance and may necessitate
removal of parking.
Raised Crosswalk
Raised crosswalks are flat-topped speed humps, 22 feet in
length, built as a pedestrian crosswalk, with vehicle ramps on
the approaches.
This type of crosswalk is applicable to local streets where
speed control and pedestrian crossing designation are
desired. It can be an effective safety tool most appropriate
near locations experiencing high pedestrian traffic, such as
Item 12.a. - Page 50
I I I I
~--__,.,i~:-'l,p,,· ...,....,....._____,....,.....,..
Page 17 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
near schools, parks, and recreation facilities and can also be used to discourage cut-through
traffic. Raised crosswalks are well-marked and may contain special paving or textures.
Raised crosswalks slow traffic, increases pedestrian visibility in the crosswalks, and require
minimal maintenance. Some of the downsides are that they may increase emergency response
times, damage emergency response vehicles if not carefully designed, increase traffic noise in
vicinity of crosswalk, create drainage issues where raised crossing extends from curb to curb, or
require extensive warning signs to be effective
Mid-Block Chokers
Chokers are raised islands in the parking zone that can be
detached from the curb line to allow for drainage. Mid-
Block chokers narrow the roadway and are most
applicable on wide streets with speeding and cut-through
problems.
Mid-block chokers reduce speed, break up driver’s sight-
line, reduce pedestrian crossing distance, and increases
pedestrian and motorist visibility. However, they may
require partial or total removal of on-street parking and they increase maintenance for areas
where street sweeping equipment cannot reach between the choker and the curb line.
Medians
Medians are raised islands in the center of the roadway that separate
traffic directions. Medians are used on wide streets to narrow the
travel lanes, interrupt sight distances down the center of the roadway,
and ease pedestrian crossings. They also offer an opportunity for
landscaping and visual
enhancements to the
neighborhood. Medians may
require removal of parking and
there is a high cost to construct
and maintain them.
Major Bulbouts
Major bulbouts narrow the street width, and create
smaller corner radii, creating a shorter and safer
pedestrian crossing and encouraging drivers to slow
down. Construction of major bulbouts requires altering
the curb, gutter and sidewalk. Major bulbouts may
contain special paving or landscaping and are generally
used at intersections where parking is restricted.
Unfortunately, they may create a hazard for bicyclists
who are less visible to turning vehicles and cross traffic,
require partial or total removal of parking, could result in
increased maintenance costs, and care must be
exercised to keep motorists from hitting bulbouts.
Item 12.a. - Page 51
';L:J I t: _________ .,
L) ~ ... ,:
\,~----(. ::. .,, __ '}
Page 18 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
Chicanes
A curved street alignment that can be designed into new
developments or retrofitted in existing right-of-ways is
called a chicane. The curvilinear alignment requires
additional maneuvering and shortens drivers’ sight-
lines, resulting in lower average speeds. This device
can be applied to any street where speed control is
desired, provided the street is wide enough to
accommodate the curvilinear design.
Extreme Measures
Extreme measures are traffic control devices and roadway design features primarily designed to
discourage residential street cut-through traffic. They are used when it has been found that
traffic volumes exceed established thresholds. Volume reduction devices can be used by
themselves or in conjunction with basic and/or intermediate measures. Some Extreme
Measures which could be considered for the Berry Gardens neighborhood are described in the
following sections.
Partial Closure
A partial closure is a physical barrier that restricts
vehicles from turning into a street, while still allowing
for bicycle access. The opposite lane is left open to
allow vehicle exits. Two-way traffic is maintained for
the rest of the block. Partial closures are applicable to
local streets where cut-through traffic is a concern. It
can also be a favorable traffic volume control measure.
The benefits of partial closure are that they restrict movement into
a street while maintaining full access and movement within the
street block for residents, reduce cut-through traffic, reduce
pedestrian crossing distance through a closure island, and create
space for street landscaping. Drawbacks are that they may require
partial or total removal of on-street parking, may redirect traffic to
other local streets, may increase trip length for local drivers, and is
in effect at all times, even if cut-through problem exists only at
certain times of day.
Full Street Closure
A complete closure of the street blocks both lanes of travel, so that
the street becomes a cul-de-sac. This device eliminates all through
traffic and limits street access to local residents. This device is
applicable to local streets with major cut-through concerns where an
emergency vehicle response route does not exist. The closure
location may be designed as a pocket park with through bicycle and
pedestrian access.
Positive aspects include restriction of all through traffic, effective
volume and speed control, and provides opportunity to improve the
aesthetic quality of the street. Negative aspects include re-direction
Item 12.a. - Page 52
Page 19 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
of traffic to other local streets, increased trip length for local drivers, partial removal of on-street
parking and may result in difficult turnaround conditions. Full closures are not applicable for
designated emergency vehicle response routes.
Effectiveness of Traffic Calming Measures
The following tables provide general assessments of the effectiveness of some traffic calming
measures under certain street conditions.
TABLE 6
EFFECTIVENESS OF BASIC MEASURES
Basic Measures: Reduces
Speed
Reduces
Traffic Noise Loss of
Parking
Restricts
Access
Emergency
Impacts Maint. Cost
Safety Education
Program Maybe Maybe No
Change No No No No Low
Police
Enforcement Yes Maybe No
Change No No No No Low
Radar Application Maybe No No
Change No No No No Low
High-Visibility
Crosswalks Maybe No No
Change No No No Yes Medium/
High
Pavement Striping Maybe No No
Change Maybe No No Yes Low
High-Visibility
Signs Maybe Maybe Increase No No Yes Occasional Low
Truck Restrictions No Yes Decrease No No No Occasional Low
*Speed humps and crosswalks must be reinstalled each time a street is resurfaced.
Cost = "Low" is less than $1,000, "Medium" is $1,000 to $10,000, "High" is greater than $10,000
Item 12.a. - Page 53
Page 20 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
TABLE 7
EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERMEDIATE MEASURES
Basic Measures: Reduces
Speed
Reduces
Traffic Noise Loss of
Parking
Restricts
Access
Emergency
Impacts Maint. Cost
Speed Humps Yes Maybe Increase No No Yes Yes Medium
Minor Bulbout Yes Maybe No
Change Maybe No No Yes Medium
Gateway
Treatments Maybe Minimal No
Change No No No Yes
Medium/
High
Raised Crosswalk Yes Maybe Increase Yes No Yes Yes Medium/
High
Mid-Block Chokers Yes Maybe No
Change Yes No Some Yes Medium
Median Yes Maybe Decrease Yes Yes Yes Yes Medium/
High
Major Bulbout Yes No No
Change Yes No Some Yes
Medium/
High
Chicanes Yes Maybe No
Change Yes Maybe Some Yes Medium/
High
*Speed humps and crosswalks must be reinstalled each time a street is resurfaced.
Cost = "Low" is less than $1,000, "Medium" is $1,000 to $10,000, "High" is greater than $10,000
TABLE 8
EFFECTIVENESS OF EXTREME MEASURES
Basic Measures: Reduces
Speed
Reduces
Traffic Noise Loss of
Parking
Restricts
Access
Emergency
Impacts Maint. Cost
Partial Closure Maybe Yes No
Change Maybe Yes Maybe Yes High
Full Street Closure Maybe Yes No
Change Maybe Yes Yes Yes High
Cost = "Low" is less than $1,000, "Medium" is $1,000 to $10,000, "High" is greater than $10,000
Impacts
Prior to installing traffic calming measures, it is important to carefully consider potential impacts.
While many of the measures offer positive results, there are potential problems, which may be
more significant than the original concern. This section attempts to describe some of the
possible impacts of the use of the aforementioned traffic calming tools.
Effect on Emergency Vehicles Response Times
Speed, and to a lesser extent, volume traffic calming measures have potential for negatively
impacting emergency vehicle response because they physically affect speed and maneuvering.
Many physical traffic calming techniques can significantly worsen emergency response time.
The City’s Fire and Police Departments are concerned about the effect these devices have on
response time. These concerns will need to be addressed for each location where traffic
calming techniques are considered.
Item 12.a. - Page 54
Page 21 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
Traffic Diversion
Another concern is the potential for traffic calming techniques to move, rather than solve, a
problem. Proposals for traffic volume reductions will include an adequate traffic engineering
study to evaluate traffic diversion impacts.
Impacts on Transit and Utility Vehicles
Some traffic calming options could potentially impact bus routes and utility vehicles. Service
providers should be consulted.
Considerations for Other Roadway Users
In addition to safety concerns, traffic calming measures can often have unintended negative
impacts on bicyclists, roller skaters, skate boarders, joggers, pedestrians and parked vehicles.
These impacts will also need to be considered.
Noise Impacts
The noise impact to adjacent residents resulting from vehicles braking, going over and around
traffic calming devices can have an impact on the acceptability of these devices by residents
affected by them. The support of residents living immediately adjacent to locations where
physical changes are proposed will be important to the success of any project.
Loss of Parking
It may be necessary to restrict or prohibit on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of certain
traffic calming features.
Liability Exposure Implications
Traffic calming devices may result in varying degrees of liability exposure to the City.
This exposure stems from the potential negative impact to emergency vehicle response times.
Delay of emergency response could result in a civil action by an injured party from allegations
that the emergency vehicle response was delayed by traffic calming devices. It is also possible
that traffic calming devices themselves might allegedly result in damage or injury.
Visual Impacts and Aesthetic Concerns
While some traffic calming devices can have favorable aesthetic impacts, others can be
unsightly. Virtually all traffic calming techniques require reflective devices, signs and striping
which may negatively affect the aesthetics of a neighborhood.
Increased Maintenance Costs
Street maintenance costs will increase in two areas. First, landscaping associated with such
devices as bulbouts, chokers and chicanes, etc., will require regular maintenance. Second,
devices such as speed humps will have to be reinstalled each time a residential street is
overlaid which will increase these costs.
Item 12.a. - Page 55
Page 22 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
VI. Courtland Street Partial or Full Closure
Three alternative traffic conditions were analyzed in this report regarding potential limited
access on Courtland Street just north of Strawberry Avenue. Each of these alternatives is
discussed below along with traffic redistribution assumptions associated with each alternative.
Analysis only represents existing traffic conditions. Analysis for projected traffic volumes for
future years or due to planned developments was outside of the scope of this report.
Figure 7: Potential Barricade Locations for Limiting Access on Courtland Street
Alternative #1 - Partial Closure (Southbound Lane)
Alternative #1 assumes that Courtland Street is converted to a one-way northbound only facility
by placing advanced signage and a barricade in the southbound lanes at the location shown in
Figure 7. The redistribution of traffic under this alternative is summarized as follows and shown
on Figure 8:
Southbound traffic from East Grand Avenue, west of Courtland Street (EBR), was
redistributed to South Oak Park Boulevard (EBR).
Southbound traffic from East Grand Avenue, east of Courtland Street (WBL), was
redistributed to South Oak Park Boulevard (WBL).
Southbound traffic from Courtland Street, north of East Grand Avenue (SBT), was
redistributed to South Oak Park Boulevard (SBT).
29 AM (70%) and 140 PM (90%) volumes were redistributed, the rest is going to the
Shopping Center north of the closure.
Item 12.a. - Page 56
Page 23 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
Most of this traffic is assumed to be cut-thru traffic in the AM and PM peak hour,
redistributed to Ash Street, South Oak Park Boulevard, and Cedar Street, the
Southbound cut-thru traffic is redistributed to South Oak Park Boulevard or Ash Street
For roadway volumes 80% of the volumes were rerouted, the rest is generated by the houses,
and the same distribution was used.
Alternative #1 was analyzed within Synchro, a computer software traffic simulation program to
determine peak hour operation, delay and Level of Service (LOS). The results are shown in
Tables 9 and 10.
TABLE 9
ALTERNATIVE #1 INTERSECTION LOS
# Intersection
Control
Type
Target
LOS
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Delay LOS Delay LOS
1 Grand Avenue & Oak Park Boulevard Signal C 23.7 C 33.1 C
2 Grand Avenue & Courtland Street Signal C 20.0 B 20.9 C
3 Grand Avenue & Juniper Street TWSC C 15.7 C 23.5 C
4 Oak Park Boulevard & Seabright Avenue TWSC C 12.1 B 15.0 B
5 Cedar Street & Courtland Street TWSC C 8.7 A 8.9 A
6 Cedar Street & Boysenberry Street TWSC C 8.8 A 9.2 A
7 Cedar Street & Spruce Street TWSC C 9.1 A 9.4 A
8 Ash Street & Courtland Street TWSC C 11.3 B 13.1 B
Notes:
1. TWSC = Two Way Stop Control
2. LOS = Delay based on worst minor street approach for TWSC intersections, average of all approaches for signal
TABLE 10
ALTERNATIVE #1 ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS
# Roadway
Roadway Type Target
LOS
ADT
Volume V/C LOS
1 Courtland St just north of Berry Gardens Two Lane Collector C 1,218 0.10 A
2 Courtland St between Huckleberry Ave & Cedar St Two Lane Collector C 1,207 0.10 A
3 Courtland St between Ash St & Jasmine Pl Two Lane Collector C 907 0.08 A
4 Cedar St between Boysenberry St & Spruce St Two Lane Collector C 282 0.05 A
5 Cedar St between Boysenberry St & Courtland St Two Lane Collector C 357 0.06 A
6 Boysenberry St between Cedar St & Blackberry Ave Two Lane Collector C 84 0.01 A
7 Boysenberry St between Cedar St & Blueberry Ave Two Lane Collector C 115 0.02 A
8 Seabright Ave between Oak Park Blvd & Cranberry St Two Lane Collector C 684 0.11 A
Notes:
1. Based on Highway Capacity Manual, Fourth Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2000
2. All volume thresholds are approximate and assume ideal roadway characteristics. Actual thresholds for each LOS
listed above may vary depending on a variety of factors including (but not limited to) roadway curvature and grade
Item 12.a. - Page 57
Item 12.a. - Page 58
-
1
~
~
~ a:s r----c..
~ a:s
0
riehi 4 Seab
A ve '
-
/
I
2 E Grand Ave _3
,,j.,)
,,j.,) ti) ti)
't1 ~ ~
s::: .S4 a:s
;J s:::
~ ~
~ '-:,
Pop~ar St 8
Strawberry Ave
-
,,j.,) 7 5Cedar St ("I)
6 t ~ ~ .Q
A
...,
i::: ~ (") flJ
Ave ~ (I)
Raspberry ("I) c:i t"I-
I I I
.. 8 Ash St ....
Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study
1 ,.._-;;;-,:;--
~c;:N
~~ L111(163) t0N~
.J i l ._268(490) r 86( 175)
124(181l_J it i 289(478 -+
27(75 7 ~
sj-l()t')
~N-r-------.,,
N~N .,.,-
4
7
~N
sj-t')~
LT}
~ -~N ~oo~ ~ <D-0
.J i l ._3 4 ~ r21 t,j
5f8l_J it i ~ 0 5-+ :::i 6(10 7 ~ ~ ~N~
o~-_.,., t,j
CEDAR STREET
LEGEND :
n 'in' -~si--LO-
L18(51) ';;f',:::.:;:::"
si-r---r---
.J i l ._433(689)
r-13(17)
57(94l_J it i 420(755-+
7(8 7 ~
<Ot'lN
~
srt'l-
~
~ N~
O.:::..~ L15(14) ~a~
0-t'l
.J i l ._ofo~ ro2
Tl_J iti 0 0-+
0 0 7 ~
~I()~
o~N
0 <D
'---CEDAR STREET
8
!:::.:;::-~
~?;;'~ L12(21)
I I l ._118(134)
_.J + r-10(21)
26(37l _J i t i 92(215-+
28(32 7 5'w
~l()sj-
;:;:; -
ASH STREET
xx -AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
(xx) -PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Alternative =11=1 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
4/1/2015 8:49 AM \\70.3.250.26\C0MM0N\PRJ\7985\7985EX001.DWG
~ 000 Lo(o) 000 ~
.J i l ._440(709) ~ r-21(23) t,j
O(OlJ it i ~ 490(737-+ ~ 22(47 7 ~ 1s N~t'l ~a~ ~ ~ ....
I\ ~ I'\
IE-
[;j
~ ::,;
~
~ ~
§
c::,
8-:=''r0' Lo(3)
~
000 ~
.J i l ._18(13) t,j
ro(7) :,.,
ll:;
1(0l_J it i ~ 6(14-+ ~ 0(0 7 ~
~~ ~ _.,.,.,.,
:,.;;
~ I~
'-CEDAR STREET
Page 25 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
As summarized above, all of the study intersections and roadway segments would continue to
operate at or above acceptable LOS C conditions under the Alternative #1 conditions. There
were no significant changes to the operating characteristics for the study intersections or study
roadway segments.
Effect on Emergency Vehicles Response Times
The response time to the neighborhood may remain the same under the Alternative #1
conditions, assuming that emergency responders will travel around the southbound closure to
access the neighborhood. Should evacuation of the neighborhood be necessary, evacuees may
interfere with emergency responders attempting to enter the neighborhood.
Alternative #2 - Partial Closure (Northbound Lane)
Alternative #2 assumes that Courtland Street is converted to a one-way southbound only facility
by placing advanced signage and a barricade in the northbound lanes at the location shown in
Figure 7. The redistribution of traffic under this alternative is summarized as follows and shown
on Figure 9:
Northbound traffic from Courtland Street, south of East Grand Avenue (NBT), was
redistributed to Seabright Avenue, then to South Oak Park Boulevard.
Eastbound traffic from Courtland Street, south of East Grand Avenue (NBR), was
redistributed to Juniper Street via Spruce Street.
Westbound traffic from Courtland Street, south of East Grand Avenue (NBL), was
redistributed to Seabright Avenue, then to South Oak Park Boulevard.
68 AM (90%) and 50 PM (70%) volumes were redistributed, the rest is going to the
Shopping Center north of closure.
Most of this traffic is assumed to be cut-thru traffic in the AM and PM peak hour,
redistributed to Ash Street, South Oak Park Boulevard, and Cedar Street, the
Northbound cut-thru traffic is redistributed to South Oak Park Boulevard via Ash Street
and few via Seabright Avenue.
For roadway volumes 80% of the volumes were rerouted, the rest is generated by the houses,
and the same distribution was used.
Alternative #2 was analyzed within Synchro, a computer software traffic simulation program to
determine peak hour operation, delay and Level of Service (LOS). The results are shown in
Tables 11 and 12.
Item 12.a. - Page 59
Item 12.a. - Page 60
-
1
~
~
~ a:s r----c..
~ a:s
0
riehi 4 Seab
A ve '
-
/
I
2 E Grand Ave _3
,,j.,)
,,j.,) ti) ti)
't1 ~ ~
s::: .S4 a:s
;J s:::
~ ~
~ '-:,
Pop~ar St 8
Strawberry Ave
-
,,j.,) 7 5Cedar St ("I)
6 t ~ ~ .Q
A
...,
i::: ~ (") flJ
Ave ~ (I)
Raspberry ("I) c:i t"I-
I I I
.. 8 Ash St ....
Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study
1 ,_N-:;--~ ~ ~~N l"")~U")
-r---si-~g¥ L101(155) ~ L18(51) t0N~ si--r---
.J i l ._244(472) .J i l ._419(630) r 72( 117) r-27(76)
124(181l_J it i 57(94l_J it i 296(507-+ 420(755-+
20( 46 7 ~ 14(37 • ~
<Dt--1"") nN-
~N-~~ LO~
n-
4 ~ en N~
~-<D
L5tl
O~N ~si-~
Ql"")IX)
.J i l ._a o
ro2
Tl_J iti 0 0-+
0 0 7 ~ ~N~
o~N ,-..
'---CEDAR STREET
7 8
~N 0 8
sj-1"")~ ~ r---~U"l
-~N
L5t}
~"'~ L1(12(1 ~ro~ ~ si-~N
<D-0 Nsl-N
.J i l ._a o .J i l ._129 143)
r21 ~ r-10(21)
t,j
10(8l_J it i ~ 7(24l_J it i 0~10-+ :::i 92(160-+
614 7 ~ ~ 28(24 7 §Ee ~,.,.,~
n~-~-si-
0 t,j U") -N ,.,.,
CEDAR STREET ASH STREET
LEGEND :
xx -AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
(xx) -PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Alternative =11=2 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
4/1/2015 8:50 AM \\70.3.250.26\C0MM0N\PR J\7985\7985EX001.DWG
~ 000 Lo(o) 000 ~
.J i l ._440(709) ~ r-21(23) t,j
O(OlJ it i ~ 480(727-+ ~ 22(47 7 ~ 1s N~sl" ~a~ 0, ,.,., .... -N
I\ ~ I'\
IE-
[;j
~ ::,;
~
~ ~
§
c::,
8-:=''r0'
Lan
~
000 ~
.J i l ._8 3 t,j
ro7 :,.,
ll:;
1(0l_J i t i ~ 11(28-+ ~ 0(0 7 ~
~~ ~ _,.,.,,.,.,
:,.;;
~ I~
'-CEDAR STREET
Page 27 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
TABLE 11
ALTERNATIVE #2 INTERSECTION LOS
# Intersection
Control
Type
Target
LOS
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Delay LOS Delay LOS
1 Grand Avenue & Oak Park Boulevard Signal C 23.5 C 30.6 C
2 Grand Avenue & Courtland Street Signal C 21.1 C 22.5 C
3 Grand Avenue & Juniper Street TWSC C 14.5 B 22.1 C
4 Oak Park Boulevard & Seabright Avenue TWSC C 12.3 B 13.4 B
5 Cedar Street & Courtland Street TWSC C 8.4 A 9.1 A
6 Cedar Street & Boysenberry Street TWSC C 8.8 A 9.2 A
7 Cedar Street & Spruce Street TWSC C 8.9 A 9.2 A
8 Ash Street & Courtland Street TWSC C 11.0 B 12.9 B
Notes:
1. TWSC = Two Way Stop Control
2. LOS = Delay based on worst minor street approach for TWSC intersections, average of all approaches for signal
TABLE 12
ALTERNATIVE #2 ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS
# Roadway
Roadway Type Target
LOS
ADT
Volume V/C LOS
1 Courtland St just north of Berry Gardens Two Lane Collector C 1,413 0.12 A
2 Courtland St between Huckleberry Ave & Cedar St Two Lane Collector C 1,364 0.11 A
3 Courtland St between Ash St & Jasmine Pl Two Lane Collector C 1,370 0.11 A
4 Cedar St between Boysenberry St & Spruce St Two Lane Collector C 248 0.04 A
5 Cedar St between Boysenberry St & Courtland St Two Lane Collector C 318 0.05 A
6 Boysenberry St between Cedar St & Blackberry Ave Two Lane Collector C 84 0.01 A
7 Boysenberry St between Cedar St & Blueberry Ave Two Lane Collector C 94 0.02 A
8 Seabright Ave between Oak Park Blvd & Cranberry St Two Lane Collector C 862 0.14 A
Notes:
1. Based on Highway Capacity Manual, Fourth Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2000
2. All volume thresholds are approximate and assume ideal roadway characteristics. Actual thresholds for each LOS
listed above may vary depending on a variety of factors including (but not limited to) roadway curvature and grade
As summarized above, all of the study intersections and roadway segments would continue to
operate at or above acceptable LOS conditions under the Alternative #2 conditions. The LOS for
the intersection of Grand Avenue and Juniper Street improved from C to B. There were no other
significant changes to the operating characteristics for the study intersections or study roadway
segments.
Effect on Emergency Vehicles Response Times
The response time to the neighborhood will remain the same under the Alternative #2
conditions. It could be assumed that an ambulance or other emergency responder needing to
Item 12.a. - Page 61
Page 28 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
exit the neighborhood will travel around the northbound closure. Should evacuation of the
neighborhood be necessary, exit routes would be limited to the three remaining points of
connection. Evacuees travelling around the northbound closure may interfere with emergency
responders attempting to enter the neighborhood.
Alternative #3 - Full Street Closure
Alternative #3 assumes that Courtland Street is closed to traffic by placing advanced signage
and a barricade across both lanes at the location shown in Figure 7. The redistribution of traffic
under this alternative is summarized as follows and shown on Figure 10:
(EBR) Southbound traffic from East Grand Avenue, west of Courtland Street, was
redistributed to South Oak Park Boulevard (EBR).
(WBL) Southbound traffic from East Grand Avenue, east of Courtland Street, was
redistributed to South Oak Park Boulevard (WBL).
(SBT) Southbound traffic from Courtland Street, north of East Grand Avenue, was
redistributed to South Oak Park Boulevard (SBT).
(NBT) Northbound traffic from Courtland Street, south of East Grand Avenue, was
redistributed to Seabright Avenue, then to South Oak Park Boulevard.
(NBR) Eastbound traffic from Courtland Street, south of East Grand Avenue, was
redistributed to Cedar Street and Juniper Street.
(NBL) Westbound traffic from Courtland Street, south of East Grand Avenue, was
redistributed to Seabright Avenue, then to South Oak Park Boulevard.
Most of this traffic is assumed to be cut-thru traffic in the AM and PM peak hour,
redistributed to Ash Street, South Oak Park Boulevard, and Cedar Street, the
Southbound cut-thru traffic is redistributed to South Oak Park Boulevard or Ash Street,
the Northbound cut-thru traffic is redistributed to South Oak Park Boulevard via Ash
Street and few via Seabright Avenue.
For roadway volumes 80% of the volumes were rerouted, the rest is generated by the houses,
and the same distribution was used.
Alternative #3 was analyzed within Synchro, a computer software traffic simulation program to
determine peak hour operation, delay and Level of Service (LOS). The results are shown in
Tables 13 and 14.
Item 12.a. - Page 62
Item 12.a. - Page 63
-
1
~
~
~ a:s r----c..
~ a:s
0
riehi 4 Seab
A ve '
-
/
I
2 E Grand Ave _3
,,j.,)
,,j.,) ti) ti)
't1 ~ ~
s::: .S4 a:s
;J s:::
~ ~
~ '-:,
Pop~ar St 8
Strawberry Ave
-
,,j.,) 7 5Cedar St ("I)
6 t ~ ~ .Q
A
...,
i::: ~ (") flJ
Ave ~ (I)
Raspberry ("I) c:i t"I-
I I I
.. 8 Ash St ....
Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study
1 ,.._-;;;-,:;--
~c;:N n 'in' -~si-~~ L101(155)
-LO-
L18(51) ';;f',:::.:;:::"
t0N~ si-r---r---
.J i l ._244(472) .J i l ._433(689) r 86( 176) r-13(17)
124(181l_J it i 57(94l_J it i 289(478 -+ 420(755-+
27(75 7 ~ 7(8 7 ~
<Dr---.,., t'lN-
~N-~~ LO~ .,.,-
4 ~
~ N~
O.:::..~
L5tl
~a~
0-t'l
.J i l ._a o
ro2
Tl_J iti 0 0-+
0 0 7 ~
~-~ o~N r---
'---CEDAR STREET
7 8
~N
sj-t')~
L6t}
~ !:::.:;::-~
L1(12(1
-~N ~oo~ ~ N~N
<D-0 -N-
.J i l ._a o .J i l ._129 143)
r21 ~ r-10(21)
t,j
5f8l_J it i ~ 7(24l_J it i 0 5-+ :::i 92(215-+
6(10 7 ~ ~ 28(32 7 §Ee ~.,.,~ "'~-~-si-
0 t,j I() -N .,.,
CEDAR STREET ASH STREET
LEGEND :
xx -AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
(xx) -PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Alternative =11=3 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
4/1/2015 8:50 AM \\70.3.250.26\C0MM0N\PR J\7985\7985EX001.DWG
~ 000 Lo(o) 000 ~
.J i l ._440(709) ~ r-21(23) t,j
O(OlJ it i ~ 480(727-+ ~ 22(47 7 ~ 1s N~sl" ~a~ 0, .,., .... -N
I\ ~ I'\
IE-
[;j
~ ::,;
~
~ ~
§
c::,
8-:=''r0'
Lan
~
000 ~
.J i l ._8 3 t,j
ro7 :,.,
ll:;
1(0l_J i t i ~ 6(14-+ ~ 0(0 7 ~
~~ ~ _.,.,.,.,
:,.;;
~ I~
'-CEDAR STREET
Fi ure 10
Page 30 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
TABLE 13
ALTERNATIVE #3 INTERSECTION LOS
# Intersection
Control
Type
Target
LOS
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Delay LOS Delay LOS
1 Grand Avenue & Oak Park Boulevard Signal C 23.9 C 33.3 C
2 Grand Avenue & Courtland Street Signal C 20.7 C 21.0 C
3 Grand Avenue & Juniper Street TWSC C 14.5 B 22.1 C
4 Oak Park Boulevard & Seabright Avenue TWSC C 12.5 B 15.2 C
5 Cedar Street & Courtland Street TWSC C 8.4 A 8.7 A
6 Cedar Street & Boysenberry Street TWSC C 8.8 A 9.1 A
7 Cedar Street & Spruce Street TWSC C 8.8 A 9.1 A
8 Ash Street & Courtland Street TWSC C 10.9 B 12.7 B
Notes:
1. TWSC = Two Way Stop Control
2. LOS = Delay based on worst minor street approach for TWSC intersections, average of all approaches for signals
TABLE 14
ALTERNATIVE #3 ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS
# Roadway
Roadway Type Target
LOS
ADT
Volume V/C LOS
1 Courtland St just north of Berry Gardens Two Lane Collector C 0 0.00 A
2 Courtland St between Huckleberry Ave & Cedar St Two Lane Collector C 429 0.04 A
3 Courtland St between Ash St & Jasmine Pl Two Lane Collector C 518 0.04 A
4 Cedar St between Boysenberry St & Spruce St Two Lane Collector C 165 0.03 A
5 Cedar St between Boysenberry St & Courtland St Two Lane Collector C 240 0.04 A
6 Boysenberry St between Cedar St & Blackberry Ave Two Lane Collector C 84 0.01 A
7 Boysenberry St between Cedar St & Blueberry Ave Two Lane Collector C 104 0.02 A
8 Seabright Ave between Oak Park Blvd & Cranberry St Two Lane Collector C 956 0.16 A
Notes:
1. Based on Highway Capacity Manual, Fourth Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2000
2. All volume thresholds are approximate and assume ideal roadway characteristics. Actual thresholds for each LOS
listed above may vary depending on a variety of factors including (but not limited to) roadway curvature and grade
As summarized above, all of the study intersections and roadway segments would continue to
operate at or above acceptable LOS conditions under the Alternative #3 conditions. The LOS for
the intersection of Grand Avenue and Juniper Street improved from C to B. The intersection of
Oak Park Boulevard and Seabright Avenue will worsen to LOS C in the PM peak hour.
