Agenda Packet 2000-10-24
, - "
CITY COUNCIL (1& ff
AGENDA ~d~
Michael A. Lady Mayor
Tony M. Ferrara Mayor Pro Tem Steven Adams City Manager
Thomas A. Runels Council Member Timothy J. Carmel City Attorney
Steve Tolley Council Member Kelly Wetmore Director, Administrative Services
Jim Dickens Council Member
NOTICE OF
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
Tuesday
OCTOBER 24. 2000
6:30 P.M.
Arroyo Grande City Council Chambers
215 East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande
AGENDA
1. ROLL CALL
2. PUBLIC COMMENT on Special Meeting Agenda Items.
Members of the public wishing to address the Council on any item described in this
Notice may do so when recognized by the Presiding Officer.
3. CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION:
(a) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of litiqation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c)
involvinq one (1) potential case.
4. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION:
Announcement of reportable action from closed session, if .any.
5. ADJOURNMENT.
CITY COUNCIL B&t{/
AGENDA ~/7~
Michael A. Lady Mayor
Tony M. Ferrara Mayor Pro Tem Steven Adams City Manager
Thomas A. Runels Council Member Timothy J. Carmel City Attomey
Steve Tolley Council Member Kelly Wetmore Director, Administrative Services
Jim Dickens Council Member
AGENDA SUMMARY
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 24,2000
7:00 P.M.
Arroyo Grande City Council Chambers
215 East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande
1. CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL
3. FLAG SALUTE: BOY SCOUT TROOP 234
JEFF ST ASELL, LEADER
4. INVOCATION: RABBI NORMAN MENDEL, CONGREGATION
BETH DAVID, SAN LUIS OBISPO
5. SPECIAL PRESENTATION:
5.a. Proclamation - Red Ribbon Celebration Week
5.b. Proclamation - Erosion Control Month
6. AGENDA REVIEW:
6a. Move that all resolutions and ordinances presented tonight be read in title only
and all further readings be waived.
AGENDA SUMMARY - OCTOBER 24, 2000
PAGE 2
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
7.a. Amended Conditional Use Permit Case No. 00-004 to Place a 960 Sauare
Foot Modular Building on the New Hope Church Property. Located at 900
Oak Park Blvd.. for the Roval Oaks Christian School (McCANTS)
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution approving amended Conditional Use
Permit Case No. 00-004.
7.b. Application for Certificate of Public 'Convenience and Necessity - De Groot
Enterprises. dba Five Cities Taxi Service (WETMORElTerBORCH)
Recommended Action: 1) Conduct the required public hearing; 2) Determine
whether the public convenience and necessity require an additional taxicab
service within the City limits of Arroyo Grande; and 3) Adopt a Resolution
granting a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity contingent upon
compliance with conditions and requirements of the Arroyo Grande Municipal
Code.
7.c. Proposed Ordinance Amendina Portions of Title 9 of the Arroyo Grande
Municipal Code regardina Second Residential Dwellina Units (McCANTS)
Recommended Action: 1) Introduce Ordinance amending portions of Title 9 of
the Municipal Code regarding Second Residential Dwelling Units.
8. CITIZENS' INPUT. COMMENTS. AND SUGGESTIONS:
Persons in the audience may discuss business not scheduled on this agenda
regarding any item of interest within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Council
will listen to all communication but, in compliance with the Brown Act, will not
take any action on items that are not on the agenda.
Upon completing your comments:
. You may be directed to staff for assistance;
. A Council/Board Member may indicate an interest in discussing your
issue with you subsequent to the Council meeting;
. The Council may direct staff to research the issue and subsequently
report back to the Council (generally in the form of a memorandum or
staff report); or
. No action is required or taken.
9. CITY COUNCIL CONSENT AGENDA:
The following routine items listed below are scheduled for consideration as a
group. The recommendations for each item are noted. Any Council/Board
Member may request that any item be withdrawn from the Consent Agenda to
permit discussion or change the recommended course of action. The City
Council may approve the remainder of the Consent Agenda on one motion.
AGENDA SUMMARY - OCTOBER 24, 2000
PAGE 3
9. CONSENT AGENDA (continued):
9.a. Cash Disbursement Ratification (SNODGRASS)
Recommended Action: Approve the listing of cash disbursements to vendors
for the period October 1, 2000 through October 15, 2000.
9.b. Cash Flow Analysis/Approval of Interfund Advance from the Water Facility
Fund (SNODGRASS)
Recommended Action: Receive and file August cash report and approve the
interfund advance from the Water Facility Fund to cover cash deficits in other
funds as of August 30, 2000.
9.c. Minutes of Reaular City Council Meeting/Special Plannlna Commission
Meetina of October 10. 2000 (WETMORE)
Recommended Action: Approve minutes as submitted.
9.d. 2000 San Luis Obispo County Plays It Safe (SLOCOPS) Grant (TerBORCH)
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution in support of the 2000 SLOCOPS
Grant.
9.e. Fair Oaks Avenuerrally Ho Road Overlav Proiect. Project No. 2000-3.
Progress Payment No.3 (SPAGNOLO)
Recommended Action: Authorize Progress Payment No.3 in the amount of
$51,221.33 to R. Burke Corporation.
9.f. Sprina 2000 Pavement Manaaement Proiect. Proiect No. 2000-5. Progress
Payment No.2 and Notice of Completion (SPAGNOLO)
Recommended Action: 1) Authorize Progress Payment No.2 in the amount of
$20,691.00 to Bond Blacktop, Inc.; 2) Direct staff to file a Notice of Completion;
and 3) Authorize the release of retention of $10,041.96, thirty-five (35) days after
Notice of Completion has been recorded, if no liens have been filed.
9.g. Technical Amendment to the Consultant Services Agreement Between the
City of Arrovo Grande and John L. Wallace & Associates (SPAGNOLO)
Recommended Action: Amend the Consultant Services Agreement to include
recently mandated federal-aid funding provisions.
9.h. Lopez Dam Improvement Bond Documents (SNODGRASS/CARMEL)
Recommended Action: Authorize the Mayor to sign the Lopez Dam
Improvement Bond documents.
AGENDA SUMMARY - OCTOBER 24, 2000
PAGE 4
10. CONTINUED BUSINESS:
10.a. Revision to the Sewer Area Charae (SPAGNOLO)
Recommended Action: 1) Authorize the City Manager to execute a Consultant
Services Agreement to revise the sewer area charge to address open space
easement; and 2) Authorize an appropriation of $8,500 from the Sewer Facility
Fund and add the Sewer Area Charge Update to the Capital Improvement
Program.
10.b. Termination of Consultant Services Aareement with Envicom Corporation
(ADAMS)
Recommended Action: Authorize and direct the City Manager to terminate the
existing Consultant Services Agreement with Envicom to prepare the update of
the City's General Plan.
11. NEW BUSINESS:
None.
12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS:
This item gives the Mayor and Council Members the opportunity to present
reports to the other members regarding committees, commissions, boards, or
special projects on which they may be participating.
(a) MAYOR MICHAEL A. LADY:
(1) South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District
(SSLOCSD)
(2) Other
(b) MAYOR PRO TEM TONY M. FERRARA:
(1) Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA)
(2) Economic Vitality Corporation (EVC)
(3) Air Pollution Control District (APCD)
(4) Other
(c) COUNCIL MEMBER THOMAS A. RUNELS:
(1) Zone 3 Water Advisory Board
(2) County Water Resources Advisory Committee (WRAC)
(3) Other
(d) COUNCIL MEMBER STEVE TOLLEY:
(1) Long-Range Planning Committee
(2) San Luis Obispo Council of Governments/San Luis
Obispo Regional Transit Authority (SLOCOG/SLORTA)
(3) Other
AGENDA SUMMARY - OCTOBER 24, 2000
PAGE 5
12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (continued):
(e) COUNCIL MEMBER JIM DICKENS:
(1) South County Area Trans,it (SCAT)
(2) Economic Development Committee/Chamber of Commerce
(3) Community Recreation Center Subcommittee
(4) Economic Opportunity Commission (EOC)
(5) South County Youth Coalition
(6) Other
13. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS:
Correspondence/Comments as presented by the City Council.
14. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS:
Correspondence/Information for the City Council presented by the City Manager.
15. ADJOURNMENT
AGENDA SUMMARY - OCTOBER 24, 2000
PAGE 6
* * * * * * *
Copies of the staff reports or other written materials relating to each item of business
referred to on this agenda are on file with the Director of Administrative Services and are
available for public inspection and reproduction at cost. If you have questions regarding
any agenda item, please contact the Director of Administrative Services at (805) 473-
5414.
* * * * * * *
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to
participate in a City meeting, please contact the Director of Administrative Services at
the number listed above at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to ensure that reasonable
arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting.
* * * * * * *
Note: This agenda is subject to amendment up to 72 hours prior to the date and time
set for the meeting. Please refer to the agenda posted at City Hall for any revisions, or
call the Director of Administrative Services at (805) 473-5414 for more information.
www.arroyoqrande.org
-- ~--_..__._--,_._----"_." .'.--,--"'-- - -- ----~~-
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE - ABBREVIATIONS revised 08104100
A Agricultural Preserve
AS Assembly Bill LAFCO Local Agency Formation Commission
ADA Americans with DlsabUities Act LOCC League d Carlfomia Cities
AG General Agriculture LLA Lot Line Adjustment
AGMC ArrfliO Grande Municipal Code LUE Land Use Element
AGPOA Arroyo Grande Police Officers' Association MER Lot Merger
APN, Asses$or's Parcel Number MF CondominiumITownhouse
APCB Air Pollution Control Board MFA Apartments
APeD Air Pollution Control District MHP Mobile Home Parks
ARC Architectural Review Committee 0 Offlce Professional
ASCE American Society Civil Engineers OCSD Oceano Community Services District
ASD Administrative Services Department OSCE Open Space and Conservation Element
AWNA American Wel.er Works Association PC Planning Commission
BD Building Division PD Police Department
CA City Attorney PF Pub~QuasiPubNc
CC City Council PPR Plot Plan Review
CCC California Conservation Corps PRD Parks & Recreation Department
CCCSIF Central Coast Cities Self-Insurance Fund PRE-APP Pr.appflCatlon
CD Community Development PSHHC Peoples' Self-Help Housing Corp.
CDBG Community Development Block Grant PSP Planned Sign Program
CE Circulation Element PUD Planned Unit Development
CEC California Energy Commission PH Public Works Dep8'lment
CECA California Environmental Quality Act RDA Redevelopment Agency
CIP Capital Improvement Program RE Residential Estate
CIWMP California Integrated Waste Management Plan RFP Request for Pr()p9Sals
CM City Manager's Office RFQ Request for QuaBficalions
CMC California Men's Colony RH Hillside Residential
CMP Congestion Management Plan RHNP Regional Housing Needs Plan
COC Certificate of Compliance RR Rural Residential
CPI Consumer Price Index RS Suburban Retidential
CUP Conditional Use Permit RTA Reversion to Acreage
DARE Drug Abuse Resistance Education RWQCB Regional W.er Quality Control Board
DC Development Code SAC Staff Advisory Committee
CEA Drug Enforcement Administration SB Senate Bm
E.C. Election Code SCAT South County Area Tl1U1Sit
EDD Economic Development Department SEIU Service Employees International Union
EDU Equivalent Dwelling Unit SF Single Family
EIR Environmental Impact Report SLO San Luis O~lspo
EIS Environmental Impact Statement SLOCOG San Luis Obispo Counc" of Governments
EOC Economic Opportunity Commission SLOHA San Luis Obispo Housing Authority
EVC Economic Vitality Corporation SLONTF San Luis Obispo Nan:otIcs Task Force
FAU Federal Aid Urban SLORTA San Luis Obispo Regional Tr..1 Authority
FD Fire Division SLOWRAC San Luis Obispo County W.. Resources Advisory
FDM Federal Disaster Assistance Administration Committee
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency SR Senior Housing
FID F"mancial Services Department SSLOCOWA South San Luis Obispo County W.er Association
FPPC Fair Political Practices Commission SSLOCSD South San Luis ObispO County Sanitation District
FTA Federal Transit Administration SRRE Source Reduction & RecycHng Element
FY Fiscal Year SWRCD State WeAer Resources Control Board
G.C. Govemment Code TPM Tentative Parcel Map
GC General Commercial TT Tentative Tract Map
GF General Fund TTAC Transportation Technical Advisory Committee
GP General Plan TUP Temporary Use Permit
GPA General Plan Amendment UBC Uniform Building Code
HCD California Department of Housing and Community UFC Uniform Fire Code
Development USA Underground Service AI8!1
HOP Home Occupancy Permit VAR Variance
HUD Housing and Urban Development Dept. VC VIII4Ige Commercial
I Industrial and Business Part< VCB SlO County VIsitors & Conference Bureau
ISTEA IntermOdal Surface Transportation VSR Vtew Shed Review
JPA Joint Powers Authority ZONE 3 San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water
Conservation Dlstrlct- Zone 3 (Lopez Project)
- --._-~_..._...~
5...
H.",.,." P,.ol...ti.",
WHEREAS, tobacco, alcohol and other drug use,and abuse has reached pandemic stages
in California and throughout the United States; and
WHEREAS, it Is imperative that community members launch unified and visible tobacco,
alcohol, and other drug prevention education programs and activities to eliminate the
demand for these substances; and
WHEREAS, Californians For Drug-Free Youth, Inc. (CADFY), coordinates the California Red
Ribbon Celebration in cooperation with National Family Partnership to offer our citizens the
opportunity to demonstrate their commitment to healthy, drug-free lifestyles; and
WHEREAS, President Bill Clinton is the National Honorary Chair, and Governor Davis and
Mrs. Sharon Davis are the State Honorary Chairpersons to provide national and state focus
on a Drug-Free America; and
WHEREAS, the Red Ribbon Celebration will be observed across America during RED
RIBBON CELEBRATION WEEK, October 23-31,2000; and
WHEREAS, Parents, Youth, Government, Business, Law Enforcement, Schools, Religious
Institutions, Service Organizations, Social Services, Health Services, Media, and the
General Public will demonstrate their commitment to drug-free communities by wearing
and displaying Red Ribbons during this week-long celebration; and
WHEREAS, the City of Arroyo Grande further commits resources to ensure the success of
the RED RIBBON CELEBRATION and year round tobacco, alcohol, and other drug
prevention efforts.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Michael A. Lady, Mayor of the City of Arroyo
Grande, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby recognize October 23-31, 2000 as RED
RIBBON CELEBRATION WEEK, and encourage all citizens to pledge: NO USE OF ILLEGAL
DRUGS, AND NO ILLEGAL USE OF LEGAL DRUGS, and to participate In tobacco, alcohol,
and other drug prevention programs and activities, making a visible statement and
commitment to healthy, drug-free communities In which to raise a generation of drug-free
youth.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Se I of the City of
Arroyo Grande to be affixed this 24th day of October, 2000.
MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR
5.b.
a.., ProcIaIa\\tI
WHEREAS, the well-being of our citizens depends upon the production of
ample supplies offood, fiber and other products of the soil; and
WHEREAS, the quality and quantity of these products depend upon the
conservation and proper management of the soil and water resources;
and
WHEREAS, the Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District, the
University of California Cooperative Extension, the Morro Bay National
Estuary Program, the San Luis Obispo County Farm Bureau Watershed
Coordinating Committee, and other organizations are providing proactive,
practical, and cooperative programs through which landowners are
taking the initiative to protect, conserve, and make proper use of these
resources; and
WHEREAS, in the year 2000 the soil conservation movement is celebrating
its 65th Anniversary of carrying forward a program of soil and water
conservation in cooperation with numerous agencies and counUess
individuals; and
WHEREAS, City and County Grading Ordinances recognizes the necessity
of preventative measures to implement erosion control practices.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Michael A. Lady, Mayor of
the City of Arroyo Grande, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby
recognize, and proclaim October, 2000 as "EROSION CONTROL MONTH"
in the City of Arroyo Grande.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal
of the City of Arroyo Grande to be affixed this 24th day of October, 000.
MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR
----,----..----,--
'\, 7.8.,
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande will hold a
Public Hearing onthe following project:
CASE NO. Conditional Use Permit Amendment 00-004
APPLICANT: New Hope Church
LOCATION: 900 N. Oak Park Blvd.
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting an amendment to
Conditional Use Permit 84-368 to allow the placement
of a 960 square foot modular building on the property
to provide additional classroom space for the Royal
Oaks Christian School.
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION: Categorical Exemption per Section 15303 CEQA
Guidelines
REPRESENTATIVE: Robert Burnett
Any person affected or concemed by this application may submit written comments to the
Director of Administrative Services at 214 E. Branch Street, Arroyo Grande, Califomia,
during normal business hours (8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M.) before the City Council hearing, or
appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the project and the environmental
impacts at the time of hearing.
Any person interested in the proposal can contact the Community Development
Department at 214 E. Branch Street, Arroyo Grande, California, during normal business
hours (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.).
IF YOU CHALLENGE AN ITEM IN COURT, YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY THOSE
ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING DESCRIBED IN THIS
NOTICE, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AT, OR
PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC HEARING.
FAILURE OF ANY PERSON TO RECEIVE THE NOTICE SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE
GROUNDS FOR ANY COURT TO INV ALIDA TE THE ACTION OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY
FOR WHICH THE NOTICE WAS GIVEN.
Date and Time of Hearing: Tuesday, October 24,2000 at 7:00 P.M.
Place of Hearing: Arroyo Grande City Council Chambers
215 E. Branch Street
~~. cA.J~t1iJNL- Arroyo Grande, California 93420
Kelly etm6re
Director of Administrative Services/Deputy City Clerk
Publish 1 T, October 13, 2000
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KERRY McCANTS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
BY: KELLY HEFFERNON v.., \\...
ASSOCIATE PLANNER
SUBJECT: AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 00-004 TO
PLACE A 960 SQUARE FOOT MODULAR BUILDING ON THE
NEW HOPE CHURCH PROPERTY, LOCATED AT 900 OAK PARK
BLVD., FOR THE ROYAL OAKS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
DATE: OCTOBER 24, 2000
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving
Amended Conditional Use Permit Case No. 00-004.
FUNDING:
No fiscal impact.
DISCUSSION:
The Planning Commission considered this item on September 19, 2000 and
recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving Amended
Conditional Use Permit Case No. 00-004 (reference Attachment 1 for Planning
Commission meeting minutes). Because this project is located within a Planned
Development (PD 1.1), only the City Council is authorized to grant final approval.
The original Conditional Use Permit for the New Hope Church (formerly called the
Foursquare Church) was approved in 1 984 to construct a two-phased church
facility; a scaled-down phase I was ultimately constructed. In 1997, the City
Council approved an amendment to CUP 84-368 to allow the operation of a
preschool and elementary school within the existing church building. A maximum
occupancy of 90 preschool and 1 54 elementary school students was established at
that time.
The applicant seeks a second amendment to CUP 84-368 to place a 960 square
foot modular building on the east side of the property boundary to temporarily
'-',~""
City Council
October 24, 2000
Amended Conditional Use Permit 00-004
Page 2
provide needed classroom space for the Royal Oaks Christian School (reference
Attachment 2). The request is for a three (3) year time period, providing an interim
solution while plans for a permanent expansion are being prepared. The modular
building would enable the school to reduce the number of students in the existing
classrooms while staying within the maximum number of students allowed per the
original Conditional Use Permit. Letters the City has received from parents and
neighbors regarding the proposed project are included as Attachments 2 through 7.
AL TERNA TIVES:
The following alternatives are presented for Council consideration:
- Approve staff's recommendation;
- Do not approve staff's recommendation;
- Modify as appropriate and approve staff's recommendation;
- Provide direction to staff.
Attachments:
Resolution of Approval
1. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of September 19, 2000
2. Letter from Applicant Dated July 22, 2000
3. Letter from Cathy Lee dated October 3, 2000
4. Letter from Tara Maria Stilwell dated October 2, 2000
5. Letter from Mary & Jim McDonnel dated September 28, 2000
6. Letter from Maryellen Perrin dated September 26, 2000
7. Letter from Tom and Claire Holbrook received September 15, 2000
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING AMENDED CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT CASE NO. 00-004, THEREBY AMENDING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-368, APPLIED FOR BY
THE NEW HOPE CHURCH, LOCATED AT 900 NORTH
OAK PARK BOULEVARD
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande approved Conditional Use
Permit No. 84-368 on June 26, 1984 for the construction of the Foursquare Church,
presently called the New Hope Church, located at 900 North Oak Park B~ulevard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved an amendment to Conditional Use Permit No.
84-368 on November 25, 1997 to allow the operation of a preschool and elementary
school at the church facility; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande adopted a
resolution on September 1 9, 2000 recommending that the City Council approve
Amended Conditional Use Permit Case No. 00-004 to temporarily place a 960 square
foot modular building for the Royal Oaks Christian School; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing on this application in
accordance with the Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this project is consistent with the General
Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed this project in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the
Arroyo Grande Rules and Procedures for Implementation of CEQA and has
determined that the Project is Categorically Exempt per Section 1 5303 of the CEQA
Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds, after due study, deliberation and public hearing,
the following circumstances exist:
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit Findings:
1. The proposed use is permitted within the Oak Park Acres Planned
Development (PD 1.1) pursuant to the provisions of Section 9-03.050 of the
Development Code, and complies with all applicable provisions of the
Development Code, the goals and objectives of the Arroyo Grande General
Plan, and the development policies and standards of the City.
2. The proposed use will not impair the integrity and character of the district in
which it is to be established or located because the proposed use is similar to
-~--~~ ~-
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
surrounding uses.
3. The site is suitable for the type and intensity of use or development that is
proposed because all the necessary easements, circulation, parking and
setbacks would be provided.
4. There are adequate provisions for water, sanitation, and public utilities and
services to ensure the public health and safety.
5. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties and improvements in the vicinity
because the proposed project would not create adverse environmental impacts.
Architectural Review Findings:
1. The proposal is consistent with the General Architectur~1 Review Guidelines for
the City of Arroyo Grande.
2. The proposal is consistent with the text and maps of the Arroyo Grande
General Plan, and the City of Arroyo Grande Development Code.
3. The proposal will not be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort and general
welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
project.
4. The general appearance of the proposed building is consistent with the
character of the neighborhood because the size and design are consistent with
the existing church facility.
5. The proposal is not detrimental to the orderly and harmonious development of
the City.
6. The proposal will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the
neighborhood.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande hereby approves Amended Conditional Use Permit Case No. 00~004, with the
above findings, and subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference.
On motion by Council Member , seconded by Council Member ,
and by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this day of , 2000.
------~,.. ~--_.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 3
MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELL Y WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
__ ____.,_____.~'m._
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 4
EXHIBIT" A"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 00-004
NEW HOPE CHURCH, LOCATED AT 900 NORTH OAK PARK BOULEVARD
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
GENERAL CONDITIONS
This approval authorizes the temporary placement of a 960 square foot modular
building on the east side of the property boundary.
The applicant shall comply with the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall ascertc;lin and comply with all Federal, State, County and City
requirements as are applicable to this project.
2. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Amended
Conditional Use Permit Case No. 00-004.
3. This application shall automatically expire on October 24, 2002 unless a building
permit is issued. Thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the approval, the
applicant may apply for an extension of one (1) year from the original date of
expiration.
4. Development shall occur in substantial conformance with the plans presented to
the City Council at the meeting of October 24, 2000 and marked Exhibits "81 -
84", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
5. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her/its sole expense any action
brought against the City, its present or former agents, officers, or employees
because of the issuance of said approval, or in anyway relating to the
implementation thereof, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The
applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any
court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents,' officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The
City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense
of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his/her
obligations under this condition.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
6. The modular building shall be removed three (3) years after issuance of a
building permit.
~.~.._.~~
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 5
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
7. The roof shall be a darker color to contrast with the walls of the modular
building. All colors shall blend with the rest of the structures on the project
site.
8. The landscaping plans shall include a mix of shrubbery and trees along the east
and south sides of the modular building. The Community Development
Director shall approve the plant selection.
BUILDING AND FIRE DEPARTMENT
9. The structure shall be a State of California approved modular building.
10. The project shall comply with the most recent editions of the California State
Fire and Building Codes and the Uniform Building and Fire Codes as adopted by
the City of Arroyo Grande.
11. Fees - The applicant shall pay all applicable City fees prior to issuance of a
Building Permit.
PRIOR TO ISSUING A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY:
12. The applicant shall post designated fire lanes, per Section 22500.1 of the
California Vehicle Code.
13. The applicant must provide an approved "security key vault", per Building and
Fire Department guidelines.
14. The modular building must either be fully sprinklered per Building and Fire
Department guidelines, or an on-site fire hydrant installed as approved by the
Building and Fire Department.
---....._---------
--
I
. ., ..
.. ! , . ; ";
/
, -.....
1 EXHiBiT B 1
" /
i -
I
, /
I
I ' 0 (
.". ..
'.l~ J
/ r(J' \
0 ' '\
\ ' .'
.
~ . I
} $i .,' {IoI\~ ~"'M' /
0'" ~.f/9 ~ '
, lIT ,"/.&t:,<~: '( ~ /" - ,,/ ..... ,-
""~.S',, ':/,;:.;.:., ,_NORTH
" j{//,/.P"~ 'Th ~ .
rl~ t>~. ,,~'( '\AMI!'" \ Y/i'; '.
.' ,'/" ,'I
, . - :',1 ",/:,.- ,
\ '/ ,h'% ~
.' .' ./{'Iy," O-~I~'-
.' ' ' " ' ,,' /.' <:I
. ,ft <> ....p.-;:.." '
. .~ . C'- ' .,"
_., " . . ":/.'/0/:'
";' . "" 1///'/';(' ~
.' .' ,/ ~ ' ~ti@; . C>'iI'- . f#4': ~
. ,'" "/~ d' WI?;a:>N!"-'
:" ,I,..' / . '
'\ . ''30?'''~'
" . ~f.~ -
"
, .
" C.O.MM~WAL. i
. \ ~~'U~~~
"
:.MOf.t~ Qt.'" to, ,~ ~~
J'~f~~f{' "
~ . \-Of. , &
tp72..
flt?~ ' \ _~r;?:Z:O~ '
-
)J. - ~~-~~
. ~ \,Of' ~
K ' M(),tl"
. ~ ~-r (:'.6 />?~\
_.' ..,~
" \.
~ K#~
,. t.~H1 '
'-, \....6f \
frt' ,~~
'A:e.~ ,e;~A.Hc.~ ~1,
.
, . - IJ~. \Oi ' ,
" ~ --,'
''- . .~. . Mt'1\Ht? .~~'-" -
,
, "
. " .
~ .
'" J..; \ - ' i
. '
. .' . ':. NiCiN\t'{':'MAP:. .
. ... '.
. ' .
-
~i.,,,",:., ...: ! .
"
_.__..._---_....__._-_._~------------
. .
..
_~ ~t EXHIBIT B2
" .'-' \;
.
. '
.., "
i .' ' '
., ....... : -.--
,
. "...- ,.-
.J'
- ~ .-
: , '
'", : \ ~~'
~ "",,-_..
.
. .,
. "~I
'i:; ',' ' .)
. ,
\ .
.. ' ---~
, '
I ~ ~"" ,___-
\ 1 .
\ ~ ~\'
~'~':"~
, "7 :''10
..... . -.=: ~
i= - --'-1 : ~ ,c\1<
.0. \ \ ~ }:~,,~
. \ \ I ~ ~,
. ' \ ~ ~:dJ
>:; J' i J. - \ \ :~ ~~
, ' - - _' \ ""'1 "'~I
I \ I' ",' I \ (? ''r'''' .'
~i ~ ' \ ~ t. ~ \ \ .~ ~ ~?l :I- -
~ ' . J I · 1-
. i \ ,\ ' ./ ' ".
\. I \ I I \ ,,}~
! . : '\ ,'. ,r
~ J' \...-----\..1. \ \ !
, .\... . ' \ I '
\, ;' ' \ .\
~""'I - \' I .' , '"
'. V, ' '
. \-' \, .
,- '" -
\\, . .\ '-'.
..;':P\ i .-
',' \'.: '
" \, \
~. ~
:.1<11 . ,
I ; . \
i I \ ' ,
. ~ ' !,
~' . I.',
'I' ~,..4I . ' ",
, .,~ . '
~ . ,;..,' ~,- '. -
~ ~ ,,\ ,.',' .
~ . ..' ' .
, . I .
. . '
~ . \ .
~~ ~ 'I'
:z:. ~ ' : i.
\' rJ ' : "
'. I '
.. 1\ ... ' '
a .. · ,
<-~ . ~ : ..
c i I .
c' , I "
;.(. ~ ..; : ~l -.
',"""", I r:;:to
- I ~~
~ ' ,. ~~
- . ~~
8 tl !O,. .. ;', '.1.<1 ,-
,,- ' " '. " ..'!\- ,
& :. I.. .'::,." '-
_' ~ ' oi:!\
. "
or '.' i;'\\
~ --',
~ '
.(,.
o
~
~ )
~ \
D \
v
~ I
E)(.\'\\6\1' 63
~ ~ ---0':2: //
0@ ell C ~ ~ % '0 _.J
' ~'" " " ~ "'""
' -< ,,~ " .. , ..
' ',~ '& ;; ".. 6- . .. -..
' ... 10 j-! III ;i c> 10
' ",... ~ · - g . ~ 0
r ; ,,' ~ \ .. . 10 :r .)
. \ , ... i.... c: .,
' 'I " . ;0 , ", ',,_ 0_..
. '" .> g ~ ~ .',
\.. '" . . "\ ~,.,
I. \ .. ~ ,
~.\ OJ
I . .. . , "
',I I.p , ro'
o .,.".... .. _~' "\
\ " . -
\ . , · , 1" o~\\
' .\ ~ Q iI : :.'
'<h r i i ~ ~ 1;~~~
,... . 0 ... . >~
,\, ~ 6. "'I \ )'i.1J
I, %, .
\, I~\ " ~ 'I , "'?s~~
,,,'' . . \ , "~.,
' . . h, ..
I, "\." ~ ~ :'3 ""
. " . · it .. . ~),\
" . - - , ,,~..,
:", c) ... I ~. ~7.J.
:.1 ~'" ~. :.
~ ~ t .. ~ , ' .."
'\ 0 0 ~. : 'r
'il , e. ~ ';) e.
'\ (I N"
" '!) 0
h . ...
' " . . ,
' , '. '.
.
' )
, ..
' ..
.
,
.
. .
' ,
,
:\
t .
~ ~..r
, '
I
,
I
.
:'
\
,
I
I
I
I
.
,
\ .
' \
.---~-.Jj
i
,;
i \
(')
Q
~~
s~ .
-0
3~
~'~
rn4
503
~:.:8
i;'J~
~6
orn
" ,~
.:~, '. '.
"I, .',\ ',.': ':
f...\ .,11, ,
{l .~\~'" : '
:., '~J',' y, ,
~ .t.~i.;a;:." .: ..~. .
EXHIBIT B4
, I.
P..~t
,-
5_
II:
~ I I
. Ii
~ I
,- I'
i /5 !
". If I
111 ~
I j ,
; ~ @ , I
f ~ ,
. II ;.. ~ It
i=- ~ I!I~ : I I~-
~....,.. . I I I :.-
~ E.~ !,.
!.....,.- I . r- ......,
rri ; I I
\~:\ ! i
\l o~! ! -
~ i 1 ,
~ I I
~ i
YO' 'I
' I
~ ! - ! i
F-- I v I '
"";.' ~ I
",' +- I
ii' I I ,~: '
,d / f ~ ; ~ ~ '\
' I'
, i i 1- 1" I I
~ ~ @ 0 ~ ~,~ @JI$
I
J
e
/ I '
, I I
,;.,. ~~,
~~v
!
, ~ ~ 't ..i.o...;'~:~ ~"CSe
I f~T:-.i'ii~F_w;,tt;.~
i - ~ <(s I ~ It 1C . ~
"... ~I'lllis:
5 .. 11'. "~ I !i:
t i ~ ;. r ~ f J 111 i G
t ~ s; i- '''1.t1:y
filitri~J e
.k.Bi 1~!: t
.~r -~-=--r-
~'~, " r-
! I '
!!. .J
ti~ ~,' :/' ,
t . ,
, ! 1: -.... ~'----" ::::;';:L--:',,I ", n. ,_Wii_,,,,",, J
~ .. ~I ..w...,_~~.~---:. G:1 -.-- I
. .........._, - ~ -'. - ....-. . .,
ennsoll _,_....~.._ ~ ~_. ~tJiiii.~ __.____. _:~ .___
f ~ ,",_~,C4~:::"~-=-;;'::: ~\~~y:)'f. --.......
I Ulg6S -..~'._...'"- ,--. _ __,_.. ,.' .-_ __
...~...:.._........ ...~.",-. ,........,
! -._.-.~....- .......~, ,_-00:', ..., -.-c .
i ,--......r.......~... '..~~..-=::; .
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT
MINUTES
September 19, 2000
Page 1 A TT ACHMENT 1
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Greene called the regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo
Grande to order at 7:10 p.m.
ROLL CALL
X Commissioner Costello
X Commissioner Keen
X Commissioner London
ABSENT Vice-Chair Parker
X Chair Greene
APPRO V AL OF MINUTES
The minutes of September 5, 2000 were approved as amended.
VICE-CHAIR PARKER ARRIVED AT THE MEETING.
ITEM I.
A. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None
B. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
1. Letter to the Planning Commission from Sharon Shepherd, dated September 19, 2000
regarding Agenda Item No. 111., Pre-Application for the Chevron Station.
2. Letter to the Planning Commission from Liane Peterson, dated September 18, 2000 regarding
Agenda Item No. II. A. Conditional Use Permit for the New Hope Church.
3. Memorandum to FILE regarding Public Hearing Notices for Agenda Item No. II. A. Conditional
Use Permit for New Hope Church
4. Memorandum to the Planning Commission from Kerry McCants, Community Development
Director regarding Status of Cleanup on Tract 1998 adjacent to James Way and La Canada
ITEM II. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
II.A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT CASE NO. 00-004; LOCATION 900 NORTH
OAK PARK BLVD.; APPLICANT - NEW HOPE CHURCH; REPRESENTATIVE - ROBERT
BURNETT
Kelly Heffernon, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and stated that the New Hope
Church is located in the Neighborhood Commercial District of the Oak Park Acres Planned
Development at the intersection of Oak Park Blvd. and James Way. The church facility
accommodates both the Little Oaks Preschool and the Royal Oaks Christian School.
Ms. Heffernon further explained that the church was originally approved in 1984 as a two-
phased project in which a scaled down Phase 1 was ultimately constructed. Since the original
Conditional Use Permit did not include the operation of a school facility, an amendment was
approved in 1997 to allow for both a preschool and elementary school. The City imposed a
maximum occupancy of 90 children for the preschool and 1 54 students for the elementary
school for a total of 244 students. Ms. Heffernon stated that the total of 225 students quoted
in the staff report is incorrect.
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT
MINUTES
September 19, 2000
Page 2
Ms. Heffernon further explained that the church was proposing a second amendment to the
original CUP to place a 960 square foot modular building on the east side of the property
boundary to provide additional classroom space for the Royal Oaks Christian School. The
temporary classroom would allow the school to keep the number of students down in the
existing classes and will not exceed the maximum occupancy. The request is for a three year
time period.
Ms. Heffernon stated that as conditioned, the exterior materials and colors of the modular
structure will match the existing church facility and the proposed project meets all relevant
Development Code requirements.
To date, staff has received two written public comments from neighboring property owners, which
were previously distributed.
Ms. Heffernon stated that staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached
resolution approving Amended Conditional Use Permit Case No. 00-004 subject to the conditions of
approval.
Commissioner London asked about the three- (3) year Conditional Use Permit time period. He
stated that according to his calculations this would end on September 19, 2003. However, in
the staff report, Exhibit A, paragraph 3 there is a different date. Which date was correct?
