The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda Packet 2001-01-09CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Michael A. Lady Tony M. Ferrara Thomas A. Runels Jim Dickens Sandy Lubin Mayor � Mayor Pro Tem Council Member Council Member Council Member �� - , , , ,- Steven Adams City Manager Timothy J. Carmel City Attomey Kelly Wetmore Director, Administrative Services NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING Tuesday JANUARY 9, 2001 5:45 P.M. Arroyo Grande City Council Chambers 215 East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande AGENDA 1. ROLL CALL 2. PUBLIC COMMENT on Special Meeting Agenda Items. Members of the public wishing to address the Council on any item described in this Notice may do so when recognized by the Presiding Officer. 3. CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION: a. CONTRACT PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION pursuant to Government Code Section 54957: Title: City Attorney 4. � RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION: Announcement of reportable action from closed session, if any. ADJOURNMENT. c:closedsession.agenda.010901. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Michael A. Lady Tony M. Ferrara Thomas A. Runels Jim Dickens Sandy Lubin Mayor � Mayor Pro Tem Council Member Council Member Council Member �� _ ✓`li��o�- �r�ai�i . Steven Adams City Manager Timothy J. Carmel City Attomey Kelly Wetmore Director, Administrative Services AGENDA SUMMARY CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 2001 7:00 P.M. Arroyo Grande City Council Chambers 215 East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. ROLL CALL 3. FLAG SALUTE 4. 5. 6. INVOCATION: SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS None. AGENDA REVIEW 7:00 P.M. ARROYO GRANDE LIONS CLUB JACK GATZ, PRESIDENT PASTOR RON GERKING, SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH, ARROYO GRANDE 6a. Move that all resolutions and ordinances presented tonight be read in title only and alt further readings be waived. AGENDA SUMMARY — JANUARY 9, 2001 PAGE 2 7. CITIZENS' INPUT. COMMENTS. AND SUGGESTIONS: Persons in the audience may discuss business not scheduled on this agenda regarding any item of interest within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Council will listen to all communication; however, in compliance with the Brown Act, will not take any action on items that are not on the agenda. Upon completing your comments: ♦ You may be directed to staff for assistance; ♦ A Council Member may indicate an interest in discussing your issue with you subsequent to the Council meeting; ♦ The Council may direct staff to research the issue and subsequently report back to the Council (generally in the form of a memorandum or staff report); or ♦ No action is required or taken. 8. CONSENT AGENDA The following routine items listed below are scheduled for consideration as a group. The recommendations for each item are noted. Any Council Member may request that any item be withdrawn from the Consent Agenda to permit discussion or change the recommended course of action. The City Council may approve the remainder of the Consent Agenda on one motion. 8.a. Cash Disbursement Ratification (SNODGRASS) Recommended Action: Approve the listing of cash disbursements for the period December 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000. 8.b. Statement of Investment Deposits (SNODGRASS) Recommended Action: Receive and file the report of current investment deposits as of December 31, 2000. 8.c. Adoption of Ordinance Establishing Maximum Buildinct Size for Commercial Uses (McCANTS) Recommended Action: Adopt Ordinance amending portions of Title 9 of the Municipal Code to establish maximum building size for commercial uses. 8.d. Minutes of the City Council Meeting of December 12, 2000 (WETMORE) Recommended Action: Approve minutes as submitted. 