Minutes 2005-02-22
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2005
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 215 EAST BRANCH STREET
ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor/Chair Ferrara called the Regular City CounciVRedevelopment Agency meeting to order at
7:00 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
City CounciVRDA: CounciVBoard Members Dickens, Guthrie, Arnold, Mayor Pro TemlVice
Chair Costello and Mayor/Chair Ferrara were present.
City Staff Present: City Manager Adams, City Attomey Carmel, Director of Administrative
Services/City Clerk Wetmore, Chief of Police TerBorch, Director of
Financial Services Pillow, Director of Public Works/CIty Engineer
Spagnolo, Associate Planner Heffemon, Assistant Planner Foster, and
Planning Intern Andrew Bursan.
1... FLAG !iALUTE
Members of Boy Scout Troop 26 led the Flag Salute.
4. INVOCATION
Jean Bowser, Bahai Faith, delivered the invocation.
5. SPECIAL PRESENTATI,9NS
5.a. Mayor's Commendation Recognizing Larry Sc:hmldt for Outstanding S.....ice and
COntribution. to the City of Arroyo Grande Organization and Community a.
Building Official with the City of Arroyo Grande
Mayor Ferrara presented a Mayor's Commendation to Larry Schmidt for his outstanding service
and contributions to the City of Arroyo Grande as Building Official with the City of Arroyo Grande.
6. AGENDA REVIEW
6.a. Resolution. and Ordinances Read In TItle Only
Council Member Amold moved, Council Member Dickens seconded, and the motion passed
unanimously that all resolutions and ordinances presented at the meeting shall be read in title
only and all further reading be waived.
7. CI"(JZENS'!NPVT, COWlENTS. At.tP SUGGES110NS
Jerrv Bun!n. Govemment Affairs Director, Home Builders Association of the Central Coast,
submitted a letter for the record (on file in the Administrative Services Department) requesting
extra notification beyond what is required by State law to review any documentation concerning
proposed increases to the City's development impact fees.
Garv Andreini, Cafe Andreini, said that word is out that a large well-known coffee retailer was I
interasted in opening. a coffee business in the Village Center. He requested to be notified of any
hearings regarding a request for establishment of a new coffee business in the Village. I
,
I
- _..~_._-
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 22, 2005
PAGE 2
8. CONSEtfT AGENDA
Director of Public Works Spagnolo responded to questions from Mayor Ferrara and Council
Member Dickens regarding Item 8.c. relating to acceptance of easements for Tract 2207, Vista
Del Mar.
Council Member Guthrie moved, and Council Member Dickens seconded the motion to approve
Consent Agenda Items 8.a. through 8.1., with the recommended courses of action. City Attorney
Carmel reed the title of the Ordinance in Item 8.d. The motion carried on the following roll-call
vote:
AYES: Guthrie, Dickens, Arnold, Costello, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
a.a. Cult Dlabursement Ratification.
ActIon: Ratified the listings of cash disbursements for the period February 1, 2005 -
February 15, 2005.
a.b. COnsideration of Statement of Investment Deposits.
ActIon: Received and filed the report of current investment deposits as of January 31,
2005.
a.c. COnsideration of Acceptance of Easements, Right of Way and Public
Improvements for Tract 2207 - Vista Del Mar - JH Land Partnership.
ActIon: 1) Accepted the public improvements, as constructed, that were conditioned for
Tract 2207; 2) Adopted Resolution No. 3812, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City
of Arroyo Granda Accepting Certain Easements, Rights of Way and Related
Improvements within Tract 2207"; 3) Adopted Resolution No. 3813, "A Resolution of the
City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande Accepting Certain Easements, Rights of Way
and Related Improvements Off.site of Tract 2207"; 4) Continue to reject, without
prejudice as to future acceptance, the offer of dedication for road purposes over Lot No.
40; and 4) Accepted the 10% warranty security in the amount of $350,320.40.
8.d. eonslderatlon of Adoption of an Ordinance Amending the ZonIng _ to Rezone
Certain Properties for eonslstency with the General Plan (Development Code
Amendment 040006).