Ms. Heffernon stated that the deadline Mr. London was referring to was in reference to the
Conditional Use Permit itself, which was for a two-year time period. However, under special
conditions of this CUP, the time period would be three years after the issuance of a building
permit.
Commissioner Costello asked how many students were permitted at the school?
Ms Heffernon replied that 90 students were permitted at the pre-school and 154 students were
permitted at the elementary school.
Mr. Costello asked if the 90 children allowed for the pre-school were full time equivalents. If for
instance, some of the children were going part time, they could actually have 120, and if 60 of
them were part time this would be the equivalent of 30 full time. He asked if the numbers still
added up to the limit of 90 children?
Ms. Heffernon replied that the way the school is licensed there can be no more than 90 students
during one day attending the pre-school.
Mr. Costello asked if there were licenses that restrict the number of children that can be
educated at this facility? In other words, does someone license the facility, other than the City?
Ms. Heffernon stated that the school was licensed by the State and that the license is for the
number of students that was approved by the City.
Mr. Costello asked if the original Conditional Use Permit allowed for a specific number of
classrooms?
~---_._-----
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT
MINUTES
September 19, 2000
Page 3
Ms. Heffernon stated that the original Conditional Use Permit allowed 10 classrooms. She also
stated that the actual resolution approving the school facility is not specific about the number of
classrooms. The details on the number of classrooms were in the staff report.
Mr. Costello asked if the original Conditional Use Permit specified what the number of
classrooms should be, or was this an issue?
Ms. Heffernon stated that the original Conditional Use Permit was for a phased project,
however, they had submitted a revised project that was smaller than originally approved.
Therefore, she is not sure if ten classrooms was the number that was on site now.
Commissioner Costello asked if Ms. Heffernon knew if there was a limit set on the number of
classrooms or not?
Ms. Heffernon stated that she understood what Commissioner Costello was asking and identified
the Memorandum that he was referring to, however the final resolution for the Conditional Use
Permit did not specify the number of classrooms.
Vice-Chair Parker asked Ms. Heffernon to identify the exact parcel this project was referring to
with regard to the maps in the PD zoning section in the Development Code. Ms. Parker and Ms.
Heffernon then discussed the uses in the PD zoning and what the allowed setbacks would be.
Ms. Parker stated that the residents in this area had complained because the property was not in
compliance regarding drainage, grading, lighting shields and solid waste on the property. She
asked if they were in compliance at this time?
Ms. Heffernon stated that they were in compliance with drainage, grading, and lighting shields.
With regards to the solid waste issue, she stated she would defer this question to Pastor
Barnett.
Mr. Campbell stated that the drainage issue had been addressed several years ago. It had been
required in 1996 and it was addressed shortly thereafter.
Vice-Chair Parker and Ms. Heffernon discussed the number of children that was allowed by the
Conditional Use Permit and how many students were attending the school.
Vice-Chair Parker asked about the temporary permit that was being issued for three (3) years.
She stated that she does not recall the Planning Commission ever allowing three years for a
permit. Vice-Chair Parker asked about temporary permits on a Conditional Use Permit. She
asked if a temporary permit was based on the request of the applicant or was it at the discretion
of the staff?
Ms. Heffernon stated that the Planning Commission had the discretion to change this time period
to whatever they felt was appropriate. The three-year time limit had been discussed with the
Staff Advisory Committee. It was decided that, with the applicant's need, and what staff was
willing to consider temporary without putting in additional improvements, this was an
appropriate time limit.
- -------._-----------
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT
MINUTES
September 19, 2000
Page 4
Pastor Robert Barnett, 766 Naples, Grover Beach stated that at this point there were only 104
elementary students enrolled at the elementary school, 70 pre-school children per day and that
the school did not exceed the maximum allowed per day.
Pastor Barnett gave a brief history of the school explaining that he had come to pastor the
church 3 years ago. Within a few days of his arrival he had attended the City Council hearing on
the Conditional Use Permit. It was at this time that he learned about the problems the neighbors
had had with the church and the property on which it is located. His goal since then has been
to be a "team player" and address the concerns of both the neighbors and the City.
He stated that he had apologized for the way the previous pastor had opened the school without
the proper City permits. He further explained that he had also agreed to address the issues of
drainage and solid waste that had been stored on the site behind the fence. These issues were
taken care of at the time of the City Council hearings.
Pastor Barnett stated that he had heard that there was still some concern about construction
materials that are stored on the site and he had instructed his staff to remove these materials.
He also said that he wanted to stay within the constraints of the Conditional Use Permit and he
wanted to assure the City and the neighbors that this was the intent of the Church. The Church
was not looking at expanding further, but rather in the future, they would like to separate the
Church from the school facility.
Vice-Chair Parker and Pastor Barnett discussed the number of students in the school and the size
of the classrooms. Ms. Parker asked what the plans for the school were in the future as the
three-(3) year time limit did not allow them very long to decide what to do?
Pastor Barnett stated that they had to decide what was best for them to do and what, feasibly,
they could do. He did not have the answers to this question at this time.
Ms. Parker stated that the neighbors had had many concerns at this site and the Church had
taken care of this. She wanted Pastor Barnett to know that she appreciated this very much.
Concerning the construction material that still remains on the site, she asked if there was any
way to put this into storage or move it somewhere that the neighbors do not have to look at it?
Pastor Barnett stated that this material was going to be taken care and that it would be gone in
the next few days.
Commissioner Costello asked if the church was considering building to the north of the current
church site and how far north would they be building?
Pastor Barnett stated that, although they have room to build to the north, there was another
parcel of land towards the ocean that they have looked at and would possibly consider. They
are doing the research to find out what will be best both economically for the Church and for the
Community.
Commissioner Costello stated that he was appreciative of the willingness of the church to
consider the neighborhood when making their decisions.
---,...--......--- --_.~---
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT
MINUTES
September 19, 2000
Page 5
Commissioner Keen stated that the map showed that the church owned two parcels at this
location and he asked if they had been merged into one parcel? He stated that it appeared that
the church was built over the parcel lines.
Ms. Heffernon stated that her drawing of the church building was not drawn to scale and that it
did not go over onto the second parcel. She also stated the Assessor's parcel map showed this
area divided into two parcels.
Chair Greene stated that he appreciated Pastor Barnett's sincerity in taking care of the problems
at this site. He stated that the issue of the past problems with the neighbors had nothing to do
with granting or denying the request for a modular schoolroom. Mr~ Greene referenced the letter
from the Peterson's concerning the materials stored. He informed Pastor Barnett that this item
would be going on to the City Council for final approval. Although the Planing Commission
would not make the removal of the materials a condition for approval, he wanted Pastor Barnett
to know that he had said these materials would be removed and that there were members of the
City Council present at this meeting that would know of this promise.
Wayne Russell, 367 Hollister, representing New Hope Church spoke to the Commission stating
that he had met with a representative from the City and the following items would be addressed:
. A new fire hydrant would be installed on the site.
. New landscaping will be put in place to help screen the new modular building.
. The modular roof will be painted to match the terra cotta tile roof of the church.
Commissioner Costello asked what type of roof the modular unit had?
Mr. Russell stated that it had a metal roof.
Vice-Chair Parker asked if the modular unit complied with all the State safety codes including fire
standards?
Mr. Russell stated that the modular unit was being leased from a company that leases or sells
these types of units to all the public and school buildings in the area and he assumed that they
would comply with all State regulations.
Commissioner Keen stated that, according to the drawings, the air conditioner units were
located on the James Way side of the building. He wondered if they could be placed on the
north end so they would not be visible from James Way?
Mr. Russell stated that they did not have an option because of the way the modular has to sit on
the property. It has to back up to the pre-school play yard and another existing classroom and it
would be too noisy to the have the air conditioner located next to the classroom. He also stated
that the air conditioner would be screened with the new landscaping.
Commissioner Costello stated that he did not have a problem with the project as it had been
presented, however he does not believe that the Development Code allows metal roofs. In
Development Code Section 9-' 0.090 for Mobil Homes and Manufactured Home requirements,
section 3.A , states "a roof constructed of asphalt, composition shingle, tile, crushed rock or
similar roofing material, except metal... is acceptable". The land Use Element also states, that
in keeping with the small town character of Arroyo Grande, metal roofs should be avoided. Mr.
._._-_.~._.~------_._..-
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT
MINUTES
September 19, 2000
Page 6
Costello stated that this issue would have to be addressed in deciding whether or not to approve
this project.
Commissioner Costello stated that aside from this, the limit to the number of classrooms is
included in the original CUP and he felt that the Commission should make sure this condition is
watched, especially with the possibility of a new school building being built.
Vice-Chair Parker asked staff about Condition No. 6 that stated that the modular building should
be removed three years after issuance of a building permit. She asked if the church would be
able to come back and ask for an extension?
Ms. Heffernon stated that if the church wanted to extend their time limit they would have ~o
come back for another amendment to the Conditional Use Permit.
Ms. Parker asked why Condition No.7 was included in this permit? She didn't think that it was
the usual requirement to condition what color the roof would have to be.
Ms. Heffernon stated that the ARC had asked that this be a condition.
Ms. Parker stated that the way Pastor Bennett had discussed this situation with the neighbors
and the fact that he is trying to make amends and make things acceptable with the
neighborhood was commendable. Therefore, she does not have a problem with the project.
She said that there were certain things were all right with her because this was only a temporary
situation. For instance, she does have a problem with the ten-foot set back, but in this case she
is willing to overlook it. She also felt there should be trees between the building and the edge of
the property, but again, because this is temporary it would alright. Ms. Parker stated that she is
willing to accept the metal roof because this is a temporary building and the church is willing to
make it look better by painting it. She also stated that she does not believe that the color of the
roof should be in the Conditions of Approval.
Commissioner Keen stated that he thought that in the original Conditional Use Permit, the
reference to classrooms was meant to be a reference to Sunday School classrooms. The
problem arose when the church wanted to change the verbiage from Sunday School classrooms
to regular school classrooms.
Commissioner Costello stated that he felt there was still a void in what was permitted and what
was not. He would like the language of the CUP to be more specific and cleaner.
Commissioner Keen stated that with regards to the metal roof since this was a temporary
building he felt that this was all right. Also, since the ARC saw fit to put a condition about the
roof color in the permit to make it blend in with the existing structures he feels this is
appropriate. He stated that the three-year time limit was a good condition. He also said that he
liked where the modular unit was placed on the site rather than on the north side of the building
where it would infringe on the neighborhood.
Mr. Keen asked Mr. Campbell to explain why Condition No. 14 asked for the modular unit to be
fully sprinkled but they were putting in a fire hydrant instead. He felt that the Condition should
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT
MINUTES
September 19, 2000
Page 7
be amended to have the words "either/or" inserted if the fire hydrant was going to take the
place of the sprinklers.
Chair Greene asked Mr. Campbell if he had language that could be used to modify Condition No.
14.
Mr. Campbell stated that the language should be "alternatively, an onsite fire hydrant to be
located as approved by the Fire Department".
Commissioner London stated that he did not have any problem with this project.
Commissioner Keen moved that the Planning Commission adopt:
RESOLUTION NO. 00-1761
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ARROYO GRANDE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL APPROVE AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
CASE NO. 00-004, THEREBY AMENDING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT 84-368, APPLIED FOR BY THE NEW HOPE CHURCH,
LOCATED AT 900 NORTH OAK PARK BOULEVARD.
with Exhibit A as amended. Vice-Chair Parker seconded the motion. The motion was approved by
the following roll call vote:
ROLL CALL VOTE
YES Commissioner Costello
YES Commissioner Keen
YES Commissioner London
YES Vice-Chair Parker
YES Chair Greene
II. B. PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM 00-004; LOCATION - 1166 EAST GRAND AVENUE;
APPLICANT - GRAND AVENUE SELF-STORAGE; REPRESENTATIVE - JIM CRAVENS
Teresa McClish, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report and stated that the owner of Grand
Avenue Self-Storage was applying for a Planned Sign Program Amendment to place one ground
sign adjacent to the Wet Pets ground sign at 1164 Grand Avenue. The site is located in the
General Commercial District. Ms. McClish explained that Grand Avenue Self-Storage is located at
1166 Grand Avenue behind Wet Pets. The owner of Wet Pets has a Planned Sign Program,
approved in 1996, for their signs. Both parties have agreed to have the Grand Avenue Self-
Storage ground sign on the Wet Pet's property since it will be more visible from Grand Avenue.
Ms. McClish stated that at the current time there is one ground sign and one wall sign for Wet
Pets, and one wall sign for Grand Avenue Self-Storage on the site. All the signs are non-
illuminated. Ms. McClish explained that the proposed ground sign is consistent with all
Development Code requirements. The proposed ground sign is 24-sq. ft. and would be located in
a narrow planter area.
ATTACHMENT 2
New Hope Church
900 N. Oak Park Blvd. Arroyo Grande Ca.93420
Royal Oaks Christian School 489-9200
Little Oaks Preschool 489-459-8-
Robert L Burnett Pastor
- ,
To: City of Arroyo Grande, Planning Department
From: New Hope Church (Previously know as Oak Park Foursquare)
Date: July 22od, 2000
Subject : Amendment to Use Permit to include a 24X40 modular
classroom to be used in the Royal Oaks
Christian School.
History:
Little Oaks Preschool has been open since April of 1990 and Royal Oaks Christian
School has been open since the fall of 1993. At this present time we have an enrollment
of 125 children and employ 15 adults in our Little Oaks Preschool. The Royal Oaks
Christian School has an enrollment of 100 children and employs 20 adults. Together our
schools employ 35 adults and serve 225 students from this area. At present time we have
been forced to combine some of our grades due to growth and facility limitations. With
the city's approval we would like to place a modular in the location specified on the plot
plans. 1bis would allow for us to keep the number of students down in our aJready
existing classes, but allow for us to grow to the city's specified occupancy of 120
students for our Royal Oaks Christian School.
The modular would be a 24X40 unit, which is specified on the plot plans and the modular
drawings. We would also use a facing and color that would blend in with aJready existing
structures. Thank for your consideration of this matter, we look forward to hearing nom
you soon.
Pastor Robert Burnett
A TT ACHMENT 3
RECEIVED
CITY OF ARROYO GHM~DE
00 OCT -5 Pii ~: 19
, October 3, 2000
'~el.ta.~Y
Arroyo Grande City Han
P.O. Box 550
Arroyo Grande, Ca. 93420
Dear Mr. Lady,
lam writing to encourag~ you to vote yes on the Royal Oaks Christian
School modular classroom project. My daughters have attended Little
Oaks and Royal Oaks for over four years now. I have worked. in the
classroom as a teacher's aide, substitute and playground supervisor. I
made it a point to know that school inside and out. Frankly, I believe it is
the best-kept secret in town!
Believe me when I say that Pastor Robert, Patty Clarkson and the entire
staff, have a heart for God and a heart for every child in that schooL As
a parent and staff member, I couldn't be more proud of Royal Oaks
Christian School. Every idea, every need is prayerfully considered.
My daughter Katelynn, is currently in the first grade at ROCS. Her
classroom is set up in the sanctuary awaiting a modular dassrO()m. Your
vote could enable her to be set up in her "very own" classroom as early
as next month. Your vote of support would be greatly appreciated.
Thaok you.
Sincerely,
&d'2tf~
Cathy Lee '~f~~ C,'. ~~ MM~if
:;203~ j~~~1Wr/le-~
~~,Ca.
73 'fCf c-J
695 South 7th Street ATTACHMENT 4
Gtovet BeC1ch, CA 93433 RECEIVED
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Odobet 2, 2000 00 OCT - 5 Ai'ilI: 3 ,
RE: RoYC11 OC1ks ChtistiC1n School ModulC1t' clC1sst'oom Pt'oject
MC1YO~ Mike I.4dy i
Anoyo Gt'C1nde City HC1[1
P.O. Box 550
Attoyo GtC1nqe, CA 93421
Deqt MC1yot,
I C1m wt'iting in t'egC1tds to the ROYC11 OC1ks Chti5tiC1n School ModulC1t clC1sstoom Pt'ojed.
This school C1nd its pt'oject C1t'e positive community C1ssetS. This school teC1ches its childten
to hC1ve C1 positive chC1t'C1det while educC1ting theit' minds. Cht'istiC1n eduCC1tion is C1 need in
this C1req. This project will expC1nd the school's C1bility to continue building strong minds
C1nd chC1tC1der in the children who C1ttend. I completely support this project C1nd encow.qge
you to fuvor it C1S well. ThC1nk you fot' yout time.
CotdiC1l1y,
1M tU &;f!tJ
TC1tC1 MC1tiC1 Stilwell
,.
~
~
t-~ C.I~ M(U~~y
.k€K(~'
C\~ ~r\1
A TT ACHMENT 5
RECEIVED
September 28, 2000 CITY O?'ARROYO GHANDE
Arroyo Grande City Hall 00 DCi -2 PH~: 20
P.O. Box 550
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
. i Dear Mike Lady, ,
,
We would like to express our support for the Royal Oaks Christian School on
Oak Park and Jamesway in Arroyo Grande. This school provides sound
education, and is an asset to our community. Currently, two of our children
attend this school.
The number of students attending this school is expanding. The school is
attempting to accommodate this expansion by insta11ing a modular classroom
unit on the property. We think that this is a viable solution and we support
it. We hope that you witt support and approve this project at your next City
Council meeting.
Please give this matter your heartfelt attention.
Sincerely,
Mary & Jim McDonnel fYI~ ;f/j)-rl/J
134 La Ftoricita
Pismo Beach, CA 93449 J~~
773-9391
toj:;..
'p2
c..cLu1C~ :
e '. c;:,~ MCVt~
K ar:t1.:.
-,- ___..___..__0"___.____ --...-
A TT ACHMENT 6
RECEIVEO ,. ',:nc-
CITY Or ARROYO GRI\;rl;c.
OOSEP 21 PM 3: 4' 1021 Acorn Drive --
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
September 26, 2000
Mayor Mike Lady
Arroyo Grande City Hall
P.O. Box 550
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
Dear Mayor Lady,
I writing to express my support of Royal Oaks Christian School's expansion project that
will be coming before the City Council for approval in October. As a homeowner in the
immediate area of the school, I believe Royal Oaks is an asset to our neighborhood. Over
the years that the school has been in operation, the administration has been sensitive and
considerate to the neighborhood regarding traffic flow and noise, and they have always
maintained an attractive and well cared for physical appearance. In addition, it is an asset
to our community to have the option of choosing a Christian education at a school that
has high academic standards.
I urge you to approve the addition of the modular classrooms.
Respectfully,
CUUu(~ p~
Maryellen Perrin
Q.: Ci1 M(u\~e,(
'COI'Y\M; Dw. f),Y"~
--"----
.
. . RECEIVED
ATTACHMENT 7 SEP 1 5 2000
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
To Whom It May Concern:
My family and I have been a neighbor of the Four Square Church since
December of 1994. From the beginning we have had a difficult relationship. We
live at 1024 Robin Circle.
We have included numerous articles, reports, and final decisions relating to the
..,
previous request for addition(buildings. What stands out most is the Church
believing they have the right to expand without proper approvals. You will
notice language stating that the Church has never had approval for a daily full-
time school, and their intent was only to offer a Sunday program to Church
attendees. That has never been the case, as they have been operating a full-
time day care/school facility for some time now.
The planning division noted fire alarm concerns, traffic concerns, neighborhood
reaction, emergency vehicle access, etc. Each time these items were addressed
the Church chose not to submit another CUP. Instead, wanted to bypass the
planning division and have the City Council over-ride the rejected proposal. It
was also stated that the Church wished not to notify their neighbors. Our
concern is that these issues have not been addressed.
Given the history of the church it is our concern that additional classrooms will
only add to the increased traffic, noise decibel, and general lack of concern for
any surrounding neighbors that has already been an existing problem for many
years. Not to mention having this all happen right outside our back fence.
We believe a serious review needs to be done with regards to running a full-time
school. Let alone any expansion proposals. Please take the time to read the
enclosed and consider fairly what is at stake. Thank you for your time.
Sincere' 'c- ~ CJ~-4.
To Holbrook Claire Holbrook
---_._--~-- __~..J
.
,
. CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING '. -
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande will hold
a Public Hearing on the following project:
CASE NO. Conditional Use Permit Amendment 00-004
APPLICANT: New Hope Church
LOCATION: 900 N. Oak Park Blvd.
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION: Categorical Exemption per Section 15303 CEOA. Guidelines
REPRESENTATIVE: Robert Burnett
The Planning Commission will consider an amendment to Conditional Use Permit 84-368 to allow
the placement of a 960 square foot modular building to provide additional classroom space for the
Royal Oaks Christian School.
Any person affected or concerned by this application may submit written comments to the
Community Development Department at 214 E. Branch Street, Arroyo Grande, California, during
normal business hours (8:00 AM. to 5:00 P.M.) before the Planning Commission hearing, or
appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the project and the environmental impacts at
the time of hearing.
IF YOU CHALLENGE AN ITEM IN COURT, YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY
THOSE ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING DESCRIBED
IN THIS NOTICE, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED TO THE PLANNING
COMMISSION AT, OR PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC HEARING.
FAILURE OF ANY PERSON TO RECEIVE .THE NOTICE SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE
GROUNDS FOR ANY COURT TO INVALIDATE THE ACTION OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY
FOR WHICH THE NOTICE WAS GIVEN.
Time and Place of Hearing:
Tuesday, September 19, 2000 at 7:00 P.M.
Arroyo Grande City Council Chambers
215 E. Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, California 93420
mission Secretary
.----.- ----.- J
I ',,"" "',;. ," , riM'" Ul _Ul~~,:',':,~"_Y_CU
.. ,~ ,"'. ..-," .
Church's requ~sfior;:Classr().orT.~
rejected by Plannilig . Commission
, ..." '.
By Tom Parsons These, 'commiss'ioners Roben thatomer churches and organiza-
Staff Writer Carr and ,John Keen said, would tions have been given approval te
ARROYO GRANDE ~ Pastor have been part of the conditional use move .moduIars ontO their propert)
Phillip Coleman and his parishioner pennit if the facilideswere origi-, without having to apply for another
and attorney Michael Zimmermannally intended tobeuse,d as ~ ~~ol .:coodifional use permit. -: ..;. "
may have .10 "turn the other cheek'" on a daily basis. j' -f.~~'::,:,~ff ,;:\7:.:, ;~' 'Of the exampleS he gave. Doreen
toward the City Council now that According Coleman, the Church Liberto-Blanck, the city'~ director
the Arroyo Grande Planning Com- ~ool has about 80., students cur- of planning, '~hed two that
mission has denied their request to rentlyregistered. He.~ that were in fact reqWied to apply for a
instaIl two relocatable classroom the number would top out at about conditional use' penniL ,',
units in the parking lot of the Oak 150 in m.e. IJCxt f~w years.". Zimmern1aI1 cbaDgect hiS assertion
Park FoW'Sq~ ~urch. , In addiuon, be .~. emphasized to "some" were given approval.
The church site IS located on the that ~school o;yas mtended solely Then upon further research,
northeast comer of James Way ~d . for his ~gregauon ~ the students Liberto-Blanck discovered that all
Oak Park Boulevard; The ~tlon were mt:mbers C?f his. church. the cases Zimmerman had given as
came at l.ast Tue~y ~ m~ung of Later m the discussions, Coleman examples s1ipportingthe church's
the Planning CO~S1on.. ' cbangedthat figure ~~'tSO percent of .. '
, . The issue, according to comments the students 'at the'school were poS1~on had, to ~, c:onttary,,~
.', from the commissioners; was not members ofhis., , congre,' OJI'eJlt1."on. .requ, Ired to ,.~,bt&1n the ,P, e, ,rmns
whether the church should have Also in ~ originaI.&rf'DDents through the ~ ~..",.;~ .
classrooms on the property, but presen~ tC;t.tbe',~lon and However, the inf~on which
whether the church was attempting rec~edjD, the~. ~ 1984 finally bottomed the scale on the
to circumvent' city ordinances by' wc;re'the,' .'reDUirb 1:ron1 Yone, sup- negative side against the church's
~~~~~g~~~~'s~bn~ ~i!~~~~-~ =c=:: r;:~i''::::m%:;
pennit. ' '~j"'. .~ h',' \:~',~'~'~ ~~":" :;' ',~tYt'hirit.i!iG...~Sb'bOrhOod buiIdiiigswoUid'i1ave tvjo"class-
"They,lre"putdng' in'"some'thingcomDietciat'(prOject)P~ the ropms''eacIi'o;'' ~.'..;::.., "~"'"
that was not part of the original traffic g~ated ~ a~, takes 'The approved nurDberof _ class-
building," noted commissioner Bill place primarily on SuDday~", - . 1'OOIDS in the original condid~ use
Deviny. "So if they want to change, . 'CommissionerJ:oJm,' 'Soto 'sug- permit was limited to 10. Coleman
then they should go back through for gested the possibilitytbat the panel mcfZimmerman admitted having 11
the conditional use penniL" ,could help ~ church through an classrooms in ,use eVen now for the
However, Coleman express~ his abbreviated approval process if the school. ,
concern about receiving a favorable church would supply the commis- The next step for the church is
response if he had to take his request sion with 'a list of neighbors within' either an appeal of the commission's
through a public hearing process. 300 feet of the property so they negadve resolution to the City
He and Zimmerman were also could be notified. . Council or an applicadon for an
concerned about the cost of such a Coleman turned down the offer architectual review and condidonal
process, which could require ~other ~. it would still involve a pub- use permiL, ,.,. '..,: : "~" .
enviromnental impact report. lic hearing. ' . , Coleman and Zimmerman indi-
,However, as the discussion prog- Zimmerman also tried to assert cated they wo1ild pursue an appeal.
ressed, commissioners began to , ,.,,', ",~,~~"i..."'~. ,'~,', '
" :- question even the use of th~ class- ,... ,: . ....~ :\; ',~-<:.'~" ", ,t" ''':,', ...; ','
- h' rooms on the property because the ';,;Z ,\' ',' , ... '... .
church intended to use the new fa- '. ., .,......
cHities for a daily-attended elemen- , . -
..:/... iMy school. . ,
/ The original conditional use per- ' . ,
. . mit, granted after an appeal.to the ' " '.
City Council in 1985, was issued for-hi .:,
classrooms 4esignated for'Sunday " '
school programs and not for a full- .
time school. several of ~ ~s-, ,~
sioners pointed out. ,'"..~(.).:.J ;
As support for their understand:..
ing of the conditions which existed
10 years ago, comn1issioners ~
the lack of issues addressed in the
original application, such as bus ac-
cess and a traffic study. _~
--"~
, City"f
c:lfr:, taya g'tandE. P. o. Box 550
214 East Branch Street
Public Works Department Arrvyo Granda, CA 9342:
Phone (805)473-5440
June 17, 1996 FAX (805) 473-0386
Reverend Phil Coleman
Foursquare Church
900 Oak Park Boulevard
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
Subject: Grading Permit requirements and alteration of drainage
Dear Reverend Coleman:
This is to confirm with you our discussions in the field on the afternoon of June 3, 1996. As you
recall. we had previously discussed the grading permit for the Foursquare Church as well as the
drainage improvements required by that plan earlier last year and corresponded on the matter on
February 15, 1996, (copy attached).
More recently. the Church commenced grading without an approved modification to the
previously approved grading plan. After reviewing the site in the field and discussing the matter
with you and Bill Ballagh., the City's inspector. we concluded that the foHowing actions should be
taken:
1. The Church will proceed to retain an engineer or other qualified consultant to reflect its
desired modifications to the previously approved grading plan. This new plan can show
grading to occur iri phases or can reflect the Church's desire to construct all of the grading
at one time.
.
2. The drainage along the north easterly side of the property should provide for a swale or
other drainage facilities, generally as shown on the original grading plan, or an approved
alternative so as to prevent drainage migrating to adjoining property owners' yards.
... If the Church wishes to construct a building on this pad in the future, a'soils consultant
.J.
should be retained in order to detennine the condition of the fill and its structural
,suitability for building purposes. .
4. In order to assist you in reviewing the dimensions o~your northeasterly property line, the
Public Works Department.can provide you with a copy of the recorded tract map for the
adjoining properties.
.
5. You discussed with Mr. BaUagh and me an alternative to regrading.the back yard of the
pmperty immediately to the east of your existing fence along the playground. Any such
, .
'C'VUTRTT CCR"
-- ,."---,,.,. ---...
J UN-tt: (-1 ::I::I~ .1..1.''''' I..ll T ur ~IU uro-u'U,IC UC"".h.,I.....I...,~ , ........
Arroyo Grande pl~rmiDg COlD1"icdOD. Page 4
June 6, 1995
Chairperson Keen said the next public hearing item was Vans Companies, Im:. alone with twO .
non-public hearings, but the Oak PaIk Foursquare Church requested to be bard first ro which
Vons agreed. The Commissioners agreed to this anangement.
k""NON-PUBUC 'R'RA.1UNG - REQUEST FOR IN'I'ERPRETATION OF ~.t1b;.1~
RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS ARE BEING PERMI.TrED UlmER CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT .cASE NO. 84-368 AND ARUu:.1:J!.CTURAL REVIEW CASE NO. 15-328
AT 900 OAK PARK BOm:..EVARD, APPUCANT IS OAK PABK FOURSQUARE
CHURCH
P1ann:ing Director l.iberto-BIanck presented this item to the Ptanning Commi<<ion ariDl a CUP
was approved in 1984 for a LWO phased church facility. that an AR.c for phase I of canmucti.on
was approved by the City Council in 1985, but before building pe.tmits c:ou1d be _JNI, die CUP
expi:recL Ms. Liberto-Blanck said the applicant R:SUbmitted the CUP whid1 was re-approved by
the City Council in January of 1986. pt2nnl!\g Director l.10e:ro-B1,.ftck gave die .rest of the
background of this project stating that Mr. Zimmerman approach staff early this year zegmling
insza11ing rel()l"~ohle classrcoms on the site and was advised a CUP would be mquired. She
identified other similar projectS that required a CUP and provided reasons CUP's were ~tary
for such requests. Ms. Libeno-Blanck advised the Commissioners that they would be making
a recommendaIion to the City Council, as this was in a. Planned Development Zone.
Mike Zimmerman, representing the applicant, gave reasons why he felt they should not be .
required to submit another CUP, and that these modular units should be considered as part of
phase I of their original CUP-
Chairman Keen asked Mr. Zimmerman where on the property he proposed to put these units to
which Mr. Zimmennan replied on the East end of the lower parking lot replacing ten parking
spaces.
Chairman Keen asked Mr. Zimmc:nnan how many classrooms them were at the present time.
Mr. Zimmerman stated tbe.te were 9 classrooms and there was no office at tbe pftSeDt time, but
an upstairs sound room is beir1C used for a ma.ke-sbift office..
Commissioner Tappan asked the applicant regardinc the schaal at this time ancf Mr. Zimmerman
said they have had 3. pmschool for the past six yem and a grade school up to the e:ichth pade
for the past couple of yeatS. Commissioner Tappan asked what the Dine cJamooms would be
used for if it was only up to grade eighL Mr. Zimmerman ICSpOnded that they only had about
80 students now and they want to have appiopti. size clas~ for each. Also, he continued,
they needed more classroom spaa: for the Christim Educa.non Department for SWldaJ momi:ng
and so forth. Mr. Zimmem1an stated it would be a combined use plus ofticc space.
Chairman Keen asked Mr. Zimmerman if the grades would be extended beyond tile ei&hth, to
which Mr. Zimmerman mplied it would .remain at the eighth gI3de level, and they did JJat
a.1'I~tc over ISO students at anyone time. .
Commissioner Deviny asked the size of the proposed units and applicant xesponded 24 ft. by 50
ft.
-
--- - --.---.- ----
,JUN-~'(-J..':::r=,:::> J.J.'~ '-~ I I U/'" ~IU ~I"""'"
~~'-..J~ I . -... .
Arroyo GraDde pI~nftil1: Cmnmicci()D J.6age3
.TW'le 6, 1995
Phil Colemau, pastor of the c:hUl'Ch, also .spoke in favor of the project.
The Commissioners questioned tbe applicants at.1eDgth l'C5iAding di1fermt asp:crs as to number
of cIassroo~, offices, size of proposed modular UDiIs, and so folth. Some of the ccm~~ of
the Commi~sioners were:
. Would the number ot parking spaces still be snfficimt?
. How would the units look from the street?
. Would emergency v~l\icles have appropriate access to tbc=~?
. Would the proposed increase in S1'Qdenrs involve a traffic impact?
. Would the pIeSent alarm system be connected to these units?
. Would the nfl!:igbbors have any opposition to the added units?
It was unclear whether a weekday school was pan of the CUP originaUy approved..
The applicants conrinued to smre that they were opposed to filing for another CUP _ PWming
Director Liberto-Blanck then suggested that the applicam provide the names and addresses of
~ neighbors within 300 fe:t of the project and another non-pubIic hearinl would be held for an
., inteIpretation. The applicants said mey did not want notic::s sent to their nqhbors.
The Commissionez:5 continued to discuss with the applicant ways they might review this
proposed addition without a CUP including architectural amendment with pIO~ owner
notification, but the applicants swed they pxefer.red a denial by the P1~nnil'i Commission and
they would go to the City Council.
Commissioner CalT made a motion: · After due research and de1ibc:2tioq the P121U1ina
Comm;~~Qn finds that the proposed reloc:atabh: dasaooms, subject to tt~~ and sitiDI appIu~
of the MC, City Engineer, and PlamUng Directory will take tbe pJace of c:IassrDom.s Dot
" consaucted with piase I of the previous approvals 'and that now tbe:refore be it resolved that the
Planning Commission hereby makes the inreqm:tation tbat inmr112tinn of two reI~~ble
classrooms for a period not to exceed five ycm is pemIiuc:d under CondhinMt Use Permit Case
No. 84-368 and ArchitectuIal Review Case No. 85-328..
Mr. Zimmennan stated it was two modular unitS, Dot two cIasstooms, far a total of lour
additional cla.ssrcoms. When ColXlmi c.anuer em further questioned the appJicaDu about the
units, the applicants .responded they were doubJe-.wide, split in half tEailer aaits..
Commissioner Caa withdrew his motion.
. The following action was taken:
TOTAL P.B7."
-- _.....~_...._...------------~.- -------
..I1./I"-C.I-.I.:;1:;..;I J..J..-lItJe.,I "-,,, I I "'-'I r...",..., I...... ......". '1.1.1....
~-._~ ..-
J Agenda J.tCm .NO. .u..L.l.:.
.
'-r-,
TO: P~g Commission
VIA: Doreen LiberTo-Blanck, Director of Planning
FROM: Scott E. Spier1ing, Cw:rent Planner
DATE: June 6, 1995
SUBJECT:" Request for IntetpreWion, Oak Park Foursquare Church .
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends char. the Planniq Commission discuss the in~. J'P.quest:ing the
applicant's representative to provide clarification as l'~saIj', and then adopt one of the two
amched. resolutions.
BACKGROUND:
In 1984, the applicant received a Conditional Use Permit (CUP No. 84-368) for an ovenll sire .
development plan for a two phased church facility. Before constrUCtion could begin on either
phase, .aII Architectural Review (ARC) application had to be subm.itted, reviewed and approved.
On May 28, 1985, the Cily Council approved ARC 85-328 for phase I of construction of the
church. Before building permits could be issued, the CUP expired. The applicant resubmitted
the CUP and it was re-approved by the City Council on January 27, 1986.
In We 1986, building permits were issued for the church.' These permits zef]ecr a ~led-down
phase L Several offices and classrooms were not included in the ~. doc:umems that
were included in the approval of ARC 85-328. The churcb was cooscrucred per &:be c:onsuuction
documenrs and has been occupied since the !are 1980's.