8.e. ReQUest for Authorization to Close Certain City Streets and Use Citv Proaerty for the Annual Strawberry Festival, Annual Easter in the Village, and Annual Fourth of Julv (McCANTS) Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution authorizing the closure of City streets and use of City property. AGENDA SUMMARY — JANUARY 9, 2001 PAGE 3 8. CONSENT AGENDA: (continued) 8.f. Citv Hall Re-Roofinq Proiect. Progress Payment No 1 and Notice of Completion (HERNANDEZ) Recommended Action: 1) Authorize progress payment in the amount of $37,716.15 to Quaglino Roofing; 2) Direct staff to file a Notice of Completion; and 3) Authorize release of the retention of $4,190.68, thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded, if no liens have been filed. 8.g. Fair Oaks Avenue/Tallv Ho Road Overlav Project, Project No PW-2000-3, Progress Payment No. 5 (SPAGNOLO) Recommended Action: Authorize progress payment in the amount of $14,650.88 to R. Burke Corporation for work completed on the Fair Oaks Avenue/Tally Ho Road Overlay capital improvement project. 8.h. Pro4ram Suaplement AQreement for the Scenic Creekside Walk Through the Historic VillaQe of Arroyo Grande. Phase II (SPAGNOLO) Recommended Action: 1) Adopt Resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute the Program Supplement Agreement No. M005; and 2) Direct the Director of Administrative Services to submit Program Supplement Agreement No. M005 and authorizing Resolution to Caltrans. 8.i. Pro4ram Suaalement Aqreement for the Traffic Way Bridge Rail Replacement Project (SPAGNOLO) Recommended Action: 1) Adopt Resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute the Program Supplement Agreement No. M006; and 2) Direct the Director of Administrative Services to submit Program Supplement Agreement No. M006 and authorizing Resolution to Caltrans. 8.j. Implementation of New State Minimum Wage Rate (ADAMS) Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution to increase wages for those part-time positions that fall below the new State minimum wage. 8.k. Approval of Park and Ride Lot Lease Agreement (SPAGNOLO) Recommended Action: Approve the Park and Ride Lease Agreement with the California State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9.a. Consideration of Conditional U�e Permit 00-015 to Construct an 84-room Assisted Care Facility at 579 Camino Mercado (Horizon Senior Housing,� (McCANTS) � Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit Case No. 99-015 subject to the conditions of approval. AGENDA SUMMARY — JANUARY 9, 2001 PAGE 4 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued): 9.b. Proaosed Ordinance Amendina Portions of Title 9 of the Municipal Code Eliminatinq Mini-storacte as an Allowable Use in all Commercial Zonina Districts (McCANTS) Recommended Action: Introduce Ordinance amending Title 9, Chapter 7 of the Municipal Code to eliminate mini-storage as an allowable use in all Commercial Districts. 10. CONTINUED BUSINESS: None. 11. NEW BUSINESS None. 12. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS Correspondence/Comments as presented by the City Council. 13. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS Correspondence/Comments as presented by the City Manager. 14. ADJOURNMENT AGENDA SUMMARY — JANUARY 9, 2001 PAGE 5 * * * * * * * Copies of the staff reports or other written materials relating to each item of business referred to on this agenda are on file with the Director of Administrative Services and are available for public inspection and reproduction at cost. If you have questions regarding any agenda item, please contact the Director of Administrative Senrices at (805) 473- 5414. * * * * * * * In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting, please contact the Director of Administrative Services at the number listed above at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to ensure that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting. * * * * * * * Note: This agenda is subject to amendment up to 72 hours prior to the date and time set for the meeting. Please refer to the agenda posted at City Hall for any revisions, or call the Director of Administrative Services at (805) 473-5414 for more information. www. a rroyog ra n d e. o rg 8.