Minutes 2005-04-26
I
I
I
i MINUTES
I
j REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
I
I TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 2005
I COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 215 EAST BRANCH STREET
I
!
ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA
I 1. CALL TO ORDER
I Mayor Ferrara called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
I 2. ROLL CALL
City Council: Council Members Dickens, Guthrie, Arnold, Mayor Pro Tem Costello and
I Mayor Ferrara were present.
I
I City Staff Present: City Manager Adams, City Attorney Carmel, Director of Administrative
Services/City Clerk Wetmore, Chief of Police TerBorch, Director of
I Financial Services Pillow, Director of Parks, Recreation & Facilities
Hernandez, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Spagnolo, Associate
Planner McClish, and Assistant Planner Foster.
3. FLAG SALUTE
Homer Clees, representing Knights of Columbus, led the Flag Salute.
4. INVOCATION
! Pastor Jerry Nelson, Seventh Day Adventist Church, delivered the invocation.
!
, 5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
I
! 5.a. Mayor's Commendation Recognizing Howard Mankins for his Contribution to the
i Village Streetlight "Let Thera Be Lights" Program.
,
I
I Mayor Ferrara presented a Mayor's Commendation to Howard Mankins recognizing him for his
generous contribution to the "Let There Be Lights" Program. Mr. Mankins thanked the City
Council and provided a brief overview of his family history and involvement in the community.
5.b. Honorary Proclamation Recognizing April 29, 2005 as Arbor Day.
Mayor Ferrara presented an Honorary Proclamation proclaiming April 29, 2005 as "Arbor Day" in
the City of Arroyo Grande. Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities Hernandez accepted the
Proclamation on behalf of the City and invited the public to attend a tree planting ceremony at
Elm Street Park on Friday, April 29th at 10 a.m.
6. AGENDA REVIEW
6.a. Resolutions and Ordinances Read In Title Only
Mayor Pro Tem Costello moved, Council Member Arnold seconded, and the motion passed
unanimously that all resolutions and ordinances presented at the meeting shall be read in title
only and all further reading be waived.
I
1.....-___ ~----- -
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 26, 2005
PAGE 2
7. CITIZENS' INPUT. COMMENTS. AND SUGGESTIONS
Dennis Mahon, Charlotte, NC, representing the family of Kristin Smart, who has been missing for
9 years. He acknowledged that although there was nothing specific the City Council could do, it
was important for Kristin's memory that her name be spoken, and he then provided a
background of the case.
Susan Flores, Arroyo Grande, thanked the Arroyo Grande Police Department for protecting its
citizens. She stated that her home and place of business had become a target of harassment.
She referred to First Amendment freedom of speech rights; however, acknowledged that it takes
the court system to stop slanderous statements and untruths. She informed the public that the
permits for the concrete in her backyard were issued in 1981 and are on file with the City. She
noted that her family purchased the home in 1988. She concluded by stating it was her family's
hope that Kristin Smart will someday return to her family.
8. CON3ENT AGENDA
Mayor Ferrara asked if there were any members of the public who would like to comment on any
of the Consent Agenda Items.
Chuck Fellows, Arroyo Grande, requested that Item 8.L be pulled and continued for further public
review. He commented that the community is losing trees far faster than they are being
replaced, especially street trees. He said the City's tree ordinance is not resulting in adequate
protection of our urban forest.
Mike Liebo, Destination Imagination Coordinator, referred to Item. 8.t. and reflected on the
experiences of former Destination Imagination participants. He introduced the group of students
from the Ocean View Elementary and Judkins Middle School Global Competition teams, who
each gave brief performances relating to their request for financial support.
Ann Wilson, representing the Brambles Homeowners Association in Berry Gardens, referred to
Item 8.h. and inquired how the offers of dedications, acceptance of the easements, rights of
ways and public improvements for Tract 2260 would affect the ongoing issues over the
responsibility for maintenance of the Berry Gardens drainage basin, and if affected, requested
the item be continued until those issues have been resolved.