In January 1994, Staff was made aware that the church was planning on becinning an danenrary ,
school on the site. Stiff researched the previous approvals and found notbiDg to imi~tP. that
a school was permitted on the site.. Staff contacted Mike Zimmi!nn2n~ a .L~l~~'iYe:tbr me
chUl'cl1 to inform him that the church should apply for a CUP for tbe school or at Jast an
intcrpretaticn of whether the school was aUowcct at the site. In February 1994. Mr. ZimmcmIan
informed stJff that the church felt that the school was permj~ uncfer their preYiaa appmvals
and they felt that there was no reason to submit a CUP or a. request for intap.tr<f..I~OII School
was scheduled to SW't in September 1994. "
DISCUSSION: .
Bawr this year, Mr. Zimmcnnan approached staff, on behalf of the c:Inm:h, about fttpm~g .
relot-atable classrooms on the site. Staff indicaled that a CUP would be b:iIt~ This
determination was consistent with past approval!. including:
-- ...- ~ - -
. .JU'l-4::'(-1.::,i~ J.J.'C.I. I,..J , J ur MJ'V',....,... .....,.,........... --
.PJ~"nj.,: CommimOD "-'...... .,....., ~'-' , . "'-r
.,/
"Request for Interpretation
Oak Park FouISquare Church
JUDe 6, 1995
Page Two
. rcl~tablc ~oms at Coasral Christian School;
. a. rcloc:atable room at St. Patrick's Church;
. a rclocarable da.ss:room at St. Patrick's School; and
. the re10carable Rancho GIande sales office.
The CUP process allowed review of the adequacy of parking, fire proteetion measures, and
geneI2l use, location and architeCtUre of the unirs. The CUP also allowed the PWming
Commission to place an expiration dare on the units so that they would not become permanent.
The applicant's repxesentative asked that staff research past approvals for the church, ~ri~g that
he felt that past approvals should be viewed as allowing the relDcatabJe unirs. Staff reviewed
the CUP and ARC applications and still felt that a CUP and ARC should be tI!IqUited for the
reJocatab1e units. However, staff told the applicant's representative that the church could file
an interprer.a.tion request to be reviewed by the Planning Commission. The applicant bas filed
that request (see attaChed).
~ Attached are reduced plans that were prepared for ARC 85-328. These plans show the site plan
and floorpIans for phase 1. Phase II is shown in dashed lines on the site plan. Areas on the
floor plans that have been "bubbled-in. were not constructed. It should be noted that three (3)
additional classrooms were constrUcted on the same level as the medial sound room. These
classrooms were not shown on the ARC drawings.
Also attached are minutes and resolutions for the Planning Commission and City Council
meetings that were held on this project.
It should be noted that the applicant bas not addressed the issue of the school on the site. Sraff
still feels that the applicant should submit a request for intcxptetation or a CUP for the schooL
However, the applicant's represenrative does indicam in his letter that the church would like the
reloc:ata.b1e units to be in place by the beginniflg of September.
PLANNING COMl\1ISSlON OPTIONS
l. The. Planning Commission may intctpret that iDsrallation of modular c1a.ssroom units is
permitted under CUP 84-368 and ARC 85-328.
,Yy6)
0\01 ..,y 2. The Planning Commission may iDteqttet that mqal1anon of moduw classroom units is
l/\Yi not pcrmiued without first applying and being gIatlted a CUP and ARC tor the units.
Attachments: Letter from Michael ZimmemIan
, Minutes, Resolutions and Sr.a:ff Rc:pons for CUP 84-368 and ARC 85-328
Resolutions ('2)
Reduced plans for ARC 85-328 .
-
..-. .....
.-... ------. .-......--... ..-. ................-. -'. :~~
---. -- ---- -- --
.Mayor and Oty Council
'. Request for IDterpt.etation, Oak Park Foursquare Chun:h
<,
June 27, 1995
Pale 2 .
DISCUSSION:
During the June 6th Planning Commission meeting, Mr. Zimmerman, and Phil Coleman., pastor
of the Oak Park Foursquare Church, clarified sever:al issues. The church wants to instaJI twO..
'24.ft."x"SO:ft:moduIar units which would cansist of a total of four additional classroOms. The
units would be located on the cast end of the lower parking lot replacing ten parking spaces.
The church has nine existing classrooms. Mr. Zimmerman explained that a preschool bas been
operating the past six years, and a grade school up to the eighth grade bas been opexaEing the
past couple of years~ There are cur.rcntly 80 StUdents, but the applicant does not anticipate more
than 150 students at anyone time in the fumre.
, The Planning Commission asked the two Planning Comm;4:s1oners on the Planning Comm;wou
at the time the project was approved in the 1980's whether the approval included a weekday
schooL It was uncle.ar that a weekday school was part of the original CUP.
Some, of the C9mmission concerns included the reduction in the number of parking spaces;
providing adequate acc=ss to the modular units for emergency vehicles; potential increase in
traffic due to an increased number of students; concems of the neighbors; and the aesthetics of
the units.
The Planning Commission suggested that rather rhan amend the existing CUP, an amended .
architeCtural review with notification r.o the propertY owners within 300 feet of the Oak Park
Foursquare Church miiht be appropriate. This would give all city departments an opportUnity
to review the units and provide comments, as well as gain citizen input. The applicant inclicated
they did not wane notices sent ro surrounding neighbors, and preferred a Planning Commission
recammeI.'ldation of denial to the City Council.
Two resolution are anached for Council review and consideration. Resolution #1 finds the
proposal consistent with the original approval, and Resolution #2 finds the proposal noc
consistent with the qinal approval
AttaChments: June 6, 1995 Planning Commission Staff RcpoIt and Minutes
Resolutions (2)
Reduced plans for ARC 85-328
c: Pastor Phil Coleman
Mike Zimmerman
PJannin: Commission
.
c::.mo.oaa
-
-- '
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
AND ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of
Arroyo Grande on the following item: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 84-368,
AMENDMENT
Applicant: Oak Park Foursquare Church
Representative: Patty Clarkson
Location: 900 North Oak Park Boulevard
Proposal: Amendment to allow a preschool and elementary school within an
existing church.
Environmental
Determination: Recommend Negative Declaration
In compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning Commission has
.recommended a Negative Declaration on the above project. If the City Council does not feel
that a Negative Declaration is appropriate, approval of the project will not be considered.
Any person affected or concerned by this proposal may submit written comments to the
Community Development Department before the City Council hearing, or appear and be heard
in support of or opposition to the proposal at the time of hearing.
Any person interested in the proposal can contact the Community Development Department at
214 East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande, California, during normal business hours (8:00 a.m. to
Noon and 1 :00 to 5:00 p.m.).
IF YOU CHALLENGE AN ITEM IN COURT, YOU MAYBE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY
THOSE ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING
DESCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED TO THE
CITY COUNCIL AT, OR PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC HEARING.
FAILURE OF ANY PERSON TO RECEIVE THE NOTICE SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE
GROUNDS FOR ANY COURT TO INVALIDATE THE ACTION OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY
FOR WHICH THE NOTICE WAS GIVEN.
Date and Time of Hearing: Tuesday, November 25,1997,7:30 P.M.
Place of Hearing: Arroyo Grande Community CenterlWoman's Club
211 Vernon Street, Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
r1 (J.~
NANCY ~S, CITY CLERK
--.--"---
I ' ," """:~', < pnoto Dy .(.jJ~~.,~II~
C' h h' "', ,;"'-:-. ':"'t~ ':':f'<( ':~:":""I' ",-,. -'.::. ,,}
urc ,s 'reques.' ,or'C ~SSr9,()ltis
rejected by PlanniilgCorrimission
",..J> . . " ~ .
n y Tom Parsons These, . commissIoners Robert thatomer churches and organiza.
Staff Writer Carr and .1ohn Keen s,aid, would UODS have been given approval te
ARROYO GRANDE.;..... Pastor have been part of the conditional use move.moduIars ontO their proper!)
Phillip Coleman and his parishioner permit if the facilities were origi.., without having to apply for anothe:
and attorney Michael Zimmermannally int"",ded to be~ as~ school ,:conditional use permiL .: ,,;. '.
may have ,to "turn the ~ther cheek" on a daily basis.':- ';;~~,;;~.:'~';,r':Y'~ ~: ,:~' 'Of the exampleS be gave. Doreen
toward the City Council now that According Coleman, the' cburcb. ' Liberto-BIanck. the city',s directo:
the Arroyo Grande Planning Com- ~l has about 80, students cur- of planning. '~ed two that
mission has denied their request to remly registered. He.,~ that were in fact requjied to apply for a
install two relocatable classroom the number would top out 81 about conditional use' permi~ '
units in the parKing lot of the Oak 150 in ~. IJext f~w years: .' Zimme.rmaIi'chaDg~ his assertion
Park Foursq~ ~urch. , In additIon, be ,,~, emphasized to "some" were given approval.
The church sIte IS located on the that ~e ,school ~as mtended solely Then upon further research,
northeast comer of James Way ~ . for his congregation ~ the students Liberto-Blanck discovered that all
Oak Park Boulevard. The actIon W(:re members' of his church. the cases '7:___ bad .
!as Tuesda" . f Later. th "':____8: C I .wuwJGIUUW gtven as
came at . t .y ~ m~ung 0 m e WM..~ons, 0 eman examples stipportingdle church's
the Planning CO~Slon.. " changed that figure ~,,50 percent of .., '
, . The issue, according to comments the students'81 the school were pos1~on had, 10 ~, contrary, ~
" from the commissioners,' was not members of his cOngregation. .requlred to~btam the perDllts
whether the church should have Also in,~ origiDaI, arguments through the n~ process.."_,:,,
classrooms on the property, but presente# tct: the' ,cpmmission and However. the info~on which
whether the church was attempting recorded}n Jbe ~ute.!!. ~ 1984 finally bottomed the scale on the
to circumvent City ordinances by 'w~e 'thereriiarbfromone sup- negative side against the church's
pronosingl(U~clucie ~ete11?-D(}~ porter.,WI:1~~,that be.~feeIs this request was the rea1i~on by the
uni~-:'in t1i(J;nm:~n,:'~::k'~~~~;~ us((~':,~~),,'j~,~~t~rt,9r:'!he coIJ1P1:ission .th,a~the "two' m~du1ar
permit. :,"". :.. "co~umty tbim '1De...~lrU~hood buildings would have two class-
"They're 'putting in'_something cOmInercial"(prOject)'bCca\ise the ~mseach. ;' ",,,":'~
that was not part of the original traffic gen~ I:?y a .church takes The approved number of, class-
building," noted commissioner Bill place primarily on Sui1day~" rooms in the original conditional use
Deviny. "So if they want to change, Commissiorier"J:oJm Soto sug- permit was limited to 10. Coleman
then they should go back through for gested the possibility that the panel and Zimmerman admitted having 11
the conditional use permit." could help the church through an classrooms in use even now for the
However, Coleman expresse:d his abbreviated approval process if the school.
concern about receiving a favorable church would supply the commis-. The next step for the church is
response if he had to take his request sion with a list of neighbors within either an appeal of the commission's
through a public hearing process. 300 feet of the property so they negative resolution to the City
He and Zimmennan were also could be notified. ' Council or an application for an.
concerned about the cost of such a Coleman turned down the offer architectua1 review and conditional
process, which could require another because it would still involve a pub- use permit. .' "'" : ,'~, ,.
environmental impact repon.' lie hearing." , 'Coleman' and Zimmennan indi-
,However, as the discussion prog- Zimmerman also ,tried to assert cated they woUld pursue an appeal.
ressed. commissioners began to , ..,', ,".~ ",~", ~~~" ,', ' . .'
'>. question even the use of th~ class- ...'. , .:~ .'~ "~~,~;,=..,, '... ;' " ' .': , ''',',
"', rooms on the property because the~"1, .... ,00' .... '
church intended to use,the new fa- '.." ..... , "PA.~NEU'- '. .....
. ';;'" cilities for a daily-attended e1emen-:,;, '.' '.. "~' IN YOU. . ','.1-, .. .. ",:
-- t<trv school .',' 111111( III ,
,,- ...-. J . : . . ~~ __ '. ; 1',) ,'_ ...,~: .1'..... . ;-".r':". 'i. ", Mt. .';-". ~
/ The ongmal conditIonal use per- ",,; ':--:. :.\";"~~";;="" COM,. ',:., ,.,./. ,', .
.. mit, granted after an appeal, to the . ,:: ;,,~>,6t~!q-i:'i~;"j:;i'" ;" ,"~: :> " ',',' ;;,/~': ~', ';
City Council in .1985. was issued for "-":"-:-'~"':':,~~MIJj.:.STATE BANK ';-: -, ..;<,
classrooms desIgnated fior' Sunday ".. ,.~$<... ,:I.. , , ' .
_." ...:......~~,....-r.~'~~~.. .:... ~ 0;.........;...' ftf. I . ',::'.;" . .." ~~;.-~it ...;.... ...~;;..-. '~': ."
:~~r=:o~~:O:o~:: VF,WC1.1J~,:'~rrO~~Ip.YQ~...Move
. '. . ",.: :,;'.. ..+'....'~."....' 'rttm',. .~., ",.-.."-'!"~:'ijN ~ '.-.....~',"': ''',i'd''
Sloners pomted out. :,..';,,'~,d.' ',' it"'~r.}.Q,' . '.', our'e' ome ",'~!'
,_..1__""". ~r,.._,....
As suppon for their uuug~l4UU- . . >'f.' ..' ',< f' ': ':'. , ,;;-u.'... '
ing of the conditions which existed
10 years ago, commissioners noted
the lack of issues addressed in the
original application, such as bus ac-
cess and a traffic swdy.
- ~ I
.JUI'-, (- J.JJ;;) J.J.'~J. \..! I' ur nlV<.U I U ~'UJC:,
~.,.,--~ I .ou.",
--AY 1
" M... G 1995
&"AW 0""'C:1:5 ..i
.."'ORew ~V'CI D a.vid 4 Zimmerman << Zeilenga. r
....CIo4.1:1. zr......c.....'" aZ7 EAST .....CIot ","cC'\" A_ItA COClE .OS "
.a.ERT :I:II.ENG.A PCS? OrFICl; lICK ,.. TELE""ONE ......70S
~ Grade.. Ga1ib:sia 93421-_
Hay 10, 1995
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
PLANNING DEFT.
Re: OAK PARK FOURSQUARE amRCH
Dear DOREEN:
I aJn writinq this letter on beha..lf of Oak Park Foursquare
Church where I am a member. As we discussed, the church applied
~or and received a conditional use p8-~t when we built a portion
o~ phase one af our church facility in 1984.
We are now in need of additional classroom space, and. when , "-
...
checkinq on get~inq a permit for some modulars a question was ,..,.: .
raised as to whether or not this would be included under our
eXistinq use permit - Obviously, we th.inJc it should be. It seems
to us that addinq classroom space is clearly within what vas
intended in our 2 phase proj ect. We are neecU.nq to go with
m.odul.ars at this time Wltil we can save enouqh money to build
permanent bui~din9's in completinq phase one and into phase two of
our project. It is anticipated that the modulus will be USaQ
tor approximately 5 to 8 years before we will be in a position to
buil.d..
You have asked us to 'let an iDterprata:t:ion from the
planninq commission reqardinq the scope of our use penU.t- This
leti:er shall constitute the request for said interpretation. w.
have a.lso enclosed the $37.00 f.. tor SUI.. It would be greatly
appreciated if this matter would be placed on the planninq
commissi.on aqencia on the earliest opportuni t:y. W. need t:o have
the Duildinqs in place and ready to occupy by September 1., 1995.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
KI~ 'J'T. ZI1Ul~~..ns.N'
---..-.......---
'" '" ,
. To Whom It May Concern, November 19, 1997
I am writing this letterin response to the proposed approval of Oak Park Foursquare Church's
petition for a school permit. I live adjacent to the Church's property, at 1040 Robin Circle. For
some reason, I did not receive initial notification of motions pending on this issue; I hope it isn't too
late to express concerns.
In order for you to make an informed decision in this matter, you need all pertinent facts. In the
following paragraphs I will outline the church's historical relationship with its neighbors. I know
that certain of these issues may not directly impact the current one, but I wish to create a record to
insure that what occurred in the past will not be continued. as I Wlderstandthat the church has a
new, and hopefully more amenable, pastor. ' ,
Several years ago, we bought our house, at which time there was a natural hillside behind our
fence, on the church's property. This was before any improvements had been started. We never
had any problem with drainage (into our backyard) because the natural water-drainage slope was
intact. At some point, the church began to grade the land behind our house, and all its property
adjacent to the homes on Robin Circle. I was concerned about drainage from the moment they
began to alter the natural contours of the hill, without apparent awareness of any possible
consequences. I went to see Scott Spierling, who showed me the plans of the church's property,
and explained to me, in detail, what improvements had been approved, ie grading and compacting
earth. I tried to talk with Mr. Van Laum, who, at the time, was the city engineer in public workS.
He belittled my concerns and told me, literally, not to bother him again. The pastor of the church
was also very offensive in his behavior, at one point knocking on my front door and threatening me
with a lawsuit (!); at the least, he told me, if I made any more objections to what he was doing, he
was going to have dirt dumped behind my house until it reached 'the sky', because that was his
right. Needless to say, I backed off; I was terrified of Phil Colman, the pastor. However, I
watched as they graded and added earth far beyond the determination of what Mr. Spierling had
indicated.
As it stands now, the grading was never amended to bring it back into compliance with the law; nor
was any drainage ever provided, even in the promised form of a 'French drain', at any point along
the affected property. Consequently, drainage into our backyard and house is a constant winter
threat, and much damage has already been done further down the street, at the homes of the
Holbrooks, as well as their neighbors: In addition to this, the church has seen fit to prop all its
extra pipes (pipes which ought to have been put to use, I assume) against our fence, as well as
many other objects, which further obstructs drainage.
I feel, as a very concerned neighbor of the church, that if you are going to approve any expansion
of their (illegal) school, you should, in good conscience, bring the present improvements into
compliance. I feel that this responsibility falls on the city, regardless of how I was treated by Mr.
Van Lauro, as it is YO!J,r offices which approve or disapprove such improvements. It is very
WlsettIing to feel that my city, to which I contribute, doesn't care enough for its individual citizens
to follow through on compliance, to make sure that what it approves is done correctly to the letter
of the law.
I thank you for considering my cOncerns, and for reading this letter. City of Arroyo Grande
commoolty Development Dept.
Sincerely, HOV 1 9 1997
[j"" ~ ~ ~C
~r~ - .
______uu._________
.
~ c .
SOURCE LIST:
1. City of Arroyo Grande General Plan
2. City of Arroyo Grande General Plan Land Use Map
3. City of Arroyo Grande Development Code
4. City of Arroyo Grande Zoning Map
5. City of Arroyo Grande Existing Setting and Community Issues Report
6. City of Arroyo Grande General Plan EIR
7. Air Pollution Control District Clean Air Plan
8. FEMA - Flood Insurance Rate Map
9. Project Description
10. Project Plans
11. Site Inspection
12. Ordinance 431 C. S.
13. Institute of Traffic Engineers (lTE) Trio Generation Manual
EXPLANATIONS:
The site is currently developed with a church. The existing Conditional Use Permit does not allow for the
operation of a school. The applicant is proposing that a preschool and elementary school operate within
the existing facility. The site is at the corner of Oak Park Blvd., a four lane arterial street and James
Way, a two-lane collector street. The majority of trips will be in the morning and afternoon when
students are dropped off and picked up.
The school has been operating since 1990 with a current enrollment of about 173 students. Though the
school has been operating without a Conditional Use Permit, there has been an increase in vehicle trips.
These increased trips have not had a significant impact to traffic flows on Oak Park Blvd. and James
Way. The additional trips that could occur as a result of full enrollment of 244 would increase the
number of existing trips, but is not considered significant.
Therefore, the increase vehicle trips on Oak Park Blvd. and James Way is not anticipated to have a
significant impact on the environment.
~ - --"--~---_..__.._.._~---_.__.._..~..-
. ..........-c;r-...I.:;,":;I;;;> ..1.10';;;>:;' '- J. I T ur ,.,""'... '''' ,"",", u..c:. ~ ........, u-M....I......
I .~_
C-.... ~
From '
Phone , 4.,.3 -54 ~O
FU.78 _ d.~ ~~ .
. . ._..
TO: Mayor and City Council .
VIA: Rick TerBorch, Interim City M:an:agcr
FROM:. Doreen Libeno-BJanck, DirI:ctoi of p1:mm"g
SUBJECT: Request for Inrerprmtion., Oak Park Foursquare Church
(Location: 900 Oak Park Boulevard) .
DA TE: June 27. 1995
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council ma.ke an interptetaaon that
insf2l.1aoon of modular classroom units is not permitted without first applyi11l for and being
~ gIanted a conditional use permit and arc:hirectwal review for the units.
BACKGROUND:
A conditional use permit (CUP) was approved m 1984 for a two phased cbtirch facility 1oc~
at 900 Oak Park Boulevard. In 1985 I the Ciry Council approved aId1irectur2l review for phase
I of the church. In 1986, a. building permit wa." issued for a sca.Ied-down phase I. with several
offices and classrooms not included in the consttuction documents chat were approved as part
of the architeCtUI'3i review. .
In 1994, staff discussed the proposed Oak Park Foursquare Clurch weekday school with Mike
Zimmerman (reptcsentative for the church), . iadic:atin& that aft=' IeYiewiu& me CUP and
~ review files, it was unclear whethf!r a weekday scl100l was iDcludeci as put of the
original approval. Mr. Zimmerman felt the weekday school was pm of tbe orig;m.1 ~!ilovaL
Earlier this year. Mr. Zimmerman asked staff about Dlft'SI1WI ~t2hle c:1assrooms on the site.
Staff indicated a CUP would be required, which is consistent with past approvals on similar
requests. Mr. Zimmerman felt the modular units should be cansideted as pan of phase lof the
original CUP and architectural review.
The church submitted an intcrprerarion request for PlanniDg Corumiftiou and City Council
review. On June 6, 1995, the Planning Conuniqift'C7 COIISi.dcn:d the iDreqkemri<m, and after a.
lengthy discussion, made the above recommen:darloa (see June 6, 1995 PJuDiDg Commission
staff repOIt and MinuteS for more information). Sina: the c:hurch is 1",...u:d ill. a Planned
Development (PD) project, the Planning O1mm;~~n makes a n:commeu411Uou to the City
Council.
C:\D(4)61
.----..---- ----
,
f i .
.
Conditional Use Permit 84-368 Amendment
Oak Park Foursquare Church
November 4, 1997
Page 2
.
BACKGROUND:
The existing church was approved by the City Council in, 1984 for a two phased
church facility. In 1985, the Council approved ARC 85-328 for Phase I construction
of the church. Subsequently, the Conditional Use Permit expired and the City Council
reapproved the project in 1986 (reference attached resolution). In 1987, the church'
completed construction of a scaled-down Phase I that did not include offices and
classrooms as shown on the approved plans. Phase II has never been constructed
(reference attached map).
The church is requesting the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) be amended to allow the
operation of a preschool and elementary school within the existing building. However,
the school has been in operation since 1990 (reference attached letter from the
church). Approval of the CUP Amendment would bring 'the school into conformance
with City Code requirements.
DISCUSSION:
The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit to allow a
preschool and elementary school within the existing building. The applicant has
indicated that the current enrollment is about 80 students for the preschool and 93
for the elementary school. The church is requesting that the CUP allow a maximum
of 90 preschool students and 1 54 elementary students, for a total of 244 students.
According to the Fire Chief, a maximum of 244 students could be accommodated
within the existing building. However, the school would need to obtain State
approval for an increased to the preschool class size.
The school has been operating since 1990 with a current enrollment of about 173
students. Though the school has been operating without a ~onditional Use Permit,
there has been an increase in vehicle trips from operating the school. These
increased trips have not had a significant impact to traffic flows on Oak Park Blvd.
and James Way. The additional trips that could occur as a result of full enrollment of
244 students would increase the number of trips on Oak Park Blvd. and James way.
However, the increase vehicle trips is not anticipated to be significant.
The building was constructed in 1987 and all applicable fees were paid at that time.
The Staff Advisory Committee (SAC) discussed whether the traffic impact fee should.
be paid for the school. The SAC recommended that no traffic impact fee be paid for
the school because the classrooms used by the school were ,constructed as
classrooms, and have continually been used as classrooms since 1987.
ISSUES:
The existing building has a fire alarm system that has not been State certified.
Consequently, the Fire and Building Department has recommended a condition of
approval that the fire alarm system be certified by a Fire Department approved
contractor (condition no. 9). This would ensure that the fire alarm system would
operate to the current standards required by the Uniform Fire Code (UFC). Otherwise"
all other building and fire code requirements are in compliance.
_._-- ~---~._~
.
" ~. ~.
City Council
Conditional Use Permit 84-368 Amendment
November 25, 1997
Page 2 of 3
The school has been operating since 1990 with a current enrollment of about 173
students. Though the school has been operating without a Conditional Use Permit,
there has been an increase in vehicle trips from operating the school. These increased
trips have not had a significant impact to traffic flows on Oak Park Blvd. and James
Way. The additional trips that could occur as a result of full enrollment of 244
students would increase the number of trips on Oak Park Blvd. and James Way.
However, the increase vehicle trips is not anticipated to be significant.
The building was constructed in 1987 and all applicable fees were paid at that time.
The Staff Advisory Committee (SAC) discussed whether the traffic impact fee should
be paid for the school. The SAC recommended that no traffic impact fee be paid for
the school because the classrooms used by the school were constructed as
classrooms, and have continually been us~d as classrooms since 1987.
The existing building has a fire alarm system that has not been State certified.
Consequently, the Fire and Building Department has recommended a condition of
approval that the fire alarm system be certified by a Fire Department approved
contractor (condition no. 9). This would ensure that the fire alarm system would
operate to the current standards required by the Uniform Fire Code (UFC). Otherwise,
all other building and fire code requirements are in compliance.
In 1995, the church did some grading on a vacant portion of the property adjacent to
the north property line. As a result, the Public Works Department received several
complaints. Consequently, the Public Works Director met with the church and
concluded that several actions were necessary to rectify the grading (reference
condition of approval no. 10). To date, the church has not complied with the actions
as outlined in the letter identified in condition of approval no. 10. Therefore, condition
of approval no. 10 requires that the grading modifications occur no later than
December 15, 1997.
A public notice was sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the proposed
project, and a public notice was placed in the Times-Press-Recorder. Prior to the
Planning Commission meeting, staff received one letter from Tom and Claire Holbrook
who live adjacent to the north property line at 1024 Robin Circle. They have
expressed several concerns regarding the church operations (reference attached
letter). Subsequent to the Planning Commission meeting, staff received a letter from
the Petersons' , adjacent residents, regarding the drainage issue (reference
attachment) .
In responses to the Holbrook's concerns, the following conditions of approval have
been added: condition no. 10 requires that the grading issue be. resolved by December
15, 1997; condition no. 5, requires all lighting be shielded; and, condition no. 8
requires that the school van be parked on the south end of the parking lot.
-- -----..-.--. J
7.11.,
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the City Council of the
City of Arroyo Grande on the following item: APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY.
Applicant: M.M. DeGroot, owner, DeGroot Enterprises, dba Santa Maria
Valley and Solvang Taxi
Proposal: The Council will consider an application for a Certificate of Public
Convenience and Necessity from Santa Maria Valley and
Solvang Taxi for the operation of a taxicab service within the City
limits of Arroyo Grande.
Representative: Rick TerBorch, Chief of Police
Kelly Wetmore, Director of Administrative Services/Deputy Clerk
Any person affected or concerned about the proposal may submit written comments to the
Director of Administrative Services/Deputy City Clerk before the City Council hearing, or
appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the proposal at the time of the hearing.
Any person interested in the proposal can contact the Administrative Services Department
at 214 East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande, California, or by telephone at (805) 473-5414
during normal business hours (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.).
IF YOU CHALLENGE AN ITEM IN COURT, YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY THOSE
ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING DESCRIBED IN THIS
NOTICE, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AT, OR
PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC HEARING.
FAILURE OF ANY PERSON TO RECEIVE THE NOTICE SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE GROUNDS
FOR ANY COURT TO INVALIDATE THE ACTION OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY FOR WHICH
THE NOTICE WAS GIVEN.
Date and Time of Hearing: Tuesday, October 24,2000, 7:00 p.m.
Place of Hearing: Arroyo Grande City Council Chambers
215 East Branch Street
~t!!ur IA ,dtkj1ffU- Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
Kelly VVetmore
Director of Administrative Services/Deputy City Clerk
Publish 1T, October 13, 2000
_...,._--_.~.__._-~-----~ -~-_._-_.-.-
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KELLY WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ~STRATIVE SERVICES ~
RICK TerBORCH, CHIEF OF POLlC
SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND
NECESSITY - DE GROOT ENTERPRISES, dba FIVE CITIES TAXI
SERVICE
DATE: OCTOBER 24, 2000
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council 1) Conduct the required public hearing; 2) Determine
whether the public convenience and necessity require an additional taxicab service within
the City limits of Arroyo Grande; and 3) Adopt a Resolution granting a Certificate of Public
Convenience and Necessity subject to full compliance with all conditions and requirements
of Title 5, Chapter 10 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code.
FUNDING:
City Council action on this matter will have no fiscal impact.
DISCUSSION:
Title 5, Chapter 10 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code sets out specific requirements for
the application and operation of taxicab companies within the City limits of Arroyo Grande.
Taxicab companies must obtain a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity from
the City in order to commence operations. As part of the process, the City Council must
conduct an advertised public hearing and determine if there is a public need or demand
for additional taxicab service in the City.
Currently, Central Coast Taxicab Services is the only taxicab service operating within the
City with an approved Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity, and also serves
as the provider for the City's Senior Taxi Program which is administered through South
County Area Transit (SCAT).
At its June 13, 2000 meeting, the City Council approved a Certificate of Public
Convenience and Necessity for Beach Cities Taxi to be operated by Jeff Goldenberg.
However, at this time, Mr. Goldenberg has not yet fulfilled all of the necessary
requirements to obtain his Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to commence
operations.
The City has received a proposal from De Groot Enterprises to operate a taxicab service
in Arroyo Grande which will be called Five Cities Taxi Service. De Groot Enterprises
currently owns and operates Solvang Taxi and Santa Maria Valley Taxi companies. Mr.
De Groot also submitted applications to the cities of Grover Beach and Pismo Beach for
Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity, which were approved on October 2,
2000 and October 17,2000, respectively.
Mr. De Groot is proposing to start his business in this area with one taxicab and add more
if needed. He will be using new Ford Windstar mini vans that hold six passengers. The
color scheme, white with green lettering, will be the same as he is currently using in
Solvang and Santa Maria. This color scheme is different from the other two approved
companies. Mr. De Groot has indicated that he will not be opening an office in the Five
Cities area until business warrants doing so. He will be hiring drivers from this area and
will be finding a suitable location for the exchange of cabs after each shift. He indicated
that in Santa Maria and Solvang, he obtained permission from local businesses to allow
drivers to leave their personal vehicles in the parking lot during their shift and to exchange
the cabs. He is hoping to make a similar arrangement with a business in the Five Cities
area.
Mr. De Groot has indicated that he will be charging $2.00 per mile with a $5.00 minimum
charge. Effective October 1,2000, Central Coast Taxi increased its pickup fee from $2.00
to $3.00 and continues to charge $2.00 a mile.
Should the Council approve Mr. De Groot's application, he will be required to comply with
the following: a) submit his vehicles for inspection by the Police Department; b) supply
evidence of the required insurance; c) obtain a business license; and d) obtain taxi driver
permits from the Police Department for all drivers prior to the Certificate of Public
Convenience and Necessity being issued to commence operations.
AL TERNA TIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for Council's consideration:
- Approve staffs recommendation;
- Modify staffs recommendation;
- Do not approve staffs recommendation; or
- Provide direction to staff.
Attachments:
1. Resolution conditionally approving the issuance of a Certificate of Public Convenience
and Necessity;
2. Mr. De Groot's application to operate a taxicab service in Arroyo Grande;
3. Municipal Code - Title 5, Chapter 10 "Taxicabs"; and
4. Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity form.
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION NO. -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO
GRANDE GRANTING A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND
NECESSITY TO FIVE CITIES TAXI SERVICE FOR THE OPERATION OF
A TAXICAB SERVICE WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS CONTINGENT UPON
FULL AND TOTAL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL CONDITIONS AND
REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 5, CHAPTER 10 "TAXICABS" OF THE
ARROYO GRANDE MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, Five Cities Taxi Service, owned and operated by M.M. "Dutch" De Groot, has
applied for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to operate a taxicab service
in the City of Arroyo Grande; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing to consider the application for a taxicab service was duly
noticed and held on October 24, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that public convenience and necessity require
, the additional taxicab service operating within the City limits.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande
hereby grants and bestows a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to Five
Cities Taxicab Service, contingent upon full and total compliance with all the conditions and
requirements of Title 5, Chapter 10 ''Taxicabs'' of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that if the conditions and requirements of the Arroyo Grande
Municipal Code are not met by the applicant, the Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity will not be issued.
On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and on the
following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this _ day of October, 2000.
RESOLUTION NO. 3448
PAGE 2
MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICESI
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
.....-...._-.
M.M. DE GROOT, dba Attachment 2
P,O.BOX 92 ......
SANTA MARIA V ALLY & SANTA MARIA, CA 93456
SOLVANG TAXI
RECEIVED
SEP 13 2000
ARROYO GRANDE
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Santa Maria Sept, 12. .2000
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
P.O.BOX 550
ARROYO GRANDE ,CA. 93421
MEMBERS OF CITY CONCUL
MY NAME IS M.M. I DUTCH' DE GROOT I LIVE ON 2922 STARDUST DR. SANTA
MARIA, CA.
I FILE THIS LETTER WITH YOU TO REQUEST A PERMIT TO OPERATE A TAXI
IN YOU CITY.
I OPERATE A TAXI IN SOLVANG AND IN SANTA MARIA.
I LIKE TO START OUT WITH ONE CAB AND THAN ADD MORE IF THAT IS
NECESARRY.
I WILL USE NEW FORD WINDSTAR MINI VANS THEY HAVE PROVEN VERY
USEFULL AND WILL HOLD SIX PASS.
FOR COLOR AND SIGNS SEE PICTURE.
I HAVE PUBLIC LIABILITY INS. AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY
MY TPC # 151805
IF YOU NEED ANY MORE INFORMATION I BE GLAD TO SUPPLY THAT TO
YOU.
SINCEREL Y
~--
"- ..
,.," ".~~-,.
..' -
".-.--
.....' ~
Attachment 3
5-10.01 5~.10.01
GH.fi..PTER 10. T AXTCABS
.' ,
Sec. 5-10.01. Definitions.
For the purposes of this chapter, unless otherwise apparent
from the context, certain words and phrases used in this chapter
are defined as follows:
(a) "Street" shall mean any piece of road commonly used
for the purposes o~ public travel~
(b) "Driverll shall mean every person in charge of, or
operating, aIIY pas.:: enger-(~a.:,r'r'~-i ng mo t;or:~'p:::'o ge1J.8d vehicle, either
as agent, employae, or otherwi~e, of t"l1€: O~:J:rler, as the ovmer, or
under the direc1;ion. of the ovm.er.
( I.~) "Driver':: Iermi.""'''''~11 ""~n a -ermit ie."'u""-:'l b-v tb~
. '.... ,t.: ~Io.."'_'_~'" u....JO_. tJ . ...,;(j _.... "" ~_
.
Ch' f f Pl' t . -. 'd ~ '... . t
. ~e 0 _ O_,1.:~e '0 an .::.n':1.1Vl,. ua.,J., person p-erm.1t:t1.ng tna't: peI'son -0
drive a taxicab UpO!l the stT.'eets of the C:i.'Cy"
(d) "Oert:i.f tc-.at e!! shall ru.ea..'1 a z.;ertificate of public
convenience a...T1.d r1'2:(;.\?:::5i"t:y i ':3suei by' the Cotlneil.