ActIon: Adopted Ordinance No. 564, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of
Arroyo Grande Amending the Zoning Map to Rezone Certain Properties for Consistency
with the General Plan (Development Code Amendment 04-006)".
a.e. COnsideration of Adoption of a Resolution Approving a One-Year TIme extension
for Conditional Use Permit 98-013 and Variance 01-OO1j Camino M.cado and West
Branch Streetj Appllecl for by Stephen Cool.
ActIon: Adopted Resolution No. 3814, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Arroyo Grande Approving a One-Year Time Extension for Conditional Use Permit 99-013
and Variance 01-001; Camino Mercado and West Branch Street; Applied for by Stephen
Coor.
a.f. COnsideration of Adoption of a Resolution Approving a Ona-Year TIme Extension
for Amended COnditional Use Permit 03-004j 1220 Ferroll Avenuej Applied for by
Coastal Chrlatlan School.
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 3815, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Arroyo Granda Approving a One-Year Time Extension for Amended Conditional Use
Permit 03-004; 1220 Farroll Avenue; Applied for by Coastal Christian SchooI".
CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 22, 2005
PAGE 3
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
9.a. COnsideration of Appeal of Planning Commission Interpretation that Auto Parts
Sales Without Installation Services Is not an Allowed Use In the Gntway Mixed-
Use (GMU) Zoning District
Assistant Planner Foster presented the staff report and recommended the Council adopt a
Resolution denying the appeal and upholding the Planning Commission's interpretation that auto
parts sales without installation services is not an allowed use in the Gateway Mixed-Use (GMU)
zoning district.
Mayor Ferrara opened the public hearing.
Johan Scharin, appellant, commented that since purchasing the property approximately two
years ago, he has been able to fill most of the vacant spaces; however, it has been difficult to fill
the ramaining spaces. He sta~ed the building in question has been vacant for five years and
there have been extensive marketing efforts to find a tenant. He commented that as a site for an
auto parts ratailer, this site sits about 200-300 feet back from Grand Avenue and is an in-line
shopping center space, therefore he felt the use was appropriate. He referred to previous
discussions and concems expressed about customers changing oil in the parking lot and
commented that other retailers in the center sell motor oil and felt that should not be a factor to
deny the use. He also commented on the time and money spent to look for an appropriate way
to fill in the retention basin without success; however, they are still willing to work with staff on
this issue to improve the site. He stated that due to the problems with the location and layout of
the center, it was difficult to attract tenants, and tax revenues and rent was being lost. He
commented that constructing another building in the location of the retention basin with the
existing building still vacant would become a burden. He requested the Council consider an auto
parts sales retailer without installation as an acceptable use.
Upon hearing no further public comments, Mayor Ferrara closed the public hearing.
Mayor.Ferrara referred back to an earlier application through which AutoZone wanted to locate
across the street. He recalled that when the Council denied that request, there was a focus on
the issue of service uses adjacent to a retail outlet. He stated that he thought the language
regarding allowable uses along the Gateway segment of Grand Avenue had been updated, and
that auto parts stores would not be allowed in the Gateway section of the City. He said that in
looking at other auto parts stores, working on vehicles after purchasing parts is common
behavior and if it was prohibited, it would be difficult to regulate. He commented that within a
linear mile, there is a line of auto parts stores along Grand Avenue and adding another store in
the middle would not generate additional sales tax, but would divert sales from other stores. He
emphasized the intent for the Gateway segment was to create an environment that welcomes
pedestrian traffic. He acknowledged the appellant's difficulty in attracting tenants; however, he
referred to a recent demographic and marketing study undertaken by the City and said he would
endorse an aggressive campaign to use the study results to assist in attracting more desirable
tenants to this Center. He supported the Planning Commission's interpretation that auto parts
sales without installation services is not an allowed use in the Gateway Mixed-Use (GMU)
Zoning District.