However, this is still an acceptable LOS. There were no other significant changes to the
operating characteristics for the study intersections or study roadway segments.
Effect on Emergency Vehicles Response Times
The response time for emergency services will be increased under the Alternative #3 conditions.
With a full street closure, police and fire emergency responders will have to take longer paths to
reach certain parts of the neighborhood.
Item 12.a. - Page 64
Page 31 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
Fire
There are three Five Cities Fire Authority stations within a mile and a half radius of Berry
Gardens: Station 1 located near the Village of Arroyo Grande, Station 2 at the corner of 7th
Street and Rockaway Avenue in Grover Beach, and Station 3 on Highway 1 and 13th Street in
Oceano. Responders from Station 1 and Station 2 would be affected by a full closure of
Courtland Street when responding to emergencies in the neighborhood. Figure 11 illustrates the
increase in trip length for an emergency responder reporting from Station 1. The length of travel
increases by about a quarter mile (1.8 miles to 2.1 miles).
Figure 11: Fire Response Distances from Station 1
Figure 12 illustrates the increase in trip length for an emergency responder reporting from
Station 2. The length of travel increases by about a quarter mile (1.1 miles to 1.4 miles).
Figure 12: Fire Response Distances from Station 2
Station 3 is located in Oceano on Highway 1 and 13th Street. Closing Courtland Street north of
Strawberry Avenue would not affect the response time from this station. The distance would
remain about two miles.
Item 12.a. - Page 65
Page 32 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
Police
There are two local police stations: Arroyo Grande Police Department on Halcyon Road just
north of Grande Avenue and Grover Beach Police Department on the corner of 7th Street and
Rockaway Avenue. Responders from both police departments would be affected by a full
closure of Courtland Street when responding to emergencies in the neighborhood. Figure 13
illustrates the increase in trip length for an emergency responder reporting from Arroyo Grande
Police Department. The length of travel increases by about a quarter mile (1.1 miles to 1.4
miles).
Figure 13: Police Response Distances from Arroyo Grande Police Department
Figure 14 illustrates the increase in trip length for an emergency responder reporting from
Grover Beach Police Department. The length of travel increases by about a quarter mile (1.1
miles to 1.4 miles).
Figure 14: Police Response Distances from Grover Beach Police Department
Item 12.a. - Page 66
Page 33 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
Hospital
Responders coming from Arroyo Grande Community Hospital will not be affected by this
closure, because they would most likely use the southern access point to the neighborhood.
VII. Conclusion and Recommendations
As presented through this report, there are various measures of traffic control and traffic calming
that could be implemented in the Berry Gardens neighborhood. The analysis in this report
included a all-way stop control warrant analysis for the intersection of Cedar Street and
Boysenberry Street, traffic calming measures on Courtland Street, and closures on Courtland
Street north of Strawberry Avenue.
Cedar Street/ Boysenberry Street Intersection
As discussed in the all-way stop control section of this report, the intersection of Cedar Street
and Boysenberry Street does not meet warrants established in the MUTCD for installation of an
all-way stop. Traffic volumes, accident and speed data fall significantly short of the numbers
needed to meet the warrants. Therefore, installing stop signs on Cedar Street at this intersection
is not recommended.
Neighborhood Traffic Calming
Several traffic calming measures were highlighted in this report for use on Courtland Street.
There are basic, intermediate, and extreme measures which increase in cost and effectiveness.
Measures to be implemented depend upon the concerns expressed by the neighborhood
community and the available funds of the City.
Since Courtland Street meanders through the neighborhood with stop signs at Huckleberry
Avenue, Loganberry Avenue, and Ash Street, speeding was not observed in these areas.
However the northern segment, from Blackberry Avenue to Grand Avenue, is wide and straight
without stop signs. If speeding is a concern, new speed limit signs, a radar trailer, or police
enforcement may be good starting points. Speed humps, raised crosswalks, medians, and
bulbouts would also be effective in reducing speeds; these measures would be permanent and
more expensive. These methods could be implemented near the entrances to the neighborhood
to narrow the roads and create a sense of place and near Kingo Park to draw more attention to
pedestrian activity.
Other traffic calming measures could be implemented by the City at their discretion.
Courtland Street Partial or Full Closure
The most extreme form of traffic control brought forth in this report is road closure. Specifically,
an analysis was performed for the partial and full closure of Courtland Street north of Strawberry
Avenue. Limiting or restricting access on Courtland Street to and from the neighborhood has
little effect on the operating conditions of the local street network, and there were no study
intersection of roadways with LOS conditions below the target LOS C. From a level of service
perspective, closing Courtland Street at the neighborhood boundary would not pose a significant
problem.
Item 12.a. - Page 67
Page 34 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
However, closing Courtland Street would break up the grid network of the City, increasing the
lengths of trips for neighborhood residents and emergency responders. Traffic would be
dispersed onto other minor streets such as Spruce Street and Seabright Avenue. Emergency
response vehicles would be required to travel less direct routes to respond to emergencies.
Response times could be increased by about 25%. The Five Cities Fire Authority and the local
police departments should be consulted regarding effects of closing Courtland Street. If the City
decides to implement full or partial closure, it is recommended that a temporary "trial run" be
used first to gauge the community's response.
Item 12.a. - Page 68
Page 35 Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
APPENDIX
ACCIDENT DATA
TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA
RESIDENT LETTER AND PETITION FOR ALL-WAY STOP
Item 12.a. - Page 69
Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
APPENDIX A
ACCIDENT DATA
Item 12.a. - Page 70
REPORT 8 - TOTAL COLLISIONS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
01/01/2009 thru 01/01/2010
Report Run On: 03/20/2015
Total Count: 175
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande
Primary Rd ALDER ST Distance (ft)75 Direction S Secondary Rd EAST GRAND AV NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 10 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P082 Collision Date 20091214 Time 1835 Day MON
Primary Collision Factor STRTNG|BCKNG Violation 22106 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20101012
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 29 F W HNBD BACKING S -- 00 CHRYS 1997 -3 N -M G
2 PRKD 998 -PARKED N -- 00 HONDA 1998 -3 N ---
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd ALLEN ST Distance (ft)141 Direction E Secondary Rd TRAFFIC WY NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 7 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P059 Collision Date 20090524 Time 1614 Day SUN
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20100106
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 18 M W HNBD PROC ST W -- 00 MERCU 1999 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 42 F W HNBD STOPPED W -- 00 CHEVR 2008 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd ASH ST Distance (ft)186 Direction W Secondary Rd JASMINE PL NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 11 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 67 Collision Date 20090313 Time 2206 Day FRI
Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type OVERTURNED Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20091120
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 20 F H HBD-UNK PROC ST W -- 00 TOYOT 2007 -1 F -M D DRVR SEVERE 20 F 1 0 D -
2 PRKD 998 -PARKED W -- 00 TOYOT 2006 -3 N ---
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd ASH ST Distance (ft)10 Direction E Secondary Rd SPRUCE ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge Collision Date 20090825 Time 1540 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20100520
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 48 F W HNBD PROC ST W D 2200 FORD 1996 -3 N -L G
2 DRVR 34 M W HNBD STOPPED W D 2200 DODGE 1999 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Page 1 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 71
I
I l J
-I
01/01/2009 thru 01/01/2010
Report Run On: 03/20/2015
Total Count: 175
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)588 Direction E Secondary Rd BRISCO RD NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P089 Collision Date 20090621 Time 2500 Day SUN
Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC|DRG Violation 23152A Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20100206
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 18 F W HBD-UI PROC ST E A 0100 TOYOT 2002 --N -M B
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd COURTLAND ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 81 Collision Date 20090316 Time 0903 Day MON
Primary Collision Factor STOP SGN|SIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20091120
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 37 M H HNBD PROC ST W -- 00 FORD 1990 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 48 F W HNBD LFT TURN N -- 00 CHEVR 1998 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)123 Direction W Secondary Rd COURTLAND ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat 0AG Type 0 CalTrans Badge P057 Collision Date 20090411 Time 1147 Day SAT
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20091121
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 50 F W HNBD PROC ST W -- 00 SAAB 1996 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 66 F A HNBD SLOWING W -- 00 HONDA 1992 -3 N -M G PASS 78 M 3 0 G -
3 DRVR 48 M HNBD STOPPED W -- 00 SATUR 2001 -3 N -M G PASS 50 F 3 0 G -
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd COURTLAND ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P082 Collision Date 20090428 Time 1754 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor NOT STATED Violation Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20091121
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 93 M W HNBD PROC ST W -- 00 OLDSM 1997 -3 E -M G
2 DRVR 19 F H HNBD LFT TURN N -- 00 FORD 1995 -3 N -M G PASS 24 M 6 0 G -
PASS 2 M 5 0 Q -
3 DRVR 40 M W HNBD STOPPED S -- 00 CHRYS 2004 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd EL CAMINO REAL NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P091 Collision Date 20090512 Time 1620 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21802A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20100106
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 23 M O HNBD LFT TURN S -- 00 SUBAR 2005 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 21 F H HNBD PROC ST W -- 00 CHEVR 2008 -3 N -M G PASS 21 F 3 0 G -
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Page 8 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 72
~
I -1
-
I I I
I I I
--
T
_I l
-1-T
01/01/2009 thru 01/01/2010
Report Run On: 03/20/2015
Total Count: 175
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande
Primary Rd FARROLL AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd HALCYON RD NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 10 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P081 Collision Date 20090518 Time 1500 Day MON
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20100106
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 40 F H HNBD PROC ST E -- 00 BUICK 1995 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 30 F H HNBD STOPPED E -- 00 CHEVR 2008 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd GRAND AV Distance (ft)600 Direction W Secondary Rd ALDER ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P076 Collision Date 20090120 Time 1530 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20090822
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 17 M W HNBD PROC ST E -- 00 CHEVR 1992 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 35 M H HNBD STOPPED E -- 00 DAEW 2001 -3 N -M G DRVR COMP PN 35 M 1 0 G -
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd COURTLAND ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P053 Collision Date 20091120 Time 0928 Day FRI
Primary Collision Factor R-O-W PED Violation 21950A Collision Type AUTO/PED Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20100907
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PED Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action X-WLK AT Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 70 F W HNBD RGT TURN S -- 00 FORD 2005 -3 F -M G
2 PED 19 F W HNBD E N 6000 --3 N ---
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd ELM ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P081 Collision Date 20090106 Time 0942 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20090824
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1 DRVR 55 F H HNBD PROC ST W -- 00 MERCU 2001 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 65 M W HNBD LFT TURN E -- 00 FORD 2007 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd GRAND AV Distance (ft)75 Direction W Secondary Rd ELM ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge 59 Collision Date 20090314 Time 0033 Day SAT
Primary Collision Factor STRTNG|BCKNG Violation 22106 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20091117
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 998 -IMP UNK IMP UNK BACKING --- 00 ---N ---
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Page 19 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 73
-j
-1-T
-I
REPORT 8 - TOTAL COLLISIONS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
01/01/2010 thru 01/01/2011
Report Run On: 03/20/2015
Total Count: 23
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)214 Direction E Secondary Rd ALDER ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P082 Collision Date 20100118 Time 1800 Day MON
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20101101
Weather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 29 F W HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 FORD 2001 -3 E -M G DRVR COMP PN 29 F 1 0 G -
2 DRVR 39 M W HNBD STOPPED E D 2200 FORD 1999 -3 N -M G PASS 36 F 3 0 G -
PASS 13 M 4 0 G -
PASS 9 M 6 0 G -
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd COURTLAND ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P081 Collision Date 20101206 Time 0839 Day MON
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20111213
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 44 M H HNBD PROC ST W -- 00 HONDA 1997 -3 N -M G DRVR COMP PN 35 F 1 0 G -
2 DRVR 35 M W HNBD STOPPED W -- 00 SATUR 2002 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)81 Direction W Secondary Rd COURTLAND ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P051 Collision Date 20101213 Time 1644 Day MON
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20111213
Weather1 FOG Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 29 M W HNBD PROC ST E -- 00 TOYOT 2000 -3 F -M G
2 DRVR 42 F W HNBD STOPPED E -- 00 CHRYS 1999 -3 N -M G DRVR COMP PN 42 F 1 0 G -
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd EL CAMINO REAL NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P081 Collision Date 20101220 Time 1223 Day MON
Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21802A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20111227
Weather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 17 M W HNBD LFT TURN S -- 00 AUDI 2000 -3 E -M G PASS 14 M 3 0 G -
2 DRVR 55 M H HNBD PROC ST W -- 00 TOYOT 1997 -3 N -M G PASS 49 F 3 0 G -
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Page 1 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 74
I
I I I I
•
I
I l I
-1-T
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
From: <SWITRS@chp.ca.gov>
To:<shuffman@omnimeans.com>
Date: 3/20/2015 11:48 AM
Subject: I-SWITRS Report Request - ID #78174
I-SWITRS has received and processed your Collision Report 8 request for the following criteria:
Report Type: SWITRS Reports
Jurisdiction: Arroyo Grande
Location: Arroyo Grande:San Luis Obispo
Reporting Period: 01/01/2011 - 01/01/2012
Include Collisions on: Private Property, Highway
The Selection criteria did not generate any report.