�. /, aRROr o� � � INCONGOqATED Z V D rn � Y , '� MEMORANDUM 4 ��FORN� P TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: LYNDA K. SNODGRASS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCIAL SERVICES BY: JANET M. HUWALDT, ACCOUNTING SUPERVISOR � � SUBJECT: CASH DISBURSEMENT RATIFICATION DATE: JANUARY 9, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council ratify the attached listing of cash disbursements for the period December 1— December 31, 2000. FUNDING: There is a$2,140,142.81 fiscal impact. DISCUSSION: The attached listing represents the cash disbursements required of normal and usual operations. It is requested that the City Council approve these payments. ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT 1— Cash Disbursement Listing ATTACHMENT 2— December 1, 2000 Accounts Payable Check Register ATTACHMENT 3— December 1, 2000 Payroll Checks and Benefit Checks ATTACHMENT 4— December 7, 2000 Payroll Sick Leave Checks and Benefits ATTACHMENT 5— December 8, 2000 Accounts Payable Check Register ATTACHMENT 6— December 15, 2000 Accounts Payable Check Register ATTACHMENT 7— December 15, 2000 Payroll Checks and Benefit Checks ATTACHMENT 8— December 22, 2000 Accounts Payable Check Register ATTACHMENT 9— December 29, 2000 Payroll Checks and Benefit Checks ATTACHMENT 10 — December 31, 2000 Accounts Payable Pre-paid Check Register ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE CASH DISBURSEMENTS For the Period of December 1 Through December 31, 2000 January 9, 2001 Presented are the cash disbursements issued by the Department of Financial Services for the period December 1 to December 31, 2000. Shown are cash disbursements by week of occurrence and e of a ment. �'VEEI� TYPE OF PAYMENT SCHEDLTL� ' ��►,�1�T'T' December 1, 2000 Accounts Payable Cks 98392-98437 Payroll Checks and Benefit Checks December 7, 2000 Payroll Sick Leave Checks and Benefits December 8, 2000 Accounts Payable Checks 98449-98540 December 15, 2000 Accounts Payable Checks 98540-98669 Less Payroll Cks included in Attachment 3 Payroll Checks and Benefit Checks December 22, 2000 Accounts Payable Checks 98689-98765 Less Payroll Cks included in Attachment 7 December 29, 2000 Payroll Checks and Benefit Checks December 31, 2000 Accounts Payable Pre-paid Checks Less Payroll Cks included in Attachment 9 One Month Total 2 147,160.03 3 267,659.82 414,819.85 4 . 10,480.51 5 87,527.48 6 227,048.20 (52,334.08) 7 257,006.15 431,720.27 8 576,803.49 (193 091.51 383,711.98 9 226,091.82 10 788,432.42 (202,641.52) 585,790.90 $ 2,140,142.81 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE INDEX FOR BUDGET DEPARTMENTS EDEN COMPUTER SYSTEM GINERAL FUND (010� Citu Government (Fund 010) 4001 - City Council 4002 - City Clerk 4003 - City Attorney 4101 - City Manager 4102 - Printing/Duplicating 4120 - Financial Services 4121 - Taxes/ Insurance/ Bonds 4130 - Community Development 4131 - Community Building (CDBG) 4140 - Management Information System 4145 - Non Departmental Public Sa�ty (Fund 010) 4201 - Police 4211 - Fire 4212 - Building & Safety 4213 - Government Buildings Public Works (Fund 010) 4301 - Public Works-Admin & Engineering 4303 - Street/Bridge Maintenance 4304 - Street Lighting 4305 - Automotive Shop Parks & Recreation (Fund 010) 4420 - Parks 4421 - Recreation 4422 - General Recreation 4423 - Pre-School Program 4424 - Recreation-Special Programs 4425 - Children in Motion 4430 - Soto Sport Complex 4460 - Parkway Maintenance SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Park Development Fee Fund (Fund 213) 4550 - Park Development Fee Traffic Signal Fund (Fund 222) 4501 - Traffic Fund Transportation Fund (Fund 225) 4553 - Public Transit System Construction Tvt Fund (Fund 230) 4556 - Constritction Tax Police Grant Fund (Fund 271) 4202 - State AB3229 Cops Grant 4203 - Federal COPS Hiring Grant 4204 - Federal Local Law Enforcement ENTERPRISE FUNDS Sewer Fund (Fund 612) 4610 - Sewer Maintenance Water Fund (Fund 640) 4710 - Water Administration 4711 - Water Production 4712 - Water Distribution Lopez Administration (Fund 641) 4750 - Lopez Administrakion CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 5501-5599 - Park Projects 5601-5699 - Streets Projects 5701-5799 - Drainage Projects 5801-5899 - Water/Sewer/Street Projects 5901-5999 - Water Projects Dept. Index for CouncIl ATTACHMEIQT 2 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 11/29/00 11:17 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 VOUCHER/ ' CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUhIDER DATE NUhffiER NAME DESCRIPTION NUNIDER 98392 12/O1/00 085176 3T EQUIPMENT CO SEWER HOSE 612.4610.6201 98393 12/O1/00 101454 ADLESON,HESS & KELLY PROF.SVCS-REVIEW AUDIT LETTER 010.4003.5327 96394 12/O1/00 101606 ALLAN HANCOCK COLLEGE 5 PEOPLE HAZMAT REFRESH.CLASS 010.4420.5501 96395 12/O1/00 006006 ARROYO GRANDE FLOWER SH FLORAL ARRANGEMENT-SOUZA/PRYOR 010.4001.5504 98396 12/O1/00 006084 ARROYO GRANDE GLASS R& R WINDOW PANE 010.4213.5604 98396 12/O1/00 006084 ARROYO GRANDE GLASS LOUVERS 010.4420.5605 98397 12/O1/00 009750 BRENDA BARROW REIMB.TURKEY SPLYS 010.4424.5252 98398 12/O1/00 012090 JO BOYD BRIDGE CLASSES-BOYD 010.4424.5351 98399 12/O1/00 100677 CYNTHIA BRODERSEN REF.PARK DEPOSIT-BRODERSEN 010.0000.4354 98400 12/O1/00 017550 CA.ST.DEPT.FISH & GAME RENEWAL LAKE & STREAM PERM 220.4303.5613 98401 12/O1/00 102103 CORRPRO COMPANIES,INC CATHODIC PROTECT.SVCS-INSP. 640.4712.5609 98402 12/O1/00 100151 COUNTRY CHRISTMAS BOUTI REF.C/B DEP-COUNTRY CHRISTMAS 010.0000.2206 98403 12/O1/00 101326 DAVID CROCKETT CODE ENFORCE CLASS-CROCKETT 010.4130.5501 96404 12/O1/00 026754 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C BOTTLED WATER 010.4421.5201 98404 12/O1/00 026754 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C BOTTLED WATER 010.4130.5201 98404 12/O1/00 026754 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C BOTTLED WATER 010.4101.5201 98404 12/O1/00 026754 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C BOTTLED WATER 010.4120.5201 98404 12/O1/00 026754 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C BOTTLED WATER 010.4301.5201 98404 12/O1/00 026754 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C SOTTLED WATER 010.4212.5201 98405 12/O1/00 027534 D.G.REPAIR SVC-FORK LIFT 640.4712.5603 98405 12/O1/00 027534 D.G.REPAIR SVC-FORK LIFT 220.4303.5603 98405 12/01/00 027534 D.G.REPAIR SVC-FORK LIFT 010.4420.5603 98406 12/O1/00 029484 DIESELRO INC. SVC-IZUZU TRUCK 640.4712.5601 98407 12/O1/00 101379 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,IN WATER VALVE EXTENSIONS 640.4712.5610 98408 12/O1/00 102105 CHRIS GAREY BUILDING USE -DIRECTOR RETREAT 010.4101.5201 98409 12/O1/00 101366 HAWTHORN SUITES RESV-JIM WILLIAMS 010.4201.5501 98410 12/O1/00 042822 LINDA HOLT EMO RECERT-I-IOLT 010.4201.5501 98411 12/O1/00 043914 JOSEPH IANNEO REGIS-J.IANNEO 010.4201.5501 96412 12/O1/00 101604 BARBIE JONES REIMB.SNACK SUPPLIES-JONES 010.4425.5259 98412 12/O1/00 101604 BARBIE JONES REIMB.SUPPLIES-JONES 010.4425.5255 ITEM AMOUNT 1,612.44 200.00 82.50 89.55 55.34 12.87 22.31 483.00 28.00 127.25 1,035.00 250.00 80.00 35.00 21.67 21.66 21.67 20.00 15.00 81.46 40.73 40.72 314.81 93.31 100.00 420.00 40.00 296.00 187.45 83.73 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 1,612.44 200.00 82.50 89.55 68.21 22.31 483.00 28.00 127.25 1,035.00 250.00 80.00 135.00 162.91 314.81 93.31 100.00 420.00 40.00 296.00 271.18 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 11/29/00 11:17 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUhIDER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 98413 12/O1/00 101999 MAINLINE VIDEO INSPECT-PILGRIM EASEMENT 612.4610.5303 98413 12/Ol/00 101999 MAINLINE VIDEO INSPECT-ARROYO AVE/CALIF 612.4610.5303 98414 12/Ol/00 