,
,
CITY COUNCIUREOEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 22, 2005
PAGE 4
Council Member Arnold acknowledged the appellanfs difficulties in securing a tenant for this
vacancy; however, he had looked at the center and the specific location and the City's desire to
upgrade this area. He said that allowing an auto parts store into this Center would not achieve
that goal and supported the Planning Commission's interpretation and decision.
Council Member Dickens asked for a status update on the Buxton Company retail study which
was referred to eartier and when the Council would receive the results of the study. City
Manager Adams responded that the study had been completed, a draft list had been prepared,
and staff had engaged in ongoing discussions with the appellant to provide retail contacts from
that list. He stated that staff had received a final list and The Buxton Company is preparing final
information packets to send out to retailers with letters. Additionally, staff was working
independantly with prospective retailers to direct them to this center.
In response to concerns expressed by Council Member Dickens conceming economic impacts,
City Manager Adams stated he would have to analyze the City's Economic Development
Strategy to determine potential economic impacts. Council Member Dickens stated that he had
been opposed to approving an auto parts store when it was proposed across tha street in a new
development facing Grand Avenue. He acknowledged that this situation was differant, with a
vacancy within an existing shopping center set back from Grand Avenue, and that there may be
an obligation to move forward. He said he could not support the Planning Commission's
interpretation and would uphold the appellant's appeal.
Council Member Guthrie commented that when this issue was discussed at the Planning
Commission level, the concems expressed were related to the installation component. He stated
he looked at auto parts sales as any other retail activity; however, he did not see this use as
appropriate on the street frontage where the City was trying to develop a specific pedestrian
oriented streetscape. He commented on mixed use zoning where pacIestrian orientation is
encouraged; however, it also encourages providing certain services adjacent to residential uses.
He supported locating an auto parts store in this area of the City as long as it wasn't located
directly on the street frontage.
Mayor Pro Tem Costello clarified that the issue was whether auto parts sales without installation
services is or is not an allowed use in the Gateway Mixed Use District. He stated that at the
specific location proposed, it was not in the direct line of sight, was not intrusive, and may be a j
good location for tha proposed use. However, he stated if this use was allowed at this location, it
would allowed in other Gateway Mixed Use areas which was not desired. He supported the
Planning Commission's interpretation that auto parts stores without installation is not an allowed
use in the Gateway District; however, he would support making it an allowed use subject to a
Conditional Use Permit. He also asked staff if thera were any mechanisms that could be utilized
to enforce the prohibition of installation activities. City Manager Adams responded that the
Council cOuld adopt an Ordinance prohibiting repair and maintenance of vehicles in commercial j
parking lots, which could then be enforced by the Police Department.
,ei
In response to a question by Council Member Guthrie, staff clarified that there was also a "PED"
zoning designation in the Development Code, which does not permit certain uses in pedestrian ,
oriented storefront locations on ground floors facing E. Grand Avenue. 1
Mayor Pro Tern Costello moved to 1) Adopt a Resolution Denying Appeal 05-002 and Upholding j
the Planning Commission's Interpretation that Auto Parts Sales Without Installation Services is 1
1
;
CITY COUNCIUREOEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 22, 2005
PAGE 5
not an Allowed Use in the Gateway Mixed-Use (GMU) Zoning District; 2) To direct staff to return
to Council with a Development Code Amendment that allows auto parts sales without installation
as an allowable use in the Gateway and Fair Oaks Mixed Use Districts subject to a Minor Use
Permit (MUP/PED), but not within 200 feet of E. Grand Avenue; and 3) To diract staff to return to
Council with an Ordinance prohibiting repair and maintenance of vehicles in commercial parking
lots within the City. Council Member Guthrie asked for clarification that Mayor Pro Tam Costello
meant Minor Use Permit instead of Conditional Use Permit. Mayor Pro Tam Costello said he did
say Minor Use Permit, as that was the designation for other pedestrian oriented uses. Council
Member Guthrie seconded the motion, and following further discussion and clarifications, the
motion passed on the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Costello, Guthrie, Dickens, Arnold
NOES: Ferrara
ABSENT: None
9.b. COnsideration of Establishing a Historic Resources COmmittee and a Historic
Designation Process for the City of Arroyo Grande.
