CC 2022-04-26 Agenda PackageCITY COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA SUMMARY
Tuesday, April 26, 2022, 6:00 p.m.
In person at:
Arroyo Grande City Council Chambers
215 E. Branch Street, Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
AND via Zoom at:
Please click the link below to join the Zoom Meeting:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83255848846
Webinar ID: 832 5584 8846
Or by Telephone: 1-669-900-6833; 1-346-248-7799
In compliance with Assembly Bill (AB) 361, which allows for a deviation of teleconference rules required by the
Ralph M. Brown Act, this City Council meeting is being conducted in a hybrid in-person/virtual format.
Members of the public may participate and provide public comment on agenda items during the meeting in
person at the location identified above, by joining the Zoom meeting, or by submitting written public comments
to the Clerk of the Council at publiccomment@arroyogrande.org. Meetings will be broadcast live on Channel
20 and streamed on the City’s website and www.slo-span.org.
1.CALL TO ORDER
2.ROLL CALL
3.MOMENT OF REFLECTION
4.FLAG SALUTE
CUB SCOUT PACK 13
5.AGENDA REVIEW
5.a.Closed Session Announcements
None.
5.b.Ordinances read in title only
None.
6.SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
6.a.Update Regarding Countywide COVID-19 Efforts
(McDONALD)
Recommended Action:
Receive update, accept public comments, discuss, and provide direction as necessary.
6.b.City Manager Communications
(McDONALD)
Recommended Action:
Receive correspondence/comments as presented by the City Manager and Provide
direction, as necessary.
6.c.Honorary Proclamation Recognizing April 30, 2022 as the 80th Anniversary of Arroyo
Grande Enforcing Executive Order 9066
6.d.Honorary Proclamation Declaring May 2022 as "Asian American and Native
Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Heritage Month”
6.e.Honorary Proclamation Declaring May 2022 as “National Foster Care Month”
6.f.Honorary Proclamation Declaring May 1-7, 2022 as “Public Service Recognition Week”
7.COMMUNITY COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS
This public comment period is an invitation to members of the community to present issues,
thoughts, or suggestions on matters not scheduled on this agenda. Comments should be limited to
those matters that are within the jurisdiction of the City Council. Members of the public may provide
public comment in-person or remotely by joining the Zoom meeting utilizing one of the methods
provided below. Please use the “raise hand” feature to indicate your desire to provide public
comment.
Click the link below to join the webinar: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83255848846; Webinar
ID: 832 5584 8846
•
Or by Telephone: 1-669-900-6833; 1-346-248-7799
Press * 9 to “raise hand” for public comment
•
The Brown Act restricts the Council from taking formal action on matters not published on the
agenda. In response to your comments, the Mayor or presiding Council Member may:
• Direct City staff to assist or coordinate with you.
• A Council Member may state a desire to meet with you.
• It may be the desire of the Council to place your issue or matter on a future Council agenda.
Please adhere to the following procedures when addressing the Council:
• Comments should be limited to 3 minutes or less.
• Your comments should be directed to the Council as a whole and not directed to individual Council
members.
• Slanderous, profane or personal remarks against any Council Member or member of the audience
shall not be permitted.
8.CONSENT AGENDA
The following routine items listed below are scheduled for consideration as a group. The
recommendations for each item are noted. Any member of the public who wishes to comment on
any Consent Agenda item may do so at this time. Any Council Member may request that any item be
withdrawn from the Consent Agenda to permit discussion or change the recommended course of
action. The City Council may approve the remainder of the Consent Agenda on one motion.
8.a.Consideration of Cash Disbursement Ratification
(VALENTINE)
Page 2 of 324
Recommended Action:
Ratify the attached listing of cash disbursements for the period of March 16 through March
31, 2022.
8.b.Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Creating a Recovered Organic Waste Product
Procurement Policy as Required by Senate Bill 1383
(VALENTINE)
Recommended Action:
Adopt a Resolution creating a Recovered Organic Waste Products Procurement Policy as
required by Senate Bill 1383.
8.c.Approval of Minutes
(MATSON)
Recommended Action:
Approve the minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of April 12, 2022, as submitted.
8.d.Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Declaring a Continued Local Emergency Related
to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic
(McDONALD/CARMEL)
Recommended Action:
Adopt a Resolution declaring a continued local emergency related to the Coronavirus
(COVID-19) pandemic.
8.e.Consideration of Annual Report and Adoption of a Resolution of Intention for Levy of Annual
Assessments for the Arroyo Grande Tourism Business Improvement District (AGTBID)
(McDONALD)
Recommended Action:
The AGTBID Advisory Board recommends the City Council: 1) Receive and approve the
Annual Report; 2) Adopt a Resolution of Intention to levy and collect assessments within the
AGTBID area for Fiscal Year 2022-23; and 3) Set the date for a public hearing for May 24,
2022, in accordance with Streets and Highways Code Section 36534.
8.f.Consider Adoption of Resolutions Ordering the Preparation and Filing of Annual Engineer’s
Reports for the Parkside Village and Grace Lane Assessment District, and Landscaping
and Lighting District No. 1, Within Tract 1769, for FY 2022-23
(ROBESON)
Recommended Action:
Adopt Resolutions ordering the preparation and filing of Annual Engineer’s Reports for the
Parkside Village Assessment District, Grace Lane Assessment District, and Landscaping
and Lighting Assessment District No. 1, within Tract 1769, for FY 2022-23.
8.g.Monthly Water Supply and Demand Update
(ROBESON)
Recommended Action:
Receive and file the monthly Water Supply and Demand Report.
9.PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
Page 3 of 324
10.OLD BUSINESS
10.a.Discussion and Consideration of a Project Status Update and Design Services Proposals,
and Direction Regarding a Preferred Option for the Brisco Interchange Modification Project
(PEDROTTI)
Recommended Action:
Receive the Project status report, consider options regarding design services proposals
received, and direct staff to pursue the No Project Option consistent with the
recommendation of the Brisco-Halcyon Interchange Subcommittee.
11.NEW BUSINESS
11.a.Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of a Sales Tax Measure
(VALENTINE)
Recommended Action:
1) Receive and file the 2022 PMP Update report; and 2) Direct staff to prepare a ballot
measure for the November 8, 2022 consolidated election seeking a 1% local sales tax
increase, to be provided at the June 14, 2022 City Council meeting.
12.CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
12.a.MAYOR RAY RUSSOM:
California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA)1.
South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD)2.
Tourism Business Improvement District Advisory Board3.
Other4.
12.b.MAYOR PRO TEM GEORGE:
County Water Resources Advisory Committee (WRAC)1.
Visit SLO CAL Advisory Board2.
Other3.
12.c.COUNCIL MEMBER BARNEICH:
Audit Committee1.
Homeless Services Oversight Council (HSOC)2.
Zone 3 Water Advisory Board3.
Other4.
12.d.COUNCIL MEMBER PAULDING:
Air Pollution Control District (APCD)1.
Brisco/Halcyon Interchange Subcommittee2.
Council of Governments/Regional Transit Authority/ South County Transit
(SLOCOG/SLORTA/SCT)
3.
REACH SLO Advisory Commission4.
Other 5.
Page 4 of 324
12.e.COUNCIL MEMBER STORTON:
Brisco/Halcyon Interchange Subcommittee1.
Five Cities Fire Authority (FCFA)2.
Integrated Waste Management Authority Board (IWMA)3.
South County Chambers of Commerce Governmental Affairs Committee4.
Other5.
13.COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Any Council Member may ask a question for clarification, make an announcement, or report briefly
on his or her activities. In addition, subject to Council policies and procedures, Council Members
may request staff to report back to the Council at a subsequent meeting concerning any matter or
request that staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. Any request to place a matter of
business for original consideration on a future agenda requires the concurrence of at least one other
Council Member.
14.CLOSED SESSION
None.
15.ADJOURNMENT
All staff reports or other written documentation, including any supplemental material distributed to a
majority of the City Council within 72 hours of a regular meeting, relating to each item of business on
the agenda are available for public inspection during regular business hours in the City Clerk’s office,
300 E. Branch Street, Arroyo Grande. If requested, the agenda shall be made available in
appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by the Americans with
Disabilities Act. To make a request for disability-related modification or accommodation, contact the
Legislative and Information Services Department at 805-473-5400 as soon as possible and at least
48 hours prior to the meeting date.
This agenda was prepared and posted pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2 Agenda
reports can be accessed and downloaded from the City’s website at www.arroyogrande.org If you
would like to subscribe to receive email or text message notifications when agendas are posted, you
can sign up online through the “Notify Me” feature.
City Council Meetings are cablecast live and videotaped for replay on Arroyo Grande’s Government
Access Channel 20. The rebroadcast schedule is published at www.slo-span.org.
Page 5 of 324
Item 6.c. - Page 1
Page 6 of 324
Item 6.d. - Page 1Page 7 of 324
Item 6.e. - Page 1Page 8 of 324
Item 6.f. - Page 1Page 9 of 324
Item 8.a.
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Nicole Valentine, Administrative Services Director
BY: Lynda Horejsi, Accounting Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration of Cash Disbursement Ratification
DATE: April 26, 2022
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Review and ratify cash disbursements.
IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES:
There is a $970,699.21 fiscal impact that includes the following items:
Accounts Payable Checks $596,276.06
Payroll & Benefit Checks $374,423.15
RECOMMENDATION:
Ratify the attached listing of cash disbursements for the period of March 16 through March
31, 2022.
BACKGROUND:
Cash disbursements are made weekly based on the submission of all required documents
supporting the invoices submitted for payment. Prior to payment, Administrative Services
staff reviews all disbursement documents to ensure that they meet the approval
requirements adopted in the Municipal Code and the City’s Purchasing Policies and
Procedures Manual.
ANALYSIS OF ISSUES:
The attached listing represents the cash disbursements required of normal and usual
operations during the period. The disbursements are accounted for in the FY 2021 -22
budget.
Page 10 of 324
Item 8.a.
City Council
Consideration of Cash Disbursement Ratification
April 26, 2022
Page 2
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council’s consideration:
1. Approve staff’s recommendation;
2. Do not approve staff’s recommendation; or
3. Provide other direction to staff.
ADVANTAGES:
The Administrative Services Department monitors payments of invoices for
accountability, accuracy, and completeness using standards approved by the City
Council.
Invoices are paid in a timely manner to establish goodwill with merchants.
Discounts are taken where applicable.
DISADVANTAGES:
There are no disadvantages identified in this recommendation.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
No environmental review is required for this item.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City’s website in accordance with
Government Code Section 54954.2.
Attachments:
1. March 16 – March 31, 2022 – Accounts Payable Check Register
2. March 25, 2022 – Payroll and Benefit Check Registers
Page 11 of 324
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDECHECK LISTINGMARCH 16 - MARCH 31, 2022ATTACHMENT 1Line Check Date Check # Amount Description Acct # Vendor Name1 03/16/2022 293227 $ 4,702.53 04/22 RETIREE MEDICAL 010.4099.5136 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP2 03/16/2022 293227 368.87 04/22 RETIREE MEDICAL 220.4303.5136 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP3 03/16/2022 293227 462.03 04/22 RETIREE MEDICAL 010.0000.1111 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP4 03/18/2022 293228 112.00 FOLLOWUP BACTI TESTS 640.4710.5310 ABALONE COAST ANALYTICAL INC5 03/18/2022 293229 18,613.75 ANIMAL SVCS CONTRACT PYMT Q3 FY 21/22 010.4201.5321 ANIMAL SERVICES6 03/18/2022 293230 10.45 AUTO SHOP TOWELS 010.4305.5303 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES7 03/18/2022 293230 3.51 AUTO SHOP UNIFORMS 010.4305.5143 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES8 03/18/2022 293230 3.51 AUTO SHOP UNIFORMS 010.4305.5143 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES9 03/18/2022 293230 3.51 AUTO SHOP UNIFORMS 010.4305.5143 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES10 03/18/2022 293230 7.01 BLDG MAINT UNIFORMS 010.4213.5143 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES11 03/18/2022 293230 7.01 BLDG MAINT UNIFORMS 010.4213.5143 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES12 03/18/2022 293230 7.01 BLDG MAINT UNIFORMS 010.4213.5143 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES13 03/18/2022 293230 28.50 CORP YARD MATS 010.4213.5303 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES14 03/18/2022 293230 13.83 PARKS DEPT UNIFORMS 010.4420.5143 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES15 03/18/2022 293230 13.83 PARKS DEPT UNIFORMS 010.4420.5143 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES16 03/18/2022 293230 13.83 PARKS DEPT UNIFORMS 010.4420.5143 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES17 03/18/2022 293230 7.01 SEWER DEPT UNIFORMS 612.4610.5143 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES18 03/18/2022 293230 7.01 SEWER DEPT UNIFORMS 612.4610.5143 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES19 03/18/2022 293230 7.01 SEWER DEPT UNIFORMS 612.4610.5143 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES20 03/18/2022 293230 7.00 SOTO SPORTS COMPLEX UNIFORMS 010.4430.5143 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES21 03/18/2022 293230 7.00 SOTO SPORTS COMPLEX UNIFORMS 010.4430.5143 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES22 03/18/2022 293230 7.00 SOTO SPORTS COMPLEX UNIFORMS 010.4430.5143 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES23 03/18/2022 293230 14.00 STREETS DEPT UNIFORMS 220.4303.5143 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES24 03/18/2022 293230 14.00 STREETS DEPT UNIFORMS 220.4303.5143 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES25 03/18/2022 293230 14.00 STREETS DEPT UNIFORMS 220.4303.5143 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES26 03/18/2022 293230 17.16 WATER DEPT UNIFORMS 640.4712.5143 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES27 03/18/2022 293230 13.47 WATER DEPT UNIFORMS 640.4712.5143 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES28 03/18/2022 293230 13.47 WATER DEPT UNIFORMS 640.4712.5143 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES29 03/18/2022 293231 9.80 PARKS MATS/MOPHEADS 010.4213.5303 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES30 03/18/2022 293232 96.64 REIMBURSE-VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION BBQ LUNCH 010.4130.5201 ARROYO GRANDE LIONS CLUB31 03/18/2022 293232 322.16 REIMBURSE-VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION BBQ LUNCH 010.4424.5252 ARROYO GRANDE LIONS CLUB32 03/18/2022 293232 64.43 REIMBURSE-VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION BBQ LUNCH 010.4307.5501 ARROYO GRANDE LIONS CLUB33 03/18/2022 293232 161.08 REIMBURSE-VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION BBQ LUNCH 010.4101.5504 ARROYO GRANDE LIONS CLUB34 03/18/2022 293233 33.97 ACCT#23584139568063 ALARM 220.4303.5303 AT & T35 03/18/2022 293233 198.33 ACCT#238451-01839190 RADIO 010.4145.5403 AT & T36 03/18/2022 293234 240.00 03/08 ON SITE FOR COUNCIL MEETING 010.4140.5303 A-TOWN AUDIO VIDEO37 03/18/2022 293235 145.00 MONTHLY UST INSPECTION-CORP YARD 010.4305.5303 B & T SVC STN CONTRACTORS, INC38 03/18/2022 293235 487.20 VST NOZZLE FOR PW FUEL PUMP 010.4305.5303 B & T SVC STN CONTRACTORS, INCPage 12 of 324
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDECHECK LISTINGMARCH 16 - MARCH 31, 2022ATTACHMENT 1Line Check Date Check # Amount Description Acct # Vendor Name39 03/18/2022 293236 $ 385.48 PW-25 BRAKE SVC, FRONT INNER SEAL 010.4430.5601 BACK ON THE ROAD AUTOMOBILE40 03/18/2022 293237 170.67 PW-66 BATTERY 220.4303.5603 BATTERY SYSTEMS41 03/18/2022 293238 273.42 LEGAL & INFO SERVICES ENVELOPES 010.4102.5255 BOONE PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC42 03/18/2022 293238 1,217.10 UTILITY BILLING ENVELOPES 010.4102.5255 BOONE PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC43 03/18/2022 293239 215.50 18" CITY LOGO FOR VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT 010.4305.5601 BRAND CREATIVE44 03/18/2022 293240 20.36 VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION POSTER 010.4130.5201 BURDINE PRINTING (DBA)45 03/18/2022 293240 67.89 VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION POSTER 010.4424.5252 BURDINE PRINTING (DBA)46 03/18/2022 293240 13.58 VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION POSTER 010.4307.5501 BURDINE PRINTING (DBA)47 03/18/2022 293240 33.94 VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION POSTER 010.4101.5504 BURDINE PRINTING (DBA)48 03/18/2022 293241 252.00 ANNUAL SUPPORT AGREEMENT-OAISYS VOICE 010.4204.5607 CIO SOLUTIONS LP49 03/18/2022 293242 5.23 CAP SCREW & WASHER 220.4303.5603 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT(DBA)50 03/18/2022 293242 100.36 PW-11 HANDLE 640.4712.5603 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT(DBA)51 03/18/2022 293242 95.73 PW-11 SEAT ADJUSTER 640.4712.5603 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT(DBA)52 03/18/2022 293242 136.85 WATER DEPT RAMMER RECOIL START 640.4712.5603 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT(DBA)53 03/18/2022 293243 338.45 KYOCERA COPIER CONTRACT 010.4421.5602 DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SVCS54 03/18/2022 293244 271.88 (2) SEWER MAIN COUPLINGS-OLIVE ST MAIN 612.4610.5610 FAMCON PIPE AND SUPPLY INC55 03/18/2022 293245 624.11 TP 010.4213.5604 FASTENAL COMPANY56 03/18/2022 293246 552.24 WATER SVC SUPPLIES-FITTINGS 640.5946.7001 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC57 03/18/2022 293247 9,667.50 HALCYON COMPLETE STREETS 010.4301.5303 GHD INC58 03/18/2022 293247 334.40 LRSP, TIF, CE, SSARP 350.5612.7701 GHD INC59 03/18/2022 293248 46.55 VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION PLAQUES 010.4130.5201 GRAND AWARDS, INC60 03/18/2022 293248 155.16 VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION PLAQUES 010.4424.5252 GRAND AWARDS, INC61 03/18/2022 293248 31.03 VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION PLAQUES 010.4307.5501 GRAND AWARDS, INC62 03/18/2022 293248 77.58 VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION PLAQUES 010.4101.5504 GRAND AWARDS, INC63 03/18/2022 293249 3,931.47 PREPARE 2021 ANNUAL REPORT 640.4710.5303 GSI WATER SOLUTIONS64 03/18/2022 293250 660.00 CASH FOR GRASS 660 SQFT 226.4306.5554 CLAUDE C. HARTMAN65 03/18/2022 293251 86.08 PORTABLE RESTROOM RENTAL 2/7-3/7 220.4303.5552 HARVEY'S HONEY HUTS66 03/18/2022 293251 340.23 TOILET & HANDWASH STN RENTAL-EGG HUNT 010.4424.5252 HARVEY'S HONEY HUTS67 03/18/2022 293251 340.23 TOILET & HANDWASH STN RENTAL-HALLOWEEN 010.4424.5252 HARVEY'S HONEY HUTS68 03/18/2022 293252 3,153.75 (1) NEW FIRE HYDRANT 640.4712.5610 ICONIX WATERWORKS (US) INC69 03/18/2022 293252 44.59 SEWER TAPE 612.4610.5610 ICONIX WATERWORKS (US) INC70 03/18/2022 293253 1,087.50 WELL #9 WELL PUMP CONTROL PANEL 640.4711.5603 INDEPENDENT ELECTRIC SUPPL.INC71 03/18/2022 293254 85.80 (4) RENT MAINLINE 6"X20' 3/3/22-6/4/22 220.4303.5552 IRRIGATION WEST (DBA)72 03/18/2022 293255 18,643.09 3998 GALL #87 GASOLINE 010.0000.1202 JB DEWAR, INC73 03/18/2022 293255 21.65 FUEL-PD-4620 & PD-4621 010.4203.5608 JB DEWAR, INC74 03/18/2022 293256 64.00 REFUND-BUSINESS LICENSE 010.0000.4050 KING CONCRETE & CONSTR. INC75 03/18/2022 293257 14.89 NYLON CABLE TIES 010.4305.5603 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC76 03/18/2022 293258 691.90 SHORETEL PHONE CHRGS-CITY HALL 010.4145.5403 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLCPage 13 of 324
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDECHECK LISTINGMARCH 16 - MARCH 31, 2022ATTACHMENT 1Line Check Date Check # Amount Description Acct # Vendor Name77 03/18/2022 293258 $ 691.90 SHORETEL PHONE CHRGS-PD STATION 010.4201.5403 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC78 03/18/2022 293259 112.50 ROOM USE FEES OCEANVIEW 1/10-1/31 010.4425.5303 LUCIA MAR UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST79 03/18/2022 293259 37.50 ROOM USE FEES-OCEANVIEW WINTER BREAK 010.4425.5303 LUCIA MAR UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST80 03/18/2022 293260 3,718.57 FAIR OAKS WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT 640.5911.7501 MICHAEL K NUNLEY & ASSOC.81 03/18/2022 293260 1,015.58 2021 SEWER LINING PROJECT 612.5821.7501 MICHAEL K NUNLEY & ASSOC.82 03/18/2022 293261 17.32 (2) WHITE MARKING PAINT 010.4301.5273 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC83 03/18/2022 293261 16.82 BASSWOOD SHEET, POLISH, CLEANER 010.4213.5604 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC84 03/18/2022 293261 25.83 CLEANING CLOTH, BLEACH 010.4213.5604 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC85 03/18/2022 293261 15.07 DAWN ULTRA 010.4420.5605 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC86 03/18/2022 293261 17.22 EXPANSION FOAM 220.4303.5613 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC87 03/18/2022 293261 58.16 GFI RECEPTACLE, TOGGLE SWITCH 010.4213.5604 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC88 03/18/2022 293261 36.35 PAINT-GRAFFITI COVER 010.4213.5604 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC89 03/18/2022 293261 66.83 RES# 3 & 6 ROOF REPAIR MATERIAL 640.4712.5609 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC90 03/18/2022 293261 65.44 RES#3 & 6 PAINT & BRUSH 640.4712.5609 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC91 03/18/2022 293261 29.03 SIGNS-NO TRESPASS, RESTROOM 010.4213.5604 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC92 03/18/2022 293261 31.23 TAPE MEASURE, PLUNGER 010.4213.5604 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC93 03/18/2022 293262 754.40 REIMBURSEMENT-CITY MGRS REGION 010.4101.5501 CITY OF MORRO BAY94 03/18/2022 293263 1,468.61 PW-52 REPLACE ARROWBOARD 640.4712.5603 NICK'S TELECOM (DBA)95 03/18/2022 293264 (9.99) CREDIT RETURN-OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4421.5201 OFFICE DEPOT96 03/18/2022 293264 (5.69) CREDIT RETURN-OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4421.5201 OFFICE DEPOT97 03/18/2022 293264 81.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4421.5201 OFFICE DEPOT98 03/18/2022 293264 54.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4421.5201 OFFICE DEPOT99 03/18/2022 293264 5.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4421.5201 OFFICE DEPOT100 03/18/2022 293264 45.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4421.5201 OFFICE DEPOT101 03/18/2022 293264 9.04 OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4421.5201 OFFICE DEPOT102 03/18/2022 293264 20.74 OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4421.5201 OFFICE DEPOT103 03/18/2022 293265 51.83 COPIER CONTRACT-OVERAGE 010.4421.5602 OFFICE1104 03/18/2022 293266 891.47 FOR VARIOUS RUG 9 BOARDS PER QUOTE 612.4610.5610 OUTSIDE THE BOX ENGINEERING105 03/18/2022 293266 2,080.11 FOR VARIOUS RUG 9 BOARDS PER QUOTE 640.4712.5610 OUTSIDE THE BOX ENGINEERING106 03/18/2022 293267 94.58 REIMBURSE-EGG HUNT SUPPLIES 010.4424.5252 LINDSEY OVERSTREET107 03/18/2022 293268 7,412.02 ELECTRIC 010.4145.5401 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO108 03/18/2022 293268 12.98 ELECTRIC 217.4460.5355 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO109 03/18/2022 293268 2,342.75 ELECTRIC 612.4610.5402 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO110 03/18/2022 293268 3,992.61 ELECTRIC 640.4711.5402 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO111 03/18/2022 293268 7,058.00 ELECTRIC 640.4712.5402 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO112 03/18/2022 293268 1,464.64 ELECTRIC 010.4307.5402 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO113 03/18/2022 293268 16,505.25 ELECTRIC-STREET LIGHTING 010.4307.5402 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO114 03/18/2022 293269 600.00 K-RAIL RENTAL 01/22-02/22 010.4919.5303 PACIFIC PETROLEUM CALIFORNIAPage 14 of 324
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDECHECK LISTINGMARCH 16 - MARCH 31, 2022ATTACHMENT 1Line Check Date Check # Amount Description Acct # Vendor Name115 03/18/2022 293269 $ 900.00 K-RAIL RENTAL 07/21-09/21 010.4919.5303 PACIFIC PETROLEUM CALIFORNIA116 03/18/2022 293269 900.00 K-RAIL RENTAL 10/21-12/21 010.4919.5303 PACIFIC PETROLEUM CALIFORNIA117 03/18/2022 293270 17.50 UNIFORM CLEANING-ADMIN 010.4201.5303 PARAMOUNT CLEANERS118 03/18/2022 293270 390.00 UNIFORM CLEANING-PATROL SVCS 010.4203.5303 PARAMOUNT CLEANERS119 03/18/2022 293270 66.50 UNIFORM CLEANING-SUPPORT SVCS 010.4204.5303 PARAMOUNT CLEANERS120 03/18/2022 293271 (3.24) CASH OVER 010.0000.4818 PETTY CASH121 03/18/2022 293271 2.29 MEETING SUPPLIES 010.4101.5201 PETTY CASH122 03/18/2022 293271 29.84 OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4001.5504 PETTY CASH123 03/18/2022 293271 19.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4301.5201 PETTY CASH124 03/18/2022 293271 6.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES-NOTEBOOK 010.4130.5201 PETTY CASH125 03/18/2022 293271 0.58 POSTAGE DUE ON DELIVERY 010.4145.5208 PETTY CASH126 03/18/2022 293271 10.10 POSTAGE-MAILING SITE MAP TO MNS 010.4145.5208 PETTY CASH127 03/18/2022 293272 162.89 VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION TUMBLER 010.4101.5319 PRINTPAL PROMOTIONS & PRINTING128 03/18/2022 293272 82.21 VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION TUMBLER 010.4424.5252 PRINTPAL PROMOTIONS & PRINTING129 03/18/2022 293272 271.50 VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION TUMBLER 010.4307.5501 PRINTPAL PROMOTIONS & PRINTING130 03/18/2022 293272 108.60 VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION TUMBLER 010.4424.5250 PRINTPAL PROMOTIONS & PRINTING131 03/18/2022 293272 460.78 VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION TUMBLER 010.4424.5250 PRINTPAL PROMOTIONS & PRINTING132 03/18/2022 293273 7,932.12 TRAFFIC WAY BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 350.5679.7501 QUINCY ENGINEERING INC133 03/18/2022 293274 15.00 03/22 REVERSE OSMOSIS RENTAL 010.4201.5303 RICHETTI COMPLETE WATER134 03/18/2022 293275 1,415.11 EMERGENCY GENERATOR FOR FCFA 350.5473.7501 SALAS O'BRIEN135 03/18/2022 293276 40.00 REIMBURSE-(2) MSA MEETINGS JAN & MAR 010.4420.5501 WILLIAM R. SIMPSON136 03/18/2022 293277 388.72 (2) CONTROLLER & IRRIGATION NOZZLES 226.4306.5303 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC137 03/18/2022 293277 20.17 PVC COUPLINGS 010.4420.5605 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC138 03/18/2022 293278 3,500.00 03/22 TBID ADMIN FEE 240.4150.5303 SOUTH COUNTY CHAMBERS139 03/18/2022 293279 3,500.00 CASH FOR GRASS 3500 SQFT 226.4306.5554 SNEZANA STAJIC140 03/18/2022 293280 526.63 3/8" FLEX TORQ WRENCH, PLIERS 010.4305.5603 TCA TOOLS INC141 03/18/2022 293281 360.00 LAND SURVEYING, PLAN CHECK, MAP REVIEW 010.4301.5303 TETRA TECH INC142 03/18/2022 293282 88.36 CODE BOOK SUBSCRIPTION 010.4201.5503 THOMSON REUTERS WEST143 03/18/2022 293283 52.95 CITY HALL-BUSINESS TV 010.4145.5401 TIME WARNER CABLE144 03/18/2022 293284 605.49 PW-4 REPAIR WINDOW MOTOR 010.4301.5601 TOM'S AUTO SERVICE145 03/18/2022 293285 60,000.00 PERFORM THE 2021 STRIPING REFRESH PROJECT 350.5638.7002 TOSTE CONSTRUCTION146 03/18/2022 293286 13,511.44 02/22 SOCIAL MEDIA TBID MARKETING 240.4150.5301 VERDIN MARKETING INK147 03/18/2022 293287 920.75 WALLACE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 010.4301.5303 WALLACE GROUP A CALIF CORP148 03/18/2022 293288 1,831.33 NCMA STAFF EXTENSION SERVICES 640.4710.5303 WATER SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC149 03/18/2022 293289 77.07 SOTO-LUTE RAKE, SAND BAGS 010.4430.5605 WHITE CAP CONST. SUPPLY150 03/18/2022 293290 1,440.00 01/22 SIGNAL MAINT 12 INTERSECTIONS 010.4307.5303 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC COMPANY INC151 03/18/2022 293290 60.00 OAK PARK & EL CAMINO REAL 010.4307.5303 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC COMPANY INC152 03/18/2022 293290 60.00 OAK PARK & JAMES WAY 010.4307.5303 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC COMPANY INCPage 15 of 324
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDECHECK LISTINGMARCH 16 - MARCH 31, 2022ATTACHMENT 1Line Check Date Check # Amount Description Acct # Vendor Name153 03/18/2022 293290 $ 75.00 OAK PARK & W BRANCH 010.4307.5303 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC COMPANY INC154 03/18/2022 293290 501.66 REPLACE GREEN BALL-WO#3378 & W3390 220.4303.5303 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC COMPANY INC155 03/18/2022 293290 2,285.68 WO#3386 INSTALL LOOPS MASON & BRANCH 220.4303.5303 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC COMPANY INC156 03/18/2022 293291 95.00 USED OIL SERVICE 010.4305.5303 WORLD OIL ENVIROMENTAL SVCS157 03/18/2022 293292 23.62 UB REFUND CUSTOMER #00026225 640.0000.2301 NEMEH KAZAL158 03/18/2022 293293 27.55 UB REFUND CUSTOMER #00024214 640.0000.2301 COURTNEY MALLORY159 03/18/2022 293294 126.70 UB REFUND CUSTOMER #00028406 640.0000.2301 ALYSSA RODRIGUEZ160 03/25/2022 293295 788.00 TAI CHI WINTER SESSION I 010.4424.5351 DIXIE D ADENIRAN161 03/25/2022 293296 50.00 PARK DEPOSIT REFUND-STROTHER 010.0000.2206 ANDREA ALVARADO162 03/25/2022 293297 53.81 OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4102.5201 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES163 03/25/2022 293298 977.90 02/22 DOGGIE CLASSES 010.4424.5351 IRINA BEATTY164 03/25/2022 293299 98.57 STICKERS-PARKS MAKE LIFE BETTER 010.4421.5504 BURDINE PRINTING (DBA)165 03/25/2022 293300 50.00 PARK DEPOSIT REFUND-RANCHO GRANDE 010.0000.2206 ALEXANDRIA CARRASCO166 03/25/2022 293301 129.60 YOGA IN THE PARK-WINTER SESSION I 010.4424.5351 KATHRYN CARRINGTON167 03/25/2022 293302 796.28 202 LE POINT-PROP VACATE AGREEMENT 010.4145.5508 JENA SIMMONS & CHAD JACKSON168 03/25/2022 293303 987.20 ACCT#8245100960223598- PD DARK 010.4145.5401 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS169 03/25/2022 293304 203.20 02/22 CLOGGING CLASS 010.4424.5351 KATHLEEN J CINOWALT170 03/25/2022 293305 1,540.00 03/22 CROWDSTRIKE CYBERSECURITY 010.4140.5303 CIO SOLUTIONS LP171 03/25/2022 293305 4,768.00 03/22 STRATEGIC SUPPORT 010.4140.5303 CIO SOLUTIONS LP172 03/25/2022 293306 195.86 PW-66 FILTERS 220.4303.5603 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT(DBA)173 03/25/2022 293306 17.58 PW-66 FILTERS 220.4303.5603 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT(DBA)174 03/25/2022 293307 476.00 WRITING FOR LIFE WINTER SESSION I 010.4424.5351 GAYLE CUDDY175 03/25/2022 293308 70.00 REFUND- QUILTING CLASS 010.0000.4605 LINDA DIEPENBROCK176 03/25/2022 293309 90.76 REIMBURSE FOR FUEL 010.4203.5608 STEPHEN DOHERTY177 03/25/2022 293310 1,104.00 ROLLER SKATING WINTER SESSION I 010.4424.5351 DOOMSDAY SKATE LLC178 03/25/2022 293311 98.00 REFUND-BASKETBALL 010.0000.4605 SUSANAH DOUGLAS179 03/25/2022 293312 165.00 REFUND-JR SCIENCE CAMP 010.0000.4605 BRITTA DRAGOVCIC180 03/25/2022 293313 330.00 REFUND-JR SCIENCE CAMP 010.0000.4605 MACKENZIE DUBOW181 03/25/2022 293314 2,066.88 TRASH CAN LINERS, TP 010.4420.5605 FASTENAL COMPANY182 03/25/2022 293315 106.00 BL13-54627 REFUND OVERPAYMENT 010.0000.4050 FITNESS 19183 03/25/2022 293316 600.00 PUBLIC ART INSTALLATION-PAINT 010.0000.2033 EDWIN FREGOSO184 03/25/2022 293317 882.00 NEEDLE ARTS MYSTERY AFGHAN 01/07-02/25 010.4424.5351 ELIZABETH FRYER185 03/25/2022 293318 978.83 SERGER SEWING WINTER SESSION I 010.4424.5351 MARY JO GABEL186 03/25/2022 293319 50.00 PARK DEPOSIT REFUND- RANCHO GRANDE 010.0000.2206 SARAH GABRIEL187 03/25/2022 293320 50.00 PARK DEPOSIT REFUND-HERITAGE SQUARE 010.0000.2206 FELIX GAXIOLA188 03/25/2022 293321 25.00 REFUND-PICKLEBALL KEY 010.0000.4605 THEODORE GILLAN189 03/25/2022 293321 100.00 REFUND-PICKLEBALL MEMBERSHIP 010.0000.4605 THEODORE GILLAN190 03/25/2022 293322 50.00 PARK DEPOSIT REFUND-STROTHER 010.0000.2206 JORDON GONZALEZPage 16 of 324
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDECHECK LISTINGMARCH 16 - MARCH 31, 2022ATTACHMENT 1Line Check Date Check # Amount Description Acct # Vendor Name191 03/25/2022 293323 $ 50.00 PARK DEPOSIT REFUND-RANCHO GRANDE 010.0000.2206 DAVID HECKATHORN192 03/25/2022 293324 (10.00) CANCELLATION FEE 010.0000.4354 PAOLA HERRERA193 03/25/2022 293324 50.00 PARK DEPOSIT REFUND-STROTHER 010.0000.2206 PAOLA HERRERA194 03/25/2022 293324 103.00 PARK RENTAL REFUND-STROTHER 010.0000.4354 PAOLA HERRERA195 03/25/2022 293325 805.90 CONTRACT SVCS-SALES TAX 010.4120.5303 HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS196 03/25/2022 293325 213.52 CONTRACT SVCS-SALES TAX 010.4120.5303 HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS197 03/25/2022 293325 396.93 CONTRACT SVCS-SALES TAX 218.4101.5303 HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS198 03/25/2022 293326 72.00 REFUND- TENNIS COURT RENTAL 010.0000.4354 INDIA HOFFMAN199 03/25/2022 293327 359.39 (4) 6" SEWER COUPLINGS 612.4610.5610 ICONIX WATERWORKS (US) INC200 03/25/2022 293328 165.00 REFUND-JR SCIENCE CAMP 010.0000.4605 MISHA IKEDA201 03/25/2022 293329 210.00 ADULT BASKETBALL SCOREKEEPER- 15 GAMES 010.4424.5352 LA PAZ JHADE202 03/25/2022 293330 300.00 2022 ADULT BASKETBALL OFFICIAL MANAGER 010.4424.5352 GASTON KETTING OLIVIER203 03/25/2022 293331 400.00 03/06/22 PICKLEBALL CLINIC 010.4424.5351 PRINCESS LEONG204 03/25/2022 293332 50.00 PARK DEPOSIT REFUND-STROTHER 010.0000.2206 BROOK LITZINGER205 03/25/2022 293333 2,199.04 02/22 ZUMBA & BARRE 010.4424.5351 HEIDY MANGIARDI206 03/25/2022 293334 50.00 PARK DEPOSIT REFUND-STROTHER 010.0000.2206 WES MELLO207 03/25/2022 293335 50.00 PARK DEPOSIT REFUND-STROTHER 010.0000.2206 JEANNE MILLER208 03/25/2022 293336 16.15 SCREEN FOR WELL VENTS 640.4711.5603 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC209 03/25/2022 293337 165.00 REFUND-JR SCIENCE CAMP 010.0000.4605 SAMANTHA MYERS210 03/25/2022 293338 96.00 REFUND-WOMENS CLUB SPVR FEE 010.0000.4655 KATHY NIENHOUSE211 03/25/2022 293339 235.13 PAPER, STORAGE BOXES, ENVELOPES 010.4102.5201 OFFICE DEPOT212 03/25/2022 293340 25.00 REFUND-CIM REGISTRATION FEE 010.0000.4602 JENNIFER OLSON213 03/25/2022 293341 70.00 REFUND-QUILTING 010.0000.4605 NANCI OTT214 03/25/2022 293341 70.00 REFUND-QUILTING 010.0000.4605 NANCI OTT215 03/25/2022 293342 34.31 ELECTRIC WELL#11 352 LA CANADA 640.4711.5402 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO216 03/25/2022 293342 13.97 ELECTRIC-484 BAKEMAN 219.4460.5304 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO217 03/25/2022 293343 3,528.00 QUILTING-WINTER SESSION I 010.4424.5351 BARBARA ANN PORTER218 03/25/2022 293344 50.00 PARK DEPOSIT REFUND-STROTHER 010.0000.2206 BREANA PUGNER219 03/25/2022 293345 200.00 REFUND-WOMENS CLUB DEPOSIT 010.0000.2206 VANESSA RAMIREZ220 03/25/2022 293346 51.84 COUNCIL CHAMBERS WATER 010.4213.5303 READYREFRESH BY NESTLE221 03/25/2022 293347 120.00 ADULT SOFTBALL SCORER- 5 GAMES 010.4424.5352 MARTINA SARMIENTO222 03/25/2022 293348 103.22 PIPE CUTTER, PVC PIPE 010.4420.5605 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC223 03/25/2022 293349 216.53 GAS SERVICES-1375 ASH ST 010.4145.5401 SOCALGAS224 03/25/2022 293349 126.18 GAS SERVICES-200 N HALCYON 010.4145.5401 SOCALGAS225 03/25/2022 293349 14.79 GAS SERVICES-350 S ELM 010.4145.5401 SOCALGAS226 03/25/2022 293350 1,000.00 GOLD LEVEL-CHAIRMAN CIRCLE OF INFLUENCE 010.4145.5503 SOUTH COUNTY CHAMBERS227 03/25/2022 293351 131.87 MARKING PAINT 640.4712.5255 STATEWIDE SAFETY & SIGNS INC228 03/25/2022 293351 123.70 SAFETY TRAFFIC SIGN 640.4712.5255 STATEWIDE SAFETY & SIGNS INCPage 17 of 324
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDECHECK LISTINGMARCH 16 - MARCH 31, 2022ATTACHMENT 1Line Check Date Check # Amount Description Acct # Vendor Name229 03/25/2022 293352 $ 226.94 UNIFORMS-CORRAL 010.4203.5272 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS230 03/25/2022 293353 52.00 REFUND-BL19-000193 OVERPYMT 010.0000.4050 TORCHELL MIND & BODY231 03/25/2022 293354 673.41 (2) SQ POSTS, (12) SNS RESHEETS, ANCHOR 220.4303.5613 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS232 03/25/2022 293355 308.29 PW-79 HYD FILTER, FUEL PUMP KIT, FILTER 010.4420.5603 TURF STAR, INC233 03/25/2022 293356 17.19 ALLIANZ INSURANCE-TRAVEL 010.4421.5501 U.S. BANK234 03/25/2022 293356 15.81 AMAZON-OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4101.5201 U.S. BANK235 03/25/2022 293356 124.90 AMAZON-PICKLEBALL SUPPLIES 010.4424.5251 U.S. BANK236 03/25/2022 293356 32.28 AMAZON-SIM CARD READER 010.4213.5255 U.S. BANK237 03/25/2022 293356 187.50 AMAZON-TRASH BAGS 010.4213.5604 U.S. BANK238 03/25/2022 293356 203.94 AMAZON-TRASH BAGS 220.4303.5613 U.S. BANK239 03/25/2022 293356 1,210.00 ANNUAL LICENSING FEE-OCEANVIEW 010.4425.5255 U.S. BANK240 03/25/2022 293356 56.90 AUTHORIZE.NET CREDIT CARD FEE 010.4145.5555 U.S. BANK241 03/25/2022 293356 549.74 BEST BUY- PW MEETING ROOM TV 010.4213.5604 U.S. BANK242 03/25/2022 293356 50.19 CLASSES-RESISTANCE BANDS 010.4424.5351 U.S. BANK243 03/25/2022 293356 (25.00) CREDIT-SO CTY CHAMBER BREAKFAST MEETING 010.4101.5504 U.S. BANK244 03/25/2022 293356 100.00 DMV PHYSICAL -TIM SCHMIDT 640.4712.5501 U.S. BANK245 03/25/2022 293356 334.96 EQUIPMENT/UNIFORM REPLACEMENT 010.4201.5272 U.S. BANK246 03/25/2022 293356 8.95 FREIGHT 010.4203.5501 U.S. BANK247 03/25/2022 293356 83.63 FUEL 010.4201.5608 U.S. BANK248 03/25/2022 293356 72.78 FUEL 010.4201.5608 U.S. BANK249 03/25/2022 293356 50.38 FUEL 010.4203.5608 U.S. BANK250 03/25/2022 293356 235.61 FUEL 010.4203.5608 U.S. BANK251 03/25/2022 293356 76.05 FUEL 010.4203.5608 U.S. BANK252 03/25/2022 293356 201.40 FUEL 010.4204.5608 U.S. BANK253 03/25/2022 293356 67.89 FUEL 010.4204.5608 U.S. BANK254 03/25/2022 293356 129.37 FUEL 010.4204.5608 U.S. BANK255 03/25/2022 293356 522.71 FUN EXPRESS-EGG HUNT SUPPLIES 010.4424.5252 U.S. BANK256 03/25/2022 293356 94.77 GRAND BOUQUET-SYMPATHY FLOWERS 010.4101.5504 U.S. BANK257 03/25/2022 293356 45.26 IT SAVVY-KEYBOARD, MOUSE-PD CH 010.4140.5602 U.S. BANK258 03/25/2022 293356 549.12 MARIPOSA INN-CM CONFERENCE LOD 010.4101.5501 U.S. BANK259 03/25/2022 293356 26.69 MEET THE MACHINES SMART & FINAL 010.4424.5252 U.S. BANK260 03/25/2022 293356 216.77 MEET THE MACHINES SUPPLIES-FUN EXPRESS 010.4424.5252 U.S. BANK261 03/25/2022 293356 50.00 MEMBERSHIP-CAPTO 010.4201.5503 U.S. BANK262 03/25/2022 293356 190.00 MEMBERSHIP-IACP 010.4201.5503 U.S. BANK263 03/25/2022 293356 515.00 NEW TIMES ADVERTISING 010.4421.5504 U.S. BANK264 03/25/2022 293356 67.12 OFFICE DEPOT-LAMINATOR 010.4421.5201 U.S. BANK265 03/25/2022 293356 36.74 OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4002.5201 U.S. BANK266 03/25/2022 293356 71.32 OFFICIAL IMAGING 010.4421.5201 U.S. BANKPage 18 of 324
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDECHECK LISTINGMARCH 16 - MARCH 31, 2022ATTACHMENT 1Line Check Date Check # Amount Description Acct # Vendor Name267 03/25/2022 293356 $ 77.20 PATROL SUPPLIES-EAR PIECES 010.4203.5255 U.S. BANK268 03/25/2022 293356 191.53 PATROL SUPPLIES-INTOXIMETER 010.4203.5255 U.S. BANK269 03/25/2022 293356 334.79 PD-4617 WINDOW REPLACEMENT 010.4201.5601 U.S. BANK270 03/25/2022 293356 250.00 PEACHJAR-MEET THE MACHINES ADV 010.4424.5252 U.S. BANK271 03/25/2022 293356 879.18 PICKLEBALL CENTRAL -BALLS 010.4424.5251 U.S. BANK272 03/25/2022 293356 669.95 PR SAFE& LOCK-PICKLEBALL LIGHT 010.4424.5351 U.S. BANK273 03/25/2022 293356 283.42 PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES 010.4423.5253 U.S. BANK274 03/25/2022 293356 41.50 R& T EMBROIDERY 220.4303.5613 U.S. BANK275 03/25/2022 293356 173.05 SCHOOL YEAR SUPPLIES 010.4425.5255 U.S. BANK276 03/25/2022 293356 205.27 SCHOOL YEAR SUPPLIES 010.4425.5255 U.S. BANK277 03/25/2022 293356 4.60 SECURE CONFERENCE 010.4140.5303 U.S. BANK278 03/25/2022 293356 27.23 SHIPPING/POSTAGE 010.4201.5208 U.S. BANK279 03/25/2022 293356 189.39 SM TOYOTA-SOTO WORKTRUCK TAILGATE 010.4430.5601 U.S. BANK280 03/25/2022 293356 194.72 SNACK SUPPLIES 010.4425.5259 U.S. BANK281 03/25/2022 293356 250.00 SOFTWARE MAINT-DRONE SOFTWARE 010.4204.5607 U.S. BANK282 03/25/2022 293356 75.00 TLO -INVESTIGATIVE SVCS 010.4204.5607 U.S. BANK283 03/25/2022 293356 456.63 TRAINING LODGING 010.4203.5501 U.S. BANK284 03/25/2022 293356 39.90 TRAINING SUPPLIES 010.4203.5501 U.S. BANK285 03/25/2022 293356 955.28 TRAINING-LODGING 010.4201.5501 U.S. BANK286 03/25/2022 293356 450.35 TRAINING-LODGING 010.4201.5501 U.S. BANK287 03/25/2022 293356 1,388.16 TRAINING-LODGING 010.4203.5501 U.S. BANK288 03/25/2022 293356 567.63 TRAINING-LODGING 010.4204.5501 U.S. BANK289 03/25/2022 293356 1,031.95 TRAINING-LODGING 010.4204.5501 U.S. BANK290 03/25/2022 293356 1,020.72 TRAINING-LODGING 010.4204.5501 U.S. BANK291 03/25/2022 293356 1,628.89 TRAINING-LODGING & SUPPLIES 010.4203.5501 U.S. BANK292 03/25/2022 293356 575.00 TRAINING-REGISTRATION/TUITION 010.4203.5501 U.S. BANK293 03/25/2022 293356 635.00 TRAINING-REGISTRATION/TUITION 010.4204.5501 U.S. BANK294 03/25/2022 293356 824.00 TRAINING-REGISTRATION/TUITION 010.4204.5501 U.S. BANK295 03/25/2022 293356 1,563.98 TRAINING-TRAVEL, LODGING 010.4201.5501 U.S. BANK296 03/25/2022 293356 50.00 TRIBE COFFEE-PICKLEBALL CONTEST 010.4424.5251 U.S. BANK297 03/25/2022 293356 17.24 TRIBE COFFEE-STAFF MEETING 010.4421.5255 U.S. BANK298 03/25/2022 293356 1,381.38 UNITED AIRLINES-FEMA TRAINING 010.4101.5501 U.S. BANK299 03/25/2022 293356 32.60 VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION SUPPLIES 010.4130.5201 U.S. BANK300 03/25/2022 293356 21.73 VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION SUPPLIES 010.4307.5501 U.S. BANK301 03/25/2022 293356 139.22 VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION SUPPLIES 010.4424.5250 U.S. BANK302 03/25/2022 293356 54.34 VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION SUPPLIES 010.4101.5504 U.S. BANK303 03/25/2022 293356 179.43 WALMART-TRASH BAGS 010.4420.5605 U.S. BANK304 03/25/2022 293356 24.41 WALMART-VALENTINES DAY CONTEST 010.4424.5252 U.S. BANKPage 19 of 324
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDECHECK LISTINGMARCH 16 - MARCH 31, 2022ATTACHMENT 1Line Check Date Check # Amount Description Acct # Vendor Name305 03/25/2022 293356 $ 528.85 ZOOM MEETINGS 010.4140.5303 U.S. BANK306 03/25/2022 293357 727.33 01/22-06/22 CA ST REG COSTS 640.4710.5503 USA OF N CA & NV307 03/25/2022 293358 224.00 03/08 ADULT ART PARTY-POPPIES 010.4424.5351 PEGGY VALKO308 03/25/2022 293359 50.00 PARK DEPOSIT REFUND-ELM ST PARK 010.0000.2206 CRYSTAL VAZQUEZ309 03/25/2022 293360 66.27 ACCR#808089883-00003 CIM CELL 010.4425.5255 VERIZON WIRELESS310 03/25/2022 293360 304.08 ACCT#472480460-00002 CITY IPAD 010.4145.5403 VERIZON WIRELESS311 03/25/2022 293361 50.00 PARK DEPOSIT REFUND-RANCHO GRANDE 010.0000.2206 KAYDI VISSER312 03/25/2022 293361 58.00 PARK RENTAL REFUND-RANCHO GRANDE 010.0000.4354 KAYDI VISSER313 03/25/2022 293362 185.00 ASH ST RESTROOM-SNAKE & CLEAR DRAINS 010.4213.5303 WATERBOYS PLUMBING314 03/25/2022 293363 50.00 PARK DEPOSIT REFUND-STROTHER 010.0000.2206 HEATHER WEARE315 03/25/2022 293364 1,065.00 PUBLIC ART INSTALLATION-DESIGN, PAINT & FINISH 010.0000.2033 TREVOR WEIGER316 03/25/2022 293365 89.00 24" OLEA ARIZONA FRUITLESS TREE 010.4420.5605 WEST COVINA NURSERIES317 03/25/2022 293366 525.00 01/22 SM WATER ADJ IMPLMTN 640.4710.5575 WHITE BRENNER LLP318 03/25/2022 293367 60.00 ADULT SOFTBALL SCORER 4 GAMES 010.4424.5352 SHIRLEY WILLMOTT319 03/25/2022 293368 2,401.00 SOCCER SAT CLASSES WINTER SESSION I 010.4424.5351 YOUTH EVOLUTION BASKETBALL320 03/25/2022 293369 3,153.50 POLICE DEPT DUES: PAYMENT 011.0000.2116 ARROYO GRANDE POLICE ASSN321 03/25/2022 293370 40,866.03 FEDERAL WITHHOLDING: PAYMENT 011.0000.2104 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE322 03/25/2022 293370 11,985.30 MEDICARE: PAYMENT 011.0000.2105 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE323 03/25/2022 293370 48,556.50 SOCIAL SECURITY: PAYMENT 011.0000.2105 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE324 03/25/2022 293371 2,086.52 CASDI: PAYMENT 011.0000.2111 CA ST EMPLOYMENT DEVEL DEPT325 03/25/2022 293371 16,398.11 STATE WITHHOLDING: PAYMENT 011.0000.2108 CA ST EMPLOYMENT DEVEL DEPT326 03/25/2022 293372 695.52 DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES 011.0000.2114 CA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT327 03/25/2022 293373 15.00 03/22 AG FIRE ASSN DUES 011.0000.2115 FIVE CITIES FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC328 03/25/2022 293374 3,360.00 AG CAREER FIREFIGHTERS ASSN: PAYMENT 011.0000.2115 FIVE CITIES PROF. FIREFIGHTERS329 03/25/2022 293375 3,032.33 DEFERRED COMPENSATION - EE %: 011.0000.2117 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP330 03/25/2022 293375 10,927.25 DEFERRED COMPENSATION - EE: PAYMENT 011.0000.2117 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP331 03/25/2022 293375 866.66 DEFERRED COMPENSATION - ER: PAYMENT 011.0000.2117 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP332 03/25/2022 293375 275.00 ROTH - AFTER TAX: PAYMENT 011.0000.2117 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP333 03/25/2022 293376 77.75 03/22 LEGAL SVCS 011.0000.2125 LEGALSHIELD334 03/25/2022 293377 117.11 PERS BUYBACK - AFTER TAX: PAYMENT 011.0000.2106 PERS - RETIREMENT335 03/25/2022 293377 259.69 PERS BUYBACK - PRE TAX: PAYMENT 011.0000.2106 PERS - RETIREMENT336 03/25/2022 293377 1,300.95 PERS EMPLOYER PICK UP: PAYMENT 011.0000.2106 PERS - RETIREMENT337 03/25/2022 293377 29,106.88 PERS RETIREMENT: PAYMENT 011.0000.2106 PERS - RETIREMENT338 03/25/2022 293377 48,652.65 PERS RETIREMENT: PAYMENT 011.0000.2106 PERS - RETIREMENT339 03/25/2022 293377 (0.06) PERS ROUNDING 010.0000.4818 PERS - RETIREMENT340 03/25/2022 293378 1,149.96 SEIU DUES: PAYMENT 011.0000.2118 S.E.I.U. LOCAL 620341 03/25/2022 293379 1,603.28 PARS: PAYMENT 011.0000.2107 US BANK OF CALIFORNIA342 03/31/2022 293380 838.96 03/22 SUPPLEMENTAL INSURANCE 011.0000.2126 AFLAC INSURANCEPage 20 of 324
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDECHECK LISTINGMARCH 16 - MARCH 31, 2022ATTACHMENT 1Line Check Date Check # Amount Description Acct # Vendor Name343 03/31/2022 293381 $ 2,066.00 CASH FOR GRASS REBATE 2066 SQF 226.4306.5554 KATHRYN ACETO344 03/31/2022 293382 213.40 AMMO for SWAT & RANGE MASTER SCHOOL 010.4204.5501 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES, INC345 03/31/2022 293382 66.16 SALES TAX 010.4204.5501 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES, INC346 03/31/2022 293382 16.54 SALES TAX 010.4204.5501 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES, INC347 03/31/2022 293382 853.60 SWAT TRAINING AMMO- 9MM LUGER 010.4204.5501 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES, INC348 03/31/2022 293383 735.00 2022 DOT DRUG & ALCOHOL TESTIN 220.4303.5501 ADDICTION MED CONSULTANTS, INC349 03/31/2022 293384 16.05 REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR WATER METERS 640.4712.5611 AQUA-METRIC SALES CO(DBA)350 03/31/2022 293385 43.44 BAN#9391033181 ALARM 640.4710.5403 AT&T351 03/31/2022 293385 58.43 BAN#9391033183 473-2198 010.4201.5403 AT&T352 03/31/2022 293385 32.86 BAN#9391033183 473-2198 010.4201.5403 AT&T353 03/31/2022 293385 235.90 BAN#9391033184 473-5100 010.4201.5403 AT&T354 03/31/2022 293385 238.90 BAN#9391033184 473-5100 010.4201.5403 AT&T355 03/31/2022 293385 22.56 BAN#9391033186 CC MACHINE 010.4145.5403 AT&T356 03/31/2022 293385 62.65 BAN#9391033187 481-6944 010.4201.5403 AT&T357 03/31/2022 293385 62.65 BAN#9391033187 481-6944 010.4201.5403 AT&T358 03/31/2022 293386 (28.00) CREDIT 010.4203.5601 BIG BRAND TIRE CO.359 03/31/2022 293386 3,154.73 FLEET-STOCK TIRES 010.4203.5601 BIG BRAND TIRE CO.360 03/31/2022 293387 735.00 REFUND PPR21-044 LOCATION INELIGIBLE 010.0000.4510 BRYCE BOGLE361 03/31/2022 293388 212.61 PW - LEAVE/OVERTIME FORMS 010.4102.5255 BOONE PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC362 03/31/2022 293388 103.50 PW - LEAVE/OVERTIME FORMS 010.4102.5255 BOONE PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC363 03/31/2022 293388 24.50 PW - LEAVE/OVERTIME FORMS 010.4102.5255 BOONE PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC364 03/31/2022 293389 126.00 CITY HALL PEST CONTROL 010.4213.5303 BREZDEN PEST CONTROL, INC365 03/31/2022 293389 181.00 PD PEST CONTROL 010.4213.5303 BREZDEN PEST CONTROL, INC366 03/31/2022 293390 3,188.00 2021 USE TAX 010.0000.2014 CA DEPT OF TAX & FEE ADMIN367 03/31/2022 293391 736.00 01/22 WEED ABATEMENT 220.4303.5303 CA ST DEPT OF CORRECTIONS368 03/31/2022 293391 1,469.26 12/21 WEED ABATEMENT 220.4303.5303 CA ST DEPT OF CORRECTIONS369 03/31/2022 293392 74.00 LIVESCAN/FINGERPRINT 010.4421.5316 CA ST DEPT OF JUSTICE370 03/31/2022 293392 74.00 LIVESCAN/FINGERPRINT 010.4425.5316 CA ST DEPT OF JUSTICE371 03/31/2022 293393 6.40 PD-4602 MINI BULB 010.4203.5601 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS372 03/31/2022 293393 194.20 PW-60 SEAT COVER 640.4712.5601 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS373 03/31/2022 293394 199.98 ACCT#8245100960104152 PD INTERNET 010.4201.5403 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS374 03/31/2022 293395 5,528.14 ADMIN/SUPPORT FLEET UPLIFTING 010.4201.5601 DANA SAFETY SUPPLY375 03/31/2022 293396 400.00 02/22 UTILITY BILL MAILING 640.4710.5303 DATAPROSE LLC376 03/31/2022 293396 411.04 02/22 UTILITY BILL MAILING 640.4710.5555 DATAPROSE LLC377 03/31/2022 293396 1,629.79 02/22 UTILITY BILL MAILING 640.4710.5208 DATAPROSE LLC378 03/31/2022 293396 102.76 02/22 UTILITY BILL MAILING 612.4610.5555 DATAPROSE LLC379 03/31/2022 293397 2,500.00 TREEKEEPER 1 YR RENEWAL 010.4420.5255 DAVEY RESOURCE GROUP INC380 03/31/2022 293398 4,759.70 DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE ELM ST PLAY STRUCTURE 350.5564.7501 EIKHOF DESIGN GROUPPage 21 of 324
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDECHECK LISTINGMARCH 16 - MARCH 31, 2022ATTACHMENT 1Line Check Date Check # Amount Description Acct # Vendor Name381 03/31/2022 293399 $ 48.48 T POST PULLER 010.4420.5605 FARM SUPPLY CO382 03/31/2022 293400 43.50 MILLER WAY BOOSTER CHECK VALVE 640.4712.5610 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC383 03/31/2022 293401 3,000.00 DEPOSIT-SOTO SOLAR LIGHT DEMO 010.4430.5255 FONROCHE LIGHTING AMERICA384 03/31/2022 293402 615.00 CASH FOR GRASS 615 SQFT 226.4306.5554 ROBERTA GODSEY385 03/31/2022 293403 107.70 SYMPATHY FLOWERS HOLUB 010.4101.5504 GRAND BOUQUET386 03/31/2022 293404 153.59 WELL #9 -FRT ON ELECTRIC PANEL 640.4711.5603 INDEPENDENT ELECTRIC SUPPL.INC387 03/31/2022 293405 84.50 FUEL PD-4620/4621 010.4203.5608 JB DEWAR, INC388 03/31/2022 293406 879.67 RESOLUTION AND MINUTE BOOK, PAPER 010.4002.5201 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONERY INC389 03/31/2022 293407 135.00 02/22 BRANCH ROOM USE FEES 010.4425.5303 LUCIA MAR UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST390 03/31/2022 293407 135.00 02/22 OCEAN VIEW ROOM USE FEES 010.4425.5303 LUCIA MAR UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST391 03/31/2022 293408 47.39 (2) PROPANE TANK EXCHANGE 220.4303.5613 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC392 03/31/2022 293408 213.30 (3) 50LB BAGS AQUAPHALT, HAMME 220.4303.5613 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC393 03/31/2022 293408 46.32 CEMENT ANCHOR 220.4303.5613 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC394 03/31/2022 293408 9.41 DOOR PULLS, FASTENERS 220.4303.5613 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC395 03/31/2022 293408 215.49 GRINDER 010.4420.5273 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC396 03/31/2022 293408 24.08 HAND TOOLS, SOCKET 220.4303.5273 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC397 03/31/2022 293408 209.00 JIGSAW & BLADES 220.4303.5273 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC398 03/31/2022 293408 5.38 PLUMBING SUPPLES 640.4712.5610 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC399 03/31/2022 293408 15.14 PINE SOL, BATTERIES 010.4213.5604 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC400 03/31/2022 293408 69.98 PW-56 IMPACT SETTER, BITS, DRILL DRIVER 010.4420.5273 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC401 03/31/2022 293408 22.60 RANGE MAINT-SPRAYPAINT 010.4203.5255 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC402 03/31/2022 293408 79.67 SOTO-WD40, NYLON LINE, TAPE, KEYS 010.4430.5605 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC403 03/31/2022 293408 57.08 TRASH CAN, GRILL BRUSH 010.4420.5605 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC404 03/31/2022 293408 51.70 VOLTAGE DETECTOR, WALLBOARD ANCHOR KIT 010.4213.5604 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE, INC405 03/31/2022 293409 3,500.00 MONUMENT PRESERVATION 350.5638.7501 NORTH COAST ENGINEERING INC406 03/31/2022 293409 700.00 ANDRE DRIVE / LOS CIERVOS COURT INTERCONNECT 640.5976.7501 NORTH COAST ENGINEERING INC407 03/31/2022 293410 1,074.68 PRE EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL TESTING 010.4201.5315 PACIFIC CENTRAL COAST HEALTH408 03/31/2022 293410 70.00 PRE EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL TESTING 010.4421.5315 PACIFIC CENTRAL COAST HEALTH409 03/31/2022 293410 420.00 PRE EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL TESTING 010.4425.5315 PACIFIC CENTRAL COAST HEALTH410 03/31/2022 293410 45.00 PRE EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL TESTING 640.4710.5315 PACIFIC CENTRAL COAST HEALTH411 03/31/2022 293410 480.00 PRE EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL TESTING 640.4712.5315 PACIFIC CENTRAL COAST HEALTH412 03/31/2022 293411 9,570.26 K-RAILS-CHEVRON STORM DRAIN 251 E GRAND 350.5797.7201 PACIFIC PETROLEUM CALIFORNIA413 03/31/2022 293412 19,935.00 022 UPDATE OF PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 350.5638.7501 PAVEMENT ENGINEERING INC414 03/31/2022 293413 200.00 WASHING MACHINE REBATE 226.4306.5554 PEACE LUTHERAN CHURCH415 03/31/2022 293414 211.30 02/22 PARKING CITATION PROCESS 010.4204.5303 PHOENIX GROUP416 03/31/2022 293415 861.25 PATROL AMMO - LESS LETHAL 010.4203.5255 PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT417 03/31/2022 293415 1,170.00 PATROL AMMO - LESS LETHAL 010.4203.5255 PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT418 03/31/2022 293415 157.42 SALES TAX 010.4203.5255 PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENTPage 22 of 324
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDECHECK LISTINGMARCH 16 - MARCH 31, 2022ATTACHMENT 1Line Check Date Check # Amount Description Acct # Vendor Name419 03/31/2022 293416 $ 50.00 FREIGHT 010.4203.5601 PVP COMMUNICATIONS, INC420 03/31/2022 293416 629.00 PATROL FLEET - MOTORS EQUIPMENT 010.4203.5601 PVP COMMUNICATIONS, INC421 03/31/2022 293416 1,758.00 PATROL FLEET - MOTORS EQUIPMENT 010.4203.5601 PVP COMMUNICATIONS, INC422 03/31/2022 293416 185.00 SALES TAX 010.4203.5601 PVP COMMUNICATIONS, INC423 03/31/2022 293417 92.00 TRAINING-TUITION 010.4203.5501 SAN DIEGO MIRAMAR COLLEGE424 03/31/2022 293418 151.50 02/22 PARKING CITATION REV DIST 010.0000.4203 SLO COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER425 03/31/2022 293419 1,437.72 TRITECH CAD BILLING 4/22-9/22 010.4204.5606 SLO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT426 03/31/2022 293420 81.60 CC PH NOTICE - DISTRICT ELECTIONS 010.4002.5301 THE MCCLATCHY COMPANY LLC427 03/31/2022 293420 84.15 CC PH NOTICE - DISTRICT ELECTIONS 010.4002.5301 THE MCCLATCHY COMPANY LLC428 03/31/2022 293420 89.25 CC PH NOTICE - DISTRICT ELECTIONS 010.4002.5301 THE MCCLATCHY COMPANY LLC429 03/31/2022 293420 84.15 CC PH NOTICE - DISTRICT ELECTIONS 010.4002.5301 THE MCCLATCHY COMPANY LLC430 03/31/2022 293421 75.00 02/22 INVESTIGATIVE SVCS 010.4204.5303 TRANSUNION RISK431 03/31/2022 293422 3,000.00 POSTAGE BY PHONE 010.4145.5208 US POSTAL SERVICE432 03/31/2022 293423 922.62 ACCT#208620661-00002 PD CELL PHONES 010.4201.5403 VERIZON WIRELESS433 03/31/2022 293424 1,867.55 NCMA STAFF EXTENSION SERVICES 640.4710.5303 WATER SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC434 03/31/2022 293425 519.21 COPY MACHINE LEASE PYMT 010.4201.5803 WELLS FARGO VENDOR FINANCIAL $ 596,276.06 Page 23 of 324
ATTACHMENT 2
.
General Fund 332,360.94 5101 Salaries Full time 226,536.42
Streets Fund 15,094.06 5101 Volunteer Employee Retirement -
American Rescue Plan Act 138.38 5102 Salaries Part-Time - PPT 4,170.71
Sewer Fund 9,495.00 5103 Salaries Part-Time - TPT 16,545.08
Water Fund 17,334.77 5105 Salaries OverTime 9,830.42
374,423.15 5106 Salaries Strike Team OT -
5107 Salaries Standby 1,670.30
5108 Holiday Pay 215.25
5109 Sick Pay 2,584.93
5110 Annual Leave Buyback -
Administrative Services - 5111 Vacation Buyback -
Information Services - 5112 Sick Leave Buyback -
Community Development - 5113 Vacation Pay 2,500.14
Police 9,055.74 5114 Comp Pay 3,989.65
Public Works - Maintenance - 5115 Annual Leave Pay 2,398.79
Public Works - Enterprise 252.96 5116 Salaries - Police FTO -
Recreation - Administration 252.96 5121 PERS Retirement 29,261.10
Recreation - Special Events 268.76 5122 Social Security 19,626.05
Children In Motion - 5123 PARS Retirement 320.67
9,830.42 5126 State Disability Ins. 900.34
5127 Deferred Compensation 741.66
5131 Health Insurance 46,553.49
5132 Dental Insurance 2,743.12
5133 Vision Insurance 726.39
5134 Life Insurance 369.58
5135 Long Term Disability 674.41
5137 Leave Payouts -
5142 Unemployment Insurance -
5143 Uniform Allowance -
5144 Car Allowance 837.50
5146 Council Expense -
5147 Employee Assistance -
5148 Boot Allowance -
5149 Motor Pay 102.15
5150 Bi-Lingual Pay 150.00
5151 Cell Phone Allowance 975.00
374,423.15
Total FCFA payroll cost for this period is $188,675.22. FCFA payroll and accounts payable expenditures are
processed as part of the JPA financial services agreement between Arroyo Grande, Grover Beach and
Oceano Community Services District. Arroyo Grande's portion of the FCFA annual budget is identified in the
contractual services budget.