John Mack, architect representing S&S Homes, referred to Item 8.g. (Cross Boundary Sewer
Connection and Service Agreement between the City of Arroyo Grande and City of Grover
Beach) and pointed out that there was a typographical error in the Agreement on page 2
referring to Parkview Estates Phase II. He stated that it should be corrected to Parkview Estates
Phase I.
Upon hearing no further public comments, Mayor Ferrara closed the public comment period.
Council Member Arnold requested that Consent Agenda Item 8.L be pulled.
Council Member Dickens requested Consent Agenda Item 8.h. be pulled for clarification in
response to public comment.
Council Member Arnold moved, and Council Member Dickens seconded the motion to approve
Consent Agenda Items 8.a. through 8.1., as recommended, with the correction to the Agreement
in Item 8.g. as noted; and with the exception of Items 8.h. and 8.i. The motion carried on the
following roll-call vote:
- ._---~--- .---....--
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 26, 2005
PAGE 3
AYES: Arnold, Dickens, Guthrie, Costello, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
a.a. Cash Disbursement Ratification.
Action: Ratified the listings of cash disbursements for the period April 1 , 2005 - April 15,
2005.
8.b. Consideration of Statement of Investment Deposits.
Action: Received and filed the report of current investment deposits as of March 31,
2005.
a.c. Consideration of Approval of Minutes.
Action: Approved the minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of April 12, 2005 as
submitted.
8.d. Consideration of Rejection of Claim Against the City - E. Brigham.
Action: Rejected claim.
8.e. Consideration of Resolution Supporting Amtrak Intercity Motorcoaches Access at
Locations with No Other Intercity Transit Services.
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 3833, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Arroyo Grande Supporting Amtrak Intercity Motorcoaches Access at Locations with no
other Intercity Transit Services".
8.1. Consideration of Funding Request from Destination Imagination.
Action: Appropriated $2,000 for a contribution to the Ocean View Elementary and I
Judkins Middle School Destination Imagination Global Competition teams.
8.g. Consideration of Cross Boundary Sewer Connection and Service Agreement with
the City of Grover Beach.
Action: Approved the proposed Cross Boundary Sewer Connection and Service
Agreement with the City of Grover Beach to enable sewer service to homes in the
Parkside Development on Dixson Street utilizing a connection to a City of Grover Beach
sewer collection line.
8.j. Consideration of Work Force Housing Program Proposed by S&S Homes for
Vesting Tentative Tract Map 02-002.
Action: Approved the work force housing program proposed by S&S Homes for Vesting
Tentative Tract Map 02-002 - Parkside Village. I
a.k. Consideration of Request to Refund Application Fees for Architectural Review and I
Admlnlatratlve Sign Permit Applications.
Action: Approved the request from the South County Historical Society to refund the
application fees for Architectural Review 05-005 and Administrative Sign Permit 05-009.
8.1. Consideration of Severance Pay for Office Assistant I Position.
Action: Approved one-month severance pay for City Manager's Office Assistant I
Position.
8.h. Consideration of Acceptance of Easements, Rights of Ways and Public
Improvements for Tract 2260 - Phases I, II and III - Berry Gardens - S&.S Homes.
Recommended Action: 1) Accept the public improvements for Tract 2260; 2) Adopt
Resolution accepting certain easements, rights of way and related improvements within
Tract 2260; 3) Adopt Resolution accepting certain easements, rights of way and related
improvements off-site of Tract 2260; and 4) Accept the 10% warranty security in the
amount of $376,045.84.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 26, 2005
PAGE 4
In response to Council Member Dickens' inquiry regarding acceptance of easements, right of
ways and public improvements for Tract 2260, Director Spagnolo clarified that acceptance of the
easements and right of ways would not affect the maintenance of the drainage basin that is
adjacent to the Brambles development.
8.1. Consideration of Resolution Regarding Maintenance of Trees Planted by the City
on Private Property.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution ceasing maintenance of trees planted by the
City on private property.
Council Member Arnold commented that based on public comments received by a City Planning
Commissioner and written comments submitted by a City Architectural Review Committee
member, it may be prudent to postpone the item for further review.