California Highway Patrol
Support Services Section
iswitrs@chp.ca.gov
(916) 843-4230
Item 12.a. - Page 75
REPORT 8 - TOTAL COLLISIONS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
01/01/2012 thru 12/31/2012
Report Run On: 03/20/2015
Total Count: 1
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande
Primary Rd HALCYON RD Distance (ft)65 Direction W Secondary Rd EL CAMINO REAL NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge Collision Date 20120805 Time 1140 Day SUN
Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20121009
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 76 M W HNBD UNS TURN E A 0100 FORD 1992 -3 N -P G
2 DRVR 44 M W HNBD STOPPED E J 4800 DODGE 2008 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Page 1 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 76
REPORT 8 - TOTAL COLLISIONS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
01/01/2013 thru 01/01/2014
Report Run On: 03/20/2015
Total Count: 196
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande
Primary Rd ASH ST Distance (ft)491 Direction W Secondary Rd ALDER ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 10 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0105 Collision Date 20130803 Time 0736 Day SAT
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20141022
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DUSK/DAWNPed Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 44 M W HNBD PROC ST W A 0700 HONDA 2001 -3 N -L B
2 PRKD 998 -null -A 0700 MAZDA 2006 ------
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd ASH ST Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd ASH ST 1172 NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 10 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0107 Collision Date 20130521 Time 1733 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor NOT STATED Violation Collision Type Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140904
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1 DRVR 998 -null -A 0100 -------
2 PRKD 998 -null W A 0100 NISSA 2007 ------
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd ASH ST Distance (ft)252 Direction E Secondary Rd COURTLAND NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 11 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0114 Collision Date 20131101 Time 0041 Day FRI
Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC|DRG Violation 23152A Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20141209
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 30 F W HBD-UI PROC ST E A 0100 BMW 2002 -3 A 22107 -L B
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd ASH ST Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd COURTLAND NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 11 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0106 Collision Date 20131115 Time 1841 Day FRI
Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21801A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20141208
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 18 M O HNBD LFT TURN N A 0100 NISSA 2008 -3 N -L G PASS 16 F 3 0 L G
2 DRVR 39 M H HNBD PROC ST W A 0100 SATUR 1999 -3 N -L G
3 DRVR 37 F W HNBD STOPPED S A 0100 NISSA 2014 -3 N -L G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Page 1 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 77
I
I l
I
01/01/2013 thru 01/01/2014
Report Run On: 03/20/2015
Total Count: 196
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande
Primary Rd CEDAR ST Distance (ft)112 Direction E Secondary Rd SPRUCE ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 11 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0107 Collision Date 20130711 Time 1623 Day THU
Primary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation Collision Type Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20141006
Weather1 Weather2 Rdwy Surface Rdwy Cond1 Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With Lighting Ped Action Cntrl Dev Loc Type Ramp/Int
1 DRVR 998 -null --- 00 -------
2 PRKD 998 -HNBD PARKED E D 2200 FORD 2012 -3 N ---
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd CHILTON ST Distance (ft)250 Direction E Secondary Rd OAK PARK BL NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P082 Collision Date 20130924 Time 2500 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20141030
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1 PRKD 998 -PARKED E A 0100 FORD 2012 --N ---
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd DODSON WY Distance (ft)78 Direction E Secondary Rd S HALCYON RD NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 7 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0114 Collision Date 20130626 Time 0954 Day WED
Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20140306
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 72 F O HNBD PROC ST N D 2200 TOYOT 2000 -3 A 22107 -M G DRVR COMP PN 72 F 1 0 M G
PASS COMP PN 58 F 3 0 M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd E BRANCH ST Distance (ft)500 Direction E Secondary Rd MASON ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 7 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20130110 Time 1009 Day THU
Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC|DRG Violation 23152A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20140124
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 68 F W DRUG OPPOS LN E A 0100 -2009 -3 A 21658 -L G
2 DRVR 36 M W HNBD PROC ST W D 2200 FORD 2000 -3 N -M G PASS COMP PN 24 M 3 0 M G
3 PRKD 998 -PARKED W A 0800 HONDA 2011 -3 N ---
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd E BRANCH ST Distance (ft)150 Direction E Secondary Rd MASON ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20130924 Time 1304 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20141031
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT FNCT Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 66 M W HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 ACURA 2012 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 43 M W HNBD PROC ST E I 1100 FREIG 2007 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Page 5 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 78
-j
! T
l
-
J l
~
01/01/2013 thru 01/01/2014
Report Run On: 03/20/2015
Total Count: 196
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande
Primary Rd E BRANCH ST Distance (ft)175 Direction E Secondary Rd MASON ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 8 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P090 Collision Date 20131201 Time 1614 Day SUN
Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC|DRG Violation 23152A Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20141231
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DUSK/DAWNPed Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 65 F W HBD-UI PROC ST W A 0100 CHEVR 2005 -3 A 22350 -M G PASS 45 M 3 0 M G
2 DRVR 64 F W HNBD STOPPED W A 0100 TOYOT 2006 -3 N -M G PASS 24 M 3 0 M G
PASS 21 M 4 0 M G
PASS 23 M 6 0 M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd BELL ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0107 Collision Date 20130312 Time 1650 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140804
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 64 M W HNBD RGT TURN E D 2200 DODGE 2008 -3 N -M G PASS 63 F 3 0 M G
2 DRVR 70 M W HNBD PROC ST E C 0200 OTHER 2011 -3 N -P W
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)113 Direction W Secondary Rd BRANCH ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P082 Collision Date 20130531 Time 1000 Day FRI
Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22100A Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20150115
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 64 F W HNBD RGT TURN E A 0100 HONDA 2007 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 54 F W HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 NISSA 2009 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)110 Direction E Secondary Rd BRISCO RD NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20131031 Time 1306 Day THU
Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21802A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20141121
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 62 F H HNBD LFT TURN S A 0100 CHRYS 2003 -3 A 21802 -M G
2 DRVR 62 M W HNBD PROC ST E G 2622 -1996 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd COURTLAND NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20130102 Time 0854 Day WED
Primary Collision Factor R-O-W PED Violation 21950A Collision Type AUTO/PED Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140117
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PED Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action X-WLK AT Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 79 M W HNBD LFT TURN S A 0700 FORD 1999 -3 N -M G
2 PED 76 M W HNBD N N 6000 --3 N ---PED OTH VIS 76 M 0 0 P -
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Page 6 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 79
I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I
I T
I
-
-1-T
01/01/2013 thru 01/01/2014
Report Run On: 03/20/2015
Total Count: 196
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)30 Direction E Secondary Rd COURTLAND AV NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0110 Collision Date 20130222 Time 1900 Day FRI
Primary Collision Factor NOT DRIVER Violation Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140719
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1 DRVR 52 M W HNBD CHANG LN W D 2200 CHEVR 1965 -3 K -M G
2 DRVR 47 M A HNBD SLOWING W A 0100 MAZDA 1996 -3 N -M G DRVR COMP PN 47 M 1 0 M G
PASS 17 F 3 0 M G
PASS 44 F 0 0 M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd COURTLAND ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0114 Collision Date 20130329 Time 1510 Day FRI
Primary Collision Factor STOP SGN|SIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140805
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 18 F H HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 CHEVR 2005 -3 N -M G PASS 18 M 3 0 M G
PASS 1 F 4 0 P Q
2 DRVR 87 M W HNBD PROC ST N A 0100 CADIL 2007 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd E GRAND AV 1100 NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge 1300850 Collision Date 20130521 Time 1125 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor STOP SGN|SIG Violation 21453A Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20140827
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 67 F H HNBD PROC ST E E 2236 CHEVR 2006 -3 F -M G PASS 70 M 3 0 M G
2 DRVR 26 M H HNBD LFT TURN W A 0100 TOYOT 2002 -3 N -M G
3 DRVR 45 M W HNBD RGT TURN N D 2200 FORD 2001 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd E GRAND AV 1200 NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0106 Collision Date 20130329 Time 0949 Day FRI
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20140804
Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 60 F W HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 HONDA 2006 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 25 M H HNBD SLOWING E D 2200 CHEVR 2012 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd E GRAND AV 1500 NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P071 Collision Date 20130428 Time 1015 Day SUN
Primary Collision Factor OTHER HAZ Violation 21208B Collision Type OTHER Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140813
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With BICYCLE Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F BICY 19 M W HNBD PROC ST E L 0400 --3 N ---
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Page 7 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 80
-
I I
I I
! T
I l _,
I
T I
I
-I
-I
01/01/2013 thru 01/01/2014
Report Run On: 03/20/2015
Total Count: 196
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande
Primary Rd N BRISCO RD Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd RT 101 NCIC 4001 State Hwy?Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0114 Collision Date 20130702 Time 1210 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140930
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 998 F IMP UNK IMP UNK LFT TURN N -- 00 CADIL 2013 ------
2 DRVR 23 F W HNBD LFT TURN N A 0100 HYUND 2008 -3 --M G PASS 23 F 3 0 M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd N COURTLAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd EAST GRAND AV NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0107 Collision Date 20130702 Time 1559 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20141006
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 31 M H HNBD SLOWING S D 2200 CHEVR 2004 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 61 F W HNBD STOPPED S A 0100 NISSA 2013 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd N COURTLAND AV Distance (ft)25 Direction N Secondary Rd EAST GRAND AV NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0107 Collision Date 20130702 Time 1600 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor STRTNG|BCKNG Violation 22106 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20141006
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 31 M H HNBD LFT TURN S D 2200 CHEVR 2004 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 61 F W HNBD STOPPED S A 0100 NISSA 2013 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd N HALCYON RD Distance (ft)140 Direction S Secondary Rd BENNETT NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0106 Collision Date 20130712 Time 0918 Day FRI
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20141006
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 23 F W HNBD PROC ST N A 0700 SUBAR 2012 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 43 M H HNBD SLOWING N E 2235 FORD 1992 -3 N -M G PASS 26 M 3 3 --
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd N HALCYON RD Distance (ft)19 Direction S Secondary Rd EL CAMINO REAL NCIC 4001 State Hwy?Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0110 Collision Date 20131021 Time 1640 Day MON
Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type OVERTURNED Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20140421
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 40 F W HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 LEXUS 1999 -3 N -M G DRVR COMP PN 40 F 1 0 M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Page 22 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 81
-
I
-1-T
I
T T
01/01/2013 thru 01/01/2014
Report Run On: 03/20/2015
Total Count: 196
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande
Primary Rd RANCHO PKWY Distance (ft)94 Direction N Secondary Rd WEST BRANCH ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 3 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20130311 Time 1346 Day MON
Primary Collision Factor STRTNG|BCKNG Violation 22106 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140805
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 20 F H HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 CHEVR 2001 -3 N -G -
2 DRVR 27 M W HNBD STOPPED S A 0100 TOYOT 2005 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RODEO DR Distance (ft)35 Direction N Secondary Rd JAMES WY NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 4 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20130905 Time 1504 Day THU
Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC|DRG Violation 23152A Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20141030
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 25 M W HBD-UI LFT TURN N A 0700 JEEP 2012 -3 A 22350 -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RT 227 Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd HUASNA RD NCIC 4001 State Hwy?Y Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 5 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P010 Collision Date 20131111 Time 0005 Day MON
Primary Collision Factor DRVR ALC|DRG Violation 23152A Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20141212
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 59 F W HBD-UI LFT TURN N A 0700 TOYOT 2011 -3 A 22107 -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RUTH ANN WY Distance (ft)365 Direction N Secondary Rd BRIGHTON AV NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20130128 Time 1713 Day MON
Primary Collision Factor OTHER IMPROP DRV Violation Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140624
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 44 F W HNBD OTHER S A 0700 CHEVR 2002 -3 O -M B DRVR OTH VIS 9 M 2 1 M B
PASS 13 M 6 0 P G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd S COURTLAND Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd BLACKBERRY NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P089 Collision Date 20130124 Time 2500 Day THU
Primary Collision Factor NOT DRIVER Violation Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140117
Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1 BICY 57 M W PHYS RAN OFF RD S L 0400 --3 M ---BICY COMP PN 57 M 1 0 P W
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Page 27 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 82
-j
-
-
f f
I r r
01/01/2013 thru 01/01/2014
Report Run On: 03/20/2015
Total Count: 196
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande
Primary Rd SOUTH HALCYON
RD
Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd SOUTH HALCYON NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 10 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P057 Collision Date 20131120 Time 1520 Day WED
Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21802A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20141208
Weather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 48 F W HNBD LFT TURN W A 0100 NISSA 2009 -3 N -M G DRVR COMP PN 48 F 1 0 M G
2 DRVR 48 F W HNBD PROC ST W A 0100 NISSA 2009 -3 N -L E DRVR COMP PN 59 F 1 0 L E
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd SOUTH OAK PARK
BL
Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd CHILTON ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0107 Collision Date 20130627 Time 1539 Day THU
Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20150115
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 998 -null S A 0100 PONTI ------
2 DRVR 26 F W null S I 2000 OTHER 2008 ------
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd SPRUCE ST Distance (ft)129 Direction N Secondary Rd ASH ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0110 Collision Date 20130406 Time 1500 Day SAT
Primary Collision Factor STRTNG|BCKNG Violation 22106 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140813
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1 PRKD 998 -PARKED S A 0100 MITSU 2003 --N ---
2F DRVR 17 M H HNBD BACKING S A 0700 TOYOT 1993 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd SPRUCE ST Distance (ft)435 Direction S Secondary Rd CEDAR ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 11 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20130129 Time 1028 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20140626
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 78 M W HNBD PROC ST S A 0800 GMC 1992 -3 M -M G
2 PRKD 998 -PARKING S D 2200 NISSA 2002 -3 N ---
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd STAGECOACH RD Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd GULARTE RD NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 5 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0114 Collision Date 20130910 Time 1142 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type OTHER Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140411
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With NON-CLSN Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F BICY 57 M W IMP UNK IMP UNK PROC ST S L 0400 --3 M ---BICY SEVERE 57 M 0 0 P W