OVERTIME BY DEPARTMENT:
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
DEPARTMENTAL LABOR DISTRIBUTION
PAY PERIOD
03/04/2022 - 03/17/2022
3/25/2022
BY FUND BY ACCOUNT
Page 24 of 324
Item 8.b.
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Bill Robeson, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director
Nicole Valentine, Administrative Services Director
BY: Ron Simpson, Public Works Manager
Lynda Horejsi, Accounting Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration of adoption of a Resolution Creating a Recovered
Organic Waste Product Procurement Policy as required by Senate Bill
1383
DATE: April 26, 2022
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Adopt a Resolution creating a Recovered Organic Waste Products Procurement Policy
(Policy) as required by Senate Bill (SB) 1383.
IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES:
The fiscal impact of the proposed Policy is currently unknown but is estimated to be
significant. The estimated cost for procurement of recovered organic waste product(s)
required to meet the City’s SB 1383 requirements is between $21,000 and $129,900.
There will be significant staff time required for the procurement of recovered organ ic
waste products and recycled-content paper and paper products, use/application of the
recovered organic waste products, and the record keeping and tracking requirements.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Resolution creating a Recovered Organic Waste Products Procurement Policy
as required by Senate Bill 1383.
BACKGROUND:
SB 1383 was signed into law on September 19, 2016, to require a reduction of organic
waste disposal to landfills from 2014 levels by 75% and increase edible food recovery by
20% by 2025. SB 1383 is the most significant waste reduction mandate to be adopted by
the State of California in the last 30 years.
At the November 9, 2021 City Council meeting, the Council adopted an ordinance adding
Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction and SB 1383 CalGreen Recycling and
Page 25 of 324
Item 8.b.
City Council
Consideration of adoption of a Resolution Creating a Recovered Organic Waste
Product Procurement Policy as required by Senate Bill 1383
April 26, 2022
Page 2
Model Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance Requirements to the Arroyo Grande
Municipal Code (AGMC) in order to comply with the requirements of SB 1383. The City
must now adopt a Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Policy to implement
a portion of the requirements imposed by SB 1383 . The City is already required to procure
paper products, and printing and writing paper, consistent with the requirements of
Sections 22150-22154 of the Public Contract Code. The new SB 1383 regulation adds to
that requirement, and includes provisions for record keeping a nd reporting. The proposed
City policy is a modified version of one that was prepared by the Integrated Waste
Management Authority’s consultant, HF&H, for use by cities in San Luis Obispo County
and contains provisions necessary to comply with the new CalRecyle regulations. HF&H
had previously been retained by CalRecyle to develop Statewide SB 1383 model
documents, including franchise agreements, enforcement ordinances and procur ement
policies for organic waste products and paper products.
ANALYSIS OF ISSUES:
The SB 1383 regulations define two different types of procurement that the City is required
to implement: the procurement of organic waste products and the purchase of recyc led-
content paper.
Organic Waste Products
Organic waste products are defined by the regulations as certain products that are made
from organic waste that is diverted from the landfill. This can include compost, mulch,
Renewable Natural Gas (RNG), energy, and other products made at organic waste
facilities. This definition does not include mulch made from trees that were trimmed or
removed and chipped onsite.
CalRecycle’s SB 1383 regulations require the City to procure a prescribed quantity of
recovered organic waste products to meet an annual procurement target based on
population: 0.08 tons of organic waste per resident per year. CalRecycle will annually
provide the City with its procurement target, which is recalculated every 5 years.
CalRecycle has notified the City that the annual procurement target through December
2026 is 1,442.6 tons of organic waste products. The table below displays the procurement
target calculations, details each qualifying organic waste product type, and the amount of
each type needed annually based on meeting the procurement target using only one type
of recovered organic waste product.
Page 26 of 324
Item 8.b.
City Council
Consideration of adoption of a Resolution Creating a Recovered Organic Waste
Product Procurement Policy as required by Senate Bill 1383
April 26, 2022
Page 3
While the procurement requirements are considerable, SB 1383 allows the City to meet
the procurement target through a combination of recovered organic waste products. The
City does not need to buy or use the organics products itself to meet this requirement.
The City may contractually designate a public or private entity as a direct service provider
(DSP) to meet the procurement obligation on behalf of the City. The City may also acquire
recovered organic waste products through free distribution by a contractor and the City
may provide procured organic waste products to residents in events such as
compost/mulch giveaways.
In order to meet the procurement requirements, the City will need to determine what type
or types of products are available and the amount of each type of product feasible for
acquisitions and use.
Transportation fuel. The City does not have a fleet of vehicles that can meet this
requirement via fuels and does not have access to RNG produced from organic waste.
Energy from renewable gas. The City does not currently have access to electricity or heat
derived from renewable gas or biomass conversion. The City could explore the availability
of opportunities for procurement of electricity from organic waste products with community
partners, including PG&E, Kompogas SLO and, Central Coast Community Energy.
Compost. Currently, the Public Work’s Department utilizes a few cubic yards of compost
per year. In order to reach the procurement goal, the City would need to utilize and/or
make available for residential giveaways a significantly larger amount of compost. The
compost currently used may or may not be SB 1383 compliant. SB 1383 eligible compost
must be produced at a compostable material handling operation or facility permitted or
authorized under 14 CCR Chapter 3.1 of Division 7 or produced at a large volume in-
vessel digestion facility that composts on-site as defined and permitted under 14 CCR
Chapter 3.2 of Division 7 and meet the State’s composting operations regulatory
18,033
0.08
1,442.6
Recovered Organic Waste Product One Ton
Equivalent
Quantity
Procured
Annually
Quantity
Procured
Monthly
Unit
Renewable Gas in the form of Transportation Fuel 21 30,295.4 2,524.6 DGE
Electricity from Renewable Gas 242 349,118.9 29,093.2 kWh
Heat from Renewable Gas 22 31,738.1 2,644.8 therms
Electricity from Biomass Conversion 650 937,716.0 78,143.0 kWh
Compost (tons)0.58 836.7 69.7 tons
Compost (cubic yards)1.45 2,091.8 174.3 cubic yards
Mulch 1 1,442.6 120.2 tons
Arroyo Grande Population (based on 2020 census)
Per Capita Procurement Target
Annual Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Target
Page 27 of 324
Item 8.b.
City Council
Consideration of adoption of a Resolution Creating a Recovered Organic Waste
Product Procurement Policy as required by Senate Bill 1383
April 26, 2022
Page 4
requirements. The City can explore DSP agreements or look at the possibility of an
organic waste flow agreement with a composting facility to secure the required amount of
compost at a discounted rate. Researching local costs for eligible compost and utilizing
estimates that other jurisdictions have provided, procurement of compost could cost the
City between $10-$30 per cubic yard of compost, for an annual cost of between $21,000
to $62,800.
Mulch. Like compost, the Public Works Department utilizes a few cubic yards of mulch
annually. A substantially larger amount of mulch would need to be utilized and/or made
available for residential giveaways. The mulch currently used may or may not be SB 1383
compliant. Mulch is only SB 1383 eligible if produced at: (i) a compostable material
handling operation or facility as defined in 14 CCR Section 17852(a)(12), that is permitted
or authorized under 14 CCR Division 7, other than a chipping and grinding operati on or
facility as defined in 14 CCR Section 17852(a)(10); (ii) a transfer/processing facility or
transfer/processing operation as defined in 14 CCR Sections 17402(a)(30) and (31),
respectively, that is permitted or authorized under 14 CCR Division 7; or (iii) a solid waste
landfill as defined in Public Resources Code Section 40195.1 that is permitted under 27
CCR Division 2. As noted above with regard to compost, the City can explore DSP
agreements or look at the possibility of an organic waste flow agreeme nt with an eligible
facility to secure the required amount of mulch at a discounted rate. Researching local
costs for eligible mulch and utilizing estimates that other jurisdictions have provided,
procurement of mulch could cost could cost the City between $30-$90 per ton of mulch,
for an annual cost of between $43,300 to $129,900.
Staff is currently gathering data needed to benchmark use of compliant recycled organic
waste products. Developing a program that both meets the City’s recovered organic
waste product annual procurement target and uses the material will be challenging.
Compost and mulch are currently the most readily available types of recovered organic
waste products and are already in use by the City. While the City may enter into purchase
agreements to procure the required tons of compost and/or mulch, the procurement target
is anticipated to far exceed what is used and needed by the City. Additionally, only eligible
product can be procured to count towards the procurement target. Key considera tions
with compost and mulch options are the current use by City departments, procurement of
eligible product(s), capacity for use on managed lands, capacity and location for storage
of the compost/mulch, maintenance and security of the stored product(s), and the ultimate
end use of the product(s).
Staff is also looking at what, if any, partnership opportunities are available to allow the
City to meet its procurement target in an environmentally and fiscally sustainable way.
Staff will work with South County Sanitary and Cold Canyon Landfill to look at options to
obtain organic waste products that meet the SB 1383 procurement requirement. This may
include providing a specified quantity of product(s) to the City and to residents through
Page 28 of 324
Item 8.b.
City Council
Consideration of adoption of a Resolution Creating a Recovered Organic Waste
Product Procurement Policy as required by Senate Bill 1383
April 26, 2022
Page 5
giveaways. These types or arrangements with franchise waste haulers and landfills are
being negotiated locally in franchise agreement amendments and statewide.
Should procurement requirements be met through compost and/or mulch, City staff will
be required to keep detailed procurement records including:
Dates product received
How and where the product was used and applied
Type, quantity and source of product
Proof of purchase or acquisition
Copy of enforceable mechanism (for mulch)
Copy of agreement with DSP which includes definitions and specifications of the
type of product and an enforcement mechanism for non -compliance with SB
1383 requirements.
While staff time is currently unknown, it is anticipated to be 5-10 hours weekly both for
the procurement and use/application/giveaway of organic waste products as well as the
recordkeeping requirements for the product use/application.
Staff will continue to assess all options to comply with the procurement requirement,
including the procurement of both mulch and compost.
Recycled-content Paper and Paper Products
SB 1383 regulations also require all City departments that purchase paper and paper
products, including writing and copying paper and janitorial supplies such as tissue and
paper towels, to procure 30% postconsumer recycled -content products that are also
recyclable. The City must also require businesses providing the paper products to the
City to certify in writing to the percentage of post -consumer recycled material in the
purchased product(s) and that the products are eligible to be labeled with an unqualified
recyclable label. The City may waive the certification if the required information is
provided on the product label or through the vendor’s catalog, invoice or website.
To meet the SB 1383 regulations, the City’s proposed policy includes a requirement that
recycled paper and paper products be purchased where the fitness and quality are equal
to non-recycled-content paper and paper products and the price is equal or less than non-
recycled items. The proposed policy also includes record keeping responsibilities to track
the purchase of recycled-content paper and paper products.
Given the SB 1383 requirements, and that purchasing is decentralized in the City, this is
an added burden across all departments and divisions. All purchasers must now:
Research the cost, fitness and recycled-content of all paper and paper products
before purchase
Page 29 of 324
Item 8.b.
City Council
Consideration of adoption of a Resolution Creating a Recovered Organic Waste
Product Procurement Policy as required by Senate Bill 1383
April 26, 2022
Page 6
Document each product purchased including copies of the invoice or receipt,
required certifications for recycled-content and recyclability or other verification of
recycled-content, date purchased, quantity purchased, and recycled-content
(including products that contain none)
Include any justification for why a product was purchased that did not meet the
recycled-content requirements or did not include the verification for recyclability
Upload all documentation to a document repository within 30 days of purchase
Request vendors providing printing services use best efforts to use paper
meeting the SB 1383 recycled-content requirements
While the actual staff time required for compliance with the purchase of recycled -content
paper and paper products is unknown, it is currently estimated that it will take roughly 5 -
10 hours weekly of staff time citywide based on the number of purchasers and products
purchased throughout the City.
Recordkeeping
All documents supporting compliance with the recovered organic waste product
purchases must be kept as part of the implementation record and provided to CalRecycle
upon request. The Administrative Services Department is responsible for tracking the
procurement of recycled content paper and paper products and recovered organic waste
products, to ensure all required documentation has been collected, collated, maintained
and provided to the Integrated W aste Management Authority monthly for compilation of
the annual report on the City’s procurement of recovered organic waste products and
recycled-content paper and paper products.
The attached Resolution includes the proposed Recovered Organic Waste Product
Procurement Policy that will enable the City to satisfy a portion of SB 1383’s requirements.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council’s consideration:
1. Adopt a Resolution Creating a Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement
Policy as required by Senate Bill 1383;
2. Modify and adopt a Resolution Creating a Recovered Organic Waste Product
Procurement Policy as required by Senate Bill 1383; or
3. Provide other direction to staff.
ADVANTAGES:
Adoption of the proposed Resolution and Policy will enable the City to comply wit h a
portion of the requirements of SB 1383 related to organic waste product procurement.
Timely compliance with SB 1383 will ensure that the City is working to meet the
requirement of reducing organic waste disposal to landfills by 75% from 2014 levels by
2025.
Page 30 of 324
Item 8.b.
City Council
Consideration of adoption of a Resolution Creating a Recovered Organic Waste
Product Procurement Policy as required by Senate Bill 1383
April 26, 2022
Page 7
DISADVANTAGES:
Failure to approve the required Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Policy
could subject the City to penalties imposed by CalRecyle, which can be up to $10,000
per day. The estimated cost for procurement of recovered organ ic waste product(s)
required to meet the City’s SB 1383 requirements is between $21,000 and $129,900.
There will be significant staff time required for the procurement of recovered organic
waste products and recycled-content paper and paper products, use/application of the
recovered organic waste products, and record keeping and tracking requirements.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
No environmental review is required for this item.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the Ci ty’s website in accordance with
Government Code Section 54954.2.
Attachments:
1. Proposed Resolution
Page 31 of 324
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE CREATING RECOVERED ORGANIC
WASTE PRODUCT PROCUREMENT POLICY AS
REQUIRED BY SENATE BILL 1383
WHEREAS, in September 2016, Governor Brown signed into law Senate Bill 1383 (SB
1383) establishing methane reduction targets in an effort to curb the presence of methane
emissions caused by organic waste; and
WHEREAS, SB 1383, the Short-lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Act of 2016, requires
jurisdictions to procure, annually, a certain quantity of recovered organic waste products
and to purchase recycled-content paper products; and
WHEREAS, adoption of a Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Policy will
assist the City in reaching compliance with SB 1383 procurement requirements; and
WHEREAS, CalRecycle finalized regulations to achieve goals set forth by SB 1383 in
November 2020; and
WHEREAS, SB 1383 became effective on January 1, 2022, and local jurisdictions are
required to enact regulations set forth in SB 1383 and provide a copy of the Recovered
Organic Waste Product Procurement Policy to CalRecycle.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande
as follows:
1. The above recitals are true, correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.
2. The “Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Policy” attached hereto as
Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, is hereby adopted.
3. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption.
On motion of Council Member ______, seconded by Council Member ________, and by
the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 26th day of April, 2022.
Page 32 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
___________________________________
CAREN RAY RUSSOM, MAYOR
ATTEST:
___
JESSICA MATSON, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
___________________________________
WHITNEY MCDONALD, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
Page 33 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 3
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
RECOVERED ORGANIC WASTE
PRODUCT PROCUREMENT POLICY
Section 1. Purpose
A. It is the policy of the City, applicable to all departments and divisions, to incorporate
environmental considerations including recycled-content and recovered Organic
Waste product use into purchasing practices and procurement. This Recovered
Organic Waste Product Procurement Policy (Policy) will help the City to:
1. Protect and conserve natural resources, water, and energy;
2. Minimize the City’s contribution to climate change, pollution, and solid waste
disposal; and,
3. Comply with State requirements as contained in 14 CCR Division 7, Chapter
12, Article 12 (SB 1383 procurement regulations) to procure a specified
amount of Recovered Organic Waste Products to support Organic Waste
disposal reduction targets and markets for products made from recycled
and recovered Organic Waste materials, and to purchase Recycled-
Content Paper Products and Recycled-Content Printing and Writing Paper.
Section 2. Definitions
A. “Annual Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Target” means the
amount of Organic Waste in the form of a Recovered Organic Waste Product that
the City is required to procure annually under 14 CCR Section 18993.1. This target
shall be calculated by multiplying the per capita procurement target, which shall be
0.08 tons of Organic Waste per California resident per year, times the City’s
residential population using the most recent annual data reported by the California
Department of Finance. Annually, CalRecycle will provide notice to each City of its
Annual Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Target by posting such
information on CalRecycle’s website and providing written notice directly to the
City.
B. “Compost” means the product resulting from the controlled biological
decomposition of organic solid wastes that are source separated from the
municipal solid waste stream or which are separated at a centralized facility or as
otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 17896.2(a)(4).
Page 34 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 4
Compost eligible for meeting the Annual Recovered Organic Waste Product
Procurement Target must be produced at a compostable material handling
operation or facility permitted or authorized under 14 CCR Chapter 3.1 of Division
7 or produced at a large volume in -vessel digestion facility that composts on-site
as defined and permitted under 14 CCR Chapter 3.2 of Division 7. Compost shall
meet the State’s composting operations regulatory requirements.
C. “Direct Service Provider” means a person, company, agency, district, or other
entity that provides a service or services to City pursuant to a contract or other
written agreement or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(17).
D. “Electricity Procured from Biomass Conversion” means electricity generated from
biomass facilities that convert recovered Organic Waste, such as wood a nd
prunings from the municipal stream, into electricity. Electricity procured from a
biomass conversion facility may only count toward the City’s Annual Recovered
Organic Waste Product Procurement Target if the facility receives feedstock
directly from certain permitted or authorized compostable material handling
operations or facilities, transfer/processing operations or facilities, or landfills, as
described in 14 CCR Section 18993.1(i).
E. “City” means the City of Arroyo Grande.
F. “Organic Waste” means solid wastes containing material originated from living
organisms and their metabolic waste products including, but not limited to, food,
yard trimmings, organic textiles and carpets, lumber, wood, Paper Products,
Printing And Writing Paper, manure, biosolids, digestate, and sludges, or as
otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(46). Biosolids and digestate are as
defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(4) and 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(16.5),
respectively.
G. “Paper Products” include, but are not limited t o, paper janitorial supplies, cartons,
wrapping, packaging, file folders, hanging files, corrugated boxes, tissue, and
toweling; or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(51).
H. “Printing and Writing Papers” include, but are not limited to, copy, xerographic,
watermark, cotton fiber, offset, forms, computer printout paper, white wove
envelopes, manila envelopes, book paper, note pads, writing tablets, newsprint,
and other uncoated writing papers, posters, index cards, calendars, brochures,
reports, magazines, and publications; or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section
18982(a)(54).
I. “Procurement of Recovered Organic Waste Products” shall mean purchase or
acquisition (e.g., free delivery or free distribution from a hauler or other entity via a
written agreement or contract), and end use by the City or others. The City’s
Annual Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Target can be fulfilled
directly by the City or by Direct Service Providers through written contracts or
agreements for Procurement of Recovered Organic Waste Products at the City’s
behest.
Page 35 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 5
J. “Publicly-Owned Treatment Works” or “POTW” has the same meaning as in
Section 403.3(r) of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Any renewable gas
procured from a POTW shall meet the requirements of subsection (h) of 14 CCR
Section 18993.1.
K. “Recovered Organic Waste Products” means products made from California,
landfill-diverted recovered Organic Waste processed at a permitted or otherwise
authorized operation or facility, or as other wise defined in 14 CCR Section
18982(a)(60). Products that can be used to meet the Annual Recovered Organic
Waste Product Procurement Target shall include Compost, SB 1383 Eligible
Mulch, Renewable Gas from an in-vessel digestion facility, and Electricity Procured
from Biomass Conversion as described herein and provided that such products
meet requirements of 14 CCR, Division 7, Chapter 12, Article 12.
L. “Recordkeeping Designee” means the public employee appointed by the City
Manager or his or her designee to track procurement and maintain records of
Recovered Organic Waste Product procurement efforts both by the City and
others, if applicable, as required by 14 CCR, Division 7, Chapter 12, Articles 12
and 13. The Recordkeeping Designee will report such re cords to the Reporting
Designee.
M. “Reporting Designee” means an entity that a City contracts with or otherwise
arranges to carry out any of the City’s reporting responsibilities of this policy as
authorized in 14 CCR.City.
N. "Recyclability" means that the Paper Products and Printing and Writing Paper
offered or sold to the City are eligible to be labeled with an unqualified recyclable
label as defined in 16 Code of Federal Regulations Section 260.12 (2013).
O. “Recycled-Content Paper Products and Recycled-Content Printing and Writing
Paper” means such products that consist of at least thirty percent (30%), by fiber
weight, postconsumer fiber, consistent with the requirements of Sections 22150 to
22154 and Sections 12200 and 12209 of the Public Contract Code, and as
amended.
P. “Renewable Gas” means gas derived from Organic Waste that has been diverted
from a landfill and processed at an in-vessel digestion facility that is permitted or
otherwise authorized by 14 CCR to recover Organic Waste, or as otherwise
defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(62).
Q. “SB 1383” means Senate Bill 1383 of 2016 approved by the Governor on
September 19, 2016, which added Sections 39730.5, 39730.6, 39730.7, and
39730.8 to the Health and Safety Code, and added Chapter 13.1 (commencing
with Section 42652) to Part 3 of Division 30 of the Public Resources Code,
establishing methane emissions reduction targets in a statewide effort to reduce
emissions of short-lived climate pollutants, as amended, supplemented,
superseded, and replaced from time to time.
Page 36 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 6
R. “SB 1383 Regulations” or “SB 1383 Regulatory” means or refers to, for the
purposes of this policy, the Short-Lived Climate Pollutants (SLCP): Organic Waste
Reductions regulations developed by CalRecycle and adopted in 2020 that created
Chapter 12 of 14 CCR, Division 7 and amended portions of regulations of 14 CCR
and 27 CCR.
S. “SB 1383 Eligible Mulch” means mulch eligible to meet the Annual Recovered
Organic Waste Product Procurement Target, pursuant to 14 CCR Chapter 12 of
Division 7. This SB 1383 Eligible Mulch shall meet the following conditions for the
duration of the applicable procurement compliance year, as specified by 14 CCR
Section 18993.1(f)(4):
1. Produced at one of the following facilities:
i. A compostable material handling operation or facility as defined in
14 CCR Section 17852(a)(12), that is permitted or authorized under
14 CCR Division 7, other than a chipping and grinding operation or
facility as defined in 14 CCR Section 17852(a)(10);
ii. A transfer/processing facility or transfer/processing operation as
defined in 14 CCR Sections 17402(a)(30) and (31), respectively, that
is permitted or authorized under 14 CCR Division 7; or,
iii. A solid waste landfill as defined in Public Resources Code Section
40195.1 that is permitted under 27 CCR Division 2.
2. Meet or exceed the physical contamination, maximum metal concentration,
and pathogen density standards for land application specified in 14 CCR
Sections 17852(a)(24.5)(A)1 through 3.
T. “State” means the State of California.
Policies
Section 3. Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement
3.1 Procurement Target
A. City will annually procure for use or giveaway a quantity of Recovered Organic
Waste Products that meets or exceeds its Annual Recovered Organic Waste
Product Procurement Target through the implementation of Sections 3 through 5
of this Policy.
B. To be eligible to meet the Annual Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement
Target, products that may be procured include the following (provided that each
product meets the criteria included in their respective definition in Section 2 of this
Policy):
Page 37 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 7
1. SB 1383 eligible Compost (as defined in Section 2.B).
2. SB 1383 Eligible Mulch (as defined in Section 2.R).
3. Renewable Gas (in the form of transportation fuel, electricity, or heat) (as
defined in Section 2.O).
4. Electricity Procured from Biomass Conversion (as defined in Section 2.D).
3.2 Requirements for Direct Service Providers
A. Direct Service Providers of landscaping maintenance, renovation, and
construction shall:
1. Use Compost and SB 1383 Eligible Mulch, as practicable, produced from
recovered Organic Waste, as defined in Section 2.B and 2.R of this Policy,
for all landscaping renovations, construction, or maintenance performed for
the City, whenever available, and capable of meeting quality standards and
criteria specified. SB 1383 Eligible Mulch used for land application shall
comply with 14 CCR, Division 7, Chapter 12, Article 12 and must meet or
exceed the physical contamination, maximum metal concentration and
pathogen density standards specified in 14 CCR Section
17852(a)(24.5)(A)(1) through (3).
2. If Direct Service Provider is subject to the Model Water Efficient Landscape
Ordinance (MWELO, as adopted by AGMC 16.84.010), comply with
Sections 492.6 (a)(3)(B), (C), (D), and (G) of the State’s MWELO, Title 23,
Division 2, Chapter 2.7 of the CCR, as amended September 15, 2015,
which requires the submittal of a landscape design plan with a “Soil
Preparation, Mulch, and Amendments Section” to include the following:
a. For landscape installations, Compost at a rate of a minimum of 4
cubic yards per 1,000 square feet of permeable area shall be
incorporated to a depth of six (6) inches into the soil. Soils with
greater than six percent (6%) organic matter in the top six (6) inches
of soil are exempt from adding Compost and tilling.
b. Apply a minimum three- (3-) inch layer of mulch on all exposed soil
surfaces of planting areas except in turf areas, creeping or rooting
groundcovers, or direct seeding applications where mulch is
contraindicated. To provide habitat for beneficial insects and other
wildlife, leave up to five percent (5%) of the landscape area without
mulch. Designated insect habitat must be included in the landscape
design plan as such.
c. Procure organic mulch materials made from recycled or post -
consumer materials rather than inorganic materials or virgin forest
products unless the recycled post-consumer organic products are
Page 38 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 8
not locally available. Organic mulches are not required where
prohibited by local Fuel Modification Plan Guidelines or other
applicable local ordinances.
d. For all mulch that is land applied, procure SB 1383 Eligible Mulch
that meets or exceeds the physical contamination, maximum metal
concentration, and pathogen density standards for land applications
specified in 14 CCR Section 17852(a)(24.5)(A)(1) through (3).
3. Keep and provide records of Procurement of Recovered Organic Waste
Products (either through purchase or acquisition) to Recordkeeping
Designee, upon completion of projects. Information to be provided shall
include:
a. General description of how and where the product was used and if
applicable, applied;
b. Source of product, including name, physical location, and contact
information for each entity, operation, or facility from whom the
Recovered Organic Waste Products were procured;
c. Type of product;
d. Quantity of each product; and,
e. Invoice or other record demonstrating purchase or procurement.
B. Direct Service Provider of Organic Waste collection services shall:
1. Provide a specified quantity of Compost or SB 1383 Eligible Mulch to City
and its customers via periodic “giveaways” as specified in a franchise
agreement or other agreement.
2. Keep and provide records to the City including the following:
a. Dates provided
b. Source of product including name, physical location and contact
information for each entity, operation or facility from whom the
Recovered Organic Waste Products were procured;
c. Type of product;
d. Quantity provided; and,
e. Invoice or other record or documentation demonstrating purchase,
procurement, or transfer of material to giveaway location.
Page 39 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 9
C. Renewable Gas procurement by Direct Service Providers
1. Direct Service Providers transporting solid waste, organic materials, and/or
recyclable materials shall procure their fuel as Renewable Gas if required
to do so in RFPs and RFQs released by the City for such services or as
required by permit, license, written agreement, or written contract with the
City.
2. Departments releasing RFPs and RFQs for contractors that procure fuel in
the course of their services to the City shall include a preference to
contractors that propose to use the amount or percentage of Renewable
Gas specified in the RFP or RFQ to be eligible for said price preference.
Such use, if it occurs, shall be documented in a written contract or
agreement.
3. If Renewable Gas made from recovered Organic Waste is used by Direct
Service Providers, Direct Service Providers shall submit information listed
in Section 3.3.B.2.a-e on a schedule to be determined by City, but not less
than annually to the Recordkeeping Designee.
4. Renewable Gas used by Direct Service Providers under Sections 3.3.A and
3.3.B shall comply with criteria specified in 14 CCR Section 18993.1.
3.2 Requirements for City Departments
A. Compost and SB 1383 Eligible Mulch procurement. Divisions and departments
responsible for landscaping maintenance, renovation, or construction shall:
1. Use Compost and SB 1383 Eligible Mulch produced from recovered
Organic Waste, as defined in Section 2.B and 2.R of this Policy, for
landscaping maintenance, renovation, or construction , as practicable,
whenever available, and capable of meeting quality standards and criteria
specified. SB 1383 Eligible Mulch used for land application must meet or
exceed the physical contamination, maximum metal concentration and
pathogen density standards specified in 14 CCR Section
17852(a)(24.5)(A)(1) through (3).
2. When City uses Compost and SB 1383 Eligible Mulch and the applications
are subject to the Model Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance (MWELO,
as adopted by AGMC 16.84.010), pursuant to City Code Section 15.06.050
Section (d), comply with Sections 492.6 (a)(3)(B), (C), (D), and (G) of the
State’s Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, Title 23, Division 2,
Chapter 2.7 of the CCR, as amended September 15, 2015, which requires
the submittal of a landscape design plan with a “Soil Preparation, Mulch,
and Amendments Section” to include the following:
a. For landscape installations, Compost at a rate of a minimum of 4
cubic yards per 1,000 square feet of permeable area shall be
Page 40 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 10
incorporated to a depth of six (6) inches into the soil. Soils with
greater than six percent (6%) organic matter in the top six (6) inches
of soil are exempt from adding Compost and tilling.
b. Apply a minimum three- (3-) inch layer of mulch on all exposed soil
surfaces of planting areas except in turf areas, creeping or rooting
groundcovers, or direct seeding applications where mulch is
contraindicated. To provide habitat for beneficial insects and other
wildlife, leave up to five percent (5%) of the landscape area without
mulch. Designated insect habitat must be included in the landscape
design plan as such.
c. Procure organic mulch materials made from recycled or post -
consumer materials rather than inorganic materials or virgin forest
products unless the recycled post-consumer organic products are
not locally available. Organic mulches are not required where
prohibited by local Fuel Modification Plan Guidelines or other
applicable local ordinances.
d. For all mulch that is land applied, procure SB 1383 Eligible Mulch
that meets or exceeds the physical contamination, maximum metal
concentration, and pathogen density standards for land applications
specified in 14 CCR Section 17852(a)(24.5)(A)(1) through (3).
3. Keep records, including invoices or proof of Recovered Organic Waste
Product procurement (either through purchase or acquisition), and submit
records to the Recordkeeping Designee, upon completion of project.
Records shall include:
a. General procurement records, including:
(i) General description of how and where the product was used
and applied, if applicable;
(ii) Source of product, including name, physical location, and
contact information for each entity, operation, or facility from
whom the Recovered Organic Waste Products were
procured;
(iii) Type of product;
(iv) Quantity of each product; and,
(v) Invoice or other record demonstrating purchase or
procurement.
Page 41 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 11
b. For Compost and SB 1383 Eligible Mulch provided to residents
through giveaway events or other types of distribution methods, keep
records of the Compost and SB 1383 Eligible Mulch provided to
residents. Records shall be maintained and submitted to the
Recordkeeping Designee in accordance with the requirements
specified in Section 3.2.A.3.
c. For procurement of SB 1383 Eligible Mulch, maintain an updated
copy of the ordinance or enforceable mechanism(s) requiring that the
mulch procured by the City or Direct Service Provider meets the land
application standards specified in 14 CCR Section 18993.1, as it may
be amended from time to time.
4. When Procurement of Recovered Organic Waste Products occurs through
a Direct Service Provider, enter into a written contract or agreement or
execute a purchase order with enforceable provisions that includes: (i)
definitions and specifications for SB 1383 Eligible Mulch, Compost,
Renewable Gas, and/or Electricity Procured from Biomass Conversion;
and, (ii) an enforcement mechanism (e.g., termination, liquidated damages)
in the event the Direct Service Provider is not compliant with the
requirements.
B. Renewable Gas procurement (used for fuel for transportation, electricity, or heating
applications). For Renewable Gas procurement, City shall:
1. Procure Renewable Gas made from recovered Organic Waste for
transportation fuel, electricity, and heating app lications to the degree that it
is appropriate and available for the City and to help meet the Annual
Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Target, which requires
compliance with criteria specified in 14 CCR Section 18993.1.
2. Keep records in the same manner indicated in Section 3.2.A.3 for the
amount of Renewable Gas procured and used by the City, including the
general procurement record information specified in Section 3.2.A.3.a, and
submit records to the Recordkeeping Designee on a schedule prescribed
by the Recordkeeping Designee. City shall additionally obtain the
documentation and submit records specified in Section 3.2.B.3 below, if
applicable.
3. If the City procures Renewable Gas from a POTW,
a. Annually verify that the Renewable Gas from the POTW complies
with the requirements specified in 14 CCR Section 18993.1(h),
including, but not limited to the exclusion in 14 CCR Section
17896.6(a)(1) and the items listed in this Section 3.2.B.3.
Page 42 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 12
b. Annually receive a record from the POTW documenting the tons of
Organic Waste received by the POTW from: (i) a compostable
material handling operation or facility as defined in 14 CCR Section
17852(a)(12), other than a chipping and grinding operation or facility
as defined in 14 CCR Section 17852(a)(10), that is permitted or
authorized under 14 CCR Division 7; (ii) transfer/processing facility
or transfer/processing operation as defined in 14 CCR Sections
17402(a)(30) and (31), respectively, that is permitted or authorized
under 14 CCR Division 7; or (iii) a solid waste landfill as defined in
Public Resources Code Section 40195.1 that is permitted under 27
CCR Division 2.
c. Annually receive documentation from the POTW of the percentage
of biosolids that the POTW produced and transported to activities
that constitute landfill disposal in order to demonstrate that the
POTW transported less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the
biosolids it produced to activities that constitute landfill disposal. For
the purposes of this Policy, landfill disposal is defined pursuant to 14
CCR Section 18983.1(a) and includes final disposition at a landfill;
use of material as alternative daily cover or alternative intermediate
cover at a landfill, and other dispositions not listed in 14 CCR Section
18983.1(b). Alternative daily cover or alternative intermediate cover
are defined in 27 CCR Sections 20690 and 20700, respectively.
d. Annually receive documentation that the POTW receives vehicle -
transported solid waste that is an anaerobically digestible material
for the purpose of anaerobic co-digestion with POTW treatment plant
wastewater to demonstrate that the POTW meets the requirement of
14 CCR Section 18993.1(h)(2).
e. City shall submit these records to the Recordkeeping Designee and
Reporting Designee on a schedule to be determined by
Recordkeeping Designee.
C. Electricity Procured from Biomass Conversion. For Electricity Procured from
Biomass Conversion, City shall:
1. Procure electricity from a biomass conversion facility that receives
feedstock from a composting facility, transfer/processing facility, a solid
waste landfill, and/or receives feedstock from the generator or employees
on behalf of the generator of the Organic Waste and to the degree that it is
available and practicable for the City and to help meet the Annu al
Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Target, which requires
compliance with criteria specified in 14 CCR Section 18993.1.
2. Maintain records and conduct the following recordkeeping activities:
Page 43 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 13
a. Keep records in the same manner indicated in Section 3.2.A.3 of this
Policy for the amount of Electricity Procured from Biomass
Conversion facilities, including the general procurement record
information specified in Section 3.2.A.3.a.
b. Receive written notification by an authorized representative of the
biomass conversion facility certifying that biomass feedstock was
received from a permitted solid waste facility identified in 14 CCR
Section 18993.1(i).
c. Provide these records to the Recordkeeping Designee.
Section 4. Recycled-content Paper Procurement
4.1 Requirements for City Departments
A. Option 1: Comparable or more favorable pricing: If fitness and quality of Recycled-
Content Paper Products and Recycled-Content Printing and Writing Paper are
equal to that of non-recycled items, all departments and divisions of City shall
purchase Recycled-Content Paper Products and Recycled-Content Printing and
Writing Paper that consists of at least thirty percent (30%), by fiber weight,
postconsumer fiber, whenever available at the same or a lesser total cost than
non-recycled items, consistent with the requirements of the Public Contracts Code,
Sections 22150 through 22154 and Sections 12200 and 12209, as amended.
Option 2: Price preference: If fitness and quality of Recycled -Content Paper
Products and Recycled-Content Printing and Writing Paper are equal to that of
non-recycled items, all departments and divisions of City shall purchase Recycled-
Content Paper Products and Recycled-Content Printing and Writing Paper that
consists of at least thirty percent (30%), by fiber weight, postconsumer fiber,
whenever the total cost is the same or a lesser t otal cost than non-recycled items
or whenever available at the same or a lesser total cost than the non -recycled
items, consistent with the requirements of the Public Contract Code, Sections
22150 through 22154 and Sections 12200 and 12209, as amended.
Option 3: No price preference: If fitness and quality of Recycled-Content Paper
Products and Recycled-Content Printing and Writing Paper are equal to that of
non-recycled items, all departments and divisions of City shall purchase Recycled -
Content Paper Products and Recycled-Content Printing and Writing Paper (rather
than non-recycled items) that consists of at least thirty percent (30%), by fiber
weight, postconsumer fiber, consistent with the requirements of the Public Contract
Code, Sections 22150 through 22154 and Sections 12200 and 12209, as
amended.
B. All Paper Products and Printing and Writing Paper shall be eligible to be labeled
with an unqualified recyclable label as defined in Title 16 Code of Federal
Regulations Section 260.12 (2013).
Page 44 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 14
C. Provide records to the Recordkeeping Designee of all Paper Products and Printing
and Writing Paper purchases on a schedule to be determined by Recordkeeping
Designee (both recycled-content and non-recycled content, if any is purchased)
made by a division or department or employee of the City. Records shall include a
copy of the invoice or other documentation of purchase, written certifications as
required in Section 4.2.A.3-4 for recycled-content purchases, vendor name,
purchaser name, quantity purchased, date purchased, and recycled content
(including products that contain none), and if non-Recycled-Content Paper
Products and/or non-Recycled-Content Printing and Writing Paper are provided,
include a description of why Recycled -Content Paper Products and/or Recycled-
Content Printing and Writing Paper were not provided.
4.2 Requirements for Vendors
A. All vendors that provide Paper Products (including janitorial Paper Products) and
Printing and Writing Paper to City shall:
1. Provide Recycled-Content Paper Products and Recycled-Content Printing
and Writing Paper that consists of at least thirty percent (30%), by fiber
weight, postconsumer fiber, if fitness and quality are equal to that of non -
recycled item, and available at equal or lesser price.
2. Only provide Paper Products and Printing and Writing Papers that meet
Federal Trade Commission Recyclability standard as defined in Title 16
Code of Federal Regulations Section 260.12 (2013).
3. Certify in writing, under penalty of perjury, the minimum percentage of
postconsumer material in the Paper Products and Printing and Writing
Paper offered or sold to the City. This certification requirement may be
waived if the percentage of postconsumer material in the Paper Products,
Printing and Writing Paper, or both can be verified by a product label,
catalog, invoice, or a manufacturer or vendor internet website.
4. Certify in writing, under penalty of perjury, that the Paper Products and
Printing and Writing Paper offered or sold to the City is eligible to be labeled
with an unqualified recyclable label as defined in Title 16 Code of Federal
Regulations Section 260.12 (2013).
5. Provide records to the Recordkeeping Designee of all Paper Products and
Printing and Writing Paper purchased from the vendor within thirty (30) days
of the purchase (both recycled-content and non-recycled content, if any is
purchased) made by a division or department or employee of the City.
Records shall include a copy of the invoice or other documentation of
purchase, written certifications as required in Section 4.2.A.3-4 for recycled-
content purchases, purchaser name, quantity purchased, date purchased,
and recycled content (including products that contain none), and if non -
Recycled-Content Paper Products and/or non- Recycled-Content Printing
and Writing Paper are provided, include a description of why Recycled -
Page 45 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 15
Content Paper Products and/or Recycled-Content Printing and Writing
Paper were not provided.
B. All vendors providing printing services to the City via a printing contract or written
agreement, shall use Printing and Writing Paper that consists of at least thirty
percent (30%), by fiber weight, postconsumer fiber, or as amended by Public
Contract Code Section 12209.
Section 5. Recordkeeping Responsibilities
A. A department or public employee, as determined by the City Manager, will be the
responsible department or person to act\ as the Recordkeeping Designee that will
be responsible for obtaining records pertaining to Procurement of Recovered
Organic Waste Products and Recycled-Content Paper Products and Recycled-
Content Printing and Writing Paper, as well as reporting such records to the
Reporting Designee.
B. The Recordkeeping Designee and/or Reporting Designee will do the following to
track Procurement of Recovered Organic Waste Products, Recycled-Content
Paper Products, and Recycled-Content Printing and Writing Paper:
1. Collect and collate copies of invoices or receipts (paper or electronic) or
other proof of purchase that describe the procurement of Printing and
Writing Paper and Paper Products, including the volume and type of all
paper purchases; and, copies of certifications and other required
verifications from all departments and/or divisions procuring Paper Products
and Printing and Writing Paper (whether or not they contain recycled
content) and/or from the vendors providing Printing and Writing Paper and
Paper Products. These records must be kept as part of City’s
documentation of its compliance with 14 CCR Section 18993.3.
2. Collect and collate copies of invoices or receipts or documentation
evidencing procurement from all departments and divisions procuring
Recovered Organic Waste Products and invoices or similar records from
vendors/contractors/others procuring Recovered Organic Waste Products
on behalf of the City to develop evidence of City meeting its Annual
Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Target. These records
must be kept as part of the City’s documentation of its compliance with 14
CCR Section 18993.1.
3. Collect, collate, and maintain documentation submitted by the City, Direct
Service Providers, and/or vendors, including the information reported to the
Recordkeeping Designee in accordance with Sections 3.2.A.3, 3.2.B.2,
3.2.C.2, 3.3.A.3, 3.3.B.2, 3.3.C.3, 4.1.C, and 4.2.A.5.
4. Compile an annual report on the City’s direct procurement, and
vendor/other procurement on behalf of the City, of Recovered Organic
Waste Products, Recycled-Content Paper Products, and Recycled-Content
Page 46 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 16
Printing and Writing Paper, consistent with the recordkeeping requirements
contained in 14 CCR Section 18993.2 for the Annual Recovered Organic
Waste Product Procurement Target and 14 CCR Section 18993.4 for
Recycled-Content Paper Products and Recycled-Content Printing and
Writing Paper procurement. This report shall be made available to the City’s
responsible entity for compiling the annual report to be submitted to
CalRecycle (which will include a description of compliance on many other
SB 1383 regulatory requirements) pursuant to 14 CCR Division 7, Chapter
12, Article 13. The procurement report shall also be shared with the City
Council annually as evidence of implementing this Policy.
Section 6. Effective Date of Policy
This Policy shall go into effect immediately.
Page 47 of 324
1 Item 8.c.
ACTION MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
April 12, 2022, 6:00 p.m.
Hybrid City Council Chamber/Virtual Zoom Meeting
215 East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande
Council Members Present: Mayor Ray Russom, Mayor Pro Tem George,
Council Member Barneich, Council Member
Paulding, Council Member Storton
Staff Present: City Attorney Timothy Carmel, City Manager
Whitney McDonald, Assistant City
Manager/Public Works Director Bill Robeson,
Administrative Services Director Nicole
Valentine, Assistant Planner Patrick Holub,
Community Development Director Brian
Pedrotti, Police Chief Michael Martinez, Police
Commander Zak Ayala, Police Commander
Shawn Cosgrove
Given the recent increase in COVID-19 cases in San Luis Obispo County, and in compliance with
Assembly Bill (AB) 361, which allows for a deviation of teleconference rules required by the Ralph M.
Brown Act, this meeting was conducted in a hybrid in-person/virtual format.
_____________________________________________________________________
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Pro Tem George called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Acting Clerk Holub performed roll call.
3. MOMENT OF REFLECTION
4. FLAG SALUTE
Rachel Cloud, Exchange Club of the Central Coast, led the flag salute.
5. AGENDA REVIEW
It was recommended to hear Item 9.a. after Item 11.a. The Council concurred.
5.a. Closed Session Announcements
None.
Page 48 of 324
2 Item 8.c.
5.b. Ordinances read in title only
Mayor Pro Tem George moved, Council Member Barneich seconded, and the motion passed
unanimously by voice vote that all ordinances presented at the meeting be read by title only and
all further readings be waived.
6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
6.a. Update Regarding Countywide COVID-19 Efforts
City Manager McDonald provided a brief update on COVID-19.
Mayor Pro Tem George invited public comment. No public comments were received.
No action was taken on this item.
6.b. City Manager Communications
City Manager McDonald highlighted the Annual Egg Hunt and Ribbon Cutting Ceremony for the
new basketball court at Strother Park; and upcoming items for Council consideration.
Mayor Pro Tem George invited public comment. No public comments were received.
No action was taken on this item.
6.c. Honorary Proclamation Declaring the Month of April 2022 as "Sexual Assault Action
Month”
Mayor Pro Tem George read the Honorary Proclamation Declaring the Month of April 2022 as
"Sexual Assault Action Month". Shawn Freeman, Lumina Alliance, accepted the proclamation.
Mayor Pro Tem George invited public comment. No public comments were received.
No action was taken on this item.
6.d. Honorary Proclamation Declaring April 29, 2022 as "Arbor Day"
Mayor Pro Tem George read the Honorary Proclamation Declaring April 29, 2022 as "Arbor
Day". Bill Robeson, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director, accepted the proclamation.
Mayor Pro Tem George invited public comment. No public comments were received.
No action was taken on this item.
7. COMMUNITY COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS
Mayor Pro Tem George invited public comment. No public comments were received.
8. CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Pro Tem George asked the Council if there were any questions or any items to be pulled from
the consent agenda for further discussion.
Item 8.e. and 8.g. were pulled for separate vote.
Council made comments on Items 8.c., and 8.e.
Page 49 of 324
3 Item 8.c.
Council Member Barneich referred to Item 8.d. and requested staff look into the possibility of cancelling
the last City Council meeting in June rather than the first meeting in July so that it flows into the Fourth
of July holiday. Council Member Storton concurred.
Mayor Pro Tem George invited public comment. Speaking from the public were Jim Guthrie and Gaea
Powell. No further public comments were received.
Moved by Council Member Paulding
Seconded by Council Member Storton
Approve Consent Agenda Items 8.a. through 8.n., with the exception of Items 8.e. and 8.g., with the
recommended courses of action. City Attorney Carmel read the full title of the Ordinance in Item 8.j.
AYES (5): Mayor Ray Russom, Mayor Pro Tem George, Council Member Barneich, Council Member
Paulding, and Council Member Storton
Passed (5 to 0)
8.a. Consideration of Cash Disbursement Ratification
Ratified the listing of cash disbursements for the period of March 1 through March 15, 2022.
8.b. Consideration of Statement of Investment Deposits
Received and filed the report listing investment deposits of the City of Arroyo Grande as of
February 28, 2022, as required by Government Code Section 53646(b).
8.c. Consideration of Acceptance of the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, Single
Audit, and Audit Report for the Transportation Development Act Transportation Fund
Reports
Received and filed the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR), Single Audit, and Audit
Report for the Transportation Development Act Transportation Fund Reports for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2021.
8.d. Consideration of Cancellation of July 12, 2022 City Council Meeting
Cancelled the regularly scheduled Council meeting of July 12, 2022.
8.f. Consideration of Rotational Schedule for the South County Chambers of Commerce
Monthly Arroyo Grande Business Meeting
Considered and approved the list of City Council rotational assignments for attending the South
County Chambers of Commerce monthly Arroyo Grande Business Meeting.
8.h. Approval of Minutes
Approved the minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of March 22, 2022, as submitted.
8.i. Consideration to Declare Police and Public Works Surplus Property
Page 50 of 324
4 Item 8.c.
Adopted a Resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE DECLARING VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT AS SURPLUS AND
AUTHORIZING THEIR SALE OR DISPOSAL".
8.j. Consideration of Adoption of an Urgency Ordinance Establishing a Military Equipment
Use Policy in Accordance with the Requirements of AB 481
Adopted an Urgency Ordinance entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
POLICY AND DECLARING THE ORDINANCE TO BE AN URGENCY ORDINANCE TO TAKE
EFFECT IMMEDIATELY UPON ADOPTION".
8.k. Consider Approval of Amendment #3 to the Amended and Restated Solid Waste
Collection Franchise Agreement for Solid Waste, Recyclable Materials, and Organic
Materials Collection with South County Sanitary Services, Inc., to Comply with the
Requirement
Approved Amendment #3 to the Amended and Restated Solid Waste Collection Franchise
Agreement for Solid Waste, Recyclable Materials, and Organic Materials Collection with South
County Sanitary Services, Inc.
8.l. Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Declaring a Continued Local Emergency
Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic and Authorizing the Continuance of Remote
Teleconference Meetings of the Legislative Bodies Pursuant to Government Code
Section 54953(e)(3)
Adopted a Resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE DECLARING A CONTINUED LOCAL EMERGENCY RELATED TO THE
CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC AND AUTHORIZING THE CONTINUANCE OF
REMOTE TELECONFERENCE MEETINGS OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODIES OF THE CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e)".
8.m. Consideration of Approval of Amendment to the Agreement for Consultant Services with
GHD to Expand Scope of Services to allow for the Completion of the Halcyon Road
Complete Streets Plan
Approved and authorized the Mayor to execute the Amendment to Agreement for Consultant
Services with GHD for the completion of the Halcyon Road Complete Streets Plan.
8.n. Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Approving Fiscal Year 2023 Community
Project Funding Request for the Swinging Bridge Project
Adopted a Resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2023 COMMUNITY PROJECT
FUNDING REQUEST FOR THE SWINGING BRIDGE PROJECT APPLICATION UNDER THE
FEDERAL COMMUNITY PROJECT AND/OR FEDERAL APPROPRIATION SUBCOMMITTEE
PROGRAMS", and designated the City Manager or her designee as the City’s signature
authority to take all actions necessary to seek and apply for the funding opportunities.
8.e. Consideration of Appointments to the Arroyo Grande Tourism Business Improvement
Advisory Board
Page 51 of 324
5 Item 8.c.
Moved by Council Member Storton
Seconded by Council Member Paulding
Appoint Myraline Morris Whitaker to the Arroyo Grande Tourism Business Improvement District
Advisory Board.
AYES (5): Mayor Ray Russom, Mayor Pro Tem George, Council Member Barneich, Council
Member Paulding, and Council Member Storton
Passed (5 to 0)
8.g. Consider Adoption of an Ordinance Adding Chapter 2.21 to Title 2 of the Arroyo Grande
Municipal Code (AGMC) Establishing By-District Elections for Four Council Members,
Defining District Boundaries, and Scheduling the Order of Elections for Each District
Moved by Council Member Storton
Seconded by Council Member Barneich
Adopt an Ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE, ADDING CHAPTER 2.21 TO TITLE 2 OF THE CITY OF ARROYO
GRANDE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING BY-DISTRICT ELECTIONS FOR FOUR
COUNCIL MEMBERS, DEFINING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES, AND SCHEDULING THE
ORDER OF ELECTION FOR EACH DISTRICT". City Attorney Carmel read the full title of the
Ordinance.
AYES (4): Mayor Pro Tem George, Council Member Barneich, Council Member Paulding, and
Council Member Storton
NOES (1): Mayor Ray Russom
Passed (4 to 1)
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
9.a. Resolution Updating Operating Fees Set Forth in the Master Fee Schedule
Item 9.a. was heard after Item 11.a.
Administrative Services Director Valentine presented the staff report and recommended Council
adopt a Resolution updating operating fees set forth in the Master Fee Schedule, effective June
13, 2022.
Mayor Pro Tem George opened the public hearing. Upon hearing no public comments, Mayor
Pro Tem George closed the public hearing.
Moved by Council Member Storton
Seconded by Mayor Ray Russom
Adopt a Resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE UPDATING OPERATING FEES set forth IN THE MASTER FEE
SCHEDULE".
Page 52 of 324
6 Item 8.c.
AYES (5): Mayor Ray Russom, Mayor Pro Tem George, Council Member Barneich, Council
Member Paulding, and Council Member Storton
Passed (5 to 0)
10. OLD BUSINESS
10.a. Consider Potential Permanent Parklet Program
Item 10.a. was heard out of order.
Community Development Director Pedrotti presented the staff report and Assistant City
Manager/Public Works Director Robeson provided comments regarding safety as it relates to
traffic on East Branch Street and the use of parklets. Staff responded to questions from
Council.
Mayor Pro Tem George invited public comment. Speaking from the public were Lee Samways,
Dr. Charles Chadwell, Jim Guthrie, Tammy Price, Denise Andreini, who also read a letter from
Amanda and Chandler Craner, and Pat Cusack, Henry Gonzalez, and Riley Taylor. Acting
Clerk Holub acknowledged supplemental information received and read into the record written
comments received from Alexandra Hagen, Lisa Portwood, Kristen Johnson, Aja Castilleja,
Stewart and Lori Morse, Aimee Armor-Avant, Heidi Ambrose, Rebecca Richards, Colleen
Tooley, Brenda Auer, Renee Westerhuis, and Toni Pelletier. No further public comments were
received.
Council provided direction to staff. No action was taken on this item.
11. NEW BUSINESS
11.a. Consider Request from South County Sanitary Service for Integrated Solid Waste
Collection Rate Increase
Mayor Pro Tem George called for a brief break at 7:54 p.m. The Council reconvened at 8:00
p.m.
Administrative Services Director Valentine introduced Bill Statler, Rate Review Consultant, who
spoke about the rate review process and findings and responded to questions from Council.
Mayor Pro Tem George invited public comment. Speaking from the public were Jeff Clarin, Jim
Guthrie, and Jeff Stevens. No further public comments were received.
Moved by Council Member Storton
Seconded by Council Member Paulding
1) Set a public hearing for June 14, 2022, to consider adjusting the waste collection services
rates for June 15, 2022, January 1, 2023 and January 1, 2024; and 2) Direct staff to prepare
and distribute a Proposition 218 notice with a delayed implementation start date of May 1, 2022,
for the proposed waste collection services rate increases.
AYES (5): Mayor Ray Russom, Mayor Pro Tem George, Council Member Barneich, Council
Member Paulding, and Council Member Storton
Page 53 of 324
7 Item 8.c.
Passed (5 to 0)
12. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Mayor Ray Russom commented on design of directional signs. Staff commented that this will be
included in future reports to Council.
13. CLOSED SESSION
None.
14. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the City Council, Mayor Pro Tem George adjourned the
meeting at 10:22 p.m.
_________________________
Caren Ray Russom, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Jessica Matson, City Clerk
Page 54 of 324
Item 8.d.
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Whitney McDonald, City Manager
Timothy J. Carmel, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Declaring a Continued
Local Emergency Related to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic
DATE: April 26, 2022
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Adoption of the Resolution will continue the declared local emergency related to the
COVID-19 pandemic.
IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES:
There are no direct fiscal impacts related to the proposed ac tion; however, adoption of
the Resolution will facilitate the ability for the City to request resources including financial
support and reimbursement from the State Office of Emergency Services and the Federal
Emergency Management Agency for costs incurred in preparation and/or response to the
COVID-19 pandemic.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Resolution declaring a continued local emergency related to the Coronavirus
(COVID-19) pandemic.
BACKGROUND:
As the City Council is aware, in accordance with Section 8.12.060 of the Arroyo Grande
Municipal Code, the former City Manager, in his capacity as the Director of Emergency
Services, proclaimed a local emergency on March 16, 2020, regarding th e COVID-19
pandemic. The City Council ratified the proclamation at its regular meeting on March 24,
2020, and adopted resolutions declaring a continued local emergency since that time as
the pandemic has persisted.
ANALYSIS OF ISSUES:
Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Section 8.12.065(C) provides that the City Council is to
“Review the need for a continuing emergency declaration at regularly scheduled meetings
at least every twenty-one (21) days until the emergency is terminated.” Accordingly, the
City Council has adopted the appropriate Resolutions declaring a continued local
Page 55 of 324
Item 8.d.
City Council
Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Declaring a Continued Local
Emergency Related to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic
April 26, 2022
Page 2
emergency related to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic within the required 21-day
time period since the ratification of the proclamation at its March 24, 2020 regular meeting.
This item is being presented to the City Council to satisfy the requirements of Section
8.12.065(C). Given the ongoing state of emergency proclaimed by the Governor, the
ongoing public health orders issued by the State, and the ongoing work required of City
staff to respond to the pandemic and these proclamations and orders, it is recommended
that the City Council adopt the Resolution declaring the need to continue the emergency
declaration. The San Luis Obispo County (County) Public Health Officer and the County
Emergency Services Director terminated the County’s emergency declarations with
respect to the COVID-19 pandemic on February 25, 2022. However, a statewide
emergency declaration issued by the Governor remains in place related to the pandemic.
In light of the ongoing statewide emergency, the ongoing impacts associated with the
coronavirus within the Arroyo Grande community and the City organization, it is
recommended that the City Council continue the declared local emergency.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council’s consideration:
1. Adopt the Resolution declaring the need to continue the declared local emergency;
or
2. Provide other direction to staff.
ADVANTAGES:
Adoption of the Resolution will satisfy the requirement of the Arroyo Grande Municipal
Code regarding the periodic review of the declared local emergency related to the COVID-
19 pandemic.
DISADVANTAGES:
No disadvantages have been identified to adopting the Resolution.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
No environmental review is required for this item.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City’s website in accordance with
Government Code Section 54954.2.
Attachments:
1. Proposed Resolution
Page 56 of 324
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE DECLARING A CONTINUED LOCAL
EMERGENCY RELATED TO THE CORONAVIRUS (COVID-
19) PANDEMIC
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 8.12.060 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code,
the former City Manager, in his capacity as the Director of Emergency Services
proclaimed a local emergency on March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council ratified the emergency proclamation through adoption of
Resolution No. 4974 at its regular meeting on March 24, 2020; and
WHEREAS, Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Section 8.12.065(C) provides that the City
Council is to review the need for a continuing emergency declaration at regularly
scheduled meetings at least every twenty-one (21) days until the emergency is
terminated; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Resolutions declaring a continued local
emergency related to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on April 14, April 28, May
12, May 26, June 9, June 23, July 14, August 11, August 25, September 8, September
22, October 13, October 27, November 10, November 24, December 8, 2020, January
12, January 26, February 9; February 23; March 9, March 23, April 13, April 27, May 11,
May 25, June 8, June 22, July 27, August 10, August 24, September 14, September 28,
October 12, October 26, November 9, November 23, December 14, 2021, January 11,
January 25, February 8, February 22, March 8, March 22, and April 12, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the Secretary of Health and Human Services Director issued a Determination
that a Public Health Emergency Exists and has existed as of January 27, 2020 ; and
WHEREAS, the President of the United States declared a State of National Emergency;
the Governor of the State of California has proclaimed a State of Emergency for the State
of California and issued Executive Orders and direction regarding measures to mitigate
the spread of cases of COVID-19 within the State of California and all recitals set forth
therein, are included as though fully set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, the COVID-19 pandemic continues to spread rapidly worldwide and in the
U.S., continuing to present an immediate and significant risk to public health and safety,
and resulting in serious illness or death to vulnerable populations, including the elderly
and those with underlying health conditions.
Page 57 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande
that:
1. All recitals set forth above, are true, correct and incorporated herein.
2. A local emergency is declared to continue to exist throughout the City of Arroyo
Grande, and the City has been undertaking, and will continue through termination
of this emergency to undertake necessary measures and incur necessary costs,
which are directly related to the prevention of the spread of COVID -19 and are
taken in furtherance of: the Secretary of Health and Human Services’
determination that a public health emergency has existed since January 27, 2020;
the Governor’s Proclamation of a State of Emergency on March 4, 2020; the
President of the United States’ Declaration of a National Emergency on March 13,
2020; and related orders and directives.
On motion of Council Member _______________________, seconded by Council
Member _______________________, and by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
The foregoing Resolution was approved this 26th day of April, 2022.
Page 58 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 3
CAREN RAY RUSSOM, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JESSICA MATSON, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
WHITNEY MCDONALD, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
Page 59 of 324
Item 8.e.
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Whitney McDonald, City Manager
BY: Sarah Lansburgh, Deputy City Clerk
SUBJECT: Consideration of Annual Report and Adoption of a Resolution of
Intention for Levy of Annual Assessments for the Arroyo Grande
Tourism Business Improvement District (AGTBID)
DATE: April 26, 2022
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Receive and approve the Annual Report, which provides information on the activities of
the AGTBID during the past year, and adopt a Resolution that would continue the levy of
annual assessments for AGTBID for another year.
IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES:
Based on the anticipated year-end results for 2021-22, the assessments expected to be
collected total approximately $230,000 for Fiscal Year 2021-22. The AGTBID budget
provides $5,000 to the City to cover a portion of the City’s cost associated with supporting
a Community Services Specialist position for vacation rental code compliance. The
AGTBID budget also provides $3,000 to the City for administrative support.
RECOMMENDATION:
The AGTBID Advisory Board recommends the City Council: 1) Receive and approve the
Annual Report; 2) Adopt a Resolution of Intention to levy and collect assessments within
the AGTBID area for Fiscal Year 2022-23; and 3) Set the date for a public hearing for
May 24, 2022, in accordance with Streets and Highways Code Section 36534.
BACKGROUND:
In May 2013, the City Council adopted an Ordinance establishing the AGTBID. The
AGTBID was formed under the Parking and Business Improvement Law of 1989,
Sections 36500 et. seq. of the Streets and Highways Code and incorporat ed into the
Arroyo Grande Municipal Code (AGMC) in Title 3, Chapter 3.46.
The purpose of forming the AGTBID was to provide revenue to defray the cost of services,
activities, and programs promoting lodging businesses in the AGTBID through the
Page 60 of 324
Item 8.e.
City Council
Consideration of Annual Report and Adoption of a Resolution of Intention for Levy
of Annual Assessments for the Arroyo Grande Tourism Business Improvement
District (AGTBID)
April 26, 2022
Page 2
promotion of scenic, recreational, cultural, and other attractions in the AGTBID as a tourist
destination. An assessment is levied on all lodging businesses within the AGTBID
boundaries and is based upon two percent of the rent charged by the operator per
occupied room per night for all transient occupancies.
In December 2014, the City Council adopted an Ordinance amending Chapter 3.46 of the
Arroyo Grande Municipal Code to provide that the same exemptions that apply to the
Transient Occupancy Tax apply to AGTBID assessments and amended the definition of
"lodging" to include vacation rentals and homestays.
ANALYSIS OF ISSUES:
In accordance with the provisions in the Streets and Highways Code and AGMC Section
3.46.100, the City Council appointed an Advisory Board. Pursuant to Streets and
Highways Code Section 36533, the Advisory Board is to prepare an annual report, which
is to be submitted to the City Council for its review and approval. AGMC Section 3.46.060
also provides that the assessments for the AGTBID are to be reviewed annually by the
City Council based upon the Annual Report of the Advisory Board, and after approval of
the Annual Report, the City Council is to follow the hearing process outlin ed in Streets
and Highways Code Section 36534 for the annual assessment for the upcoming fiscal
year. Section 36534 provides for the adoption of a Resolution to levy an annual
assessment for that fiscal year. The Resolution also sets a public hearing date in order to
receive any written or oral protests against the continuation of the AGTBID as required
by the applicable statute.
The AGTBID has been in effect for almost nine (9) years and has been considered
successful. In January 2018, the City Council combined the Tourism Marketing
Committee, which was coordinated by the Chamber of Commerce, and the Advisory
Board, increasing the number of members of the Advisory Board from a minimum of three
(3) to not more than nine (9). The Advisory Board implements the programs and activities
funded through the AGTBID. The South County Chamber of Commerce administers the
AGTBID program; therefore, minimal staff time has been required by the City.
In June 2018, the Council approved an Agreement with Verdin Marketing for tourism
marketing services to provide a fresh perspective and innovative ideas given the current
economic climate and needs of Arroyo Grande’s tourism market. Since that time, a
tourism website, rebranding of Visit Arroyo Grande, a monthly e-newsletter, advertising
campaigns, a tourism strategic plan, and other marketing efforts have been developed
and implemented. The term of the current contract with Verdin Marketing will expire on
June 30, 2022. Therefore, the City, on behalf of the AGTBID, has issued a Request for
Proposals (RFP) for marketing, communications, website management, and social media
Page 61 of 324
Item 8.e.
City Council
Consideration of Annual Report and Adoption of a Resolution of Intention for Levy
of Annual Assessments for the Arroyo Grande Tourism Business Improvement
District (AGTBID)
April 26, 2022
Page 3
services for Visit Arroyo Grande. The RFP was published on April 7, 2022, and will close
May 13, 2022, at 5:00 p.m.
On March 28, 2022, the Advisory Board reviewed and approved the Annual Report and
has forwarded it to the City Council for consideration. The Advisory Board recommends
extending the assessments and continuing the program. As noted above, following
approval of the Annual Report and adoption of the Resolution, the next step in the process
is to schedule a public hearing for May 24, 2022. The public hearing will allow lodging
businesses subject to the assessment to submit comments, voice concerns, and protest
the assessment. As set forth in Section s 36524 and 36525 of the California Streets and
Highways Code, the City Council has the ability to continue to levy and collect the
proposed citywide AGTBID assessment at the May 24, 2022 public hearing, unless
written protests are received from lodging businesses that pay 50% or more of the
proposed assessments. In that event, the Council cannot consider continuation of the
AGTBID for at least one year.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council’s consideration:
1. Approve staff recommendations;
2. Request changes or clarification to the Annual Report; or
3. Do not approve staff recommendations; or
4. Provide other direction to staff.
ADVANTAGES:
The recommendations will enable the City to extend the AGTBID, which provides a
mechanism to generate funding to promote lodging stays and tourism in the City, in turn
increasing transient occupancy tax revenue and supporting local businesses.
DISADVANTAGES:
No disadvantages with approving the Annual Report and adopting the Resolution levying
the assessment for another year are identified.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
No environmental review is required for this item.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City’s website in accord ance with
Government Code Section 54954.2.
Page 62 of 324
Item 8.e.
City Council
Consideration of Annual Report and Adoption of a Resolution of Intention for Levy
of Annual Assessments for the Arroyo Grande Tourism Business Improvement
District (AGTBID)
April 26, 2022
Page 4
Attachments:
1. Proposed Resolution
2. Annual Report
Page 63 of 324
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO
CONTINUE THE ARROYO GRANDE TOURISM BUSINESS
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, TO CONTINUE THE BASIS
FOR AND TO LEVY THE ASSESSMENTS FOR THE
DISTRICT, AND TO SET A DATE FOR THE PUBLIC
HEARING ON THE DISTRICT AND THE ASSESSMENT
FOR THE 2022-23 FISCAL YEAR
WHEREAS, the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989 (“PBIAL”),
sections 36500 et seq. of the Streets and Highway Code, authorizes cities to establish
business improvement districts for several purposes, one of which is promotion o f
tourism; and
WHEREAS, the Arroyo Grande Tourism Business Improvement District was established
in May, 2013 and incorporated into the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code (“AGMC”) under
Chapter 3.46; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Streets and Highways Code Section
36530 and AGMC Section 3.46.100, the City Council appointed an Advisory Board to
provide oversight, guidance, and recommendations regarding the use of the assessment
funds; and
WHEREAS, the AGMC and the PBIAL require the Advisory Board to prepare and submit
an annual report (“Annual Report”) stating proposed changes, improvements and
activities for the fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, on March 28, 2022, the Advisory Board approved the Annual Report; and
WHEREAS, the Advisory Board Annual Report was filed and approved by the Arroyo
Grande City Council on April 26, 2022.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande
as follows:
1. All recitals set forth above, are true, correct and incorporated herein.
2. The City Council proposes to continue the Arroyo Grande Tourism Business
Improvement District (“District”) in accordance with AGMC Chapter 3.46 and
Streets and Highways Code Sections 36500 et seq. and levy assessments for
fiscal year 2022-23.
