The URL can be used to link to this page

CC 2022-02-22 Agenda Packet CITY OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING PRRD 0 GfiegAjbE AGENDA SUMMARY Tuesday, February 22, 2022, 6:00 p.m. CALIFORNIA+ `� iitZiff Please click the link below to join the Zoom Meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83255848846 Webinar ID: 832 5584 8846 Or by Telephone: 1-669-900-6833; 1-346-248-7799 Given the recent increase in COVID-19 cases in San Luis Obispo County, and in compliance with Assembly Bill(AB)361, which allows for a deviation of teleconference rules required by the Ralph M. Brown Act, City Council meetings will be conducted by video/teleconferencing through Zoom Webinar until further notice. Meetings will be broadcast live on Channel 20 and streamed on the City's website and www.slo-span.org. Members of the public may participate and provide public comment on agenda items during the meeting by joining the Zoom meeting or by submitting written public comments to the Clerk of the Council at publiccomment@arroyogrande.org. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. MOMENT OF REFLECTION 4. FLAG SALUTE 5. AGENDA REVIEW 5.a. Closed Session Announcements The City Attorney will announce reportable actions taken, if any, from the Special Meeting of February 22, 2022: a) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8: Property: 400 West Branch Street Agency negotiators: Whitney McDonald, City Manager; Bill Robeson, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director Negotiating parties: Dev Patel, on behalf of Kamla Hotels Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment 5.b. Ordinances read in title only None. 6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 6.a. Update Regarding Countywide COVID-19 Efforts (McDONALD) Recommended Action: Receive update, accept public comments, discuss, and provide direction as necessary. 6.b. City Manager Communications (McDONALD) Recommended Action: Receive correspondence/comments as presented by the City Manager and Provide direction, as necessary. 6.c. Annual Presentation from Central Coast Community Energy (CCCE) 7. COMMUNITY COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS This public comment period is an invitation to members of the community to present issues, thoughts, or suggestions on matters not scheduled on this agenda. Comments should be limited to those matters that are within the jurisdiction of the City Council. Members of the public may provide public comment in-person or remotely by joining the Zoom meeting utilizing one of the methods provided below. Please use the "raise hand" feature to indicate your desire to provide public comment. • Click the link below to join the webinar: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83255848846; Webinar ID: 832 5584 8846 • Or by Telephone: 1-669-900-6833; 1-346-248-7799 Press * 9 to "raise hand" for public comment The Brown Act restricts the Council from taking formal action on matters not published on the agenda. In response to your comments, the Mayor or presiding Council Member may: • Direct City staff to assist or coordinate with you. • A Council Member may state a desire to meet with you. • It may be the desire of the Council to place your issue or matter on a future Council agenda. Please adhere to the following procedures when addressing the Council: • Comments should be limited to 3 minutes or less. • Your comments should be directed to the Council as a whole and not directed to individual Council members. • Slanderous, profane or personal remarks against any Council Member or member of the audience shall not be permitted. 8. CONSENT AGENDA The following routine items listed below are scheduled for consideration as a group. The recommendations for each item are noted. Any member of the public who wishes to comment on any Consent Agenda item may do so at this time. Any Council Member may request that any item be withdrawn from the Consent Agenda to permit discussion or change the recommended course of action. The City Council may approve the remainder of the Consent Agenda on one motion. Page 2 of 340 8.a. Consideration of Cash Disbursement Ratification (VALENTINE) Recommended Action: Ratify the attached listing of cash disbursements for the period of January 16 through January 31, 2022. 8.b. Consideration of Fiscal Year 2021-22 Mid-Year Financial Status Report and Request to Approve One Budget Adjustment Request (VALENTINE) Recommended Action: Receive, consider, and file the FY 2021-22 Mid-Year Financial Status Report; and approve one Budget Adjustment Request in the amount of$27,550 for the addition of an Associate Engineer position in the Public Works Department. 8.c. Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Declaring a Continued Local Emergency Related to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic (McDONALD) Recommended Action: Adopt a Resolution declaring a continued local emergency related to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. 8.d. Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the Continuance of Remote Teleconference Meetings of the Legislative Bodies of the City of Arroyo Grande Pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e)(3) (MATSON/CARMEL) Recommended Action: Adopt a Resolution authorizing the continuance of remote teleconference meetings pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e)(3). 8.e. Consideration of Approval of Minutes (MATSON) Recommended Action: Approve the minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of February 8, 2022, as submitted. 8.f. Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Adopting and Authorizing Submittal of a Notification of Intent to Comply in Accordance with SB 619 to CalRecycle (McDONALD) Recommended Action: Adopt a Resolution adopting and authorizing submittal of a Notification of Intent to Comply in accordance with SB 619 to CalRecycle. 8.g. Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22050 Determining to Continue Work Under Emergency Contracts for the Storm Drain System at 251 East Grand Avenue Project, PW 2021-12 (ROBESON) Recommended Action: Page 3 of 340 Adopt a Resolution finding that there is a need to continue the emergency action for the storm drain system repairs at 251 East Grand Avenue in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22050. 8.h. Consideration of Resolution Accepting an Offer of Dedication for Street, Drainage, Slope and Public Utility Easements Per Parcel Map AG PM 06-0004 and Acceptance of Castillo Del Mar Extension Project Improvements, PW 2021-05 (ROBESON) Recommended Action: Adopt a Resolution: 1) rescinding the action to reject the offer of dedication for street, drainage, slope and public utility easements, 2) accepting the offer of dedication for street, drainage, slope and public utility easements known as Castillo Del Mar as identified on Parcel Map AG PM 06-0004, and 3) accepting the project improvements as constructed by J.J. Fisher Construction, Inc. in accordance with the plans and specifications for the Castillo Del Mar Extension Project, PW 2020-05; and direct staff to file a Notice of Completion, and authorize release of retention, thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded, if no liens have been filed. 8.i. Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Updated Freeway Maintenance Agreement with the State of California for the Portion of State Highway Route (SR) 101 within the City of Arroyo Grande (ROBESON) Recommended Action: 1) Adopt a Resolution approving and authorizing the Mayor to execute the Freeway Maintenance Agreement for the portion of State Highway Route (SR) 101 within the City of Arroyo Grande; and 2) Direct the City Clerk to forward the Resolution, Freeway Maintenance Agreement, and Letter of Self Insurance to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 8.j. Consideration of Rejection of All Bids or Awarding a Contract for the Base Bid and Additive Alternative for Construction of the Swinging Bridge Retrofit Project, PW 2021-06, and Appropriation of Funds from the Sales Tax Fund Balance (ROBESON) Recommended Action: Reject all bids and direct staff to solicit new bids after modifications are made to the construction documents for the Swinging Bridge Retrofit Project (PW2021-06). 8.k. Monthly Water Supply and Demand Update (ROBESON) Recommended Action: Receive and file the monthly Water Supply and Demand Report. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9.a. Public Hearing on the Creation of a District-Based Election System and Consideration of Draft District Maps Recommended Action: 1) Receive a report from the consultant and staff on the districting process and outreach efforts; 2) Conduct a public hearing to consider draft maps; 3) Provide direction on which Page 4 of 340 maps should be considered for final selection at the next Public Hearing; and 4) Provide direction on a proposed election sequence. 10. OLD BUSINESS 10.a. Receive an Update on Progress Toward Council Goals and Priorities for Fiscal Year 2021- 22 (McDONALD) Recommended Action: Receive an update regarding progress toward the City Council's Fiscal Year 2021-22 Goals and Priorities. 11. NEW BUSINESS 11.a. Discussion Regarding Municipal Code Requirements Related to the Sale and Discharge of Class C ("Safe and Sane") Fireworks (McDONALD/LIEBERMAN) Recommended Action: Discuss Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Section 8.08 related to the sale and discharge of Class C ("Safe and Sane") fireworks, and provide direction to staff regarding potential changes to the existing code section, such as a complete prohibition of fireworks in the City or other modifications. 12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS 12.a. MAYOR RAY RUSSOM: 1. California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA) 2. Central Coast Community energy (CCE) 3. City Selection Committee 4. South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD) 5. Tourism Business Improvement District Advisory Board 6. Other 12.b. MAYOR PRO TEM GEORGE: 1. County Water Resources Advisory Committee (WRAC) 2. Visit SLO CAL Advisory Board 3. Other 12.c. COUNCIL MEMBER BARNEICH: 1. Audit Committee 2. Homeless Services Oversight Council (HSOC) 3. Zone 3 Water Advisory Board 4. Other Page 5 of 340 12.d. COUNCIL MEMBER STORTON: 1. Brisco/Halcyon Interchange Subcommittee 2. Five Cities Fire Authority (FCFA) 3. Integrated Waste Management Authority Board (IWMA) 4. South County Chambers of Commerce Governmental Affairs Committee 5. Other 12.e. COUNCIL MEMBER PAULDING: 1. Air Pollution Control District (APCD) 2. Brisco/Halcyon Interchange Subcommittee 3. Council of Governments/Regional Transit Authority/ South County Transit (SLOCOG/SLORTA/SCT) 4. REACH SLO Advisory Commission 5. Other 13. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS Any Council Member may ask a question for clarification, make an announcement, or report briefly on his or her activities. In addition, subject to Council policies and procedures, Council Members may request staff to report back to the Council at a subsequent meeting concerning any matter or request that staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. Any request to place a matter of business for original consideration on a future agenda requires the concurrence of at least one other Council Member. 14. CLOSED SESSION None. 15. ADJOURNMENT All staff reports or other written documentation, including any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the City Council within 72 hours of a regular meeting, relating to each item of business on the agenda are available for public inspection during regular business hours in the City Clerk's office, 300 E. Branch Street, Arroyo Grande. If requested, the agenda shall be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act. To make a request for disability-related modification or accommodation, contact the Legislative and Information Services Department at 805-473-5400 as soon as possible and at least 48 hours prior to the meeting date. This agenda was prepared and posted pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2 Agenda reports can be accessed and downloaded from the City's website at www.arroyogrande.org If you would like to subscribe to receive email or text message notifications when agendas are posted, you can sign up online through the "Notify Me" feature. City Council Meetings are cablecast live and videotaped for replay on Arroyo Grande's Government Page 6 of 340 Access Channel 20. The rebroadcast schedule is published at www.slo-span.org. Page 7 of 340 Annual Member Agency Update City of Arroyo Grande February 22, 2022 Central Coast 4111 Community WI Enrgy Item 6.c. How Does CCA Work? "A Partnership to support shared customers" hiadi Central Coast 11M Community Page 9 of 340 4roFEnergy Item 6.c. �,E cam, , ��g-vaL . CITY OF s� clop l� ��cxnveR` of a o oC" o -8, I ,,..Q F / r_,� v `f..) :11111111:„„„Ho. { Y •;tircSo'mti{u+s.a�' 4 a GIG 0 tI _ I 1°,4/f-§:k.,„: • __��'� `� ALIFORNIA) 1 �04 r,OLETA '''. - ®�. 1��`' ' ~ '+•�9amcrouda.�1�jNrlass �„� eRev� �J T HE °.1. FOf. A• �.>.,r __ ` �ylF'I I o�� LLISTi CRY cc r ti '�a�of �\.F c,.. . S 1--------`• �� I � \ Central Coast * •,-�� r9 *��{ � Community ��. , ,: �'� CALIFORNIA ckr`dF&R ° Santa Cruz County - Energy c !��ry p Nc li gLIFOR� 180' (------ a . o� SOLCSO OFSA'", San Benito County, o ti's ' GtT Y O�� o .,, a1�Jia O } �� `t.n; Monterey County I� 9Lir IFOR� A • � �� "�LIFOR�� — r-lli�L - O °4O o i612122:H' dUAN o G�— FS d9 031.1 NIT W �>, ': �� Paso Robles 'J s 4 - C9 ,, k� - � SAND =. n w - ' ' e� W.; r Morro Bayn r' -.a�*,`•"zxaTeL,u�r;4y CIT)7 Grover Beach San Luis Obispo 1869 O ,•.,•�y`�� OArroyo Grande Pi mo B-ach 7850' I 4,c�Ro�F .�� Ufa Santa Barbara County °� �' err U�9 • LJ ;m • J ` : 4k �q 1 ��18$� ti�14'01100 otia C'�L+F0f.,r.4' ��i rrlr,":-,., ED L,`CY O\ o� SplG �I— jtc, LO) 4,--------72-..t. �� `' ��c. �qh� �� ln,CaRno0.aK&° � �f M AU G1r r MO 6{�" f rQ� Ri1DRA � City Santa Maria _ CAnonaita0 Central Coast r!. Community Page 10 of 340 E Item 6.c. CCCE GOVERNANCE Policy Board: Meets 4 Times Annually including Annual Meeting Operations Board: Meets 10 Times Annually including Annual Meeting Community Advisory Council: Meets 7 Times Annually including Annual Meeting IN m IIII County of City of City of County of City of County of County of City of Santa Cruz Santa Cruz Watsonville Monterey Salinas San Benito Santa Santa Maria Barbara AL. ...XL, Coastal II Peninsula Salinas San Benito Santa Cruz San Luis South SB County SB County Cities Cities Cities Cities Cities Obispo County Cities Cities Cities Cities Marina Carmel Greenfield Hollister* Capitola* Guadalupe Goleta Monterey San Luis Arroyo Solvang* Sand City* Gonzales San Juan Obispo* Grande Pacific* Scotts Buellton Carpinteria* SeasideGrove Bautista Valley Morro Bay p Grover Del Rey Soledad* Paso Robles 10 Beach Oaks Pismo* Beach *City representative currently serving in a shared sea jotCentral Coast Community Page 11 of 340 41110Energy Item 6.c. • 3Cchoice — clean & renewable • $50+ million — Customer • Contracts with Local Vendors Over �n offering benefits $1,000,000 V L • 3Cprime — 100% renewable • Over $14 million set aside • 38 full time employees offering for FY 21/22 Energy • 2 offices — Monterey& San Luis • 94% enrollment Programs Obispo W Local Economic ''� LocalChoice IPSAVINGS `=,:m,��;o�, Vitality Support Z44a . - ....., V1 1-1 • Received an A rating with S&P • 889 MWs of Renewables — solar, • Over $140 Million in Rate wind, geothermal Stabilization Fund • 261 MWs of battery storage Pm' • Service and Loans Paid Off • Pathway to 100% clean & renewable W 0 Financial a Clean • , ,y C..) 0 Stability Energy fso��`�y F C.) C.) .. i„„, CM) < Central Coast rik Community Page 12 of 340 Energy Item 6.c. CCCE'S Pathway to 100% Clean and 700% " I., Renewable by 2030 Pe by 2030 91, Supporting Affordable Rates, Increasing Renewable Resources, and Accelerating Greenhouse Gas Reduction CCCEs new energy-supply strategy will provide the folllowing benefits: ,A) Irk CCCEs goal is to reach 60% clean and renewable energy by 2025 (5 years ahead of A's goal) and 100% by 2030 ( 15 years ahead of CA's goal) Irak _AK Financially beneficial to customers and CCCE through reduced operating costs of $B-15 million/year allowing for more affordable and stable ratesiir r while supporting economic development 7 a #- ' . . A 1.. / Learn more at / nerg .or /understanding-clean-energy/ 1 i Page 13 of 340 Item 6.c. FAST TRACKING NEW ENERGY DEVEL • CCCE Long-term (LT) Contracting Status as a % of Retail Load 100% CCCE's Executed Contract Summary 90% 80% Project Type Count Gen Capacity(MW) Storage Capacity (MW) 70% 60% 50% Solar + Storage PPAs 9 633 201 40% Solar Only PPAs 1 150 30% 20% Wind PPAs 1 33 10% Geothermal PPAs 2 73 0% 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 RA Only Agreement 1 60 3CE Executed PPA% State RPS Requirement% State RPS LT Contracting Requirement%-3CE's Procurement Policy% 14 889 261 These projects will serve about 61 % of CCCE's retail load when all are online, expected in 2025. Central Coast Community Page 14 of 340 Energy Item 6.c. CCCE COMMITMENT TO RENEWABLE PROCUREMENT • contracted for approximately $ 1 billion in long term solar plus storage contracts since 2018 • shortlisted 7 local projects through its local renewables RFP • Joined other CCAs to advance long duration storage RFP to support grid reliability through existing and new technologies • issued an RFQ for up to 100MW of front of the meter battery storage, with the potential to island projects for increased resiliency • We invite the City of Seaside to join this project and identify Central sites Community Page 15 of 340V' Energy Item 6.c. CCCE HISTORIC RATES & COVID- 19 RESPONSE Jan April May & July 2020 — 2018 2019 2020 0 June 2020 Feb 2022 3% rebate 5% rebate 4 7% monthly 50% Bill 2% discount Reduction discount Central Coast rh Community Page 16 of 340 Energy Item 6.c. GOALS OF 2022 CCCF SERVICE OFFFRINGS V Long-term rate adoption increases predictability and rate stability PREDICTABILITY Customer choices and transparency improve with simplified customer SIMPLICITY classes New rates increase customer rate equity throughout customer segments FAIRNESS New rate structure maintains competitive rates across all customer segments COMPETITIVENESS https://3cenergy.org/2022-energy-choices/ Central Coast Community Page 17 of 340 Energy Item 6.c. APPROVED APPROA ' O RATE DESIGN 1 . Estimate the total cost necessary to serve all 3CE customers • Power procurement • Energy Programs • Rate stabilization fund • Administrative costs 2 . Create simple, easily understood customer classes based on size and usage profile 3. Allocate total cost across customer classes 4 . Adjust allocations so each class will save a minimum of 1 `)/0 relative to PG&E 5. Design rates for each customer class to recover costs allocated to that class 6. Rates will go live effective March 1 , 2022 for customers within PG&E's service territory , Central Coast Community Page 18 of 340 Energy Item 6.c. FY 21/22 Energy Programs ',Ammo CCCE Energy Programs 4.0 `OMM°""r.; Electrify Your Ride - $2.8 million - NOVEMBER 2021 exp Overview: School Bus Electrification - $1 million - OCTOBER 2021 • $1 .3 million in FY 18/19 Agriculture Electrification - $600k - OCTOBER 2021 • $5.4 million in FY 19/20 • $6.2 million in FY 20/21 Residential Electrification - $1.6 million • Estimated $14. 1 million in FY 21/22 New Construction Electrification - $1.5 million - OCYOBER 2021 • 4% of operating revenue in FY —_ 21/22 Reach Code - $60k jr] Battery Energy Storage Pilot - $350k Electrification in building and transportation sectors could �`_ Summer Readiness - $400., result in $3 billion of a`++ Energy Education, Workforce Development and Innovation Grants - untapped revenue market17.7 $1 million wide ill Greenhouse Gas Inventory - $64k Page 19 of 34 Electrification and Innovation Grant Program Planning and Implementation • Funding for planning and implementation projects related to electrification • Intended for member agencies to electrify their vehicle fleets, municipal properties, and the community infrastructure that serves households and businesses. Innovation • Funding to deploy new and innovative electrification or other clean energy- related technology for municipal or community buildings and/or fleets. • Intended to foster market transformation, demonstrate scalable and replicable solutions, and identify potential future CCCE energy program concepts. rCentral Coast h Community Page 20 of 340 Energy Item 6.c. I Y Locall Sited Front of the Yo�� os _- I tai Distributed EnergyStorage Pro4 re • fill , H _ Benefits _� �ntif...i,.i..ff..i � � -ir.ilj -441.: r� a.,z--.'T• I — _ .1,..,,iw _ _ , • Rate Stability reduced energy cost & reduced RA cc .� * {O f4 7' , ;; • Grid Stability local power supply, critical period imports reduce • ewer outages • Grid services balance power flows • Reduced GHGs evening dispatch of day-time "solar" electrons • Local jobs building and maintaining facilities • Potential "micro rid" islandingesiliency ormal munit Page 2 Energy Item 6.c. Medium and Heavy-Duty Vehicle Electrification Program • Intended to support the electrification of Member Agency medium and heavy-duty fleet vehicles • Potential applications include street sweepers, refuse trucks, dump trucks, and first response vehicles • CCCE will reserve funds for qualifying projects and funds will be dispersed once purchases and/or projects are completed • Intended to work in coordination with city/county purchasing schedules and policies • Incentives likely to be tied to increased cost of electric models from standard internal combustion options Arr. Central Coast Community Page 22 of 340V' Energy Item 6.c. Central Coast 0,-11) Community ELECTRIFY YOUR RIDE Energy CLEAN ENERGY.LOCAL CONTROL on Electric Vehicles and Chargers 1 .1;:71 9 AS".... 0-111-1 n i++++r.m� +f+ 116646' er 0 ig w gli, '111:111111114 REDUCE EMISSIONS EQUITABLE ACCESS ELECTRIC VEHICLE REBATES EV CHARGER REBATES Reducing emissions, getting more Providing extra funding for disadvantaged $2,000 - 54,000 in rebates available for $2,41)0 - 110,000 available for elet#ric vehicles (EVs)on the road and communities and low-income customers will purchase or lease of new or used electric Level 2 electric vehicle chargers building more charging stations will tighten up gaps in equitable access to vehicles, including motorcycles and at home or workplace- Includes increase local and regional adoption clean-energy resources e-bikes, Additional stackable funds the labor and material costs for rates to meet state and regional available, including up to 515,000 for installation, including electrical climate action goals income-qualified customers panel upgrades or replacments 'age 23 of 34' Item 6.c. Learn more and apply at 3cenergy.org/electrify-your-rlde-program CityArroyoof Grande •. . _ byThe Numbers � Cht4le4,.Y (96. 74% Enrollment) e,v . 1 ., j ,� 1 �erAlfE i I �� 8 , 343 total enrolled customers ele .moi r 6 ' I li 7 ,218 Residential , a , . -,-,,, . ,.. 1, l'i' ,..„,„ -_ ,, =.,,,..„ 1 - _ , , 1 , 057 Commercial . _ _ • 14 Agricultural I l(iii.k.... *.,...,- ' - -.) I ENERGY PROGRAM FUNDS _.„_ . . .i..,.. lilt .., i Electrify Your Ride $ 18 . 7k dill,. 4. 11 mob _ AL I Central Coast IOW PO Community Page 24 of 340 Energy Item 6.c. FIELD PROMOTION Salinas & San Luis 2021 Obispo W r - 111 eV 40 IVO ' --- ''- I _ ___ _ _. _. . 4,..,„ ze eentravision 1 Atii 11•4e '\r 4-4 , iirimmemo iiiir . .,,,,,_ ,.„,. .4111 a Aftnom . Tl.� , • _4;ar" t� ales NQS& w r .� .10 .: 11 -Aft • Vi; A A '\_a 5 .11 jiii.. ..i i 1:11:t �� g A 1 � .� it,� r 0 .. 4iiii*Eggeli , Provided lunch & PPE to almost 500 jok Central Coast Community workers and counting Page 25 of 340 Energy Item 6.c. ustomer - esources & Tools Phase 1 Enter Account Information English Espanol *PG&E Account Number 0 Help Creating resources to li e I p *Your Last Name or Business Name(as it appears on your PG&E bill) customers get access to data Please enter your Las Name or Business Names as it appears on your PG&E biil *Service Location ZIP Code(as it appears on your PG&E bill) and make informed rate de c i s i o n s (Dont know your account information?Skip this sten.). ,,-. . 11 - Customer Energy Portal - Rate Comparison Tool for Cost of Gridx s :..r RA — . Service .,. ::1 11 1� 1 Phase 2 ��,� �,.��.� _...:m,o�„ ,_ 1,,,m, - Harnessing customer data to ;; gMl integrate energy programs and o.. n_Mv,. _.. _ ._., , .._..0 x,a._ x,.p,_ .,__.,. opportunities for electrification Central Coast rik Community Page 26 of 340 Energy Item 6.c. ID CO IC MISS fl " .I. ! �■■r IF YOU 'RE A BUSINESS IN THE CENTRAL COAST, (i) SIGN UP FOR CENTRAL COAST COMMUNITY CD ENERGY'S VENDOR REGISTRY (1) This Vendor Registry allows CCCE to know what organizations and services Ce are available.Vendors registered with CCCE will be contacted directly with business specific Requests for Proposals as theyareapplicable. ., .,.; P q P L 0 VISIT BIT.LY/CCCE-VENDOR-REGISTRY 13 44./i C Centra ICoast I \ i i) rk Community ' Energy CLEAN ENERGY LOCAL COlITROL, Central Coast rik Community Page 27 of 340 Energy Item 6.c. + • 5 rS I.\ •� 1 T ravel PM A , � .i {_ A Unified Central Coast -I ., T Lr I , CCA _ •1 r 7 ._. • ii : : [ _. L , lg„ 44 ..-J 1 Key Updates: ■..--� • Adopted Cost of Service rate structure to achieve agency goals `I • Working with CCCE member agencies on regulatory and legislative matters that 1 . ..__ . --IIIF:Z.r: ... -Ilk - ensure customer fairness and equal access to resources - 1 •- • Pathway to achieve 100% clean and renewable energy by 2030 i : N. 4 • Leveraging Community Advisory Council for outreach and non-voting seat - participation on Operations & Policy Boards II - !IT..... ea • Engaging with the community around development of future programs - • • "_•- =.111 • Enrollment of over 140k customers in 2021 & 2022 across 12 communities r _ . _ ow' f e 7'rl 1 Jr . ' ' -.� +w' Central Coast •# Community - .�,� a Page 28 of 340 Energy Item 6.c. Stay Connected with CCCE www.3Cenergy.orq cfr info@3CE.org 1.888.909.6227 � @3CEnergy @3CEnergy � @3CEnergyEnEspanol Follow us online, join our newsletter and board agenda notification list, and check our extensive FAQ section on the website. opCentral Coast Community Page 29 of 340 Energy Item 6.c. 7./IRROVO OCt 0,0 INCORPORATE �IY °I JULY 10, 1911) cQ<<FO�P MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Nicole Valentine, Administrative Services Director BY: Lynda Horejsi, Accounting Manager SUBJECT: Consideration of Cash Disbursement Ratification DATE: February 22, 2022 SUMMARY OF ACTION: Review and ratify cash disbursements. IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES: There is a $828,962.48 fiscal impact that includes the following items: • Accounts Payable Checks $463,202.89 • Payroll & Benefit Checks $365,759.59 RECOMMENDATION: Ratify the attached listing of cash disbursements for the period of January 16 through January 31, 2022. BACKGROUND: Cash disbursements are made weekly based on the submission of all required documents supporting the invoices submitted for payment. Prior to payment, Administrative Services staff reviews all disbursement documents to ensure that they meet the approval requirements adopted in the Municipal Code and the City's Purchasing Policies and Procedures Manual. ANALYSIS OF ISSUES: The attached listing represents the cash disbursements required of normal and usual operations during the period. The disbursements are accounted for in the FY 2021-22 budget. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration: Item 8.a. Page 30 of 340 City Council Consideration of Cash Disbursement Ratification February 22, 2022 Page 2 1. Approve staff's recommendation; 2. Do not approve staff's recommendation; or 3. Provide other direction to staff. ADVANTAGES: • The Administrative Services Department monitors payments of invoices for accountability, accuracy, and completeness using standards approved by the City Council. • Invoices are paid in a timely manner to establish goodwill with merchants. • Discounts are taken where applicable. DISADVANTAGES: There are no disadvantages identified in this recommendation. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: No environmental review is required for this item. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS: The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City's website in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2. Attachments: 1. January 16 — January 31, 2022 — Accounts Payable Check Register 2. January 28, 2022 — Payroll and Benefit Check Registers Item 8.a. Page 31 of 340 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ATTACHMENT 1 CHECK LISTING JANUARY 15-JANUARY 31, 2022 _ Line Check Date (Check# GL Amount Description Acct# Vendor Last Name 1 01/18/2022 292684 $ 4,697.38 02/22 RETIREE MEDICAL 010.4099.5136 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP 2 01/18/2022 292684 368.87 02/22 RETIREE MEDICAL 220.4303.5136 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP 3 01/18/2022 292684 462.03 02/22 RETIREE MEDICAL 010.0000.1111 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP 4 01/20/2022 292685 1,811.47 PROP 218 MAILER-BULK MAIL PERMIT 640.4710.5208 US POSTMASTER 5 01/20/2022 292685 452.90 PROP 218 MAILER-BULK MAIL PERMIT 612.4610.5208 US POSTMASTER 6 01/21/2022 292686 55.00 DONATION-MAYORS HOLIDAY HOUSE 010.0000.4607 5 CITIES HOMELESS COALITION 7 01/21/2022 292687 197.22 ACCT 238451-01839190 RADIO 010.4145.5403 AT&T 8 01/21/2022 292687 33.78 ACCT 235841-39568063 ALARM 220.4303.5303 AT&T 9 01/21/2022 292688 200.00 CPCA TRAINING SYMPOSIUM-POST PER DIEM 010.4204.5501 ZAK AYALA 10 01/21/2022 292689 145.00 01/22 UST INSPECTION 010.4305.5303 B&T SVC STN CONTRACTORS,INC 11 01/21/2022 292690 165.00 PEST CONTROL: PW 010.4213.5303 BREZDEN PEST CONTROL,INC 12 01/21/2022 292691 96.90 GOPHER TRAPS,PRIMER 010.4420.5605 BRISCO MILL&LUMBER YARD 13 01/21/2022 292691 31.42 KILZ PRIMER 010.4420.5605 BRISCO MILL&LUMBER YARD 14 01/21/2022 292691 28.63(3)BUCKETS 640.4712.5255 BRISCO MILL&LUMBER YARD 15 01/21/2022 292691 2.68 GLUE 640.4712.5255 BRISCO MILL&LUMBER YARD 16 01/21/2022 292691 39.86 PW-60 PHONE MOUNT 640.4712.5255 BRISCO MILL&LUMBER YARD 17 01/21/2022 292692 58.19 B'FAST W/SANTA POSTERS 010.4424.5252 BURDINE PRINTING(DBA) 18 01/21/2022 292693 506.30 6 TON 1/2"MED ASPHALT 640.5946.7001 CALPORTLAND CONSTRUCTION 19 01/21/2022 292694 430.00 CIM REFUND-WINTER BREAK WK 3$215X2 010.0000.4602 REBECCA CAMPBELL 20 01/21/2022 292695 68.57 PW-140 TRASH PUMP BATTERY 220.4303.5603 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 21 01/21/2022 292695 40.92 PW-140 TRASH PUMP COOLANT 220.4303.5603 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 22 01/21/2022 292695 5.61 PW-61 WHEEL HUB DUST CAP 220.4303.5603 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 23 01/21/2022 292695 51.59 PW-14 OIL&FILTER 640.4712.5601 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 24 01/21/2022 292696 31.25 SOTO SPORTS COMPLEX SOD 010.4430.5605 CENTRAL COAST SOD INC 25 01/21/2022 292697 11,941.75 1/21-12/21 HILLCREST DR TOWER 010.4145.5553 BLAIR B&MARK H MANKINS,CO-TRUSTEES- 26 01/21/2022 292698 881.00 CASH FOR GRASS-881 SQFT 226.4306.5554 FAITH CROW 27 01/21/2022 292699 177.79 GEARWRENCH EXT SET,RATCHET SET 220.4303.5273 DNB INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 28 01/21/2022 292700 500.00 BASIC SWAT SCHOOL-POST PER DIEM 010.4203.5501 STEPHEN DOHERTY 29 01/21/2022 292701 14,000.00 2021 SOTO SPORTS TURF RENOVATION 350.5515.7001 DORMAN HYDRO-SEEDING 30 01/21/2022 292702 500.00 BASIC SWAT SCHOOL-POST PER DIEM 010.4203.5501 ANTHONY ESTRADA 31 01/21/2022 292703 20.00 PW-22 FLAT TIRE REPAIR 220.4303.5601 FIGUEROA'S TIRES 32 01/21/2022 292704 2,758.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR STORM DRAIN SYSTEM 350.5797.7501 GARING TAYLOR&ASSOCIATES INC 33 01/21/2022 292705 700.00 VILLAGE SIDEWALK CLEANING-116FT 220.4303.5303 HOME DETAILING PROFESSIONALS 34 01/21/2022 292706 90.00 FORFEIT GAME FEES-08/15/21 010.4424.5352 LARRY JUAREZ,SR 35 01/21/2022 292706 300.00 2021 UMPIRE FEE-FALL 010.4424.5352 LARRY JUAREZ,SR 36 01/21/2022 292706 300.00 2021 UMPIRE FEE-SUMMER 010.4424.5352 LARRY JUAREZ,SR 37 01/21/2022 292706 100.00 2021 UMPIRE FEE-SPRING 010.4424.5352 LARRY JUAREZ,SR 38 01/21/2022 292707 34.42 STD 3/8 SOCKET SET 010.4305.5273 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC 39 01/21/2022 292708 5,970.88 1/21-12/21 HILLCREST DR RENT 010.4145.5553 MARK H MANKINS 40 01/21/2022 292709 5,970.88 1/21-12/21 HILLCREST DR RENT 010.4145.5553 BLAIR AND DEANNE MANKINS,RT UTD DTD 9/9/15 Page 32 of 340 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ATTACHMENT 1 CHECK LISTING JANUARY 15-JANUARY 31, 2022 _ Line Check Date (Check# GL Amount Description Acct# Vendor Last Name 41 01/21/2022 292710 $ 246.67 METRIC&SAE T-HANDLES 220.4303.5273 MATCO TOOLS 42 01/21/2022 292711 135.00 LIFT STN#5 MOTOR REPAIR 612.4610.5610 MELLO&SON'S PUMPS&MOTORS 43 01/21/2022 292711 1,198.19 WELL#6&8 MOTOR REPAIRS 640.4711.5603 MELLO&SON'S PUMPS&MOTORS 44 01/21/2022 292712 125.80 B'FAST W/SANTA-REIMBURSE KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS 010.4424.5252 RICK MERCIER 45 01/21/2022 292713 1,500.00 STREETSAVE ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION 350.5638.7701 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT.COMM. 46 01/21/2022 292713 1,000.00 STREETSAVE SOFTWARE SUPPORT SERVICES 350.5638.7701 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT.COMM. 47 01/21/2022 292714 9,283.39 FAIR OAKS WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT 640.5911.7501 MICHAEL K NUNLEY&ASSOC. 48 01/21/2022 292714 5,593.42 2021 SEWER LINING PROJECT DESIGN 612.5821.7501 MICHAEL K NUNLEY&ASSOC. 49 01/21/2022 292715 59.26 1 CU YD DG-SOTO SPORTS COMPLEX 350.5515.7001 MIER BROS LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS 50 01/21/2022 292715 7,693.35 170 CU YDS TEE/MIX SOTO RENOVATION 350.5515.7001 MIER BROS LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS 51 01/21/2022 292715 1,357.65 30 CU YDS TEE/MIX SOTO RENOVAT 350.5515.7001 MIER BROS LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS 52 01/21/2022 292715 140.08 1/3 YD CONCRETE-TALLY HO SVC REPAIR 640.4712.5610 MIER BROS LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS 53 01/21/2022 292716 1,430.00 THANKSGIVING BREAK CAMPS-CYBERCRAWLER 010.4424.5351 MINDS IN MOTION OF NJ LLC 54 01/21/2022 292717 76.54 TAPE,JOINT COMPOUND,DRYWALL 010.4213.5604 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE,INC 55 01/21/2022 292717 59.34 CONNECTOR WIRE,ELECTRIC BALLAST 010.4213.5604 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE,INC 56 01/21/2022 292717 41.99(3)T8 FLORESCENT BULBS 010.4213.5604 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE,INC 57 01/21/2022 292717 26.92 TOILET FLAPPERS 010.4213.5604 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE,INC 58 01/21/2022 292717 35.55 CABLE TIES 010.4213.5604 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE,INC 59 01/21/2022 292717 11.16(4)MOUSE TRAPS 010.4213.5604 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE,INC 60 01/21/2022 292717 41.71 MINI ROLLERS,SPRAY PAINT,CITRUS SPRAY,SANDPAPER 010.4213.5604 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE,INC 61 01/21/2022 292717 21.53 PLUNGER,PLIERS 010.4213.5604 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE,INC 62 01/21/2022 292717 29.69 SPRAYPAINT,DRILL BITS 010.4213.5604 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE,INC 63 01/21/2022 292717 39.85 HEARING PROTECTION,GLOVES 010.4420.5605 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE,INC 64 01/21/2022 292717 8.68(2)KEYS-SOTO 010.4430.5605 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE,INC 65 01/21/2022 292717 8.61 CABLE TIES 010.4430.5605 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE,INC 66 01/21/2022 292717 33.35 (4)CANS SPRAY PAINT,TAPE 010.4430.5605 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE,INC 67 01/21/2022 292717 48.48 STEEL TAMPER 220.4303.5613 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE,INC 68 01/21/2022 292717 17.22(2)BAGS FAST SET CONCRETE 220.4303.5613 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE,INC 69 01/21/2022 292717 7.53 SAMPLE BAGS 640.4712.5255 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE,INC 70 01/21/2022 292717 5.38 BATTERIES 640.4712.5255 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE,INC 71 01/21/2022 292717 32.30 WIRE CONNECTORS FOR METERS 640.4712.5255 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE,INC 72 01/21/2022 292718 35.00 REFUND-BRIDGE 010.0000.4605 CHRISTINE MOORE 73 01/21/2022 292719 210.00 PW-44 REPAIR 612.4610.5601 MULLAHEY FORD 74 01/21/2022 292720 218.15 FCFA FIRE EXTINGUISHER MAINT 010.4213.5303 SCOTT O'BRIEN FIRE&SAFETY CO 75 01/21/2022 292721 870.00 2021 STREET REPAIRS-4 ADDITIONAL STREETS 350.5638.7501 PAVEMENT ENGINEERING INC 76 01/21/2022 292722 200.00 REFUND-WOMENS CLUB DEPOSIT 010.0000.2206 RUBEN PILLE 77 01/21/2022 292723 50.00 PARK DEPOSIT REFUND-STROTHER 010.0000.2206 DAVID RIVERA 78 01/21/2022 292723 58.00 PARK RENTAL REFUND-STROTHER 010.0000.4354 DAVID RIVERA 79 01/21/2022 292724 30.00 ADULT SOFTBALL SCORER-2 X$15 010.4424.5352 MARTINA SARMIENTO 80 01/21/2022 292725 75.00 REFUND-PICKLEBALL 010.0000.4605 KAREN SCHMIDT Page 33 of 340 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ATTACHMENT 1 CHECK LISTING JANUARY 15-JANUARY 31, 2022 Line Check Date (Check# GL Amount Description Acct# Vendor Last Name 81 01/21/2022 292726 $ 14.79 GAS SERVICES-350 S ELM 010.4145.5401 SOCALGAS 82 01/21/2022 292726 274.03 GAS SERVICES-200 N HALCYON 010.4145.5401 SOCALGAS 83 01/21/2022 292726 318.32 GAS SERVICES-1375 ASH ST 010.4145.5401 SOCALGAS 84 01/21/2022 292727 6,699.60 MS Office Pro Plus-- 010.4140.5607 SOFTWAREONE,INC 85 01/21/2022 292727 0.15 MS OFFICE PRO PLUS ELECTRONIC 010.4140.5607 SOFTWAREONE,INC 86 01/21/2022 292728 3,500.00 01/22 TBID ADMIN FEE 240.4150.5303 SOUTH COUNTY CHAMBERS 87 01/21/2022 292729 148.32 DUMPSTERS-RANCHO GRANDE PARK 010.4213.5303 SOUTH COUNTY SANITARY SVC, INC 88 01/21/2022 292729 227.84 DUMPSTERS-FCFA 010.4213.5303 SOUTH COUNTY SANITARY SVC, INC 89 01/21/2022 292729 148.32 DUMPSTERS-STROTHER PARK 010.4213.5303 SOUTH COUNTY SANITARY SVC, INC 90 01/21/2022 292729 116.59 DUMPSTERS-PD 010.4213.5303 SOUTH COUNTY SANITARY SVC, INC 91 01/21/2022 292729 164.23 DUMPSTERS-PW CARDBOARD 010.4213.5303 SOUTH COUNTY SANITARY SVC, INC 92 01/21/2022 292729 160.23 TRASH/RECYCLING-CITY HALL 010.4213.5303 SOUTH COUNTY SANITARY SVC, INC 93 01/21/2022 292730 32,918.52 FY21/22 ANNUAL WATER SYSTEM FEE 640.4710.5303 SWRCB 94 01/21/2022 292731 90.00 M ROBLES D-3,WATER CERT RENEWAL 010.4420.5503 SWRCB-DWOCP 95 01/21/2022 292732 130.57 PD-4618 TOLL&PENALTY 010.4203.5501 THE TOLL ROADS 96 01/21/2022 292733 50.00 PARK DEPOSIT REFUND-HERITAGE PARK 010.0000.2206 TANIA TRONCOSO 97 01/21/2022 292734 6,750.00 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES 220.4303.5303 VENCO POWER SWEEPING INC 98 01/21/2022 292734 2,250.00 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES 010.4307.5303 VENCO POWER SWEEPING INC 99 01/21/2022 292735 200.00 WASHING MACHINE REBATE 226.4306.5554 JARED WORTHEN 100 01/21/2022 292736 200.00 UB Refund Cst#00025954 640.0000.2301 VALERIE BOICE 101 01/21/2022 292737 37.42 UB Refund Cst#00024440 640.0000.2301 NICOLE M DELEON 102 01/21/2022 292738 4.83 UB Refund Cst#00023486 640.0000.2301 JENNIFER EVERETT 103 01/21/2022 292739 9,007.37 FEDERAL WITHHOLDING TAX 011.0000.2104 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 104 01/21/2022 292739 7,404.18 SOCIAL SECURITY 011.0000.2105 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 105 01/21/2022 292739 1,731.62 MEDICARE 011.0000.2105 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 106 01/21/2022 292740 2,702.23 STATE WITHHOLDING TAX 011.0000.2108 CA ST EMPLOYMENT DEVEL DEPT 107 01/21/2022 292740 511.43 STATE SDI CONTRIBUTION 011.0000.2111 CA ST EMPLOYMENT DEVEL DEPT 108 01/21/2022 292741 18,768.52 EE DEFERRED COMP-FLAT 011.0000.2117 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP 109 01/21/2022 292742 20,623.67 FIRE TIER I PPE 01/06/22 011.0000.2106 PERS-RETIREMENT 110 01/21/2022 292742 11,750.28 POLICE TIER I PPE 01/06/22 011.0000.2106 PERS-RETIREMENT 111 01/21/2022 292742 10,784.17 POLICE PEPRA PPE 01/06/22 011.0000.2106 PERS-RETIREMENT 112 01/21/2022 292742 11,527.21 MISC PEPRA PPE 01/06/22 011.0000.2106 PERS-RETIREMENT 113 01/21/2022 292742 8,307.64 MISC TIER I PPE 01/06/22 011.0000.2106 PERS-RETIREMENT 114 01/21/2022 292742 6,967.56 FIRE PEPRA PPE 01/06/22 011.0000.2106 PERS-RETIREMENT 115 01/21/2022 292742 6,138.10 POLICE TIER II PPE 01/06/22 011.0000.2106 PERS-RETIREMENT 116 01/21/2022 292742 3,955.20 MISC TIER II PPE 01/06/22 011.0000.2106 PERS-RETIREMENT 117 01/28/2022 292743 838.96 01/22 SUPPLEMENTAL INSURANCE 011.0000.2126 AFLAC INSURANCE 118 01/28/2022 292744 3,153.50 01/22 AGPD ASSN DUES 011.0000.2116 ARROYO GRANDE POLICE ASSN 119 01/28/2022 292745 41,222.31 FEDERAL WITHHOLDING TAX 011.0000.2104 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 120 01/28/2022 292745 46,807.24 SOCIAL SECURITY 011.0000.2105 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE Page 34 of 340 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ATTACHMENT 1 CHECK LISTING JANUARY 15-JANUARY 31, 2022 _ Line Check Date (Check# GL Amount Description Acct# Vendor Last Name 121 01/28/2022 292745 $ 11,432.84 MEDICARE 011.0000.2105 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 122 01/28/2022 292746 15,952.35 STATE WITHHOLDING TAX 011.0000.2108 CA ST EMPLOYMENT DEVEL DEPT 123 01/28/2022 292746 2,436.10 STATE SDI CONTRIBUTION 011.0000.2111 CA ST EMPLOYMENT DEVEL DEPT 124 01/28/2022 292747 298.84 CHILD SUPPORT PAYDATE 01/28/22 011.0000.2114 CA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 125 01/28/2022 292747 133.38 CHILD SUPPORT PAYDATE 01/28/22 011.0000.2114 CA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 126 01/28/2022 292747 150.46 CHILD SUPPORT PAYDATE 01/28/22 011.0000.2114 CA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 127 01/28/2022 292747 154.15 CHILD SUPPORT PAYDATE 01/28/22 011.0000.2114 CA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 128 01/28/2022 292747 16.15 CHILD SUPPORT PAYDATE 01/28/22 011.0000.2114 CA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 129 01/28/2022 292748 15.00 01/22 AG FIRE ASSN DUES 011.0000.2115 FIVE CITIES FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC 130 01/28/2022 292749 3,360.00 01/22 CAREER FF ASSN DUES 011.0000.2115 FIVE CITIES PROF.FIREFIGHTERS 131 01/28/2022 292750 3,848.39 EE DEFERRED COMP% 011.0000.2117 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP 132 01/28/2022 292750 10,957.48 EE DEFERRED COMP FLAT 011.0000.2117 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP 133 01/28/2022 292750 866.66 ER DEFERRED COMP FLAT 011.0000.2117 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP 134 01/28/2022 292750 275.00 EE ROTH CONTRIBUTION 011.0000.2117 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP 135 01/28/2022 292751 21.51 02/22 RETIREE MEDICAL 010.4099.5136 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP 136 01/28/2022 292752 77.75 01/22 LEGAL SVCS 011.0000.2125 LEGALSHIELD 137 01/28/2022 292753 1,195.60 01/22 SEIU DUES 011.0000.2118 S.E.I.U.LOCAL 620 138 01/28/2022 292754 990.22 EE PARS CONTRIBUTION PAYDATE 01/28/22 011.0000.2107 US BANK OF CALIFORNIA 139 01/28/2022 292754 247.57 ER PARS CONTRIBUTION PAYDATE 01/28/22 011.0000.2107 US BANK OF CALIFORNIA 140 01/28/2022 292755 386.00 SW MONITORING&SAMPLING LAB FEE 220.4303.5303 ABALONE COAST ANALYTICAL INC 141 01/28/2022 292755 386.00 SW MONITORING&SAMPLING LAB FEE 220.4303.5303 ABALONE COAST ANALYTICAL INC 142 01/28/2022 292756 467.04 PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES 010.4423.5253 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 143 01/28/2022 292756 164.58 THERABANDS 010.4424.5251 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 144 01/28/2022 292756 25.85 KEYCHAIN LIGHTS 010.4424.5251 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 145 01/28/2022 292756 284.43 SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES 010.4424.5252 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 146 01/28/2022 292756 252.18 SCHOOL YEAR SUPPLIES 010.4425.5255 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 147 01/28/2022 292756 65.88 COMMUNITY RELATIONS-SANTA COP 010.0000.2025 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 148 01/28/2022 292756 124.10 COVID SUPPLIES 010.4919.5255 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 149 01/28/2022 292757 1,851.85 PURCHASE WATER METERS FOR FY 2021/22 640.4712.5207 AQUA-METRIC SALES CO(DBA) 150 01/28/2022 292757 5,480.28 PURCHASE WATER METERS FOR FY 2021/22 640.4712.5207 AQUA-METRIC SALES CO(DBA) 151 01/28/2022 292757 17.18 REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR WATER METERS 640.4712.5611 AQUA-METRIC SALES CO(DBA) 152 01/28/2022 292758 118.67 PW-5 METAL CUTTING BLADES,WD-40 640.4712.5255 ARROYO GRANDE HOME&GARDEN 153 01/28/2022 292759 390.00 2022 LICENSE-PUBLIC PERF OF COPYRIGHTED MUSIC 010.4003.5319 ASCAP 154 01/28/2022 292760 566.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES-PD ENVELOPES 010.4201.5201 BOONE PRINTING&GRAPHICS INC 155 01/28/2022 292761 37.68(2)FASTSET CONCRETE,BIT TIPS 220.4303.5613 BRISCO MILL&LUMBER YARD 156 01/28/2022 292762 391.00 2022 PUBLIC PERF OF COPYRIGHTED MUSIC 010.4003.5319 BROADCAST MUSIC INC 157 01/28/2022 292763 649.00 01/21-12/21 UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANK 010.4305.5303 CA DEPT OF TAX&FEE ADMIN 158 01/28/2022 292764 1,011.16 10/21-12/21 SMIP 010.0000.2208 CA ST DEPT OF CONSERVATION 159 01/28/2022 292764 (50.56)ADMIN FEE-SMIP 010.0000.4801 CA ST DEPT OF CONSERVATION 160 01/28/2022 292765 224.00 10/21-12/21 STATE GREEN BLDG STD FEE 010.0000.2223 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS Page 35 of 340 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ATTACHMENT 1 CHECK LISTING JANUARY 15-JANUARY 31, 2022 Line Check Date (Check# GL Amount Description Acct# Vendor Last Name 161 01/28/2022 292765 $ (22.40)ADMIN CODE ENF EDUC FEE 010.0000.2223 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS 162 01/28/2022 292766 347.10 FILLSAND DELIVERY 640.5946.7001 CALPORTLAND CONSTRUCTION 163 01/28/2022 292766 436.22 FILL SAND 25 TON 640.5946.7001 CALPORTLAND CONSTRUCTION 164 01/28/2022 292767 16.14 PW-60 WINDSHIELD FLUID&FUEL 640.4712.5601 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 165 01/28/2022 292768 175.62 REPLACEMENT SAFETY SHOES 640.4712.5255 CARR'S BOOTS&WESTERN 166 01/28/2022 292769 1,510.00 2021 QTRLY MAINT,ANNUAL TEST 010.4213.5303 CENTRAL ELEVATOR SERVICES 167 01/28/2022 292770 987.20 ACCT#8245100960223598-PD VOICE 010.4145.5401 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 168 01/28/2022 292770 179.89 ACCT#8245100960223572-PD BUSINESS 010.4145.5401 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 169 01/28/2022 292771 237.00 LCW ANNUAL CONFERENCE-GSA PER DIEM 010.4204.5501 SHAWN COSGROVE 170 01/28/2022 292772 354.35 KYOSERA COPIER LEASE PMT 010.4421.5602 DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SVCS 171 01/28/2022 292773 65.25 2022 ELECTION CODE 010.4002.5506 DFM ASSOCIATES 172 01/28/2022 292774 250.00 SEXUAL ASSAULT INV.POST PER DIEM 010.4204.5501 PHILLIP DOLLMAN 173 01/28/2022 292775 74.00 PROACTIVE PATROL TACTICS-GSA PER DIEM 010.4203.5501 ANTHONY ESTRADA 174 01/28/2022 292776 1,196.32(40)SOTO TURF RENO FERTILIZER 350.5515.7001 EWING 175 01/28/2022 292777 405.31 WELL#9-GALV PIPE,VALVES,FITTINGS 640.4711.5603 FARM SUPPLY CO 176 01/28/2022 292778 20.00 LOCK REPAIR 010.4213.5604 FRANK'S LOCK&KEY 177 01/28/2022 292778 154.73(6)3866 LOCKS, 1 PADLOCK 010.4420.5605 FRANK'S LOCK&KEY 178 01/28/2022 292779 285.00 STUMP GRINDER RENTAL 010.4420.5605 GROVER TOOL AND RENTALS 179 01/28/2022 292779 185.00 STUMP GRINDER RENTAL 010.4420.5605 GROVER TOOL AND RENTALS 180 01/28/2022 292780 175.00 J MATSON MEMBERSHIP 4/22-3/23 010.4002.5503 IIMC-INTL INST OF MUNICIPAL 181 01/28/2022 292781 1,405.52 12/21 ZUMBA,BARRE 010.4424.5351 HEIDY MANGIARDI 182 01/28/2022 292782 237.00 LCW ANNUAL CONFERENCE-GSA PER DIEM 010.4201.5501 MICHAEL MARTINEZ 183 01/28/2022 292783 255.28 PW-44 SMALL TOOLS 612.4610.5273 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE,INC 184 01/28/2022 292783 55.40 BATTERIES FOR STOCK 640.4712.5255 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE,INC 185 01/28/2022 292784 132.02 FIRE EXTINGUISHER SVC-PD 010.4201.5303 SCOTT O'BRIEN FIRE&SAFETY CO 186 01/28/2022 292785 8.89 DELIVERY CHARGES 010.4201.5208 ON TRAC 187 01/28/2022 292786 30.68 ELECTRIC-WELL#11 352 LA CANADA 640.4711.5402 PACIFIC GAS&ELECTRIC CO 188 01/28/2022 292786 13.20 ELECTRIC-484 BAKEMAN LN 219.4460.5304 PACIFIC GAS&ELECTRIC CO 189 01/28/2022 292787 18.00 UNIFORM CLEANING-ADMIN 010.4201.5303 PARAMOUNT CLEANERS 190 01/28/2022 292787 431.50 UNIFORM CLEANING-PATROL SVCS 010.4203.5303 PARAMOUNT CLEANERS 191 01/28/2022 292787 99.25 UNIFORM CLEANING-SUPPORT SVCS 010.4204.5303 PARAMOUNT CLEANERS 192 01/28/2022 292788 1,200.00 PET PICK-UP BAGS 010.4420.5605 PET PICK-UPS 193 01/28/2022 292788 183.21 FREIGHT 010.4420.5605 PET PICK-UPS 194 01/28/2022 292789 41.50(2)SWEAT SHIRT EMBROIDERY 010.4420.5255 R&T EMBROIDERY,INC 195 01/28/2022 292789 50.19 SWEATSHIRTS/HOODIES-HANSON,CA 612.4610.5255 R&T EMBROIDERY,INC 196 01/28/2022 292789 50.18 SWEATSHIRTS/HOODIES-HANSON,CA 640.4712.5255 R&T EMBROIDERY,INC 197 01/28/2022 292790 5.38 COUNCIL CHAMBERS WATER 010.4213.5303 READYREFRESH BY NESTLE 198 01/28/2022 292791 894.13 PW-11 BACKHOE-2 NEW FRONT TIRES 640.4712.5603 SANTA MARIA TIRE, INC 199 01/28/2022 292792 513.00 2022 MUSIC LICENSING ACCT#1172 010.4003.5503 SESAC 200 01/28/2022 292793 1,060.00 SOFTWARE MAINT-INTERVIEW ROOM 010.4204.5607 SIGNALSCAPE INC Page 36 of 340 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ATTACHMENT 1 CHECK LISTING JANUARY 15-JANUARY 31, 2022 _ Line Check Date (Check# GL Amount Description Acct# Vendor Last Name 201 01/28/2022 292793 $ 3,904.90 REPLACE AND UPGRADE INTERVIEW ROOM COMPUTER 010.4204.5607 SIGNALSCAPE INC 202 01/28/2022 292794 264.70 HERBICIDE-WEED ABATEMENT FOR WATER FACILITIES 640.4712.5604 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 203 01/28/2022 292795 813.40 ANNUAL OPERATING PERMIT-STANDBY 640.4710.5303 SLO COUNTY AIR POLLUTION 204 01/28/2022 292796 60.00 T-2 RENEWAL FOR J KAUFMAN 640.4712.5501 SWRCB-DWOCP 205 01/28/2022 292797 30.00 UNIFORMS-GIESMANN 010.4203.5272 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS 206 01/28/2022 292798 232.74 CODE BOOK SUBSCRIPTION 010.4201.5503 THOMSON REUTERS WEST 207 01/28/2022 292799 1,085.28 PW-22 FRONT&REAR PADS&ROTORS 220.4303.5601 TOM'S AUTO SERVICE 208 01/28/2022 292799 2,396.05 PD-4603 REPAIR 010.4203.5601 TOM'S AUTO SERVICE 209 01/28/2022 292800 100.84(1)SQ POST 2 X 12 220.4303.5613 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS 210 01/28/2022 292800 69.11 (5)12x18 SIGNS-JAMES WAY OPEN SPACE 220.4303.5613 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS 211 01/28/2022 292800 504.19(5)SQUARE POST 2X12 220.4303.5613 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS 212 01/28/2022 292800 647.75(4)ROADMAX 5 GALL RED PAINT 220.4303.5613 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS 213 01/28/2022 292800 347.20(6)TURN ARROWS SIGNS 220.4303.5613 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS 214 01/28/2022 292801 255.43 MAYORS MTG-REGIONAL HOST 010.4001.5501 U.S.BANK 215 01/28/2022 292801 (78.60)GRAND BOUQUET FLORIST CREDIT-LIEBERMAN 010.4001.5504 U.S.BANK 216 01/28/2022 292801 964.69 LODGING,MEALS-LLOC NEW LAW SEMINAR 010.4002.5501 U.S.BANK 217 01/28/2022 292801 117.88 COSTCO-EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION LUNCHEON 010.4101.5319 U.S.BANK 218 01/28/2022 292801 174.56 SUPPLIES-EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION 010.4101.5319 U.S.BANK 219 01/28/2022 292801 30.00 MMASC ANNUAL EVENT 010.4101.5501 U.S.BANK 220 01/28/2022 292801 400.00 CA CITY MGMT FOUNDATION-MCDONALD 010.4101.5503 U.S.BANK 221 01/28/2022 292801 34.44 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4120.5201 U.S.BANK 222 01/28/2022 292801 35.00 GFOA BUDGET TRAINING 010.4120.5501 U.S.BANK 223 01/28/2022 292801 99.00 SURVEY MONKEY SUBSCRIPTION 010.4130.5503 U.S.BANK 224 01/28/2022 292801 2.07 SECURE CONFERENCE 010.4140.5303 U.S.BANK 225 01/28/2022 292801 528.85 ZOOM DEPT MEETINGS 010.4140.5303 U.S.BANK 226 01/28/2022 292801 430.00 SOLARWINDS-IT HELPDESK SOFTWARE 010.4140.5303 U.S.BANK 227 01/28/2022 292801 72.73 IT SAVVY-LAPTOP CASES 010.4140.5602 U.S.BANK 228 01/28/2022 292801 344.80 IT SAVVY-VIDEO ADAPTERS 010.4140.5602 U.S.BANK 229 01/28/2022 292801 76.91 AMAZON-MICROPHONE 010.4140.5602 U.S.BANK 230 01/28/2022 292801 129.29 NEWEGG-DOCKING STATION 010.4140.5602 U.S.BANK 231 01/28/2022 292801 47.70 AUTHORIZE,NET CC FEE 010.4145.5555 U.S.BANK 232 01/28/2022 292801 421.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4201.5201 U.S.BANK 233 01/28/2022 292801 1,473.25 SUBSCRIPTION-PATROL QWIK CODES 010.4201.5503 U.S.BANK 234 01/28/2022 292801 23.53 PD RADAR TRAILER DMV 010.4201.5601 U.S.BANK 235 01/28/2022 292801 17.40 RANGE MAINTENANCE 010.4201.5605 U.S.BANK 236 01/28/2022 292801 180.00 ENGINEERS BOARD REGISTRATION 010.4301.5501 U.S.BANK 237 01/28/2022 292801 150.00 CPRS MEMBERSHIP-SIMPSON 010.4420.5503 U.S.BANK 238 01/28/2022 292801 75.00 ABPA MEMBERSHIP-SIMPSON 010.4420.5503 U.S.BANK 239 01/28/2022 292801 100.00 OFFICE MAX-PAPER 010.4420.5605 U.S.BANK 240 01/28/2022 292801 464.39 LOWES-CLEANER ATTACHMENT 010.4420.5605 U.S.BANK Page 37 of 340 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ATTACHMENT 1 CHECK LISTING JANUARY 15-JANUARY 31, 2022 Line Check Date (Check# GL Amount Description Acct# Vendor Last Name 241 01/28/2022 292801 $ 25.00 DREAMSTIME-ACTIVITY GUIDE PHOTO 010.4421.5504 U.S.BANK 242 01/28/2022 292801 172.39 AMAZON--ADJ HEIGHT DESK 010.4421.6001 U.S.BANK 243 01/28/2022 292801 72.86 PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES 010.4423.5253 U.S.BANK a 244 01/28/2022 292801 269.55 SMART&FINAL-B'FAST W/SANTA 010.4424.5252 U.S.BANK 245 01/28/2022 292801 421.25 VONS-TURKEY TROT PRIZES 010.4424.5252 U.S.BANK 246 01/28/2022 292801 363.84 WALMART-B'FAST W/SANTA TABLECLOTHES 010.4424.5252 U.S.BANK 247 01/28/2022 292801 1.41 FACEBOOKAD 010.4424.5351 U.S.BANK 248 01/28/2022 292801 180.00 CC PARTY FACTORY-HALLOWEEN BOUNCE HOUSE 010.4424.5353 U.S.BANK 249 01/28/2022 292801 367.04 SCHOOL YEAR SUPPLIES 010.4425.5255 U.S.BANK 250 01/28/2022 292801 361.70 SNACK SUPPLIES 010.4425.5259 U.S.BANK 251 01/28/2022 292801 20.00 MSA MEETING 220.4303.5501 U.S.BANK 252 01/28/2022 292801 99.28 OFFICE MAX-PAPER 220.4303.5613 U.S.BANK 253 01/28/2022 292801 95.00 PW-44 KAUTZ TOWING 612.4610.5601 U.S.BANK 254 01/28/2022 292801 149.99 D-1 EXAM PREP CLASS--CAMPBELL 640.4712.5501 U.S.BANK 255 01/28/2022 292801 416.62 SANTA COP 010.0000.2025 U.S.BANK 256 01/28/2022 292801 1,668.13 SANTA COP 010.0000.2025 U.S.BANK 257 01/28/2022 292801 40.00 SANTA COP 010.0000.2025 U.S.BANK 258 01/28/2022 292801 16.25 FREIGHT 010.0000.2025 U.S.BANK 259 01/28/2022 292801 565.69 SANTA COP 010.0000.2025 U.S.BANK 260 01/28/2022 292801 1,962.07 SANTA COP 010.0000.2025 U.S.BANK 261 01/28/2022 292801 1,879.96 SANTA COP 010.0000.2025 U.S.BANK 262 01/28/2022 292801 1,243.10 SANTA COP 010.0000.2025 U.S.BANK 263 01/28/2022 292801 294.50 SANTA COP 010.0000.2025 U.S.BANK 264 01/28/2022 292801 133.76 OTS TRAINING LODGING DEPOSIT 010.4209.5501 U.S.BANK 265 01/28/2022 292801 449.75 PATROL SUPPLIES 010.4203.5255 U.S.BANK 266 01/28/2022 292801 120.16 UNIFORMS-CHAVEV PT-ACADEMY 010.4203.5272 U.S.BANK 267 01/28/2022 292801 750.00 TRAINING/TUITION-REGISTRATION 010.4203.5501 U.S.BANK 268 01/28/2022 292801 71.80 TRAINING-CPR/FIRST AID FOR DEPT 010.4203.5501 U.S.BANK 269 01/28/2022 292801 350.00 TRAINING/TUITION-REGISTRATION 010.4203.5501 U.S.BANK 270 01/28/2022 292801 375.00 TRAINING/TUITION-REGISTRATION 010.4203.5501 U.S.BANK 271 01/28/2022 292801 109.29 SUPPORT SVCS SUPPLIES 010.4204.5255 U.S.BANK 272 01/28/2022 292801 435.00 EQUIPMENT-SUPPORT SVCS 010.4204.5272 U.S.BANK 273 01/28/2022 292801 20.00 FREIGHT 010.4204.5272 U.S.BANK 274 01/28/2022 292801 149.00 TRAINING/TUITION-REGISTRATION 010.4204.5501 U.S.BANK 275 01/28/2022 292801 375.00 TRAINING/TUITION-REGISTRATION 010.4204.5501 U.S.BANK 276 01/28/2022 292801 28.02 PD-4622 PART 010.4204.5601 U.S.BANK 277 01/28/2022 292801 26.39 INTERVIEW PANEL LUNCH 010.4307.5148 U.S.BANK 278 01/28/2022 292802 224.00 ART CLASSES:01/09 ADULT ART PARTY 010.4424.5351 PEGGY VALKO $ 463,202.89 Page 38 of 340 ATTACHMENT 2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DEPARTMENTAL LABOR DISTRIBUTION PAY PERIOD 01/07/2022 -01/20/2022 1/28/2022 BY FUND BY ACCOUNT General Fund 321,386.46 5101 Salaries Full time 203,750.21 Streets Fund 17,123.62 5101 Volunteer Employee Retirement - Sewer Fund 7,218.52 5102 Salaries Part-Time - PPT 3,932.21 Water Fund 20,030.99 5103 Salaries Part-Time -TPT 12,464.82 365,759.59 5105 Salaries OverTime 9,030.89 5106 Salaries Strike Team OT - 5107 Salaries Standby 1,737.80 5108 Holiday Pay 17,671.25 OVERTIME BY DEPARTMENT: _ 5109 Sick Pay 5,450.00 Administrative Services - 5110 Annual Leave Buyback - Information Services - 5111 Vacation Buyback - Community Development - 5112 Sick Leave Buyback - Police 8,789.75 5113 Vacation Pay 4,052.25 Public Works- Maintenance - 5114 Comp Pay 2,527.33 Public Works- Enterprise 241.14 5115 Annual Leave Pay 2,883.52 Recreation -Administration - 5116 Salaries - Police FTO - Recreation - Special Events - 5121 PERS Retirement 28,861.65 Children In Motion - 5122 Social Security 18,403.97 9,030.89 5123 PARS Retirement 247.57 5126 State Disability Ins. 997.96 5127 Deferred Compensation 741.66 5131 Health Insurance 46,459.02 5132 Dental Insurance 2,743.12 5133 Vision Insurance 718.00 5134 Life Insurance 380.41 5135 Long Term Disability 656.94 5137 Leave Payouts - 5142 Unemployment Insurance - 5143 Uniform Allowance - 5144 Car Allowance 837.50 5146 Council Expense - 5147 Employee Assistance - 5148 Boot Allowance - 5149 Motor Pay 64.01 5150 Bi-Lingual Pay 150.00 5151 Cell Phone Allowance 997.50 365,759.59 Total FCFA payroll cost for this period is $197,664.34. FCFA payroll and accounts payable expenditures are processed as part of the JPA financial services agreement between Arroyo Grande, Grover Beach and Oceano Community Services District. Arroyo Grande's portion of the FCFA annual budget is identified in the contractual services budget. Page 39 of 340 - :ARROYO 0RRORATE� 7 � x V * JULY 10, 1911 E/FO P MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Nicole Valentine, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: Consideration of Fiscal Year 2021-22 Mid-Year Financial Status Report and Request to Approve One Budget Adjustment Request DATE: February 22, 2022 SUMMARY OF ACTION: Consider and file the Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22 Mid-Year Financial Status Report and approve one Budget Adjustment Request. IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES: Preparation of the Mid-Year Financial Status Report requires staff time within the existing work plan and budget for the Administrative Services Department. At mid-year, FY 2021- 22 revenues for the General Fund were $8.8 million, or five percent (5%) above the Budget Target. Actual Expenditures were $9.4 million, and below the Budget Target by $2.1 million (10%). With this report, staff is also requesting approval of one budget adjustment totaling $27,550 from the General Fund. The request would provide current fiscal year funding to add an Associate Engineer position to the Public Works Department to provide additional Capital Improvement Program (CIP) support. With the influx of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds, there is a large increase in CIP projects to complete in addition to the growing infrastructure projects that the City has planned to complete in the future. This will increase the full-time equivalent (FTE) staffing count within the Public Works Department by 1 to a total of 23. The ongoing cost of this new position would be $170,900 annually and, if approved, will be added into the upcoming FY 2022-23 budget. RECOMMENDATION: Receive, consider, and file the FY 2021-22 Mid-Year Financial Status Report; and approve one Budget Adjustment Request in the amount of $27,550 for the addition of an Associate Engineer position in the Public Works Department. Item 8.b. Page 40 of 340 City Council Consideration of Fiscal Year 2021-22 Mid-Year Financial Status Report and Request to Approve One Budget Adjustment Request February 22, 2022 Page 2 BACKGROUND: Mid-Year Financial Report Each fiscal year the City Council adopts a budget, which commits government resources and services to accomplish the City's mission of making Arroyo Grande the best place possible for everyone who lives, works, and visits here. The Mid-Year Financial Status Report is the second of four financial performance reports that staff will present to Council during the 2021-22 fiscal year. The purpose of the FY 2021-22 Mid-Year Financial Status Report is to: • Compare mid-year revenues received and expenditures incurred to the mid-year of the prior year and to the budgeted Target to determine the City's financial performance; • Provide explanations for key account variances and identify any potential trends that might impact financial planning; and • Provide other key mid-year information, including headcount statistics, completed Capital Improvement Projects, and requests for City Council approval of Budget Adjustment Requests that have not previously been approved. The City's actual mid-year financial results will be compared to both the prior year's mid- year and the budgeted Target. During FY 2020-21, the General Fund revenue and expenditure Target was calculated as one half (50%) of the FY 2020-21 Budget, or basically six equal months of the budget. For FY 2021-22, staff has revised this approach to more accurately reflect what is expected through December 2021. The Target for expenditures is calculated as one half (50%) of the FY 2021-22 Budget and represents the 6-month period from July 2021 through December 2021, except for the Non- Departmental Annual Payments line that has a Target of the full budget items are expended at the beginning of the fiscal year. This approach increased the Target from 50% to 55.5% for mid-year. The Target for revenues does not use the 50% Target but a Target of 40.3% that more accurately reflects the anticipated revenues to be received in the first half of the fiscal year. Using the Target as a comparator against actual results provides a simplified method to evaluate performance at mid-year. Budget Adjustments In addition to reporting on the City's quarterly and mid-year financial status, the Mid-Year report also provides an opportunity for adjustments to the budget that have become necessary or advisable following approval of the final budget for the fiscal year. This Mid- Year report includes a request for approval of one budget adjustment that will provide funding for one new position within the Public Works Department, as discussed in more detail below. Item 8.b. Page 41 of 340 City Council Consideration of Fiscal Year 2021-22 Mid-Year Financial Status Report and Request to Approve One Budget Adjustment Request February 22, 2022 Page 3 ANALYSIS OF ISSUES: Mid-Year Revenue and Expenditures Compared to Prior Year Current Year Mid-Year Actuals Compared to Prior Year Mid-Year Actuals General Fund Mid-Year Mid-Year FY 2021-22 FY 2020-21 Variance Revenue $ 8,864,353 $ 7,440,350 $ 1,424,003 Expenditures $ 9,467,533 $ 8,156,596 $ 1,310,936 Governmental Funds includes Special Revenue Funds, Debt Service Funds, as well as the General Fund. The majority of the revenue and expenditure variances in Governmental Funds were attributed to variances within the General Fund and the newly created American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Fund, which is separate from the General Fund. The General Fund is the primary operating fund of the City and accounts for resources and services traditionally associated with government. General Fund revenues at mid-year of this year were $1.4 million higher than mid-year of the prior year. Expenditures were also $1.3 million higher at the end of mid-year of the current fiscal year versus mid-year of the prior year. A more thorough explanation of mid-year changes is set forth in the attached financial report. The following is a summary of mid-year changes between the two fiscal years. Revenue ($1.4 million higher) The majority of the $1.4 million variance between mid-year of this year and the prior mid- year is related to an increase in Property Tax, Sales Tax and Transient Occupancy Tax revenue received in the first half of FY 2021-22 that was lower in the first half of FY 2020- 21. Expenditures ($1.3 million higher) As mentioned, mid-year expenditures compared to the prior year were higher by $1.3 million. The majority of the variance between the two fiscal mid-year reports is related to timing and payment of Liability and Property Insurance, as well as an intentional delay in hiring four positions in the first half of FY 2020-21 . Item 8.b. Page 42 of 340 City Council Consideration of Fiscal Year 2021-22 Mid-Year Financial Status Report and Request to Approve One Budget Adjustment Request February 22, 2022 Page 4 Mid-Year Revenue and Expenditures Compared to Target Current Year Mid-Year Actuals Compared to Target General Fund FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 Mid-Year Target Mid-Year Actuals Variance Revenue $ 7,898,477 $ 8,864,353 $ 965,876 Expenditures $ 11,648,716 $ 9,467,533 $ (2,181,184) The table above compares mid-year actual results to the budgeted Target. Mid-Year actual revenue was above the Target by $965,876. Mid-Year actual expenditures were below the Target by $2.1 million. The following is a summary of the mid-year revenue and expenditure variances compared to the budgeted Target. A more thorough explanation of mid-year variances is set forth in the attached financial report. Revenue ($965,876 higher) Revenue for FY 2021-22 was budgeted conservatively due to the many unknowns related to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, which resulted in mid-year revenue being above the Target. Some of the larger revenue variances are explained below. • The largest single source of City revenue is Secured Property Tax. Secured Property Tax is billed by the County to property owners and payable in two (2) installments. Property owners typically receive their first property tax bill at the end of September or early October, with a due date of November 1st. The majority of property tax related to the first installment is received in December 2021 . The second installment is due on April 1st and will be reflected in the fourth quarter report. Actual revenue received in this category was higher than the Target by $688,330. • The Sales Tax Target identified in the Mid-Year report is based on four months of revenue, taking into account the timing of anticipated payments, as actual sales tax receipts by December 31, 2021, represent four months of payments (Jul — Oct). Nonetheless sales tax realization through mid-year is higher than the Target by $103,511 indicating stronger than expected economic activity early in this fiscal year • License and permit revenue fell short of the Target by $82,506. Planning Division revenue fell short of the Target by $51,288. The Target is based on 50% or 6 months of the fiscal year's total budget. The majority of the variance is due to fewer permits being issued through mid-year than estimated in the Target. Revenue in this category is customer driven and fluctuates over the course of a year as well as year over year based on demand. • Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) revenue is reflecting an $277,691 favorable variance to the Target. The Target and actual TOT revenue represents only five Item 8.b. Page 43 of 340 City Council Consideration of Fiscal Year 2021-22 Mid-Year Financial Status Report and Request to Approve One Budget Adjustment Request February 22, 2022 Page 5 months of TOT receipts due to the timing of payments. Lodging facilities have thirty days after the month's end to make their TOT payments. Expenditures ($2.2 million lower) Actual mid-year expenditures were $2,181,184 under the Target. All of the City's departments are under their spending Targets. Some of the more significant savings occurred in the Police, Administrative Services, and Community Development Departments. • A portion of the variance is attributed to the annual CaIPERS UAL retirement payment. This payment was budgeted at $1,571,900 but the actual expenditure was $1 ,519,503, resulting in a favorable variance to the budget of $52,397. • Other favorable departmental variances compared to the Target include salary savings and lower contractual service spending, as described in more detail in the report (Attachment 1). Budget Adjustments Staff identified one additional budget adjustment request during the mid-year budget review, as described in more detail below: • $27,550 Public Works Department: It is recommended that the Public Works Administration Division add an Associate Engineer position to provide additional Capital Improvement Program (CIP) support. With the influx of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds, there is a large increase in CIP projects to complete, in addition to the growing infrastructure projects planned to be completed in the future. If approved, this adjustment will increase the FTE count within the Public Works Department by 1 to a total of 23. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration: 1. Receive and file the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Mid-Year Financial Status Report and approve one Budget Adjustment Request; 2. Provide other direction to staff regarding the FY 2021-22 Mid-Year Financial Status Report and one Budget Adjustment Request; 3. Receive and file the FY 2021-22 Mid-Year Financial Status Report and do not approve the Budget Adjustment Request and provide further direction to staff; or 4. Provide other direction to staff. Item 8.b. Page 44 of 340 City Council Consideration of Fiscal Year 2021-22 Mid-Year Financial Status Report and Request to Approve One Budget Adjustment Request February 22, 2022 Page 6 ADVANTAGES: The financial report presents an updated review of the City's financial performance in the first half of FY 2021-22. Approval of the requested budget adjustment will enable staff to continue providing high quality services to the organization and to the public. DISADVANTAGES: No disadvantages have been identified at this time. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: No environmental review is required for this item. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS: The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City's website in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2. Attachments: 1. Fiscal Year 2021-22 Mid-Year Financial Status Report Item 8.b. Page 45 of 340 ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF Roro GRANDE City of Arroyo Grande Fiscal Year 2021-22 $FCALIFORNIAJ Mid-Year Financial Status Report _a lTr3Y� INTRODUCTION The following report is an overview of the City's fiscal position in the middle of Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22, which will be referred to as Mid-Year. The purpose of this report is to update the public and the City Council on the City's financial position at the end of the second quarter of the fiscal year and compare actual results to the prior year and the budgeted Target, to determine the City's performance. The mid- year report timeframe is July 1 through December 31, 2021. The financial report is organized in the following sections: Section 1—an overview of City's financial position after the ENSURING FISCAL completion of half of FY 2021-22. This includes a comparison of mid-year results between the current and STABILITY: prior year. In addition, mid-year results will be compared to the budgeted Target. As part of the analysis, brief In Fall 2020, the City Council explanations of significant revenue and expenditure 'stablished a goal to ensure variances are included. financial stability for the Section 2 — a listing of any personnel changes occurring organization throughout the during the second quarter and a summary of headcount by alarming, budgeting, and department.This section also includes the City's calculated expenditure process, including vacancy rate. 'reparation and presentation Section 3—an update on the Capital Improvement Projects f year-end and quarterly (CIP) managed by the Public Works and Community financial reports. Development Departments. This section includes CIP that were completed in the second quarter along with their final costs. Section 4— a listing of Budget Amendment Requests previously approved by Council and completed in the second quarter, as well as a list of additional budget adjustments that are being presented to Council along with the mid-year report for consideration and approval. Page 1 Page 46 of 340 ATTACHMENT 1 SECTION 1: OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL POSITION CITY FUND STRUCTURE The overall City budget is comprised of many individual funds,which are categorized below.This financial report will focus primarily on the General Fund but will also report on all Governmental Funds(i.e.Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds). General Fund—The General Fund is the primary operating fund of the City, which accounts for resources and services traditionally associated with government. Special Revenue Funds—Special revenue funds are used to account for and report the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are restricted or committed to expenditure for specified purposes other than debt service or capital projects. Debt Service Funds—This fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources and payment of long- term debt principal and interest. This includes the USDA loan issued by the City to finance the relocation of City Hall. Enterprise Funds - An enterprise fund is a separate accounting and financial reporting mechanism for which revenues and expenses are segregated into a fund with financial statements separate from all other governmental activities.These funds include Water and Sewer services provided to City residents. Private Purpose Fund — The private-purpose fund was created to hold the assets of the former Redevelopment Agency of the City of Arroyo Grande until they are distributed. Agency Funds—Agency funds are funds that the City holds on behalf of another entity. Currently, there are two Agency funds. One is the Sanitation District fund, which accounts for the receipt and remittance of wastewater processing fees on behalf of the South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District.The other is the Downtown Parking Fund, which collects assessments from Arroyo Grande Village merchants within the boundaries of the Parking and Business Improvement Area for maintenance of the Village parking lots. The following chart below shows an overview of the City's fund structure. ALL FUNDS GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS PROPRIETORY FUNDS FIDUCIARY FUNDS Legislative&Information Services Fire Protection Impact Fees City Hall Debt Service Sewer Successor Agency to RDA Downtown Parking Administrative Services Public Access Television Sewer Facility S Sanitation Distribution cCommunity Development Police Protection Impact LL ? Water Police Department Park Development ° v Water Facility °o LL w Recreation Services Park Improvement w Q Lopez Water Public Works Recreation Community Center @ 43Grace Lane Assessment District o w LLParkside Assessment District j _ a Street(Gas Tax) N TrafficSignalization Ce' Traffic Circulation 0 Transportation Facility Impact N Transportation In-Lieu Water Neutralization In-Lieu Affordable Housing Tourism Business Improvement Dist. Water Availability CDBG Grant Fund State COPS Block Grant Page 2 Page 47 of 340 ATTACHMENT 1 CURRENT YEAR ACTUALS COMPARED TO PRIOR YEAR Table 1 below reflects revenue and expenditure patterns through mid-year of FY 2021-22 and compares the current mid-year results against the prior year's results for all Governmental Funds as well as the City's General Fund. The calculated percentages in the table reflect the mid-year actuals for both revenue and expenditures, divided by that fiscal year's annual budget. Table 1 Governmental Funds Mid-Year Mid-Year FY 2021-22 FY 2020-21 Variance Revenue 46% 42% 4% Expenditures 32% 34% -2% General Fund Mid-Year Mid-Year FY 2021-22 FY 2020-21 Variance Revenue 45% 41% 4% Expenditures 45% 44% 1% The following discussion focuses on both the City's Governmental Funds and the General Fund and provides a comparison between mid-year results for the current and prior year for both revenue and expenditures. Governmental Funds and General Fund revenue and expenditures for the first half of this year are generally on Target with the prior year. The Governmental Funds category includes Special Revenue Funds, Debt Service Funds, as well as the General Fund. Governmental Funds—At the end of the first half of FY 2021-22,Governmental Fund revenue was 4%, or$4.0 million higher than the prior year, and expenditures were lower by 2%or$1.3 million. The majority of the revenue and expenditure variances in Governmental Funds were attributed to variances within the General Fund and the newly created American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Fund, which is separate from the General Fund and not otherwise addressed in this report. The Governmental Funds category includes the General Fund as well as other Special Revenue Funds.The General Fund and ARPA Fund variances are explained as follows: General Fund—The General Fund is the primary operating fund of the City and accounts for resources and services traditionally associated with government. General Fund revenue in the first half of FY 2021-22 was 4%, or $1.4 million higher than the first half of the prior year. The largest variances are related to an increase in Property Tax, Sales Tax, and Transient Occupancy Tax. Expenditures were also 1%, or $1.3 million higher in the first half of this year versus the prior year. The largest variance is due to the timing of allocation of prepayments; in FY 2020-21 this was accounted for each quarter and in FY 2021-22 this is accounted for at time of payment in July. ARPA Fund —The ARPA Fund was created to help separately track funding provided pursuant to the American Rescue Plan Act. This Act is intended to provide financial aid to families, governments, businesses,schools, non-profits and others impacted by the COVID-19 public health crisis.To date the City has received $2,150,121, which in FY 2021-22 created an increase in governmental revenues. Minimal expenditures related to COVID-19 have been incurred in the first half of this fiscal year. Page 3 Page 48 of 340 ATTACHMENT 1 GENERAL FUND IMPACTS The following discussion focuses on the City's General Fund performance. Chart 1 starts off with a simple overview of General Fund performance compared to the Target. Next are expenditures by category(Table 2). This is followed by a summarized look at FY 2021-22 mid-year actual expenditures compared to the Target(Table 3). Lastly,a discussion of General Fund revenue is included,which compares mid-year actual results to the Target (Table 4). The City's actual mid-year financial results will be compared to both the prior year's mid-year and the budgeted Target. Using the Target as a comparator against actual results provides a simplified method to evaluate performance for mid-year. During FY 2020-21, the Target was calculated as one half (50%) of the FY 2020-21 Budget, or basically six equal months of the budget. For FY 2021-22, staff has revised this approach to more accurately reflect what is expected through December 2021. The Target for expenditures is calculated as one half(50%)of the FY 2021-22 Budget and represents the 6-month period from July 2021 through December 2021, except for the Non-Departmental Annual Payments line that has a Target of the full budget.This approach increased the Target from 50%to 55.5%at mid-year. The Target for revenues does not use the 50% Target but a Target of 40.3% that more accurately reflects the anticipated revenues to be received in the first half of the fiscal year. Revenue realization is typically low at mid-year due to the timing of receipt of major tax revenues, the time lag involved in billing cycles, and the receipt of reimbursements. Chart 1 Chart 1 shows a simple comparison FY 2021-22 Mid-Year of actual revenue and expenditures through mid-year compared to the Target. The actual mid-year General Fund revenue is more than o the budgeted Target by $965,876. 11111-- Property Tax, Sales Tax and Transient Occupancy Tax are all trending to show positive results when compared to the Target REVENUES EXPENDITURES through mid year. Actual .T�rgec Actual expenditures through mid-year totaled $9.5 million, or 45% of the full year's Budget, and are under the Target by$2,181,184. A more detailed discussion on General Fund revenue and expenditure variances is included later in this report. Table 2 FY 2021-22 %of Table 2 reflects major expenditure cost Expenditure Category Mid-Year Acutals Actuals categories within the General Fund. This Personnel Costs $ 6,206,645 65.6% chart is intended to explain where the City's Operating Costs 2,976,247 31.4% resources were spent during the first half of Debt Service 118,968 1.3% the fiscal year.Within the total expenditures Capital Outlay 12,673 0.1% of$6.2 million, 65.6% of the City's costs are Transfers Out 153,000 1.6% Total $ 9,467,533 Page 4 Page 49 of 340 ATTACHMENT 1 associated with personnel, 31.4% with operating and maintenance, 1.3% for the City's debt service, and 1.7%with transfers to other funds. Table 3 reflects the mid-year status of all General Fund operating departments.Some departments include multiple divisions.The divisions are consolidated under their respective department, rather than reflected individually within the table. Table 3—General Fund Expenditures by Department General Fund Department Variances-First Quarter General Fund Department 2021-22 2021-22 2021-22 Dollar Budget Mid-Year Target Mid-Year Actuals Fav/(Unfav) Fav/(Unfav) City Administration $ 1,129,656 $ 564,828 $ 434,597 $ 130,231 12% Legislative&Information Services 439,875 219,938 166,814 53,124 12% Administration Services 5,874,405 2,937,203 1,998,834 938,368 16% Non-Departmental Annual Payments 2,290,692 2,290,692 2,238,295 52,397 2% Community Development 2,117,900 1,058,950 666,340 392,610 19% Police Department 6,033,354 3,016,677 2,605,684 410,993 7% Recreation Services 1,117,500 558,750 524,901 33,849 3% Public Works 2,003,358 1,001,679 832,067 169,613 8% TOTAL EXPEDITURES 21,006,740 11,648,716 9,467,533 2,181,184 10% Overall, mid-year expenditures were $2,181,184 under the Target. Though all City departments were under their spending Targets, some of the more significant savings occurred in the Administrative Services, Police, and Community Development Departments.The mid-year Target is based on six months or 50% of budgeted expenditures, except for the Non-Departmental Annual Payments line that has a Target of the full budget. This line includes the City's Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL) retirement payment and the General and Liability Insurance payment. This approach increased the Target from 50% to 55.5% for the first quarter. A more detailed explanation of key expenditure variances by individual department/division is provided below. KEY EXPENDITURE VARIANCES FOR INDIVIDUAL DIVISIONS/DEPARTMENTS Department: Administrative Services The Administrative Services Department includes the Division:4120-Administrative Services and City's Fiscal as well as Information Technology 4145-Non Departmental functions.The annual CaIPERS UAL retirement payment Issue: Overall savings CaIPERS prepayment was budgeted at$1,571,900 but the actual expenditure and CIP Fund Transfers was$1,519,503, resulting in a favorable variance to the Impact to General Fund: $938,368 savings budget of$52,397.The remaining variance is related to CIP Fund Transfers of approximately$900,000 at mid-year related to the approval of using excess reserve fund balance towards the pavement management program totaling $1,751,000. This project is still in process and will remain a variance until project completion in Q4 of this fiscal year. Police Services includes the functions of Administration, Patrol Services, Support Services and the Office of Traffic Safety(OTS) Grant for Traffic/DUI Enforcement Program. For simplicity,will be analyzed in total rather than by individual divisions. Some of the more significant variances include: Page 5 Page 50 of 340 ATTACHMENT 1 Department: Police Services • The Police Patrol Division currently has two Division:Various (4201, 4203, 4204,4208, vacancies of its Police Officer positions in the first half 4209) of FY 2021-22, resulting in labor savings of Issue: Overall savings in salaries and benefits approximately$169,900. Impact to General Fund: $410,993 savings • The City's contract with the County Sheriff Department for dispatch services is paid semiannually in the months of January and June. Payments for these services will not be made until the third and fourth quarters, resulting in a mid-year favorable variance to the Target of$215,000. • The City's contract with the County for Animal Control Services is paid quarterly; the October through December payment was made in January, resulting in a mid-year favorable variance to the Target of$18,600. Department: Community Development The Community Development Department includes the Division:Various (4301,4130,4212) functions of Planning, Engineering, and Building & Issue: Overall savings in salaries and Safety Divisions. The majority of the favorable variance contractual services in this department can be attributed to salary savings Impact to General Fund: $392,610 savings and lower spending in contractual services. Salary savings within Community Development is attributed to a number of staffing variances that occurred through the first half of the fiscal year and include: • The vacancy of the Building Permit Technician position in the Building division through mid-year resulted in labor savings of approximately $49,250. During the first half of the fiscal year, this service has been provided by the City's Building Services contractor until the recruitment is completed. • The vacancy of the Planning Manager and Community Services Specialist positions in the Planning division in through mid-year resulted in labor savings of approximately$139,200. • The vacancy of the part-time Intern position and salary savings from the Permit Tech position being hired at a lower step than budgeted at mid-year resulted in labor savings of approximately $27,300. • Minimal contractual services for the Planning Division were incurred through mid-year resulting in $115,522 of favorability to the Target.The following table will summarize where these savings occurred: Planning Contractual Services Budget Target Expenditures Variance Comprehensive General Plan Update 150,000 75,000 - 75,000 Comprehensive General Plan Studies 10,000 5,000 - 5,000 On-Call Environmental Review Services 50,000 25,000 - 25,000 On-Call Planning Services and Misc.Planning Studies 30,000 15,000 4,478 10,522 240,000 120,000 4,478 115,522 • Contractual services for the Building division costs were lower than the Target by approximately $12,400. However,the December invoice had not yet been paid at mid-year;this payment would bring this account over the Target by approximately$16,000. • Minimal contractual services for the Engineering Division were incurred through mid-year resulting in $40,248 of favorability to the Target.The following table will summarize where these savings occurred: Page 6 Page 51 of 340 ATTACHMENT 1 Engineering Contractual Services Budget Target Expenditures Variance Stormwater: 2nd Nature Software 9,000 4,500 - 4,500 Annual Water Quality Testing/Report 15,000 7,500 2,738 4,763 MS4 Permit 7,000 3,500 10,602 (7,102) On-Call Engineering Services 80,000 40,000 1,913 38,088 111,000 55,500 15,252 40,248 • The variance for Community Development Travel and Membership Expenditures through mid- year results in $5,326 of favorability to the Target. This variance is related to the continued COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on trainings being attended in 2021. KEY REVENUE VARIANCES BY ACCOUNT Table 4-General Fund Revenue General Fund Revenue Variances-Mid-Year REVENUE BY CATEGORY 2021-22 FY2021-22 FY2021-22 Dollar % Budget Mid-Year Target Mid-Year Actuals (Unfav)/Fav Fav/(Unfav) Property Tax $ 5,665,926 $ 2,832,963 $ 3,521,293 $ 688,330 12% Sales Tax 4,487,142 1,495,714 1,599,225 103,511 2% Transient Occ.Tax 972,000 405,000 682,691 277,691 29% Property Tax in Lieu of VLF 1,895,649 - - - 0% Franchise Fees 696,900 232,300 211,978 (20,322) -3% License&Permit Fees 571,200 285,600 203,094 (82,506) -14% User Fees 504,000 252,000 289,179 37,179 7% Planning Fees 510,500 255,250 203,962 (51,288) -10% Recreation Fees 512,595 256,298 330,026 73,728 14% Transfers In 3,089,400 1,544,700 1,523,514 (21,186) -1% Other Revenue 677,305 338,653 299,392 (39,260) -6% TOTAL 19,582,617 7,898,477 8,864,353 965,876 5% As reflected in Table 4, mid-year actual revenue was over the Target by$965,876.This table uses a Target of 40.3%that more accurately reflects the anticipated revenues to be received in the first half of the fiscal year. A more detailed discussion is included below to help explain actual revenue variances through mid- year compared to the Target. Property Tax-The majority of the City's property tax revenue comes from Secured Property Taxes. This tax is billed on a fiscal year(July 1-June 30) basis and is payable in two (2) annual installments. Property owners typically receive their first property tax bills at the end of September or early October,with a due date of November 1St. The majority of property tax related to the first installment was received in December 2021.The second property tax bill installment is received in April 2022 and will be included in the fourth quarter report. Property tax typically represents around 31%of the City's annual revenue.The Target is based on six months of Property Tax revenue.Actual revenue received in this category was higher than this Target in part because many taxpayers make the full payment in December. Page 7 Page 52 of 340 ATTACHMENT 1 Sales Tax — Sales tax realization through mid-year is higher than the Target. Actual sales tax revenue received through mid-year was $1,599,225 and represents four months of payments (Jul — Oct). The Target is also based on four months of revenue,taking into account the timing of anticipated payments. Transient Occupancy Tax(TOT)—TOT revenue is reflecting an $277,691 favorable variance to the Target. The Target and actual TOT revenue represents only five months of TOT receipts due to the timing of payments. Lodging facilities have thirty days after the month's end to make their TOT payments. Property Tax in Lieu of Vehicle License Fees (VLF) — Property tax in lieu of VLF is received in two installments during the fiscal year.Typically,the revenue is received in the months of January(3rd quarter) and June (4th quarter). The Target for this revenue is zero at mid-year. Franchise Fees—Five months of Waste Water Connection franchise fees were received through mid-year. In addition, Charter Communications franchise fees earned in the second quarter will not be paid and received until the third quarter. In light of the timing of payments, the Target is based on 4 months of revenue. Without the Charter Communications franchise fee receipts, the actual revenue at the end of the second quarter is lower than the Target by$20,322. License&Permit Fees and Planning Fees—License and permit revenue fell short of the Target by$82,506. Planning revenue fell short of the Target by$51,288.The majority of the variance is due to fewer permits being issued through mid-year than estimated in the Target. The Target is based on 50% or 6 months of the fiscal year's total budget. Revenue in this category is customer driven and fluctuates over the course of a year as well as year over year based on demand. Recreation Fees—Recreation revenue is reflecting a $73,728 favorable variance to the Target.The Target is based on 6 months of the fiscal year's total budget. The recreation revenue budget estimates were conservative due to the many unknowns related to childcare activities and the COVID-19 pandemic. SECTION 2: POSITION CHANGES AND HEADCOUNT NUMBERS Page 8 Page 53 of 340 ATTACHMENT 1 POSITION ALLOCATION CHANGES MADE BY THE CITY COUNCIL (2nd Quarter) None made during this quarter. FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) BY DEPARTMENT— PERMANENT STAFF ONLY The following table reflects FTE staffing by department as of December 31, 2021. The table only includes permanent staff and does not include part-time or temporary staffing. While departments may hire part- time staff on a regular or seasonal basis, they are not included in the analysis below. epartment dopted Budget Vacancies %of Total acant Positions Headcount(FTE's) (Mid-Year) Staffing City Manager&Human Resources 2 - 3% Administrative Services 7 - 9% Community Development 10 3 13% Planning Manager,Community Services ISpecialist,Building Permit Technician Legislative&Info Services 2 - 3% Police Services 29 2 39% Police Officer(2) Public Works 22 1 29% Maintenance WorkerI Recreation Services 3 - 4% Total 75 6 100% EMPLOYEE VACANCY RATE The City's employee vacancy rate at the end of the second quarter of FY 2021-22 was 8%. This equates to six (6) vacant positions. The vacancy rate tracks the number of permanent vacant positions at the end of the quarter in comparison to the total number of permanent positions available. Unlike a turnover rate, which tracks employees that separated during the period, the vacancy rate only looks at vacancies at the end of period.The costs associated with turnover includes the cost of advertising new positions, training, overtime, lowered productivity, and workload balance. SECTION 3: UPDATE ON COMPLETED CAPITAL PROJECTS Page 9 Page 54 of 340 ATTACHMENT 1 This information is provided to keep the Council apprised of the status of the City's Capital Improvement Projects (CIP). No CIP projects were completed in the second quarter of FY 2021-22. Page 10 Page 55 of 340 ATTACHMENT 1 SECTION 4: APPROPRIATION TRANSFERS AND BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS Administrative and Previously-Approved Second Quarter Budget Adjustments The following second quarter budget adjustments were previously approved by Council or are classified as administrative and not requiring Council approval. $15,000 Capital Improvement: Appropriated Sales Tax funding of $15,000 for the Castillo Del Mar Extension Project.Approved on 09/28/2021 Council meeting, item 8.f., and completed as of 09/28/2021, but not included in the First Quarter Financial Status Report. $29,730 Police Department: Administrative Carryover of$29,730 for the Department of Justice -Tobacco Grant. Council accepted this grant April 27, 2021 as part of a 3-year program. This program operates on the Federal fiscal year from October 1, 2021,through September 30, 2022, and was added to the budget on October 1, 2021. This grant funding will continue to support local efforts to reduce the illegal sale of tobacco products in the City. $4,280 Capital Improvement: Appropriated General Fund of $4,280 to complete the design and obtain construction support services for the Five Cities Fire Authority (FCFA) Station 1 Emergency Generator Replacement Project. Approved on 10/12/2021 Council meeting, item 8.e. $4,000 Water and Sewer Funds:Appropriated Water Fund of$2,800 and Sewer Fund of$1,200 for mailing of water baseline letters for mandatory water use reductions associated with the Stage 1 Water Shortage Emergency.Approved on 10/12/2021 Council meeting, item 9.a. $1,806,291 Administrative Services Department:Appropriated American Rescue Plan Act(ARPA) Funds to COVID related City expenditures,infrastructure projects,and qualified ARPA Projects(non-infrastructure). Approved on 10/12/2021 Council meeting, item 10.a. $136,426 Capital Improvement: Appropriated Sales Tax funding of$136,426 for the Inclusive Elm Street Park Playground Replacement Project. Approved on 10/26/2021 Council meeting, item 11.a. $20,000 Capital Improvement: Appropriated Sales Tax funding of $20,000 for the Castillo Del Mar Extension Project. Approved on 11/23/2021 Council meeting, item 8.h. Additional Requested First Quarter Budget Adjustments One new budget adjustment is proposed for approval along with the review and receipt of this report. The additional budget adjustment is requested as described in more detail below: • $27,550 Public Works Department: It is recommended that the Public Works Administration Division add an Associate Engineer position to provide additional Capital Improvement Program (CIP)support. With the influx of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds,there is a large increase in CIP projects to complete, in addition to the growing infrastructure projects that the City has planned for the future. If approved, this will increase the FTE count within the Public Works Department by 1 to a total of 23. Page 11 Page 56 of 340 pRROYO 2 cp '� tNCORPORATEl7 9 6 - O JULY 10, 1911 cQE1FO�P MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Whitney McDonald, City Manager Timothy J. Carmel, City Attorney SUBJECT: Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Declaring a Continued Local Emergency Related to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic DATE: February 22, 2022 SUMMARY OF ACTION: Adoption of the Resolution will continue the declared local emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic. IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES: There are no direct fiscal impacts related to the proposed action; however, adoption of the Resolution will facilitate the ability for the City to request resources including financial support and reimbursement from the State Office of Emergency Services and the Federal Emergency Management Agency for costs incurred in preparation and/or response to the COVID-19 pandemic. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution declaring a continued local emergency related to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. BACKGROUND: As the City Council is aware, in accordance with Section 8.12.060 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code, the former City Manager, in his capacity as the Director of Emergency Services, proclaimed a local emergency on March 16, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. The City Council ratified the proclamation at its regular meeting on March 24, 2020, and adopted resolutions declaring a continued local emergency since that time as the pandemic has persisted. ANALYSIS OF ISSUES: Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Section 8.12.065(C) provides that the City Council is to "Review the need for a continuing emergency declaration at regularly scheduled meetings at least every twenty-one (21) days until the emergency is terminated." Accordingly, the City Council has adopted the appropriate Resolutions declaring a continued local Item 8.c. Page 57 of 340 City Council Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Declaring a Continued Local Emergency Related to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic February 22, 2022 Page 2 emergency related to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic within the required 21-day time period since the ratification of the proclamation at its March 24, 2020 meeting. This item is being presented to the City Council to satisfy the requirements of Section 8.12.065(C). Given the ongoing state of emergency proclaimed by the Governor, the ongoing public health orders issued by the State and local public health officers, and the ongoing work required of City staff to respond to the pandemic and these proclamations and orders, it is recommended that the City Council adopt the Resolution declaring the need to continue the emergency declaration. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration: 1. Adopt the Resolution declaring the need to continue the declared local emergency; or 2. Provide other direction to staff. ADVANTAGES: Adoption of the Resolution will satisfy the requirement of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code regarding the periodic review of the declared local emergency related to the COVID- 19 pandemic. DISADVANTAGES: No disadvantages have been identified to adopting the Resolution. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: No environmental review is required for this item. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS: The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City's website in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2. Attachments: 1. Proposed Resolution Item 8.c. Page 58 of 340 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DECLARING A CONTINUED LOCAL EMERGENCY RELATED TO THE CORONAVIRUS (COVID- 19) PANDEMIC WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 8.12.060 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code the former City Manager, in his capacity as the Director of Emergency Services proclaimed a local emergency on March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic; and WHEREAS, the City Council ratified the emergency proclamation through adoption of Resolution No. 4974 at its regular meeting on March 24, 2020; and WHEREAS, Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Section 8.12.065(C) provides that the City Council is to review the need for a continuing emergency declaration at regularly scheduled meetings at least every twenty-one (21) days until the emergency is terminated; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Resolutions declaring a continued local emergency related to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on April 14, April 28, May 12, May 26, June 9, June 23, July 14, August 11, August 25, September 8, September 22, October 13, October 27, November 10, November 24, December 8, 2020, January 12, January 26, February 9; February 23; March 9, March 23, April 13, April 27, May 11, May 25, June 8, June 22, July 27, August 10, August 24, September 14, September 28, October 12, October 26, November 9, November 23, December 14, 2021, January 11, January 25, and February 8, 2022; and WHEREAS, the Secretary of Health and Human Services Director issued a Determination that a Public Health Emergency Exists and has existed as of January 27, 2020; and WHEREAS, the President of the United States declared a State of National Emergency; the Governor of the State of California has proclaimed a State of Emergency for the State of California and issued Executive Orders and direction regarding measures to mitigate the spread of cases of COVID-19 within the State of California; the San Luis Obispo County Emergency Services Director has proclaimed a local emergency; and the San Luis Obispo County Public Health Director has declared a public health emergency related to the spread of cases of COVID-19 within the State of California and all recitals set forth therein, are included as though fully set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the COVID-19 pandemic continues to spread rapidly worldwide and in the U.S., continuing to present an immediate and significant risk to public health and safety, and resulting in serious illness or death to vulnerable populations, including the elderly and those with underlying health conditions. Page 59 of 340 RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande that: 1. All recitals set forth above, are true, correct and incorporated herein. 2. A local emergency is declared to continue to exist throughout the City of Arroyo Grande, and the City has been undertaking, and will continue through termination of this emergency to undertake necessary measures and incur necessary costs, which are directly related to the prevention of the spread of COVID-19 and are taken in furtherance of: the Secretary of Health and Human Services' determination that a public health emergency has existed since January 27, 2020; the Governor's Proclamation of a State of Emergency on March 4, 2020; the President of the United States' Declaration of a National Emergency on March 13, 2020; the County Emergency Services Director's Proclamation of Local Emergency and the County Public Health Director's Declaration of a Public Health Emergency on March 13, 2020; and the City Director of Emergency Services' Proclamation of Local Emergency on March 17, 2020; and related orders and directives. On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: The foregoing Resolution was approved this 22nd day of February, 2022. Page 60 of 340 RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 3 CAREN RAY RUSSOM, MAYOR ATTEST: JESSICA MATON, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: WHITNEY MCDONALD, CITY MANAGER APPROVED AS TO FORM: TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY Page 61 of 340 (F PRROYO NCORPOR ATED Y� * JULY 10, 1911 c4EIFOON MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Jessica Matson, Legislative & Information Services Director/City Clerk Timothy J. Carmel, City Attorney SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the Continuance of Remote Teleconference Meetings of the Legislative Bodies of the City of Arroyo Grande Pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e)(3) DATE: February 22, 2022 SUMMARY OF ACTION: Adoption of the Resolution will enable the City to continue to comply with the requirements of legislation, AB 361, and authorize the continued use of teleconferencing for meetings of the City's legislative bodies. IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES: There are no direct fiscal impacts related to the proposed action. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution authorizing the continuance of remote teleconference meetings pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e)(3). BACKGROUND: AB 361 amended Government Code Section 54953, adding a new subsection (e) that permits legislative bodies, when there is a proclaimed State of Emergency declared by the Governor pursuant to Government Code Section 8625, to make a determination to authorize meeting remotely via teleconferencing as a result of the emergency. To do so, a resolution would need to be adopted in which the legislative body finds that meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees, or that State or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing. The City Council first adopted a Resolution making findings in accordance with AB 361 and Government Code Section 54953(e) at its September 28, 2021 meeting. The Resolution is valid for thirty (30) days after teleconferencing for the first time under the new regulations. If the State of Emergency remains active after that 30 day period, the local agency may act to renew its resolution authorizing remote teleconferenced meetings by passing another resolution which includes findings that the State of Emergency Item 8.d. Page 62 of 340 City Council Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the Continuance of Remote Teleconference Meetings of the Legislative Bodies of the City of Arroyo Grande Pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e)(3) February 22, 2022 Page 2 declaration remains active, the local agency has reconsidered the circumstances of the State of Emergency, and the local agency has either identified: A) ongoing, direct impacts to the ability to meet safely in-person, or B) active social distancing measures as directed by relevant State or local officials. ANALYSIS OF ISSUES: A draft Resolution has been prepared for Council consideration to allow the City to continue conducting its public meetings via teleconference. The Resolution includes continued findings based upon a determination that, as a result of the proclaimed State of Emergency in California due to the COVID-19 pandemic and its continued spread in San Luis Obispo County and Arroyo Grande through the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV- 2, which is far more transmissible than prior variants of the virus and, as even fully vaccinated individuals can spread the virus to others, holding meetings in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees. While the Resolution provides authority for the City to continue conducting public meetings remotely for the next thirty (30) days, the City may determine to resume meetings in-person prior to the expiration of that thirty-day period. At this time, it is anticipated that the City Council meeting scheduled for March 8, 2022, will be conducted in-person at Council Chambers while also retaining an option for the public to participate via Zoom. It is recommended that the proposed Resolution be adopted to enable advisory body meetings scheduled between February 22, 2022, and March 8, 2022, to occur via teleconference (Zoom) and to provide flexibility for future meetings of the City Council and its advisory bodies in the event that guidance from the State or County Health Officers changes within the next thirty (30) days. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration: 1. Adopt the Resolution authorizing the continuance of remote teleconference meetings pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e)(3); or 2. Provide other direction to staff. ADVANTAGES: Adoption of the Resolution will satisfy the requirements of Government Code Section 54953(e)(3) and allow the City to safely continue carrying out its business in a manner that will minimize the risk of contracting COVID-19 for everyone involved. DISADVANTAGES: No disadvantages have been identified to adopting the Resolution. Item 8.d. Page 63 of 340 City Council Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the Continuance of Remote Teleconference Meetings of the Legislative Bodies of the City of Arroyo Grande Pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e)(3) February 22, 2022 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: No environmental review is required for this item. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS: The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City's website in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2. Attachments: 1. Proposed Resolution Item 8.d. Page 64 of 340 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AUTHORIZING THE CONTINUANCE OF REMOTE TELECONFERENCE MEETINGS OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODIES OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PURSUANT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e) WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020 Governor Newsom declared a State of Emergency in the State of California pursuant to Government Code Section 8625 as a result of the threat of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic; and WHEREAS, subsequently, in March 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Governor Newsom issued Executive Orders N-25-20 and N-29-20. These orders suspended certain elements of the Brown Act and specifically allowed for legislative bodies as defined by the Brown Act to hold their meetings entirely electronically with no physical meeting place. On June 11, 2021 , Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N- 08-21 which provided that the provisions in Executive Order N-29-20 suspending certain elements of the Brown Act would continue to apply through September 30, 2021; and WHEREAS, on September 16, 2021 Governor Newsom signed AB 361, which added subsection (e)to Government Code section 54953 of the Brown Act, and makes provision for remote teleconferencing participation in meetings by members of a legislative body, without compliance with the requirements of Government Code section 54953(b)(3), subject to the existence of certain conditions; and WHEREAS, a required condition of AB 361 is that a state of emergency is declared by the Governor pursuant to Government Code section 8625, proclaiming the existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the State caused by conditions as described in Government Code section 8558; and WHEREAS, in addition to the Governor's proclamation of a State of Emergency, on March 16, 2020 the former City Manager, in his capacity as the Director of Emergency Services, proclaimed a local State of Emergency as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic. The City Council ratified the proclamation at its regular meeting on March 24, 2020, and has continued to make determinations since that time that a local State of Emergency continues to exist in Arroyo Grande as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted a Resolution making findings in accordance with AB 361 and Government Code Section 54953(e) authorizing remote teleconference meetings on September 28, October 26, November 23, December 14, 2021, and January 25, 2022; and Page 65 of 340 RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 WHEREAS, COVID-19 cases in San Luis Obispo County continue to be a threat to public health. Evidence clearly indicates that the Omicron variant is far more transmissible than prior variants of the virus and that even fully vaccinated individuals can spread the virus to others; and WHEREAS, as a condition of extending the use of the provisions found in Government Code section 54953(e), the City Council must reconsider the circumstances of the State of Emergency that exists in the City, and the City Council has done so; and WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to adopt a Resolution finding that the requisite conditions exist for the legislative bodies of the City of Arroyo Grande, as defined in the Brown Act, to conduct remote teleconference meetings without compliance with paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Government Code section 54953. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande as follows: 1. The above recitals are true, correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. 2. In accordance with the requirements of Government Code Section 54953(e)(3), the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande hereby finds and determines that it has reconsidered the circumstances of the State of Emergency and that the State of Emergency continues to exist and to directly impact the ability to meet safely in person due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and its continued spread in San Luis Obispo County and Arroyo Grande through the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV- 2, which is far more transmissible than prior variants of the virus, and can be spread to others even by fully vaccinated individuals, and therefore holding meetings in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees. 3. The City Manager and legislative bodies of the City of Arroyo Grande are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of this Resolution including, continuing to conduct open and public remote teleconferencing meetings in accordance with the requirements of Government Code section 54953(e) and other applicable provisions of the Brown Act. 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption and shall be effective for thirty (30) days after its adoption, subject to being extended for an additional 30 day period by the City Council's adoption of a subsequent resolution in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e)(3) to further extend the time during which the legislative bodies of the City of Arroyo may continue to teleconference without compliance with paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Government Code section 54953. Page 66 of 340 RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 3 On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: The foregoing Resolution was approved this 22nd day of February, 2022. Page 67 of 340 RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 4 CAREN RAY RUSSOM, MAYOR ATTEST: JESSICA MATSON, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: WHITNEY MCDONALD, CITY MANAGER APPROVED AS TO FORM: TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY Page 68 of 340 .4 CITY OF p(O 0RA O � ACTION MINUTES 11,0CALIFORNIA "xn REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL February 8, 2022, 6:00 p.m. Zoom Virtual Meeting Webinar ID: 832 5584 8846 ByTelephone: 1-669-900-6833; 1-346-248-7799 Council Members Present: Mayor Ray Russom, Council Member Paulding, Council Member Barneich, Council Member Storton, Mayor Pro Tern George Staff Present: City Clerk Jessica Matson, City Attorney Timothy Carmel, City Manager Whitney McDonald, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director Bill Robeson, Administrative Services Director Nicole Valentine, Community Development Director Brian Pedrotti, Acting Planning Manager Andrew Perez, Associate Planner Patrick Holub Given the recent increase in COVID-19 cases in San Luis Obispo County, and in compliance with Assembly Bill (AB) 361, which allows for a deviation of teleconference rules required by the Ralph M. Brown Act, this meeting was held by teleconference. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Ray Russom called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL City Clerk Matson took roll call. 3. MOMENT OF REFLECTION 4. FLAG SALUTE Bruce Blair, Central Coast Cops 'N Kids, led the flag salute. 5. AGENDA REVIEW 5.a Closed Session Announcements 1 Item 8.e. Page 69 of 340 None. 5.b Ordinances read in title only Moved by Mayor Ray Russom Seconded by Council Member Barneich That all ordinances presented for introduction or adoption be read in title only and all further readings be waived. AYES (5): Mayor Ray Russom, Council Member Paulding, Council Member Barneich, Council Member Storton, and Mayor Pro Tern George Passed (5 to 0) 6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 6.a Update Regarding Countywide COVID-19 Efforts City Manager McDonald provided a brief update on COVID-19 including masking requirements. Mayor Ray Russom invited public comment. No public comments were received. No action was taken on this item. 6.b City Manager Communications City Manager McDonald provided information regarding the City's Tree City USA designation, Volunteer Appreciation Drive-Thru Event; status of districting; and discussed upcoming items for Council consideration. Mayor Ray Russom invited public comment. No public comments were received. No action was taken on this item. 7. COMMUNITY COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS Mayor Ray Russom invited public comment. Speaking from the public were Linda Busek and Jamie Sanbanmatsu. No further public comments were received. 8. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Ray Russom asked the Council if there were any questions or any items to be pulled from the consent agenda for further discussion. There were none. Mayor Ray Russom invited public comment. No public comments were received. Moved by Council Member Barneich Seconded by Council Member Storton Approve Consent Agenda Items 8.a. through 8.f., with the recommended courses of action. AYES (5): Mayor Ray Russom, Council Member Paulding, Council Member Barneich, Council Member Storton, and Mayor Pro Tem George 2 Item 8.e. Page 70 of 340 Passed (5 to 0) 8.a Consideration of Cash Disbursement Ratification Ratified the listing of cash disbursements for the period of January 1 through January 15, 2022. 8.b Consideration of Statement of Investment Deposits Received and filed the report listing investment deposits of the City of Arroyo Grande as of December 31, 2021, as required by Government Code Section 53646(b). 8.c Consideration of a Resolution Approving the Updated CaIPERS Required Salary Schedule for Fiscal Year 2021-22 Effective as of January 7, 2022, to Incorporate Changes Approved by the Five Cities Fire Authority Board of Directors Adopted a Resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING THE UPDATED CITYWIDE COMBINED SALARY SCHEDULE". 8.d Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Declaring a Continued Local Emergency Related to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic Adopted a Resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DECLARING A CONTINUED LOCAL EMERGENCY RELATED TO THE CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC". 8.e Consideration of Approval of Minutes Approved the minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of January 25, 2022, as submitted. 8.f Consideration of a Resolution Determining to Continue Work Under Emergency Contracts and an Amendment to the FY 2021-22 CIP Budget Transferring $115,800 from ARPA funds for the Storm Drain System at 251 E Grand Ave, PW 2021-12 1) Adopted a Resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DETERMINING A NEED TO CONTINUE WORK UNDER EMERGENCY CONTRACTS TO REPAIR THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM AT 251 EAST GRAND AVENUE"; and 2) Approved an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program budget to add $115,800 of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds for the Storm Drain System at 251 East Grand Avenue, PW 2021-12. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9.a Appeal Case 21-007; Appeal of Planning Commission Approval of Minor Use Permit- Plot Plan Review 21-029 for the Establishment of a Vacation Rental; Location: 1562 Strawberry Ave; Appellant: Stew and Francine Errico, Et. Al. Community Development Director Pedrotti introduced the item, and Associate Planner Holub provided a PowerPoint presentation. Staff responded to questions from Council. Stew and Francine Errico, Appellants, addressed the Council and responded to questions. 3 Item 8.e. Page 71 of 340 Patrick Goroski, Applicant, addressed the Council and responded to questions. Mayor Ray Russom opened the public hearing. Speaking from the public were Francine Errico, Ben Errico, Linda Drummy, and Michelle Chariton. City Clerk Matson stated that one written public comment was received and was read during public comment by the submitter. Upon hearing no further public comments, Mayor Ray Russom closed the public hearing. City Attorney Carmel addressed comments related to due process and noted that there was no violation. Moved by Mayor Ray Russom Seconded by Council Member Barneich Adopt a Resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DENYING APPEAL CASE NO. 21-007 AND APPROVING PLOT PLAN REVIEW CASE NO. 21-029; LOCATED AT 1562 STRAWBERRY AVENUE; APPLIED FOR BY BRENDA GOROSKI; APPEALED BY STEW AND FRANCINE ERRICO", and to refund the Planning Commission appeal fee of$491 to the Appellants. AYES (5): Mayor Ray Russom, Council Member Paulding, Council Member Barneich, Council Member Storton, and Mayor Pro Tern George Passed (5 to 0) 9.b Discuss and Consider Introduction of an Ordinance Amending Title 16 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code (AGMC) Regarding Accessory Dwelling Units and Tiny Homes On Wheels; Development Code Amendment 20-001 Mayor Ray Russom called for a brief break at 8:24 p.m. The Council reconvened at 8:34 p.m. Mayor Ray Russom, Mayor Pro Tern George and Council Member Storton declared conflicts of interest due to ownership of a permitted accessory dwelling unit. Council Member Barneich declared a conflict of interest due to compensation expected from Council Member George for design of her accessory dwelling unit. City Attorney Carmel commented on the Fair Political Practices Commission's (FPPC) advice regarding the conflicts of interest. City Clerk Matson explained the process for randomly drawing straws virtually to determine which of the conflicted Council members may continue to hear the item. Mayor Ray Russom, Mayor Pro Tern George, Council Members Barneich and Storton were entered by City Clerk Matson into the virtual straw-drawing tool. Mayor Pro Tern George and Council Member Storton virtually drew the short straws and remained in the meeting to hear the item. Mayor Ray Russom and Council Member Barneich left the meeting. Mayor Pro Tern George presided. Community Development Director Pedrotti introduced the item and Acting Planning Manager Perez provided a presentation and responded to questions from Council. 4 Item 8.e. Page 72 of 340 Mayor Pro Tern George opened the public hearing. Speaking from the public were Joe Pollon and Randy Russom. City Clerk Matson read into the record written correspondence received from Joe Pollon. Upon hearing no further public comments, Mayor Pro Tern George closed the public hearing. Council provided comments regarding removing Tiny Homes on Wheels from the ordinance and creating a separate ordinance; balancing character of neighborhoods; prohibiting short term rentals in all new ADUs; developing objective design standards; prohibiting roof top patios; permitting a fee waiver program; creating a pre-fabrication program; costs and requirements associated with solar panels; and prohibiting Tiny Homes on Wheels in front yards unless no other alternative exists. Moved by Council Member Paulding Seconded by Council Member Storton Direct staff to modify the ordinance to remove the Tiny Homes on Wheels section; to research Council conflict issues regarding Tiny Homes on Wheels and return to Council with direction on alternative means to address Tiny Homes on Wheels; and to modify the proposed ordinance to add objective design standards that fit the design of the existing structure; prohibiting roof top patios on detached ADUs; develop a permit fee waiver program; develop a pre-fabricated program; modify language to reflect that ADUs shall be located on the rear portion of a parcel unless no feasible alternative exists; and to research incentives for installation of solar panels. AYES (3): Council Member Paulding, Council Member Storton, and Mayor Pro Tern George ABSENT (2): Mayor Ray Russom, and Council Member Barneich Passed (3 to 0) 9.c Public Hearing to Discuss and Consider a Resolution Approving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Projects for Year 2022 Mayor Ray Russom and Council Member Barneich rejoined the meeting at 10:39 p.m. Community Development Director introduced the item, and Acting Planning Manager Perez provided a presentation and recommended that the Council adopt a Resolution approving projects to be funded with the City's allocation of CDBG funds for the Year 2022. Mayor Ray Russom opened the public hearing. Upon hearing no public comments, Mayor Ray Russom closed the public hearing. Moved by Council Member Storton Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem George Adopt a Resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG) PROJECTS FOR YEAR 2022". AYES (5): Mayor Ray Russom, Council Member Paulding, Council Member Barneich, Council Member Storton, and Mayor Pro Tem George 5 Item 8.e. Page 73 of 340 Passed (5 to 0) 10. OLD BUSINESS 10.a Receive an Update on Progress Toward Council Goals and Priorities for Fiscal Year 2021- 22 Brief discussion ensued regarding continuing this item to a future meeting. Mayor Ray Russom invited public comment. No public comments were received. Moved by Mayor Ray Russom Seconded by Mayor Pro Tern George To continue the item to a date uncertain. AYES (5): Mayor Ray Russom, Council Member Paulding, Council Member Barneich, Council Member Storton, and Mayor Pro Tern George Passed (5 to 0) 11. NEW BUSINESS None. 12. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS None. 13. CLOSED SESSION None. 14. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the City Council, Mayor Ray Russom adjourned the meeting at 10:57 p.m. Caren Ray Russom, Mayor Jessica Matson, City Clerk 6 Item 8.e. Page 74 of 340 F PRROYO ° c� '1 tN CORPORATED -5 * JULY 10, 1911 * C44IFORJ MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Whitney McDonald, City Manager Timothy Carmel, City Attorney SUBJECT: Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Adopting and Authorizing Submittal of a Notification of Intent to Comply in Accordance with SB 619 to CalRecycle DATE: February 22, 2022 SUMMARY OF ACTION: Adoption of the proposed Resolution will seek to secure administrative civil penalty relief from any continuing violations of the State's SB 1383 Regulations for the 2022 calendar year in accordance with SB 619. IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES: There is no fiscal impact in submitting a Notification of Intent to Comply in accordance with SB 619, however, failure to comply with SB 1383 requirements can expose the City of substantial financial penalties. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution adopting and authorizing submittal of a Notification of Intent to Comply in accordance with SB 619 to CalRecycle. BACKGROUND: The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) has developed prescriptive regulations to achieve the State's organic waste reduction goals. In addition to the City's recent adoption of an ordinance adding Chapter 8.33, Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction, and Chapter 15.06, SB 1383 CalGreen Recycling and Model Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance Requirements, to the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code, in order to comply with the State's new regulations, amendments to the City's Solid Waste Franchise Agreement with South County Sanitary Service are also necessary. CalRecyle's SB 1383 regulations became enforceable on January 1, 2022. For violations, CalRecycle has discretion to determine the level of penalty necessary to remedy any given violation by jurisdictions, but can impose penalties of up to $10,000 per day. As Item 8.f. Page 75 of 340 City Council Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Adopting and Authorizing Submittal of a Notification of Intent to Comply in Accordance with SB 619 to CalRecycle February 22, 2022 Page 2 jurisdictions with solid waste authority are preparing to implement the laws throughout the State, many local governments are facing challenges and delays due to the COVID-19 pandemic and other issues. In response, Governor Newsom signed SB 619 (Laird, Chapter 508, Statutes of 2021) into law to support local governments as they design and implement successful organic waste recycling programs. The law authorizes CalRecycle to waive civil penalties if a jurisdiction submits a Notification of Intent to Comply for some or all of the regulatory requirements and successfully implements a plan to correct their violations. Jurisdictions may submit a Notification of Intent to Comply to CalRecycle with the attached Resolution by March 1, 2022. ANALYSIS OF ISSUES: The City has experienced delays in updating required amendments to the Solid Waste Franchise Agreement with its hauler, South County Sanitary Services, since the agreement is being coordinated through the Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA) in conjunction with other local jurisdictions. This process has been further complicated by the departure of San Luis Obispo County from the IWMA organization. IWMA's consultants, HF&H, have assisted in drafting amendments to the Franchise Agreements for a number of entities that have haulers who are subsidiaries of Waste Connections, which includes South County Sanitary Services; however, the process has not been concluded. Currently, draft amendments to the City's Solid Waste Franchise Agreement have been submitted to Waste Connections' legal counsel for review, and negotiations are expected to conclude within the next few weeks to allow City staff to bring the amendments to the City Council for its consideration in the near future. City staff were also recently informed by the IWMA that Cara Morgan, Branch Chief at CalRecycle, has been in touch with them in response to IWMA's request for further clarification on SB 619. Ms. Morgan has recommended that jurisdictions not apply under SB 619 if they have completed the following by June 30, 2022: 1. Franchise agreement (with SB 1383 required language inserted) Board/Council approved and signed. 2. SB 1383 Ordinance Board/Council approved and signed. The obvious dilemma for the City is that while we are hopeful that the amendments to the Solid Waste Franchise Agreement with South County Sanitary Services will be completed and approved by the City Council by June 30, 2022, the statutory deadline for filing for relief under SB 619 is March 1, 2022. Accordingly, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Resolution and authorize the City Manager to submit the SB 619 Notification of Intent to Comply to CalRecycle. The Resolution is based upon a suggested format provided by CalRecycle. In the event that the City is successful in completing the Item 8.f. Page 76 of 340 City Council Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Adopting and Authorizing Submittal of a Notification of Intent to Comply in Accordance with SB 619 to CalRecycle February 22, 2022 Page 3 Franchise Agreement amendments prior to June 30, 2022, City staff will advise CalRecycle and request that the City's submittal under SB 619 be withdrawn. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration: 1. Adopt the proposed Resolution; 2. Do not adopt the Resolution; or 3. Provide other direction to staff. ADVANTAGES: Adoption of the Resolution will provide administrative civil penalty relief from any continuing violations of the State's SB 1383 Regulations in accordance with SB 619, in the event the City is unable to complete the required amendments to the Solid Waste Franchise Agreement with South County Sanitary Services by June 30, 2022. DISADVANTAGES: No disadvantages are identified. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: No environmental review is required for this item. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS: The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City's website in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2. Attachments: 1. Proposed Resolution 2. Notification of Intent to Comply Item 8.f. Page 77 of 340 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ADOPTING AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF A NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO COMPLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SB 619 TO CALRECYLE WHEREAS, CalRecycle, in consultation with the California Air Resources Board, has adopted regulatory requirements (Regulations), consistent with the mandate of Senate Bill 1383 (Lara, 2016), that are designed to achieve the organic waste reduction goals established in Section 39730.6 of the Health and Safety Code through a 50 percent reduction in the level of the statewide disposal of organic waste from the 2014 level by 2020 and a 75 percent reduction in the level of the statewide disposal of organic waste from the 2014 level by 2025; and WHEREAS, the City of Arroyo Grande is a local jurisdiction required to comply with the Regulations; and WHEREAS, the City of Arroyo Grande is or expects to be facing continuing violations of the Regulations commencing during the 2022 calendar year, as further set forth in the attached Notification of Intent to Comply; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill 619 (Laird, 2021), through amendments to Section 42652.5 of the Public Resources Code (Statute), created a mechanism called a Notification of Intent to Comply through which a local jurisdiction may secure administrative civil penalty relief from any continuing violations of the Regulations for the 2022 calendar year and may be eligible for a broader and longer-term regulatory compliance path, including suspended administrative civil penalties, through a corrective action plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Arroyo Grande is a local jurisdiction authorized by the Statute to submit a Notification of Intent to Comply for CalRecycle approval; and WHEREAS, CalRecycle shall approve a Notification of Intent to Comply that is duly adopted by the jurisdiction by formal written resolution and meets the requirements of the Statute. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande that: 1. The City of Arroyo Grande by and through its City Council hereby formally adopts the Notification of Intent to Comply attached hereto as Exhibit "A." 2. The City of Arroyo Grande hereby authorizes and directs its City Manager, on its behalf, to submit the Notification of Intent to Comply attached as Exhibit "A" to CalRecycle for approval pursuant to the Statute. Page 78 of 340 RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 3. By submitting the Notification of Intent to Comply pursuant to and subject to the above-referenced requirements, the City of Arroyo Grande represents and certifies that it will implement the proposed actions to remedy the violations according to the proposed schedule as approved by CalRecycle and in accordance with the Statute and Regulations. 4. The City of Arroyo Grande by and through its City Council also acknowledges and agrees to comply with any maximum compliance deadline in any corrective action plan that CalRecycle, in its sole discretion, determines to be necessary and appropriate under the circumstances for the correction of any violation(s) of the Statute and Regulations identified in its Notification of Intent to Comply. On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and on the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 22nd day of February, 2022. Page 79 of 340 RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 3 CAREN RAY RUSSOM, MAYOR ATTEST: JESSICA MATSON, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: WHITNEY MCDONALD, CITY MANAGER APPROVED AS TO FORM: TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY Page 80 of 340 Attachment 2 Exhibit A Notification of Intent to Comply CalRecycle is providing this optional form as a convenience to assist jurisdictions (counties, cities, a county and city, or special districts providing solid waste collection services) for purposes of submitting a notification of intent to comply to CalRecycle [see Public Resources Code (PRC) section 42652.5(c)]. A jurisdiction may submit a notification of intent to comply if it is facing continuing violations of the Short-lived Climate Pollutants: Organic Waste Reductions requirements in Title 14 California Code of Regulations (14 CCR). The written notification of intent to comply, adopted by resolution of the jurisdiction's governing body, shall be sent to CalRecycle no later than March 1, 2022, to NOIC(cx)CalRecycle.ca.gov. A jurisdiction shall, at minimum, include the following in its notification: 1. A description, with specificity, of the continuing violations. 