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Page 32 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 83
! T
I
I r T
REPORT 8 - TOTAL COLLISIONS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
01/01/2014 thru 01/01/2015
Report Run On: 03/20/2015
Total Count: 90
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande
Primary Rd ASH ST Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd ELM ST PARK NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 11 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P089 Collision Date 20140605 Time 2045 Day THU
Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21804A Collision Type AUTO/PED Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140819
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run FELONY Motor Vehicle Involved With PED Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action NOT IN RD Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1 PED 34 F W HNBD E N 6000 --2 A 21950 ---PED COMP PN 34 F 9 3 --
2F DRVR 998 -ENT TRAF --- 00 -------
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd ASH ST Distance (ft)235 Direction E Secondary Rd SPRUCE ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 11 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0110 Collision Date 20140226 Time 1359 Day WED
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20150129
Weather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 87 F W HNBD PROC ST W A 0100 TOYOT 2001 -3 N -L G
2 DRVR 74 M W HNBD PROC ST W A 0100 CHRYS 2002 -3 N -M G PASS 18 F 3 0 M G
3 DRVR 46 M O HNBD PROC ST E D 2200 FORD 2008 -3 N -M G
4 DRVR 16 M O HNBD STOPPED W A 0100 SCION 2014 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd BRANCH MILL RD Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd 700 BRANCH MILL NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0101 Collision Date 20140228 Time 0506 Day FRI
Primary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation Collision Type OTHER Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20150129
Weather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER OBJ Lighting DARK - NO Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1 DRVR 998 -IMP UNK IMP UNK PROC ST -A 0100 BMW 1997 -3 N -M B
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd BRANCH MILL RD Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd NEWSOM NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 6 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0101 Collision Date 20140512 Time 0630 Day MON
Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21802A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20140806
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 35 M W HNBD LFT TURN E A 0100 FORD 2001 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 30 M H HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 HONDA 1995 -3 N -M G DRVR OTH VIS 30 M 1 0 M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Page 1 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 84
I
I l I
-1-T
I
-
l
01/01/2014 thru 01/01/2015
Report Run On: 03/20/2015
Total Count: 90
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)10 Direction E Secondary Rd BRISCO RD NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P067 Collision Date 20140313 Time 0825 Day THU
Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20150220
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 23 M W HNBD LFT TURN E A 0100 TOYOT 2008 -3 E -M G
2 DRVR 60 F W HNBD PROC ST W A 0100 HYUND 2003 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)335 Direction E Secondary Rd BRISCO RD NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20140320 Time 1300 Day THU
Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21804A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20140717
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 23 F W HNBD ENT TRAF S A 0100 VOLKS 2003 -3 N -M G DRVR COMP PN 23 F 1 3 --
2 DRVR 79 F W HNBD PROC ST W D 2200 DODGE 2006 -3 N -M G PASS 998 M 3 0 M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)27 Direction W Secondary Rd BRISCO RD NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0106 Collision Date 20140405 Time 1330 Day SAT
Primary Collision Factor LANE CHANGE Violation 21658A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20150306
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 19 F H HNBD CHANG LN E A 0100 HONDA 2005 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 39 F W HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 FORD 2012 -3 N -L G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)400 Direction E Secondary Rd BRISCO RD NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P090 Collision Date 20140414 Time 1435 Day MON
Primary Collision Factor WRONG SIDE Violation 21202A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140724
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With BICYCLE Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F BICY 58 F W HNBD PROC ST E L 0400 --3 N ---BICY COMP PN 58 F 1 0 P -
2 DRVR 24 F W HNBD RGT TURN W A 0100 VOLKS 2001 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd COURTLAND NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0101 Collision Date 20140917 Time 1845 Day WED
Primary Collision Factor STOP SGN|SIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20141210
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 24 F H HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 CHRYS 2002 -3 F -M G PASS COMP PN 24 M 3 0 M G
PASS 26 M 6 0 M G
PASS 2 M 4 0 M Q
2 DRVR 66 M W HNBD PROC ST N A 0100 CHEVR 1999 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Page 3 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 85
-j
I
t
I
I l J
f
I _,
01/01/2014 thru 01/01/2015
Report Run On: 03/20/2015
Total Count: 90
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)30 Direction W Secondary Rd COURTLAND AV NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20140321 Time 1405 Day FRI
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20140718
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 24 F W HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 TOYOT 2006 -1 F -M G PASS 998 F 3 0 M G
2 DRVR 25 F W HNBD STOPPED E A 0100 HONDA 2008 -2 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd COURTLAND ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0115 Collision Date 20140126 Time 1319 Day SUN
Primary Collision Factor STOP SGN|SIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20140726
Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With MV ON OTHER RD Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 57 M W HNBD PROC ST W A 0100 SUBAR 2006 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 58 M W HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 BMW 1995 -3 N -M G DRVR COMP PN 58 M 1 0 M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd COURTLAND ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge P090 Collision Date 20140306 Time 1455 Day THU
Primary Collision Factor LANE CHANGE Violation 21658A Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20150220
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 30 M W IMP UNK IMP UNK MERGING E A 0100 FORD 1997 -3 N -M B
2 DRVR 55 M W HNBD PROC ST E A 0800 FORD 2006 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)119 Direction E Secondary Rd COURTLAND ST NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0115 Collision Date 20140621 Time 1937 Day SAT
Primary Collision Factor OTHER HAZ Violation 22517 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140820
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 66 M W HNBD PARKED E A 0100 CHRYS 2004 -3 N -M H
2 BICY 47 M W HNBD PROC ST E L 0400 --3 N ---BICY OTH VIS 47 M 1 1 P V
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd EAST GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd EL CAMINO REAL NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20140130 Time 0954 Day THU
Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21802A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20150203
Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 23 M W HNBD LFT TURN S D 2200 FORD 2009 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 40 F W HNBD PROC ST W A 0700 NISSA 2002 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Page 4 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 86
I
I T
I
-1-T
-1-T
~
01/01/2014 thru 01/01/2015
Report Run On: 03/20/2015
Total Count: 90
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): Arroyo Grande
Primary Rd GRAND AV Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd COURTLAND AV NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 1 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0106 Collision Date 20140314 Time 1627 Day FRI
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20140728
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 49 M W HNBD PROC ST E D 2200 FORD 2005 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd HALCYON RD Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd BENNETT NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 2 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P053 Collision Date 20140108 Time 1315 Day WED
Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21801A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20150127
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 16 M O HNBD LFT TURN N A 0100 TOYOT 2014 -3 F -M G PASS 16 F 3 0 M G
2 DRVR 56 M W HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 HONDA 2006 -3 N -L G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd HUASNA RD Distance (ft)70 Direction E Secondary Rd CLARENCE AV NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 5 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P057 Collision Date 20140331 Time 1721 Day MON
Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20150227
Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With BICYCLE Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F BICY 15 M W HNBD CHANG LN E L 0400 --3 E ---BICY OTH VIS 15 M 1 1 P W
2 DRVR 50 M HNBD PROC ST E I 1100 MERCE 2012 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd LE POINT ST Distance (ft)230 Direction E Secondary Rd CROWN TER NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P069 Collision Date 20141028 Time 0719 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22100A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20150106
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 72 F W HNBD U-TURN E A 0700 TOYOT 2004 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 50 F W HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 SCION 2005 -3 N -G -PASS OTH VIS 20 F 3 0 L G
PASS COMP PN 17 F 6 0 P H
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd LEANNA DR Distance (ft)35 Direction W Secondary Rd VALLEY RD NCIC 4001 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City Arroyo Grande County San Luis Obispo Population 3 Rpt Dist 9 Beat CITY Type 0 CalTrans Badge P0110 Collision Date 20140331 Time 0430 Day MON
Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20150219
Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1 PRKD 998 -PARKED -A 0100 FORD 2004 --N ---
2F DRVR 998 -null --- 00 -------
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 SafetyEquip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Page 10 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.Item 12.a. - Page 87
~
I r T
I
I
I T
I
-
I I I
I I I
~
Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
APPENDIX B
TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA
Item 12.a. - Page 88
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Omni-Means, Ltd.
800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Grand Avenue @ Oak Park Boulevard
San Luis Obispo
Wednesday, September 24, 2014
35.120968°
-120.609163°
Sunny and Clear
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 3 70 23 2 15 28 7 2 14 44 5 4 6 37 19 2
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 4 89 24 1 25 23 14 1 19 55 5 3 7 31 19 3
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 4 117 27 1 14 22 17 0 29 60 1 2 15 37 31 5
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 5 6115 3 233221 5 1236 2 4 147638 3
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 8 81 16 2 22 45 9 2 29 49 7 4 15 55 21 2
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 5 91 32 8 23 62 9 2 34 76 6 5 11 54 30 6
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 8 7537 4 304110 1 3179 4 9 228733 5
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 6 7938 1 295210 4 3092 3 7 247227 1
SouthboundNorthbound WestboundEastbound
TOTAL 43 663 212 22 181 305 97 17 198 491 33 38 114 449 218 27
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 13 56 25 4 30 76 64 2 79 76 6 5 39 117 57 2
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 12 61 30 2 56 83 34 4 47 116 11 3 34 113 32 3
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 9 73 34 4 44 111 46 7 42 126 15 3 25 120 34 5
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 15 72 27 4 47 91 45 1 43 109 10 4 26 126 34 1
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 7 52 34 2 62 106 41 2 46 107 11 1 31 130 51 5
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 15 58 31 1 51 114 53 2 50 115 10 3 35 114 44 3
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 13 55 26 0 50 108 54 1 25 104 5 5 19 117 38 2
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 13 47 31 1 37 88 45 2 43 115 16 1 40 131 25 3
TOTAL 97 474 238 18 377 777 382 21 375 868 84 25 249 968 315 24
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 27 326 123 15 104 200 38 9 124 296 20 25 72 268 111 14
4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 46 255 126 11 204 422 185 12 181 457 46 11 117 490 163 14
Northbound WestboundSouthbound Eastbound
PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.925 3.7%
PM 185 422 204 0.93
PM 0.975 1.8%
AM 38 200 104 0.91
PHF 0.934 0.88
Oak Park Boulevard
AM PM
181 124 111 163
457 296 268 490
46 20 72 117
PM AM
Grand AvenueGrand Avenue
PM AM
PHF 0.794 0.908 PHF
0.93 27 326 123 AM
0.92 46 255 126 PM
Page 1 of 3Oak Park Boulevard
Item 12.a. - Page 89
~
Metro]affic Data Inc.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
i----------+---....-----.-----I I I I I
-.__________.___ ._I I I+
.--------------j . ~.......--------
-i-----+--------... @ ...
North t----------t---...._____._____ ~ r.___
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Omni-Means, Ltd.
800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Grand Avenue @ Oak Park Boulevard 35.120968°
San Luis Obispo -120.609163°
9/24/2014 Sunny and Clear
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0001000001000000
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0011000100000001
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0200000010000020
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0111000600020000
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0000000001000003
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0204000100000000
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0002000400020011
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0002000300030000
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
TOTAL 052110001512070035
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0117001210020104
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0101000300000002
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0101000500020002
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0011100310000000
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0111000200020001
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0003010302041100
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0013020100000101
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0002020712030000
TOTAL 04419151263401313010
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 0208000801050014
4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 02261101312081103
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
Bikes Peds
Peds <>
AM Peak Total 425 PM0116
PM Peak Total 11 30 AM 0008
ds <>34 AM PM
Oak Park Boulevard
PeAM PM
10 10
21 01
00 01
PM AM <>Grand Avenue Grand Avenue
PM AM
Peds <>
58
Peds <8020AM
13022PM
Oak Park Boulevard Page 2 of 3
Item 12.a. - Page 90
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
---_____, I I I I I
-+I ' I+ .......--------j ~
--... @ ... ~ -
North
,_______,______ ._ Ti-----------+--
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Omni-Means, Ltd.
www.metrotrafficdata.com 669 Pacific Street, Suite A
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Grand Avenue @ Oak Park Boulevard
San Luis Obispo
Wednesday, September 24, 2014
Oak Park Boulevard
Grand Avenue
Sunny and Clear
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE161 Seconds Signal
COMMENTS All approaches have protected left turns.
Page 3 of 3
Item 12.a. - Page 91
--a. •
J J ~ . . ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~~
dOlS @------
North STOP --~ ,tt,1r,,,
, .. 0 -,~, "'C .. ,
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Omni-Means, Ltd.
800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
35.120850°
-120.606655°
Sunny and Clear
Grand Avenue @ Courtland Street
San Luis Obispo
Wednesday, September 24, 2014
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 613027917682224832
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 13411184514900635634
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 114607363131010617534
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 118119290138445810175
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 155528291137623610854
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 11 15 3 2 16 2 9 1 12 107 1 7 3 94 8 5
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 12 8 2 3 35 7 11 4 16 106 3 9 10 105 1 4
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 11 6 5 1 12 4 15 3 16 131 8 4 8 112 4 7
Northbound WestboundEastboundSouthbound
TOTAL 9051361097317314947632042416993435
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 14 12 5 1 29 14 27 1 30 184 10 1 19 139 16 1
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 17 8 7 0 39 16 30 0 26 205 8 4 19 173 11 5
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 14 11 6 3 32 18 35 2 18 175 12 5 19 153 12 1
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 19 8 6 1 40 12 25 2 29 175 9 2 16 152 16 2
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 14 8 5 0 34 21 23 0 21 200 8 1 22 152 12 2
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 15 13 5 0 33 17 28 0 33 176 14 0 14 179 6 4
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 16 7 4 1 31 17 19 2 18 168 10 1 22 134 11 3
Eastbound WestboundNorthboundSouthbound
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 16 13 5 0 20 11 11 0 19 134 9 0 10 105 11 0
TOTAL 125 80 43 6 258 126 198 7 194 1417 80 14 141 1187 95 18
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 49 34 15 8 71 15 44 9 57 420 14 23 27 419 18 20
4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 64 35 24 4 145 67 113 4 94 755 37 12 76 630 51 10
Northbound WestboundSouthbound Eastbound
PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.891 5.1%
PM 113 67 145 0.956
PM 0.935 1.4%
AM 44 15 71 0.613
PHF 0.927 0.792
Courtland Street
AM PM
94 57 18 51
755 420 419 630
37 14 27 76
PM AM
Grand AvenueGrand Avenue
PM AM
PHF 0.935 0.932 PHF
0.845 49 34 15 AM
0.932 64 35 24 PM
Page 1 of 3Courtland Street
Item 12.a. - Page 92
~
Metro]affic Data Inc.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
i----------+---....-----.-----I I I I I
-.__________.___ ._I I I+
.--------------j . ~.......--------
-i-----+--------... @ ...
North t----------t---...._____._____ ~ r.___
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Omni-Means, Ltd.