Page 64 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
3. The Annual Report is on file with the City Clerk and contains a full and detailed
description of the improvements and activities to be provided for fiscal year 2022 -
23. No changes to the District boundaries are proposed, and the report includes
the estimated cost of providing improvements and activities for fiscal year 2022 -
23. The assessment is not proposed to be increased.
4. The boundaries of the District are the boundaries of the City of Arroyo Grande.
5. The assessment levied by the District shall be used for activiti es and programs
promoting lodging businesses in the District through the promotion of scenic,
recreational, cultural, and other attractions in the District as a tourist destination,
and as further set forth in ACMG Section 3.46.030.
6. The assessment is proposed to be levied on all “lodging” businesses in the District,
as that term is defined in AGMC section 3.46.020, and allocated by the City of
Arroyo Grande.
7. The assessment shall be based upon two percent (2%) of the rent charged by the
operator per occupied room per night for all transient occupancies and shall be
collected quarterly.
8. New lodging businesses shall not be exempt from immediate assessment.
9. A public hearing, held pursuant to AGMC Chapter 3.46 and Streets and Highways
Code Section 36535, to allow for comments and to receive written and oral protests
on the District and proposed assessment, is hereby set for 6:00 p.m., Tuesday
May 24, 2022, before the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande at the City
Council Chambers at 215 E. Branch St., Arroyo Grande, CA or via teleconference
as follows: Zoom Meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83255848846; Webinar ID:
832 5584 8846; Or by Telephone: 1-669-900-6833; 1-346-248-7799.
10. At the public hearing, the testimony of all interested persons for or against the
continuation of the District, the boundaries of the District, or the furnishing of
specified types of improvements or activities will be heard. A protest may be made
orally or in writing by any interested person. However, only written protests will
be considered in determining if there is a majority protest. The form and
manner of protests shall comply with Streets and Highways Code Sections
36524 and 36525.
11. Any protest pertaining to the regularity or sufficiency of the proceedings shall be in
writing and clearly state the irregularity of defect to which objection is made.
Written protests must be received by the City Clerk of the City of Arroyo Grande
before the close of the public hearing scheduled herein and may delivered or
mailed to the City Clerk, City of Arroyo Grande, 300 East Branch Street, Arroyo
Grande, CA 93420. A written protest may be withdrawn in writing at any time before
Page 65 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 3
the conclusion of the public hearing. Each written protest shall contain a written
description of the business in which the person signing the protest is interested
sufficient to identify the business. If the person signing the protest is not shown on
the official records of the City of Arroyo Grande as the owner of a business, then
the protest shall contain or be accompanied by written evidence that the person is
the owner of the business.
12. If at the conclusion of the public hearing, there are of record, written protest by the
owners of lodging businesses within the District that will pay fifty percent (50%) or
more of the total assessments of the entire District, no further proceedings to
continue the District shall occur. New proceedings to continue the District shall not
be undertaken again for a period of at least one (1) year from the date of the finding
of a majority protest by the City Council. If the majority of written protests are only
as to an improvement or activity proposed, then that type of improvement or activity
shall not be included in the District.
13. The City Clerk is instructed to provide notice as required by AGMC Chapter 3.46
and Streets and Highways Code Section 36534. The City Clerk shall give notice
of the public hearing by causing this Resolution of Intention to be published once
in a newspaper of general circulation in the City no less than seven (7) days before
the public hearing.
On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and
on the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 26th day of April, 2022.
Page 66 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 4
CAREN RAY RUSSOM, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JESSICA MATSON, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
WHITNEY McDONALD, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
Page 67 of 324
Annual Report | 2021–2022
1
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 68 of 324
Overview and Goals 3
Strategic Plan 4
Completed Initiatives 5
Target Audiences 6
Geographic Markets 7
Equity, Diversity and Inclusion 8
Why Tourism Matters 9
Destination Campaigns 10
Results at a Glance 11
Email Marketing 12
Social Media 13
Paid Media 14
Public Relations & Partnerships 15
Table of Contents
2 Page 69 of 324
Overview & Goals
The Arroyo Grande Tourism Business Improvement District
(Arroyo Grande TBID) has a plan in motion to reach travelers
whose interests and behaviors align with the genuine experi-
ences found in our area. These travelers are ready to discover
the magic of Arroyo Grande—a town differentiated by its
charming atmosphere, striking scenery, and access to some
of the Central Coast’s most sought-after experiences.
The Arroyo Grande TBID Advisory Board is made up of
representatives from lodging or hospitality related
businesses in Arroyo Grande appointed by the City Council.
The TBID helps to promote Arroyo Grande as a travel
destination and is funded by a 2% assessment charged by
hotels for this purpose.
Position Arroyo Grande as
a travel destination
Increase overnight stays in
Arroyo Grande
Introduce new visitors to
Arroyo Grande
Marketing Goals:
3Page 70 of 324
In August 2020, the Arroyo Grande TBID finalized their three-year strategic plan defining key impera-
tives, objectives to measure and initiatives to execute. This plan will guide all future marketing efforts
and direct the organization.
Vision Mission Position
A thriving community
rooted in authentic
hospitality and nourished
by a strong economy
To market Arroyo Grande as a
desirable travel destination,
create memorable
experiences and support a
prosperous economy and
community
Visit Arroyo Grande is the city’s primary source for destination marketing
services and tourism leadership. We are:
• Storytellers of the Arroyo Grande tourism experience
• Providers of tourism related information and data
• Collaborators championing the value of tourism and supporting key
tourism drivers
• Stewards balancing the benefits of tourism with Arroyo Grande’s
quality of life
Values Reputation
• Truth
• Excellence
• Teamwork
• Community
• Impact
• Transparent
• Forward-thinking
• Reliable
• Humble
• Partners
Imperatives Objectives Initiatives
Support the Destination
in Tourism Recovery
and Strengthen
Organizational Capacity
for Future Impact
• Recover/Achieve 2019
Occupancy Rate
• Increase Staffing budget
• Align on and implement tiered re-opening marketing and
communication plan with key partners and stakeholders
• Advocate for organizational capacity to ensure the resiliency of AG’s
tourism economy
• Enhance the tourism industry’s position and importance in AG’s
economic recovery
Increase Brand
Awareness as a Central
California Destination
of Choice
• Increase share of county
visitor volume
• Increase use of shared
brand assets
• Differentiate AG brand's position in the larger SLO CAL travel market
• Create a content library and tool kit to influence a unified brand approach
• Pursue opportunities for collaborative and aligned promotional
partnerships and messaging
Ensure the Quality of
our Brand Promise and
Visitor Experience
• Increase number of visitor
hours in market
• Increase length of stay
• Create a framework to evaluate and promote events that generate
new and repeat visitors to the destination
• Encourage the availability of downtown and highlight opportunities
• Design attractive trip itineraries to drive visitation to AG’s portfolio
of experiences
Expand Stakeholder
and Community
Engagement to Create a
Collaborative and
Supportive Tourism
Industry
• Increase representation
of lodging partners on the
Board
• Grow stakeholder
participation
• Increase resident
approval of tourism
• Create a stakeholder engagement and outreach campaign to
educate and promote the value of the TBID to lodging partners
• Collaborate with stakeholders to design and expand co-operative
marketing programs
• Increase the voice of tourism with key governmental, businesses
and community decision makers and leaders
2021–2024 Strategic Plan
4 Page 71 of 324
Completed Initiatives
Visit SLO CAL
Equity, Diversity &
Inclusion Study
As a strategic plan initiative, Arroyo
Grande TBID in partnership with Visit
SLO CAL, participated in the 2021
Equity, Diversity & Inclusion (EDI)
Audience & Asset Alignment Study
conducted by Insights Strategic
Marketing and Research. The study
was designed to help identify gaps in
product offerings and also provided
direction to the images and messag-
ing that will enable Arroyo Grande
TBID to effectively communicate the
leisure product and invitation to
these audiences.
California Welcome
Center Video and
Assets
California Welcome Centers are
strategically located across the state,
staffed with experts who can provide
resources and information that
inspires visitors to explore a destina-
tion's greater region. To help increase
brand awareness for Arroyo Grande
TBID, a video shoot was held to
capture assets for a new California
Welcome Center video spot. The
videography and images captured
reflect the diversity of the region and
its visitors. The spot features authen-
tic Arroyo Grande destination
locations and activities including
wineries and tasting rooms, outdoor
vistas and activities, premiere restau-
rants and shops.
Website Content
Enhancements
In line with Arroyo Grande TBID content
pillars, a culinary themed itinerary was
developed to help drive visitation to the
website and highlight the area's top
food and beverage offerings to people
in the trip planning phase. Existing
outdoor adventures and family fun
itineraries were also updated with
keywords and relevant content.
5Page 72 of 324
Target Audiences
Who are we be speaking to? In previous years, Arroyo Grande TBID built
personas of the visitor profile to craft messages and assets that are
specific to their behaviors and interests (Ex. On-the-Go Eric, Family-
Focused Fiona and Ready-to-Relax Rachel). Instead, Arroyo Grande TBID
aligned with Visit SLO CAL’s audience approach for the year, evolving from
specific personas to target “The Purposeful Traveler.”
Who is this audience? Purposeful Travelers live vividly and value simplicity,
keeping life and the mind as uncluttered as possible. Authenticity and being
true to oneself while maintaining strong personal relationships with family
and friends is important. Curious and creative, they are open-minded, want
to explore and learn about new things, and seek stimulating experiences.
They are in tune with nature and themselves, doing activities they enjoy.
Generation
7%
39%
22%25%
7%
Gen Z
1997–2010
Millennial
1977–1996
Gen X
1965–1976
Boomers
1946–1964
Pre Boomers
<1946
46%
male
54%
female
57%
married
29%
single
40%
children in
household
43%
graduated
college
$130.4K
household
income
46
average
age
Ethnicity
50% White/Cauc.
30% Hispanic
6% Black/AA
12% Asian
2% Other
6 Page 73 of 324
Geographic Markets
As the pandemic continues, Arroyo Grande TBID focused on shorter drive markets
throughout California, including the San Francisco Bay Area, Greater Los Angeles and
the Central Valley to generate overnight stays.
San Francisco Bay Area1
3 Central Valley
(Fresno, Visalia, Bakersfield)
2 Los Angeles
(Thousand Oaks, Long Beach)
7Page 74 of 324
Equity, Diversity
& Inclusion
Arroyo Grande TBID is committed to ensuring its work fosters
equity, diversity and inclusion, so that all visitors feel welcome. In
partnership with Visit SLO CAL, the destination participated in a
recent 2021 Equity, Diversity & Inclusion (EDI) Audience & Asset
Alignment Study conducted by Insights Strategic Marketing and
Research. The study was designed to help identify gaps in product
offerings and also provided direction to the images and messaging
that will enable the organization to effectively communicate the
leisure product and invitation to these audiences.
Strategy
Arroyo Grande TBID will aim to increase familiarity and awareness
of the destination among five specific audience segments includ-
ing Black travelers, Hispanic travelers, Asian travelers, travelers
with disabilities and LGBTQ+ travelers. Messaging will let potential
visitors know that Arroyo Grande is a safe and welcoming
community that invites people with diverse backgrounds.
Completed Initiatives:
• Showed diverse visitors in advertising and marketing
materials that show people of color in a way that depicts the
destination as welcoming
• Developed programmatic video ads (Outdoors, Family,
Culinary) that include audience segment
• Utilized EDI images across all owned channels
• Used inclusive language and messaging within
content platforms
• Amplified the voices of women-owned and minority-owned
local travel and tourism related businesses
• Created Instagram/Facebook stories
• Positioned Arroyo Grande as a destination with small town
charm and history, with a thriving culinary scene and
outdoor activities that appeal to visitors from all
backgrounds and ethnicities
8 Page 75 of 324
Sources: Dean Runyon, Inc., American Road & Transportation Builders Association,
San Luis Obispo County of Education, United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, Tourism Economics
Why Tourism Matters
in SLO County
Travel Spending
$1.19B
$3.3M
a day
$136K
an hour
$2.3K
a minute
$38
a second
Tourism puts
10,450
people
to work each day
Tourism contributes
$35.9M
in transient
occupancy tax
revenue
(15.6% YOY Decrease)
Without state and local
tax revenue generated
by travel and tourism,
each SLO CAL household
would pay an additional
$1,113 in taxes
Travel spending created $66M in local tax
revenue which would cover the expenses for
614 police officers’ salaries or…..
760 firefighters salaries or…..
1,401 teachers salaries or…..
106 miles of 2-lane resurfaced roads
9Page 76 of 324
Destination Campaigns
To inspire travel to Arroyo Grande and build brand awareness, a series of digital ads were
placed programmatically and on social media. Several motion graphics were created to
attract key audiences' attention with movement and messaging covering unique travel
activities in the destination.
Time Well Spent
In September 2021, Arroyo Grande TBID launched its new marketing campaign “Time
Well Spent” that focuses on the destination as a place “where experiences are naturally
more full, more engaging, and more worth your time.” The campaign targets “The
Purposeful Traveler” persona geared towards family, outdoor and culinary activities. To
help build brand awareness and drive hotel bookings, new video assets were utilized to
create three new 15-second programmatic digital ads with voice overs that click thru to
existing “outdoor adventure” and “family fun” itineraries on the website. A new “Time
Well Spent” graphic is an additional layer to the campaign, used both in programmatic
video and custom social media posts.
10Page 77 of 324
Results at a Glance
July–February YOY
20% increase
in website visits (sessions)
50% increase
in time on site
Reached 846,845
through paid media
Facebook
20,419
engagements
12,078
clicks from paid media
Instagram
6,589
engagements
Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT)
July–January totals
2020–2021:
$519,636
2021–2022:
$FPO
2019–2020:
$684,104
2018–2019:
$596,208
2017–2018:
$576,450
34% decrease
in pageviews
11 Page 78 of 324
Email Marketing
Email marketing keeps Arroyo Grande top of mind for
potential travelers and highlights the destination's unique
offerings. This year, the design template was refreshed to
bring in video assets to attract readers’ interests. The
monthly newsletter is sent out to an opt-in subscriber
database through Mailchimp with featured content
covering the following:
• Specific themes from Arroyo Grande’s key
messaging points
• Promotion of events, new happenings and local
businesses that support tourism
• Itineraries, activities, restaurants, accommodations
and more that build interest in planning an Arroyo
Grande getaway, with URLs that link to the website
3.9% average click rate
E-newsletter Results:
1,054 email subscribers
8 distributed newsletters
32% average open rate
Industry benchmarks show an average open rate of 20.4%
and click rate of 2.25%. Source: Mailchimp
12Page 79 of 324
Social Media
Arroyo Grande TBID developed engaging content on its owned
social media channels (Facebook, Instagram and Twitter) with
the goal to strengthen its brand identity and create awareness
of the destination.
• Used new video/photo assets in social media posts and stories
• Developed original content geared towards targeted
personas around local favorites including businesses, history,
people and artisans, etc. that highlighted the friendly and
historic character of the destination
• Incorporated Time Well Spent campaign messaging
• Shared user-generated content to build audience and to show
authentic experiences
• Supported local events
20,419 engagements
(19% increase YOY)
6,589 total engagements
(1% increase YOY)
110,019 impressions
(25% increase YOY)
261,774 impressions
(40% increase YOY)
Facebook Results:
Instagram Results:
6,039 followers
(4% decrease YOY)
3,040 followers
(17% increase YOY)
13 Page 80 of 324
Paid Media
July 2021–February 2022 had strong
performance across all digital platforms:
programmatic video and paid search.
Programmatic video had over 800,000
impressions and over 5,000 clicks/visits
to the website. The programmatic buy also
tracked visits as a conversion and had over
5,000 tracked visits. Paid search was
started this year with 96,000 impressions,
and over 7,000 clicks. Performance was
excellent across the board for Arroyo
Grande TBID.
FY 2022 Media Timeline
SLO CAL
Campaign Co-op
South County Visitors Guide
2021
July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June
2022Print Partnership Programs*CCTC Co-op Sunset Magazine
Social
Search
Video
Allocation Total spend $70,000
Programmatic
Video: 56%
Social Media: 9%
Co-op Partnership
Programs (CCTC Sunset
Co-op, SLO CAL Campaign
Co-Op, South County
Visitors Guide): 13%
Search: 22%
*Arroyo Grande TBID leverages its regional partnerships with Central Coast Tourism Council and Visit SLO CAL for industry
research and participates in reactive co-op print/digital advertising opportunities throughout the fiscal year.
14Page 81 of 324
In an effort to differentiate Arroyo Grande TBID’s brand's position in the larger travel market and
continue to increase exposure for the destination through earned media, Arroyo Grande TBID
leveraged its existing tourism partnerships with Visit California, Visit SLO CAL, Highway 1 Discov-
ery Route and Central Coast Tourism Council.
In February, Arroyo Grande TBID partnered with the City of SLO and Highway 1 Discovery Route to
host a press trip for two journalists who represented lifestyle and culinary outlets including Food
Wine Travel Magazine, the official International Food Wine and Travel Writers Association
Magazine, travel site Wander with Wonder and "SoCal Restaurant Show" in LA on AM 830 KLAA.
Public Relations & Partnerships
Visit California is the state marketing
agency that partners with the state’s
travel industry to keep California top-of-
mind as a premier travel destination.
Arroyo Grande TBID submitted story
pitches and content for the following
marketing topics:
• California’s Holiday Spirit
• California’s Sustainable Wineries
• Roadside Must Eats
Visit SLO CAL is the non-profit county-
wide destination marketing and
management organization for San Luis
Obispo County. They are responsible
for promoting a community as an
attractive travel destination and
enhancing its public image as a dynamic
place to live and work. In addition to
submitting content about Arroyo
Grande for use in media pitching and
story lead generation, Arroyo Grande
TBID also partnered with them on the
following initiatives:
• Future Visitor Profile Study
• Equity, Diversity & Inclusion Asset
Alignment Study
• House of Brands Phase 1
The Central Coast Tourism Council is a
marketing organization that promotes
the Central Coast of California. Arroyo
Grande TBID submitted content for
the following marketing topics:
• Event promotion and content
• Sunset co-op
Partnerships:
15 Page 82 of 324
visitarroyogrande.org
Page 83 of 324
Item 8.f.
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Bill Robeson, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Consider Adoption of Resolutions Ordering the Preparation and Filing
of Annual Engineer’s Reports for the Parkside Village and Grace Lane
Assessment Districts, and Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1,
Within Tract 1769, for FY 2022-23
DATE: April 26, 2022
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Adoption of the Resolutions will authorize preparation of the Annual Engineer’s Reports
for the Parkside Village, Grace Lane, and Tract 1769 Assessment Districts, as required
by the California Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972.
IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES:
For Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-2022 the total budgets for the three subject Assessment
Districts were as follows:
Parkside Village Assessment District $ 36,100
Grace Lane Assessment District $ 17,635
Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 1 (Tract 1769) $ 3,900
It is anticipated that the FY 2022-2023 will be similar in total budget amounts.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Resolutions ordering the preparation and filing of Annual Engineer’s Reports for
the Parkside Village Assessment District, Grace Lane Assessment District, and
Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 1, within Tract 1769, for FY 2022-23.
BACKGROUND:
The California Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (California Streets and Highways
Code section 22500 et seq., the “Act”) allows local gove rnmental agencies to form
assessment districts for the purpose of financing the costs and expenses of landscaping
and lighting public areas. Accordingly, the City of Arroyo Grande formed the following
three separate assessment districts in compliance with the Act:
Page 84 of 324
Item 8.f.
City Council
Consider Adoption of Resolutions Ordering the Preparation and Filing of Annual
Engineer’s Reports for the Parkside Village and Grace Lane Assessment Districts,
and Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1, Within Tract 1769, for FY 2022-23
April 26, 2022
Page 2
Tract Number Assessment District Name Date formed
Tract 2310 Parkside Village Assessment District November 8, 2005
Tract 2236 Grace Lane Assessment District November 28, 2006
Tract 1769 Landscape and Lighting District No. 1 May 12, 1992
The Act requires that the City complete the following process each fiscal year in order to
levy and collect assessments:
1. Adopt a Resolution describing any proposed new improvements or any substantial
changes in existing improvements and ordering preparation and filing of an
Engineer’s Report.
2. Approve the Engineer’s Report and adopt a Resolution of Intention. The Resolution
of Intention declares the City Council’s intention to levy and collect assessments
under the subject assessment districts for the upcoming fiscal year. It also states
whether the assessment is proposed to change from the previous year and sets a
date, hour, and place for a public hearing.
3. Conduct the public hearing affording all interested parties the opportunity to hear
and be heard.
4. Adopt a Resolution confirming the assessment, which constitutes the levy of the
assessments for FY 2022-23.
Upon fulfillment of these requirements, the City must submit the Resolution confirming
the assessments to the County of San Luis Obispo for inclusion on the FY 2022-23
property tax roll.
ANALYSIS OF ISSUES:
The first step in the statutorily prescribed process contained in the Act requires that the
City adopt a Resolution describing any proposed new improvements or any substantial
changes in existing improvements and ordering the preparation and filing of an Engineer’s
Report. The subject assessment districts are largely responsible for covering expenses
related to maintaining the public landscaping within the defined boundaries of the
separate districts.
No new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements are proposed for
any of the assessment districts for FY 2022-23.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council’s consideration:
1. Adopt Resolutions ordering the preparation and filing of Annual Engineer’s Reports
for the Parkside Village Assessment District, Grace Lane Assessment District and
Page 85 of 324
Item 8.f.
City Council
Consider Adoption of Resolutions Ordering the Preparation and Filing of Annual
Engineer’s Reports for the Parkside Village and Grace Lane Assessment Districts,
and Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1, Within Tract 1769, for FY 2022-23
April 26, 2022
Page 3
Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 1, within Tract 1769, for FY
2022-23; or
2. Modify and adopt the Resolutions; or
3. Do not adopt the Resolutions; or
4. Provide other direction to staff.
ADVANTAGES:
Adoption of the Resolutions describing the existing improvements and ordering the
preparation and filing of an Engineer’s Report will be in compliance with California Streets
and Highways Code, Section 22622 and is the first step required in the levy of
assessments.
DISADVANTAGES:
No disadvantages for this proposed action have been identified.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
No environmental review is required for this item.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City’s website in accordance with
Government Code Section 54954.2.
Attachments:
1. Proposed Resolution – Grace Lane
2. Proposed Resolution – Parkside Village
3. Proposed Resolution – Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1 – Tract 1769
Page 86 of 324
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE ORDERING THE PREPARATION
AND FILING OF THE ANNUAL ENGINEER’S REPORT
FOR THE GRACE LANE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
WHEREAS, the owner (Vista Roble, LLC) of Lots 1 through 19, Tract 2236, petitioned
the City to form a maintenance assessment district, commonly referred to as the Grace
Lane Assessment District to provide a means to finance the costs of maintenance,
operation, and service of certain specified improvements; and
WHEREAS, on November 28, 2006, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande
adopted Resolution No. 3976 ordering the formation of the Grace Lane Assessment
District under Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code section
22500 et seq. (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972), which allows local governmental
agencies to form assessment districts for the purpose of financing the costs and
expenses of landscaping and lighting public areas; and
WHEREAS, the said improvements in the Grace Lane Assessment District include, but
are not limited to: 1) a pedestrian trail across the open space property (Lot B) including,
but not limited to, the existing informal hiking trail currently passing through Lot B,
signage, fencing; 2) common areas and facilities, including but not limited to the open
space parcels and drainage facilities; 3) open space and maintenance thereof in
accordance with fuel modification specifications as described in Mitigation Measure No.
15 in Resolution No. 3732 of the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande; and 4) a
private drive and associated improvements for Lots 16 through 19; and
WHEREAS, in order to levy and collect an annual assessment for the Grace Lane
Assessment District, it is necessary for the City to comply with Streets and Highways
Code, Section 22620 et seq.; and
WHEREAS, Streets and Highways Code Section 22622 require s the City to adopt a
Resolution that generally describes any proposed new improvements or any substantial
changes in existing improvements and order the preparation and filing of an engineer’s
report; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, at its meeting of April 26, 2022, received a report from the
Public Works Director advising the City Council that no new improvements or
substantial changes in existing improvements are proposed for the Grace Lane
Assessment District.
Page 87 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande, as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein.
2. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 22622, the City Council
determines that no new improvements or any substantial changes in existing
improvements are proposed within the boundaries of the Grace Lane
Assessment District in Fiscal Year 2022-2023.
3. The City Council orders the preparation and filing of an Engineer’s Report for the
Grace Lane Assessment District in accordance with Streets and Highways Code
Section 22565 et seq.
On motion of Council Member , seconded by Counci l Member ,
and by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 26th day of April, 2022.
Page 88 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 3
CAREN RAY RUSSOM, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JESSICA MATSON, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
WHITNEY McDONALD, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
Page 89 of 324
ATTACHMENT 2
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE ORDERING THE PREPARATION
AND FILING OF THE ANNUAL ENGINEER’S REPORT
FOR THE PARKSIDE VILLAGE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
WHEREAS, the owner (Parkside Village, LLC) of Lots 1 through 67, Tract 2310,
requested the City form an assessment district, commonly referred to as the Parkside
Village Assessment District to provide a means to finance the costs of maintenance,
operation, and service of certain specified improvements; and
WHEREAS, on November 8, 2005, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande
adopted Resolution No. 3888 ordering the formation of the Parkside Village Assessment
District under Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code section
22500 et seq. (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972), which allows local governmental
agencies to form assessment districts for the purpose of financing the costs and
expenses of landscaping and lighting public areas; and
WHEREAS, the said improvements in the Parkside Village Assessment District include
but are not limited to: landscaping bordering Farroll Road, Bakeman Road Entrances,
behind and along Bakeman Lots 10, 11, 12 and 13 of Phase 1, mini park pedestrian
pathway easement and drainage ba sin; fencing, gates and walls bordering Farrol Road,
Bakeman Road Entrances, behind and along Bakeman Lots 10, 11, 12 and 13, park
and drainage basin; the pathway easement, lighting and all improvements between lots
1, 2, and 3 between Dixson Street and the mini park, the mini park and all
improvements to include walkways, play area, benches and basketball court on Lot 24;
the drainage retention basin and all improvements including the water separator on Lot
25 and French drains along the East boundary of T ract 2310-2; and
WHEREAS, in order to levy and collect an annual assessment for the Parkside Village
Assessment District, it is necessary for the City to comply with Streets and Highways
Code, Section 22620 et seq.; and
WHEREAS, Streets and Highways Code Section 22622 requires the City to adopt a
Resolution that generally describes any proposed new improvements or any substantial
changes in existing improvements and order the preparation and filing of an engineer’s
report; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, at its meeting of April 26, 2022, received a report from the
Public Works Director advising the City Council that no new improvements or
substantial changes in existing improvements are proposed for the Parkside Village
Assessment District.
Page 90 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande, as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein.
2. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 22622, the City Council
determines that no new improvem ents or any substantial changes in existing
improvements are proposed within the boundaries of the Parkside Village
Assessment District in Fiscal Year 2022-2023.
3. The City Council orders the preparation and filing of an Engineer’s Report for the
Parkside Village Assessment District in accordance with Streets and Highways
Code Section 22565 et seq.
On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member ,
and by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 26th day of April, 2022.
Page 91 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 3
CAREN RAY RUSSOM, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JESSICA MATSON, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
WHITNEY McDONALD, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
Page 92 of 324
ATTACHMENT 3
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE ORDERING THE PREPARATION
AND FILING OF THE ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT
FOR THE ARROYO GRANDE LANDSCAPING AND
LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1, WITHIN
TRACT 1769, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
WHEREAS, the property owners of Arroyo Grande, Tract 1769, petitioned the City to
form a landscaping and lighting assessment district, commonly referred to as
Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 1, within Tract 1769, to provide
means to finance the costs of maintenance, operation, and service of certain specified
improvements; and
WHEREAS, on May 12, 1992, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande adopted
Resolution No. 2932 ordering the formation of Arroyo Grande Landscap ing and Lighting
Assessment District No. 1, within Tract 1769, under Part 2 of Division 15 of the
California Streets and Highways Code section 22500 et seq. (Landscape and Lighting
Act of 1972), which allows local governmental agencies to form assessment district s for
the purpose of financing the costs and expenses of landscaping and lighting public
areas; and
WHEREAS, said improvements in the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District
No. 1 include but are not limited to: landscaping and ornamental vegetation in the public
rights of way; and
WHEREAS, in order to levy and collect an annual assessment for Landscaping and
Lighting Assessment District No. 1, it is necessary for the City to comply with Streets
and Highways Code, Section 22620 et seq.; and
WHEREAS, Streets and Highways Code Section 22622 require s the City to adopt a
Resolution that generally describes any proposed new improvements or any substantial
changes in existing improvements and order the preparation and filing of an engineer’s
report; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, at its meeting of April 26, 2022, received a report from the
Public Works Director advising the City Council that no new improvements or
substantial changes in existing improvements are proposed for Landscaping and
Lighting Assessment District No. 1, within Tract 1769.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande, as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein.
Page 93 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
2. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 22622, the City Council
determines that no new improvements or any substantial changes in existing
improvements are proposed within the boundaries of Landscaping and Lighting
Assessment District No. 1, within Tract 1769 in Fiscal Year 2022-2023.
3. The City Council orders the preparation and filing of an engineer’s report for
Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 1, within Tract 1769, in
accordance with Streets and Highways Code Section 22565 et seq.
On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member ,
and by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 26th day of April, 2022.
Page 94 of 324
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 3
CAREN RAY RUSSOM, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JESSICA MATSON, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
WHITNEY McDONALD, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
Page 95 of 324
Item 8.g.
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Bill Robeson, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director
BY: Shane Taylor, Utilities Manager
SUBJECT: Monthly Water Supply and Demand Update
DATE: April 26, 2022
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The update reports the City’s total water supply and demand for March, 2022. Current
Lopez Reservoir level and projected levels are provided in the attachments.
IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES:
Approximately two (2) hours of staff time is required to prepare the report.
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file the monthly Water Supply and Demand Report.
BACKGROUND:
On October 12, 2021, the City Council adopted a Resolution declaring a Stage 1 Water
Shortage Emergency, and implementing emergency water conservation measures and
restrictions as a result of the extreme drought conditions.
In March, the City’s water use was 176.7 acre-feet with a per capita use of 105 gallons
per day/per person. There was a total of 0.75 inches of rainfall in the City in March, 2022.
ANALYSIS OF ISSUES:
The United States Drought Monitor, as of April 11, 2022, shows San Luis Obispo County
in a severe drought. Rainfall to date for the period July 1, 2021, through March 31, 2022,
is 8.08 inches at the Corporation Yard rain gauge. Lopez Lake, as of April 11, 2022, is at
28.9% capacity (14,279).
The new water year began on April 1, 2021, and the City’s annual Lopez contract supply
was 2,290 acre-feet. On August 24, 2021, the San Luis Obi spo County Board of
Supervisors (Board) enacted the Low Reservoir Response Plan (LRRP) for Lopez Lake.
On September 8, 2021, the Zone III Technical Advisory Committee endorsed the action
Page 96 of 324
Item 8.g.
City Council
Monthly Water Supply and Demand Update
April 26, 2022
Page 2
of reducing contract deliveries by 10%. The City began reducing the flow of Lopez Lake
deliveries on September 15, 2021, to 1.9 million gallons per day, compared to the normal
flow of 2.2 million gallons per day. In addition, the City has 1,323 acre-feet of ground
water entitlement from the Santa Maria Basin, and wells within the Pismo Formation that
produce approximately 160 acre-feet per year. The second quarter monitoring for the
Santa Maria Basin sentry wells was completed on April 5, 2022. The deep well index was
7.98 feet above sea level, which is 0.48 feet higher than the deep well index threshold
value of 7.5 feet and 1.08 feet lower than the index value one year ago. The rainfall in
December 2021 did raise Lopez Lake from 28% to 30% full, however the LRRP remains
in effect, along with Stage 1 water shortage emergency mandatory reductions. The water
use for the City of Arroyo Grande for water year 2021/2022, which ended March 31, 2022,
was 2,280 with a per capita use of 115 gallons per day/person.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council’s consideration:
1. Receive and file the report; or
2. Provide other direction to staff.
ADVANTAGES:
This report provides the City Council and the public with the current and projected
conditions of our water supply and demand.
DISADVANTAGES:
No disadvantages noted at this time.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
No environmental review is required for this item.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the Ci ty’s website in accordance with
Government Code Section 54954.2
Attachments:
1. Lopez Monthly Operations Report for March, 2022
2. Lopez Reservoir Storage Projection
3. Monthly Water Use Comparison
4. Monthly Monitoring Report for March, 2022
Page 97 of 324
San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water District
Zone 3 - Lopez Project - Monthly Operations Report
March, 2022
101.36
Note: Deliveries are in acre feet. One acre foot = 325, 850 gallons or 43, 560 cubic feet. Safe yield is 8,730
acre feet.
"Year to Date" is January to present for State water, April to present for Lopez deliveries, and July to present for rainfall.
2093.38
April to Present
12.00
Arroyo Grande 2061
Lopez Dam Operations
Lake Elevation (full at 522.37 feet)467.18
Storage (full at 49200 acre feet)14324
Rainfall 0.93
Downstream Release (4200 acre feet/year)274.36
Spillage (acre feet)0
This Month Year to Date
3100.78
0.00
807.00 126.91
Entl.Surplus
Water
Declared Usage
2868
Total
Available
Water
Lopez Water Deliveries
0.00Oceano CSD 272.7 107.00 0.00380
788.98Grover Beach 720 282.00 0.001002
55.45Pismo Beach 802.8 314.00 46.281117
72.43CSA 12 220.5 86.00 6.40307
298.91124085.00
19.83967.50
99.9375034.63
State Water Deliveries
3010.2440771596.00 179.595673 447.302206138.47Total
Contractor
Difference (feet)-55.19
% Full 29.1%
Comments:
1) Oceano supplied water to Canyon Crest via Arroyo Grande's Edna turn out. A total of 1.77 AF delivered to Canyon Crest was added
to Oceano's water usage this month and 1.77 AF was subtracted from Arroyo Grande's usage this month.
2) Lopez Water Deliveries are now operated under the Low Reservoir Response Plan (LRRP). In August 2021 TAC requested a 10%
entitlement reduction (retroactive to April 2021) in anticipation of reaching the 15,000 AF trigger of the LRRP. Entitlements shown
represent a 10% reduction.
Surplus water shown is actually "Carry Over" water as designated in the LRRP.
April to Present Lopez Entitlement+Surplus Water Usage
0
50
100
150
200
250
Apr '21 May '21 Jun '21 Jul '21 Aug '21 Sep '21 Oct '21 Nov '21 Dec '21 Jan '22 Feb '22 Mar '22Acre FeetAG GB OCSD PB CSA12
January to Present State Water Usage
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Apr '21 May '21 Jun '21 Jul '21 Aug '21 Sep '21 Oct '21 Nov '21 Dec '21 Jan '22 Feb '22 Mar '22Acre FeetOCSD PB CSA12 SanMig
San Miguelito 28.6312011.34
This Month
%
Total
January to Present
Usage
This Month
% of
Annual
Request
Usage % of Annual
Request
159.29
Total Water
Deliveries
This Month
34.63
66.63
131.28
13.9
11.34
417.07
Annual
Request
32.38
Usage
0.00
66.63
0.00
0.00
%
32.38
0.00
68.98
0.00
0.00
2061.00
0.00
720.00
55.45
72.43
2908.8899.01 417.00
SWP
Deliveries
SWP
Deliveries
Change in
Storage
179 40.53
926.41This Month Stored State Water
6.4%
6.2%73.0%
0.0%0.0%
0.0%78.7%
5.8%5.0%
2.9%23.6%
6.9%24.1%
7.8%20.7%
4.6%13.3%
4.4%53.1%6.3%20.3%
9.5%23.9%
4.0%
0.0%
23.6%
0.0%
0.0%
4.0%
0.0%
24.5%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
0.0%
100.0%
6.9%
32.8%
71.3%6.2%
Entitlement Surplus
Usage %Usage %
Entitlement Surplus
Usage %
885.88Last Month Stored State Water
Surplus
Requested
807.00
107.00
282.00
314.00
86.00
1596.00
Tuesday, April 5, 2022 Page 1 of 1Report printed by:AdminData entered by:Desiree B.
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 98 of 324
0.54
0.00
4.70
2.14
0.240.000.000.000.000.00
0.52
1.42
5.16
0.22
0.94
0.000.000.00 0.000.000.00
2.38
0.30
7.33
0.000.00
0.43
2.873.10 2.77
0.900.330.06 0.030.020.320.62
1.34
2.03
3.023.252.91
1.13
0.410.07 0.030.020.320.62
1.70
2.24
3.12
2.98
2.84
0.98
0.36 0.320.62
1.70
9/27/2022, 10000
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
1/1/20202/1/20203/1/20204/1/20205/1/20206/1/20207/1/20208/1/20209/1/202010/1/202011/1/202012/1/20201/1/20212/1/20213/1/20214/1/20215/1/20216/1/20217/1/20218/1/20219/1/202110/1/202111/1/202112/1/20211/1/20222/1/20223/1/20224/1/20225/1/20226/1/20227/1/20228/1/20229/1/202210/1/202211/1/202212/1/20221/1/2023Storage (AF)Date
LOPEZ RESERVOIR STORAGE PROJECTION
Actual Precipitation Predicted Precipitation Actual Storage
20,000 AF Storage Projection Storage Projection (No Rain)
10,000 AF
1. Storage projection is based on predicted rainfall from longrangeweather.com, inflow based on predicted rainfall, 20-21 downstream release requests, and municipal usage.
2.Municipal Usage is based on Jan 2010-Dec 2020 average monthly deliveries.
3. Predicted inflow is based off of historical precipitation and storage data. Antecedant moisture conditions are factored into the model.The first rainstorms after months without
rain will cause less inflow than rainstorms during the rainy season. If the average daily rainfall for the previous three months is below 1 inch the model will multiply the predicted
inflow by 0.1, if the average is above 1 inch the inflow is multiplied by 1.25.
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 99 of 324
ATTACHMENT 3
180.9 176.7
108 105
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Mar-21 Mar-22
Monthly Water Use Comparison
Production (Acre Feet)Usage ( gpcd)
Page 100 of 324
ATTACHMENT 4
Below is the information you have submitted for the month of March 2022. We use
your most recently submitted monthly report in our calculations
State Water Resources Control Board Office of Research, Planning & Performance
Page 101 of 324
Item 10.a.
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Brian Pedrotti, Community Development Director
BY: Robin Dickerson, PE, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Discussion and Consideration of a Project Status Update and Design
Services Proposals, and Direction Regarding a Preferred Option for
the Brisco Interchange Modification Project
DATE: April 26, 2022
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Consideration of the project status update and direction regarding design services options
for the Brisco-Halcyon Road Interchange Modifications project (Project) will allow staff to
either move forward with the design phase of the project, or allow staff to shift resources
to other critical infrastructure City priorities.
IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES:
The total estimated future cost of the Project is $32.1 million. Table 1 shows the total
estimated costs and funding sources for the Project as shown in the FY 2021-23 Biennial
Budget:
Table 1
Total Funding 2021-22 Revenue to
Source Budget to Date Total Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Complete
Regional SHA 482,320 482,320
STIP 6,624,000 3,312,000 3,312,000 6,624,000
Other Financing 21,695,598 4,558,781 8,568,408 8,568,409 21,695,598
General Fund 312 312
Traffic Signalization 959,183 479,591 479,592 959,183
Transp Facility 3,657,692 2,036,473 790,000 831,219 1,621,219
Sales Tax 1,300,000 100,000 950,000 200,000 50,000 1,200,000
Total 34,719,105 2,619,105 790,000 6,340,000 12,559,999 12,410,001 32,100,000
Page 102 of 324
Item 10.a.
City Council
Discussion and Consideration of a Project Status Update and Design Services
Proposals, and Direction Regarding a Preferred Option for the Brisco Interchange
Modification Project
April 26, 2022
Page 2
The budgeted design costs are $1.4 million. The proposed design cost s for the four
proposals received ranged from $1.59 to $2.43 million, exceeding the budgeted design
costs by at least $200,000 and upwards of $1 million. To date, the City has spent
approximately $2.6 million related to the Project, which was funded using Transportation
Facility funds, Regional State Highway Account (SHA) and local sales tax funds. Nearly
all of these costs were associated with the Project Approval and Environmental
Determination Phase of the Project.
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the Project status report, consider options regarding design services proposals
received, and direct staff to pursue the No Project Option consistent with the
recommendation of the Brisco-Halcyon Interchange Subcommittee.
BACKGROUND:
The Brisco-Halcyon Road Interchange Project has been underway since the late 1990’s.
In 2004, the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) provided $465,000 in
regional and State Transportation Improvement (STIP) funds for project development. In
2005, the City Council approved a consultant services agreement with Wood Rodgers to
complete the Project Approval and Environmental Determination Phase (PA&ED). During
the 2012 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) programming year,
SLOCOG allocated $5,624,000 in STIP funding for construction of the interchange
project. SLOCOG increased this amount to $6,624,000 during the 2014 STIP
programming year.
Over the past seventeen years, numerous studies, meetings and discussions have been
conducted, including evaluation of eighteen proposed alternatives. The background and
description of the final alternatives were described in the staff report for the March 26,
2019 City Council meeting (see Attachment 4). During this March 2019 meeting, the City
Council approved Alternative 4C as the preferred alternative over Alternative 1 and a no-
build alternative. At this time, total project costs were estimated at $22.7 million. This
milestone decision allowed City staff and consultants to complete the project report and
environmental documents for consideration and approval by Caltrans.
In January 2021, Council approved the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration
(IS/MND) for the Project, which included consideration of Alternative 4C, Alternative 1,
and the no-build alternative. By this time, Project costs had escalated to $25.9 million. In
April 2021, the Project Report and Environmental Assessment were completed and
approved by Caltrans, which concluded the PA&ED Phase. In May 2021, the 5-Year
Page 103 of 324
Item 10.a.
City Council
Discussion and Consideration of a Project Status Update and Design Services
Proposals, and Direction Regarding a Preferred Option for the Brisco Interchange
Modification Project
April 26, 2022
Page 2
Capital Improvements Program included updated total Project costs of $32.1 million. The
staff reports for these previous meetings are provided as Attachments 4-6.
In December of 2021, City staff issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for design
services for the Project, specifically of Alternative 4C. Staff received four proposals.
Following staff review of the proposals, interviews were held with all four firms and they
were ranked based on qualifications presented in their proposals and as a result of the
interviews. Staff then entered into negotiations with the top ranked firm, Quincy
Engineering.
During the course of the project, the City Council created a Brisco -Halcyon Road
subcommittee consisting of staff and two Councilmembers to help provide guidance and
recommendations to the full Council given the increasing size and scope of the project.
Records indicate that the subcommittee met periodically from at least 2008 until the
present, including recently in April 2018 and January 2019. On March 30, 2022, the latest
subcommittee meeting was convened to discuss the results of the proposals and to make
a recommendation to the City Council on moving forward with the Project (see discussion
below). The subcommittee consists of two Councilmembers, Council Member Storton and
Council Member Paulding, with City staff present including the City Manager, Ass istant
City Manager/Public Works Director, Community Development Director, and City
Engineer. At the subcommittee meeting, the City Engineer made a presentation
(Attachment 3) outlining the history of the Project, the outcome of the RFQ for design
services, and three options for consideration by the committee, as discussed in more
detail below.
ANALYSIS OF ISSUES:
Request for Qualifications
The scope of work prepared for the project for the 2022 RFQs was limited to designs for
Alternative 4C. The scope also included a cap on the cost of construction of $12–15
million, with cost reduction realized through phasing, deferring of improvements, value
engineering and finding opportunities for additional funding sources.
All four firms proposed similar cost reductions which included the following:
Shifting the roundabout to the northeast, which would reduce the impacts and
right of way acquisition needs on the County property;
Reducing the size of the Park and Ride lot and deferring it to a later phase;
Elevating the roundabout, which would reduce the retaining walls required;
Deferring the Grace Lane/Rodeo Drive improvement;
Deferring the US 101 southbound on-ramp realignment;
Deferring the sound walls; and
Looking for additional phasing opportunities of portions of the roundabout itself.
Page 104 of 324
Item 10.a.
City Council
Discussion and Consideration of a Project Status Update and Design Services
Proposals, and Direction Regarding a Preferred Option for the Brisco Interchange
Modification Project
April 26, 2022
Page 4
All four firms also identified similar constraints and concerns for the Project and the ability
to deliver the scope of work, which included the following:
Caltrans approval of and the process for determining phasing options;
The significant relocation of utilities and timing of relocation; and
Inflationary costs of construction.
Quincy Engineering was determined to be the top -ranked proposal, and City Staff is
currently under contract negotiations with this firm.
Brisco-Halcyon Interchange Subcommittee
On March 30, 2022, a Special Meeting of the Brisco-Halcyon Interchange Subcommittee
was held to discuss the RFQs for the design of the Project and to receive a
recommendation for moving forward with the Project. Staff presented three options to the
subcommittee in consideration of the design proposals received in response to the 2002
RFQ, as follows:
No Project Option
Award as Proposed
Award a Reduced Scope
Following a presentation by staff, public input from community members, and
subcommittee deliberation, the subcommittee supported the No Project Option, citing the
increasing costs associated with the project and a desire to shift resources to other City
priorities. (See Attachment 2 – Subcommittee Action Minutes)
The options presented to the subcommittee are detailed below:
Option 1 – No Project
The No-Project option proposes no improvements to existing facilities. No additional lanes
or improvements would be added to the subject intersections, and existing and future
congestion, circulation, capacity and control would not be relieved. This option would
allow the City to shift resources to other critical City priorities, most notably street repair,
pavement maintenance and sidewalk gap closures. By selecting this option, the City
would lose the $6.6M in STIP funds that have been granted for the project through the
San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG). This option does not meet the
purpose and need of the Project, but was supported by the subcommittee as the preferred
direction given the current available information; most notably the significant present-day
cost outlay required by the City and the unknowns associated with potential future
escalating costs to complete the Project.
Page 105 of 324
Item 10.a.
City Council
Discussion and Consideration of a Project Status Update and Design Services
Proposals, and Direction Regarding a Preferred Option for the Brisco Interchange
Modification Project
April 26, 2022
Page 5
Option 2 – Award as Proposed
Option 2 would direct staff to implement the plans, specifications and estimate (PS&E)
phase of the Project. Based on the top-ranked consultant’s proposal, the cost of design
would be $1.77 million. Under the current Biennial Fiscal Years 2021-23 budget, this
represents nearly $400,000 more than was budgeted for the PS&E phase. All proposals
were above the City’s budgeted amount of $1.4 million, most likely due to the added
components of value engineering, phasing options and grant funding support, which are
typically not included in design contracts but are considered crucial to designing a project
that could be constructed within a budget of $12–15 million.
If Option 2 were selected, staff would complete contract negotiations with the selected
consultant and present the contract to Council for approval at a future meeting. T he
design team would then prepare construction drawings and specifications for Alternative
4C with phasing to be determined within this proposed construction cost range. To reduce
construction cost, the design team is proposing to shift and elevate the roundabout to the
northeast, reducing the impacts to the County-owned parcel, eliminating or reducing
retaining walls, reducing and deferring the Park and Ride lot, and deferring other
improvements such as Grace Lane/Rodeo Drive improvements, the southbound US
101/Grand Ave realignment, and sound walls. At the subcommittee meeting, staff
discussed the challenges with this option, such as the potential for higher costs
associated with utility relocation and Caltrans’ acceptance of design and phasing
revisions. This option is also challenging because it allows less flexibility than the reduced
scope option (Option 3, below) before committing to finalizing the PS&E, and the design
proposals were all over the budgeted amount.
Option 3 – Award a Reduced Scope
Option 3 would reduce the scope of services to a 30% design, reducing the design cost
to approximately $570,000. The scope of service for this option would include support for
engaging with Caltrans to obtain its approval of the phasing and potential value
engineering changes to reduce costs, as well as a more definitive cost estimate and
project timeline. To reduce construction cost, the proposed design team would still shift
and elevate the roundabout to the northeast. This alteration would reduce impacts to the
County-owned parcel, eliminate or reduce the need for retaining walls, reduce and defer
the Park and Ride lot, and defer improvements such as Grace Lane/Rodeo Drive.
In summary, this option would provide staff with more certainty regarding the following:
Caltran’s willingness to approve utility policy exceptions for encroachments
Overall project configuration consensus with Caltrans, City Council and major
stakeholders
A more definitive project cost estimate update to help inform decision making on
the financial plan for construction
Page 106 of 324
Item 10.a.
City Council
Discussion and Consideration of a Project Status Update and Design Services
Proposals, and Direction Regarding a Preferred Option for the Brisco Interchange
Modification Project
April 26, 2022
Page 6
Project timeline, particularly for utility relocations, right-of-way acquisition, and
advertisement of construction of the Project.
Upon completion of the 30% design, which is estimated to take approximately 8-9 months,
staff would return to Council with a suggested list of construction components, an updated
project timeline, and updated construction costs.
Subcommittee Recommendation
The Subcommittee meeting on March 26, 2019 included a staff presentation, public
comment, and a discussion of the options by the two subcommittee members, Council
Member Paulding and Council Member Storton. The Subcommittee ultimately supported
the No Project Option. Several factors contributed to this recommendation, with the most
significant being the escalating costs associated with the project. While noting the
difficulty in this decision given the approximately $2.6 million in funding that the City ha s
already invested toward the project, as well as the potential loss of $6.6 million in STIP
funding, the Subcommittee cited the future unknowns regarding utility relocation,
Caltrans’ acceptance of design and phasing revisions, and inflationary costs of materials
as complicating factors. Further, the Subcommittee also considered the overall future
financial obligations of the City, which notably include the significant multi -year cost of
City-wide pavement maintenance, and the impact that the project could have on the ability
of the City to fund and complete other priorities.
Potential Future Improvements
If the Subcommittee’s recommendation is approved by Council, staff anticipate s
continuing to evaluate potential improvements at the Brisco -Halcyon Interchange area
and potential funding sources for these improvements. Funding sources may include the
$959,183 in Traffic Signalization Impact fees and $1,621,219 in Transportation Facilities
Impact Fees previously allocated to this Project. In addition, staff will continue to confer
with SLOCOG staff regarding any possibilities that a portion of the $6.6 million in STIP
funds allocated to this Project might be reallocated to a different project that would relieve
regional congestion within the City. However, SLOCOG has indicated that the STIP
funding must be obligated for construction by June 30, 2024, and a project would need to
be under construction in 2025.
Improvements that staff will continue to evaluate include:
Improvements along Brisco from El Camino Real to West Branch to include
possible reconstruction and restriping;
Continuing to pursue a “no right on red” for those traveling east bound on W est
Branch Street at Brisco Road and providing the necessary signal head
modifications for that signal;
Upgrading the signal controller at Brisco Road and El Camino Real;
Page 107 of 324
Item 10.a.
City Council
Discussion and Consideration of a Project Status Update and Design Services
Proposals, and Direction Regarding a Preferred Option for the Brisco Interchange
Modification Project
April 26, 2022
Page 7
Realigning the southbound on ramp at US 101 and Grand Avenue to improve
traffic flow along Grand Avenue and eliminate one of the signals in the area ; or
Providing an auxiliary lane on US 101 from either Grand Ave to Brisco Road or
Brisco Road to Camino Mercado or both.
Depending on the outcome of discussions regarding available funding and the anticipated
need and benefit of each of these improvements, staff will include viable improvements
in a future Capital Improvement Plan for consideration by Council.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for Council’s consideration:
1. Receive the Project status report, consider options regarding design services
proposals received, and direct staff to pursue Option 1 – No Project in accordance
with the Brisco-Halcyon Road Subcommittee’s recommendation; or
2. Receive the Project status report, consider options regarding design services
proposals received, and direct staff to pursue Option 2 – complete contract
negotiations with the selected consultant for the proposed scope of work included
in the design services RFQ and present the contract to Council for approval at a
future meeting; or
3. Receive the Project status report, consider options regarding design services
proposals received, and direct staff to pursue Option 3 – negotiate a contract with
the selected consultant for a Reduced Scope and present the contract to Council
for approval at a future meeting; or
4. Provide other direction to staff.
ADVANTAGES:
Approving the subcommittee’s preference for Option 1 - No Project will allow staff to cease
commitment of further funding and staff time toward the Project, allowing a significant shift
in personnel and financial resources toward other City Council priorities, including
delayed street repair, pavement maintenance , and sidewalk gap closures.
DISADVANTAGES:
The recommended No Project Option does not meet the purpose and need identified for
the Project. By selecting this option, the City would lose the $6.6 million in STIP funds
that have been granted for the Project, and would forego the previously spent $2.6 million
invested over the last 20+ years without the construction of improvements .
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
This project is subject to both the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). In January 2021, Council approved the Initial
Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the project, which included
consideration of Alternative 4C, Alternative 1, and the no-build alternative. In April 2021,
Page 108 of 324
Item 10.a.
City Council
Discussion and Consideration of a Project Status Update and Design Services
Proposals, and Direction Regarding a Preferred Option for the Brisco Interchange
Modification Project
April 26, 2022
Page 8
the project report and Environmental Assessment were completed and approved by
Caltrans, which concluded the PA&ED Phase.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City’s website in accordance with
Government Code Section 54954.2.
Attachments:
1. Brisco-Halcyon Road Interchange Subcommittee Meeting Minutes of March
30, 2022.
2. Presentation to the Brisco-Halcyon Road Interchange Subcommittee Meeting
on March 30, 2022
3. Final Project Report with IS/MND and EA
4. Staff Report on the Brisco-Halcyon Road Interchange Modifications Project –
March 26, 2019.
5. Staff Report on the Adoption of the IS/MND and Design RFPs for the Brisco -
Halcyon Modifications Project – January 26, 2021.
6. Staff Report on the 5-year Capital Improvement Program – May 11, 2021
Page 109 of 324
ATTACHMENT 1
ACTION MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
ARROYO GRANDE BRISCO-HALCYON INTERCHANGE SUBCOMMITTEE
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 30, 2022
*LOCATION CHANGE*
ARROYO GRANDE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER
215 EAST BRANCH STREET, ARROYO GRANDE
1. CALL TO ORDER
Community Development Director Brian Pedrotti called the special Arroyo Grande Brisco-Halcyon
Interchange Subcommittee meeting to order at 10:38 a.m. Due to the late change in the meeting
location additional time was allotted before the meeting was called to order.
The Committee agreed to hear item 4 before item 3.
2. ROLL CALL
Board: Committee Members Jimmy Paulding and Keith Storton were
present.
Staff Present: City Manager Whitney McDonald, Assistant City Manager / Public
Works Director Bill Robeson, Community Development Director
Brian Pedrotti, City Engineer Robin Dickerson and Assistant
Planner Patrick Holub were present.
4. DISCUSSION ITEMS
City Engineer Dickerson made a presentation to the committee presenting the results of the
Proposals for design of the Brisco Interchange Modification Project. The following options were
discussed:
No project option
Award as proposed
Award as a reduced scope
City Engineer Dickerson also responded to questions regarding utility relocations, future costs
and their funding sources and the feasibility of reduced scope and changing course back to alt 1.
City Manager McDonald answered a question regarding potential impacts to the City’s pavement
management program if the Brisco project were fully funded.
Following the presentation Committee Member Paulding opened the public comment period.
Steve Junor asked two questions regarding costs and whether or not their funding sources were
currently ambiguous.
Mark Mankins spoke about the importance of providing adequate truck turning radii and access
to the businesses in the Brisco area and commented that pavement management citywide should
be a bigger priority than simply improving this one interchange.
Patty Welsh commented that it is probably time to pull out of this project.
John King asked a question regarding other funding sources available.
Page 110 of 324
Minutes: AGBHIS PAGE 2
Wednesday, March 30, 2022
Cissy Pace spoke about how costs have increased dramatically and that she does not like
roundabouts.
Hearing no further public comment, the public comment period was closed.
Committee Member Paulding made a number of comments regarding the project and stated that
spending more money on this project is not a good decision. He explained his original and
continuing opposition to this alternative, but mentioned that Level of Service (LOS) is still a
problem. He stated that the City should prioritize making the City more bike-able and walkable.
He stated that the reduced scope option would further the Sunk Cost Fallacy and that we should
shift resources to other projects and priorities in the City. Without specific costs known and without
a financial plan to pay for them, he supported the “No Project” option.
Committee Member Storton made a number of comments regarding the project and outlined his
original support for the project. He continued by explaining why he was opposed to Alternative 1.
He stated that the expenses for this project have become ridiculous and that the Council needs
to discuss the future of this project. He supported the “No Project” option.
3. PUBLIC COMMENT
None.
5. ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting adjourned at 11:47 am.
_____________________________ _____________________________
PATRICK HOLUB JIMMY PAULDING
ASSISTANT PLANNER COMMITTEE MEMBER
(Approved at AGBHIS Mtg ________)
_____________________________
KEITH STORTON
COMMITTEE MEMBER
Page 111 of 324
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 112 of 324
Page 113 of 324
Page 114 of 324
Page 115 of 324
Page 116 of 324
Page 117 of 324
Page 118 of 324
Page 119 of 324
Page 120 of 324
Page 121 of 324
Page 122 of 324
Page 123 of 324
Page 124 of 324
Alt 4CProposed
Realignment
Page 125 of 324
Attachments 3 - 6
ATTACHMENT 3 - Final Project Report with IS/MND and EA
Available as a link: https://www.arroyogrande.org/DocumentCenter/View/9844/Approved-Project-
Report-and-Environmental-Documents
ATTACHMENT 4 - Staff Report on the Brisco-Halcyon Road Interchange Modifications
Project – March 26, 2019
Available as a link:
https://www.arroyogrande.org/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Item/8316?fileID=15099
ATTACHMENT 5 - Staff Report on the Adoption of the IS/MND and Design RFPs for the
Brisco-Halcyon Modifications Project – January 26, 2021
Available as a link:
https://www.arroyogrande.org/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Item/10604?fileID=16660
ATTACHMENT 6 - Staff Report on the 5-year Capital Improvement Program – May 11, 2021
Available as a link:
https://www.arroyogrande.org/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Item/11007?fileID=17138
Page 126 of 324
Item 11.a.
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Whitney McDonald, City Manager
Bill Robeson, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director
Nicole Valentine, Administrative Services Director
Jill McPeek, Capital Improvement Project Manager
SUBJECT: Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of
a Sales Tax Measure
DATE: April 26, 2022
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Review and provide direction on Infrastructure Financing Options and direct staff to
prepare a resolution and ordinance for City Council consideration at the June 14, 2022
meeting to place a 1% local sales tax measure on the November 2022 ballot.
IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES:
The 2022 Pavement Management Program (PMP) Update reports that the City will
require $6.1 million annually to maintain the current Pavement Condition Index (PCI) level
of 56. Historically, the City has been able to allocate approximately $1,250,000 annually
towards the pavement management program. A new 1% local sales tax measure increase
will generate approximately $5 million annually that may be allocated towards maintaining
the City’s streets, sidewalks, and stormwater infrastructure.
RECOMMENDATION:
1) Receive and file the 2022 PMP Update report ; and 2) Direct staff to prepare a ballot
measure for the November 8, 2022 consolidated election seeking a 1% local sales tax
increase, to be provided at the June 14, 2022 City Council meeting.
BACKGROUND:
On April 27, 2021, the City Council considered and established goals and priorities for
incorporation into the upcoming Biennial Budget. On June 8, 2021, the City Council
adopted the Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-23 Biennial Operating Budget with 3 Categories:
Investing in the Future
Investing in City Infrastructure and Facilities
Investing in People
Page 127 of 324
Item 11.a.
City Council
Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of a Sales Tax
Measure
April 26, 2022
Page 2
Within the Investing in City Infrastructure and Facilities category, an item was included to
“identify and pursue short- and long-term funding mechanisms, such as a sales tax
measure, for pavement maintenance and other infrastructure maintenance needs.” This
report will focus on Streets, Sidewalks, and Storm water Infrastructure needs. It will
provide a detailed review of different funding mechanisms to accomplish the infrastructure
needs outlined.
Streets Repairs
Pavement Management Program and System
On February 14, 2017, the City Council adopted the 2016 Update to the Pavement
Management Plan (PMP) and endorsed the “Critical Point Management” methodology for
the City’s Pavement Management System (PMS). The Critical Point Strategy approach
selects the road segments for repair or resurfacing that are at a “critical point” of
deterioration. The critical point is a point located on the pavement deterioration graph
which indicates the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) value is about to drop to a level
which would trigger a more expensive maintenance or rehabilitation approach. The
Critical Point Strategy is a long-range methodology that maintains and improves
roadways before they slip into a PCI range that reflects costlier repairs. Roadways are
then treated with an appropriate maintenance or rehabilitation treatment before degrading
into a more expensive treatment. The PMS will annually evaluate and provide
recommendations for repair and resurfacing based on this critical point approach. This
method, along with field evaluations is currently being used each fiscal year when
considering the Street Repairs Projects.
Over the last ten years, the City has allocated the following funds towards the Pavement
Management Program:
Page 128 of 324
Item 11.a.
City Council
Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of a Sales Tax
Measure
April 26, 2022
Page 3
Chart 1
Table 1
PMP Funding
Urban SHA = the City’s annual allocation through SLOCOG
General Fund = general revenue, including Reserve Fund Balance
Streets Fund = SB 1 funds
Transportation Fund = Local Transportation Fund (LTF) provided by the San Luis Obispo
County of Government’s (SLOCOG)
Local Use Sales Tax = Measure O-06 revenue
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
4,000,000
4,500,000
FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22
Pavement Management Program Funding
Transportation Fund Construction Fund Streets Fund General Fund
Expense Recovery Urban SHA Local Use Sales Tax Total
Funding Source FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22
Urban SHA 70,000$ 69,335$ 68,829$ 68,828$ 69,172$ 70,000$ 70,000$ 70,000$ -$ 131,000$
Expense Recovery - 90 60 - - - - - - -
General Fund - - - 17,159 12,620 14,665 4,313 - - 1,751,000
Streets Fund - 32,962 - - - - 328,474 309,610 146,328 468,072
Construction Fund - - - 3,267 - - - - - -
Transportation Fund - 197,800 200,507 200,000 100,000 100,000 - - - -
Local Use Sales Tax 644,472 835,265 476,532 785,164 649,341 672,920 298,305 625,089 - 1,717,837
Total 714,472$ 1,135,453$ 745,928$ 1,074,418$ 831,134$ 857,584$ 701,092$ 1,004,699$ 146,328$ 4,067,909$
Page 129 of 324
Item 11.a.
City Council
Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of a Sales Tax
Measure
April 26, 2022
Page 4
As indicated in Chart 1 above, the past two years have been outliers in the City’s average
annual PMP. In 2020-21, street repairs were delayed in order to evaluate the additional
streets that were able to be funded using excess General Fund Reserves, as discussed
in more detail below. As a result, the 2021 -22 PMP includes both the 2021 and 2022
street repair projects, including the excess reserves allocated to the 2020-21 PMP project.
2021 Streets Repairs
On April 27, 2021, in addition to the Goals and Priorities set for Fiscal Years 2021 -23 and
based on an available budget of $1.4M for construction, the City Council approved Streets
Selection for the 2021 Street Repairs Project , Option 2, allocating $1,338,000 to correct
base failures and alligator cracking using a dig out treatment method shown in Table 2
Table 2
2021 Streets Repairs Project Options
Option 1 - Correct
Base Failures Only
(Digouts)
Option 2 - Correct
Base Failures
(Digouts)
and Alligator Cracking
Street Segment Expected Service Life
3 - 5 Years
Expected Service Life
5 - 7 Years
Valley Rd - Sunrise Terrace to Bridge $ 113,000 $ 149,000
Corbett Cyn Rd - Rte 227 to City Limits 183,000 184,000
Fair Oaks Ave - S Halcyon to Bridge 167,000 230,000
Wesley Street - End Street to W Branch 79,000 95,000
Vernon Street - End Street to W Branch 91,000 132,000
S Elm Street - The Pike to City Limits 64,000 166,000
E Grand Ave - Halcyon to ECR 289,000 382,000
N Halcyon Rd - ECR to E Grand Ave 230,000 351,000
S Elm Street - Ash St to Farroll Ave 330,000 525,000
S Elm Street - Farroll Ave to The Pike 37,000 162,000
Rancho Pkwy - James Wy to W Branch 489,000 713,000
Total $ 1,216,000 $ 1,338,000
At that time, the City’s pavement consultant, Joe Ririe, reviewed street repairs, explained
how to evaluate pavement conditions, PCI and good pavement management to maintain
Page 130 of 324
Item 11.a.
City Council
Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of a Sales Tax
Measure
April 26, 2022
Page 5
the Road System. The presentation included an estimated total Roadway Replacement
Cost of $268 million and an Average Citywide PCI in 2021 as shown in Table2:
Table 3
Average Citywide PCI in 2021
In an effort to further strengthen the City’s PMP, on July 27, 2021, the City Council
appropriated $1,751,000 of the General Fund Reserve Balance (reserve balance)
towards the Pavement Management Program and funded repairs of the four remaining
road segments identified in the list of potential 2021 Street Repairs shown in Table 2. This
reserve balance occurred as a result of a number of factors, chiefly expenditure
reductions instituted at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic combined with better-than-
anticipated revenue received during the pandemic and one -time relief funds received from
the Federal government. In considering this additional allocation of one-time reserve
balance to street repairs in 2021, it was estimated that the cost to complete the four
segments would be $1,751,000 (about $4.02/square foot), whereas if these four street
segments were to receive no maintenance and continue to deteriorate, the cost to
reconstruct them would reach $9,738,780 (about $22.37/square foot). This estimate did
not factor for inflation, so reconstruction costs would likely be high er in the future. These
figures are presented in the Table 4 below, which demonstrates how completing the four
street segments offered the greatest return on investment for the City.
Table 4
Deferred Maintenance Cost (specific street segments of 2021 Streets Repairs Project)
Page 131 of 324
Item 11.a.
City Council
Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of a Sales Tax
Measure
April 26, 2022
Page 6
In addition, at the July 27,2021 City Council, meeting, it was noted that in order to maintain
an overall pavement condition index of “Fair” (PCI range of 51 to 70) an annual budget
increase of approximately $4.6 million would be needed.
Construction of the 2021 Street Repairs project began in February 2022 and is
anticipated to be complete in June 2022.
Sidewalk Repairs
In 2016, City Public Works staff completed a deferred maintenance assessment that identified each
sidewalk segment in need of repair and estimated a total cost of $1,346,250 to repair all
sidewalk defects in the City. Since 2016, the City has allocated an average of $120,000
annually to sidewalk repairs. Funding for sidewalk repairs is provided almost entirely from
local sales tax revenue, with occasional funds (e.g. up to $50,000 in FY 2018-19) provided
by regional State Highway Account (SHA) grants.
Table 5
Historical Sidewalk Repairs Funding
Stormwater Repairs
Stormwater is defined as the runoff generated when precipitation from rain events flows
over land or impervious surfaces without percolating into the ground. Stormwater is often
considered a nuisance because it mobilizes pollutants such as motor oil and tr ash.
Stormwater Repairs are not paid for through the City’s Water and Wastewater Enterprise
Fiscal Year Gen Fund Sales Tax RSHA Total
15/16 301.02$ 94,326.62$ 94,627.64$
16/17 2,123.55$ 27,936.46$ 30,060.01$
17/18 9,488.83$ 143,808.07$ 153,296.90$
18/19 3,106.32$ 103,893.25$ 50,000.00$ 156,999.57$
19/20 133,104.64$ 133,104.64$
20/21 138,601.83$ 138,601.83$
21/22 148,296.60$ 148,296.60$
Page 132 of 324
Item 11.a.