2. A detailed explanation of the reasons, supported by documentation, why the local jurisdiction is unable to comply. 3. A description of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on compliance. 4. A description of the proposed actions the local jurisdiction will take to remedy the violations within the timelines established in 14 CCR section 18996.2 with a proposed schedule for doing so. The proposed actions shall be tailored to remedy the violations in a timely manner. Upon approval by CalRecycle of a jurisdiction's notification and implementation of the intent to comply, a jurisdiction may be eligible for both of the following: 1. Administrative civil penalty relief for the 2022 calendar year pursuant to PRC section 42652.5(d). 2. A corrective action plan pursuant to 14 CCR section 18996.2. a. CalRecycle may address through a corrective action plan any violations disclosed in a jurisdiction's notification that will take more than 180 days to correct. In this situation, the proposed actions and schedule in the jurisdiction's approved notification will be in effect until a corrective action plan is issued. CalRecycle will respond in writing to a jurisdiction within 45 business days of receiving its notification with an approval, disapproval, request for additional information, or timeline for a decision on approval or disapproval. CalRecycle will include details about why a jurisdiction did not meet the requirements for a Notification of Intent to Comply when disapproving the jurisdiction's notification. Page 81 of 340 Please clearly print or type responses. Attach additional pages as necessary. Jurisdiction Name: City of Arroyo Grande County: San Luis Obispo Person Completing the Form: First Name: Whitney Last Name: McDonald Title: City Manager Mailing Address: 300 E. Branch Street City: Arroyo Grande, CA Zip Code: 93420 Email Address: wmcdonald@arroyogrande.org Phone Number: 805 473-5400 1. Select using the check boxes below or write in the continuing violations for each applicable regulatory section. For each selection, please describe the specific violations related to the regulatory section. Example: (B) 14 CCR section 18984.1 Three-Container Organic Waste Collection Services i. Not implementing mandatory residential foodwaste collection for all residents. Note: City already provides mandatory green waste collection to all residents ii. Not implementing mandatory commercial organics collection for all businesses under 2 cubic yards. Note: City already provides mandatory commercial organics collection to all businesses 2 cubic yard or more. Disclaimer: The list of possible continuing violations below is not inclusive of all potential violations of the regulations. (A) 14 CCR section 18984 Combined Organic Waste Collection Services. This requirement is not included since the requirements are further specified in sections 18984.1-18984.11. ❑ (B) 14 CCR section 18984.1 Three-Container Organic Waste Collection Services ❑ (C) 14 CCR section 18984.2 Two-Container Organic Waste Collection Services ❑ (D) 14 CCR section 18984.3 Unsegregated Single Container Collection Services ❑ (E) 14 CCR section 18984.4 Recordkeeping Requirements for Compliance with Organic Waste Collection Services O (F) 14 CCR section 18984.5 Container Contamination Minimization O (G) 14 CCR section 18984.6 Recordkeeping Requirements for Container Contamination Minimization ❑ (H) 14 CCR section 18984.7 Container Color Requirements ❑ (I) 14 CCR section 18984.8 Container Labeling Requirements ❑ (J) 14 CCR section 18984.11 Waivers Granted by a Jurisdiction ❑ (K) 14 CCR section 18985.1. Organic Waste Recovery Education and Outreach. O (L) 14 CCR section 18985.2. Edible Food Recovery Education and Outreach ❑ (M) 14 CCR section 18985.3. Recordkeeping Requirements for a Jurisdiction's Compliance with Education and Outreach Requirements ❑ (N) 14 CCR section 18988.1. Jurisdiction Approval of Haulers and Self-Haulers ❑ (0) 14 CCR section 18988.3. Self-haulers of Organic Waste ❑ (P) 14 CCR section 18988.4. Recordkeeping Requirements for Compliance with Jurisdiction Hauler Program ❑ (Q) 14 CCR section 18989.1. CALGreen Building Codes ❑ (R) 14 CCR section 18989.2 Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance Page 82-of 340 ❑ (S) 14 CCR section 18991.1. Jurisdiction Edible Food Recovery Program ❑ (T) 14 CCR section 18991.2. Recordkeeping Requirements for Jurisdiction Edible Food Recovery Program ❑ (U) 14 CCR section 18992.1. Organic Waste Recycling Capacity Planning (V) 14 CCR section 18992.2. Edible Food Recovery Capacity ❑ (W) 14 CCR section 18993.1. Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Target ❑ (X) 14 CCR section 18993.2. Recordkeeping Requirements for Recovered Organic Waste Procurement Target ❑ (Y) 14 CCR section 18993.3. Recycled Content Paper Procurement Requirements (Z) 14 CCR section 18993.4. Recordkeeping Requirements for Recycled Content Paper Procurement (AA) 14 CCR section 18994.2. Jurisdiction Annual Reporting Note: This requirement is not included since jurisdictions are still expected to report to CalRecycle. n(BB) 14 CCR section 18995.1. Jurisdiction Inspection Requirements Note: Section 18995.1(a)(1) should not be included because a jurisdiction should already be completing this action due to the requirements of PRC Chapter 12.9 (commencing with Section 42649.8) ❑ (CC) 14 CCR section 18995.2. Implementation Record and Recordkeeping Requirements (DD) 14 CCR section 18995.3. Jurisdiction Investigation of Complaints of Alleged Violations Note: This requirement is not included since jurisdictions are still expected to investigate complaints. ❑ (EE) 14 CCR section 18995.4. Enforcement by a Jurisdiction Use the check box(es) below to write in the continuing violations for any regulatory section(s) not reflected above and describe the specific violations related to the regulatory section. Example: (1) (Type regulatory section number) (Type regulatory section title) i. Describe the specific violations related to the regulatory section ❑ (1) The City of Arroyo Grande has experienced delays in the approval of amendments to its solid waste franchise agreement with its hauler, South County SanitaryServices, in order to comply with SB 1383. The City has been working on the amendments through the San Luis Obispo County Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA) and its consultant, HF&H. We are informed that draft amendments have been submitted to the hauler and are currently under review by its legal counsel. ❑ (2) ❑ (3) ❑ (4) ❑ (5) Page 83 of 340 2. A detailed explanation of the reasons why the jurisdiction is unable to comply, supported by documentation, if applicable. The City is part of IWMA and has been using the services of IWMA's consultant, HF&H, in negotiating amendments to its solid waste franchise agreement with South County Sanitary Services. HF&H has also been negotiating similar amendments for a number of other agencies in San Luis Obispo County for other haulers that are subsidiaries of Waste Connections. This effort has also included seeking to have consistent provisions in the several franchise agreement amendments implementing SB 1383, since IWMA will be delegated responsibilities relating to implementation. Waste Connections' legal counsel has the proposed amendments, but has not completed their review and it is anticipated that there may be issues that will require additional negotiations in order to finalize the amendments. 3. A description of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on compliance. Negotiations of the Franchise Agreement amendments have experienced some delay due to illness of key members of the negotiation team associated with the COVID-19 virus. 4. Provide a description of the proposed actions the jurisdiction will take to remedy the violations with a proposed schedule for completing each action. The proposed actions shall be tailored to remedy the violations in a timely manner. See optional format below. The City intends to continue to work with IWMA and its consultants to coordinate the language in the franchise agreement amendments. We are hopeful that the amendments to the franchise agreement will be agreed to by South County Sanitary Services and approved by the City Council by June 30, 2022, or as soon as possible thereafter. I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature Printed Name Title Date Page 84 of 340 Description of the proposed actions with proposed schedules the jurisdiction will take to remedy the violations. The proposed actions shall be tailored to remedy the violations in a timely manner. Regulatory Requirement and Description Action Proposed Schedule TASK 1: completion of approval of amendments to solid waste Date to be completed: 6/30/22 franchise agreement with South County Sanitary or as soon as possible thereafer TASK 2: Date to be completed: TASK 3: Date to be completed: Regulatory Requirement and Description Action Proposed Schedule TASK 1: Date to be completed: TASK 2: Date to be completed: EXAMPLE Regulatory Requirement: (B.i.) 14 CCR section 18984.1 Three-Container Organic Waste Collection Services Description: Not implementing mandatory residential foodwaste collection for all residents. Note: City already provides mandatory greenwaste collection to all residents Action Proposed Schedule TASK 1: Purchase two additional collection trucks and modify Date to be completed: collection routes 4/7/2022 TASK 2: The city will work with its hauler to find a facility to Date to be completed: accept mixed organic waste. 4/14/2022 Regulatory Requirement: (B.ii.) 14 CCR section 18984.1 Three-Container Organic Waste Collection Services Description: Not implementing mandatory commercial organics collection for all businesses under 2 cubic yards. Note: City already provides mandatory commercial organics collection to all businesses 2 cubic yard or more. Action: Proposed Schedule TASK 1: Purchase two additional collection trucks and modify Date to be completed: collection routes 4/21/2022 TASK 2: The city will work with its hauler to acquire and distribute Date to be completed: appropriate containers to all commercial accounts. The city will 4/28/2022 obtain monthly reports from the hauler to monitor full distribution of carts. Page 85 of 340 (F PRROYO NCORPOR ATED Y� * JULY 10, 1911 C141F04t�P. MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Bill Robeson, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director BY: Jill McPeek, Capital Improvement Project Manager SUBJECT: Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22050 Determining to Continue Work Under Emergency Contracts for the Storm Drain System at 251 East Grand Avenue Project, PW 2021-12 DATE: February 22, 2022 SUMMARY OF ACTION: Adoption of a Resolution by the required four-fifths vote will allow for the continuance of emergency repairs to the storm drain system at 251 East Grand Avenue. IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES: The FY 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget, as amended, includes $525,800 of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds for repair of the Storm Drain System at 251 East Grand Avenue Project. Staff time has been and will continue to be necessary to coordinate construction activities with the property owners, consultant engineer, and contractors. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution finding that there is a need to continue the emergency action for the storm drain system repairs at 251 East Grand Avenue in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22050. BACKGROUND: Public Contract Code (PCC) Section 22050 allows a public agency, in the case of an emergency, to repair or replace a public facility, take any directly related and immediate action required by that emergency, and procure the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those purposes without going through a formal bid process. On November 9, 2021, the Council adopted Resolution No. 5124 declaring an emergency and authorizing the immediate expenditure of funds to repair the storm drain system located at 251 East Grand Avenue, which had failed following a storm that occurred in October 2021. The urgency for the repairs is to prevent storm water from entering the deteriorating Item 8.g. Page 86 of 340 City Council Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22050 Determining to Continue Work Under Emergency Contracts for the Storm Drain System at 251 East Grand Avenue Project, PW 2021-12 February 22, 2022 Page 2 corrugated metal pipe (CMP)which undermines the soil surrounding the CMP and causes voids under the pavement leading to surface depressions and eventually sink holes. PCC Section 22050 requires that after proceeding with an emergency project, the City Council shall review the emergency action at its next regularly scheduled meeting and at every regularly scheduled meeting thereafter until the emergency action is terminated, and if it is determined that there is a need to continue the action, authorize continuation of the emergency action by a four-fifths vote. On February 8, 2022, the Council adopted Resolution No. 5154 determining a need to continue work under emergency contracts to repair the storm drain system at 251 East Grand Avenue. At the February 8th meeting, Council also approved an amendment to the FY 2021-22 CIP Budget, transferring $115,800 of ARPA funds to the project to address additional unanticipated underground concrete removal in the alignment of the new storm drain pipe. The critical removal of the obstructions was successful, along with the subsequent installation of the new pipe. There are a few final components of the project listed below that staff anticipates will be completed in the next two weeks. ANALYSIS OF ISSUES: Since the February 8, 2022 Council meeting, the status of the project as of February 16, 2022, is as follows: • California Auger Boring completed grouting around the outside of the new storm drain pipe in the area of obstructions to fill any voids that may have occurred during boring operations; • CalPortland completed removal of the bore pit trench boxes; and • CalPortland began construction of the new headwalls at the inlet and outlet of the new storm drain pipe. As of February 16, 2022, the project costs are estimated as follows, including expended plus anticipated costs: Plug and fill existing CMP storm drain $ 47,200 Installation of new storm drain pipe 336,300 Extra work due to new storm drain obstructions 102,600 Site restoration, fencing & barricade rental 15,600 Before/after testing of fuel lines 2,800 Consultant services - design, construction, testing 21,300 Total $ 525,800 Item 8.g. Page 87 of 340 City Council Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22050 Determining to Continue Work Under Emergency Contracts for the Storm Drain System at 251 East Grand Avenue Project, PW 2021-12 February 22, 2022 Page 3 With the failed CMP being filled, the potential for directed storm water flow into the failed CMP and surrounding voids no longer exists and storm water will now enter the new permanent storm drain pipe. However, prompt actions still required to complete the project include lining of the new pipe, testing of the fuel lines, and site restoration. For these reasons, staff recommends continuing the emergency action. As required by statute, staff will continue to bring a similar item to the Council on all subsequent regular meeting agendas until all emergency repairs have been completed and the emergency action is terminated by the Council. Staff will continue to work with the contractors and design engineer to complete the emergency repairs. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration: 1. Adopt a Resolution determining a need to continue work under the emergency declaration; 2. Do not adopt the proposed Resolution and direct staff to prepare a resolution to terminate the emergency declaration; or 3. Provide other direction to staff. ADVANTAGES: Adoption of the Resolution will allow for the continuance of emergency repairs to the storm drain system at 251 East Grand Avenue and will eliminate a serious threat to public health and safety and minimize disruptions to the Chevron station's operations. DISADVANTAGES: None identified at this time. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: No environmental review is required for this item. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS: The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City's website in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2. ATTACHMENT: 1. Proposed Resolution Item 8.g. Page 88 of 340 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DETERMINING A NEED TO CONTINUE WORK UNDER EMERGENCY CONTRACTS TO REPAIR THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM AT 251 EAST GRAND AVENUE WHEREAS, on November 9, 2021 , pursuant to Public Contract Code (PCC) Sections 20168 and 22050, the City Council deemed it was in the public interest to immediately authorize the expenditure of City funds needed to safeguard the public health, safety and welfare and to proceed immediately with emergency repairs of the storm drain system at 251 East Grand Avenue; and WHEREAS, on November 9, 2021, the City Council deemed that the emergency repairs would not permit a delay resulting from a competitive solicitation for bids and that prompt action, including authorization to expend all funds required for such repairs without competitive bidding, was necessary to respond to the emergency; and WHEREAS, on November 9, 2021 , the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5124 declaring an emergency and authorizing the immediate expenditure of funds to repair the storm drain system at 251 East Grand Avenue; and WHEREAS, PCC Section 22050 requires that after proceeding with an emergency project, the City Council shall review the emergency action at its next regularly scheduled meeting and at every regularly scheduled meeting thereafter until the emergency action is terminated; and WHEREAS, on November 23, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5130; on December 14, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5137; on January 11, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5140; on January 25, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5147; and on February 8, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution. No. 5154 determining a need to continue work under emergency contracts to repair the storm drain system at 251 East Grand Avenue; and WHEREAS, if it is determined that there is a need to continue the action, PCC Section 22050 requires a four-fifths vote to authorize the continuation of the emergency action. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande that the storm drain system emergency declared by the City Council on November 9, 2021, shall be deemed to continue. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the storm drain system emergency shall be deemed to continue to exist until its termination is declared by the City Council. Page 89 of 340 RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 On motion by Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and on the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 22nd day of February, 2022. Page 90 of 340 RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 3 CAREN RAY RUSSOM, MAYOR ATTEST: JESSICA MATSON, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: WHITNEY McDONALD, CITY MANAGER APPROVED AS TO FORM: TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY Page 91 of 340 (F PRROYO NCORPOR ii, ATED Y� * JULY 10, 1911 c4EIFOON MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Bill Robeson, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director BY: Robin Dickerson, City Engineer Jill McPeek, Capital Improvement Project Manager SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution Accepting an Offer of Dedication for Street, Drainage, Slope and Public Utility Easements Per Parcel Map AG PM 06-0004 and Acceptance of Castillo Del Mar Extension Project Improvements, PW 2021-05 DATE: February 22, 2022 SUMMARY OF ACTION: Rescind the previous City Council action rejecting the Offer of Dedication on August 11, 2009 and accept the offer of dedication for street, drainage, slope and public utility easements for Parcel Map AG PM 06-0004, accept the offer for a 64' wide public street known as Castillo Del Mar per Parcel Map AG PM 06-0004, and accept the Castillo Del Mar Extension Project improvements and begin the one-year warranty period for defects that may arise. IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES: The amended FY 2020/21 and FY 2021/22 Capital Improvement Program budgets included $1,095,370.64 for the Castillo Del Mar Extension Project consisting of$536,500 of developer contributions, $478,121.01 of Sales Tax funds and $80,749.63 from the Lucia Mar Unified School District (LMUSD). The final contract and change orders resulted in a total cost of $1,042,452.35, $930,943.20 for the direct contract amount and $111,509.15 in additional quantities placed and contract change orders. The recommended action will not impact staff resources. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution: 1) rescinding the action to reject the offer of dedication for street, drainage, slope and public utility easements, 2) accepting the offer of dedication for street, drainage, slope and public utility easements known as Castillo Del Mar as identified on Parcel Map AG PM 06-0004, and 3) accepting the project improvements as constructed by J.J. Fisher Construction, Inc. in accordance with the plans and specifications for the Castillo Del Mar Extension Project, PW 2020-05; and direct staff to file a Notice of Item 8.h. Page 92 of 340 City Council Consideration of Resolution Accepting an Offer of Dedication for Street, Drainage, Slope and Public Utility Easements Per Parcel Map AG PM 06-0004 and Acceptance of Castillo Del Mar Extension Project Improvements, PW 2021-05 February 22, 2022 Page 2 Completion, and authorize release of retention, thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded, if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: In May 2006 the City entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Lucia Mar Unified School District, JH Land Partnership, and John Taylor, Trustee to enable the City to accomplish the extension of Castillo Del Mar to Valley Road. The MOU also provided for the preparation of a tentative parcel map. The tentative parcel map was prepared creating 4 parcels and the offer of dedication for the extension of Castillo Del Mar to Valley Road. On August 11, 2009, the City Council approved Parcel Map AG PM 06-0004. As part of that action, the City Council rejected without prejudice the offer of dedication of Castillo Del Mar for street, drainage, slope and public utility easements. At the time of the final Parcel Map approval staff recommended rejecting the Castillo Del Mar offer of dedication until such time that JH Land Partnership provided payment as required by the MOU and the construction plans were completed. The Parcel Map was subsequently recorded on May 31, 2011 . On January 12, 2021, the City Council awarded a construction contract for the Castillo Del Mar Extension Project to J.J. Fisher Construction, Inc. in the amount of $930,943.20 and authorized the City Manager to approve change orders in the amount of$111,509.15. On September 28, 2021, and on November 23, 2021, the Council augmented the project budget, providing for a total amount available for construction of $1,044,900.20. The contractor's final construction cost for the project is $1,042,452.35. The general scope of work involved the demolition of portions of the existing Castillo Del Mar roadway and Arroyo Grande High School (AGHS) parking lot and the construction of public improvements within a new right-of-way that realigned Castillo Del Mar to a new connection point with Valley Road. The scope of work also included a multi-use path, drainage improvements, waterline relocation, landscaping, street lighting, parking lot striping, and an access drive that connects the two AGHS parking lots and provides additional parking for the high school. Costs associated with the improvements to the high school parking lot were covered by the Lucia Mar Unified School District. ANALYSIS OF ISSUES: Although the offer of dedication for street, drainage, slope and public utility easements for Castillo Del Mar were originally rejected without prejudice, per Government Code Section 66477.2 (a), the offer of dedication shall remain open and the legislative body may by resolution at any later date, and without further action by the subdivider, rescind its action and accept the offer of dedication, which acceptance shall be recorded in the office of the County Recorder. With the completion of the Castillo Del Mar improvements, it is recommended that the City Council rescind the rejection and accept on behalf of the Item 8.h. Page 93 of 340 City Council Consideration of Resolution Accepting an Offer of Dedication for Street, Drainage, Slope and Public Utility Easements Per Parcel Map AG PM 06-0004 and Acceptance of Castillo Del Mar Extension Project Improvements, PW 2021-05 February 22, 2022 Page 3 public the offer of dedication for street, drainage, slope and public utility easements for Castillo Del Mar as shown on Parcel Map AG PM 06-0004. The contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications within schedule, within the available budget, and there are no outstanding issues. It is, therefore, recommended that the City accept the Castillo Del Mar Extension Project and begin the one-year warranty period for defects that may arise. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration: 1. Approve staff's recommendations; 2. Do not approve staff's recommendation and request further information; 3. Modify staff's recommendation and approve; or 4. Provide other direction to staff. ADVANTAGES: Now that the improvements have been completed the City Council on behalf of the public is able to accept the offer of dedication for street, drainage, slope and public utility easements for Castillo Del Mar per Parcel Map AG PM 06-0004. The project is complete and accepting the improvements will allow staff to close out the project. The street extension of Castillo Del Mar provides improved access for the Vista Del Mar and the Heights at Vista Del Mar developments, and will help relieve congestion related to traffic surrounding Arroyo Grande High School. DISADVANTAGES: No disadvantages have been identified. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: No environmental review is required for this item. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS: The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City's website in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2. Attachments: 1. Proposed Resolution 2. Parcel Map AG PM 06-0004 3. Notice of Completion Item 8.h. Page 94 of 340 ATTACHMENT 1 Complimentary Recording Requested Pursuant to Government Code Sections 6103 and 27383 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO City Clerk City of Arroyo Grande 300 East Branch Street Arroyo Grande, California 93420 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE, RESCINDING REJECTION AND ACCEPTING AN OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR STREET, DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CASTILLO DEL MAR AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP AG PM 06-0004 AND CONSTRUCTED BY JJ FISHER CONSTRUCTION, INC. Page 95 of 340 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE, RESCINDING REJECTION AND ACCEPTING AN OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR STREET, DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CASTILLO DEL MAR AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP AG PM 06-0004 AND CONSTRUCTED BY JJ FISHER CONSTRUCTION, INC. WHEREAS, the City Council approved Parcel Map AG PM 06-0004 on August 11, 2009 and rejected without prejudiced the offer of dedication shown on the referenced parcel map for streets, drainage, slope and public utility easements; and WHEREAS, Final Parcel Map AG PM 06-0004 was recorded by the County Recorder on May 31, 2011; and WHEREAS, the City Council awarded the construction of the Castillo Del Mar Extension Project improvements on January 12, 2021 to J.J. Fisher Construction, Inc.; and WHEREAS, J.J. Fisher Construction, Inc. has constructed and completed the improvements per the approved plans and specifications for the Castillo Del Mar Extension Project on schedule; and WHEREAS, City staff inspected the improvements on February 14, 2022 and find they are constructed in accordance with the approved plans for the Castillo Del Mar Extension Project; and WHEREAS, per Government Code Section 6647.2 (a), the offer of dedication shall remain open and the legislative body may by resolution at any later date, and without further action by the subdivider, rescind its action and accept the offer of dedication, which acceptance shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande hereby: 1. Rescinds its rejection of an offer of dedication for street, drainage, slope and public utility easements on August 11, 2009; and 2. Accepts the offer of dedication for street, drainage, slope and public utility easements for Castillo Del Mar as shown on final Parcel Map AG PM 06-0004 recorded May 31 , 2011 and attached hereto for reference; and 3. Accepts the improvements for the Castillo Del Mar Extension Project. Page 96 of 340 RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and on the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 22nd day of February, 2022. Page 97 of 340 RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 3 CAREN RAY RUSSOM, MAYOR ATTEST: JESSICA MATSON, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: WHITNEY McDONALD, CITY MANAGER APPROVED AS TO FORM: TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY Page 98 of 340 Attachment 2 • 95 OWNER'S STA TEM EN T PARCEL MAP AG PM 06-0004 CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT I ion rc+$Aer_€.LUM5t wA the undersigned, hereby state that we are all the owners of and all parties Being a subdn+ ion of a portion of Lot 103,107 and 108 of the Ranchos COM! Piedra, I, City Engineer of the City of Arroyo Grande. do hereby state N having any record title in the real property included within the subdivision and �+� San r�� that I hove examined this mop, that the subdivision shown hereon is I project shown on this map and that each of us does hereby Consent to the Pismo de Chamisal,in the City ofAm)yo Grande Coulfy of Luis Obispo,State of substantially the some as it appeared on the tentative map and any approved • Ring and/or recordation of this mop. alterations thereof and that all provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the California,according to the map filed in Book A,Page 65 of Maps,ri the Office of the ordinances of the City of Arroyo Grande applicable at the time of approval of We hereby dedicate to the public for public use all streets shown on this map the tentative have been complied with. Q.: and we dedicate to the pubic the easements for drainage and slope phloems County Recorder of said County so designated on this map and all uses incident thereto./ We hereby reserve to ourselves, our heirs and assigns for the use and benefit of �' -� Q'y+'+„T Date �72 the several public utiiity companies which ore authorized to serve in said GLA City Engineer subdivision, easements for public utility purposes, delineated an said map as y,OA ND BG MiCMAEL- E. LJeFN RcE '257o eitPIA $ 12f31'2b'6' "Public Utility Easement”; or P,U.E'. e.+"y a,9Ca-pyo 9� { CraigCampbell, actingan behalf of the Ci[ engineer of the Cityof Arra d V ampbelY g yo rr p Grande as allowed under Section 66421 of the Subdivision Map A'cC do hereby Lucia Mar Unified School District, a political subdivision of the State of California, rya.b261 state that 1 have exonined the mop shower hereon and I van satisfied that this who acquired title as Arroyo Grande High School District and as Arroyo GrandeEip 155198 map is technically correct. Unicom High Soh District ACKNOWLEDGMENT '9l£ 744Z0_,____ �� _ Sr y, Board of Trustees State of California C'gL1E� C•ig amp,,1 LS "x•- ex 12/31/2009 Dote County of C1,-..1 ..;s(Nlo; y- -) John M. Taylor, surviving trustee of the Survivor's Trust.and the "Taylor Family 4 t 4 [� Trust"established under the E. and E. Tayfar Living Trust U/T/A dated December On�G-1rel�Q_—before me, -Lp}__N ac-/C�a M►1a idirt + (insert name and title of the officer} SURVEYOR'S STA TEMEN T /_ ByT4. :, r. L�C�. ir eG hprove appeared J4r^.e3 esectory evidence ors = who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) This map was prepared by me or under my direction and is based upon a field whoseinstrument and acknowledged to survey in c nlarmante with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and name(s)is/are subscribed to the within CLERK'Slocal ordinance of the request of Don.5?7ognolo in September 2006. I hereby I TY STA TEMEN T me that he/she/they executed the same in h sjher/then authorizedlocal that this parcel map substantially conforms to the approved or copocity(ies), and that by his/her/their signoture(s)on the instrument the conditionally approved tentative map, if any: I hereby state that all the I. the undersigned 4gvrtfc clerk of the City of Arroyo Grande, do hereby certify person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)acted, executed the monuments are of the character and occupy the positions indicated or that they that the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande State of California, did on instrument. will be set in those positions within one year of the recordation of this map and Int 1t, 2043_approve this Parc!Map AC PM 06-0004, in accordance with that the monuments are, or will be, sufficient to enable the survey to be pfbwsians of the subdiei on mop act and Total ordinance and that the 25 foot 1 certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the taws of the State of Californiaretraced. wide offer of dedication shown hereon for Volley Road was accepted on behalf of that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. • LAND CIAg the public and that the offers of dedication shown hereon for streets, drainage r40 and slope easements were rejected without prejudice 1 also do hereby certify It17NESS my hand and official seal. r,,,, 1.Marc e). Dat I$/ZS p$ that the City Council did order the abandonment of the public streets or public Si ,,t 4 ❑ easements, within the limits of this map, recorded September 29, 1964 in RookJ � '' a, do 9 1317, Pages 83, 8s, and 97, recorded July 17, 2000 as Instrument Ha Signature*.411101- Name Printed k.LC f le..' 5 rya,6064 I George Y Mmohenko L.S. 6964(Cit E 9/3D/09) 2000-039507, and recorded February 27, 2007, os Instrument Na C I 2007-013203 of Official Records in the County Cierk-Recorder's Office, are County of Sant vara hi.0i7en Exp.913 hereby abandoned in accordance with Government Code Section 66443(j) with the Comissian Expires 3!811+� 99 `4 COUNTY RECORDER'S STATEMENT filing of this map. Comisalon MCN L' O die OF CALIF@ eve I - UI.C.(•i�� Piled this J!51 day of_Pet FM 24.11 at ebi 110 A.M. in at the request of Y. -0aprty-Clerk of the City a Arrp Grande Moak Tit of Parcel Maps, at Page Q5 g eqGeorge A CKNDWLED GMEN T Morthenka, TD 3q State of California • Document No 2QI14�YLI-1 Fee: S f a.00 - _ VICINITY MAP BEET County of Sere,Li..:a dcasea ) .4 ' .h+lie L, RlZdewald f3' ��0 ▪ pP11 5 0. On�.A,.a�.aaoa before me. L�y�dA �.��icr County Recorder By. i f rOr (insert name and title of the officer) { �� personally appeared Jekr. 11.7a ltw " • Y.� who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) i whose names)is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to PLANNING COMMISSION'S STATEMENT D p r. 4' me that he/she/they executed the same in his/ier/thelr authorized 0°A &s FR' capaclty(les), and that by his/her/their signature(s)on the instrument the i hereby state that this Parcel Map AG 06-0004 conforms to the Tentative Mop 'O� ` cy.'�E person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)acted, executed the thereof, approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande, instrument. California. S' G I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California I-�,r d �Dp P�5 P'r`47 that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. Secretary of[`pre fPlannning Commission .5----.15^-+■ - R 6 TQ NATNE55 my hand and official seal. T ,,/ � �� 9 Signature 7{..[t Ma? Nome Printed k�C/'fay ARROYV GRANDE N� ❑i 9 County of den Lre:3 Ob iip.0 _ _ crvu Ewr�r wwp v� HIGH SCHOOL "' Germiston Expires OR II Z Cannes w.uwrx�swr �ve. '� Camissian,{' I1 4Lin ,.Ai�scAoc Auc,rlEemMs wECrumP4 EPwrEE,wg SOILS REPORTEON lir-air" .ER d Mut WOWS �^ not to scale SITE '`o /j" C'qs, WALUCEEsOLPCCS SWHISOw K[EPw0.TIL`i✓aL Limits r� " a Earth Systems Pacific '� � 2049 North Prel+sker Lane 612 CLARION COURT Suite E • sada Luis aeisno. CA 93401 c- j ,6, Suite Santo Maria, CA. 93454 T 805 swot 1 F tits 544-4294 ciry�� %� &-42009 Supple23, 2008 mlental Lettot Pendingp WALLACE GROUP ale 0232-a os-0049 �'" October 2008 \0 First American Title Company Order No.: 4001-2280867 SHEET 1 OF 5 SH.8ETS 4 Page 99 of 340 . . 96 r 1 PARCEL MAPAG Pill 06-0004 T Signature Omissions Statement Being a subdivision of a portion of Lot 103,107and tO8oftheRanchos Corral de Piedra, F" The following signatures have been omitted under the provisions of Section Prsnio de Charnisal,in the City of Arroyo Grande,County of San Luis Obispo,State of TRUSTEE'S STATEMENT Z 66436(a)(3J(4)(i)of the Subdivision slap Act as their interests are such that California,according to the map sled in Book A,Page 65 of Maps,in the Office of the a they can not ripen into a fee title and such signatures are not required by the Farm Credit West, FLCA, as trustee under Deed of Trust recorded December 17, governing bady County Recorder of said County 2007 os Instrument No. 2007-080418 of Official Records of the County of San Union Oil Company of California; on easement for ppoehnes and Incidental Luis=•ispo, C ifornia. purposes, recorded July 20, 1906 in Book 70 of Deeds, Page 385: �1 - --- ____-- Document(s)declaring modifications thereof recorded April 14, 1938 as Rook 236 its 4 s.f%e 71.r..7` !/;,,4h.✓•d•.'f- Page 259 of Official Records. Document(s)decla.ing modificotions thereof recorded April 16, 1941 as Rock 294 ACKfVOWLEDGMEN T Page 268 of Official Records. Isabelle E Ballagh et at; an easement for pumping plan, pipes and incidental State of California purposes recorded November 10, 7925 in Book 7, Page 246 of Official Records. County of Sjgo s+t s Oh 1Aco.e ) Document(s)declaring modifications thereof recorded June 17, 2004 as On 4i4Akta.__—before me. Lettyy..P YA{i; Instrument Na 2004-051468 of Official Records. (insert name and b e of the officer) Santo Maria Gas Company, a Corporation; an easement for pipeline recorded personally appeared a0i0.r+$INN'S ft.• March 18, 1932 in Book 120, Page 392 of Official Records. who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose nome(s)is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to Isabelle E. Balingh. et at; an easement for ingress, egress, road,pipeline and me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized incidental purposes. recorded April 30. 1940 in Book 276, Page 485 of Official capocity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s)on the instrument the Records. person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)acted, executed the Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California Corporation; an easement for instrument. electrical Iooalies and incidental purposes recorded December 5, 1941 in Book I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California 310, Page 374 of Official Records. that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. Southern Counties Gas Company of California, a corporation; an easement for 5!1NES3 my hand and official seal. pipe line and incidental purposes, recorded July 9, 1942 as Rook 334 Page 352 • of Official Records. .,t Southern California Gas Company a California Corporation; an easement for Signature`#';1c pi..../.. Name Printed){•tom,All public()fifties recorded October 2.TX 1950 in Cook 383, Page 491 of Official County of Sn..I-Lai 5,-061 Records. Camisslon Expires 3/..11-2 Paul Al. Haddox and Hazel E Naddo; an easement for well,pipeline ingress, Comission#_1_11_9_1_3_p_--_—_— egress and incidental purposes recorded October 9, 1959 in Book 1027, Page 100 of Official Records • • Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California Corporation; on easement for public utities recorded October 25, 1967 in Book 1453, Page 366 of Official Records. Pacific Gas and Electric Compan, a California Corporation; an easement for public utlities recorded May 24, 1990 as Instrument Na. 1990-35220 of Official Records. J4 Land Partnership, LP; an easement for access road, utilities and incidental purposes recorded December 29, 1999 as Instrument No. 1999--089542 of Official Records. CML& CCIISTRUCIION LUM•O0I'aiT LANDSCAPE RACHRECRIRE AECIur.CA Dr. ` KAMMNp SPUBLIC YENK9 W,E,ESIEA,X. RVEYING lGIS SOLLMONS mil1 WAFER RESOURCES WALLACE SKMaCe ErtalEETOwa 612 CLARION COURT SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 T 8155444011 F 805 544.4294 WALL'\CE GROUP —.""—P-- File 0232-0506-0049 1 .51- .01'2 OF 5 SHEETS Page 100 of 340 97 952774rE 94 e ten 5648T M .„94", 8 Set brass cep LS 6964 n standard City monument wag 33.27'AI x R. 5 P A Fouad monument n mermen,well as noted PARCEL MAP AG PM 06-0004 o . ps • Found mbar LS 5702 per R7 or found monument as holed Bei a subdivision of a 0 S<! retia LS 6954 BOUNDARY RE—ESTABLISHMENT Frondnotmasa �' F°'� t Sept nem tag Ls 6964 n9 of Cot 443,107 1(18 of the Ranchos Gartside Piedra, erg RCE den n Pismo de Chemise',in the City of Arroyo Grande,County of San LUIS Obispo,State of monument net N4,g",�, , round r•cep ed a with log P RecordCalifornia,according to the map�"ed in Book A,Pie 65 of Maps,in the of the ��41/ gtegnk accepted w r iron se 8eaing-eewng Mfmsactkrn 0 pipe RCE 5977 per 94 8P Beai9 rtirlaooe intersection"h'�k County Recorder of said County Q= k�F,/ti, `' CA Camp Rule Aensiment ti❑n 4, N56Y2711 R4 ,r.'", Bel deeds ‘''',;•/,? res$79.26'F N To. , ?�, QR1R x0043/25 Records __ __ `- --Found--r brass cep tot 39 ped iS 5702 n _ .°' rood 3/bion Ape capped ; R4 193 f 6/LS/98/��8 _- = S.) mrn !nee per R7 R��V LS 2580 R6 bearsic. 95 34 5 1 A78bi,..-p a 5597123'9 045' R7 9/-/ s f �,`�'�j r� • 4 o�o sc e At57'38i701 '� l33.A7 '' R8 18R5/40 p01 it 1S'"Rt600.00' R7 'f.— \ Found l'brass N59Y}231 •w R9 y of Arcoyv Aee1e Control Network .tg1, S r 'fir`G 73' i 7 .7' R=6IN----00' - .�� sluTnded x911'2k r Casement g"1 O :,245 R] I ,`3 Z L.181 78�6�17'1ti 7'15'18'Y RLI 8977 n Found 2'brass 1 monument weR per 94 to RAW \ Ruben UUtleyEaEasement 6 feet wide unless otherwise noted '+',.46",ini " SVx,E3EV. 1 :'�. -� y1 60.78' stomped t5 5702 n 1 s* ' c C1Q V""5 , +� x t7 �EIC �� $ LL/.001000jC e s t i"1 o i7 e I !Aar mmamen!weA Aer R7 r1 Found!3/2'con pine togged �' '(1 y ,/Set Nan and 60 m¢e of 36r43'4r • ey,rna, �Dl4'roti RCE 9804 per R6 +t . (4 a 4, 0 0 R 4 i`Tag 15 6964 edculated from R7 \, a.__iia r �' �Q C cX 0I ytw /:.. n rap boulder eh i ,. 4. 14 n R3 /�// N',- z Found r}/2'iron piipe2"111. 14 yy •C4 / / f°n,� w� �__4________________� no log,disturbed �', O' �, •6R / / 4i`' '3, not 39 1530/0R/584 M.- a +' 4 , // // do shown on Y-.4 I i c • 0' //f// ---- - r 53/L5/51 77 `$03 Favna r 1%2 ion Ape wddh Ste Wei$'( `-— % Found}1/2•:an pipe wen VP 1 nag Per Ry Set tag[s 6964: �- - y lag &gibe accepted as r e r ' found 3/4"fmn Ape with nae --�' • �` Tri G L 2207 '{� r/2'ion Alae with rug RCE x - tat 38 `r. r ssat Ra x `e:, nears No4asau�r.2s; _ �. 19/MB/26 s, g r G iircils 25'N 6'R6 northerly 1.27'per R1 ,',' s. ( y d NN8932t 56236'RB885077V 58232'At I yr round 2'fan Ape with tog 1.0' • • �'•L aide 0_?, Found r ion pine with nag ygap` I I ikon �9806 accepted 6 tot 361c q ''''7?-',9,- R£I accepted es r kat pipe Per '-' 39177 R5 / per R'3 '� p '_ 94 and R8,Sold kr rrs1 lire 798 0 262.09'iWMP �. Cc .,I' y Road 50(eel wide oro 5873Yh. 480.85.17 5 . s3 Cot 15 1` n w 37'35' 46066'Its 1 ! 2282/0R/527 La!31 1 Lot 108 a •'04,, txaey "n .g 51.87'Id row er Basis of Bearings A/M B/6 5 sou*coon e--g V. Lot lv ''x _ •r 754/0R/15a y Pie Basis of Bening kr this surrey is between Pont A-90,a --- ^3 -i`-1� I y 1 03 s�`� l�F. d 3/4•ion A 9Pen,nn $ ` .3`�- r Lot L v ''+°• r.•• begs M57'5G OPf'E Q 74' `f�7+ found nen pine n Monument wet!a[WAYe)'Read p}d Leanne .•, See i1 all 1� !Ufa/OR/627 'f On and Pont 0-23,a found'ren pipe n monument weR at �' e" Omwunn'A• a k'1 'rr'- 1 Cherry Avenue old Loo Si us per the City of Array)Outdo • i., 'G'ty Lmils , A/M B/6 6�s-:�'. ; 25' 25' .f� Horizontal and Vertical Control Network prepared by UK NSkh 1 58648597 sisoso y�e �• Ting• ' tat 29 . raj Surveys.bb if 69026. the Rearing Fran A-90 to 0-23 is -, Z 23 58874'9 39816 92 S-. �•.ry s_ North 317'13"Fust Cs Se n the Ci[ of Arra Grade }".. 'g , °u5 % N 1 Mac Ms Department. p `---------.---�_ -a- 1997-017047 Q.R. yip'" aRr tot 22 2001 OR/135 �` Lot 0 L7 SZ Found r}/2'ion pine•iN log •eye. RLL 9806 per R3 See ci A/M B/6 5 replacement nae oe Sheet 4 40 Dedoa[ ti <\ per this e�, OlyofArroyokande '-\ j -_� -.----- - -�- � Control Pont 0-23 � � �- __L J b 1 _ Found i r/2.ban pine fL y _ � `� 25' with tag RC£98A5 Na!1 Qgq A �, 4,5 / (si'\4'. �� ' Aa R2 and R3 58874E v stele N. CnLEh.GIHEEfbu Found l"ron poe Found 3 r 4•ion A a 58924'9 371.15• r0'Rl `` \ D0'��"T10r"'`�"'v�a"` accepted os 1 1/4'iur O ��`.�' tih 7 37'417! ""' ; V urrsc.�uxPrtECT/PE Ripe RCC 9806 pc R$Set • '` [�✓u Ply Ler+i[s .S86Tyr 46£ i GC00nc.vvhowEESNuc tag L$6964 4 44°- ! '' • g' OM top RCE snub r v B cars ore., EP.ihph1 .'� N sa648.597.3954},1f r $ \ I F. •1 i/4'ion pipe per R1;o r49led a4 pont r iiiiiiiiii r suavEnPu+ava yolu*ror� GRAPHIC SCALE -- �` with tog RCS 9aD6 on centerline of!a7 er wA,En PEEP MFS o xe aoo • ! per R2 held for lne 1 MR9 per 311-5'/82 WALLACESWANSON Penrw.mruu ,30• �, 672 CLARION COURT _ -. __ _ SAN Eus 001590, CA 934e1 Ply of Arnold amide T Sas std-4o1 t 0 sae 544-4294 i IN F2er Control Point A-90 WALLACE GROUP 'e'er"-reeky"m.P. t:Pen 200 it, Fnle 0232-0506-0049 Sams'3 OF 5 SI-TEEPS Page 101 of 340 98 Non Plottoble Easements 3/MB/B6 01 b` 101;pipeline,r vas and egress remred per 7027/014/600; S PARCEL MAP AG PM06-0004 - ONE TABLE calls for an exrwterg rryatrort �pipe tine but O G ONE LINCRI 8608910 does"°t'P''''°°°�'`'°"• / Being a subdivision of a portion of Lot 103,107and 108 of the Ranchos Corral de Piedra, 1-- Li -- L1 81.73 N4856'2YW Easement 1.a'paella oreffes recorded 0klo6er 25 15197 n Saar / / Pismo de Chamisal,in the City of Arroyo Grande,County of San Luis Obispo State of 12 65.08 44656'291w 145.2 Page 366 of o(6ckr Recrda'falls outside of this subdnieonr • 13 10665 567'40.30 E Wafer ruts and potline California,accordingto the m filed in Book A,Page 65 of Maps,in the Office of the 14 1!7.69 532792YF Easement for public rood recorded November 25.1599 it Boa* eosemen!pp 7/08/246 2 L5 4361 98240'30T r54�Pale 413 of Officio!8 Wsoutside of this,terbrbnisicn modified V / County Recorder of said County 17 5166 58740'30T 4396 53259Y,5 E ��2094-asr+s6 11 y'� !egend 18 3642 58T37Y,5 E v�Q� 'co54' /�'// A sad brass cap 15.6964 1.v stardwd afy monument.ei 19 r&65 5!6'S629T _ ■ Fouad monument iv monument FA as noted LIP 180.23 5327923£ OAO {) Q¢i - � /1,a •/ 0 Found rebor Se DLL5702 per s 6964N7 a land monument os rioted L1 1500 N5g7137E Prrlvte acre 02 66-97 S327923T , easement&atFity easement �+� • / O� t, Lo!39 Set mg and tog LS 6984 Att Measured 173 65!54 42746'6T \ per 099-069542 D.R. \1� d' / . / v R Reed 174 15.20 92246'46V • , o / CY / P Proration 115 81.73 N46565Y8 4 8B Dearing-Rearing Intersection 116 101364 N87Y030 w I 11� --leRite gas pgNite ingress and egress yk Y f r.: f 'yt a0 Seo ing-Aisfamae lntersectim easement pe'120/06'/392 ' /¢.. / 882 Ac.arms Parcel �Aa, Tract 20awe Official Records OA Compass Ati• Ps t 5'Electrical easement 11 'Cay Cas easement per 583/04/491 ,j' / 882 Al Ne! - S.19/MB/26 ,x1 N/4 RI }0/05./25 per 1990-3522(!D-R N Rand a+d itr;drnlol purposes 5�" {*. R2 10/45/38 re\ 1.w-^ per 276/08/485 1-`$ R3 1171S/97 R�%Rf� +�3 'lis . /, =anentold t%385 ty � 85 34,116/15 P berme:ingress end egress / / 236/08/259 244/08/26$and �1T� • N i70-W Bs S3/r-4/51 4p'Offer W Dedication JJ 1.32 Paresf ;' easement per 276/06./485.,),/ / 324/08/352 / R8 19 /0 far Public Street per this m� I 1.32 As.Cross \ _ Slope Emmen! + r D6r Ac..Net ♦ / • CRR9 y of Arroyo Crenate Control Woo* iI Y%.t s /% v .v UD 1Ya'ecge Eminent i`� rug• / ,- .-- Lot JS e Public fltt411y Iosement 8 feet nide unloss otherwise Hated 11%-ir • `•-�` ,- � - C ;wie access / / �. 'gO S,qF CUM TABLE .. 016 _ 3 •• ---e!...,,,-Pt easement&utility easement / / ; Ci M, cum LEMON Paws DELTA 13 C=d.N �� per 1999-039542 OR �/ • • ti C' �� / 4 ,07,5' o Cl 356.92 26&00 757472' City of Ana Grande RFI e A.2 / T1�` 07.-,6 �r 02 f 71.39 332.00 1473'26° County of Son Luis Obispo • •` ..,.....2-" 'S • C3 124.64 33200 2130:15' 83 �' _' r: / / � 0 Ater of Dedication C4 39.28 2500 90111.28. 1.7 fl/ 514for 6''' ` ••` ‹�S , 1 - i pada Slice! CS 3526 25.07 8959'32' 1.a Y • \ 10 64'Pirate access C8 150.53 moo 4x'44'or >� , ' o-4, ••• easement&Willy easement 1.o!s5 G7 435.56 33200 7570'03' 30'Goa mooted per !i �� C y! per 6999-0189542 D.B. `s`�•`� - Ce 35625 25.00 8951.24' 583/Q?/497 , _ 1.h_v :•(3+.• �.� • a`O . L'4 3426 25IX7 895825" 584005Ge gas pipeline.ingress and egress '� ,CI s -' 15' •2.• Cto !7049 56100 7777'52' easement per 120/08/392 R7 y 5.11 169.98 43200 1554'34' + ��_ C7 �--i--. +y ' 5.12 127.76 268(57 2617245 Food on f for Parcell _ 25' PIrE4rc Road food and incidental purposeski: 59737[19 E• 46'885'Y v \ C13 66.75 261617 14'41'56per 206/EF/1355.14 1702! 60000 .1875'74'0o'274/04/485and this mop _ 17.05 As Cross h 2232/OR/627 \ 862 As Net •C15 39394 300.m 7574'12" _ 016 213-26 300.07 40�41ir gi Parcel Exception 'S' \ \ 1101 35 4.64 AG fret $ I 754/08/l 58 0\ 10131 a a 5'Occident ea cot t. � • Lot 30 per 1940-35220 a8. $' ++II / Let l illi \ /1.0`Vestries!easement per 1990-35220 DF. ` ' • • • tt centerline PG&E A/MB 165 .,� ' I\' easernmt per 3r0/LIR/374 2232/0R/527 \ 3a'Offer or Deaa�vr+m 1.,1 , �. 7 root earth of pl 37041.' �Excsptivn 'A' sir Sneer g� ...Ir. CMLE wwEEeeO ]997-0]7047 O,R. per this mop caxsmuc.w,wa Eurx See Debi!!ii' saucy 395.477af ,I �Cily Lrrmils ' 6LnwoscwE nncnrtEcnaE 00 94ee1 3 2001DF2/]35i -____ • , ,�,gp Mr�nef.tiia Exr.KllDtiG 1.r''77 rr�� +I vLexxnrs Lot V L7 1 3 ?MUGWOFNSADM.S N gM �� 5uuRYEYIHGfGeS SOLI11nOHS AIM$l 5 TEC+E SWANSOe GRAPHIC SCALE 8 2 CiARION rouar D SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93101 immil se no 2o9 ice -----Farad 7 7/2 tan ppe,6 h lag X805 5393017 F 8055.44-9294 �� BCF saps per ReplacedWALLACE GROUP ' ''''." EH PERT Intim sSet brass coq 1S 8964 in File 0232-0506-0048 ) =�' standard City monument weir z, 1 - 100 IL. after construction MEET 4 OF 5 SHEETS Page 102 of 340 9 9 I e qi rid(sheet 5 only) 1 3/MB/86/ -___Future(after construction) 01 X . PARCEL MAP AG PM 06-0004 T 100 year Aad irnrls pp / November Rood study ; Being a Subdivision of apcthon of Lot 103, 10 rand 108 of the Ranchos Corral de Piedra, r. oxrtlber}f,2009 --------—NO pa flood!mita per Pismo de Chamisal in the City of Arroyo Grande,County of Sart Luis Obispo,State of WallaLe Gros,Flood Study California,accordi to Them filed in BookA,Page 65of Maps,in the Office of the Noyenter TT,2008 -.F . TOD yep flood grails and �5 k. ' County Recorder of said County Future(after construction) foo yea flood Imps per :--'�` AddifianallAfOfII]afion Sheet Reece Coup flood stud _ November 11,2008 . - / Pursuant to Section 664342 of The Cavemmell Code the following°Offhand Sdormafion is for / informational purposes desaibiag The conditions as of Me dole of tlxr4,and is not intended to affect -. • / record tete interest The oddr1iard information is dxlwd from public rewords or repMc and does root I -'f // reply the Correctness or sufficiency of those records or reports by the preprit& F • / 1A�F ,r-'''/' J .Fr` ~ \tett i s flood 'a - \' �� Tr G o 2207 CONOiMONS of APPROVAL NOTES limits per Wallacere Group!toad Study -`` v- 's..+F, November i1,2006 ��1301. �� `'.�- 9- 8uldng Reslricliae: `I� 'rJ F �` 19/MB/26 TT. The applicant Shoff submit an engineering study moiling flooang related fo see note 1} We projeeei seta The Nectar of Public Wyles hod loose The prepared study for ` �� 'r F oppraw[My portions of the site subject to Reading from a 100-)ear storm 's' - / shah be door,an the recorded map y other recorded regarddocument,and shag be .- I / f Parcel 1 _. noted as a baking resfrictron. / �F / Future Io year flood(after construction) 13 Foliar fa approrang any balding permit within the project for occrgmcy all Parcel 3 / !knits per NtaVoce Group Flood study public utl f es strap be aperaManN J / November 11,2008 \_F Future15.My residential'or commercial'development of the pries created by This - \ Rasing Restriction----------7/ esGittkrl: approve/shelf be required to pay it far shore,os determined by the City Cae c , \1 see note f i of the cast of the Castillo Del hen extension and refuted drainage end other improvements My lurfher ob6lidgon of The parcels hereby created sheet odade w , T / a requirement to pay a portion of The cost of The Casthio Del gar extension and �� Meted iaprwements,as set forth n xn the itanorondof ENderstartdng L,ty of Arroyo!pude - , ,/ desaeed in CanOtion 16 he cot County of San Lars Obispo m ` F 16. this Fenlab'vp mop app-o00 shah not become effective unless and anti the • I ament Memorandum d U to-sloadng['Owner the City of Arroyo Aide,Luca `1Q[ Ms-lAdled Schaal Oifrict,Jf Land Partnershp and John Taylor,Trustee is W •• \ �` intended in substantially the form presented to the Council of ifs meeting of A 0 0 October}0.20CK,or as othcrise approved by The City and hely executed by 107 yea'!food , , \ S�jll : the obeli descrtLed Parties. `.' Limits per*Pace Grow flood Study \ .r g November u,2008 , \ �i Mitigation Measures 8mldeg Restriction-see note it�\ 1 9 y- 22 Residential'deaele m ent,on the 1.3-one public facilities site(force 3t is prandheled I ,,,�,,+�L�j consistentconsistentOhOhSection 1s.12.l?0. of the City's Development Code '019 E j 58797 460!85'Y Parcel Responsible Poly Lucia for Doffed sprat District ParcelMonitoring Agency City of Arroyo Grande,Community Detebpment Deportment 11. • x 2.3:Consistent with the 2071 Comae Ron Update Program fie,sip Mare a , 7v deheopment ceoplioofian on the 11.uroae Residentid 11110de poeef(Parcel 2)stroll Wade li pravisioe lar is permmaat open-space porcel to retain steeper dopes oroi ape natural S) ez Fufwe 1p0 sae good(altar construction) regefatian and*firer site features(i n..a duster subdiasiari or PUD). on 13 heals per Wotoce Croup Fuad Study vh Noterwbn 11.zoos.Future buidi�g restriction I RetipansrLJe Party Developer 11 • one note IT. Monitoring Agency City of Aooe n Ihiede,Cpmmunlly Development 0 ns'fmdrt lining: Prior to certification of project-specific LFQA davmaet Lot 103 A/M8/65 OttEflCarEENrG CaHSRooTiCs ver 588'4839 --`-- Lit !Links1997-017047 0,R. gwoscxvr':a<ecnraEcruPE rr��rr��Ir�p I{E 3g5.41If --- �------------------- 200 OR 135 .4 COMICAL PIONEER Lot 108 O. PIALOnliG .111)11,mi___Onm. Gil" '�«5�" wA TER RESOURCE. GRAPHIC SCALE WALLACE Sways.NT ERNI:444 No o w too 612 CLARION COURT 5N7 LUIS OBISPO, CA $3401 WALLACE GROUP w 606 " r6w SBas594A 294 f Ill Feel'} ".1. File 0232-0506-0049 F loch= 190 11 - • SHII3ET 5 OF 5 SFfts,LC'L'S Page 103 of 340 RECORDING REQUESTED BY Attachment 3 AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 300 EAST BRANCH STREET ARROYO GRANDE,CA 93420 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is owner or agent of owner of the interest or estate or the property hereinafter described as stated below. 2. The FULL NAME of the OWNER is: The City of Arroyo Grande 3. The FULL ADDRESS of the OWNER is: 300 East Branch Street,Arroyo Grande, California 93420 4. The NATURE OF THE INTEREST or ESTATE of the undersigned is: in fee 5. THE FULL NAME and FULL ADDRESS of ALL PERSONS,if any,who hold such interest or estate with the undersigned as JOINT TENANTS or as TENANTS IN COMMON are: NAMES ADDRESSES None 6. THE FULL NAMES and FULL ADDRESSES of the PREDECESSOR'S in interest of the undersigned if the property was transferred subsequent to the commencement of the work of improvements herein referred to: NAMES ADDRESSES None 7. All work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was COMPLETED January 19, 2022 8. The NAME OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACTOR,if any,for such work of improvement is: J.J.Fisher Construction,Inc. 9. The street address of said property is: Castillo Del Mar, within the City of Arroyo Grande, CA 10. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Arroyo Grande,County of San Luis Obispo, State of California,and is described as follows: Castillo Del Mar Extension Project,PW 2020-05 Verification of NON-INDIVIDUAL owner:I,the undersigned,declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I am the Public Works Director of the aforesaid interest or estate in the property described in the above notice;that I have read the said notice,that I know and understand the contents thereof,and the facts stated therein are true and correct. Bill Robeson,Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director February 22,2022,Arroyo Grande,California --END OF DOCUMENT-- Page 104 of 340 �p,RR0Y0 c /O '�' tNCORPORATEI]p 9 .611~iitiliftO * JULY ,D, 1911 * MEMORANDUM oi TO: City Council FROM: Bill Robeson, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director BY: Jill McPeek, Capital Improvement Project Manager SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Updated Freeway Maintenance Agreement with the State of California for the Portion of State Highway Route (SR) 101 within the City of Arroyo Grande DATE: February 22, 2022 SUMMARY OF ACTION: Approve an updated Freeway Maintenance Agreement for the portion of State Highway Route (SR) 101 within the City of Arroyo Grande to include permanent storm water improvements within the SR-101 right-of-way for the area of Oak Park Boulevard and El Camino Real. IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES: The updated Freeway Maintenance Agreement will not result in increased costs to the City. Staff time will be needed to process the updated Freeway Maintenance Agreement and Resolution. RECOMMENDATION: 1) Adopt a Resolution approving and authorizing the Mayor to execute the Freeway Maintenance Agreement for the portion of State Highway Route (SR) 101 within the City of Arroyo Grande; and 2) Direct the City Clerk to forward the Resolution, Freeway Maintenance Agreement, and Letter of Self Insurance to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). BACKGROUND: During a rain event at the end of December 2019, a catch basin on El Camino Real east of Oak Park Boulevard did not drain properly and caused the roadway to flood. Investigations following the rain event revealed that a previous repair (20+ years ago) to the storm drain pipe running from the catch basin to a maintenance hole on Oak Park Boulevard had failed, creating a plug in the pipe and was causing subsurface erosion around the maintenance hole. In January 2020, the Council approved an emergency repair project to complete temporary measures to avoid further subsurface erosion under Item 8.i. Page 105 of 340 City Council Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Updated Freeway Maintenance Agreement with the State of California for the Portion of State Highway Route (SR) 101 within the City of Arroyo Grande February 22, 2022 Page 2 Oak Park Boulevard. In January and February 2020, staff worked diligently with its design consultant and contractors to complete the temporary measures and to reopen a travel lane on Oak Park Boulevard that had been temporarily closed. These temporary measures lead to the need for City crews to pump water during rain events from the catch basin on El Camino Real to an uphill drainage inlet. In parallel with these efforts, staff continued to work with the design consultant in developing a permanent solution for the storm water within the area. After evaluating several alternatives, it was determined that the most cost effective and least disruptive solution is to convey the storm water within the SR-101 right of way to a box culvert to which a pipe conveying the storm water was previously connected. ANALYSIS OF ISSUES: In order to construct the permanent solution, an encroachment permit from Caltrans is necessary. As a prerequisite to issuing an encroachment permit for the City to install the storm drain system from the City right-of-way into the SR-101 right-of-way, Caltrans is requiring the City to update its Freeway Maintenance Agreement. The updated Freeway Maintenance Agreement incorporates the proposed storm drain system and supersedes the two previous Freeway Maintenance Agreements dated June 8, 1966 and October 26, 1966. The Freeway Maintenance Agreement restates and documents the roles and responsibilities between Caltrans and the City for SR-101 within the City. The Freeway Maintenance Agreement documents the City's maintenance responsibility for items such as pavement surfaces, sidewalks, drainage systems, lighting, signage and graffiti removal. It is not anticipated that the revised Freeway Maintenance Agreement will require additional City expenditures or resources beyond what is already included in the current Agreement, with the exception of maintenance of the anticipated improvements necessary to remedy the El Camino Real/Oak Park drainage issues. The Freeway Maintenance Agreement presented with this staff report has been prepared in coordination with Caltrans and has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney. Adoption of the Resolution authorizes the Mayor to execute the Freeway Maintenance Agreement for the portion of SR-101 within the City of Arroyo Grande. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration: 1. Approve staff's recommendations to 1) Adopt a Resolution approving and authorizing the Mayor to execute the Freeway Maintenance Agreement for the portion of State Highway Route (SR) 101 within the City of Arroyo Grande; and 2) Direct the City Clerk to forward the Resolution, Freeway Maintenance Agreement, and Letter of Self Insurance to Caltrans; Item 8.i. Page 106 of 340 City Council Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Updated Freeway Maintenance Agreement with the State of California for the Portion of State Highway Route (SR) 101 within the City of Arroyo Grande February 22, 2022 Page 3 2. Do not approve staff's recommendations and request further information; 3. Modify staff's recommendation and approve; or 4. Provide other direction to staff. ADVANTAGES: Updating the Freeway Maintenance Agreement will allow for the construction of permanent storm water improvements in the area of Oak Park Boulevard and El Camino Real, and will eliminate roadway flooding and the need for City crews to pump storm water away from the area water during rain events. DISADVANTAGES: None identified at this time. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: No environmental review is required for this item. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS: The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City's website in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2. Attachment: 1. Proposed Resolution and Freeway Maintenance Agreement with Arroyo Grande, SLO 101 PM 12.0 to 14.6 2. Exhibit A to Proposed Resolution Item 8.i. Page 107 of 340 Attachment 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING A FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR THE PORTION OF STATE HIGHWAY ROUTE 101 WITHIN THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AND APPOINTING THE MAYOR AS THE OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN THE FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of Arroyo Grande (City) and State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)entered into a Freeway Agreement dated May 17, 1989, relating to the portion of State Highway Route 101 between the South City Limit near El Campo Road and the North City Limit at Oak Park Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the City and Caltrans entered into a Freeway Maintenance Agreement dated June 8, 1966, covering the portion of State Highway Route 101 between post mile 12.02 and 14.45, and into a second Freeway Maintenance Agreement dated October 26, 1966, covering the portion of State Highway Route 101 between post mile 14.45 and 14.63; and WHEREAS, subsequent adjustments to State Highway Route 101 within the City of Arroyo Grande have been completed, or are nearing completion, and there is a desire by Caltrans and the City to clarify and revise the division of maintenance responsibilities within or outside those modified freeway limits as described within "Exhibit A," attached hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande hereby: 1. Approves Exhibit A attached, entitled "Freeway Maintenance Agreement with City of Arroyo Grande, SLO 101 PM 12.0 to 14.6." 2. Appoints the Mayor as the official representative authorized to sign the Freeway Maintenance Agreement. On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and on the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 22nd of February, 2022. Page 108 of 340 RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 CAREN RAY RUSSOM, MAYOR ATTEST: JESSICA MATSON, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: WHITNEY MCDONALD, CITY MANAGER APPROVED AS TO FORM: TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY Page 109 of 340 Attachment 2 EXHIBIT A February 1,2022 SLO 101 PM 12.0 to 14.6 FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE THIS AGREEMENT is made effective this day of , 20 , by and between the State of California, acting by and through the Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as "STATE" and the CITY of ARROYO GRANDE; hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and collectively referred to as "PARTIES". SECTION I RECITALS 1 . On May 17, 1989 a Freeway Agreement was executed between CITY and STATE, wherein the PARTIES consented to certain adjustments of the local street and road system required for the development of that portion of STATE Highway Route (SR) 101 , declared a freeway, within the jurisdictional limits of the CITY. 2. Recent adjustments to said freeway have now been completed and the PARTIES hereto mutually desire to identify the maintenance responsibilities of the CITY for areas lying within those modified freeway limits. 3. On October 15, 2008, STATE relinquished to CITY that portion of State Route 227 (SR 227) within the City limits, including the portion of SR 227 situated adjacent to State Route 101 . 4. Encroachment Permit Number was executed between CITY and STATE on to construct a realigned City drainage system into Caltrans R/W on SR 101 . 5. There are existing Freeway Maintenance Agreements, with CITY dated June 8, 1966 and October 26, 1966. This Agreement is meant to replace or supersede the earlier agreements. NOW THEREFORE IT IS AGREED: SECTION II AGREEMENT 1 . PARTIES agree this Agreement shall supersede all previous said Freeway Maintenance Agreements executed by PARTIES on June 8, 1966 and October 26, 1966. 2. Pursuant to Section 7 of the May 17, 1989 Freeway Agreement, CITY has resumed or will resume control and maintenance over each of the relocated or 1 Page 110 of 340 February 1,2022 SLO 101 PM 12.0 to 14.6 reconstructed CITY roads, frontage roads, and other STATE constructed local roads, except for any portion which is adopted by STATE as a part of the freeway proper. 3. The degree or extent of maintenance work to be performed, and the standards therefore, shall be in accordance with the provisions of Section 27 of the Streets and Highways Code and the then current edition of the State Maintenance Manual. 4. CITY agrees to continue their control and maintenance of each of the affected relocated or reconstructed CITY streets and roads as shown on the attached hereto, Exhibit A, B, C, and D and made a part hereof by this reference. 5. When another planned future improvement has been constructed and/or a minor revision has been effected within the limits of the freeway herein described which will affect the PARTIES' maintenance responsibility as described herein, and there is mutual agreement on a change in the maintenance responsibilities between PARTIES, the PARTIES can revise the Exhibit A, B, C and or D by a mutual written-execution of each of the exhibits. 6. CITY must obtain the necessary Encroachment Permits from STATE's District 5 Encroachment Permit Office prior to entering STATE right of way to perform CITY maintenance responsibilities. This permit will be issued at no cost to CITY. 7. VEHICULAR OVERCROSSINGS 7.1 .CITY will maintain, at CITY expense, the deck wearing surface and structural drainage system (and shall perform such work as may be necessary to ensure an impervious and/or otherwise suitable surface) and all portions of the structure above the bridge deck, including, but without limitation, lighting installations, as well as all traffic service facilities (sidewalks, signs, pavement markings, bridge rails, etc.) that may be required for the benefit or control of traffic using that overcrossing. 