800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Grand Avenue @ Courtland Street 35.120850°
San Luis Obispo -120.606655°
9/24/2014 Sunny and Clear
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0000000100000000
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0002000101030100
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0101001202001101
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000000010000
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0001001001010000
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000000020200
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000000001010000
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0000000000000000
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
TOTAL 0104002405081401
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0102000305081300
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0000001312032001
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0000100400020300
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0000001100010200
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0000000303020300
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0100000001000201
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0002000103160100
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0001000100010400
TOTAL 02051021611412331802
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 0001001002040200
4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 00001021115082801
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Bikes Peds
Peds <>
AM Peak Total 55 PM2010
PM Peak Total 19 20 AM 1001
ds <>10 AM PM
Courtland Street
PeAM PM
10 00
52 28
00 02
PM AM <>Grand Avenue Grand Avenue
PM AM
Peds <>
48
Peds <0000AM
11000PM
Courtland Street Page 2 of 3
Item 12.a. - Page 93
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
---_____, I I I I I
-+I ' I+ .......--------j ~
--... @ ... ~ -
North
,_______,______ ._ Ti-----------+--
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Omni-Means, Ltd.
www.metrotrafficdata.com 669 Pacific Street, Suite A
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Grand Avenue
Sunny and Clear
Grand Avenue @ Courtland Street
San Luis Obispo
Wednesday, September 24, 2014
Courtland Street
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE Signal
COMMENTS Eastbound and westbound approaches have
protected left turns. Northbound and southbound
left turns are permitted.
98 Seconds
Page 3 of 3
Item 12.a. - Page 94
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Omni-Means, Ltd.
800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Grand Ave @ Juniper St
San Luis Obispo
Thursday, February 26, 2015 Clear
35.120708°
-120.604064°
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 507000000643153200
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 5050000001252536501
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 3020000001201359402
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 4030000009270614204
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 70410000010043910402
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 5050000001274239301
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 30300000012842511003
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 401000000135103413305
Southbound EastboundNorthbound Westbound
TOTAL 36030100000891351940773018
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 50400000019192414601
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 70900000017984619203
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 607000000177111315400
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 4080000001781401016705
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 707000000203143419605
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 504000000199133714200
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 50200000014891614102
Southbound Eastbound WestboundNorthbound
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 205000000139141313101
TOTAL 410460000001414 92 15 43 1269 0 17
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 19013100000490221021440011
4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 2403100000073747823709013
Northbound WestboundSouthbound Eastbound
PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.875 2.2%
PM 0 0 0 #####
PM 0.911 1.3%
AM 0 0 0 #####
PHF 0.903 0.883 AM PM
00 00
737 490 440 709
47 22 21 23
PM AM
Grand AvenueGrand Avenue
PM AM
PHF 0.841 0.915 PHF
0.727 19 0 13 AM
0.859 24 0 31 PM
Page 1 of 3Juniper Street
Item 12.a. - Page 95
~
Metro]affic Data Inc.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
i----------+---....-----.-----I I I I I
-.__________.___ ._I I I+
.--------------j . ~.......--------
-i-----+--------... @ ...
North t----------t---...._____._____ ~ r.___
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Omni-Means, Ltd.
800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Grand Ave @ Juniper St 35.120708°
San Luis Obispo -120.604064°
Thursday, February 26, 2015 Clear
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0000000402000200
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000000002000002
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0001000101000000
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000101000200
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0000000101000000
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000103001000
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000000202000200
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0000000002000001
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
TOTAL 000100010014001603
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0002001300100101
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0005000502000001
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0001000601000101
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0001000601000000
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0001000200000300
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0011000100000100
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0002000000000101
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0001000000000000
TOTAL 001140012304100704
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 0000000408001201
4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 00080001904000402
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
Bikes Peds
Peds <>
AM Peak Total 11 5 PM0008
PM Peak Total 8 29 AM 0000
ds <>21 AM PM
0
PeAM PM
00 00
48 24
00 10
PM AM <>Grand Avenue Grand Avenue
PM AM
Peds <>
00
Peds <4000AM
19000PM
Juniper Street Page 2 of 3
Item 12.a. - Page 96
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
---_____, I I I I I
-+I ' I+ .......--------j ~
--... @ ... ~ -
North
,_______,______ ._ Ti-----------+--
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Omni-Means, Ltd.
www.metrotrafficdata.com 669 Pacific Street, Suite A
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Grand Ave @ Juniper St
San Luis Obispo
Thursday, February 26, 2015
Juniper Street
Grand Avenue
Clear
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPEN/A One-Way Stop
COMMENTS
Page 3 of 3
Item 12.a. - Page 97
--@------------~~~=~ North STOP
y
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Omni-Means, Ltd.
800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Oak Park Blvd @ Seabright Ave
San Luis Obispo
Thursday, February 26, 2015 Clear
35.116907°
-120.609455°
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 085112271030100050
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 092103280010000030
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 2114030472021101330
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 2125144532230002040
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 2108025400010200150
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0117140510112100361
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 2119335452141001130
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 180202421140000020
Southbound EastboundNorthbound Westbound
TOTAL 984091721333851945048311
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 1824061000000102120
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0930031001041011040
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0873131040231202020
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 21012261073010002161
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 2923061122320101040
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 09712111194221101071
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 21012371084030200360
Southbound Eastbound WestboundNorthbound
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 177407890141001020
TOTAL 8 730 19 8 49 839 14 8 19 4 7 1 10 5 33 2
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
7:45 AM - 8:45 AM 64695131418944933035181
4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 63918730446135814044232
Northbound WestboundSouthbound Eastbound
PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.929 2.5%
PM 13 446 30 0.912
PM 0.961 1.5%
AM 4 189 14 0.877
PHF 0.65 0.75
Oak Park Blvd
AM PM
8 9 18 23
13 54
43 34
PM AM
Seabright AveSeabright Ave
PM AM
PHF 0.722 0.861 PHF
0.938 6 469 5 AM
0.964 6 391 8 PM
Page 1 of 2Oak Park Blvd
Item 12.a. - Page 98
~
Metro]affic Data Inc.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
i----------+---....-----.-----I I I I I
-.__________.___ ._I I I+
.--------------j . ~.......--------
-i-----+--------... @ ...
North t----------t---...._____._____ ~ r.___
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Omni-Means, Ltd.
800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Oak Park Blvd @ Seabright Ave 35.116907°
San Luis Obispo -120.609455°
Thursday, February 26, 2015 Clear
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0000000000010000
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000100000000001
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0000010000010000
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000000000000
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 1100000000000001
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000000000001
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000000000010001
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0000000000020000
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
TOTAL 1100110000050004
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0000000000020003
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0000000000000001
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0100000000040100
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0201000000000100
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0000010000000102
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0000010000010002
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0000000000000001
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0000000000020000
TOTAL 0301020000090309
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
7:45 AM - 8:45 AM 1100000000010003
4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0201020000010205
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
Bikes Peds
Peds <>
AM Peak Total 24 PM0201
PM Peak Total 6 7 AM 0000
ds <>53 AM PM
Oak Park Blvd
PeAM PM
00 00
00 02
00 00
PM AM <>Seabright Ave Seabright Ave
PM AM
Peds <>
11
Peds <0110AM
0020PM
Oak Park Blvd Page 2 of 3
Item 12.a. - Page 99
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
---_____, I I I I I
-+I ' I+ .......--------j ~
--... @ ... ~ -
North
,_______,______ ._ Ti-----------+--
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Omni-Means, Ltd.
www.metrotrafficdata.com 669 Pacific Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Oak Park Blvd @ Seabright Ave
San Luis Obispo
Thursday, February 26, 2015
Oak Park Blvd
Seabright Ave
Clear
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPEN/A Two-Way Stop
COMMENTS
Page 3 of 3
Item 12.a. - Page 100
-----@------&. North
~ , t f
""C -
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Omni-Means, Ltd.
800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
35.117133°
-120.606558°
Courtland St @ Cedar St
San Luis Obispo
Thursday, February 26, 2015 Clear
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0600050000000050
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0910150000000030
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 017000110000000030
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0900180000000050
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 02121170000000010
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 01400170000000040
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 01600370000000070
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 09003130000000030
Northbound WestboundSouthboundEastbound
TOTAL 010131106300000000310
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 025004280000001080
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 015005260000001040
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 018115310000000070
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 015003270000001060
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 017005281000000010
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 06106300000001040
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0192012441000000030
Southbound Eastbound WestboundNorthbound
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 019005240000001030
TOTAL 0134414523820000050360
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 0602183400000000150
4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 057302612920000020140
Southbound EastboundNorthbound Westbound
PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.902 0.8%
PM 2 129 26 0.689
PM 0.719 0.0%
AM 03480.656
PHF ##### #####
Courtland Street
AM PM
0 0 15 14
00 00
00 02
PM AM
Cedar Street
PM AM
PHF 0.536 0.571 PHF
0.674 0 60 2 AM
0.714 0 57 3 PM
Page 1 of 3Courtland Street
Item 12.a. - Page 101
~
Metro]affic Data Inc.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
i----------+---....-----.-----I I I I I
-.__________.___ ._I I I+
.--------------j . ~.......--------
i-----+--------... @ ...
North t----------t---...._____._____ ~ r.___
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Omni-Means, Ltd.
800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Courtland St @ Cedar St 35.117133°
San Luis Obispo -120.606558°
Thursday, February 26, 2015 Clear
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0001000000010000
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000010100000003
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0000000000000001
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000000000001
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0000000200010000
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000000010000
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0010000000010000
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0000000000020000
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
TOTAL 0011010300060005
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0101000000010001
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0100010000030003
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0003000300010000
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0001000000010000
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0100000000000000
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0000000000000000
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0000000000010000
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0000000000010000
TOTAL 0305010300080004
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 0010000200050000
4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0101000000020000
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Bikes Peds
Peds <>
AM Peak Total 17 PM0001
PM Peak Total 1 3 AM 0000
ds <>00 AM PM
Courtland Street
PeAM PM
00 00
00 00
00 00
PM AM <>0 Cedar Street
PM AM
Peds <>
52
Peds <2001AM
0010PM
Courtland Street Page 2 of 3
Item 12.a. - Page 102
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
---_____, I I I I I
-+I ' I+ .......--------j ~
-... @ ... ~ -
North
,_______,______ ._ Ti-----------+--
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Omni-Means, Ltd.
www.metrotrafficdata.com 669 Pacific Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Cedar Street
Clear
Courtland St @ Cedar St
San Luis Obispo
Thursday, February 26, 2015
Courtland Street
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE One-Way Stop
COMMENTS
N/A
Page 3 of 3
Item 12.a. - Page 103
a. ~ ~ >-
@----____ North
t
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Omni-Means, Ltd.
800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Cedar St @ Boysenberry St
San Luis Obispo
Thursday, February 26, 2015 Clear
35.117195°
-120.604855°
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0000100002000400
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0120200002000000
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0000100001001610
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000002001100
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0120000001000200
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0110000011000700
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 1000000006000500
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0100000003000400
Northbound WestboundSouthboundEastbound
TOTAL 145040001180022910
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0000101007100300
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0100000002101400
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0010100002001600
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0000100004002210
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0100210006001210
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 10200000010002610
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0100000008002300
Southbound Eastbound WestboundNorthbound
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0000000001001400
TOTAL 1330511004020103030
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 133000001110001800
4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 122031000280071330
Southbound EastboundNorthbound Westbound
PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.771 0.0%
PM0130.333
PM 0.682 0.0%
AM 0 0 0 #####
PHF 0.7 0.5
Boysenberry Street
AM PM
01 03
28 11 18 13
00 07
PM AM
Cedar StreetCedar Street
PM AM
PHF 0.643 0.639 PHF
0.583 1 3 3 AM
0.417 1 2 2 PM
Page 1 of 3Boysenberry Street
Item 12.a. - Page 104
~
Metro]affic Data Inc.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
i----------+---....-----.-----I I I I I
-.__________.___ ._I I I+
.--------------j . ~.......--------
-i-----+--------... @ ...
North t----------t---...._____._____ ~ r.___
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Omni-Means, Ltd.
800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Cedar St @ Boysenberry St 35.117195°
San Luis Obispo -120.604855°
Thursday, February 26, 2015 Clear
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0000000000000000
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000000000000002
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0000000000000001
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000000000000
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0000000100000001
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000000000001
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000010010000001
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0001000000010010
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
TOTAL 0001010110010016
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0000000200000100
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0200000100010200
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0001002010030001
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0200010300000002
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0000000100000000
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0000000000000000
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0001000000040001
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0000000000010002
TOTAL 0402012710090306
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 0001010110010013
4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0201010400040003
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Bikes Peds
Peds <>
AM Peak Total 36 PM0101
PM Peak Total 3 12 AM 0101
ds <>33 AM PM
Boysenberry Street
PeAM PM
01 10
00 00
00 00
PM AM <>Cedar Street Cedar Street
PM AM
Peds <>
14
Peds <1000AM
4020PM
Boysenberry Street Page 2 of 3
Item 12.a. - Page 105
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
---_____, I I I I I
-+I ' I+ .......--------j ~
--... @ ... ~ -
North
,_______,______ ._ Ti-----------+--
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Omni-Means, Ltd.
www.metrotrafficdata.com 669 Pacific Street, Suite A
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Cedar Street
Clear
Cedar St @ Boysenberry St
San Luis Obispo
Thursday, February 26, 2015
Boysenberry Street
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE Two-way Stop
COMMENTS
N/A
Page 3 of 3
Item 12.a. - Page 106
+ ➔
dOlS @-=----------=-~~ North STOP
T
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Omni-Means, Ltd.
800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Spruce St @ Cedar St
San Luis Obispo
Thursday, February 26, 2015 Clear
35.117256°
-120.603474°
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 2400001000000100
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 1921230020300000
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 3400012050200110
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 3010080110100000
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0300030020201121
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 4600064020101100
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 4500012011001000
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0300141010400000
Northbound WestboundSouthboundEastbound
TOTAL 1734313261011411303431
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 1800074023300100
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0310163000000110
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 4900192012001100
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 12000103122100100
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0801074022600110
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 2600165034700110
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 1310081003401000
Southbound Eastbound WestboundNorthbound
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 23001102001200200
TOTAL 11422146324110172302830
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 10131001861100602331
4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 725012321418101401420
Southbound EastboundNorthbound Westbound
PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.720 2.8%
PM 14 32 2 0.923
PM 0.826 1.7%
AM 61800.6
PHF 0.571 0.571
Spruce Street
AM PM
810 3 2
10 0 3 4
14 6 2 1
PM AM
Cedar StreetCedar Street
PM AM
PHF 0.5 0.875 PHF
0.6 10 13 1 AM
0.615 7 25 0 PM
Page 1 of 3Spruce Street
Item 12.a. - Page 107
~
Metro]affic Data Inc.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
i----------+---....-----.-----I I I I I
-.__________.___ ._I I I+
.--------------j . ~.......--------
-i-----+--------... @ ...
North t----------t---...._____._____ ~ r.___
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Omni-Means, Ltd.