City Council
Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of a Sales Tax
Measure
April 26, 2022
Page 7
Funds and have, instead, been funded through the CIP Budget using local sales tax
revenue. The FY 2021-23 Biennial budget included the following Stormwater Projects as
shown in Table 5:
Table 6
Stormwater Projects included in the FY 2021-23 Biennial budget
Over the course of a few meetings held in July, October, and November 2021, and finally
in February 2022, the City Council allocated American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funding
received from the Federal government to certain Stormwater Projects. The following
Stormwater projects are now funded through ARPA:
Table 7
As identified in Tables 6 and 7 above, the City is completing two major repair projects
involving failed Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP) stormwater facilities. The City has
approximately 2.57 miles of existing CMP facilities. Addressing deteriorating CMP while
it is still intact with an in-place lining treatment can be approximately 80 percent less in
cost versus addressing a partial or full failure of a CMP. This was demonstrated when
significant CMP failures at 251 East Grand Avenue (Chevron Station) and Oak Park
Proj.2021-22 Revenue to
No.Project Name Total Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Complete
5778 231 Drainage Facility 5,487
218 Sales Tax 53,500
58,987
5795 Oak Park Boulevard / El Camino Real
Storm Drain System
218 Sales Tax 390,972
390,972
5796 Storm Water Master Plan
Update/Watershed Management Plan
218 Sales Tax 172,500
172,500
57XX Storm Drain System at 251 East Grand
Avenue
218 Sales Tax 410,000
410,000
5794 Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP) Lining 218 Sales Tax 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
500,000
57XX Trash Capture Devices 218 Sales Tax 4,000 4,000 103,000 103,000
214,000
5780 Corporation Yard Stormwater Compliance
Plan Implementation
218 Sales Tax 65,231 20,000 20,000 20,000
125,231
Total Drainage Projects 1,136,459 169,231 223,000 223,000 120,000 1,871,690
Total Project Budget
Tally Ho/Corbett Canyon Creek Confluence
Restoration/Sedimentation Reduction
Stormwater Infrastructure Projects
Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP) Lining 500,000
Storm Drain System at 251 East Grand Avenue (Chevron Station)525,800
Oak Park Boulevard/El Camino Real Storm Drain System 400,000
Trash Capture Devices 214,000
Stormwater Master Plan Update/Watershed Management Plan 116,700
Stormwater GIS Layer (incorporate into the Stormwater Master Plan Update)50,000
1,806,500
Page 133 of 324
Item 11.a.
City Council
Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of a Sales Tax
Measure
April 26, 2022
Page 8
Boulevard and El Camino Real. The cost to line the 251 East Grand CMP would have
been approximately $60,000. Staff has prioritized the CMPs that will be first in line for a
lining treatment and will be evaluating (in-pipe video) other CMPs where treatment is likely
needed.
Sales Tax
California has a State-mandated minimum sales tax of 7.25 percent. Attachment 3
provides a Local Government Guide to California Sales, Use and Transaction Tax from
the City’s sales tax consultant, HdL, detailing the allocation of sales tax and how u se tax
is imposed in California. Counties, municipalities, and districts are allowed to increase the
sales tax in their jurisdictions up to a total of 2 percent.
Not all sales tax revenue goes to the City. California’s base sales tax is 6%. The additional
sales tax of 1.25% is called the Bradley-Burns tax, of which1% is allocated to counties or
incorporated cities to use at their discretion and the remainder 0.25% is distributed to
county local transportation funds (LTFs) to support transportation programs. The following
graphic provides a general breakdown of the standard 7.25% sales tax charged
throughout the State and its general distribution:
In most areas of California, local jurisdictions have added local taxes that increase the
tax owed by a seller. Sellers are required to report and pay the applicable local taxes for
their taxable sales and purchases. Arroyo Grande currently has a ½ cent (0.5%) sales
tax measure that was approved by the voters in 2006; during the election process this
measure was name Measure O-06. This brings the total tax charged to customers
purchasing items in the City of Arroyo Grande to 7.75%.
Page 134 of 324
Item 11.a.
City Council
Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of a Sales Tax
Measure
April 26, 2022
Page 9
Measure O-06 passed by 50.11%, which met the majority voter approval required for
establishing a local transactions and use tax. The operative date of the transactions and
use tax commenced on April 1, 2007. Advisory Measures K -06, L-06, M-06, and N-06
were placed on the ballot to ask voters if a portion of the revenue from the sales tax should
be used to fund specific needs identified in the City's long-range financial plan. Advisory
Measure K-06 (transportation improvements) asked:
If the proposed sales tax measure is approved, should a portion of the
proceeds be used to fund transportation improvements, including, but not
limited to, upgrade of the Brisco Road/Halcyon Road – Highway 101
Interchange?
This Advisory Measure passed favorably by 70.45%.
Advisory Measure L-06 (infrastructure improvements) asked:
If the proposed sales tax measure is approved, should a portion of the
proceeds be used to fund maintenance and upgrade of City’s infrastructure,
including, but not limited to, street maintenance and improvements,
upgrade of the drainage system, and projects to prevent pollution, erosion
and sedimentation in the creek system from storm water runoff?
This Advisory Measure passed favorably by 68.57%.
Advisory Measure M-06 (public safety equipment, staffing, facilities) asked:
If the proposed sales tax measure is approved, should a portion of the
proceeds be used to fund public safety expenses, including, but not limited
to, expansion of the Police Station, purchase of Fire apparatus, and
additional Fire Department staffing?
This Advisory Measure passed favorably by 59.89%.
Advisory Measure N-06 (improving City facilities/ADA compliance) asked:
If the proposed sales tax measure, is approved, should a portion of the
proceeds be used to fund improvements to City facilities to meet Federal
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements, including, but not
limited to, upgrade of the City Hall Complex?
This Advisory Measure did not pass, receiving 58.85% "No" votes.
Page 135 of 324
Item 11.a.
City Council
Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of a Sales Tax
Measure
April 26, 2022
Page 10
The Advisory Measures are not legally binding; however, they provide important
information to the City to help establish funding priorities and the City has spent its
Measure O-06 funds consistent with the advisory measures’ directions since 2007. On
May 12, 2015, the City Council confirmed that “infrastructure improvements” funded
through Measure O-06 revenue may also include information technology infrastructure,
such as network servers, switches and enterprise-wide software. The City publishes and
distributes an annual report to each household on the revenues and expenditures from
the Measure O-06 sales tax proceeds. Additionally, the City Council is required to conduct
a public hearing every five years to determine whether it is necessary for the sales tax to
remain in effect.
On July 14, 2020, the City Council considered placing a Local Transaction and Use Tax
(“Sales Tax”) Measure on the November 3, 2020 Ballot. Extensive Council discussion
ensued and, at that time, Council did not direct pursuit of a measure due to the unknown
financial impacts on the City’s residents as a result of COVID-19.
Here is a table displaying the current Sales & Use Tax Rates for the Region:
Page 136 of 324
Item 11.a.
City Council
Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of a Sales Tax
Measure
April 26, 2022
Page 11
Table 8
Sales & Use Tax Rates (Effective April 1, 2022)
ANALYSIS OF ISSUES:
Street Repair Costs
In February 2022, the City contracted with Pavement Engineering Inc. (PEI) to update all
the City’s Pavement Management System. The final report was received on April 21, 2022
(Attachment 1). The City currently maintains approximately 67.5 centerline miles of roads
representing 13,922,291 square feet of pavement with a replacement value of
approximately $313,566,000 as calculated by StreetSaver. Despite past efforts, the
condition of the City’s streets has declined. On a pavement condition scale of 0 to 100,
streets now rank an average of 56, down from an average of 69 in 2016. The breakdown
by functional classification is as follows in Table 9:
City Rate County
Monterey 9.25%Monterey
Salinas 9.25%Monterey
Carmel-by-the-Sea 9.25%Monterey
Del Rey Oaks 9.25%Monterey
Gonzales 8.75%Monterey
Greenfield 9.50%Monterey
King City 8.75%Monterey
Marina 9.25%Monterey
Pacific Grove 8.75%Monterey
Sand City 8.75%Monterey
Seaside 9.25%Monterey
Soledad 9.25%Monterey
Arroyo Grande 7.75%San Luis Obispo
Atascadero 8.75%San Luis Obispo
Grover Beach 8.75%San Luis Obispo
Morro Bay 8.75%San Luis Obispo
Paso Robles 8.75%San Luis Obispo
Pismo Beach 7.75%San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo 8.75%San Luis Obispo
Unincorporated SLO County 7.25%San Luis Obispo
Goleta 7.75%Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara 8.75%Santa Barbara
Santa Maria 8.75%Santa Barbara
Carpinteria 9.00%Santa Barbara
Guadalupe 8.75%Santa Barbara
Page 137 of 324
Item 11.a.
City Council
Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of a Sales Tax
Measure
April 26, 2022
Page 12
Table 9
The chart below shows the City’s street system broken down into 10-point PCI ranges:
Chart 2
PEI generated five (5) scenario projections of future pavement conditions in the City and
the costs to obtain and maintain those conditions over the course of ten years, which are
represented graphically below in Chart 3:
Page 138 of 324
Item 11.a.
City Council
Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of a Sales Tax
Measure
April 26, 2022
Page 13
Chart 3
A summary of each of the scenario projections are as follows:
Scenario 1: Unconstrained Budget/ Funds Needed to obtain Optimum PCI of 85
($74.3M for Year 1, $4.5M/Yr Avg. for Years 2-10.)
Scenario 2: Amount of funding to increase PCI by 5 (Avg. $8.0M/Yr.)
Scenario 3: Amount of funding to maintain PCI of 56 (Avg. $6.3M/Yr.)
Scenario 4: Impact of the current funding amount ($1.25M/Yr.), showing that the
current PCI would decline from 56 to 35, a 21 point overall drop in 10 years.
Scenario 5: Represents the impact to the PCI if Zero dollars are spent
Optimum PCI refers to the highest PCI level that the overall network can achieve within
the given “Budget Needs” time frame. The charts that follow illustrate the consequences
to the City’s overall weighted PCI and Deferred Maintenance Amount (costs for street
repairs that get delayed or rescheduled into the future due to budget limitations), based
on the scenario projections.
At the current funding level of $1.25M/Yr., it is predicted the PCI of the entire system will
continue to deteriorate from 56 to 35, a 21 PCI point drop over the next 10 years, and the
backlog of deferred maintenance will grow from $70 million to $209 million, an increase
of 197%. A PCI of 35 falls within the Poor Condition category. An example of a 35 PCI is
Brighton Avenue, between Courtland and North Elm Street. Streets that have fallen into
Page 139 of 324
Item 11.a.
City Council
Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of a Sales Tax
Measure
April 26, 2022
Page 14
the Poor Condition Category require more expensive repair treatments such as light to
heavy rehabilitation as opposed to lower cost light to heavy maintenance treatments. In
addition, when repairs are deferred, they fall into a deferred maintenance backlog that
creates a vicious cycle. As necessary repairs are postponed, streets start to deteriorate
requiring more expensive repair treatments.
Chart 4
Based on the identified needs and current funding sources available to the City for its
pavement maintenance, there are no long-term options available that can overcome the
condition and replacement cost of the City's streets without a new and significant source
of income for street repair.
Financing Options - Types of Municipal Debt
General Obligation Bonds
General Obligation Bonds (GO Bonds) are municipal bonds that provide a way for local
governments to raise money for projects (e.g. streets and roads) that may not generate
a revenue stream directly. GO Bonds require voter approval of a new revenue source
(property taxes) to pay debt service. These bonds are secured by the full faith, credit and
taxing power of the municipality, which typically results in the lowest possible interest
Page 140 of 324
Item 11.a.
City Council
Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of a Sales Tax
Measure
April 26, 2022
Page 15
rates for financing a capital project, which is the primary advantage of borrowing money
by issuing GO bonds. These type of bonds are approved by a 2/3rd voter approval and
paid from an additional property tax levied on property owners.
Another advantage of using GO Bonds to finance capital projects is the generally lower
cost of issuance, when compared to most other methods of financing capital projects.
This is because the legal structure for the issuance of general obligation bonds is less
complex than most other financing methods. Cities borrow funds to pay for infrastructure
with a long useful life, rather than using current cash for a variety of reasons. In the case
of public assets like a street, paying for it over time provides “intergenerational equity.” In
other words, the current generation does not pay the entire bill for a bridge with a 50-year
useful life, for example; rather, users of that long-term asset pay their share over time.
The use of borrowing, paid for with a new revenue source, also allows cities to use their
other resources to pay for vital services including public safety. Finally, in the case of GO
bonds, property owners are asked to pay for the improvements with property taxes as
property values throughout the city will benefit from the additional public investment.
Pros/Cons of GO’s Bonds
Pros:
o Lowest Cost
o Does not rely on existing General Fund resources
Cons:
o Long lead time, usually 9-12 months
o High voter hurdle, requires 2/3 voter approval
o Limited flexibility of use of proceeds
Lease Revenue Bonds
Lease revenue bonds (LRBs) are another form of debt financing public agencies often
use to fund capital projects, including street and road upgrades. To utilize LRBs the City
would establish a separate public financing entity that would issue the bonds and colle ct
lease payments from the City in an amount sufficient to cover the debt service payments.
LRBs usually finance the construction of facilities, including office buildings, correction
facilities, courthouses, and streets and are secured through an encumbrance on a City
building or facility. However, unlike revenue bonds that use money generated by the
project itself (e.g. a bridge toll or water system project) to make the debt service
payments, facilities funded by LRBs often do not have a dedicated funding source. For
this reason, the issuance of LRBs are often paired with a new funding source (e.g. new
sales tax measure) sufficient to cover the debt service.
Pros/Cons of LRBs
Pros:
o City Council approval of bond issuance, although voter approval is needed for the
funding source (Sales Tax Measure)
Page 141 of 324
Item 11.a.
City Council
Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of a Sales Tax
Measure
April 26, 2022
Page 16
o Quick implementation
o Very flexible/widely available
Cons:
o General Fund obligation
o Encumbrance of facility
o Requires a new funding source, such as a voter approved sales tax measure
After reviewing the two Bond options available, the LRBs appear as the logical choice with
a new form of revenue like a sales tax measure to fund the payment of this obligation. City
staff worked with an independent municipal advisor to provide potential terms and bonding
amounts. Below is table 10 comparing a 30-year and 20-year term LRB:
Table 10
To move forward with this option, the City would need to place a 1% local sales tax measure
on the November 2022 ballot; the proposed sales tax measure would generate an estimated
$5 million annually in additional revenue. The estimated 1% local sales tax of $5 million is
based on doubling the current Measure O-06 ½ cent sales tax totals of approximately $2.5
million annually.
30-year term 20-year term
Method of Sale Public Public
Reserve Requirement N/A N/A
Final Maturity 10/1/2052 10/1/2042
Closing Date 6/1/2023 6/1/2023
True Interest Cost (TIC)4.80%4.45%
Par Amount $38,540,000 $31,635,000
Project Fund Amount $38,645,466 $31,992,966
Total Debt Service $71,921,633 $47,950,667
Max. Annual Debt Service $2,400,000 $2,400,000
Avg. Annual Debt Service $2,451,874 $2,480,207
Notes:
Scale from Cosumnes CSD AA- rated COPs as of 4/14/22 plus 100 bps
Assumes COI of $250k and UWD of $7/bond
Assumes AA rating, no DSRF
City of Arroyo Grande
2023 Lease Revenue Bonds
Page 142 of 324
Item 11.a.
City Council
Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of a Sales Tax
Measure
April 26, 2022
Page 17
Use of LRBs for Streets Repair
Based on the information in the table above, staff worked with PEI to review scenarios that
used the 30-year term LRBs of approximately $39 million, with a debt service payment of
approximately $2.5 million, leaving a remaining $2.5 million for annual ongoing infrastructure
maintenance. Scenarios A through D below depict costs and PCI projections for the next 15
years.
To create Scenario A, the following funds were included in the first 5 years of projections:
$39 million received from the issuance of LRBs +
$2 million in revenue per year for 5 years from the new 1% local sales tax +
$1 million from Measure O-06 revenue
This would bring the total spent in the first 5 years of streets repairs to $54 million ($39million
in LRBs funding + $2 million/year in new 1% local sales tax for 5 years + $1 million in
Measure O-06 local sales tax for 5 years). In the years after the initial 5 year spending plan,
the City would be able to allocate a total of $3.75 million annually to pavement maintenance
($2.5 million in new 1% local sales tax + $1.25 million in Measure O-06 local sales tax). This
scenario is depicted as Scenario A in Chart 5 below.
Scenario B depicted in Chart 5 below uses the same first 5-year projections as Scenario A,
but includes an estimated $5 million in annual maintenance after the first five years. This
scenario is provided for information purposes to depict the anticipated PCI level with an
additional $1.25 million for annual maintenance. The City does not currently have an
anticipated revenue source for a full $5 million in annual maintenance.
Scenario C depicted in Chart 5 below used the 30-year term LRBs of approximately $39
million spent on street repairs over the course of 10 years rather than 5, along with a debt
service payments of approximately $2.5 million per year, leaving a remaining $2.5 million
for annual ongoing infrastructure maintenance for the last 5 years of the projection. Under
this scenario, the total spent in the first 10 years of streets repairs would be $64 million ($39
million in LRBs funding + $1.5 million/year in new 1% local sales tax for 10 years + $1 million
in Measure O-06 local sales tax for 10 years). In the years after the initial 10 year spending
plan, the City would be able to allocate a total of $3.75 million annually to pavement
maintenance ($2.5 million in new 1% local sales tax plus $1.25 million in Measure O-06 local
sales tax).
Scenario D depicted in Chart 5 below projects PCI levels that would result from the use of
$5 million from a new 1% sales tax measure plus $1.25 million in revenue from Measure O-
06 local sales tax. This scenario would not include revenue from LRBs or any other long
term debt solution.
Page 143 of 324
Item 11.a.
City Council
Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of a Sales Tax
Measure
April 26, 2022
Page 18
Chart 5
A summary of each of the scenario projections are as follows:
Scenario A: $54 million ramp up over 5 years, with $3.75 million annual
maintenance after that – overall cost over the 15-year period of $116,500,000
Scenario B: $54 million ramp up over 5 years, with $5 million annual maintenance
after that – overall cost over the 15-year period $129,000,000
Scenario C: $64 million ramp up over 10 years, with $3.75 million annual
maintenance after that – overall cost over the 15-year period $95,250,000
Scenario 4: $6.25 million over 15 years – overall cost over the 15-year period
$93,750,000
Based on this analysis, it does not appear that LRBs are the best option for the City. While
the influx of revenue from LRBs would allow the City to increase the average PCI from 56
to 67 by FY 2025-26, it is estimated that the City would need to invest significantly more
money than the City would have available even with a new 1% sales tax measure. As a
result, the City’s average PCI would yet again degrade in the out years of the 15-year
projection while at the same time requiring the City to make ongoing debt service
payments for at least an additional 15 years. At this time, staff would recommend moving
Page 144 of 324
Item 11.a.
City Council
Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of a Sales Tax
Measure
April 26, 2022
Page 19
forward with placing a 1% local sales tax measure on the November 2022 ballot and using
a significant portion of the increased annual revenue of approximately $5 million dollars
directly towards Streets, Sidewalks, and Stormwater Infrastructure Maintenance. This
would enable the City to maintain road conditions using the Critical Point Strategy
approach.
Sidewalk Repair and Stormwater Infrastructure Needs
As detailed in the 2016, deferred maintenance assessment estimated a total cost of
$1,346,250 to repair all sidewalk defects in the City. Current sidewalk repair costs are
estimated at $15/square foot. Therefore, of the average $120,000 in annual repairs
completed since 2016, the City has completed an estimated 11,400 linear feet of sidewalk
repairs. Additional funding from a new sales tax measure may enable the City to complete
additional sidewalk repairs and reduce continual sidewalk degradation, leading to quicker
and more extensive sidewalk improvements. This in turn will minimize hazards and lower
potential claims received in connection with sidewalk defects.
Similarly, the City’s existing stormwater infrastructure requires constant repair,
replacement, and maintenance. According to a 2016 assessment of the City’s existing
drainage facilities, $238,000 is needed annually to complete necessary improvements to
avoid costly failures and areas of flooding. On average, the City has been able to allocate
$100,000 to these improvements. Additionally, it is estimated that lining of the City’s
existing CMPs will cost approximately $4 million. Although the City has allocated
$500,000 in ARPA funding toward CMP lining, it is anticipated that an additional $3.5
million is needed to complete the lining. Revenue from a new sales tax measure may
enable the City to better fund these needed improvements.
Sales Tax Measure
In order to make a change to any general tax rate, the change must be approved by the
voters. Proposition 218, approved in 1996, now requires that all City tax election
measures be placed on the same election when City Council Members are selected
unless a financial emergency is declared. The next Council election is scheduled for
November 8, 2022. Subsequent Council elections are held every two years. In order to
place a tax measure on the November 8, 2022 ballot, 2/3rds of the City Council (at least
4 members) must approve the action to place the measure on the ballot. Once placed on
the ballot, the measure must be approved by 50% +1 votes of voting residents of the City.
If passed by the Council and the electorate, the tax would be effective no sooner than the
first day of the first calendar quarter, commencing more than 110 days after the adoption
of the ordinance. Therefore, the tax would be effective no sooner than April 1, 2023.
A Resolution ordering the submission to the qualified electors of the City a measure
relating to the establishment of a local transactions and use tax and an Ordinance adding
Chapter 3.23 to Title 3 of the AGMC regarding a transactions and use tax must receive a
2/3 vote of the City Council (at least 4 members) in order to place a tax measure on the
Page 145 of 324
Item 11.a.
City Council
Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of a Sales Tax
Measure
April 26, 2022
Page 20
November 8, 2022 ballot. Additional Resolutions are also required regarding the filing of
written arguments.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Sales Tax Measure
As with most policy actions, enacting an increase to the sales tax has advantages and
disadvantages.
Some arguments in favor include:
Unlike property taxes, sales taxes are paid by a greater distribution of the
population, including travelers, tourists, homeowners, renters, employees, and
businesses in the City;
Sales taxes are not paid on many basic necessities such as rent, groceries,
medicines and services;
Sales taxes are paid based on consumption (those who can afford to spend more
pay more), and they are paid incrementally instead of in a lump sum;
Because the tax is established by a vote of the local electorate, it cannot be taken
by the State;
The sales tax would generate additional revenue to maintain the City’s Streets,
Sidewalk, and Storm Drain Infrastructure, which are critical to a functioning
community;
All other jurisdictions in the Region, excluding Pismo Beach and the
unincorporated County, have an additional 1% sales tax in their City; therefore:
o There is no competitive advantage shown for having a lower sales tax rate;
o Arroyo Grande citizens make many purchases outside of the City and may
be paying a higher rate already, while none of that tax supports services in
Arroyo Grande.
Some arguments against include:
Additional taxes reduce the discretionary income of Arroyo Grande residents;
Tax increases are not generally perceived positively by the citizenry and may
erode trust in local government;
This is a general tax and there is no guarantee on the how the additional revenue
will be spent.
Options
In order to draft the measure, decisions on the following key issues will need to be made:
Amount of Increase
Staff recommends that 1% be proposed as the local sales tax amount as the City
needs the entire 1% to address deteriorating infrastructure needs.
Local Sales Tax Allocation Report
To ensure accountability, Measure O-06 included a provision requiring the City to
publish and distribute an annual report to each household on the revenues and
Page 146 of 324
Item 11.a.
City Council
Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of a Sales Tax
Measure
April 26, 2022
Page 21
expenditures from the sales tax proceeds. Staff is recommending providing a Local
Sales Tax Allocation Report.
Advisory Measure
Advisory measures may be added to the ballot along with a sales tax measure to
obtain direction from the public regarding the use of funds received from the tax.
As indicated in the Background section above, Measure O -06 included a number
of advisory measures that helped to identify the voters desire for the City’s
spending plan. Given the clear identified need for significant additional funding for
the City’s streets, sidewalks, and stormwater infrastructure repairs and
maintenance, it is anticipated that all of the revenue from a new 1% sales tax would
be spent on these improvements. An advisory measure could be added with the
sales tax measure to confirm the public’s desire for spending the revenue to meet
these needs. Alternatively, the sales tax measure its elf may describe the
anticipated use of funds for these purposes. For instance, the measure may be
written to state: “To provide funding for general city services in Arroyo Grande,
including increasing maintenance and repair of streets, sidewalks, stormwat er and
drainage facilities; shall an ordinance establishing a one percent sales tax be
adopted?”
Next steps
In order to place the local sales tax measure on the November 8, 2022 ballot, Council will
need to approve the measure prior to July 22, 2022. In order to provide staff enough time
to submit the proper paperwork and related resolutions and ordinances, a decision must
be made by the June 14, 2022 Council meeting.
June 14, 2022
1) Adopt Resolution ordering the
submission to the qualified electors of the
city of a certain measure relating to
Transaction and Use Tax at the General
Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday,
November 8, 2022 as called by
Resolution; and 2) Introduce Ordinance –
Transaction and Use Tax
Adopt Resolution setting priorities for filing
written arguments regarding measure and
directing the City Attorney to prepare an
impartial analysis
Adopt Resolution providing for the filing of
rebuttal arguments
June 28, 2022
Adopt Ordinance – Transaction and Use
Tax (Required by State Dept of Tax &
Administration, but subject to voter
approval)
Page 147 of 324
Item 11.a.
City Council
Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of a Sales Tax
Measure
April 26, 2022
Page 22
July 22, 2022 Last Day for Filing Arguments
July 22, 2022 Impartial Analysis for measure due from
City Attorney
July 23 – August 1, 2022
10-day Public Examination Period for
Arguments and Impartial Analysis
August 2, 2022 Last Day to File Rebuttal Arguments
August 3 – 12, 2022 10-day Public Examination Period for
Rebuttal Arguments
By August 12, 2022 (E-88)
Last day to file final ballot measure
documents (Arguments, Impartial
Analysis, with County Clerk/Registrar of
Voters for inclusion voter information
guide)
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council’s consideration:
Include a brief summary of each feasible alternative available for consideration. It is
important to provide a complete list. Do not exclude potential alternatives simply because
staff believes they will be detrimental.
1. Receive and file the 2022 Pavement Management Program Update report and
direct staff to prepare a ballot measure for the November 8, 2022 consolidated
election seeking a 1% local sales tax increase, to be provided at the June 14, 2022
City Council meeting;
2. Receive and file the 2022 Pavement Management Program Update report and do
not direct staff to prepare a ballot measure for the November 8, 2022 consolidated
election seeking a 1% local sales tax increase; or
3. Provide other direction to staff.
ADVANTAGES:
Seeking an additional 1% sales tax will enable the City to significantly increase its
investment in existing streets, sidewalks, and stormwater facilities and address deferred
maintenance needs. A new 1% sales tax will bring the City on par with the other cities in
the County and allow the City to reinvest the increased revenue in critical infrastructure
necessary to safely move goods and services throughout the City. Sales taxes are paid
by all visitors to the City and not just residents, ensuring that costs are distributed to those
who use the City’s facilities. Increased sales taxes paid by customers within the City will
be retained and reinvested within the City, providing a greater benefit to residents and
businesses.
DISADVANTAGES:
If the voters approve a new 1% sales tax measure, costs for cer tain goods will increase
within the City. Even with the revenue from a new 1% sales tax measure, the City’s
Page 148 of 324
Item 11.a.
City Council
Discussion of Infrastructure Financing Options and Consideration of a Sales Tax
Measure
April 26, 2022
Page 23
average PCI is anticipated to remain at current levels or increase only slightly over the
course of 15 years. Additional funding sources are still needed to address the City’s
deferred and ongoing maintenance for existing streets, sidewalks, and stormwater
infrastructure. A new 1% sales tax measure would not provide funding for other City
facilities (e.g. buildings, parks, public restrooms, etc.) or infrastructure.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
No environmental review is required for this item.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City’s website in accordance with
Government Code Section 54954.2.
Attachments:
1. 2022 Pavement Management Program Update
2. Measure O-06 Advisory Measures
3. Local Government Guide to California Sales, Use and Transaction Tax
Page 149 of 324
You can ride on our reputation
Pavement Engineering Inc.
2022 PMP Update
Final Report
April 2022
City of Arroyo Grande ATTACHMENT 1
Page 150 of 324
THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
2022 Pavement Management Program Update
Table of Contents
Section Description
I. Executive Summary
Introduction
Work Performed
Findings
Budget Analysis
Conclusions and Recommendations
II. Background
Pavement Design Basics
Pavement Deterioration
Typical Pavement Defects
Pavement Maintenance Treatments
Pavement Rehabilitation Treatments
III. Pavement Management Program Specifics
Background (StreetSaver)
Program Assumptions
Pavement Maintenance & Rehabilitation (M&R) Units Costs
Annual Pavement Maintenance/ Rehabilitation Program
Visual Evaluations
Program Updates
IV. Reference Reports
Street Name Alphabetical Listing
Street List PCI High to Low
V. GIS Toolbox
GIS Toolbox
Terminology
Base Map Implementation
Current PCI Condition Map
Appendix A Summarized System Information
Network Summary Statistics
Network Replacement Cost
Decision Tree
Appendix B Budget Scenarios
Needs Analysis & Zero Budget
Maintain Current PCI
Increase PCI by 5 Points
Current Funding
Appendix C Definitions
Page 151 of 324
Section I
Executive Summary
Page 152 of 324
E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y P a g e | 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Arroyo Grande currently maintains approximately 67.5 centerline miles of
roads representing 13,922,291 square feet of pavement with a replacement value of
approximately $313,566,000 as calculated by the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission's (MTC) StreetSaver® Program.
Pavement Engineering Inc. (PEI) updated all the streets in the City’s Pavement
Management Program, using StreetSaver®. The purpose of a Pavement Management
Program is to track inventory, store work history and furnish budget estimates to optimize
funding for improving the City’s pavement system.
INTRODUCTION
A Pavement Management Program has several distinctive uses:
• As a budgeting tool, a Pavement Management Program uses treatment costs that
are based on recently bid projects, by the participating agency, so that budgets
reflect historical costs for the area.
• As an inventory tool, a Pavement Management Program provides a quick and easy
reference for pavement areas and use.
• As a pavement condition record, a Pavement Management Program provides age,
load-related, non-load related and climate-related pavement condition and
deterioration information. The Pavement Management Program uses pavement
deterioration curves, based on nationwide research, which allow the program to
predict a pavement’s future condition.
A Pavement Management Program is not capable of providing detailed engineering
designs for a street. The Pavement Management Program instead helps the user identify
candidate streets for potential repair and maintenance. Project level pavement analysis
and engineering is an essential feature of future pavement maintenance and rehabi litation
projects. Additional investigation, or project level analysis, can optimize the City’s
pavement management dollars. Project level engineering examines the pavements in
significantly more detail than the visual evaluation required for the Pavement
Management Program Update and optimizes designs for all of the peculiar constraints of
a set of project streets.
Page 153 of 324
E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y P a g e | 2
WORK PERFORMED
Pavement Distress Survey and Database Update
For this update, PEI performed inspections on approximately 67.5 centerline miles of
road. Field inspections were completed in February 2022.
PEI measured the following distress types as part of our review: alligator cracking
(fatigue), block cracking, distortions, longitudinal & transverse cracking, patching & utility
cut patching, rutting / depressions, weathering, and raveling. All the collected data was
entered into the City’s StreetSaver® database.
As part of our field review, all the streets were mea sured to confirm lengths and widths.
Lengths were measured using a vehicle-mounted electronic measuring device and widths
were measured using a hand-held measuring wheel. Measurement discrepancies were
tabulated and reviewed with the City to determine if corrections were needed.
PEI performed a quality control (QC) check on our work. PEI’s QC check consists of
performing a field review of any street segment where the Pavement Condition Index
(PCI) showed a decrease of 3 or more points per year, or an increase of 1 PCI without a
documented Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) treatment, when compared to the
last inspection for the same road segment in the StreetSaver® database. Each segment
in the QC process was visually reviewed to determine if the StreetSaver® calculated PCI
was representative of the observed overall pavement condition for that road segment.
Variations found were re-inspected by a Senior Engineering Technician, or the Project
Manager, and the segments’ PCI was recalculated.
FINDINGS
The updated Pavement Management Program showed that the City's overall average
PCI is 56.
The breakdown by functional classification is as follows:
Functional
Classification
Centerline
Miles Lane Miles
Pavement
Area
(sq. ft.)
Percent of
System Average PCI
Arterial 11.32 29.66 3,100,945 22.3% 58
Collector 12.38 24.91 2,561,293 18.4% 55
Residential 43.41 86.53 7,839,302 56.3% 56
Other 0.39 1.73 420,751 3.0% 55
Totals 67.50 142.83 13,922,291 100.0% 56
Page 154 of 324
E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y P a g e | 3
The pie graph below shows the percentage of each functional classification, by area.
The bar graph below shows the City’s street system broken down into 10-point PCI
ranges.
Arterials
3,100,945
22.3%
Collectors
2,561,293
18.4%
Residentials
7,839,302
56.3%
Other
420,751
3.0%
0.31%
42,251
3.24%
441,214 0.56%
75,610
100,497
4.95%
725,370
20.49%
2,837,575
17.13%
2,403,012 15.79%
2,247,668
18.90%
2,617,986 17.83%
2,483,846
375,526
130,810
0.80%
87,846
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
100-91 90-81 80-71 70-61 60-51 50-41 40-31 30-21 20-11 10-0Area (SqFt)PCI Range
Total System by Functional Class by PCI
Arterials
Collectors
Residentials
Other
0.72%
5.18%
20.25%
17.15%
16.04%
18.69%17.73%
2.68%
0.93%0.63%100,497
725,370
2,837,575
2,403,012
2,247,668
2,617,986 2,483,846
375,526
130,810 87,846
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
100-91 90-81 80-71 70-61 60-51 50-41 40-31 30-21 20-11 10-0Area (SqFt)PCI Range
Total System by Functional Class by PCI
Arterials
Collectors
Residentials
Other
Page 155 of 324
E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y P a g e | 4
The breakdown by Condition Category and corresponding PCI range is shown below:
Condition Category Breakdown
Condition PCI Range % Of Total Square Feet
Excellent 100-91 0.72% 100,497
Good 90-71 25.59% 3,562,945
Fair 70-51 33.40% 4,650,680
Poor 50-31 36.65% 5,101,832
Failed 30-0 3.64% 506,336
The analysis shows that 70.05% of the City's pavement are in Fair to Poor condition.
Details of each street segment are provided in Section IV: Reference Reports.
BUDGET ANALYSIS
StreetSaver® uses a decision tree to model the decision -making process that agencies
follow to select a maintenance or rehabilitation strategy. The decision tree contains
"branches" for each functional classification, surface type and condition category.
Jurisdictions can outline their maintenance and rehabilitation strategy by choosing a
treatment for each branch.
The treatments listed in the decision tree are generalized to provide a range of treatments.
Typical treatments within each generalized treatment range are listed below. The exact
treatment would need to be determined during the design phase of the project.
StreetSaver® assigns a treatment action and estimated cost to each street segment
based on the pavement's current PCI.
Page 156 of 324
E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y P a g e | 5
Treatment Category Typical Treatment
Light Maintenance • Slurry Seal or Micro-Surface
• Fog Seal or Scrub Seal
Heavy Maintenance
• Chip Seal, Cape Seal
• Slurry Seal or Micro-Surface with Digouts
• Thin Maintenance Overlay (TMO)
Light Rehab. • Overlay (2” and under) or Thin Mill and Fill
Heavy Rehab.
• Overlay (greater than 2”) or Thick Mill and Fill
• Cold-In-Place Recycling
• Full Depth Reclamation
• Pulverize and Resurfacing
Reconstruct • Full Section Reconstruction
Decision Tree Unit Prices
As a minimum, recent bid tabulations should be used to determine the appropriate unit
costs. Further, the unit costs include other costs such as design, construction
management, contingencies or other related construction costs (ADA ramps, curb &
gutters, striping etc.) to form a more comprehensive unit cost for the selected treatments.
For the City of Arroyo Grande, the unit costs on the following table were used:
Treatment Arterial Collector Residential
Cost/ Sq Yd
Crack Seal ($$/LF) $1.59 $1.27 $1.27
Light Maintenance $5.72 $4.57 $4.57
Heavy Maintenance $21.20 $17.66 $17.66
Light Rehab $60.05 $56.52 $52.99
Heavy Rehab $91.85 $84.78 $84.78
Reconstruct $229.61 $197.82 $173.09
Page 157 of 324
E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y P a g e | 6
For this update, PEI analyzed several scenarios, which are summarized below:
Budget Scenario Projections
PEI generated Five (5) scenario projections which are represented graphically below:
A summary of each of the scenario projections are as follows:
Scenario 1: Unconstrained Budget/ Funds Needed to obtain an Optimum PCI of 85
($74.3M for Year 1, $4.5M/Yr Avg. for Years 2-10.)
Scenario 2: Amount of funding to increase PCI by 5 (Avg. $8.0M/Yr.)
Scenario 3: Amount of funding to maintain PCI of 56 (Avg. $6.3M/Yr.)
Scenario 4: Impact of the current funding amount ($1.25M/Yr.).
The Average Citywide PCI would decline from 56 to 35, a 21 point drop
over the next 10 years.
Scenario 5: Represents the impact to the PCI if Zero dollars are spent
The full report for the various budget scenarios can be found in Appendix B.
85
61
56
37
56
3130
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
-2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031PCI RangeYear
Projections (S1) Needs
$67.3M/Yr 1, then
Avg. $4.6M/Yr
(S2) Increase by 5
Avg. $7.9M/Yr
(S3) Maintain 56;
Avg $6.1M/Yr
(S4) Current
Budget $1.25M/Yr
(S5) Zero Budget
85
61
56
35
56
29
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032PCI RangeYear
Scenario Projections
(S1)
Needs: $74.3M Yr 1,
then Avg. $4.5M/Yr
(S2)
Increase by 5:
Avg. $8.0M/Yr
(S3)
Maintain 56:
Avg. $6.3M/Yr
(S4)
Current Funding:
Avg. $1.25M/Yr
(S5)
Zero Budget
Page 158 of 324
E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y P a g e | 7
Budget Consequences
The following graphs illustrate the consequences to the City’s overall weighted PCI and
Deferred Maintenance Amount, based on the scenario projections:
At the current funding level of $1.25M/Yr., the PCI of the entire system will deteriorate
from 56 to 35, a 21 PCI point drop over the next 10 years. In addition, the backlog of
deferred maintenance grows from $70 million to $209 million, an increase of 197%.
$67M $74M
$85M
$99M
$117M
$135M
$154M
$172M
$185M
$196M
57 55 53 51 48
46 44 41 39 37
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
$-
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 PCIDeferred Maintenance($ Millions)Year
Scenario 4 -Current Budget Consequences
AVG $1.25M/YR
Deferred Maintenance Pavement Condition Index
$70M
$81M
$95M
$112M
$131M
$149M
$165M
$182M
$191M
$209M
55 53 51 48
46 43 41 39 37 35
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
$-
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 PCIDeferred Maintenance($ Millions)Year
Scenario 4 -Current Funding Consequences
Avg. $1.25M/Yr
Deferred Maintenance Pavement Condition Index
Page 159 of 324
E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y P a g e | 8
To maintain the current PCI of 56, it is projected that an average funding level of
$6.3M/YR is necessary. At this funding level the backlog of deferred maintenance grows
from $69 million to $130 million, an increase of 87%.
To increase the PCI 5 points from 56 to 61, it is projected that an average funding level
of $8.0M/Yr is necessary. At this funding level the backlog of deferred maintenance grows
from $68 million to $108 million, an increase of 59%.
$67M $74M $79M $86M $96M
$109.01 $120M $125M $129M $131M
56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
$-
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 PCIDeferred Maintenance($ Millions)Year
Scenario 3 -Maintain 56 PCI
Deferred Maintenance Pavement Condition Index
$67M $71M $75M $81M $89M $100.16 $104M $105M $106M $105M
56.5 57 57.5 58 58.5 59 59.5 60 60.5 61
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
$-
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 PCIDeferred Maintenance($ Millions)Year
Scenario 2 -Increase PCI by 5
Deferred Maintenance Pavement Condition Index
$69M $76M $84M $94M $105M $115M $121M $127M $129M $130M
56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
$-
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 PCIDeferred Maintenance($ Millions)Year
Scenario 3 -Budget Consequences
Maintain 56 PCI (Avg. $6.3M/Yr)
Deferred Maintenance Pavement Condition Index
$68M $73M $79M $88M $98M $104M $109M $110M $110M $108M
56.5 57 57.5 58 58.5 59 59.5 60 60.5 61
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
$-
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 PCIDeferred Maintenance($ Millions)Year
Scenario 2 -Budget Consequences
Increase PCI by 5 (Avg. $8.0M/Yr)
Deferred Maintenance Pavement Condition Index
Page 160 of 324
E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y P a g e | 9
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This Executive Summary provides a review of the 2022 Pavement Management Program
Update performed by PEI. PEI inspected all road segments in the City of Arroyo Grande.
The average overall PCI for the City is 56, and 70.05% of the City's pavement is in Fair
to Poor condition.
To maintain the system at its current overall PCI of 56, the City will need to spend an
average of $6.3 million annually over the next 10 years. Maintaining the current funding
level of approximately $1.25 Million annually will result in a PCI loss of 21 points in 10
years to a PCI of 35.
A review of the City’s street system, by functional classification, shows that the Arterial
streets have the highest average PCI of 58, the Collector streets have an average PCI of
55, and the Residential streets have an average PCI of 56. As a general rule, agencies
typically try to keep their arterials in the best condition because they carry the bulk of the
traffic and loading, followed by collectors, then the residential/ local streets.
Moving forward, PEI recommends the City carefully evaluate the overall annual budget
to determine the amount it wants to commit to pavement maintenance and rehabilitat ion
projects. We recommend the City set priorities for each functional classification and
perhaps certain streets within each classification.
This Pavement Management Program will assist the City in its efforts to monitor
treatments and track their effectiveness and help the City in setting future priorities and
treatment policies. To ensure the City is evaluating accurate data, PEI suggests the City
update its Pavement Management Program on a regular basis and review the entire
system every three years, this includes a thorough review of the Decision Tree and the
unit costs contained within. As the City maintains and updates its Pavement Management
Program, the program will become a valuable tool in its efforts to maximize performance
and minimize the spending for pavements.
Page 161 of 324
Section II
Background
Page 162 of 324
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 1
BACKGROUND
This section is intended to introduce important pavement design definitions and
calculations as a background for understanding the Pavement Management Program
(PMP) assumptions.
PAVEMENT DESIGN BASICS
Pavements are a structural support system generally con sidered to act like a beam. But
unlike beams in buildings, which generally have static loads, the pavement structure is
flexed many times from traffic loading. Cars and light trucks have little impact on the
pavement structure. Larger/Heavier trucks have very significant impacts on the pavement
due to the high axle weights. The impact of trucks is measured in equivalent single
18,000-pound axle loads (EALs). The total EALs are converted into a design Traffic Index
(TI). As an example, a design TI of 5 is equal to 7,160 EALs. A Design TI of 8 is equal to
372,000 EALs. Therefore, the design TI is the total number of EALs that the pavement
will support before it begins to fail, regardless of the passage of time. Normally for a new
pavement, the EALs over a 20-year period are used. For rehabilitation treatments such
as overlays, 10 years is generally used.
The other element of pavement design is the support of the beam. The support is provided
by the sub-grade soils. The support value is designated by the R-value test.
Using the design TI and R-value, the pavement designer chooses various materials to
construct the structural section. The most common pavement section is a thin layer of
asphalt concrete over aggregate base(s). Many options are available depending o n
specific project requirements and conditions.
The Design Life of a pavement is the period of time that a pavement is engineered, or
planned, to perform at a satisfactory level. The Service Life of a pavement is the actual
amount of time that a pavement performs at that satisfactory level. The design methods
used in California are based on a 50 percent reliability rate. So, the average service life,
of all pavements constructed using t hose design procedures, will be the design life. This
generally means that about half of the pavements will not last the full design life and the
other half will last longer than the design life. Therefore, the expected service life of a
pavement is generally expressed in a range of years. For a pavement with a 20-year
design life, the expected service life of that pavement will be 17 to 23 years.
PAVEMENT DETERIORATION
Pavement deteriorates from two processes , Fatigue and Aging, which occur
simultaneously. In a well-designed and constructed pavement, the two processes result
in the need to rehabilitate the pavement at approximately the same time. This is called
the design life. The design life for most new pavements is 20 years. Each deterioration
process has its own set of pavement defects, which are relate d to the process.
Page 163 of 324
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 2
Fatigue
The first deterioration process, fatigue, is caused by heavy axle loads. As the pavement
structure flexes or bends from heavy wheel loads, the asphalt concrete layer’s ability to
flex is consumed. With enough bending, the asphalt concrete layer begins to break at the
bottom. These cracks progress upward until they reach the surface and appear as
alligator cracking. These areas are repaired by removal and replacement of the asphalt
concrete in the affected areas. These repairs are commonly called digouts.
As the pavement structure, its supporting soils, and the precise loading from wheel loads
vary, so does the time it takes for alligator cracking to appear. As alligator cracking
appears, the pavement should be repaired with digouts. Generally, when the total
cumulative quantity of digouts reaches approximately 10 percent , or more, of the total
area, the pavement is considered to have reached its service life and requires major
rehabilitation.
Aging
The major element of the pavement structure that ages is the asphalt concrete layer. To
a minor extent, aggregate bases can age if contaminated by fine soil particles, which are
transported from the subsoil into the aggregate base.
Asphalt Concrete (AC) pavement is composed of aggregates and asphalt binder. The
aggregates used are generally of fair quality and will experience some breakdown over
time. Aggregate aging problems need to be addressed with maintenance treatments. As
the asphalt binder ages, it loses volume through the loss of volatile components in the
asphalt. As the volume decreases, or shrinks, the pavement will progressively crack from
the resulting tensile strain in the layer. Normally, these cracks first show up as transverse
cracks. They also show up in weak areas, such as paving joints. These cracks widen and
increase over time until the pavement has a checkerboard appearance.
The aging process also causes the pavement to become more brittle. The increased
stiffness results in additional cracking from loaded vehicles. This load induced cracking
from the brittleness of the asphalt concrete is very s imilar to fatigue cracking in
appearance.
The major agent for deterioration of the asphalt concrete binder is oxygen , whose carrier
is water. Water enters the pavement either from the surface or as water vapor from
underneath.
TYPICAL PAVEMENT DEFECTS
St reetSaver® identifies eight different Asphalt Concrete distress types. These are:
1. Alligator Cracking (Fatigue)
2. Block Cracking
3. Distortions
4. Longitudinal and Transverse
Cracking
5. Patching and Utility Cut Patching
6. Rutting and Depression
7. Raveling
8. Weathering
Page 164 of 324
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 3
These defects are common to virtually the entire pavement as aging progresses.
For purposes of understanding the levels of these distresses, the condition level
descriptions from the ASTM D6433 “Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots
Pavement Condition Index Surveys” are included herein:
Alligator Cracking (Fatigue)
Description:
Alligator or fatigue cracking is a series of interconnecting cracks caused by fatigue failure
of the asphalt concrete surface under repeated traffic loading. Cracking begins at the
bottom of the asphalt surface (or stabilized base) where tensile stress and strain are
highest under wheel load. The cracks propagate to the surface initially as a series of
parallel longitudinal cracks. After repeated traffic loading, the cracks connect, forming
many sided, sharp-angled pieces that develop a pattern resembling chicken wire or the
skin of an alligator. The pieces are generally less than 0.6 m (2 ft) on the longest side.
Alligator cracking occurs only in areas subjected to repeated traffic loading, such as wheel
paths. Therefore, it would not occur over an entire area unless the entire area were
subject to traffic loading (pattern -type cracking that occurs over an entire area not
subjected to loading is called “block cracking,” which is not a load-associated distress).
Severity Levels:
L Fine, longitudinal hairline cracks running parallel to each other with no, or only
a few interconnecting cracks. The cracks are not spalled.
M Further development of light alligator cracks into a pattern or network of cracks
that may be lightly spalled.
H Network or pattern cracking has progressed so that the pieces are well defined
and spalled at the edges, with some pieces rocking under vehicle traffic .
Image 1: Alligator Cracking
Page 165 of 324
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 4
Block Cracking
Description:
Block cracks are interconnected cracks that divide the pavement into approximately
rectangular pieces. The blocks may range in size from approximately 0.3 by 0.3 m (1 by
1 ft) to 3 by 3 m (10 by 10 ft). Block cracking is caused mainly by shrinkage of the asphalt
concrete and daily temperature cycling (which results in daily stress/strain cycling). It is
not load-associated. Block cracking usually indicates that the asphalt h as hardened
significantly. Block cracking normally occurs over a large portion of the pavement area,
but sometimes will occur only in non-traffic areas. This type of distress differs from
alligator cracking in that alligator cracks form smaller, many -sided pieces with sharp
angles. Also, unlike block cracks, alligator cracks are caused by repeated traffic loadings
and therefore found only in traffic areas (i.e., wheel paths).
Severity Levels: (*See definitions of longitudinal transverse cracking.)
L Blocks are defined by low-severity* cracks.
M Blocks are defined by medium -severity* cracks.
H Blocks are defined by high-severity* cracks.
Image 2: Block Cracking
Page 166 of 324
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 5
Distortions
Description:
Distortions are usually caused by corrugations, bumps, sags and shoving. They are
localized abrupt upward or downward displacements in the pavement surface, a series of
closely spaced ridges and valley or localized longitudinal displacements of the pavemen t
surface. Distortions affect ride quality.
Severity Levels:
L Distortion produces vehicle vibrations, which are noticeable, but no reduction
in speed is necessary for comfort or safety and/or individual distortions cause
the vehicle to bounce slightly but create little discomfort.
M Distortion produces vehicle vibrations, which are significant, and some
reduction in speed is necessary for safety and comfort.
H Distortion produces vehicle vibrations, which are so excessive that speed must
be reduced considerably for safety and comfort.
Image 3: Distortions
Page 167 of 324
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 6
Longitudinal and Transverse Cracking (Non-PCC Slab Joint Reflective)
Description:
Longitudinal cracks are parallel to the pavement’s centerline or laydown direction. They
may be caused by:
1. A poorly constructed paving lane joint.
2. Shrinkage of the AC surface due to low temperature or hardening of the
asphalt and/or daily temperature cycling.
3. A reflective crack caused by cracking beneath t he surface course, including
crack in PCC slabs.
4. Decreased support or thickness near the edge of the pavement.
Transverse cracks extend across the pavement at approximately right angles to the
pavement centerline or direction of laydown. These may be cause d by conditions (2) and
(3) above. These types of cracks are not usually load-associated.
Severity Levels:
L One of the following conditions exists:
(1) Non-filled crack where the width is less than 10 mm (3/8 in.) or
(2) filled crack of any width, where crack filler in satisfactory condition.
M One of the following conditions exists:
(1) non-filled crack width is greater than or equal to 10 mm and less than 75
mm (3/8 to 3 in.)
(2) non-filled crack is less than or equal to 75 mm (3 in.) surrounded by light
and random cracking, or
(3) filled crack is of any width surrounded by light random cracking.
H One of the following conditions exists:
(1) any crack filled or non-filled surrounded by medium or high severity
random cracking,
(2) non-filled crack greater than 75 mm (3 in.) or
(3) A crack of any width where approximately 100 mm (4 in.) of pavement
around the crack is severely broken.
Image 4: Longitudinal and Transverse Cracking
Page 168 of 324
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 7
Patching and Utility Cut Patching
Description:
A patch is an area of pavement that has been replaced with new material to repair the
existing pavement. A patch is considered a defect no matter how well it is performed (a
patched area or adjacent area usually does not perform as well as an original pavement
section). Generally, some roughness is associated with this distress.
Severity Levels:
L Patch is in good condition and satisfactory. Ride quality* is rated as low
severity or better.
M Patch is moderately deteriorated and/or ride quality* is rated as medium
severity.
H Patch is badly deteriorated and/or ride quality* is rated as high severity .
Needs replacement soon.
*Ride quality is defined in the severity levels of distortions.
Image 5: Patching and Utility Cut Patching
Page 169 of 324
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 8
Rutting and Depressions
Description:
A rut is a surface depression in the wheel paths. Pavement uplift may occur along the
sides of the rut, but in many instances, ruts are noticeable only after a rainfall when the
paths are filled with water. Rutting stems from a permanent deformation in any of the
pavement layers or sub-grades, usually caused by consolidated or lateral movement of
the materials due to traffic load. Significant rutting can lead to major structural failure of
the pavement.
Depressions are localized areas where the pavement structure is lower than the
surrounding area, but the transition is not abrupt enough to be considered a distortion.
They are often referred to as “bird baths”.
Severity Levels: (Average Rut or Depression Depth)
L 1/2" to less than 1” (13 to 25mm).
M 1” to less than 2” (25 to 50mm).
H equal to or greater than 2” (over 50mm).
Image 6: Rutting and Depressions
Page 170 of 324
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 9
Raveling
Description:
Raveling is the dislodging of coarse aggregate particles. Raveling may be caused by
insufficient asphalt binder, poor mixture quality, insufficient compaction, segregation, or
stripping.
Coarse aggregate refers to the predominant coarse aggregate size of the asphalt mix,
and aggregate clusters refers to when more than one adjoining coarse aggregate piece
is missing. If in doubt about a severity level, three representative areas of one square
yard each (square meter) should be examined and the number of mis sing aggregate
particles/clusters is counted.
Severity Levels:
M Considerable loss of coarse aggregate greater than 20 per square yard
(square meter), and/ or clusters of missing coarse aggregate are present.
H Surface is rough and pitted, and it may be completely removed in places.
Image 7 : Raveling
Page 171 of 324
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 10
Weathering
Description:
Weathering is the wearing away of the asphalt binder and fine aggregate matrix.
Coarse aggregate refers to predominant coarse aggregate size of the asphalt mix. Loss
or dislodging of coarse aggregate is covered under Raveling. Surface wear is normally
caused by oxidation, inadequate compaction, insufficient asphalt content, excessive
natural sand, surface water erosion, and traffic. Weathering occurs faster in areas with
high solar radiation.
Severity Levels:
L Asphalt surface beginning to show signs of aging which may be accelerated
by climatic conditions loss of fine aggregate mix is noticeable and may be
accompanied by fading of the asphalt color. Edges of the aggregates are
beginning to be exposed (less than 0.05 inches or 1 mm).
M Loss of the fine aggregate matrix is noticeable and the edges of the coarse
aggregate have been exposed up to 1/4th of the width (of the longest side)
of the coarse aggregate due to the loss of fine aggregate matrix.
H Edges of the coarse aggregate have been exposed greater than 1/4th of the
width (of the longest side) of the coarse aggregate. There is considerable
loss of fine aggregate matrix leading to potential or some loss of coarse
aggregate.
Image 8: Weathering
Page 172 of 324
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 11
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE TREATMENT S
Pavement maintenance treatments are designed to slow the pavement aging process.
Mainly, the treatments are designed to protect the pavement from the adverse effects of
water and to some extent vehicle traffic.
Maintenance treatments, which protect the pavement from aging, are crack sealing,
digouts, slurry seals, and cape seals. When pavements have extensive cracking and are
beyond their design life, interim holding measures including skin patches and thin
overlays are used as a stop gap prior to major rehabilitation.
The following outlines some of the more common types of maintenance treatments:
Crack Sealing
Crack sealing prevents surface water from getting beneath the asphalt concrete layer into
the aggregate bases. Crack sealing is generally performed using hot rubberized crack
sealing material. The procedure includes routing small cracks, cleaning and s ealing.
Digouts
Digouts are small areas of deteriorated pavements, which are removed and replaced with
new asphalt concrete. Pavement removal is accomplished by cold planning or saw cutting
and excavation. New asphalt is installed in at least two lifts. The digout depth is
determined depending on the street type and construction.
Slurry Seals
Slurry seals consist of a combination of fine aggregate and emulsified oil. A new type of
slurry seal called Rubberized Asphalt Slurry (RAS) is in the development sta ge. Currently,
the cost of RAS is 2 to 3 times as much as a conventional slurry seal, which makes the
product economically unattractive. Slurry seals are used when the existing pavement
surface is severely raveled.
Cape Seals
Cape seals consist of a chip s eal over coated with a slurry seal. A chip seal is an
application of small angular rock (chips) approximately 1/4" to 3/8” in a maximum size
embedded into a thick application of asphalt emulsion. Most chip seals incorporate
polymer modified binders.
Cape seals are used on residential and collector streets to maintain a pavement, which
may need an overlay, but there are not sufficient funds available. Cape seals are placed
over low to moderate alligator cracks and block shrinkage cracking. Due to the distres s
covered by the cape seal, small areas of disbanding or failure may occur and will require
patching.
Page 173 of 324
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 12
Cape sealed surfaces are fairly coarse compared to new paving. Due to this
characteristic, they may not be acceptable to some residential areas.
Interim Holding Measures (or “Stop Gap” in StreetSaver ® Terms)
Interim holding measures or stop gap treatments are used to “hold” the pavement
together until funds become available for major rehabilitation. Common holding measures
used include skin patches and thin overlays.
Skin patches are thin lifts of fine asphalt concrete placed over deteriorated areas.
Thin maintenance overlays are placed to hold the surface together. The asphalt concrete
layer is generally 1 to 1-1/2 inches thick. A 3/8 inch aggregate is used with a rubberized
asphalt binder, where the rubber has been mixed into solution with the asphalt binder
during the refinement process. This is referred to as Terminally Blended Asphalt Rubber
Binder.
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION TREATMENTS
Pavement rehabilitation consists of treatments used to restore the existing pavement
quality or to add additional structural support to the pavement. Rehabilitation treatments
include conventional overlays; pulverization and resurfacing; ARHM (asphalt rubb er hot
mix) overlays; AC removal and replacement (Mill and Fill); and reconstruction.
The following outlines some of the more common types of rehabilitation treatments:
Conventional Overlays
Conventional overlays generally consist of surface preparation and varying thicknesses
of asphalt concrete. Surface preparation can consist of crack filling, pavement repairs of
base failures and leveling courses.
The overlay thickness is determined by the structural requirement of the deflection
analysis and reflective cracking criteria. The reflective cracking criteria requires the
thickness of the overlay to be a minimum 1/2 the thickness of the existing bonded layers.
Pavement fabric can account for 0.10 ft of asphalt for reflective cracking criteria if the
structural requirements from the deflection analysis are met.
Conventional overlays have an expected service life of 7 to 13 years if they are designed
to meet structural and reflective cracking criteria and are well constructed.
Page 174 of 324
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 13
Pulverization and Resurfacing
Pulverization and resurfacing is an alternative to conventional overlays for streets that are
structurally adequate but exhibit sufficient cracking to warrant improvement to the asphalt
surface.
Pulverization and resurfacing are an intermediate step between overlays and
reconstruction. The existing asphalt concrete is recycled into aggregate base and the
recycled base increases the total structural section. The surface is re -graded to conform
to flush facilities similar to the way the pavement is keycut for overlays. The re-grading
allows for some improvement to the cross section and profile. This method eliminates the
stress history and cracking of the old asphalt concrete pavement, thus eliminating
negative impacts on the new asphalt concrete surface.
Some instability can be encountered when the pulverization method is used. PEI typically
recommends budgeting 5 to 10 percent of the pulverized sub -grade area for stabilization.
Stabilization can be performed using 6-inch deep lift asphalt concrete.
Pulverization and resurfacing has a life expectancy of 13 to 18 years. The life expectancy
is slightly less than full reconstruction because some residual deficiencies in thickness or
quality of the unaffected layers may still exist. Additional testing is necessary to determine
if pulverization is a viable alternative. This testing includes measuring the existing
structural section and testing the native soil for bearing capacity (R -value).
RHMA Overlays
Rubberized Hot Mix Asphalt (RHMA) is a material that uses crumb rubber mixed with
traditional asphalt binders to produce a more flexible paving material than conventional
dense graded hot mix asphalt (HMA).
Caltrans has developed design criteria for use of this material based on accelerated
performance testing using its dual wheel accelerated pavement testing equipment. The
Caltrans criteria allows RHMA to be used in a one to two ratio to conventional hot mix
asphalt. Thus 1 inch of RHMA is equal to 2 inches of conventional hot mix asphalt for
reflective cr acking criteria.
RHMA costs approximately 1-3/4 times as much as conventional asphalt and provides a
similar service life to that of conventional hot mix asphalt, 7 to 13 years. RHMA is
generally only feasible when vertical constraints such as curb and gu tter restrict the
thickness of the overlay. RHMA typically has more open surface than conventional hot
mix asphalt and is more difficult to obtain a high-quality finished product.
Page 175 of 324
B a c k g r o u n d P a g e | 14
AC Removal and Replacement (Mill and Fill)
On some thick asphalt concrete pavements, the most economical approach to
rehabilitating the pavement is to remove some of the existing asphalt concrete surface,
which matches the existing profile. The replacement material can be either conventional
hot mix asphalt (HMA) or RHMA, depending on the design criteria.
In other cases, due to drainage or other physical constraints, additional thickness cannot
be placed. If the underlying base is sufficient to support anticipated loading, the asphalt
layer can be removed and replaced. Depending on existing conditions, this method
should have a life of 15 to 20 years.
Reconstruction
When the pavement has severe cross section deficiencies or requires significant
structural strengthening, reconstruction may be the only alternative. Generally, existi ng
pavement materials are recycled and incorporated into the new pavement structure.
Structural section material alternatives include treated soils, full depth asphalt concrete,
recycled materials and Portland cement concrete.
Page 176 of 324
Section III
Pavement Management Program Specifics
Page 177 of 324
P a v e m e n t M a n a g e m e n t P r o g r a m S p e c i f i c s P a g e | 1
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM SPECIFICS
This section discusses the characteristics of the Pavement Management Program and its
application for the City of Arroyo Grande.
BACKGROUND (STREETSAVER)
During the early years of Pavement Management software development, many
companies developed private software packages focused on management of municipal
street systems. Though these programs were versatile and sophisticated, the user was
also dependent upon the software vendor for trainin g, program updates, and software
servicing. Many of the vendors had difficulty maintaining their software, leaving agencies
stranded after making a substantial investment.
In 1982, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) completed a study of local
road and street maintenance needs and revenue short falls in the San Francisco Bay
Area. The results of the study indicated that local jurisdictions were spending only 60
percent of funds required to maintain roads in a condition considered adequate. This
indicated a need to improve pavement maintenance and rehabilitation techniques and
practices. A committee was formed to evaluate pavement management efforts. At
approximately the same time, six public works directors reviewed a proposal to develop
a prototype Pavement Management Program (PMP); however, it was felt that the
proposed system was too complex. This group strongly emphasized that simplicity was
the most important objective to be developed in a PMP if it was to be adopted and used
by cities and counties.
In 1983, a consultant was retained to assist MTC in determining PMP needs, PMP
resources, and problems. In addition, they were to develop three basic elements of a
standardized prototype PMP: a pavement condition index (PCI), effective maintenance
treatments for the Bay Area, and a network level assignment procedure. The result was
the first version of the MTC PMP. Since that time the program has evolved into
StreetSaver.
Today, MTC uses StreetSaver to help local cities and counties better allocate resources,
predict the future condition of their pavements at different levels of funding, and
demonstrate the effects of underfunded road programs. The Bay Area was one of the first
regions in the country to implement a Pavement Management Program that is used by
nearly all of its localities. Using StreetSaver, cities and counties can plan and manage
road improvement projects, document budget needs and shortfalls, and use the collected
data to build support for additional transportation funding.
Page 178 of 324
P a v e m e n t M a n a g e m e n t P r o g r a m S p e c i f i c s P a g e | 2
StreetSaver manages a collection of related data organized for easy storage and
retrieval. The StreetSaver program includes a database comprised of several sets of
related data ("tables") that contain information about the street network in the jurisdiction.
This information includes pavement condition, the available maintenance/rehabilitation
treatments and their costs, and the history of the network. Based on this information,
budget analyses are performed. A budget analysis allows the user to project network
maintenance and rehabilitation needs, and costs to evaluate the consequences of various
budget allocation alternatives. Alternatives can be evaluated in terms of maintenance and
rehabilitation that can actually be performed, future pavement condition, and deferred
costs. For some agencies, use of the StreetSaver program is cyclical. For others,
pavement management is integrated into an ongoing effort to manage their street
networks.
Implementation
There are several steps involved in implementing an effective Pavement Management
Program. These tasks should be completed on a periodic basis. These tasks include:
1. Collect pavement condition and maintenance/rehabilitation data.
2. Enter re-inspection data and/or applied maintenance and rehabilitation
information.
3. Check/update maintenance treatment definitions and pavement category
definitions.
4. Calculate Pavement Condition Index (PCI)
5. Evaluate system and current Maintenance/Rehabilitation strategies. Determine
Budget needs and if necessary, develop alternate Budget Summaries.
6. Present analysis outputs to funding bodies.
7. Acquire funds and apply maintenance/rehabilitation treatments.
PROGRAM ASSUMPTIONS
The goal of the Pavement Management Program is to furnish budgetary amounts in order
to achieve system wide improvements in the overall pavement condition. The goal of
project engineering is to obtain the proper structural affect, for the lowest financial
amount, for a given subset of the network to be maintained. Using the Pavement
Management Program, management is able to realistically budget for economically
maintaining the City’s pavement Network. Annually updating maintenance activity and
costs keeps the program current.
Page 179 of 324
P a v e m e n t M a n a g e m e n t P r o g r a m S p e c i f i c s P a g e | 3
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION (M&R) UNIT COSTS
The reliability and accuracy of any PMP is based on the information contained in its
Decision Tree. The listed treatments in the Decision Tree are generalized to provide a
range of treatments. The exact treatment would need to be determined during the design
phase of a project.
Typical treatments within each generalized treatment range are listed in table 3 below.
Based on a street segment’s current PCI condition, StreetSaver® assigns a treatment
action and estimated cost to perform the suggested treatment. This cost is not just what
is paid to the contractor but should include all the “Soft Costs” incurred by the City.
Soft Costs can include the surface preparation, engineering cost, materials testing, and
construction inspection. Even if these tasks are done “in-house”, the inclusion in
combination with the construction costs will tend to show the “true picture” of the cost of
a specific project.
The following costs were used to develop the indicated budget numbers for each st reet
segment PEI reviewed. The costs include, but are not limited to, miscellaneous work
such as transitions, striping, and digouts.
The costs are averages. Small systems will have higher unit costs and large systems will
have lower unit costs. The larger the annual project size, the better the economies of
scale. Timing is also important. Bidding the work in early spring will result in significantly
lower prices than bids solicited in the late summer or fall. If small packages are used,
costs could be 25 to 50 percent higher.
Treatment Category Typical Treatment
Light Maintenance • Slurry Seal or Micro-Surface
• Fog Seal or Scrub Seal
Heavy Maintenance • Chip Seal, Cape Seal
• Slurry Seal or Micro-Surface with Digouts
• Thin Maintenance Overlay (TMO)
Light Rehab. • Overlay (2” and under) or Thin Mill and Fill
Heavy Rehab.
• Overlay (greater than 2”) or Thick Mill and Fill
• Cold-In-Place Recycling
• Full Depth Reclamation
• Pulverize and Resurfacing
Reconstruct • Full Section Reconstruction
Table 3: General Treatment Categories with Typical Treatments
Page 180 of 324
P a v e m e n t M a n a g e m e n t P r o g r a m S p e c i f i c s P a g e | 4
The unit costs include a 30% increase to account for potential ADA Curb Ramp repairs
that may be triggered by applying a maintenance or rehabilitation treatment to a street
section. The unit costs also include a 17% allowance to account for “Soft Costs”. As well
as a 10% contingency. These prices are in today’s dollars (2022) and do not account for
inflation.