7.2.As directed by section 92.6 of the Streets and Highways Code, at locations determined by STATE, screening shall be placed on STATE freeway overpasses on which pedestrians are allowed. All screens installed under this program will be maintained by STATE, at STATE expense. 8. VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN UNDERCROSSINGS 8.1 .CITY will maintain the CITY paved roadway sections, including the traveled way, shoulders, curbs, sidewalks, wall surfaces (including eliminating graffiti), 2 Page 111 of 340 February 1,2022 SLO 101 PM 12.0 to 14.6 drainage installations, lighting installations and traffic service facilities that may be required for the benefit or control of traffic using that undercrossing. 8.2.CITY will request STATE's District Encroachment Permit Engineer to issue the necessary Encroachment Permit for any proposed change in minimum vertical clearances between CITY roadway surface and the structure that results from modifications to the roadway (except when said modifications are made by STATE). If the planned modifications will result in a reduction in the minimum clearance within the traveled way, an estimate of the clearance reduction must be provided to STATE's Transportation Permit Engineer prior to starting work. Upon completion of that work, a vertical clearance diagram will be furnished to STATE's Transportation Permit Engineer that shows revised minimum clearances for all affected movements of traffic, both at the edges of the traveled way and at points of minimum clearance within the traveled way. 9. WALLS, SOUNDWALLS, AND COLUMNS - CITY is responsible for debris removal, cleaning, and painting to keep CITY's side of any wall structure or column free of debris, dirt, and graffiti. 10.LANDSCAPED AREAS CITY is responsible for the maintenance of any plantings or other types of roadside improvements of PROJECT lying outside of the fenced area restricting walk-on access to the freeway. 1 1 .INTERCHANGE OPERATION - It is STATE's responsibility to provide efficient operation of freeway interchanges, including ramp connections to local streets and roads. 12.ELECTRICALLY OPERATED TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES A separate "Electrical Facilities Cost Sharing Agreement" may be executed in the future allocating these costs between the PARTIES. 13.LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES 13.1 . Nothing within the provisions of this Agreement is intended to create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties not PARTIES to this Agreement or to affect the legal liability of a PARTY to the Agreement by imposing any standard of care with respect to the operation and maintenance of STATE highways and local facilities different from the standard of care imposed by law. 13.2. Neither CITY nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE, under or in connection with any work, authority or 3 Page 112 of 340 February 1,2022 SLO 101 PM 12.0 to 14.6 jurisdiction conferred upon STATE arising under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that STATE shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY and their officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth under, including, but not limited to, tortuous, contractual, inverse condemnation and other theories or assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under this Agreement. 13.3. Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction conferred upon CITY and arising under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that CITY shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless STATE and all of its officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth under, including, but not limited to, tortuous, contractual, inverse condemnation or other theories or assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under this Agreement. 14.PREVAILING WAGES: 14.1 . Labor Code Compliance- If the work performed under this Agreement is done under contract and falls within the Labor Code section 1720(a)(1) definition of a "public works" in that it is construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair; or maintenance work under Labor Code section 1771 . CITY must conform to the provisions of Labor Code sections 1720 through 1815, and all applicable provisions of California Code of Regulations found in Title 8, Chapter 8, Subchapter 3, Articles 1-7. CITY agrees to include prevailing wage requirements in its contracts for public works. Work performed by CITY's own forces is exempt from the Labor Code's Prevailing Wage requirements. 14.2. Requirements in Subcontracts - CITY shall require its contractors to include prevailing wage requirements in all subcontracts when the work to be performed by the subcontractor under this Agreement is a "public works" as defined in Labor Code Section 172O(a)(1) and Labor Code Section 1771 . Subcontracts shall include all prevailing wage requirements set forth in CITY's contracts. 15.INSURANCE 15.1 . SELF-INSURED - CITY is self-insured. CITY agrees to deliver evidence of self- insured coverage providing general liability insurance, coverage of bodily injury liability and property damage liability, naming STATE, its officers, agents and employees as the additional insured in an amount of $1 million per 4 Page 113 of 340 February 1,2022 SLO 101 PM 12.0 to 14.6 occurrence and $2 million in aggregate and $5 million in excess. Coverage shall be evidenced by a certification of self-insurance letter ("Letter of Self- Insurance"), satisfactory to STATE, certifying that CITY meets the coverage requirements of this section. This Letter of Self-Insurance shall also identify the SR 101 location as depicted in EXHIBIT A. CITY shall deliver to STATE the Letter of Self-Insurance with a signed copy of this AGREEMENT. A copy of the executed Letter of Self-Insurance shall be attached hereto and incorporate as Exhibit B. 15.2. SELF-INSURED using Contractor - If the work performed under this AGREEMENT is done by CITY 's contractor(s), CITY shall require its contractor(s) to maintain in force, during the term of this AGREEMENT, a policy of general liability insurance, including coverage of bodily injury liability and property damage liability, naming STATE, its officers, agents and employees as the additional insured in an amount of $1 million per occurrence and $2 million in aggregate and $5 million in excess. Coverage shall be evidenced by a certificate of insurance in a form satisfactory to the STATE that shall be delivered to the STATE with a signed copy of this Agreement. 16. TERMINATION - This Agreement may be terminated by timely mutual written consent by PARTIES, and CITY's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement may be grounds for a Notice of Termination by STATE. 17.TERM OF AGREEMENT - This Agreement shall become effective on the date first shown on its face sheet and shall remain in full force and effect until amended or terminated at any time upon mutual consent of the PARTIES or until terminated by STATE for cause. PARTIES are empowered by Streets and Highways Code Section 114 and 130 to enter into this Agreement and have delegated to the undersigned the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the respective agencies and covenants to have followed all the necessary legal requirements to validly execute this Agreement. 5 Page 114 of 340 February 1,2022 SLO 101 PM 12.0 to 14.6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, PARTIES hereto have set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. THE CITY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By: Mayor Initiated and Approved By: By: City Manager Deputy District Director Maintenance District 05 ATTEST: By: City Clerk By: City Attorney 6 Page 115 of 340 EXHIBIT "A" (Plan map identifying the applicable STATE Routes (Freeway proper) and CITY roads and facilities) Page 1 of 1 Page 116 of 340 l*f MINTY RpMTE TOTE MPMMMECT No. STEETS INDEX OF PLANS r05 SLO 101 12.0 - 14.60 1 5 1 . VICINITY MAP 2. LOCATION No. 1 3. LOCATION No. 2 4. LOCATION No. 3 5. LOCATION No. 4 EXHIBIT A VICINITY MAP LOCATION No. 2 BRISCO RD. LOCATION No. 4 FAIR OAKS AVE. Q 5 EZZ P Oi o i ni W e ar . i d` o o *Pniiik ori ry '� {♦_ R.BRUICMST. ��5 QY��r ‘. 41.'"(\,,,_,,,..........,/M�'C♦ �fv`= (1:4, p; _ �rt I ` o! _ ordiI •... T, EL CugNO J7--11-----, T— -. fE TOT —_ ��4 EL C ms`s.. T _ V�. `Y ` J S.TRAFFIC WAY CITY LIMITS EL E�WI '/T� $14.„,, Yf a {�.,y+p _ (SEE LOCATION.I FOR r, g •L �' '.P� :`C N •'•y�0 y`'�4' r0 Op��IE *ESTERO'CITY LIMITS/ g -� 1y cOe �C.4 ? N.,' i P = 8 4 !4 •BET'EMMETT 4. 4- ' OAR ST. 5 4L i Q LOCATION No. 1 DI- N. OAK PARK BLVD. LOCATION No. 3 GRAND AVE. FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ON STATE ROUTE 101 FROM THE THE CITY LIMIT JUST WEST OF EL CAMPO RD. TO THE CITY LIMIT AT N. OAK PARK BLVD. RELATIVE BORDER SCALE 0 } IS IN INCHES I I I I I I I Page 117 of 340 Disr CW,TT ROUTE TOTr 412CTIm1D.T a& 5 SLO 101 12.0 - 14.6 2 5 APPROXIMATE PISMO BEACH/ ARROYO GRANDE CITY LIMITS R/W \___ _ _ ___ \ / NB ON RAMP ; \ ROUTE 1 01 a l \ - w- BRANCH STREET R/W j71 - - - R/W 'N OAK PARK RD OC Cq \ O %' BR. NO. 49-155 4i1/1/O \ , EL CAMINO REAL \-- LEGEND O R/W i m e AREA MAINTAINED BY CITY LOCATION 1 r ct Q FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Il WITH THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 0 EXHIBIT "A" RELATIVE BORDER SCALE D 2 1 IS IN INCHES Page 118 of 340 Wsr COIMrr ROUTE TO' RlRO.I[CT 'No?arts 5 SLO 101 12.0 - 14.6 3 5 LOCATION 2 FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT R/w ° 61Y4/1/c6, WITH THE CEXHIBIT ITY OF ARROYO GRANDE STRFF7- Ne N '� RgMp �< \ F R/W ,R0� � /4/.R/W T � eRqNCy o9 ST 8Nof RFFT /4F 1 rI1/0 if �/4 � ,1 VI BRISCO RD UC V B R 49-154 • 'c<C)Pp F� \c-76) CMI \ N0 ` LEGEND 0 RF44 R/W AREA MAINTAINED BY CITY \ . RELATIVE BORDER SCALE 0 2 Page 119 of 340 Dist COUNTY ROUTE POST MILES SHEET TOTAL TOTAL PROJECT No. SHEETS 5 SLO 101 12.0 - 14.6 4 5 R/W Is • \ ° Ay ROTE 101 ss \ R/W .\ .. \ x _ G' P�0 q'-7o GRAND AVE. OC BR 49- 176 OF '� ■ • \ : " . R /W LEGEND LOCATION 3 AREA MAINTAINED BY CITY FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE EXHIBIT " A " Page 120 of 340 RELATIVE BORDER SCALE 0 1 2 3 IS IN INCHES 1 1 I i 1 1 I Di$' CONN, DWTE TA 4Vici.Vcr slET METS 5 SLO 101 12.0 to 14.6 5 5 LOCATION 4 FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE EXHIBIT "A" R/W PS o VALLEY RD OC (FAIR OAKS AVE) \ N BR 49-174 90 R/W N - - - - ,N N N N o� N N oy J`` N N LEGEND N �`�� N AREA MAINTAINED BY CITY N R/W N RELATIVE BORDER SCALE 0 1 2 3 Page 121 of 340 EXHIBIT B—LETTER OF CERTIFICATE OF CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE STATEMENT OF SELF INSURANCE Caltrans - District 5 February 1 , 2022 50 Higuera Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 ATTN: Berkeley Lindt -Senior Maintenance Engineer RE: Statement of Self Insurance for City of Arroyo Grande Related to Freeway Maintenance Agreement with State of California Department of Transportation ("STATE") for the portion of freeway along Highway 101 at PM 12.0 to 14.6. Dear Berkeley, The purpose of this letter is to certify that the CITY is self-insured and self-funded covering third-party claims arising out of its general operations (for example, commercial general liability and automobile liability insurance). Further the CITY is self-insured covering workers' compensation claims and has received the consent of the State Department of Industrial Relations to do so. Each fiscal year, as a part of its budgetary process, the CITY appropriates funds specifically to satisfy valid third-party claims and workers' compensation claims, which may be brought against the CITY. The CITY certifies its self-insured, general liability coverage for bodily injury liability and property damage liability, meets the required coverage amounts in section 15 (INSURANCE) of the Maintenance Agreement, specifically general liability insurance, coverage of bodily injury liability and property damage liability in an amount of $1 million per occurrence and $2 million in aggregate and $5 million in excess. The CITY further represents that regarding any claims made in connection with the Maintenance Agreement by the STATE, the STATE will be first-in-line regarding the reserved, self-insured amounts. If you need any additional information regarding this letter, please direct those inquires through my office. Sincerely, FINANCE MANAGER Page 1 of 1 Page 122 of 340 EXHIBIT "C" TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND LIGHTING A separate "Electrical Facilities Cost Sharing Agreement" will be executed in the future allocating costs between parties. Pagel of 1 Page 123 of 340 January 28,2022 EXHIBIT "D" CITY shall be responsible for the construction and maintenance of the City Drainage System as highlighted in the attached Exhibit D and shall be responsible for any cleanup necessary or damage caused by the City Drainage System. In the event that the City Drainage System conflicts with any future widening or freeway improvements, City shall be responsible for all costs associated with relocation of the City Drainage System to avoid such conflicts. CITY shall be responsible to maintain any disturbed landscaping and irrigation until the landscaping is reestablished. Pagel of 1 Page 124 of 340 FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ADJACENT TO OAK PARK BLVD. DRAINAGE SYSTEM EXHIBIT "D" CONSTRUCTION NOTES LEGEND REPLACE EYEING CATCH BASIN PER CTTY STANDARD.. FL FLOWUNE © \ \, 0 ATTACH ANG.'oroNEW CATCH a.NrEa� D.aDS w. 10 TOP OF GRATE FG nNGGaDOND f� ISTIC RNEw Ir FEE OrIEE Na CGrtr�ARN/%2LOx°.swaaroncxnllw"R C'''"R Ex6nNGCN,RANSi'"BAAT53N U'S HI0/114/Ay- STATION O GL r 5 n. RL 5 Rnt R AI. ELEv ELEVATION ESE22"x.Em /yW o RSEREEGnNGawAEauNEANDVALVENEAR S.. STANDARDDa N m 53 399 I AY y pPRESERVEE EYEING IDrE:wA�a�NUNF. SD \`� I9.9 Lf Of 24'HOPE rpe al 10.59% El xTa r=UET LEv-.Tms _ T O CONSTRUCT..ENSEWER UNE. INV INVERT ELEvniroN G -WEE O \ / CONSTRUCT NaNHOLE PERCm STANDARD 5523. HGL HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE �u $ FRE HYDRANT :s ., CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE INTO PER CALRANS STANDARD 091A. s nuNHOLF � �0.4 411111� I' A I O O .� ,D'TaEE LLe•`��* EXISTING CATCH BASIN S\33E CnONNE<TU HOParE ioE 6TwG wL,RA,SrDOua Fe x)sD<uRivER,PERfcAB RaNSN SGNPOLE LTRANS BOX LE R COVER i, ---- \ - ATTACHED PLAN RESTORE DISTURBED VEGETATION W. Op --- .� CALTRnNS aECOL<NOGNAWINGS. O uD DCBx SEE PaORIF ONr RNORE pflAI WATER PoF VECOVER ' \ . BASIN FL OF S.iD evEaorvfioc.no O ciui� a SURVEY MONUMENT III —SS FASTING SEWER LINE +�•®so G EE:� I n "� „�' ® ; INGGCAL`R"NSCATCKensIN \'�w',"EA,I"GREs"s°PErrSwrt„eAsxE,sANDeo..,PLrwnHSFCTIONe,znlDzufoR _so FxisnNGsroRMORANUNE z.a D F s vDDiE a, O NEWM HOLE E MTI�.x.xa33 .Z oda ® Al l �r � \ ..,2I3 RAN NEW.,� D DE ./Pr4'6.31,44,, ES /Eiairso-" / WITS OF BRIO7,. ,,„, IL \\ \_ay.w' 4 fie. i -- zg� / P II \\ •• y° `'— Haa�u>z STADON oio5o 44'\ /.....„........,...\,,,,...... �L. le L:EE\ . 0 0 ES> m6x iY x PT INV IN REV-SIDS / \ SPLrt/T2. EE y° LT_ III'-'-- -- \ 'i°'hoa // E>:Ae a 1DT — \ xRnNG AI,FLO 2.STD DEQ ,e'TaEE \ � T_�\'-yv� ® '' _ • /E I _ __ _ --- _ LAT CROSSINGS ET—RECSONnTO WER INFACTALTIES.� EG E,Ev.xVf �„ / FL OF IVSD=mM' �l� 0 B 1 LOOCWON ANDD EOFEWINGU. — — _ STA7E R/W ,.',REE za,REE • IH aF DEPTH or Fx u< DA / N85'5/53"W j05.00' — �•_ _ �za,f OF DO/HOVE vqa®oxx 6 V o ® rE _ L______ Q 5�w-5 _� �— O '�� cwuv AM =67.0 ,Lo-5—Ho 5�� / �.\ ———— — �3,l�5.5 HOPE NR.®,u,x, "�, FEDN TA MIN ELEV.61.1 E22.SLEV. •3 131 r I •a _ee _ nATIo o.a°m aCr ��, _ EL CAMINO REAL ASNAL I E:Srexm,.3x9D ET OUTE,EV.61.N —41111111k us--- 4VtrIIIIIIIIIIIUIOPPPP" W. INV ON) Q / w W — • --- ----W INV We_se a _ _w�w—mow _ ga� W� / �w � 00 �50� ,\R\R�\\\\R\��\�\„„„ ;a ° •N I �50 \ z-so-rn e�DG /' (WOOD PANEL) sD/� DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE MAINTAINED BY CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE GRAPHIC SCALE o 48 SCALE:I INCH-20 FEET DESCRIPTION: DATE: APPD.BY: DESIGN FIRM: SEAL: DESIGNED BT: DRAWN BT: CHECKED ET: SCALE: T.T. E4T °' REFERENCE N0. LAV A,= SAV CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE GE? DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 2020-003 E I K H O F (1.A.!\ PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF: HORIZ. ASSHOWN a.,.RDESIGN GROUPIR f`��vL` a�. + OAK PARK DRAINAGE DESIGNOM EL CAMINO REAL SHEET: Nx"ofDFVDNGRDUP.corn JEFFREY VAN DEN EIKID;R.C.E. em OATS ATASCALERO,CA 93922 805-00-1910 FM 305-961.3175 CVERT. NIA AG Oak Park Drainage Repairs 2 of 5 WWW.. Page 125 of 340 CRAT \ED -� * JULY 10, 1911 * C44IFORJ MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Bill Robeson, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director BY: Robin Dickerson, PE, City Engineer Jill McPeek, Capital Improvement Project Manager SUBJECT: Consideration of Rejection of All Bids or Awarding a Contract for the Base Bid and Additive Alternative for Construction of the Swinging Bridge Retrofit Project, PW 2021-06, and Appropriation of Funds from the Sales Tax Fund Balance DATE: February 22, 2022 SUMMARY OF ACTION: Reject all bids and authorize solicitation of new bids after modifications are made to the construction documents for the Swinging Bridge Retrofit Project, or award a contract for the base bid and additive alternative for construction of the Project, PW 2021-06, and appropriate funds from the sales tax fund balance to fully fund the Project. IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES: The FY 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget includes $616,269 of Local Sales Tax Funds for the Swinging Bridge Retrofit Project ($23,469 budgeted for FY 2021- 22 plus $592,800 carryover from FY 2020-21). An additional appropriation of$214,922 is needed if the Base Bid plus Additive Alternate No. 1 is awarded, or an additional appropriation of $270,122 is needed if the Base Bid plus Additive Alternate No. 2 is awarded. RECOMMENDATION: Reject all bids and direct staff to solicit new bids after modifications are made to the construction documents for the Swinging Bridge Retrofit Project (PW2021-06). BACKGROUND: On December 14, 2021, the City Council approved construction plans and specifications for retrofitting and upgrading the structural components of the Swinging Bridge. The Project consists of removing and replacing the existing cables and helical anchors, Item 8.j. Page 126 of 340 City Council Consideration of Rejection of All Bids or Awarding a Contract for the Base Bid and Additive Alternative for Construction of the Swinging Bridge Retrofit Project, PW 2021-06, and Appropriation of Funds from the Sales Tax Fund Balance February 22, 2022 Page 2 reinforcing the existing concrete abutments, cleaning and painting the existing towers, and tightening and/or installing bolts at the suspension bridge wood connections. During the bidding process, the condition of the existing wood members of the bridge itself was reviewed in detail and it was determined that the treated lumber on the bridge had moved past its useful life. To address this, an Addendum was issued presenting as-built plans that contained a design for replacing the wood members. The Addendum added three Bid Additive Alternatives to the project scope: Additive Alternate No. 1 Removal of existing wood members and replacing each component with new wood members, including the decking. Additive Alternate No. 2 Removal of existing wood members and replacing each component with new wood members, with composite decking. Additive Alternate No. 3 Paint new wood members of Additive Alternate No. 1 or Additive No. 2. At the time of Council approval of construction plans and specifications, it was estimated that the total project costs, before the Additive Alternates were introduced, would be $730,870 as follows: FY 2021/22 12/14/21 I Difference Budget Estimate Revenue Local Sales Tax $ 616,269 $ 730,520 - $ 114,251 Total Revenue $ 616,269 $ 730,520 - $ 114,251 Expenditures Construction $ 485,291 $ 542,000 - $ 56,709 Construction Contingencies (15%) 50,200 81,300 - 31 ,100 Const Mgt, Inspect, Environ Compliance, Advertise 66,817 102,220 - 35,403 Geotechnical Services 13,961 5,000 8,961 Total Expenditures $ 616,269 $ 730,520 - $ 114,251 Anticipated Shortfall $ 114,251 Item 8.j. Page 127 of 340 City Council Consideration of Rejection of All Bids or Awarding a Contract for the Base Bid and Additive Alternative for Construction of the Swinging Bridge Retrofit Project, PW 2021-06, and Appropriation of Funds from the Sales Tax Fund Balance February 22, 2022 Page 3 ANALYSIS OF ISSUES: On February 1, 2022, two bids were received for the Swinging Bridge Retrofit Project. The project specifications stated that the lowest bidder will be determined using the base bid. Following bid review, it was determined that the lowest base bid was received from Hanly General Engineering Corporation, that Hanly General Engineering Corporation is responsible, and that the bid is responsive. Below presents the total project costs using the bid amounts submitted by Hanly General Engineering Corporation. Base Bid Base Bid Base Bid Base Bid Base Bid + Add Alt 1 + Add Alt 1 + Add Alt 2 + Add Alt 2 + Add Alt 3 + Add Alt 3 Expenditures Construction $482,236 $ 629,236 $ 709,236 $ 677,236 $ 757,236 Construction Contingencies (15%) 72,335 94,385 106,385 101,585 113,585 Const Mgt, Inspect, Environ, Ads 102,570 102,570 102,570 102,570 102,570 Geotechnical Services 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Total Expenditures $ 662,141 $ 831,191 $ 923,191 $ 886,391 $ 978,391 FY 2021/22 Budget $ 616,269 $ 616,269 $ 616,269 $ 616,269 $ 616,269 Shortfall $ -45,872 $ -214,922 $ -306,922 $ -270,122 $ -362,122 An award, if made, would be based on the Base Bid with consideration that Additive Alternate No. 1 or Additive Alternate No. 2 be included as the treated lumber has moved past its useful life and there are cost efficiencies in performing both the retrofit and wood replacement as one contract. Additive Alternate No. 3 is not recommended for consideration due to its cost compared to the other bid received. If an award is made, construction, including the procurement of materials requiring long lead times, is anticipated to occur between March 2023 and November 2023. Had the replacement of the bridge's existing wood members been identified prior to bid advertisement, they would have been made part of the base bid and the required contractor licensing would have included both Class A and Class B licenses. This would have allowed for a larger pool of potential contractors and perhaps a more competitive bidding environment. In addition, the cost of material and freight continues to remain inflated. Therefore, it is recommended that the project be repackaged to include replacement of the wood members as part of the base bid, include both Class A and Class B contractor licensing, and rebid in Fall 2022 in an effort to receive a more favorable bid that includes both the retrofit and wood replacement, and perhaps a stabilization in materials costs. Should favorable bids be received and a construction contract awarded by the end of 2022, the ordering of materials requiring long lead times could begin in early 2023 in an effort to be completed prior to the Harvest Festival. Item 8.j. Page 128 of 340 City Council Consideration of Rejection of All Bids or Awarding a Contract for the Base Bid and Additive Alternative for Construction of the Swinging Bridge Retrofit Project, PW 2021-06, and Appropriation of Funds from the Sales Tax Fund Balance February 22, 2022 Page 4 ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration: 1. Reject all bids, repackage the construction documents as outlined above, and direct staff to solicit new bids at a future date; 2. Reject all bids and direct staff to solicit new bids with the current construction documents; 3. Award a construction contract consisting of the Base Bid and Additive Alternate No. 1 to Hanly General Engineering Corporation and appropriate $214,922 from the Sales Tax fund balance; 4. Award a construction contract consisting of the Base Bid and Additive Alternate No. 2 to Hanly General Engineering Corporation and appropriate $270,122 from the Sales Tax fund balance; or 5. Provide other direction to staff. ADVANTAGES: Rejecting the bids and repackaging the construction documents may reduce construction costs without impacts to the overall project objectives. DISADVANTAGES: Rejecting the bids will delay the project and, depending on uncontrollable future conditions, could result in higher future bids. Current permits obtained from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the Regional Water Quality Control Board will need to either be renewed or new applications submitted. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15301(d) covering the restoration or rehabilitation of deteriorated or damaged structures to meet current standards of public health and safety not caused by an environmental hazard. As part of the design, permits have been obtained from California Fish and Wildlife and Regional Water Quality Control Board for Rehabilitation of the Swinging Bridge. Mitigation as required by these permits has been incorporated into the plans and specifications. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS: The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City's website in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2. Attachment: 1. Bid Opening Log Sheet Item 8.j. Page 129 of 340 ATTACHMENT 1 p,RROro o c INCORPORATE Z CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE U D BID OPENING LOG SHEET JULY 10. 1911 * DEADLINE: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2022 —2:00 PM cq��FORN�P PROJECT NAME: RETROFIT OF SWINGING BRIDGE OVER ARROYO GRANDE CREEK PROJECT NO.: PW 2021-06 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST: $542,000 ADDENDUM: #3 SUBMITTED BY: BASE BID: ADD ALT 1: ADD ALT 2: ADD ALT 3: TOTAL BID 1. Hanly General Eng Corp $482,236.00 $147,000.00 $195,000.00 $80,000.00 $904,236.00 Solvang, CA 93464 2. Cushman Contracting Corp $688,085.00 $165,510.00 $190,250.00 $30,500.00 $1,074,345.00 Goleta, CA 93116-0147 3. 4. cki_./ ./`7 AY?c41- Jill McP ek, Capital Improvement Project Manager Page 130 of 340 CRAT \ED -� * JULY 10, 1911 * cQE�FORJ MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Bill Robeson, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director BY: Shane Taylor, Utilities Manager SUBJECT: Monthly Water Supply and Demand Update DATE: February 22, 2022 SUMMARY OF ACTION: The update reports the City's total water supply and demand for January, 2022. Current Lopez Reservoir level and projected levels are provided in the attachments. IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES: Approximately two (2) hours of staff time is required to prepare the report. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the monthly Water Supply and Demand Report. BACKGROUND: On October 12, 2021, the City Council adopted a Resolution declaring a Stage 1 Water Shortage Emergency, and implementing emergency water conservation measures and restrictions as a result of the extreme drought conditions. In January, the City's water use was 131.3 acre-feet with a per capita use of 78 gallons per day/per person. There was a total of 0 inches of rainfall in the City in January, 2022. ANALYSIS OF ISSUES: The United States Drought Monitor, as of February 8, 2022, shows San Luis Obispo County in a moderate drought. Rainfall to date for the period July 1, 2021, through January 31, 2022, is 7.23 inches at the Corporation Yard rain gauge. Lopez Lake, as of February 8, 2022, is at 29.8% capacity (14,736). The new water year began on April 1, 2021, and the City's annual Lopez contract supply was 2,290 acre-feet. On August 24, 2021, the San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors (Board) enacted the Low Reservoir Response Plan (LRRP) for Lopez Lake. On September 8, 2021, the Zone III Technical Advisory Committee endorsed the action Item 8.k. Page 131 of 340 City Council Monthly Water Supply and Demand Update February 22, 2022 Page 2 of reducing contract deliveries by 10%. The City began reducing the flow of Lopez Lake deliveries on September 15, 2021, to 1 .9 million gallons per day, compared to the normal flow of 2.2 million gallons per day. Currently, the deliveries from the Water Treatment Plant are at 1 .6 million gallons per day. In addition, the City has 1,323 acre-feet of ground water entitlement from the Santa Maria Basin, and wells within the Pismo Formation that produce approximately 160 acre-feet per year. The first quarter monitoring for the Santa Maria Basin sentry wells was completed on January 4, 2022. The deep well index was 9.36 feet above sea level, which is 1 .86 feet higher than the deep well index threshold value of 7.5 feet and 0.08 feet higher than the index value one year ago. The recent rainfall in December did raise Lopez Lake from 28% to 30% full, however the LRRP remains in effect, along with Stage 1 water shortage emergency mandatory reductions. The projected water use for the City of Arroyo Grande for water year 2021/22 is 2,450 acre-feet based on current rainfall. ALTERNATIVES: Not applicable at this time. ADVANTAGES: This report provides the City Council and the public with the current and projected conditions of our water supply and demand. DISADVANTAGES: No disadvantages noted at this time. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: No environmental review is required for this item. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS: The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City's website in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2 Attachments: 1. Lopez Monthly Operations Report for January, 2022 2. Lopez Reservoir Storage Projection 3. Monthly Water Use Comparison 4. Monthly Monitoring Report for January, 2022 Item 8.k. Page 132 of 340 Attachment 1 San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water District Zone 3 -Lopez Project -Monthly Operations Report January, 2022 J _ Lopez Water Deliveries State Water Deliveries Entl. Surplus Surplus Total This Month April to Present This Month January to Present Total Water Contractor Water Requested Available Entitlement Surplus Entitlement Surplus Total Annual Usage n of SWP Change in Usage 7 of Annual SWP Deliveries ual Declared Water Usage % Usage % Usage % Usage % Usage % Request Request Deliveries Storage Request Deliveries This Month ~Arroyo Grande 2061 807.00 807.00 2868 127.63 6.2% 0.00 0.0% 1798.44 87.3% 0.00 0.0% 1798.44 62.7% 127.63 I Sceano CSD 272.7 107.00 107.00 380 0,00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 750 33.06 4.4% 33.06 I 4.4% 33.06 Grover Beach 720 282.00 282.00 1002 62.33 8.7% 0.00 0.0% 661.37 91.9% 0.00 0.0% 661.37 66.0% 1 1 62.33 Pismo Beach 802.8 314.00 314.00 1117 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 46.13 5.7% 0.00 0.0% 46.13 4.1% 1240 103.91 8.4% 103.91 8.4% 103.91 CSA 12 220.5 86.00 _ 86.00 307 3.50 1.6% 0.00 0.0% 63.41 28.8% 0.00 0.0% 63.41 20.70., 96 5.94 6.2%. 5.94 6.2% 9.44 San Mit:uelito 120 7.81 6.5% 7.81 6.5% 7.81 Total 4077 1 1896.00 11596.00 I 5673 193.46 1 4.7%1 0.00 I 0.0% 2569.35 1 63.0%1 0.00 I 0.0%1 2569.35 145.3% 2206 150.72 6.8% 0 -150.72 150.72 6.8% 0.00 344.18 Last Month Stored State Water 986.83 This Month Stored State Water 836.11 April to Present Lopez Entitlement+Surplus Water Usage January to Present State Water Usage 120 250 100 - -- -i 200150 -a2000 = 60- -- - u. 8 100, Lpp, LL 60 Apr'21 May Jun'21 Jul'21 Aug Sep'21 Oct'21 Nov'21 Dec'21 Jan'22 0 - - 1•1-1 '21 '21 Apr'21 May'21 Jun'21 Jul'21 Aug'21 Sep'21 Oct'21 Nov'21 Dec'21 Jan'22 ®AG M GB O OCSD n PB■CSA12 I D OCSD D PB■CSA72 D SanMig I Note: Deliveries are in acre feet. One acre foot=325,850 gallons or 43,560 cubic feet. Safe yield is 8,730 "Year to Date"is January to present for State water,April to present for Lopez deliveries,and July to present for rainfall. acre feet. Comments: Lopez Dam Operations This Month Year to Date 11 Oceano supplied water to Canyon Crest via Arroyo Grande's Edna turn out.A total of 1.38 AF delivered to Canyon Crest was added Lake Elevation(full at 522.37 feet) 468.32 Difference(feet) -54.05 to Oceano s water usage this month and 1.38 AF was subtracted from Arroyo Grande's usage this month. Storage(full at 49200 acre feet) 14755 %Full 30.0% 2)Lopez Water Deliveries are now operated under the Low Reservoir Response Plan(LRRP). In August 2021 TAC requested a 10% Rainfall 0.03 11.04 entitlement reduction(retroactive to April 2021)in anticipation of reaching the 15,000 AF trigger of the LRRP.Entitlements shown Downstream Release(4200 acre feet/year) 237.84 2755.62 represent a 10%reduction. Spillage(acre feet) 0 1 0.00 Surplus water shown is actually"Carry Over"water as designated in the LRRP. Friday,February 4,2022 Data entered by: D.Bravo Report printed by: Admin Page I of I Page 133 of 340 Attachment 2 LOPEZ RESERVOIR STORAGE PROJECTION 40000 - - -1-Attuah'Rreeipitation Predicted Precipitation ---- ;jcruai=toragi 1 - 14.00 — —i 20,000 fkF 5tor2age projecticin ' $torqge Projeictioip(NQ Rain) . — . 110,000 AF l 35000 - 1 i i - 12.00 30000 -. . 1 1 - 1 1 - . - 10.00 25000 - - • - i _ - w - 7.33 - 8.00 a 20000 - — — 7------.----- - __-co - o N - 6.00 516 • 15000 - • 4.i0 9/16/2022,10000 • 4.00 10000k —-fes.- 2. - d,l-.7- - --.—.—•—•.-, — �3, 2 .7 { + 2.$82 4 -. _ 2.38 . 2..4 2.03 2.2a 5000 -•• I _1--)447 1t2 1. 0 1. 0 . 2.00 0. 0 i 0 41' 3 0. 8 p .4 0.33 6 r 201'2012 0 2 0.� E r �� %320 0.42 0.62 0 0.36 0.320.62 • 010 O.100. .001 r00 0 0 00 :r+r,rrrp0 0 0 ` 0 - - — J_.: >>. - _ _�.��f __�.— .— —. f. - 1.—•---4—f 1—. -- 0.00 O O O O O O O O O O O O e-I .-i e-1 e-I e-1 a-I I-I e-1 N e-1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 1-1 a`-I �-I e\-I e--1 1-1 e`-1 �-I �-I N a�-I e`i e\-I a-I-I a`-1 ‘-I ,-1 a`-1 a`-I a\1 a`-1 a�-1 a-I-I a�-I a�-I a\-1 e\-1 eV a`-I a\-1 a`-I e`-I a`-1 a�-I a-I-I ‘-I a-4 a`-I a`-1 a`-1 N M If n W O`1 O e`-1 N N N In t! n W 011 O ‘-I CV N ‘-I IN N rn cr V1 lD I, W Ol O N N N a-I a-I a-I N N N ei eV N Date 1.Storage projection is based on predicted rainfall from longrangeweather.com,inflow based on predicted rainfall,20-21 downstream release requests,and municipal usage. 2. Municipal Usage is based on Jan 2010-Dec 2020 average monthly deliveries. 3.Predicted inflow is based off of historical precipitation and storage data.Antecedant moisture conditions are factored into the model.The first rainstorms after months without rain will cause less inflow than rainstorms during the rainy season.If the average daily rainfall for the previous three months is below 1 inch the model will multiply the predicted inflow by 0.1,if the average is above 1 inch the inflow is multiplied by 1.25. Page 134 of 340 ATTACHMENT 3 Monthly Water Use Comparison 180 165.1 160 140 131.3 120 98 100 III 80 78 60 40 20 0 Jan-21 Jan-22 •Production(Acre Feet) •Usage(gpcd) Page 135 of 340 ATTACHMENT 4 Below is the information you have submitted for the month of January 2022. We use your most recently submitted monthly report in our calculations Reporter Slane Taylor Urban Water Supplier(Number) Arroyo Grande City of(508) Public Water System ID(s) CA4010001 Reporting Month 0122 County/Counties San Luis Obispo County Under Drought Declaration Yes Water Shortage Contingency Plan 1 Water Shortage Level Yes Population 17641 Total Potable Water Production 131.3 AF Commercial Agricultural Water 0 AF Residential Use Percentage 80% CII Water 14.4 AF Recycled Water 0 AF Non-revenue Water AF Estimated R-GPCD 62.59 Qualification Emergency Response Section Revealed? Yes State Water Resources Control Board Office of Research, Planning & Performance Page 136 of 340 (F PRROYO NCORPOR ATED Y� * JULY 10, 1911 c4EIFOON MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Jessica Matson, Legislative & Information Services Director/City Clerk Timothy J. Carmel, City Attorney SUBJECT: Public Hearing on the Creation of a District-Based Election System and Consideration of Draft District Maps DATE: February 22, 2022 SUMMARY OF ACTION: Public Hearing to consider draft maps for the creation of a district-based election system. IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES: There is no financial impact for conducting the public hearing and receiving input. However, transitioning to district elections required the City to retain the services of a demographer. The cost of such services are projected to be approximately $24,000 and have been budgeted in the FY 2021-2023 Biennial Budget. RECOMMENDATION: 1) Receive a report from the consultant and staff on the districting process and outreach efforts; 2) Conduct a public hearing to consider draft maps; 3) Provide direction on which maps should be considered for final selection at the next Public Hearing; and 4) Provide direction on a proposed election sequence. BACKGROUND: On October 2, 2019, the City received a Notice of Violation (NOV")of the California Voting Rights Act ("CVRA") and accompanying documentation from attorney Robert Goodman on behalf of his client, Maria Minicucci, alleging that the City's use of an at-large election system created racially polarized voting in violation of the CVRA. On October 22, 2019, the City Council adopted a Resolution (Attachment 1) declaring its intent to transition from at-large to district-based elections by November 8, 2022, and authorized a settlement agreement with Ms. Minicucci. The City engaged a demographer, National Demographics Corporation (NDC), to assist the City in the districting process. NDC has worked with the City to develop a timeline of public forums, formal public hearings, draft map dates, and final map adoption and presented the process and timeline to the City Council and public. Item 9.a. Page 137 of 340 City Council Public Hearing on the Creation of a District-Based Election System and Consideration of Draft District Maps February 22, 2022 Page 2 NDC also worked with the City and County Registrar of Voters to confirm GIS boundaries, prepare total population estimates and socio-economic data for use in paper and online map-drawing tools, and prepared reports regarding demographics and compliance with State and federal criteria in preparation for analysis of map submissions from the public. NDC's staff led two public workshops conducted in the Fall of 2021 to assist in the map drawing process and has evaluated each of the maps submitted for compliance with applicable laws. Pursuant to Elections Code Section 10010, the City conducted its first two public hearings on July 27, 2021, and August 10, 2021, prior to drafting maps of proposed districts. At the July 27th hearing, NDC provided a general overview of the districting process and Council received initial public input on communities of interest and approved the timeline for developing and approving a Council district map. At the August 10th hearing, NDC and staff provided further information on the districting process and outreach initiatives. Council received further input from the public on a list of neighborhoods and communities of interest to consider in the district map-drawing process. Public Outreach In July 2021 , the City initiated extensive outreach efforts to inform the public about district-based elections and the process associated with developing the Council election districts These outreach efforts included the following: • Creation of a districting webpage on the City's website: www.arroyoqrande.org/districtelections; • Creation and publication of a video about the districting process; • Full page mailer to all Arroyo Grande residences with districting information and a blank map allowing residents to draw and submit maps on paper to the City; • Information regarding the online map-drawing tool (DistrictR); • Flyers with information and a blank map provided at the City Hall counter, public events, and public presentations; • Spotlights on the City's homepage; • Regular Social Media posts; • An information Email was sent to all City subscribers; • Bill stuffer in September/October Utility Bills; • Full page ad in the Chamber Newsletter; • Four press releases promoting the public hearings, workshops, and mapping tools; • Two virtual workshops held on September 18th and October 28th, 2021; • Information booth at the City's Summer Concert Series; • City Manager presentations to multiple service groups; • Emails to members of the public who submitted a map prior to release of official US Census data; Item 9.a. Page 138 of 340 City Council Public Hearing on the Creation of a District-Based Election System and Consideration of Draft District Maps February 22, 2022 Page 3 • An article in the February Chamber Newsletter. • Half page spotlight regarding upcoming public hearings on Annual Sales Tax mailer These outreach efforts resulted in the City receiving 156 maps from the public, including 42 paper maps hand-delivered or mailed to City Hall, 86 paper maps received by email, and 28 maps submitted using the DistrictR online mapping tool. Of these 156 maps, 140 were submitted prior to the 2020 Census data being released and 16 were submitted after Census data was released. ANALYSIS OF ISSUES: This hearing is the third of four required public hearings the City must hold prior to adopting a Council district map to begin transitioning to district-based elections. At the first public hearing on July 27, 2021 , Council received a presentation from NDC with a general overview of the districting process, received initial public input on district boundaries, and approved the timeline for developing and approving a Council district map. At the second public hearing on August 10, 2021, Council received further public input on local factors to consider in the district map-drawing process, received an update and provided direction to staff on a districting outreach plan. The purpose of this third hearing is to present publicly submitted maps along with draft maps developed by NDC. Staff is requesting Council direction on which maps should be considered for final map selection at the fourth hearing on March 8, 2022, and what, if any, changes the Council would like to see in those selected maps. In order to further encourage public participation and transparency and allow additional discussion of the proposed maps, staff is recommending that an additional public hearing be conducted prior to the adoption of a final map. Following the March 8th hearing, staff will bring an ordinance to the Council for introduction on March 22, 2022, with adoption of the final map scheduled for April 12, 2022. The schedule has been updated on the Districting Timeline, as show below and in Attachment 2. DateTime Location Meeting Type July 27, 6:00 Council Public Hearing 1 2021 PM Chambers Held prior to release of draft maps. _ / Virtual _ Receive input on composition of districts. _ August 10, 6:00 Council Public Hearing 2 2021 PM Chambers Held prior to release of draft maps. / Virtual Receive input on composition of districts. Census Data Release Census Bureau releases official 2020 August 16, 2021 Census population data. September 10:00 Virtual Public Workshop 1 18, 2021 AM— Item 9.a. Page 139 of 340 City Council Public Hearing on the Creation of a District-Based Election System and Consideration of Draft District Maps February 22, 2022 Page 4 12:00 PM California Data Release California Statewide Database releases Early October 2021 California's official 'prisoner-adjusted' 2020 population data. October 6:00 — Virtual Public Workshop 2 28, 2021 8:00 PM February 8, 2022 5:00 PM Draft Map Submissions Due February 15, 2022 Release Draft Maps (7 days prior to Public Hearing 3) February 6:00 Virtual Public Hearing 3 22, 2022 PM Discuss and revise the draft maps and discuss election sequence. March 8, 6:00 Virtual Public Hearing 4 2022 PM Discuss draft maps and election sequence. Final map selection. March 22, 6:00 Virtual Public Hearing 5 2022 PM Introduce ordinance. April 12, 6:00 Virtual Map adopted by ordinance 2022 PM Adoption deadline: April 17, 2022 Maps Submitted by the Public In total, the City received 156 maps from the public. All maps were analyzed and considered by NDC when creating their draft maps. 75 maps submitted by the public were drawn to demonstrate communities of interest or one district within the City (Attachment 7). 81 maps were submitted showing four districts within the City (Attachment 6). NDC has analyzed all map submissions and found the maps fall into the following categories: • Noncompliant maps (not population balanced) • Maps that divide the Village, with a horizontal pattern in the southwest • Maps that divide the Village, with a vertical pattern in the southwest • Maps that divide the Village, with a mixed pattern in the southwest • Maps that unite the Village, with a horizontal pattern in the southwest • Maps that unite the Village, with a mixed pattern in the southwest Consideration of Initial Draft Maps A number of federal and State statutes and Court decisions dictate the process and considerations that the City must use to create voting districts. Voting districts must comply with the following requirements: • Each district shall contain a nearly equal population. Item 9.a. Page 140 of 340 City Council Public Hearing on the Creation of a District-Based Election System and Consideration of Draft District Maps February 22, 2022 Page 5 • Each district shall be drawn in a manner that complies with the US Constitution, California Constitution, Federal Voting Rights Act, and California Voting Rights Act. • Each district shall not be drawn with race as the predominate factor in violation of the principles established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), and its progeny. Additionally, pursuant to Elections Code Section 21601, the Council must adopt district boundaries using the following criteria as set forth in the following order of priority: 1. To the extent practicable, districts shall be geographically contiguous. Areas that meet only at the points of adjoining corners are not contiguous. 2. To the extent practicable, the geographic integrity of any local neighborhood or local community of interest shall be respected in a manner that minimizes its division. A "community of interest" is a population that shares common social or economic interests that should be included within a single district for purposes of its effective and fair representation. Communities of interest do not include relationships with political parties, incumbents, or political candidates. 3. District boundaries should be easily identifiable and understandable by residents. To the extent practicable, districts shall be bounded by natural and artificial barriers, by streets, or by the boundaries of the city. 4. To the extent practicable, and where it does not conflict with the preceding criteria, districts shall be drawn to encourage geographical compactness in a manner that nearby areas of population are not bypassed in favor of more distant populations. Lastly, the Council may not adopt district boundaries for the purpose of favoring or discriminating against a political party. Public Comment Regarding Communities of Interest Staff compiled public comment and input received during the two 2021 public hearings, two public workshops, and via email regarding communities of interest (COls) within the City, as well as suggestions for drawing Council districts. This input was used by NDC when developing their three maps for consideration, discussed further below. From this public input, the following themes developed: Communities of Interest The following communities of interest may be identified through the comments received: 1. West side of Elm Street 2. The Village Item 9.a. Page 141 of 340 City Council Public Hearing on the Creation of a District-Based Election System and Consideration of Draft District Maps February 22, 2022 Page 6 3. West side multi-family housing area (i.e. along North and South Elm Street) 4. Areas with higher Latinx populations i.e. South Elm Street and South Halcyon Road 5. Residents North/East of Highway 101 and South/West of Highway 101 Other Public Input In addition to the identification of the communities of interest identified above, the following comments were received for consideration by Council as part of the process for creating voting districts: 1. Keep the Village as one district 2. Do not create Council districts 3. Base Council districts only on geographical lines to avoid gerrymandering NDC Draft Maps NDC considered all publicly submitted maps and legal requirements under the U.S. and California Constitutions, the California Voting Rights Act and the California Fair Maps Act. Based on these considerations, NDC developed 3 draft maps for the Council's consideration entitled Plans 901 , 902, and 903 (Attachments 3, 4, and 5 respectively). Below is a summary of each: • Plan 901 unites the Village in District 2, while District 1 crosses the freeway. The boundary between Districts 3 and 4 mostly follows Elm Street, while that between Districts 4 and 2 follows Arroyo Grande Creek. • Plan 902 unites the Village in District 2, while District 1 crosses the freeway. The boundary between Districts 3 and 4 follows Halcyon Road and Fair Oaks Avenue, while that between Districts 4 and 2 follows the freeway, Fair Oaks Avenue, and Valley Road. • Plan 903 unites the Village in District 2, but District 1 stays on one side of the freeway. The boundary between Districts 3 and 4 follows Brisco Road and Elm Street, while that between Districts 4 and 2 follows Grand Avenue and Halcyon Road. Election Sequencing California Election Code states that there must be a "potential sequencing of elections" published with the maps (EC 10010(a)(2)). After analyzing all of the submitted maps, existing Council terms of office, and where current Council members reside, NDC developed a potential election sequence for Council's consideration and discussion as follows: • District 1 and District 2 up for election in 2024, as two incumbents whose terms expire in 2024 live in those areas; and • Districts 3 and 4 up for election this November 2022. Item 9.a. Page 142 of 340 City Council Public Hearing on the Creation of a District-Based Election System and Consideration of Draft District Maps February 22, 2022 Page 7 NDC added this potential election sequence to each map in order to comply with the Election Code requirement cited above. The identified sequence is the same on each map. This sequence is offered as one possibility for discussion and deliberation by the City Council. Sequencing of the elections by district will not impact the ability of seated Council members to serve out the remainder of their existing terms of office. Next Steps Staff is requesting Council review the maps submitted by the public (Attachments 6 and 7) and NDC (Attachments 3, 4, and 5), provide direction on which maps should be considered for final map selection at the next hearing on March 8, 2022, and what, if any, changes the Council would like to see in those selected maps. NDC has grouped publicly submitted maps by theme. They are shown in the attachments as follows: Attachments 3, 4, and 5 • NDC's maps, Plans 901, 902, and 903 (3) Attachment 6 • Publicly-submitted four district maps (81) (6a) Noncompliant maps (57, excluding 12 that were just barely noncompliant and slightly revised to become compliant) (6b) Maps that divide the Village, with a horizontal pattern in the southwest (6) (6c) Maps that divide the Village, with a vertical pattern in the southwest (10) (6d) Maps that divide the Village, with a mixed pattern in the southwest (2) (6e) Maps that unite the Village, with a horizontal pattern in the southwest (5) (6f) Maps that unite the Village, with a mixed pattern in the southwest (1) Attachment 7 • Publicly-submitted community of interest maps (45) • Publicly-submitted one district maps (30) Attachment 7 is available as a link to the Interactive Review Map. Layers can be selected to review these maps. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration: 1. a) Receive a report on the City's districting process and outreach efforts; b) Conduct a public hearing to consider draft maps; c) Provide direction on which maps should be considered for final selection at the next Public Hearing; and d) Provide direction on a proposed election sequence; or 2. Provide other direction to staff. Item 9.a. Page 143 of 340 City Council Public Hearing on the Creation of a District-Based Election System and Consideration of Draft District Maps February 22, 2022 Page 8 ADVANTAGES: Approving the recommendation will allow for public input regarding the initial draft maps and allow Council to review and select final draft maps for consideration at the next public hearing on March 8, 2022. DISADVANTAGES: No disadvantages have been identified. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: No environmental review is required for this item. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS: The Public Hearing Notice and Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City's website in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2. Additionally, the Public Hearing Notice was published in the Tribune. Attachments: 1. Resolution 4949 2. Districting Timeline 3. Plan 901 4. Plan 902 5. Plan 903 6. Publicly Submitted Maps Showing Four-Districts 7. Publicly Submitted Maps Showing Communities of Interest and One District 8. NDC's PowerPoint Presentation Item 9.a. Page 144 of 340 Attachment 1 RESOLUTION NO. 4949 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO TRANSITION FROM AT-LARGE TO DISTRICT-BASED ELECTIONS BY NOVEMBER 2022 WHEREAS, members of the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande ("City") are currently elected in at-large elections in which each of the four Council members along with the Mayor are elected through a City-wide vote; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 34886 permits the legislative body of a city to adopt an ordinance that requires members of the legislative body to be elected by district with an elective mayor, without being required to submit the ordinance to the voters for approval; and WHEREAS, on October 2, 2019, the City received a letter entitled Notice of Violation of California Voting Rights Act ("Notice") from attorney Robert Goodman on behalf of Maria Minicucci ("Prospective Plaintiff'), asserting that the City's method of conducting elections may violate the California Voting Rights Act ("Act") and threatening litigation if the City doesn't voluntarily transition to a district-based election system; and WHEREAS, a violation of the Act may be established if it is shown that racially polarized voting occurs in elections in the jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the Act provides a means for prospective plaintiffs to allege racially polarized voting combined with an at-large voting system impair the ability of a protected class of voters to elect candidates of its choice or to influence the outcome of an election and to seek a change from a jurisdiction's at-large election system to a district-based system; and WHEREAS, the Act allows prospective plaintiffs to file a lawsuit against the City if the City does not adopt a resolution of intent to transition to district-based elections within 45 days of the Notice; and WHEREAS, Prospective Plaintiff offered to consider a settlement agreement whereby the City would not be required to institute district-based elections until the November 2022 regular election in order to allow 2020 U.S. Census data to be used in drawing district boundaries; and WHEREAS, the City denies the assertion that its at-large system violates the Act or any other law and asserts that the City's election system is legal in all respects; and WHEREAS, the City Council has concluded that the public interest would best be served by transitioning to a district-based election system with an elective mayor due to the Page 145 of 340 RESOLUTION NO. 4949 PAGE 2 inherent uncertainties and costs associated with defending the City's at-large election system. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande as follows: 1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Before the November 2022 regular election, the City Council will consider adoption of an ordinance to institute a district-based election system with an elective mayor as authorized under Government Code Section 34886. 3. Prior to considering an ordinance to establish district boundaries for a district- based election system with an elective mayor, the City will follow the requirements pursuant to Elections Code Section 10010 including: a. Hiring a qualified consultant to provide demographic services and assist in the preparation of proposed district maps; b. Conduct public outreach, including to non-English speaking communities, to explain the districting process and to encourage public participation; c. Before drawing a draft map or maps of the proposed division boundaries, hold at least two public hearings at which the public is invited to provide input regarding the composition of the districts and to consider district boundaries; d. After drawing a draft map or maps, publish the draft map(s) and the potential sequence of the district elections and hold at least two public hearings at which the public is invited to provide input regarding the content of the draft map or maps and the proposed sequence of elections; and e. Hold a public hearing at which the City Council will consider and adopt an ordinance establishing district-based elections with an elective mayor, including a district boundary map and the sequence of the district elections. 4. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. 5. The City Manager is hereby authorized to enter into a professional services agreement as necessary with a consultant qualified to provide demographic services to the City. On motion of Mayor Ray Russom, seconded by Council Member Paulding, and on the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Mayor Ray Russom and Council Members Paulding, Storton, George, Barneich NOES: None ABSENT: None The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 22nd day of October, 2019. Page 146 of 340 RESOLUTION NO. *Of PAGE 3 CARE RAY RIZ• •M, MAYOR ATTEST: t .fir[ U .r 6w KELLY ET ORE, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO CONTENT. r Ph JAMES A =' -4 MAN, CITY MANAGER APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATHER WHITHAM, CITY ATTORNEY Page 147,of 340 OFFICIAL CERTIFICATION I, KELLY WETMORE, City Clerk of the City of Arroyo Grande, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the attached Resolution No. 4949 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande on the 22nd day of October, 2019. WITNESS my hand and the Seal of the City of Arroyo Grande affixed this 23rd day of October, 2019. litiaValete----- KELLYLY EE ORE, CITY CLERK Page 148 of 340 Attachment 2 Date Time Location Meeting Type July 27, 6:00 PM Council Public Hearing 1 2021 Chambers/ Held prior to release of draft maps. Receive Virtual input on composition of districts. August 10, 6:00 PM Council Public Hearing 2 2021 Chambers/ Held prior to release of draft maps. Receive Virtual input on composition of districts. Census Data Release Census Bureau releases official 2020 Census August 16, 2021 population data. September 10:00 Virtual Public Workshop 1 18, 2021 AM- 12:00 PM California Data Release California Statewide Database releases Early October 2021 California's official 'prisoner-adjusted' 2020 population data. October 28, 6:00— Virtual Public Workshop 2 2021 8:00 PM February 8, 2022 5:00 PM Draft Map Submissions Due February 15, 2022 Release Draft Maps (7 days prior to Public Hearing 3) February 22, 6:00 PM Virtual Public Hearing 3 2022 Discuss and revise the draft maps and discuss election sequence. March 8, 6:00 PM Virtual Public Hearing 4 2022 Discuss draft maps and election sequence. Final map selection. March 22, 6:00 PM Virtual Public Hearing 5 2022 Introduce ordinance. April 12, 6:00 PM Virtual Map adopted by ordinance 2022 Adoption deadline: April 17, 2022 Updated 2/1/22 Page 149 of 340 901 ATTACHMENT 3 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to ` �� District Elections �o`,s 4. ro 1 ~ro 227 21 James Way ofi 4� Cl CSO u -� v o 2, �, � C°� ,..,2;9' ,S,`1' ,�� Huasna Rd �a 101 Montego St �B Sti fi �Sco4- �Z Sr ��r � o ''2•0 �� 1 E Grand Ave o �� ' 3 �� ,G 2 Co Maple St �� o�°.- �Oa �c✓�‘; I e. - cn Ash Sty 0 to C �' �o� a t�l10 101 F� 4) Fair Oaks Ave s ' e1 Farroll Ave P 1 � MINI In 4 i 4, The Pike (7-' Sunrise Dr ProposedElection Sequence: 111101 Leanna Dr ' 7. 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PagAi 7 XLIV4o National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 901 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,586 4,700 V 4,717 4,466 18,469 Deviation from ideal -31 83 100 -151 251 %Deviation -0.67% 1.80% 2.17% -3.27% 5.44% %Hisp 13.1% 14% 27% 25% 20% %NH White 74% 76% 61% 63% 69% Total Pop – %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 5% 5% — Total 3,400 4,101 3,352 3,291 14,144 %Hisp 9% 10% 19% 14% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 83% 83% 71% 78% 79% %NH Black 3% 0% 1% 0% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 5% 5% 5% Total 3,698 3,836 2,804 2,996 13,334 %Latino est. 8% 8% 18% 13% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 7% 17% 13% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 89% 78% 82% 84% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 3,378 3,521 2,374 2,589 11,862 %Latino est. 8% 7% 17% 12% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 8% 7% 16% 12% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 86% 89% 79% 83% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 2,739 2,822 1,726 1,966 9,253 Latino est. 7% 7% 12% 10% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 7% 12% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 87% 90% 83% 86% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 0% 1% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,087 5,174 0 4,737 4,143 18,140 age0-19 15% 24% 26% 20% 22% Age age20-60 45% 45% 50% 56% 49% age60plus 40% 31% 23% 24% 29% immigrants 8% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 67% 75% 57% 64% 65% english 89% 91% 85% 85% 88% spanish 4% 1% 10% 10% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% other fang 5% 6% 2% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 4% 4% hs-grad 44% 49% 46% 52% 48% Education bachelor 23% 24% 20% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 17% 14% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 17% 25% 34% 24% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 49% 59% 63% 62% 58% income 0-25k 19% 9% 12% 18% 14% income 25-50k 11% 16% 21% 13% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 19% 19% 16% income 75-200k 47% 47% 44% 46% 46% income 200k-plus 10% 12% 4% 4% 8% single family 86% 95% t 74% 78% 84% multi-family 14% 5% 26% 22% 16% Housing Stats rented 22% 27% 48% 35% 33% owned 78% 73% 52% 65% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. MaPIRMPage 151 of 340 02/11/2022 17:56 Page 1 of 1 ror R-�Ir..r In ATTACHMENT 4 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to , Plan ,.. District Elections °`�S efi I ,ro 227, 21 James War e L� 0 a cb° ° a� v 0 2, I qv °��° ,4� Fluasna Rd (1 101 Montego St - ' 1- 131., S� �I, fi �co�� Z Sr ��c��c`9 d: � �° gyro 9' ��v x p °`r �c E Grand Ave o �y��' �� Q Gbe 3 2 vc w ��L ti t °� y ��a� ��e O UMaple St �� °�� O�- acs �4G a y VD Ash St 0 m c �' �� a e�°d 1011 Fair Oaks Ave s 00 of ip. Farroll Aver 1 ' 4 p e a The Pike (7-' Sunrise Dr ProposedElection Sequence: `1* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PagAi 7NaV4o National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 902 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,586 4,670 1 4,633 4,580 18,469 Deviation from ideal -31 53 16 -37 90 Deviation -0.67% 1.15% 0.35% -0.80% 1.95% %Hisp 13.1% 13% t 26% 26% 20% %NH White 74% 77% 61% 63% 69% Total Pop – %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 5% 5% — Total 3,400 4,081 3,293 3,371 14,144 %Hisp 9% 10% 18% 15% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 83% 84% 73% 76% 79% %NH Black 3% 1% 0% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 5% 6% 5% Total 3,698 3,832 2,848 2,956 13,334 %Latino est. 8% 8% 17% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 7% 16% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 89% 79% 81% 84% %NH Black 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,378 3,517 2,412 2,555 11,862 %Latino est. 8% 7% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 8% 7% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 89% 81% 82% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 2,739 2,817 1,781 1,916 9,253 Latino est. 7% 7% 12% 10% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 87% 90% 84% 86% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,087 5,140 4,593 4,320 18,140 age0-19 15% 24% 24% 22% 22% Age age20-60 45% 45% 49% 57% 49% age60plus 40% 31% 27% 20% 29% immigrants 8% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 67% 74% 57% 64% 65% english 89% 91% 84% 86% 88% spanish 4% 1% 12% 8% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% other lang 5% 6% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 4% 4% hs-grad 44% 49% 46% 52% 48% Education bachelor 23% 24% 21% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 17% 14% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 17% 25% 32% 27% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 49% 59% 62% 63% 58% income 0-25k 19% 9% 17% 13% 14% income 25-50k 11% 16% 20% 13% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 17% 21% 16% income 75-200k 47% 47% 41% 50% 46% income 200k-plus 10% 12% 5% 2% 8% single family 86% 95% 71% 81% 84% multi-family 14% 5% 29% 19% 16% Housing Stats rented 22% 27% 49% 34% 33% owned 78% 73% 51% 66% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. motittillfoage 153 of 340 02/11/2022 18:29 Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT 5 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to , Plan 903 ,.. District Elections °`�S y �ro ro ro� C 227; 27 James Way 27 °� .'k' Croy cY,o � u (5 q� be° ,�� ° juasna Rd �a r not Montego St --------/ .\'`-e' Br�� Sr ��c�5T ��rofi� prilEML'I'I'W' .ip E Grand Ave �c co a o. aa� <� O ¢ U Maple St �� °�� O'� SCS �� ry C4) G ,y n Ash St 0 m c �4� a �o d 1011 Fair Oaks Ave se' cn Ay, Farroll Ave F ,„ 4 n 4, ,.t C 41 The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: `1* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PagAi/aP40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 903 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,572 4,668 o 4,408 4,821 18,469 Deviation from ideal -45 51 -209 204 413 %Deviation -0.97% 1.10% -4.53% 4.42% 8.95% %Hisp 11.6% 16% 25% 27% 20% %NH White 77% 73% 63% 61% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% — Total 3,343 4,263 3,124 3,415 14,144 %Hisp 9% 12% 17% 14% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 82% 71% 76% 79% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 2% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 6% 5% Total 3,800 3,743 t 2,785 3,006 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 16% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 9% 15% 15% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 77% 80% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,524 3,372 I 2,397 2,569 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 8% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 87% 78% 81% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 2,912 2,666 1,765 1,910 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 1% 2% 1% %NH White est. 90% 89% 82% 84% 87% %NH Black est. 1% 0% 2% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,139 5,190 4,233 4,577 18,140 age0-19 18% 23% 25% 21% 22% Age age20-60 46% 46% 50% 54% 49% age60plus 36% 31% 25% 25% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 79% 57% 58% 65% english 90% 92% 86% 82% 88% spanish 4% 0% 8% 12% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other lang 6% 6% 2% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% hs-grad 42% 52% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 25% 22% 20% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 13% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 22% 23% 31% 26% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 50% 61% 62% 60% 58% income 0-25k 14% 12% 14% 17% 14% income 25-50k 7% 17% 22% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 16% 18% 19% 16% income 75-200k 53% 47% 42% 43% 46% income 200k-plus 13% 8% 4% 5% 8% single family 95% 93% 71% 74% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 29% 26% 16% Housing Stats rented 13% 31% 50% 38% 33% owned 87% 69% 50% 62% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fido leMoage 155 of 340 02/14/2022 15:14 Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT 6A City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to ,� Plan 101A District Elections �o`,s 9 '<, Not Population Balanced u, bro ro ro� C 1 ~ro 7 21 James Way o'. �� ,„\,, roe �bo c 0 b ^F # obe° ti� HuaSt Rd 4b iop Montego St - i 'Bra� Sti fic, so°�� ;St ��c� � s C•7 mss' cP E Grand Ave �' �, o ,§' ✓� 2. ocap '>-<e' 9 P- 0 Maple t 7 'P. e ..,cry % y Cl) Ash St 0 m c � ae�od 1011 R Fair Oaks Ave s 4 of Farroll Ave E F -� . 