Community Development Director Strong presented the staff report and recommended the
Council consider the recommendations of the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) and the
Planning Commission regarding formation of a Historic Resources Committee (HRC) and
establishing a process for local historic designation of eligible resources in the City of Arroyo
Grande. Director Strong responded to questions from Council concerning State versus local
historic designations; clarification regarding the appointment process for the HRC; and
clarification conceming proposed tax relief incentives.
Mayor Ferrara opaned the public hearing.
The following members of the public spoke in support of the formation of a Historic Resources
Committee and the establishment of a process for designating local historic resources:
Chuck Fellows. Arroyo Grande resident, ARC member for four years, current Planning
Commissioner, and Chairman of Preserve the Village. i
Jan Scott. Arroyo Grande resident and Curator of the South County Historical Society. ,)
Gordon Bennett, Arroyo Grande resident. ,
,
Susan Aores, Arroyo Granda resident.
Upon hearing no further public comments, Mayor Ferrara closed the public hearing. I
Council comments included support for creating a Historic Resources Committee (HRC) with
defined roles and responsibilities; acknowledgement that there are many qualified people in the
community available to serve on the HRC; support for the development of criteria for designation
of local historic resources; support for creating financial incentives for historic restoration; a il
suggestion that the HRC be expanded and not limited to five (5) people; another suggestion that
the HRC should have structure as a core group with the ability to create an ad-hoc element; and :~
a suggestion for an amendment in the policy language as follows: "Owners of resources .~
recommended or nominated by the HRC for inclusion on a local historic register BAswls must be j
,
notified". I
!
j
i
CITY COUNCIUREOEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 22, 2005
PAGE 6
Mayor Pro Tem Costello moved to direct staff to develop the appropriate documents for
consideration by the Council at a future meeting for the establishment of a Historic Resources
Committee (HRC) and the establishment of a historic resource designation process including the
development of criteria for local designation of historic resources; establishment of a review
process for designating historic resources for listing on a local register; the expansion and
update of the 1991 Historic Resource Survey; and the creation of incentives for historic
preservation, restoration and reuse. Council Member Amold seconded the motion, and on the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Dickens, Guthrie, Costello, Arnold, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby dectared to be passed.
Mayor Ferrara called a break at 8:47 p.m. The Council reconvened at 8:57 p.m.
9.c. COnsideration of General Plan Amendment Case No. 04-003 - HoWling Element
Amendment.
Associate Planner Heffemon presented the staff report and recommended tha Council adopt a
Resolution approving General Plan Amendment 04-003. Staff responded to questions from
Council concerning SB 1818, which made significant changes to the State's density bonus law,
effective January 1, 2005.
Mayor Ferrara suggested that staff ch89k with the League of California Cities Housing Task
Force regarding tha status of sa 1818. He referred to the most recent general government report
from the Legislative Analyst's office, which declared the original housing legislation to be an
unfunded State mandate, and recommended it be eliminated or changed. He stated he saw
similar characteristics with regard to an unfunded State mandate in SB 1818. .,
j
'1
Mayor Ferrara opened the public hearing. '1
Jerrv Rioux, representing the Housing Trust Fund, encouraged adoption of the Housing Element j
,
,
Amendments in order to have a certified Housing Element which will allow the City to qualify for j
certain State housing program funds and also to protect the City from potential lawsuits for not ,j
having an adequate General Plan.
Jerrv Bunin, representing Home Builders Association, stated that although he agreed that SB
1818 is complicated, he has had extensive discussions with ttle State Department of Housing I
and Community Development (HCD) and gave an overview of his understanding of their
interpretations of SB 1818. He suggested coming back with altemative inclusionary housing
requirements that has a different incentive that appeals to builders. I
Jane Sedek, stated she is purchasing property at 1136 E. Grand Avenue. Sha referred to SB
1818 which raises many questions about inclusionary housing requirements and results in more j
restrictive requirements for developers. She requested the Council take more time to review SB J
1818 before approving the Housing Element. !