800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Spruce St @ Cedar St 35.117256°
San Luis Obispo -120.603474°
Thursday, February 26, 2015 Clear
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0001000000000001
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000000000000004
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0000000000000001
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000100000003
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0000000100000000
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000000000002
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000000000000000
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0000001000000001
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
TOTAL 00010012000000012
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0000100000000000
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0000010000000000
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0000000000000004
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0000000100000002
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0003000000000000
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0000000000000000
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0000000000000000
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0002000000010003
TOTAL 0005110100010009
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000200000006
4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 0003000100000006
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Bikes Peds
Peds <>
AM Peak Total 08 PM0003
PM Peak Total 0 10 AM 0000
ds <>66 AM PM
Spruce Street
PeAM PM
00 00
00 00
00 00
PM AM <>Cedar Street Cedar Street
PM AM
Peds <>
00
Peds <2000AM
1000PM
Spruce Street Page 2 of 3
Item 12.a. - Page 108
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
---_____, I I I I I
-+I ' I+ .......--------j ~
--... @ ... ~ -
North
,_______,______ ._ Ti-----------+--
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Omni-Means, Ltd.
www.metrotrafficdata.com 669 Pacific Street, Suite A
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Cedar Street
Clear
Spruce St @ Cedar St
San Luis Obispo
Thursday, February 26, 2015
Spruce Street
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE All-Way Stop
COMMENTS
N/A
Page 3 of 3
Item 12.a. - Page 109
.:,.,., l
•
dOlS @----------------North
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Omni-Means, Ltd.
800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Ash Street @ Courtland Street
San Luis Obispo
Wednesday, September 24, 2014
35.114735°
-120.607012°
Sunny and Clear
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0010213082460121410
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000613043712162320
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 306021602449123321
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 306010604212132850
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 602060604208153001
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 1223130706239022962
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 9160647010246123333
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 423070406255012630
SouthboundNorthbound WestboundEastbound
TOTAL 37 5 27 1 33 7 42 0 44 218 57 5 33 216 22 7
Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 32509220073041233101
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 02118621083650127112
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 41321631605359072690
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 6210721708399054760
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 011012319012323162710
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 300015118012543033450
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 301014018015360003371
Eastbound WestboundNorthboundSouthbound
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 10209516133921131120
TOTAL 20 8 14 3 90 22 145 1 70 301 35 3 25 258 61 4
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks
8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 31 5 14 1 22 4 24 0 26 92 28 2 10 118 12 6
4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 13 4 5 2 50 9 70 0 37 160 24 1 21 134 21 0
Northbound WestboundSouthbound Eastbound
PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.869 2.3%
PM 70 9 50 0.921
PM 0.919 0.5%
AM 24 4 22 0.735
PHF 0.801 0.913
Courtland Street
AM PM
37 26 12 21
160 92 118 134
24 28 10 21
PM AM
Ash StreetAsh Street
PM AM
PHF 0.921 0.759 PHF
0.735 31 5 14 AM
0.611 13 4 5 PM
Page 1 of 3Courtland Street
Item 12.a. - Page 110
~
Metro]affic Data Inc.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
i----------+---....-----.-----I I I I I
-.__________.___ ._I I I+
.--------------j . ~.......--------
-i-----+--------... @ ...
North t----------t---...._____._____ ~ r.___
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Omni-Means, Ltd.
800 975 6938 Ph /F 669 P ifi St t S it A
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 669 Pacific Street, Suite A
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Ash Street @ Courtland Street 35.114735°
San Luis Obispo -120.607012°
9/24/2014 Sunny and Clear
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0000000403020000
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000000402002002
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0001000001010002
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000011010000
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0002100000010110
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000000010200
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000000100010001
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0001000210000001
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
TOTAL 00041001127072316
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0001000300000000
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0000000102010100
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0001100000000011
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0000000100010000
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0002000101030000
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0002000224000004
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0001001700000201
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0002001600000001
TOTAL 00091022127050317
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 0003100310030312
4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 0005100425040015
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
Bikes Peds
Peds <>
AM Peak Total 611 PM0015
PM Peak Total 9 18 AM 0013
ds <>52 AM PM
Courtland Street
PeAM PM
21 11
50 30
00 00
PM AM <>Ash Street Ash Street
PM AM
Peds <>
34
Peds <3000AM
4000PM
Courtland Street Page 2 of 3
Item 12.a. - Page 111
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
---_____, I I I I I
-+I ' I+ .......--------j ~
--... @ ... ~ -
North
,_______,______ ._ Ti-----------+--
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Turning Movement Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax Omni-Means, Ltd.
www.metrotrafficdata.com 669 Pacific Street, Suite A
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Ash Street @ Courtland Street
San Luis Obispo
Wednesday, September 24, 2014
Courtland Street
Ash Street
Sunny and Clear
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPEN/A Two-Way Stop
COMMENTS
Page 3 of 3
Item 12.a. - Page 112
a. --
J J 4 JJl,ii ~!-·
dOlS @------
North STOP -::~ Tttr 1r,,,
---"'tJ
-◄,
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:Omni-Means, Ltd.
669 Pacific Street, Suite A
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo CA 93401
24 Hour Count Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
www.metrotrafficdata.com
STREET LATITUDE
SEGMENT LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
OS
Courtland Street
North of Strawb erry Ave
2/26/2015 Sunny and clear
35.118862°
-120.606865°
NUMBER OF LANES
Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
12:00 AM 01203 11013 6
1:00 AM 00000 00000 0
2:00 AM 20002 01001 3
3:00 AM 00101 00000 1
4:00 AM 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
Hourly
Totals
Northbound Southbound
2
4:00 AM 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
5:00 AM 222814 10023 17
6:00 AM 4 7 15 17 43 132814 57
7:00 AM 17 21 25 21 84 4 9 14 14 41 125
8:00 AM 33 27 25 24 109 11 15 16 11 53 162
9:00 AM 20 17 11 16 64 9 12101142 106
10:00 AM 15 27 15 15 72 14 12 21 14 61 133
11:00 AM 30 14 20 20 84 17 21 33 23 94 178
12:00 PM 27 20 21 17 85 24 26 29 26 105 190
1:00 PM 27 19 18 16 80 31 19 21 22 93 173
2:00 PM 21 21 22 32 96 21 25 25 34 105 201
3:00 PM 26 29 20 33 108 40 29 39 31 139 247
4:00 PM 30 23 21 24 98 41 37 38 41 157 255
5:00 PM 20 24 25 23 92 40 55 52 43 190 282
6:00 PM 22 17 13 18 70 40 19 20 27 106 176
7:00 PM 18 14 9 11 52 21 19 23 19 82 134
8:00 PM 1187632 25 18 15 12 70 102
9:00 PM 436821 11 6 2 10 29 50
10:00 PM 11215 855220 25
11:00 PM 00000 10135 5
1218 1413Total46.3%53.7%
AM% 30.1% AM Peak 178 11:00 am to 12:00 pm AM P.H.F. 0.84
PM% 69.9% PM Peak 284 5:15 pm to 6:15 pm PM P.H.F. 0.90
Total 2631
200
Thursday - 2/26/15
Northbound
Southbound
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
# of vehicles0
20
40
60
Time Period
Item 12.a. - Page 113
----
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:Omni-Means, Ltd.
669 Pacific Street, Suite A
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo CA 93401
24 Hour Count Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
www.metrotrafficdata.com
STREET LATITUDE
SEGMENT LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
OS
Courtland Street
Between Huckleberry Ave and Cedar St
2/26/2015 Sunny and clear
35.117303°
-120.606697°
NUMBER OF LANES
Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
12:00 AM 10012 22015 7
1:00 AM 00000 10001 1
2:00 AM 00000 01001 1
3:00 AM 00011 00000 1
4:00 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Hourly
Totals
Northbound Southbound
2
4:00 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
5:00 AM 22138 01023 11
6:00 AM 4781736 13149 45
7:00 AM 11 12 20 14 57 5611931 88
8:00 AM 22 18 23 12 75 8 8 10 16 42 117
9:00 AM 16 15 7 10 48 7791235 83
10:00 AM 11 16 12 10 49 6 11141445 94
11:00 AM 18 16 15 11 60 19 15 26 24 84 144
12:00 PM 25 16 19 13 73 22 24 19 24 89 162
1:00 PM 19 15 11 14 59 20 24 16 20 80 139
2:00 PM 14 19 10 20 63 17 25 18 24 84 147
3:00 PM 23 28 21 17 89 25 29 33 24 111 200
4:00 PM 33 19 25 21 98 32 31 36 30 129 227
5:00 PM 18 10 22 22 72 33 36 56 29 154 226
6:00 PM 24 15 16 15 70 37 19 18 19 93 163
7:00 PM 15 15 7 8 45 17 14 20 15 66 111
8:00 PM 8117 329 14 22 12 8 56 85
9:00 PM 4421020 764724 44
10:00 PM 30216 742518 24
11:00 PM 2001012 01179 21
973 1169Total45.4%54.6%
AM% 27.7% AM Peak 144 11:00 am to 12:00 pm AM P.H.F. 0.88
PM% 72.3% PM Peak 227 4:00 pm to 5:00 pm PM P.H.F. 0.87
Total 2142
180
Thursday - 2/26/15
Northbound
Southbound
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
# of vehicles0
20
40
Time Period
Item 12.a. - Page 114
----
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:Omni-Means, Ltd.
669 Pacific Street, Suite A
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo CA 93401
24 Hour Count Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
www.metrotrafficdata.com
STREET LATITUDE
SEGMENT LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
OS
Courtland Street
Between Mentone Ave and Jasmine Pl
2/26/2015 Sunny and clear
35.114940°
-120.607012°
NUMBER OF LANES
Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
12:00 AM 00224 02103 7
1:00 AM 00000 00000 0
2:00 AM 00000 10102 2
3:00 AM 00123 00011 4
4:00 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 2
Hourly
Totals
Northbound Southbound
2
4:00 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 2
5:00 AM 00011 10012 3
6:00 AM 2411118 243817 35
7:00 AM 2761328 5 7 17 10 39 67
8:00 AM 10 11 12 9 42 11 9 12 11 43 85
9:00 AM 679931 5591029 60
10:00 AM 10 15 9 5 39 8 11121344 83
11:00 AM 21 13 11 15 60 17 15 30 19 81 141
12:00 PM 11 18 10 12 51 23 24 24 13 84 135
1:00 PM 19 10 10 12 51 20 16 14 13 63 114
2:00 PM 13 11 12 20 56 16 23 20 30 89 145
3:00 PM 22 25 12 25 84 23 19 28 28 98 182
4:00 PM 26 17 17 14 74 24 28 23 20 95 169
5:00 PM 15 17 20 13 65 27 34 35 31 127 192
6:00 PM 15 13 12 17 57 32 17 14 11 74 131
7:00 PM 1747533 18 13 12 8 51 84
8:00 PM 1184427 11 11 11 3 36 63
9:00 PM 345517 753621 38
10:00 PM 12003 524213 16
11:00 PM 00000 10001 1
745 1014Total42.4%57.6%
AM% 27.8% AM Peak 141 11:00 am to 12:00 pm AM P.H.F. 0.86
PM% 72.2% PM Peak 197 5:15 pm to 6:15 pm PM P.H.F. 0.90
Total 1759
140
Thursday - 2/26/15
Northbound
Southbound
60
80
100
120
140
# of vehicles0
20
40
Time Period
Item 12.a. - Page 115
----
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:Omni-Means, Ltd.
669 Pacific Street, Suite A
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo CA 93401
24 Hour Count Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
www.metrotrafficdata.com
STREET LATITUDE
SEGMENT LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
OS
Cedar Street
East of Boysenberry Street
2/26/2015 Sunny and clear
35.117219°
-120.604501°
NUMBER OF LANES
Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
12:00 AM 10001 00000 1
1:00 AM 00000 00000 0
2:00 AM 00011 00101 2
3:00 AM 00000 00000 0
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2
Hourly
Totals
Eastbound Westbound
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 AM 00000 00022 2
6:00 AM 01102 21429 11
7:00 AM 362213 408214 27
8:00 AM 326314 275418 32
9:00 AM 343111 532414 25
10:00 AM 13105 03115 10
11:00 AM 40138 225817 25
12:00 PM 332311 554115 26
1:00 PM 124512 453315 27
2:00 PM 243413 246719 32
3:00 PM 646420 796931 51
4:00 PM 824519 357520 39
5:00 PM 8128 129 495523 52
6:00 PM 631414 235313 27
7:00 PM 422210 42039 19
8:00 PM 02406 11406 12
9:00 PM 20204 00101 5
10:00 PM 11002 30216 8
11:00 PM 00101 00011 2
196 239Total45.1%54.9%
AM% 31.0% AM Peak 35 8:15 am to 9:15 am AM P.H.F. 0.80
PM% 69.0% PM Peak 56 4:45 pm to 5:45 pm PM P.H.F. 0.67
Total 435
35
Thursday - 2/26/15
Eastbound
Westbound
15
20
25
30
35
# of vehicles0
5
10
Time Period
Item 12.a. - Page 116
----
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:Omni-Means, Ltd.
669 Pacific Street, Suite A
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo CA 93401
24 Hour Count Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
www.metrotrafficdata.com
STREET LATITUDE
SEGMENT LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
OS
Cedar St
West of Boysenberry St
2/26/2015 Sunny and clear
35.117219°
-120.605204°
NUMBER OF LANES
Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
12:00 AM 00000 00000 0
1:00 AM 00000 00000 0
2:00 AM 00011 00011 2
3:00 AM 00000 00000 0
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2
Hourly
Totals
Eastbound Westbound
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 AM 00000 00123 3
6:00 AM 00101 21328 9
7:00 AM 22127 406111 18
8:00 AM 126312 276419 31
9:00 AM 23218 622414 22
10:00 AM 13217 03216 13
11:00 AM 40127 223512 19
12:00 PM 03238 453113 21
1:00 PM 224311 223310 21
2:00 PM 333413 326617 30
3:00 PM 445316 456520 36
4:00 PM 832417 446216 33
5:00 PM 6108 125 273416 41
6:00 PM 631212 325212 24
7:00 PM 322310 32038 18
8:00 PM 22307 11406 13
9:00 PM 20103 00101 4
10:00 PM 01001 20114 5
11:00 PM 00101 00011 2
167 198Total45.8%54.2%
AM% 32.1% AM Peak 36 8:15 am to 9:15 am AM P.H.F. 0.75
PM% 67.9% PM Peak 42 5:15 pm to 6:15 pm PM P.H.F. 0.62
Total 365
30
Thursday - 2/26/15
Eastbound
Westbound
10
15
20
25
30
# of vehicles0
5
Time Period
Item 12.a. - Page 117
----
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:Omni-Means, Ltd.