4 , a gbh The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 1* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PagAi 7 N_PEF4o National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 101A District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop4� 884 4,022 4,675 4,888 18,469 Deviation from ideal 267 -595 58 271 866 %Deviation 5.78% -12.89% 1.26% 5.87% 18.76% %Hisp 12.1% 16% 25% 25% 20% %NH White 76% 74% 62% 64% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,564 3,727 3,294 3,559 14,144 %Hisp 9% 12% 17% 14% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 86% 81% 72% 76% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 6% 5% Total 4,061 3,203 t 2,983 3,087 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 16% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 9% 15% 15% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 78% 81% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,764 2,888 I 2,555 2,655 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 8% 14% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 14% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 88% 79% 82% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,109 2,265 1,896 1,983 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 90% 89% 83% 84% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,435 4,563 4,412 4,730 18,140 age0-19 18% 22% 23% 23% 22% Age age20-60 47% 45% 48% 56% 49% age60plus 35% 32% 30% 21% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 79% 58% 59% 65% english 90% 91% 86% 83% 88% spanish 3% 0% 9% 11% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 5% 6% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 4% 5% 4% hs-grad 42% 52% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 25% 22% 21% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 12% 10% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 22% 27% 29% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 50% 61% 60% 62% 58% income0-25k 14% 11% 19% 13% 14% income 25-50k 7% 18% 22% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 16% 21% 16% income 75-200k 53% 46% 39% 47% 46% income 200k-plus 13% 8% 5% 4% 8% single family 95% 93% 69% 78% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 31% 22% 16% Housing Stats rented 13% 31% 50% 37% 33% owned 87% 69% 50% 63% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 157 of 340 02/08/2022 16:15 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toa District Elections �o`,s „ -0 Not Population Balanced u, �ro ro , ' CYro 1 ~ro C2-2- 2, 7/ 21 James War o 4� �roa a cb° o (5 q� obe° ,�� HuaSt Rd (1010 Montego St - ' 1Br Sti fic sc°fie Sr � �� Ts (''> �� Mij �� ods � cP E Grand Ave o c�y��' 75 3 �� 2 2. y CS" �<e' O ? IL U Maple St �� PO °�� 0�� CS r �� G �0' L. VD Ash St QS, El c �� a e�o�, 101 Fair Oaks Ave s x L lull Farroll Ave E i elm 4 a t e a th The Pike 9-- <,,:, Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 1* Leanna Dr ` 2022: Districts 3 & 4 k 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PagAi 7 XLii9 4o National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 103 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,807 4,093 4,666 4,903 18,469 Deviation from ideal 190 -524 49 286 810 %Deviation 4.12% -11.35% 1.06% 6.19% 17.54% %Hisp 11.8% 16% t 26% 25% 20% %NH White 76% 74% 62% 64% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,562 3,677 3,293 3,614 14,144 %Hisp 8% 13% 17% 14% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 81% 71% 77% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 6% 5% Total 4,039 3,196 t 2,985 3,114 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 9% 15% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 87% 77% 81% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,752 2,880 I 2,553 2,677 11,862 %Latino est. 6% 8% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 88% 79% 82% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,105 2,243 1,886 2,019 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 88% 83% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,410 4,581 4,407 4,742 18,140 age0-19 19% 22% 23% 23% 22% Age age20-60 46% 46% 47% 56% 49% age60plus 36% 32% 30% 21% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 79% 57% 60% 65% english 91% 91% 85% 84% 88% spanish 3% 1% 10% 10% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 5% 7% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 4% 5% 4% hs-grad 42% 53% 45% 51% 48% Education bachelor 26% 22% 21% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 22% 28% 28% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 60% 60% 62% 58% income 0-25k 13% 12% 18% 14% 14% income 25-50k 8% 17% 22% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 16% 21% 16% income 75-200k 54% 46% 38% 48% 46% income 200k-plus 13% 8% 5% 3% 8% single family 95% 93% 68% 79% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 32% 21% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 31% 51% 36% 33% owned 86% 69% 49% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 159 of 340 02/10/2022 14:25 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toa District Elections �°`,s „ -0 Not Population Balanced u, 4 �ro ro . ' CYro 1 ~ro C2-2- 2, 7/ 21 James War ° cv cb° o (5 � °,be°q ,-� Huasna Rd (101 Montego St - / 1- 13,..7_ S� fic �co�d � Sr ��.C°c o '� �� p 'Q cP' E Grand Ave \ o6 0- 'G 2 Fd \ o-� e UMaple St l �� -. (;off° ��O�k cs r VDAsh St Qtil � 0 „"'� Cad, Q, 101 Fair Oaks Ave s of Farroll Ave . Ftikep � 1, 4n l C O e a 4iii The Pike Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 1* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Phi/NaV40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 104 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,978 3,980 4,881 4,630 18,469 Deviation from ideal 361 -637 264 13 998 %Deviation 7.82% -13.80% 5.72% 0.28% 21.62% %Hisp 11.6% 15% 26% 26% 20% %NH White 76% 75% 62% 62% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,672 3,703 3,451 3,319 14,144 %Hisp 8% 12% 18% 14% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 82% 72% 75% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 5% 6% 5% Total 4,171 3,195 3,126 2,842 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 15% 16% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 9% 15% 15% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 87% 78% 80% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,873 2,873 2,673 2,443 11,862 %Latino est. 6% 9% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 14% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 89% 88% 79% 81% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,191 2,279 1,971 1,812 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% %NH White est. 91% 88% 83% 84% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,551 4,499 4,603 4,487 18,140 age0-19 19% 22% 22% 24% 22% Age age20-60 46% 46% 48% 55% 49% age60plus 35% 32% 29% 21% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 79% 60% 57% 65% english 91% 91% 87% 82% 88% spanish 3% 0% 8% 12% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 5% 7% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 4% 6% 4% hs-grad 42% 53% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 26% 22% 21% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 12% 10% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 22% 27% 30% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 61% 61% 62% 58% income 0-25k 14% 12% 19% 13% 14% income 25-50k 8% 18% 21% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 16% 22% 16% income 75-200k 54% 46% 40% 46% 46% income 200k-plus 13% 8% 5% 4% 8% single family 95% 93% 70% 77% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 30% 23% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 32% 49% 37% 33% owned 86% 68% 51% 63% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 161 of 340 02/10/2022 14:30 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toan 106 District Elections �°`�s 9 -0 Not Population Balanced u, ro lir rofi C 1 ‹,ro 227 \_ 21 James Way 27 °� ° 4b �' 7**** ,'"i;\ Orae U ar -$-" ‘,m N'6 1 #' 4' , HuaSt Rd -- *� O1� �/ Montego St rt,,, Sti fi IIII co sO cP E Grand Ave o �� ° �' f �.' o. a,ae ,`'4, 2. y Cs� '>-<e' O * 0 Maple St �� '-P (se O,�b �C✓$ cx - Cl) Ash St i� to C �o' a st�llo 1/ O 1 R Fair Oaks Ave Farroll Ave .":?,i- i, 4 t 4a o The Pike 9-- Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 4* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Phi/RPEF 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 106 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,115 4,240 4,193 4,921 18,469 Deviation from ideal 498 -377 -424 304 922 %Deviation 10.79% -8.17% -9.18% 6.58% 19.97% %Hisp 15.2% 14% 28% 23% 20% %NH White 72% 76% 59% 67% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,872 3,428 2,957 3,888 14,144 %Hisp 10% 10% 19% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 81% 83% 73% 78% 79% %NH Black 3% 0% 0% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 5% 4% 6% 5% Total 3,865 3,493 2,581 3,395 13,334 %Latino est. 9% 7% 17% 14% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 9% 7% 16% 13% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 89% 80% 83% 84% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,489 3,209 2,169 2,995 11,862 %Latino est. 9% 7% 15% 13% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 9% 7% 14% 12% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 88% 81% 84% 85% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 2,826 2,538 1,569 2,320 9,253 %Latino est. 8% 6% 12% 10% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 6% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 87% 90% 84% 86% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,626 4,453 4,225 4,836 18,140 age0-19 15% 26% 25% 21% 22% Age age20-60 44% 51% 51% 50% 49% age60plus 41% 24% 24% 28% 29% immigrants 9% 6% 10% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 66% 71% 57% 67% 65% english 90% 90% 82% 87% 88% spanish 3% 1% 14% 6% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% other fang 3% 7% 2% 4% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 6% 4% 4% hs-grad 44% 46% 46% 54% 48% Education bachelor 24% 24% 21% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 16% 15% 12% 10% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 16% 27% 35% 25% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 61% 64% 58% 58% income 0-25k 20% 9% 14% 12% 14% income25-50k 14% 11% 19% 17% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 19% 19% 16% income 75-200k 44% 51% 44% 47% 46% income 200k-plus 8% 14% 4% 4% 8% single family 81% 94% 73% 86% 84% multi-family 19% 6% 27% 14% 16% Housing Stats rented 28% 30% 47% 28% 33% owned 72% 70% 53% 72% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 163 of 340 02/10/2022 14:43 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to Plan 107 District Elections �o`�s -0 Not Population Balanced u, ro ro� Cl I ,�ro y2I 21 James War 27e C ob° �� c '4 - c' c� o C.) C) <,''''e'° ,�� Huasna Rd ,fib cP r101` -----/ Montego Str Sv fi '� co�� Sr ��cr C•7 (1' gyro �,'„ p FE Grand Ave o cyi -75 w 3 , �G 1 U Maple St �� °�� N. 0' SCS �� ry v, G y n Ash St 0 m c Fair Oaks Ave • �� ase..(//ov 101 of Farroll Ave /— i4 1 a 4iii The Pike Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 1* -Leanna Dr ` 2022: Districts 3 & 4 — 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PagAilqzAuV40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 107 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,943 4,126 4,666 4,734 18,469 Deviation from ideal 326 -491 49 117 817 Deviation 7.06% -10.63% 1.06% 2.53% 17.70% %Hisp 11.5% 17% t 26% 25% 20% %NH White 77% 72% 62% 64% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,647 3,741 3,293 3,464 14,144 %Hisp 8% 13% 17% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 80% 71% 77% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 6% 5% Total 4,102 3,251 1 2,985 2,996 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 9% 15% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 86% 77% 81% 84% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,809 2,920 l 2,553 2,580 11,862 %Latino est. 6% 9% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 9% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 86% 79% 82% 85% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,135 2,278 1,886 1,954 9,253 Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 91% 87% 83% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,522 4,637 4,407 4,575 18,140 age0-19 19% 22% 23% 23% 22% Age age20-60 46% 46% 47% 56% 49% age60plus 35% 32% 30% 21% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 79% 57% 59% 65% english 91% 91% 85% 84% 88% spanish 3% 0% 10% 10% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 5% 6% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 4% 5% 4% hs-grad 42% 53% 45% 51% 48% Education bachelor 26% 22% 21% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 22% 28% 29% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 61% 60% 62% 58% income 0-25k 14% 12% 18% 13% 14% income 25-50k 8% 18% 22% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 16% 21% 16% income 75-200k 54% 46% 38% 47% 46% income 200k-plus 13% 8% 5% 4% 8% single family 95% 93% 68% 78% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 32% 22% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 31% 51% 36% 33% owned 86% 69% 49% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 165 of 340 02/10/2022 14:47 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to Plan District Elections �°`�s <, Not Population Balanced e, 4. Ciro I �ro1227, 21 James Way °'. C u �� °cb �ro o ar 4°� -ao C)°� °,be° ,�� Huasna Rd r101 Montego St�� B�a�ch �c�5 crofic co�� t ��1c2 ��o' I �J off/ �s �a g e��42, `, I �� r Jo ,e 2 Maple St 7' 4cr (.=,3� Ash St■ i� 9� m o' a� o �103 c4), Fair Oaks Ave s� oel Farroll Ave F 1 � 1 4 The Pike d Sunrise Dr-� ProposedElection Sequence: liLeanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Phi/N_P 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 108 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,405 4,849 4,243 4,972 18,469 Deviation from ideal -212 232 -374 355 729 %Deviation -4.59% 5.02% -8.10% 7.69% 15.79% %Hisp 10.7% 15% t 27% 26% 20% %NH White 79% 73% 61% 62% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,300 4,150 2,987 3,707 14,144 %Hisp 7% 11% 19% 15% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 81% 71% 76% 79% %NH Black 0% 2% 1% 2% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,670 3,897 2,551 3,216 13,334 %Latino est. 6% 9% 18% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 9% 17% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 91% 84% 78% 81% 84% %NH Black 0% 2% 1% 1% 1% Total 3,411 3,524 2,172 2,755 11,862 %Latino est. 6% 9% 17% 13% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 9% 16% 12% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 91% 84% 79% 82% 85% %NH Black 0% 2% 1% 1% 1% Total 2,792 2,795 1,576 2,090 9,253 %Latino est. 5% 8% 12% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 5% 8% 12% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 92% 86% 84% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 2% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,187 5,056 4,206 4,691 18,140 age0-19 23% 18% 27% 20% 22% Age age20-60 45% 46% 51% 54% 49% age60plus 32% 36% 22% 26% 29% immigrants 7% 7% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 72% 57% 62% 65% english 91% 90% 85% 84% 88% spanish 2% 2% 9% 11% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 3% 3% 2% other fang 6% 5% 2% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 4% 3% 5% 4% 4% hs-grad 41% 52% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 27% 21% 19% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 17% 13% 13% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 26% 18% 35% 24% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 57% 53% 64% 61% 58% income0-25k 9% 17% 11% 19% 14% income 25-50k 9% 18% 20% 14% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 16% 12% 20% 18% 16% income 75-200k 52% 44% 45% 44% 46% income 200k-plus 14% 9% 3% 4% 8% single family 97% 87% 74% 76% 84% multi-family 3% 13% 26% 24% 16% Housing Stats rented 22% 27% 49% 36% 33% owned 78% 73% 51% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 167 of 340 02/10/2022 14:53 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to Plan 110 District Elections �o`�s '% Not Population Balanced u, 4. efi 1 , 227/ 21 James War e \c,,o ,0 0 u ,0 �" ^a ao q� obe° ,�� Huasna Rd E Grand Ave o (101 Montego St -----/-----/ �B Sti Nt\ c',�� x ("'> p IP ��y� ,' a cip' 3 c, U �� c'. . O UMaple St �� 2.. o° .�O�k ,��4,� s ' ' i % ,C-c-' y cn Ash St Q� i� m ''f' R 9' Cas �, 101 Fair Oaks Ave s X of Farroll Ave F , 4 � , a The Pike 9-• Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 14 Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Phi/ULSP 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 110 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,978 3,761 4,996 4,734 18,469 Deviation from ideal 361 -856 379 117 1,235 %Deviation 7.82% -18.54% 8.21% 2.53% 26.75% %Hisp 11.6% 17% 25% 25% 20% %NH White 76% 74% 62% 64% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,672 3,505 3,503 3,464 14,144 %Hisp 8% 13% 17% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 80% 72% 77% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 6% 5% Total 4,171 2,977 3,190 2,996 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 9% 15% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 87% 77% 81% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,873 2,678 2,731 2,580 11,862 %Latino est. 6% 9% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 88% 78% 82% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,191 2,099 2,009 1,954 9,253 Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 91% 88% 83% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,551 4,282 4,732 4,575 18,140 age0-19 19% 22% 23% 23% 22% Age age20-60 46% 46% 48% 56% 49% age60plus 35% 32% 29% 21% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 79% 58% 59% 65% english 91% 91% 86% 84% 88% spanish 3% 0% 10% 10% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 5% 7% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 4% 5% 4% hs-grad 42% 53% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 26% 22% 21% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 22% 27% 29% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 60% 60% 62% 58% income0-25k 14% 11% 18% 13% 14% income 25-50k 8% 18% 22% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 16% 21% 16% income 75-200k 54% 45% 39% 47% 46% income 200k-plus 13% 8% 5% 4% 8% single family 95% 93% 69% 78% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 31% 22% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 32% 50% 36% 33% owned 86% 68% 50% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 169 of 340 02/11/2022 11:15 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to .,z, Plan District Elections °`�S 'o Not Population Balanced u, efi Ciro I , \_ I 21 James War e ° �� ob° ��ro o ar -,ate I°C°� qv be° ti� Huasna Ra fi (1 Montego St - ' 1B S� 1. cP �� cop E Grand Ave o -c, T*7o �y��' 3 2 .t °� y �ca� �<e O o Maple St �� 'iT ,se ��0r� �o-Q '� G �a C4' y cn Ash St �� 0 m ,,,c, Ca ego R �, 1011 N— Fair Oaks Ave s cn of Farroll Ave E , . 4 ° e a Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: pi The Pike d 14. Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pa9A17 7Xu9EF40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 111 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,978 4,091 4,489 4,911 18,469 Deviation from ideal 361 -526 -128 294 887 %Deviation 7.82% -11.39% -2.77% 6.37% 19.21% %Hisp 11.6% 17% 25% 25% 20% %NH White 76% 73% 63% 63% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,672 3,716 3,144 3,613 14,144 %Hisp 8% 13% 17% 14% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 80% 70% 78% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 4% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 4,171 3,182 2,823 3,158 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 10% 16% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 9% 15% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 86% 77% 82% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,873 2,856 2,429 2,704 11,862 %Latino est. 6% 9% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 9% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 78% 83% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,191 2,222 1,801 2,039 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 91% 88% 82% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,551 4,608 4,228 4,753 18,140 age0-19 19% 22% 24% 22% 22% Age age20-60 46% 46% 48% 55% 49% age60plus 35% 32% 28% 23% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 79% 57% 59% 65% english 91% 91% 86% 83% 88% spanish 3% 0% 9% 11% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 5% 3% 2% other lang 5% 6% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 4% 5% 4% hs-grad 42% 53% 45% 51% 48% Education bachelor 26% 22% 21% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 13% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 22% 28% 28% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 61% 61% 62% 58% income 0-25k 14% 12% 17% 15% 14% income 25-50k 8% 18% 22% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 17% 20% 16% income 75-200k 54% 46% 39% 46% 46% income 200k-plus 13% 8% 5% 4% 8% single family 95% 93% 68% 77% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 32% 23% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 32% 51% 36% 33% owned 86% 68% 49% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " 'qa, age 171 of 340 02/11/2022 11:21 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to .,� Plan 112 District Elections �o`,s „ -0 Not Population Balanced u, �ro ro ro� C 1 ~ro C2-2. 7/ 21 James War e cv ob° o q� ieo ,_,'b9'b ,S,`1' �� Huasna Rd 101 `4 Montego St�� Branch �c�5� �rofic St S �e r E Grand AveMij p o ��y��' r 0 � 2 r mecca c, p hti¢ n� P- 0 Maple St �� °�� O`?) �o�� 2' cn y cn Ash St 0 m c llille a� Fair Oaks Ave S.t74oQ, 1011 of Farroll Ave E , i 4 1 e a 4ii, The Pike 9-- <,,:, Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 1* Leanna Dr ' - 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Phi iii 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 112 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,078 4,596 4,497 4,298 18,469 Deviation from ideal 461 -21 -120 -319 780 %Deviation 9.98% -0.45% -2.60% -6.91% 16.89% %Hisp 15.7% 14% 26% 25% 20% %NH White 71% 77% 63% 64% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,795 4,033 3,164 3,152 14,144 %Hisp 12% 10% 17% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 82% 83% 71% 78% 79% %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 3% 5% 6% 6% 5% Total 3,958 3,755 2,745 2,876 13,334 %Latino est. 9% 8% 17% 14% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 9% 7% 16% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 89% 77% 82% 84% %NH Black 1% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,585 3,447 2,361 2,469 11,862 %Latino est. 8% 7% 16% 13% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 8% 7% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 86% 90% 78% 83% 85% %NH Black 1% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 2,867 2,768 1,729 1,889 9,253 %Latino est. 7% 7% 12% 10% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 1% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 88% 90% 82% 86% 87% %NH Black est. 1% 0% 2% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,666 5,088 4,318 4,067 18,140 age0-19 16% 24% 25% 22% 22% Age age20-60 48% 44% 49% 56% 49% age60plus 36% 31% 27% 22% 29% immigrants 8% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 71% 75% 57% 60% 65% english 90% 91% 85% 83% 88% spanish 4% 1% 9% 11% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 5% 6% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% hs-grad 45% 49% 46% 52% 48% Education bachelor 23% 24% 20% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 16% 13% 13% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 19% 25% 30% 27% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 52% 59% 61% 62% 58% income 0-25k 18% 9% 16% 15% 14% income 25-50k 10% 17% 22% 14% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 14% 15% 17% 21% 16% income 75-200k 50% 47% 41% 46% 46% income 200k-plus 9% 12% 5% 4% 8% single family 90% 95% 70% 77% 84% multi-family 10% 5% 30% 23% 16% Housing Stats rented 20% 28% 51% 36% 33% owned 80% 72% 49% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Ra'! age 173 of 340 02/11/2022 11:28 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toan 113 District Elections �°`,s „ '<, Not Population Balanced u, 4 �ro ro fi CYro 1 ~ro 227/ 21 James War cv cb° �� o (5 q� °mac ° ,S�� luasna Rd 101 Montego St-,--' 1B S� �I, (D'C'' �co�� ra�Z Sr V:C)C' `9 T*7 �� gyro +0 �� p E Grand Ave o c ��' a Cr tea. J �0 U Maple St 2. ,6°� ,c,,O``� )I-‘t� y Ash St m tCa��o d 101 �— Fair Oaks Ave s cn of Farroll Ave F � � n l p ° r a ii The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: IN Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pa9A1/YL,P 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 113 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,804 4,173 4,455 5,037 18,469 Deviation from ideal 187 -444 -162 420 864 %Deviation 4.05% -9.62% -3.51% 9.10% 18.71% %Hisp 11.6% 16% 26% 26% 20% %NH White 77% 73% 63% 63% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,570 3,706 3,138 3,730 14,144 %Hisp 8% 12% 18% 14% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 86% 81% 72% 76% 79% %NH Black 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,973 3,335 2,754 3,272 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 17% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 8% 16% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 79% 80% 84% %NH Black 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% Total 3,678 3,025 2,354 2,805 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 8% 16% 13% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 15% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 90% 86% 80% 81% 85% %NH Black 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% Total 3,030 2,381 1,728 2,114 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 8% 12% 10% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 12% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 1% 2% 1% %NH White est. 90% 88% 84% 84% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 1% 1% 2% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,389 4,648 4,397 4,705 18,140 age0-19 18% 22% 26% 20% 22% Age age20-60 45% 46% 51% 54% 49% age60plus 37% 32% 23% 27% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 69% 78% 57% 61% 65% english 91% 91% 86% 84% 88% spanish 3% 1% 9% 11% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 3% 3% 2% other fang 5% 7% 2% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% hs-grad 42% 52% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 26% 22% 19% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 13% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 22% 23% 33% 24% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 60% 63% 60% 58% income0-25k 15% 11% 12% 19% 14% income 25-50k 9% 17% 21% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 19% 18% 16% income 75-200k 52% 46% 44% 43% 46% income 200k-plus 13% 9% 4% 5% 8% single family 93% 94% 73% 75% 84% multi-family 7% 6% 27% 25% 16% Housing Stats rented 16% 30% 49% 37% 33% owned 84% 70% 51% 63% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 175 of 340 02/11/2022 11:34 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toan 114 District Elections �o`,s 9 '<, Not Population Balanced u, �ro ro ro� C 1 ~ro 227/ 21 James Way o' c0�'kro� o C o , b e, q� owe° ,-� ivasna Rd b. r� 101 Montego Sty- ' 'Br Sti�I, fie ��o�� ani Sr ��c9 s o C•7 gyro ��'� x s lall 1 ° s �� E Grand Aveiii �cy� c"5 immommi7 �� =� ��a�d� ��e �o U Maple St l <Se s,,c,0r� % W 'Its cn Ash St 0 m c '7-9• c a��o d 101 ir R Fair Oaks Ave s cn of Farroll Ave F F -,,.. 4 � 1, C a 4iii The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 1* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PagAi 7 N_P 4o National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 114 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,069 4,134 4,636 4,630 18,469 Deviation from ideal 452 -483 19 13 935 %Deviation 9.79% -10.46% 0.41% 0.28% 20.25% %Hisp 11.8% 17% 25% 26% 20% %NH White 76% 74% 63% 62% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,796 3,758 3,271 3,319 14,144 %Hisp 8% 13% 17% 14% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 88% 80% 71% 75% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 3% 5% 6% 6% 5% Total 4,220 3,234 3,038 2,842 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 16% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 9% 15% 15% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 87% 77% 80% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,913 2,893 I 2,613 2,443 11,862 %Latino est. 6% 9% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 9% 14% 14% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 90% 87% 78% 81% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,235 2,259 1,947 1,812 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 91% 89% 82% 84% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,743 4,555 4,355 4,487 18,140 age0-19 20% 21% 22% 24% 22% Age age20-60 45% 48% 48% 55% 49% age60plus 35% 31% 30% 21% 29% immigrants 7% 7% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 80% 58% 57% 65% english 92% 90% 86% 82% 88% spanish 3% 1% 9% 12% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 4% 7% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 4% 6% 4% hs-grad 40% 55% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 27% 20% 21% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 10% 12% 10% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 24% 20% 27% 30% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 53% 60% 60% 62% 58% income 0-25k 12% 14% 18% 13% 14% income 25-50k 8% 17% 22% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 11% 18% 16% 22% 16% income 75-200k 55% 45% 39% 46% 46% income 200k-plus 14% 6% 5% 4% 8% single family 96% 92% 69% 77% 84% multi-family 4% 8% 31% 23% 16% Housing Stats rented 15% 32% 50% 37% 33% owned 85% 68% 50% 63% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 177 of 340 02/11/2022 11:41 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to E1an 115 District Elections �o`�s '% Not Population Balanced u, lam, �ro ,ro 1 , 227/ 21 James Way o'. 4� �roa a cbo o (5 q� o19° ,-� F uasna Rd r iot Montego St ��tt-B�a�z Sr ��c\\5� ��rofi� o *o '''9' S cP �e E Grand Ave �� ,' a e -� 3 G�� tiG 2 0 w d� C.2 .V2 t �� y �ca� �<e O * U Maple St �� :. °�� .�O,�b �`�� a A �`a G cx C4) 7 cn Ash St Q� 0 �' c �4� a eyo�, 1011 Fair Oaks Ave s ' cn of Farroll Ave F P H The Pike 9-- Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: IN Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pa9A1 7 719 4o National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 115 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,002 4,255 4,690 4,522 18,469 Deviation from ideal 385 -362 73 -95 747 Deviation 8.34% -7.84% 1.58% -2.06% 16.18% %Hisp 12.9% 13% 26% 28% 20% %NH White 75% 78% 63% 60% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,692 3,788 3,329 3,336 14,144 %Hisp 10% 9% 16% 17% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 82% 84% 72% 76% 79% %NH Black 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 5% 7% 3% 5% Total 4,001 3,521 3,018 2,794 13,334 %Latino est. 8% 7% 17% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 7% 16% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 89% 79% 81% 84% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 3,655 3,238I 2,587 2,382 11,862 %Latino est. 8% 7% 15% 13% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 8% 7% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 90% 80% 82% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 2,989 2,620 1,895 1,749 9,253 Latino est. 7% 7% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 6% 11% 11% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 88% 90% 84% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,416 4,741 4,532 4,451 18,140 age0-19 15% 25% 26% 20% 22% Age age20-60 45% 45% 56% 51% 49% age60plus 40% 31% 18% 29% 29% immigrants 9% 6% 10% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 65% 74% 58% 65% 65% english 89% 92% 84% 86% 88% spanish 4% 1% 10% 10% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% other lang 5% 6% 3% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 4% 4% hs-grad 45% 48% 48% 51% 48% Education bachelor 23% 24% 19% 21% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 17% 13% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 17% 25% 36% 24% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 48% 60% 65% 61% 58% income 0-25k 19% 9% 9% 20% 14% income 25-50k 13% 17% 17% 16% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 22% 16% 16% income 75-200k 45% 48% 49% 43% 46% income 200k-plus 10% 12% 2% 5% 8% single family 84% 95% 76% 78% 84% multi-family 16% 5% 24% 22% 16% Housing Stats rented 24% 28% 45% 37% 33% owned 76% 72% 55% 63% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 179 of 340 02/11/2022 11:46 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toan 116 District Elections ..,,c,,,,, „ _ 'o \ot Population Balanced u, �ro ro , ' CYro 1 ~ro 227 21 James War e C L) �� cb0 ��ro o "b ., (5 9c o�c° ,S�� 1luasna RdOIJ (1010 Montego St - i 1Br Sti fic II e, .1.'() Sr �4��c� o 'p, �C� L �_� o S ��e r ViCJlS�S- o �c.,0 'U G�� ✓ �G w C1, n ct �c� 6i°''� 'Z'c-<e O o 3 Maple St f. (s �O,Nk o��, �� cn Ash St Q� 0 tri `(°J �'� a e�o d 101 Fair Oaks Ave s of Farroll Ave F , o 4. r o The Pike it d Sunrise Dr ProposedElection Sequence: li Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pa9A1 7§Xu9 4o National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 116 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,150 3,910 4,737 4,672 18,469 Deviation from ideal 533 -707 120 55 1,240 %Deviation 11.54% -15.31% 2.60% 1.19% 26.86% %Hisp 14.8% 12% 27% 25% 20% %NH White 74% 79% 62% 62% 69% Total Pop - %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 6% 5% Total 3,697 3,533 3,275 3,640 14,144 %Hisp 10% 8% 15% 18% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 83% 86% 73% 74% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 1% 3% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 5% 7% 4% 5% Total 3,935 3,240 2,980 3,179 13,334 %Latino est. 8% 8% 17% 13% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 8% 16% 13% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 88% 89% 79% 80% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 1% 3% 1% Total 3,596 2,970 2,562 2,734 11,862 %Latino est. 8% 7% 15% 12% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 8% 7% 15% 12% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 88% 89% 80% 79% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 1% 3% 1% Total 2,955 2,389 1,871 2,038 9,253 %Latino est. 7% 7% 11% 10% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 90% 84% 83% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 0% 1% 3% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,594 4,423 4,481 4,642 18,140 age0-19 17% 24% 26% 21% 22% Age age20-60 45% 43% 57% 50% 49% age60plus 38% 32% 18% 29% 29% immigrants 8% 6% 10% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 65% 75% 57% 66% 65% english 89% 92% 83% 87% 88% spanish 4% 0% 11% 8% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 3% 2% 4% 2% 2% other fang 4% 6% 3% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 6% 4% 4% hs-grad 44% 49% 49% 50% 48% Education bachelor 24% 24% 18% 21% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 18% 13% 11% 10% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 19% 25% 34% 24% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 50% 59% 65% 60% 58% income 0-25k 17% 9% 8% 22% 14% income 25-50k 12% 17% 16% 17% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 23% 14% 16% income 75-200k 47% 47% 49% 42% 46% income 200k-plus 10% 12% 3% 5% 8% single family 85% 95% 75% 79% 84% multi-family 15% 5% 25% 21% 16% Housing Stats rented 24% 29% 43% 37% 33% owned 76% 71% 57% 63% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " 'qa, age 181 of 340 02/11/2022 11:51 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to Plan District Elections �o`�S -0 Not Population Balanced u, �ro ro rofi C� 1 , 227/ 21 James War o f cb° o q� 2c ,S,`1' �� Huasna Rd 101 t, Montego St --- Br S� c, cs fi F cogs 7 Sr ��'''cb cP* '''9' gyro S cP E Grand Ave I. oi. c0 ru Cs '� O if ' ,c'� o"ti e 0 & �� O IL U Maple St °`�� Ori �cs 7, � �ry G 7 cn Ash St 1 m c 4' �� a��o d 101 Fair Oaks Ave s '01A_ Farroll Ave FP ___ 1 4 000 a Alb The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 1* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pa9Ai7 P4o National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 501 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,830 4,239 o 4,408 4,992 18,469 Deviation from ideal 213 -378 -209 375 753 %Deviation 4.61% -8.19% -4.53% 8.12% 16.31% %Hisp 11.9% 17% 25% 26% 20% %NH White 76% 73% 63% 63% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% — Total 3,633 3,755 3,124 3,633 14,144 %Hisp 8% 14% 17% 14% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 88% 80% 71% 77% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 2% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 4,088 3,265 t 2,785 3,196 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 9% 15% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 77% 81% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,796 2,933 I 2,397 2,736 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 8% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 78% 82% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,145 2,268 1,765 2,075 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% %NH White est. 90% 89% 82% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 0% 2% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,508 4,651 4,233 4,748 18,140 age0-19 20% 21% 25% 21% 22% Age age20-60 45% 48% 50% 54% 49% age60plus 36% 31% 25% 25% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 79% 57% 59% 65% english 92% 90% 86% 83% 88% spanish 3% 1% 8% 12% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other lang 5% 7% 2% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% hs-grad 40% 55% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 27% 20% 20% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 13% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 24% 21% 31% 26% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 52% 59% 62% 61% 58% income 0-25k 13% 13% 14% 18% 14% income 25-50k 8% 17% 22% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 11% 18% 18% 19% 16% income 75-200k 54% 45% 42% 43% 46% income 200k-plus 14% 7% 4% 5% 8% single family 95% 93% 71% 75% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 29% 25% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 31% 50% 37% 33% owned 86% 69% 50% 63% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 183 of 340 02/07/2022 22:21 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to Plan 502 District Elections �o`�s '% Not Population Balanced 4. �ro Not Contiguous ,ro Ciro I ~ro 7Z 21 James Way 27 o'. coo u -4' �c' v o 2, �, k- Coy �� be° ti� Huasna Ra �° ,fib (1 101 Montego St - ! �"T S� fic cs cc'' ro o�, �7 Sr ,�cp �a �� cls �e E Grand Ave o ��y��' 3 �.L p. ��G7di 2 c.5 Maple St °� ' c0`�� CS 4 � G �0, cn Ash St rt a, 0 m ca 4' �.. 'o, e..00 (101i 1011 �� Fair Oaks Ave s of Farroll Ave F , 4 c _ VII �� I The Pike Sunrise Dr d Proposed Election Sequence: l -Leanna 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pa9A1/§4aV40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 502 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,461 3,763 1 4,390 4,855 18,469 Deviation from ideal 844 -854 -227 238 1,698 Deviation 18.28% -18.50% -4.92% 5.15% 36.78% %Hisp 14.0% 14% 29% 22% 20% %NH White 73% 76% 59% 67% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 5% 5% 5% - Total 4,020 3,220 3,142 3,762 14,144 %Hisp 9% 10% 21% 12% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 82% 82% 71% 81% 79% %NH Black 3% 1% 1% 0% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 6% 4% 5% 5% Total 4,253 3,045 2,625 3,411 13,334 %Latino est. 9% 7% 19% 12% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 9% 7% 18% 11% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 89% 78% 85% 84% %NH Black 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,865 2,781 2,212 3,004 11,862 %Latino est. 9% 7% 17% 11% 10% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 7% 16% 11% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 84% 89% 79% 85% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,133 2,207 1,569 2,344 9,253 %Latino est. 8% 6% 13% 9% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 6% 12% 9% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 87% 90% 83% 88% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 0% 0% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,847 4,148 4,549 4,597 18,140 age0-19 15% 26% 27% 19% 22% Age age20-60 45% 48% 51% 52% 49% age60plus 40% 26% 21% 29% 29% immigrants 9% 6% 10% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 65% 72% 57% 68% 65% english 89% 91% 84% 87% 88% spanish 4% 1% 12% 8% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% other fang 4% 6% 3% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well 3% 5% 6% 3% 4% hs-grad 45% 46% 46% 54% 48% Education bachelor 23% 25% 20% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 16% 14% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 17% 27% 38% 23% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 49% 62% 65% 59% 58% income 0-25k 20% 8% 11% 16% 14% income 25-50k 13% 13% 19% 16% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 20% 18% 16% income 75-200k 44% 50% 46% 45% 46% income 200k-plus 10% 13% 3% 4% 8% single family 82% 94% 76% 84% 84% multi-family 18% 6% 24% 16% 16% Housing Stats rented 26% 32% 47% 29% 33% owned 74% 68% 53% 71% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 185 of 340 02/07/2022 22:20 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to Plan District Elections �°`�s '% Not Population Balanced u, CJ 227; 27 James War 27e 4b ob° �� ° 0 2,I # qv °,be° ,S,`1" ivasna Rd 101 Montego St ' Branch S �c�, p O 15,5, °4-e" Z t ��'c �'� ��Sc p E Grand Ave e ,,.,, ' ' c.N.... ./,,q7 , se o c.0 p r� 2 o Maple St �� °�� O�b SCS 1 Cl) Ash St m Ir. Fair Oaks AveAvg ase 0). "0 1011 Cie I 0.111 f Farroll Ave E � -140. i 4 1 e a Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: gbh The Pike Q 1* Leanna Dr i 7" 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pa9Ai 7 N_PEF4o National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 503 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,054 4,596 4,247 4,572 18,469 Deviation from ideal 437 -21 -370 -45 807 %Deviation 9.47% -0.45% -8.01% -0.97% 17.48% %Hisp 13.7% 14% I 27% 26% 20% %NH White 73% 77% 61% 63% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 5% 5% — Total 3,770 4,033 2,993 3,348 14,144 %Hisp 10% 10% 19% 14% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 83% 83% 71% 77% 79% %NH Black 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 5% 5% 5% Total 4,078 3,755 2,490 3,011 13,334 %Latino est. 8% 8% 18% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 7% 16% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 89% 78% 82% 84% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 3,717 3,447 2,118 2,580 11,862 %Latino est. 8% 7% 16% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 8% 7% 15% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 85% 90% 80% 83% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 2,985 2,768 1,552 1,948 9,253 Latino est. 7% 7% 12% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 87% 90% 84% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 0% 1% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,533 5,088 4,203 4,316 18,140 age0-19 15% 24% 26% 21% 22% Age age20-60 46% 44% 50% 56% 49% age60plus 38% 31% 24% 24% 29% immigrants 8% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 69% 75% 57% 61% 65% english 90% 91% 85% 84% 88% spanish 4% 1% 10% 11% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% other lang 5% 6% 2% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% hs-grad 45% 49% 46% 52% 48% Education bachelor 23% 24% 20% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 17% 13% 13% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 18% 25% 34% 26% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 50% 59% 63% 62% 58% income 0-25k 19% 9% 13% 17% 14% income 25-50k 11% 17% 21% 14% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 19% 20% 16% income 75-200k 47% 47% 44% 46% 46% income 200k-plus 9% 12% 4% 4% 8% single family 86% 95% t 73% 77% 84% multi-family 14% 5% 27% 23% 16% Housing Stats rented 22% 28% 49% 35% 33% owned 78% 72% 51% 65% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 187 of 340 02/07/2022 22:19 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toa District Elections �o`,s „ -0 Not Population Balanced u, ro b CY 1 227; 21 James Way 27 o'. 4� roe cY,o �� u 0 "S q� J/ beo ti' Huasna Rd rlol� Montego St -------/ B1. Sti fic, SGog� ani Sr ��,cY' s Cep. gyro PI p cP E Grand Ave o c<6 75 3 c ��4. 2 ' �� IL U Maple St '. ,s O�� o�� 1� �ry C„ G 9 cn Ash St i� m 41 �� c a 1011 � Fair Oaks Ave s ' A Farroll Ave F el m ., 4 00 pi The Pike Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 1* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pa9A17§ _PEF4o National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 504 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,039 3,654 5,199 4,577 18,469 Deviation from ideal 422 -963 582 -40 1,545 %Deviation 9.14% -20.86% 12.61% -0.87% 33.46% %Hisp 11.6% 16% 26% 25% 20% %NH White 77% 74% 62% 64% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,705 3,360 3,720 3,359 14,144 %Hisp 8% 12% 18% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 81% 71% 78% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 5% 6% 5% Total 4,209 2,893 3,318 2,914 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 9% 15% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 87% 78% 81% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,907 2,615 I 2,830 2,510 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 8% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 79% 82% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,228 2,041 2,088 1,896 9,253 Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 91% 88% 83% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,601 4,185 4,953 4,402 18,140 age0-19 19% 22% 23% 23% 22% Age age20-60 46% 45% 48% 56% 49% age60plus 35% 33% 29% 21% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 79% 58% 59% 65% english 90% 91% 86% 84% 88% spanish 3% 0% 10% 10% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 5% 7% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 4% 5% 4% hs-grad 42% 53% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 25% 22% 21% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 22% 27% 29% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 60% 61% 62% 58% income0-25k 14% 11% 19% 13% 14% income 25-50k 8% 18% 21% 14% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 16% 22% 16% income 75-200k 54% 45% 39% 48% 46% income 200k-plus 14% 8% 5% 3% 8% single family 95% 93% 70% 78% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 30% 22% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 32% 49% 36% 33% owned 86% 68% 51% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 189 of 340 02/07/2022 22:19 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toPlan 506 ,.. District Elections �o`�s -0 Not Population Balanced u, 4. 'bro 4' firo Ciro 1 .ro I 21 James Way ^a e coo � u <,C''° 'S�� 1luasna Rd ,fi4 .9 b Montego Str--1°- 1B S� fi �Sco�� a�z Sr ��,��r �4_,,j, ,z, o � �� -e x E Grand Ave c �p �' Il o Maple St 7 'P. (se �O"b C✓1�� cx X' y cn Ash St 0 toC RFair Oaks Ave �o• as,,Io 01 Farroll Ave E P ,i, V4 a The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: le Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PagAi 7 NtPEF4o National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 506 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,299 4,262 4,249 4,659 18,469 Deviation from ideal 682 -355 -368 42 1,050 %Deviation 14.77% -7.69% -7.97% 0.91% 22.74% %Hisp 16.2% 14% 27% 22% 20% %NH White 71% 76% 61% 67% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 5% 5% 5% - Total 3,904 3,457 3,181 3,602 14,144 %Hisp 10% 10% 20% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 81% 82% 73% 80% 79% %NH Black 3% 1% 1% 0% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 5% 4% 6% 5% Total 4,016 3,504 2,508 3,306 13,334 %Latino est. 10% 8% 19% 12% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 9% 7% 17% 11% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% %NH White est. 84% 88% 78% 84% 84% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,622 3,212 2,092 2,936 11,862 %Latino est. 9% 7% 16% 11% 10% %Spanish-Sumamed 9% 7% 15% 11% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 88% 80% 85% 85% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 2,911 2,561 1,487 2,294 9,253 %Latino est. 8% 6% 14% 9% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 6% 13% 9% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 87% 89% 83% 87% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 1% 0% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,778 4,464 G 4,504 4,394 18,140 age0-19 16% 26% 27% 18% 22% Age age20-60 44% 51% 50% 51% 49% age60plus 40% 24% 23% 31% 29% immigrants 9% 6% 9% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 64% 70% 57% 70% 65% english 89% 90% 84% 88% 88% spanish 5% 1% 12% 6% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 4% 2% 1% 3% 2% other fang 3% 7% 3% 4% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 5% 6% 3% 4% hs-grad 43% 47% 47% 55% 48% Education bachelor 24% 24% 20% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 16% 15% 11% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 18% 28% 36% 21% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 52% 61% 64% 58% 58% income 0-25k 19% 9% 13% 15% 14% income25-50k 15% 11% 19% 16% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 14% 15% 19% 18% 16% income 75-200k 44% 50% 44% 46% 46% income 200k-plus 8% 14% 4% 4% 8% single family 79% 94% 77% 86% 84% multi-family 21% 6% 23% 14% 16% Housing Stats rented 31% 30% 44% 27% 33% owned 69% 70% 56% 73% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Ra'! age 191 of 340 02/07/2022 22:17 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toan 507 District Elections ..,,c,,,,, „ -0 N of Population Balanced u, �ro ro ro� U 1 �ro 21 James War o 4� U. cv cb° �� o �o� Ooh C% obex ,�� HuaSt Rd r101� Montego St�� Branch �c �5T trofic S PI .,,,c, p oT ��cP E Grand Ave o eciS p Ccip' ' U2 c ,c'� �, Cys° <c O ? P- C5 Maple St 7 I. Ne O�� o�� ry V, G y cn Ash St 0 m c Fair Oaks Ave �� ase CoQ, 101, of Farroll Ave E � . 4 a Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: pi The Pike Q 14. Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PagAi 7NaV4o National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 507 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,039 4,030 4,823 4,577 18,469 Deviation from ideal 422 -587 206 -40 1,009 %Deviation 9.14% -12.71% 4.46% -0.87% 21.85% %Hisp 11.6% 17% 26% 25% 20% %NH White 77% 72% 62% 64% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% - Total 3,705 3,682 3,398 3,359 14,144 %Hisp 8% 13% 17% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 80% 71% 78% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 6% 5% Total 4,209 3,144 3,067 2,914 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 9% 15% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 86% 78% 81% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,907 2,822 2,623 2,510 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 9% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 79% 82% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,228 2,185 1,944 1,896 9,253 Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 91% 88% 83% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,601 4,558 4,579 4,402 18,140 age0-19 19% 22% 23% 23% 22% Age age20-60 46% 46% 47% 56% 49% age60plus 35% 32% 30% 21% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 80% 57% 59% 65% english 90% 91% 85% 84% 88% spanish 3% 0% 10% 10% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 5% 6% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% hs-grad 42% 53% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 25% 22% 21% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 22% 28% 29% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 61% 60% 62% 58% income 0-25k 14% 12% 18% 13% 14% income 25-50k 8% 18% 22% 14% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 16% 22% 16% income 75-200k 54% 46% 38% 48% 46% income 200k-plus 14% 8% 5% 3% 8% single family 95% 93% 68% 78% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 32% 22% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 32% 51% 36% 33% owned 86% 68% 49% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 193 of 340 02/07/2022 22:16 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to Plan District Elections �°`�s -0 Not Population Balanced u, ro rofi Cl 227; 21 James War 27e 4bC °b° �� ° 0 fie° ,s.' Huasna RdJ ,fib 401: Montego Sty' �ranchS �°��I crofii 011111010L 4--e" 7, cP E Grand Ave o c.0 a -75 3 4 �, a '\Q (4 2 ,, J �° tie J L ,.,= Maple St �� 2.. °�� Cr' ��, 1;.' v: y cn Ash St Q„ i� tri c �� r� ae�od 101 Fair Oaks Avg s of 1 Farroll Ave FIlltil 4 o a The PikeSunrise Dr d Proposed Election Sequence: 1011 ' -Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 — 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PagAilki9U40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 508 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,245 4,041 1 4,227 4,956 18,469 Deviation from ideal 628 -576 -390 339 1204 %Deviation 13.60% -12.48% -8.45% 7.34% 26.08% %Hisp 13.1% 14% t 27% 26% 20% %NH White 74% 76% 61% 63% 69% Total Pop – %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% — Total 3,809 3,692 2,975 3,669 14,144 %Hisp 10% 10% 19% 15% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 82% 83% 71% 78% 79% %NH Black 3% 1% 1% 0% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 4,194 3,340 t 2,537 3,263 13,334 %Latino est. 8% 8% 18% 14% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 7% 17% 13% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 89% 78% 82% 84% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 3,835 3,064 t 2,156 2,807 11,862 %Latino est. 8% 7% 17% 13% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 8% 7% 16% 12% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 89% 79% 83% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 3,086 2,475 1,563 2,129 9,253 %Latino est. 7% 7% 12% 10% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 7% 12% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 88% 90% 83% 86% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 0% 1% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,628 4,633 4,198 4,681 18,140 age0-19 16% 25% 27% 20% 22% Age age20-60 47% 43% 51% 55% 49% age60plus 37% 32% 22% 25% 29% immigrants 8% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 68% 75% 57% 63% 65% english 89% 92% 86% 84% 88% spanish 4% 0% 9% 11% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% other fang 5% 6% 2% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 4% 4% hs-grad 45% 48% 46% 52% 48% Education bachelor 23% 25% 19% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 17% 13% 13% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 18% 25% 35% 25% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 49% 60% 64% 62% 58% income0-25k 18% 9% 11% 18% 14% income 25-50k 11% 17% 21% 14% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 20% 19% 16% income 75-200k 47% 47% 45% 45% 46% income 200k-plus 10% 12% 3% 4% 8% single family 87% 95% 74% 77% 84% multi-family 13% 5% 26% 23% 16% Housing Stats rented 21% 29% 49% 36% 33% owned 79% 71% 51% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 195 of 340 02/07/2022 22:15 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toPlan 509 ,.. District Elections �°`�s -„ Not Population Balanced T 4. e 4 CJ 227; 21 James Way 27 °'. 4b4� Owe cY,o u -� v o 2, I q� J °be° ti� Huasna Rd 101 'c'.' Montego St"- ' Br Sv fic, c�' ro oRP �� 7 Sr .c:c, Qa �c -?). X E Grand Ave o ��, �� G 3 °' - 2 L,'", CT) °" ase `i o Maple St 2. N°�� ,,,..,..co,�k �c,• �� U y cn Ash St 0 C R Fair Oaks Ave c`2 E. 01 • cn Q'el Farroll Ave F it at 04 The PikeSunrise Dr d Proposed Election Sequence: liLeanna D 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PagAi 7 N_PEF4o National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 509 District 1 2 3 4 1 Total Total Pop 5,131 4,154 4,390 4,794 18,469 Deviation from ideal 514 -463 -227 177 977 Deviation 11.13% -10.03% -4.92% 3.83% 21.16% %Hisp 13.4% 15% 29% 22% 20% %NH White 74% 74% 59% 67% 69% Total Pop — %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 5% 5% 5% 5% — Total 3,810 3,469 3,142 3,724 14,144 %Hisp 9% 11% 21% 12% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 82% 83% 71% 80% 79% %NH Black 3% 1% 1% 0% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 5% 4% 6% 5% Total 4,048 3,320 2,625 3,341 13,334 %Latino est. 9% 8% 19% 12% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 8% 18% 12% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 88% 78% 84% 84% %NH Black 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,687 3,020 2,212 2,943 11,862 %Latino est. 8% 7% 17% 11% 10% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 7% 16% 11% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 88% 79% 85% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,010 2,368 1,569 2,306 9,253 %Latino est. 7% 6% 13% 9% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 6% 12% 9% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 87% 90% 83% 87% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 0% 0% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,521 4,491 4,549 4,579 18,140 age0-19 15% 26% 27% 19% 22% Age age20-60 44% 50% 51% 50% 49% age60plus 41% 24% 21% 31% 29% immigrants 9% 6% 10% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 64% 73% 57% 67% 65% english 89% 92% 84% 86% 88% spanish 4% 1% 12% 8% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% other fang 4% 6% 3% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 6% 4% 4% hs-grad 44% 46% 46% 54% 48% Education bachelor 23% 25% 20% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 17% 13% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 17% 27% 38% 23% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 48% 64% 65% 57% 58% income0-25k 20% 10% 11% 15% 14% income 25-50k 13% 12% 19% 17% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 20% 18% 16% income 75-200k 44% 51% 46% 45% 46% income 200k-plus 10% 12% 3% 5% 8% single family 82% 93% 76% 84% 84% multi-family 18% 7% 24% 16% 16% Housing Stats rented 26% 33% 47% 28% 33% owned 74% 67% 53% 72% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 197 of 340 02/07/2022 22:14 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to Plan 510 District Elections ..,,°`-s '% Not Population Balanced u, CJ 227; 21 James War e 4b °b° ° 0 "S I # O('''' °,be° ,S,'''' ivast Rd (1 Montego St - ' 1- 13,..2_ S� �I, fi �co�� Z Sr �c ��c9 P �° gyro 5,. .e °fir �� E Grand Ave o �y��' o Maple St �� °�� 0�� acs 1 c.54 G �0' y Dip Ash St rt a� o m c tP R 4' �� a��°�, 101 Fair Oaks Ave c, cn l 111.111 pew,. Farroll Ave E P � i 4 1 t e a Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: tili The Pike Q 14rLenna Dr INV 2022: Districts 3 & 4 011114 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pa9A1/ _PEF 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 510 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,305 3,981 1 4,606 4,577 18,469 Deviation from ideal 688 -636 -11 -40 1,324 %Deviation 14.90% -13.78% -0.24% -0.87% 28.68% %Hisp 13.6% 13% 28% 25% 20% %NH White 74% 77% 60% 64% 69% Total Pop - %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% - Total 3,897 3,604 3,284 3,359 14,144 %Hisp 10% 9% 20% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 81% 85% 72% 78% 79% %NH Black 3% 0% 0% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 5% 6% 5% Total 4,209 3,325 I 2,886 2,914 13,334 %Latino est. 8% 8% 17% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 7% 16% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 89% 79% 81% 84% %NH Black 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,844 3,055I 2,453 2,510 11,862 %Latino est. 8% 7% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 8% 7% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 90% 81% 82% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,103 2,458 1,796 1,896 9,253 Latino est. 7% 7% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 7% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 88% 90% 85% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,714 4,547 4,477 4,402 18,140 age0-19 16% 25% 24% 23% 22% Age age20-60 47% 43% 50% 56% 49% age60plus 37% 33% 27% 21% 29% immigrants 8% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 68% 75% 61% 59% 65% english 89% 92% 86% 84% 88% spanish 4% 0% 10% 10% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% other lang 5% 6% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 4% 5% 4% hs-grad 46% 48% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 23% 25% 21% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 17% 13% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 18% 25% 30% 29% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 49% 60% 63% 62% 58% income 0-25k 18% 9% 17% 13% 14% income 25-50k 11% 18% 20% 14% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 17% 22% 16% income 75-200k 47% 47% 43% 48% 46% income 200k-plus 10% 12% 4% 3% 8% single family 87% 95% 73% 78% 84% multi-family 13% 5% 27% 22% 16% Housing Stats rented 21% 29% 48% 36% 33% owned 79% 71% 52% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 199 of 340 02/07/2022 22:14 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toan 513 District Elections �o`�s 9 -„ Not Population Balanced 4, 4. b ro� C� 1 ~ro 227 21 James Way 27 o'. U �o� o •• v O �� o7, �° �eio � H"asna Rd J r101� r j Montego St�� B _ c r eh Sr �� c�fi cP• E Grand Ave ■ o i' ��' a �� 2 3 � a� �<c' o U Maple St �� °�� \C'O. �`4', 1 ''''.Lc" C.1? y CLD Ash St �� c° m c Fair Oaks Ave �� ase• CoQ, 101 cn of Farroll Ave F P � � n l p C O H ,,._ Alb The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 1* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PagAin9u9U40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 513 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,823 4,041 1 4,714 4,891 18,469 Deviation from ideal 206 -576 97 274 850 %Deviation 4.46% -12.48% 2.10% 5.93% 18.41% %Hisp 11.5% 15% t 25% 27% 20% %NH White 77% 74% 63% 61% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% — Total 3,562 3,722 3,353 3,507 14,144 %Hisp 8% 12% 17% 16% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 82% 71% 76% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 4% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 3% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 4,004 3,288 2,954 3,088 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 16% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 8% 15% 15% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 87% 77% 80% 84% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,716 2,973 I 2,542 2,631 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 8% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 14% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 87% 78% 81% 85% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,081 2,353 1,873 1,946 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 7% 11% 11% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% %NH White est. 91% 88% 82% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 1% 3% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,423 4,533 4,500 4,684 18,140 age0-19 19% 22% 25% 21% 22% Age age20-60 46% 46% 49% 54% 49% age60plus 36% 32% 26% 24% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 79% 57% 60% 65% english 91% 91% 86% 83% 88% spanish 3% 1% 8% 12% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 5% 7% 2% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well 3% 4% 4% 5% 4% hs-grad 42% 53% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 26% 22% 20% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 13% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 22% 30% 26% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 60% 61% 61% 58% income 0-25k 13% 12% 15% 17% 14% income 25-50k 8% 18% 22% 14% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 18% 19% 16% income 75-200k 54% 46% 41% 45% 46% income 200k-plus 13% 8% 4% 4% 8% single family 95% 93% 70% 76% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 30% 24% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 31% 50% 36% 33% owned 86% 69% 50% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Ra'! age 201 of 340 02/07/2022 22:11 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to Plan District Elections �°`�S -0 Not Population Balanced u, �ro ro ro, C� 1 , 227/ 21 James War e oC c:'' b u o Q o ° , C�� q'-' °'c ,- Huasna Rd 101 Montego St-_ Br S� 'c '..sr Filiircp. �7 Sr ��•.�cr P ip, ��ro S Qo E Grand Ave o c0 p -75 c 3 �� °� e ( o IL U Maple St �� 2.. °�� O`�� a1 v: y n Ash Sttri 0 Ca,. �� a ego 101 Fair Oaks Avg4. s ' 1119r1 of Farroll Ave F 1 � 4 a The Pike d Sunrise Dr ProposedElection Sequence: 1011 Leanna Dr146,N7.- 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pa1nkfV40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 514 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,528 3,471 o 4,878 5,592 18,469 Deviation from ideal -89 -1,146 261 975 2,121 %Deviation -1.93% -24.82% 5.65% 21.12% 45.94% %Hisp 11.5% 14% 25% 25% 20% %NH White 76% 77% 63% 63% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,300 3,253 3,483 4,109 14,144 %Hisp 9% 10% 17% 15% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 86% 82% 71% 77% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 6% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,760 2,838 3,099 3,637 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 8% 17% 14% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 8% 16% 13% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 88% 77% 81% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,482 2,597 l 2,653 3,130 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 7% 16% 13% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 7% 7% 15% 12% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 89% 89% 78% 82% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 2,874 2,080 1,939 2,360 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 7% 12% 10% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 7% 12% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 1% 2% 1% %NH White est. 90% 89% 82% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,065 4,034 4,767 5,274 18,140 age0-19 17% 24% 26% 20% 22% Age age20-60 47% 43% 50% 54% 49% age60plus 36% 33% 25% 26% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 76% 57% 64% 65% english 89% 91% 86% 85% 88% spanish 4% 0% 8% 10% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 6% 7% 2% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 5% 5% 4% 4% hs-grad 43% 51% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 25% 23% 19% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 12% 13% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 22% 24% 31% 24% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 49% 60% 62% 61% 58% income 0-25k 15% 9% 14% 19% 14% income 25-50k 7% 18% 22% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 16% 18% 18% 16% income 75-200k 53% 46% 43% 45% 46% income200k-plus 13% 11% 4% 4% 8% single family 95% 94% I 72% 77% 84% multi-family 5% 6% 28% 23% 16% Housing Stats rented 13% 30% 49% 36% 33% owned 87% 70% 51% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 203 of 340 02/07/2022 22:10 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toan 516 ,.. District Elections �°`�s -0 Not Population Balanced u, � ro 4' ,ro cry 1 .ro Z2 7; 21 James Wa1, 27 �� lb e'," � u 0 2, q� J be° ,s.