Council members asked questions of staff concerning the proposal and discussion ensued
regarding maintenance of the City's street trees; the City's current tree ordinance regulations;
and clarification regarding the City's potential liability for maintaining trees located on private
property. Following discussion, staff was requested to prepare recommendations for updating
and enhancing the City's tree regulations and to involve the Architectural Review Committee and
Parks and Recreation Commission.
Mayor Pro Tem Costello moved to adopt the following Resolutions: "A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ACCEPTING CERTAIN EASEMENTS,
RIGHTS OF WAY AND RELATED IMPROVEMENT WITHIN TRACT 2260"; "A RESOLunON
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ACCEPTING CERTAIN
EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS OFF-SITE OF TRACT
2260"; and "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
CEASING MAINTENANCE OF TREES PLANTED BY THE CITY ON PRIVATE PROPERTY".
Council Member Arnold seconded the motion, and the motion carried on the following roll-call
vote:
AYES: Costello, Arnold, Dickens, Guthrie, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
9.a. Consideration of Amendments to Conditions of Approval for Veatlng Tentative
Tract Map 02-002 (VTTM 2310): Applicant - S&S Homes; Location - 10.3-acre site
located on the North Side of Farroll Avenue Between Oak Park Blvd. and Golden
West Homes.
Community Development Director Strong presented the staff report and recommended the
Council adopt a Resolution approving proposed amendments to Conditions of Approval for
VTTM 02-002 to modify the requirements for drainage improvements. Director Strong responded
to questions from Council regarding whether the proposed measures address the existing
deficiencies; which properties would be included in the maintenance district; clarification thai the
developer would prefer to create a maintenance district rather than a Homeowners Association;
clarification that the developer will provide an offer of dedication for the proposed park and
- I
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 26, 2005
PAGE 5
receive park fee credit; clarification that the developer, not the City, would be responsible for
costs associated with forming the Maintenance District; clarification that the developer (S&S
Homes) had been provided with the proposed modified conditions of approval; clarification that
there is a small detention basin on Farroll Avenue near the project which would continue to be
utilized until the property owner decides to utilize the property for another use; and confirmation
that there would be no impact from this project to Arroyo Grande Creek.
Mayor Ferrara opened the public hearing.
Dan Miller, resident near the project, noted that the property where the small drainage basin is
located is for sale. He asked how many units were being proposed, and asked if the park was
going to be separate from the drainage basin.
John Mack, architect for S&S Homes, responded to questions raised by Mr. Miller and stated
that the approved project includes 52 patio homes and 13 custom homes; the park is totally
separate from the drainage basin; and the basin will be fenced off. He stated that there was
agreement by S&S Homes regarding the amended condition relating to the maintenance district,
however; he expressed concern with the amendment to condition #15 due to timing issues
related to forming the maintenance district.
Colleen Martin, Arroyo Grande, stated that she was discouraged to see how many homes were
being proposed. She asked whether Farroll Avenue would be resurfaced as it was in desperate
need of resurfacing. She expressed concerns that along Farroll Avenue from Halcyon Road to
the project, there were no continuous sidewalks, and suggested that the City and developer
combine their efforts to install curb, gutter, and sidewalks along those areas of Farroll Avenue
that did not have it. She further expressed concern regarding the additional traffic traveling down
Farroll Avenue to Halcyon to get to the freeway.
Upon hearing no further public comments, Mayor Ferrara closed the public hearing.
Council Member Guthrie supported the proposed amendment. He referred to the comments
concerning Farroll Avenue and agreed that it would be advantageous to seek additional funding
to repave Farroll in its entirety and to install and connect existing sidewalks along Farroll if
funding was available.
In response to a question from Council Member Dickens, staff confirmed that Farroll Avenue was
identified as a top priority project in the City's Pavement Management Plan. He stated that the
Preliminary Capital Improvement Plan budget, which will be presented to the City Council next
month, includes funding in Fiscal Year 05-06 for the Farroll Avenue project. Director Spagnolo
also noted that construction of the Farroll Avenue project could be coordinated with the proposed
development project.