(e) 'IO~'m~r'! shall n.~eall and. inclu.de every person mming
, , or having the use or c-.Ollt:rol. of a.ny taxio;,~ab..
(f) rrRate card!' shall mea...'1. a card provided by the o\omer
of a size and type to be specified by the City Clerk for display
in each taxicab, \'lhic.h. c.a.rd shall set; forth the rates of fare. then
in force.
(g) "Taxicab:! sh5.11 mean a motor-propelled passenger-
carrying vehicle used for the transportation of passenge,rs ".rho
direct the route to be traveled OITer the streets and not operated
over a fixed route for compensation.
(h) IITaxie;ab stand.'! shall mean a. public place alongside
the curb of a street or else\.,here in the City whic,h place has been
1.67-.1 Reprint No. 9 - 9'~30<..73
- ..~--_._------
5-10.01 5,-10.02
designated by the Council as reser~ed exclusively for the use of a
holder of a certj.ficate of public 00nveIiience and nec.essity.
(Sec. ~, Ord. 91 C.S., eff. September 13, 1973)
Sec. 5-10.02. Certificates of public c.onveni.ence a.nd nec(;}ssit~
, reQuired.
(a) Applic.ations. It shall be unlawful for any person
to engage in the business of operating any taxicab in the City
without first having obtained from the Council a certificate of
public convenience and nece8sity~ All persons applying for such
certificates shall file wii::h the CO".lllcil a verified application
\.,hich shall set forth the following:
(1) The name 81"La. address of the person making the
application;
(2) Ii' , at the time of making the application,
such person is actua.lly operating a taxicab service in the City,
the number of t;axi08.bs ovme.?- and opera,ted therein by the appli-
cant;
(3) The numb~r of ve4icles for which a certificate
of public convenience ~d ne0essity is desired;
(4) The make, type, yeax of mBIlufacture, and
passenger seating capacity of each taxicab for which the applica-
tion for such ceI~ifi0ate is made;
(5) A descriptio~ of the proposed color scheme,
insignia, or any other distinguishing characteristics of the taxi-
cab. In this respect, no .t\'lO' (2) taxicab companies shall have the
same color scheme; and
(6) Such other information as the Council may
require.
167.~2 Reprint No.9 - 9-30-73
----------
5-10.02 5-10.02
(b) A;eplications: Hearings. Upon the filing of the
,
fully completed application for the certificate of public convenience
and necessity, the City Clerk shall fix the time for a public hear-
ing thereon before the Council for the purpose of determining
whet~er the public convenience ~~d necessity require the proposed
taxicab service '" No certifica.te shall be granted until the Council
shall, after the hearing, declare by resolution that the public
convenience and necessity require the proposedt:axicab service.
(c) .!2plications; Hear'ings: Noti-=<..3~o Not:i(:~e of the
.
time and place of the public hearing before the Council shall be
published once in a nevlspaper of general circulation in the City
ten (10) days prior to the beaxi.ng. The eost of such publioation
shall be at the expE:nse o.f t~e appl.:Lcar..:t '" ...
Cd) ~eterillination: Gri~eria. In determining 'v'rhet;her
the public conveni.ence a...rtd necessity rsquire the taxic.ab sarvie.e
for ~'rhich the a.pplication )..2 made ~ the Cou..71(.,;il shall investigate
and consider:
J (1) The demand of the public for additional taxicab
service;
(2) The adequacy of the existing taxicab servi.ce;
(3) The fina...71cial responsibili.ty and experience
of the applicant;
(4-) The number, make, and type of the equipment
and the color scheme to be used; and
(5) The effect which additional taxicab service
may have on traffic congestion and parking and whether such ser-
vice \V'ill result in a greater hazar'd. to the public;.
( e) Issua...71ce. If the Council shall, by resolution,
..- -
167-3 Reorint No. 9 - 9-30-73
- - ---..-..'----- --.-
5-10.02 5-10.02
declare that the public convenience and ne~esaity require the addi-
tional taxicab service, a certificate to that effect shall be
issued to the persons entitled thereto; provided, how~ver, the
Council may, at its discretion, determine the c~aracter ~~~ number
of permits to be granted to f~'nish necessary service; and, pro-
vided, further, no certificate authorized pursuant to the provi-
sions of this chapter shall be issued to any person \olho shall not
have fully complied with all the. necessary requirements of this
chapter..
(f) Existing operations. Ths provisions of this sec-
tion shall not effect the nltmber of taxicabs operating with valid
permits on September 13, 1973=
(g) Canc-.el.lation c If the service permitted pursua.Tl"t: to
the provisions of this ~hapter is fer an;r reason discontinue,d for
a period of forty-five (45) days, the certificate granted shall be
automaticall:r canc~lled elld. st.all be restoreil only in accordance
with the provisions of this section.
eh) Sales and t~arrsfe~s~ If ~1 o~mer sells or transfers
title to a taxicab for which a certificate has been issued, or in
the event a taxicab for \'Thi.~h a certifieate ha.s been issued has
been destroyed, such o\1I1er shall be ent;i tIed, as a matter of right,
upon written application to the COUI1Cil made within fifteen (15)
days after such sale, tr&~sfer, or destruf;tion, to have a ne\.,
certificate issued, but for no greater number than sold, trans-
ferred, or destroyed, provided such owner has complied with all
the provisions of this chapter.
(i) Revocation ~T).d suspension. The Council may, at any
time, revoke or suspend the certificate granted on the following
167~/+ Reprint No.9 - 9-30-73
~-10.02 5-10~04
grounds or any of them:
(1) If the owner's record is unsatisfactory;
(2) If the owner fails to operate taxicab:; in accordance with the provisions
of this O1apter;
(3) If the owner discontinues or suspends operations of taxicab:; for a period
of thirty (30) days without peITl1ission first had and obtained; and
(4) If taxicab:; are operated at a rate of fare other than that filed with the
aty Oerk.
(j) SUrrender. All certificates which shall have been suspended or revoked by the
Council shall be surrendered to the aty Oerk.
(Sec. 1, Ord. 91 C.s., efl. September 13, 1973.)
~ 5-10.03. License ~
No certificate of public convenience and necessity shall be issued or continued in
operation unless the holder" thereof has paid an annual license tax as set forth in Section 3-
1.419 of Articie 4 of Ctapter 1 of Title 3 of this Code. Such license tax shall be for the
calendar" year and shall be in .addition to any other license feeS or charg~ established by
proper authority and applicable to such holder of the vehicles under his operation and conti-ol;"
provided, however, whenever any vehicle is placed in service after the beginning of the calendar
year, the tax for such vehicle shall be prorated on "a monthly basis.
(Sec. 1, Ord. 91 C.s., eff. September 13, 1973)
~ 5-10.04. Certificates Q( ~ convenience. aoo necessity: Transfer.
No certificate of public convenience and necessity may be sold, B$igned, mortgaged, or
otherwise transferred without the consent of the Council first had and obtained.
(Sec. 1, Ord. 91 C.s., eff. September 13, 1973)
167-5 Reprint No. 41 (1/1/88)
5-10.05 5-10.07
~ ~-10.05. ' Ident~ ~ am inSignia .',
Each holder of a certificate of public convenience and necessity sh8ll keep on file with
the Oty Qe:k a statement of the name under which he is doing business, the color scheme by
which his taxicaoo will be marked and painted, and the iffiignia to be carried on such taxicaoo.
Such color scheme and insignia shall conform to the application of the holder on file with the
City Qerk. All taxicab:; operated by the holder of such a certificate sh8ll be painted and
, marked in accordance with the statement currently on file with the City Clerk. No holder of a
certificate shall file' any statement of colors, markings, or insignia which is the same as, or
similar to, the colors, markings, or insignia then currently on file by any other holder of a
certificate. Each taxicab shall, in plain view on the exterior 'thereof, have the business name
and address of the owner painted in letters at least one-half (1/211) inch high.
(Sec. 1, Ord. 91 e.S., eff. September 13, 1973)
~ 5-10.06. Periodic inspections: y~ ~txnent am maintenance.
Prior to the use and operation of any vehicle pursuant to the provisions of this C1apter,
such vehicle shall be thoroughly examined and inspected by the Police Department and found to
cCXT{>ly with all of the laws of the State and the City and with such reosonable rules and
regulations for, safety as may be prescribed by the Chief of Police or by the Council. Every
vehicle operating pursuant to the provisions of this C1apter shall be periodically~ted by
the Police Department every six (6) mmths to insure the continued maintenance of safe
operating conditions. A fee, as established by resolution of the City Council, for each
inspection shall be paid to the City.
In addition, every vehicle' operating pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall be
kept in a clean and sanitary condition.
(Sec. 1~ Ord. 91 C.S., eff. September 13, 1973, as amended by Sec. 1, Ord. 361 C.5., eff.
November 13, 1987)
~ 5-10.07. Refusal !Q. ~, passengers: Prohibition Q( drivers.
(a) It shall be a violation of the provisions of ,this Chapter for any driver of a
taxicab to refuse, or neglect to convey any orderly person upon request unlesS previously
engaged or unable or forbidden by the provisions of this C1apter so to do. No driver of any
taxicab shall solicit business for any hotel or rootel or attempt to divert patronage from one
hotel or rootel to another. Neither shall such driver engage in selling intoxicating liquor, nor in
tra.mporting intoxicating liquor, except when the same is in the ~ion of a passenger, nor
, solicit business for any house off ill repute, nor use his vehicle for any purpose other than the
transportation of passengers.
167-6 Reprint No. 41 (1/1/88)
5-10.07 5-10.07
(b) All persons . engaged in the taxicab business in the aty opera~ pursuant to
'.' the provisions of this O\apter, shall render an overall service to, the public desiring to use
taxicaoo. Holders of certificates of public convenience and necessity shall maintain a central
p1Bce of business. and keep the same open twenty-four (24) hours ada.y for the purpose of
.
receiving calls and dispatching taxicaoo. They shall amwer all c8lls received by them
.
.
167-7 Reprint No. 41 (1/1/88)
~
---~ ~------
;>-10.07 ~=ill..O..S.
for services inside the City as soon as they can do so, and if such service cannot be rendered
within a reasonable time, they shall then notify the prospective passengers how long it will be ' .
before such 'c~ can be 'amwered and give the reason therefore. Any holder 'who shall refuse
to accept a call anywhere in the City at any time when such holder has available taxicabs, or
who shall fail or refuse to give overall service, shall be deemed a violator of the provisions of
this Q1apter, and the certificate granted shall be revoked at the discretion of the Council.
. (Sec. 1, Ord. 91 C.S., eff. September 13, 1973)
~ 5-10.08. QperatinQ' r~ations: ~~
(a) Any driver employed to transport passengers to a definite point shall take the
roost direct route possible which will carry his passenger to his ,destination safely and
expeditiously.
(b) No driver of any licensed taxicab shall refuse any person prompt taxicab
service in the City at any tirrie while such taxicab is. on the public streets ready for service,
unless such taxicab is already engaged in the carrying of one or IOOre passengers or is enroute
to answer a call for taxicab service; provided, further, nothing in this. Subsection shall require
any owner or driver to furn~h taxicab service to any person under the influence of intoxicating
liquor or narcotics or to any person who is insane or who is a known criminal.
(c) Every driver, upon request, shall give a correct receipt for the aroount of
payment received.
(d) No driver of any taxicab shall accept, take into his vehicle, or transport any
larger number of passengers than the r/}-tes covering the seating capacity of his vehicle.
167-8 Reprint No. 9 - 9-30-73
~-10.08 5-10.09
(e) No driver shall permit any taxicab to remain standing in any established taxicab
stand, unless the taxicab is attenaed by a driver or operator, except when assisting passengers
to load or unload or ,when answering the telephone.
(f) No driver shall carry any passenger other than payi.rg passengers or persons
authorized by or on canpany business.
(g) Every driver shall at all times display his driver's permit and picture in a
conspicuous place in the taxicab which he is operating.
(h) Any violation of the provision:> of this Section shall be cause for the
revocation of the pennit of the driver guilty of such violation.
(Sec. 1, Ora. 91 C.S., eff. September 13, 1973)
~ 5-10.09. TaxicaP drivers: Permits.
(a) No person shall drive or operate any taxicab in the aty without having first
obtained a pem1it in' writing to qo so fran the QUef of Police or any person designated by' him.
Such pennit issued will entitle the driver to work only for those, persons whose names appear on
the pennit. A new permit will be required for each suOOequent employment; provided, however,
no application shall be necessary' other than a ratification of charge of employment.
(b) Applicants for such, permits shall file applications therefor with the O1ief of
Police. The application shall contain the follo~ infonnation, tcgether with a fee, as
established by resolution of the aty Council, and pictures of the applicant:
(1) 'The osme, marital status, age, residence, last previOl5 address, anc'I the
leOgth of residence .at such last address and in the aty; and
(2) 'The ,names and addresses to two (2) residents of the aty'acquainted with
the applicant.
Each application shall be accompanied by a certificate from a reputable physician
certifying that in his opinion the applicant is not inflicted with any disease or infimlity which
might make him an unsafe or unsatisfactory driver.
(c) No permit shall be issued anc'I a permit there~ofore granted shall be r~voked:
(1) If the applicant is under twenty-one (21) years of age;
167-9 Reprint No. 41 (1/1/88)
.5:-10.09 .5-10.09
(2) If the applicant has not resided in the county sixty (60) ." ..
days immediately prior to filing;
(3) If the applicant does not possess a valid Class "C" dr i ver IS
license issued by the state;
(4) If the applicant is a reckless driver or has been convicted
of reckless driving or driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor
or narcotics;
(5) If the applicant is guilty or has been convicted of a felony
or crime involving moral turpitude;
(6) If the applicant is not a fit and proper person to drive a
taxicab; or
(7) If the applicant violates any provision of this chapter.
(d) All applicants for drivers' permits shall be fingerprinted; and
their applications will then be considered by the Chief of Police and either
granted or denied within thirty (30) days unless, for good cause, time for
further consideration is needed. Before any application is finally passed upon,
the Police Department shall conduct an investigation of the applicant.
(e) Upon the approval of an application, the Chief of Police shall
issue a driver' s permit to the applicant, \tihich permit shall bear the name,
address, race, and other identifying characteristics of the applicant, including
the signature of the applicant;. Such permit shall be fixed in a conspicuous
place in the taxicab so as to be seen from the passengers' comparbnent.
(f) If a driver changes his/her employment to a different owner,
he/she shall, within twenty-four (24) hours thereafter, notify the Chief of
Police for the purpose of having his/her driver IS permit changed so as to
property designate the name of the new errployer.
(g) ~en issued, the driver's permit shall be valid for one (1) year
from the elate of issuance, unless the permit has been revoked for any of the
causes set forth in this section. '!he driver, in making an application for a
renewal of this permit, shall follow the same procedure as set forth in making
his/her original application, except he/she shall not be fingerprinted or be
required to furnish a I;i1ot03raph. The applicant shall pay the fee, as
established by resolution of the City Council, for the issuance of the renewal
permit.
(Sec. 1, Ord. 91 C.S., eff. September 13, 1973, as amended by Sec. 1, Ord. 361
C.S., eff. November 13, 1987; Sec. 7, Ord. 452 C.S., eff. November 12, 1992)
167-10 Reprint No. 52 (1/15/93)
5.-:1D_1O .5:-=10_12
,.
.sec... 5.-:- lQ .]1). .Taxicab..driv.ers: .. Permits.:. . ReuOC'l\tian.
'!he C1ief of Police may revoke or refuse to renew an operator's permit if
the driver or applicant has, since the granting of hisjher permit,:
(a) Been convicted of a felony or a crirre involving moral turpitude,
pandering, using, possessing, selling or transporting narcotics, or irrparting
information for obtaining narcotics;
(b) Been convicted of driving recklessly or mile under the influence
of alcohol or narcotics;
(c) Had hisjher driver' s license or chauffeur's license issued by the
state revoked or suspended;
(d) Had two (2) or more convictions of misdemeanor hit-and-run or
speed violations, as set forth in the Vehicle Code of the state, occurring during
any consecutive period not exceeding twelve (12) months; or
(e) Violated any of the provisions of the chapter.
(Sec. 1, Ord. 91 C.S., eff. September 13, 1973)
See. 5-10.11. Repealed.
See. ,5-10.12. Public,liability.
(a) It shall be unlawful for any owner or operator to drive or operate
a taxicab or cause a taxicab to be'driven or operated in the City; and no license
for the operation thereof shall be granted, unless and until there is on file
with the City Clerk, and in full force and effect at all times mile such taxicab
is being operated, a certificate of a policy of insurance, approved by the City
Attorney, with a solvent and responsible conpmy au1thorized to do business in
the State, insuring the owner of such taxicab (giving the manufacture nurrber and
State license nurrber) against loss by reason of injury Or damage that may r'esu1t
to persons or property from the negligent operation or defective construction
of such taxicab, or for any other cause. Such policy mall have policy limits
of not less than Five Hundred 'Ihousand and nO/100ths Dollars ($SOO,OOO.OO) for
the injury or death of one person and One Million and no/lOOths Dollars
($1,000,000.00) for the injury of two (2) or more persons in the same accident
and One Hundred Thousand and no/lOOths Dollars ($100,000.00) for injury or
destruction of property.
167-11 Reprint No. 54 (9/0l/94)
.5.-:1.0_12 .5::10..13
..,
(b) Such policy of insurance shall guarantee the payment to any and
persons suffering injury or damage to persons or property of any final judgIrent
rendered against such owner or driver, within the limits set forth in subsection
(a) of this section, irrespective of the financial condition or any acts or
omissions of such owner or driver, and shall insure to the benefit of sum
persons.
(c) If, at any tiIre, such policy of insurance is cancelled by the
corcpany issuing such policy, or if the author ity of the corcpany to do business
in the State shall be revoked, the City Clerk shall require the owner to replace
such policy with another policy satisfactory to the City Attorney and file a
certificate thereof, and in default thereof the owner's license to operate shall
be revoked.
(d) All public passenger vehicles for hire shall be under the
supervision and control of the Chief of Police; and he shall notperrnit any
driver to operate any taxicab in the City while the taxicab, or any equipment
used thereof or therewith, shall 'be unsafe, defective, or in any unsanitary
conditions. Every taxicab shall be at all tiIres subject to inspection by any
police officer of the City.
(Sec. 1, Ord. 91 C.S., eff. September 13, 1973, as amended by Sec. 1, Ord. No.
463 C.S., eff. May 26, 1994)
S~....5..71o..13 . Bates..of..far:.e.
(a) '!he owner shall set hisJher own rates of fare, but he shall cause
a copy of all rates to be filed with the City Clerk and also shall cause a
schedule of rates to be prominently displayed in each taxicab operatErl in the
City. All charges fixed, charged, or collected for service shall be in
accordance with the rate schedules posted with the City Clerk; and it shall be
unlawful for different charges to be made therefor.
(b) No schedule of rates shall be cha.rged after the schedule has been
posted except by the owner filing a copy of the new sd1edule with the City Clerk.
(c) If at any tine the Council believes that any presently in-force
schedule of rates or proposed schedule of rates is or may be excessive, the
Council may notify the owner who filed sum a schedule of the COW1Cil' s intention
to reduce rates and may order such person to show cause why such rates should
167-12 Reprint No. 54 (9/01/94)
Attachment 4
CERTIFICATE OF
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY
Pursuant to Resolution No. _' adopted by the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande on , this certificate is hereby issued to
The authority granted by this Certificate is limited to those services and conditions,
in all aspects, as contained upon the applicant's application, dated , and this
certificate shall become valid and effective only upon signature of all parties listed b~low,
and in no event prior to
License Taxes Paid
DATE FINANCE DIRECTOR
Certificate of
DATE CITY ATTORNEY Insurance Complies
Vehicles Inspected
DATE POLICE CHIEF
Vehicle Inspection
DATE POLICE CHIEF Fee Paid
Taxicab Drivers'
DATE POLICE CHIEF Permits Issued
Rate Schedule
DATE DEPUTY CITY CLERK Provided
Rate Schedules
DATE POLICE CHIEF Posted in Taxi
_._-,._.__._.._--_."~ ___"n,.
7.c.
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande will hold a Public
Hearing on the following item:
CASE NO. NIA
APPLICANT: City of Arroyo Grande
LOCATION: Citywide
PROPOSAL: Proposed Ordinance amending portions of Title 9 of the Arroyo
Grande Municipal Code regarding Second Residential Dwelling
Units.
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION: Statutory Exemption Per Section 15282(i) of the CEQA Guidelines
REPRESENTATIVE: Kerry McCants, Community Development Director
In compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), it has been determined
pursuant to Section 15252(i) of the CEQA Guidelines that the activity is not a project as
determined in Section 15378.
Any person affected or concerned by this issue may submit written comments to the Director of
Administrative Services before the CitY Council hearing, or appear and be heard in support of or
opposition to the project.
Any person interested in the proposal can contact the Community Development Department at
214 E. Branch Street, Arroyo Grande, California, during normal business hours (8:00 a.m. to 5:00
p.m.). The proposed Ordinance will be available for public inspection at the above address.
IF YOU CHALLENGE AN ITEM IN COURT, YOU MAYBE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY THOSE
ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING DESCRIBED IN THIS
NOTICE, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AT, OR
PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC HEARING.
FAILURE OF ANY PERSON TO RECEIVE THE NOTICE SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE
GROUNDS FOR ANY COURT TO INVALIDATE THE ACTION OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY
FOR WHICH THE NOTICE WAS GIVEN.
Date and Time of Hearing: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 at 7:00 P.M.
Place of Hearing: Arroyo Grande City Council Chambers
215 E. Branch Street
~j; {)J1<)tUf)"~- Arroyo Grande, California 93420
KellyWet ore
Director of Administrative Services/Deputy City Clerk
Publish 1 T, October 13, 2000
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL I
FROM: KERRY McCANTS, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR V~
BY: TERESA McCLISH, ASSISTANT PLANNER1'ff.(..I
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE REGARDING SECOND RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS
DATE: OCTOBER 24, 2000
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council:
1. Introduce for first reading by title only the proposed ordinance entitled, II An Ordinance
of the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande Amending Portions of Title 9 of the
Municipal Code Regarding Second Residential Dwelling Units"; and
2. Direct the Director of Administrative Services to file a "Notice of Exemption" with the
County Recorder.
FUNDING:
No fiscal impact.
DISCUSSION:
Recently, the City Council directed staff to review and revise Development Code
Section 9-11.140 regarding second residential dwelling units in order to reflect
changes in both Council policy and the law regarding such units. The Planning
Commission reviewed the proposed revisions on September 1 9, 2000 and unanimously
recommended that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance.
At the request of the Planning Commission, staff has included language in the
proposed ordinance requiring a firewall between an attached primary and second
dwelling unit. Planning Commissioners' concerns included parking requirements,
access, front yard setbacks, deed restrictions and consistency with the General Plan
(reference Attachment 2). Additionally, Commissioners asked staff to determine how
addresses are given to second residential dwelling units. The Building Department
does assign a separate address for these residences.
City Council
Ordinance Regarding Second Residential Units
October 24, 2000
Page 2 of 2
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
Staff has reviewed this project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines and the City of Arroyo Grande Rules and Procedures
for Implementation of CEQA. It has been determined pursuant to Section 15282(1) of
the CEQA Guidelines the adoption of an ordinance regarding second units is a statutory
exemption.
AL tERNA TIVES:
The following alternatives are presented for Council consideration:
- Introduce the Ordinance;
- Modify and introduce the Ordinance;
- Reject the Ordinance;
- Provide direction to staff.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 Proposed Ordinance in legislative format
Attachment 2 Draft Planning Commission minutes from 9/1 9/00
ORDINANCE NO. C.S.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE AMENDING PORTIONS OF TITLE 9 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SECOND RESIDENTIAL
DWELLING UNITS
WHEREAS, the City of Arroyo Grande has a responsibility, pursuant to Government Code
Section 65852.2, to address the need for second residential dwelling units, while at the
same time considering environmental and service constraints; and
WHEREAS, the Housing Element of the General Plan of the City of Arroyo Grande
adopted on June 22, 1993, provides for the utilization of second residential dwelling units
as an affordable housing incentive in residential zones; and
WHEREAS, the City of Arroyo Grande has conducted environmental review for adoption
of an ordinance establishing procedures to provide for the development of second
residential dwelling units in the City of Arroyo Grande, and has found that it can be seen
with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed second residential dwelling unit
requirements will have an effect on the environment and therefore is exempt from the
provisions of CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande has reviewed and considered
the information in the proposed document and staff report, as well as public testimony
presented at the hearing and make the following findings of fact:
A. The proposed second residential dwelling unit requirements are consistent with the
goals, objectives, policies, and programs of the General Plan, and are necessary
and desirable to implement the provisions of the General Plan.
B. The proposed second residential dwelling unit requirements will not adversely affect
the public health, safety, and welfare.
C. The proposed second residential dwelling unit requirements 'are consistent with the
purpose and intent of Title 9.
D. The potential environmental impacts of the proposed second residential dwelling
unit requirements are insignificant.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
-..----"-..----..----
ORDINANCE NO. C.S.
PAGE 2
SECTION 1: Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Section 9-11.140 is amended in its entirety
as follows:
CHAPTER 9-11.140
SECOND RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS
A. Purpose and Intent
The purpose of these standards is to ensure that second residential dwelling units
located in Residential Districts do not adversely impact either adjacent residential parcels
or the surrounding neighborhood, and are developed in a manner which protects the
integrity of the Residential District, while providing for needed housing opportunities. There
are environmental and service constraints the City faces, which limit the addition of second
dwelling units. In particular, such units may not be appropriate on hillside lots because of
environmental constraints. The addition of a second residential dwelling unit is limited by
urban service capacity, public safety standards, traffic conditions, fire hazards, privacy
impacts and compatibility with neighboring uses and structures. This Chapter addresses
these limitations.
B. Applicability
1. Second residential dwelling units may be permitted in any Residential
District except the RE District, subject to obtaining a Conditional Use
Permit pursuant to Section 9-03.050 of this Title and as otherwise
provided in this Section. All findings required by Section 9-03.050
must be made in addition to specific findings required by this Chapter
prior to issuance of a conditional use permit. Second residential
dwelling units shall be served by City water and sanitary sewer
systems. Second residential dwelling units shall be prohibited on lots
containing a guest house, converted garage, mobile home, or more
than one existing single family dwelling.
2. Second residential dwelling units may be attached to or detached from
the main dwelling. If the second dwelling unit is attached to the main
dwelling, each shall be served by separate outside entrances. The
interior wall( s) of an attached unit which separate it from the main unit
shall be fire rated according to the most recent Uniform Building
Code, and shall not be connected by a doorway or opening to the
main dwelling. An "attached second residential dwelling unit" shall
mean a dwelling unit that is either combined within the living area or
attached to the primary residence. A "detached second residential
dwelling unit" shall mean a dwelling unit that is not combined within
- -~-~._.__.- ...-- --------.--
ORDINANCE NO. C.S.
PAGE 3
or attached to the primary residence. For the purposes of this
Chapter, "dwelling unit" shall not include a garage or any accessory
structure. "Primary residence" shall mean an existing detached
residential structure that conforms with all applicable zoning
regulations.
3. A second residential dwelling unit may be constructed simultaneously
with or after construction of the principal residence. In addition, an
existing principal residence may, subject to obtaining a conditional
use permit for such residence, be considered the second residential
dwelling unit, and a new residence may be constructed which would
then be considered the primary residence. The applicant shall apply
for and obtain a conditional use permit for a second residential
dwelling unit prior to submission of an application for a building permit
for the proposed new residence.
C. Property Development Standards
The second residential dwelling unit shall comply with all zoning regulations and
property development standards of the District in which it is located, existing building,
health, safety and fire codes, and architectural review criteria, including, but not limited to,
setbacks, height limits and maximum lot coverage. In addition, the following standards
shall apply:
1. Minimum Lot Size
The minimum lot size for a parcel to be eligible for a detached second
dwelling unit shall be 12,000 square feet, excluding all rights of way
and private access easements. The minimum lot size for a parcel to
be eligible for an attached second dwelling uni~ shall be 7,200 square
feet, excluding all rights of way.
2. Building Separation
A detached second residential dwelling unit shall be located at least
20 feet from the primary residence.
3
ORDINANCE NO. C.S.
PAGE 4
3. Yard Setbacks
The second residential dwelling unit shall have the same minimum
yard setback requirements as the base zone of the primary residence
on the parcel as outlined in Table 9-06.050-A and Table 9-06.050-B.,
Setbacks outlined in Appendix C.W.D.219 as referenced in Table 9-
06.050 A and Table 9-06.050-B shall not be applicable to second
residential dwelling units. The minimum front yard setback for second
residential dwelling units shall be equal to or greater than the
maximum front yard setback of adjacent parcels.
4. Architectural Compatibility
The second residential dwelling unit shall be architecturally
compatible with the primary residence and the surrounding
neighborhood, and shall incorporate the same colors and materials as
the primary residence.
5. Maximum Size
Gross floor area of a second residential dwelling unit shall not exceed
640 square feet.
6. Maximum Slope
The building site upon which the second residential dwelling unit will
be constructed shall not have an average slope in excess of twenty
percent. A topographic map and slope analysis, as recommended by
the Community Development Director, shall be stamped and signed
by either a registered civil engineer, registered architect, or registered
landscape architect. Average slope is defined as follows:
S= I x L x 100
A x 43,560
Where S = average natural slope, in percent.
1= interval, in feet, of the contour lines.
L= the sum, in feet, of the length of the contour lines,
at selected contour interval "I".
A= the total area, in acres, of the site.
4
ORDINANCE NO. C.S.
PAGE 5
7. Parking
A minimum of one off-street parking space shall be provided for each
bedroom in the second residential dwelling unit in addition to the off-
street parking spaces required for the main dwelling. All parking
spaces shall be exclusive of front and street side yard setbacks.
Such parking spaces shall be located in close proximity to the second
residential dwelling unit so as to provide convenient access for the
occupant. Additional parking may be required provided that a finding
IS made that the additional parking requirements are directly related
to the use of the second residential dwelling unit and are consistent.
with existing neighborhood standards applicable to existing dwellings.
8. Occupancy Requirements
Second residential dwelling units shall not be offered for sale apart
from the primary residence and shall be occupied on a month to
month basis or longer. Either the primary residence or the second
residential dwelling unit must be occupied by the owner of the
property.
9. Driveway Access
Second residential dwelling units shall be served by the same
driveway access to the street as the primary residence.
10. Performance Standards
For establishing conditional use criteria, the Community Development
Director shall consider the adequacy of water, sewer, drainage, fire
and emergency services, and the impact of additional dwelling units
on traffic flow.
11. Deed Restriction
A deed restriction shall be recorded against the title of the property
containing a second residential dwelling unit prior to issuance of a
building permit. Such deed restriction shall stipulate that the second
5
~_.-
ORDINANCE NO. C.S.
PAGE 6
dwelling unit cannot be sold and the owner of the property must
occupy one of the units on the premises.
12. Utility Meters
Only one electric and one gas meter shall be allowed on the property
and shall serve both the primary residence and the second unit.
13. Other Conditions
Second residential dwelling units shall comply with such other
conditions or standards which, in the judgment of the City, are
necessary or appropriate to mitigate possible adverse impacts on the
neighborhood.
D. FINDINGS
The Planning Commission may issue a conditional use permit for a second residential
dwelling unit as applied for or in modified form, if on the basis of the application and the
evidence submitted, the Planning Commission makes all of the following findings.
1. The proposed second dwelling unit complies with the standards
described in Section 9-11.140.C.
2. The second dwelling unit will not unreasonably interfere with the
privacy otherwise available to residents of adjoining properties.
3. The proposed second dwelling unit is designed to be compatible with
the exterior appearance and character of the existing neighborhood.
4. The proposed second dwelling unit is designed to be compatible with
the existing main dwelling unit in terms of architectural style, bulk,
height, materials, colors and landscaping.
5. The proposed second dwelling unit will not cause unreasonable noise,
traffic congestion, parking congestion or overload existing public
facilities or utilities.
6
ORDINANCE NO. C.S.
PAGE 7
E. STATE LAW APPLICABLE
The provisions of this Section shall be subordinate to and superceded by the
controlling provisions of any applicable State law or laws.
F. ILLEGAL SECOND RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT
The establishment or continuance of a second residential dwelling Ullit without a
Conditional Use Permit or contrary to the provisions of this Section is declared to be
unlawful and shall constitute a misdemeanor and a public nuisance.
SECTION 2: Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Table 9-06.040-A is amended as follows:
Table 9-06.040 A Uses Permitted Within Residential Districts
USE RE RH RR RS SF VR MF MFA SR MIIP
15. Second Residential NP C C C C C C C C NP
Dwelling Unit
SECTION 3: Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Chapter 9-18 DEFINITIONS is amended as
follows:
Second Dwelling Unit: A detached or attached dwelling unit that provides
complete, independent living facilities for one or more persons. It shall include
permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the
same parcel or parcels upon which the primary unit is situated.
SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be urilawful, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or any
part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section,
subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of
the fact that anyone or more section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence,
clause or phrases be declared unlawful.
SECTION 5: A summary of this Ordinance shall be published in a newspaper published
and circulated in the City of Arroyo Grande at least five (5) days prior to the City
Council meeting at which the proposed Ordinance is to be adopted. A certified copy
7
-- --'_._-~.__..-._,-~_._-_._._-"-
ORDINANCE NO. C.S.
PAGE 8
of the full text of the proposed Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the Director
of Administrative Services/Deputy City Clerk. Within fifteen (15) days after adoption
of the Ordinance, the summary with the names of those City Council Members voting
for and against the Ordinance shall be published again, and the Director of
Administrative Services/Deputy City Clerk shall post a certified copy of the full text of
such adopted Ordinance.
SECTION 6: This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after the date of
its adoption.
On motion of Council Member , seconded by
Council Member and on the following roll call vote, to-
wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Ordinance was adopted this day of , 2000.
8
ORDINANCE NO. C.S.
PAGE 9
MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELL Y WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
9
.
A TT ACHMENT I
ORDINANCE NO. C.S.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AMENDING
PORTIONS OF TITLE 9 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE
REGARDING SECOND RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Section 9-11.140 is amended in its entirety
as follows:
CHAPTER 9-11.140
SECOND RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS
A. Purpose and Intent
The purpose of these standards is to ensure that second residential dwelling units
located in singlo family Residential Districts do not adversely impact either adjacent
residential parcels or the surrounding neighborhood, and are developed in a manner which
protects the integrity of the Residential District, while providing for needed housing
opportunities. for o'....nOF& of oligiblo par~ols.
B. Applicability
1.
____.____ ~__~ _____,_ _.__. _.n.____..__ ~--------._------ ---..-.-'
ORDINANCE NO. C.5.
PAGE 2
Second residential dwelling units shall be prohibited on lots containing
a guest house, converted garage, mobile home, or more than one
existing single family dwelling.
2.
An "attached second residential dwelling unit" shall
mean a dwelling unit that is either combined within the living area or
attached to the primary residence. A "detached second residential
dwelling unit" shall mean a dwelling unit that is not combined within
or attached to the primary residence. For the purposes of this
Section, "dwelling unit" shall not include a garage or any accessory
structure. "Primary residence" shall mean an existing detached
residential structure that conforms with all applicable zoning
regulations.
3.
C. Property Development Standards
The second residential dwelling unit shall comply with all
property development standards of the District in which it is located, existing building,
and fire codes, and architectural review criteria, including, but not limited to,
setbacks, height limits and maximum lot coverage. In addition, the following standards
shall apply:
2
----- ---.-
.
ORDINANCE NO. C.5.