`'.' Huasna Rd Montego St -' Br Sti fic, isco�� ani Sr ��,c`c' 1��0 ,� 2 gyro E Grand Ave o z.' ° 3 a� �� ,,lU Maple St '. °�,, _-_-_. p �O,�k ,0�`r U y cn Ash St i� to � C R Fair Oaks Ave 9' ast• <--- ,C-/F' io� x 101• cn of Farroll Ave p P � ' n 1, a li The Pike 2-• Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: III Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PagAinidV40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 516 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,078 4,751 4,409 4,231 18,469 Deviation from ideal 461 134 -208 -386 847 %Deviation 9.98% 2.90% -4.51% -8.36% 18.35% %Hisp 19.7% 14% 29% 17% 20% %NH White 68% 74% 60% 73% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 5% 5% 5% 5% — Total 3,686 3,472 3,301 3,685 14,144 %Hisp 12% 10% 20% 11% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 77% 84% 75% 80% 79% %NH Black 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 6% 4% 3% 6% 5% Total 3,598 3,829 2,557 3,350 13,334 %Latino est. 12% 8% 18% 10% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 11% 7% 17% 10% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% %NH White est. 83% 88% 79% 85% 84% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,193 3,529 2,144 2,996 11,862 %Latino est. 11% 7% 16% 10% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 11% 7% 15% 9% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% %NH White est. 83% 88% 81% 86% 85% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 2,506 2,824 1,543 2,380 9,253 %Latino est. 9% 6% 14% 8% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 6% 13% 8% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 90% 83% 88% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,627 4,504 4,634 4,375 18,140 age0-19 19% 23% 24% 20% 22% Age age20-60 47% 48% 51% 50% 49% age60plus 34% 29% 25% 30% 29% immigrants 10% 7% 9% 8% 8% Immigration naturalized 60% 70% 59% 72% 65% english 87% 92% 84% 88% 88% spanish 7% 2% 12% 3% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 4% 1% 1% 3% 2% other fang 2% 5% 3% 6% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 4% 3% 6% 4% 4% hs-grad 43% 43% 50% 56% 48% Education bachelor 23% 25% 20% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 16% 17% 10% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 24% 27% 31% 20% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 56% 56% 62% 60% 58% income 0-25k 16% 12% 16% 12% 14% income25-50k 17% 11% 17% 17% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 16% 11% 18% 20% 16% income 75-200k 45% 51% 44% 45% 46% income 200k-plus 7% 14% 4% 5% 8% single family 75% 95% 79% 88% 84% multi-family 25% 5% 21% 12% 16% Housing Stats rented 39% 22% 38% 31% 33% owned 61% 78% 62% 69% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 205 of 340 02/07/2022 22:09 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toan 517 District Elections �°`�s y -0 Not Population Balanced u, ro ro� C ro 1 1 227; 21 James War 27e 4b 4� Ora .:"9 u 0 "b I q� // °fie° ,s.' Huasna Rd ,fib 101 'c'.'Montego St�� B�aik Sr ��1/2 cc5� ��rofi� E Grand Ave o �!' * U Maple St 61 ,i �0`- (--A. ''',- cn Ash St i� m ,i' c Fair Oaks Ave � as��Io 01 • cn Q'el Farroll Ave F t 400 a The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: le Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pai?N_P 140 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 517 District 1 2 r 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,027 4,358 4,095 4,989 18,469 Deviation from ideal 410 -259 -522 372 932 %Deviation 8.88% -5.61% -11.31% 8.06% 20.19% %Hisp 16.7% 13% 28% 22% 20% %NH White 71% 77% 60% 66% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,790 3,536 3,006 3,812 14,144 %Hisp 11% 10% 20% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 80% 83% 72% 80% 79% %NH Black 3% 1% 1% 0% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 5% 4% 6% 5% Total 3,741 3,566 t 2,516 3,511 13,334 %Latino est. 10% 7% 19% 12% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 10% 7% 17% 11% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 84% 89% 78% 84% 84% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,355 3,276 2,117 3,114 11,862 %Latino est. 10% 6% 17% 11% 10% %Spanish-Sumamed 9% 6% 16% 11% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 84% 89% 79% 84% 85% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 2,695 2,635 1,506 2,417 9,253 %Latino est. 8% 6% 13% 9% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 6% 13% 9% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 91% 83% 87% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 1% 0% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,623 4,522 4,275 4,720 18,140 age0-19 16% 25% 27% 19% 22% Age age20-60 44% 50% 51% 51% 49% age60plus 40% 25% 21% 31% 29% immigrants 9% 6% 9% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 62% 70% 57% 71% 65% english 88% 90% 84% 88% 88% spanish 6% 1% 11% 6% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% other lang 3% 7% 3% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 4% 5% 6% 3% 4% hs-grad 44% 46% 47% 55% 48% Education bachelor 23% 25% 20% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 16% 15% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 18% 27% 37% 21% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 60% 65% 58% 58% income 0-25k 20% 9% 12% 15% 14% income25-50k 15% 11% 19% 16% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 20% 18% 16% income 75-200k 43% 51% 46% 47% 46% income 200k-plus 9% 14% 4% 4% 8% single family 78% 94% 76% 86% 84% multi-family 22% 6% 24% 14% 16% Housing Stats rented 31% 29% 46% 27% 33% owned 69% 71% 54% 73% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 207 of 340 02/07/2022 21:49 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toPlan 518 District Elections �° .. `�s 9 -0 Not Population Balanced �ro Not Contiguous ro rofi 1 �ro 227 \_ i 21 James Way ofi 4�' roe a �b° o 4)0 2 (5 q''' °be ,�� ivasna 1 101 Montego St - / 1- 131.@,7 Br fi o�� 7 Sr ��c� �°r f o' ;ro ��vsc x E Grand Ave o � 75 0- �� ti o3 b o Maple St 7" ° 0�O Cs'$ 1 ,,, G 9' Cip Ash St0 miPC v a�� Fair Oaks Ave I0 • 0 01 el L 'm Farroll Ave x x (44 t . 4 00a L The Pike Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 'g* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 P i?rRiV40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 518 District 1 2 3 4 1 Total Total Pop 5,461 3,460 1 5,344 4,204 18,469 Deviation from ideal 844 -1,157 727 -413 2,001 %Deviation 18.28% -25.06% 15.75% -8.95% 43.34% %Hisp 14.0% 14% 30% 19% 20% %NH White 73% 77% 58% 70% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 5% 5% - Total 4,020 2,956 3,798 3,370 14,144 %Hisp 9% 9% 20% 12% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 82% 83% 73% 80% 79% %NH Black 3% 1% 0% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% Total 4,253 2,816 3,240 3,025 13,334 %Latino est. 9% 7% 16% 14% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 9% 7% 15% 13% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 89% 80% 83% 84% %NH Black 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,865 2,577 t 2,752 2,668 11,862 %Latino est. 9% 7% 14% 13% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 8% 7% 14% 12% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 3% 1% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 84% 90% 82% 84% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,133 2,053 1,986 2,081 9,253 %Latino est. 8% 6% 11% 10% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 3% 1% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 87% 90% 85% 87% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,847 3,805 5,245 4,243 18,140 age0-19 15% 27% 23% 23% 22% Age age20-60 45% 49% 51% 50% 49% age60plus 40% 24% 26% 27% 29% immigrants 9% 6% 10% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 65% 70% 61% 65% 65% english 89% 91% 84% 87% 88% spanish 4% 1% 11% 7% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% other fang 4% 6% 2% 4% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 5% 5% 4% 4% hs-grad 45% 45% 48% 53% 48% Education bachelor 23% 26% 21% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 16% 14% 11% 10% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 17% 27% 31% 27% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 49% 64% 63% 59% 58% income 0-25k 20% 8% 15% 12% 14% income 25-50k 13% 12% 18% 18% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 18% 19% 16% income 75-200k 44% 51% 45% 47% 46% income 200k-plus 10% 14% 4% 4% 8% single family 82% 93% 76% 86% 84% multi-family 18% 7% 24% 14% 16% Housing Stats rented 26% 33% 43% 29% 33% owned 74% 67% 57% 71% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 209 of 340 02/07/2022 21:48 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to Plan District Elections �°`�s <, N of Population Balanced u, �ro ro ro, C� 1 , 227/ 21 James War e C cY'° o u o �� Q #C�°� q� 'c° ,-� Huasna Rd 101 `4 Montego Sty' �ranchS {�c��J G ;cc', •7 4747 011110111L 4--e" Z cP E Grand Ave o c�y� a -75 34 �� ,¢G 2 ,, J �° tie J IL U Maple St �� 2.. °�� O`�� , 0v y n Ash St 0 m Ca, � a �o� 101 Fair Oaks A17114411=1: 1:16,1 s ' of Farroll Ave F � 4 o a The Pike <,,:, Sunrise Dr ProposedElection Sequence: 1011 Leanna Dr146,N7.- 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 P i?rM9 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 519 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 6,326 2,960 1 4,227 4,956 18,469 Deviation from ideal 1,709 -1,657 -390 339 3,366 %Deviation 37.02% -35.89% -8.45% 7.34% 72.90% %Hisp 12.9% 14% 27% 26% 20% %NH White 75% 76% 61% 63% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% - Total 4,654 2,847 2,975 3,669 14,144 %Hisp 9% 11% 19% 15% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 84% 81% 71% 78% 79% %NH Black 2% 1% 1% 0% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 6% 6% 5% 5% Total 5,145 2,389 2,537 3,263 13,334 %Latino est. 8% 8% 18% 14% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 8% 17% 13% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 87% 88% 78% 82% 84% %NH Black 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% Total 4,727 2,172 2,156 2,807 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 8% 17% 13% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 7% 8% 16% 12% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 87% 89% 79% 83% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 3,835 1,726 1,563 2,129 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 8% 12% 10% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 12% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 89% 88% 83% 86% 87% %NH Black est. 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 5,762 3,498 4,198 4,681 18,140 age0-19 19% 23% 27% 20% 22% Age age20-60 46% 43% 51% 55% 49% age60plus 36% 34% 22% 25% 29% immigrants 8% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 68% 77% 57% 63% 65% english 91% 90% 86% 84% 88% spanish 3% 0% 9% 11% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% other fang 4% 7% 2% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 5% 5% 4% 4% hs-grad 43% 53% 46% 52% 48% Education bachelor 25% 22% 19% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 18% 11% 13% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 21% 22% 35% 25% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 59% 64% 62% 58% income0-25k 16% 10% 11% 18% 14% income 25-50k 11% 19% 21% 14% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 18% 20% 19% 16% income 75-200k 49% 44% 45% 45% 46% income 200k-plus 12% 9% 3% 4% 8% single family 89% 93% 74% 77% 84% multi-family 11% 7% 26% 23% 16% Housing Stats rented 21% 32% 49% 36% 33% owned 79% 68% 51% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Ra'! age 211 of 340 02/07/2022 21:47 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to Plan District Elections �°`�s '% Not Population Balanced u, 4. ro rofi C� I ,�� 2 7I 21 James Way 27 ofi C eb° �� ' 0 "b q� // be9('''' ti� HuaSo Rd �° ,fib r Montego St�� B Sti fi sc°�� a� Sr ��c� �� c� �� P o�� cam' E Grand Ave • a c�y� n 'u cr, � cc'. .o J C �Q'` O al Maple Stoho �o`� ,��% U Qy cn Ash St � i m ''f' R 9' Fair Oaks Ave s a��o�, 101 of Farroll Ave F X � n - C a The Pike 9-• Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 14 Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pa9MYLPU40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 520 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,039 4,201 4,410 4,819 18,469 Deviation from ideal 422 -416 -207 202 838 %Deviation 9.14% -9.01% -4.48% 4.38% 18.15% %Hisp 11.6% 16% 25% 26% 20% %NH White 77% 74% 62% 62% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% — Total 3,705 3,901 3,055 3,484 14,144 %Hisp 8% 13% 16% 15% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 81% 71% 76% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 4% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 6% 5% Total 4,209 3,334 2,786 3,005 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 16% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 9% 15% 15% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 87% 77% 80% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,907 2,989 2,392 2,574 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 9% 14% 15% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 14% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 88% 79% 81% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,228 2,350 1,770 1,905 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 12% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 10% 11% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 91% 88% 83% 84% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,601 4,729 4,090 4,720 18,140 age0-19 19% 22% 23% 23% 22% Age age20-60 46% 46% 48% 55% 49% age60plus 35% 32% 29% 22% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 80% 58% 57% 65% english 90% 92% 86% 82% 88% spanish 3% 0% 8% 12% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 5% 3% 2% other fang 5% 6% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 4% 6% 4% hs-grad 42% 53% 45% 51% 48% Education bachelor 25% 22% 21% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 10% 13% 10% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 22% 27% 30% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 61% 61% 61% 58% income 0-25k 14% 12% 18% 14% 14% income 25-50k 8% 18% 22% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 16% 21% 16% income 75-200k 54% 46% 39% 46% 46% income 200k-plus 14% 7% 5% 4% 8% single family 95% 93% 68% 77% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 32% 23% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 32% 51% 37% 33% owned 86% 68% 49% 63% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 213 of 340 02/07/2022 21:46 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toan 521 ,.. District Elections �°`�s -0 Not Population Balanced u, e 4 I , 7 21 James War 27e 4b °� v o 2, # qc "S$' ,S,`1" �� Huasna Rd� 4 ' ,fib (1 Montego St - ' 1B S� fi P-W Xops ae�`P E Grand Ave o � ��' 3 0 - } 2 v a� �2 C �� O s U Maple St 7" 'P. <s �O�b c✓1�� 2' C,-/r) y cn Ash St 0 to iPC R Fair Oaks Ave v astIo 01 • cn 91e Farroll Ave E P � 4 a- 9--The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: leLeanna Dr mir2022: Districts 3 & 4 ____...e.. , 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pa 1?CALI I 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 521 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,223 3,997 4,390 4,859 18,469 Deviation from ideal 606 -620 -227 242 1226 %Deviation 13.13% -13.43% -4.92% 5.24% 26.55% %Hisp 14.7% 14% 29% 22% 20% %NH White 72% 76% 59% 68% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 5% 5% 5% — Total 3,890 3,298 3,142 3,815 14,144 %Hisp 10% 10% 21% 12% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 81% 83% 71% 80% 79% %NH Black 3% 1% 1% 0% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 5% 4% 5% 5% Total 3,962 3,298 2,625 3,449 13,334 %Latino est. 9% 7% 19% 12% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 9% 7% 18% 11% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 84% 89% 78% 85% 84% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,574 3,026 2,212 3,050 11,862 %Latino est. 9% 7% 17% 11% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 9% 7% 16% 10% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 88% 79% 85% 85% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 2,895 2,405 1,569 2,384 9,253 %Latino est. 8% 6% 13% 9% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 6% 12% 9% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 90% 83% 87% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 1% 0% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,734 4,246 4,549 4,611 18,140 age0-19 15% 26% 27% 19% 22% Age age20-60 44% 50% 51% 50% 49% age60plus 41% 24% 21% 31% 29% immigrants 9% 6% 10% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 64% 70% 57% 69% 65% english 89% 90% 84% 87% 88% spanish 5% 1% 12% 7% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% other fang 3% 7% 3% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well 3% 5% 6% 3% 4% hs-grad 44% 46% 46% 55% 48% Education bachelor 24% 25% 20% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 16% 15% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 17% 28% 38% 22% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 50% 61% 65% 58% 58% income 0-25k 20% 9% 11% 15% 14% income 25-50k 14% 12% 19% 17% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 20% 18% 16% income 75-200k 44% 51% 46% 45% 46% income 200k-plus 9% 14% 3% 4% 8% single family 81% 94% 76% 85% 84% multi-family 19% 6% 24% 15% 16% Housing Stats rented 28% 31% 47% 28% 33% owned 72% 69% 53% 72% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 215 of 340 02/07/2022 21:45 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toPlan 522 District Elections �°`�s y -0 Not Population Balanced u, ro b , ' ro C 1 227; 21 James Way 27 °'. car Y,o u 0 q� J be° ,s.' Huasna Rd ( N `� 101 Montego St�� e'''' B�a�� Sr ��,c�5� �crofi' o cP Aye E Grand AvePI p o °6 75 3 �.pc) � 2 (\"ti 2J ° �� o F U Maple St �� 2. °")) �0�� Cl) y CLD Ash St 1, L. m c �� a Iwo�, 101 Fair Oaks Ave s 4 of Farroll Ave F „ 4 nl C n• O e ,,._ The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 1* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PagMAPEF40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 522 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,039 3,825 4,854 4,751 18,469 Deviation from ideal 422 -792 237 134 1,214 Deviation 9.14% -17.15% 5.13% 2.90% 26.29% %Hisp 11.6% 15% 26% 26% 20% %NH White 77% 75% 62% 63% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% - Total 3,705 3,579 3,397 3,463 14,144 %Hisp 8% 12% 17% 15% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 82% 72% 75% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 6% 5% Total 4,209 3,083 3,081 2,961 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 16% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 8% 15% 15% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 87% 77% 80% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,907 2,782 2,643 2,530 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 8% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 14% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 88% 78% 81% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,228 2,206 1,953 1,866 9,253 Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 91% 89% 83% 84% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,601 4,355 4,576 4,608 18,140 age0-19 19% 22% 23% 23% 22% Age age20-60 46% 46% 48% 56% 49% age60plus 35% 32% 29% 21% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 79% 58% 59% 65% english 90% 91% 86% 83% 88% spanish 3% 0% 9% 11% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 5% 7% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 4% 5% 4% hs-grad 42% 53% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 25% 22% 21% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 22% 27% 29% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 61% 61% 62% 58% income 0-25k 14% 11% 18% 13% 14% income 25-50k 8% 18% 22% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 16% 21% 16% income 75-200k 54% 46% 39% 47% 46% income 200k-plus 14% 8% 5% 4% 8% single family 95% 93% 69% 78% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 31% 22% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 32% 50% 36% 33% owned 86% 68% 50% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 217 of 340 02/07/2022 21:44 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toa District Elections �°`,s „ -0 Not Population Balanced u, ro b ro� C 1 ‹,ro 227, 21 James War 27e 4b ° U ob �� c 0 q� J/ °,beO('''' ti� juast Rd ,fib cP r� 101 Montego St - 1Br S� fi� �� p E Grand Ave o �, �.i..< �' 7d Cicip' s ' -C2 �,' o. a,ae '',.3' -C2 2 2. o° '�c' 9 s. I o Maple St 7 'P. ,°� .,,c,0�� o�Q P 4`� G 0" Cl) y Cl) Ash St 'Its m c Fair Oaks Ave �� ase ci) 'll''S �o 1011 cn of Farroll Aver ir. a ° 4ii, The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 1* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pal?N_P 4O National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 523 District 1 2 3 4 1 Total Total Pop 4,886 4,183 I 4,823 4,577 18,469 Deviation from ideal 269 -434 206 -40 703 Deviation 5.83% -9.40% 4.46% -0.87% 15.23% %Hisp 12.3% 16% 26% 25% 20% %NH White 76% 73% 62% 64% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% — Total 3,740 3,647 3,398 3,359 14,144 %Hisp 10% 12% 17% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 83% 84% 71% 78% 79% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 4% 6% 6% 5% Total 4,009 3,344 3,067 2,914 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 9% 15% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 78% 81% 84% %NH Black 1% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,687 3,042 2,623 2,510 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 8% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 7% 8% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 79% 82% 85% %NH Black 1% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,039 2,374 1,944 1,896 9,253 Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 89% 83% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 1% 0% 3% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,578 4,580 4,579 4,402 18,140 age0-19 18% 23% 23% 23% 22% Age age20-60 49% 44% 47% 56% 49% age60plus 34% 33% 30% 21% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 79% 57% 59% 65% english 88% 93% 85% 84% 88% spanish 3% 0% 10% 10% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 1% 4% 3% 2% other fang 7% 5% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 4% 3% 5% 5% 4% hs-grad 45% 49% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 24% 24% 21% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 18% 12% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 21% 24% 28% 29% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 60% 60% 62% 58% income0-25k 14% 11% 18% 13% 14% income 25-50k 8% 18% 22% 14% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 15% 14% 16% 22% 16% income 75-200k 52% 48% 38% 48% 46% income 200k-plus 12% 9% 5% 3% 8% single family 93% 95% 68% 78% 84% multi-family 7% 5% 32% 22% 16% Housing Stats rented 18% 28% 51% 36% 33% owned 82% 72% 49% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 219 of 340 02/07/2022 21:43 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toan 524 District Elections �o`,s 9 -0 Not Population Balanced �ro .. Not Contiguous ro ro� 1 ~ro 21 James Way o'. � roe c_.,,,9‘ o ar cv "V" ^a q''' obe° ,�� Huasna Rd 101 Montego St 1Br Sv aitch c�' , , C,i �rofi -c ''‘-' x E Grand Ave o ��y� p 2 3 �� ¢G `� o Maple St �� o�°i boa �cs�� l L. m Ash Std I rt �. 0 Fair Oaks Ave �� Oase �o Q,c 1011 I Farroll AveMI r 4 ° o a /� I The Pike S d -`ris-1p. ProposedElection Sequence: IiLeanna Dr ___ , - 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PagAiWV40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 524 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,054 3,763 I 4,741 4,911 18,469 Deviation from ideal 437 -854 124 294 1,291 Deviation 9.47% -18.50% 2.69% 6.37% 27.96% %Hisp 13.7% 14% 27% 23% 20% %NH White 73% 76% 60% 67% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 4% 5% - Total 3,770 3,220 3,406 3,749 14,144 %Hisp 10% 10% 20% 12% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 83% 82% 72% 79% 79% %NH Black 3% 1% 0% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 6% 5% 6% 5% Total 4,078 3,045 2,921 3,290 13,334 %Latino est. 8% 7% 17% 14% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 7% 16% 13% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 89% 80% 83% 84% %NH Black 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,717 2,781 2,460 2,904 11,862 %Latino est. 8% 7% 15% 13% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 8% 7% 15% 12% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 89% 81% 84% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 2,985 2,207 1,808 2,253 9,253 %Latino est. 7% 6% 12% 10% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 87% 90% 84% 87% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 0% 0% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,533 4,148 t 4,662 4,797 18,140 age0-19 15% 26% 24% 22% 22% Age age20-60 46% 48% 49% 52% 49% age60plus 38% 26% 27% 26% 29% immigrants 8% 6% 10% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 69% 72% 59% 63% 65% english 90% 91% 84% 86% 88% spanish 4% 1% 12% 7% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% other fang 5% 6% 1% 4% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 5% 5% 4% 4% hs-grad 45% 46% 46% 53% 48% Education bachelor 23% 25% 22% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 17% 14% 12% 10% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 18% 27% 31% 26% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 50% 62% 62% 59% 58% income 0-25k 19% 8% 18% 11% 14% income 25-50k 11% 13% 20% 17% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 17% 20% 16% income 75-200k 47% 50% 41% 47% 46% income 200k-plus 9% 13% 5% 4% 8% single family 86% 94% 72% 85% 84% multi-family 14% 6% 28% 15% 16% Housing Stats rented 22% 32% 48% 30% 33% owned 78% 68% 52% 70% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 221 of 340 02/07/2022 21:43 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to Plan 525 District Elections �o`�s -0 Not Population Balanced u, lam, �ro ,ro Ciro 1 , 227/ 21 James Way o9' cbo o (5 obe° ,4�� Huasna Rd r101� � 'C''Montego St�� Branch S �c�, � �rofi� Flu cogs t -e.� * d'� S E Grand Ave ,-C.?: ec<i p 0 G"� O �c ,-� -75 c, C ti „, Cys° ,��e O IL 0 Maple St �� '. s0) O�� CS 7? ' `?'" �ry C,-/,' G y Cl) Ash St 0 m Fair Oaks Ave �� ase t7/0 101 cn of Farroll Ave E P � 1400 a As The Pike Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 1* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 P i?rRii 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 525 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,039 4,030 4,823 4,577 18,469 Deviation from ideal 422 -587 206 -40 1,009 %Deviation 9.14% -12.71% 4.46% -0.87% 21.85% %Hisp 11.6% 17% 26% 25% 20% %NH White 77% 72% 62% 64% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% - Total 3,705 3,682 3,398 3,359 14,144 %Hisp 8% 13% 17% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 80% 71% 78% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 6% 5% Total 4,209 3,144 3,067 2,914 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 9% 15% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 86% 78% 81% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,907 2,822 2,623 2,510 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 9% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 79% 82% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,228 2,185 1,944 1,896 9,253 Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 91% 88% 83% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,601 4,558 4,579 4,402 18,140 age0-19 19% 22% 23% 23% 22% Age age20-60 46% 46% 47% 56% 49% age60plus 35% 32% 30% 21% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 80% 57% 59% 65% english 90% 91% 85% 84% 88% spanish 3% 0% 10% 10% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 5% 6% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% hs-grad 42% 53% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 25% 22% 21% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 22% 28% 29% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 61% 60% 62% 58% income 0-25k 14% 12% 18% 13% 14% income 25-50k 8% 18% 22% 14% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 16% 22% 16% income 75-200k 54% 46% 38% 48% 46% income 200k-plus 14% 8% 5% 3% 8% single family 95% 93% 68% 78% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 32% 22% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 32% 51% 36% 33% owned 86% 68% 49% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 223 of 340 02/07/2022 21:41 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toan 526 District Elections �o`�S 9 -0 Not Population Balanced u, �ro ro ro� U 1 �ro227, 21 James War o 4� U. cv cb° �� o �o� (5 v5 obe° ,�� HuaSt Rd r101 Montego St�� Branch �c�5� trofic co�� r ��'� �'Q' W S PI �� oT ��cP E Grand Ave o eciS 0 Ccip' ' U2 �c ,c'� �, Cys° <c O ? P- C5 Maple St 7 I. Ne O�� o�� ry C4' G y cn Ash St 0 m c Fair Oaks Ave �� ase CoQ, 101, 4 of Farroll Ave E � . 4 a Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: pi The Pike Q 14. Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 P Aa4IP 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 526 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,039 4,030 4,823 4,577 18,469 Deviation from ideal 422 -587 206 -40 1,009 %Deviation 9.14% -12.71% 4.46% -0.87% 21.85% %Hisp 11.6% 17% 26% 25% 20% %NH White 77% 72% 62% 64% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% - Total 3,705 3,682 3,398 3,359 14,144 %Hisp 8% 13% 17% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 80% 71% 78% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 6% 5% Total 4,209 3,144 3,067 2,914 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 9% 15% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 86% 78% 81% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,907 2,822 2,623 2,510 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 9% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 79% 82% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,228 2,185 1,944 1,896 9,253 Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 91% 88% 83% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,601 4,558 4,579 4,402 18,140 age0-19 19% 22% 23% 23% 22% Age age20-60 46% 46% 47% 56% 49% age60plus 35% 32% 30% 21% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 80% 57% 59% 65% english 90% 91% 85% 84% 88% spanish 3% 0% 10% 10% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 5% 6% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% hs-grad 42% 53% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 25% 22% 21% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 22% 28% 29% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 61% 60% 62% 58% income 0-25k 14% 12% 18% 13% 14% income 25-50k 8% 18% 22% 14% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 16% 22% 16% income 75-200k 54% 46% 38% 48% 46% income 200k-plus 14% 8% 5% 3% 8% single family 95% 93% 68% 78% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 32% 22% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 32% 51% 36% 33% owned 86% 68% 49% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 225 of 340 02/07/2022 21:27 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toan 529 District Elections �o`,s „ '<, Not Population Balanced �ro Not Completely Covered ro ro� 1 ‹,ro 1 227 21 James Wa1, a 0 Hca 0' ca Gro O O Oo� c;c o �o,�e, tiro / Huasna Rd i ---------// , ol� Montego St - ' it:// 'Br Sti c, co�� St �� c�. ,p N, ��rofi E Grand Ave o a :c. 3 �, a �e V v' o"ti e I Li 0 Maple St °� , \,cO`sN> C�3� L. X) y n Ash St0 m Fair Oaks Ave �� a��lo0 1/ 717 4 el Farroll Ave F � ., 4 a °= 41 The Pike '..c) Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: `1* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 P iM_I 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 529 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,699 2,905 V 6,072 4,577 18,253 Deviation from ideal 82 -1,712 1,455 -40 3,167 %Deviation 1.78% -37.08% 31.51% -0.87% 68.59% %Hisp 12.4% 14% 25% 25% 20% %NH White 76% 76% 63% 64% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% - Total 3,456 2,615 4,572 3,359 14,002 %Hisp 9% 8% 18% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 83% 83% 75% 78% 79% %NH Black 3% 1% 0% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 6% 5% 6% 5% Total 3,784 2,401 4,030 2,914 13,129 %Latino est. 8% 7% 15% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 7% 14% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 87% 89% 81% 81% 84% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,466 2,194 I 3,501 2,510 11,671 %Latino est. 8% 7% 13% 14% 11% %Spanish-Surnamed 7% 6% 13% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 87% 90% 82% 82% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 2,816 1,760 2,634 1,896 9,106 Latino est. 7% 6% 11% 11% 9% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 6% 10% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% %NH White est. 88% 90% 86% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,124 3,350 6,086 4,402 17,962 age0-19 15% 27% 22% 23% 22% Age age20-60 46% 48% 46% 56% 49% age60plus 39% 25% 32% 21% 29% immigrants 8% 6% 9% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 66% 70% 66% 59% 65% english 88% 92% 88% 84% 88% spanish 4% 0% 8% 10% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% other fang 5% 6% 3% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 5% 4% 5% 4% hs-grad 45% 44% 50% 51% 48% Education bachelor 23% 27% 21% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 18% 13% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 18% 27% 27% 29% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 48% 66% 59% 62% 58% income 0-25k 18% 7% 16% 13% 14% income 25-50k 11% 13% 21% 14% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 16% 16% 22% 16% income 75-200k 47% 51% 42% 48% 46% income 200k-plus 11% 14% 5% 3% 8% single family 87% 92% 80% 78% 84% multi-family 13% 8% 20% 22% 16% Housing Stats rented 21% 36% 39% 36% 33% owned 79% 64% 61% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 227 of 340 02/07/2022 23:06 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to afl 530 __ District Elections . K Not Population Balanced , _ ® .i. '/ I22ƒ n . . C° ƒ * - • « 1 gym, }®- mwm% » 1& E4 .. . . - ¥ f® = a ". $ ` - E GrAnd Ave ( S % • _ §, & � . 2 / ! , & sp. $e ^ ; •> , ri. 3 v a w y Fair Oak _ * ` . k\ E;:i EtriI - 4 .\ - ƒ . mGenr Proposed Election T mw _ I nal • 2022: Districts 3 & 4 ] 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PagePa9e.1? Ufd40 N Ei1 era hics Corrioration,I&m_ 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 530 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,223 3,997 4,725 4,524 18,469 Deviation from ideal 606 -620 108 -93 1226 %Deviation 13.13% -13.43% 2.34% -2.01% 26.55% %Hisp 14.7% 14% 31% 19% 20% %NH White 72% 76% 58% 70% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 5% 5% 5% — Total 3,890 3,298 3,249 3,708 14,144 %Hisp 10% 10% 19% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 81% 83% 72% 80% 79% %NH Black 3% 1% 0% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% Total 3,962 3,298 2,603 3,471 13,334 %Latino est. 9% 7% 18% 12% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 9% 7% 17% 12% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 84% 89% 79% 84% 84% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,574 3,026 2,210 3,052 11,862 %Latino est. 9% 7% 16% 12% 10% %Spanish-Sumamed 9% 7% 15% 11% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 88% 80% 85% 85% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 2,895 2,405 1,572 2,381 9,253 %Latino est. 8% 6% 12% 9% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 6% 12% 9% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 90% 84% 87% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 1% 0% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,734 4,246 4,661 4,499 18,140 age0-19 15% 26% 25% 21% 22% Age age20-60 44% 50% 53% 49% 49% age60plus 41% 24% 22% 30% 29% immigrants 9% 6% 10% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 64% 70% 57% 70% 65% english 89% 90% 83% 89% 88% spanish 5% 1% 13% 5% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% other fang 3% 7% 2% 4% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 5% 6% 3% 4% hs-grad 44% 46% 47% 54% 48% Education bachelor 24% 25% 20% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 16% 15% 12% 10% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 17% 28% 34% 24% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 50% 61% 64% 58% 58% income 0-25k 20% 9% 13% 13% 14% income 25-50k 14% 12% 18% 18% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 20% 18% 16% income 75-200k 44% 51% 45% 47% 46% income 200k-plus 9% 14% 4% 4% 8% single family 81% 94% 73% 88% 84% multi-family 19% 6% 27% 12% 16% Housing Stats rented 28% 31% 46% 28% 33% owned 72% 69% 54% 72% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 229 of 340 02/08/2022 10:53 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to I1an 531 District Elections �°`�s '% Not Population Balanced 4. � ro 4 ,ro I , 7 zz�; James Way 27 °'. 4b w _ �� Cl� U ar -� a v ,m 2, q� J/ °beti� , ° Huasna Rd r Montego St�i I Br Sv fi� c�' ro S 1111 !nd �� -<e s rt --c, o �� 0 a �¢ C �� JCchti tie I t UMaple St °�� O�b ��L. % 3 -7 cn Ash St ''NWT0 to Fair Oaks Ave �� as��I0 01 Farroll Ave P {i t 4 4 8 o a �_ Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 1 Leanna Dr2022: Districts 3 & 4 Y Y 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PMPEF40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 531 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,129 3,824 5,414 4,102 18,469 Deviation from ideal 512 -793 797 -515 1,590 %Deviation 11.09% -17.18% 17.26% -11.15% 34.44% %Hisp 13.7% 15% 26% 24% 20% %NH White 74% 76% 62% 65% 69% Total Pop - %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 5% 5% 5% - Total 3,763 3,259 3,967 3,156 14,144 %Hisp 9% 10% 18% 14% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 82% 83% 74% 78% 79% %NH Black 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% Total 4,055 3,115 I 3,435 2,729 13,334 %Latino est. 9% 7% 17% 12% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 7% 16% 12% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 89% 79% 84% 84% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 3,691 2,842 2,917 2,412 11,862 %Latino est. 8% 7% 16% 11% 10% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 7% 15% 11% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 89% 80% 84% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 3,006 2,245 2,132 1,870 9,253 %Latino est. 7% 6% 12% 9% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 6% 12% 9% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 87% 90% 84% 87% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,534 4,166 5,462 3,978 18,140 age0-19 16% 26% 26% 18% 22% Age age20-60 45% 50% 52% 47% 49% age60plus 39% 24% 22% 34% 29% immigrants 9% 6% 10% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 64% 72% 57% 72% 65% english 88% 92% 83% 89% 88% spanish 5% 1% 12% 5% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% other fang 4% 6% 3% 4% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 6% 3% 4% hs-grad 44% 46% 48% 54% 48% Education bachelor 23% 25% 20% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 17% 14% 11% 10% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 18% 27% 34% 21% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 49% 64% 64% 57% 58% income 0-25k 19% 9% 13% 16% 14% income 25-50k 13% 12% 18% 19% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 14% 15% 20% 16% 16% income 75-200k 45% 51% 45% 44% 46% income 200k-plus 10% 13% 4% 5% 8% single family 83% 93% I 75% 87% 84% multi-family 17% 7% 25% 13% 16% Housing Stats rented 26% 33% 43% 28% 33% owned 74% 67% 57% 72% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Ra'! age 231 of 340 02/08/202211:00 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to Plan 532 District Elections ..,,o`'s <, Not Population Balanced u, e, 1 ~ro c2--2-. 21 James War o u �, cbo �ro o (5 qv obe° ,-� Huasna Rd r101c Montego St - ' "Br S� (D'C'' c°�2 a�z Sr ��c� iso C�° ;c a �s �e s E Grand Ave o �, _ccy��' N. c3 a ,epd � �� a� e Mapleo� Oak'' O s U4 � ,tea 16.1. GAsh St �� lop cn cv � ae�o Q, 1011 Fair Oaks Aves 119F11 Farroll Ave 1 i•woo+ . 4 8 a The Pike 9-- Sunrise Dr ProposedElection Sequence: , t' Leanna Dr,146N7- 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pa1?r a 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 532 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 3,958 4,041 1 5,514 4,956 18,469 Deviation from ideal -659 -576 897 339 1,556 %Deviation -14.27% -12.48% 19.43% 7.34% 33.70% %Hisp 11.4% 14% t 25% 26% 20% %NH White 77% 76% 63% 63% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% - Total 2,861 3,692 3,923 3,669 14,144 %Hisp 9% 10% 17% 15% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 85% 83% 71% 78% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 0% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,258 3,340 3,473 3,263 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 8% 16% 14% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 7% 15% 13% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 89% 77% 82% 84% %NH Black 1% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,015 3,064 t 2,976 2,807 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 7% 15% 13% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 7% 7% 14% 12% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 88% 89% 78% 83% 85% %NH Black 1% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 2,479 2,475 2,170 2,129 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 7% 12% 10% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 7% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 1% 2% 1% %NH White est. 90% 90% 82% 86% 87% %NH Black est. 1% 0% 2% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 3,466 4,633 5,359 4,681 18,140 age0-19 15% 25% 25% 20% 22% Age age20-60 48% 43% 50% 55% 49% age60plus 37% 32% 26% 25% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 75% 58% 63% 65% english 88% 92% 87% 84% 88% spanish 4% 0% 8% 11% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 7% 6% 2% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% hs-grad 45% 48% 46% 52% 48% Education bachelor 23% 25% 20% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 13% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 20% 25% 30% 25% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 47% 60% 62% 62% 58% income 0-25k 16% 9% 15% 18% 14% income 25-50k 6% 17% 21% 14% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 14% 15% 18% 19% 16% income 75-200k 52% 47% 42% 45% 46% income 200k-plus 12% 12% 4% 4% 8% single family 94% 95% I 72% 77% 84% multi-family 6% 5% 28% 23% 16% Housing Stats rented 12% 29% 49% 36% 33% owned 88% 71% 51% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 233 of 340 02/08/2022 11:06 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toan 533 District Elections �°`,s „ -0 Not Population Balanced �ro .. Not Contiguous ro ro� 1 ~ro 21 James War e cv ob° �� o ,S q� °,be° �� Huasna Rd 4- (----- Jill N r101 � � Montego St --------/ �� B�a�� Sr ��c� �* � ��rofio CP Aye E Grand Ave 0cP �� a 3 �� `G �� 2 k 0 Maple St 7' . ‘�0�� %� r VD Ash StR : L. C o' a Fair Oaks Ave S t..0oQ, 1011 cn of Farroll Ave E P , 4 � _ �� e 0 _ ,i The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: * Leanna Dr ' ` 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PM4uV40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 533 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,825 3,763 1 4,970 4,911 18,469 Deviation from ideal 208 -854 353 294 1,207 %Deviation 4.51% -18.50% 7.65% 6.37% 26.14% %Hisp 12.6% 14% 28% 23% 20% %NH White 75% 76% 59% 67% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 4% 5% - Total 3,580 3,220 3,596 3,749 14,144 %Hisp 9% 10% 20% 12% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 83% 82% 73% 79% 79% %NH Black 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 6% 4% 6% 5% Total 3,879 3,045 3,120 3,290 13,334 %Latino est. 8% 7% 16% 14% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 7% 15% 13% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 89% 79% 83% 84% %NH Black 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,542 2,781 I 2,635 2,904 11,862 %Latino est. 8% 7% 14% 13% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 8% 7% 14% 12% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 89% 81% 84% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 2,902 2,207 1,891 2,253 9,253 %Latino est. 7% 6% 12% 10% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 87% 90% 84% 87% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 0% 1% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,254 4,148 4,941 4,797 18,140 age0-19 15% 26% 24% 22% 22% Age age20-60 44% 48% 51% 52% 49% age60plus 41% 26% 26% 26% 29% immigrants 9% 6% 9% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 65% 72% 62% 63% 65% english 89% 91% 86% 86% 88% spanish 4% 1% 11% 7% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% other fang 4% 6% 1% 4% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well 3% 5% 5% 4% 4% hs-grad 44% 46% 47% 53% 48% Education bachelor 23% 25% 22% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 17% 14% 11% 10% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 17% 27% 32% 26% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 48% 62% 64% 59% 58% income0-25k 19% 8% 17% 11% 14% income 25-50k 13% 13% 19% 17% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 17% 20% 16% income 75-200k 45% 50% 44% 47% 46% income 200k-plus 10% 13% 4% 4% 8% single family 83% 94% I 75% 85% 84% multi-family 17% 6% 25% 15% 16% Housing Stats rented 24% 32% 46% 30% 33% owned 76% 68% 54% 70% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Ra'! age 235 of 340 02/08/2022 11:12 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to Plan District Elections �o`�s '% Not Population Balanced u, 4. ro ro� C� I ,�� 227, 21 James Way 27 o'. �o� o •• ar O �� vo) 4.' ��o Huasna Rd r 1010 _� Montego Sty �B ?yam �� r j ,,..', r1eh S 4:"AliLcrfi.e. z t �'� I'� �Sco ; , as • 9. �� cP S �e e E Grand Ave i' ��' liir %' b -75 3 �� 2. y Cs� ��e' O ? IL U Maple St �� °�� 0�� %� r CD �` `'' G 0" Cl) y cn Ash St0 4.m „i, R a "lo Q, 101 Fair Oaks Ave s cn of Farroll Ave F : n l C O e a The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: mil* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 P i?rN_PEF40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 535 District 1 2 3 4 1 Total Total Pop 4,823 4,041 I 4,854 4,751 18,469 Deviation from ideal 206 -576 237 134 813 Deviation 4.46% -12.48% 5.13% 2.90% 17.61% %Hisp 11.5% 15% 26% 26% 20% %NH White 77% 74% 62% 63% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% — Total 3,562 3,722 3,397 3,463 14,144 %Hisp 8% 12% 17% 15% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 82% 72% 75% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 3% 5% 6% 6% 5% Total 4,004 3,288 3,081 2,961 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 16% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 8% 15% 15% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 87% 77% 80% 84% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,716 2,973 I 2,643 2,530 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 8% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 14% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 87% 78% 81% 85% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,081 2,353 1,953 1,866 9,253 Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 7% 11% 11% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 91% 88% 83% 84% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,423 4,533 4,576 4,608 18,140 age0-19 19% 22% 23% 23% 22% Age age20-60 46% 46% 48% 56% 49% age60plus 36% 32% 29% 21% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 79% 58% 59% 65% english 91% 91% 86% 83% 88% spanish 3% 1% 9% 11% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 5% 7% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 4% 5% 4% hs-grad 42% 53% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 26% 22% 21% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 22% 27% 29% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 60% 61% 62% 58% income 0-25k 13% 12% 18% 13% 14% income 25-50k 8% 18% 22% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 16% 21% 16% income 75-200k 54% 46% 39% 47% 46% income 200k-plus 13% 8% 5% 4% 8% single family 95% 93% 69% 78% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 31% 22% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 31% 50% 36% 33% owned 86% 69% 50% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 237 of 340 02/08/2022 11:24 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toa District Elections �o`,s 9 -0 Not Population Balanced u, bro ro ro� C 1 ~ro 227 \_ , 21 James Way 27 o'. 4bacv U`" CD Cr0 �� C 0 b 7 60 obe° ti� Huasna Rd 4b rc iot Montego St ------/ �� B�a�� Sr ��Cc' T ��rofi� cP E Grand Ave o ��' a w ° �� ` 2 t �� y �ca� �<e O Maple St �� °�� 0'� SCS 4 G (7 cn Ash Sts rt i� � c as e�o Q, 101 Ill.Fair Oaks Ave el Farroll Ave F P 1 � o R' The Pike 9-- Sunrise Dr ProposedElection Sequence: PI Leanna Dr146,N7.- 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 P i?r LSP 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 536 District 1 2 3 4 i Total -- Total Pop 5,380 4,041 o 4,732 4,316 18,469 Deviation from ideal 763 -576 115 -301 1,339 %Deviation 16.53% -12.48% 2.49% -6.52% 29.00% %Hisp 12.7% 14% 26% 28% 20% %NH White 76% 76% 62% 60% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% - Total 3,922 3,692 3,304 3,227 14,144 %Hisp 9% 10% 16% 18% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 83% 83% 72% 77% 79% %NH Black 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 5% 7% 3% 5% Total 4,294 3,340 3,029 2,671 13,334 %Latino est. 8% 8% 17% 14% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 7% 16% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 89% 79% 81% 84% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 3,925 3,064 t 2,598 2,275 11,862 %Latino est. 8% 7% 16% 13% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 8% 7% 15% 12% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 86% 89% 80% 82% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 3,195 2,475 1,892 1,691 9,253 %Latino est. 7% 7% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 7% 11% 11% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 88% 90% 84% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,709 4,633 4,522 4,276 18,140 age0-19 15% 25% 26% 21% 22% Age age20-60 46% 43% 56% 51% 49% age60plus 39% 32% 18% 28% 29% immigrants 9% 6% 10% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 65% 75% 57% 66% 65% english 88% 92% 83% 87% 88% spanish 4% 0% 11% 9% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 3% 2% 4% 2% 2% other fang 5% 6% 2% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 6% 4% 4% hs-grad 45% 48% 48% 50% 48% Education bachelor 23% 25% 19% 21% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 17% 13% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 18% 25% 36% 25% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 48% 60% 65% 62% 58% income 0-25k 19% 9% 8% 21% 14% income 25-50k 12% 17% 17% 16% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 23% 15% 16% income 75-200k 45% 47% 49% 43% 46% income 200k-plus 11% 12% 3% 4% 8% single family 85% 95% I 75% 79% 84% multi-family 15% 5% 25% 21% 16% Housing Stats rented 23% 29% 45% 37% 33% owned 77% 71% 55% 63% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 239 of 340 02/08/2022 11:32 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to , Plan 538 ,.. District Elections �o`�s -0 Not Population Balanced u, e, Ciro 1 , 227/ 21 James War e C u �� ubo �ro o ar qv ,S$'° �� HuaSt 1 101 `4 Montego St �Br S� fiu s�o�� adz Sr ��r � � ;c cP E Grand Ave o � � c,t3 2 0- �o as e �2 �� O I o Maple St <s �O�b �✓1�� 2' C,-/r) '-4, Cl) Ash St toC N. R Fair Oaks Ave �v ast�Io 01 cn c / Farroll Ave Et ___ ' 4 000 pd a ° The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 11111 Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 P 1MaV4° National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 538 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 2,781 4,082 6,947 4,659 18,469 Deviation from ideal -1,836 -535 2,330 42 4,166 %Deviation -39.77% -11.59% 50.47% 0.91% 90.23% %Hisp 12.7% 12% 25% 22% 20% %NH White 73% 79% 62% 67% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 5% 5% - Total 2,170 3,305 5,067 3,602 14,144 %Hisp 9% 9% 17% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 84% 85% 73% 80% 79% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 0% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 5% 6% 5% Total 2,313 3,346 4,369 3,306 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 7% 17% 12% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 7% 16% 11% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 88% 90% 78% 84% 84% %NH Black 1% 0% 2% 1% 1% Total 2,133 3,076 I 3,717 2,936 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 6% 15% 11% 10% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 6% 14% 11% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 87% 91% 79% 85% 85% %NH Black 1% 0% 2% 1% 1% Total 1,768 2,471 2,720 2,294 9,253 %Latino est. 7% 6% 12% 9% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 5% 12% 9% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% %NH White est. 88% 91% 82% 87% 87% %NH Black est. 1% 0% 2% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 2,558 4,259 6,930 4,394 18,140 age0-19 14% 25% 24% 18% 22% Age age20-60 46% 49% 49% 51% 49% age60plus 40% 26% 27% 31% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 70% 58% 70% 65% english 89% 91% 86% 88% 88% spanish 4% 1% 10% 6% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 3% 3% 2% other lang 6% 6% 2% 4% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well 4% 4% 5% 3% 4% hs-grad 44% 45% 47% 55% 48% Education bachelor 24% 25% 20% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 15% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 18% 27% 30% 21% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 48% 61% 61% 58% 58% income 0-25k 16% 9% 17% 15% 14% income25-50k 7% 11% 21% 16% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 14% 15% 17% 18% 16% income 75-200k 53% 51% 41% 46% 46% income 200k-plus 11% 14% 5% 4% 8% single family 92% 94% t 73% 86% 84% multi-family 8% 6% 27% 14% 16% Housing Stats rented 13% 30% 47% 27% 33% owned 87% 70% 53% 73% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Ra'! age 241 of 340 02/08/2022 13:01 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toPlan 539 District Elections �°`�s y -0 Not Population Balanced u, bro ro ro� C 1 ro 227; James Way 27 o'. 4b °�° � u 0 b ^F eo ,be° ti. Huasna RdJ 4 .9 S 101 Montego St -' Branch S 'S f �ro�c, �c� P so�� ecP E Grand Ave o ° � 7 7 Ct `'J v; otidee C-'. , k U Maple St 6. °s �0`- c�,- 3 U Cl) Ash St 0 m C Fair Oaks Ave �� asp' r �' io 101• cliof Farroll Ave FAi ,) i, ___ . 4 a00 e a ,i The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: mil* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 P M'RP 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 539 District 1 2 3 4 Total d Total Pop 5,228 3,997 4,414 4,830 18,469 Deviation from ideal 611 -620 -203 213 1,231 %Deviation 13.23% -13.43% -4.40% 4.61% 26.66% %Hisp 15.2% 14% 27% 23% 20% %NH White 72% 76% 60% 67% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 5% 5% - Total 3,862 3,298 3,235 3,750 14,144 %Hisp 10% 10% 20% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 81% 83% 73% 79% 79% %NH Black 3% 1% 0% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 5% 4% 6% 5% Total 3,947 3,298 2,660 3,429 13,334 %Latino est. 9% 7% 18% 13% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 9% 7% 17% 12% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 84% 89% 79% 84% 84% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,565 3,026I 2,237 3,034 11,862 %Latino est. 9% 7% 16% 12% 10% %Spanish-Sumamed 9% 7% 15% 11% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 88% 80% 85% 85% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 2,885 2,405 1,609 2,354 9,253 %Latino est. 8% 6% 13% 9% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 6% 12% 9% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 87% 90% 83% 87% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 1% 0% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,686 4,246 4,609 4,599 18,140 age0-19 16% 26% 26% 19% 22% Age age20-60 44% 50% 50% 51% 49% age60plus 40% 24% 24% 30% 29% immigrants 9% 6% 9% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 64% 70% 57% 69% 65% english 89% 90% 83% 88% 88% spanish 4% 1% 13% 6% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% other fang 3% 7% 2% 4% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 5% 6% 3% 4% hs-grad 44% 46% 47% 55% 48% Education bachelor 23% 25% 21% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 16% 15% 12% 10% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 17% 28% 36% 22% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 61% 64% 58% 58% income 0-25k 19% 9% 14% 14% 14% income 25-50k 14% 12% 19% 17% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 19% 19% 16% income 75-200k 44% 51% 44% 47% 46% income 200k-plus 9% 14% 4% 4% 8% single family 80% 94% I 75% 86% 84% multi-family 20% 6% 25% 14% 16% Housing Stats rented 29% 31% 46% 27% 33% owned 71% 69% 54% 73% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 243 of 340 02/08/2022 13:07 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toan 540 District Elections �°`,s „ -0 Not Population Balanced u, 4 �ro ro fi CYro 1 ~ro C2-2. 7/ 21 James War ° . rocve cb° �� o q� ,..,2;9'„ S,`1' �� Huasna Rd 101 cP Montego St - ' iB S� �I, fi �co$� rangy Sr ��c9 P �° gyro �� p E Grand Ave o ,), c, 4�' o r ca � 2, c ) Sl 1 c.5 Maple St 7' o).” �OaCSy Cl) Ash SJ m � R � Cd,s,Oaks Ave e v o cn 1011dof Farroll Ave E , .O, 4 ° a The Pike 9-- Sunrise Dr ProposedElection Sequence: * Leanna Dr ' 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PaMCALIP 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 540 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,078 4,152 4,497 4,742 18,469 Deviation from ideal 461 -465 -120 125 926 %Deviation 9.98% -10.07% -2.60% 2.71% 20.06% %Hisp 15.7% 13% 26% 24% 20% %NH White 71% 78% 63% 65% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 4% 5% — Total 3,795 3,631 3,164 3,555 14,144 %Hisp 12% 9% 17% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 82% 84% 71% 78% 79% %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 3% 5% 6% 6% 5% Total 3,958 3,418 2,745 3,213 13,334 %Latino est. 9% 7% 17% 14% 11% %Spanish-Surnamed 9% 7% 16% 14% 11% Voter Registration a/Asian-Sumamed 3% 2% 2% 1% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 89% 77% 82% 84% %NH Black 1% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,585 3,142 2,361 2,774 11,862 %Latino est. 8% 7% 16% 13% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 8% 7% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 90% 78% 83% 85% %NH Black 1% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 2,867 2,546 1,729 2,111 9,253 %Latino est. 7% 6% 12% 11% 8% %Spanish-Surnamed 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 1% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 88% 91% 82% 86% 87% %NH Black est. 1% 0% 2% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,666 4,587 4,318 4,569 18,140 age0-19 16% 25% 25% 21% 22% Age age20-60 48% 46% 49% 53% 49% age60plus 36% 29% 27% 26% 29% immigrants 8% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 71% 73% 57% 62% 65% english 90% 91% 85% 84% 88% spanish 4% 1% 9% 10% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 5% 6% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% hs-grad 45% 48% 46% 52% 48% Education bachelor 23% 24% 20% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 16% 14% 13% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 19% 26% 30% 27% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 52% 60% 61% 60% 58% income 0-25k 18% 9% 16% 14% 14% income 25-50k 10% 15% 22% 16% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 14% 15% 17% 20% 16% income 75-200k 50% 48% 41% 46% 46% income 200k-plus 9% 12% 5% 4% 8% single family 90% 95% t 70% 80% 84% multi-family 10% 5% 30% 20% 16% Housing Stats rented 20% 29% 51% 34% 33% owned 80% 71% 49% 66% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 245 of 340 02/08/2022 13:12 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toa District Elections ..,,c,,,,, „ -0 N of Population Balanced u, �ro ro ro� C 1 ~ro C2-2. 7/ 21 James Way o' cb° o --� ,-,e, ao q� obe° ,�� Huast Rd rN ^ c, 'sr ,•'. 1010 Montego Sty- ' 131Sti�I, Cc �co 'eZ Sr c��c9 P � �� gyro ��' x E Grand Ave / CCcs. ,' 0 �Cc'. . 2 cn 0 <e UMaple t- -„ "r liCY ' O 7, cn Ash St _ Qtri � 0 C . �'o, aFair Oaks Ave s e�o Q, 101 cn 119F1 Farroll Ave k eiA_ i 4 1 4 a L_ 9-- Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: _masa J Leanna Dry' 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 P iMIV40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 541 District '1 -. --- 1-11-4 Total -- o Total Pop 4,609 4,041 5,056 4,763 18,469 Deviation from ideal -8 -576 439 146 1,015 %Deviation -0.17% -12.48% 9.51% 3.16% 21.98% %Hisp 11.5% 14% 25% 27% 20% %NH White 77% 76% 63% 61% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% - Total 3,369 3,692 3,558 3,526 14,144 %Hisp 9% 10% 16% 16% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 84% 83% 72% 77% 79% %NH Black 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 4% 5% Total 3,820 3,340 3,189 2,985 13,334 %Latino est. 8% 8% 17% 14% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 7% 16% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 87% 89% 79% 81% 84% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 3,512 3,064 t 2,738 2,548 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 7% 16% 13% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 7% 7% 15% 12% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 87% 89% 80% 82% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 2,855 2,475 2,026 1,897 9,253 %Latino est. 7% 7% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 7% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 88% 90% 84% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,035 4,633 4,846 4,625 18,140 age0-19 15% 25% 26% 20% 22% Age age20-60 47% 43% 53% 52% 49% age60plus 38% 32% 21% 27% 29% immigrants 8% 6% 10% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 67% 75% 57% 65% 65% english 88% 92% 85% 86% 88% spanish 4% 0% 9% 10% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 2% 2% 4% 2% 2% other fang 6% 6% 2% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 4% 4% hs-grad 45% 48% 47% 51% 48% Education bachelor 23% 25% 19% 21% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 18% 13% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 19% 25% 33% 24% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 47% 60% 63% 61% 58% income0-25k 18% 9% 11% 20% 14% income 25-50k 10% 17% 19% 16% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 21% 16% 16% income 75-200k 48% 47% 46% 44% 46% income 200k-plus 11% 12% 3% 4% 8% single family 89% 95% 73% 78% 84% multi-family 11% 5% 27% 22% 16% Housing Stats rented 18% 29% 46% 37% 33% owned 82% 71% 54% 63% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 247 of 340 02/08/2022 13:17 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to Plan District Elections °`�S -0 Not Population Balanced u, 4. bro ro ro� C� I ,�ro y2I 21 James Way 27 °� 4e .,„o'1\'' c u v4k.- (5 qc c,o' ,�� Huast Rd Montego St�� Branch rii (.2.\ 7 .c..- �c�,Sp crofic S �� P o"� ��cam' E Grand Ave `-C?". ec � O Co- -75 „ �a. `C ?, -c, 14 c'. . 2 ` '` i 11- C� Maple St 4 Or, cs cn � a 7 cn Ash St 1 m c � ego d 101 Fair Oaks Ave s e I Farroll Ave E Pr 4 a The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: `1* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 P iMLSP 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 542 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,039 4,030 4,408 4,992 18,469 Deviation from ideal 422 -587 -209 375 1,009 %Deviation 9.14% -12.71% -4.53% 8.12% 21.85% %Hisp 11.6% 17% 25% 26% 20% %NH White 77% 72% 63% 63% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% - Total 3,705 3,682 3,124 3,633 14,144 %Hisp 8% 13% 17% 14% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 80% 71% 77% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 2% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 4,209 3,144 2,785 3,196 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 9% 15% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 86% 77% 81% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,907 2,822 2,397 2,736 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 9% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 78% 82% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,228 2,185 1,765 2,075 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% %NH White est. 91% 88% 82% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,601 4,558 4,233 4,748 18,140 age0-19 19% 22% 25% 21% 22% Age age20-60 46% 46% 50% 54% 49% age60plus 35% 32% 25% 25% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 80% 57% 59% 65% english 90% 91% 86% 83% 88% spanish 3% 0% 8% 12% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other lang 5% 6% 2% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% hs-grad 42% 53% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 25% 22% 20% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 13% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 22% 31% 26% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 61% 62% 61% 58% income 0-25k 14% 12% 14% 18% 14% income 25-50k 8% 18% 22% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 18% 19% 16% income 75-200k 54% 46% 42% 43% 46% income 200k-plus 14% 8% 4% 5% 8% single family 95% 93% 71% 75% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 29% 25% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 32% 50% 37% 33% owned 86% 68% 50% 63% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 249 of 340 02/08/2022 13:22 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toa District Elections �o`,s 9 -0 Not Population Balanced u, ro b ro� C 1 ~ro 227 21 James Way 27 o'. ° U ob �� c 0 "b bec ti� Huasna Rd rioi Montego St�� Branch �L�'S�J crofi� 7 St "ci cP �� PIE Grand Ave o e�� c"cip' � ?� -O 2 w � �� Cyt �< O U Maple St 0 �� °�� Ori SCS . ,i,,,,,,_., �ry y cn Ash St I i� m c �4• Ca,s, d 101 Fair Oaks Ave s cn of Farroll Ave F P � ' I . 4 000 a H 41, The Pike d Sunrise Dr ProposedElection Sequence: `g* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PMPEF40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 543 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,039 4,030 4,408 4,992 18,469 Deviation from ideal 422 -587 -209 375 1,009 %Deviation 9.14% -12.71% -4.53% 8.12% 21.85% %Hisp 11.6% 17% 25% 26% 20% %NH White 77% 72% 63% 63% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% - Total 3,705 3,682 3,124 3,633 14,144 %Hisp 8% 13% 17% 14% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 80% 71% 77% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 2% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 4,209 3,144 2,785 3,196 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 9% 15% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 86% 77% 81% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,907 2,822 2,397 2,736 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 9% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 78% 82% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,228 2,185 1,765 2,075 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% %NH White est. 91% 88% 82% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,601 4,558 4,233 4,748 18,140 age0-19 19% 22% 25% 21% 22% Age age20-60 46% 46% 50% 54% 49% age60plus 35% 32% 25% 25% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 80% 57% 59% 65% english 90% 91% 86% 83% 88% spanish 3% 0% 8% 12% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other lang 5% 6% 2% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% hs-grad 42% 53% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 25% 22% 20% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 13% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 22% 31% 26% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 61% 62% 61% 58% income 0-25k 14% 12% 14% 18% 14% income 25-50k 8% 18% 22% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 18% 19% 16% income 75-200k 54% 46% 42% 43% 46% income 200k-plus 14% 8% 4% 5% 8% single family 95% 93% 71% 75% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 29% 25% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 32% 50% 37% 33% owned 86% 68% 50% 63% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 251 of 340 02/08/2022 13:27 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toPlan 544 ,.. District Elections °`�S -0 Not Population Balanced u, ro ro� C� I ,�� y_ i 21 James War 27e C °b° �� ° 0 "b C. )°) fie° ,s.' Huasna RdJ ,fib r101‘ Montego Sty,-_. �raichS Cc' ��c, c°gd 7 r �� p �'�Q' o cP E Grand Ave o c.0 s7 C,V- -75 aG c'. .3 c, J ,c,' P- 02 0 Maple St '. °") �0�� c�� 'a1 ,Cr,' y cn Ash St �� i� m c 4' �a a��o d 101 Fair Oaks Ave ,r cn of Farroll Ave FMOS k, 4 � n l C O a The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 11111 Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 P 1?r _PEF 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 544 District 1 2 3 4 1 Total Total Pop 5,179 4,165 o 4,533 4,592 18,469 Deviation from ideal 562 -452 -84 -25 1,014 %Deviation 12.17% -9.79% -1.82% -0.54% 21.96% %Hisp 11.6% 15% 27% 26% 20% %NH White 76% 74% 61% 63% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,808 3,766 3,205 3,366 14,144 %Hisp 9% 11% 19% 14% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 85% 82% 70% 78% 79% %NH Black 2% 1% 2% 0% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 4,322 3,342 2,706 2,964 13,334 %Latino est. 8% 8% 18% 14% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 8% 17% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 88% 87% 78% 82% 84% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 3,979 3,040 t 2,301 2,542 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 8% 16% 13% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 7% 8% 15% 12% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 87% 88% 79% 83% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 3,250 2,395 1,671 1,937 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 7% 12% 10% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 7% 12% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 1% 2% 1% %NH White est. 89% 89% 83% 86% 87% %NH Black est. 