Council Member Dickens acknowledged that the development project had already been
approved and he supported the amendment to the original conditions of approval that would
allow for a redesign of the drainage basin.
Council Member Arnold supported the proposed amendment.
Mayor Pro Tem Costello supported the proposed amendment and also noted it would be prudent
to wait until the development project is finished before the City proceeds with the Farroll Avenue
project, in order to avoid tearing up a new street.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 26, 2005
PAGE 6
Mayor Ferrara stated that the amendment was appropriate. He commented on the deteriorating
condition of Farroll Avenue and stated that this is a location that would require monitoring
throughout the construction process. He also agreed with comments regarding the need for
contiguous sidewalks in the area near the project and the elementary school.
Council Member Arnold moved to adopt a Resolution as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE REVISING CONDmON OF
APPROVAL NO. 114 REGARDING DRAINAGE BASIN FOR VESTING TENATlVE TRACT
MAP 02-002 (VTTM 2310) BY S&S HOMES, NORTH SIDE OF FAR ROLL AVENUE". Council
Member Dickens seconded the motion, and the motion carried on the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Arnold, Dickens, Guthrie, Costello, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
9.b. Consideration of Specific Plan Amendment 03-001: Applicant - S&S Homes;
Location - Southwest corner of Courtland Street and East Grand Avenue.
Mayor Ferrara announced a conflict of interest due to ownership of real property within 500 feet
of the project and stepped down from the dais. Mayor Pro Tem Costello took over as the
Presiding Officer.
Assistant Planner Foster presented the staff report and recommended the Council adopt a
Resolution amending the Berry Gardens Specific Plan to allow mixed-use development of
Subareas 3 and 4. Staff responded to questions from Council regarding the proposad 45-foot
maximum building height; explanation of Specific Plan versus Development Code standards;
clarification concerning maximum density requirements; clarification regarding the previously
certified Environmental Impact Report; clarification regarding development standerds that would
preclude condominium conversion in the future; and clarification regarding access/utility
easement issues and reimbursement provisions for easement and infrastructure improvement
costs.
Mayor Pro Tem Costello opened the public hearing.
Ruth Matsumoto Dea, property owner representing Subarea 3, stated her family has owned this
property for 50 years and gave some background about the property's agricultural and farming
history, and expressed concerns with the proposed Specific Plan Amendment. She indicated that
she has placed the property for sale, there is a pending offer, and she requested a continuance
of this item for 90 days.
Jeffrev Emrick, architect and engineer for EDA, spoke on behalf of Ruth Dea and her vision to
provide more affordable housing in the City. He stated that the proposed Specific Plan
Amendment does not do justice to that vision and stated that the Specific Plan Amendment
reduces the value of Subarea 3, divides the property into two different zones and two different
types of development. He disagreed with the three proposed access easement provisions in the
Plan; disagreed with finding #2 in the proposed Resolution which states that the Specific Plan
Amendment will not result in an illogical land use pattern; disagreed with finding #4 which states
that the standards for building height take advantage of the unusual existing grades in the project
area; and concluded by suggesting a lot line adjustment to rotate the existing property line.
-------
----.--.--.-.- .....---.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 26, 2005
PAGE 7
Ann Wilson, attorney assisting Ruth Dea, addressed issues relating to securing the easements
between the two properties; installation of mutual infrastructure improvements; difficulty in
cooperation between the two landowners; and elevation differences. She suggested a lot line
adjustment to address these issues, which would eliminate the need for securing easements, the
installation of infrastructure improvements, the cooperation necessary to develop the two
parcels, and the elevation differences would also be eliminated or reduced. She questioned the
legality of some portions of the proposed amendment, the Addendum to the EIR which assumes
that the addition of 56 apartments would not substantially affect the conclusions in the certified
EIR, and expressed concern about the proposed reimbursement provisions, especially with
regard to the 7% interest rate. She concluded by commenting that the City's involvement in an
agreement between two adjacent landowners was questionable.