Pam Dennev, attomey representing S&S Homes, referred to Jasmine Place, which includes
seventeen (17) affordable housing units, of which only four (4) units have been sold to date. She I
I
i!
! i
CITY COUNCIUREOEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 22, 2005
PAGE 7
spoke about how difficult it is to qualify for these units and that the affordability restrictions are
onerous.
Bill Sedek, 1136 E. Grand Avenue, said he was a small developer trying to build quality units.
He expressed concems about the changes in the affordable housing requirements.
Upon hearing no further public comments, Mayor Ferrara closed the public hearing.
Council Members Guthrie, Dickens, Arnold, and Mayor Pro Tem Costello supported the Housing
Element Amendments as proposed; and acknowledged that there were unknowns with regard to
SB 1818; however, the City's goal is to adopt a Housing Element to be in compliance with State
law.
Mayor Ferrara requested the Council consider postponing the approval of this item for a short
time in order to conduct further research on the potential impacts of SB 1818 and noted that the
League of Califomia Cities is in the process of drafting substitute housing legislation and looking
for a sponsor for the bill. He stated that he would like to defer this item until staff could receive
clarification on the League's position concerning SB 1818.
Council Member Arnold moved to continue this item to the next regular City Council meeting of
March 8, 2005. Council Member Guthrie seconded the motion, and on tha following roll-call
vote:
AYES: Amold, Guthrie, Dickens, Costello, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
10. CONTINUED BUSINESS
None.
11. NjiW BUSINEiS
11.a. COnsideration of a Resolution Establishing Speed Umlta on Huasna Road.
Director of Public Works Spagnolo presented the staff report and recommended tha Council
adoPt a Resolution establishing the posted speed limits at 40 mph on Huasna Road from
Highway 227 to Stagecoach Road and 45 mph on Huasna Road from Stagecoach Road to the
easterly City limit. Director Spagnolo and Police Chief TerBorch responded to questions from
Council.
Mayor Ferrara invited public comments on this item.
Dean Clark, Arroyo Grande, asked questions about the results of the speed survey, expressed
concems about raising the speed limit, and commented that the City should stick with the 40
mph speed limit and enforce it.
PattY Walsh, Arroyo Granda, spoke about public safety issues and stated that the speed limits
should be enforced as posted.
--
CITY COUNCIUREOEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 22, 2005
PAGE 8
Brian Tallv. emphasized the public safety issues and stated he would like to see lighted
crosswalks on Huasna Road.
Hearing no further public comments, Mayor Ferrara closed the public comment period.
Council comments included support for adjusting the speed limits so that they can be effectively
enforced; suggested finding ways to encourage reduction of speed on Huasna Road, such as
installing lighted crosswalks, additional botts dots, and increased speed limit and enforcement
signage. There was also a suggestion to direct staff, as well as the citizens, to send a letter to
tha Court's Traffic Commissioner explaining the unique road conditions as related to public
safety.
Council Member Amold moved to adopt a Resolution as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ESTABUSHING SPEED UIIITS ON
HUASNA ROAD", and directed staff to study the potential for additional traffic calming devices
near Strother Park including, but not limited to a lighted crosswalk, additional botts dots,
increased signage, and drafting a letter to the Court's Traffic Commissioner relaying the
concerns of the neighborhood. Council Member Dickens seconded the motion, and on the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Amold, Dickens, Guthrie, Costello, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 A YES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
11.b. COnsideration of Fiscal Year 2004-05 MId-Year Budget Status Report.
[COUNCIURDA]
Director of Financial Services Pillow presented the staff report and recommended the
CounciVRDA Board of Directors: 1) Approve detailed budget adjustments and recommendations;
2) Approve (Deny) requests for additional appropriations in the General Fund as detailed; and 3)
Approve Schedules A through E included in the Mid-Year Budget Status Report.
Mayor/Chair Ferrara invited public comments on this item. No public comments were received.