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,634 4,720 4,465 4,321 18,140 age0-19 17% 23% 26% 20% 22% Age age20-60 46% 45% 50% 55% 49% age60plus 37% 32% 23% 25% 29% immigrants 8% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 68% 78% 57% 61% 65% english 89% 92% 86% 83% 88% spanish 4% 0% 9% 12% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% other fang 5% 6% 2% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% hs-grad 44% 51% 46% 52% 48% Education bachelor 24% 23% 19% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 18% 12% 13% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 20% 23% 33% 25% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 49% 61% 63% 61% 58% income 0-25k 16% 10% 12% 18% 14% income 25-50k 10% 18% 21% 14% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 16% 19% 19% 16% income 75-200k 49% 47% 44% 45% 46% income 200k-plus 12% 9% 4% 4% 8% single family 90% 94% t 73% 76% 84% multi-family 10% 6% 27% 24% 16% Housing Stats rented 18% 31% 49% 36% 33% owned 82% 69% 51% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 253 of 340 02/08/2022 13:35 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toPlan 545 ,.. District Elections °`�S -0 Not Population Balanced u, 4. e 4 I , 7 22�; 21 James Way 27 °� 4bU CV �'' v o .b / °be° ti� Huasna RdJ ,fib r no1c � Montego St - ' 1- -6'1. Sti fi� c�' ro o c. E Grand Ave o �� p b� 3 �, p. I o Maple St �� e �O,-b �c$ '`b' G y Cl) Ash St0 to � C 4' as to' �101 F �� Fair Oaks Ave (------- 4 ,,f Farroll Ave E ,,, o 4, F o H a' The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: INLeanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 ____..e. ' 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pl? 4LV40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 545 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 3,403 3,460 I 8,899 2,707 18,469 Deviation from ideal -1,214 -1,157 4,282 -1,910 6,192 %Deviation -26.29% -25.06% 92.74% -41.37% 134.11% %Hisp 11.1% 14% 26% 18% 20% %NH White 76% 77% 62% 70% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 5% 5% - Total 2,519 2,956 6,328 2,341 14,144 %Hisp 8% 9% 15% 15% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 86% 83% 73% 82% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 2% 0% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 3% 5% Total 2,843 2,816 5,586 2,089 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 7% 16% 11% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 7% 15% 10% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 89% 79% 85% 84% %NH Black 1% 0% 2% 0% 1% Total 2,632 2,577 4,788 1,865 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 7% 15% 10% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 7% 14% 10% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 88% 90% 80% 86% 85% %NH Black 1% 0% 2% 0% 1% Total 2,186 2,053 3,552 1,462 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 6% 11% 9% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 6% 11% 9% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 90% 83% 88% 87% %NH Black est. 1% 1% 2% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 3,011 3,805 8,485 2,839 18,140 age0-19 14% 27% 23% 19% 22% Age age20-60 46% 49% 52% 43% 49% age60plus 40% 24% 25% 38% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 7% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 70% 57% 86% 65% english 88% 91% 84% 94% 88% spanish 4% 1% 11% 1% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 0% 2% other fang 6% 6% 2% 5% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 4% 5% 5% 1% 4% hs-grad 43% 45% 48% 55% 48% Education bachelor 24% 26% 20% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 14% 11% 10% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 19% 27% 29% 20% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 47% 64% 61% I 57% 58% income 0-25k 16% 8% 16% 17% 14% income 25-50k 6% 12% 19% 21% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 14% 15% 19% 13% 16% income 75-200k 53% 51% 42% 45% 46% income 200k-plus 11% 14% 5% 4% 8% single family 93% 93% I 72% 95% 84% multi-family 7% 7% 28% 5% 16% Housing Stats rented 12% 33% 44% 23% 33% owned 88% 67% 56% 77% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 255 of 340 02/08/2022 13:46 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toPlan 546 ,.. District Elections �°`�s -0 Not Population Balanced u, � ro 4 firo I , 27 Z� I 21 James War 7 e 4b �� v o "b # °,b° �� Huasna Rai Montego St'' l' 61- ,, S� tN fi o�� Sr ��cr Pda , �ro E Grand Ave o �� 3 C.5 �r 2 P o 0 oMaple St '. °")) �O�b �0.,4 % ,C,r,' o %, y CED Ash St j E. to Fair Oaks AveiTilit �'v as��/o 01 • cn Q'el Farroll Ave E 1 t moo. 400 e a The Pike IDI 9-- Sunrise Dr ProposedElection Sequence: 'g* Leanna Dr •k 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pai?N_P 140 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 546 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,100 4,185 I 4,419 4,765 18,469 Deviation from ideal 483 -432 -198 148 915 %Deviation 10.46% -9.36% -4.29% 3.21% 19.82% %Hisp 14.5% 14% 28% 23% 20% %NH White 72% 76% 60% 66% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 5% 5% 5% — Total 3,782 3,497 3,207 3,659 14,144 %Hisp 10% 10% 20% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 82% 83% 72% 79% 79% %NH Black 3% 1% 0% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 5% 4% 6% 5% Total 3,985 3,383 2,645 3,321 13,334 %Latino est. 9% 7% 18% 13% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 9% 7% 17% 12% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 84% 89% 79% 83% 84% %NH Black 3% 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,615 3,092 2,228 2,927 11,862 %Latino est. 9% 7% 16% 12% 10% %Spanish-Sumamed 9% 6% 15% 11% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 83% 90% 80% 84% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 2,903 2,475 1,599 2,276 9,253 %Latino est. 8% 6% 12% 9% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 6% 12% 9% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 91% 84% 87% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 0% 0% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,570 4,442 4,561 4,567 18,140 age0-19 15% 25% 27% 20% 22% Age age20-60 45% 49% 51% 50% 49% age60plus 39% 26% 23% 30% 29% immigrants 9% 6% 10% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 65% 72% 57% 67% 65% english 89% 91% 83% 87% 88% spanish 4% 1% 13% 7% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% other fang 4% 6% 2% 4% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 6% 4% 4% hs-grad 45% 45% 46% 54% 48% Education bachelor 23% 25% 20% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 16% 14% 12% 10% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 17% 26% 36% 23% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 49% 63% 65% 58% 58% income 0-25k 20% 9% 13% 14% 14% income 25-50k 14% 12% 19% 17% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 16% 19% 19% 16% income 75-200k 44% 51% 45% 46% 46% income 200k-plus 10% 13% 4% 4% 8% single family 82% 93% I 75% 85% 84% multi-family 18% 7% 25% 15% 16% Housing Stats rented 27% 31% 47% 28% 33% owned 73% 69% 53% 72% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 257 of 340 02/08/2022 13:53 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toan 547 District Elections �o`,s „ -0 Not Population Balanced u, �ro ro , ' CYro 1 ~ro C2-2- 2, 7/ 21 James War o 4� �roa a cb° �� o (5 q' - b9° ,' ' HuaSt Rd (1010 Montego St - ' 1Br Sti fic sc°fie Sr � ,c� Ts (''> �� Mij �� ods � cP E Grand Ave o c�y��' 75 3 �� 2 it, 2. y CS" �<e' O ? F U Maple St 7' e 0r� %� r a �,z..\-i-,_., �Q, � '� n Ash St 0 m c Fair Oaks Ave �� ase ..(//o 101, of Farroll Ave E ., � 400 a 41 The Pike '..c) Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: `1* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 P iMLSP 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 547 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,039 4,030 4,823 4,577 18,469 Deviation from ideal 422 -587 206 -40 1,009 %Deviation 9.14% -12.71% 4.46% -0.87% 21.85% %Hisp 11.6% 17% 26% 25% 20% %NH White 77% 72% 62% 64% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,705 3,682 3,398 3,359 14,144 %Hisp 8% 13% 17% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 80% 71% 78% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 6% 5% Total 4,209 3,144 3,067 2,914 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 9% 15% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 86% 78% 81% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,907 2,822 2,623 2,510 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 9% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 79% 82% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,228 2,185 1,944 1,896 9,253 Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 91% 88% 83% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,601 4,558 4,579 4,402 18,140 age0-19 19% 22% 23% 23% 22% Age age20-60 46% 46% 47% 56% 49% age60plus 35% 32% 30% 21% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 80% 57% 59% 65% english 90% 91% 85% 84% 88% spanish 3% 0% 10% 10% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 5% 6% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% hs-grad 42% 53% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 25% 22% 21% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 22% 28% 29% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 61% 60% 62% 58% income 0-25k 14% 12% 18% 13% 14% income 25-50k 8% 18% 22% 14% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 16% 22% 16% income 75-200k 54% 46% 38% 48% 46% income 200k-plus 14% 8% 5% 3% 8% single family 95% 93% 68% 78% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 32% 22% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 32% 51% 36% 33% owned 86% 68% 49% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 259 of 340 02/08/2022 13:59 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to Plan 548 District Elections �°`,S „ -0 Not Population Balanced Not Contiguous 4 �ro ro rofi 1 ~ro (-4\227 7 21 James War 27e c:',” .s,'''�� u ar V" ^a �, � C°� �� °,be° �� Huasna Rd (----N101 Montego St - ' iB �I, fi � �co � rangy Sr �-ci)c-'cNP �° gyro E Grand Ave o ° ��' cn r c - 2, clo ° Maple St oiOa o�� y cn Ash St 0 m R * ,r_,,, o' a I s e Fair Oaks Ave c �°fie 1011 cn Farroll Ave � ,i, 4 ° o a /� Q' S rise?. The Pike d Proposed Election Sequence: illi Leanna Dr __ - 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PagAi?KfV40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 548 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,054 3,763 I 4,741 4,911 18,469 Deviation from ideal 437 -854 124 294 1,291 Deviation 9.47% -18.50% 2.69% 6.37% 27.96% %Hisp 13.7% 14% 27% 23% 20% %NH White 73% 76% 60% 67% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 4% 5% - Total 3,770 3,220 3,406 3,749 14,144 %Hisp 10% 10% 20% 12% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 83% 82% 72% 79% 79% %NH Black 3% 1% 0% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 6% 5% 6% 5% Total 4,078 3,045 2,921 3,290 13,334 %Latino est. 8% 7% 17% 14% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 7% 16% 13% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 89% 80% 83% 84% %NH Black 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,717 2,781 2,460 2,904 11,862 %Latino est. 8% 7% 15% 13% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 8% 7% 15% 12% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 89% 81% 84% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 2,985 2,207 1,808 2,253 9,253 %Latino est. 7% 6% 12% 10% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 87% 90% 84% 87% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 0% 0% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,533 4,148 t 4,662 4,797 18,140 age0-19 15% 26% 24% 22% 22% Age age20-60 46% 48% 49% 52% 49% age60plus 38% 26% 27% 26% 29% immigrants 8% 6% 10% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 69% 72% 59% 63% 65% english 90% 91% 84% 86% 88% spanish 4% 1% 12% 7% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% other fang 5% 6% 1% 4% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 5% 5% 4% 4% hs-grad 45% 46% 46% 53% 48% Education bachelor 23% 25% 22% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 17% 14% 12% 10% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 18% 27% 31% 26% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 50% 62% 62% 59% 58% income 0-25k 19% 8% 18% 11% 14% income 25-50k 11% 13% 20% 17% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 17% 20% 16% income 75-200k 47% 50% 41% 47% 46% income 200k-plus 9% 13% 5% 4% 8% single family 86% 94% 72% 85% 84% multi-family 14% 6% 28% 15% 16% Housing Stats rented 22% 32% 48% 30% 33% owned 78% 68% 52% 70% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 261 of 340 02/08/2022 14:24 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to 11an 549 District Elections °`�S „ '<, Not Population Balanced u, �ro ro , ' CYro 1 ~ro 227/ 21 James Way °' cv cb° o .o (5 (' °,be° ,- c:)- , Huasna Rd r101 Montego St�� l'rBranch �c�5� 474) �rofic, sc°�� 7 t ti� *o �'� s �� ods ��cam' E Grand.' - o c�y�,' I r ' �� ,C4 2 Cyt°� �,e, O r o =- ape a3 .. �4 �1�Oa� �o✓l� r ii Ash St "' I ,i, 7-o• a, Fair Oaks Ave e.0 cn_ / odej �101i Farroll Ave F ar +� 4 a The Pike 9-- Sunrise Dr ProposedElection Sequence: `1* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pa1Mu9140 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 549 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 5,039 4,030 4,408 4,992 18,469 Deviation from ideal 422 -587 -209 375 1,009 %Deviation 9.14% -12.71% -4.53% 8.12% 21.85% %Hisp 11.6% 17% 25% 26% 20% %NH White 77% 72% 63% 63% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% - Total 3,705 3,682 3,124 3,633 14,144 %Hisp 8% 13% 17% 14% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 80% 71% 77% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 2% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 4,209 3,144 2,785 3,196 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 9% 15% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 86% 77% 81% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,907 2,822 2,397 2,736 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 9% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 78% 82% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,228 2,185 1,765 2,075 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% %NH White est. 91% 88% 82% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,601 4,558 4,233 4,748 18,140 age0-19 19% 22% 25% 21% 22% Age age20-60 46% 46% 50% 54% 49% age60plus 35% 32% 25% 25% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 80% 57% 59% 65% english 90% 91% 86% 83% 88% spanish 3% 0% 8% 12% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other lang 5% 6% 2% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% hs-grad 42% 53% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 25% 22% 20% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 13% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 22% 31% 26% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 61% 62% 61% 58% income 0-25k 14% 12% 14% 18% 14% income 25-50k 8% 18% 22% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 18% 19% 16% income 75-200k 54% 46% 42% 43% 46% income 200k-plus 14% 8% 4% 5% 8% single family 95% 93% 71% 75% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 29% 25% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 32% 50% 37% 33% owned 86% 68% 50% 63% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 263 of 340 02/08/2022 14:30 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to , Plan 550 ,.. District Elections �°`�s -0 Not Population Balanced lam, �ro ,ro Ciro I �ro 21 James Way e cb° ,, o u 0 �� 'a q� °be° ,�� Huast Rd 101 `4 Montego St - ) 1Br Sti aneh S �`c" J' �rofi FAIL c°�e' 7 t ��c ��, I 'C X doh �T E Grand Ave o ?, °, 0 u Cs �� -C2 �, �� `'. 3i, ILI CU Maple St �� o�° tO, �� 1 e0 C4' G y cn Ash St0 m IP c Fair Oaks Ave � a��I1011 cn el 41 Farroll Ave F P4 n - C e 0- The Pike Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: `1* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PagAAidV40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 550 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,927 3,955 4,768 4,819 18,469 Deviation from ideal 310 -662 151 202 972 %Deviation 6.71% -14.34% 3.27% 4.38% 21.05% %Hisp 11.9% 17% 23% 26% 20% %NH White 77% 72% 65% 62% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% %Asian-American 5% 5% 6% 5% 5% — Total 3,467 3,673 3,520 3,484 14,144 %Hisp 9% 13% 14% 15% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 80% 74% 76% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 3% 5% 6% 6% 5% Total 4,115 3,088 t 3,126 3,005 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 10% 14% 16% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 9% 14% 15% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 86% 79% 80% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,814 2,754 2,720 2,574 11,862 %Latino est. 6% 9% 14% 15% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 9% 13% 14% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 87% 80% 81% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,131 2,150 2,067 1,905 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 8% 10% 12% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 10% 11% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% %NH White est. 91% 88% 83% 84% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,421 4,452 4,547 4,720 18,140 age0-19 22% 21% 21% 23% 22% Age age20-60 45% 48% 48% 55% 49% age60plus 33% 32% 31% 22% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 82% 58% 57% 65% english 91% 91% 87% 82% 88% spanish 3% 1% 8% 12% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 5% 3% 2% other fang 5% 7% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 4% 6% 4% hs-grad 40% 55% 45% 51% 48% Education bachelor 26% 20% 22% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 9% 14% 10% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 26% 20% 25% 30% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 52% 61% 58% 61% 58% income 0-25k 12% 14% 18% 14% 14% income 25-50k 8% 18% 20% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 18% 15% 21% 16% income 75-200k 54% 45% 41% 46% 46% income 200k-plus 15% 6% 6% 4% 8% single family 98% 91% 69% 77% 84% multi-family 2% 9% 31% 23% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 33% 48% 37% 33% owned 86% 67% 52% 63% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 265 of 340 02/08/2022 14:37 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toan 551 District Elections �° .. `�s 9 -0 Not Population Balanced u, ro b ro� C 1 ~ro 227 21 James Way 27 °'. U ar cb° o 0 / be° ti� HuaSr RdJ 9c 101 Montego St�: Branch �c�5 �ro�,c, a ��'� p E Grand Ave I o ccP0 (a c� hti it, J ,0 P- C5 Maple St 2. 4°/ �0�� c�� 3 U y cn Ash St 1, i� m c Fair Oaks Ave �� ase` �o 101 of Farroll Ave FQi � C - O 0 0 H a' 41 The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: `1* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pa1?rN_P140 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 551 District 1 2 3 4 1 Total Total Pop 4,865 4,155 1 4,698 4,751 18,469 Deviation from ideal 248 -462 81 134 710 %Deviation 5.37% -10.01% 1.75% 2.90% 15.38% %Hisp 11.5% 16% 25% 26% 20% %NH White 77% 74% 62% 63% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% — Total 3,540 3,789 3,352 3,463 14,144 %Hisp 9% 12% 16% 15% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 82% 72% 75% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 3% 5% 6% 6% 5% Total 4,056 3,288 3,029 2,961 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 16% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 9% 15% 15% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 87% 78% 80% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,766 2,960 2,606 2,530 11,862 %Latino est. 6% 9% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 14% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 79% 81% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,100 2,329 1,958 1,866 9,253 Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 5% 8% 11% 11% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 91% 88% 83% 84% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,398 4,681 4,453 4,608 18,140 age0-19 19% 22% 22% 23% 22% Age age20-60 46% 46% 48% 56% 49% age60plus 35% 32% 30% 21% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 80% 57% 59% 65% english 90% 92% 85% 83% 88% spanish 3% 0% 10% 11% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 6% 6% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 4% 5% 4% hs-grad 42% 53% 45% 51% 48% Education bachelor 25% 22% 21% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 13% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 24% 22% 27% 29% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 61% 60% 62% 58% income 0-25k 13% 12% 18% 13% 14% income 25-50k 8% 18% 22% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 16% 21% 16% income 75-200k 53% 46% 39% 47% 46% income 200k-plus 14% 8% 5% 4% 8% single family 96% 93% 68% 78% 84% multi-family 4% 7% 32% 22% 16% Housing Stats rented 13% 32% 50% 36% 33% owned 87% 68% 50% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 267 of 340 02/08/2022 14:44 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to Plan 552 District Elections �°`�S -0 Not Population Balanced u, �ro ro ro, U 1 , 227/ 21 James War 4'\ U. cv cb° �� o U°� c q� 'c° ,-� Huasna Rd Hu‘ [r Montego St-_ Br S� c fi Flulco. �7 Sr ��c, P Q ��ro S Qo E Grand Ave o c0 p -75 3 �� °� e ( o IL U Maple St �� 2.. °�� O`�� 0v n v y Jim Ash St 0 m1' c 4' a eyo�, 1011 Fair Oaks Avg s ' ci) otp of Farroll Ave F 1 qe- 1, . � o o H a The Pike 9-- Sunrise Dr ProposedElection Sequence: `1* Leanna Dr146,N7.- 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PMULSP 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 552 District 1 2 3 4 Total 0 Total Pop 4,718 3,782 4,408 5,561 18,469 Deviation from ideal 101 -835 -209 944 1,779 %Deviation 2.19% -18.09% -4.53% 20.45% 38.53% %Hisp 11.6% 14% 25% 27% 20% %NH White 76% 76% 63% 61% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% - Total 3,448 3,534 3,124 4,039 14,144 %Hisp 9% 11% 17% 16% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 82% 71% 76% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,933 3,060 1 2,785 3,556 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 8% 16% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 8% 15% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 88% 77% 80% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,653 2,771 I 2,397 3,041 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 8% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 89% 78% 81% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,002 2,240 1,765 2,246 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 7% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 7% 11% 11% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 89% 82% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 0% 2% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,263 4,332 4,233 5,311 18,140 age0-19 18% 23% 25% 21% 22% Age age20-60 47% 45% 50% 54% 49% age60plus 35% 32% 25% 25% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 78% 57% 61% 65% english 90% 91% 86% 84% 88% spanish 4% 0% 8% 11% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other lang 6% 6% 2% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% hs-grad 43% 52% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 25% 23% 20% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 13% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 22% 23% 31% 25% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 50% 60% 62% 61% 58% income 0-25k 14% 10% 14% 18% 14% income 25-50k 7% 18% 22% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 16% 18% 19% 16% income 75-200k 53% 46% 42% 44% 46% income 200k-plus 13% 9% 4% 4% 8% single family 95% 93% 71% 77% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 29% 23% 16% Housing Stats rented 13% 31% 50% 37% 33% owned 87% 69% 50% 63% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. FillotleMoage 269 of 340 02/08/2022 16:41 Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT 6B City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to , Plan 105R ,.. District Elections �o`�s lam, �ro ro rofi C� I �ro 227 21 James Way 27e L� Urofi Cv 0 ��cr o 0 b owe° ,4''' � (1 1uasna Rd 101 Montego St - ! 1B S' fi �Sco�� a�� Sr ti��c� � o �� p �p r) � JecP E Grand Ave co c ��' pd j _ 3 �� o. � ' i 1Wril'' Maple St �� °� �O Nb c✓1�� 2, y Cl) Ash St i City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 105R District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,507 4,789 4,727 4,446 18,469 Deviation from ideal -110 172 110 -171 343 %Deviation -2.38% 3.73% 2.38% -3.70% 7.43% %Hisp 20.0% 13% 28% 19% 20% %NH White 68% 76% 62% 69% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 5% 5% 5% 5% Total 3,142 3,636 3,419 3,947 14,144 %Hisp 13% 9% 15% 14% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 77% 86% 76% 77% 79% %NH Black 1% 0% 1% 2% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 6% 4% 5% 6% 5% Total 3,281 3,906 2,785 3,362 13,334 %Latino est. 12% 7% 16% 11% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 11% 7% 15% 11% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% %NH White est. 83% 89% 80% 83% 84% %NH Black 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% Total 2,899 3,619 2,380 2,964 11,862 %Latino est. 11% 7% 15% 10% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 11% 7% 14% 10% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% %NH White est. 84% 88% 82% 84% 85% %NH Black 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% Total 2,279 2,943 1,748 2,283 9,253 %Latino est. 9% 6% 12% 9% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 9% 6% 11% 8% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 87% 90% 85% 86% 87% %NH Black est. 1% 1% 0% 2% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,108 4,693 4,568 4,771 18,140 age0-19 21% 23% 23% 19% 22% Age age20-60 47% 47% 55% 47% 49% age60plus 32% 30% 22% 34% 29% immigrants 10% 7% 10% 8% 8% Immigration naturalized 60% 70% 57% 75% 65% english 87% 92% 82% 90% 88% spanish 7% 2% 13% 2% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 3% 1% 3% 2% 2% other fang 3% 4% 3% 6% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 4% 3% 6% 4% 4% hs-grad 43% 42% 50% 56% 48% Education bachelor 22% 27% 19% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 16% 18% 10% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 26% 28% 30% 19% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 57% 55% 62% 59% 58% income0-25k 14% 11% 14% 17% 14% income 25-50k 17% 10% 15% 19% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 18% 9% 21% 18% 16% income 75-200k 45% 54% 45% 41% 46% income 200k-plus 6% 16% 4% 5% 8% single family 77% 96% 75% 86% 84% multi-family 23% 4% 25% 14% 16% Housing Stats rented 39% 18% 38% 36% 33% owned 61% 82% 62% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 271 of 340 02/11/2022 15:42 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to , Plan District Elections �° .. `�s 9 �ro ro ro� C 1 . ,ro 227, 21 James War 27e L� C)roc a cb° ° 0 2, qv 2e'° ,S�� 1uasna Rd 4-9 �a (1 n01 Montego St�� 4--e` Brae Sr ��c� �4� �crofic cP Grand Ave 0E1 o c�s� it,IU Maple St �� <se ��„ „�� ,� G 9' y C Ash St i� t� if' C Fair Oaks Ave v asl,' (----- ,c4) io '- io • cn mel 101, Farroll Ave pr +• 400 e a Fa The PikeSunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: I* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PaMUii140 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 109 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,668 4,589 4,491 4,721 18,469 Deviation from ideal 51 -28 -126 104 230 %Deviation 1.10% -0.61% -2.73% 2.25% 4.98% %Hisp 17.3% 13% 30% 19% 20% %NH White 71% 78% 58% 68% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 5% 5% 5% Total 3,644 3,625 3,076 3,799 14,144 %Hisp 11% 9% 19% 14% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 81% 84% 72% 79% 79% %NH Black 3% 0% 0% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% Total 3,417 3,791 2,539 3,587 13,334 %Latino est. 11% 7% 17% 12% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 10% 7% 16% 11% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 83% 89% 79% 83% 84% %NH Black 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,050 3,484 2,153 3,175 11,862 %Latino est. 10% 7% 16% 11% 10% %Spanish-Sumamed 10% 6% 15% 11% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 84% 90% 81% 83% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 2,436 2,811 1,539 2,467 9,253 %Latino est. 9% 6% 12% 9% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 9% 6% 12% 9% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 91% 84% 87% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,431 4,667 4,418 4,623 18,140 age0-19 16% 25% 26% 20% 22% Age age20-60 43% 49% 54% 50% 49% age60plus 41% 26% 20% 30% 29% immigrants 9% 6% 10% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 61% 70% 57% 73% 65% english 88% 90% 83% 89% 88% spanish 7% 1% 12% 4% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% other fang 2% 7% 2% 4% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well 4% 4% 6% 3% 4% hs-grad 45% 45% 47% 55% 48% Education bachelor 24% 25% 20% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 15% 16% 12% 10% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 17% 27% 36% 22% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 52% 60% 65% 58% 58% income0-25k 22% 9% 11% 15% 14% income25-50k 16% 11% 18% 17% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 16% 21% 17% 16% income 75-200k 41% 51% 47% 47% 46% income 200k-plus 9% 14% 3% 4% 8% single family 76% 95% 75% 89% 84% multi-family 24% 5% 25% 11% 16% Housing Stats rented 33% 28% 46% 26% 33% owned 67% 72% 54% 74% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 273 of 340 02/11/2022 11:08 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to , Plan 205 ,.. District Elections �°`�s �ro ro ro� C 1 ~ro 21 James Way 21 °'. U cb° ' 0 "b (5 °b9 ° ,4�� Huasna Rd (1 101 -� Montego Sty- ' 1Br Sti�I, fic ��co�� ani Sr ��c9 s �o �yM c n �s ece' E Grand Ave i ��' oc, �— p. c.:5 aple St 7' . °i ��0�� o�7? cx cn Ash St0 m c '� a e�o d 1011 Fair Oaks Ave s cn of Farroll Ave F , Vn l C O er4a- The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 1011 Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PM7a4,L9 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 205 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,638 4,602 4,588 I 4,641 18,469 Deviation from ideal 21 -15 " -29 24 53 %Deviation 0.45% -0.32% -0.63% 0.52% 1.15% %Hisp 11.6% 16% 26% 26% 20% %NH White 76% 75% 63% 62% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% — Total 3,459 4,147 3,231 3,307 14,144 %Hisp 8% 13% 18% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 81% 72% 75% 79% %NH Black 0% 0% 1% 3% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 6% 5% Total 3,926 3,617 2,846 2,945 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 18% 14% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 9% 16% 13% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 90% 87% 78% 79% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 1% 3% 1% Total 3,646 3,250 t 2,425 2,541 11,862 %Latino est. 6% 9% 17% 13% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 15% 12% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 89% 88% 79% 80% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 1% 3% 1% Total 3,031 2,547 1,778 1,897 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 8% 12% 10% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 12% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% %NH White est. 90% 89% 83% 84% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 0% 1% 3% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,271 5,058 4,514 4,297 18,140 age0-19 19% 22% 26% 20% 22% Age age20-60 45% 47% 50% 53% 49% age60plus 36% 31% 23% 27% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 11% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 79% 57% 58% 65% english 91% 91% 86% 82% 88% spanish 3% 1% 9% 12% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 4% 2% other lang 5% 7% 2% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% hs-grad 41% 53% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 26% 21% 19% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 13% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 22% 33% 24% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 60% 63% 59% 58% income 0-25k 13% 13% 13% 19% 14% income 25-50k 8% 17% 21% 16% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 19% 19% 16% income 75-200k 54% 46% 44% 41% 46% income 200k-plus 13% 8% 4% 5% 8% single family 95% 93% t 73% 72% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 27% 28% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 31% 49% 39% 33% owned 86% 69% 51% 61% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 275 of 340 02/11/2022 12:41 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to , Plan 515R ,.. District Elections �°`�S efi Ciro I �ro 227, 21 James War 270 L� Ci a cb° o 0 .b qv fie° ,S�� 1uasna Rd (101C S Montego St - ' 113fi c, 4;.) ocl� �es� E Grand Ave o ° ��' o -75 .; c w yCdo �� '>-<c' Oa � � b" cs's$Il Cf) Maple St a �4�O G 9' cn Cl) y Ash St toC RFair Oaks Ave �o• as,,EIo 01 cn c / �- Farroll Ave E P � 400 a The Pike Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: le Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pa1?r7_19140 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 515R District 1 2—. --Thl. Total Total Pop 4,608 4,563 1 4,548 4,750 18,469 Deviation from ideal -9 -54 -69 133 202 Deviation -0.19% -1.17% -1.49% 2.88% 4.38% %Hisp 16.4% 13% 27% 23% 20% %NH White 71% 77% 61% 66% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,455 3,608 3,392 3,689 14,144 %Hisp 9% 10% 20% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 81% 84% 73% 79% 79% %NH Black 3% 0% 1% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 5% 4% 6% 5% Total 3,543 3,757 2,699 3,335 13,334 %Latino est. 10% 7% 18% 12% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 10% 7% 17% 11% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% %NH White est. 84% 89% 79% 84% 84% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,194 3,453I 2,250 2,965 11,862 %Latino est. 10% 7% 16% 11% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 9% 7% 15% 10% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% %NH White est. 84% 89% 80% 85% 85% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 2,558 2,774 1,601 2,320 9,253 %Latino est. 8% 6% 13% 9% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 6% 13% 9% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 90% 83% 87% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 1% 0% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,176 4,654 4,833 4,477 18,140 age0-19 16% 25% 26% 18% 22% Age age20-60 44% 50% 50% 52% 49% age60plus 40% 25% 24% 30% 29% immigrants 9% 6% 9% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 62% 70% 57% 72% 65% english 89% 90% 84% 89% 88% spanish 5% 1% 12% 5% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 4% 2% 1% 3% 2% other fang 2% 7% 3% 4% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 6% 3% 4% hs-grad 43% 46% 47% 55% 48% Education bachelor 24% 25% 20% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 16% 15% 11% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 18% 27% 35% 21% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 52% 60% 64% 58% 58% income 0-25k 19% 9% 14% 14% 14% income25-50k 16% 11% 19% 16% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 14% 15% 18% 19% 16% income 75-200k 44% 51% 44% 47% 46% income 200k-plus 8% 14% 4% 4% 8% single family 77% 95% 77% 87% 84% multi-family 23% 5% 23% 13% 16% Housing Stats rented 33% 28% 44% 27% 33% owned 67% 72% 56% 73% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 277 of 340 02/11/2022 15:13 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to , Plan 528R ,.. District Elections �°`�s e, I , 227, 21 James War 27e cb° ° 0 "S IIF qv °��° ,4� Fluasna Rd (1 101 'c'.'Montego St -------/ Branch �c�5 O �ro�,c, c°�� t ��'c p Q o E Grand Ave o c.0 Co- p. rc' 2 40 U Maple St 7' 2. °dc, \O'b °S Q ,,, 111010110 i-, l cn Ash St 4 m N- Fair Oaks Ave c asp cn. CoQ, 1011 I 111.111 of Farroll Ave E , ', . 4 8 4, O O e a The Pike 9-- Sunrise Dr ProposedElection Sequence: 1110 Leanna Dr Illi-7" 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PaM7 L9140 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 528R District 1 2 3 4 i Total Total Pop 4,748 4,596 4,533 4,592 18,469 Deviation from ideal 131 -21 " -84 -25 215 %Deviation 2.84% -0.45% -1.82% -0.54% 4.66% %Hisp 12.9% 14% 27% 26% 20% %NH White 74% 77% 61% 63% 69% Total Pop — %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,540 4,033 3,205 3,366 14,144 %Hisp 9% 10% 19% 14% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 84% 83% 70% 78% 79% %NH Black 2% 1% 2% 0% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,909 3,755 2,706 2,964 13,334 %Latino est. 8% 8% 18% 14% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 7% 17% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 86% 89% 78% 82% 84% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 3,572 3,447 t 2,301 2,542 11,862 %Latino est. 8% 7% 16% 13% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 8% 7% 15% 12% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 85% 90% 79% 83% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 2,877 2,768 1,671 1,937 9,253 %Latino est. 7% 7% 12% 10% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 6% 12% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 1% 2% 1% %NH White est. 88% 90% 83% 86% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 0% 1% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,266 5,088 4,465 4,321 18,140 age0-19 15% 24% 26% 20% 22% Age age20-60 47% 44% 50% 55% 49% age60plus 38% 31% 23% 25% 29% immigrants 8% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 75% 57% 61% 65% english 90% 91% 86% 83% 88% spanish 4% 1% 9% 12% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% other fang 5% 6% 2% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% hs-grad 45% 49% 46% 52% 48% Education bachelor 23% 24% 19% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 17% 13% 13% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 18% 25% 33% 25% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 50% 59% 63% 61% 58% income 0-25k 18% 9% 12% 18% 14% income 25-50k 10% 17% 21% 14% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 19% 19% 16% income 75-200k 49% 47% 44% 45% 46% income 200k-plus 9% 12% 4% 4% 8% single family 88% 95% t 73% 76% 84% multi-family 12% 5% 27% 24% 16% Housing Stats rented 21% 28% 49% 36% 33% owned 79% 72% 51% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 279 of 340 02/11/2022 15:17 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to , Plan 606 ,.. District Elections �o`�s �ro ro rofi C� I �ro 227, 21 James War e C cb ° �� c ,m "b (5 C.(''' 2;° ,4`1"� 1luasna Rd 101 [r Montego St-_ Br S� fi Flu cogs Sr 7 ��c`� P ,. gyro S cP E Grand Ave I.i. o ,, ,,�,y� 3 if, ,e ,c'� `t „' o"ti e 0 Cy" �� O IL 0 Maple St °�� O�� o�� -�� ry G 7 cn Ash St 1 �� a� od 101 Fair Oaks Ave s IR e I Farroll Ave F P , ___-140 14 000 a The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 11111 Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pa9AiMaV40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 606 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,528 4,541 4,878 4,522 18,469 Deviation from ideal -89 -76 261 -95 356 %Deviation -1.93% -1.65% 5.65% -2.06% 7.71% %Hisp 11.5% 17% 25% 25% 20% %NH White 76% 73% 63% 63% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% — Total 3,300 4,088 3,483 3,274 14,144 %Hisp 9% 12% 17% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 86% 81% 71% 77% 79% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 2% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,760 3,593 3,099 2,882 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 17% 14% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 8% 16% 13% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 90% 87% 77% 82% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,482 3,247 2,653 2,480 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 8% 16% 13% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 7% 8% 15% 12% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 78% 83% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 2,874 2,539 1,939 1,901 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 8% 12% 10% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 12% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 1% 2% 1% %NH White est. 90% 88% 82% 86% 87% %NH Black est. 1% 0% 2% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,065 5,094 i 4,767 4,214 18,140 age0-19 17% 23% 26% 20% 22% Age age20-60 47% 46% 50% 54% 49% age60plus 36% 32% 25% 26% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 79% 57% 59% 65% english 89% 92% 86% 82% 88% spanish 4% 0% 8% 12% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 6% 6% 2% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% hs-grad 43% 51% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 25% 23% 19% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 13% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 22% 23% 31% 25% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 49% 61% 62% 60% 58% income0-25k 15% 11% 14% 18% 14% income 25-50k 7% 17% 22% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 16% 18% 19% 16% income 75-200k 53% 47% 43% 43% 46% income 200k-plus 13% 9% 4% 5% 8% single family 95% 93% 72% 74% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 28% 26% 16% Housing Stats rented 13% 31% 49% 37% 33% owned 87% 69% 51% 63% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 281 of 340 02/09/2022 11:48 Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT 6C City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to �� a District Elections �°`eS e, 4. I 227; 21 James Way °'. C cb° �� c ar YY v / fie° ti� Huasna Rd i Montego St�� Br Sti fie c�' ro S IN E Grand Ave o �� c,t3 Cis ' �� 2 .6, �� it, '� J os o Maple St '-' . ,i6) \c,O ��r- 1 ., U CED Ash St Q0 0 til IP c Fair Oaks Ave � a��Io4 1011 cf Farroll Ave F X 4 -2 , The Pike 9-• Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence:ik 14 Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pa9A1MLPU40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 101 BR District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,552 4,517 I 4,666 4,734 18,469 Deviation from ideal -65 -100 49 117 217 %Deviation -1.41% -2.17% 1.06% 2.53% 4.70% %Hisp 11.4% 17% 26% 25% 20% %NH White 76% 73% 62% 64% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,402 3,986 3,293 3,464 14,144 %Hisp 8% 13% 17% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 80% 71% 77% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 3% 5% 6% 6% 5% Total 3,818 3,535 t 2,985 2,996 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 9% 15% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 86% 77% 81% 84% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,548 3,181 I 2,553 2,580 11,862 %Latino est. 6% 9% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 79% 82% 85% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% Total 2,951 2,462 1,886 1,954 9,253 Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 91% 88% 83% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,201 4,958 4,407 4,575 18,140 age0-19 19% 22% 23% 23% 22% Age age20-60 45% 47% 47% 56% 49% age60plus 36% 31% 30% 21% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 79% 57% 59% 65% english 91% 91% 85% 84% 88% spanish 3% 1% 10% 10% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 5% 7% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 4% 5% 4% hs-grad 41% 53% 45% 51% 48% Education bachelor 26% 21% 21% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 22% 28% 29% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 60% 60% 62% 58% income 0-25k 13% 12% 18% 13% 14% income 25-50k 8% 17% 22% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 16% 21% 16% income 75-200k 54% 46% 38% 47% 46% income 200k-plus 13% 8% 5% 4% 8% single family 95% 93% 68% 78% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 32% 22% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 30% 51% 36% 33% owned 86% 70% 49% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 283 of 340 02/11/2022 15:37 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to �� a District Elections °`�S e, 4. 227; 21 James Way °'. C.> eb° �� c 0 "b I q� °��° ,4�� 1luasna Rd 4-- (-----N 101/ `� Montego St�� 1" /3.i. 'c'.' Cc' �crofie �,SGog� Sr �� o �9' W �� s E Grand Ave o �� U Maple St l .-,..-1,. off° ��O�k cs l r . VD 7A71 St ,i74. m c �a a '10 Q, Fair Oaks Ave s of Farroll Ave F � 101 r 00 { The Pike 9-' Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 14 Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pi?r§4LIV40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 201 AR District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,534 4,445 4,860 4,630 18,469 Deviation from ideal -83 -172 243 13 415 %Deviation -1.80% -3.73% 5.26% 0.28% 8.99% %Hisp 11.4% 13% 27% 26% 20% %NH White 77% 77% 59% 62% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,298 4,038 3,489 3,319 14,144 %Hisp 9% 9% 20% 14% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 85% 85% 71% 75% 79% %NH Black 1% 0% 2% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 5% 6% 5% Total 3,630 3,709 3,153 2,842 13,334 %Latino est. 8% 8% 16% 16% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 8% 15% 15% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 88% 89% 78% 80% 84% %NH Black 1% 0% 2% 1% 1% Total 3,337 3,387 t 2,695 2,443 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 7% 14% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 7% 7% 14% 14% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 89% 89% 78% 81% 85% %NH Black 1% 0% 2% 1% 1% Total 2,754 2,740 1,947 1,812 9,253 %Latino est. 7% 7% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 7% 10% 11% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 90% 83% 84% 87% %NH Black est. 1% 0% 2% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 3,996 5,005 4,652 4,487 18,140 age0-19 15% 24% 23% 24% 22% Age age20-60 46% 44% 51% 55% 49% age60plus 39% 32% 26% 21% 29% immigrants 8% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 67% 77% 63% 57% 65% english 88% 93% 87% 82% 88% spanish 4% 0% 8% 12% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% other fang 5% 6% 2% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 4% 6% 4% hs-grad 44% 49% 47% 51% 48% Education bachelor 23% 24% 21% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 18% 13% 12% 10% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 18% 25% 29% 30% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 48% 61% 62% 62% 58% income 0-25k 18% 10% 17% 13% 14% income 25-50k 10% 17% 19% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 16% 22% 16% income 75-200k 48% 48% 43% 46% 46% income200k-plus 11% 11% 5% 4% 8% single family 87% 94% I 75% 77% 84% multi-family 13% 6% 25% 23% 16% Housing Stats rented 20% 29% 46% 37% 33% owned 80% 71% 54% 63% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 285 of 340 02/11/2022 15:46 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to �� a District Elections �°`�s �ro ro Cyro� 1 �ro 227 , 21 James Way 27° 4� 4 C)roe a cbo ° ° q 2e '4''' Huasna Ra o 101 'c'.' 1 Montego Sty �� B�a�� r ��cAv �crofi� illi ��SC,o "ci d�0 %d' E Grand Ave c � c�� , �O 2 3 �� ., CU Maple St l �b 0, �Oa� �� a " L �ry cn Ash St0 til IP c Fair Oaks Ave � as�I 101 4 el Farroll Ave F � 404, C n• O tili The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 1* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pa1MLP140 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 201B District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop4� 601 4,616 4,622 4,630 18,469 Deviation from ideal -16 -1 5 13 29 %Deviation -0.35% -0.02% 0.11% 0.28% 0.63% %Hisp 11.6% 14% 27% 26% 20% %NH White 78% 75% 61% 62% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,404 4,130 3,291 3,319 14,144 %Hisp 8% 11% 19% 14% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 86% 83% 72% 75% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 5% 6% 5% Total 3,767 3,807 2,918 2,842 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 15% 16% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 9% 15% 15% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 86% 79% 80% 84% %NH Black 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% Total 3,504 3,431 t 2,484 2,443 11,862 %Latino est. 6% 9% 14% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 9% 14% 14% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 91% 85% 80% 81% 85% %NH Black 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% Total 2,859 2,777 1,805 1,812 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 8% 10% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 5% 8% 10% 11% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 91% 87% 84% 84% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,330 4,909 4,414 4,487 18,140 age0-19 22% 18% 23% 24% 22% Age age20-60 46% 45% 49% 55% 49% age60plus 31% 37% 28% 21% 29% immigrants 7% 7% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 74% 61% 57% 65% english 91% 90% 87% 82% 88% spanish 2% 2% 8% 12% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 3% 3% 2% other fang 5% 6% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 4% 6% 4% hs-grad 41% 52% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 26% 21% 21% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 18% 12% 12% 10% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 27% 18% 28% 30% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 55% 55% 62% 62% 58% income0-25k 11% 15% 18% 13% 14% income 25-50k 9% 17% 20% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 15% 16% 22% 16% income 75-200k 53% 45% 42% 46% 46% income 200k-plus 15% 8% 4% 4% 8% single family 97% 88% I 72% 77% 84% multi-family 3% 12% 28% 23% 16% Housing Stats rented 18% 29% 48% 37% 33% owned 82% 71% 52% 63% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 287 of 340 02/11/2022 12:19 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to , Plan 202 ,.. District Elections °`�S \r'e, �ro ro ro� C 1 ' ,ro 227, 21 James War e U cb° c ar (5 q� °be° ,4�� Huasna Rd r� 101 Montego St - / 1- -01. S� fi� ��co�e � Sr ��c9 s �o �� gyro 9' �� pcP E Grand Ave o �, c<6 �' �� c, �e .3 c‘. . o Maple St I 7' '6. „°0 ��0�� CS 6' C,4) y Cl) Ash St �� 0 m c �'� a e�o d 1011 � Fair Oaks Ave s ' cn of L_ Farroll Ave F , 400 The Pike a- (7 Sunrise Dr ProposedElection Sequence: 1* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PMLSP 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 202 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,638 4,431 4,666 4,734 18,469 Deviation from ideal 21 -186 49 117 303 Deviation 0.45% -4.03% 1.06% 2.53% 6.56% %Hisp 11.6% 17% 26% 25% 20% %NH White 76% 73% 62% 64% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% — Total 3,459 3,929 3,293 3,464 14,144 %Hisp 8% 13% 17% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 80% 71% 77% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 6% 5% Total 3,926 3,427 2,985 2,996 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 9% 15% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 86% 77% 81% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,646 3,083 l 2,553 2,580 11,862 %Latino est. 6% 9% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 79% 82% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,031 2,382 1,886 1,954 9,253 Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 88% 83% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,271 4,887 4,407 4,575 18,140 age0-19 19% 22% 23% 23% 22% Age age20-60 45% 47% 47% 56% 49% age60plus 36% 31% 30% 21% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 79% 57% 59% 65% english 91% 91% 85% 84% 88% spanish 3% 1% 10% 10% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 5% 7% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 4% 5% 4% hs-grad 41% 53% 45% 51% 48% Education bachelor 26% 21% 21% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 22% 28% 29% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 60% 60% 62% 58% income 0-25k 13% 12% 18% 13% 14% income 25-50k 8% 17% 22% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 16% 21% 16% income 75-200k 54% 46% 38% 47% 46% income 200k-plus 13% 8% 5% 4% 8% single family 95% 93% 68% 78% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 32% 22% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 30% 51% 36% 33% owned 86% 70% 49% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 289 of 340 02/11/2022 12:24 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to , Plan 203 District Elections �° .. `�s 9 �ro ro , ' ro C 1 227; 21 James Way °'. Cl r cb° �� 8 '4 �-c' 0 -, q� fie° ,4,`1."('''' � Huasna Ra r Montego St 1- 13.1. Sti fie °o�� anZ Sr �"ci)c- ' J o y yro �� x E Grand Ave p o ��y� CP �' C,5 MEI U Maple St 1 ::,,z:1 Maple tisOr-\'' c$ 7, W 'I, cn Ash St0 m c �� a�'0 d 101 ir R Fair Oaks Ave s cn of Farroll Ave F � 4i1, C r a 4iii The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 1* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PagAiMV40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 203 District 1 2 3 4 1 Total Total Pop 4,603 4,625 4,611 4,630 18,469 Deviation from ideal -14 8 -6 13 27 %Deviation -0.30% 0.17% -0.13% 0.28% 0.58% %Hisp 11.4% 16% t 25% 26% 20% %NH White 76% 75% 62% 62% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% — Total 3,434 4,163 3,228 3,319 14,144 %Hisp 8% 13% 17% 14% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 81% 72% 75% 79% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 6% 5% Total 3,857 3,640 2,995 2,842 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 16% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 9% 15% 15% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 87% 77% 80% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,582 3,271 I 2,566 2,443 11,862 %Latino est. 6% 9% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 14% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 89% 88% 78% 81% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 2,975 2,566 1,900 1,812 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% %NH White est. 91% 89% 82% 84% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,243 5,077 4,333 4,487 18,140 age0-19 19% 22% 23% 24% 22% Age age20-60 45% 47% 48% 55% 49% age60plus 36% 31% 30% 21% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 79% 58% 57% 65% english 91% 91% 86% 82% 88% spanish 3% 1% 9% 12% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 5% 7% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 4% 6% 4% hs-grad 41% 53% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 26% 21% 21% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 12% 10% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 22% 27% 30% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 60% 60% 62% 58% income 0-25k 13% 13% 19% 13% 14% income 25-50k 8% 17% 22% 15% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 16% 16% 22% 16% income 75-200k 54% 46% 39% 46% 46% income 200k-plus 13% 8% 5% 4% 8% single family 95% 93% 69% 77% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 31% 23% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 30% 50% 37% 33% owned 86% 70% 50% 63% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 291 of 340 02/11/2022 12:30 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to , Plan 204 ,.. District Elections °`�S lam, �ro ,ro Ciro I �ro 227, 21 James Way °'. coo u 0 2, (5 ° °�� ,4�� 1luasna Rd r101� � � Montego St�� Branch �c�,S� �rofi� rii cogs t -e.� A Q S cP E Grand Ave o ,, e i c%)' C ' O a �c ,C'S t „, Cys° �,e, O 0 Maple St �� '. se O'� �o�� ry v, G y Cl) Ash St0 m Fair Oaks Ave �� ase �o101 cn of Farroll Ave E P � .: 4 00et a " The Pike Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 1* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PagAiMaV40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 204 District 1 2 3 4 1 Total Total Pop 4,467 4,602 4,823 4,577 18,469 Deviation from ideal -150 -15 P 206 -40 356 %Deviation -3.25% -0.32% 4.46% -0.87% 7.71% %Hisp 11.6% 16% 26% 25% 20% %NH White 76% 73% 62% 64% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% — Total 3,266 4,121 3,398 3,359 14,144 %Hisp 9% 12% 17% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 86% 82% 71% 78% 79% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 6% 5% Total 3,722 3,631 3,067 2,914 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 9% 15% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 86% 78% 81% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,448 3,281 2,623 2,510 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 8% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 79% 82% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 2,837 2,576 1,944 1,896 9,253 Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 88% 83% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 1% 0% 3% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,015 5,144 G 4,579 4,402 18,140 age0-19 17% 23% 23% 23% 22% Age age20-60 47% 46% 47% 56% 49% age60plus 36% 31% 30% 21% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 78% 57% 59% 65% english 90% 92% 85% 84% 88% spanish 4% 0% 10% 10% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 6% 6% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% hs-grad 43% 51% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 25% 23% 21% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 22% 23% 28% 29% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 49% 61% 60% 62% 58% income0-25k 15% 11% 18% 13% 14% income 25-50k 7% 17% 22% 14% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 16% 16% 22% 16% income 75-200k 53% 47% 38% 48% 46% income 200k-plus 13% 9% 5% 3% 8% single family 95% 93% 68% 78% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 32% 22% 16% Housing Stats rented 13% 31% 51% 36% 33% owned 87% 69% 49% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 293 of 340 02/11/2022 12:35 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to , Plan 601 ,.. District Elections °`�S e, 4. 227; 21 James Way °'. .k'' C.5'' a coo u 0 2, I q� be° ,4,`1'(''' � Huasna Ra (1 Montego St�� Br S� if c�' ro -eco t7 St �� po Q� �C 'bill CP !ra ndAve o ,3, ��y��' a a 3 a�G�� G2 o Maple St �� °�° ��0rN �o�Q �a y cn Ash St rt a� C o' aS� Fair Oaks Ave � 01 oI 111.111 Q, 1 o co Farroll Ave F f ,„ 4i 4, 00 The Pike Sunrise Dr 01 (7-' ProposedElection Sequence: 'ig* Leanna Dr ' - ` 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 P i?aP 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 601 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,825 4,596 4,471 4,577 18,469 Deviation from ideal 208 -21 -146 -40 354 %Deviation 4.51% -0.45% -3.16% -0.87% 7.67% %Hisp 12.6% 14% 29% 25% 20% %NH White 75% 77% 58% 64% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 5% 5% — Total 3,580 4,033 3,172 3,359 14,144 %Hisp 9% 10% 21% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 83% 83% 71% 78% 79% %NH Black 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 5% 4% 6% 5% Total 3,879 3,755 I 2,786 2,914 13,334 %Latino est. 8% 8% 16% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 7% 16% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 89% 79% 81% 84% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 3,542 3,447I 2,363 2,510 11,862 %Latino est. 8% 7% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 8% 7% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 90% 80% 82% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 2,902 2,768 1,687 1,896 9,253 %Latino est. 7% 7% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 87% 90% 84% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,254 5,088 4,396 4,402 18,140 age0-19 15% 24% 24% 23% 22% Age age20-60 44% 44% 51% 56% 49% age60plus 41% 31% 25% 21% 29% immigrants 9% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 65% 75% 63% 59% 65% english 89% 91% 86% 84% 88% spanish 4% 1% 10% 10% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% other fang 4% 6% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 4% 5% 4% hs-grad 44% 49% 47% 51% 48% Education bachelor 23% 24% 22% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 17% 13% 11% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 17% 25% 32% 29% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 48% 59% 65% 62% 58% income 0-25k 19% 9% 16% 13% 14% income 25-50k 13% 17% 18% 14% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 17% 22% 16% income 75-200k 45% 47% 45% 48% 46% income 200k-plus 10% 12% 4% 3% 8% single family 83% 95% I 75% 78% 84% multi-family 17% 5% 25% 22% 16% Housing Stats rented 24% 28% 47% 36% 33% owned 76% 72% 53% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 295 of 340 02/08/2022 14:51 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to , Plan 602R ,.. District Elections �°`�S y �ro ro , ' CYro 1 227; 21 James Way °'. .:".c) u q� °be° ,4,`1' Huasna Rd (1 101 'c'.'Montego St �� Brae Sr �� S��c�5T ��rofic Apo Q fie, e E Grand Ave o co �' a 3 75 w o. o it, �� Cs�� ,��e O IL CU � Maple St � °)°i 0.°- `-'S �`'S� cn y cn Ash St Q m o' c a� Fair Oaks Ave _ S�oQ, 101 of Farroll Ave Er 4 - 4,Oo e a The Pike 41, 9-- Sunrise Dr ProposedElection Sequence: `g* Leanna Dr 1.11V\47" 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pa1M_P140 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 602R District 1 2 3 4 1 Total Total Pop 4,748 4,596 4,671 4,454 18,469 Deviation from ideal 131 -21 P 54 -163 294 %Deviation 2.84% -0.45% 1.17% -3.53% 6.37% %Hisp 12.9% 14% 27% 26% 20% %NH White 74% 77% 60% 64% 69% Total Pop — %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,540 4,033 3,314 3,257 14,144 %Hisp 9% 10% 19% 14% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 84% 83% 72% 76% 79% %NH Black 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 5% 6% 5% Total 3,909 3,755 I 2,839 2,831 13,334 %Latino est. 8% 8% 17% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 7% 16% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 89% 79% 81% 84% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 3,572 3,447 I 2,398 2,445 11,862 %Latino est. 8% 7% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 8% 7% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 90% 80% 82% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 2,877 2,768 1,772 1,836 9,253 %Latino est. 7% 7% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 88% 90% 84% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,266 5,088 4,556 4,230 18,140 age0-19 15% 24% 24% 23% 22% Age age20-60 47% 44% 48% 57% 49% age60plus 38% 31% 28% 20% 29% immigrants 8% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 75% 57% 61% 65% english 90% 91% 84% 85% 88% spanish 4% 1% 12% 8% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% other fang 5% 6% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% hs-grad 45% 49% 46% 52% 48% Education bachelor 23% 24% 22% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 17% 13% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 18% 25% 31% 28% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 50% 59% 61% 63% 58% income 0-25k 18% 9% 18% 12% 14% income 25-50k 10% 17% 21% 14% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 17% 22% 16% income 75-200k 49% 47% 40% 50% 46% income 200k-plus 9% 12% 5% 3% 8% single family 88% 95% 70% 80% 84% multi-family 12% 5% 30% 20% 16% Housing Stats rented 21% 28% 49% 35% 33% owned 79% 72% 51% 65% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 297 of 340 02/11/2022 15:22 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to , Plan 603 ,.. District Elections �°`�S „ 4 �ro ro ro� C 1 �ro 227 , James War e .:"9 u q'' °be° ,S,''' Huasna Rd 101 FilMontego St �Br S� fic sc°�� adz Sr w��c� � � �c� cP E Grand Ave o ° � 3 �� . . 2 „, y v� -e o oI (5 Maple St �� °�� .�,�0r� �o�Q �a y VDAsh St rt �� 0 o' c a� Fair Oaks Ave s'10� 101i of C m Farroll Ave F , 114,o 4 . a L The Pike 9-- Sunrise Dr ProposedElection Sequence: 'g* Leanna Dr 1.11\17- 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PMULSP 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 603 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,825 4,596 4,471 4,577 18,469 Deviation from ideal 208 -21 -146 -40 354 %Deviation 4.51% -0.45% -3.16% -0.87% 7.67% %Hisp 12.6% 14% 29% 25% 20% %NH White 75% 77% 58% 64% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 5% 5% — Total 3,580 4,033 3,172 3,359 14,144 %Hisp 9% 10% 21% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 83% 83% 71% 78% 79% %NH Black 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 5% 4% 6% 5% Total 3,879 3,755 I 2,786 2,914 13,334 %Latino est. 8% 8% 16% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 7% 16% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 89% 79% 81% 84% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 3,542 3,447I 2,363 2,510 11,862 %Latino est. 8% 7% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 8% 7% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 90% 80% 82% 85% %NH Black 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 2,902 2,768 1,687 1,896 9,253 %Latino est. 7% 7% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 87% 90% 84% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,254 5,088 4,396 4,402 18,140 age0-19 15% 24% 24% 23% 22% Age age20-60 44% 44% 51% 56% 49% age60plus 41% 31% 25% 21% 29% immigrants 9% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 65% 75% 63% 59% 65% english 89% 91% 86% 84% 88% spanish 4% 1% 10% 10% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% other fang 4% 6% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 4% 5% 4% hs-grad 44% 49% 47% 51% 48% Education bachelor 23% 24% 22% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 17% 13% 11% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 17% 25% 32% 29% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 48% 59% 65% 62% 58% income 0-25k 19% 9% 16% 13% 14% income 25-50k 13% 17% 18% 14% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 17% 22% 16% income 75-200k 45% 47% 45% 48% 46% income 200k-plus 10% 12% 4% 3% 8% single family 83% 95% I 75% 78% 84% multi-family 17% 5% 25% 22% 16% Housing Stats rented 24% 28% 47% 36% 33% owned 76% 72% 53% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 299 of 340 02/08/2022 15:10 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to , Plan 604 District Elections ° .. `�S 9 �ro ro , ' ro C 1 227; 21 James Way27 °� U s cb° ° �o (5 q� be° ,�� ° 'iii- Rd r101 o Montego St�� Branch �c�, T �rofi� S IN E Grand Ave o o ' c.c.s. , Q �c C'S2 �ct, Cy � <� O� e4 0rMaple St � �07? G �2' C4' y cn Ash St i� m 'ef' c ir R Fair Oaks Avecn o• asp �o Q, 101 J of Farroll Ave F P � . 