Treatment Arterial Collector Residential
Cost/ Sq Yd
Crack Seal ($$/LF) $1.59 $1.27 $1.27
Light Maintenance $5.72 $4.57 $4.57
Heavy Maintenance $21.20 $17.66 $17.66
Light Rehab $60.05 $56.52 $52.99
Heavy Rehab $91.85 $84.78 $84.78
Reconstruct $229.61 $197.82 $173.09
Table 1: General Treatment Unit Costs used in Arroyo Grande StreetSaver® Database.
Decision Trees / Treatment Strategies
The Decision Trees are broken down into two main areas; Preventive Maintenance (PM)
and Rehabilitation. StreetSaver® makes preventive maintenance a top priority. The
longer a segment can be kept in good condition the lower the overall cost of its treatments.
Preventive Maintenance addresses the sections that have a PCI of 71 and greater. This
area is further broken down to specific treatments that could be better termed as Crack
Sealing, Surface Treating and Restoration Treatments.
The Decision Tree allows the user to program these treatments on a cyclical basis. As
part of this cyclical process, once a road has reached the point where it can no longer be
maintained by a crack seal or a surface seal the program will shift to a Restoration
Treatment. The program uses this treatment to restore the pavement in long term
budgeting scenarios to the Very Good category.
The Decision Tree for Preventive Maintenance and Rehabilitation was reviewed with the
City of Arroyo Grande and updated by PEI. The decision tree customizes the logic for
how and what maintenance and rehabilitation treatments StreetSaver® selects.
Five general pavement treatment categories were used to account for the various
treatments in the decision tree: Reconstruction, Heavy Rehabilitation, Light
Rehabilitation, Heavy Maintenance, and Light Maintenance. Specifying a general
Page 181 of 324
P a v e m e n t M a n a g e m e n t P r o g r a m S p e c i f i c s P a g e | 5
treatment category allows the user to stay focused on a budget level analysis rather than
moving to a project level analysis.
The PMP software assumes average construction and material quality. Pavement life is
very sensitive to materials and workmanship quality. Poor quality new construction may
result in up to a 50 percent loss in the pavement life. In other words, poor quality new
construction may last 10 to 15 years, whereas excellent quality construction may last 20
to 30 years. Investing in quality, both in design and construction, provides significant
returns in extended pavement life resulting in lowered annual maintenance costs.
The Decision Tree for the City of Arroyo Grande can be found in Appendix A of this
report.
ANNUAL PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE / REHABILITATION PROGRAM
The PCI range of 0 to 100 is broken down into five condition categories for budget
calculation purposes. StreetSaver default PCI breakpoints were used during the update
of the City of Arroyo Grande’s Pavement Management Program.
The breakpoints are as follows:
PCI BREAKPOINTS
Arterials Collectors Residential
100 I 100 I 100 I
90 LIGHT MAINTENANCE 90 LIGHT MAINTENANCE 90 LIGHT MAINTENANCE
70 70 70 II III II III II III (Non-Load) (Load) (Non-Load) (Load) (Non-Load) (Load)
HEAVY
MAINTENANCE
LIGHT
REHABILITATIO
N.
HEAVY
MAINTENANCE
LIGHT
REHABILITATIO
N
LIGHT
MAINTENANCE HEAVY
MAINTENANCE
50 50 50 IV IV IV
HEAVY REHABILITATION. HEAVY REHABILITATION
LIGHT REHABILITATION
25 25 25 V V V
0 RECONSTRUCT 0 RECONSTRUCT 0 RECONSTRUCT
Figure 3: PCI Breakpoints
When a pavement section is identified for maintenance or rehabilitation, a user defined
network-level cost category for a pavement of that functional class, type and condition is
used to determine the needed funds for that section.
Page 182 of 324
P a v e m e n t M a n a g e m e n t P r o g r a m S p e c i f i c s P a g e | 6
For sections falling within the preventive maintenance category, or category one (1), a
time sequence is used to identify the appropriate treatm ent and cost. For those sections
falling into a rehabilitation category, or categories two (2), three (3), four (4), or five (5),
the PCI is used to determine the repair category for a pavement section.
The repair category is combined with functional class ification (as a surrogate for traffic
index) and surface type (as a surrogate for structural adequacy) to identify the appropriate
treatment and cost. The treatment and cost identified for the section is a network -level
budget planning treatment and is ge nerally considered as a cost category for budgeting
purposes rather than an actual treatment. Some sections will require more money than
estimated, some will require less. A project-level analysis is used to determine the actual
treatment to be used for a given section based on condition, structural capacity and other
factors.
The funding needs are summed for all sections needing work for each year of the analysis
period to determine the annual budget needs. The needs analysis provides a list of
sections needing work over the selected analysis period and an estimate of the funds
needed. In StreetSaver, this analysis period is 5 years. It identifies maintenance and
rehabilitation needs without considering funding constraints, i.e. the Needs Analysis is
unconstrained by the available budget. StreetSaver identifies candidate sections and
funds needed to provide the level of service to meet agency -defined goals.
When an agency has a considerable backlog of maintenance and repair needs, the first-
year needs will include the bulk of sections needing work. From a funding standpoint,
this may appear unrealistic; however, the needs analysis is only the first step in planning
and programming. The information from the needs analysis is generally bes t presented
to management as the total 5 year needs or the average needs per year of the 5-year
period. Few agencies will be able to meet the first year needs as developed by the
program.
The StreetSaver® Needs Analysis provides information on the condition of the network
over the analysis period with and without application of the treatments. Since the
application of treatments assume no limit on funds, this can be considered the upper limit
of condition that could be reached by the agency and the condition without treatment can
be considered the lower limit.
StreetSaver® uses a ranking process based on cost-effectiveness concepts. Basically,
the longer a pavement is in good condition, the more benefit the user gets from the
pavement. This can be approximated by the area under the PCI vs Time curve.
The larger that area, the longer the pavement provides the desired level of service. That
area is divided by annualized costs per unit area. This ratio is weighted for different usage
so that arterial streets are selected for repair before collectors in the same condition,
Page 183 of 324
P a v e m e n t M a n a g e m e n t P r o g r a m S p e c i f i c s P a g e | 7
which are selected for repair before residential/locals in the same condition. Sections of
pavements that provide the best service for the least money are then selected as those
that should be repaired first. StreetSaver provides a ranked listing based on this cost-
effectiveness analysis. StreetSaver also shows the condition with and without
treatment, the estimated costs for each section, the calculations used to determine the
ranking, and a listing of sections not recommended for treatment.
VISUAL EVALUATIONS
PEI’s technical staff evaluated all of the streets. The Visual Evaluations of the streets
were performed in accordance with the process described in ASTM D6433 using MTC’s
Modified pavement distresses described in Section II: Background, of this report. Once
the data was entered into the program, PEI completed a quality assurance review of the
system and verified the results in the field. The street inventory was based on visual
evaluations.
PROGRAM UPDATES
The Pavement Management Program is a dynamic program. It is expected that the City
will continue to visually rate their street network and update their StreetSaver® database
at least every three years. In addition to the visual review, the City should update the
database by adding new streets incorporated into the City, as well as any maintenance
or rehabilitation treatments applied to any particular street segment.
Page 184 of 324
Section IV
Reference Reports
Page 185 of 324
Street List Alphabetical
Page 186 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande - 2022 PMP UpdateStreet List AlphabeticalArea IDStreet Name Section IDBegin LocationEnd LocationFC Lns L W A (SqFt) Last MnR Date Last MnR TreatmentCurrent PCIPCI ConditionA Acorn Drive10 Equestrian Way (N)Equestrian Way (S)R 2 1,500 37 55,50035Poor (50-31)D Alder Street10 Farroll AvenueCameron CourtR 2 690 38 26,220 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL41Poor (50-31)D Alder Street20 Farroll AvenueFair Oaks AveR 2 730 37 27,010 08/30/2012SLURRY SEAL37Poor (50-31)D Alder Street25 Fair Oaks AvenueAsh StR 2 680 37 25,16040Poor (50-31)E Alder Street30 Ash StEast Grand AveMaC 2 1,450 38 55,100 08/12/2012SLURRY SEAL52Fair (70-51)B Allen Street10 Traffic WayGarden StreetR 2 2,150 31 66,650 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL63Fair (70-51)C Alpine Street (North)10 Grand AvenueFaeh AveR 2 1,058 34 35,972 05/16/2018SLURRY SEAL67Fair (70-51)C Alpine Street (South)10 Cerro Vista Circle (EOS)Cerro Vista LaneR 2 270 32 8,640 05/16/2018SLURRY SEAL69Fair (70-51)C Alpine Street (South)20 Cerro Vista LnDodson WayR 2 242 34 8,228 05/16/2018SLURRY SEAL44Poor (50-31)C Alpine Street (South)30 Dodson WayE. GrandR 2 1,430 34 48,620 05/16/2018SLURRY SEAL63Fair (70-51)A Andre Drive15 Jenny PlaceCDSR 2 1,470 29 42,63066Fair (70-51)A Arabian Circle10 Vista DriveCul-de-SacR 2 633 37 23,42149Poor (50-31)C Arroyo Avenue10 Pilgram WayWest Cherry AvenueR 2 607 33 20,031 07/01/2010RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC)75Good (90-71)D Ash Street10 City LimitCIW East of SpruceMaC 2 1,470 41 60,270 08/05/2012SLURRY SEAL63Fair (70-51)D Ash Street20 CIW E. of Spuce StS. Elm StR 2 600 33 19,80034Poor (50-31)D Ash Street30 S. Elm StWalnut StreetR 2 1,015 37 37,555 08/05/2012SLURRY SEAL52Fair (70-51)D Ash Street40 Walnut StreetAlder StR 2 1,015 37 37,55542Poor (50-31)D Ash Street Bathrooms Parking L Soto-010 Ash Street at Spruce StBathroomsO 1 240 60 14,400 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL66Fair (70-51)A Asilo Street10 La Canada Street (North end) La Canada Street (South End)R 2 1,320 29 38,280 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL74Good (90-71)A Asilo Street20 La CanadaVista DriveR 2 1,300 29 37,700 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL78Good (90-71)E Aspen Street10 Ash StreetPoplar StreetR 2 1,480 37 54,76056Fair (70-51)A Avenida de Diamente10 Via Bandolero (North end)Via Bandolero (South End)R 2 3,000 37 111,00034Poor (50-31)D Bakeman Lane (N)10 Farroll Avenue (East Side)Farroll Avenue (West Side)R 2 1,400 33 46,200 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL76Good (90-71)D Bakeman Lane (S)10 Farroll Road (West Side)Farroll Road (East Side)R 2 1,590 36 57,240 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL51Fair (70-51)C Bambi Court10 Tiger Tail DriveCul-de-SacR 2 400 37 14,80043Poor (50-31)B Bedloe Lane10 West Cherry LaneFair Oaks AvenueR 2 500 19 9,500 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL50Poor (50-31)D Beech Street10 Farroll AvenueFair Oaks AvenueR 2 700 34 23,800 08/06/2012SLURRY SEAL30Failed (30-0)C Bell Street10 Grand Avenue (East)El Camino RealR 2 1,050 35 36,750 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL50Poor (50-31)E Bennett Avenue10 Linda DriveHalcyon (North)R 2 1,020 35 35,700 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL43Poor (50-31)C Bennett Avenue20 Halcyon (North)El Camino RealR 2 1,210 37 44,770 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL60Fair (70-51)E Beta Court10 Brighton AvenueCul-de-SacR 2 230 36 8,28030Failed (30-0)E Blackberry Avenue15 Boysenberry StCranberry StR 2 1,050 33 34,65080Good (90-71)E Blueberry Avenue10 Boysenberry StreetCourtland StreetR 2 483 33 15,93979Good (90-71)E Boysenberry Street10 Raspberry AvenueStrawberry StreetR 2 930 33 30,69080Good (90-71)B Branch Mill Road10 East Cherry AvenueCity LimitMaC 2 3,280 26 85,280 05/15/2017SEAL CRACKS36Poor (50-31)B Branch Street (E)70 Bridge St (Bricks)Mason St (Bricks)A 2 875 42 36,750 12/01/2017CHIP SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL72Good (90-71)B Branch Street (E)80 Mason St (Bricks)Garden StA 2 1,460 48 70,080 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL46Poor (50-31)B Branch Street (E)90 Garden StHuasnaA 2 1,030 32 32,960 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL59Fair (70-51)A Branch Street (W)10 Oak Park BoulevardCamino MercadoMiA 2 1,740 44 77,430 07/01/2019DEEP PATCH55Fair (70-51)A Branch Street (W)20 Camino MercadoBrisco RoadMiA 2 2,880 67 192,960 07/01/2019DEEP PATCH66Fair (70-51)A Branch Street (W)30 Brisco RoadCOP East of Library entranceMiA 2 1,080 42 45,360 07/01/2019DEEP PATCH59Fair (70-51)B Branch Street (W)40 COP East of Library entrance VernonMiA 2 1,610 42 67,620 07/01/2019DEEP PATCH85Good (90-71)04/21/2022Page 1 of 11Page 187 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande - 2022 PMP UpdateStreet List AlphabeticalArea IDStreet Name Section IDBegin LocationEnd LocationFC Lns L W A (SqFt) Last MnR Date Last MnR TreatmentCurrent PCIPCI ConditionB Branch Street (W)45 Vernon StE. GrandMaC 2 830 28 23,240 07/01/2019DEEP PATCH48Poor (50-31)B Branch Street (W)50 E. Grand AveTraffic WayA 3 275 50 13,75079Good (90-71)B Branch Street (W)60 Traffic WayBridge StA 2 685 40 27,400 12/01/2017CHIP SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL60Fair (70-51)B Bridge Street10 Branch Street (East)Traffic WayR 2 950 39 37,05052Fair (70-51)E Brighton Avenue10 Oak Park BoulevardChange of PavementR 2 360 43 15,480 08/30/2015SLURRY SEAL61Fair (70-51)E Brighton Avenue15 Change of PavementCourtland StreetR 2 355 43 15,26580Good (90-71)E Brighton Avenue20 Courtland StreetElm Street (North)R 2 1,900 37 70,30037Poor (50-31)E Brisco Road10 Grand Ave (East)Linda DriveMiA 2 750 37 27,75077Good (90-71)E Brisco Road20 Linda DriveEl Camino RealMiA 2 1,350 37 49,95072Good (90-71)E Brisco Road30 El Camino RealBranch Street (West)MiA 2 300 32 9,600 07/01/2015MILL AND THICK OVERLAY85Good (90-71)D Brittany Avenue10 South ElmCarrington PlaceR 2 310 37 11,47073Good (90-71)C California Street10 Cherry Avenue (West)Fair Oaks AvenueR 2 525 38 19,950 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL45Poor (50-31)A Calle Carmen10 Via BandoleroCul-de-SacR 2 250 37 9,25039Poor (50-31)A Calle Cuervo10 Via Las AguilasCul-de-SacR 2 260 29 7,54070Fair (70-51)B Callie Court10 Huasna RoadCul-de-SacR 2 235 37 8,69557Fair (70-51)D Cameron Court10 Alder StreetHalcyon Road (South)R 2 562 37 20,794 08/06/2012SLURRY SEAL40Poor (50-31)A Camino Mercado10 Branch Street (West)COP West of Walmart Entrance MaC 2 1,000 38 38,000 12/01/2016SLURRY SEAL65Fair (70-51)A Camino Mercado20 COP West of Walmart Entrance Rancho ParkwayMaC 2 1,490 41 61,09048Poor (50-31)B Campana Place10 Gularte RoadCul-de-SacR 2 625 38 23,75036Poor (50-31)B Canyon Way10 Tally HoCIWR 2 1,300 38 49,400 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL56Fair (70-51)B Car Corral Parking Lot (Lower) Corral-010 E. Branch StBeginning of Middle Corral Parking Lot O 1 300 62 18,870 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL68Fair (70-51)B Car Corral Parking Lot (Upper) Corral-020 Corral-010, Rear of Business E. Le Point St and Cross Gutter.O 1 200 73 14,600 12/01/2016THIN AC OVERLAY(1.5 INCHES)85Good (90-71)B Car Corral Parking Lot (Upper) Corral-030 E. Le Point St at Miller Way Cross Gutter at bottom and West Side O 1 200 160 32,00076Good (90-71)A Cardinal Court10 Robin CircleCul-de-SacR 2 150 37 5,550 12/01/2016SLURRY SEAL60Fair (70-51)D Carmella Crive10 Farroll AvenueCDSR 2 900 35 31,500 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL54Fair (70-51)D Carol Place10 Carmella DriveFarroll AvenueR 2 580 35 20,300 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL50Poor (50-31)D Carrington Place10 Brittany AveCDSR 2 175 37 6,47571Good (90-71)A Castillo Court10 Vista DriveCul-de-SacR 2 345 29 10,00579Good (90-71)C Castillo del Mar10 End of StreetOrchard AvenueR 2 2,790 37 103,230 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL74Good (90-71)C Castillo del Mar20 Orchard AvenueValley RoadR 2 163 37 6,031 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL76Good (90-71)E Cedar Street10 Aspen StreetSpruce StreetR 2 540 35 18,90056Fair (70-51)E Cedar Street25 Spruce StreetCourtland StreetR 2 887 32 28,38470Fair (70-51)C Cerro Vista Circle10 Cerro Vista LaneAlpine Street (South)R 2 715 37 26,455 05/16/2018SLURRY SEAL51Fair (70-51)C Cerro Vista Lane10 Alpine Street (South)Cerro Visto CircleR 2 550 42 23,375 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL48Poor (50-31)A Chaparral Lane15 Spanish Moss LnCul-de-SacR 2 860 37 31,82042Poor (50-31)E Chelsea Court10 Brighton AveCul-de-sacR 2 175 37 6,47549Poor (50-31)B Cherry Avenue (East)10 Traffic WayPC Railway PlaceMaC 2 1,420 45 63,900 07/01/2013SLURRY SEAL85Good (90-71)B Cherry Avenue (East)10 Traffic WayEnd of Street (US 101)R 2 200 40 8,000 07/01/2019DEEP PATCH93Excellent (100-91)B Cherry Avenue (East)20 PC Railway PlaceBranch Mill RoadMaC 2 1,125 40 45,000 07/01/2013SLURRY SEAL52Fair (70-51)B Cherry Avenue (East)30 Branch Mill RoadEnd of PavementR 2 600 22 13,20077Good (90-71)C Cherry Avenue (West)20 Arroyo AvenueEnd of Street (AGHS)R 2 878 39 34,242 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL76Good (90-71)E Chilton Avenue10 Oak Park BoulevardRobles RoadR 2 1,500 19 28,500 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL34Poor (50-31)04/21/2022Page 2 of 11Page 188 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande - 2022 PMP UpdateStreet List AlphabeticalArea IDStreet Name Section IDBegin LocationEnd LocationFC Lns L W A (SqFt) Last MnR Date Last MnR TreatmentCurrent PCIPCI ConditionB City Hall Parking LotCtyHal-010 Mason Street (South)End of LotO 1 126 60 7,56026Failed (30-0)B Clarence Avenue10 Huasna RoadEnd of StreetR 2 646 27 17,442 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL65Fair (70-51)A Clinton Court10 James WayCul-de-SacR 2 290 29 8,41069Fair (70-51)B Coach Road10 Branch Mill RoadFlora Road - CIW North of Flora MaC 2 743 36 26,748 07/01/2012THIN AC OVERLAY(1.5 INCHES)86Good (90-71)B Cobre Place10 Gularte RoadCul-de-SacR 2 550 37 20,35028Failed (30-0)A Colina Street10 Via La BarrancaJames WayR 2 435 26 11,310 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL32Poor (50-31)A Collado Corte10 Avenida de DiamanteCul-de-SacR 2 315 37 11,655 12/01/2016THIN AC OVERLAY(1.5 INCHES)90Good (90-71)B Corbett Canyon Road10 Route 227City LimitMaC 2 1,230 24 29,520 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH45Poor (50-31)B Corbett Canyon Road20 Huasna RdPrintz RdA 2 2,700 26 70,20051Fair (70-51)C Cornwall Avenue10 El Camino RealN. Rena StreetR 2 1,361 35 47,635 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL61Fair (70-51)E Corona del Tierra10 Brighton AvenueCul-de-SacR 2 420 37 15,54045Poor (50-31)D Corporation Yard Parking Lot CrpYrd-010 East Entrance to Corp Yard (Front) West End at GateO 1 250 72 18,000 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL69Fair (70-51)D Corporation Yard Parking Lot CrpYrd-020 Rear Maintenance AreaRearO 1 270 241 65,286B Corral Place10 Corbett Canyon RoadCul-de-SacR 2 660 28 18,48046Poor (50-31)E Courtland Street (N)10 Grand Avenue (East)Brighton AvenueMaC 2 850 37 31,45064Fair (70-51)E Courtland Street (N)20 Brighton AvenueNewport AvenueMaC 2 550 36 19,80075Good (90-71)E Courtland Street (S)10 Ash StreetRaspberry AvenueMaC 2 390 37 14,43065Fair (70-51)E Courtland Street (S)20 Raspberry AvenueStrawberry AvenueMaC 2 1,070 37 39,59071Good (90-71)E Courtland Street (S)30 Strawberry AvenueCOP at CIWMaC 2 300 40 12,00073Good (90-71)E Courtland Street (S)40 COP at CIWE. Grand AveMaC 2 510 41 20,91081Good (90-71)E Cranberry Avenue10 Raspberry AvenueBlackberry AvenueR 2 715 33 23,59580Good (90-71)C Creekside Drive10 Woodland DriveCul-de-SacR 2 445 37 16,465 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL33Poor (50-31)B Cross Street10 Ide StreetAllen StreetR 2 660 37 24,420 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL20Failed (30-0)B Crown Hill10 Branch Street (East)End of StreetR 2 1,640 30 49,200 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL72Good (90-71)B Crown Terrace10 Crown HillLe Point StreetR 2 450 20 9,000 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL42Poor (50-31)B Crown Terrace20 Le Point StreetNorth EndR 2 230 37 8,510 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL69Fair (70-51)A Cuerda Corte10 Avenida de DiamanteCul-de-SacR 2 240 37 8,88034Poor (50-31)A Cuesta Place10 Via La BarrancaCul-de-SacR 2 265 26 6,890 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL38Poor (50-31)A Deer Trail Circle10 Equestrian WayCul-de-SacR 2 800 25 20,00030Failed (30-0)C Del Mar Place10 Castillo del MarSouth End (Cul-de-Sac)R 2 240 36 8,64090Good (90-71)D Del Sol Street10 The PikeTierra StR 2 730 37 27,010 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL54Fair (70-51)C Del Sur10 Castillo del MarSouth End (Cul-de-Sac)R 2 430 36 15,48090Good (90-71)C Diamond Circle10 Leanna DriveCul-de-SacR 2 205 34 6,970 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL69Fair (70-51)D Diana Place10 Farroll AveEnd of StreetR 2 950 37 35,150 08/06/2012SLURRY SEAL61Fair (70-51)D Dixson Street10 Oak Park BoulevardCDSR 2 735 37 27,195 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL75Good (90-71)E Dodson Way10 Alder StreetHalcyon Road (South)R 2 600 27 16,200 08/12/2012SLURRY SEAL53Fair (70-51)C Dodson Way20 Halcyon Road (South)Alpine Street (South)R 2 730 35 25,550 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL70Fair (70-51)D Don Robert's Field Parking Lot DonRob-010 Oak Park Bl. North of Dixson St End of Parking LotO 1 223 93 20,85083Good (90-71)A Dos Cerros10 Via Las AguilasCul-de-SacR 2 345 29 10,00550Poor (50-31)E E Grand Avenue (EB)510 City Limit @ COP E. of Oak Park Juniper StA 2 1,250 38 47,500 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL58Fair (70-51)E E Grand Avenue (EB)520 Juniper StreetS. Elm StreetA 2 1,100 40 44,000 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL38Poor (50-31)E E Grand Avenue (EB)530 S. Elm StSouth Halcyon RoadA 2 2,800 40 112,000 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL65Fair (70-51)04/21/2022Page 3 of 11Page 189 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande - 2022 PMP UpdateStreet List AlphabeticalArea IDStreet Name Section IDBegin LocationEnd LocationFC Lns L W A (SqFt) Last MnR Date Last MnR TreatmentCurrent PCIPCI ConditionC E Grand Avenue (EB)540 South Halycon RoadEl Camino RealA 2 1,820 30 54,600 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH43Poor (50-31)C E Grand Avenue (EB)545 El Camino RealPCC @ 101 OvercrossingA 2 700 30 21,000 07/01/2014MILL AND THICK OVERLAY86Good (90-71)B E Grand Avenue (EB)550 AC @ Hwy 101 overpassW. BranchA 2 500 30 15,00088Good (90-71)B E Grand Avenue (WB)510 W. BranchPCC @ Highway 101 overpassA 2 500 30 15,00088Good (90-71)C E Grand Avenue (WB)515 PCC @ 101 OvercrossingEl Camino RealA 2 700 30 21,000 07/01/2014MILL AND THICK OVERLAY85Good (90-71)C E Grand Avenue (WB)520 El Camino RealNorth Halcyon RdA 2 1,850 30 55,500 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH44Poor (50-31)E E Grand Avenue (WB)530 North Halcyon RdNorth Elm StA 2 2,750 40 110,000 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL61Fair (70-51)E E Grand Avenue (WB)540 North Elm StFairviewA 2 950 40 38,000 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL41Poor (50-31)E E Grand Avenue (WB)550 FairviewCity Limit @ COP, East of Oak Park A 2 1,400 38 53,200 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL44Poor (50-31)E El Camino Real10 City LimitOak Park BoulevardMaC 2 95 50 4,750 07/01/2012THIN OVERLAY w/FABRIC78Good (90-71)E El Camino Real20 Oak Park BoulevardHillcrest DriveMiA 2 2,050 30 61,500 07/01/2012THIN OVERLAY w/FABRIC84Good (90-71)E El Camino Real30 Hillcrest DriveW/C 850' E/O Hillcrest DrMiA 2 850 40 34,000 07/01/2012THIN OVERLAY w/FABRIC79Good (90-71)E El Camino Real35 W/C 850' E/O Hillcrest DrBrisco RdMiA 2 1,550 32 49,600 07/01/2012THIN OVERLAY w/FABRIC78Good (90-71)E El Camino Real40 Brisco RoadHalcyon Road (North)MiA 2 700 50 35,000 07/01/2012THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5 INCHES)70Fair (70-51)C El Camino Real50 Halcyon Road (North)Bennett.MiA 2 1,160 68 78,880 07/01/2012RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC)76Good (90-71)C El Camino Real60 BennettE. Grand AveMiA 2 820 37 30,340 07/01/2012THIN OVERLAY w/FABRIC77Good (90-71)E Elm Street (North)10 Grand Ave (East)Brighton AvenueR 2 875 38 33,250 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL43Poor (50-31)E Elm Street (North)20 Brighton AvenueCDSR 2 475 37 17,575 08/12/2014THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5 INCHES)48Poor (50-31)D Elm Street (South)10 City LimitThe PikeMiA 2 800 47 37,600 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH35Poor (50-31)D Elm Street (South)20 The PikeFarroll AvenueMiA 2 1,510 62 93,620 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH61Fair (70-51)D Elm Street (South)30 Farroll AvenueAsh StreetMiA 2 1,450 62 89,900 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH45Poor (50-31)E Elm Street (South) (NB)540 Ash StreetGrand Ave (East)MiA 2 2,030 31 62,930 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL60Fair (70-51)E Elm Street (South) (SB)540 E. Grand AveAsh StMiA 2 2,100 31 65,100 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL59Fair (70-51)D Elm Street Comm Center Parkin ElmSt-020 End of DrivewayEnd of LotO 1 220 78 17,160 08/12/2015SLURRY SEAL60Fair (70-51)D Elm Street Comminty Center Dri ElmSt-010 Driveway East of Ash St Bathrooms Elm St Rec Center parking lotO 1 490 27 13,23049Poor (50-31)C Eman Court10 Alpine Street (South)Cul-de-SacR 2 480 34 16,320 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL43Poor (50-31)A Emerald Bay Drive (East)10 Rodeo DriveCul-de-SacR 2 446 37 16,502 07/01/2015MILL AND THICK OVERLAY50Poor (50-31)A Emerald Bay Drive (West)10 Rodeo DriveCul-de-SacR 2 465 37 17,205 07/01/2015MILL AND THICK OVERLAY65Fair (70-51)A Equestrian Way10 James WayVista CircleMaC 2 2,600 37 96,20033Poor (50-31)A Equestrian Way20 Vista CircleNoyes RoadMaC 2 1,906 37 70,52233Poor (50-31)C Faeh Avenue10 Halcyon Road (North)El Camino RealR 2 600 36 21,600 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL78Good (90-71)D Fair Oaks Avenue10 Elm Street (South)Alder StMaC 2 2,200 41 90,200 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL46Poor (50-31)D Fair Oaks Avenue20 Alder StHalcyon Road (South)MaC 2 625 41 25,625 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL78Good (90-71)C Fair Oaks Avenue30 Halcyon Road (South)PCC E. of WoodlandMiA 2 1,100 57 62,700 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH41Poor (50-31)C Fair Oaks Avenue40 PCC E. of WoodlandValley RoadMiA 4 2,240 60 134,400 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL62Fair (70-51)C Fair Oaks Avenue50 Valley RoadPCC @ 101 OverpassMiA 4 1,680 48 80,640 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL67Fair (70-51)B Fair Oaks Avenue60 Traffic WayPCC @ Hwy 101 bridgeMiA 4 430 48 20,640 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL44Poor (50-31)E Fair View Drive10 Grand Avenue (E)Brighton AvenueR 2 840 37 31,080 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL34Poor (50-31)E Fair View Drive20 Brighton AvenueCul-De-SacR 2 300 38 11,400 09/09/2015SLURRY SEAL35Poor (50-31)B Farmhouse Place10 Grove CourtHillside CourtR 2 400 37 14,80072Good (90-71)D Farroll Avenue10 City LimitElm Street (South)MaC 2 1,675 42 70,35072Good (90-71)D Farroll Avenue20 Elm Street (South)Victorian CtR 2 1,100 40 44,00073Good (90-71)04/21/2022Page 4 of 11Page 190 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande - 2022 PMP UpdateStreet List AlphabeticalArea IDStreet Name Section IDBegin LocationEnd LocationFC Lns L W A (SqFt) Last MnR Date Last MnR TreatmentCurrent PCIPCI ConditionD Farroll Avenue30 Victorian CtHalcyon Road (South)R 2 1,525 36 54,90066Fair (70-51)C Farroll Avenue40 Halcyon Road (South)Cul-De-SacR 2 335 30 10,050 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL48Poor (50-31)B Fieldview Place10 Hillside CourtGrove CourtR 2 360 37 13,32075Good (90-71)B Fire Access Road10 Pearwood AvenueGularte RoadO 1 551 10 5,51076Good (90-71)B Flora Road10 Coach RoadEnd of StreetR 2 650 38 24,700 07/01/2012THIN AC OVERLAY(1.5 INCHES)85Good (90-71)C Forest Glen Drive10 Woodland DriveCul-De-SacR 2 415 37 15,355 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL34Poor (50-31)B Fortuna Court10 Platino LaneCul-de-SacR 2 240 37 8,88041Poor (50-31)B Garden Street10 East Branch StreetEnd of Street (Creek)R 2 250 24 6,00085Good (90-71)B Garden Street110 Ide StreetE. Cherry AvenueR 2 1,040 37 38,480 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL85Good (90-71)B Garden Street120 Cherry Avenue (East)Grove CourtR 2 125 37 4,62563Fair (70-51)D Garfield Place10 The PikeCul-De-SacR 2 1,243 37 45,991 08/06/2012SLURRY SEAL46Poor (50-31)D Garfield Place20 Garfield PlaceNorth End (Cul-de-Sac)R 2 125 34 4,25044Poor (50-31)D Gaynfair Terrace10 The PikeFarroll AvenueR 2 1,620 38 61,560 08/06/2012SLURRY SEAL59Fair (70-51)D Golden West Place10 Farroll AvenueCul-De-SacR 2 700 38 26,600 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL58Fair (70-51)A Grace Lane10 Rodeo Drive - SouthsideRodeo Drive - NorthsideR 2 2,650 29 76,850 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL71Good (90-71)A Grace Lane20 Rodeo DriveChaparral LaneR 2 135 37 4,995 05/23/2016SLURRY SEAL49Poor (50-31)B Greenwood Drive10 Flora RoadEnd of StreetR 2 672 35 23,520 07/01/2012THIN AC OVERLAY(1.5 INCHES)85Good (90-71)B Grove Court10 Fieldview PlaceFarmhouse PlaceR 2 375 37 13,87571Good (90-71)B Gularte Road10 Corbett Canyon RoadStagecoach RoadR 2 1,850 33 61,79038Poor (50-31)B Gularte Road20 Stagecoach RoadCul-De-SacR 2 772 37 28,56444Poor (50-31)C Halcyon Road (North)10 El Camino RealE Grand AvenueMiA 2 1,630 37 60,310 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH41Poor (50-31)C Halcyon Road (South)30 Fair Oaks AvenueOlive StreetMaC 4 522 61 31,842 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL54Fair (70-51)C Halcyon Road (South)40 Olive StreetCameron CourtMaC 2 830 61 50,630 07/01/2013SLURRY SEAL44Poor (50-31)C Halcyon Road (South)50 Cameron CourtCalle De Los SueiMaC 2 670 50 33,500 07/01/2013SLURRY SEAL39Poor (50-31)C Halcyon Road (South)60 Calle De Los SueiThe PikeMaC 1 290 34 9,860 07/01/2013SLURRY SEAL55Fair (70-51)C Halcyon Road (South) NB520 Fair Oaks AvenueE Grand AvenueMiA 2 2,180 31 67,580 07/01/2013SLURRY SEAL36Poor (50-31)C Halcyon Road (South) SB520 E Grand AvenueFair Oaks AvenueMiA 2 2,180 30 65,400 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL34Poor (50-31)D Hampton Place10 Brittany AveCDSR 2 185 37 6,84571Good (90-71)B Harrison Street10 Mckinley StreetCul-De-SacR 2 251 18 4,518 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL79Good (90-71)B Haven Court10 Waller PlLeedham PlR 2 578 37 21,38693Excellent (100-91)B Hawkins Court10 Cross StreetCul-De-SacR 2 133 37 4,921 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL35Poor (50-31)A Hidden Oak Road10 James WayEORR 2 880 37 32,560 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL78Good (90-71)E Hillcrest Drive10 Sierra DriveMontego StreetR 2 1,930 22 42,460 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL40Poor (50-31)E Hillcrest Drive20 Montego StreetEl Camino RealR 2 1,244 21 26,124 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL34Poor (50-31)B Hillside Court10 Fieldview PlaceLos Olivos LaneR 2 620 37 22,94076Good (90-71)A Hodges Road15 Equestrian WayEast EndR 2 1,075 25 26,87529Failed (30-0)B Huasna Road10 East Branch StreetBolsa Chica EntranceMiA 2 1,200 61 73,200 08/30/2012SLURRY SEAL60Fair (70-51)B Huasna Road20 Bolsa Chica EntranceCallie CtMiA 2 1,350 38 51,300 08/05/2012SLURRY SEAL58Fair (70-51)B Huasna Road30 Callie CtCity LimitMiA 2 1,640 61 100,040 08/05/2012SLURRY SEAL50Poor (50-31)E Huckleberry Avenue10 Cranberry StreetCourtland StreetR 2 490 33 16,17080Good (90-71)B Huebner Lane10 Branch Mill RoadWater TankO 2 1,487 11 16,35755Fair (70-51)B Ide Street10 Whiteley StreetGarden StreetR 2 990 33 32,670 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL85Good (90-71)04/21/2022Page 5 of 11Page 191 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande - 2022 PMP UpdateStreet List AlphabeticalArea IDStreet Name Section IDBegin LocationEnd LocationFC Lns L W A (SqFt) Last MnR Date Last MnR TreatmentCurrent PCIPCI ConditionB Ikeda Way10 Huasna RoadVard Loomis LaneR 2 470 37 17,39040Poor (50-31)A James Way10 Oak Park BoulevardEquestrian WayMaC 2 2,180 41 89,380 08/03/20186" DIGOUTS74Good (90-71)A James Way20 Equestrian WayClinton CtMaC 2 1,100 41 45,100 08/03/20184" DIGOUTS74Good (90-71)A James Way30 Clinton CtRancho ParkwayMaC 2 2,350 41 96,350 08/03/20186" DIGOUTS77Good (90-71)A James Way40 Rancho ParkwayRodeo DriveMaC 2 1,200 41 49,200 08/03/20184" DIGOUTS76Good (90-71)A James Way50 Rodeo DriveVillage Glen DriveMaC 2 1,930 41 79,130 08/03/20184" DIGOUTS73Good (90-71)A James Way60 Village Glen DriveTally Ho RoadMaC 2 1,412 41 57,892 08/03/20186" DIGOUTS75Good (90-71)A Jenny Place11 James WayCul-de-sacR 2 600 29 17,40039Poor (50-31)E Juniper Street10 Poplar StreetE Grand AvenueR 2 570 37 21,09057Fair (70-51)A La Canada10 James WayAsilo StR 2 1,275 35 44,62532Poor (50-31)A La Canada20 Asilo StVista DriveR 2 700 37 25,90078Good (90-71)B La Cresta Drive15 Huasna RoadPlatino Lane (W)R 2 1,800 37 66,60054Fair (70-51)B La Paz Circle10 Platino LaneCul-de-SacR 2 175 37 6,47528Failed (30-0)D La Vista Court10 The PikeCul-De-SacR 2 420 32 13,440 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL49Poor (50-31)A Ladera Place10 Via La BarrancaCul-De-SacR 2 150 26 3,900 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL71Good (90-71)D Lancaster Drive10 The PikeElm Street (South)R 2 1,085 32 34,720 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL53Fair (70-51)B Larchmont Drive10 Vernon StreetWestley StreetR 2 950 33 31,350 07/01/2014THIN OVERLAY w/FABRIC77Good (90-71)B Launa Lane10 Los Olivos LaneEnd of StreeR 2 550 34 18,700 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL77Good (90-71)B Le Point Street10 Nevada StreetMason Street (North)R 2 850 30 25,500 05/15/2017SEAL CRACKS37Poor (50-31)B Le Point Street20 Mason Street (North)Tally Ho RoadMaC 2 545 38 20,710 05/15/2017SEAL CRACKS68Fair (70-51)B Le Point Street30 Corbett CynCrown TerraceMaC 2 1,298 37 48,026 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL65Fair (70-51)B Le Point Terrace10 Branch Street (East)Crown HillR 2 150 25 3,750 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL58Fair (70-51)B Le Point Terrace20 Crown HillEnd of StreetR 2 300 25 7,500 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL68Fair (70-51)C Leanna Drive10 Valley RoadGate W/O TurquoiseR 2 1,456 38 55,328 07/01/2015SLURRY SEAL67Fair (70-51)E Ledo Place10 Brighton AvenueCul-De-SacR 2 305 37 11,28525Failed (30-0)B Leedham Place10 E. Cherry AveHaven CtR 2 415 37 15,35593Excellent (100-91)A Lift Station No 1LiftSta010 K-Mart Parking LotEnd of LotO 1 93 13 1,20950Poor (50-31)E Linda Drive10 Bennett AvenueBrisco RoadR 2 1,090 38 41,420 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL54Fair (70-51)E Linda Drive20 Brisco RoadOceanview SchoolR 2 950 30 28,500 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL36Poor (50-31)E Linda Drive30 Oceanview SchoolN. Elm StR 2 180 38 6,840 07/01/2014SLURRY SEAL38Poor (50-31)E Loganberry Avenue10 Cranberry StreetCourtland StreetR 2 470 33 15,51080Good (90-71)C Los Berros10 Valley RdCentury LnMaC 2 830 40 33,200 11/01/2017RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC)90Good (90-71)A Los Ciervos11 Vista DriveCul-de-SacR 2 920 29 26,68078Good (90-71)A Los Ciervos Ct10 Vista DriveCul-de-SacR 2 345 29 10,00577Good (90-71)B Los Olivos Lane15 E Cherry AveHillsdale CourtR 2 510 34 17,34044Poor (50-31)D Magnolia Drive10 Sycamore DriveCDSR 2 1,190 35 41,650 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL44Poor (50-31)E Maple Street10 Elm Street (South)Walnut StreetR 2 950 37 35,150 08/12/2012SLURRY SEAL48Poor (50-31)E Maple Street20 Walnut StreetAlder StreetR 2 956 37 35,372 08/12/2012SLURRY SEAL43Poor (50-31)B Mariposa Circle10 Platino LaneCul-De-SacR 2 170 36 6,12036Poor (50-31)B Mason Street (North)10 East Branch StreetLe Point StreetMaC 2 440 29 12,760 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL40Poor (50-31)B Mason Street (South)10 Allen StreetNelson StreetR 2 940 39 36,660 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL49Poor (50-31)B Mason Street (South)20 Nelson StreetEast Branch StreetR 2 617 35 21,595 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL60Fair (70-51)04/21/2022Page 6 of 11Page 192 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande - 2022 PMP UpdateStreet List AlphabeticalArea IDStreet Name Section IDBegin LocationEnd LocationFC Lns L W A (SqFt) Last MnR Date Last MnR TreatmentCurrent PCIPCI ConditionA Matthew Way10 Andre DriveLa CanadaR 2 830 29 24,070 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL51Fair (70-51)B May Street10 Mckinley StreetWest EndR 2 800 35 28,000 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL77Good (90-71)B Mckinley Street10 Crown HillMay StreetR 2 736 33 24,288 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL71Good (90-71)A Meadowlark Drive10 Oak Park BoulevardRobin CircleR 2 595 37 22,015 12/01/2016SLURRY SEAL54Fair (70-51)A Mercedes Lane15 Rodeo DriveCDS N. of Old Ranch RoadR 2 2,110 37 79,84057Fair (70-51)C Mesa Drive10 Tiger Tail DriveCul-De-SacR 2 1,020 37 37,74037Poor (50-31)A Mesquite Lane10 Chaparral LaneJames WayR 2 1,270 37 46,990 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL52Fair (70-51)B Miller Circle10 Milller WayCul-de-SacR 2 195 31 6,045 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL59Fair (70-51)B Miller Way10 Le Point StreetEnd of Street (Gate)R 2 2,220 32 71,040 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL58Fair (70-51)E Montego Street10 Newport AveCDSR 2 1,080 34 36,720 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL51Fair (70-51)D Morning Rise Lane10 EOSFarroll AvenueR 2 900 35 31,50078Good (90-71)D Mulberry Lane10 Magnolia DriveSycamore DriveR 2 365 35 12,775 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL48Poor (50-31)A Mustang Circle10 Equestrian WayCul-de-SacR 2 355 37 13,13541Poor (50-31)B Myrtle Drive10 Myrtle StE. CherryR 2 620 33 20,46078Good (90-71)B Myrtle Street10 Garden StreetCOP East of NogueraR 2 392 37 14,504 07/01/2010RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC)70Fair (70-51)B Myrtle Street20 COP East of NogueraMyrtle DrR 2 390 21 8,19078Good (90-71)B Nelson Street10 Traffic WayMason Street (South)MaC 2 970 39 37,830 08/30/2015SLURRY SEAL48Poor (50-31)B Nelson Street20 Mason Street (South)Cul-De-SacR 2 730 39 28,470 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL78Good (90-71)B Nevada Street10 East Branch StreetLe Point StreetR 2 325 20 6,500 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL80Good (90-71)C Newman Drive10 Alpine Street (South)End of StreetR 2 560 34 19,040 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL45Poor (50-31)E Newport Avenue10 Courtland StreetMontego StreetR 2 1,080 30 32,40039Poor (50-31)E Newport Avenue Frontage10 Courtland St South of Newport CDSR 1 1,030 18 18,540 07/01/2014SLURRY SEAL44Poor (50-31)D Noel Street10 Oak Park BoulevardCDSR 2 470 37 17,390 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL77Good (90-71)B Noguera Place10 Myrtle StreetCul-De-SacR 2 386 37 14,282 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL43Poor (50-31)A Oak Leaf Circle10 Equestrian WayCul-de-SacR 2 300 37 11,10043Poor (50-31)E Oak Park Boulevard30 Sierra DriveEl Camino RealMiA 2 340 50 17,00085Good (90-71)D Oak Park Boulevard (NB)510 Farrol AvenueCity LimitMiA 2 800 30 24,000 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL52Fair (70-51)A Oak Park Boulevard (NB)540 West BranchJames WayA 2 1,300 30 39,13061Fair (70-51)A. Oak Park Boulevard (NB)550 James WayCity Limit (COP at end of median) MiA 2 800 23 18,400 12/01/2017RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC)90Good (90-71)D Oak Park Boulevard (SB)510 City LimitFarroll AvenueMiA 2 720 30 21,600 08/05/2012SLURRY SEAL49Poor (50-31)A Oak Park Boulevard (SB)550 City Limit (COP at end of median) James WyMiA 2 800 26 20,80077Good (90-71)C Oak Street10 E Grand AvenueBennett AveR 2 690 37 25,530 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL62Fair (70-51)A Old Ranch Road10 West Branch StreetMercedes LaneR 2 1,900 40 76,000 07/01/2015MILL AND THIN OVERLAY48Poor (50-31)C Olive Street10 Woodland DriveHalcyon Road (South)R 2 674 34 22,916 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL48Poor (50-31)B Olohan AlleyOlolhn-010 Mason StShort StO 1 285 46 13,16752Fair (70-51)B Ololhan Alley Parking LotOlolhn-020 Short StreetBridge StreetO 1 632 48 30,715 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL64Fair (70-51)C Opal Circle10 Leanna DriveCul-de-SacR 2 205 34 6,970 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL65Fair (70-51)C Orchard Avenue10 Fair Oaks AvenueWest CherryR 2 520 38 19,760 07/01/2010THIN OVERLAY w/FABRIC69Fair (70-51)C Orchard Avenue20 West Cherry AvenueCOP S. of Pilgrim WayR 2 900 44 39,600 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL67Fair (70-51)C Orchard Avenue30 COP S. of Pilgram WyCastillo de MarR 2 650 37 24,05071Good (90-71)B Oro Drive10 Huasna RoadPlatino LaneR 2 1,430 37 52,910 12/01/2016THIN AC OVERLAY(1.5 INCHES)90Good (90-71)B Oro Drive20 Platino LaneGularte RoadR 2 1,110 37 41,070 12/01/2016THIN AC OVERLAY(1.5 INCHES)90Good (90-71)04/21/2022Page 7 of 11Page 193 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande - 2022 PMP UpdateStreet List AlphabeticalArea IDStreet Name Section IDBegin LocationEnd LocationFC Lns L W A (SqFt) Last MnR Date Last MnR TreatmentCurrent PCIPCI ConditionB Outland Court10 Gularte RoadCul-De-SacR 2 170 37 6,29060Fair (70-51)D Pacific Pointe Way10 Elm Street (South)Elm Street (South)R 2 797 37 29,489 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL78Good (90-71)D Palm Court10 Walnut StreetCul-De-SacR 2 452 37 16,724 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL48Poor (50-31)A Palos Secos10 Rancho ParkwayCul-de-SacR 2 630 29 18,27067Fair (70-51)A Paraiso Court10 AsiloCul-de-SacR 2 190 29 5,510 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL78Good (90-71)C Park Way10 Halcyon Road (South)Rena Street (South)R 2 378 34 12,852 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL65Fair (70-51)B Paseo Street10 May StreetEnd of StreetR 2 185 37 6,845 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL61Fair (70-51)B Paseo Street20 Corbett Cyn (Hwy227)EOSR 2 76 44 3,344 05/15/2017SEAL CRACKS39Poor (50-31)D Paul Place10 The PikeElm Street (South)R 2 1,030 35 36,050 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL51Fair (70-51)B PC Railway Place10 Allen StreetEast Cherry AveR 2 340 25 8,670 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL45Poor (50-31)B PC Railway Place20 Allen StreetEnd of StreetR 2 335 20 6,700 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL38Poor (50-31)C Pearl Drive10 North EndLeanna Drive (E)R 2 1,275 34 43,350 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL60Fair (70-51)B Pearwood Avenue10 Huasna RoadOak Hill Road (EOS)R 2 1,200 34 40,920 07/01/2010THIN OVERLAY w/FABRIC75Good (90-71)D Pecan Place10 Fair Oaks AveNorth EndR 1 336 16 5,376 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL56Fair (70-51)D Pecan Street10 Farroll AvenueFair Oaks AvenueR 2 700 37 25,900 08/12/2012SLURRY SEAL32Poor (50-31)C Pilgrim Way10 Orchard AvenueArroyo AvenueR 2 370 36 13,320 07/01/2010THIN OVERLAY w/FABRIC75Good (90-71)E Pine Street10 Maple StreetCDSR 2 650 37 24,050 08/12/2012SLURRY SEAL49Poor (50-31)B Plata Road10 Oro DriveCul-De-SacR 2 415 37 15,35527Failed (30-0)B Platino Lane10 La Cresta DriveStagecoach RoadR 2 1,145 37 42,36539Poor (50-31)B Platino Lane20 Stagecoach RoadOroR 2 340 37 12,58066Fair (70-51)A Platino Lane30 Oro DrGate @ TempusR 2 550 37 20,35030Failed (30-0)B Plomo Court10 Stagecoach RoadCul-De-SacR 2 260 37 9,62030Failed (30-0)B Poole Street15 Traffic WayWhiteley StR 2 1,134 39 44,22654Fair (70-51)E Poplar Street10 Juniper StreetElm Street (South)R 2 1,120 37 41,44063Fair (70-51)E Poplar Street20 Juniper StreetWest End (Poplar Basin)R 2 300 34 10,20070Fair (70-51)B Pradera Court10 La Cresta DriveCul-De-SacR 2 355 37 13,135 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL59Fair (70-51)E Priscilla Lane10 Ruth Ann WayCul-De-SacR 2 530 37 19,61036Poor (50-31)A Puesta del Sol10 Los CervosVista DriveR 2 1,450 29 42,05080Good (90-71)A Quail Court10 Robin CircleCul-De-SacR 2 295 37 10,915 12/01/2016SLURRY SEAL60Fair (70-51)A Quail Ridge Court10 Hidden Oak RdCDSR 2 335 33 11,055 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL80Good (90-71)A Rancho Grande Park Parking Lot RchGrd-010 James Way @ Salid Del Sol End of LotO 1 440 88 39,07267Fair (70-51)A Rancho Parkway10 West Branch StreetCamino MercadoMaC 2 1,620 42 68,040 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH49Poor (50-31)A Rancho Parkway20 Camino MercadoVia PocaMaC 2 1,880 42 78,960 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH40Poor (50-31)A Rancho Parkway30 Via PocaJames WayMaC 2 1,060 42 44,520 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH34Poor (50-31)E Raspberry Avenue15 Boysenberry StCranberry StR 2 1,050 33 34,65079Good (90-71)A Refugio Place10 Rancho ParkwayCul-De-SacR 2 450 29 13,05073Good (90-71)C Rena Street (North)10 E Grand AvenueBennett AvenueR 2 670 36 24,120 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL55Fair (70-51)C Rena Street (South)10 Dodson WayE Grand AvenueR 2 1,280 36 46,080 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL28Failed (30-0)B Reservoir Road10 West BranchWater Tank (Res No. 4)O 1 1,880 12 22,560D Rice Court10 Bakeman LaneCDSR 2 175 37 6,475 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL56Fair (70-51)B Ridgeview Way10 Tally Ho RoadWhite CourtR 2 760 28 21,280 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL75Good (90-71)A Robin Circle10 Meadowlark DriveOak Park BoulevardR 2 2,210 37 81,770 12/01/2016SLURRY SEAL59Fair (70-51)04/21/2022Page 8 of 11Page 194 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande - 2022 PMP UpdateStreet List AlphabeticalArea IDStreet Name Section IDBegin LocationEnd LocationFC Lns L W A (SqFt) Last MnR Date Last MnR TreatmentCurrent PCIPCI ConditionE Robles Road10 Sierra DriveEnd of StreetR 2 180 18 3,240 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL46Poor (50-31)E Robles Road20 El Camino RealEnd of Road - Chilton StR 2 325 24 7,800 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL40Poor (50-31)A Rodeo Court10 Rodeo DrEnd CDSR 2 338 36 12,16893Excellent (100-91)A Rodeo Drive10 West Branch StreetMercedes LaneMaC 2 1,970 38 74,86036Poor (50-31)A Rodeo Drive20 Mercedes LaneEmerald Bay DriveMaC 2 2,100 37 77,70035Poor (50-31)A Rodeo Drive30 Emerald Bay DriveJames WayMaC 2 1,490 37 55,13031Poor (50-31)A Rodeo Drive40 James WayCDSR 2 465 37 17,20555Fair (70-51)D Rogers Court10 Victoria WayCDSR 2 550 37 20,350 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL41Poor (50-31)A Rosemary Court10 La CanadaCDSR 2 350 29 10,15065Fair (70-51)A Rosemary Lane10 West EndCDSR 2 1,220 29 35,380 12/01/2016SLURRY SEAL79Good (90-71)B Rosewood Lane10 Huasna RoadCDSR 2 525 35 18,375 08/06/2012SLURRY SEAL68Fair (70-51)D Russ Court10 Paul PlaceCDSR 2 240 35 8,400 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL55Fair (70-51)E Ruth Ann Way (North)10 Brighton AvenueCDSR 2 430 37 15,91049Poor (50-31)E Ruth Ann Way (South)10 Brighton AvenueCDSR 2 550 37 20,35046Poor (50-31)E Sage Street10 Spruce StreetAspen StreetR 2 535 36 19,26063Fair (70-51)A Salida de Sol10 James WayCul-de-SacR 2 680 29 19,720 12/01/2016SLURRY SEAL80Good (90-71)D Sandalwood Avenue10 Alder StreetHalcyon Road (South)R 2 580 34 19,720 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL39Poor (50-31)A Scenic Circle10 Equestrian WayCDSR 2 410 37 15,17045Poor (50-31)E Seabright Avenue10 Oak Park BoulevardCranberry StreetR 2 245 33 8,08581Good (90-71)B Short Street10 Allen StreetPoole StreetR 2 475 39 18,52578Good (90-71)B Short Street20 Poole StreetNelson StreetR 2 470 39 18,33033Poor (50-31)B Short Street30 Nelson StreetNorth End (AG Creek)R 2 285 39 11,11580Good (90-71)B Short Street40 E Branch StreetOlohan AlleyR 2 130 26 3,38085Good (90-71)E Sierra Drive10 Oak Park BoulevardHillcrest DriveR 2 2,187 22 48,114 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL35Poor (50-31)A Sombrillo10 Salida de SolRosemary CourtR 2 940 29 27,260 12/01/2016SLURRY SEAL78Good (90-71)D Soto Complex Parking Lot (East Soto-020 Ash St @ Jasmine PlWhere lot widdensO 1 360 60 21,600 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL66Fair (70-51)D Soto Complex Parking Lot (West Soto-030 Begging of Wide areaEntrance to Corp YardO 1 400 90 36,000 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL52Fair (70-51)A Spanish Moss Lane10 Mesquite LaneChaparral LaneR 2 1,150 37 42,550 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL34Poor (50-31)E Spruce Street10 Ash StreetCedar StreetR 2 900 37 33,30049Poor (50-31)E Spruce Street20 Cedar StreetPoplar StreetR 2 600 37 22,20049Poor (50-31)B Stagecoach Road10 Huasna RoadPlatino LaneMaC 2 1,140 41 46,74044Poor (50-31)B Stagecoach Road20 Platino LaneCity LimitMaC 2 1,400 41 57,40033Poor (50-31)D Starlight10 FarrollMorning RiseR 2 630 35 22,05080Good (90-71)B Station Way10 Fair Oaks AvenueTraffic WayR 2 1,252 37 46,324 08/12/2012SLURRY SEAL27Failed (30-0)A Stevenson Drive10 Hodges RoadJames WayR 2 420 25 10,50027Failed (30-0)B Stillwell Drive10 East CherryMyrtleR 2 590 33 19,47078Good (90-71)E Strawberry Avenue10 Boysenberry StCourtland StR 2 600 33 19,80080Good (90-71)E Strawberry Avenue20 Courtland StCDSR 2 365 33 12,04580Good (90-71)B Strother Park Parking LotStroth-010 Huasna @ Rosewood LnEnd of LotO 1 600 92 55,20011Failed (30-0)E Sunset Drive10 Elm Street (South)Alder StreetR 2 2,200 33 72,600 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL72Good (90-71)B Sweet Pea Court10 Waller PlLeedham PlR 2 620 37 22,94093Excellent (100-91)D Sycamore Court10 Sycamore DriveCDSR 2 135 35 4,725 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL45Poor (50-31)04/21/2022Page 9 of 11Page 195 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande - 2022 PMP UpdateStreet List AlphabeticalArea IDStreet Name Section IDBegin LocationEnd LocationFC Lns L W A (SqFt) Last MnR Date Last MnR TreatmentCurrent PCIPCI ConditionD Sycamore Drive10 Magnolia DriveGaynfair TerraceR 2 710 37 26,270 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL48Poor (50-31)D Sycamore Drive20 Gyanfair TerraceHalcyon Road (South)R 2 900 37 33,300 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL50Poor (50-31)B Tally Ho Road10 Highway 227 (Printz Rd)James WayMaC 2 1,950 37 72,150 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL73Good (90-71)B Tally Ho Road20 James WayLe PointMaC 2 1,700 37 62,900 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL68Fair (70-51)B Tanner Lane10 Flora RoadBranch Mill RoadR 2 658 34 22,372 07/01/2012THIN AC OVERLAY(1.5 INCHES)85Good (90-71)C Taylor Place10 Alpine Street (South)End of StreetR 2 657 37 24,309 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL49Poor (50-31)D The Pike10 City LimitTierra St.MaC 2 400 54 21,600 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL62Fair (70-51)D The Pike15 Tierra StS. Elm StMaC 2 770 60 46,200 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL60Fair (70-51)D The Pike20 Elm Street (South)Halcyon Road (South)MaC 2 2,650 40 106,000 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL63Fair (70-51)D Tierra Street10 The PikeDel Sol StreetR 2 1,000 28 28,000 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL42Poor (50-31)C Tiger Tail Drive10 Valley RoadCDSR 2 915 37 33,85534Poor (50-31)C Todd Lane10 Halcyon Road (South)Fair Oaks AvenueR 2 680 34 23,120 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL48Poor (50-31)B Toyon Place10 Stagecoach RoadCul-de-SacR 2 200 37 7,40032Poor (50-31)B Traffic Way10 Branch Street (West)PCC at BridgeMiA 2 250 40 10,000 07/01/2019DEEP PATCH49Poor (50-31)B Traffic Way15 PCC at BridgeFair OaksMiA 2 1,400 65 91,700 07/01/2019DEEP PATCH49Poor (50-31)B Traffic Way20 Fair Oaks AvenueHighway 101MiA 2 1,075 60 64,500 07/01/2019DEEP PATCH71Good (90-71)B Traffic Way Extension10 Traffic WayTrinity AvenueR 2 750 32 24,000 07/01/2011RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)78Good (90-71)B Trinity Avenue10 Traffic Way ExtensionEnd of StreetR 2 850 30 25,50037Poor (50-31)C Turquoise Drive10 LeAnna Drive (E)LeAnna Drive (W)R 2 1,140 34 38,760 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL62Fair (70-51)C Valley Road10 Fair Oaks AvenueCity LimitMiA 2 1,400 47 65,800 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL59Fair (70-51)C Valley Road20 City Limit N. of Sunrise Tr @ COP Tiger Tail DrMiA 2 675 47 31,725 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH40Poor (50-31)C Valley Road30 Tiger Tail RdCity Limit at BridgeMiA 2 550 60 33,000 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH49Poor (50-31)B Vard Loomis Court10 Vard Loomis LaneCul-de-SacR 2 145 57 8,26549Poor (50-31)B Vard Loomis Lane10 Huasna RoadCul-de-SacR 2 800 37 29,60034Poor (50-31)D Verde Place10 The PikeCul-de-SacR 2 350 37 12,950 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL59Fair (70-51)B Vernon Street10 Branch Street (West)Larchmont DriveR 2 310 37 11,470 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH19Failed (30-0)B Vernon Street20 Larchmont DriveEnd of StreetR 2 160 24 3,840 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH16Failed (30-0)C Via Avante10 Castillo de MarCul-de-SacR 2 300 28 8,400 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL74Good (90-71)A Via Bandolero10 Via VaqueroAvenida de DiamanteR 2 3,550 37 131,35037Poor (50-31)C Via Belmonte Court (North)10 Castillo del MarCul-de-SacR 2 230 40 9,200 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL76Good (90-71)C Via Belmonte Court (South)10 Castillo del MarCul-de-SacR 2 640 28 17,920 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL76Good (90-71)C Via Berros10 Valley RoadCity LimitR 2 455 26 11,83017Failed (30-0)C Via Firenze (North)10 Castillo del MarCul-de-SacR 2 405 28 11,340 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL74Good (90-71)C Via Firenze (South)10 Cul-de-SacCastillo del MarR 2 405 28 11,340 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL75Good (90-71)A Via La Barranca10 Tally Ho RoadEnd of StreetR 2 1,250 35 43,750 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL36Poor (50-31)A Via Las Aquilas10 Camino MercadoPalos SecosR 2 1,700 29 49,30070Fair (70-51)A Via Las Aquilas20 Palos SecosCDSR 2 934 29 27,08669Fair (70-51)A Via Poca10 Rancho ParkwayVia BandoleroR 2 230 37 8,51029Failed (30-0)A Via Vaquero10 Rancho ParkwayAvenida de DiamenteR 2 1,700 38 64,60034Poor (50-31)A Via Vaquero20 Avenida de DiamenteVia BandoleroR 2 600 38 22,80032Poor (50-31)D Victoria Way10 Garfield PlaceRogers CourtR 2 800 37 29,600 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL46Poor (50-31)D Victorian Court10 Farroll AvenueCDSR 2 710 37 26,27080Good (90-71)04/21/2022Page 10 of 11Page 196 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande - 2022 PMP UpdateStreet List AlphabeticalArea IDStreet Name Section IDBegin LocationEnd LocationFC Lns L W A (SqFt) Last MnR Date Last MnR TreatmentCurrent PCIPCI ConditionB Village Court10 Trinity AvenueCul-de-SacR 2 215 36 7,74041Poor (50-31)A Village Glen10 James WayHidden Oak RdR 2 1,300 33 42,900 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL74Good (90-71)C Virginia Drive10 Halcyon Road (South)Woodland DriveR 2 866 37 32,042 07/01/2014SLURRY SEAL28Failed (30-0)A Vista Circle10 Cul-de-SacEquestrian WayR 2 412 37 15,24440Poor (50-31)A Vista Drive10 Equestrain WayPCC at medianR 2 1,310 37 48,47027Failed (30-0)A Vista Drive20 PCC at MedianLa CanadaR 2 1,850 37 68,45070Fair (70-51)E Wallace Place10 Maple StEOSR 1 200 22 4,400 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL34Poor (50-31)B Waller Place10 E. Cherry AveSweet Pea CtR 2 260 42 10,92093Excellent (100-91)B Waller Place20 Sweet Pea CtHaven CtR 2 304 32 9,72893Excellent (100-91)D Walnut Street10 Farroll AvenueAsh StreetR 2 1,386 38 52,668 08/12/2012SLURRY SEAL42Poor (50-31)E Walnut Street20 Ash StreetEnd of StreetR 2 1,200 37 44,400 08/12/2012SLURRY SEAL51Fair (70-51)B Wesley Street10 Branch Street (East)Larchmont DriveR 2 350 39 13,650 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH21Failed (30-0)B White Court10 Ridgeview WayCul-de-SacR 2 315 32 10,080 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL90Good (90-71)B Whiteley Street15 South End (Cul-de-Sac)North End (AG Creek)R 2 1,058 37 39,14667Fair (70-51)C Willow Lane10 Halcyon Road (South)Woodland DriveR 2 750 35 26,250 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL41Poor (50-31)D Wilson Court10 Bakeman LaneCDSR 2 175 37 6,475 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL61Fair (70-51)B Wilton Place10 Vernon StEast EndR 2 370 36 13,320 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL70Fair (70-51)B Women's Club Parking Lot (Lowe WmnClb-020 Lower LotFront doorO 1 170 125 21,250 05/15/2017SEAL CRACKS42Poor (50-31)B Women's Club Parking Lot (Uppe WmnClb-010 Both Upper lotsFront doorO 1 400 60 24,000 05/15/2017SEAL CRACKS39Poor (50-31)E Wood Place10 Dodson WayCDSR 2 650 35 22,750 08/12/2012SLURRY SEAL49Poor (50-31)C Woodland Court10 Woodland DriveCul-de-SacR 2 215 37 7,955 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL40Poor (50-31)C Woodland Drive10 South End (Cul-de-Sac)Virginia DrR 2 650 37 24,050 07/01/2014SLURRY SEAL20Failed (30-0)C Woodland Drive20 Creekside DriveVirginia DrMaC 2 644 37 23,828 09/09/2015SLURRY SEAL35Poor (50-31)C Woodland Drive30 Fair Oaks AvenueCreekside DriveMaC 2 1,240 37 45,880 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL48Poor (50-31)C Woodland Drive40 Fair Oaks AvGate End of StreetR 2 320 37 11,840 05/16/2018SLURRY SEAL64Fair (70-51)C Woodland Drive50 Cerro Vista CrGate/COPR 2 145 37 5,365 05/16/2018SLURRY SEAL62Fair (70-51)B Zogata Way10 Gularte RoadStagecoach RoadR 2 1,020 37 37,74035Poor (50-31)04/21/2022Page 11 of 11Page 197 of 324
Street List PCI High to Low