Following CounciVBoard comments, Mayor Pro TemlVice Chair Costello moved to 1) Approve
detailed budget adjustments and recommendations; 2) Approve requests for additional
appropriations in the General Fund as detailed; and 3) Approve Schedules A through E included
in the Mid-Year Budget Status Report. CounciVBoard Member Dickens seconded the motion,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Costello, Dickens, Guthrie, Arnold, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
There being 5 A YES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
CITY COUNCIUREOEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 22, 2005
PAGE 9
12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
a. MAYOR TONY M. FERRARA:
(1) San Luis Obispo COuncil of Governmenta/San Luis Obispo Regional Transit
Authority (SLOCOG/SLORT A). Reported on impacts to transportation and
transit funding for San Luis Obispo County, which include the BriscolHalcyon/101
Intersection and the EI Campo/101 Intersection project. Processing of these
projects has cessed until funding is restored, possibly in 2008 or beyond.
(2) South San luis Obispo COunty Sanitation DIstrict (SSLOCSD). Discussed
administrative and maintenance issues; reported that there is an upcoming
meeting relating to the status of the Sanitation District in the Zone 1/1 A
assessments for Arroyo Grande Creek flood control area.
(3) Other. 1) Attended Mayor's meeting in Morro Bay whare Assembly Member
Blakeslee presented information on legislation he is going to sponsor. 2) Attended
League of Califomia Cities Channel Counties meeting. Will distribute information
shared at that meeting relating to upcoming meetings and events.
b. MAYOR PRO TEM JOE COSTELLO:
(1) . Zone 3 Wstar Advisory Board. No report. Next meeting is March 17"'.
(2) COunty Water Resources AdvIsory COmmittee (WRAC). Approved goals for
upcoming year.
(3) Air Pollution COntrol District (APeD). No repot. Next meeting is March 2301.
(4) Other. Attended Fire Department Oversight Committee; cooperative efforts with
the City of Grover Baach continue to go well; training is continuing to improve,
with participation from Oceano Community Services District Rre Department.
Discussed City of Pismo Beach request for joint study to examine cooperative
efforts with that City.
c. COUNCIL MEMBER JIM DICKENS:
(1) South COunty Area Transit (SCAT). Reviewed budget assumptions; raviewed
item presented by City of Grover Beach for transportation improvements relating
to their Ramona Gardens Community and Cultural Specific Plan. Reported that
SCAT will now be conducting their meetings on a quarterly basis.
(2) South County Youth Coalition. Presentation received on the First Five Funding
Program for Pre-School in Oceano.
(3) Other. None.
d. COUNCIL MEMBER JIM GUTHRIE:
(1) economic Vitality Corporation (EVC). No report. Next meeting is February 2301.
(2) Other. None.
e. COUNCIL MEMBER ED ARNOLD:
(1) Integrated Waste Managament Authority Board (IWMA). No report.
(2) California Joint Powera Insurance Authority (CJPIA). No report.
(3) Other. None. .1
1
J
13. CITY COUNCIL MEMBea ITEMS: ~
"
None. 1
ii
i j
CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
FEBRUARY 22, 2005
PAGE 10
14. CITY MANAGER ITEMS:
None.
15. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS:
Mayor Ferrara reported that he attended the Zone 1/1A meeting today to discuss the DWR Work
Plan on the Arroyo Grande Creek.
16. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS:
City Manager Adams announced that a groundbreaking ceremony for the Rotary Bandstand
project would be held Wednesday, February 23rd at noon; and a dedication ceremony would be
held at the Arroyo Grande Police Department's Community Resource Center at 2:00 p.m. He
also announced that a date and time had been confirmed for April 1, 2005 at 3:00 p.m. to meet
with Assembly Member Blakeslee.
17. COMMUNITY COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS:
None.
j
18. ADJOURNMENT !
\
Mayor/Chair Ferrara adjourned the meeting at 11:10 p.m. I
'~L
Tony Ferrar . or/Chair
ATTEST:
/ J,~
ifi
Kelly We or City Clerk/Agency Secretary
(Approved at CC Mtg 3-8-05 )
I
I
,
-- __m _ --~~