4 a The Pike (7-' Sunrise Dr ProposedElection Sequence: `1* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PagAiMuQ40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 604 District 1 2 3 4 1 Total Total Pop 4,528 4,541 4,823 4,577 18,469 Deviation from ideal -89 -76 P 206 -40 295 Deviation -1.93% -1.65% 4.46% -0.87% 6.39% %Hisp 11.5% 17% 26% 25% 20% %NH White 76% 73% 62% 64% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% — Total 3,300 4,088 3,398 3,359 14,144 %Hisp 9% 12% 17% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 86% 81% 71% 78% 79% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 6% 5% Total 3,760 3,593 3,067 2,914 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 8% 15% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 87% 78% 81% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,482 3,247 2,623 2,510 11,862 %Latino est. 7% 8% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 7% 8% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 79% 82% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 2,874 2,539 1,944 1,896 9,253 Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 90% 88% 83% 85% 87% %NH Black est. 1% 0% 3% 1% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,065 5,094 G 4,579 4,402 18,140 age0-19 17% 23% 23% 23% 22% Age age20-60 47% 46% 47% 56% 49% age60plus 36% 32% 30% 21% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 11% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 79% 57% 59% 65% english 89% 92% 85% 84% 88% spanish 4% 0% 10% 10% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 6% 6% 1% 3% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% hs-grad 43% 51% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 25% 23% 21% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 22% 23% 28% 29% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 49% 61% 60% 62% 58% income0-25k 15% 11% 18% 13% 14% income 25-50k 7% 17% 22% 14% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 16% 16% 22% 16% income 75-200k 53% 47% 38% 48% 46% income 200k-plus 13% 9% 5% 3% 8% single family 95% 93% 68% 78% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 32% 22% 16% Housing Stats rented 13% 31% 51% 36% 33% owned 87% 69% 49% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 301 of 340 02/08/2022 15:16 Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT 6D City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to I1an District Elections �°`�S efi I ,ro 227, 21 James War e Cl CD ar -- v ., 4� vo • �e'° � Huasna Rd \ / <. Montego St 101 fi • �� ra�Z St 4-� ,°�S s � ��ro L_________32....._ -8 ..... T �a _ _ �I 7d w a. hie � ti N. Map e at "�� V'' Z.,G a cn Ash St rt 724. 0 m c 4 �� a��0 101 Fair Oaks Ave s cn I Imr e I Farroll Ave F 1 La-, I_ 0 o �• c CD Q+ The Pike jit (7-' Sunrise Dr ProposedElection Sequence: INLeanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PaMRi1 140 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 527 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,711 4,303 4,730 4,725 18,469 Deviation from ideal 94 -314 113 108 427 %Deviation 2.04% -6.80% 2.45% 2.34% 9.25% %Hisp 11.8% 14% 21% 31% 20% %NH White 77% 75% 66% 58% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% — Total 3,325 4,039 3,533 3,249 14,144 %Hisp 9% 10% 14% 19% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 87% 80% 77% 72% 79% %NH Black 0% 2% 2% 0% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 3% 6% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,910 3,549 t 3,272 2,603 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 14% 18% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 9% 14% 17% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% %NH White est. 90% 85% 81% 79% 84% %NH Black 0% 2% 2% 0% 1% Total 3,623 3,218 2,811 2,210 11,862 %Latino est. 6% 9% 14% 16% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 13% 15% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% %NH White est. 91% 84% 81% 80% 85% %NH Black 0% 2% 2% 0% 1% Total 2,984 2,538 2,159 1,572 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 8% 10% 12% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 10% 12% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% %NH White est. 91% 86% 85% 84% 87% %NH Black est. 0% 2% 1% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,244 4,785 4,451 4,661 18,140 age0-19 22% 19% 21% 25% 22% Age age20-60 45% 46% 53% 53% 49% age60plus 34% 35% 26% 22% 29% immigrants 7% 7% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 73% 63% 57% 65% english 91% 90% 87% 83% 88% spanish 3% 1% 7% 13% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 3% 3% 3% 2% other fang 5% 6% 2% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 4% 6% 4% hs-grad 40% 53% 50% 47% 48% Education bachelor 27% 21% 19% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 12% 10% 12% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 26% 18% 23% 34% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 53% 56% 60% 64% 58% income0-25k 11% 15% 17% 13% 14% income 25-50k 8% 18% 17% 18% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 16% 17% 20% 16% income 75-200k 54% 43% 44% 45% 46% income 200k-plus 15% 8% 4% 4% 8% single family 98% 86% 77% 73% 84% multi-family 2% 14% 23% 27% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 33% 39% 46% 33% owned 86% 67% 61% 54% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 303 of 340 02/07/2022 21:40 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to , Plan ,.. District Elections �o`�s e, 4. 227; 21 James Way °'. cam° '4 �"C' c u ., ar 2, �, 4- C°F q� be° ,4,`1'(''' � Huasna Ra 4-- (---. 101/ Montego St�� l'rBr Sti fic c�' ro c°�� 7 Sr �-c , Q� �c s E Grand.' - o c�y��' Csjeg '� <2 ., p- �e �� _I tt U o��hti <c OO r o Maple a i ^„-) O,-k �� , G ,� C.4) y Ash St �� 0 r m C Fair Oaks Ave �� ast• �o 101I cn of Farroll Ave p , . }* . a o � a ,, The Pike 9-• Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: `fit Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PagAiNiaV40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 537R District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,484 4,585 4,714 4,686 18,469 Deviation from ideal -133 -32 97 69 230 %Deviation -2.88% -0.69% 2.10% 1.49% 4.98% %Hisp 11.4% 17% t 25% 26% 20% %NH White 76% 74% 63% 63% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,364 4,024 3,353 3,403 14,144 %Hisp 7% 13% 17% 14% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 88% 80% 71% 78% 79% %NH Black 0% 1% 4% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 4% 5% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,794 3,559 2,954 3,027 13,334 %Latino est. 7% 9% 16% 15% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 9% 15% 14% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 77% 81% 84% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 3,524 3,205 I 2,542 2,591 11,862 %Latino est. 6% 9% 15% 14% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 6% 8% 14% 13% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %NH White est. 89% 87% 78% 83% 85% %NH Black 0% 0% 3% 1% 1% Total 2,935 2,478 1,873 1,967 9,253 %Latino est. 6% 8% 11% 11% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 6% 8% 11% 10% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% %NH White est. 90% 88% 82% 86% 87% %NH Black est. 1% 0% 3% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,146 5,013 4,500 4,481 18,140 age0-19 19% 22% 25% 21% 22% Age age20-60 45% 47% 49% 54% 49% age60plus 37% 31% 26% 24% 29% immigrants 7% 6% 10% 10% 8% Immigration naturalized 70% 78% 57% 59% 65% english 91% 91% 86% 82% 88% spanish 3% 1% 8% 12% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 5% 7% 2% 2% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well 3% 4% 4% 5% 4% hs-grad 41% 53% 46% 51% 48% Education bachelor 26% 21% 20% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 19% 11% 13% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 22% 30% 27% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 59% 61% 61% 58% income 0-25k 13% 12% 15% 17% 14% income 25-50k 8% 17% 22% 14% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 12% 17% 18% 20% 16% income 75-200k 54% 46% 41% 44% 46% income 200k-plus 13% 8% 4% 5% 8% single family 95% 93% 70% 76% 84% multi-family 5% 7% 30% 24% 16% Housing Stats rented 14% 30% 50% 36% 33% owned 86% 70% 50% 64% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 305 of 340 02/11/2022 15:29 Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT 6E City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to , Plan ,.. District Elections �°`�s efi Ciro I �ro 227, 21 James War 27e , v o "b I '9'c,fie° �� 1uasna Rd r Grand MoAvnteezp St go St - ' 1B S� fi co 4E1 o � cP ��' a c w o ,,, e‘4, �°� y o '>-' O s o Maple St °� �O-b c✓1‘; e. - cip Ash St■ r' jr, QI2, m glir 70' a�iod 101 • Fair Oaks Ave s ' cn Farroll Ave 4 - 4, 0 F e a The Pike 9-- Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: III Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pa1M_P140 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 102 District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,760 4,411 4,719 4,579 18,469 Deviation from ideal 143 -206 102 -38 349 %Deviation 3.10% -4.46% 2.21% -0.82% 7.56% %Hisp 14.7% 13% 31% 20% 20% %NH White 72% 77% 58% 69% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 8% 4% 5% 5% 5% Total 3,567 3,598 3,250 3,729 14,144 %Hisp 9% 9% 20% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 81% 84% 71% 80% 79% %NH Black 3% 1% 1% 0% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% Total 3,684 3,578 2,696 3,376 13,334 %Latino est. 9% 7% 19% 12% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 9% 7% 17% 12% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 84% 90% 78% 84% 84% %NH Black 3% 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,338 3,284 2,266 2,974 11,862 %Latino est. 9% 7% 17% 11% 10% %Spanish-Sumamed 9% 7% 16% 11% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 84% 89% 79% 85% 85% %NH Black 3% 0% 0% 1% 1% Total 2,712 2,615 1,609 2,317 9,253 %Latino est. 7% 6% 13% 9% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 7% 6% 12% 9% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 91% 83% 87% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 0% 0% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,296 4,605 4,693 4,546 18,140 age0-19 15% 25% 27% 19% 22% Age age20-60 44% 50% 54% 48% 49% age60plus 41% 25% 20% 33% 29% immigrants 9% 6% 10% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 66% 70% 57% 69% 65% english 90% 90% 84% 87% 88% spanish 3% 1% 11% 8% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% other fang 3% 7% 3% 4% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 5% 6% 4% 4% hs-grad 44% 46% 47% 54% 48% Education bachelor 23% 25% 19% 20% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 16% 15% 12% 10% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 16% 27% 36% 23% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 60% 65% 57% 58% income 0-25k 20% 9% 11% 17% 14% income25-50k 15% 11% 18% 18% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 21% 17% 16% income 75-200k 44% 51% 47% 44% 46% income 200k-plus 9% 14% 3% 5% 8% single family 80% 94% 75% 86% 84% multi-family 20% 6% 25% 14% 16% Housing Stats rented 29% 29% 45% 28% 33% owned 71% 71% 55% 72% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Fillogaillfoage 307 of 340 02/08/2022 22:13 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition toan 505R ..,. District Elections �o`�s 9 2,ro ro rofi C 1 ro 1 227; James Way ofi .. cY,o u '2;$' ,�� Huasna Rd 101 Montego St'- ' l' -6-tat? S' fi co�� Sr ��cr , cro vo nso� �ecf' E Grand Ave o c�5 U Maple St 7 i°� O,�k �.I �� ,c-r,' y cn Ash St �� i� rriC Fair Oaks Ave �cv asl,. 01 • 4.4 Farroll Ave F ,, 40 a The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: le Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 P iMLSP 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 505R District 1 2 3 4 Total -- Total Pop 4,788 4,623 o 4,399 4,659 18,469 Deviation from ideal 171 6 -218 42 389 %Deviation 3.70% 0.13% -4.72% 0.91% 8.43% %Hisp 16.1% 13% 28% 22% 20% %NH White 71% 76% 60% 67% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,658 3,696 3,189 3,602 14,144 %Hisp 10% 10% 20% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 82% 82% 72% 80% 79% %NH Black 3% 1% 1% 0% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 5% 4% 6% 5% Total 3,564 3,772 2,692 3,306 13,334 %Latino est. 10% 7% 18% 12% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 10% 7% 17% 11% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 84% 89% 78% 84% 84% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,198 3,462 2,266 2,936 11,862 %Latino est. 10% 7% 17% 11% 10% %Spanish-Sumamed 9% 7% 15% 11% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 84% 89% 80% 85% 85% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 2,558 2,791 1,610 2,294 9,253 %Latino est. 8% 6% 13% 9% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 6% 12% 9% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 90% 83% 87% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 1% 0% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,451 4,740 4,555 4,394 18,140 age0-19 16% 25% 27% 18% 22% Age age20-60 43% 50% 51% 51% 49% age60plus 41% 25% 21% 31% 29% immigrants 9% 6% 10% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 63% 70% 57% 70% 65% english 89% 90% 84% 88% 88% spanish 5% 1% 12% 6% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% other fang 3% 7% 3% 4% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 6% 3% 4% hs-grad 44% 46% 46% 55% 48% Education bachelor 24% 24% 20% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 15% 15% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 17% 27% 37% 21% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 60% 65% 58% 58% income 0-25k 21% 9% 11% 15% 14% income25-50k 15% 11% 19% 16% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 20% 18% 16% income 75-200k 43% 50% 46% 46% 46% income 200k-plus 9% 14% 4% 4% 8% single family 78% 95% 76% 86% 84% multi-family 22% 5% 24% 14% 16% Housing Stats rented 31% 28% 46% 27% 33% owned 69% 72% 54% 73% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 309 of 340 02/11/2022 14:50 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to �� a District Elections °`�S y 4. '2,ro ro . ' Cro 1 �ro 227 , James War e 4� roe ..c.,/ cY,o u °fie,° �� Huasna Rd 101 `c' Montego St ------/ �� BTa�� Sr ��c�5� vo ��rofi� X E Grand Ave o °�� ' a c." - O �� Maple St 7 i°� �O�k �� 2' C.4) y cD Ash St i� ri-i � C Fair Oaks Ave (),' as,�/o 01 • cn 4'el Farroll Ave E 4 a The Pike d Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: le Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pa9MnaV40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 511R District 1 2 3 4 i Total Total Pop 4,458 4,623 1 4,698 4,690 18,469 Deviation from ideal -159 6 81 73 240 Deviation -3.44% 0.13% 1.75% 1.58% 5.20% %Hisp 15.6% 13% 28% 22% 20% %NH White 73% 76% 60% 67% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,448 3,696 3,400 3,601 14,144 %Hisp 10% 10% 20% 12% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 82% 82% 72% 80% 79% %NH Black 3% 1% 1% 0% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 5% 4% 6% 5% Total 3,359 3,772 2,883 3,320 13,334 Latino est. 10% 7% 18% 12% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 9% 7% 17% 11% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 84% 89% 78% 84% 84% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,020 3,462 2,424 2,956 11,862 %Latino est. 9% 7% 17% 11% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 9% 7% 16% 10% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 89% 80% 85% 85% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 2,435 2,791 1,724 2,303 9,253 %Latino est. 8% 6% 13% 9% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 6% 12% 9% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 90% 83% 87% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 1% 0% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,125 4,740 4,884 4,391 18,140 age0-19 15% 25% 27% 18% 22% Age age20-60 42% 50% 51% 51% 49% age60plus 42% 25% 22% 30% 29% immigrants 9% 6% 9% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 62% 70% 57% 72% 65% english 88% 90% 84% 89% 88% spanish 5% 1% 12% 5% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% other fang 3% 7% 3% 4% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 4% 4% 6% 3% 4% hs-grad 44% 46% 46% 55% 48% Education bachelor 24% 24% 20% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 16% 15% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 16% 27% 37% 21% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 50% 60% 65% 58% 58% income 0-25k 21% 9% 12% 15% 14% income25-50k 15% 11% 19% 16% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 19% 18% 16% income 75-200k 42% 50% 45% 47% 46% income 200k-plus 9% 14% 4% 4% 8% single family 78% 95% 76% 87% 84% multi-family 22% 5% 24% 13% 16% Housing Stats rented 30% 28% 46% 26% 33% owned 70% 72% 54% 74% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. " "qa, age 311 of 340 02/11/2022 15:03 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to �� a District Elections °`�S lam, �ro ,ro Ciro I ,ro 227, James Way °'. °�° ., u fie,° �� 1uasna Rd (1 tt'FrMontego St�� B�a�� Sr ��cc5� ��rofie E Grand Ave oe�s� �, 7 o t „`' ��a� ��e O UMaple St �� e �O,,b �cs-s$ < cx v) y cn Ash St 0 ri-iC R �4 a s two • d 101 Fair Oaks Ave ' of Farroll Ave P A) 4 a ° The Pike Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: le Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PaMYii1 40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 512R District 1 2 r 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,723 4,358 4,698 4,690 18,469 Deviation from ideal 106 -259 81 73 365 %Deviation 2.30% -5.61% 1.75% 1.58% 7.91% %Hisp 15.7% 13% 28% 22% 20% %NH White 72% 77% 60% 67% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 6% 5% 5% Total 3,607 3,536 3,400 3,601 14,144 %Hisp 10% 10% 20% 12% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 81% 83% 72% 80% 79% %NH Black 3% 1% 1% 0% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 5% 4% 6% 5% Total 3,565 3,566 2,883 3,320 13,334 %Latino est. 10% 7% 18% 12% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 10% 7% 17% 11% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 84% 89% 78% 84% 84% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,206 3,276 2,424 2,956 11,862 %Latino est. 10% 6% 17% 11% 10% %Spanish-Surnamed 9% 6% 16% 10% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 84% 89% 80% 85% 85% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 2,591 2,635 1,724 2,303 9,253 %Latino est. 8% 6% 13% 9% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 6% 12% 9% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 91% 83% 87% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 1% 0% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,342 4,522 4,884 4,391 18,140 age0-19 16% 25% 27% 18% 22% Age age20-60 43% 50% 51% 51% 49% age60plus 41% 25% 22% 30% 29% immigrants 9% 6% 9% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 62% 70% 57% 72% 65% english 88% 90% 84% 89% 88% spanish 5% 1% 12% 5% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% other fang 3% 7% 3% 4% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 4% 5% 6% 3% 4% hs-grad 44% 46% 46% 55% 48% Education bachelor 23% 25% 20% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 16% 15% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 17% 27% 37% 21% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 50% 60% 65% 58% 58% income 0-25k 21% 9% 12% 15% 14% income25-50k 15% 11% 19% 16% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 19% 18% 16% income 75-200k 42% 51% 45% 47% 46% income 200k-plus 9% 14% 4% 4% 8% single family 79% 94% 76% 87% 84% multi-family 21% 6% 24% 13% 16% Housing Stats rented 30% 29% 46% 26% 33% owned 70% 71% 54% 74% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Ra'! age 313 of 340 02/11/2022 15:08 Page 1 of 1 City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to , Plan 605R ,.. District Elections �o`�s �ro ro ro� C 1 ' ,ro 227, \_ 21 James Way 27 o'. cY,o u '4 -°' v 0 "b I �, 4-- C.) qc , o b$' �� 1luasna Rd Montego St - ' 1- -01..q.12Sti fi� soo�e Sr ��cr � � �� ops �es E Grand Ave � ��' w--c, aI411 wpd o �_ ci, it a�'-' o�a� �<e 0 k U Maple St 7 '6. „°e �O�k c✓1�� 3 Cl) �� z, cx Cl) Ash St toiP C Fair Oaks Ave � as��Io 01 • cn o'el \______) Farroll Ave E.) i, 2 4 a a The Pike Sunrise Dr Proposed Election Sequence: 1110 Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 PM�4LP40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 605R District 1 2 3 4 Total Total Pop 4,602 4,623 4,585 4,659 18,469 Deviation from ideal -15 6 -32 42 74 Deviation -0.32% 0.13% -0.69% 0.91% 1.60% %Hisp 15.7% 13% 28% 22% 20% %NH White 71% 76% 60% 67% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 4% 5% 5% 5% Total 3,464 3,696 3,383 3,602 14,144 %Hisp 9% 10% 20% 13% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 81% 82% 72% 80% 79% %NH Black 3% 1% 1% 0% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 5% 5% 4% 6% 5% Total 3,473 3,772 2,783 3,306 13,334 %Latino est. 10% 7% 19% 12% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 9% 7% 17% 11% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 84% 89% 78% 84% 84% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 3,129 3,462 2,335 2,936 11,862 %Latino est. 9% 7% 17% 11% 10% %Spanish-Sumamed 9% 7% 16% 11% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 84% 89% 80% 85% 85% %NH Black 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% Total 2,499 2,791 1,669 2,294 9,253 %Latino est. 8% 6% 13% 9% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 6% 13% 9% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2018) Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 90% 83% 87% 87% %NH Black est. 2% 1% 0% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,192 4,740 4,814 4,394 18,140 age0-19 16% 25% 27% 18% 22% Age age20-60 44% 50% 51% 51% 49% age60plus 41% 25% 23% 31% 29% immigrants 9% 6% 9% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 64% 70% 57% 70% 65% english 90% 90% 84% 88% 88% spanish 4% 1% 12% 6% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 4% 2% 2% 3% 2% other fang 3% 7% 3% 4% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 3% 4% 6% 3% 4% hs-grad 44% 46% 47% 55% 48% Education bachelor 24% 24% 20% 19% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 16% 15% 12% 9% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 16% 27% 36% 21% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 51% 60% 64% 58% 58% income 0-25k 20% 9% 13% 15% 14% income25-50k 15% 11% 19% 16% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 13% 15% 19% 18% 16% income 75-200k 44% 50% 45% 46% 46% income 200k-plus 8% 14% 4% 4% 8% single family 78% 95% 76% 86% 84% multi-family 22% 5% 24% 14% 16% Housing Stats rented 31% 28% 45% 27% 33% owned 69% 72% 55% 73% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. "'otlei, age 315 of 340 02/11/2022 15:33 Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT 6F City of Arroyo Grande 2021/22 Transition to a534R District Elections 'o`�s 2f • ' isJames Way z : �, C�_ o Gf ..c.,1 c ar O � ' � vo 4ly � ,be° Fluasna Rd (-----'` (101 Montego St ----'' Branch �L�'S'cJ ��rofi� .cz co E Grand Ave o � ��' a IIW \2' Gb ,,,,, 1:.! x° ''',;' VII CT) c"ti e t, 0 � O UMaple St 7' off '- v�O,'k ��‘; e.2' '- cn Ash St to i'o ic''' .?,,E.��o d r1.717 N. R Fair Oaks Ave s cn of Farroll Ave P P � 4 4, 0 a The Pike 9-- Sunrise Dr ProposedElection Sequence: `g* Leanna Dr 2022: Districts 3 & 4 2024: Districts 1 & 2 Pa 1MN_P40 National Demographics Corporation,February 12,2022 City of Arroyo Grande- Plan 534R District 1 2 3 4 1 Total Total Pop 4,483 4,746 4,749 4,491 18,469 Deviation from ideal -134 129 132 -126 266 %Deviation -2.90% 2.79% 2.86% -2.73% 5.76% %Hisp 17.5% 16% 23% 22% 20% %NH White 69% 73% 65% 68% 69% Total Pop %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% %Asian-American 7% 5% 6% 4% 5% Total 3,367 3,934 3,381 3,463 14,144 %Hisp 13% 12% 15% 12% 13% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 80% 82% 74% 80% 79% %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %Asian/Pac.lsl. 3% 4% 6% 6% 5% Total 3,252 3,776 3,120 3,186 13,334 %Latino est. 11% 8% 14% 13% 11% %Spanish-Sumamed 10% 8% 14% 12% 11% Voter Registration %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 85% 87% 80% 84% 84% %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% Total 2,904 3,418 2,724 2,816 11,862 %Latino est. 9% 8% 14% 12% 10% %Spanish-Sumamed 9% 8% 13% 11% 10% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% (Nov 2020) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% %NH White est. 86% 87% 81% 85% 85% %NH Black 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% Total 2,328 2,659 2,049 2,217 9,253 %Latino est. 8% 7% 10% 9% 8% %Spanish-Sumamed 8% 7% 10% 9% 8% Voter Turnout %Asian-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% (Nov 2018) %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% %NH White est. 87% 89% 84% 87% 87% %NH Black est. 1% 1% 2% 0% 1% ACS Pop.Est. Total 4,326 5,042 4,453 4,319 18,140 age0-19 18% 25% 23% 20% 22% Age age20-60 46% 51% 48% 51% 49% age60plus 36% 24% 29% 29% 29% immigrants 8% 6% 10% 9% 8% Immigration naturalized 63% 74% 58% 66% 65% english 85% 92% 87% 86% 88% spanish 10% 1% 8% 7% 6% Language spoken at home asian-lang 1% 2% 4% 3% 2% other fang 4% 6% 2% 4% 4% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less than Very Well" 5% 4% 4% 4% 4% hs-grad 46% 47% 44% 55% 48% Education bachelor 23% 25% 21% 18% 22% (among those age 25+) graduatedegree 15% 13% 14% 10% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 23% 26% 27% 24% 25% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 53% 63% 59% 57% 58% income0-25k 20% 11% 15% 12% 14% income 25-50k 13% 12% 19% 17% 16% Household Income income 50-75k 14% 15% 17% 20% 16% income 75-200k 44% 51% 44% 46% 46% income200k-plus 9% 11% 5% 4% 8% single family 84% 93% 73% 85% 84% multi-family 16% 7% 27% 15% 16% Housing Stats rented 26% 32% 45% 28% 33% owned 74% 68% 55% 72% 67% Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census. Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database. Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. "'otlei, age 317 of 340 02/11/2022 15:26 Page 1 of 1 F PRROYO ° c1, '1 tN CORPORATED -5 * JULY 10, 1911 * C44IFOJ MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Whitney McDonald, City Manager SUBJECT: Receive an Update on Progress Toward Council Goals and Priorities for Fiscal Year 2021-22 DATE: February 22, 2022 SUMMARY OF ACTION: Continued consideration of an update regarding the progress made toward meeting the City Council's Goals and Priorities for Fiscal Year 2021-22. IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES: There are no financial impacts associated with receipt of the update regarding progress toward meeting Council's Fiscal Year 2021-22 Goals and Priorities. RECOMMENDATION: Receive an update regarding progress toward the City Council's Fiscal Year 2021-22 Goals and Priorities. BACKGROUND: This item was continued from the February 8, 2022 City Council meeting agenda due to a lack of sufficient time to discuss the item. On September 22, 2020, the City Council adopted a list of Top 10 Council Priorities for Fiscal Year 2020-21 to help prioritize and focus staff work efforts for the year. On March 23, 2021, Council received an update regarding the City's progress toward completing the Top 10 Priorities and directed that a process be undertaken each year to establish the Council's goals and priorities. On April 27, 2021 , Council considered and approved a list of Council Goals and Priorities for Fiscal Year 2021-22 (Goals and Priorities) (Attachment 1) to help direct the work of the Council and City staff during the applicable biennial budget cycle. The identified Goals and Priorities were grouped under three main categories: Investing in the Future, Investing in the City's Infrastructure and Facilities, and Investing in People. A number of key considerations guided the development of the Goals and Priorities, including Top 10 Priorities not completed during Fiscal Year 2020-21, items identified as new priorities as Item 10.a. Page 318 of 340 City Council Receive an Update on Progress Toward Council Goals and Priorities for Fiscal Year 2021-22 February 22, 2022 Page 2 a result of the work completed in Fiscal Year 2020-21, items required to support the ongoing operations of the City's enterprises and infrastructure, and emergent needs continuing to result from the COVID-19 pandemic and turnover in City staff. The Goals and Priorities were updated as part of the Fiscal Year 2021-23 Biennial Budget presentation and adoption in June 2021 to include estimated time frames for completion. While the Goals and Priorities were incorporated into the Biennial Budget, which spans two years, the identified work items focused on Fiscal Year 2021-22 with a stated intent to review and update the Council approved Goals and Priorities each year This report provides an update regarding the City's progress on completing the identified Goals and Priorities for Fiscal Year 2021-22, with a focus on the first half of the Fiscal Year. ANALYSIS OF ISSUES: Significant progress has been made toward accomplishing a number of Goals and Priorities for Fiscal Year 2021-22. Some items, however, have experienced delays and will take more time to complete or are ongoing in nature. Table 1 below identifies each Goal and Priority, the estimated timeframe for completion provided as part of the Biennial Budget, and a status report in the far-right column. Table 1 Category Goal/Priority Estimated Timeline Status Update Investing Begin Scoping discussion to Delayed due to staff in the comprehensive occur by Fall 2021; turnover, other priority Future General Plan update kick-off of update to and emergent items. begin by Spring 2022. New target date is Spring 2022 for scoping discussion with kick off in Fall 2022. Initiate and/or • Regional pre- • On target. Pre- complete housing approved ADU approved plans initiatives funded by plans currently reviewed by grant programs underway, to be Architectural Review • Regional pre- completed in 2022 Committee & approved ADU • Consider Planning plans incorporating Commission. Will be • Objective design objective design presented to Council standards standards into in Spring 2022. comprehensive • Objective design General Plan standards will be update with scoping discussed with General Plan update Item 10.a. Page 319 of 340 City Council Receive an Update on Progress Toward Council Goals and Priorities for Fiscal Year 2021-22 February 22, 2022 Page 3 discussion in Fall scoping item in 2021 Spring 2022. Complete ADU Summer 2021 Delayed due to conflict ordinance issues, introduced on amendments February 8, 2022, but continued to a date uncertain to address changes requested by Council. Evaluate water Part of Council's Completed. Direction resiliency options consideration of provided to pursue: available to the City Central Coast Blue • Short term Project in Summer and agreement with Fall 2021 OCSD • Emergency interconnect with Golden State Water • CCB • Discuss potential sale of water from scalping plant with nearby ag users • Continue engaging with County staff re Nacimiento and State Water if available in the future • Ballot measure to allow purchase of State Water outside of emergency Continue support for Incorporate into To be included in existing and new comprehensive General Plan update economic General Plan update process development process initiatives • COVID Relief • COVID Relief • COVID relief Program Program to be programs expanded • Determine administered through ARPA whether to through 2021 allocations conduct baseline • Consideration of • Baseline analysis to analysis of baseline analysis to be included in Item 10.a. Page 320 of 340 City Council Receive an Update on Progress Toward Council Goals and Priorities for Fiscal Year 2021-22 February 22, 2022 Page 4 existing and occur with General Plan scoping future business discussion of discussion in Spring needs comprehensive 2022. • Evaluate the General Plan potential to update scope (Fall enable cannabis 2021) businesses in • Consider potential • Delayed until 2023 Arroyo Grande to enable cannabis businesses in Fall 2021 Support regional Ongoing Ongoing. Specific steps efforts to address completed this year homelessness and include: emergency shelter • ARPA funding needs allocated for the purchase of property and/or development of a homeless shelter by 5Cities Homeless Coalition. • Safe parking meeting conducted in December 2021 with faith community to discuss interest in programs and services. • Facilitated locating the warming shelter at the South County Regional Center this winter, with certain dates reserved at the Women's Club due to scheduling conflicts at the Regional Center. Review status of Fall 2021 Completed. Five Cities Fire Authority 3rd Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement, and Item 10.a. Page 321 of 340 City Council Receive an Update on Progress Toward Council Goals and Priorities for Fiscal Year 2021-22 February 22, 2022 Page 5 consider cost analysis of service delivery models Evaluate options to Summer/Fall 2021 Completed. pay down CaIPERS unfunded accrued liability Investing Identify and pursue • Discuss options for • Delayed due to other in City short- and long-term short- and long- priority items, such Infrastruc funding term infrastructure as water shortage ture and mechanisms, such financing in Fall emergency, and the Facilities as a sales tax 2021. need to completed measure, for • Consider potential updated pavement pavement sales tax measure index evaluation. maintenance and in Spring 2022. Scheduled for other infrastructure March/April 2022. maintenance needs • On track to consider tax measure in Spring 2022. • Excess reserves allocated to additional 2020/21 pavement repair projects. Complete design • Contract for design • Delayed. RFP issued and/or begin services for Brisco in December 2021 construction of key Interchange Project with contract award infrastructure expected Fall 2021 expected for projects, including: with design consideration April • Brisco expected to be 2022. Interchange completed in Spring Project 2023 • Traffic Way • Traffic Way Bridge • Delayed. Bridge Replacement Replacement design Replacement design expected to expected to be • Swinging Bridge be complete in Fall complete in Summer Rehabilitation 2022 and 2023 and construction construction expected to begin expected to begin Summer 2023 Summer 2024. • Swinging Bridge • Delayed. RFP for Rehabilitation construction issued. construction Construction Item 10.a. Page 322 of 340 City Council Receive an Update on Progress Toward Council Goals and Priorities for Fiscal Year 2021-22 February 22, 2022 Page 6 expected to begin expected to begin Spring 2022 Summer 2022. Evaluate and select Spring 2022 Estimated in options for replacing Spring/Summer 2022. the Mark M. Millis Community Center Complete a water Complete rate study in Delayed but partially and sewer rate Summer 2021 and completed. Rate Study study and consider propose adoption in approved January 11, implementing a rate Fall 2021. 2022, rate hearing adjustment scheduled for March 8, 2022, and new rates anticipated to be implemented in April 2022. Complete a Begin in Winter 2021- RFP issued February comprehensive fee 22 with proposed 10, 2022, with project study and consider adoption in Spring commencement adjusting City fees, 2022 expected to begin June including impact 1, 2022. fees Investing Adopt and Proposed policy for Delayed but completed in in People implement Diversity, Council consideration January 2022. Equity, and Inclusion in Summer 2021 . Implementation ongoing. initiatives Implementation and preparation of additional polices as appropriate will be ongoing. Maintain and Ongoing Ongoing increase public engagement with the City • The process for • On track. Next • Complete creating voting hearings scheduled process to create districts will begin in February and voting districts in with two public March with maps to 2022 hearings in Summer be adopted by April • Increase public 2021 and conclude 2022. Several outreach through with two public outreach methods surveys, social hearings in Spring employed to date. media 2022. Districts will engagement, and be implemented in events Fall 2022. Item 10.a. Page 323 of 340 City Council Receive an Update on Progress Toward Council Goals and Priorities for Fiscal Year 2021-22 February 22, 2022 Page 7 • Evaluate • Public outreach • Completed. technology efforts will increase opportunities to with the hiring of a enhance public new Deputy City participation in Clerk/Communicati meetings ons Coordinator • Ongoing video- and • Completed. Hybrid tele-conferencing meeting option options for public implemented in July meetings will be and August 2021 , but discussed with Zoom only meetings Council in June resumed due to delta 2021 and variant and increase implemented in July in local COVID cases 2021, with ongoing and mask evaluation and requirements. refinement • Survey completed thereafter regarding parklets. Modernize • Public safety • Delayed, expected to technologies and camera upgrades begin deployment in systems in key are expected to be Spring 2022. areas, such as completed by public safety Winter 2022. cameras, human • Human resources • Summer 2022 more resources software systems likely due to staffing processes, and will be implemented constraints. accounting and by Winter 2021. agenda • Agenda • Implemented. management management software systems software will be implemented in Summer 2021 . • Accounting • Delayed due to management staffing constraints, software will be Water Shortage procured in Winter Emergency, COVID 2021/22 and impacts, other items. implemented Procurement through Fiscal Year expected in Summer _ 2022-23. 2022. Focus resources Ongoing Ongoing and implement efficiencies to Item 10.a. Page 324 of 340 City Council Receive an Update on Progress Toward Council Goals and Priorities for Fiscal Year 2021-22 February 22, 2022 Page 8 ensure optimized service levels within core City functions Evaluate and Ongoing. A City-wide Ongoing. Salary survey implement salary survey will be delayed, expected to be employee retention, completed during completed during first attraction, Fiscal Year 2021-22. half of Fiscal Year 2022- recruitment, 23. development, and support strategies During the course of the Fiscal Year 2021-22, emerging issues in certain areas have created the need to readjust priorities. For instance, significant staff time and resources have been required to respond to the current drought and the need to declare and implement a Stage 1 Water Shortage Emergency. This work effort was not anticipated as part of the Goals and Priorities and resulted in the redirection of staff resources. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has continued to create operational constraints for the City, creating delays due to staff outages. Other emerging issues and Council-directed priorities, such as changes at the Integrated Waste Management Authority, implementation of State legislation (e.g. SB 1383 and SB 9), development of a permanent parklet program, etc., have also adjusted staff work efforts during Fiscal Year 2021-22. These considerations have resulted in delays for some items identified in the Goals and Priorities. Staff will continue making progress toward meeting the Goals and Priorities established for Fiscal Year 2021-22, as described above. A new goal-setting process will be undertaken in April 2022 to review and adjust the Goals and Priorities as needed and desired by Council for the upcoming Fiscal Year. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration: 1. Receive an update regarding progress toward the City Council's Fiscal Year 2021- 22 Goals and Priorities; or 2. Provide other direction to staff. ADVANTAGES: Receiving the status report on the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Goals and Priorities provides an update to the Council and the public on the City's efforts toward completing and accomplishing a number of vital work efforts. This review may assist in the development of new goals and priorities for the upcoming Fiscal Year 2022-23. DISADVANTAGES: There are no disadvantages identified at this time. Item 10.a. Page 325 of 340 City Council Receive an Update on Progress Toward Council Goals and Priorities for Fiscal Year 2021-22 February 22, 2022 Page 9 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: No environmental review is required for this item. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS: The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City's website in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2. Attachment: 1. Fiscal Years 2021-23 Goals and Priorities Included in Biennial Budget Item 10.a. Page 326 of 340 ATTACHMENT 1 Council Goals and Priorities for Fiscal Years 2021-23 Investing in the Future • Begin comprehensive general plan update • Initiate and/or complete housing initiatives funded by grant programs o Regional pre-approved ADU plans o Objective design standards • Complete ADU ordinance amendments • Evaluate water resiliency options available to the City • Continue support for existing and new economic development initiatives o COVID Relief Program o Determine whether to conduct baseline analysis of existing and future business needs o Evaluate the potential to enable cannabis businesses in Arroyo Grande • Support regional efforts to address homelessness and emergency shelter needs • Review status of Five Cities Fire Authority 3rd Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement,and consider cost analysis of service delivery models • Evaluate options to pay down Ca1PERS unfunded accrued liability Investing in City Infrastructure and Facilities • Identify and pursue short-and long-term funding mechanisms, such as a sales tax measure,for pavement maintenance and other infrastructure maintenance needs • Complete design and/or begin construction of key infrastructure projects,including: o Brisco Interchange Project o Traffic Way Bridge Replacement o Swinging Bridge Rehabilitation • Evaluate and select options for replacing the Mark M. Millis Community Center • Complete a water and sewer rate study and consider implementing a rate adjustment • Complete a comprehensive fee study and consider adjusting City fees,including impact fees Investing in People • Adopt and implement Diversity,Equity,and Inclusion initiatives • Maintain and increase public engagement with the City o Complete process to create voting districts in 2022 o Increase public outreach through surveys,social media engagement, and events o Evaluate technology opportunities to enhance public participation in meetings • Modernize technologies and systems in key areas,such as public safety cameras,human resources processes,and accounting and agenda management software systems • Focus resources and implement efficiencies to ensure optimized service levels within core City functions Page 327 of 340 • Evaluate and implement employee retention, attraction,recruitment, development, and support strategies Anticipated Timeframes for Completion of the Goals and Priorities Identified Above for Fiscal Years 2021-23 Category Goal/Priority Anticipated Timeframe for Completion Investing in Begin comprehensive General Plan Scoping discussion to occur by Fall the Future update 2021;kick-off of update to begin by Spring 2022. Initiate and/or complete housing • Regional pre-approved ADU initiatives funded by grant programs plans currently underway, to be • Regional pre-approved ADU completed in 2022 plans • Consider incorporating objective • Objective design standards design standards into comprehensive General Plan update with scoping discussion in Fall 2021 Complete ADU ordinance amendments Summer 2021 Evaluate water resiliency options Part of Council's consideration of available to the City Central Coast Blue Project in Summer and Fall 2021 Continue support for existing and new Incorporate into comprehensive economic development initiatives General Plan update process • COVID Relief Program • COVID Relief Program to be • Determine whether to conduct administered through 2021 baseline analysis of existing and • Consideration of baseline future business needs analysis to occur with discussion • Evaluate the potential to enable of comprehensive General Plan cannabis businesses in Arroyo update scope (Fall 2021) Grande • Consider potential to enable cannabis businesses in Fall 2021 Support regional efforts to address Ongoing homelessness and emergency shelter needs Review status of Five Cities Fire Fall 2021 Authority 3rd Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement, and consider cost analysis of service delivery models Evaluate options to pay down Ca1PERS Summer/Fall 2021 unfunded accrued liability Page 328 of 340 Investing in Identify and pursue short-and long- Discuss options for short-and long- City term funding mechanisms, such as a term infrastructure financing in Fall Infrastructu sales tax measure,for pavement 2021. re and maintenance and other infrastructure Consider potential sales tax measure Facilities maintenance needs in Spring 2022. Complete design and/or begin • Contract for design services for construction of key infrastructure Brisco Interchange Project projects,including: expected Fall 2021 with design • Brisco Interchange Project expected to be completed in • Traffic Way Bridge Replacement Spring 2023 • Swinging Bridge Rehabilitation • Traffic Way Bridge Replacement design expected to be complete in Fall 2022 and construction expected to begin Summer 2023 • Swinging Bridge Rehabilitation construction expected to begin Spring 2022 Evaluate and select options for replacing Spring 2022 the Mark M. Millis Community Center Complete a water and sewer rate study Complete rate study in Summer 2021 and consider implementing a rate and propose adoption in Fall 2021. adjustment Complete a comprehensive fee study Begin in Winter 2021-22 with and consider adjusting City fees, proposed adoption in Spring 2022 including impact fees Investing in Adopt and implement Diversity, Equity, Proposed policy for Council People and Inclusion initiatives consideration in Summer 2021. Implementation and preparation of additional polices as appropriate will be ongoing. Maintain and increase public • The process for creating voting engagement with the City districts will begin with two • Complete process to create public hearings in Summer 2021 voting districts in 2022 and conclude with two public • Increase public outreach through hearings in Spring 2022. Districts surveys, social media will be implemented in Fall 2022. engagement,and events • Public outreach efforts will • Evaluate technology increase with the hiring of a new opportunities to enhance public Deputy City participation in meetings Clerk/Communications Coordinator • Ongoing video-and tele- conferencing options for public meetings will be discussed with Council in June 2021 and implemented in July 2021,with Page 329 of 340 ongoing evaluation and refinement thereafter Modernize technologies and systems in • Public safety camera upgrades key areas, such as public safety cameras, are expected to be completed by human resources processes, and Winter 2022. accounting and agenda management • Human resources software software systems systems will be implemented by Winter 2021. • Agenda management software will be implemented in Summer 2021. • Accounting management software will be procured in Winter 2021/22 and implemented through Fiscal Year 2022-23. Focus resources and implement Ongoing efficiencies to ensure optimized service levels within core City functions Evaluate and implement employee Ongoing. A City-wide salary survey retention,attraction,recruitment, will be completed during Fiscal Year development,and support strategies 2021-22. Page 330 of 340 pRROYO 23 cp '� tNCORPORATEl7 9 V O JULY 10, 1911 cQE1FO�P MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Whitney McDonald, City Manager Steve Lieberman, Five Cities Fire Chief/Executive Officer Michael Martinez, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Discussion Regarding Municipal Code Requirements Related to the Sale and Discharge of Class C ("Safe and Sane") Fireworks DATE: February 22, 2022 SUMMARY OF ACTION: Discussion and direction regarding potential amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 8.08 — Fireworks. IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES: No financial impact to the City is projected. RECOMMENDATION: Discuss Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Section 8.08 related to the sale and discharge of Class C ("Safe and Sane") fireworks, and provide direction to staff regarding potential changes to the existing code section, such as a complete prohibition of fireworks in the City or other modifications. BACKGROUND: Chapter 8.08 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code lays out the City's current fireworks program, which allows the sale and discharge of fireworks approved by the California Fire Marshall (also known as "safe and sane" fireworks) within the City, subject to certain limitations and requirements. The City's fireworks program has been discussed by the City Council at various times over the years. Most recently, Municipal Code Section 8.08.100 was revised in 2019 to limit the public discharge of safe and sane fireworks to July 4th only. Following the receipt of renewed questions and concerns from the public regarding the City's current fireworks program, the City Council directed staff at its January 11, 2022 regular meeting to schedule a future agenda item to discuss potential amendments to the City's current fireworks program. Item 11.a. Page 331 of 340 City Council Discussion Regarding Municipal Code Requirements Related to the Sale and Discharge of Class C ("Safe and Sane") Fireworks February 22, 2022 Page 2 ANALYSIS OF ISSUES: The provisions contained in Chapter 8.08 of the City's Municipal Code (Attachment 1) delineate the conditions under which the sale and discharge of safe and sane fireworks may occur within the City. Sales may occur only at temporary booths permitted by the City's fire chief, now the Five Cities Fire Authority (FCFA) Fire Chief/Executive Officer, operated and maintained by a recognized charitable, civic or patriotic group or organization. Applications for permits to sell fireworks must be filed with the FCFA between March 1-April 15 each year. The maximum number of permits available each year is limited to one permit per each three thousand (3,000) residents of the City, resulting in a current total of six (6) available permits at this time. Sales are permitted to occur between noon on June 28th through noon on July 5th. As mentioned above, Municipal Code Section 8.08.100 allows fireworks to be discharged on July 4th only but without specifying the time of day. The result is that safe and sane fireworks may be discharged in the City from 12:00 am through 11:59 pm on July 4th When the FCFA was formed in 2010 and assumed management of the annual fireworks concessions program, Arroyo Grande and Grover Beach modified their Municipal Codes in an effort to allow for more consistent program management. Since the City last amended Section 8.08.100, the other member communities served by the FCFA have revised their applicable code/regulation and limited the discharge of fireworks to July 4th between the hours of 10am-10pm. A review of the codes and regulations adopted by each of the FCFA's member agencies have revealed a few additional distinctions between the agencies' fireworks booth management and sales regulations. In the event that Council desires to modify the City's existing fireworks program, the FCFA recommends considering the following proposals (as related to Arroyo Grande) to better align the three FCFA member agencies regulations: Item 11.a. Page 332 of 340 City Council Discussion Regarding Municipal Code Requirements Related to the Sale and Discharge of Class C ("Safe and Sane") Fireworks February 22, 2022 Page 3 Five Cities Fire Authority Proposed Standardization of Fireworks Booth Management & Sales Arroyo Grande PROPOSED STANDARD Pgm Mgmt/Inspection/Fees FCFA FCFA Time Period for Selling Fireworks noon,June 28th-noon July 5th June 28(Noon)to July 4(9pm) Unsold Fireworks Removal Date 9 a.m.,July 6th July 6(9am) Daily Hours of Operation for Sales 9 a.m.to 9 p.m. 9am-9pm Discharging Fireworks-July 4 24 hours 10am-10pm Fire Extinguishers at Booth Two 51b chemical fire extinguishers Two 51b chemical fire extinguishers Location of Booth 50ft from any building 30 feet from any building or fireworks booth Type of Secured Storage Container Metal Metal The chart below displays a summary comparison of how the seven cities of San Luis Obispo County regulate fireworks: Fireworks Allowable City Allowed? Discharge Dates Arroyo Grande Yes 7/4 — 24hrs Atascadero No - Grover Beach Yes 7/4 — 10a/10p Morro Bay Yes Unspecified Paso Robles No - Pismo Beach No - San Luis Obispo No - The Arroyo Grande Police Department (AGPD) and the FCFA track calls of service in the City that are related to fireworks. Between July 1-6, 2021, AGPD responded to a total of 361 calls and of these 361 calls, 59 were related to fireworks (16.3%). The FCFA responded to 36 calls in Arroyo Grande during the same time period, including one small trash fire related to improper disposal of fireworks. During this time frame, calls for service to the FCFA related to fireworks represented 2.8% of total calls. Between July 1-6, 2020, Item 11.a. Page 333 of 340 City Council Discussion Regarding Municipal Code Requirements Related to the Sale and Discharge of Class C ("Safe and Sane") Fireworks February 22, 2022 Page 4 AGPD responded to a total of 384 calls and of these 384 calls, 48 were related to fireworks (13%). In 2020, FCFA responded to 41 calls for service with 2 being fireworks related (4.9%). ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration: 1. Provide direction to staff regarding revisions to the Municipal Code; 2. Determine that no changes to the Municipal Code are needed at this time; or 3. Provide other direction to staff. ADVANTAGES: Discussion of the City's current fireworks program ensures transparency and an opportunity for the City Council and the public to provide input regarding any desired changes to the program. DISADVANTAGES: There are no disadvantages identified to reviewing and discussing the City's fireworks program. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: No environmental review is required for this item. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS: The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City's website in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2. Attachments: 1. City of Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Chapter 8.08 Item 11.a. Page 334 of 340 Attachment 1 8.08.040 Chapter 8.08 the permit of the director of building and fire. (Ord. 588 §2 (part), 2007) FIREWORKS Sections: 8.08.040 Permits—Applications. 8.08.010 Title 19 of the California All applicants for a permit to sell fire- Code of Regulations. works shall: 8.08.020 Amendment to Fire Code. A. Submit a written eligibility applica- 8.08.030 Sale. tion to sell fireworks on a form provided by 8.08.040 Permits—Applications. the city. 8.08.050 Meeting. B. Applications for eligibility shall be 8.08.060 Fireworks stands— accepted by the department of building and Construction and fire between March 1st and April 15th and placement. shall state the name of the applicant, the 8.08.070 Sales. name of the organization, its address, the president or head of the organization, and 8.08.080 Fireworks stands— a complete account of the proposed dispo- General requirements. sition of all gross receipts of fireworks to be 8.08.090 Delivery. sold at the proposed stand. Failure of such 8.08.100 Public discharge. account to show that at least fifty(50) per- 8.08.110 Violations. cent of the net profits from the sale of fire- works will be expended for the benefit of 8.08.010 Title 19 of the California the city or its residents shall cause such Code of Regulations. application to be denied. Storage, use, retail sales and handling C. No organization may receive more of fireworks shall be in accordance with than one permit to sell fireworks sale dur- Title 19 of the California Code of Regula- ing any one calendar year. One permit may tions and this chapter. (Ord. 588 §2 (part), be issued to two or more qualifying appli- 2007) cants as a joint venture. 8.08.020 Amendment to Fire Code. D. The maximum number of permits California Fire Code Chapter 56 is shall be based on one permit per each three amended to add the following provisions thousand (3,000) residents of the city or regarding the sale and use of fireworks, fraction thereof, based on the official city Class C ("Safe and Sane"). (Ord. 594 § 7, census. Should the number of applications 2007: Ord. 588 §2(part), 2007) exceed the number of available permits, an (Ord. No. 657, § 12, 10-8-2013) initial drawing shall be conducted by the city clerk and all applicants shall be placed 8.08.030 Sale. on an eligibility list in the order drawn. No person shall sell or offer for sale any Permits shall be issued to applicants in the fireworks within the city except in a tempo- order of the list and the eligibility list shall rary stand or structure used specifically for be maintained by the department of build- the display and sale of fireworks operated ing and fire on an ongoing basis and made and maintained by a recognized charitable, available to the public.In any year succeed- civic or patriotic group or organization with ing the initial drawing, permits shall be is- 194.1 Supp.No.27,4-14 Page 335 of 340 8.08.040 sued to applicants in order of the list begin- ning with the first applicant after the last applicant issued a permit the prior year. 0 Supp.No.27,4-14 194.2 Page 336 of 340 8.08.040 Applicants filing an application that are not shall be deemed eligible. The city shall at- on the existing list will be placed at the end tempt to provide notice to the applicant; of the list at the time the application is filed. however,it shall be the absolute duty of the E. On an annual basis, eligible appli- applicant to stay apprised of its position on cants shall be those on the list equal to the the list. Such eligible applicants shall file an number of available permits beginning at application for a permit with the depart- the start of the list and working downward. ment of building and fire no later than May If an applicant withdraws their application, 15th. the next succeeding applicant on the list I. Each applicant organization must shall be deemed eligible. Eligible applicants have its principal general membership shall file a fireworks stand permit applica- and/or governing board meeting place tion with the department of building and within the corporate limits of the city of fire between March 1st and April 15th of Arroyo Grande and must have been estab- the year for which the permit is requested lished within the city for a minimum of two and shall state the name of the applicant, years continuously preceding the filing of the name of the organization, its address, the application for permit and must have a president or head of the organization, the bona fide membership of at least fifteen location of the proposed stand, the names (15)members. of the persons who will actually staff the J. Insurance. The city council shall, by stand on behalf of the applicant and a corn- resolution, establish appropriate insurance plete account of the proposed disposition requirements and conditions related to the of all gross receipts of fireworks to be sold sale of fireworks. at the proposed stand for that year. K. No permit shall be issued unless the F. Each applicant must include a "let- applicant organization represents to the city ter of agreement" signed by the property that all aspects of the sale of fireworks, owner or their authorized agent permitting including the application for all necessary the organization to erect a fireworks stand permits, will be conducted by a member of on the owner's property. Failure to do so the applicant organization. All application shall cause such application to be denied. fees shall be paid by the applicant organiza- G. Applicants that are issued a permit tion. Such fees shall not be paid by any are required to file with the city a"fireworks other affiliated organization, including a stand financial statement" form, which is seller, distributor, or vendor of fireworks. due by October 31st of the calendar year in Applicants will neither hire nor use indepen- which the permit is issued. On this form dent contractors or other persons who are each applicant must certify that at least fifty not members of the organization in connec- (50) percent of the prior year's net profits tion with any aspect of the sale of fire- from the sale of fireworks were expended works. Only members of the applicant or- for the benefit of the city and its residents. ganization shall staff the fireworks stand, Failure to so certify prior to submitting a except spouses,parents and children or mem- fireworks stand permit application shall bers who are eighteen (18) years of age or cause such renewal application to be de- older, may also staff such stand, subject to nied. the provisions of this subsection.All mem- H. If any applications from eligible ap- bers of the organization must have a valid plicants are either denied or not received by identification, which verifies that such per- April r 15th, the next applicant(s) on the list son is a valid member of the organization, 195 Supp.No.21,4-11 Page 337 of 340 8.08.040 on their person or inside the fireworks stand. C. Fireworks stands need not comply Organizational membership records for fire- with the auilding code of the city. Stands works stand workers should also be re- requiring electrical service shall be required tained in the stand for reference. to obtain an electrical permit from the build- L. Permit Fees and Conditions. The ing and life safety division. Stands shall be city council shall, by resolution, establish constructed or erected in a manner that will appropriate fees and conditions related to reasonably ensure the safety of attendants the sale of fireworks. (Ord. 588 § 2 (part), and patrons. The stands shall be subject to 2007) inspection by representatives of the depart- ment of building and fire at any time. 8.08.050 Meeting. D. Each stand shall have a minimum of two marked exits or as otherwise di- There shall be a meeting the first Mon- rected by the director of building and fire. day of June at seven-thirty p.m. of every E. Each stand shall have a minimum year. This meeting is mandatory for the of two fire extinguishers of a type desig- representatives of the permittee organiza- nated by the director of building and fire. tions. Safety practices, legal issues and ex- (Ord. 588 §2(part), 2007) planation of the laws,rules and regulations (Ord. 588 §2(part), 2007) will be discussed.At this meeting,the appli- cations,certificates of insurance and letters 8.08.070 Sales. of permission will be submitted and the Fireworks stands shall comply with the permits issued. Wholesale distributors, or following requirements related to sales: their bona fide agents, shall also be present A. Fireworks shall not be sold before at this meeting. (Ord. 588 §2 (part), 2007) noon on the twenty-eighth of June and such sales shall cease at noon on the fifth day of 8.08.060 Fireworks stands— July. Sales during this time period will be limited to nine a.m. to nine p.m. each day. Construction and placement. Any permittee failing to observe these hours Retail sales of fireworks shall be made designated for sale may have their permit only from temporary fireworks stands. Sale revoked or be ineligible for a permit in nib- of fireworks from any other building or sequent years. structure is prohibited. Temporary stands B. Sales to individuals under the age of will be subject to the following provisions: eighteen (18) is prohibited. The permittee A. No fireworks stands shall be lo- shall require that each person who pur- cated within fifty (50) feet of any other chases fireworks produce identification prov- building,within one hundred(100)feet of a ing that such person is eighteen (18) years gasoline or other type of flammable fuel of age or older. pump or storage area, within five hundred C. Each person who purchases fire- (500)feet of another fireworks stand or less works must be provided with handouts that than one-eighth of a mile from the city's contain information related to where "safe boundary with another jurisdiction. and sane fireworks" can legally be dis- B. All fireworks stands shall be erected charged and the associated hazards. The or constructed on commercial or industrial- contents of this document will be reviewed zoned property.No fireworks stands will be and approved by the director of building constructed or erected on residential prop- and fire. (Ord. 588§2(part), 2007) erty. (Ord. No. 627,§ 13, 12-14-2010) Supp.No.21.4-11 196 Page 338 of 340 8.08.110 8.08.080 Fireworks stands—General 8.08.090 Delivery. Am,, requirements. A. The wholesale distributors will make A. Each stand shall provide tempo- all deliveries and end of sale season pick- rary sanitary facilities or obtain permission ups. Excess storage of fireworks will not be permitted. to use either private or public facilities dur B. Reserved.(Ord. 588§2(part),2007) ing the hours of operation. Proof of sani- (Ord. No. 627,§ 13, 12-14-2010) tation facilities shall be documented in writ- ten form. 8.08.100 Public discharge. B. All weeds,trash,and debris shall be Discharge of "safe and sane fireworks" cleared for a distance of at least twenty-five may only occur on July 4th in legally per- (25) feet surrounding the fireworks stand. mitted locations. No person under eighteen C. Doors of the stand shall not be (18) years of age may possess or discharge locked on the outside of the door while "safe and sane fireworks" except when un- anyone is inside the stand.The door may be der the direct supervision of a person twenty latched in such a manner that will not cause one(21)years of age or older. (Ord. 588§2 any undue delay to anyone exiting in an (part), 2007) (Ord. No. 627, § 13, 12-14-2010; Ord. No. emergency. 699, §2,4-23-2019) D. An aisle or passageway in the fire- works stand will be kept clear and unob- 8.08.110 Violations. structed so as not to impede anyone leaving Persons violating any provisions of this the stand in an emergency. section shall be deemed guilty of a misde- meanor and,upon conviction thereof, shall E. The use of electrical or fuel-oper- be punished by a fine not to exceed one ated heaters in the fireworks stand is pro- thousand ($1,000) dollars or by imprison- hibited. ment in the county jail for a period not to E The temporary fireworks stand will exceed six months or by both such fine and be dismantled and removed from its loca- imprisonment.Any violations of these pro- tion not later than the Sunday of the week- visions shall constitute a separate offense end following the 5th of July of each year.It for each and every day during which such shall be the responsibility of the permittee violation is committed or continued. (Ord. to remove the stand. If the removal of the 588 §2(part), 2007) stand is not accomplished by this deadline, the city of Arroyo Grande may remove and store it at permittees'cost and expense until it is redeemed by the payment of appropri- ate fees and interest thereon. In addition, the permittee failing to meet this deadline will be ineligible for a permit the following year. G. Each stand shall have adequate tem- porary parking acceptable to the director of the department of building and fire. (Ord. 588§2(part), 2007) 197 Supp.No.35,10-19 Page 339 of 340 Chapter 8.12 tion of the emergency functions of the city with all other public agencies,corporations, EMERGENCY SERVICES organizations,and affected private persons. ORGANIZATION* (Ord. No. 638,§ 1, 11-8-2011) Sections: 8.12.010 Purposes. 8.12.020 Emergency defined. For the purposes of this chapter,"emer- 8.12.020 Emergency defined. gency"means the actual or threatened exis- 8.12.025 Standardized Emergency tence of conditions of disaster or of ex- Management System treme peril to the safety of persons and (SEMS)and National property within the city caused by such Incident Management conditions as air pollution,fire,flood,storm, System(NIMS). epidemic,riot or earthquake,acts of terror- 8.12.030 Disaster council— ism, or other conditions, including condi- Membership. tions resulting from war or the imminent 8.12.040 Disaster council—Powers threat of war, but other than conditions and duties. resulting from a labor controversy, which conditions are or are likely to be beyond the 8.12.050 Director, assistant control of the services, personnel, equip- director,and coordinator ment and facilities of the city,requiring the of emergency services. combined forces of other political subdivi- 8.12.060 Powers and duties of the sions to combat, or with respect to regu- director,assistant director, lated energy utilities, a sudden and severe and coordinator of energy shortage which requires extraordi • - emergency services. nary measures beyond the authority vested 8.12.065 City council—Powers and in the California Public Utilities Commis- duties. sion. 8.12.070 Emergency organization. (Ord. No. 638,§ 1, 11-8-2011) 8.12.080 Emergency plan. 8.12.025 Standardized Emergency 8.12.090 Expenditures. Management System 8.12.100 Violation. (SEMS)and National Incident Management 8.12.010 Purposes. System(NIMS). The declared purposes of this chapter The city shall use SEMS and NIMS for are to provide for the preparation and car- coordinating all local emergencies. The ba- rying out of plans for the protection of sic framework of SEMS/NIMS incorpo- persons and property within the city in the rates the use of the incident command sys- event of an emergency;the direction of the tem, multi-agency or interagency emergency organization; and the coordina- coordination,the State's master mutual aid agreement, the operational area concept, *Editor's note—Ord.No.638,§1,adopted Nov.8,2011, and the operational area satellite informa- amended the former Ch. 8.12,§§8.12.010-8.12.090,and enacted a new Ch.8.12 as set out herein.The former Ch. tion system. 8.12 pertained to similar subject matter and derived from (Ord. No. 638,§ 1, 11-8-2011) Prior code §§4.-1.01-4-1.09; Ord. No. 556, §§ 2N, 20, adopted 2004. Supp.No.35,10-19 198 Page 340 of 340