Page 198 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande - 2022 PMP UpdateStreet List Sorted by PCI (High to Low)Area IDStreet Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC Lns L W A (SqFt) Last MnR Date Last MnR TreatmentCurrent PCIPCI ConditionB Cherry Avenue (East)10 Traffic WayEnd of Street (US 101)R 2 200 40 8,000 07/01/2019DEEP PATCH93Excellent (100-91)B Haven Court10 Waller PlLeedham PlR 2 578 37 21,38693Excellent (100-91)B Leedham Place10 E. Cherry AveHaven CtR 2 415 37 15,35593Excellent (100-91)A Rodeo Court10 Rodeo DrEnd CDSR 2 338 36 12,16893Excellent (100-91)B Sweet Pea Court10 Waller PlLeedham PlR 2 620 37 22,94093Excellent (100-91)B Waller Place10 E. Cherry AveSweet Pea CtR 2 260 42 10,92093Excellent (100-91)B Waller Place20 Sweet Pea CtHaven CtR 2 304 32 9,72893Excellent (100-91)A Collado Corte10 Avenida de DiamanteCul-de-SacR 2 315 37 11,655 12/01/2016THIN AC OVERLAY(1.5 INCHES)90Good (90-71)C Del Mar Place10 Castillo del MarSouth End (Cul-de-Sac)R 2 240 36 8,64090Good (90-71)C Del Sur10 Castillo del MarSouth End (Cul-de-Sac)R 2 430 36 15,48090Good (90-71)C Los Berros10 Valley RdCentury LnMaC 2 830 40 33,200 11/01/2017RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC)90Good (90-71)A. Oak Park Boulevard (NB)550 James WayCity Limit (COP at end of median) MiA 2 800 23 18,400 12/01/2017RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC)90Good (90-71)B Oro Drive10 Huasna RoadPlatino LaneR 2 1,430 37 52,910 12/01/2016THIN AC OVERLAY(1.5 INCHES)90Good (90-71)B Oro Drive20 Platino LaneGularte RoadR 2 1,110 37 41,070 12/01/2016THIN AC OVERLAY(1.5 INCHES)90Good (90-71)B White Court10 Ridgeview WayCul-de-SacR 2 315 32 10,080 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL90Good (90-71)B E Grand Avenue (EB)550 AC @ Hwy 101 overpassW. BranchA 2 500 30 15,00088Good (90-71)B E Grand Avenue (WB)510 W. BranchPCC @ Highway 101 overpassA 2 500 30 15,00088Good (90-71)B Coach Road10 Branch Mill RoadFlora Road - CIW North of Flora MaC 2 743 36 26,748 07/01/2012THIN AC OVERLAY(1.5 INCHES)86Good (90-71)C E Grand Avenue (EB)545 El Camino RealPCC @ 101 OvercrossingA 2 700 30 21,000 07/01/2014MILL AND THICK OVERLAY86Good (90-71)B Branch Street (W)40 COP East of Library entrance VernonMiA 2 1,610 42 67,620 07/01/2019DEEP PATCH85Good (90-71)E Brisco Road30 El Camino RealBranch Street (West)MiA 2 300 32 9,600 07/01/2015MILL AND THICK OVERLAY85Good (90-71)B Car Corral Parking Lot (Upper) Corral-020 Corral-010, Rear of Business E. Le Point St and Cross Gutter.O 1 200 73 14,600 12/01/2016THIN AC OVERLAY(1.5 INCHES)85Good (90-71)B Cherry Avenue (East)10 Traffic WayPC Railway PlaceMaC 2 1,420 45 63,900 07/01/2013SLURRY SEAL85Good (90-71)C E Grand Avenue (WB)515 PCC @ 101 OvercrossingEl Camino RealA 2 700 30 21,000 07/01/2014MILL AND THICK OVERLAY85Good (90-71)B Flora Road10 Coach RoadEnd of StreetR 2 650 38 24,700 07/01/2012THIN AC OVERLAY(1.5 INCHES)85Good (90-71)B Garden Street10 East Branch StreetEnd of Street (Creek)R 2 250 24 6,00085Good (90-71)B Garden Street110 Ide StreetE. Cherry AvenueR 2 1,040 37 38,480 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL85Good (90-71)B Greenwood Drive10 Flora RoadEnd of StreetR 2 672 35 23,520 07/01/2012THIN AC OVERLAY(1.5 INCHES)85Good (90-71)B Ide Street10 Whiteley StreetGarden StreetR 2 990 33 32,670 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL85Good (90-71)E Oak Park Boulevard30 Sierra DriveEl Camino RealMiA 2 340 50 17,00085Good (90-71)B Short Street40 E Branch StreetOlohan AlleyR 2 130 26 3,38085Good (90-71)B Tanner Lane10 Flora RoadBranch Mill RoadR 2 658 34 22,372 07/01/2012THIN AC OVERLAY(1.5 INCHES)85Good (90-71)E El Camino Real20 Oak Park BoulevardHillcrest DriveMiA 2 2,050 30 61,500 07/01/2012THIN OVERLAY w/FABRIC84Good (90-71)D Don Robert's Field Parking Lot DonRob-010 Oak Park Bl. North of Dixson St End of Parking LotO 1 223 93 20,85083Good (90-71)E Courtland Street (S)40 COP at CIWE. Grand AveMaC 2 510 41 20,91081Good (90-71)E Seabright Avenue10 Oak Park BoulevardCranberry StreetR 2 245 33 8,08581Good (90-71)E Blackberry Avenue15 Boysenberry StCranberry StR 2 1,050 33 34,65080Good (90-71)E Boysenberry Street10 Raspberry AvenueStrawberry StreetR 2 930 33 30,69080Good (90-71)E Brighton Avenue15 Change of PavementCourtland StreetR 2 355 43 15,26580Good (90-71)E Cranberry Avenue10 Raspberry AvenueBlackberry AvenueR 2 715 33 23,59580Good (90-71)E Huckleberry Avenue10 Cranberry StreetCourtland StreetR 2 490 33 16,17080Good (90-71)E Loganberry Avenue10 Cranberry StreetCourtland StreetR 2 470 33 15,51080Good (90-71)04/21/2022Page 1 of 11Page 199 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande - 2022 PMP UpdateStreet List Sorted by PCI (High to Low)Area IDStreet Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC Lns L W A (SqFt) Last MnR Date Last MnR TreatmentCurrent PCIPCI ConditionB Nevada Street10 East Branch StreetLe Point StreetR 2 325 20 6,500 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL80Good (90-71)A Puesta del Sol10 Los CervosVista DriveR 2 1,450 29 42,05080Good (90-71)A Quail Ridge Court10 Hidden Oak RdCDSR 2 335 33 11,055 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL80Good (90-71)A Salida de Sol10 James WayCul-de-SacR 2 680 29 19,720 12/01/2016SLURRY SEAL80Good (90-71)B Short Street30 Nelson StreetNorth End (AG Creek)R 2 285 39 11,11580Good (90-71)D Starlight10 FarrollMorning RiseR 2 630 35 22,05080Good (90-71)E Strawberry Avenue10 Boysenberry StCourtland StR 2 600 33 19,80080Good (90-71)E Strawberry Avenue20 Courtland StCDSR 2 365 33 12,04580Good (90-71)D Victorian Court10 Farroll AvenueCDSR 2 710 37 26,27080Good (90-71)E Blueberry Avenue10 Boysenberry StreetCourtland StreetR 2 483 33 15,93979Good (90-71)B Branch Street (W)50 E. Grand AveTraffic WayA 3 275 50 13,75079Good (90-71)A Castillo Court10 Vista DriveCul-de-SacR 2 345 29 10,00579Good (90-71)E El Camino Real30 Hillcrest DriveW/C 850' E/O Hillcrest DrMiA 2 850 40 34,000 07/01/2012THIN OVERLAY w/FABRIC79Good (90-71)B Harrison Street10 Mckinley StreetCul-De-SacR 2 251 18 4,518 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL79Good (90-71)E Raspberry Avenue15 Boysenberry StCranberry StR 2 1,050 33 34,65079Good (90-71)A Rosemary Lane10 West EndCDSR 2 1,220 29 35,380 12/01/2016SLURRY SEAL79Good (90-71)A Asilo Street20 La CanadaVista DriveR 2 1,300 29 37,700 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL78Good (90-71)E El Camino Real10 City LimitOak Park BoulevardMaC 2 95 50 4,750 07/01/2012THIN OVERLAY w/FABRIC78Good (90-71)E El Camino Real35 W/C 850' E/O Hillcrest DrBrisco RdMiA 2 1,550 32 49,600 07/01/2012THIN OVERLAY w/FABRIC78Good (90-71)C Faeh Avenue10 Halcyon Road (North)El Camino RealR 2 600 36 21,600 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL78Good (90-71)D Fair Oaks Avenue20 Alder StHalcyon Road (South)MaC 2 625 41 25,625 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL78Good (90-71)A Hidden Oak Road10 James WayEORR 2 880 37 32,560 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL78Good (90-71)A La Canada20 Asilo StVista DriveR 2 700 37 25,90078Good (90-71)A Los Ciervos11 Vista DriveCul-de-SacR 2 920 29 26,68078Good (90-71)D Morning Rise Lane10 EOSFarroll AvenueR 2 900 35 31,50078Good (90-71)B Myrtle Drive10 Myrtle StE. CherryR 2 620 33 20,46078Good (90-71)B Myrtle Street20 COP East of NogueraMyrtle DrR 2 390 21 8,19078Good (90-71)B Nelson Street20 Mason Street (South)Cul-De-SacR 2 730 39 28,470 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL78Good (90-71)D Pacific Pointe Way10 Elm Street (South)Elm Street (South)R 2 797 37 29,489 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL78Good (90-71)A Paraiso Court10 AsiloCul-de-SacR 2 190 29 5,510 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL78Good (90-71)B Short Street10 Allen StreetPoole StreetR 2 475 39 18,52578Good (90-71)A Sombrillo10 Salida de SolRosemary CourtR 2 940 29 27,260 12/01/2016SLURRY SEAL78Good (90-71)B Stillwell Drive10 East CherryMyrtleR 2 590 33 19,47078Good (90-71)B Traffic Way Extension10 Traffic WayTrinity AvenueR 2 750 32 24,000 07/01/2011RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)78Good (90-71)E Brisco Road10 Grand Ave (East)Linda DriveMiA 2 750 37 27,75077Good (90-71)B Cherry Avenue (East)30 Branch Mill RoadEnd of PavementR 2 600 22 13,20077Good (90-71)C El Camino Real60 BennettE. Grand AveMiA 2 820 37 30,340 07/01/2012THIN OVERLAY w/FABRIC77Good (90-71)A James Way30 Clinton CtRancho ParkwayMaC 2 2,350 41 96,350 08/03/20186" DIGOUTS77Good (90-71)B Larchmont Drive10 Vernon StreetWestley StreetR 2 950 33 31,350 07/01/2014THIN OVERLAY w/FABRIC77Good (90-71)B Launa Lane10 Los Olivos LaneEnd of StreeR 2 550 34 18,700 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL77Good (90-71)A Los Ciervos Ct10 Vista DriveCul-de-SacR 2 345 29 10,00577Good (90-71)B May Street10 Mckinley StreetWest EndR 2 800 35 28,000 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL77Good (90-71)04/21/2022Page 2 of 11Page 200 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande - 2022 PMP UpdateStreet List Sorted by PCI (High to Low)Area IDStreet Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC Lns L W A (SqFt) Last MnR Date Last MnR TreatmentCurrent PCIPCI ConditionD Noel Street10 Oak Park BoulevardCDSR 2 470 37 17,390 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL77Good (90-71)A Oak Park Boulevard (SB)550 City Limit (COP at end of median) James WyMiA 2 800 26 20,80077Good (90-71)D Bakeman Lane (N)10 Farroll Avenue (East Side)Farroll Avenue (West Side)R 2 1,400 33 46,200 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL76Good (90-71)B Car Corral Parking Lot (Upper) Corral-030 E. Le Point St at Miller Way Cross Gutter at bottom and West Side O 1 200 160 32,00076Good (90-71)C Castillo del Mar20 Orchard AvenueValley RoadR 2 163 37 6,031 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL76Good (90-71)C Cherry Avenue (West)20 Arroyo AvenueEnd of Street (AGHS)R 2 878 39 34,242 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL76Good (90-71)C El Camino Real50 Halcyon Road (North)Bennett.MiA 2 1,160 68 78,880 07/01/2012RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC)76Good (90-71)B Fire Access Road10 Pearwood AvenueGularte RoadO 1 551 10 5,51076Good (90-71)B Hillside Court10 Fieldview PlaceLos Olivos LaneR 2 620 37 22,94076Good (90-71)A James Way40 Rancho ParkwayRodeo DriveMaC 2 1,200 41 49,200 08/03/20184" DIGOUTS76Good (90-71)C Via Belmonte Court (North)10 Castillo del MarCul-de-SacR 2 230 40 9,200 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL76Good (90-71)C Via Belmonte Court (South)10 Castillo del MarCul-de-SacR 2 640 28 17,920 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL76Good (90-71)C Arroyo Avenue10 Pilgram WayWest Cherry AvenueR 2 607 33 20,031 07/01/2010RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC)75Good (90-71)E Courtland Street (N)20 Brighton AvenueNewport AvenueMaC 2 550 36 19,80075Good (90-71)D Dixson Street10 Oak Park BoulevardCDSR 2 735 37 27,195 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL75Good (90-71)B Fieldview Place10 Hillside CourtGrove CourtR 2 360 37 13,32075Good (90-71)A James Way60 Village Glen DriveTally Ho RoadMaC 2 1,412 41 57,892 08/03/20186" DIGOUTS75Good (90-71)B Pearwood Avenue10 Huasna RoadOak Hill Road (EOS)R 2 1,200 34 40,920 07/01/2010THIN OVERLAY w/FABRIC75Good (90-71)C Pilgrim Way10 Orchard AvenueArroyo AvenueR 2 370 36 13,320 07/01/2010THIN OVERLAY w/FABRIC75Good (90-71)B Ridgeview Way10 Tally Ho RoadWhite CourtR 2 760 28 21,280 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL75Good (90-71)C Via Firenze (South)10 Cul-de-SacCastillo del MarR 2 405 28 11,340 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL75Good (90-71)A Asilo Street10 La Canada Street (North end) La Canada Street (South End)R 2 1,320 29 38,280 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL74Good (90-71)C Castillo del Mar10 End of StreetOrchard AvenueR 2 2,790 37 103,230 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL74Good (90-71)A James Way10 Oak Park BoulevardEquestrian WayMaC 2 2,180 41 89,380 08/03/20186" DIGOUTS74Good (90-71)A James Way20 Equestrian WayClinton CtMaC 2 1,100 41 45,100 08/03/20184" DIGOUTS74Good (90-71)C Via Avante10 Castillo de MarCul-de-SacR 2 300 28 8,400 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL74Good (90-71)C Via Firenze (North)10 Castillo del MarCul-de-SacR 2 405 28 11,340 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL74Good (90-71)A Village Glen10 James WayHidden Oak RdR 2 1,300 33 42,900 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL74Good (90-71)D Brittany Avenue10 South ElmCarrington PlaceR 2 310 37 11,47073Good (90-71)E Courtland Street (S)30 Strawberry AvenueCOP at CIWMaC 2 300 40 12,00073Good (90-71)D Farroll Avenue20 Elm Street (South)Victorian CtR 2 1,100 40 44,00073Good (90-71)A James Way50 Rodeo DriveVillage Glen DriveMaC 2 1,930 41 79,130 08/03/20184" DIGOUTS73Good (90-71)A Refugio Place10 Rancho ParkwayCul-De-SacR 2 450 29 13,05073Good (90-71)B Tally Ho Road10 Highway 227 (Printz Rd)James WayMaC 2 1,950 37 72,150 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL73Good (90-71)B Branch Street (E)70 Bridge St (Bricks)Mason St (Bricks)A 2 875 42 36,750 12/01/2017CHIP SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL72Good (90-71)E Brisco Road20 Linda DriveEl Camino RealMiA 2 1,350 37 49,95072Good (90-71)B Crown Hill10 Branch Street (East)End of StreetR 2 1,640 30 49,200 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL72Good (90-71)B Farmhouse Place10 Grove CourtHillside CourtR 2 400 37 14,80072Good (90-71)D Farroll Avenue10 City LimitElm Street (South)MaC 2 1,675 42 70,35072Good (90-71)E Sunset Drive10 Elm Street (South)Alder StreetR 2 2,200 33 72,600 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL72Good (90-71)D Carrington Place10 Brittany AveCDSR 2 175 37 6,47571Good (90-71)E Courtland Street (S)20 Raspberry AvenueStrawberry AvenueMaC 2 1,070 37 39,59071Good (90-71)04/21/2022Page 3 of 11Page 201 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande - 2022 PMP UpdateStreet List Sorted by PCI (High to Low)Area IDStreet Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC Lns L W A (SqFt) Last MnR Date Last MnR TreatmentCurrent PCIPCI ConditionA Grace Lane10 Rodeo Drive - SouthsideRodeo Drive - NorthsideR 2 2,650 29 76,850 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL71Good (90-71)B Grove Court10 Fieldview PlaceFarmhouse PlaceR 2 375 37 13,87571Good (90-71)D Hampton Place10 Brittany AveCDSR 2 185 37 6,84571Good (90-71)A Ladera Place10 Via La BarrancaCul-De-SacR 2 150 26 3,900 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL71Good (90-71)B Mckinley Street10 Crown HillMay StreetR 2 736 33 24,288 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL71Good (90-71)C Orchard Avenue30 COP S. of Pilgram WyCastillo de MarR 2 650 37 24,05071Good (90-71)B Traffic Way20 Fair Oaks AvenueHighway 101MiA 2 1,075 60 64,500 07/01/2019DEEP PATCH71Good (90-71)A Calle Cuervo10 Via Las AguilasCul-de-SacR 2 260 29 7,54070Fair (70-51)E Cedar Street25 Spruce StreetCourtland StreetR 2 887 32 28,38470Fair (70-51)C Dodson Way20 Halcyon Road (South)Alpine Street (South)R 2 730 35 25,550 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL70Fair (70-51)E El Camino Real40 Brisco RoadHalcyon Road (North)MiA 2 700 50 35,000 07/01/2012THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5 INCHES)70Fair (70-51)B Myrtle Street10 Garden StreetCOP East of NogueraR 2 392 37 14,504 07/01/2010RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC)70Fair (70-51)E Poplar Street20 Juniper StreetWest End (Poplar Basin)R 2 300 34 10,20070Fair (70-51)A Via Las Aquilas10 Camino MercadoPalos SecosR 2 1,700 29 49,30070Fair (70-51)A Vista Drive20 PCC at MedianLa CanadaR 2 1,850 37 68,45070Fair (70-51)B Wilton Place10 Vernon StEast EndR 2 370 36 13,320 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL70Fair (70-51)C Alpine Street (South)10 Cerro Vista Circle (EOS)Cerro Vista LaneR 2 270 32 8,640 05/16/2018SLURRY SEAL69Fair (70-51)A Clinton Court10 James WayCul-de-SacR 2 290 29 8,41069Fair (70-51)D Corporation Yard Parking Lot CrpYrd-010 East Entrance to Corp Yard (Front) West End at GateO 1 250 72 18,000 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL69Fair (70-51)B Crown Terrace20 Le Point StreetNorth EndR 2 230 37 8,510 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL69Fair (70-51)C Diamond Circle10 Leanna DriveCul-de-SacR 2 205 34 6,970 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL69Fair (70-51)C Orchard Avenue10 Fair Oaks AvenueWest CherryR 2 520 38 19,760 07/01/2010THIN OVERLAY w/FABRIC69Fair (70-51)A Via Las Aquilas20 Palos SecosCDSR 2 934 29 27,08669Fair (70-51)B Car Corral Parking Lot (Lower) Corral-010 E. Branch StBeginning of Middle Corral Parking Lot O 1 300 62 18,870 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL68Fair (70-51)B Le Point Street20 Mason Street (North)Tally Ho RoadMaC 2 545 38 20,710 05/15/2017SEAL CRACKS68Fair (70-51)B Le Point Terrace20 Crown HillEnd of StreetR 2 300 25 7,500 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL68Fair (70-51)B Rosewood Lane10 Huasna RoadCDSR 2 525 35 18,375 08/06/2012SLURRY SEAL68Fair (70-51)B Tally Ho Road20 James WayLe PointMaC 2 1,700 37 62,900 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL68Fair (70-51)C Alpine Street (North)10 Grand AvenueFaeh AveR 2 1,058 34 35,972 05/16/2018SLURRY SEAL67Fair (70-51)C Fair Oaks Avenue50 Valley RoadPCC @ 101 OverpassMiA 4 1,680 48 80,640 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL67Fair (70-51)C Leanna Drive10 Valley RoadGate W/O TurquoiseR 2 1,456 38 55,328 07/01/2015SLURRY SEAL67Fair (70-51)C Orchard Avenue20 West Cherry AvenueCOP S. of Pilgrim WayR 2 900 44 39,600 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL67Fair (70-51)A Palos Secos10 Rancho ParkwayCul-de-SacR 2 630 29 18,27067Fair (70-51)A Rancho Grande Park Parking Lot RchGrd-010 James Way @ Salid Del Sol End of LotO 1 440 88 39,07267Fair (70-51)B Whiteley Street15 South End (Cul-de-Sac)North End (AG Creek)R 2 1,058 37 39,14667Fair (70-51)A Andre Drive15 Jenny PlaceCDSR 2 1,470 29 42,63066Fair (70-51)D Ash Street Bathrooms Parking L Soto-010 Ash Street at Spruce StBathroomsO 1 240 60 14,400 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL66Fair (70-51)A Branch Street (W)20 Camino MercadoBrisco RoadMiA 2 2,880 67 192,960 07/01/2019DEEP PATCH66Fair (70-51)D Farroll Avenue30 Victorian CtHalcyon Road (South)R 2 1,525 36 54,90066Fair (70-51)B Platino Lane20 Stagecoach RoadOroR 2 340 37 12,58066Fair (70-51)D Soto Complex Parking Lot (East Soto-020 Ash St @ Jasmine PlWhere lot widdensO 1 360 60 21,600 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL66Fair (70-51)A Camino Mercado10 Branch Street (West)COP West of Walmart Entrance MaC 2 1,000 38 38,000 12/01/2016SLURRY SEAL65Fair (70-51)04/21/2022Page 4 of 11Page 202 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande - 2022 PMP UpdateStreet List Sorted by PCI (High to Low)Area IDStreet Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC Lns L W A (SqFt) Last MnR Date Last MnR TreatmentCurrent PCIPCI ConditionB Clarence Avenue10 Huasna RoadEnd of StreetR 2 646 27 17,442 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL65Fair (70-51)E Courtland Street (S)10 Ash StreetRaspberry AvenueMaC 2 390 37 14,43065Fair (70-51)E E Grand Avenue (EB)530 S. Elm StSouth Halcyon RoadA 2 2,800 40 112,000 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL65Fair (70-51)A Emerald Bay Drive (West)10 Rodeo DriveCul-de-SacR 2 465 37 17,205 07/01/2015MILL AND THICK OVERLAY65Fair (70-51)B Le Point Street30 Corbett CynCrown TerraceMaC 2 1,298 37 48,026 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL65Fair (70-51)C Opal Circle10 Leanna DriveCul-de-SacR 2 205 34 6,970 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL65Fair (70-51)C Park Way10 Halcyon Road (South)Rena Street (South)R 2 378 34 12,852 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL65Fair (70-51)A Rosemary Court10 La CanadaCDSR 2 350 29 10,15065Fair (70-51)E Courtland Street (N)10 Grand Avenue (East)Brighton AvenueMaC 2 850 37 31,45064Fair (70-51)B Ololhan Alley Parking LotOlolhn-020 Short StreetBridge StreetO 1 632 48 30,715 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL64Fair (70-51)C Woodland Drive40 Fair Oaks AvGate End of StreetR 2 320 37 11,840 05/16/2018SLURRY SEAL64Fair (70-51)B Allen Street10 Traffic WayGarden StreetR 2 2,150 31 66,650 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL63Fair (70-51)C Alpine Street (South)30 Dodson WayE. GrandR 2 1,430 34 48,620 05/16/2018SLURRY SEAL63Fair (70-51)D Ash Street10 City LimitCIW East of SpruceMaC 2 1,470 41 60,270 08/05/2012SLURRY SEAL63Fair (70-51)B Garden Street120 Cherry Avenue (East)Grove CourtR 2 125 37 4,62563Fair (70-51)E Poplar Street10 Juniper StreetElm Street (South)R 2 1,120 37 41,44063Fair (70-51)E Sage Street10 Spruce StreetAspen StreetR 2 535 36 19,26063Fair (70-51)D The Pike20 Elm Street (South)Halcyon Road (South)MaC 2 2,650 40 106,000 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL63Fair (70-51)C Fair Oaks Avenue40 PCC E. of WoodlandValley RoadMiA 4 2,240 60 134,400 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL62Fair (70-51)C Oak Street10 E Grand AvenueBennett AveR 2 690 37 25,530 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL62Fair (70-51)D The Pike10 City LimitTierra St.MaC 2 400 54 21,600 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL62Fair (70-51)C Turquoise Drive10 LeAnna Drive (E)LeAnna Drive (W)R 2 1,140 34 38,760 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL62Fair (70-51)C Woodland Drive50 Cerro Vista CrGate/COPR 2 145 37 5,365 05/16/2018SLURRY SEAL62Fair (70-51)E Brighton Avenue10 Oak Park BoulevardChange of PavementR 2 360 43 15,480 08/30/2015SLURRY SEAL61Fair (70-51)C Cornwall Avenue10 El Camino RealN. Rena StreetR 2 1,361 35 47,635 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL61Fair (70-51)D Diana Place10 Farroll AveEnd of StreetR 2 950 37 35,150 08/06/2012SLURRY SEAL61Fair (70-51)E E Grand Avenue (WB)530 North Halcyon RdNorth Elm StA 2 2,750 40 110,000 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL61Fair (70-51)D Elm Street (South)20 The PikeFarroll AvenueMiA 2 1,510 62 93,620 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH61Fair (70-51)A Oak Park Boulevard (NB)540 West BranchJames WayA 2 1,300 30 39,13061Fair (70-51)B Paseo Street10 May StreetEnd of StreetR 2 185 37 6,845 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL61Fair (70-51)D Wilson Court10 Bakeman LaneCDSR 2 175 37 6,475 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL61Fair (70-51)C Bennett Avenue20 Halcyon (North)El Camino RealR 2 1,210 37 44,770 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL60Fair (70-51)B Branch Street (W)60 Traffic WayBridge StA 2 685 40 27,400 12/01/2017CHIP SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL60Fair (70-51)A Cardinal Court10 Robin CircleCul-de-SacR 2 150 37 5,550 12/01/2016SLURRY SEAL60Fair (70-51)E Elm Street (South) (NB)540 Ash StreetGrand Ave (East)MiA 2 2,030 31 62,930 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL60Fair (70-51)D Elm Street Comm Center Parkin ElmSt-020 End of DrivewayEnd of LotO 1 220 78 17,160 08/12/2015SLURRY SEAL60Fair (70-51)B Huasna Road10 East Branch StreetBolsa Chica EntranceMiA 2 1,200 61 73,200 08/30/2012SLURRY SEAL60Fair (70-51)B Mason Street (South)20 Nelson StreetEast Branch StreetR 2 617 35 21,595 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL60Fair (70-51)B Outland Court10 Gularte RoadCul-De-SacR 2 170 37 6,29060Fair (70-51)C Pearl Drive10 North EndLeanna Drive (E)R 2 1,275 34 43,350 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL60Fair (70-51)A Quail Court10 Robin CircleCul-De-SacR 2 295 37 10,915 12/01/2016SLURRY SEAL60Fair (70-51)D The Pike15 Tierra StS. Elm StMaC 2 770 60 46,200 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL60Fair (70-51)04/21/2022Page 5 of 11Page 203 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande - 2022 PMP UpdateStreet List Sorted by PCI (High to Low)Area IDStreet Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC Lns L W A (SqFt) Last MnR Date Last MnR TreatmentCurrent PCIPCI ConditionB Branch Street (E)90 Garden StHuasnaA 2 1,030 32 32,960 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL59Fair (70-51)A Branch Street (W)30 Brisco RoadCOP East of Library entranceMiA 2 1,080 42 45,360 07/01/2019DEEP PATCH59Fair (70-51)E Elm Street (South) (SB)540 E. Grand AveAsh StMiA 2 2,100 31 65,100 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL59Fair (70-51)D Gaynfair Terrace10 The PikeFarroll AvenueR 2 1,620 38 61,560 08/06/2012SLURRY SEAL59Fair (70-51)B Miller Circle10 Milller WayCul-de-SacR 2 195 31 6,045 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL59Fair (70-51)B Pradera Court10 La Cresta DriveCul-De-SacR 2 355 37 13,135 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL59Fair (70-51)A Robin Circle10 Meadowlark DriveOak Park BoulevardR 2 2,210 37 81,770 12/01/2016SLURRY SEAL59Fair (70-51)C Valley Road10 Fair Oaks AvenueCity LimitMiA 2 1,400 47 65,800 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL59Fair (70-51)D Verde Place10 The PikeCul-de-SacR 2 350 37 12,950 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL59Fair (70-51)E E Grand Avenue (EB)510 City Limit @ COP E. of Oak Park Juniper StA 2 1,250 38 47,500 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL58Fair (70-51)D Golden West Place10 Farroll AvenueCul-De-SacR 2 700 38 26,600 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL58Fair (70-51)B Huasna Road20 Bolsa Chica EntranceCallie CtMiA 2 1,350 38 51,300 08/05/2012SLURRY SEAL58Fair (70-51)B Le Point Terrace10 Branch Street (East)Crown HillR 2 150 25 3,750 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL58Fair (70-51)B Miller Way10 Le Point StreetEnd of Street (Gate)R 2 2,220 32 71,040 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL58Fair (70-51)B Callie Court10 Huasna RoadCul-de-SacR 2 235 37 8,69557Fair (70-51)E Juniper Street10 Poplar StreetE Grand AvenueR 2 570 37 21,09057Fair (70-51)A Mercedes Lane15 Rodeo DriveCDS N. of Old Ranch RoadR 2 2,110 37 79,84057Fair (70-51)E Aspen Street10 Ash StreetPoplar StreetR 2 1,480 37 54,76056Fair (70-51)B Canyon Way10 Tally HoCIWR 2 1,300 38 49,400 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL56Fair (70-51)E Cedar Street10 Aspen StreetSpruce StreetR 2 540 35 18,90056Fair (70-51)D Pecan Place10 Fair Oaks AveNorth EndR 1 336 16 5,376 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL56Fair (70-51)D Rice Court10 Bakeman LaneCDSR 2 175 37 6,475 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL56Fair (70-51)A Branch Street (W)10 Oak Park BoulevardCamino MercadoMiA 2 1,740 44 77,430 07/01/2019DEEP PATCH55Fair (70-51)C Halcyon Road (South)60 Calle De Los SueiThe PikeMaC 1 290 34 9,860 07/01/2013SLURRY SEAL55Fair (70-51)B Huebner Lane10 Branch Mill RoadWater TankO 2 1,487 11 16,35755Fair (70-51)C Rena Street (North)10 E Grand AvenueBennett AvenueR 2 670 36 24,120 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL55Fair (70-51)A Rodeo Drive40 James WayCDSR 2 465 37 17,20555Fair (70-51)D Russ Court10 Paul PlaceCDSR 2 240 35 8,400 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL55Fair (70-51)D Carmella Crive10 Farroll AvenueCDSR 2 900 35 31,500 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL54Fair (70-51)D Del Sol Street10 The PikeTierra StR 2 730 37 27,010 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL54Fair (70-51)C Halcyon Road (South)30 Fair Oaks AvenueOlive StreetMaC 4 522 61 31,842 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL54Fair (70-51)B La Cresta Drive15 Huasna RoadPlatino Lane (W)R 2 1,800 37 66,60054Fair (70-51)E Linda Drive10 Bennett AvenueBrisco RoadR 2 1,090 38 41,420 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL54Fair (70-51)A Meadowlark Drive10 Oak Park BoulevardRobin CircleR 2 595 37 22,015 12/01/2016SLURRY SEAL54Fair (70-51)B Poole Street15 Traffic WayWhiteley StR 2 1,134 39 44,22654Fair (70-51)E Dodson Way10 Alder StreetHalcyon Road (South)R 2 600 27 16,200 08/12/2012SLURRY SEAL53Fair (70-51)D Lancaster Drive10 The PikeElm Street (South)R 2 1,085 32 34,720 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL53Fair (70-51)E Alder Street30 Ash StEast Grand AveMaC 2 1,450 38 55,100 08/12/2012SLURRY SEAL52Fair (70-51)D Ash Street30 S. Elm StWalnut StreetR 2 1,015 37 37,555 08/05/2012SLURRY SEAL52Fair (70-51)B Bridge Street10 Branch Street (East)Traffic WayR 2 950 39 37,05052Fair (70-51)B Cherry Avenue (East)20 PC Railway PlaceBranch Mill RoadMaC 2 1,125 40 45,000 07/01/2013SLURRY SEAL52Fair (70-51)A Mesquite Lane10 Chaparral LaneJames WayR 2 1,270 37 46,990 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL52Fair (70-51)04/21/2022Page 6 of 11Page 204 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande - 2022 PMP UpdateStreet List Sorted by PCI (High to Low)Area IDStreet Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC Lns L W A (SqFt) Last MnR Date Last MnR TreatmentCurrent PCIPCI ConditionD Oak Park Boulevard (NB)510 Farrol AvenueCity LimitMiA 2 800 30 24,000 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL52Fair (70-51)B Olohan AlleyOlolhn-010 Mason StShort StO 1 285 46 13,16752Fair (70-51)D Soto Complex Parking Lot (West Soto-030 Begging of Wide areaEntrance to Corp YardO 1 400 90 36,000 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL52Fair (70-51)D Bakeman Lane (S)10 Farroll Road (West Side)Farroll Road (East Side)R 2 1,590 36 57,240 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL51Fair (70-51)C Cerro Vista Circle10 Cerro Vista LaneAlpine Street (South)R 2 715 37 26,455 05/16/2018SLURRY SEAL51Fair (70-51)B Corbett Canyon Road20 Huasna RdPrintz RdA 2 2,700 26 70,20051Fair (70-51)A Matthew Way10 Andre DriveLa CanadaR 2 830 29 24,070 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL51Fair (70-51)E Montego Street10 Newport AveCDSR 2 1,080 34 36,720 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL51Fair (70-51)D Paul Place10 The PikeElm Street (South)R 2 1,030 35 36,050 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL51Fair (70-51)E Walnut Street20 Ash StreetEnd of StreetR 2 1,200 37 44,400 08/12/2012SLURRY SEAL51Fair (70-51)B Bedloe Lane10 West Cherry LaneFair Oaks AvenueR 2 500 19 9,500 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL50Poor (50-31)C Bell Street10 Grand Avenue (East)El Camino RealR 2 1,050 35 36,750 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL50Poor (50-31)D Carol Place10 Carmella DriveFarroll AvenueR 2 580 35 20,300 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL50Poor (50-31)A Dos Cerros10 Via Las AguilasCul-de-SacR 2 345 29 10,00550Poor (50-31)A Emerald Bay Drive (East)10 Rodeo DriveCul-de-SacR 2 446 37 16,502 07/01/2015MILL AND THICK OVERLAY50Poor (50-31)B Huasna Road30 Callie CtCity LimitMiA 2 1,640 61 100,040 08/05/2012SLURRY SEAL50Poor (50-31)A Lift Station No 1LiftSta010 K-Mart Parking LotEnd of LotO 1 93 13 1,20950Poor (50-31)D Sycamore Drive20 Gyanfair TerraceHalcyon Road (South)R 2 900 37 33,300 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL50Poor (50-31)A Arabian Circle10 Vista DriveCul-de-SacR 2 633 37 23,42149Poor (50-31)E Chelsea Court10 Brighton AveCul-de-sacR 2 175 37 6,47549Poor (50-31)D Elm Street Comminty Center Dri ElmSt-010 Driveway East of Ash St Bathrooms Elm St Rec Center parking lotO 1 490 27 13,23049Poor (50-31)A Grace Lane20 Rodeo DriveChaparral LaneR 2 135 37 4,995 05/23/2016SLURRY SEAL49Poor (50-31)D La Vista Court10 The PikeCul-De-SacR 2 420 32 13,440 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL49Poor (50-31)B Mason Street (South)10 Allen StreetNelson StreetR 2 940 39 36,660 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL49Poor (50-31)D Oak Park Boulevard (SB)510 City LimitFarroll AvenueMiA 2 720 30 21,600 08/05/2012SLURRY SEAL49Poor (50-31)E Pine Street10 Maple StreetCDSR 2 650 37 24,050 08/12/2012SLURRY SEAL49Poor (50-31)A Rancho Parkway10 West Branch StreetCamino MercadoMaC 2 1,620 42 68,040 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH49Poor (50-31)E Ruth Ann Way (North)10 Brighton AvenueCDSR 2 430 37 15,91049Poor (50-31)E Spruce Street10 Ash StreetCedar StreetR 2 900 37 33,30049Poor (50-31)E Spruce Street20 Cedar StreetPoplar StreetR 2 600 37 22,20049Poor (50-31)C Taylor Place10 Alpine Street (South)End of StreetR 2 657 37 24,309 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL49Poor (50-31)B Traffic Way10 Branch Street (West)PCC at BridgeMiA 2 250 40 10,000 07/01/2019DEEP PATCH49Poor (50-31)B Traffic Way15 PCC at BridgeFair OaksMiA 2 1,400 65 91,700 07/01/2019DEEP PATCH49Poor (50-31)C Valley Road30 Tiger Tail RdCity Limit at BridgeMiA 2 550 60 33,000 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH49Poor (50-31)B Vard Loomis Court10 Vard Loomis LaneCul-de-SacR 2 145 57 8,26549Poor (50-31)E Wood Place10 Dodson WayCDSR 2 650 35 22,750 08/12/2012SLURRY SEAL49Poor (50-31)B Branch Street (W)45 Vernon StE. GrandMaC 2 830 28 23,240 07/01/2019DEEP PATCH48Poor (50-31)A Camino Mercado20 COP West of Walmart Entrance Rancho ParkwayMaC 2 1,490 41 61,09048Poor (50-31)C Cerro Vista Lane10 Alpine Street (South)Cerro Visto CircleR 2 550 42 23,375 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL48Poor (50-31)E Elm Street (North)20 Brighton AvenueCDSR 2 475 37 17,575 08/12/2014THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5 INCHES)48Poor (50-31)C Farroll Avenue40 Halcyon Road (South)Cul-De-SacR 2 335 30 10,050 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL48Poor (50-31)E Maple Street10 Elm Street (South)Walnut StreetR 2 950 37 35,150 08/12/2012SLURRY SEAL48Poor (50-31)04/21/2022Page 7 of 11Page 205 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande - 2022 PMP UpdateStreet List Sorted by PCI (High to Low)Area IDStreet Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC Lns L W A (SqFt) Last MnR Date Last MnR TreatmentCurrent PCIPCI ConditionD Mulberry Lane10 Magnolia DriveSycamore DriveR 2 365 35 12,775 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL48Poor (50-31)B Nelson Street10 Traffic WayMason Street (South)MaC 2 970 39 37,830 08/30/2015SLURRY SEAL48Poor (50-31)A Old Ranch Road10 West Branch StreetMercedes LaneR 2 1,900 40 76,000 07/01/2015MILL AND THIN OVERLAY48Poor (50-31)C Olive Street10 Woodland DriveHalcyon Road (South)R 2 674 34 22,916 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL48Poor (50-31)D Palm Court10 Walnut StreetCul-De-SacR 2 452 37 16,724 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL48Poor (50-31)D Sycamore Drive10 Magnolia DriveGaynfair TerraceR 2 710 37 26,270 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL48Poor (50-31)C Todd Lane10 Halcyon Road (South)Fair Oaks AvenueR 2 680 34 23,120 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL48Poor (50-31)C Woodland Drive30 Fair Oaks AvenueCreekside DriveMaC 2 1,240 37 45,880 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL48Poor (50-31)B Branch Street (E)80 Mason St (Bricks)Garden StA 2 1,460 48 70,080 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL46Poor (50-31)B Corral Place10 Corbett Canyon RoadCul-de-SacR 2 660 28 18,48046Poor (50-31)D Fair Oaks Avenue10 Elm Street (South)Alder StMaC 2 2,200 41 90,200 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL46Poor (50-31)D Garfield Place10 The PikeCul-De-SacR 2 1,243 37 45,991 08/06/2012SLURRY SEAL46Poor (50-31)E Robles Road10 Sierra DriveEnd of StreetR 2 180 18 3,240 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL46Poor (50-31)E Ruth Ann Way (South)10 Brighton AvenueCDSR 2 550 37 20,35046Poor (50-31)D Victoria Way10 Garfield PlaceRogers CourtR 2 800 37 29,600 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL46Poor (50-31)C California Street10 Cherry Avenue (West)Fair Oaks AvenueR 2 525 38 19,950 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL45Poor (50-31)B Corbett Canyon Road10 Route 227City LimitMaC 2 1,230 24 29,520 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH45Poor (50-31)E Corona del Tierra10 Brighton AvenueCul-de-SacR 2 420 37 15,54045Poor (50-31)D Elm Street (South)30 Farroll AvenueAsh StreetMiA 2 1,450 62 89,900 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH45Poor (50-31)C Newman Drive10 Alpine Street (South)End of StreetR 2 560 34 19,040 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL45Poor (50-31)B PC Railway Place10 Allen StreetEast Cherry AveR 2 340 25 8,670 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL45Poor (50-31)A Scenic Circle10 Equestrian WayCDSR 2 410 37 15,17045Poor (50-31)D Sycamore Court10 Sycamore DriveCDSR 2 135 35 4,725 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL45Poor (50-31)C Alpine Street (South)20 Cerro Vista LnDodson WayR 2 242 34 8,228 05/16/2018SLURRY SEAL44Poor (50-31)C E Grand Avenue (WB)520 El Camino RealNorth Halcyon RdA 2 1,850 30 55,500 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH44Poor (50-31)E E Grand Avenue (WB)550 FairviewCity Limit @ COP, East of Oak Park A 2 1,400 38 53,200 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL44Poor (50-31)B Fair Oaks Avenue60 Traffic WayPCC @ Hwy 101 bridgeMiA 4 430 48 20,640 08/15/2015SLURRY SEAL44Poor (50-31)D Garfield Place20 Garfield PlaceNorth End (Cul-de-Sac)R 2 125 34 4,25044Poor (50-31)B Gularte Road20 Stagecoach RoadCul-De-SacR 2 772 37 28,56444Poor (50-31)C Halcyon Road (South)40 Olive StreetCameron CourtMaC 2 830 61 50,630 07/01/2013SLURRY SEAL44Poor (50-31)B Los Olivos Lane15 E Cherry AveHillsdale CourtR 2 510 34 17,34044Poor (50-31)D Magnolia Drive10 Sycamore DriveCDSR 2 1,190 35 41,650 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL44Poor (50-31)E Newport Avenue Frontage10 Courtland St South of Newport CDSR 1 1,030 18 18,540 07/01/2014SLURRY SEAL44Poor (50-31)B Stagecoach Road10 Huasna RoadPlatino LaneMaC 2 1,140 41 46,74044Poor (50-31)C Bambi Court10 Tiger Tail DriveCul-de-SacR 2 400 37 14,80043Poor (50-31)E Bennett Avenue10 Linda DriveHalcyon (North)R 2 1,020 35 35,700 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL43Poor (50-31)C E Grand Avenue (EB)540 South Halycon RoadEl Camino RealA 2 1,820 30 54,600 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH43Poor (50-31)E Elm Street (North)10 Grand Ave (East)Brighton AvenueR 2 875 38 33,250 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL43Poor (50-31)C Eman Court10 Alpine Street (South)Cul-de-SacR 2 480 34 16,320 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL43Poor (50-31)E Maple Street20 Walnut StreetAlder StreetR 2 956 37 35,372 08/12/2012SLURRY SEAL43Poor (50-31)B Noguera Place10 Myrtle StreetCul-De-SacR 2 386 37 14,282 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL43Poor (50-31)A Oak Leaf Circle10 Equestrian WayCul-de-SacR 2 300 37 11,10043Poor (50-31)04/21/2022Page 8 of 11Page 206 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande - 2022 PMP UpdateStreet List Sorted by PCI (High to Low)Area IDStreet Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC Lns L W A (SqFt) Last MnR Date Last MnR TreatmentCurrent PCIPCI ConditionD Ash Street40 Walnut StreetAlder StR 2 1,015 37 37,55542Poor (50-31)A Chaparral Lane15 Spanish Moss LnCul-de-SacR 2 860 37 31,82042Poor (50-31)B Crown Terrace10 Crown HillLe Point StreetR 2 450 20 9,000 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL42Poor (50-31)D Tierra Street10 The PikeDel Sol StreetR 2 1,000 28 28,000 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL42Poor (50-31)D Walnut Street10 Farroll AvenueAsh StreetR 2 1,386 38 52,668 08/12/2012SLURRY SEAL42Poor (50-31)B Women's Club Parking Lot (Lowe WmnClb-020 Lower LotFront doorO 1 170 125 21,250 05/15/2017SEAL CRACKS42Poor (50-31)D Alder Street10 Farroll AvenueCameron CourtR 2 690 38 26,220 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL41Poor (50-31)E E Grand Avenue (WB)540 North Elm StFairviewA 2 950 40 38,000 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL41Poor (50-31)C Fair Oaks Avenue30 Halcyon Road (South)PCC E. of WoodlandMiA 2 1,100 57 62,700 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH41Poor (50-31)B Fortuna Court10 Platino LaneCul-de-SacR 2 240 37 8,88041Poor (50-31)C Halcyon Road (North)10 El Camino RealE Grand AvenueMiA 2 1,630 37 60,310 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH41Poor (50-31)A Mustang Circle10 Equestrian WayCul-de-SacR 2 355 37 13,13541Poor (50-31)D Rogers Court10 Victoria WayCDSR 2 550 37 20,350 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL41Poor (50-31)B Village Court10 Trinity AvenueCul-de-SacR 2 215 36 7,74041Poor (50-31)C Willow Lane10 Halcyon Road (South)Woodland DriveR 2 750 35 26,250 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL41Poor (50-31)D Alder Street25 Fair Oaks AvenueAsh StR 2 680 37 25,16040Poor (50-31)D Cameron Court10 Alder StreetHalcyon Road (South)R 2 562 37 20,794 08/06/2012SLURRY SEAL40Poor (50-31)E Hillcrest Drive10 Sierra DriveMontego StreetR 2 1,930 22 42,460 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL40Poor (50-31)B Ikeda Way10 Huasna RoadVard Loomis LaneR 2 470 37 17,39040Poor (50-31)B Mason Street (North)10 East Branch StreetLe Point StreetMaC 2 440 29 12,760 12/01/2017SLURRY SEAL40Poor (50-31)A Rancho Parkway20 Camino MercadoVia PocaMaC 2 1,880 42 78,960 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH40Poor (50-31)E Robles Road20 El Camino RealEnd of Road - Chilton StR 2 325 24 7,800 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL40Poor (50-31)C Valley Road20 City Limit N. of Sunrise Tr @ COP Tiger Tail DrMiA 2 675 47 31,725 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH40Poor (50-31)A Vista Circle10 Cul-de-SacEquestrian WayR 2 412 37 15,24440Poor (50-31)C Woodland Court10 Woodland DriveCul-de-SacR 2 215 37 7,955 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL40Poor (50-31)A Calle Carmen10 Via BandoleroCul-de-SacR 2 250 37 9,25039Poor (50-31)C Halcyon Road (South)50 Cameron CourtCalle De Los SueiMaC 2 670 50 33,500 07/01/2013SLURRY SEAL39Poor (50-31)A Jenny Place11 James WayCul-de-sacR 2 600 29 17,40039Poor (50-31)E Newport Avenue10 Courtland StreetMontego StreetR 2 1,080 30 32,40039Poor (50-31)B Paseo Street20 Corbett Cyn (Hwy227)EOSR 2 76 44 3,344 05/15/2017SEAL CRACKS39Poor (50-31)B Platino Lane10 La Cresta DriveStagecoach RoadR 2 1,145 37 42,36539Poor (50-31)D Sandalwood Avenue10 Alder StreetHalcyon Road (South)R 2 580 34 19,720 08/07/2012SLURRY SEAL39Poor (50-31)B Women's Club Parking Lot (Uppe WmnClb-010 Both Upper lotsFront doorO 1 400 60 24,000 05/15/2017SEAL CRACKS39Poor (50-31)A Cuesta Place10 Via La BarrancaCul-de-SacR 2 265 26 6,890 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL38Poor (50-31)E E Grand Avenue (EB)520 Juniper StreetS. Elm StreetA 2 1,100 40 44,000 07/01/2011SLURRY SEAL38Poor (50-31)B Gularte Road10 Corbett Canyon RoadStagecoach RoadR 2 1,850 33 61,79038Poor (50-31)E Linda Drive30 Oceanview SchoolN. Elm StR 2 180 38 6,840 07/01/2014SLURRY SEAL38Poor (50-31)B PC Railway Place20 Allen StreetEnd of StreetR 2 335 20 6,700 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL38Poor (50-31)D Alder Street20 Farroll AvenueFair Oaks AveR 2 730 37 27,010 08/30/2012SLURRY SEAL37Poor (50-31)E Brighton Avenue20 Courtland StreetElm Street (North)R 2 1,900 37 70,30037Poor (50-31)B Le Point Street10 Nevada StreetMason Street (North)R 2 850 30 25,500 05/15/2017SEAL CRACKS37Poor (50-31)C Mesa Drive10 Tiger Tail DriveCul-De-SacR 2 1,020 37 37,74037Poor (50-31)04/21/2022Page 9 of 11Page 207 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande - 2022 PMP UpdateStreet List Sorted by PCI (High to Low)Area IDStreet Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC Lns L W A (SqFt) Last MnR Date Last MnR TreatmentCurrent PCIPCI ConditionB Trinity Avenue10 Traffic Way ExtensionEnd of StreetR 2 850 30 25,50037Poor (50-31)A Via Bandolero10 Via VaqueroAvenida de DiamanteR 2 3,550 37 131,35037Poor (50-31)B Branch Mill Road10 East Cherry AvenueCity LimitMaC 2 3,280 26 85,280 05/15/2017SEAL CRACKS36Poor (50-31)B Campana Place10 Gularte RoadCul-de-SacR 2 625 38 23,75036Poor (50-31)C Halcyon Road (South) NB520 Fair Oaks AvenueE Grand AvenueMiA 2 2,180 31 67,580 07/01/2013SLURRY SEAL36Poor (50-31)E Linda Drive20 Brisco RoadOceanview SchoolR 2 950 30 28,500 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL36Poor (50-31)B Mariposa Circle10 Platino LaneCul-De-SacR 2 170 36 6,12036Poor (50-31)E Priscilla Lane10 Ruth Ann WayCul-De-SacR 2 530 37 19,61036Poor (50-31)A Rodeo Drive10 West Branch StreetMercedes LaneMaC 2 1,970 38 74,86036Poor (50-31)A Via La Barranca10 Tally Ho RoadEnd of StreetR 2 1,250 35 43,750 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL36Poor (50-31)A Acorn Drive10 Equestrian Way (N)Equestrian Way (S)R 2 1,500 37 55,50035Poor (50-31)D Elm Street (South)10 City LimitThe PikeMiA 2 800 47 37,600 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH35Poor (50-31)E Fair View Drive20 Brighton AvenueCul-De-SacR 2 300 38 11,400 09/09/2015SLURRY SEAL35Poor (50-31)B Hawkins Court10 Cross StreetCul-De-SacR 2 133 37 4,921 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL35Poor (50-31)A Rodeo Drive20 Mercedes LaneEmerald Bay DriveMaC 2 2,100 37 77,70035Poor (50-31)E Sierra Drive10 Oak Park BoulevardHillcrest DriveR 2 2,187 22 48,114 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL35Poor (50-31)C Woodland Drive20 Creekside DriveVirginia DrMaC 2 644 37 23,828 09/09/2015SLURRY SEAL35Poor (50-31)B Zogata Way10 Gularte RoadStagecoach RoadR 2 1,020 37 37,74035Poor (50-31)D Ash Street20 CIW E. of Spuce StS. Elm StR 2 600 33 19,80034Poor (50-31)A Avenida de Diamente10 Via Bandolero (North end)Via Bandolero (South End)R 2 3,000 37 111,00034Poor (50-31)E Chilton Avenue10 Oak Park BoulevardRobles RoadR 2 1,500 19 28,500 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL34Poor (50-31)A Cuerda Corte10 Avenida de DiamanteCul-de-SacR 2 240 37 8,88034Poor (50-31)E Fair View Drive10 Grand Avenue (E)Brighton AvenueR 2 840 37 31,080 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL34Poor (50-31)C Forest Glen Drive10 Woodland DriveCul-De-SacR 2 415 37 15,355 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL34Poor (50-31)C Halcyon Road (South) SB520 E Grand AvenueFair Oaks AvenueMiA 2 2,180 30 65,400 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL34Poor (50-31)E Hillcrest Drive20 Montego StreetEl Camino RealR 2 1,244 21 26,124 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL34Poor (50-31)A Rancho Parkway30 Via PocaJames WayMaC 2 1,060 42 44,520 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH34Poor (50-31)A Spanish Moss Lane10 Mesquite LaneChaparral LaneR 2 1,150 37 42,550 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL34Poor (50-31)C Tiger Tail Drive10 Valley RoadCDSR 2 915 37 33,85534Poor (50-31)B Vard Loomis Lane10 Huasna RoadCul-de-SacR 2 800 37 29,60034Poor (50-31)A Via Vaquero10 Rancho ParkwayAvenida de DiamenteR 2 1,700 38 64,60034Poor (50-31)E Wallace Place10 Maple StEOSR 1 200 22 4,400 07/01/2012SLURRY SEAL34Poor (50-31)C Creekside Drive10 Woodland DriveCul-de-SacR 2 445 37 16,465 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL33Poor (50-31)A Equestrian Way10 James WayVista CircleMaC 2 2,600 37 96,20033Poor (50-31)A Equestrian Way20 Vista CircleNoyes RoadMaC 2 1,906 37 70,52233Poor (50-31)B Short Street20 Poole StreetNelson StreetR 2 470 39 18,33033Poor (50-31)B Stagecoach Road20 Platino LaneCity LimitMaC 2 1,400 41 57,40033Poor (50-31)A Colina Street10 Via La BarrancaJames WayR 2 435 26 11,310 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL32Poor (50-31)A La Canada10 James WayAsilo StR 2 1,275 35 44,62532Poor (50-31)D Pecan Street10 Farroll AvenueFair Oaks AvenueR 2 700 37 25,900 08/12/2012SLURRY SEAL32Poor (50-31)B Toyon Place10 Stagecoach RoadCul-de-SacR 2 200 37 7,40032Poor (50-31)A Via Vaquero20 Avenida de DiamenteVia BandoleroR 2 600 38 22,80032Poor (50-31)04/21/2022Page 10 of 11Page 208 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande - 2022 PMP UpdateStreet List Sorted by PCI (High to Low)Area IDStreet Name Section ID Begin Location End Location FC Lns L W A (SqFt) Last MnR Date Last MnR TreatmentCurrent PCIPCI ConditionA Rodeo Drive30 Emerald Bay DriveJames WayMaC 2 1,490 37 55,13031Poor (50-31)D Beech Street10 Farroll AvenueFair Oaks AvenueR 2 700 34 23,800 08/06/2012SLURRY SEAL30Failed (30-0)E Beta Court10 Brighton AvenueCul-de-SacR 2 230 36 8,28030Failed (30-0)A Deer Trail Circle10 Equestrian WayCul-de-SacR 2 800 25 20,00030Failed (30-0)A Platino Lane30 Oro DrGate @ TempusR 2 550 37 20,35030Failed (30-0)B Plomo Court10 Stagecoach RoadCul-De-SacR 2 260 37 9,62030Failed (30-0)A Hodges Road15 Equestrian WayEast EndR 2 1,075 25 26,87529Failed (30-0)A Via Poca10 Rancho ParkwayVia BandoleroR 2 230 37 8,51029Failed (30-0)B Cobre Place10 Gularte RoadCul-de-SacR 2 550 37 20,35028Failed (30-0)B La Paz Circle10 Platino LaneCul-de-SacR 2 175 37 6,47528Failed (30-0)C Rena Street (South)10 Dodson WayE Grand AvenueR 2 1,280 36 46,080 08/12/2014SLURRY SEAL28Failed (30-0)C Virginia Drive10 Halcyon Road (South)Woodland DriveR 2 866 37 32,042 07/01/2014SLURRY SEAL28Failed (30-0)B Plata Road10 Oro DriveCul-De-SacR 2 415 37 15,35527Failed (30-0)B Station Way10 Fair Oaks AvenueTraffic WayR 2 1,252 37 46,324 08/12/2012SLURRY SEAL27Failed (30-0)A Stevenson Drive10 Hodges RoadJames WayR 2 420 25 10,50027Failed (30-0)A Vista Drive10 Equestrain WayPCC at medianR 2 1,310 37 48,47027Failed (30-0)B City Hall Parking LotCtyHal-010 Mason Street (South)End of LotO 1 126 60 7,56026Failed (30-0)E Ledo Place10 Brighton AvenueCul-De-SacR 2 305 37 11,28525Failed (30-0)B Wesley Street10 Branch Street (East)Larchmont DriveR 2 350 39 13,650 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH21Failed (30-0)B Cross Street10 Ide StreetAllen StreetR 2 660 37 24,420 08/05/2013SLURRY SEAL20Failed (30-0)C Woodland Drive10 South End (Cul-de-Sac)Virginia DrR 2 650 37 24,050 07/01/2014SLURRY SEAL20Failed (30-0)B Vernon Street10 Branch Street (West)Larchmont DriveR 2 310 37 11,470 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH19Failed (30-0)C Via Berros10 Valley RoadCity LimitR 2 455 26 11,83017Failed (30-0)B Vernon Street20 Larchmont DriveEnd of StreetR 2 160 24 3,840 12/30/2021DEEP PATCH16Failed (30-0)B Strother Park Parking LotStroth-010 Huasna @ Rosewood LnEnd of LotO 1 600 92 55,20011Failed (30-0)D Corporation Yard Parking Lot CrpYrd-020 Rear Maintenance AreaRearO 1 270 241 65,286B Reservoir Road10 West BranchWater Tank (Res No. 4)O 1 1,880 12 22,56004/21/2022Page 11 of 11Page 209 of 324
Section V
GIS Toolbox
Page 210 of 324
GIS Toolbox Page | 1
GIS TOOLBOX
This section is intended to introduce the new feature in StreetSaver. The GIS portion
of the program is specifically designed for those agencies that do not have “in -house” GIS
departments.
GIS TOOLBOX
The GIS toolbox is a new feature available within StreetSaver. This is one of the most
powerful tools available in StreetSaver. The ability to link the existing road segments to
a base map and produce maps displaying the Current Condition, Age of Pavement,
Needs Treatments, Scenario Treatments, Last Treatment and Last Year Inspected are
now available with just a few key strokes. No longer does an agency need to access
“outside resources” or “wait” for graphical representations of their road system.
Maps that reflect the current condition of an agency’s road system are a valuable asset
when meeting with City Councils and the general public. A map of future maintenance
treatments can be used to inform the residents when future work is scheduled on their
road.
A basic “shapefile” is already loaded into the StreetSaver system. From this shapefile it
is just a matter of “linking” or “assigning” the beginning location and ending location of
each management section found in the database.
There are a few cautions that the City of Arroyo Grande should be aware of in regard to
the GIS mapping. GIS is a “node” to “node” application. It uses intersections or nodes
as its way to pinpoint a specific location. This means that each of the City’s management
sections needs to begin and end at a point that can be defined or found by the GIS link.
Using house numbers or change in pavements will need to be defined as “feet” from the
nearest “node”. This will produce a more precise map. Next the Street Names will need
to match and that will mean a more precise accounting of “street tags”. The difference
between calling a tag a “drive” or an “avenue” can hinder the linking process.
TERMINOLOGY
Once the GIS Toolbox is opened there will be two master items that can be accessed.
First there is the “GIS Reporting”. This screen is used to “mine” StreetSaver data for
display in GIS format. Queries can be performed using the standard StreetSaver filter
screen, using pre-defined criteria defined by the system, or by selecting an area of the
map. If Section data is returned those shapes can be exported to GIS shapefiles or
printed out in a map format.
Page 211 of 324
GIS Toolbox Page | 2
Then there is the “Section Link” screen which will match segments in the basemap based
on street name, type (street tag) and/or direction. Each Section can be linked to a
segment or segments in the basemap.
Explanations of the toolbars and the buttons available on the GIS Reporting screen are
outlined below:
Navigation Toolbar
Reporting Toolbar
BASE MAP IMPLEMENTATION
Pavement Engineering Inc. reviewed the base map included with StreetSaver and the
automatic linking process. The review found most of the segments were linked correctly.
Any of the segments that were not previously linked were fixed so they were linked.
Page 212 of 324
Current PCI ConditionPrinted: 4/21/2022
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Test
Feature Legend
Category I - Very Good
Category II - Good (Non-Load)
Category III - Good (Load)
Category IV - Poor
Category V - Very Poor
Page 213 of 324
Appendix A
Summarized System Information
Page 214 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Network Summary Statistics
Printed: 4/21/2022
Total Sections Total Center Miles Total Lane Miles Total Area (sq. ft.)PCI
19Arterial 3.12 9.39 56877,070
315Residential/Local 43.41 86.53 567,839,302
20Other 0.39 1.73 55420,750.7
39Minor Arterial (4)8.20 20.27 592,223,875
52Major Collector (5)12.38 24.91 552,561,293
142.8367.50445Total
56Overall Network PCI as of 4/21/2022:
** Combined Sections are excluded from totals. These Sections do not have a PCI Date - they have not been inspected or had a Treatment applied.
**Combined 2 0.36 0.41 N/A
13,922,290.7
87,846
Other 2 0.36 0.41 N/A87,846
Criteria:1 MTC StreetSaver
Page 215 of 324
Functional Class Surface Type Lane Miles Unit Cost/
Square Foot
Cost To Replace/ (in
thousands)
Pavement Area/
Square Feet
Arterial AC 8.9 $25.51 839,320 $21,413
AC/AC 0.5 $25.51 42,000 $1,072
Major Collector (5)AC 24.3 $21.98 2,506,555 $55,094
AC/AC 0.6 $21.98 54,738 $1,203
Minor Arterial (4)AC 14.6 $25.51 1,712,145 $43,681
AC/AC 5.7 $25.51 511,730 $13,055
Other AC 2.1 $19.23 493,997 $9,501
AC/AC 0.0 $19.23 14,600 $281
Proposed; Private; Non-County AC 13.1 $19.23 914,182 $17,582
Residential/Local AC 78.3 $19.23 7,062,321 $135,824
AC/AC 8.2 $19.23 772,731 $14,861
Network Replacement Cost
Printed: 04/21/2022
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Criteria:1 MTC StreetSaver
Grand Total:156.3 $313,56614,924,319
Page 216 of 324
Arterial AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.59 3
Surface Treatment LIGHT MAINTENANCE $5.72 7
Restoration Treatment LIGHT REHAB $60.05 2
II - Good, Non-Load Related HEAVY MAINTENANCE $21.20
III - Good, Load Related LIGHT REHAB $60.05
IV - Poor HEAVY REHAB $91.85
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT $229.61
AC/AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.59 3
Surface Treatment LIGHT MAINTENANCE $5.72 6
Restoration Treatment LIGHT REHAB $60.05 2
II - Good, Non-Load Related HEAVY MAINTENANCE $21.20
III - Good, Load Related LIGHT REHAB $60.05
IV - Poor HEAVY REHAB $91.85
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT $229.61
AC/PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $0.60 3
Surface Treatment SINGLE CHIP SEAL $0.74 6
Restoration Treatment MILL AND THICK OVERLAY $7.23 2
II - Good, Non-Load Related DOUBLE CHIP SEAL $1.52
III - Good, Load Related HEATER SCARIFY & OVERLAY $5.95
IV - Poor HEATER SCARIFY & OVERLAY $6.14
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC)$14.00
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460 Printed: 4/3/2022
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between
Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:
Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria:1 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal
Page 217 of 324
Arterial PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 3
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $1.11
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $1.51
IV - Poor THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5 INCHES)$1.92
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)$14.00
ST I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 9
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related SINGLE CHIP SEAL $1.11
III - Good, Load Related SINGLE CHIP SEAL $1.51
IV - Poor SINGLE CHIP SEAL $1.92
V - Very Poor THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5 INCHES)$7.67
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460 Printed: 4/3/2022
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between
Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:
Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria:2 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal
Page 218 of 324
Collector AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.27 4
Surface Treatment LIGHT MAINTENANCE $4.57 7
Restoration Treatment LIGHT REHAB $56.52 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related HEAVY MAINTENANCE $17.66
III - Good, Load Related LIGHT REHAB $56.52
IV - Poor HEAVY REHAB $84.78
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT $197.82
AC/AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.27 4
Surface Treatment LIGHT MAINTENANCE $4.57 7
Restoration Treatment LIGHT REHAB $56.52 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related HEAVY MAINTENANCE $17.66
III - Good, Load Related LIGHT REHAB $56.52
IV - Poor HEAVY REHAB $84.78
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)$197.82
AC/PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $0.60 4
Surface Treatment SINGLE CHIP SEAL $0.74 7
Restoration Treatment MILL AND THIN OVERLAY $5.04 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related DOUBLE CHIP SEAL $1.52
III - Good, Load Related HEATER SCARIFY & OVERLAY $5.95
IV - Poor HEATER SCARIFY & OVERLAY $6.14
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)$11.38
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460 Printed: 4/3/2022
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between
Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:
Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria:3 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal
Page 219 of 324
Collector PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 9
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $1.11
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $1.51
IV - Poor THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5 INCHES)$1.92
V - Very Poor THIN AC OVERLAY(1.5 INCHES)$7.47
ST I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 9
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related SINGLE CHIP SEAL $1.11
III - Good, Load Related SINGLE CHIP SEAL $1.51
IV - Poor SINGLE CHIP SEAL $1.92
V - Very Poor THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5 INCHES)$7.47
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460 Printed: 4/3/2022
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between
Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:
Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria:4 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal
Page 220 of 324
Residential/Local AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.27 4
Surface Treatment LIGHT MAINTENANCE $4.57 8
Restoration Treatment LIGHT REHAB $52.99 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related HEAVY MAINTENANCE $17.66
III - Good, Load Related LIGHT REHAB $52.99
IV - Poor HEAVY REHAB $84.78
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT $173.09
AC/AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.27 4
Surface Treatment LIGHT MAINTENANCE $4.57 8
Restoration Treatment LIGHT REHAB $52.99 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related HEAVY MAINTENANCE $17.66
III - Good, Load Related LIGHT REHAB $52.99
IV - Poor HEAVY REHAB $84.78
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT $173.09
AC/PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.32 4
Surface Treatment SINGLE CHIP SEAL $0.74 8
Restoration Treatment MILL AND THIN OVERLAY $5.04 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related DOUBLE CHIP SEAL $1.52
III - Good, Load Related HEATER SCARIFY & OVERLAY $5.95
IV - Poor HEATER SCARIFY & OVERLAY $6.14
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)$103.12
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460 Printed: 4/3/2022
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between
Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:
Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria:5 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal
Page 221 of 324
Residential/Local PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 4
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $1.11
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5 INCHES)$1.92
V - Very Poor THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5 INCHES)$7.27
ST I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 9
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related SINGLE CHIP SEAL $1.11
III - Good, Load Related SINGLE CHIP SEAL $1.51
IV - Poor SINGLE CHIP SEAL $1.92
V - Very Poor THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5 INCHES)$7.27
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460 Printed: 4/3/2022
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between
Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:
Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria:6 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal
Page 222 of 324
Other AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.27 4
Surface Treatment LIGHT MAINTENANCE $4.57 8
Restoration Treatment LIGHT REHAB $52.99 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related HEAVY MAINTENANCE $17.66
III - Good, Load Related LIGHT REHAB $52.99
IV - Poor HEAVY REHAB $84.78
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT $173.09
AC/AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.27 4
Surface Treatment LIGHT MAINTENANCE $4.57 8
Restoration Treatment LIGHT REHAB $52.99 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related HEAVY MAINTENANCE $17.66
III - Good, Load Related LIGHT REHAB $52.99
IV - Poor HEAVY REHAB $84.78
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT $173.09
AC/PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.60 4
Surface Treatment SINGLE CHIP SEAL $1.74 8
Restoration Treatment MILL AND THIN OVERLAY $5.04 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related DOUBLE CHIP SEAL $1.52
III - Good, Load Related HEATER SCARIFY & OVERLAY $5.95
IV - Poor HEATER SCARIFY & OVERLAY $6.14
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)$8.75
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460 Printed: 4/3/2022
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between
Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:
Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria:7 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal
Page 223 of 324
Other PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 9
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $1.11
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $1.51
IV - Poor THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5 INCHES)$1.92
V - Very Poor THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5 INCHES)$7.27
ST I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 9
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related SINGLE CHIP SEAL $1.11
III - Good, Load Related SINGLE CHIP SEAL $1.51
IV - Poor SINGLE CHIP SEAL $1.92
V - Very Poor THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5 INCHES)$7.27
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460 Printed: 4/3/2022
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between
Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:
Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria:8 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal
Page 224 of 324
Appendix B
Budget Scenarios
Page 225 of 324
Needs Analysis
&
Zero Budget
($115 Million over 10 Years)
• Projected PCI/Cost Summary
Page 226 of 324
Year PCI Treated PCI Untreated CostPM Cost Rehab Cost
2023 88 54 $74,304,659$1,081,805 $73,222,854
2024 85 52 $3,590,110$139,558 $3,450,552
2025 84 49 $3,812,710$2,670,001 $1,142,709
2026 83 46 $2,931,491$1,262,331 $1,669,160
2027 84 43 $5,329,728$3,070,618 $2,259,110
2028 83 40 $2,479,390$1,858,703 $620,687
2029 82 38 $2,065,227$1,098,470 $966,757
2030 83 35 $6,419,504$2,810,996 $3,608,508
2031 86 32 $9,490,509$5,866,106 $3,624,403
2032 85 29 $4,550,497$3,367,185 $1,183,312
Total Cost
$114,973,825
PM Total Cost
$23,225,773
% PM
20.20%$91,748,052
Rehab Total Cost
Needs - Projected PCI/Cost
Summary
Printed: 4/21/2022
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Inflation Rate = %3.00
Criteria:1 MTC StreetSaverPage 227 of 324
Maintain Current PCI
($63.5 Million over 10 Years)
• Pavement Network Condition Lane Miles
• Network Condition Summary
• Cost Summary
Page 228 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Interest: 0%
Target-Driven Scenarios
Pavement Network Condition Lane Miles
Inflation: 3%Printed: 4/21/2022
Year Arterial
Annual budget needs to meet target objectives
Collector Res/Loc Other Total
Preventative
Maintenance
Target: Overall 56
Scenario: Maintain 56
Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
2023 $287,857 $762,565 $1,327,727 $0 $2,378,149$1,052,135
2024 $253,456 $634,350 $4,865,051 $0 $5,752,857$131,922
2025 $1,083,141 $1,000,368 $4,403,068 $0 $6,486,577$21,046
2026 $1,591 $0 $7,184,151 $0 $7,185,742$1,764
2027 $3,528,741 $2,482,308 $2,251,837 $0 $8,262,886$53,315
2028 $3,370,076 $895,419 $2,998,988 $0 $7,264,483$10,779
2029 $3,408,938 $1,102,986 $3,763,665 $0 $8,275,589$227,243
2030 $2,648,154 $1,058,050 $3,307,325 $0 $7,013,529$268,407
2031 $16,524 $3,217,767 $1,963,600 $0 $5,197,891$974,761
2032 $1,238,443 $2,098,929 $2,306,831 $0 $5,644,203$527,702
Scenarios Criteria:Functional Class <> O - Other 1 MTC StreetSaver
Pavement Network prior to treatments in lane miles.
Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.
$63,461,906Grand Total:
Average Yearly Total:$6,346,191
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
LifeFunctional Class
Arterial 57 4.0%8.2%10
Collector 53 5.2%9.4%7
Residential 54 14.6%26.6%13
2023
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
LifeFunctional Class
Arterial 58 17.3%35.5%11
Collector 55 31.5%49.3%8
Residential 56 27.0%45.7%14
Page 229 of 324
Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.
Scenarios Criteria:Functional Class <> O - Other 2 MTC StreetSaver
2024
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
LifeFunctional Class
Arterial 55 19.4%35.5%10
Collector 52 22.7%48.6%8
Residential 58 37.4%45.4%15
2025
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
LifeFunctional Class
Arterial 54 21.6%38.0%10
Collector 50 17.9%46.5%8
Residential 58 42.8%42.8%16
2026
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
LifeFunctional Class
Arterial 52 21.6%50.0%9
Collector 46 17.9%53.8%7
Residential 61 51.6%35.8%18
2027
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
LifeFunctional Class
Arterial 54 31.5%52.3%10
Collector 47 27.0%49.8%8
Residential 60 53.8%37.6%18
2028
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
LifeFunctional Class
Arterial 56 40.7%46.7%12
Collector 45 30.1%50.0%8
Residential 60 56.6%36.8%18
2029
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
LifeFunctional Class
Arterial 58 48.7%45.0%13
Collector 44 34.0%46.2%9
Residential 60 60.7%35.7%19
2030
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
LifeFunctional Class
Arterial 58 54.9%41.3%14
Collector 43 36.1%54.2%9
Residential 59 64.2%32.8%19
Page 230 of 324
Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.
Scenarios Criteria:Functional Class <> O - Other 3 MTC StreetSaver
2031
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
LifeFunctional Class
Arterial 55 54.9%44.1%14
Collector 47 46.4%48.9%11
Residential 59 64.9%33.5%20
2032
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
LifeFunctional Class
Arterial 54 57.7%41.3%14
Collector 49 52.8%46.2%12
Residential 59 66.4%31.9%20
Page 231 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Target-Driven Scenarios
Network Condition Summary
Printed: 4/21/2022Interest: 0.00% Inflation: 3.00%
Projected Network Average PCI by year
Year Without Selected TreatmentWith Selected TreatmentNever Treated
Target: Overall 56
Scenario: Maintain 56
Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
2023 545654
2024 525652
2025 495649
2026 465646
2027 435643
2028 405640
2029 375637
2030 355635
2031 325632
2032 295629
Percent Network Area by Functional Classification and Condition Class
Condition in base year 2023, prior to applying treatments.
Condition Class Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 4.0%5.2%14.6%0.0%23.8%
II / III 10.8%4.5%16.9%0.0%32.1%
IV 8.2%9.4%24.9%0.0%42.4%
V 0.0%0.0%1.6%0.0%1.6%
23.0%Total 19.0%58.1%0.0%100.0%
Condition in year 2023 after schedulable treatments applied.
Condition Class Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 4.0%6.0%15.7%0.0%25.6%
II / III 10.8%3.6%15.8%0.0%30.3%
IV 8.2%9.4%24.9%0.0%42.4%
V 0.0%0.0%1.6%0.0%1.6%
23.0%Total 19.0%58.1%0.0%100.0%
Condition in year 2032 after schedulable treatments applied.
Condition Class Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 13.2%10.0%38.5%0.0%61.8%
II / III 0.2%0.2%1.0%0.0%1.4%
IV 2.1%0.0%0.1%0.0%2.2%
V 7.4%8.8%18.4%0.0%34.6%
23.0%Total 19.0%58.1%0.0%100.0%
MTC StreetSaver
Functional Class <> O - Other
Scenarios Criteria:1
Page 232 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Target-Driven Scenarios - Cost Summary
Printed: 4/21/2022Inflation: 3%Interest: 0%
Target: Overall 56
Scenario: Maintain 56
Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
2023 $100,555
$1,225,459
$0
$1,052,135
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Project
$1,326,014Total
$0
$2,378,149 $69,341,918
2024 $1,589,476
$0
$4,031,459
$131,922
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Project
$5,620,935Total
$0
$5,752,857 $75,626,898
2025 $192,873
$0
$6,272,658
$21,046
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Project
$6,465,531Total
$0
$6,486,577 $83,540,752
2026 $51,836
$0
$7,132,142
$1,764
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Project
$7,183,978Total
$0
$7,185,742 $94,178,984
2027 $198,170
$0
$8,011,401
$53,315
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Project
$8,209,571Total
$0
$8,262,886 $104,873,802
2028 $634,945
$0
$6,618,759
$10,779
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Project
$7,253,704Total
$0
$7,264,483 $115,158,502
Year Rehabilitation Preventive Maintenance Total Cost Deferred
Functional Class <> O - OtherScenarios Criteria:1 MTC StreetSaver
Page 233 of 324
2029 $181,417
$0
$7,866,929
$227,243
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Project
$8,048,346Total
$0
$8,275,589 $121,430,959
2030 $160,011
$0
$6,585,111
$268,407
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Project
$6,745,122Total
$0
$7,013,529 $126,608,450
2031 $224,135
$0
$3,998,995
$974,761
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Project
$4,223,130Total
$0
$5,197,891 $128,610,094
2032 $389,341
$0
$4,727,160
$527,702
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Project
$5,116,501Total
$0
$5,644,203 $129,768,597
SummaryFunctional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint.
Arterial $15,083,979 $752,942
Collector $12,893,022 $359,720
Residential/Local $32,215,831 $2,156,412
$60,192,832 $3,269,074Total:$63,461,906Grand Total:
Year Rehabilitation Preventive Maintenance Total Cost Deferred
Functional Class <> O - OtherScenarios Criteria:2 MTC StreetSaver
Page 234 of 324
Increase PCI by 5 Points
($79.9 Million over 10 Years)
• Pavement Network Condition Lane Miles
• Network Condition Summary
• Cost Summary
Page 235 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Interest: 0%
Target-Driven Scenarios
Pavement Network Condition Lane Miles
Inflation: 3%Printed: 4/21/2022
Year Arterial
Annual budget needs to meet target objectives
Collector Res/Loc Other Total
Preventative
Maintenance
Target: By Year
Scenario: Increase by 5
Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
Year Year Value Year Value Year ValueValue
Year 1 56.5 Year 2 57 Year 3 57.5 Year 4 58
Year 5 58.5 Year 6 59 Year 7 59.5 Year 8 60
Year 9 60.5 Year 10 61
2023 $370,302 $790,880 $2,246,963 $0 $3,408,145$1,052,135
2024 $168,538 $1,294,515 $5,624,933 $0 $7,087,986$131,922
2025 $1,843,202 $1,318,587 $5,009,024 $0 $8,170,813$21,046
2026 $1,967,157 $728,841 $6,267,406 $0 $8,963,404$2,032
2027 $3,062,794 $3,008,989 $2,858,794 $0 $8,930,577$55,136
2028 $4,680,141 $940,717 $4,594,307 $0 $10,215,165$10,836
2029 $2,856,812 $307 $6,293,751 $0 $9,150,870$228,130
2030 $1,136,813 $3,452,215 $4,838,260 $0 $9,427,288$268,274
2031 $1,138,242 $1,619,319 $4,640,611 $0 $7,398,172$1,024,532
2032 $143,032 $1,271,959 $5,738,472 $0 $7,153,463$719,719
Scenarios Criteria:Functional Class <> O - Other 1 MTC StreetSaver
Pavement Network prior to treatments in lane miles.
Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.
$79,905,883Grand Total:
Average Yearly Total:$7,990,588
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
LifeFunctional Class
Arterial 57 4.0%8.2%10
Collector 53 5.2%9.4%7
Residential 54 14.6%26.6%13
Page 236 of 324
Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.
Scenarios Criteria:Functional Class <> O - Other 2 MTC StreetSaver
2023
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
LifeFunctional Class
Arterial 58 18.5%35.5%11
Collector 55 32.0%49.3%8
Residential 57 33.0%45.7%15
2024
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
LifeFunctional Class
Arterial 55 19.4%35.5%10
Collector 54 25.9%45.9%8
Residential 59 40.0%43.2%16
2025
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
LifeFunctional Class
Arterial 56 23.9%35.7%10
Collector 53 22.4%42.6%9
Residential 60 46.0%39.9%17
2026
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
LifeFunctional Class
Arterial 56 29.6%42.1%11
Collector 50 25.0%47.3%8
Residential 62 53.7%34.0%18
2027
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
LifeFunctional Class
Arterial 57 38.2%45.6%12
Collector 52 36.1%40.8%10
Residential 61 56.6%35.2%19
2028
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
LifeFunctional Class
Arterial 61 50.9%36.5%13
Collector 50 39.3%40.8%10
Residential 62 61.8%31.9%19
2029
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
LifeFunctional Class
Arterial 62 57.2%36.5%15
Collector 47 39.3%40.8%10
Residential 63 66.6%29.8%20
Page 237 of 324
Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.
Scenarios Criteria:Functional Class <> O - Other 3 MTC StreetSaver
2030
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
LifeFunctional Class
Arterial 60 59.8%36.5%15
Collector 51 49.5%40.8%12
Residential 63 69.2%27.8%20
2031
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
LifeFunctional Class
Arterial 59 62.5%36.5%15
Collector 52 54.5%40.8%12
Residential 64 71.6%26.8%22
2032
PCI
Percentage of the
Network in Very
Good Condition
Percentage of the
Network in Poor or
Very Poor Condition
Remaining
LifeFunctional Class
Arterial 57 62.5%36.5%14
Collector 53 58.2%40.8%13
Residential 65 73.7%24.3%22
Page 238 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Target-Driven Scenarios
Network Condition Summary
Printed: 4/21/2022Interest: 0.00% Inflation: 3.00%
Projected Network Average PCI by year
Year Without Selected TreatmentWith Selected TreatmentNever Treated
Target: By Year
Scenario: Increase by 5
Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
Year Year Value Year Value Year ValueValue
Year 1 56.5 Year 2 57 Year 3 57.5 Year 4 58
Year 5 58.5 Year 6 59 Year 7 59.5 Year 8 60
Year 9 60.5 Year 10 61
2023 545754
2024 525752
2025 495849
2026 465846
2027 435943
2028 405940
2029 376037
2030 356035
2031 326132
2032 296129
Percent Network Area by Functional Classification and Condition Class
Condition in base year 2023, prior to applying treatments.
Condition Class Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 4.0%5.2%14.6%0.0%23.8%
II / III 10.8%4.5%16.9%0.0%32.1%
IV 8.2%9.4%24.9%0.0%42.4%
V 0.0%0.0%1.6%0.0%1.6%
23.0%Total 19.0%58.1%0.0%100.0%
Condition in year 2023 after schedulable treatments applied.
Condition Class Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 4.2%6.1%19.2%0.0%29.5%
II / III 10.6%3.5%12.3%0.0%26.4%
IV 8.2%9.4%24.9%0.0%42.4%
V 0.0%0.0%1.6%0.0%1.6%
23.0%Total 19.0%58.1%0.0%100.0%
Condition in year 2032 after schedulable treatments applied.
Condition Class Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 14.4%11.0%42.8%0.0%68.2%
II / III 0.2%0.2%1.2%0.0%1.6%
IV 1.5%0.0%0.1%0.0%1.6%
V 6.9%7.7%14.0%0.0%28.6%
23.0%Total 19.0%58.1%0.0%100.0%
MTC StreetSaver
Functional Class <> O - Other
Scenarios Criteria:1
Page 239 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Target-Driven Scenarios - Cost Summary
Printed: 4/21/2022Inflation: 3%Interest: 0%
Target: By Year
Scenario: Increase by 5
Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
Year Year Value Year Value Year ValueValue
Year 1 56.5 Year 2 57 Year 3 57.5 Year 4 58
Year 5 58.5 Year 6 59 Year 7 59.5 Year 8 60
Year 9 60.5 Year 10 61
2023 $1,130,551
$1,225,459
$0
$1,052,135
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Project
$2,356,010Total
$0
$3,408,145 $68,311,933
2024 $618,691
$0
$6,337,373
$131,922
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Project
$6,956,064Total
$0
$7,087,986 $73,230,878
2025 $246,020
$0
$7,903,747
$21,046
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Project
$8,149,767Total
$0
$8,170,813 $79,441,761
2026 $92,694
$0
$8,868,678
$2,032
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Project
$8,961,372Total
$0
$8,963,404 $88,220,488
2027 $198,170
$0
$8,677,271
$55,136
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Project
$8,875,441Total
$0
$8,930,577 $97,949,562
2028 $185,987
$0
$10,018,342
$10,836
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Project
$10,204,329Total
$0
$10,215,165 $104,051,232
Year Rehabilitation Preventive Maintenance Total Cost Deferred
Functional Class <> O - OtherScenarios Criteria:1 MTC StreetSaver
Page 240 of 324
2029 $279,860
$0
$4,866,510
$228,130
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Project
$8,922,740Total
$3,776,370
$9,150,870 $108,509,636
2030 $534,913
$0
$4,928,540
$268,274
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Project
$9,159,014Total
$3,695,561
$9,427,288 $109,896,550
2031 $224,135
$0
$4,130,557
$1,024,532
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Project
$6,373,640Total
$2,018,948
$7,398,172 $110,288,852
2032 $370,036
$0
$1,184,235
$719,719
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Project
$6,433,744Total
$4,879,473
$7,153,463 $108,471,371
SummaryFunctional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint.
Arterial $16,553,431 $813,602
Collector $14,001,115 $425,214
Residential/Local $45,837,575 $2,274,946
$76,392,121 $3,513,762Total:$79,905,883Grand Total:
Year Rehabilitation Preventive Maintenance Total Cost Deferred
Functional Class <> O - OtherScenarios Criteria:2 MTC StreetSaver
Page 241 of 324
Current Funding
($12.5 Million over 10 Years)
• Network Condition Summary
• Cost Summary
• Sections Selected for Treatment
• GIS Maps of Treatments by year
• GIS Maps of All Years by Treatment
Page 242 of 324
YearYearYearBudgetPMBudgetPM Budget PM
2023 $1,250,000 5%
2024 $1,250,000 5%
2025 $1,250,000 5%
2026 $1,250,000 5%
2027 $1,250,000 5%
2028 $1,250,000 5%
2029 $1,250,000 5%
2030 $1,250,000 5%
2031 $1,250,000 5%
2032 $1,250,000 5%
Projected Network Average PCI by Year
With Selected Treatment Treated Centerline
Miles
Treated
Lane Miles
Never TreatedYear
2023 5554 6.903.45
2024 5352 5.772.88
2025 5149 4.022.01
2026 4846 7.243.62
2027 4643 9.134.57
2028 4340 11.305.65
2029 4137 8.654.36
2030 3935 8.184.09
2031 3732 8.824.41
2032 3529 9.554.77
Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category
Condition
Condition in base year 2023, prior to applying treatments.
Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 4.0%5.2%14.6%0.0%23.8%
II / III 10.8%4.5%16.9%0.0%32.1%
IV 8.2%9.4%24.9%0.0%42.4%
V 0.0%0.0%1.6%0.0%1.6%
Total 23.0%19.0%58.1%0.0%100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2023 after schedulable treatments applied.
Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 4.0%5.6%16.7%0.0%26.3%
II / III 10.8%4.1%14.8%0.0%29.7%
IV 8.2%9.4%24.9%0.0%42.4%
V 0.0%0.0%1.6%0.0%1.6%
Total 23.0%19.0%58.1%0.0%100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2032 after schedulable treatments applied.
Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 3.5%1.6%20.0%0.0%25.1%
II / III 0.5%0.5%1.9%0.0%2.9%
IV 10.3%4.6%13.6%0.0%28.4%
V 8.7%12.3%22.6%0.0%43.6%
Total 23.0%19.0%58.1%0.0%100.0%
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary
Printed: 4/21/2022
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Scenario: Current Budget ($1.25M/Yr)
Interest: 0%Inflation: 3%
MTC StreetSaverCriteria:
Functional Class <> O - OtherScenarios Criteria:
1Page 243 of 324
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Scenarios - Cost Summary
Printed: 4/21/2022Interest: 0.00% Inflation: 3.00%
Scenario: Current Budget ($1.25M/Yr)
2023 $1,250,000
$1,185,031
$401,370
$783,661
$0
$0
$64,014 $0$70,470,991$0
$199,534
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2024 $1,250,000
$1,185,395
$730,343
$455,052
$0
$0
$64,478 $0$81,292,805$0
$5,169
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2025 $1,250,000
$1,175,313
$263,528
$0
$911,785
$0
$72,331 $0$94,668,706$0
$3,881
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2026 $1,250,000
$1,182,582
$1,131,166
$0
$51,416
$0
$65,455 $0$112,411,737$0
$3,311
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2027 $1,250,000
$1,183,251
$595,989
$0
$587,262
$0
$64,581 $0$130,861,906$0
$3,516
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2028 $1,250,000
$1,175,194
$1,175,194
$0
$0
$0
$73,120 $0$149,205,321$0
$523,298
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2029 $1,250,000
$1,179,709
$736,019
$0
$443,690
$0
$66,383 $0$165,097,545$0
$6,665
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2030 $1,250,000
$1,155,225
$364,227
$0
$790,998
$0
$92,117 $0$181,544,652$0
$7,005
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Year Budget RehabilitationPM Deferred Stop GapSurplus PM
Preventative
Maintenance
Criteria:
Scenarios Criteria:
1 MTC StreetSaverPage 244 of 324
2031 $1,250,000
$1,180,100
$274,863
$0
$905,237
$0
$69,470 $0$191,012,322$0
$849
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2032 $1,250,000
$1,144,799
$933,331
$0
$211,468
$0
$103,093 $0$208,972,343$0
$4,556
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
Non-
Project
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Functional Class Stop GapRehabilitation Prev. Maint.
Summary
Stop Gap
UnmetFunded
Arterial $1,147,959 $275,073 $0 $164,329
Collector $860,666 $127,072 $0 $188,311
Residential/Local $9,737,974 $332,897 $0 $405,143
$11,746,599 $735,042 $0Grand Total:$757,783
Year Budget RehabilitationPM Deferred Stop GapSurplus PM
Preventative
Maintenance
Criteria:
Scenarios Criteria:
2 MTC StreetSaverPage 245 of 324
YearYearYearBudgetPMBudgetPM Budget PM
2023 $1,250,000 5%
2024 $1,250,000 5%
2025 $1,250,000 5%
2026 $1,250,000 5%
2027 $1,250,000 5%
2028 $1,250,000 5%
2029 $1,250,000 5%
2030 $1,250,000 5%
2031 $1,250,000 5%
2032 $1,250,000 5%
Area ID
Year:
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC
Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
PCILengthWidthArea
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2023
Delta -
SouthWest
Garfield Place Garfield Place North End (Cul-
de-Sac)
GarfieldPl 20 R AC $40,035 11,622 HEAVY REHAB444,25034125 42 100
$40,035Treatment Total
Charlie -
SouthEast
Alpine Street (North) Grand Avenue Faeh Ave AlpineStN 10 R AC/AC $211,796 13,546 LIGHT REHAB6735,972341,058 66 100
Echo -
WestCentral
Courtland Street (S) Raspberry Avenue Strawberry
Avenue
CourtlandS 20 MaC AC $248,626 13,388 LIGHT REHAB7039,590371,070 69 100
Delta -
SouthWest
Farroll Avenue Victorian Ct Halcyon Road
(South)
FarrollAv 30 R AC $323,239 14,564 LIGHT REHAB6654,900361,525 64 100
$783,661Treatment Total
Charlie -
SouthEast
Alpine Street (South) Cerro Vista Circle
(EOS)
Cerro Vista Lane AlpineStS 10 R AC $16,954 12,728 HEAVY MAINTENANCE698,64032270 67 77
Alpha -
NorthWest
Andre Drive Jenny Place CDS AndreDr 15 R AC $83,650 12,304 HEAVY MAINTENANCE6642,630291,470 64 74
Alpha -
NorthWest
Calle Cuervo Via Las Aguilas Cul-de-Sac CalleCuerv 10 R AC $14,796 12,924 HEAVY MAINTENANCE707,54029260 68 78
Delta -
SouthWest
Carrington Place Brittany Ave CDS Carrington 10 R AC $12,706 12,534 HEAVY MAINTENANCE716,47537175 70 79
Charlie -
SouthEast
Diamond Circle Leanna Drive Cul-de-Sac DiamondCr 10 R AC $13,677 11,519 HEAVY MAINTENANCE696,97034205 67 77
Alpha -
NorthWest
Emerald Bay Drive
(West)
Rodeo Drive Cul-de-Sac EmeralsByW 10 R AC/AC $33,761 12,226 HEAVY MAINTENANCE6517,20537465 64 74
Bravo -
NorthEast
Garden Street Cherry Avenue
(East)
Grove Court GardenSt 120 R AC $9,076 12,865 HEAVY MAINTENANCE634,62537125 61 72
Bravo -
NorthEast
Grove Court Fieldview Place Farmhouse Place GroveCt 10 R AC $27,226 16,756 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7113,87537375 70 79
Delta -
SouthWest
Hampton Place Brittany Ave CDS HamptonPl 10 R AC $13,432 12,534 HEAVY MAINTENANCE716,84537185 70 79
Alpha -
NorthWest
Ladera Place Via La Barranca Cul-De-Sac LaderaPl 10 R AC $7,653 10,963 HEAVY MAINTENANCE713,90026150 69 79
Charlie -
SouthEast
Oak Street E Grand Avenue Bennett Ave OakSt 10 R AC/AC $50,096 11,721 HEAVY MAINTENANCE6225,53037690 60 71
Charlie -
SouthEast
Orchard Avenue COP S. of Pilgram
Wy
Castillo de Mar OrchardAv 30 R AC $47,192 15,790 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7124,05037650 70 79
Bravo -
NorthEast
Wilton Place Vernon St East End WiltonPl 10 R AC $26,137 13,763 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7013,32036370 69 78
Interest: 0.00%
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment
Inflation: 3.00%Printed: 4/22/2022
Scenario: Current Funding ($1.25M/Yr)
Scenarios Criteria:Functional Class <> O - Other
** - Treatment from Project Selection 1 MTC StreetSaver
Page 246 of 324
$356,356Treatment Total
Bravo -
NorthEast
Branch Street (W) COP East of Library
entrance
Vernon BranchStW 40 MiA AC/AC $42,977 89,252 LIGHT MAINTENANCE8567,620421,610 84 91
Bravo -
NorthEast
Coach Road Branch Mill Road Flora Road - CIW
North of Flora
CoachRd 10 MaC AC/AC $13,583 87,999 LIGHT MAINTENANCE8626,74836743 85 92
Bravo -
NorthEast
Hillside Court Fieldview Place Los Olivos Lane HillsideCt 10 R AC $11,649 78,979 LIGHT MAINTENANCE7622,94037620 75 83
$68,209Treatment Total
Bravo -
NorthEast
Harrison Street Mckinley Street Cul-De-Sac HarrisonSt 10 R AC/AC $22 1,445,714 SEAL CRACKS794,51818251 77 79
Charlie -
SouthEast
Los Berros Valley Rd Century Ln LosBerros 10 MaC AC $69 3,842,964 SEAL CRACKS9033,20040830 88 89
Bravo -
NorthEast
May Street Mckinley Street West End MaySt 10 R AC $142 1,116,722 SEAL CRACKS7728,00035800 76 78
Bravo -
NorthEast
Nevada Street East Branch Street Le Point Street NevadaSt 10 R AC $29 1,195,790 SEAL CRACKS806,50020325 79 81
Alpha -
NorthWest
Oak Park Boulevard (NB) James Way City Limit (COP at
end of median)
OakPkBlNB 550 MiA AC $47 4,299,750 SEAL CRACKS9018,40023800 89 90
Alpha -
NorthWest
Rosemary Lane West End CDS RosemaryLN 10 R AC $163 2,087,651 SEAL CRACKS7935,380291,220 78 80
Alpha -
NorthWest
Salida de Sol James Way Cul-de-Sac SalidaDeSo 10 R AC $86 2,182,163 SEAL CRACKS8019,72029680 79 80
Alpha -
NorthWest
Sombrillo Salida de Sol Rosemary Court Sombrillo 10 R AC $132 2,009,838 SEAL CRACKS7827,26029940 77 79
$690Treatment Total
$1,248,951Year 2023 TotalYear 2023 Area Total 606,603
Area ID
Year:
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC
Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
PCILengthWidthArea
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2024
Delta -
SouthWest
Oak Park Boulevard (SB) City Limit Farroll Avenue OakPkBlSB 510 MiA AC $227,054 11,715 HEAVY REHAB4821,60030720 43 100
Charlie -
SouthEast
Valley Road Tiger Tail Rd City Limit at
Bridge
ValleyRd 30 MiA AC $346,887 11,721 HEAVY REHAB4833,00060550 43 100
$573,941Treatment Total
Delta -
SouthWest
Farroll Avenue City Limit Elm Street
(South)
FarrollAv 10 MaC AC $455,052 13,378 LIGHT REHAB7170,350421,675 67 100
$455,052Treatment Total
Bravo -
NorthEast
Crown Hill Branch Street
(East)
End of Street CrownHill 10 R AC $99,438 11,391 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7249,200301,640 69 78
Bravo -
NorthEast
Crown Terrace Le Point Street North End CrownTer 20 R AC $17,200 10,906 HEAVY MAINTENANCE698,51037230 66 75
Bravo -
NorthEast
Farmhouse Place Grove Court Hillside Court FarmhouseP 10 R AC $29,913 16,356 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7214,80037400 69 79
Interest: 0.00%
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment
Inflation: 3.00%Printed: 4/22/2022
Scenario: Current Funding ($1.25M/Yr)
Scenarios Criteria:Functional Class <> O - Other
** - Treatment from Project Selection 2 MTC StreetSaver
Page 247 of 324
$146,551Treatment Total
Charlie -
SouthEast
Castillo del Mar Orchard Avenue Valley Road CastilloDe 20 R AC $3,155 70,272 LIGHT MAINTENANCE766,03137163 74 82
Echo -
WestCentral
El Camino Real Oak Park Boulevard Hillcrest Drive ElCaminoRl 20 MiA AC/AC $40,260 74,902 LIGHT MAINTENANCE8461,500302,050 82 89
Bravo -
NorthEast
Fieldview Place Hillside Court Grove Court FieldviewP 10 R AC $6,967 71,402 LIGHT MAINTENANCE7513,32037360 73 81
Charlie -
SouthEast
E Grand Avenue (EB) El Camino Real PCC @ 101
Overcrossing
GrandAvEB 545 A AC/AC $13,748 72,489 LIGHT MAINTENANCE8621,00030700 84 91
Charlie -
SouthEast
Via Belmonte Court
(South)
Castillo del Mar Cul-de-Sac ViaBelmonS 10 R AC $9,373 70,272 LIGHT MAINTENANCE7617,92028640 74 82
$73,503Treatment Total
$1,249,047Year 2024 TotalYear 2024 Area Total 317,231
Area ID
Year:
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC
Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
PCILengthWidthArea
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2025
Bravo -
NorthEast
Corbett Canyon Road Huasna Rd Printz Rd CorbettCyn 20 A AC $760,061 11,436 HEAVY REHAB5070,200262,700 42 100
Delta -
SouthWest
Oak Park Boulevard (NB) Farrol Avenue City Limit OakPkBlNB 510 MiA AC $259,850 11,373 HEAVY REHAB5124,00030800 43 100
$1,019,911Treatment Total
Delta -
SouthWest
Brittany Avenue South Elm Carrington Place BrittanyAv 10 R AC $23,878 12,129 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7311,47037310 69 78
Charlie -
SouthEast
Oak Street E Grand Avenue Bennett Ave OakSt 10 R AC/AC $53,147 12,386 HEAVY MAINTENANCE6225,53037690 69 78
Alpha -
NorthWest
Village Glen James Way Hidden Oak Rd VillageGle 10 R AC $89,306 12,659 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7442,900331,300 70 79
$166,331Treatment Total
Bravo -
NorthEast
Flora Road Coach Road End of Street FloraRd 10 R AC/AC $13,306 66,850 LIGHT MAINTENANCE8524,70038650 82 89
Charlie -
SouthEast
E Grand Avenue (WB) PCC @ 101
Overcrossing
El Camino Real GrandAvWB 515 A AC/AC $14,160 68,162 LIGHT MAINTENANCE8521,00030700 82 89
Bravo -
NorthEast
Greenwood Drive Flora Road End of Street GreenwoodD 10 R AC/AC $12,671 66,850 LIGHT MAINTENANCE8523,52035672 82 89
Alpha -
NorthWest
Quail Ridge Court Hidden Oak Rd CDS QuailRidge 10 R AC $5,956 65,321 LIGHT MAINTENANCE8011,05533335 77 85
Bravo -
NorthEast
Tanner Lane Flora Road Branch Mill Road TannerLn 10 R AC/AC $12,052 66,850 LIGHT MAINTENANCE8522,37234658 82 89
Charlie -
SouthEast
Via Belmonte Court
(North)
Castillo del Mar Cul-de-Sac ViaBelmonN 10 R AC $4,957 64,912 LIGHT MAINTENANCE769,20040230 72 81
$63,102Treatment Total
Alpha -
NorthWest
Rodeo Court Rodeo Dr End CDS RodeoCt 10 R AC $26 2,486,003 SEAL CRACKS9312,16836338 89 90
Interest: 0.00%
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment
Inflation: 3.00%Printed: 4/22/2022
Scenario: Current Funding ($1.25M/Yr)
Scenarios Criteria:Functional Class <> O - Other
** - Treatment from Project Selection 3 MTC StreetSaver
Page 248 of 324
$26Treatment Total
$1,249,370Year 2025 TotalYear 2025 Area Total 298,115
Area ID
Year:
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC
Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
PCILengthWidthArea
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2026
Bravo -
NorthEast
Huasna Road Bolsa Chica
Entrance
Callie Ct HuasnaRd 20 MiA AC $572,092 10,824 HEAVY REHAB5751,300381,350 47 100
Bravo -
NorthEast
Le Point Terrace Branch Street
(East)
Crown Hill LePointTR 10 R AC $38,601 10,107 HEAVY REHAB583,75025150 50 100
$610,693Treatment Total
Charlie -
SouthEast
Arroyo Avenue Pilgram Way West Cherry
Avenue
ArroyoAve 10 R AC $42,950 11,075 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7520,03133607 69 78
Delta -
SouthWest
Bakeman Lane (N) Farroll Avenue
(East Side)
Farroll Avenue
(West Side)
BakemanN 10 R AC $99,061 10,848 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7646,200331,400 70 79
Charlie -
SouthEast
Castillo del Mar End of Street Orchard Avenue CastilloDe 10 R AC $221,343 14,831 HEAVY MAINTENANCE74103,230372,790 69 78
Alpha -
NorthWest
Emerald Bay Drive
(West)
Rodeo Drive Cul-de-Sac EmeralsByW 10 R AC/AC $36,891 12,162 HEAVY MAINTENANCE6517,20537465 70 79
Bravo -
NorthEast
Garden Street Cherry Avenue
(East)
Grove Court GardenSt 120 R AC $9,917 13,547 HEAVY MAINTENANCE634,62537125 69 78
Bravo -
NorthEast
Pearwood Avenue Huasna Road Oak Hill Road
(EOS)
PearwoodAv 10 R AC/AC $87,740 11,559 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7540,920341,200 69 78
Charlie -
SouthEast
Pilgrim Way Orchard Avenue Arroyo Avenue PilgramWy 10 R AC/AC $28,561 11,561 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7513,32036370 69 78
Bravo -
NorthEast
Short Street E Branch Street Olohan Alley ShortSt 40 R AC $7,248 10,037 HEAVY MAINTENANCE763,38026130 69 79
Charlie -
SouthEast
Via Avante Castillo de Mar Cul-de-Sac ViaAvante 10 R AC $18,012 14,831 HEAVY MAINTENANCE748,40028300 69 78
Charlie -
SouthEast
Via Firenze (North) Castillo del Mar Cul-de-Sac ViaFirenzN 10 R AC $24,315 14,831 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7411,34028405 69 78
$576,038Treatment Total
Alpha -
NorthWest
Collado Corte Avenida de
Diamante
Cul-de-Sac ColladoCt 10 R AC/AC $6,467 64,897 LIGHT MAINTENANCE9011,65537315 86 93
Echo -
WestCentral
El Camino Real City Limit Oak Park
Boulevard
ElCaminoRl 10 MaC AC/AC $2,636 54,462 LIGHT MAINTENANCE784,7505095 72 81
Bravo -
NorthEast
Oro Drive Huasna Road Platino Lane OroDr 10 R AC/AC $29,358 64,906 LIGHT MAINTENANCE9052,910371,430 86 93
Bravo -
NorthEast
Oro Drive Platino Lane Gularte Road OroDr 20 R AC/AC $22,789 64,906 LIGHT MAINTENANCE9041,070371,110 86 93
$61,250Treatment Total
Bravo -
NorthEast
Haven Court Waller Pl Leedham Pl HavenCt 10 R AC $46 2,793,764 SEAL CRACKS9321,38637578 89 90
Bravo -
NorthEast
Leedham Place E. Cherry Ave Haven Ct LeedhamPl 10 R AC $33 2,793,764 SEAL CRACKS9315,35537415 89 90
Interest: 0.00%
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment
Inflation: 3.00%Printed: 4/22/2022
Scenario: Current Funding ($1.25M/Yr)
Scenarios Criteria:Functional Class <> O - Other
** - Treatment from Project Selection 4 MTC StreetSaver
Page 249 of 324
Area ID
Year:
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC
Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
PCILengthWidthArea
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2026
Bravo -
NorthEast
Sweet Pea Court Waller Pl Leedham Pl SwtpeaCt 10 R AC $49 2,793,764 SEAL CRACKS9322,94037620 89 90
Bravo -
NorthEast
Waller Place E. Cherry Ave Sweet Pea Ct WallerPl 10 R AC $24 2,793,764 SEAL CRACKS9310,92042260 89 90
Bravo -
NorthEast
Waller Place Sweet Pea Ct Haven Ct WallerPl 20 R AC $21 2,793,764 SEAL CRACKS939,72832304 89 90
$173Treatment Total
$1,248,154Year 2026 TotalYear 2026 Area Total 514,415
Area ID
Year:
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC
Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
PCILengthWidthArea
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2027
Alpha -
NorthWest
Branch Street (W) Oak Park Boulevard Camino Mercado BranchStW 10 MiA AC/AC $889,396 10,806 HEAVY REHAB5577,430451,740 41 100
$889,396Treatment Total
Alpha -
NorthWest
Andre Drive Jenny Place CDS AndreDr 15 R AC $94,149 11,921 HEAVY MAINTENANCE6642,630291,470 69 78
Charlie -
SouthEast
Cherry Avenue (West) Arroyo Avenue End of Street
(AGHS)
CherryAvW 20 R AC/AC $75,624 11,537 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7634,24239878 69 78
Charlie -
SouthEast
El Camino Real Bennett E. Grand Ave ElCaminoRl 60 MiA AC/AC $80,438 12,324 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7730,34037820 69 78
Alpha -
NorthWest
Los Ciervos Ct Vista Drive Cul-de-Sac LosCiervCT 10 R AC $22,097 11,540 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7710,00529345 69 78
Charlie -
SouthEast
Via Firenze (South) Cul-de-Sac Castillo del Mar ViaFirenzS 10 R AC $25,045 14,548 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7511,34028405 69 78
$297,353Treatment Total
Echo -
WestCentral
Brisco Road El Camino Real Branch Street
(West)
BriscoRd 30 MiA AC/AC $6,868 60,221 LIGHT MAINTENANCE859,60032300 79 87
Alpha -
NorthWest
Hidden Oak Road James Way EOR HiddenOak 10 R AC $18,609 52,642 LIGHT MAINTENANCE7832,56037880 72 81
Bravo -
NorthEast
Leedham Place E. Cherry Ave Haven Ct LeedhamPl 10 R AC $8,776 49,498 LIGHT MAINTENANCE9315,35537415 89 95
Alpha -
NorthWest
Oak Park Boulevard (NB) James Way City Limit (COP at
end of median)
OakPkBlNB 550 MiA AC $13,162 57,508 LIGHT MAINTENANCE9018,40023800 86 92
Delta -
SouthWest
Starlight Farroll Morning Rise Starlight 10 R AC $12,602 58,684 LIGHT MAINTENANCE8022,05035630 75 83
$60,017Treatment Total
Charlie -
SouthEast
Alpine Street (North) Grand Avenue Faeh Ave AlpineStN 10 R AC/AC $35 3,002,812 SEAL CRACKS6735,972341,058 87 88
Interest: 0.00%
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment
Inflation: 3.00%Printed: 4/22/2022
Scenario: Current Funding ($1.25M/Yr)
Scenarios Criteria:Functional Class <> O - Other
** - Treatment from Project Selection 5 MTC StreetSaver
Page 250 of 324
Area ID
Year:
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC
Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
PCILengthWidthArea
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2027
Bravo -
NorthEast
Branch Street (W) COP East of Library
entrance
Vernon BranchStW 40 MiA AC/AC $45 15,948,474 SEAL CRACKS8567,620421,610 88 89
Alpha -
NorthWest
Calle Cuervo Via Las Aguilas Cul-de-Sac CalleCuerv 10 R AC $48 1,539,355 SEAL CRACKS707,54029260 73 75
Delta -
SouthWest
Carrington Place Brittany Ave CDS Carrington 10 R AC $41 1,060,018 SEAL CRACKS716,47537175 73 76
Bravo -
NorthEast
Coach Road Branch Mill Road Flora Road - CIW
North of Flora
CoachRd 10 MaC AC/AC $7 35,145,568 SEAL CRACKS8626,74836743 88 89
Echo -
WestCentral
Courtland Street (S) Raspberry Avenue Strawberry
Avenue
CourtlandS 20 MaC AC $93 1,710,187 SEAL CRACKS7039,590371,070 85 86
Charlie -
SouthEast
Diamond Circle Leanna Drive Cul-de-Sac DiamondCr 10 R AC $48 1,100,004 SEAL CRACKS696,97034205 71 74
Echo -
WestCentral
El Camino Real Oak Park Boulevard Hillcrest Drive ElCaminoRl 20 MiA AC/AC $108 5,845,317 SEAL CRACKS8461,500302,050 87 88
Delta -
SouthWest
Farroll Avenue Victorian Ct Halcyon Road
(South)
FarrollAv 30 R AC $54 3,002,812 SEAL CRACKS6654,900361,525 87 88
Delta -
SouthWest
Garfield Place Garfield Place North End (Cul-
de-Sac)
GarfieldPl 20 R AC $5 3,002,812 SEAL CRACKS444,25034125 87 88
Charlie -
SouthEast
E Grand Avenue (EB) El Camino Real PCC @ 101
Overcrossing
GrandAvEB 545 A AC/AC $12 16,437,761 SEAL CRACKS8621,00030700 88 89
Bravo -
NorthEast
Grove Court Fieldview Place Farmhouse Place GroveCt 10 R AC $80 2,062,311 SEAL CRACKS7113,87537375 75 78
Delta -
SouthWest
Hampton Place Brittany Ave CDS HamptonPl 10 R AC $43 1,060,018 SEAL CRACKS716,84537185 73 76
Bravo -
NorthEast
Hillside Court Fieldview Place Los Olivos Lane HillsideCt 10 R AC $100 2,844,295 SEAL CRACKS7622,94037620 81 82
Delta -
SouthWest
Oak Park Boulevard (SB) City Limit Farroll Avenue OakPkBlSB 510 MiA AC $36 2,292,625 SEAL CRACKS4821,60030720 87 88
Charlie -
SouthEast
Orchard Avenue COP S. of Pilgram
Wy
Castillo de Mar OrchardAv 30 R AC $140 1,936,467 SEAL CRACKS7124,05037650 75 77
Charlie -
SouthEast
Valley Road Tiger Tail Rd City Limit at
Bridge
ValleyRd 30 MiA AC $55 2,292,625 SEAL CRACKS4833,00060550 87 88
Bravo -
NorthEast
Wilton Place Vernon St East End WiltonPl 10 R AC $85 1,178,661 SEAL CRACKS7013,32036370 73 75
$1,035Treatment Total
$1,247,801Year 2027 TotalYear 2027 Area Total 772,147
Area ID
Year:
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC
Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
PCILengthWidthArea
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2028
Echo -
WestCentral
E Grand Avenue (EB) City Limit @ COP
E. of Oak Park
Juniper St GrandAvEB 510 A AC $561,975 10,542 HEAVY REHAB5847,500381,250 40 100
Interest: 0.00%
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment
Inflation: 3.00%Printed: 4/22/2022
Scenario: Current Funding ($1.25M/Yr)
Scenarios Criteria:Functional Class <> O - Other
** - Treatment from Project Selection 6 MTC StreetSaver
Page 251 of 324
$561,975Treatment Total
Alpha -
NorthWest
Asilo Street La Canada Vista Drive AsiloSt 20 R AC $85,759 11,128 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7837,700291,300 68 78
Echo -
WestCentral
Blueberry Avenue Boysenberry Street Courtland Street BlueberryA 10 R AC $36,258 11,289 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7915,93933483 69 79
Alpha -
NorthWest
Castillo Court Vista Drive Cul-de-Sac CastilloCt 10 R AC $22,759 11,277 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7910,00529345 69 79
Bravo -
NorthEast
Crown Terrace Le Point Street North End CrownTer 20 R AC $19,359 10,205 HEAVY MAINTENANCE698,51037230 69 79
Echo -
WestCentral
El Camino Real Hillcrest Drive W/C 850' E/O
Hillcrest Dr
ElCaminoRl 30 MiA AC/AC $92,845 12,756 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7934,00040850 70 79
Echo -
WestCentral
El Camino Real W/C 850' E/O
Hillcrest Dr
Brisco Rd ElCaminoRl 35 MiA AC/AC $135,445 12,106 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7849,600321,550 68 78
Alpha -
NorthWest
Los Ciervos Vista Drive Cul-de-Sac LosCiervos 11 R AC $60,691 11,128 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7826,68029920 68 78
Bravo -
NorthEast
Myrtle Street COP East of
Noguera
Myrtle Dr MyrtleSt 20 R AC $18,631 10,757 HEAVY MAINTENANCE788,19021390 70 79
Alpha -
NorthWest
Paraiso Court Asilo Cul-de-Sac Paraiso 10 R AC $12,534 11,128 HEAVY MAINTENANCE785,51029190 68 78
Echo -
WestCentral
Raspberry Avenue Boysenberry St Cranberry St RaspberyAv 15 R AC $78,821 11,289 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7934,650331,050 69 79
Bravo -
NorthEast
Traffic Way Extension Traffic Way Trinity Avenue TrafficWyX 10 R AC $54,595 10,927 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7824,00032750 69 78
$617,697Treatment Total
Bravo -
NorthEast
Garden Street East Branch Street End of Street
(Creek)
GardenSt 10 R AC $3,532 38,254 LIGHT MAINTENANCE856,00024250 76 84
Bravo -
NorthEast
Haven Court Waller Pl Leedham Pl HavenCt 10 R AC $12,589 52,050 LIGHT MAINTENANCE9321,38637578 88 94
Charlie -
SouthEast
Los Berros Valley Rd Century Ln LosBerros 10 MaC AC $19,544 47,967 LIGHT MAINTENANCE9033,20040830 82 89
Alpha -
NorthWest
Rodeo Court Rodeo Dr End CDS RodeoCt 10 R AC $7,163 44,970 LIGHT MAINTENANCE9312,16836338 87 93
Bravo -
NorthEast
Sweet Pea Court Waller Pl Leedham Pl SwtpeaCt 10 R AC $13,504 52,050 LIGHT MAINTENANCE9322,94037620 88 94
Bravo -
NorthEast
Waller Place E. Cherry Ave Sweet Pea Ct WallerPl 10 R AC $6,429 52,050 LIGHT MAINTENANCE9310,92042260 88 94
Bravo -
NorthEast
Waller Place Sweet Pea Ct Haven Ct WallerPl 20 R AC $5,727 52,050 LIGHT MAINTENANCE939,72832304 88 94
$68,488Treatment Total
Charlie -
SouthEast
Castillo del Mar Orchard Avenue Valley Road CastilloDe 20 R AC $30 2,451,101 SEAL CRACKS766,03137163 79 81
Bravo -
NorthEast
Corbett Canyon Road Huasna Rd Printz Rd CorbettCyn 20 A AC $120 2,225,849 SEAL CRACKS5070,200262,700 87 88
Bravo -
NorthEast
Crown Hill Branch Street
(East)
End of Street CrownHill 10 R AC $329 1,114,960 SEAL CRACKS7249,200301,640 72 75
Bravo -
NorthEast
Farmhouse Place Grove Court Hillside Court FarmhouseP 10 R AC $89 2,003,891 SEAL CRACKS7214,80037400 75 77
Delta -
SouthWest
Farroll Avenue City Limit Elm Street
(South)
FarrollAv 10 MaC AC $170 1,660,375 SEAL CRACKS7170,350421,675 85 86
Interest: 0.00%
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment
Inflation: 3.00%Printed: 4/22/2022
Scenario: Current Funding ($1.25M/Yr)
Scenarios Criteria:Functional Class <> O - Other
** - Treatment from Project Selection 7 MTC StreetSaver
Page 252 of 324
Area ID
Year:
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC
Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
PCILengthWidthArea
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2028
Bravo -
NorthEast
Fieldview Place Hillside Court Grove Court FieldviewP 10 R AC $68 2,434,792 SEAL CRACKS7513,32037360 78 80
Charlie -
SouthEast
E Grand Avenue (WB) PCC @ 101
Overcrossing
El Camino Real GrandAvWB 515 A AC/AC $45 4,641,632 SEAL CRACKS8521,00030700 86 87
Delta -
SouthWest
Oak Park Boulevard (NB) Farrol Avenue City Limit OakPkBlNB 510 MiA AC $41 2,225,849 SEAL CRACKS5124,00030800 87 88
Charlie -
SouthEast
Via Belmonte Court
(South)
Castillo del Mar Cul-de-Sac ViaBelmonS 10 R AC $88 2,451,101 SEAL CRACKS7617,92028640 79 81
$980Treatment Total
$1,249,140Year 2028 TotalYear 2028 Area Total 705,447
Area ID
Year:
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC
Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
PCILengthWidthArea
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2029
Bravo -
NorthEast
Callie Court Huasna Road Cul-de-Sac CallieCt 10 R AC $97,802 9,752 HEAVY REHAB578,69537235 41 100
Alpha -
NorthWest
Oak Park Boulevard (NB) West Branch James Way OakPkBlNB 540 A AC $476,837 10,214 HEAVY REHAB6139,130301,300 41 100
Delta -
SouthWest
Pecan Place Fair Oaks Ave North End PecanPL 10 R AC $60,470 9,802 HEAVY REHAB565,37616336 40 100
Delta -
SouthWest
Rice Court Bakeman Lane CDS RiceCt 10 R AC $72,831 9,802 HEAVY REHAB566,47537175 40 100
$707,940Treatment Total
Echo -
WestCentral
Blackberry Avenue Boysenberry St Cranberry St Blackberry 15 R AC $81,185 10,871 HEAVY MAINTENANCE8034,650331,050 69 78
Echo -
WestCentral
Boysenberry Street Raspberry Avenue Strawberry Street Boysenberr 10 R AC $71,907 10,871 HEAVY MAINTENANCE8030,69033930 69 78
Echo -
WestCentral
Cranberry Avenue Raspberry Avenue Blackberry
Avenue
CranberryA 10 R AC $55,283 10,871 HEAVY MAINTENANCE8023,59533715 69 78
Echo -
WestCentral
Huckleberry Avenue Cranberry Street Courtland Street Huckelbery 10 R AC $37,887 10,871 HEAVY MAINTENANCE8016,17033490 69 78
Echo -
WestCentral
Loganberry Avenue Cranberry Street Courtland Street Loganberry 10 R AC $36,340 10,871 HEAVY MAINTENANCE8015,51033470 69 78
Alpha -
NorthWest
Puesta del Sol Los Cervos Vista Drive PuestaDeSo 10 R AC $98,523 10,861 HEAVY MAINTENANCE8042,050291,450 69 78
Echo -
WestCentral
Seabright Avenue Oak Park Boulevard Cranberry Street SeabrightA 10 R AC $18,944 11,036 HEAVY MAINTENANCE818,08533245 70 79
Echo -
WestCentral
Strawberry Avenue Boysenberry St Courtland St Strawberry 10 R AC $46,392 10,871 HEAVY MAINTENANCE8019,80033600 69 78
Echo -
WestCentral
Strawberry Avenue Courtland St CDS Strawberry 20 R AC $28,222 10,871 HEAVY MAINTENANCE8012,04533365 69 78
Interest: 0.00%
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment
Inflation: 3.00%Printed: 4/22/2022
Scenario: Current Funding ($1.25M/Yr)
Scenarios Criteria:Functional Class <> O - Other
** - Treatment from Project Selection 8 MTC StreetSaver
Page 253 of 324
$474,683Treatment Total
Bravo -
NorthEast
Branch Street (W) COP East of Library
entrance
Vernon BranchStW 40 MiA AC/AC $51,316 68,607 LIGHT MAINTENANCE8567,620421,610 88 94
Charlie -
SouthEast
Del Mar Place Castillo del Mar South End (Cul-
de-Sac)
DelMar 10 R AC $5,239 44,424 LIGHT MAINTENANCE908,64036240 79 86
Charlie -
SouthEast
Del Sur Castillo del Mar South End (Cul-
de-Sac)
DelSur 10 R AC $9,386 44,424 LIGHT MAINTENANCE9015,48036430 79 86
$65,941Treatment Total
Delta -
SouthWest
Brittany Avenue South Elm Carrington Place BrittanyAv 10 R AC $78 1,022,118 SEAL CRACKS7311,47037310 73 75
Bravo -
NorthEast
Flora Road Coach Road End of Street FloraRd 10 R AC/AC $50 3,875,053 SEAL CRACKS8524,70038650 86 87
Bravo -
NorthEast
Greenwood Drive Flora Road End of Street GreenwoodD 10 R AC/AC $47 3,875,053 SEAL CRACKS8523,52035672 86 87
Bravo -
NorthEast
Huasna Road Bolsa Chica
Entrance
Callie Ct HuasnaRd 20 MiA AC $91 2,161,019 SEAL CRACKS5751,300381,350 87 88
Alpha -
NorthWest
Quail Ridge Court Hidden Oak Rd CDS QuailRidge 10 R AC $50 1,656,700 SEAL CRACKS8011,05533335 81 83
Bravo -
NorthEast
Tanner Lane Flora Road Branch Mill Road TannerLn 10 R AC/AC $45 3,875,053 SEAL CRACKS8522,37234658 86 87
Charlie -
SouthEast
Via Belmonte Court
(North)
Castillo del Mar Cul-de-Sac ViaBelmonN 10 R AC $50 2,189,811 SEAL CRACKS769,20040230 78 80
Alpha -
NorthWest
Village Glen James Way Hidden Oak Rd VillageGle 10 R AC $278 1,089,690 SEAL CRACKS7442,900331,300 74 76
$689Treatment Total
$1,249,253Year 2029 TotalYear 2029 Area Total 550,528
Area ID
Year:
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC
Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
PCILengthWidthArea
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2030
Alpha -
NorthWest
Cardinal Court Robin Circle Cul-de-Sac CardinalCt 10 R AC $64,300 9,407 HEAVY REHAB605,55037150 43 100
Delta -
SouthWest
Golden West Place Farroll Avenue Cul-De-Sac GoldenWest 10 R AC $308,172 9,518 HEAVY REHAB5826,60038700 40 100
Bravo -
NorthEast
Outland Court Gularte Road Cul-De-Sac OutlandCt 10 R AC $72,873 9,406 HEAVY REHAB606,29037170 43 100
Bravo -
NorthEast
Paseo Street May Street End of Street PaseoSt 10 R AC $79,303 9,344 HEAVY REHAB616,84537185 44 100
Bravo -
NorthEast
Pradera Court La Cresta Drive Cul-De-Sac PraderaCt 10 R AC $152,175 9,467 HEAVY REHAB5913,13537355 42 100
Alpha -
NorthWest
Quail Court Robin Circle Cul-De-Sac QuailCt 10 R AC $126,455 9,407 HEAVY REHAB6010,91537295 43 100
Delta -
SouthWest
Verde Place The Pike Cul-de-Sac VerdePl 10 R AC $150,032 9,466 HEAVY REHAB5912,95037350 42 100
Charlie -
SouthEast
Woodland Drive Cerro Vista Cr Gate/COP WoodlandDR 50 R AC $62,156 9,270 HEAVY REHAB625,36537145 45 100
Interest: 0.00%
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment
Inflation: 3.00%Printed: 4/22/2022
Scenario: Current Funding ($1.25M/Yr)
Scenarios Criteria:Functional Class <> O - Other
** - Treatment from Project Selection 9 MTC StreetSaver
Page 254 of 324
$1,015,466Treatment Total
Charlie -
SouthEast
Diamond Circle Leanna Drive Cul-de-Sac DiamondCr 10 R AC $16,821 9,611 HEAVY MAINTENANCE696,97034205 69 79
Alpha -
NorthWest
Rosemary Lane West End CDS RosemaryLN 10 R AC $85,383 10,706 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7935,380291,220 70 79
Alpha -
NorthWest
Sombrillo Salida de Sol Rosemary Court Sombrillo 10 R AC $65,787 10,558 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7827,26029940 69 78
$167,991Treatment Total
Bravo -
NorthEast
Cherry Avenue (East) Traffic Way End of Street (US
101)
CherryAvW 10 R AC $4,997 35,328 LIGHT MAINTENANCE928,00040200 79 87
Bravo -
NorthEast
Coach Road Branch Mill Road Flora Road - CIW
North of Flora
CoachRd 10 MaC AC/AC $16,705 67,262 LIGHT MAINTENANCE8626,74836743 87 93
Charlie -
SouthEast
E Grand Avenue (EB) El Camino Real PCC @ 101
Overcrossing
GrandAvEB 545 A AC/AC $16,415 55,719 LIGHT MAINTENANCE8621,00030700 86 93
Alpha -
NorthWest
Salida de Sol James Way Cul-de-Sac SalidaDeSo 10 R AC $12,316 41,782 LIGHT MAINTENANCE8019,72029680 71 80
Bravo -
NorthEast
White Court Ridgeview Way Cul-de-Sac WhiteCt 10 R AC $6,295 35,974 LIGHT MAINTENANCE9010,08032315 77 85
$56,728Treatment Total
Charlie -
SouthEast
Arroyo Avenue Pilgram Way West Cherry
Avenue
ArroyoAve 10 R AC $142 1,118,712 SEAL CRACKS7520,03133607 72 75
Delta -
SouthWest
Bakeman Lane (N) Farroll Avenue
(East Side)
Farroll Avenue
(West Side)
BakemanN 10 R AC $319 1,079,447 SEAL CRACKS7646,200331,400 73 75
Alpha -
NorthWest
Branch Street (W) Oak Park Boulevard Camino Mercado BranchStW 10 MiA AC/AC $141 2,098,076 SEAL CRACKS5577,430451,740 87 88
Echo -
WestCentral
Brisco Road El Camino Real Branch Street
(West)
BriscoRd 30 MiA AC/AC $40 2,572,613 SEAL CRACKS859,60032300 83 85
Charlie -
SouthEast
Castillo del Mar End of Street Orchard Avenue CastilloDe 10 R AC $672 1,789,657 SEAL CRACKS74103,230372,790 75 77
Echo -
WestCentral
El Camino Real City Limit Oak Park
Boulevard
ElCaminoRl 10 MaC AC/AC $30 1,521,509 SEAL CRACKS784,7505095 75 78
Charlie -
SouthEast
El Camino Real Bennett E. Grand Ave ElCaminoRl 60 MiA AC/AC $251 1,334,354 SEAL CRACKS7730,34037820 74 76
Alpha -
NorthWest
Emerald Bay Drive
(West)
Rodeo Drive Cul-de-Sac EmeralsByW 10 R AC/AC $114 1,272,310 SEAL CRACKS6517,20537465 74 76
Bravo -
NorthEast
Garden Street Cherry Avenue
(East)
Grove Court GardenSt 120 R AC $31 1,635,312 SEAL CRACKS634,62537125 74 76
Bravo -
NorthEast
Le Point Terrace Branch Street
(East)
Crown Hill LePointTR 10 R AC $4 2,747,998 SEAL CRACKS583,75025150 87 88
Alpha -
NorthWest
Oak Park Boulevard (NB) James Way City Limit (COP at
end of median)
OakPkBlNB 550 MiA AC $55 3,547,026 SEAL CRACKS9018,40023800 89 90
Bravo -
NorthEast
Pearwood Avenue Huasna Road Oak Hill Road
(EOS)
PearwoodAv 10 R AC/AC $279 1,201,600 SEAL CRACKS7540,920341,200 73 75
Charlie -
SouthEast
Pilgrim Way Orchard Avenue Arroyo Avenue PilgramWy 10 R AC/AC $91 1,201,845 SEAL CRACKS7513,32036370 73 75
Bravo -
NorthEast
Short Street E Branch Street Olohan Alley ShortSt 40 R AC $25 827,195 SEAL CRACKS763,38026130 72 75
Charlie -
SouthEast
Via Avante Castillo de Mar Cul-de-Sac ViaAvante 10 R AC $55 1,789,657 SEAL CRACKS748,40028300 75 77
Interest: 0.00%
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment
Inflation: 3.00%Printed: 4/22/2022
Scenario: Current Funding ($1.25M/Yr)
Scenarios Criteria:Functional Class <> O - Other
** - Treatment from Project Selection 10 MTC StreetSaver
Page 255 of 324
Area ID
Year:
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC
Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
PCILengthWidthArea
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2030
Charlie -
SouthEast
Via Firenze (North) Castillo del Mar Cul-de-Sac ViaFirenzN 10 R AC $74 1,789,657 SEAL CRACKS7411,34028405 75 77
$2,323Treatment Total
$1,242,508Year 2031 TotalYear 2031 Area Total 655,729
Area ID
Year:
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC
Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
PCILengthWidthArea
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2031
Bravo -
NorthEast
Mason Street (South) Nelson Street East Branch
Street
MasonStS 20 R AC $257,693 9,240 HEAVY REHAB6021,59535617 40 100
Bravo -
NorthEast
Traffic Way Fair Oaks Avenue Highway 101 TrafficWy 20 MiA AC $833,862 9,276 HEAVY REHAB7164,500601,075 48 100
$1,091,555Treatment Total
Delta -
SouthWest
Carrington Place Brittany Ave CDS Carrington 10 R AC $16,095 9,940 HEAVY MAINTENANCE716,47537175 70 79
Bravo -
NorthEast
Cherry Avenue (East) Branch Mill Road End of Pavement CherryAvE 30 R AC $32,812 8,380 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7713,20022600 62 72
Delta -
SouthWest
Hampton Place Brittany Ave CDS HamptonPl 10 R AC $17,015 9,940 HEAVY MAINTENANCE716,84537185 70 79
Bravo -
NorthEast
Harrison Street Mckinley Street Cul-De-Sac HarrisonSt 10 R AC/AC $11,231 8,414 HEAVY MAINTENANCE794,51818251 66 76
Bravo -
NorthEast
Nevada Street East Branch Street Le Point Street NevadaSt 10 R AC $16,157 8,435 HEAVY MAINTENANCE806,50020325 67 77
$93,310Treatment Total
Alpha -
NorthWest
Calle Cuervo Via Las Aguilas Cul-de-Sac CalleCuerv 10 R AC $4,851 40,422 LIGHT MAINTENANCE707,54029260 70 79
Charlie -
SouthEast
E Grand Avenue (WB) PCC @ 101
Overcrossing
El Camino Real GrandAvWB 515 A AC/AC $16,908 54,220 LIGHT MAINTENANCE8521,00030700 84 91
Bravo -
NorthEast
Grove Court Fieldview Place Farmhouse Place GroveCt 10 R AC $8,925 56,315 LIGHT MAINTENANCE7113,87537375 74 83
Bravo -
NorthEast
Hillside Court Fieldview Place Los Olivos Lane HillsideCt 10 R AC $14,756 68,570 LIGHT MAINTENANCE7622,94037620 79 87
Charlie -
SouthEast
Orchard Avenue COP S. of Pilgram
Wy
Castillo de Mar OrchardAv 30 R AC $15,470 51,857 LIGHT MAINTENANCE7124,05037650 74 82
$60,910Treatment Total
Alpha -
NorthWest
Andre Drive Jenny Place CDS AndreDr 15 R AC $299 1,189,663 SEAL CRACKS6642,630291,470 73 76
Charlie -
SouthEast
Cherry Avenue (West) Arroyo Avenue End of Street
(AGHS)
CherryAvW 20 R AC/AC $241 1,193,021 SEAL CRACKS7634,24239878 73 75
Interest: 0.00%
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment
Inflation: 3.00%Printed: 4/22/2022
Scenario: Current Funding ($1.25M/Yr)
Scenarios Criteria:Functional Class <> O - Other
** - Treatment from Project Selection 11 MTC StreetSaver
Page 256 of 324
Area ID
Year:
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC
Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
PCILengthWidthArea
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2031
Alpha -
NorthWest
Collado Corte Avenida de
Diamante
Cul-de-Sac ColladoCt 10 R AC/AC $5 23,304,715 SEAL CRACKS9011,65537315 88 89
Echo -
WestCentral
El Camino Real Hillcrest Drive W/C 850' E/O
Hillcrest Dr
ElCaminoRl 30 MiA AC/AC $279 1,400,409 SEAL CRACKS7934,00040850 75 77
Echo -
WestCentral
El Camino Real W/C 850' E/O
Hillcrest Dr
Brisco Rd ElCaminoRl 35 MiA AC/AC $426 1,307,962 SEAL CRACKS7849,600321,550 74 76
Echo -
WestCentral
E Grand Avenue (EB) City Limit @ COP
E. of Oak Park
Juniper St GrandAvEB 510 A AC $89 2,036,967 SEAL CRACKS5847,500381,250 87 88
Alpha -
NorthWest
Hidden Oak Road James Way EOR HiddenOak 10 R AC $202 1,235,652 SEAL CRACKS7832,56037880 76 79
Alpha -
NorthWest
Los Ciervos Ct Vista Drive Cul-de-Sac LosCiervCT 10 R AC $71 1,396,896 SEAL CRACKS7710,00529345 73 76
Bravo -
NorthEast
Oro Drive Huasna Road Platino Lane OroDr 10 R AC/AC $20 23,485,248 SEAL CRACKS9052,910371,430 88 89
Bravo -
NorthEast
Oro Drive Platino Lane Gularte Road OroDr 20 R AC/AC $16 23,485,248 SEAL CRACKS9041,070371,110 88 89
Delta -
SouthWest
Starlight Farroll Morning Rise Starlight 10 R AC $119 1,443,784 SEAL CRACKS8022,05035630 79 81
Charlie -
SouthEast
Via Firenze (South) Cul-de-Sac Castillo del Mar ViaFirenzS 10 R AC $77 1,751,202 SEAL CRACKS7511,34028405 74 77
$1,844Treatment Total
$1,247,619Year 2031 TotalYear 2031 Area Total 602,600
Area ID
Year:
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC
Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
PCILengthWidthArea
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2032
Echo -
WestCentral
Brisco Road Linda Drive El Camino Real BriscoRd 20 MiA AC $665,131 9,110 HEAVY REHAB7249,950371,350 46 100
Echo -
WestCentral
El Camino Real Brisco Road Halcyon Road
(North)
ElCaminoRl 40 MiA AC/AC $466,058 9,082 HEAVY REHAB7035,00050700 46 100
$1,131,189Treatment Total
Bravo -
NorthEast
Wilton Place Vernon St East End WiltonPl 10 R AC $34,103 10,589 HEAVY MAINTENANCE7013,32036370 69 78
$34,103Treatment Total
Charlie -
SouthEast
Castillo del Mar Orchard Avenue Valley Road CastilloDe 20 R AC $3,996 60,133 LIGHT MAINTENANCE766,03137163 78 86
Echo -
WestCentral
El Camino Real Oak Park Boulevard Hillcrest Drive ElCaminoRl 20 MiA AC/AC $51,000 58,900 LIGHT MAINTENANCE8461,500302,050 83 90
Bravo -
NorthEast
Fieldview Place Hillside Court Grove Court FieldviewP 10 R AC $8,825 62,670 LIGHT MAINTENANCE7513,32037360 77 85
Interest: 0.00%
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment
Inflation: 3.00%Printed: 4/22/2022
Scenario: Current Funding ($1.25M/Yr)
Scenarios Criteria:Functional Class <> O - Other
** - Treatment from Project Selection 12 MTC StreetSaver
Page 257 of 324
Area ID
Year:
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC
Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
PCILengthWidthArea
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2032
Delta -
SouthWest
Garfield Place Garfield Place North End (Cul-
de-Sac)
GarfieldPl 20 R AC $2,816 35,589 LIGHT MAINTENANCE444,25034125 81 88
Charlie -
SouthEast
Via Belmonte Court
(South)
Castillo del Mar Cul-de-Sac ViaBelmonS 10 R AC $11,873 60,133 LIGHT MAINTENANCE7617,92028640 78 86
$78,510Treatment Total
Alpha -
NorthWest
Asilo Street La Canada Vista Drive AsiloSt 20 R AC $279 1,321,151 SEAL CRACKS7837,700291,300 73 75
Echo -
WestCentral
Blueberry Avenue Boysenberry Street Courtland Street BlueberryA 10 R AC $114 1,379,258 SEAL CRACKS7915,93933483 74 76
Alpha -
NorthWest
Castillo Court Vista Drive Cul-de-Sac CastilloCt 10 R AC $72 1,375,895 SEAL CRACKS7910,00529345 74 76
Bravo -
NorthEast
Garden Street East Branch Street End of Street
(Creek)
GardenSt 10 R AC $36 895,865 SEAL CRACKS856,00024250 78 80
Bravo -
NorthEast
Leedham Place E. Cherry Ave Haven Ct LeedhamPl 10 R AC $37 2,359,218 SEAL CRACKS9315,35537415 90 90
Charlie -
SouthEast
Los Berros Valley Rd Century Ln LosBerros 10 MaC AC $138 2,139,738 SEAL CRACKS9033,20040830 83 85
Alpha -
NorthWest
Los Ciervos Vista Drive Cul-de-Sac LosCiervos 11 R AC $197 1,321,151 SEAL CRACKS7826,68029920 73 75
Bravo -
NorthEast
Myrtle Street COP East of
Noguera
Myrtle Dr MyrtleSt 20 R AC $60 910,824 SEAL CRACKS788,19021390 73 76
Alpha -
NorthWest
Oak Park Boulevard (NB) West Branch James Way OakPkBlNB 540 A AC $76 1,977,638 SEAL CRACKS6139,130301,300 87 88
Alpha -
NorthWest
Paraiso Court Asilo Cul-de-Sac Paraiso 10 R AC $41 1,321,151 SEAL CRACKS785,51029190 73 75
Echo -
WestCentral
Raspberry Avenue Boysenberry St Cranberry St RaspberyAv 15 R AC $246 1,379,258 SEAL CRACKS7934,650331,050 74 76
Alpha -
NorthWest
Rodeo Court Rodeo Dr End CDS RodeoCt 10 R AC $34 2,003,496 SEAL CRACKS9312,16836338 88 89
Bravo -
NorthEast
Traffic Way Extension Traffic Way Trinity Avenue TrafficWyX 10 R AC $177 1,114,128 SEAL CRACKS7824,00032750 73 75
$1,507Treatment Total
$1,245,309Year 2032 TotalYear 2032 Area Total 469,818
$12,477,152Grand Total5,492,633Grand Total Section Area:
Interest: 0.00%
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment
Inflation: 3.00%Printed: 4/22/2022
Scenario: Current Funding ($1.25M/Yr)
Scenarios Criteria:Functional Class <> O - Other
** - Treatment from Project Selection 13 MTC StreetSaver
Page 258 of 324
Scenario TreatmentsCurrent Funding ($1.25M/Yr) - 2023 Project Period - Printed: 4/22/2022
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Test
Feature Legend
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
LIGHT REHAB
SEAL CRACKS
Page 259 of 324
Scenario TreatmentsCurrent Funding ($1.25M/Yr) - 2024 Project Period - Printed: 4/22/2022
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Test
Feature Legend
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
HEAVY REHAB
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
LIGHT REHAB
Page 260 of 324
Scenario TreatmentsCurrent Funding ($1.25M/Yr) - 2025 Project Period - Printed: 4/22/2022
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Test
Feature Legend
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
HEAVY REHAB
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
Page 261 of 324
Scenario TreatmentsCurrent Funding ($1.25M/Yr) - 2026 Project Period - Printed: 4/22/2022
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Test
Feature Legend
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
HEAVY REHAB
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
Page 262 of 324
Scenario TreatmentsCurrent Funding ($1.25M/Yr) - 2027 Project Period - Printed: 4/22/2022
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Test
Feature Legend
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
HEAVY REHAB
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
SEAL CRACKS
Page 263 of 324
Scenario TreatmentsCurrent Funding ($1.25M/Yr) - 2028 Project Period - Printed: 4/22/2022
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Test
Feature Legend
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
HEAVY REHAB
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
SEAL CRACKS
Page 264 of 324
Scenario TreatmentsCurrent Funding ($1.25M/Yr) - 2029 Project Period - Printed: 4/22/2022
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Test
Feature Legend
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
HEAVY REHAB
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
SEAL CRACKS
Page 265 of 324
Scenario TreatmentsCurrent Funding ($1.25M/Yr) - 2030 Project Period - Printed: 4/22/2022
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Test
Feature Legend
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
HEAVY REHAB
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
SEAL CRACKS
Page 266 of 324
Scenario TreatmentsCurrent Funding ($1.25M/Yr) - 2031 Project Period - Printed: 4/22/2022
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Test
Feature Legend
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
HEAVY REHAB
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
SEAL CRACKS
Page 267 of 324
Scenario TreatmentsCurrent Funding ($1.25M/Yr) - 2032 Project Period - Printed: 4/22/2022
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Test
Feature Legend
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
HEAVY REHAB
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
SEAL CRACKS
Page 268 of 324
Scenario TreatmentsCurrent Funding ($1.25M/Yr) - All Project Periods - Printed: 4/22/2022
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Test
Feature Legend
SEAL CRACKS
Page 269 of 324
Scenario TreatmentsCurrent Funding ($1.25M/Yr) - All Project Periods - Printed: 4/22/2022
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Test
Feature Legend
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
Page 270 of 324
Scenario TreatmentsCurrent Funding ($1.25M/Yr) - All Project Periods - Printed: 4/22/2022
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Test
Feature LegendHEAVY MAINTENANCE
Page 271 of 324
Scenario TreatmentsCurrent Funding ($1.25M/Yr) - All Project Periods - Printed: 4/22/2022
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Test
Feature Legend LIGHT REHAB
Page 272 of 324
Scenario TreatmentsCurrent Funding ($1.25M/Yr) - All Project Periods - Printed: 4/22/2022
City of Arroyo Grande
300 E. Branch St
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
(805) 473-5460
Test
Feature Legend HEAVY REHAB
Page 273 of 324
Appendix C
Definitions
Page 274 of 324
A p p e n d i x C - D e f i n i t i o n s P a g e | 1
DEFINITIONS
This section is intended to define important pavement design acronyms and terms used
when discussing a Pavement Management System (PMS).