PAGE 3
1. Minimum Lot Size
The minimum lot size for a parcel to be eligible for a detached second
dwelling unit shall be 12,000 square feet,
The minimum lot size for a parcel to
be eligible for an attached second dwelling unit shall be 6,000 _
square feet,
2. Building Separation
A detached second _ dwelling unit shall be located at least
20 feet from the primary residence.
3. Yard Setbacks
The second residential dwelling unit shall have the same minimum
yard setback requirements as the base zone of the prima residence
on the parcel
4. Architectural Compatibility
The second residential dwelling unit shall be architecturally
compatible with the primary residence and the surrounding
neighborhood, and shall incorporate the same colors and materials as
the primary residence.
5. Maximum Size
Gross floor area of a second residential dwelling unit shall not exceed
640 square feet.
6.
3
. _ m__.._
. . . . .
. .
:
. . .
: - :
. - - . :
.
.
,
ORDINANCE NO. C.S.
PAGE 5
Second _ dwelling units shall not be offered for sale apart
from the primary residence and shall be occupied on a month to
month basis or longer. Either the primary residence or the second
residential dwelling unit must be occupied by the owner of the
property.
9.
10. Performance Standards
For establishing conditional use criteria, the Community Development
Director shall consider the adequacy of water, sewer, drainage, fire
and emergency services, and the impact of additional dwelling units
on traffic flow.
11. Deed Restriction
A deed restriction shall be recorded against the title of the property
containing a second _ dwelling unit prior to issuance of a
building permit. Such deed restriction shall stipulate that the second
dwelling unit cannot be sold and the owner of the property must
occupy one of the units on the premises.
12. Utility Meters
Only one electric and one gas meter shall be allowed on the property
and shall serve both the primary residence and the second unit.
13.
5
.
.
.
.
.
ORDINANCE NO. C.S.
PAGE 7
5.
E.
F.
SECTION 2: Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Table 9-06.040-A is amended as follows:
Table 9-06.040 A Uses Permitted Within Residential Districts
USE RE RH RR RS SF VR MF rMFA SR MHP
15. Second Residential NP C C C C C . . . NP
Dwelling Unit . . .
SECTION 3: Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Chapter 9-18 DEFINITIONS is amended as
follows:
Second Dwelling Unit: A detached or attached dwelling unit that provides
complete, independent living faci!ities for one or ~ _ persons. It shall
include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation
on the same parcel or parcels as the one upon which the primary unit is situated.
7
-----
. .
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT
MINUTES
September 19, 2000
Page 8 A TT ACHMENT 2
Commissioner Costello inquired how the sign was situated on the I(
Chair Greene opened the Public Hearing.
Jim Cravens, representing the applicant asked the PI ing Commission if they had any questions
he could answer. Vice-Chair Parker asked if th ign was wooden with raised letters and Mr.
Cravens replied that it was.
Chair Green closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Costello moved that e Planning Commission adopt
RESOLUTION NO. 00-1763
A RESOL ION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF AR YO GRANDE APPROVING PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM
AM MENT CASE NO. 00-004, APPLIED FOR BY GRAND
A v.. NUE SELF STORAGE, LOCATED AT 1166 EAST GRAND
ENUE
with exhibi A. Vice-Chair Parker seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the
following II call vote:
LL VOTE
Commissioner Costello
Commissioner Keen
Commissioner London
Vice-Chair Parker
Chair Greene
II. C. AMENDMENT TO THE ARROYO GRANDE MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING CHAPTER 11
OF TITLE 9 REGARDING SECOND RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS
Teresa McClish, Assistant Planner stated that the City Council had recently directed staff to
review and revise Development Code Sec. 9-11.140 for second residential units. Ms. McClish
stated that State law provided provisions to allow second units unless findings can be made that
they create a health, safety, or general welfare problem. Second residential units help the City
meet its affordable housing requirements and "fair share allocation" established by the California
Department of Housing and Community Development.
Ms. McClish explained to the Commission that the Housing Element in the City's General Plan
encouraged the development of second residential units and quantified the City's objective to
allow the development of 50-second residential units between 1990 and 1997. The City has
approved 16-second residential units since 1990.
Ms. McClish stated that the changes to the ordinance included clarification of Conditional Use
Permit requirements, expanded property development standards and the inclusion of findings
specific to second residential units.
---~._._._---~._---
. .
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT
MINUTES
September 19, 2000
Page 9
Commissioner Keen stated that in the staff report Ms. McClish had read a section concerning
what the State says the City was allowed to do. He asked for clarification concerning this
statement. He also asked Ms. McClish to further explain about the number of units, which Ms.
McClish had stated was fifty, that was in the General Plan.
Ms. McClish stated the State law essentially mandates second residential units and provides
provisions, which the Ordinance was based on. The General Plan includes goals and objectives
to encourage second residential units to meet housing requirements and there is a specific
objective to allow the development of fifty second residential units.
Mr. Keen stated that where it talks about an attached second unit in the Ordinance, there should
be a requirement for a firewall between the units. He asked if the Building Code included a
firewall in this instance? If it doesn't, he felt it should be added into the language of the
Ordinance.
Mr. Campbell agreed with Mr. Keen that this was an important issue, however, he did not know
if it was included in the Building Code. He stated that it would not hurt to add the language to
cover this.
Mr. Keen asked what the statement in the ordinance meant that stated "additional parking may
be required if the findings indicate it is necessary"? He asked what kind of findings these would
be? He stated that he did not feel that the new requirement of one parking space was
sufficient.
Ms. McClish stated that the language used in the Ordinance came from the state law section.
The State law does not include any language requiring covered parking spaces. Therefore, staff
felt that the language dealing with this had to be removed from the current ordinance. However,
the current proposed section does give the Commission discretion when approving the parking
requirements.
Mr. Keen stated that it was still not clear to him what kind of findings the, Commission would
have to have to require the additional parking? He would like to have the ordinance worded in
such a way that it did not leave any room for a Commission decision on this.
Ms. McClish stated that the findings provided at the end of page six of the Ordinance referred to
the second unit being compatible with the neighborhood. For instance, if all the houses in the.
neighborhood had covered parking, then to be compatible, you may require a covered parking
space.
Commissioner London asked if it would be feasible to require that second residential units be
behind the primary residence to avoid the situation the Commission had just dealt with on James
Way?
Ms. McClish stated that they had included language that stated that an applicant would not be
able to revert to the old setbacks. There is also language stating that the front yard set back
shall be equal to or greater than the maximum front yard setback of the adjacent parcels.
Mr. London stated that this still did not answer the problem of those homes that have a large
-
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT
MINUTES
September 19, 2000
Page 10
front yard that would meet the setback requirements, but by adding the second residence,
would be totally inconsistent with the surrounding neighborhood.
Kerry McCants, Community Development Director, stated that the reason staff had structured
the Ordinance in this way was that the findings needed would allow the Commission to make
this kind of decision on a case to case basis.
Mr. London stated that this would be true if the project came to the Planning Commission before
the building permit had been issued.
Mr. McCants stated that staff had done the best that they could to deal with this situation.
Mr. London asked what the reason was for having only one utility meter at the residence?
Mr. McCants stated that this was done to make it more difficult for someone to subsequently try
to create an additional parcel and sell one side.
Mr. London asked if the second residence could have its own address?
Mr. McCants stated that he did not have an answer to that question.
Mr. London asked why there was a condition restricting the possibility of having a second
. driveway?
Mr. McCants stated that it was important to recognize that this is a secondary use on an
existing developed property and having a separate driveway would create the perception of an
additional separation between the two units.
Vice-Chair Parker stated that she felt this was a huge improvement and she felt that it would
help the Planning Commission have something concrete to base its decisions on. She said she
was appreciated staff putting together this ordinance.
Ms. Parker asked if there was a period of time set by the State in which the City was supposed
to have approved fifty second residential units?
Ms. McClish stated that the fifty units was a City goal and that the State only provided the
provisions on how to shape the ordinance. The State does have language that encourages
having second units to meet the City's affordable housing requirements.
Vice-Chair Parker stated that on Page Six (6) of the staff report, Number Five (5) it stated that
Uthe proposed second dwelling unit will not cause unreasonable noise, traffic congestion,
parking...u and then it says Ucongestionu. Was this a mistake in the language of the ordinance?
Ms. McClish stated that a change would be made to correct it.
Ms. Parker stated that she appreciates staff referring to the fact that there are the necessary
infrastructure capabilities before the City continues to add on second residential units because
she believes this addresses one of Commissioner Keen's concerns about having enough water
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT
MINUTES
September 19, 2000
Page 11
for buildout.
Commissioner Costello asked if the deed restriction solved the problem of someone coming back
and trying to split a lot with a second dwelling unit on it and creating a new parcel? He also
asked what the deed restriction actually accomplished?
Ms. McClish stated that the deed restriction follows the land in terms of change in ownership,
but someone could request a lot split. They would then have to meet all the requirements for a
subdivision. The deed restriction requires that the owner reside in one or the other of the units.
Mr. Costello asked what would happen if there was a lot that exceeded 24,000 square feet and
it has a second resident dwelling on it, then someone asked to split the lot into two 12,000
square foot parcels. Could someone then ask to put a second residential dwelling on the two
1 2,000 square foot lots?
Ms. McClish stated that there was language in the ordinance referring to requirements to meet
not only property development standards, but zoning requirements as well. This is where the
issue of density requirements would be looked at. The state law reads in such a way that the
City is allowed some discretion to look at density in situations such as Mr. Costello was referring
to.
Chair Greene asked if the new parking language was drawn from the State law and was the
Commission free to deviate from this language and continue to use the language that currently
existed in the Ordinance requiring one covered and one uncovered parking space? Or, is the
Commission mandated to adopt the new language of one parking space as the threshold?
Ms. McClish stated that the Commission was not mandated to use the new language. She said
that the City Attorney suggested the new language. The City is allowed to develop an
Ordinance that includes some restrictions but State law also provides that the cities do not
create unreasonable restrictions. This was the reason that staff used the language from the
State law with regard to parking.
Mr. Greene asked if anyone had ever found that the existing language created an unreasonable
restriction either through some Appellate Court decision or through some finding made by a City
staff member.
Ms. McClish stated that the City Attorney was not comfortable including specific language for
covered parking.
Mr. McCants stated that the City Attorney was more comfortable using the approach of looking
at the findings that were listed at the back of the Ordinance and using them to make the finding
that, for instance, covered parking was required in a certain case because everyone on the street
had covered parking.
Mr. London asked what the City intended to do when the owner of the property, after building
the second unit, moves and there are two rental units?
Ms. McClish stated that the deed restriction that is required for the second dwelling unit
--,---,_.-
, ..
ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT
MINUTES
September 19, 2000
Page 12
prohibits the owner of the property from residing elsewhere.
Mr. London asked what enforcement action could the City take when it becomes aware of this
kind of violation?
Mr. McCants stated that the City would have to go to Superior Court and have the court enforce
the deed restriction.
There was no public comment.
The Planning Commission briefly discussed the ordinance and felt that the ordinance was more
restrictive and would provide them with better guidelines to work with when making their
decisions on second unit dwellings.
Chair Greene asked about the possibility of crafting language for the parking spaces that would
be required. He suggested that Section 7 be modified to read, "a minimum of one covered and
one uncovered off street parking space shall be provided" and then adopt the remaining
language from the State law. The words "each bedroom" should be deleted.
Mr. Campbell quoted language from the State law that stated "parking requirements for second
dwelling units shall not exceed one parking space per unit or one per bedroom. Additional
parking may be required providing that a finding is made that additional parking requirements are
directly related to the use of the second unit".
Mr. Greene and Mr. Campbell discussed the fact that State law regulates the number of parking
spaces and the original language should be left as it was presented.
Vice-Chair Parker moved that the Planning Commission adopt:
RESOLUTION NO. 1762
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO
GRANDE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND PORTIONS.OF THE
ARROYO GRANDE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SECOND RESIDENTIAL
DWELLING UNITS
as amended. Commissioner Costello seconded the motion. The motion was approved by
the following roll call vote:
ROLL CALL VOTE
YES Commissioner Costello
YES Commissioner Keen
YES Commissioner London
YES Vice-Chair Parker
YES Chair Greene
-".,-~- --------.-----
9.a.
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: LYNDA K. SNODGRASS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCIAL SERVICE9
BY: JANET M. HUWALDT, ACCOUNTING SUPERVISOR C(jlr
SUBJECT: CASH DISBURSEMENT RA TIFICA TION
DATE: OCTOBER 24, 2000
RECOMMENDA TION:
It is recommended the City Council ratify the attached listing of cash disbursements for
the period October 1 - October 15, 2000.
FUNDING:
There is a $669,690.25 fiscal impact.
DISCUSSION:
The attached listing represents the cash disbursements required of normal and usual
operations. It is requested that the City Council approve these payments.
ATTACHMENTS:
ATTACHMENT 1 - Cash Disbursement Listing
ATTACHMENT 2 - October 6,2000 Accounts Payable Check Register
ATTACHMENT 3 - October 6,2000 Payroll Checks and Benefit Checks
ATTACHMENT 4 - October 13, 2000 Accounts Payable Check Register
-~'-"'._-_..-_. - --~--'-'-'-~ --
A IT ACHMENT 1
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
CASH DISBURSEMENTS
For the Period of October 1 Through October 15, 2000
October 24, 2000
Presented are the cash disbursements issued by the Department of Financial Services for
the period October 1 to October 15, 2000. Shown are cash disbursements by week of
occurrence and type of payment.
October 6, 2000
Accounts Payable Cks 97653-97745 2 95,761.39
Payroll Checks and Benefit Checks 3 261,347.39
357,108.78
October 13, 2000
Accounts Payable Cks 97757-97849 4 510,697.59
Less Payroll Transfer included in
Attachment 3 (198,116.12)
312,581.47
Two Week Total $ 669.690.25
--.----
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
INDEX FOR BUDGET DEPARTMENTS
EDEN COMPUTER SYSTEM
GENERAL FUND (010) SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
City Government (Fund 010) Park Development Fee Fund (Fund 213)
4001 - City Coundl 4550 - Park Development Fee
4002 - City Oerk Traffic Signal Fund (Fund 222)
4003 - City Attorney 4501 - Traffic Fund
4101 - City Manager Transportation Fund (Fund 225)
4102 - Printing/Duplicating 4553 - Public Transit System
4120 - Finandal Services Construction Tax Fund (Fund 230)
4121 - Taxes/ InsUIance/ Bonds 4556 - Construction Tax
4130 - Community Development Police Grant Fund (Fund 271)
4131 - Community Building (CDBG) 4202 - State AB3229 Cops Grant
4140 - Management Information System 4203 - Federal COPS Hiring Grant
4145 - Non Departmental 4204 - Federal Local Law Enforcement
Public Safety (Fund 010)
4201 - Police ENTERPRISE FUNDS
4211 - Fire Sewer Fund (Fund 612)
4212 - Building & Safety 4610 - Sewer Maintenance
4213 - Government Buildings Water Fund (Fund 640)
Public Works (Fund 010) 4710 - Water Administration
4301 - Public Works-Admin & Engineering 4711 - Water Production
4303 - Street/Bridge Maintenance 4712 - Water Distribution
4304 - Street Lighting Lopez Administration (Fund 641)
4305 - Automotive Shop 4750 - Lopez Administration
Parks & Recreation (Fund 010)
4420 - Parks CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS
4421 - Recreation 5501-5599 - Park Projects
4422 - General Recreation 5601-5699 - Streets Projects
4423 - Pre-School Program 5701-5799 - Drainage Projects
4424 - Recreation-Spedal Programs 5801-5899 - Water/Sewer/Street Projects
4425 - Children in Motion 5901-5999 - Water Projects
4430 - Soto Sport Complex
4460 - Parkway Maintenance
OepL Index for Council
ATTACHMENT 2
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 1
10/03/00 16:19 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 17
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER LOCC CONF-DICKENS 010.4001. 5501 375.00
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER LOCC CONF-SPAGNOLO 010.4301.5501 325.00
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER LOCC CONF-SNODGRASS 010.4120.5501 325.00
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER LOCC CITY BOOKS-FERRARA 010.4001. 5501 14.00
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER LOCC CONF-TERBORCH 010.4101.5501 365.00
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER LOCC CONF-FERRARA/TOLLEY 010.4001.5501 650.00
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER PIZZA EXPRESS-MEETING SUPPLIES 010.4211.5501 48.00
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4101.5201 118.49
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER GINA'S-TEACHERS INDUSTRY 010.4001. 5504 38.25
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER OFFICE SUPPLIES 284.4103.5201 47.15
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER LOCC CONF.LEADERSHIP-FERRARA 010.4001.5501 225.00
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER QTRDECK-TEACHERS INDUSTRY 010.4001. 5504 26.93
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4101.5201 17.13
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER UNITED AIR-FERRARA 010.4001. 5501 92.50
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER UNITED AIR-FERRARA 010.4001. 5501 92.50
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER SLO CHAMBER OF COMMERANCE 284.4103.5201 3.00
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER SLO CNTY NEWSPAPER 010.4101. 5201 6.00
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER POSTAGE CHARGE-RETURN 010.4101. 5201 8.75
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER COMPUTER ITEMS-PD SPLITTER 010.4140.5607 44.99
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER ORAL BOARD LUNCH P&R 010.4421.5316 48.10
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER CA.P&R SOCIETY 010.4421. 5501 189.00
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4421.5201 86.17
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER CARTRIDGE 010.4130.5201 29.11
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER CREDIT ON OVERCHARGE 010.4130.6001 53.63-
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER OFFICE CHAIR 010.4130.6001 289.56
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER TRILOGY/SITING CELL TOWERS 010.4130.5503 200.00
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER OFFICE SUPPLIES/MEETING SPLYS 010.4301. 5201 166.42
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER GAS 640.4712.5501 42.81
307 10/02/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER GAS 010.4301. 5608 25.00 3,845.23
97653 10/06/00 000468 A T & T-L/DIST SVC. L/DIST PHONE-MIS 010.4140.5303 558.12
97653 10/06/00 000468 A T & T-L/DIST SVC. L/DIST PHONE-MIS REBATE 010.4140.5303 5.00-
97653 10/06/00 000468 A T & T-L/DIST SVC. L/DIST.PHONE-FAX MACHINE 010.4211.5403 56.25 609.37
97654 10/06/00 100479 A.G.CHAMBER OF COMMERCE SOAR BREAKFAST-9/13/00 010.4101. 5501 15.00 15.00
97655 10/06/00 000898 ADDICTION MEDICINE CONS PRE-EMP,DRUG SCREEN-DUTRA 010.4425.5315 45.00
97655 10/06/00 000898 ADDICTION MEDICINE CONS PRE-EMP.DRUG SCREEN-BAGGS 010.4425.5315 45.00
97655 10/06/00 000898 ADDICTION MEDICINE CONS PRE-EMP.DRUG SCREEN-STARBUCK 010.4425.5315 45.00
97655 10/06/00 000898 ADDICTION MEDICINE CONS PRE-EMP.DRUG SCREEN-JUAREZ 010.4301. 5315 45.00 180.00
97656 10/06/00 100882 ADVANCE MARKING SYSTEMS PASSPORT NAMETAGS 010.4211.5255 49.90 49.90
97657 10/06/00 002340 JOHN ALLEN ETHICAL LEADERSHIP-ALLEN 010.4201.5501 30.00 30.00
97658 10/06/00 003042 AMERICAN EQUIPMENT SVCS DUMP BIN 010.4213.5303 1,000.00 1,000.00
97659 10/06/00 003120 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUP PAINT/BATTERIES 010.4201.5255 131.10
97659 10/06/00 003120 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUP SCRUB N BUCKET 010.4201. 5255 102.96 234.06
97660 10/06/00 100897 AMERICAN TEMPS RHINEHART SVCS TO 9/23 220.4303.5303 716.39
---.--.-
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 2
10/03/00 16:19 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 17
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
97660 10/06/00 100897 AMERICAN TEMPS BANNING SVCS TO 9/15 010.4120.5303 534.24
97660 10/06/00 100897 AMERICAN TEMPS BANNING SVCS TO 9/22 010.4120.5303 629.64
97660 10/06/00 100897 AMERICAN TEMPS BANNING SVCS TO 9/22 010.4301.5303 47.70 1,927.97
97661 10/06/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE MEETING SUPPLIES 010.4101. 5501 11.70
97661 10/06/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE OFFICE SUPPLIES 284.4103.5201 1. 06
97661 10/06/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4421. 5201 12.65
97661 10/06/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE MAILING BUDGETS 010.4120.5201 10.35
97661 10/06/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE POSTAGE 010.4120.5201 24.30
97661 10/06/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE MEETING SUPPLIES 010.4101. 5201 28.71
97661 10/06/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE SUPPLIES 010.4101.5201 24.76
97661 10/06/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE GENERAL PLAN MAPS 010.4130.5201 8.54
97661 10/06/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE FILM 010.4101.5201 4.99
97661 10/06/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE COLOR COPIES-MAPS/DEEDS 010.4130.5201 28.11
97661 10/06/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE MEETING SUPPLIES 010.4301. 5201 25.48
97661 10/06/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE SUPPLIES 010.4101. 5201 4.58
97661 10/06/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE MEETING SUPPLIES 284.4103.5505 26.53
97661 10/06/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE MEETING SUPPLIES 010.4002.5501 15.00
97661 10/06/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PHOTO DEV 010.4130.5201 11.16 237.92
97662 10/06/00 006640 ART'S APPLIANCE SERVICE SERVICE OVENS-W/C 010.4213.5303 62,00 62.00
97663 10/06/00 101810 BASIC CHEMICAL SOLUTION SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 640.4712.5274 283.18 283.18
97664 10/06/00 102009 BLI INTERNATIONAL BATTERY SAVERS 010.4201. 5601 611.94 611.94
97665 10/06/00 102024 JULIE BLOCK REF. PARK DEPOSIT-BLOCK 010.0000.4354 25.00 25.00
97666 10/06/00 012168 BOXX EXPRESS UPS SHIPMENTS 010.4201. 5201 151,33 151.33
97667 10/06/00 012754 BREZDEN PEST CONTROL AGFD QTLY PEST CONTROL 010.4213.5303 90.00 90.00
97668 10/06/00 013026 BRISCO MILL & LUMBER SCREWDRIVERS 010.4201.5255 17.03
97668 10/06/00 013026 BRISCO MILL & LUMBER CORDS/SURGE PROTECTORS 010.4201.5255 56.78
97668 10/06/00 013026 BRISCO MILL & LUMBER TOWELS/SPRAYS/TOOLS/GLUE 010.4201.5255 128.66 202.47
97669 10/06/00 016695 CA,RESERVE PEACE OFFICE MEMBERSHIPS-CA.RESV.PEACE 010.4201.5503 396.10 396.10
97670 10/06/00 017472 CA. ST. DEPT. CONSERVATION SMIP 1Q 00/01 010.0000,2208 753.00
97670 10/06/00 017472 CA. ST. DEPT. CONSERVATION ADMIN FEE-SMIP 010.0000.4801 37.65- 715.35
97671 10/06/00 018330 CA.ST.DEPT.OF JUSTICE FINGERPRINT CHECK-PD 010.4201.5324 96.00
97671 10/06/00 018330 CA. ST. DEPT. OF JUSTICE FINGERPRINT CHECK-PD 010.4301.5315 32.00 128.00
97672 10/06/00 016146 CALIF.HWY PRODUCTS & SI TEMP.NO PARKING SIGN TAPE 220.4303.5613 92.80
97672 10/06/00 016146 CALIF.HWY PRODUCTS & SI ORANGE REFLECT. PANTS 220.4303.5255 41.75 134.55
97673 10/06/00 021918 CENTRAL COAST SUPPLY BLDG. MAINT. SUPPLIES 010.4213.5604 532.60
97673 10/06/00 021918 CENTRAL COAST SUPPLY RESTROOM SUPPLIES 010.4420.5605 197,88 730.48
97674 10/06/00 100521 CHANNEL COUNTIES DIVIS I CHANNEL CNTY MEETING 010.4001.5501 10.00 10.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 3
10/03/00 16:19 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 17
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
97675 10/06/00 023322 CHRISTIANSON CHEVROLET FUEL SWITCH 010.4420.5601 11.55
97675 10/06/00 023322 CHRISTIANSON CHEVROLET LUBE/OIL/FILTERS 010.4201. 5601 50.40
97675 10/06/00 023322 CHRISTIANSON CHEVROLET CHECK CHARGING SYSTEM 010.4201. 5601 32.50
97675 10/06/00 023322 CHRISTIANSON CHEVROLET REPL.DRIVE BELT/SHIFT INDlCATO 010.4201. 5601 81. 30 175.75
97676 10/06/00 023400 ROBERT CHUBBUCK REIMB.BOOT REPAIR 010.4201. 5255 55.00 55.00
97677 10/06/00 024102 COAST GRAPHIC SUPPLY PRINTING SUPPLIES 010.4102.5255 200.06 200.06
97678 10/06/00 024492 COLD CANYON LAND FILL GREEN WASTE DUMP 220.4303.5307 12.00
97678 10/06/00 024492 COLD CANYON LAND FILL GREEN WASTE DUMP 220.4303.5307 12.00
97678 10/06/00 024492 COLD CANYON LAND FILL GREEN WASTE DUMP 220.4303.5307 55.00
97678 10/06/00 024492 COLD CANYON LAND FILL GREEN WASTE DUMP 220.4303.5307 58.00
97678 10/06/00 024492 COLD CANYON LAND FILL GREEN WASTE DUMP 220.4303.5307 12.00
97678 10/06/00 024492 COLD CANYON LAND FILL GREEN WASTE DUMP 220.4303.5307 12,00
97678 10/06/00 024492 COLD CANYON LAND FILL GREEN WASTE DUMP 220.4303.5307 68.00 229.00
97679 10/06/00 026754 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C BOTTLED WATER 010.4001.5201 10.00
97679 10/06/00 026754 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C BOTTLED WATER 010.4301. 5201 25,00 35,00
97680 10/06/00 027924 D.A.R.E.AMERlCA DARE CANVAS TOTE BAGS 010.4201. 5504 29.99 29.99
97681 10/06/00 101969 DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIA COPIER LEASE#93791 010.4421. 5303 141.25 141. 25
97682 10/06/00 102025 CHRIS DEVINY REF. PARK DEPOSIT-DEVINY 010.0000.4354 25.00 25.00
97683 10/06/00 100808 DHS-WTOC RENEWAL WATER TREAT.LIC.RENEW-TAYLOR 640.4710.5503 47.00 47.00
97684 10/06/00 029796 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES,INC. 12 GA 100Z RIFLE SLUG 010.4201. 5255 311.03 311. 03
97685 10/06/00 101751 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODU OXYGEN CYLINDERS 010.4211.5206 88.19 88,19
97686 10/06/00 033150 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP CIRCULATION-GENERAL PLAN 010.4130.5318 16.90 16.90
97687 10/06/00 101379 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,IN BRASS ELLS 640.4712.5610 85.80
97687 10/06/00 101379 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,IN METER BOX LIDS 640.4712.5610 224.90
97687 10/06/00 101379 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,IN PVC FITTINGS/PIPE 640.4712,5610 224.26
97687 10/06/00 101379 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,IN PVC FITTINGS 640.4712.5610 72.39 607.35
97688 10/06/00 034352 FIRST NAT'L BANK CENT.C LEASE PORCH.HONEYWELL RETRO 010.4145.5403 25,761. 78 25,761. 78
97689 10/06/00 100881 FIVE CITIES DUPLICATE REF.W/C DEPOSIT-5 CITIES DUP. 010.0000.2206 250,00 250.00
97690 10/06/00 100691 FIVE CITIES-TIMES LEGAL 77513 010.4130.5301 48.00
97690 10/06/00 100691 FIVE CITIES-TIMES LEGAL 77514 010.4130,5301 52.50
97690 10/06/00 100691 FIVE CITIES-TIMES LEGAL 77515 010.4130.5301 55.50 156.00
97691 10/06/00 035802 FRANK'S LOCK & KEY INC DUP.KEYS/DOOR BOLT 640.4712.5601 8.68
97691 10/06/00 035802 FRANK'S LOCK & KEY INC DUP.KEYS/DOOR BOLT 010.4420.5605 3.22 11.90
97692 10/06/00 101901 THE FRESNO BEE CLASS AD-ASSOC. ENG 010.4301.5201 330.01 330.01
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 4
10/03/00 16:19 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 17
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
97693 10/06/00 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH SEWER BILL-CORP. YARD 612.0000.4751 40.58 40.58
97694 10/06/00 101088 HANSON AGGREGATES ASPHALT 220.4303.5613 78.35
97694 10/06/00 101088 HANSON AGGREGATES ASPHALT 220.4303.5613 202.05 280.40
97695 10/06/00 102027 SHEILA HARDY REF. PARK DEPOSIT-HARDY 010.0000.4354 25.00 25.00
97696 10/06/00 044496 INFORMATION SERVICES DP ON LINE TRANS-AUG 010.4201. 5606 84,04 84.04
97697 10/06/00 046176 J J'S FOOD COMPANY SUPPLIES-ZONE 3 010.4001. 5201 5.17
97697 10/06/00 046176 J J'S FOOD COMPANY SUPPLIES-LIEBERT 010.4101.5501 15.63
97697 10/06/00 046176 J J'S FOOD COMPANY SUPPLIES-LIEBERT 010.4101. 5501 52.22
97697 10/06/00 046176 J J'S FOOD COMPANY SUPPLIES-CM INTRO 010.4101.5201 24.52 97.54
97698 10/06/00 046410 J.W.ENTERPRISES TOILET RENTAL 220.4303.5552 91. 73 91.73
97699 10/06/00 101604 BARBIE JONES REIMB.SNACK SUPPLIES-JONES 010,4425.5259 111.15
97699 10/06/00 101604 BARBIE JONES REIMB.SNACK SUPPLIES-JONES 010.4425.5255 25.51
97699 10/06/00 101604 BARBIE JONES TRAVEL REIMB-JONES 010,4425.5303 26.08 162.74
97700 10/06/00 101652 J.J KELLER & ASSOCIATES HAZMAT UPGRADE MATERIALS 220.4303.5503 146.89 146.89
97701 10/06/00 102029 ELOISE KOHAL REF. PARK DEPOSIT-KOHAL 010.0000.4354 25.00 25.00
97702 10/06/00 052270 LIGHTNING POWDER CO,INC NIK STICK #8 TEST STICKS 010.4201. 5255 45.96 45.96
97703 10/06/00 101173 LONGS DRUG STORE PHOTO PROCESSING-AUG 010.4201. 5255 68.49 68.49
97704 10/06/00 053118 LUCIA MAR UN.SCH.DIST. SPECIAL ENFORCE OPERATION EXP 010.4201.5255 24.00 24.00
97705 10/06/00 053820 MC CARTHY STEEL INC ANGLE IRON 350,5632.7001 12.64 12.64
97706 10/06/00 056394 MIDAS MUFFLER & BRAKE ALIGNMENT 010.4201.5601 49.95
97706 10/06/00 056394 MIDAS MUFFLER & BRAKE LUBE/OIL/FILTER/TRANS.FLUSH 010.4201. 5601 172 . 64 222.59
97707 10/06/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE HOLE SAW/DRILL BIT 010.4420.5605 35.15
97707 10/06/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE PLUMBING SUPPLIES 640.4712.5610 1.48
97707 10/06/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE ARMR ALL/SPRAY LUBE 010.4211. 5601 20.77
97707 10/06/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE HOSE/TWIST NOZZLES 010.4211.5605 48.77
97707 10/06/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE DRILL BITS/SCREWS 220.4303.5613 33.64
97707 10/06/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE PAINTBRUSH/THINNER 220.4303.5613 63.08
97707 10/06/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE FLOOD BULB 010.4211.5603 12.83
97707 10/06/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE BULBS 010.4420.5605 29.98
97707 10/06/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE SOCKETS 010.4420.5605 9.08
97707 10/06/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE HANDLES/SPRAY PAINT 220.4303.5613 41. 53
97707 10/06/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE PVC ADAPTERS/JUNCT.BOX 010.4420.5605 23.52
97707 10/06/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE PAINT/WD-40/NUTS 640.4712.5610 39.35 359,18
97708 10/06/00 057174 MISSION OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4211.5201 125,53