John Mack, architect for S&S Homes, responded to questions from Council regarding the
proposed building height, density, easements, and conceptual design. He stated that a lot of
work has gone into this project and they would like to move forward. He did not see a lot line
adjustment as an issue. He stated the Architectural Review Committee and Planning
Commission have reviewed the Plan and provided favorable comments on the conceptual plan.
He commented that he did not think approval of the Plan tonight would preclude other
amendments in the future.
Upon hearing no further public comments, Mayor Pro Tem Costello closed the public hearing. I
i
I
Council Member Guthrie commented on the access issues and stated that Subarea 3 could not I
develop without at least one access easement; commented that the proposed values of the
easements are reasonable, however, the 7% interest rate may be too high; agreed that this
approval would not preclude future amendments for Subarea 3; suggested language be included
to protect against 45 foot buildings being visible from E. Grand Avenue; commented on the
proposed density and stated that an increase may require additional environmental review;
suggested language be added that specifies the project must include apartments; commented
that he did not see a lot line adjustment as a viable alternative; and stated he could move
forward and support the Specific Plan Amendment with the suggested changes.
Council Member Arnold stated he was not ready to move forward and would support a
continuance. He stated that one of the goals of the Specific Plan was to create one cohesive
project. He expressed concerns regarding the access/easement infrastructure and utility issues;
and also expressed concern with the project being underparked, especially with a mixed-use
project that includes a proposed restaurant use. He expressed concern about the EIR and stated
that an increase in residential could trigger the need for a new EIR. He agreed that the City
desperately needs apartments. He preferred to continue the item for 90 days to see if a plan for
Subarea 3 comes in.
Council Member Dickens thanked Ms. Dea for providing her history of the property. He said that
the goal was to create a project that benefits the City. He acknowledged the work that has been
done; however, there were a lot of unanswered questions and he could not support moving
forward at this time. He commented that the Council was considering a proposed Specific Plan
Amendment, and not a concept plan. He disagreed that the proposed amendment would not
substantially affect the conclusions in the certified EI R, and stated there are traffic and water
issues that need to be addressed; did not understand the building height exception and said he
was uncomfortable with the proposed 45-ft height standard as part of this amendment; stated
that there were unforeseen legal issues concerning the easements, and whether the interest rate
--
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 26, 2005
PAGE 8
was equitable; agreed that the City needs apartments in its housing inventory; reiterated that the
goal is to create an integrated cohesive project; acknowledged that there could be some
potential advantages in the property owners considering a lot line adjustment; and believed that
the parties needed time to resolve some of these significant issues. He suggested directing staff
to go back and review the original certified EIR, and based on the proposed amendment
determine if there is any additional impact to traffic and water usage.
Mayor Pro Tem Costello commented that if the amendment was approved tonight, it was not
likely to result in a cohesive project. He stated he would like to review the original certified EIR;
acknowledged that there were a lot of unanswered questions; commented that a lot line
adjustment may work; favored apartments; however, expressed concern with an increase in
density as it relates to traffic. He did not support moving forward at this time.
Council Member Arnold moved to continue this item until July 26, 2005 and direct staff to provide
copies of the EIR to Council for review prior to that date. Council Member Dickens seconded the
motion, and the motion carried on the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Arnold, Dickens, Costello
NOES: Guthrie
ABSENT: Ferrara
Mayor Pro T em Costello called a recess at 10:05 p.m.
Mayor Ferrara returned to the dais and reconvened the meeting at 10:15 p.m.
9.c. Consideration of Proposed Ordinance Amending Arroyo Grande Municipal Code
Chapter 16.36 of Title 16 to Include Permitting Requlraments Applicable to Auto,
Vehicle Parts Sales Without Installation Services In Commercial and Mixed Use
Districts and Adding Chapter 10.18 to Title 10 to Prohibit Auto-Related
Maintenance and Repair Activity In Commercial and Public Parking Lots
(Development Code Amendment 05-007).
Associate Planner McClish presented the staff report, recommended the Council introduce an
Ordinance amending Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Chapter 16.36 of Title 16 and Adding
Chapter 10.18 to Title 10, and responded to questions from Council.