GENERAL TERMS
AC - Asphaltic Concrete - A plant mixed asphalt binder (asphalt cement that is classified
according to the Standard Specification for Performance Graded Asphalt Binder) and
aggregate (rocks) thoroughly mixed and compacted into a mass.
ALLIGATOR CRACKING - Alligator or fatigue cracking is a series of interconnecting
cracks caused by fatigue failure of the asphalt concrete surface under repeated traffic
loading. Cracking begins at the bottom of the asphalt surface (or stabilized base) where
the stress and strain are highest under a wheel load. The cracks propagate to the surface
initially as a series of parallel longitudinal cracks. After repeated traffic loading, the cracks
connect, forming many sided, sharp-angled pieces that develop a pattern resembling
chicken wire or the skin of an alligator. Alligator cracking occurs only in areas subjected
to repeated traffic loading, such as wheel paths. (Pattern -type cracking that occurs over
an entire area not subjected to loading is called “block cracking,” which is not a load-
associated distress.)
BLOCK CRACKING - Block cracks are interconnected cracks that divide the pavement
into approximately rectangular pieces. Block cracking is caused mainly by shrinkage of
the asphalt concrete and daily temperature cycling (which results in daily stress/strain
cycling). It is not load-associated. Block cracking usually indicates that the asphalt has
hardened significantly. Block cracking normally occurs over a large portion of the
pavement area, but sometimes will occur only in non-traffic areas. This type of distress
differs from alligator cracking in that alligator cracks form smaller, many-sided pieces with
sharp angles. Also, unlike block, alligator cracks are caused by repeated traffic loadings,
and are therefore found only in traffic areas (i.e., wheel paths).
CRITICAL PCI - The PCI value at which the rate of loss increases with time, or the cost
of applying a maintenance treatment increases significantly.
DISTORTIONS (Bumps & Sags)- Bumps are small, localized, upward displacements of
the pavement surface. They are different from shoves in that shoves are caused by
unstable pavement. Sags are small, abrupt, downward displacements of the pavement
surface. If bumps appear in pattern perpendicular to traffic flow and are spaced at less
than 3 m (10 ft), the distress is called corrugation. Distortion and displacement that occur
Page 275 of 324
A p p e n d i x C - D e f i n i t i o n s P a g e | 2
over large areas of the pavement surface causing large and/or long dips in the pavement
should be recorded at “swelling.”
EMULSION - A chemical added to water and asphalt that keeps the asphalt in a stab le
suspension in the water.
ESAL - The impact of trucks is measured in equivalent single 18,000 pound axle loads
(Equivalent Single Axle Load).
FC - Functional Classification is the process by which streets and highways are grouped
into classes, or systems, according to the character of traffic service that they are intended
to provide. There are three highway functional classifications: arterial, collector, and local
roads. All streets and highways are grouped into one of these classes, depending on the
character of the traffic.
Arterials - provide the highest level of service at the greatest speed for the longest
uninterrupted distance, with some degree of access control.
Collectors - provide a less highly developed level of service at a lower speed for
shorter distances by collecting traffic from local roads and connecting them with
arterials.
Residential/Local - consists of all roads not defined as arterials or collectors and
primarily provides access to land with little or no through movement.
• (Excerpted from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway
Administration web site on “Functional Classification”.)
LONGITUDINAL / TRANSVERSE CRACKING - Longitudinal cracks are parallel to the
pavement’s centerline or laydown direction. Transverse cracks extend across the
pavement at approximately right angles to the pavement centerline or direction of
laydown. These types of cracks are not usually load-associated.
OVERLAY - The placement of asphaltic concrete mix over an existing asphaltic concrete
or portland cement concrete surface.
Light Overlay - would include any overlay of less than 2 inches of asphalt.
Heavy Overlay - is a thicker layer of asphalt and might include such
items/operations as, but not limited to fabric, milling/grinding and reconstruction.
Page 276 of 324
A p p e n d i x C - D e f i n i t i o n s P a g e | 3
PATCHING & UTILITY CUTS - A patch is an area of pavement that has been replaced
with new material to repair the existing pavement. A patch is considered a defect no
matter how well it is performing (a patched area or adjacent area usually does not perform
as well as an original pavement section). Generally, some roughness is associated with
this distress.
PAVEMENT PRESERVATION - Applying the Right Treatment to the Right Pavement at
the Right Time using the Right Materials.
PCC - Portland Cement Concrete
PCI - Pavement Condition Index - A rating scale for the condition of a road segment. 100
represents no defects and recent major rehabilitation.
PMS/ PMP - Pavement Management System/ Pavement Management Program - A
program to aid in tracking the condition of roads and a means to help quantify the cost of
maintaining the roads in a given area.
POTHOLES - Most often are structurally related distresses and should not be confused
with raveling and weathering.
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE - Provides budget dollars for localized pavement repairs
such as digouts and crack filling.
R-VALUE - A test to evaluate the base, subbase and subgrades of an area to be used in
pavement designing for thickness of asphalt.
RAVELING - Raveling is the dislodging of coarse aggregate particles. Raveling may be
caused by insufficient asphalt binder, poor mixture quality, insufficient compaction,
segregation, or stripping. In addition, raveling may be caused by certain types of traffic,
i.e., tracked vehicles. Softening of the surface and dislodging of the aggregates due to
oil spillage are also included under raveling.
REFLECTIVE CRACKING - Cracks that occur in new “thin” overlays that are identical to
the cracks that were present in the existing pavement.
RUTTING / SHOVING - A rut is a surface depression in the wheel paths. Pavement uplift
may occur along the sides of the rut, but, in many instances, ruts are noticeable only after
a rainfall when the paths are filled with water. Rutting stems from a permanent
deformation in any of the pavement layers or subgrades, usually caused by consolidated
or lateral movement of the materials due to traffic load.
Page 277 of 324
A p p e n d i x C - D e f i n i t i o n s P a g e | 4
Shoving is a permanent, longitudinal displacement of a localized area of the pavement
surface caused by traffic loading. When traffic pushes against the pavement, it produces
a short, abrupt wave in the pavement surface. This distress normally occurs only in
unstable liquid asphalt mix (cutback or emulsion) pavements.
SLURRY SEAL - Includes a graded aggregate along with emulsion and water. Generally
squeegeed and generally consists of two layers.
TI - Traffic Index - Cars and light trucks have little impact on the pavement structure.
Larger/Heavier trucks have very significant impacts on the pavement due to the high
axle weights. The total EALs is converted into a design Traffic Index (TI). The design TI
is the total number of EALs that the pavement will support before it begins to fail,
regardless of the passage of time. Normally for a new pavement, the EALs over a 20_year
period are used. For rehabilitation procedures such as overlays, 10 years is generally
used.
WEATHERING - Weathering is the loss of the fine aggregate from within the pavement
matrix. This distress indicates that either the asphalt binder has hardened appreciably or
that a poor quality mixture is present.
STREETSAVER® / REPORT DEFINITIONS
% LOAD RELATED - The percentage of the pavement distress in a management section
that is load related distress (caused by excessive weight on the pavement surface).
% OF ENVIRONMENT - The percentage of the pavement distress in a management
section that is an environment related distress.
% OTHER - Is the percentage of the pavement section that is not a load related or
environment related distress.
ACTIVE - Indicates whether or not the current record is active.
ACTION / TREATMENT - A proposed type of rehabilitation work that should be used on
a given road segment, based on PCI, FC and engineering evaluation.
ANNUAL BUDGET - The amount of money that is available each year to be used for
pavement maintenance. These funds can come from various sources and can vary from
year to year, although it is generally a fixed figure.
Page 278 of 324
A p p e n d i x C - D e f i n i t i o n s P a g e | 5
AREA - Contains the area of a section in square feet. This is automatically calculated
using the values that are entered in the Length and Width fields. However, if the section
is irregularly shaped the area can be entered by the user.
AREA ID - Is an optional, jurisdiction defined field to identify the area in which the section
is located. For example, each neighborhood or subdivision, or each geographic type
(mountain, valley, coast, etc.) in the jurisdiction may be assigned a letter of the alphabet.
BASE BUDGET - Provides an area for you to enter the dollar amount of your base
budget.
BASE BUDGET INCREASE FACTOR - Stores the percent that the base budget will
increase each year.
BASE PM SPLIT - Percent of the base budget that has been set aside for preventive
maintenance.
BEGINNING LOCATION - Identifies the point that defines the beginning of the section.
This is generally the name of a cross road or other landmark.
BRANCH - Generally a road name or a road name with a direction of travel.
CL - Centerline Mile - a measuring of the length of a road regardless of the width of the
road.
CONDITION - Column lists the condition levels (2-5) that require stop-gap treatments.
COST/ SQ YD - Indicates the cost per square yard of road for the suggested treatment.
CURRENT PCI - Calculated from either a visual inspection or a maintenance treatment.
DESCRIPTION - Displays a description of the item named in the previous column in a
grid.
DISTRESS - Contains the type of distress present on a section of a road.
DISTRESSES - Defects found in asphalt concrete (AC) pavements or portland cement
concrete (PCC) pavements. These defects degrade the condition of the road.
DETERIORATION CURVE - This provides a graphical representation of the current
pavement condition index and the historical PCIs for each section of road in your
jurisdiction.
Page 279 of 324
A p p e n d i x C - D e f i n i t i o n s P a g e | 6
END LOCATION - Identifies the point that defines the end of the section. This is generally
the name of a cross road or other landmark.
EVENTS – This provides for viewing and maintaining of Events or changes that have
been made on a management section. The Events that are included are:
• Management Section Creation.
• Results from Maintenance and Rehabilitation treatments that have been applied
to the Management Section.
• Results from Visual Inspections of Management Sections.
• Listing of changes/edits of information on a Management Section.
EVENT ACTIVE - Indicates whether an Event is currently part of the active history for the
current Section.
EVENT PCI - The PCI after the selected Event occurred.
EVENT TRANSACTION TYPE - Includes: Creation, Inspection, Treatment, Split,
Combine, Attribute Change and Core Data Change.
EVENT VALID - Indicates if an Event can be activated and made part of the valid events
for the current section.
FUNDING SOURCE - Is an optional, jurisdiction defined field to identify the funding
source for the section; an example might be G for general fund.
GENERAL CODE - Is an optional, jurisdiction defined field used to identify sections of
pavement sharing common characteristics, i.e., drainage type.
INFLATION RATE - Is the inflation used throughout your jurisdiction. You may wish to
consult your financial department with this value.
INSPECTION AREA - Is the total area of the inspection unit.
INTEREST RATE - Contains the interest rate used throughout your jurisdiction.
LM - Lane Mile - a measurement of the length of all the lanes for a given FC or area.
LIFE EXTENSION - Is the number of years that a maintenance treatment extends the life
of a pavement surface.
MAINTENANCE/ REHABILITATION - This is used to review the proposed maintenance,
new maintenance, and/ or rehabilitation for any road section in your jurisdiction.
Page 280 of 324
A p p e n d i x C - D e f i n i t i o n s P a g e | 7
MAINTENANCE DATE - Displays the date the maintenance was completed.
MANAGEMENT SECTION - This is used to maintain an inventory of all the roads and
road sections in your jurisdiction.
MANAGEMENT UNIT - Relates a project to a management unit.
MILEPOSTS - Display the beginning and ending points of a management section.
NEW PCI - Stores the PCI value that was calculated after a treatment was applied.
NUMBER OF SURFACE SEALS BEFORE OVERLAY - Displays the recommended
number of surface seals before the application of an overlay.
OLD PCI - Displays the pavement condition index before a treatment was applied.
OPTIMUM PCI – The Optimum PCI refers to the highest PCI level the overall network
can achieve within the given “Budget Needs” time frame. That level is dependent on the
parameters set in the Decision Tree and where the PCI Breakpoints are set. Changes
made to the either the timing, or the treatments, within the Decision Tree, or to the value
of each of the PCI Breakpoints will directly affect the Optimum PCI.
OTHER - Displays the weighting factor applied to management sections with functional
classes other than arterial, collector, and residential.
OVERLAY - Displays the overlay code that corresponds to an overlay procedure.
OVERLAY CODE - Is an identifier for the treatment type; use one of the six codes from
the pop-up list that appears when this is activated.
PCI CAP - Stores the maximum PCI value that will be included in needs and scenario
calculations. If a PCI value is larger than the PCI Cap value, it will not be included.
PCI EFFECTIVENESS CUT-OFF - Contains the minimum PCI value used in calculating
the area under the projected performance curve. That area is used in ranking sections
needing work, and the area below the PCI Cut -Off value is not included in that area. It
should generally be the lowest PCI value that defines the minimum acceptable condition
for all of the pavement types and functional classification groupings.
PCI HIGH - LOW > 25 - Is marked if the difference between the high and low PCI values
is greater than 25.
Page 281 of 324
A p p e n d i x C - D e f i n i t i o n s P a g e | 8
PCI HIGH VALUE - Is the maximum PCI value for an inspection unit used in the last PCI
calculation for a management unit.
PCI LOW VALUE - Is the minimum PCI value for an inspection unit used in the last PCI
calculation for a management unit.
PM% - Scenarios based on a yearly budget, this column stores the percent that has been
set aside for preventive maintenance.
RATING - The rating is the weighted cost effectiveness ratio of the recommended
treatment. Also referred to as Weighted Effectiveness Ratio (WER)
REPLACEMENT COST - Is the cost per square yard to install a new pavement surface.
RESIDENTIAL $ - Indicates the cost of a stop-gap treatment per square yard when
applied to a road with a residential functional class and a given condition.
ROAD ID - Contains a two-character identifier that was assigned to the road. The
combination of Road Number, Road Name, and Road ID must be unique for each road
section.
ROAD NAME - Displays the name of the road that corresponds to the road number and
road ID. The combination of Road Number, Road Name, and Road ID must be unique
for each road section.
ROAD NUMBER - Contains the number that was assigned to a road. The combination of
Road Number, Road Name, and Road ID must be unique for each road section.
SECTION - Usually a branch or road is large and needs to be divided into smaller pieces
to maintain. These smaller pieces are labeled as “Sections” or “Segments” and
designated with a number and a beginning and ending location.
SECTION ID - Is an identifier that is unique for each section of a given street. Note that
the Street ID and the Section ID combined describe the individual section. Therefore, that
combination must be unique. The same Section ID can be reused as long as it is used in
conjunction with a different Street ID each time.
SEGMENT LENGTH - Is the length in feet of the management section.
SELECT MANAGEMENT SECTIONS - Allows you to calculate PCI values based on
selected management sections. If this button is marked, the management sections that
Page 282 of 324
A p p e n d i x C - D e f i n i t i o n s P a g e | 9
have had records updated since the last calculations are displayed in a grid. Select the
management sections you want included in the calculations from this grid.
SPECIAL - Check box is marked if the displayed inspection unit is non-representative of
a section as a whole.
SPECIAL UNIT - The information will either be Y or blank. Y is an indication that this
inspection unit is in some way non-representative of the section as a whole, and would
receive a different maintenance/rehabilitation treatment from the rest of the section.
STANDARD INSPECTION UNITS - Is the typical number of inspection units that would
be used for a particular management section.
STOP-GAP APPLICATION INTERVAL - Indicates the number of years between the
applications of stop-gap treatments.
STREET ID - Is an identifier that is unique for each street. The Street ID usually bears
some similarity to the actual street name.
STREET NAME - Is the full name of the street including “Street”, “Way”, “Court” etc.
SURFACE - Describes the type of surface for a specific section of road. The options for
this field are:
• A - AC for asphalt concrete,
• C - AC/PCC for asphalt concrete over Portland cement concrete,
• O - AC/AC for overlays of asphalt concrete over asphalt concrete,
• P - PCC for Portland cement concrete,
• S - ST for surface treatment (This Surface Type is not used very often, as it refers
to roads that are neither AC or PCC, but have a surface treatment over dirt or
gravel.)
TREATMENT - Contains the type of treatment the road received or will receive.
TREATMENT COST - Is an optional field giving the cost in dollars and cents of the
treatment.
UNIT OF MEASURE - Displays the units of measure used to measure an item.
UNIT PRICE - Displays the price paid for an inventory item.
Page 283 of 324
A p p e n d i x C - D e f i n i t i o n s P a g e | 10
VISUAL PCI - Used to identify PCI calculations that have been determined based upon
a visual inspection. If this check box is blank, then the PCI was extrapolated based upon
the maintenance treatment that has been applied to a management section.
WEIGHTING FACTORS - Section displays the weighting factors established by your
jurisdiction for the functional classes.
YEAR OF MAINTENANCE - Stores the proposed year of a treatment.
YEARS BETWEEN CRACK SEALS - Displays the number of years between the
application of crack seals for the functional class with a specific severity.
YEARS BETWEEN SURFACE SEALS - Displays the recommended number of years
that should come between surface seal application for the functional class with the
indicated severity.
YEARS TO CALCULATE - Stores the number of years you want to include in the Budget
Needs calculation. The number of years cannot be less than 5 or more th an 20.
ZONES - Geographical areas of the city defined by city staff to aid in the development of
a maintenance plan for residential roads.
Page 284 of 324
RESOLUTION NO. 3979
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH THE STATE BOARD OF
EQUALIZATION FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF A ,LOCAL
TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX
WHEREAS, on July 25, 2006, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 579 amending the
City of Arroyo Grande Municipal Code and providing for a local transactions and use tax; and
WHEREAS, the State Board of EqualizaHon ("Board") administers and collects the
transactions and use taxes for all applicable jurisdictions within the state; and
WHEREAS, the Board will be responsible to administer and collect the transactions and use
tax for the City; and
WHEREAS, the Board requires that the City enter into a "Preparatory Agreement" and an
Administration Agreement" prior to implementation of said taxes, and
WHEREAS, the Board requires that the City Council authorize the agreements.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande that
the "Preparatory Agreement" attached as Exhibit A and the "Administrative Agreement"
attached as Exhibit B are hereby approved and the City Manager is hereby authorized to
execute each agreement.
On motion by Council Member Dickens, seconded by Council Member Amold, and by the
following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Dickens, Arnold, Costello, Guthrie, and Mayor Ferrara
None
None
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 11th day of December, 2006.
ATTACHMENT 2
Page 285 of 324
RESOLUTION NO. 3'171
PAGE 2
TONY FER
ATTEST:
E, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TI L, TY ATTORNEY
2
Page 286 of 324
AGREEMENT FOR PREPARATION TO ADMINISTER AND OPERATE
CITY'S TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX ORDINANCE
In order to prepare to administer a transactions and use tax ordinance adopted in accordance
with the provision of Part 1.6 (commencing with Section 7251) of Division 2 of the Revenue and
Taxation Code, the City of Arroyo Grande, hereinafter called City, and the STATE BOARD OF
EQUALIZATION, hereinafter called Board, do agree as follows:
I. The Board agrees to enter into work to prepare to administer and operate a transactions and
use tax in conformity with Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code which has been
approved by a majority of the electors of the City and whose ordinance has been adopted by the City.
2. City agrees to pay to the Board at the times and in the amounts hereinafter specified all of
the Board's costs for preparatory work necessary to administer the City's transactions and use tax
ordinance. The Board's costs for preparatory work include costs of developing procedures,
programming for data processing, developing and adopting appropriate regulations, designing and
printing forms, developing instructions for the Board's staff and for taxpayers, and other appropriate
and necessary preparatory costs to administer a transactions and use tax ordinance. These costs shall
include both direct and indirect costs as specified in Section 11256 of the Government Code.
3. Preparatory costs may be accounted for in a manner which conforms to the internal
accounting and personnel records currently maintained by the Board. The billings for costs may be
presented in summary form. Detailed records of preparatory costs will be retained for audit and
verification by the City.
4. Any dispute as to the amount of preparatory costs incurred by the Board shall be referred to
the State Director of Finance for resolution, and the Director's decision shall be final.
5. Preparatory costs incurred by the Board shall be billed by the Board periodically, with the
final billing within a reasonable time after the operative date of the ordinance. City shall pay to the
Board the amount of such costs on or before the last day of the next succeeding month following the
month when the billing is received.
6. The amount to be paid by City for the Board's preparatory costs shall not exceed one
hundred seventy-five thousand dollars ($175,000) (Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7272.)
Page 287 of 324
7. Communications and notices may be sent by first class United States mail.
Communications and notices to be sent to the Board shall be addressed to:
STATE BOARD OF EQUALlZA nON
P. O. BOX 942879
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0073
ATTENTION: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Communications and notices to be sent to City shall be addressed to:
City Manager
City of Arrovo Grande
P.O. Box 550, Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
8. The date of this agreement is the date on which it is approved by the Department of General
Services. This agreement shall continue in effect until the preparatory work necessary to administer
City's transactions and use tax ordinance has been completed and the Board has received all payments
due from City under the tenns of this agreement.
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
By By
Executive Director)Signature)
Steven Adams
Typed Name)
Citv Manager
Title)
Rev. 11/02)
2
Page 288 of 324
AGREEMENT FOR STATE ADMINISTRATION
OF CITY TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAXES
The City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande has adopted, and the voters of the City of
Arroyo Grande (hereafter called "City" or "District") have approved by the required majority vote, the
City of Arroyo Grande Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance (hereafter called "Ordinance"), a copy of
which is attached hereto. To carry out the provisions of Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and
Taxation Code and the Ordinance, the State Board of Equalization, (hereinafter called the "Board") and
the City do agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
Unless the context requires otherwise, wherever the following terms appear in the Agreement,
they shall be interpreted to mean the following:
I. "District taxes" shall mean the transactions and use taxes, penalties, and interest imposed
under an ordinance specifically authorized by Revenue and Taxation code Section 7285.9, and in
compliance with Part 1.6, Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
2. "City Ordinance" shall mean the City's Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance referred to
above and attached hereto, Ordinance No. 579, as amended from time to time, or as deemed to be
amended from time to time pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7262.2.
ARTICLE II
ADMINISTRA nON AND COLLECTION
OF CITY TAXES
A. Administration. The Board and City agree that the Board shall perform exclusively all
functions incident to the administration and operation of the City Ordinance.
Page 289 of 324
B. Other Applicable Laws. City agrees that all provIsIOns of law applicable to the
administration and operation of the State Sales and Use Tax Law which are not inconsistent with Part
1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code shall be applicable to the administration and
operation of the City Ordinance. City agrees that money collected pursuant to the City Ordinance may
be deposited into the State Treasury to the credit of the Retail Sales Tax Fund and may be drawn from
that Fund for any authorized purpose, including making refunds, compensating and reimbursing the
Board pursuant to Article IV of this Agreement, and transmitting to City the amount to which City is
entitled.
C. Transmittal of money.
I. For the period during which the tax is in effect, and except as otherwise provided herein, all
district taxes collected under the provisions of the City Ordinance shall be transmitted to City
periodically as promptly as feasible, but not less often than twice in each calendar quarter.
2. For periods subsequent to the expiration date of the tax whether by City's self-imposed
limits or by final judgment of any court of the State of California holding that City's ordinance is
invalid or void, all district taxes collected under the provisions of the City Ordinance shall be
transmitted to City not less than once in each calendar quarter.
3. Transmittals may be made by mail or electronic funds transfer to an account of the City
designated and authorized by the City. A statement shall be furnished at least quarterly indicating the
amounts withheld pursuant to Article IV of this Agreement.
D. Rules. The Board shall prescribe and adopt such rules and regulations as in its judgment
are necessary or desirable for the administration and operation of the City Ordinance and the
distribution of the district taxes collected thereunder.
E. Preference. Unless the payor instructs otherwise, and except as otherwise provided in this
Agreement, the Board shall give no preference in applying money received for state sales and use
taxes, state-administered local sales and use taxes, and district transactions and use taxes owed by a
taxpayer, but shall apply moneys collected to the satisfaction of the claims of the State, cities, counties,
cities and counties, redevelopment agencies, other districts, and City as their interests appear.
Rev. 1/05 2
Page 290 of 324
F. Security. The Board agrees that any security which it hereafter requires to be furnished by
taxpayers under the State Sales and Use Tax Law will be upon such terms that it also will be available
for the payment of the claims of City for district taxes owing to it as its interest appears. The Board
shall not be required to change the terms of any security now held by it, and City shall not participate in
any security now held by the Board.
G. Records of the Board.
When requested by resolution of the legislative body of the City under section 7056 of the
Revenue and Taxation Code, the Board agrees to permit authorized personnel of the City to examine
the records of the Board, including the name, address, and account number of each seller holding a
seller's permit with a registered business location in the City, pertaining to the ascertainment of
transactions and use taxes collected for the City. Information obtained by the City from examination of
the Board's records shall be used by the City only for purposes related to the collection of transactions
and use taxes by the Board pursuant to this Agreement.
H. Annexation. City agrees that the Board shall not be required to give effect to an
annexation, for the purpose of collecting, allocating, and distributing District transactions and use
taxes, earlier than the first day of the calendar quarter which commences not less than two months after
notice to the Board. The notice shall include the name of the county or counties annexed to the
extended City boundary. [n the event the City shall annex an area, the boundaries of which are not
coterminous with a county or counties, the notice shall include a description of the area annexed and
two maps of the City showing the area annexed and the location address of the property nearest to the
extended City boundary on each side of every street or road crossing the boundary.
ARTICLE III
ALLOCA T[ON OF TAX
A. Allocation. In the administration of the Board's contracts with all districts that impose
transactions and use taxes imposed under ordinances, which comply with Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the
Revenue and Taxation Code:
Rev. 1105 3
Page 291 of 324
J. Any payment not identified as being in payment of liability owing to a designated
district or districts may be apportioned among the districts as their interest appear, or, in the discretion
of the Board, to all districts with which the Board has contracted using ratios reflected by the
distribution of district taxes collected from all taxpayers.
2. All district taxes collected as a result of determinations or billings made by the Board,
and all amounts refunded or credited may be distributed or charged to the respective districts in the
same ratio as the taxpayer's self-declared district taxes fo'r the period for which the determination,
billing, refund or credit applies.
B. Vehicles, Vessels, and Aircraft. For the purpose of allocating use tax with respect to
vehicles, vessels, or aircraft, the address of the registered owner appearing on the application for
registration or on the certificate of ownership may be used by the Board in determining the place of
use.
ARTICLE IV
COMPENSA nON
The City agrees to pay to the Board as the Board's cost of administering the City Ordinance
such amount as is provided for by law. Such amounts shall be deducted from the taxes collected by the
Board for the City.
ARTICLE V
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
A. Communications. Communications and notices may be sent by first class United States
mail to the addresses listed below, or to such other addresses, as the parties may from time to time
designate. A notification is complete when deposited in the mail.
Rev. 1/05 4
Page 292 of 324
Communications and notices to be sent to the Board shall be addressed to:
State Board of Equalization
P.O. Box 942879
Sacramento, California 94279-0073
Attention: Executive Director
Communication~ and notices to be sent to the City shall be addressed to:
Citv of Arrovo Grande
P.O. Box 550
Arrovo Grande. California 93421
Attention: Citv Manager
Unless otherwise directed, transmittals of payment of District transactions and use taxes
will he sent to the address above.
B. Term. The date of this Agreement is the date on which it is approved by the Department of
General Services. The Agreement shall take effect on April I. 2007. This Agreement shall continue
until December 3 I next following the expiration date of the City Ordinance, and shall thereafter be
renewed automatically from year to year until the Board completes all work necessary to the
administration of the City Ordinance and has received and disbursed all payments due under that
Ordinance.
C. Notice of Repeal of Ordinance. City shall give the Board written notice of the repeal of
the City Ordinance not less than 110 days prior to the operative date of the repeal.
Rev ]/05 5
Page 293 of 324
ARTICLE VI
ADMINISTRA TION OF TAXES IF THE
ORDINANCE IS CHALLENGED AS BEING INVALID
A. Impoundment of funds.
1. When a legal action is begun challenging the validity of the imposition of the tax, the
City shall deposit in an interest-bearing escrow account, any proceeds transmitted to it under
Article II. c., until a court of competent jurisdiction renders a final and non-appealable judgment that
the tax is valid.
2. If the tax is determined to' be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the City shall
transmit to the Board the moneys retained in escrow, including any accumulated interest, within ten
days of the judgment of the trial court in the litigation awarding costs and fees becoming final and non-
appealable.
B. Costs of administration. Should a final judgment be entered in any court of the State of
Cali fornia, holding that City's Ordinance is invalid or void, and requiring a rebate or refund to
taxpayers of any taxes collected under the terms of this Agreement, the parties mutually agree that:
I. Board may retain all payments made by City to Board to prepare to administer the City
Ordinance.
2. City will pay to Board and allow Board to retain Board's cost of administering the City
Ordinance in the amounts set forth in Article IV of this Agreement.
3. City will pay to Board or to the State of Cali fomi a the amount of any taxes plus interest
and penalties, if any, that Board or the State of California may be required to rebate or refund to
taxpayers.
Rev. 1105 6
Page 294 of 324
4. City will pay to Board its costs for rebating or refunding such taxes, interest, or
penalties, Board's costs shall include its additional cost for developing procedures for processing the
rebates or refunds, its costs of actually making these refunds, designing and printing forms, and
developing instructions for Board's staff for use in making these rebates or refunds and any other costs
incurred by Board which are reasonably appropriate or necessary to make those rebates or refunds.
These costs shall include Board's direct and indirect costs as specified by Section 11256 of the
Government Code,
5. Costs may be accounted for in a manner, which conforms to the internal accounting, and
personnel records currently maintained by the Board. The billings for such costs may be presented in
summary form, Detailed records will be retained for audit and verification by City.
6. Any dispute as to the amount of costs incurred by Board in refunding taxes shall 'be
referred to the State Director of Finance for resolution and the Director's decision shall be final.
7. Costs incurred by Board in connection with such refunds shall be billed by Board on or
before the 25th day of the second month following the month in which the judgment of a court of the
State of California holding City's Ordinance invalid or void becomes final. Thereafter Board shall bill
City on or before the 25th of each month for all costs incurred by Board for the preceding calendar
month. City shall pay to Board the amount of such costs on or before the last day of the succeeding
month and shall pay to Board the total amount of taxes, interest, and penalties refunded or paid to
taxpayers, together with Board costs incurred in making those refunds.
CITY OF STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
By By
Signature)Executive Director)
Steven Adams
Typed Name)
Citv Manager
Title)
Rev 1/05 7
Page 295 of 324
OFFICIAL CERTIFICATION
I, KELLY WETMORE, City Clerk of the City of Arroyo Grande, County of San Luis
Obispo, State of California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the attached
Resolution No. 3979 is a true, full, and correct copy of said Resolution passed and
adopted at a special meeting of the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande on the 11 th
day of December 2006.
WITNESS my hand and the Seal of the City of Arroyo Grande affixed this 14th day of
December 2006.
N---
RE, CITY CLERK
Page 296 of 324
Local Government Guide to California Sales, Use and Transaction Tax
AUGUST 2021
ATTACHMENT 3
Page 297 of 324
Page 298 of 324
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Overview....................................................................................................01
NEXUS ........................................................................................................03
Allocation of Sales Tax ............................................................................05
Distribution of Local Sales and Use Tax
From Online Retail Purchases ...............................................................09
Allocation of Use Tax ..............................................................................11
Transactions Tax .......................................................................................15
CDTFA Fees and Charges.......................................................................17
CDTFA Updated Distribution ................................................................19
Confidentiality Standards .......................................................................20
Sales Tax Participation Agreements .....................................................22
Page 299 of 324
1
OVERVIEW
SALES, USE AND TRANSACTIONS TAXES
STATE GENERAL FUND (3.9375%)
The state first imposed a sales tax in 1933 at a rate of 2.5% in response to
the downturn in revenues resulting from the Great Depression. The tax was
assessed on retailers only for statewide purposes, including education. In
1935, California added the ‘use tax‘, to protect retailers in the state from
tax-free, out-of-state competition. In subsequent years, cities began to
impose their own sales tax, each with different taxable items and reporting
requirements. In response to merchant complaints, the state legislature in
1955, adopted a uniform local tax to be administered only by the state. The
uniform tax must be levied countywide and individual cities cannot levy the
tax unless it has been first adopted by the county in which the city is located.
Local agencies are preempted from adopting or administering their own
(Revenue and Tax Code Section 7203.5 footnote 1968).
LOCAL GENERAL FUND BRADLEY BURNS (1.0%)
One percent of the 1¼% Bradley-Burns local tax is distributed to local
agencies to support local government needs. As a city cannot adopt the tax
unless first adopted by the county as a countywide tax, some counties retain
a portion of the one-percent rate. City rates in those counties range from
0.70% to 0.995%.
COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION FUND (0.25%)
One-quarter cent of the 1¼% Bradley-Burns local tax levy is allocated to
each county’s regional transportation fund.
California Sales and Use Tax Rates
State General Fund 3.9375%
Local General Fund (Bradley-Burns)1.00%
Countywide Transportation Fund 0.25%
County Realignment for Mental Health/
Welfare/ Public Safety Services 1.5625%
Public Safety Augmentation Fund 0.50%
Total 7.25%
Transactions and Use Tax Districts
(Maximum Rate Per County)2.00%
Total 9.25%*
* The maximum transactions and use tax rate of 2% does not
account for authorizations by the state legislature for individual
counties or cities to put new district tax measures before their vot-
ers. Therefore, total tax rate maximums exceed 9.25% in portions
of Alameda, Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Monterey, San Mateo, and
Sonoma Counties and in some transportation agencies.
Page 300 of 324
2
COUNTY REALIGNMENT FOR MENTAL HEALTH/WELFARE/PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES (1.5625%)
In 1991, the state transferred approximately $2.2 Billion in health,
mental health and social service costs to counties. In exchange,
the state provided ½ cent of its sales tax and a portion of dedicated
vehicle license fee. The monies are allocated to counties based on
the level of financing prior to realignment and growth on a number
of factors that include caseload, population and poverty. In 2011,
the state adopted a Public Safety Realignment Initiative to comply
with court order requiring reductions in state prison overcrowding.
The initiative shifted non-violent prisoners with less serious felonies
to county jails. In exchange for taking the prisoners and the related
probation, health, legal and counseling responsibilities, the state
provided counties with 1.0625% of its sales tax plus a portion of
its vehicle license fees. The monies are allocated by formulas using
caseload, jail population and special factors such as poverty.
PUBLIC SAFETY AUGMENTATION FUND (0.50%)
In 1992, the State of California instructed county auditors to shift
a portion of local property tax revenues from local governments
to schools. Additional transfers to the Educational Revenue
Augmentation Fund (ERAF) were made in 1993-94. To offset the
losses, voters approved a ½% public safety tax that is distributed to
counties based on the percentage of statewide tax generated by their
county in the prior calendar year. The counties share approximately
5% of the revenues with cities within their jurisdiction that were
impacted by the ERAF transfers.
TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX DISTRICTS
In many jurisdictions, additional sales and use taxes referred to as
‘transactions taxes’ have been authorized. Please see page 17 for
additional information.
STATE ADMINISTRATION OF TAX
Under a reorganization initiated by the Taxpayer Transparency and
Fairness Act of 2017, the California Department of Tax and Fee
Administration (CDTFA), is now responsible for administration of sales,
use and transactions taxes, fuel, tobacco, alcohol and cannabis taxes
and a variety of other charges such as timber yield and environmental
fees. The Board of Equalization which previously administered sales
and use tax revenues, is now primarily responsible for overnight of
uniform property assessment practices, assessment of railroad and
utility properties and administration of insurance taxes.
Local governments are charged for their portion of shared and direct costs which are calculated annually and based on each jurisdiction’s ratio of sales tax generation. The estimated fees are deducted from the quarterly tax distributions with a year-end ‘true up’ to match
actual costs.
A separate Office of Tax Appeals (OTA) that is independent of the
state’s tax agencies, is responsible for conducting and deciding
appeals of sales and use tax assessments as well as appeals related to
personal income taxes and franchise fees. The appeals are heard and
decided by three-member panels of administrative law judges.
2Page 301 of 324
3
NEXUS
In June 2018, the United States Supreme Court overturned two
previous rulings, the first in 1967 (National Bellas Hess Inc. v.
Department of Revenue of Illinois, 386 U.S. 753 (1967)) and the
other (Quill Corp v. North Dakota (1992)) which had freed retailers
from collecting and remitting taxes for states or local jurisdictions
where they had no physical presence even though the buyer then
became responsible for paying a corresponding “use tax.” The
2018 reversal was an acknowledgement that the impracticality
and costs of tracking use tax for individual online shopping
purchases was diminishing local tax revenues and creating an
unfair competitive disadvantage for local retailers.
As a result of the South Dakota v Wayfair Inc. 585 U.S. (2018)
decision, the State of California amended Revenue and Taxation
code section 6203 which effective April 1, 2019, requires out-
of-state retailers with total annual combined sales of tangible
personal property of $500,000 or more delivered into California,
to collect and remit this state’s sales and use taxes. Further,
Revenue and Taxation code section 7262 now requires that all
retailers with statewide sales of $500,000 or more, collect and
remit voter approved transaction district taxes for every agency
imposing such a tax regardless of the level of sales within the
individual district.
California also adopted Revenue and Taxation code sections
6040-6049.5 which effective October 1, 2019, requires
Marketplace Facilitators such as Amazon, eBay and Google to
assume the obligation for collecting and remitting the sales
and use taxes for third party retailers who contract with the
facilitator to provide sales related services. These include:
payment processing, fulfillment or storage services, setting of
prices, taking orders, providing customer service or assisting
with returns or exchanges. The $500,000 threshold applies
to the sum total of all third-party transactions that the
Marketplace Facilitator processes for its clients.
Buyers who purchase merchandise from out-of-state
retailers with less than $500,000 in annual statewide sales
who do not voluntarily collect and remit the tax, continue
to be responsible for paying a corresponding “use tax” on
the purchase. Payments are made directly to the CDTFA or
included with the buyer’s state income tax returns.
Page 302 of 324
444Page 303 of 324
5
ALLOCATION OF SALES TAX
Sales tax from the Bradley-Burns levy is allocated back to the
jurisdiction where the sale was negotiated or the order was
taken. The responsibility for collecting and remitting California’s
sales and use tax is imposed upon retailers engaged in business
in this state who sell or rent tangible personal property. The
seller is responsible for the tax but is entitled to recover it from
the customer at the time of sale.
Sales tax does not apply to the sale of real property, or to
services that do not result in a finished product. In addition,
some products are specifically exempt from the sales and use
tax. Some of the more prominent exemptions include food
purchased for home consumption, goods purchased for resale,
prescription medicine, aircraft used by common carriers, utilities
and goods sold to the federal government.
A corresponding “use” tax is imposed upon the storage, use or
consumption of tangible personal property brought from outside
California. The buyer is ultimately responsible for the payment
of the use tax although it is often collected by the seller for
customer convenience. Most receipts from use tax and some
transactions where the “place of sale” are difficult to track are
placed in a county or state allocation pool and distributed back
to local jurisdictions on a pro rata basis.
WHAT CONSTITUTES “PLACE OF SALE”
In order to qualify as a place of sale under the Bradley-Burns
California Sales and Use Tax Law, certain criteria must be met:
• The location must hold a valid seller’s permit with the
California Department of Tax and Fee Administration.
• The location must be the retailer’s permanent place of
business in this state.
• The employees permanently assigned to the location
must participate in the sale by doing one of the following:
– Maintaining a stock of goods available for sale
– Negotiating sales
– Accepting orders
Page 304 of 324
6
SERVICES
Services are only taxable if they are a part of the sale or if the true
object of the transaction is considered to be the sale of tangible
personal property. Examples include:
• Repairs if the retail value of the parts and materials is
more than 10% of the total charge
• Engineering and maintenance contracts if those services
are a mandatory component of the sales transaction
• Sales of printed matter
SPECIAL ALLOCATION PROCEDURES
Leases and Rentals
The tax on long-term lease payments is normally distributed
through the countywide use tax allocation pools. The exception
is leases for passenger vehicles which are allocated back to
the jurisdiction where the vehicle was purchased and the lease
negotiated. Short term rentals (30 days or less) of cars, tools,
equipment, etc. are allocated to the jurisdiction where the
merchandise was rented.
6Page 305 of 324
7
SPECIAL ALLOCATION PROCEDURES (CONTINUED)
Out-of-State Purchases
The use tax on goods located outside California for transactions
exceeding $500,000 in value are allocated to the jurisdiction of
first functional use. The tax on out-of-state transactions under
$500,000 is allocated via the countywide allocation pools.
Merchandise that is shipped “FOB Destination” (title passes when
the customer receives the goods at a location inside California) is
subject to sales tax, not use tax. If the order is placed to an out-of-
state order desk or call center but the retailer holds the inventory in
California, the jurisdiction from where the in-state merchandise is
shipped receives the tax allocation. If an order is placed to an out-
of-state order desk or sales office but the merchandise is shipped
from a stock of goods in California that is owned or controlled by
the seller, the warehouse becomes the place of sale.
Food to Go
Prepared meals to go are generally taxable but items sold at coffee,
juice, yogurt and ice cream stores are not normally considered
prepared meals and are not taxable unless served in combination
with a prepared hot food. However, exempt items that are
combined with non-exempt items and priced as a combination
package are taxable.
Jet Fuel Sales
The sales tax on jet fuel is generally allocated to the jurisdiction
where the fuel is pumped into the aircraft.
Construction Contracts of $5 Million or More
Generally, construction contractors are required to report the
local use tax on materials consumed and the local sales tax on
fixtures furnished and installed. The amount is reported using the
Schedule B Form which contains a separate line for each county
throughout California. The taxpayer enters the local tax amount
attributable to each construction project on the corresponding
county line according to the location of the job site. This results in
the indirect distribution of the tax through the countywide pools.
In December of 1994, State Board of Equalization (now CDTFA)
adopted a resolution allowing for the direct distribution of the
local sales and use tax to the local jurisdiction of the construction
site for certain qualifying contracts. Under the resolution, a sub-
contractor who enters into a construction contract equal to or
greater than $5 million may elect to obtain a sub-permit for the
jobsite. To receive the maximum benefit, the permit should be
taken out before construction begins and participation is limited
to the installing contractor or subcontractor.
To qualify, the participating sub-contractor must already hold a
valid seller’s permit, be currently registered with the CDTFA as a
contractor and have an individual contract over $5 million. The
$5 million does not apply to the prime contract but rather to the
individual contract with the sub-contractor.
Page 306 of 324
8
SALES TAX EXEMPTIONS
When sales tax was first imposed in 1933, the only exemptions to the tax were gold bullion, utility services and goods sold to the
federal government. Since then, the state has continued to expand the number of exemptions while raising the overall rate to
offset the revenue losses. Approximately 70% of the $11 billion in lost revenues is related to food sold for home consumption and
prescription medicine and devices.
A complete list of exemptions is provided in California Department of Tax and Fee Administration’s Publication 61 and can be
downloaded at: http://www.cdtfa.ca.gov/formspubs/pub61.pdf
• Animals sold for human consumption
• Artworks purchased for a museum
• Catalogs, flyers and junk mailers
• Bulk coin and medal collections
• Common carrier aircraft and supplies
• Containers and labels to be resold as part of the product
• Custom computer programs
• Goods made by charitable organizations
• Wine-making industry
• Food sold for home preparation and consumption
• Fuel for propeller driven aircraft (jet fuel is taxable)
• Gas, electricity and water
• Motion picture products
• Occasional sales other than vessels, aircraft and vehicles
• Prescription medicine and devices
• Periodicals sold by subscription
• Seeds, plants, fertilizer and feed used to raise food for
human consumption
• Telegraph and telephone lines
• Trucks, trailers, railroad cars and watercraft used for
interstate commerce
• Sales to the federal government
8Page 307 of 324
9
DISTRIBUTION OF LOCAL
SALES AND USE TAX FROM
ONLINE RETAIL PURCHASES
The number of options that consumers now have
in how they select, pay and take possession of
merchandise has created new challenges in properly
allocating local sales and/or use tax.
The place of sales and use tax for purposes of Bradley-
Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax is outlined
in CDTFA Regulations 1802 and 1699. Generally, if
the merchandise is inventoried and delivered from
within California, the tax goes to the jurisdiction
where the order was placed or if there is no in-state
order desk, to the jurisdiction where the merchandise
is inventoried. If the merchandise is inventoried and
delivered from out of state, the tax is allocated via the
county pools except for transactions over $500,000,
which are allocated to the jurisdiction of first delivery.
The following describes the various scenarios that
determine where the local tax from online sales is
allocated.
9 Page 308 of 324
10
GUIDELINES FOR ALLOCATION OF LOCAL TAX – ONLINE AND IN-STORE
Place of Sale Location of Goods at the Time of Sale
How Customer Receives Goods Allocation of Tax
Online – Order is
placed or downloaded
outside California
California Fulfillment
Center
Shipped to
Customer from
California Location
Local tax is allocated to the jurisdiction in which
the fulfillment center is located
Online – Order is
placed or downloaded
in California
California Fulfillment
Center
Shipped to
Customer from
California Location
Per CDTFA Regulation 1802, local tax is allocated
to the jurisdiction where the order is placed
Online Out of State
Fulfillment Center
Shipped to
California Customer
Local tax is allocated to the countywide pool based
on point of delivery
Online Out of State
Fulfillment Center
Picked Up In-Store
(Click & Collect)
Local tax is allocated to the countywide pool based
on point of delivery
Online
In-Store (Goods
withdrawn from
store inventory)
Shipped to
California Customer
Local Tax is allocated to the jurisdiction where
the store is located
Online
In-Store (Goods
withdrawn from
store inventory)
Picked Up In-Store
(Click & Collect)
Local Tax is allocated to the jurisdiction where
the store is located
In-Store
In-Store (Goods
withdrawn from
store inventory)
In-Store Local Tax is allocated to the jurisdiction where
the store is located
10Page 309 of 324
11
ALLOCATION OF USE TAX
GENERAL BACKGROUND
Use tax was first imposed in 1935 to protect California retailers by
discouraging buying from out-of-state to avoid the state sales tax.
Accordingly, consumers who purchase tangible personal property
from out-of-state are liable for use tax at a rate equivalent to their
local sales tax including transactions taxes if applicable. Use tax is
also imposed on the storage, use, lease or other consumption of
tangible personal property any time a sales tax has not been paid
by the retailer.
ALLOCATION BY STATE AND COUNTY POOLS
Use tax is the responsibility of the buyer rather than the seller and
does not involve a California “place of sale.” Therefore, a pooling
system was devised to distribute the local share. It is also used to
distribute any sales tax that cannot be easily tied to a permanent
place of sale. Under the pool concept, the tax is first coded to
the county of use and then distributed to each jurisdiction in that
county on a pro rata share of taxable sales each quarter. An agency
generating 8% of the county’s total taxable sales receives 8% of the
pool. If the county of use cannot be identified, the allocation goes
to the state pool for pro rata distribution on a statewide basis.
Page 310 of 324
12
Approximately 12% - 15% of a local jurisdiction’s total sales and use tax revenues are derived from their share of the
countywide pools. Major contributions to the countywide pool include:
• Private party sales of vehicles, mobile homes, vessels
and aircraft registered at DMV.
• Online and other purchases where the merchandise is
shipped to the customer from out of state.
• Sales that include installation of the goods at the
customer’s site.
• Long term leases of equipment and other tangible
personal property for 30 days or more.
• Use tax on purchases or inventory or tools and
equipment fabricated and consumed or used at facilities
not registered as sales locations.
• Catering trucks, itinerant vendors, vending machine
operators and other permit holders who are unable to
readily tie transactions to specific jurisdictions.
• Use tax on consumption of equipment or supplies taken
out of inventory or fabricated on-site at a location that
is not qualified to be registered as a sales location.
STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
Brick & Mortar vs.
Online Sales of General
Consumer Goods
Local 1% Sales Tax by
Calendar Year
Page 311 of 324
13
ALLOCATION BASED ON PLACE OF USE
A number of changes have been implemented since 1995 that
allow some of the use tax revenue previously shared through
the pool to be directly allocated to the jurisdiction of use. The
changes are as follows.
Construction Projects
Generally, contractors or subcontractors who make
improvements to real property and make sales of fixtures are
required to hold a seller’s permit. Local tax generated by the
sale or use of tangible personal property is allocated to the
countywide use tax pool based on the location of the job site.
Contractors often elect to pay tax at the time they purchase the
material to avoid obtaining a seller’s permit and filing quarterly
returns. Contractors who issue bids on a “lump sum” basis only
(separate amounts not stated for labor and materials) cannot
hold a permit and there will be no direct allocation of local tax.
(CPPM, Chapter 2, 260.020)
Contractors and sub-contractors who have an individual
contract over $5 million and meet certain criteria may elect
to obtain a construction site sub-permit which allows for the
allocation of local tax directly to the jurisdiction where the
jobsite is located. For more information, please see “Special
Allocation Procedures” on page 8.
Page 312 of 324
14
Vehicle Leases
Effective January 1, 1996, the local portion of use tax on leases
of new cars and light trucks purchased from California dealers is
allocated directly to the jurisdiction of the new car dealer where
the leasing company acquired the vehicle. It is the leasing
institution and not the auto dealer that collects and remits the
use tax. (Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7205.1)
Auctions Events of $500,000 or More
Auctions held away from an auctioneer’s place of business that
result in taxable sales of $500,000 or more in the aggregate for
the auction event are now to be reported directly to the locality
where the auction is held. (CDTFA Regulation 1802 (a) (4))
Use Tax Purchases Exceeding $500,000
Since July 1, 1996, taxpayers that are required to be registered
with the CDTFA and who make sales or purchases of $500,000
or more that are delivered from out of state are required to
report the local 1% tax to the jurisdiction of first functional use.
The rule does not apply to vendors who are not required to
register with the CDTFA but do so voluntarily.
Direct Payment Permits
Effective January 1, 1998, cities and counties are authorized
to take out a direct payment permit and issue a use tax
exemption certificate to out-of-state vendors and lessors
(except lessors of new vehicles). The certificate exempts
the vendor or lessor from collecting use tax and allows the
purchasing entity to “self-assess” and pay the use tax on its
quarterly tax return. The local portion of the tax (1%) is then
allocated to the location of the jurisdiction registered on the
direct payment permit.
Additionally, private sector taxpayers have the option of
applying for a direct payment permit if they make $500,000
or more in cumulative leases or purchases subject to use tax
during the 12 months preceding the application. In addition
to directing 100% of the local use tax to the local jurisdiction,
the vendor exemption and self-payment procedure simplifies
the tax accrual and payment process for some taxpayers.
(Revenue and Taxation Code 7051.3, CDTFA Regulation
1699.6)
Page 313 of 324
15
TRANSACTIONS TAX
As of April 1, 2021, there were 375 transactions and use tax
districts in California. Of these, 62 are countywide district taxes,
310 citywide district taxes, and 3 unincorporated area district
taxes.
The numbers change frequently due to newly approved or
recently expired districts. New transactions taxes are being
added with almost every election cycle. The taxes are used
to finance a variety of needs including public safety services,
local hospitals, road repairs and capital projects. More than
90% of the state’s population currently reside in one or more
transactions and use tax districts.
As with other California taxes, a transactions and use tax district
must obtain a majority vote for general purposes and two-thirds
vote if for specific purposes. However, a 1988 court decision
found a Santa Clara County District that specified that the
revenues could be spent for general county purposes required
only a majority vote despite the passage of a related advisory
measure stating the voters’ intent that the revenues be spent on
specific projects. (Coleman vs. County of Santa Clara (64 Cal. App
4th 662))
The maximum transactions and use tax rate of 2% does not
account for authorizations by the state legislature for individual
counties or cities to put new district tax measures before their
voters. Therefore, total tax rate maximums exceed 9.25% in
portions of Alameda, Contra Costa, Los Angeles and San Mateo
Counties. The pertinent provisions of the California Revenue and
Taxation Code are Sections 7251.1, 7285.9 – 7285.92, 7285 –
7285.5 and 7292.
For a current listing of transactions tax rates, please visit:
https://www.cdtfa.ca.gov/formspubs/cdtfa95.pdf
15 Page 314 of 324
16
HOW THE TAX IS DISTRIBUTED
With the exception of certain goods sold to common carriers,
the transactions and use tax is imposed on the same goods and
merchandise as the local sales and use tax. However, where the
Bradley-Burns Sales and Use Tax is generally allocated to the
jurisdiction where the sale is negotiated or the order is taken,
the transactions and use tax is allocated to the district where
the goods are delivered or placed into use.
IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES AND RESOURCES
Cities and counties are required to contract with the California
Department of Tax and Fee Administration for administration of
the ordinance imposing the tax. There are two contracts. One is
for setting up the tax; the second is for ongoing administration.
Additionally, as the transactions and use tax is separate and
distinct from the local sales and use tax, a separate Resolution of
Confidentiality for access to the allocation data is required.
Agencies contemplating a transactions and use tax should
begin by contacting the California Department of Tax and
Fee Administration Local Revenue Allocation Section.
A team has been established to assist cities with the
preparatory functions for placing a proposal on the ballot
including proper wording of the ordinance and subsequent
contracts. The specific advisor is currently Olivia Siu. She
can be reached at 916.322.2563. In addition, Publication
28, Tax Information for City and County Officials and
Publication 44, Tax Tips for District Taxes, contain related
information and can be downloaded from the California
Department of Tax and Fee Administration’s website at
www.cdtfa.ca.gov.
Finally, California Constitution Article XIII C should be
reviewed with Agency Counsel to determine whether or not
a specific tax proposal being contemplated falls under the
requirements for consolidation with a regularly scheduled
general election for members of the governing body.
16Page 315 of 324
17
CDTFA FEES AND CHARGES
ADMINISTRATION AND DISTRIBUTION
The CDTFA charges local governments for their share of the
administration and distribution of local taxes. For Bradley-Burns,
the local governments’ collective share of direct, shared and
central overhead costs are calculated annually and charged to
each jurisdiction based on their ratio of sales tax generation. The
estimated fees are deducted from the quarterly tax distributions
with a year-end true-up to match local costs. In 2018, the
quarterly fees averaged 1.1891%.
The costs of local imposed transactions tax levies are also charged
quarterly but calculated individually and based on the individual
jurisdictions actual audit activity and state workload factors. The
fees are capped at 5% of gross collections for tax rates of less
than 0.25%, 3% for tax rates of less than 0.5% and 1.5% for tax
rates of 0.5% or more.
PENALTIES
For late returns or late payments, there is a penalty of 10% of the
total amount due.
INTEREST
Late payments are subject to interest. Interest is due for each
month or fraction of a month the tax payment is overdue.
COLLECTION COST RECOVERY FEE
The CRF (Collection Cost Recovery Fee) applies to each final
billing greater than $250 that remains unpaid more than 90
days after the date a demand notice is issued. The CRF applies
only after the CDTFA has mailed a demand notice to that
person requiring payment.
NEGLIGENCE OR FRAUD
An additional 25% penalty will apply (in addition to the 10%) if
the CDTFA finds that the tax was not reported due to fraud or
intent to evade the laws.
NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
If CDTFA staff notes an additional amount is due, the taxpayer will
receive a Notice of Determination. The notice will include interest,
penalty and CRF (if applicable). An additional 10% penalty will
apply to the amount unless the taxpayer files a timely appeal.
LATE TAX PREPAYMENTS
A 6% penalty will apply if a prepayment is made after the
prepayment due date but before the due date for the quarterly
return. The penalty increases to 10% if it is determined that
the prepayment was late due to neglect or willful disregard.
Interest does not apply to the prepayment as long as the tax is
paid by the due date for the quarter return.
Page 316 of 324
18
FAILURE TO TIMELY PAY SALES TAX REIMBURSEMENT OR
USE TAX COLLECTED FROM CUSTOMERS
A 40% penalty may be applied if a taxpayer collects sales and use
tax but fails to pay it to the CDTFA.
IMPROPER USE OF A RESALE CERTIFICATE
If there is improper use of a resale certificate, the transaction may
by subject to interest, fines between $1,000 and $5,000 and a
penalty of $500 per transaction or 10% of the tax due, whichever
is higher.
LOCAL JURISDICTION SHARE
The local jurisdiction receives their pro rata share of the interest
and penalties after they have been collected by the CDTFA.
RELIEF FROM PENALTIES, INTEREST AND CRF
The CDTFA may grant relief from interest, penalties and CRF
under limited circumstances that include:
• Reliance on erroneous written advice from CDTFA staff
• Late returns/payments as the result of a disaster or
public calamity
• Extensions of time
• Circumstances beyond the taxpayer’s control
Page 317 of 324
19
All cities and counties received notification from the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) regarding their
new Centralized Revenue Opportunity System (CROS), updated allocation methodology and new payment calendar.
As part of this change, CDTFA will be combining the (previous) 3rd monthly advance with the clean-up payment so agencies will
receive their clean-up payments one month earlier.
ALLOCATION CALENDAR
Below is the anticipated new allocation schedule:
CDTFA FEES AND CHARGES
1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter
Sales Period Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Advance/Clean-
Up Payments 27%46%27%27%46%27%27%46%27%27%46%27%
Clean-up Dates
(Approx.)
22-
Feb
20-
May
23-
Aug
19-
Nov
Remittance Dates
(Approx.)
20-
Jan
22-
Feb
19-
Mar
21-
Apr
20-
May
21-
Jun
21-
Jul
23-
Aug
21-
Sept
20-
Oct
19-
Nov
21-
Dec
Page 318 of 324
20
CONFIDENTIALITY STANDARDS
FOLLOWING THE RULES
Sales tax data is required to be kept confidential by Revenue and
Taxation Code Section 7056. Thus, it is unlawful for any person
who obtains access to sales and use tax records, to make known
in any manner the information disclosed on any [tax] return,
including any abstract thereof. Accordingly, a local agency may
not disclose amounts of tax paid, whether tax amounts are up or
down from a prior period, or any other information that would
reveal the business affairs or operations of a business.
Though confidential by law, sales and use tax information can
be used by local government officials if the use is “related to
collection of local sales and use taxes” or “related to other
governmental functions of the county, city and county, or city.”
Permit administrators, finance or revenue managers, economic
development staff, community development personnel, and
business license officials can benefit from access to local
sales and use tax allocation information. However, only
those positions or individuals authorized by resolution of the
governing body (City Council or Board of Supervisors) may have
access to confidential data and each person so authorized is
required to abide by the provisions of Revenue and Taxation
Code Section 7056.
Page 319 of 324
21
COMBINED INFORMATION MAY BE DISCLOSED
Sales tax payments for groups of businesses may be revealed to the
general public if the so-called “gang of four” and “80%” rules are followed.
This rule allows combined data for four or more businesses to be
released as long as no single member of the group is the source of a
disproportionate percentage, defined herein as 80%, of the group total.
The “group” may be defined as businesses in the same shopping center, a
specific business type such as new auto sellers, or businesses sharing the
same major business group.
• The “gang of four” rule must be four separate businesses with
individual sellers’ permit numbers. For example, if the group
includes four outlets and two of the outlets are sub-outlets
under the same sellers’ permit number then those two outlets
are counted as one toward the overall “gang of four” rule.
• A business with a current allocation that has since closed its
sellers’ permit cannot be counted toward the “gang of four” rule.
• A new business with an active sellers’ permit that has yet to
commence reporting sales cannot be counted toward the “gang
of four” rule.
• If the total amount for a particular group is negative that group
cannot be disclosed.
Pursuant to an Executive Order signed by Governor
Wilson in April 1994, it is also possible to publish a list
of the top sales tax generators if all of the following
conditions are met:
• At least 25 retailers are included.
• Businesses are presented in random or
alphabetical order. Businesses are not ranked
by amount paid.
• Sales or use tax amounts are omitted.
CONFIDENTIALITY STANDARDS
Page 320 of 324
22
SALES TAX PARTICIPATION AGREEMENTS
SHARING BY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
Article VIII, Section 29 of the California Constitution
authorizes local agencies to share the apportionment of sales
and use tax with each other if the governing bodies of the
participating agencies approve the agreement by a two-
thirds vote. Additionally, some cities enter into tax sharing
agreements with their county by reducing their portion of the
1.0% levy so that the difference defaults to the county.
California Government Code Section 53084 places
restrictions on financial assistance to vehicle dealers
relocating from another jurisdiction within 40 drive miles
or to big box retailers of greater than 75,000 sq. ft. that are
relocating from another jurisdiction within 25 drive miles.
Previous case law includes warehouse fulfillment centers that
primarily sell over the internet in the definition of a big box
retailer (City of Carson v. City of La Mirada No B168849, 05
C.D.O.S 52 DJDAR 75,12/30/2004).
California Government code Section 53084.5 further
prohibits any tax sharing agreement that results in a reduction
of revenues received by another agency if the subsidized
retailer continues to maintain a physical presence in the
losing jurisdiction. This section does not prevent rebates of
use tax or tax sharing agreements between local agencies.
REPORTING REQUIREMENT
Government Code Section 53083 requires specific analysis of
economic development subsidies exceeding $100,000 as well as
advance public notice and hearings. Additional reports and hearings
are required during the term and at the conclusion of the subsidies.
Consideration of tax sharing agreements that will result in a
reduction in the amount of revenue received by another local agency
must be preceded by notification by certified mail to the losing
agency at least 60 days prior to approval by the governing body and
posting of the agreement on the internet website of the agency
considering the agreement at least 30 days prior to approval. (Gov.
Code Section 53084.5)
The Government Accounting Standards Board has also issued GASB
Rule 77 that requires governments to disclose specified information
on sales tax sharing agreements within their financial statements.
Page 321 of 324
Page 322 of 324
ABOUT HdL COMPANIES
Founded in 1983, HdL was established to maximize local government revenues by providing a variety of
financial and compliance audits, analytical services and software solutions. HdL’s team of professionals
are experts in revenue management, delivering high-quality customer service to over 500 agencies
nationwide.
Through deep industry knowledge, HdL has recovered over $3 billion in sales tax revenue and remitted
over $3 billion annually in tax and business license fees for our clients. Support services and software are
available for sales, use and transactions taxes, economic development, property taxes, business license
fees, transient occupancy tax, short-term rental (STR) compliance, rent control, utility users tax, and
cannabis regulation and taxation.
Page 323 of 324
25
Delivering Revenue, Insight and Efficiency to Local Government Since 1983
714.879.5000 • 888.861.0220
hdlcompanies.com
Page 324 of 324