97708 10/06/00 057174 MISSION OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4120.5201 15.93
97708 10/06/00 057174 MISSION OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4120.5201 66.26
--
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 5
10/03/00 16:19 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 17
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
97708 10/06/00 057174 MISSION OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4421.5201 99.47
97708 10/06/00 057174 MISSION OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4421. 5201 10.14
97708 10/06/00 057174 MISSION OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4421. 5201 8.24 325.57
97709 10/06/00 057280 MITCHELL & POWER A/C UNIT-CC 010.4213.5303 1,000.00 1,000.00
97710 10/06/00 102028 MOSS BEACH HOMES/ASPlRA REF. PARK DEPOSIT-MOSS BEACH 010.0000.4354 25.00 25.00
97711 10/06/00 053428 MPH INDUSTRIES, INC. CABLE ASSEMBLY W/CONNECTORS 010.4201. 5603 54.51 54.51
97712 10/06/00 102026 CORRENA MUNSON REF.PARK DEPOSIT-MUNSON 010.0000.4354 25.00 25.00
97713 10/06/00 100256 NEXT DAY SIGNS BANNER SIGNS-CITY COUNCIL 010.4001. 5201 52.12 52.12
97714 10/06/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL FAX 473-0386 010.4145.5403 69.41
97714 10/06/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL PHONE 489-2174 010.4201. 5403 35.19
97714 10/06/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL PHONE 473-2198 010.4145.5403 79.52
97714 10/06/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL PHONE 473-5100 010.4145.5403 659.77
97714 10/06/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL PHONE 473-5141 010.4145.5403 405.50
97714 10/06/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL PHONE 271-6566 010.4145.5403 47.91
97714 10/06/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL PHONE 489-6944 010.4201. 5403 140.55
97714 10/06/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL PHONE 271-7480 010.4145.5403 64.03
97714 10/06/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL PHONE 489-9867 010.4201.5403 53.70 1,555.58
97715 10/06/00 064194 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRIC 010.4304.5402 985.68
97715 10/06/00 064194 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRIC 640.4712.5402 212.49
97715 10/06/00 064194 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRIC 640.4711.5402 9,134.17
97715 10/06/00 064194 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRIC 612.4610.5402 779.52
97715 10/06/00 064194 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRIC 010.4145.5401 5,896.36
97715 10/06/00 064194 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRIC 217.4460.5355 7.29
97715 10/06/00 064194 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRIC 010.4304.5402 11,907.18
97715 10/06/00 064194 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRIC 010.4304,5402 44.70 28,967.39
97716 10/06/00 102030 PINK TRANSFER,INC RELOCATION EXP-ADAMS 010.4101. 5319 4,656.16 4,656.16
97717 10/06/00 066924 PLAQUE SHAQUE CITY OF AG LAPEL PINS 010.4001.5201 429.00
9771 7 10/06/00 066924 PLAQUE SHAQUE EMS ENGRAVED PLATES 010.4211. 5206 48.26
97717 10/06/00 066924 PLAQUE SHAQUE RETIREES PLAQUE 010.4201. 5504 80.44
9771 7 10/06/00 066924 PLAQUE SHAQUE PLAQUE/HEATH&PLATE/WULFING 010.4201. 5504 42.90 600.60
97718 10/06/00 100724 R.L. POLK & CO. MOTOR VEHICLE REGIS BOOK 010.4201. 5255 46.12 46.12
97719 10/06/00 067548 POOR RICHARD'S PRESS BUDGET 2000-01 COVERS/DIVIDERS 010.4102.5255 988.29 988.29
97720 10/06/00 067890 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION,IN OXYGEN 010.4211.5206 16.74 16.74
97721 10/06/00 075816 SAN LUIS POWERHOUSE ANNUAL GENERATOR SVC 010.4201.5603 222.85
97721 10/06/00 075816 SAN LUIS POWERHOUSE ANNUAL SVC ON REPEATOR GEN 010.4201.5603 202.72 425.57
97722 10/06/00 073164 DAVID SANCHEZ REIMB.UNITED AIRFARE TO SACTO 010.4201.5504 293.00 293,00
-
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 6
10/03/00 16:19 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 17
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
97723 10/06/00 076830 SANTA MARIA TIRE INC. STOCK TIRES 010.4201. 5601 318.68 318.68
97724 10/06/00 100992 SCIENTIFIC VISION SYSTE 6 SONY PRINTER PACKS 010.4201. 5255 439.81 439.81
97725 10/06/00 078156 SEBASTIAN OIL DISTRIB. GAS/DIESEL 010.4211. 5608 162.01
97725 10/06/00 078156 SEBASTIAN OIL DISTRIB. GASOLINE 010.4201. 5608 1,665,33 1,827.34
97726 10/06/00 075114 SLO CNTY GENERAL HOSPIT LEGAL TOX SCREEN/AUG 010,4201.5324 28.00 28.00
97727 10/06/00 100124 SLO CNTY OFFICE OF EDUC FINGERPRINTS-CAMERON 010.4201. 5315 12.00
97727 10/06/00 100124 SLO CNTY OFFICE OF EDUC FINGERPRINTS-BAGGS/JUAREZ/STAR 010.4425.5315 24.00
97727 10/06/00 100124 SLO CNTY OFFICE OF EDUC FINGERPRINTS-BAGGS/JUAREZ/STAR 010.4301. 5315 12.00 48.00
97728 10/06/00 080340 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP PIPE WRENCH 010.4305.5273 67.14 67.14
97729 10/06/00 082040 STAPLES OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4201.5201 327.34
97729 10/06/00 082040 STAPLES OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4201. 5201 299.96 627.30
97730 10/06/00 100592 A.D. STARR SOFTBALLS FOR LEAGUES 010.4424.5257 1,643.00 1,643,00
97731 10/06/00 082328 STERLING COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE AGREE-OCT 2000 010.4201.5606 995.00
97731 10/06/00 082328 STERLING COMMUNICATIONS REPR.RADAR TRAILER ALARM 010.4201.5601 38.00
97731 10/06/00 082328 STERLING COMMUNICATIONS REPR.TOUCHMASTER SIREN 010.4201. 5603 166.83 1,199.83
97732 10/06/00 082486 STEWARD CO PRINTING SUPPLIES 010.4102.5255 83.28 83,28
97733 10/06/00 083226 SUNSET NORTH CAR WASH CAR WASHES 010.4201.5601 249.95
97733 10/06/00 083226 SUNSET NORTH CAR WASH CAR WASHES 010.4420.5601 30.00
97733 10/06/00 083226 SUNSET NORTH CAR WASH CAR WASHES 220.4303.5601 15.00
97733 10/06/00 083226 SUNSET NORTH CAR WASH CAR WASHES 640.4712.5601 15.00
97733 10/06/00 083226 SUNSET NORTH CAR WASH CAR WASHES 010.4305.5601 8.95
97733 10/06/00 083226 SUNSET NORTH CAR WASH CAR WASHES 010.4301.5601 62.00
97733 10/06/00 083226 SUNSET NORTH CAR WASH CAR WASHES 010.4420.5601 15.00 395.90
97734 10/06/00 083382 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIER FAX MACHINE FINAL PAYMENT 010.4101,5201 111.72
97734 10/06/00 083382 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIER FAX MACHINE FINAL PAYMENT 010.4002.5201 111.72
97734 10/06/00 083382 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIER FAX MACHINE FINAL PAYMENT 010.4130.5201 111.72
97734 10/06/00 083382 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIER FAX MACHINE FINAL PAYMENT 010.4120.5201 111.71 446.87
97735 10/06/00 084474 TELEGRAM TRIBUNE SUBSCRIPT-TT 010.4101.5503 144.00 144,00
97736 10/06/00 086346 TROESH READY MIX CONCRETE 350.5632.7001 675.68 675.68
97737 10/06/00 086736 DO'ITIE TRULOCK DOG OBEDIENCE CLASSES 010.4424.5351 1,024.80 1,024.80
97738 10/06/00 088084 UNITED GREEN MARK,INC. SPRINKLER PARTS 010.4420,5605 28.26
97738 10/06/00 088084 UNITED GREEN MARK, INC. SPRINKLER PARTS 010.4420.5605 42.87
97738 10/06/00 088084 UNITED GREEN MARK,INC. SPRINKLER PARTS 010.4420.5605 26.52
97738 10/06/00 088084 UNITED GREEN MARK, INC. SPRINKLER SUPPLIES 010.4430.5605 610.79 708.44
9'7'739 10/06/00 100098 V.T.& ASSOCIATES,INC REGIS-JOHN ALLEN(ETHlCAL LEAD) 010,4201.5501 297.00 297.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 7
10/03/00 16:19 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 17
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
97740 10/06/00 089426 VAVRINEK,TRINE,DAY & CO PROF.SVCS-99/00 INTERIM AUDIT 010.4120.5303 2,000.00 2,000.00
97741 10/06/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-PD CARS 010.4145.5403 305,02
97741 10/06/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-PKS SUPER 010.4421. 5303 15.55
97741 10/06/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-FD 010.4211.5403 17 ,01
97741 10/06/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-PKS DIR 010.4421.5602 21.78
97741 10/06/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-SPORTS FACILITY 010.4430.5605 24.69
97741 10/06/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-ENG 1 010.4211.5403 19.04 403.09
97742 10/06/00 090480 WAYNE'S TIRE TIRES 010.4201. 5601 114.08
97742 10/06/00 090480 WAYNE'S TIRE REPL.BALL JOINT/ALIGN 220.4303.5601 230.56
97742 10/06/00 090480 WAYNE'S TIRE LUBE/OIL/FILTER 010.4201.5601 22.27
97742 10/06/00 090480 WAYNE'S TIRE LUBE/OIL/ROTOATE 220.4303.5601 39.16 406.07
97743 10/06/00 100290 WILDERNESS OUTFITTERS FUEL BOTTLES 010.4211.5273 68.64 68.64
97744 10/06/00 100431 WILLARD PAPER CO COPY PAPER 010.4102.5255 402.19
97744 10/06/00 100431 WILLARD PAPER CO PAPER/ENVELOPES 010.4102.5255 434.09 836.28
97745 10/06/00 092586 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC COM TRAFFIC SIG.MAINT-AUG 010.4304.5303 1,212.75 1,212,75
TOTAL CHECKS 95,761.39
--. -----~._--
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 8
10/03/00 16:19 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 17
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
010 GENERAL FUND 81,754.50
217 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 7.29
220 STREETS FUND 2,021.93
284 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUND 77.74
350 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 688.32
612 SEWER FUND 820.10
640 WATER FUND 10,391. 51
TOTAL 95,761.39
ATTACHt1ENT 3
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
DEPARTMENTAL LABOR DISTRIBUTION
PAY PERIOD 9/15 TO 9/28/00
1 0/06/00
FUND 010 232,225.26 Salaries Full time 139,836.39
FUND 220 11,415.28 Salaries Part-Time 30,100.31
FUND 284 4,672.17 Salaries Over-Time 9,151.73
FUND 612 2,929.10 Holiday Pay 5,466.93
FUND 640 10,105.58 Sick Pay 4,028.40
261,347.39 Annual Leave Pay -
Vacation Buyback 2,169.95
Vacation Pay 3,671.91
Comp Pay 5,991.37
Annual Leave Pay 5,452.71
PERS Retirement 14,759.85
Social Security 14,576.55
PARS Retirement 264.96
State Disability Ins. 519.68
Health Insurance 19,547.27
Dental Insurance 3,621.00
Vision Insurance 775.78
Life Insurance 537.60
Long Term Disability -
Uniform Allowance -
Car Allowance 400.00
Council Expense 375.00
Employee Assistance -
Uniform Allowance -
Motor Pay 100.00
Total: 261,347.39
_.._._-,-_.._-_.._~_. -
ATTACHMENT 4
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 1
10/11/00 08:54 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 17
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
308 10/06/00 005616 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE G.A.REIMB 9-28-00 P/R 011.0000,1015 198,116.12 198,116.12
309 10/06/00 101771 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE POSTAGE 010.4201. 5201 10.04
309 10/06/00 101771 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE CDOA REGION II MTG/HULGAN 010.4201. 5501 15.00
309 10/06/00 101771 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE SR. POLICE OFFICER ORAL BOARD 010.4201. 5501 14.15
309 10/06/00 101771 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE TRAINING EXPENSES 010.4201. 5501 78.38
309 10/06/00 101771 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE HARVEST FESTIVAL SUPPLIES 010.4201. 5255 28.80
309 10/06/00 101771 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE FILM/PP/ARMORY SUPPLIES 010.4201.5255 30.97
309 10/06/00 101771 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4201. 5201 28.01
309 10/06/00 101771 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE CORDS/CLIPS/COVERS 010.4201.5604 43.70
309 10/06/00 101771 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE MEETING SUPPLIES 010.4201.5504 49.69 298.74
310 10/09/00 100855 CAROL ANDERSON TRAVEL ADVANCE-ANDERSON 010.4120.5501 186.00 186.00
97757 10/13/00 085176 3 T EQUI PMENT CO SEWER CLEANING HOSE 612.4610.5610 95.74 95.74
97758 10/13/00 000234 A & R WELDING SUPPLY OXY & ACET GASES 010.4305.5303 14.00 14,00
97759 10/13/00 003120 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUP FIRST AID KITS 220.4303.5255 106.82
97759 10/13/00 003120 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUP FIRST AID SUPPLIES 220.4303.5255 105.26
97759 10/13/00 003120 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUP FIRST AID SUPPLIES 640.4712.5255 34.03
97759 10/13/00 003120 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUP FIRST AID SUPPLIES 612.4610.5255 34.03
97759 10/13/00 003120 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUP OINTMENT/WIPES/COLD PACKS 010.4420.5255 128.16
97759 10/13/00 003120 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUP ANTACID TABS 010.4420.5255 9.87 418.17
97760 10/13/00 100897 AMERICAN TEMPS RHINEHART SVCS-9/30 220.4303.5303 703.20 703.20
97761 10/13/00 004914 APEX SHARPENING WORKS ROPE/ROTOR-CHAIN SAW 010.4211.5603 11.74 11.74
97762 10/13/00 006006 ARROYO GRANDE FLOWER SH FLORAL ARRANGEMENT-D. PERRIN 010.4001. 5504 50.94 50.94
97763 10/13/00 102038 ASCE, LA SECTION CLASS AD-ASST. CITY ENG 010.4301. 5201 240.00 240.00
97764 10/13/00 101997 THE BAKERSFIELD CALIFOR CLASS AD-ASSOC. ENG 010.4301.5201 218.51 218.51
97765 10/13/00 009438 BARKLOW'S FIRE TRUCK PA BARYFOIL SOUND BARRIER 010.4211. 5601 259.17 259.17
97766 10/13/00 009750 BRENDA BARROW REIMB.FILM/BANNER MATERIALS 010.4424.5252 40.74 40.74
97767 10/13/00 009984 BATES PLUMBING URINAL DRAIN STOPPAGE 010.4211.5303 161.16 161.16
97768 10/13/00 010412 ALBERT BEATTIE RENTAL AUGER DRILL/TARPS/LUMBE 010.4201.5605 256.90 256.90
97769 10/13/00 010800 BERETTA USA REGIS-LARRY COOPER 010.4201.5501 200.00 200.00
97770 10/13/00 010998 BETTER BEEP PAGER/SERVICE 010.4425.5255 36.76 36.76
97771 10/13/00 101782 BOB'S EXPRESS WASH CAR WASH 640.4712.5601 16.66
97771 10/13/00 101782 BOB'S EXPRESS WASH CAR WASH 640.4712.5603 16.66
97771 10/13/00 101782 BOB'S EXPRESS WASH CAR WASH 612.4610.5601 16.66
97771 10/13/00 101782 BOB'S EXPRESS WASH CAR WASH 612.4610.5603 16,66
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 2
10/11/00 08:54 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 17
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
97771 10/13/00 101782 BOB'S EXPRESS WASH CAR WASH 220.4303.5601 16.66
97771 10/13/00 101782 BOB'S EXPRESS WASH CAR WASH 220.4303.5603 16.70
97771 10/13/00 101782 BOB'S EXPRESS WASH . CAR WASH 010.4201.5601 18.00 118.00
97772 10/13/00 102033 BOND BLACKTOP,INC. SPRING 2000 PAVEMENT PROJECT 350.5627.7001 69,686.60 69,686.60
97773 10/13/00 013026 BRISCO MILL & LUMBER BLDG. SUPPLIES 010.4213.5604 132.26
97773 10/13/00 013026 BRISCO MILL & LUMBER SANDER/SANDPAPER 010.4213,5604 98.50
97773 10/13/00 013026 BRISCO MILL & LUMBER SLEDGE HAMMER HANDLE 640.4712.5273 4.60
97773 10/13/00 013026 BRISCO MILL & LUMBER MAIL BOX/LETTERS 220.4303.5255 9.52
97773 10/13/00 013026 BRISCO MILL & LUMBER WIRE BRUSHES/STAPLES 010.4420.5605 9.61
97773 10/13/00 013026 BRISCO MILL & LUMBER DRAIN OPENER/SCREEN 010.4420.5605 37.48
97773 10/13/00 013026 BRISCO MILL & LUMBER BULBS/BINDING 010.4213.5604 175.81
97773 10/13/00 013026 BRISCO MILL & LUMBER LUMBER 350.5632.7001 38.61 506.39
97774 10/13/00 102031 KATHY BULLOCK REF. PRE-PAID CARD-BULLOCK 010.0000.4602 7.50 7.50
97775 10/13/00 101431 BURDINE PRINTING PRINTING-CITY NEWSLETTER 010.4002.5504 1,782.99
97775 10/13/00 101431 BURDINE PRINTING BUNDLING FOR PO CARRIER ROUTES 010.4002.5504 90.00 1,872,99
97776 10/13/00 013806 BURKE AND PACE OF AG LUMBER 220.4303.5613 33.46 33.46
97777 10/13/00 101499 R. BURKE CORPORATION FAIR OAKS AVE/TALLY HO ROAD 350.5630.7001 173,412.05 173,412.05
97778 10/13/00 021940 C.COAST TAXI CAB SERVIC TAXI SVCS SEPT 15-30 225.4553.5507 1,497.50 1,497.50
97779 10/13/00 016458 CALIF PARK & REC SOCIET CPRS MEMBERSHIP-HERNANDEZ 010.4421. 5503 140.00 140.00
97780 10/13/00 102037 CBS TECHNOLOGIES,LLC 10 BUTTON MERLIN TELEPHONE 010.4211.5403 172.00 172.00
97781 10/13/00 021918 CENTRAL COAST SUPPLY R/R SUPPLIES 010.4420.5605 246.35 246.35
97782 10/13/00 101856 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS CABLE PIPELINE/MODEM LEASE 010.4140.5303 227.90 227.90
97783 10/13/00 023088 CHERRY LANE NURSERY SNAIL BAIT 010.4420.5605 18.22
97783 10/13/00 023088 CHERRY LANE NURSERY LODGE POLES 010.4420.5605 32.11 50.33
97784 10/13/00 023322 CHRISTIANSON CHEVROLET SAFETY INSPECT/LUBE/OIL/FILTER 010.4301. 5601 52.66
97784 10/13/00 023322 CHRISTIANSON CHEVROLET LUBE/OIL/FILTER 010.4213.5601 31. 03
97784 10/13/00 023322 CHRISTIANSON CHEVROLET LUBE/OIL/FILTER/FULE FILTER 010.4420.5601 86.68
97784 10/13/00 023322 CHRISTIANSON CHEVROLET DOOR REPAIR 010.4213.5601 210.31 380.68
97785 10/13/00 023400 ROBERT CHUBBUCK ADTL HOTEL ROOM EXP-CHUBBUCK 010.4201.5501 33.50 33.50
97786 10/13/00 024492 COLD CANYON LAND FILL GREEN WASTE DUMP 220.4303.5307 12.00
97786 10/13/00 024492 COLD CANYON LAND FILL GREEN WASTE DUMP 220.4303.5307 87.00
97786 10/13/00 024492 COLD CANYON LAND FILL GREEN WASTE DUMP 220.4303.5307 12.00
97786 10/13/00 024492 COLD CANYON LAND FILL GREEN WASTE DUMP 220.4303.5307 12.00
97786 10/13/00 024492 COLD CANYON LAND FILL GREEN WASTE DUMP 220.4303.5307 60.25
97786 10/13/00 024492 COLD CANYON LAND FILL GREEN WASTE DUMP 220.4303.5307 79.00 262.25
-~-_._~
-.--
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 3
10/11/00 08:54 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 17
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
97787 10/13/00 025818 LARRY COOPER BERETTA CLASS-COOPER 010.4201. 5501 30.00 30.00
97788 10/13/00 100795 CPRS DISTRICT VIII REGIS-5 PEOPLE CPRS DIST.9 010.4421. 5501 150.00 150.00
97789 10/13/00 026832 CUESTA EQUIPMENT CO ICE PACKS 010.4424.5257 51.48
97789 10/13/00 026832 CUESTA EQUIPMENT CO CR:COLD COMPRESS 010.4424.5257 51.48-
97789 10/13/00 026832 CUESTA EQUIPMENT CO REFLECTIVE TAPE 010.4211.5255 186.19
97789 10/13/00 026832 CUESTA EQUIPMENT CO STEEL TOE BOOTS/HANDLES 220.4303.5255 74.46 260.65
97790 10/13/00 102040 MARK DAIGLE REF. PARK DEPOSIT-DAIGLE 010.0000.4354 25.00 25.00
97791 10/13/00 028548 DAYSTAR INDUSTRIES STREET SWEEPING 612.4610.5303 4,975.13 4,975.13
97792 10/13/00 076848 LENNY DE LOS SANTOS TENNIS CLASSES-DE LOS SANTOS 010.4424.5351 179.20 179.20
97793 10/13/00 100789 CINDY DEAN REF. PARK DEPOSIT-DEAN 010.0000.4354 25.00 25.00
97794 10/13/00 101702 DELL MARKETING L.P. FIREWALL SOFTWARE-SERVER 010.4140.6101 563.07
97794 10/13/00 101702 DELL MARKETING L.P. CM/CD WORKSTATIONS 010.4140.6101 2,540.87
97794 10/13/00 101702 DELL MARKETING L.P. CD/FD WORKSTATIONS 010.4140.6101 2,741.33 5,845.27
97795 10/13/00 029484 DIESELRO INC. SVC.CALL PAVER 220.4303.5603 96.00
97795 10/13/00 029484 DIESELRO INC. SEAL REPAIR 010.4420.5601 329.57
97795 10/13/00 029484 DIESELRO INC. COOLANT LEAK REPAIR 010.4420,5601 41. 09 466.66
97796 10/13/00 102032 SALLY EMERSON REF.PRE-PAID CARD-EMERSON 010.0000.4602 34.25 34,25
97797 10/13/00 033072 FARM SUPPLY CO. CONTROLLER 010.4420.5605 74.77
97797 10/13/00 033072 FARM SUPPLY CO. CONTROLLER 010.4430.5605 213.43
97797 10/13/00 033072 FARM SUPPLY CO. CR:CONTROLLER 010.4430.5605 211.38- 76.82
97798 10/13/00 101379 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,IN GASKETS/BOLTS 612.4610.5610 96.53
97798 10/13/00 101379 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,IN BLIND FLANGE 612.4610.5610 14.16 110.69
97799 10/13/00 100691 FIVE CITIES-TIMES LEGAL 77500 010.4002.5301 198.00
97799 10/13/00 100691 FIVE CITIES-TIMES LEGAL 80210 010.4002.5301 31. 50 229.50
97800 10/13/00 102039 FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO RANGER TRUCK LEASE PAYMENT 010.4145.5803 2,543.29 2,543.29
97801 10/13/00 101662 FORD QUAILTY FLEET CARE REPRAIR-PW34 & 42 640.4712.5601 39.56 39.56
97802 10/13/00 035802 FRANK'S LOCK & KEY INC DUP.KEYS 010.4305,5601 10.94 10.94
97803 10/13/00 102035 DICK FRANKS REIMB.EVIDENCE PICKUP-CONCORD 010.4201.5501 85.28 85,28
97804 10/13/00 036114 FULTON FIRE ENGR.INC. SPRINKLER REVIEW-121 E.BRANCH 010.4212.5303 165.00 165,00
97805 10/13/00 039312 CITY OF GROVER BEACH DOG OBEDIENCE CLASS 010.4424.5351 202.50 202.50
97806 10/13/00 102041 LISA HALL REF. PARK DEPOSIT-HALL 010.0000.4354 25.00 25.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 4
10/11/00 08:54 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 17
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
97807 10/13/00 100044 NORMA HARLOE REF. PARK DEPOSIT-HARLOE 010.0000.4354 25.00 25.00
97808 10/13/00 100635 HARRY'S RADIATOR SVCS R/R RADIATOR 010.4213.5601 336.27
97808 10/13/00 100635 HARRY'S RADIATOR SVCS R/R WATER PUMP 010.4213.5601 260.81 597.08
97809 10/13/00 102034 HEALING ARTS COMMUNI CAT FIRE PREV.VIDEOS 010.4211.5504 165.90 165.90
97810 10/13/00 043290 CHERI HULGAN DARE VEHICLE FUEL/CHAIRS 010.4201.5504 42.93 42.93
97811 10/13/00 043914 JOSEPH IANNEO REIMB.GASOLINE-IANNEO 010.4201.5501 86.65 86.65
97812 10/13/00 101848 INVENSYS METERING SYSTE STRAINER/BOTTOM PLATES 640.4712.5611 18.02 18.02
97813 10/13/00 046098 J C LANDSCAPING LANDSCAPE MAINT. 010.4420.5303 380.00
97813 10/13/00 046098 J C LANDSCAPING LANDSCAPE MAINT. 217.4460.5356 120,00 500.00
97814 10/13/00 046176 J JOS FOOD COMPANY KITCHEN SUPPLIES 010.4211.5255 2.69 2.69
97815 10/13/00 100869 KIS COMMUNICATIONS,INC DOMAIN NAME RENEWAL TO 10/2001 010.4140.5303 35.00 35.00
97816 10/13/00 101960 MARK LACOUAGUE REIMB.MILEAGE-LACOUAGUE 010.4201. 5501 78.43 78.43
97817 10/13/00 102042 JULIE LEBENS REF. PARK DEPOSIT-LEBENS 010.0000.4354 25.00 25.00
97818 10/13/00 101999 MAINLINE VIDEO INSPECT-PHASE 111 ,350.5812.7501 867.24 867.24
97819 10/13/00 102043 MID-STATE BANK FAIR OAKS AVE-RETENTION#l 350.5630.7001 9,118.33
97819 10/13/00 102043 MID-STATE BANK FAIR OAKS AVE-RETENTION#l 350.5631.7001 6,878.74
97819 10/13/00 102043 MID-STATE BANK FAIR OAKS AVE RETENTION#2 350.5630,7001 10,982.77
97819 10/13/00 102043 MID-STATE BANK FAIR OAKS AVE RETENTION#2 350.5631.7001 8,285.24 35,265.08
97820 10/13/00 056394 MIDAS MUFFLER & BRAKE R/R BRAKES-P402 010.4213.5601 246.65
97820 10/13/00 056394 MIDAS MUFFLER & BRAKE CR:R/R BRAKES-P402 010.4213.5601 246.65-
97820 10/13/00 056394 MIDAS MUFFLER & BRAKE LUBE/OIL/FILTER-P20 010.4420.5601 135.51 135.51
97821 10/13/00 056940 MIER BROS. CONCRETE 350.5632.7001 174.71
97821 10/13/00 056940 MIER BROS. CONCRETE 350.5632.7001 92.65
97821 10/13/00 056940 MIER BROS. CONCRETE 640.4712.5610 67.57
97821 10/13/00 056940 MIER BROS. CONCRETE 350.5632.7001 84.94
97821 10/13/00 056940 MIER BROS. CONCRETE 640.4712.5610 41. 51
97821 10/13/00 056940 MIER BROS. CONCRETE 640.4712.5610 41.51
97821 10/13/00 056940 MIER BROS. CONCRETE 640.4712.5610 92,66
97821 10/13/00 056940 MIER BROS. CONCRETE 350.5632.7001 101.35 696.90
97822 10/13/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE AA BATTERY 010.4420.5605 2.67
97822 10/13/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE PAINT/WASHERS 220.4303.5613 41.18
97822 10/13/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE TRASH CANS 010.4213.5604 32.15
97822 10/13/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE MINI DUSTER 010.4420.5605 4.28
97822 10/13/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE MISC. HARDWARE 010.4420.5605 2.45
97822 10/13/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE MISC. HARDWARE 010.4420.5605 1. 67
97822 10/13/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE ADAPTER 640.4712.5610 1. 06
-,.-
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 5
10/11/00 08:54 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 17
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
97822 10/13/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE FLAG POLES/SCREW DRIVERS 010.4420.5605 20.24
97822 10/13/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE PVC NIPPLES/BUSHINGS 640.4712.5610 1. 90
97822 10/13/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE NOZZLE/SPRAY PAINT 220.4303.5613 47.40
97822 10/13/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE VALVE/ELBOW/NIPPLE 220.4303.5613 11. 01
97822 10/13/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE DUCK TAPE/MISC.HARDWARE 220.4303,5613 12.00 178.01
97823 10/13/00 057174 MISSION OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4421. 5201 145.54
97823 10/13/00 057174 MISSION OFFICE PRODUCTS CR:OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4421. 5201 7.98- 137.56
97824 10/13/00 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS 010.4213.5303 88.80
97824 10/13/00 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS 010.4213.5303 37.00
97824 10/13/00 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS 640.4712.5143 64,00
97824 10/13/00 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS 612.4610.5143 33.80
97824 10/13/00 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS 010.4420.5143 97.20
97824 10/13/00 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS 010.4305.5143 50.40
97824 10/13/00 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS 010.4213.5303 26.50
97824 10/13/00 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS 010.4213.5303 39.34
97824 10/13/00 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS 220.4303.5143 107.40 544.44
97825 10/13/00 100714 NIXON-EGLI EQUIPT.CO. LINK HANDLE-PAVER 220.4303.5603 17 .19 17.19
97826 10/13/00 061814 NOBLE SAW, INC. REPR.EDGER 010.4420,5603 37.00
97826 10/13/00 061814 NOBLE SAW,INC. FILTERS/RIDER PLATES/SPOOLS 220.4303.5603 375.13
97826 10/13/00 061814 NOBLE SAW,INC. REPR.BUSH CUTTER 010.4420.5603 60.40 472.53
97827 10/13/00 102036 BETHANY NOVAK REF. PARKING CITE#Dl1937 010.0000.4203 20.00 20.00
97828 10/13/00 062322 ONE HOUR PHOTO PLUS COLOR PRINTS 220.4303.5255 14.35 14.35
97829 10/13/00 062712 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE GAS CANS 640.4712.5255 6.42 6.42
97830 10/13/00 064258 PAGING NETWORK OF LA PAGING SVCS-SEPT 010.4421. 5602 117.44 117.44
97831 10/13/00 067548 POOR RICHARD'S PRESS PRINTING FIRE PREV.OPEN HOUSE 010.4211. 5504 123.99 123.99
97832 10/13/00 102017 RLA ENGINEERING REVIEW STEEL SUPPORT-FD 010.4211.5255 379.50 379.50
97833 10/13/00 101136 S,C.A.C.E.O. REGIS-CROCKETT LEGAL ASPECTS 010.4130.5501 60.00 60.00
97834 10/13/00 100192 SAN LUIS MAILING SVC MAIL UTILITY BILLS 640.4710.5201 941. 22
97834 10/13/00 100192 SAN LUIS MAILING SVC MAILING INSERT-FIRE DEPT 010.4211.5201 56.14 997.36
97835 10/13/00 076740 SANTA MARIA TIMES TPR SUBSCRIPTION 284.4103.5503 20.00 20.00
97836 10/13/00 074490 SLO CNTY DEPT.HEALTH CROSS CONNECT FEES TO 8/31/00 640.4710.5303 932.24 932.24
97837 10/13/00 101287 SLO CNTY IWMA DISPOSAL WASTE OIL 010.4305.5603 35.00
97837 10/13/00 101287 SLO CNTY IWMA DISPOSAL WASTE OIL 640.4711.5603 35.00 70.00
97838 10/13/00 101223 SLO CO. FIRE TRAINING REGIS-LARRY RODKEY 010.4211. 5501 12.00 12.00
,
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 6
10/11/00 08:54 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 17
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
97839 10/13/00 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY RADIATOR RECOVER 010.4211.5601 8.16 8.16
97840 10/13/00 080964 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS GAS SERVICES 010.4145.5401 46,59
97840 10/13/00 080964 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS GAS SERVICES 010.4145.5401 29.66
97840 10/13/00 080964 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS GAS SERVICES 010.4145.5401 17.48
97840 10/13/00 080964 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS GAS SERVICES 010.4145.5401 24.85
97840 10/13/00 080964 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS GAS SERVICES 010.4145.5401 24.12 142.70
97841 10/13/00 082836 STREATOR PIPE & SUPPLY DRINKING FOUNTAIN VALVES 010.4420.5605 118.26
97841 10/13/00 082836 STREATOR PIPE & SUPPLY GAL. PIPE 640.4712.5610 125.14
97841 10/13/00 082836 STREATOR PIPE & SUPPLY WATER PRESSURE GAUGES 640.4712.5610 21.13 264.53
97842 10/13/00 101932 STUDENT TRANSPORATION TRANS 8/2-8/16 010.4425.5303 945.26 945.26
97843 10/13/00 101417 MELANIE TAYLOR REF. PARK DEPOSIT-TAYLOR 010.0000.4354 25.00 25.00
97844 10/13/00 086034 TRI-CITY DISPOSAL SERVI DISPOSAL SERVICES 010.4213.5303 386.71
97844 10/13/00 086034 TRI-CITY DISPOSAL SERVI DISPOSAL SERVICES 010.4213.5303 145.96 532.67
97845 10/13/00 086736 DOTTIE TRULOCK DOG OBEDIENCE CLASSES 010.4424.5351 195.20 195.20
97846 10/13/00 101009 UNISOURCE MAINTENANCE S T.PAPER 010.4213.5604 89.30 89.30
97847 10/13/00 088084 UNITED GREEN MARK,INC. SPRINKLER SUPPLIES 010.4430.5605 153.90 153.90
97848 10/13/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS AUG PAST DUE CHARGES-PD CARS 010.4201. 5403 46.01
97848 10/13/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-CODE ENFORCE 010.4301.5403 51.12
97848 10/13/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-DIV.CHIEF 010.4211. 5403 17.71 114.84
97849 10/13/00 092590 WIGHTON'S, INC. REPR.ICE MACHINE 010.4211.5603 146.44 146.44
TOTAL CHECKS 510,697.59
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 7
10/11/00 08:54 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR PERIOD 17
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
010 GENERAL FUND 21,387.15
011 PAYROLL CLEARING FUND 198,116.12
217 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 120.00
220 STREETS FUND 2,049.99
225 TRANSPORTATION FUND 1,497.50
284 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUND 20.00
350 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 279,723.23
612 SEWER FUND 5,282.71
640 WATER FUND 2,500.89
TOTAL 510,697.59
.....
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: LYNDA K. SNODGRASS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCIAL SERVICE9'
SUBJECT: CASH FLOW ANAL YSIS/APPROVAL OF INTERFUND ADVANC
FROM THE WATER FACILITY FUND
DATE: OCTOBER 24, 2000
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council:
. Accept the August cash report,
. Approve the interfund advance of $178,202 from the Water Facility Fund to
cover cash deficits in other funds as of August 30, 2000.
FUNDING:
No outside funding is required.
Attachment
A - Cash Balancellnterfund Advance Report
ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
CASH BALANCE / INTERFUND ADVANCE REPORT
At August 30, 2000
Balance at Recommended Revised
Fund 8/30/2000 Advances Balance
010 General Fund 209,110 209,110
210 Fire Protection Impact Fees 5,082 5,082
212 Police Protection Impact Fees 1,232 1,232
213 Park Development 142,914 142,914
214 Park Improvement 1,529 1,529
215 Recreation Community Center 88 88
217 Landscape Maintenance 23,724 23,724
220 Street (Gas Tax) Fund 132,756 132,756
222 Traffic Signalization 459,212 459,212
223 Traffic Circulation 401,725 401,725
224 Transportation Facility Impact 1,579,603 1,579,603
225 Transportation 73,570 73,570
226 Water Neutralization Impact 23,862 23,862
230 Construction Tax 190,667 190,667
231 Drainage Facility 10,448 10,448
241 Lopez Facility Fund 390,519 390,519
271 State COPS Block Grant Fund 15,152 15,152
272 Calif. Law Enf. Technology Grant 24,886 24,886
274 Federal Universal Hiring Grant (8,805) 8,805 0
276 97.98 Fed Local Law Enforcement Grant 85 85
277 98.99 Fed Local Law Enforcement Grant 1,627 1,627
278 99-00 Fed Local Law Enforcement Grant 10,126 10,126
284 Redevelopment Agency (57,727) 57,727 0
285 Redevelopment Set Aside 12,759 12,759
350 Capital Projects (102,127) 102,127 0
612 Sewer Fund (7,096) 7,096 0
634 Sewer Facility 60,124 60,124
640 Water Fund 2,064,481 (178,202) 1,886,279
641 Lopez 603,273 603,273
642 Water Facility 1,472,442 1,472,442
751 Downtown Parking 28,698 28,698
760 Sanitation District Fund 128,747 128,747
761 Rubbish Collection Fund (2,447) 2,447 0
Total City Wide Cash 7,890,239 0 7,890,239
THE ABOVE LISTING ARE THE CASH BALANCES SHOWN IN THE GENERAL LEDGER
OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AS OF AUGUST 30, 2000.
8.c.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 2000
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 215 EAST BRANCH STREET
ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Lady called the Regular City Council and Special Planning Commission
meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
City Council: Plannina Commission:
X Mayor Lady X Commissioner Greene
X Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara X Commissioner Parker
X Council Member Runels X Commissioner Keen
X Council Member Tolley X Commissioner Costello
X Council Member Dickens X Commissioner London
Staff Present:
1L-City Manager
1L-Chief of Police
1L-City Attorney
1L-Director of Administrative Services
_Director of Building and Fire
1L-Director of Community Development
1L-Director of Economic Development
1L-Director of Public Works
_Director of Parks, Recreation, and Facilities
1L-Director of Financial Services
1L-Assistant Planner
3. FLAG SALUTE
Representatives from Boy Scout Troop 489 led the Flag Salute.
4. INVOCATION
Pastor Paul Bautts, Bethel Baptist Church, Grover Beach, delivered the
invocation.
5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
5.a. PROCLAMATION - "NATIONAL CHARACTER COUNTSI WEEK"
Mayor Lady presented a Proclamation declaring the week of October 15 - 21, 2000
as "National Character Counts! Week" which was accepted by Tobie Charles.
---.--....-------------.-..-.--......--
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
OCTOBER 10, 2000
6. AGENDA REVIEW
City Manager Adams requested that Agenda Item #13, Staff Communications, be
moved up on the Agenda prior to commencing with New Business.
Mayor Lady and the Council agreed to consider Agenda Item #13 following the
Consent Agenda.
6.a. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES READ IN TITLE ONLY
Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara moved, Council Member Tolley seconded, and the motion
passed unanimously that all resolutions and ordinances presented at the meeting
shall be read in title only and all further reading be waived.
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
None.