Mayor Ferrara opened the public hearing, and when no one came forward to speak on the item,
he closed the public hearing.
Mayor Ferrara recalled when the City Council considered the Master Plan for E. Grand Avenue
during the General Plan Update, which involved looking at compatibility issues for businesses
along E. Grand Avenue. He recalled that the intent at that time was to locate auto parts stores
next to similar uses in certain areas such as the Highway Commercial District where there was
an existing concentration of auto sales and auto repair businesses. He commented that the
Gateway segment was identified as the center of the City, which would focus more on pedestrian
oriented uses. He expressed concern about locating this type of use in the Gateway, the ongoing
issues relating to auto repair and maintenance in parking lots, and expressed concerns
regarding the ability to enforce the prohibition of auto repairs and maintenance in parking lots.
-'_0_-
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 26, 2005
PAGE 9
He stated that he was opposed to this particular use in the Gateway District, whether they were
200 feet off of Grand Avenue or facing Grand Avenue.
Council Member Dickens commented that there was ambiguity in the Development Code which
did not address this particular land use. He agreed with the goals for the Gateway; however, he
commented that there was a need to have a convenient place for people to have an auto parts
store and he saw this as a retail use that is needed. He acknowledged concerns expressed
about economic development and noted that redevelopment efforts take 20-30 years. He stated
that there needed to be clear guidelines in the Development Code and less ambiguity and
supported the proposed Ordinance.
Council Member Arnold agreed that redevelopment takes years; however, he was inclined to
support the proposed Ordinance with the caveat that improvements are included in the
conditional use permit process.
Council Member Guthrie supported the portion of the Ordinance that prohibits auto repair and
maintenance in commercial and public parking lots. He stated that he saw the proposed use as
another retail use which would not be detrimental to the area. He commented that since this is a
Mixed Use District, there should also be a mix of commercial uses and he supported the
Ordinance as proposed.
Mayor Pro Tem Costello agreed that he saw this as another retail use; however, he recognized
that there was potential for auto repair and maintenance activities outside of the store. He
supported the portion of the Ordinance that would enable the City to enforce prohibition of these
activities. He commented that the economic vitality of the shopping center is important and
believed that the addition of a viable use that could be regulated would be beneficial. He
supported the Ordinance as proposed.
In response to comments that redevelopment takes years, Mayor Ferrara commented that he
has seen good examples of redevelopment on Grand Avenue already. He agreed that the
structure the proposed Ordinance provides is better than having no regulations at all, and stated
he would support the Ordinance.
Council Member Guthrie moved to introduce an Ordinance as follows: "AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AMENDING ARROYO
GRANDE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 16.36 OF TITLE 16 TO INCLUDE PERMITTING
REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO AUTO, VEHICLE PARTS SALES WITHOUT
INSTALLATION SERVICES IN COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE DISTRICTS AND
ADDING CHAPTER 10.18 TO TITLE 10 TO PROHIBIT AUTO-RELATED MAINTENANCE
AND REPAIR ACTIVITY IN COMMERCIAL AND PUBLIC PARKING LOTS
(DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 05-007)". Council Member Dickens seconded the
motion, and the motion carried on the following roll-call vote:
AYES: Guthrie, Dickens, Arnold, Costello, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
10. CONTINUED BUSINESS
None.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 26, 2005
PAGE 10
11. NEW BUSINESS
11.8. Consideration of Alternatives for the Regulation of Formula Buslnessas In the City
of Arroyo Grande.
Associate Planner McClish presented the staff report and recommended the Council consider
alternatives for the regulation of formula business and direct staff accordingly. Staff responded
to questions from Council regarding various methods of regulating formula businessas;
clarification that the Design Guidelines and Standards for the Village apply to all Village
Commercial and Mixed Use areas; clarification that the Design Guidelines and Standards would
not preclude formula businesses from conforming to the City's standards; and clarifying the need
to clearly define formula business and provide some flexibility for franchise businesses.
Mayor Ferrara invited comments from those in the audience who wished to be heard on the
matter.