669 Pacific Street, Suite A
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo CA 93401
24 Hour Count Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
www.metrotrafficdata.com
STREET LATITUDE
SEGMENT LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
OS
Boysenberry Street
North of Cedar Street
2/26/2015 Sunny and clear
35.117452°
-120.604837°
NUMBER OF LANES
Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
12:00 AM 00000 00000 0
1:00 AM 00000 00000 0
2:00 AM 00011 00011 2
3:00 AM 00000 00000 0
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2
Hourly
Totals
Northbound Southbound
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 AM 00011 00101 2
6:00 AM 00000 11002 2
7:00 AM 01102 12104 6
8:00 AM 12014 00000 4
9:00 AM 00000 10102 2
10:00 AM 12104 02103 7
11:00 AM 11226 00011 7
12:00 PM 00101 10001 2
1:00 PM 22105 00011 6
2:00 PM 13105 00101 6
3:00 PM 32229 20013 12
4:00 PM 01012 20114 6
5:00 PM 21104 30003 7
6:00 PM 01102 10023 5
7:00 PM 00000 00101 1
8:00 PM 10102 10113 5
9:00 PM 00000 00000 0
10:00 PM 10001 10001 2
11:00 PM 00000 00000 0
49 35Total58.3%41.7%
AM% 38.1% AM Peak 7 10:15 am to 11:15 am AM P.H.F. 0.44
PM% 61.9% PM Peak 12 3:00 pm to 4:00 pm PM P.H.F. 0.60
Total 84
10
Thursday - 2/26/15
Northbound
Southbound
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
# of vehicles0
1
2
3
Time Period
Item 12.a. - Page 118
----
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:Omni-Means, Ltd.
669 Pacific Street, Suite A
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo CA 93401
24 Hour Count Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
www.metrotrafficdata.com
STREET LATITUDE
SEGMENT LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
OS
Boysenberry Street
South of Cedar Street
2/26/2015 Sunny and clear
35.116942°
-120.604877°
NUMBER OF LANES
Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
12:00 AM 10001 00000 1
1:00 AM 00000 00000 0
2:00 AM 00011 00101 2
3:00 AM 00000 00000 0
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hourly
Totals
Northbound Southbound
2
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 AM 00011 00000 1
6:00 AM 00000 10102 2
7:00 AM 03003 00112 5
8:00 AM 32117 00000 7
9:00 AM 11002 01001 3
10:00 AM 11103 01113 6
11:00 AM 11002 00011 3
12:00 PM 20103 10102 5
1:00 PM 10113 21003 6
2:00 PM 22004 10012 6
3:00 PM 01326 03047 13
4:00 PM 01102 12126 8
5:00 PM 13105 22217 12
6:00 PM 00101 00011 2
7:00 PM 10001 10113 4
8:00 PM 01102 21014 6
9:00 PM 00101 00000 1
10:00 PM 00000 00101 1
11:00 PM 00000 00000 0
48 46Total51.1%48.9%
AM% 31.9% AM Peak 8 7:15 am to 8:15 am AM P.H.F. 0.67
PM% 68.1% PM Peak 14 3:15 pm to 4:15 pm PM P.H.F. 0.58
Total 94
8
Thursday - 2/26/15
Northbound
Southbound
3
4
5
6
7
8
# of vehicles0
1
2
Time Period
Item 12.a. - Page 119
----
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:Omni-Means, Ltd.
669 Pacific Street, Suite A
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo CA 93401
24 Hour Count Report
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
www.metrotrafficdata.com
STREET LATITUDE
SEGMENT LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
OS
Seabright Ave
East of Oak Park Blvd
2/26/2015 Sunny and clear
35.116907°
-120.609455°
NUMBER OF LANES
Hour 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
12:00 AM 04004 00101 5
1:00 AM 00000 00000 0
2:00 AM 24006 00101 7
3:00 AM 00000 00000 0
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2
Hourly
Totals
Eastbound Westbound
4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 AM 01012 00134 6
6:00 AM 00235 113510 15
7:00 AM 341513 537621 34
8:00 AM 539421 695222 43
9:00 AM 322411 523414 25
10:00 AM 370616 432413 29
11:00 AM 716620 12159 29
12:00 PM 543618 329620 38
1:00 PM 668424 324312 36
2:00 PM 263516 126817 33
3:00 PM 1268733 563418 51
4:00 PM 1047829 554923 52
5:00 PM 91391243 589325 68
6:00 PM 446418 626216 34
7:00 PM 662317 453315 32
8:00 PM 537520 340512 32
9:00 PM 20002 21227 9
10:00 PM 23005 20103 8
11:00 PM 11002 10012 4
325 265Total55.1%44.9%
AM% 32.7% AM Peak 48 7:45 am to 8:45 am AM P.H.F. 0.86
PM% 67.3% PM Peak 70 4:45 pm to 5:45 pm PM P.H.F. 0.83
Total 590
50
Thursday - 2/26/15
Eastbound
Westbound
1
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
# of vehicles0
5
10
15
Time Period
Item 12.a. - Page 120
----
Berry Gardens Traffic Calming Study City
of Arroyo Grande R1985RPT001.docx
APPENDIX C
RESIDENT LETTER AND PETITION FOR ALL-WAY STOP
Item 12.a. - Page 121
Item 12.a. - Page 122
Dear Mayor Ferrara,
My wife and I are residents of the Berry Gardens neighborhood in Arroyo Grande. We, and many others, are
deeply concerned about the safety of our children and neighbors. We reside at the corner of Boysenberry St
and Cedar St. This area has a large number of young children who cross the street regularly to play with one
another, and several neighbors who must cross Cedar St to get their mail. We have noticed a high
concentration of traffic that speed down Cedar St, as a short-cut between Spruce St and Courtland St, making
it unsafe for walkers and bikers to cross. We have even had police stop to tell us that they felt it was unsafe for
the children to cross Cedar St. because of the speeding cars.
More often than not, these drivers will speed down Cedar and through the intersection of Boysenberry going
between 35 and 50 mph with no regard for the numerous pedestrians and bikers in the area. At night,
sometimes they can be heard revving their engines as they carelessly blast by.
This is a tragedy waiting to happen. The problem is continuing to grow worse, and we, along with 50+
families in our immediate area, are submitting our petition to respectfully request that the city install stop signs
at the critical intersection of Boysenberry St and Cedar St. to slow the traffic. It is our responsibility to make
sure our streets are safe for ALL of our neighbors; driving, biking, and walking.
Sincerely,
Jason and Breanna Walsh
175 Boysenberry St
805-369-1893
s:-
:z. 0 ..c::.
' (.-,)
~
\I:) ...
..,:--
r.:r:
-<
0
-,, ::0
:;::,rn
::OC'i ::orn o--<< 08
c::,
::0
J:>' ...,.
0 rn
Item 12.a. - Page 123
I . -.
, ·,
._. _; ~ .
'.,·:; .
I •
'
Petition to Install a 4-way Stop
at
Cedar and Boysenoerry .
_ RECEIVED
Cl I Y OF .4RROYO GRANDE
14 NOV '""3 AM 9: 45
I agree with the proposal to install a 4-way stop at the intersection of ·Cedar arid
Boysenberry. ·
Address
~~~i.t:i!#-~~=----l71¥iJJaca~dS-J., l A~ , 9.JII..JO
l7t-5 l!is..1.f \'" L, . .,-a s:1, AG 5 <11.11 t/
, 2ss cu a.v-s b ~ ; 't J-n .
l40{-., Bluekr'"c) JA-.,,e 1 A 6'.,q3y,20
\ ~ ~ve-~er,,(\AVE!.,..,...~..f Av:v, ~~4 2-0
\~ ~,'3si:~/ifr,, °t3y20 ;
;?-~ ~,f\ t'.WY~6½~~ y<f)o
r2 ~ y ~ v-5J.-T l\l? , "i '> y2...n
145 egd~r 6-I. A,&. 1.>~/i?v!
tt.{1,,---z, ', u4v (t ~-6, tf>~,
l ':-{ ::l3 ~ . .&f A, G Orr 3 l/ '2 ~
l'tdl c!edAAL <2; Cf J 1/.1-0
, '
z.c;S !Aey~ A:{; .· q3 yio ·
1.z& 0 Sac;}_ Sf, 1 A Cr. 2:3Uo ,
,~ ~ '{ Gf2l c..___. :.:;+ . l"1:0 93 C/21)
5 t> q3i1-2_6
'13 !/ ;
Item 12.a. - Page 124
0 ' • .
. ".:::. ,.,:'
'' ,-. :
I C\ . ; .
. . . .
· Petition to Install a 4-way Stop
at
Cedar and Boysenberry
·. l agree with the proposal to install a 4-way stop at the intersection of Cedar an·d
Boysenberry. ·
Item 12.a. - Page 125
Petition to Install a 4-way Stop
·at
Cedar and Boysenberry
'
I agree with the proposal to install a 4-way stop at the inten;ection of Cedar and
BoyseMberry. · ·
Name Address
1 j c;rs S .AB LJ ;;z. T 0
2 gti)v_4= . . Lj iJ v /c,(o
l 4 I B Bl1+ckt?ELµ..y AV-; A: _<:9.
3 CAP-Lo> 4rBu/<7b ; i a 1 JrH VJ Ct'-' ..l., Tu/\ l½:Q'\ MC Cs, I J(?).:iA:-N
6 C,141rvArJ Ci'B.1QMN ·
7 . . J/ ✓j . · \ ., . · ' / H-eJ en \
:-4:f!h.,~~ .. U;J:"";0i'l:fv1, ~k.orrnao)
8
g
10 ·
11 ·
12
... 13
14
15
19,
17
18
fg
2d
·21
22
23
24
25
..
.. /! // // //
14-f / Rt(: s; f ~'--,,.'Y:J (ov.e f>:s. ,c, C
lJ 7 i~c'c)~\\;,r::1-'1' A-Y. . .M·-2
ATTACHMENT 3
Item 12.a. - Page 126
Patsy Lynch
1 SOO Strawberry Ave
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
To: Jim Garing, Interim City Engineer
Attachment
Requesting consideration to implement traffic calming on Courtland, between
Huckleberry and Grande Ave.
This letter is following two previous letters sent on 12/1/2016, and 2/12/2017 .regarding
traffic issues. As requested I contacted as many of the area residents available and
discussed all the concerns listed below. Atuitched is the list of resident's signatures.
Coming from Ash the two stop signs, one at Loganberry Ave and the other at
Huckleberry Ave, these help control the traffic around Kingo Park, although there
ls a problem that many vehicles do not make a complete stop. Traffic traveling
East and West on Courtland ignore the residential speed limit of 25 :from Grande
Ave to the Huckleberry stop sign.
.'.!, The traffic on Courtland has increased in frequency and speed, it is obvious
Courtland is used as a short cut by non-local residents. There are three time
periods that are affected, 6am-9:30am, 11am-2pm; 3:30pm -9pm+.
3. *Pavement joint on Courtland adjacent to our living room northside and
neighbors bedroom southside of Courtland.
*NOTE: Received letter dated 9/26/2017 with a list of street repairs~
Prqject PW 2017-04, includes repairing the pavement joint on Courtland.
Please take our concerns into account, keeping neighborhood sa(!, quieter by
implementing traffic calming measures on Courtland,
Oat-~~~1-
PatsyLynch
cc: Teresa McClish, Director of Community Development
Item 12.a. - Page 127
Item 12.a. - Page 128
Patsy Lynch
1500 Strawberry Ave
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
To: Teresa McClish, Director of Community Development
Re: Traffic Concerns
February 17, 2017
We submitted a letter on December 1, 2016 regarding our traffic concerns, we have not received a response, we did receive a call from Ken Sage, traffic commission on December 9, 2016 stating he was meeting with all concerned, to date we have not heard any more.
As stated in or first letter the traffic on Courtland is increasing and the speed limit is exceeding the posted speed limit for a residential area. As stated in the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Guidelines memorandum dated April 12, 2016 authored by Matt Hom, Ci:ty Engineer, "Residential streets are planned to provide access to and from residential neighborhoods not intended for use of non-local traffic". There are three daily time periods that are affected, approximately 6am -9:30am, 11am -2pm, 3:30pm -9pm which leaves little time of quiet. It appears one cause for the Courtland traffic, is the signal on Oak Park Blvd. and Grande Ave is slow causing drivers to avoid that area.
Police have been contacted on several occasions, we are appreciative of their response but has not been
effective, speeding drivers need to be stopped, possibly issuance of tickets. We understand they cannot be present at all hours but selecting a peak period to observe traffic would help.
Please take our concerns into account, and keep our neighborhood safe by implementing Traffic Calming measures on Courtland Ave.
Cc: Jim Hill, Mayor
Cc: Traffic Commission
Cc: Steven Annibali, Chief of Police
Item 12.a. - Page 129
Patsy Lynch
1500 Strawberry Ave.
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
805-994-7059
To: Teresa McClish, Director of Community Development
RE: Traffic Concerns
December 1, 2016
husband and I have recently relocated from the northern California area to the wonderful City of
Arroyo Grande. We really love the area and being dose to the beach and other areas of interest.
However, we are very concerned with the amount of traffic that is building on Courtland Avenue that
seems to be increasing in both frequency and volume. Our concerns primarily lie with the lack of
compliance to the posted speed limit as we are very dose to schools and a children's park two blocks
away.
We have contacted and spoke with several individuals and agencies, yet no real solution or measures
have been put into place.
I have read the Memorandum that recently was discussed concerning the implementation of Traffic
Calming Guidelines that was issues on April lin of this year. It specifically addresses the same concerns
we are dealing with in our neighborhood, people are diverting their drives down Courtland to avoid the
more congested Oak Park Boulevard commute, but it is at the expense of safety. The posted speed limit
is being violated excessively.
There was a radar trailer here for a day or two, and patrol officers for about the same time, but as the
equipment was removed, traffic continues to be heavy and speeding the norm.
I am hoping that with your assistance, our concerns will be addressed. We live directly adjacent to
concrete tiles on Courtland that are very loud when cars cross them, the volume can be very annoying
to people with houses dose to Courtland.
They are currently building new homes on the corner of Grand and Courtland, and I truly believe that
the safety issue will increase as families move in and children will be more prevalent in the area with the
school nearby.
As it states in the memorandum, the advantages of such measures will benefit the area and there are no
disadvantages of this process. Please take our concerns into account, and keep our neighborhood safe
by implementing traffic calming measures on Courtland Ave.
Cc: Jim Mayor
I :;,_jq, , .,,,..,..f,,,...
Cc: Ken Sage, Traffic Commissioner (!JJ.,,LJ1.<..f.L' 1 • ~ w/ 6 CA.th.A)
Cc: Steven Annibali, Chief of Police
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Item 12.a. - Page 130