8. CITIZENS' INPUT. COMMENTS. AND SUGGESTIONS
Ella Honeycutt, Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District Director, stated
she had put together a report entitled Civilian Conservation Corps - 1935. She
passed out copies of the report to the Council and gave a brief overview of the
report which discusses South County soils, soil conservation, and erosion
control. She encouraged the Council to read the report and to be aware of the
condition of the City's soils. She requested that the City support Erosion Control
Month.
Nancy DePue, Superintendent for Lucia Mar Unified School District, invited the
Council to attend the groundbreaking ceremony for the Nipomo High School on
Monday, October 16, 2000 at 10:00 a.m. She thanked the City of Arroyo Grande
for the great relationship it has with the School District and for hosting all of the
students in the South County for over 50 years. She announced that the Nipomo
High School would be opening in the Fall, 2002.
9. CONSENT AGENDA
Council Member Tolley moved to approve Consent Agenda Items 9.a. through
9.h., with the recommended courses of action. Council Member Runels seconded
the motion.
a. Cash Disbursement Ratification. Approved.
b. Statement of Investment Deposits. Approved.
c. Minutes of City Council Meeting of September 26, 2000. Approved.
d. Rejection of Claim Against City - L. Frazier. Rejected Claim.
e. Establishment of the Position of Administrative Intern. Adopted Resolution
- No. 3485.
f. Approval of Employment Agreement. Approved.
g. Cost Sharing Electrical Facilities Agreement Between the City of Arroyo
Grande and the State of California Department of Transportation. Adopted
Resolution No. 3486 and Approved Agreement.
2
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
OCTOBER 10, 2000
h. Authorization to Close Certain City Streets for the Arroyo Grande High
School Homecoming Parade. Adopted Resolution No. 3487.
Voice Vote
LRolI Call Vote
Aye Lady
Ave Ferrara
Aye Runels
Aye Tolley
Aye Dickens
There being 5 A YES, and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed.
13. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
City Manager Adams reported that the City Engineer has received the Final Map
for Phase 1 of Tract 2260 (Berry Gardens), and is authorized to approve or
disapprove the map on behalf of the City. Tract 2260 is owned by Berry Gardens,
LLC and is located east of Oak Park Boulevard between Ash Street and East
Grand Avenue. Tract 2260 will subdivide a 36.8 acre property into 180 residential
lots, a 0.75 acre public park and a 1.5 acre drainage basin. He said this statement
served as a notice that the Final Map for Phase 1 of Tract 2260 will be approved
unless appealed to the City Council within ten days following the date of the
agenda.
Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara asked about the applicant's request for a time extension
and whether it was a factor with regard to this item.
Director Spagnolo confirmed that the approval of the Final Map would negate the
need for an extension.
10. CONTINUED BUSINESS
None.
11. NEW BUSINESS
11.a. STUDY SESSION - CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION
City Manager Adams stated the purpose of the study session was to review the
City's Economic Development Strategy and discuss its relationship to the
General Plan and application to the Grand Avenue Corridor. He recommended
the City Council and Planning Commission discuss the following topics:
. General Plan Update Process and Schedule;
. Economic Development Strategy;
. Incorporation of the Economic, Development Strategy into an Economic
Development Element of the General Plan; and
. East Grand Avenue Design Overlay.
3
----.---....---
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
OCTOBER 10, 2000
He stated that formal action of the Council and Commission was not required;
however, informal direction was being requested before proceeding.
City Manager Adams explained that based on previous Council direction, staff
had developed recommendations on how to proceed with the completion of the
General Plan Update as quickly as possible. He said that staff had been working
with representatives of Envicom and Higgins Associates to develop a revised
scope of work to proceed. He explained that the information received from
Envicom would require an additional expenditure of $226,000 to complete the
project which represents an increase of $180,000 over the existing amended
contract and $49,000 over the current approved budget amour-to He stated that
based on the figures, staff did not recommend authorizing the additional
expenditure. Staff recommended termination of the Envicom contract and hiring
an in-house staff person on a temporary contract basis to complete the project.
He also stated the City Attorney was reviewing the existing Envicom contract and
the work product to date to determine if any legal action is recommended.
Community Development Director McCants gave a presentation highlighting the
status of the General Plan Update and work remaining to be done, including
modification of the draft documents prepared by Envicom; the Environmental
Review process; the Circulation Element and Traffic Model which will be prepared
by Higgins Associates under separate contract; and the inclusion of an Economic
Element that reflects the Economic Development Strategy that was approved by
the Council.
Council Member Dickens asked for clarification on the budget and whether
certain items would have to be redone.
Director McCants stated that there was some work generated by the previous
consultant that Envicom had hired that would be useful to Higgins Associates
and would not have to be redone.
Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara asked if it was staff's recommendation that the City
proceed on all of the Elements in order to ensure consistency within the
documents and adopt them as a package or adopt and implement the Elements
on an incremental basis.
Director McCants replied that the General Plan documents would be presented to
the Planning Commission and City Council as a package and would contain aU
the Elements.
, Council Member Runels asked what the timeframe would be if it was completed
in-house.
Director McCants estimated that it should be completed by April or May.
4
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
OCTOBER 10, 2000
There was discussion regarding the Circulation Element, the traffic model, and
the previous work completed by Higgins Associates.
Commissioner London asked why Envicom could not meet the scope of work in
the contract.
City Manager Adams gave an overview of the circumstances that have occurred
since the project began.
Commissioner London asked how getting a consultant on board and getting up to
speed on the project would fit into the proposed timeframe.
Director McCants replied that he has had preliminary discussions with two
potential contractors who have indicated their availability.
Commissioner Parker referred to the proposed use of an in-house consultant and
asked if combining those costs with the Higgins Associates contract would still
result in a cost savings from what Envicom was proposing.
Director McCants replied yes.
Following further discussion regarding the budget, City Manager Adams
indicated there would be an approximate savings of $50,000 if the project was
completed in-house.
Mayor Lady opened the discussion to the public.
Richard Venable, 849 Mesa Drive, stated he had participated in the General Plan
Update meetings and workshops and he was appalled at the delay on the
process. He said it should have been completed by November 2000. He spoke in
opposition to the proposed increase by Envicom.
Ed Gordon, Arroyo Grande resident, stated he also participated in the meetings
and he felt that Envicom was competent. He said whenever there was change in
the objective or the details, there were delays and cost increases. He said there
was blame for the delay on both sides. He said it was a lot of work to develop a
General Plan and all it takes is a 3-2 vote of the City Council to deviate from it. He
asked if there was any mechanism to make it more difficult to deviate from the
General Plan.
Mayor Lady acknowledged that Mr. .Otis Page had recently submitted a letter with
regard to that issue; however, he had not had an opportunity to discuss it with
the City's legal counsel.
Otis Page, 606 Myrtle, referred to a letter he submitted to the City Council which
stated that the City should consider a voter referendum to establish that certain
key elements of the General Plan be fixed and only changed based on the
5
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
OCTOBER 10, 2000
recommendation of the City Council and subsequent approval of the majority of
the voters. He said this places the responsibility for change with the elected
officials providing for subsequent concurrence by the citizens.' After speaking of
the proposed SOAR initiative, he suggested that the legislative body take the
initiative to pursue such a referendum.
Ella Honeycutt spoke about the significance of agriculture in Arroyo Grande and
encouraged the City to address agriculture in the Economic Element.
Mike Titus, 404 Lierly, stated for the first time in a year he was encouraged that
the City may finally get an updated General Plan. He said in February it would be
three years since the process began and he had been involved in the entire
process. He supported staff's recommendation to bring the process in-house for
completion.
Colleen Martin, 855 Olive, stated that if the City was going to ~ring the General
Plan Update in-house, she recommended the C~uncil approve a timeline for
completion and sticking to it.
Hearing no further public comments, Mayor Lady brought the discussion back to
the Council/Commission.
Council Members discussed concerns about, the level of increase in funding
proposed by Envicom; clarification on the proposal to hire an in-house
consultant; the hiring of a firm do conduct the Environmental Review portion of
the project; the balance of funds remaining for completion of the project; and
pursuing cost recovery from Envicom.
Following further comments, the Planning Commissioners and City Council
Members reached consensus to direct staff to proceed with terminating
Envicom's contract and hiring an in-house staff person on a contract basis to
complete the project.
Economic Development Director Sheeley gave a presentation highlighting the
Economic Development Strategy approved by the City Council on May 23, 2000.
She gave an overview of the Strategy's goals for Community Image
Enhancement, Light Manufacturing, Agriculture, Retail/Commercial, Tourism,
Housing, and the Development Process.
Planning Commissioner Costello asked if the Economic Development Strategy
needed to be an Element of the General Plan in order to be effective.
Director McCants explained the existing Strategy is a statement of goals. He
explained that in order for the document to be effective in terms of dealing with
planning issues and decisions, it needs to be included in the General Plan as an
Element in order to develop a corresponding relationship with the other
6
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
OCTOBER 10, 2000
Elements. He explained that as a stand alone document, it would be more
difficult for staff to make findings on land use applications.
Commissioner Costello asked what would be a realistic timeframe to complete an
Element and adopt it Into the General Plan.
Director Sheeley responded that it would be completed and approved on the
same timeframe as the General Plan.
Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara commented that the issue was whether the Economic
Strategy could be used as a tool now, prior to it becoming part of the General
Plan. He said his view was that it could because it has goals and It serves as a
policy document. He said the Strategy cross references consistency with
existing General Plan Elements. He said that although it Is not technically part of
the General Plan, It could be used in a manner similar to an Element of the
General Plan. He referred to a previous project in which findings were made
based on the Development Code and goals in the Economic Development
Strategy. He spoke of the need to get this policy information and criteria out to
the development community. He said the document should continue to be used
as a policy document during the interim period until the General Plan Update is
finished. He spoke In support of proceeding with incorporating the Strategy into
the General Plan.
City Manager Adams clarified that the Strategy could be used now; however,
when it is incorporated into the General Plan It would be more effective.
Commissioner Keen stated he was in favor of including the Strategy into the
General Plan; however, he asked since It was not mandated by the State, it may
not be able to be used as effectively. He asked the City Attorney about legal
ramifications for the City if a project was denied based on the Economic
Development Strategy.
City Attorney Carmel responded that staff has incorporated some of the
economic policies from the Strategy into the land use criteria that would be used
in evaluating a project. He said the City stands on firm legal ground In using the
Strategy in Its current form when evaluating projects. He said the City would be
far better protected to have the Strategy incorporated into an Economic Element
of the General Plan.
Commissioner Parker commented on the agriculture portion of the Economic
Development Strategy and stated that agriculture should be looked at closely and
taken seriously. She said the Strategy encourages and supports retention of
agriculture and expansion of commercial agriculture business activities.
Commissioner Greene stated he was gratified that the Council was taking the
position that the Commission could rely upon the Economic Development
7
",,,,.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
OCTOBER 10, 2000
Strategy as a basis upon which the Commission can decide whether a project is
consistent with the goals and objectives of the City.
Mayor Lady opened up the discussion for public comment.
Steve Hollister, member of the Economic Development Task Force, thanked the
Council for approving the Economic Development Strategy. He stated the Task
Force did not mean for the Strategy to usurp the General Plan. Hecommented
that it was meant to operate within the framework of the existing General Plan.
Hearing no further comments, Mayor Lady closed the public comment period.
Director McCants gave a presentation highlighting the process to transform the
Economic Development Strategy into an Economic Element in the General Plan.
He reviewed State mandated versus optional elements and stated that although
adoption of an Economic Element is optional, it would have the same force as a
mandated Element. He explained that an Economic Element would include a
statement of policy; a basis for specific implementation actions; and would
integrate other policies such as land use, circulation, and public facilities. He
said the Economic Element would require internal consistency with other
Elements of the General Plan. Director McCants explained the Environmental
Review process and staff progress to date on researching Economic Elements
adopted by other cities.
Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara asked for clarification on the development of supporting
ordinances for the goals and implementation strategy. He asked if one of the
ordinances would be the adoption of an overlay for Grand Avenue to support the
goals in the Economic Strategy.
Director McCants responded that was correct and that the ordinance would serve
as another policy tool with an implementation action that is associated with the
objectives and policies that are in the General Plan.
City Attorney Carmel clarified that this is the type of tool that staff is looking for
in implementing the Economic Development Strategy. He said it was an
implementation that can be relied on, is legally effective, and is best suited to
adapt the Economic Strategy to a land use tool.
Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara asked if the Economic Element would be accomplished
in-house.
City Manager Adams replied that it could be prepared in-house with existing staff.
Commissioner Parker referred to the approval of a proposed overlay and stated it
would require public hearings and a Development Code Amendment. She asked
if this process could be done now separately from the General Plan Update
process.
8
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
OCTOBER 10, 2000
Director McCants replied yes.
Mayor Lady opened up the discussion for public comment.
Colleen Martin, 855 Olive, asked for an explanation of the East Grand Avenue
Gateway idea.
Mayor Lady said staff would be giving a presentation on the item. Hearing no
further comments, he closed the public comment period.
Following further discussion regarding the use of the Economic Development
Strategy as a policy document in conjunction with the Development Code and
General Plan, staff was directed to proceed with the incorporation of the
Economic Development Strategy into the General Plan.
Director McCants gave a presentation on the concept of a design overlay for East
Grand Avenue. He explained that the overlay would include a set of policies,
standards, and an implementation measure that would deal with development of
the East Grand Avenue corridor. He said the overlay would be a method to assist
, in implementing the Redevelopment Plan. Director McCants explained that the
existing Development Code provides for the adoption of design overlays. He
reviewed the proposed overlay district boundaries and objectives; proposed use
regulations; affected businesses on East Grand Avenue; site development
criteria; and design guidelines. Further, he reviewed the process and findings for
creating a design overlay.
Members of the Planning Commission commented on some of the language in
the proposed overlay district guidelines.
Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara explained that the introduction of the overlay was to
obtain consensus on the use of the concept.. He stated that the document was in
process and suggested that the Planning Commission review the report as an
Agenda Item at a future meeting. He said the Planning Commission could then
review Exhibits Band C which contain permitted uses and proposed design
guidelines for the district and then make a recommendation to the City Council.
Commission comments included ensuring that the language in the overlay is
specific enough so that it sets forth areas in which the Commission and/or
Council has some discretion when reviewing projects. Commissioner Greene
said areas should be identified in which it is the mandate of the overlay that no
discretion should exist; or if there is a limited discretion, to what extent the
Commission and/or Council can deviate from the overlay. Further, Commissioner
Greene inquired whether this overlay would be considered tentative City policy
now and how the issue of retroactivity and projects currently in process would be
addressed.
9
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
OCTOBER 10, 2000
Council Member comments included clarifying the definition of non-conforming
use; concerns about existing businesses that would become non-conforming
with the adoption of a design overlay district; consideration of the existing Level
of Service policy; proposed building height limitations in the overlay district;
reviewing the potential for certain light manufacturing uses as permitted uses
within the district; and a recommendation to increase public outrea~h efforts to
encourage public participation in the process.
Mayor Lady opened the discussion for public comment.
The following members of the public spoke: Colleen Martin, Vernon Frederick,
Nancy Gillingham, John Kiff, and Bob Barron. Comments included the concept of
the proposed design overlay in an effort to upgrade Grand Avenue; expressing
concerns about the negative impact too many development restrictions would
have on existing and future businesses on Grand Avenue; commenting on the
realities of the commercial real estate market in that there are not enough
retailers; suggesting review of alternate retail uses; and encouraging
redevelopment on existing properties.
Ted Moore, developer for the proposed Longs drug store, said the
implementation of the overlay would have a major impact on the project and
would kill the project. He commented on some of the proposed guidelines in the
overlay district and asked the Council to consider the impact the guidelines
would have on how properties can be developed and also be successful. He said
the Staff Advisory Committee, Architectural Review Committee, and Planning
Commission had preliminarily reviewed his project, and he has been able to
incorporate most of the suggestions. He stated he was planning to file an
application within the next week or two to begin the formal process and said it
could be two more months before the project gets to the Planning Commission.
He stated he would like to submit it to the Planning Commission now if the
proposed overlay was going to affect his project.
Following discussion regarding the proposed project and the intent of the
proposed overlay district, it was suggested that Mr. Moore move forward with
submitting his project application for review.
Peggy Carmichael, stated she was the present owner of the property Mr. Moore
was referring to and her family has been paying taxes on the property for 50
years. She said it seems unfair that there is so much control over her property.
She spoke in support of the proposed project.
Hearing no further comments, Mayor Lady closed the public comments. Mayor
Lady thanked and recognized the Planning Commissioners for their efforts while
serving on the Commission.
10
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
OCTOBER 10, 2000
Following discussion, staff was directed to refine the proposal for the East Grand
Avenue Design Overlay; schedule and conduct workshops with the Planning
Commission; increase public notification efforts to encourage public
participation and input; and to prepare a recommendation for how retroactivity
and projects currently proposed will be addressed.
12. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
14. ADJOURNMENT
Council Member Tolley moved, Council Member Runels seconded, and the
motion passed unanimously to adjourn the meeting.
Time: 10:45 p.m.
MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR!
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
11
8.d.
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
RICK TerBORCH. CHIEF OF POLlCE~
FROM:
SUBJECT: 2000 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY PLAYS IT SAFE (SLOCOPS)
GRANT
DATE: OCTOBER 24, 2000
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council adopt the attached resolution in support of the
2000 SLOCOPS grant.
FUNDING:
Should the City elect to participate in this program, an estimated $5,300 in grant
funds will be available for reimbursement to the City during FY 2000-01 to pay police
officer overtime associated with the holiday season driving' under the influence (DUn
education/enforcement program (A VOID the Thirteen).
DISCUSSION:
The California Highway Patrol has secured a grant from the California Office of Traffic
Safety for funding to conduct a DUI education/enforcement program during the 2000
Thanksgiving/Christmas holiday season. This funding will be used to offset the
overtime costs of the Department's current "AVOID the Thirteen" program which has
been successfully utilized countywide over the past fifteen (1 5) years. The" A VOID
the Thirteen" program is a concerted drunk driving enforcement program conducted
during the holiday season which involves thirteen law enforcement agencies in San
Luis Obispo County (the seven municipalities, the Sheriff's Department, the California
Highway Patrol, State Parks and Beaches, Cal Poly Police Department, Cuesta College
Police Department, and the Atascadero State Hospital Police Department). Under the
SLOCOPS program, officers countywide will be assigned, on an overtime basis during
identified peak DUI periods, to identify and arrest suspected DUI drivers. Additionally,
funds will be available for officers ,to give talks and other educational presentations on
the dangers of driving under the influence. The program reimburses up to 1 60 hours
of overtime per participating agency.
Since this grant program is identical to our current holiday enforcement efforts, this
grant is essentially "found money" to reimburse current costs for our proven
successful efforts.
. --_.__._~~_._- -----~._-
In order to participate in this grant program City Council authorization, in the form of
the attached resolution, is required.
AL TERNA TIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
- Approve participation in the SLOCOPS Grant Program, or
- Do not approve participation in the SLOCOPS Grant Program.
RESOLUTION NO.
-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE AUTHORIZING THE POLICE
DEPARTMENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A MULTI-AGENCY DUI
ENFORCEMENT /EDUCA TION GRANT
WHEREAS, the California Highway Patrol has applied for an Office of Traffic Safety
grant for the creation of a multi-agency Driving Under the Influence (DUI) enforcement
program; and
WHEREAS, the grant includes participation by the Police Departments of Arroyo
Grande, Atascadero, Grover Beach, Morro Bay, Paso Robles, Pismo Beach, San Luis
Obispo, California Polytechnic State University, Cuesta College, Atascadero State
Hospital, Sheriff's Department of San Luis Obispo County, California State Parks and
Beaches, and the California Highway Patrol; and
WHEREAS, the grant funds the participation of the Arroyo Grande Police Department
personnel; and
WHEREAS, the participation of all agencies will enhance public safety in the entire San
Luis Obispo County area based upon a reduction in DUI-related traffic accidents.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo
Grande authorizes the Police Department to participate in the grant (known as
SLOCOPS) and authorizes the City Manager or his designee to sign the participation
agreement.
On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member
, and on the following roll call vote, to wit:
A YES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this day of ,
2000.
Resolution No.
-
MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELL Y WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY
9.e.
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DON SPAGNOLO, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER ~
SUBJECT: FAIR OAKS AVENUE/TALLY HO ROAD OVERLAY PROJECT
PROJECT NO. 2000-3 - PROGRESS PAYMENT NO.3
DATE: OCTOBER 24, 2000
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council authorize Progress Payment NO.3 in the amount of
$51,221.33 to R. Burke Corporation for the Fair Oaks AvenuelTally Ho Road Overlay,
capital improvement project.
FUNDING:
On June 27, 2000, the Council awarded a construction contract for the Fair Oaks
AvenuelTally Ho Road Overlay Project, to R. Burke Corporation in the amount of $599,559
and authorized a contingency of $142,591 to be used for unanticipated costs during the
construction phase of the project ($742,150 total available funding).
DISCUSSION:
The City received an application for Progress Payment NO.3 from R. Burke Corporation
for work completed between September 4, 2000 and October 2, 2000. Staff has reviewed
the application and has determined that the amount requested is in conformance with the
quantity of work completed as of October 2, 2000. Progress Payment No. 3 is in the
amount of $51,221.33 of which $5,691.26 will be held in retention until the project is
completed in accordance with the project specifications.
Attachment:
Application for Progress Payment NO.3
projects/23215630/ConstructionADM/pp# 3
ctty of
Avvoy&Gv~ Public Works Department
Application for Progress Payment No.3
Contract Name: ffrir Ollb Avrnu<, Volley RD4d tmd Tolly H. Rood
Contract No: 2000-(12
City Account No: 351).5806-7001 = $51,221.33
Payment Date: 9/4,12000
Unit I n--rinfton I Bid E..i....t. I Amended Eatl....t. P- to Dat.
Bid Unit Unit Unit Percent
Item (}tv PrIce ArnoII1I (}tv I PrIce ArnoII1I (}tv PrIce ArnoII1I CorTaete
PHASE I
1 LS MobIlmtlon AIowanc:e 1 5 5 000,00 5 5 000.00 1 5 5 000,00 t 5 000,00 1 5 1';00000 t .".... '!'" 1""'"
2 LS Tl'1ImcCon1rol 115 7500,00 I.. 7 500,00 1 5 7 !\M,oo .. 7 500.00 1 5 7!\MIIII IC 7M ',M 100%
3 LS T Shoo1'" << Bra";'" 11C' 600,00 ' 15 6OO.M 1 .. 600.00 .. 600,00 1" AMM I.. "'" '.M 100%
4 '" .~ 11 t 1 400,00 I 5 1 400,00 1 t 1 400,00 t 1 400.00 1 5 1AM,M t 1 AI> '!'" 100%
SURFACE IMPR",n::M"NTS
5 IS ""lid"" _ 1 .. 19500.00 .. 19500,00 1 .. 19500,00 .. 19500,00 1" 19........M .. 10.......... 100%
6 SF A.C Pa1x:h R8DIIlr 3630 .. 3,40 5 12342.M 7793 .. 3,40 t 26496.20 7793 S ....an t ...........'> 10Mi:
7 Tf'lN Concrete 2300 5 50,00 5115000,00 1071 5 !iO.oo 5 103547.50 7071 5 7'" 1""'"
8 IF C'.........tIo CU:b and Gutter 742 5 21,l1li .. 15 AA2,oo 778 ;5 21,00 .. 15788,00 7?8 5 71 lit t 100%
9 ". Concrete Cross ""dIN and """........ 2 ,,- 4 800,00 5 9800.M 2 .. 4 800,00 .. 9 600.00 2 .. 4"""."" .. DAM,... 100%
10 EA \l\lheek:hair Ramo 10 t 1 380,00 5 13800,00 8 t 1 380,00 t 11 040,00 8 5 1........"" t 11 ".",... 100%
11 SF nn.-u R'- 726 5 6,00 .. 4 :\''18,00 770 15 6,00 .. .. 610,00 770 5 II lit I: 4--.m:nn 100%
12 EA C'......."'" 1<< Tl'1Imc 81"""" 1 5 15000,00 S 15000.00 1.00 r.. 15000,00 i" 15000,00 1,0 .. 1 1"nnnM 100%
13 SF Concrete 8IdewaI< 850 .. 4,30 5 3 655.00 953 .. 4,30 t 4 097.90 953 5 4,..., t .. 1107,90 100%
14 '" R.......re Fl'1Imes and Covers 1 5 8 000,00 .. 8000,00 1 5 8 000,00 5 8 000,00 1 5 800000 s 8nM:,v; 100%
15 LS Pavement Delneation 1 5 5800,00 .. 5 800,00 1 .. 5 800,00 .. 5 800,00 1 .. """".M .. """"M 100%
16 LF CU:b Paintl...12-Coa1s1 300 C 0,90 5 270,00 300 I.. 0,90 t 270.00 o S 0,011 t - 0%
UTILITI S
171 LS R......ce Tl'1Imc 81-1 L""". I 11511500,00 I.. 11500,00 I 01 s 11500,00 I .. - o .. 11!\M.M~ - I 100%
STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
18 F 18" Hnp,: S10nn Drain Pioe 38 t 83,00 5 3 154,00 38 t 83,00 t 3154,00 38 s ...,M It ..1....,M 100%
19 LF 24' ..npE S10nn Drain Pioe 62 5 120,00 s 7 440,00 9,5 s 120,00 s 1 140.00 0,5 .. 11000 Is 114",00 1 MIl/,
20 EA S10nn nnoln Manhole 1 .. 3 400,00 S 3 400,00 1 s 3 400.00 .. 3 400,00 1 .. ...tM,M Ie "'i 400,00 100%
21 LF French Drain - \ncI, Pioe, Aller and Backfll o t - S - o .. - t - 0 100%
22 EA S10nn Drain Drop Inlet, 1 $ 5.400,00 $ 5,400,00 1 $ 5,400,00 $ 5.400,00 1 $ 5.400.00 $ 5.400,00 100%
Per Detail Al18 W= 7ft
23 EA S10nn Drain Drop InIe~ 1 $ 8.800,00 $ 8.800,00 1 $ 8,800.00 $ 8,800,00 1 $ 8,800,00 $ 8,800,00 100%
Per Detail 8/18 W= 14ft
24 LS Removal and DlSDOSaI of Ex. SO Facil1les 1 $ 2000,00 $ 2 000,00 1 $ 2000,00 $ 2 000,00 1 $ 2 000.00 S 2000,00 100%
SUBTOTAL BID - PHASE I $ 279 099 $ 281 854 . 211 313.80 100%
PHASE I
GEN"RAL REf'lUIR"MENTS
71'; LS Mohi....lon AIowanc:e I 115 2000,00 I.. 2000,00 I 11 s 2000,00 I.. 2 000,00 I 11 s 7 00II,00 I 100%
26 L'" T..mcControl I 1r.. 1900,00 I S 1 900,00 I 11.. 1<>M:ooT t 1 900,00 I 11s 1OMM1t 1OMM1 100%
27 '''' Connuc1Ion s..vev 1 t 900,00 I 5 900,00 I 11 t 900,00 I t 900,00 I 11 S OMMlt OM,... I 100%
""IRFACE IMPRO\/I'MENTS
?8 I'" rtiri..tnn Pavement 1" 6,500,00 5 6500,00 11.. "500,00 I.. 6 500,00 1 .. ..........M 100%
29 SF A.C Palch R8DIIlr 8800 t 2,65 5 23320,00 5544lt 2,65 It 14691.60 5M4 Is .,... t 1..""1,80 100%
30 TON Class Q ...-..- Concrete 700 S 54,00 S 37 800,00 1147 5 54,00 5 61 675,56 1147 Is MOO 's 111~"'" 100%
31 L'" R-ce Fromes and Covers 1 '5 1 200,00 .. 17l1li,00 1" 1?M,oo .. 1 200,00 11s 17l1li,l1li .. 1-;;;n:M 10Mi:
32 LS neation 1 C 2800,00 5 2 800,00 1 .. 2 800,00 t 2,800,00 11.. """"M t """",M 100%
33 LF CU:b PAIntInn /2-Coa1s1 400 $ 0,80 $ 320,00 400 $ 0.80 $ 320.00 S 0.80 $ - 0%
SUBTOTAL BID - PHASE. $ 78740.00 $ 91987.18 . 11 887.18 100%
PHASE.
G"N"RAL REQUIREMENTS
34 L" M""'1zalon AIowanc:e 1 5 5000,00 s 5 000.00 1 S 5000,00 S 5 000.00 0,8 S 1'; 000.00 S 4000M AM/,
35 IS Tram~ C'.nntrnI 1 5 4 000,00 .. 400II,00 1 s 4Mn,oo .. 4 000.00 0, .. ..00IIl1li C -.,Mlloo 50%
36 LS Trench ~ Shoo1'" or Bra""'" 1'" 500,00 S 500,00 1 .. 500,00 t 500,00 0,0 t .......M I.. - 0%
37 '''' r;;;;;;;.:;;;:ton s..vev 1 t 2700,00 s 2 700,00 1 t 27oo,M t 2 700,00 00 S 27MM It - 0%
SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS
38 LS Gri....... Pavement 1 "-19500.00 S 19500,00 1 .. 19500,00 t 19500,00 1 .. 19!\MM .. 1cI'Wi:00 100%
39 SF A.C Pa1x:h Rl!ID8ir 5275 t 3,60 s 18990,00 5275 t 3.60 t 18990,00 o S 3,80 S - 0%
40 TON Class B AonhBI Concrete 2600 5 50,00 .. 130 000.00 I"""" s 50,00 .. 130 000,00 o .. !!11M .. - 0%
41 LF Concrete CU:b and Gutter 60 t 25.00 S 1,500,00 60 .. ~oo .. 1 500,00 o .. .,..M .. - 0%
42 SF nn.-u RamD 240 S 7,00 S 1680,00 240 t 700 t 1 680,00 o S 7.M t - 0%
43 LF AonhBI Concrete Dike 70 s 7,00 5 490,00 70 s 7,00 !I: 490.00 o S 7.00 S - 0%
44 LS R-;""'ce Frames and Covers 1 H.. 6 000,00 S 6 000,00 1 .. 6 000.00 .. 6 000,00 0,1 .. 6-nm.M t 600,00 10%
45 LS Pa Ion 1 .. 3 000,00 S 3000,00 1 .. 3000,00 t 3,000,00 o t 3000M t - 0%
46 LF CU:b Painting (2-Co11s) 450 $ 0,80 $ 360,00 450 $ 0,80 $ , 360,00 o $ 0.80 $ - 0%
STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
47 S 1 49 000,00 0%
48 EA ConcreIe OversIde Drain 2 $ 500,00 500,00 $ - 0%
SUBTOTAL BID - PHASE. S 2t 100.00 11%
CONSTRUCTION COST - PHASE I,ll & III . 311150.71 13%
Cont..ct Chenge Orde..
No,1 Anmended lies are reIIecIed In above Items - See ceo No, 1 no
No, 2 Thera are I_Items In tis CCO, See CCO No, 2 ; PUs two 2) de 6677,59 1,00 100%
No,3 Thera are two Items In tis ceo,; PUs rille 9 worI<i de $ 47 470,00 0,50 23 735.00 50%
TOTAL CCO COST - PHASE I,ll & III $ 54 147,59 '30 412.58 56%
TOTAL CONSTRU ION COST - PHASE I,ll & III S 851 501.36 . 40t sa.36 13%
\0 ,..1D -OD
Date
\0. to' a:> Pay to Date $ 409,563.35
Retention S 40,956.34
Date Previoua Paymonb $ 317,385.68
Previoua Retention S 35,265.OS
Id,l'/4tV This Peyment $ 51,221.33
This Retention 5 5,691.26
Date
Contract Start Date: 7/13/00
Original Contract Days: 75
Adjusted Contract Days: 9
City Manager Date Adjuated Contract I!nd Date: 10/4/00
SmdP_t.:
R 8wkeCOIpOt'IItion
PO Box 957
Son Luis Obispo. CA 93406
....
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DON SPAGNOLO, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER A
SUBJECT: SPRING 2000 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECT, NO. 2000-5,
PROGRESS PAYMENT NO.2 AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION
DATE: OCTOBER 24, 2000
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council:
A. authorize Progress Payment NO.2 in the amount of $20,691.00 to Bond Blacktop,
Inc. for work completed on the Spring 2000 Pavement Management Project.
B. direct staff to file a Notice of CO{TIpletion; and
C. authorize release of the retention of $10,041.96, thirty-five (35) days after Notice of
Completion has been recorded, if no liens have been filed.
FUNDING:
On July 11, 2000, the City Council awarded the Spring 2000 Pavement Management
Project to Bond Blacktop in the amount of $101,580 and authorized a contingency of
$10,000 to be used for unanticipated. costs during the construction phase of the Project
($111,580 total available construction funds).
DISCUSSION:
As of September 29,2000, the Contractor had completed all items of work on the project in
accordance with the plans and specifications. The final adjusted contract amount is .
$100,419.56. Deducting the 10% retention ($10,041.96), and the money previously paid,
($69,686.60), gives a current progress payment of $20,691.00. Subject to final cost
accounting, the project will be completed $11,160.44 below the construction budget.
Staff is recommending the release of the 10% retention ($10,041.96) to Bond Blacktop,
Inc. thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded, if no liens are
filed.
AL TERNA TIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
-Approve staffs recommendations;
-Do not approve staffs recommendations;
-Modify as appropriate and approve staffs recommendations;
-Provide direction to staff.
Attachments:
Application for Progress Payment No.2
Notice of COl'T1pletion
~UyojJ
~ri~
Application for Progress Payment
Contract Name: Spring 2000 Pavement Management Project
Contract No: PW-2000-5
Progress Payment No: 2 (final)
City Account No: 350-5627-7001 $20,691.00
Payment Date: 10/24/00
Bid Estimate Amended Estimate Pay to Date
Bid Unit Unit Unit %
Item Unit Description Otv Price Amount Oty Price Amount Oty Price Amount Como
1 SY Install Type II Slurry Seal 104,000 $ 0.67 $ 69,680.00 102,268 $ 0.67 $ 68,519.56 102,268 $ 0.67 $ 68,519.56 100%
2 LS Traffic Control 1 $ 9,900.00 $ 9,900.00 1 $ 9.900.00 $ 9.900.00 1 $ 9,900.00 $ 9,900.00 100%
3 LS Replace markers, marking~ 1 $ 22,000.00 $ 22,000.00 1 $22,000.00 $ 22,000.00 1 $22,000.00 $ 22,000.00 100%
legends and striping
Total $101,580.00 $100,419.56 $100,419.56 100%
~m~ 1{)lj~/J{)
Con ctor Date
Pay to Date $100,419.56
Retention $10,041.96
Date Previous Payments $69,686.60
!1-/7-t/1) This Payment _~~'I!>P.I
Date
Contract Start Date: 8/22/00
Original Contract Days: 30
Adjusted Contract Days: 0
City Manager Date Adjusted Contract End Date: 9/21/00
Send PlfYment to:
Bond Blacktop
PO Box 616
Union City, CA 94587
(510) 441-9981
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
P.O. BOX 550
ARROYO GRANDE, CA 93421
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The undersigned is owner or agent of owner of the interest or estate stated below the property hereinafter
describe.