Chuck Fellows, Arroyo Grande Planning Commissioner and Chairman of Preserve The Village,
spoke in support of directing staff to prepare an ordinance prohibiting formula businesses in the
Village in order to maintain the character, charm, and uniqueness of the Village.
No further public comments were received and the Mayor closed the public comment period.
Council comments ensued in support of drafting an ordinance which clearly defines formula
businesses and to prohibit formula businesses in the Village districts only.
Mayor Pro Tem Costello moved to direct staff to prepare an ordinance defining formula
businesses and prohibiting formula businesses in the Village districts. Council Member Arnold
seconded the motion, and the motion carried on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Costello, Arnold, Guthrie, Dickens, Ferrara
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
a. MAYOR TONY M. FERRARA:
(1) San Luis Obispo Council of Governments/San Luis Obispo Regional Transit
Authority (SLOCOGlSLORT A). Reported that a Closed Session was held to
discuss personnel issues; Announced that SLOCOG is accepting applications for
TEA funds for enhancement projects (Le., lighted crosswalks, sidewalks, etc.);
and the Board received a summary presentation on the PLACES Program.
(2) South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD). Issues
concerning Arroyo Grande Creek and Zone 1/1A were discussed; Plant is
operating well and meeting regulations and standards.
(3) Other. None.
b. MAYOR PRO TEM JOE COSTELLO:
(1) Zone 3 Water Advisory Board. Reported that the Habitat Conservation Plan is
still not adopted and is currently under legal review.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 26, 2005
PAGE 11
(2) County Water Resources Advisory Committee (WRAC). No report.
(3) Air Pollution Control District (APCD). No report.
(4) Other. Attended Fire Oversight Committee meeting and reviewed a joint dispatch
service proposal. Reported that the City of Pismo Beach is continuing
discussions about future joint fire services and is willing to fund a study.
c. COUNCIL MEMBER JIM DiCKENS:
(1) South County Area Transit (SCAT). Will be offering the Summer Youth Pass
Program and the Free Summer Lopez Shuttle Program again this year. Some
minor modifications will be made to the Avila Beach Trolley schedule. Will be
considering the Budget for the upcoming year.
(2) South County Youth Coalition. No report. Next meeting is April 28th.
(3) Other. None.
d. COUNCIL MEMBER JIM GUTHRIE:
(1) Economic Vitality Corporation (EVC). Reported that the EVC is still without an
Executive Director and recruitment efforts will continue.
(2) Other. None.
e. COUNCIL MEMBER ED ARNOLD:
(1) Integrated Waste Management Authority Board (IWMA). No report. Meets
next month for a lunch meeting at the Cold Canyon Landfill.
(2) California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA). Will be attending training
in June.
(3) Other. None.
13. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS:
a) Request to place on future agenda for consideration interpretation of General Plan
policies under Objective Ag1 of the Agriculture, Conservation and Open Space Element
regarding conservation of prime farmland soils and determine if a General Plan
Amendment is necessary to further clarify the interpretation. (GUTHRIE)
Council Member Guthrie requested, and the Council concurred, to place on a future agenda for
consideration interpretation of General Plan policies under Objective Ag1 of the Agriculture,
Conservation and Open Space Element regarding conservation of prime farmland soils and
determine if a General Plan Amendment is necessary to further clarify the interpretation.
14. CITY MANAGER ITEMS: I
None. t
15. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS:
None.
16. STAFF COMMI,INICATIONS: I
None.
j
I
---'-" -.-----,.'
-
,
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 26, 2005
PAGE 12
17. COMMUNITY COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS:
Colleen Martin, Arroyo Grande, referred to Item 13.a. and stated that it was important to clarify
the General Plan policy in question regarding conservation of prime farmland soils. She also
suggested that the Council define what constitutes a "Neighborhood Plan". Lastly, she
suggested that the Council establish a policy that addresses donations to youth groups.
18. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the City Council, Mayor Ferrara adjourned the meeting at
11 :35 p.m.
ATTEST:
&U-t~
(Approved at CC Mtg <5-/0 ~oS )
-_._--'-~