2. The FULL NAME of the OWNER is: The City of Arroyo Grande
3. The FULL ADDRESS of the OWNER is: 214 East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande, California 93421
4. The NATURE OF THE INTEREST or ESTATE of the undersigned is: in fee
5. THE FULL NAME and FULL ADDRESS of ALL PERSONS, if any, ,:"ho hold such interest or estate with
the undersigned as JOINT TENANTS or as TENANTS IN COMMON are:
NAMES ADDRESSES
None
6. THE FULL NAMES and FULL ADDRESSES ofthe PREDECESSOR'S in interest of the undersigned if the
property was transferred subsequent to the commencement of the work of improvements herein referred to:
NAMES ADDRESSES
None
7. All work of imp!ovement on the property hereinafter described was COMPLETED September 29, 2000
8. The NAME OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACTOR, if any, for such work of improvement is:
Bond Blacktop, Inc., P.O. Box 616, Union City, California 94587
9. The street address of said property is: Citywide
10. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Arroyo Grande, County of
San Luis Obispo, State of California, and is described as follows:
Sprin~ 2000 Pavement Mana~ement Pro;ect, City Pro;ect No. PW-20QO-5
Verification of NON-INDIVIDUAL owner: I, the undersigned, declare under penalty ofperjury under the laws of the
State ofCalifomiathat I am the Public Works Director ofthe aforesaid interest or estate in the property described in
the above notice; that I have read the said notice, that I know and understand the contents thereof, and the facts stated
therein are true and correct.
October 24, 2000
Don Spagnolo, PE, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Date
9.g.
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DON SPAGNOLO, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER ;!ft
SUBJECT: TECHNICAL AMENDMENT TO THE CONSULTANT SERVICES
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AND JOHN
L. WALLACE & ASSOCIATES
DATE: OCTOBER 24, 2000
RECOMMENDA TION:
It is recommended the City Council amend the current Consultant Services Agreement
between the City of Arroyo Grande and John L. Wallace & Associates (JLWA) to include
recently mandated federal-aid funding provisions.
FUNDING:
Amending the current agreement will allow the City of Arroyo Grande to continue to receive
State and Federal-aid grant funds for JLWA consultant services. The City has been
successful in securing State or Federal-aid grant funds for the following projects:
. Fair Oaks-Valley RoadlTally Ho Road Reconstruction (1998 STIP funds);
. Grand Avenue-Phase III, Elm Street to Oak Park Blvd (1998 STIP funds);
. The Scenic Creekside Path through the Historic Village of Arroyo Grande, Phases
II and'" (TE funds);
. Brisco Road/Route 101 Projsct Report & Environmental (2000 STIP funds); and
. Bridge Street Bridge Deck Rehabilitation (HBRR).
DISCUSSION:
On April 3, 2000, Caltrans issued Local Programs Procedures Manual LPP 00-03 entitled
"Revised Preaward Audits Requirements." The preaward audit requirement is placed on
all consultant contracts when State or Federal-aid highway funds participate in the
contract.
A preaward audit serves to alert both the consultant and the local agency of potential
problems concerning items such as the consultant's base contract. One of the objectives
of the audit is to determine if the consultant agreement specifically provides for the
following:
. Three year record retention period and right to audit;
. Method of payment; ,
. Reference to cost principles set forth in:
- 4.8 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Chapter 1, Part 31 for aUowability of
individual items of cost;
- 49 CFR, Part 18 for administrative procedures; and
- Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-110, which are
administrative provides for nonprofit subrecipients.
The City of Arroyo Grande has an active Consultant Services Agreement with John L.
Wallace & Associates dated June 19, 1995. This agreement is the City's standard
consultant services agreement and does not include the three specific provisions listed
above for federal-aid funding. It is recommended that the City.Council amend the current
consultant services agreement to include these federal-aid funding provisions.
AL TERNA TIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
- Approve staff's recommendation;
- Do not approve staff's recommendation;
- Modify as appropriate and approve staff's recommendation; or
- Provide direction to staff.
,
SECOND AMENDMENT
TO
CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT
This SECOND AMENDMENT TO CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT is
made and entered into this 24th day of October, 2000, by and between the CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE, a municipal corporation of the State of California (hereinafter referred
to as "CITY") and JOHN L. WALLACE dba John L. Wallace & Associates (hereinafter
referred to as "CONSULTANT").
WHEREAS, the parties entered into a Consultant Services Agreement dated June
19, 1995 and into a first amendment thereto on May 30, 1997 (hereinafter collectively
referred to as the "Agreement") wherein CONSULTANT agreed to perform certain ongoing
consultant, management and related services for CITY to provide engineering studies,
evaluations, designs, and analyses regarding CITY's public works system; and,
WHEREAS, CITY desires to continue to utilize the services of CONSULTANT; and
WHEREAS, on April 3, 2000 the California Department of Transportation issued
Local Programs Procedures (LPP) 00-03 entitled "Revised Preaward Audits Requirements"
which pertains to all consultant contracts when State or Federal-aid highway funds are
utilized in a contract; and
WHEREAS, CITY desires to continue to receive State and Federal-aid grant funding
for the services of CONSULTANT; and
WHEREAS, one of the requirements of LPP 00-03 is that the consultant agreement
specifically contain certain provisions.
Now therefore, in consideration of the premises herein contained, the parties to
mutually agree that:
1. Records will be retained by Consultant for a minimum of three years and be
available for audit.
2. Work shall be completed in accordance with the cost principles set forth in CFR 48,
Chapter 1, Part 31 for allowability of individual items of cost; CFR 49, Part 18 for
administrative procedures, and OMB circular A-110 for nonprofit subrecipients.
3. Except as modified herein, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain
in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY and CONSULTANT have executed this Second
Amendment to Agreement on the day and year first set forth above.
CONSULTANT:
JOHN L. WALLACE & ASSOCIATES
By:
John L. Wallace
CITY:
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
By:
Michael A. Lady, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kelly Wetmore, Director of Administrative Services/Deputy City Clerk
Timothy J. Carmel, City Attorney
_.,-,..."._.... "-''''''-''-
9.h.
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: TIM CARMEL, CITY A TTORNEY~
LYNDA K. SNODGRASS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCIAL SERVICES ~
SUBJECT: LOPEZ DAM IMPROVEMENT BOND DOCUMENTS
DATE: OCTOBER 24, 2000
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign the attached Lopez Dam
Improvement Bond Documents.
FUNDING:
No outside funding is required.
DISCUSSION:
On August 20, 2000 the City Council approved a Water Supply Contract with the San Luis
Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. Article 6(D) of that
Contract specifies the City will execute and provide instruments, certificates, and
agreements as may be necessary for the Flood Control and Water Conservation District to
deliver Tax-Exempt Obligations. In compliance with this provision, the City has been
asked to provide the following signed documents:
(1) 15C2-12 Certificate which verifies the information in the Official Statement.
(2) Continuing Disclosure Agreement stating the City will continue to provide
financial information.
(3) Certificate of the City pursuant to the Contract of Purchase stating that the
Water Supply Contract and the Continuing Disclosure Agreement are
enforceable and that the City knows of no facts which would undermine their
effectiveness.
(4) Certificate of the Agency regarding the accuracy of the material in the Official
Statement.
Staff has reviewed the documents and found nothing that would cause a recommendation
to not comply with the provision of the Water Supply Contract. It is therefore
recommended, the City Council authorize the Mayor, on behalf of the City, to sign the
attached documents.
---------
15c2-12 CERTIFICATE
with reference to
SLO County Financing Authority
Lopez Dam Improvement Revenue Bonds, 2000 Series A
The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the City of Arroyo Grande (the "City")
hereby certifies that there was delivered to Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, as Underwriter
(the "Underwriter") of the above-captioned bonds (the "Bonds") a Preliminary Official Statement
(including the cover page, the introduction and the appendices thereto) relating to the above-
captioned Bonds, dated October 2, 2000, which the City has deemed to be final as of the date
thereof for purposes of Rule 15c2-12 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
("Rule 15c2-12"), except for information permitted to be omitted therefrom under Rule 15c2-12.
The City approves of the use and distribution by the Underwriter of the Preliminary
Official Statement.
Dated: October 24, 2000 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
By
Mayor
-----~----~-_._--
CERTIFICATE RELATING TO THE OFFICIAL STATEMENT
I, the Mayor of the City of Arroyo Grande (the "City"), DO HEREBY CERTIFY
to .the best of my knowledge as follows:
1. The City has complied with all the agreements and satisfied all of the
conditions it is required to perform or satisfy prior to the Closing.
2. No event affecting the City has occurred since the date of the Official
Statement, which date is October 11, 2000, which either makes untrue in any material respect as
of the Closing any statement contained in the Official Statement or which is not reflected in the
Official Statement but should be reflected therein in order to make the statements therein, in light
of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
Dated: October 26, 2000 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
By
Mayor
ARROYO GRANDE CLOSING CERTS
_____. ____'~m..--..__..._... .._ ..._
CERTIFICATE OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
PURSUANT TO THE CONTRACT OF PURCHASE
I, the Mayor of the City of Arroyo Grande (the "City") DO HEREBY CERTIFY
to the best of my knowledge as follows:
1. the City is duly existing as a general law city, organized under and by
virtue of the laws of the State of California, with full legal right, power and authority to execute
and deliver the City's Participating Agency Documents;
11. the resolution of the City approving and authorizing the execution. and
delivery of the City's Participating Agency Documents was duly adopted at a meeting of the
governing body of the City which was called and held pursuant to law and with all public notice
required by law and at which a quorum was present and acting throughout;
lll. The City's Participating Agency Documents have each been duly
authorized, executed and delivered by the City and, assuming due authorization, execution and
delivery by the other parties thereto, are valid and binding obligations of the City, enforceable in
accordance with their terms, subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization,
moratorium or similar laws from time to time in effect affecting the enforceability of creditors'
rights generally and to general principles of equity, regardless of whether considered in a
proceeding in equity or at law;
IV. the execution and delivery of the City's Participating Agency Documents,
and compliance with the provisions thereof, do not and will not conflict with or constitute on the
part of the City a breach or default under any existing law, regulation, court order or consent
decree to which the City is subject, or, to the best of my knowledge after due inquiry, any
agreement or instrument to which the City is a party or by which the City is bound;
v. all actions on the part of the City necessary for the making and
performance of the City's Participating Agency Documents, and the actions on the part of the
City contemplated hereby and thereby have been duly and effectively taken and no consent,
authorization or approval of, or filing or registration with (which we have been required or
advised by Bond Counsel to do), any governmental or regulatory officer or body not already
obtained is required to be obtained by the City for the making and performance of the City's
Participating Agency Documents, or the actions on the part of the City contemplated hereby and
thereby; /
VI. the information set forth in Appendix C of the Official Statement does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state> a material fact necessary to make
the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not
misleading; and
vii. other than as set forth in the Official Statement, no litigation is pending or,
to my knowledge, threatened in any court to restrain or enjoin the execution, delivery or validity
of the City's Participating Agency Documents; and
ARROYO GRANDE CLOSING CERTS
-~_._----_...,.,,----_.._----- .
V1l1. other than as set forth in the Official Statement, there is no litigation
pending or, to my knowledge, threatened against the City or involving any of the property or
assets under the control of the City wherein an unfavorable decision, ruling or finding would
materially adversely affect the ability of the City to perfonn its obligations under the City's
Participating Agency Documents, or the transactions contemplated thereby.
This certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 8(c)(ll) of the Contract of
Purchase, dated October 11, 2000 (the "Contract of Purchase"), by and between the SLO County
Financing Authority and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated. Capitalized tenns not otherwise
defined in this certificate shall have the meanings set forth in the Contract of Purchase.
Dated: October 26, 2000 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
By
Mayor
ARROYO GRANDE CLOSING CERTS
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT
This Continuing Disclosure Agreement (the "Disclosure Agreement"), dated as of
October 1, 2000, is executed and delivered by the City of Arroyo Grande (the "City of Arroyo
Grande") in connection with the execution and delivery of $28,905,000 aggregate principal
amoUnt of SLO County Financing Authority Lopez Dam Improvement Revenue Bonds, 2000
Series A (the "Bonds"). The Bonds are being executed and delivered pursuant to an Indenture of
Trust, dated as of October 1, 2000 (the "Indenture"), by and between the Authority and U.S.
Bank Trust National Association, as trustee. The City of Arroyo Grande covenants and agrees as
follows:
SECTION 1. Purpose of the Disclosure Agreement. This Disclosure Agreement is being
executed and delivered by the City of Arroyo Grande for the benefit of the Beneficial Owners of
the Bonds and in order to assist the Participating Underwriter in complying with S.E.C. Rule
15c2-12(b)(5).
SECTION 2. Definitions. In addition to the definitions set forth in the Indenture, which
apply to any capitalized term used in this Disclosure Agreement unless otherwise defined in this
Section, the following capitalized terms shall have the following meanings:
"Annual Report" shall mean any Annual Report provided by the City of Arroyo Grande
pursuant to, and as described in, Sections 3 and 4 of this Disclosure Agreement.
"Beneficial Owner" shall mean any person which (a) has the power, directly or indirectly,
to vote or consent with respect to, or to dispose of ownership of, any Bonds (including persons
holding Bonds through nominees, depositories or other intermediaries), or (b) is treated as the
owner of any Bonds for federal income tax purposes.
"Disclosure Representative" shall mean the Mayor of the City of Arroyo Grande or such
other official as may be designated in writing to the Dissemination Agent (if other than the City
of Arroyo Grande) from time to time.
"Dissemination Agent" shall mean U.S. Bank Trust National Association, acting in its
capacity as Dissemination Agent hereunder, or any successor Dissemination Agent designated in
writing by the City of Arroyo Grande and which has filed with the City of Arroyo Grande a
written acceptance of such designation.
"National Repository" shall mean any Nationally Recognized Municipal Securities
Information Repository for purposes of the Rule. The National Repositories currently approved
by the Securities and Exchange Commission are set forth in the SEt web site located at
http://www.sec.gov/consumer/nrmsir.htm.
"Participating Underwriter" shall mean any of the original underwriters of the Bonds
required to comply with the Rule in connection with offering of the Bonds.
"Repository" shall mean each National Repository and each State Repository.
ARROYO GRANDE CDA 1
---~ ..-
rrRule" shall mean Rule 15c2-12(b)(5) adopted by the Securities and Exchange
Commission wider the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as the same may be amended from time
to time.
"State" shall mean the State of California.
rr State Repository" shall mean any public or private repository or entity designated by the
State as a state repository for the purpose of the Rule and recognized as such by the Securities
and Exchange Commission. As of the date of this Agreement, there is no State Repository.
SECTION 3. Provision of Annual Reports.
(a) The City of Arroyo Grande shall, or shall cause the Dissemination Agent to, not
later than March 15 of each year, commencing with March 15,2001, provide to each Repository
an Annual Report which is consistent with the requirements of Section 4 of this Disclosure
Agreement. The Annual Report may be submitted as a single document or as separate
documents comprising a package, and may include by reference other infonnation as provided in
Section 4 of this Disclosure Agreement. If the City of Arroyo Grande's fiscal year changes, it
shall give notice of such change to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board and the State
Repository or the Repositories.
(b) Not later than fifteen (15) Business Days prior to the date specified in subsection
(a) for providing the Annual Report to Repositories, the City of Arroyo Grande shall provide the
Annual Report to the Dissemination Agent (if other than the City of Arroyo Grande). The City of
Arroyo Grande shall provide, or cause the preparer of the Annual Report to provide, a written
certificate with each Annual Report furnished to the Dissemination Agent to the effect that such
Annual Report constitutes the Annual Report required to be furnished to it hereunder. The
Dissemination Agent may conclusively rely upon such certification and shall have no duty or
obligation to review such Annual Report.
(c) If the City of Arroyo Grande is unable to provide to Repositories an Annual
Report by the date required in subsection (a), the City of Arroyo Grande shall send a notice to
each Repository or to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board and the State Repository, if
any, in substantially the fonn attached as Exhibit A.
(d) The Dissemination Agent shall:
(i) detennine each year prior to the date for providing the Annual Report the name and
address of each National Repository and the State Repository, if any; and
(ii) to the extent infonnation is known to it, file a report with the City of Arroyo Grande
certifying that the Annual Report has been provided) pursuant to this Disclosure
Agreement, stating the date it was provided and listing all the Repositories to which it
was provided.
ARROYO GRANDE CDA 2
SECTION 4. Content of Annual Reports. The Annual Report shall contain or include by
reference the following:
(a) The audited fmancial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in effect from time to time. If any of such audited financial statements are
not available by the time the Annual Report is required to be filed pursuant to Section 3(a), the
Annual Report shall contain unaudited financial statements in a fonnat similar to the financial
statements contained in the Official Statement, and the audited financial statements shall be filed
in the same manner as the Annual Report when they become available.
(b) Changes in the service area and customer base for its Water Enterprise.
(c) Five largest customers of the Water Enterprise.
(d) Statement of connections and sales revenues for its Water Enterprise.
(e) Water tax and impact fee revenues for its Water Enterprise.
(f) Water deliveries for the Water Enterprise.
(g) Rates and Charges for water deliveries for the fiscal year most recently
concluded.
Any or all of the items listed above may be included by specific reference to other
documents, including official statements of debt issues of the City of Arroyo Grande or related
public entities, which have been submitted to each of the Repositories or the Securities and
Exchange Commission. If the document included by reference is a final official statement, it
must be available from the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. The City of Arroyo Grande
shall clearly identify each such other document so included by reference.
SECTION 5. Tennination ofReportin~ Obligation. The City of Arroyo Grande's
obligations under this Disclosure Agreement shall tenninate upon the legal defeasance, prior
redemption or payment in full of all of the Bonds. If such tennination occurs prior to the final
maturity of the Bonds, the City of Arroyo Grande shall give notice of such tennination to the
Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board and the State Repository or the Repositories.
SECTION 6. Dissemination Agent. The City of Arroyo Grande may, from time to time,
appoint or engage a Dissemination Agent to assist it in carrying out its obligations under this
Disclosure Agreement, and may discharge any such Dissemination Agent, with or without
appointing a successor Dissemination Agent. The Dissemination Agent may resign by providing
thirty (30) days written notice to the City of Arroyo Grande.
SECTION 7. Amendment: Waiver. Notwithstanding any other provision of this
Disclosure Agreement, the City of Arroyo Grande may amend this Disclosure Agreement, and
ARROYO GRANDE CDA 3
any provision of this Disclosure Agreement may be waived, provided that the following
conditions are satisfied:
(a) If the amendment or waiver relates to the provisions of Sections 3{ a), 4, or
5(a), it may only be made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a
change in legal requirements, change in law, or change in the identity, nature or statUs of
an obligated person with respect to the Bonds, or the type of business conducted;
(b) The undertaking, as amended or taking into account such waiver, would,
in the opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel, have complied with the
requirements of the Rule at the time of the original execution and delivery of the Bonds,
after taking into account any amendments or interpretations of the Rule, as well as any
change in circumstances; and
(c) The amendment or waiver either (i) is approved by the Holders of the
Bonds in the same manner as provided in the Indenture for amendments to the Indenture
with the consent of Holders, or (ii) does not, in the opinion of a nationally recognized
bond counsel, materially impair the interests of the Holders or Beneficial Owners of the
Bonds.
(c) Any amendment that modifies or increases the duties or obligations of the
Dissemination Agent shall be agreed to in writing by the Dissemination Agent.
In the event of any amendment or waiver of a provision of this Disclosure Agreement, the
City of Arroyo Grande shall describe such amendment in the next Annual Report, and shall
include, as applicable, a narrative explanation of the reason for the amendment or waiver and its
impact on the type (or, in the case of a change of accounting principles, on the presentation) of
financial infonnation or operating data being presented by the City of Arroyo Grande.
SECTIO~ 8. Additional Infonnation. Nothing in this Disclosure Agreement shall be
deemed to prevent the City of Arroyo Grande from disseminating any other infonnation, using
the means of dissemination set forth in this Disclosure Agreement or any other means of
communication, or including any other infonnation in any Annual Report in addition to that
which is required by this Disclosure Agreement. If the City of Arroyo Grande chooses to
include any infonnation in any Annual Report in addition to that which is specifically required
by this Disclosure Agreement, the City of Arroyo Grande shall have no obligation under this
Agreement to update such infonnation or include it in any future Annual Report.
SECTION 9. Default. In the event of a failure of the City of Arroyo Grande to comply
with any provision of this Disclosure Agreement, any Holder or Beneficial Owner of the Bonds
may take such actions as may be necessary and appropriate, including seeking mandate or
specific perfonnance by court order, to cause the City of Arroyo Grande to comply with its
obligations under this Disclosure Agreement. A default under this Disclosure Agreement shall
not be deemed an Event of Default under the Indenture, and the sole remedy under this
Disclosure Agreement in the event of any failure of the City of Arroyo Grande or the
ARROYO GRANDE CDA 4
Dissemination Agent to comply with this Disclosure Agreement shall be an action to compel
perfonnance.
SECTION 10. Duties. Immunities and Liabilities of Dissemination Agent. The
Dissemination Agent shall have only such duties as are specifically set forth jn this Disclosure
Agreement, and the City of Arroyo Grande agrees to indemnify and save the Dissemination
Agent, its officers, directors, employees and agents, harmless against any loss, expense and
liabilities which it may incur arising out of or in the exercise or perfonnance of its powers and
duties hereunder, including the costs and expenses (including attorneys fees) of defending
against any claim of liability, but excluding liabilities due to the Dissemination Agent's
negligence or willful misconduct. The Dissemination Agent shall be paid compensation by the
City of Arroyo Grande for its services provided hereunder in accordance with its schedule of fees
as amended from time to time and all expenses, legal fees and advances made or incurred by the
Dissemination Agent in the pe~onnance of its duties hereunder. The obligations of the City of
Arroyo Grande under this Section shall survive resignation or removal of the Dissemination
Agent and payment of the Bonds.
SECTION 11. Notices. Any notices or communications to the City of Arroyo Grande
may be given as follows:
City of Arroyo Grande
P.O. Box 550
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
Attention: City Manager
Any person may, by written notice to the other persons listed above, designate a different address
or telephone number( s) to which subsequent notices or communications should be sent.
ARROYO GRANDE CDA 5
"-..,--.-------.."..-----.-
SECTION 12. Beneficiaries. This Disclosure Agreement shall inure solely to the benefit
of the Authority, the Dissemination Agent, the Participating Underwriter and Holders and
Beneficial Owners from time to time of the Bonds, and shall create rio rights in any other person
or entity.
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
By
Mayor
AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
as Dissemination Agent
By
Authorized Officer
ARROYO GRANDE CDA
EXHIBIT A
NOTICE TO REPOSITORIES OF F AlLURE TO FILE ANNUAL REPORT
Name of Obligated Party: City of Arroyo Grande
Name of Bonds: SLO County Financing Authority
Lopez Dam Improvement Revenue Bonds
2000 Series A
Date of Delivery: October 26, 2000
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Arroyo Grande has not provided an
Annual Report with respect to the above-named Bonds as required by the Continuing Disclosure
Agreement, dated as of October I, 2000, with respect to the Bonds. [The City of Arroyo Grande
anticipates that the Annual Report will be filed by .]
Dated:
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
By
.
10.8.
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DON SPAGNOLO, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER 1%
SUBJECT: REVISION TO THE SEWER AREA CHARGE
DATE: OCTOBER 24, 2000
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council:
A. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Consultant Services Agreement to revise
the sewer area charge to address open space easements, and
C. authorize an appropriation of $8,500 from the Sewer Facility Fund and add the
Sewer Area Charge Update to the Capital Improvement Program.
FUNDING:
Funding for the Sewer Area Fee Study will be from the Sewer Facility Fund in the amount
of $8,500. The unaudited estimated fund balance in the Sewer Facility Fund as of June
30,2000 is $830,348.
DISCUSSION:
At the August 8, 2000 Council meeting a request was presented by the developer of the
Village Glen project, Tract 2265 to adjust the sewer area charge by exempting the open
space portions of lots 37 through 40 from this charge. The present sewer area charge
ordinance was enacted before the now common practice of requesting or requiring
dedication of open space easements that provide for land to remain in a natural state and,
as a result, does not provide for exemptions of these areas.
The Village Glen project, Tract 2265, is a vesting tract map which confers a vested right
to proceed with development in substantial compliance with the ordinances, policies, and
standards in effect at the time the application for a vesting tentative map is deemed
, complete. Tract 2265 was vested on October 17, 1997. Government Code ~66498.2 sets
forth a pro~edure by which a subdivider may apply for an amendment to the vesting
tentative map to secure a vested right to proceed with new ordinances. However, once
a final map has been approved and recorded, this mechanism' is unavailable to change the
regulations under which the map vested. Since the final map for Tract 2265 was recorded
on August 23, 2000 and any changes to the sewer area charge ordinance after that time
"-,.-.
would not be applicable. Therefore, staff does not recommend the sewer area charge be
adjusted for lots 37 through 40. If the Council would still like to pursue some type of
reduction in the sewer area charge for these lots, staff can be directed to further
investigate options available to obtain the benefit of a new sewer area fee structure for
these four lots.
The current sewer area charge was established in 1974. Changes have occurred over the
years in the method of calculating sewer charges. Today's methodology often is based
on the nature and intensity of a development and not on the amount of area used.
Amending the current ordinance to provide for the elimination of open space would reduce
, the revenue that was intended to provide for additional sewer facilities to meet future
capacity requirements. To provide for sewer area charges that address open space areas
when future development projects are approved, staff recommends a consultant be
selected to assist in evaluating the methodology, equity and actual costs associated with
the sewer area charge. Staff will then prepare a revised ordinance for Council
consideration.
One likely option for amending the current ordinance would be to modify the fee structure
to base them on a per unit charge, which would be consistent with the majority of other
jurisdictions. However, it is important to note that the fee in the case of Tract 2265 would
probably remain the same because the tract was approved as a cluster development. This
allowed a higher density development in some areas than would otherwise be allowed in
exchange for the dedication of open space in other areas of the tract. Overall project
density and, thus, impacts to the sewage collection and treatment facilities are the same
as if no open space easements existed.
AL TERNA TIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
- Approve staffs recommendations;
- Do not approve staffs recommendations;
- Modify as appropriate and approve staffs recommendations; or
- Provide direction to staff.
,
Attachment 1 - Municipal Code Sections 6-6.1, 6-6.405, and 6-6.408
------- -.--....--
,6-6.101 6-6010,2
CH1~.PJ:ER 50 SEWER SYSTEM*
Article 10 Definitions
Sec. 6-601010 Scope.
. - . -
oJ-
For the purposes of this chapter, unless otherwise apparent from
the context, certain words and phrases used in this chapter are defined
as set forth in this article.
(Sec. 1, Ordo 105 C.So, eff. October 24, 1974)
-.... Sec.. 6-6.1020 Area' charp;e..
"Area charge" shall mean a charge to lots within the City for
capacity in the collector system.
- ".~
(Sec. 1, Ordo 105 C.S., eff. October 24, 1974)
Seco 6-6.1030 Assessment districto
"Assessment districtll shall mean a special district formed for
the purpose 'of sewer line construction with costs and expenses dis-
tributed among benefitted properties as set forth by law 0
(Sec. 1, Ord. 105 C.S., effo October 24, 1974)
Sec. 6-6.104. Available sewer.
A sewer shall become available only after it has been accepted
by the Cityo
(Seco 1, Ord.. 105 C.So, eff.. October 24, 1974)
Seco 6-6.105. Backwater val va.
IIBackwater valvell shall mean a device which purpose is to prevent
*Artic1e lantit1ed "Connectionsll, consisting of Sections 6-6.101
through 6-60103, 'codifiedfrom Ordinance Noo 89, and Artiole2
entitled IISewer Rental Chargesll, consisting of Sections 6-6.201
~ough 6-6.208, codified from Resolution No. 672 and Ordinance
). 111~ as amended by Ordinance Noso 4 C.So, effective February 9,
1967, and 42 CoSo, effective March 11, 1971, repealed by Section 2,
Ordinance No. 105 C.So, effective October 24, 19740
218 Reprint,Noo 12 - 2-28-75
_.--, ----".
_~6ol02 ~6<>110
/." '
I
flew in a sewer in a direction opposite to that of the i~t~nded drain-
, age. .
(Sec. 1, Ord. 105 CoS., eff~ October 249 1974)
oJ-
Sec. 6-6.106. Benefit unit charge.
"Benefit un.i t charge;1 shall mean a charge to lots wi thin the
Oity having the benefit of a public sewer being located adjacent to
such lots.
(Sec. 1, Ord.105 C.S., effo October 24, 1974)
Seco 6-601070 Building 0
"Bui~ding" shall mean any structure used for b.uman habitation
or a place of business, recreation, or other activity and containing
sanitary tacilitieso
/0. 1, Ord. 105 C.S.. ') efr co October 24, 1974)
Sec. 6-6.108. Building sewero
"Building sewern sh8:1l mean that portion of a sewer beginning
two (2') feet from any building and extending to, and including its
connection to, a lateral sewero
(Sec. 1, Ordo 105 C.S., eff., October 24, 1974)
Sec. 6-6.109. Cityo
"Cityn shall mean that portion of the State of California, County
of San Luis Obispo, which is incorporated as the City of Arroyo Grande.
" ".
(Sec. 1, Ord. 105 O.S., efr., October 24, 1974)
Sec. "6-6.110. City Council.
"City Counciln shall mean the City Council for the City of Arroyo
Grande.
.." -.,'
dC. 1, Ord. 105 C.S., effo October 24, 1974)
219 R" t ~ ,~ 0 ~R 7~
E;pr~n f .''J\": 0 ,_.: ~~ ,..-,..,'....J
-~_.._.- -~-
.
6-6.405 6-6.407 . .
Sec. 6-6.405. PeDDita: Fees.
The General Sewer Permit fees shall be as follows:
(a) Seven and DO/I00tbs (_7.00) Dollars for the sewer pemit amUnapectioaa; and
(b) Connection charges as adopted by the Goveming Board of the South San Luis
Obispo Co\D1ty Sanitation DistriCt for said sanitation district.
(Sec. 1. Ord. 105 C.S.. as amended by Sec. 5. Ord. 321 C. S.. adopted March 26, 1985)
Sec. 6-6.406. Perinits: Fees: Disposition.
. '
PeDDit fees collected 1D1der Section 6-6.405 (a) shall be deposited in the General F1D1d of the
City.
PeDDit fees collected 1D1der Section 6-6.405 (b) shall be disbursed mOnthly to the South San
Luis Obispo Co\D1ty Sanitation District.
(Sec. 1. Ord. 105 C.S., as amended by Sec. 6. Ord.' 321 C.S.., adopted March 26, 1985)
Sec. 6-6.407. Connections: Fees: Can,pltations.
For each lot connection of a building sewer to a plblic sewer. a connection fee shall be
j collected by the City, before the permit for the connection work is issued, as follows:
(a) Four Hundred Ninety-One and 20/100ths Dollars (_491.20) pet'-acre.'acre'
charge"; and
(b) Seven Hundred Fifty-Four and 10/100ths Dollars (1754.10)'perunit "~nefit
unit charge".
The charges for connecting to any plblic sewer on or after October 24, 1974, shall be
deteDnined 'by appying the fo~wing foDJJUla to the above stated charge.:'
1+ (Current E.N.R. Cost Index> - 'Base E.N.R. Cost Indez) = Multipier .
Base E.N.R. Cost Index .
, "Base E.N.R. Cost Index" shall be the Engineering News Record Construction cost
Index in effect on October 24. 1974..
"Current E.N.R. Cost Index" shall be the Engineering News Record Construction
Cost Index at the time of connecting to the public sewer. .
''Multip.ier" shall be the figure used to multipy the charges set forth in subsections
(a) and (b) of this section by to adjust such charges to the current c~nstruction 'coat..
0
223-5 RepdntNo. 34 (11/1/85)
--
.. ,
.
6-6.407 6-6.407 . .
r
No cOImecUon fee will be charged for a lot, or any portion thereof, that.has been previously
. assessed in assessment district proceedings for said area charges and benefit Unit charga, unless
additiooal benefit units are devC10ped on such lot or in the case of a comnerdal property, the owner or
IUs agent wishes to increase the mmJber of fixture units devdoped previously.
The-'benefit unit charge shall be waived on any mt witbin.a...devcJopma1t for ,ach the
devdoper. consttucted .. public conection system. When any of the lots in suchdevdopnent front on
and connect to :ancmUng public sewer, there will be a benefit unit chugefor' such Iou.
. Every bouse and building requiring a sewer service shall have an independent connection to the
public sewer, except that more than one building located on a lot under one ownership, or condominium.
or Panned unit devdopnent unit may be connected to the same building sewer in comoDlW1ce with
Section 6-6.309. ' Withthe exceptJon of con<bninium and plaImed unit deveJopnents, in the event a lot
with a bouse or building so connected is subdivided, an independent sewer connection with appropriate
easements shall be pcovided for each differently owned, premises. With the exception of condomf"nuns
or panned unit devdopnents, no two (2) owners of adjacent lots fronting on the.une stteet shall be
. peanitted to join in the use 'of the same building sewer.
For, the pu:pose of calculating the number of benefit units to be assessed the following table shall I ,
be used. "
Type of DeveJopnent Nmmer of Benefit Units
. .
Single family dwellin'g . 1
Apartment, mobile home,
condominium or panned
unit deve10pnent 1 per dwelling
Hotd, motel, hosp.tal, or
resthome 1 per room
223-6 Reprint No. 34 (11/1/85)
._....._._.~-
~---_.,."~
6-6.407 6-6.408 . .
.
(
Type of DevdopDeDt (cont'd) N1Dbcr of 8mdit Uniu (coot'd)
Ccmnercial devc10pnent
witli 15 or less fixture
unita (u defined by the oJ- '
UnifODIl Planbing Code) in-
cluding retail. restaurants,
professional office
buildings or conc:b:niniums 1 per building
Coomercial devc10pnent with
more than 15 fUture units
including retail, restaurant,
professional office buildings
or condQrntnitms 1 per building, ,PUS Fifty
and 27/10Oth Dollars
(150.27) per fUture unit over
15 fixture units
(Sec. J, Ord. 105 c.s., as amended by Sec. 7, Ord. 321 c.s., adopted March 26, 1985)
, Sec. 6-6.408.'Connections: Fees: Adjustments.
An adjuStment to the area charge may be made as follows:
(a) When a lo~ ~ one and one-third (11/3) acres or larger and when, in the opmQn of the.
City, such lotquaIifies for subdivision into five, (5) or more lots, an adjusUnent will-be
made to allow for the loss of acreage in devc1opnent. The adjusted acreage to
~ch the basic area charge shall be appied shall be seventy (70~) percent of the
,gross acreage.
(b) When a lot is one and one-third (11/3) acres or larger and when, in the opmon of the
City, such lot qualifies for subdivision into five (5) or more Iota, an adjustment will be
made to allow for the loss of acreage in devc1opoent. An additiona1ad~tment may
be made for adverse topogra.1'hy or other special cooditioos ~ch make difficult the .
developnent of all the property into rmmm..m size a.ty Iota. If the latter condition
exists, at the sole discretion of the a.t>/ the final adjusteda~eage to ~ch the /'
buic area charge shall be applied shall be sixty-three (63~) percent of the gross
acreage.
(Sec. 1, Ord. 105 c.s., eff. October 24, 1974)
, 223-7 Reprint No. 34 (11/1/85)
._,-~",,~ -------
10.b.
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER~
SUBJECT: TERMINATION OF CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH ENVICOM
DATE: OCTOBER 24, 2000
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Council authorize and direct the City Manager to terminate
the existing Consultant Services Agreement with Envicom to prepare the update of
the City's General Plan.
FUNDING:
Staff believes that completing the remainder of work on the General Plan update in-
house will result in a savings of $50,000 - $100,000.
DISCUSSION:
At the October 10, 2000 joint City Council and Planning Commission study session,
alternatives for proceeding with the General Plan update process were discussed.
The City Council concurred with staffs recommendation to terminate the existing
Agreement with Envicom Corporation and hire an in-house staff person on a
temporary contract basis to complete the work. Staff also indicated that the City
Attorney was to review the Agreement and work product completed in order to
determine if any legal action would be recommended for non-performance by the
consultant.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
- Authorize the City Manager to terminate the Consultant Services
Agreement with Envicom;
- Do not authorize the City Manager to terminate the Consultant
Services Agreement with Envicom; or
- Provide direction to staff.