054484 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTEND MSA MEMBERSHIP-10 PEOPLE 220.4303.5503 98415 12/O1/00 056580 MZD STATE BANK ACH DISTRIB-11/06/00 010.4145.5319 98416 12/O1/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE TWINE/KEY RING 640.4712.5255 98416 12/O1/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE BATTERY 640.4712.5255 98416 12/O1/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HP,RDWARE BATTERY 010.4213.5255 98416 12/O1/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE NOZZLE 010.4211.5255 98416 12/O1/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE BULBS 010.4420.5605 98416 12/O1/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE SHELF/HANGER/TWINE/BULB 010.4213.5604 98416 12/O1/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HP,RDWARE BULBS 010.4420.5605 98416 12/O1/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE HOSE REPAIR PARTS 010.4420.5605 98416 12/O1/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE BLDG.MATERIAL 010.4420.5605 98417 12/O1/00 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4301.5255 98417 12/Ol/00 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4421.5201 98418 12/O1/00 058382 LAW OFFICES OF SARAH MO PROF.LEGAL SVCS-AUDIT LETTER 010.4003.5327 98419 12/O1/00 102104 NAT'L ENFORCEMENT INSTI REGIS-J.IANNEO GANG CONF. 010.4201.5501 98420 12/O1/00 102044 NOSSAM}1N,GUTHNER,KNOX & PROF.LEGAL SVCS-S.M.VALLEY WAT 640.4710.5575 98420 12/O1/00 102044 NOSSAMAN,GUTHNER,KNOX & PROF.LEGAL SVCS-S.M..VALLEY WAT 640.4710.5575 98420 12/Ol/00 102044 NOSSN�7F�N,GUTHNER,KNOX & PROF.LEGAL SVCS-S.M.VLY WATER 640.4710.5575 98420 12/O1/00 102044 NOSSAMAN,GUTHNER,KNOX & PROF.LEGAL SVCS-S.M.VLY WATER 640.4710.5575 98421 12/O1/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL PAY PHONE-489-9816 010.4145.5403 98421 12/01/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL ALARM 473-1935 640.4710.5403 98421 12/O1/00 063960 PACZFIC BELL ALARM 473-2041 010.4145.5403 98421 12/O1/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL PHONE 473-5400 010.4145.5403 98422 12/O1/00 102102 MELINA PATTON REF:YOUTH B/BALL-PATTON 010.0000.4605 98423 12/O1/00 067548 POOR RICHARD'S PRESS PARKING CITES PRINTED 010.4201.5201 98423 12/O1/00 067546 POOR RICHARD'S PRESS COPY VINTAGE PICTURES 010.4120.5201 98424 12/O1/00 101136 S.C.A.C.E.O. REGIS-DAVE CROCKETT 010.4130.5501 98425 12/O1/00 101865 THE SACRAMENTO BEE CLASS AD-ENG 010.4301.5301 98426 12/Ol/00 077766 KAREN SCHULTZ REF.PARK DEPOSIT-SCHULTZ 010.0000.4354 98427 12/O1/00 102046 RICHP.RD SLADE & ASSOC PROF.LEGAL SVCS-S.M.VLY WATER 640.4710.5575 98428 12/O1/00 074880 SLO CNTY TAX COLLECTOR PROP TAX 006,085,02308 010.4145.5551 98428 12/O1/00 074880 SLO CNTY TAX COLLECTOR PROP TAX 006,085,02486 010.4145.5551 98428 12/O1/00 074880 SLO CNTY TAX COLLECTOR PROP TAX 006,085,02553 010.4145.5551 98428 12/O1/00 074880 SLO CNTY TAX COLLECTOR PROP TAX 006,085,02631 010.4145.5551 ITEM AMOUNT 210.00 630.00 300.00 43.15 7.07 6.42 9.43 8.99 2.54 8.19 6.13 4.59 4.15 100.28 199.06 175.00 175.00 1,344.54 10,229.72 10,169.05 13,959.38 51.78 33.17 18.43 1,408.16 35.00 657.41 6.76 120.00 471.30 25.00 1,066.38 7.00 7.00 12.00 7.00 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 840.00 300.00 43.15 59.51 299.34 175.00 175.00 35,702.69 1,511.54 35.00 864.17 120.00 471.30 25.00 1,066.36 VOUCHRE2 11/29/00 11:17 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 PAGE 3 VOUCAER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUNIDER NAME DESCRIPTION 98428 12/O1/00 074880 SLO CNTY TAX COLLECTOR PROP TAX 007,192,06008 98428 12/O1/00 '074880 SLO CNTY TAX COLLECTOR PROP TAX 007,774,01275 98428 12/O1/00 074880 SLO CNTY TAX COLLECTOR PROP TAX 047,125,00208 96428 12/O1/00 074880 SLO CNTY TAX COLLECTOR PROP TAX 047,126,01020 98428 12/O1/00 074880 SLO CNTY TAX COLLECTOR PROP.TAX 062,074,01297 98429 12/O1/00 060808 SOUTH SLO COUN'TY SANIT SEWER SVC COLL-10/00 98429 12/O1/00 080808 SOUTH SLO COUNTY SANIT SEWER HOOKUPS-10/00 98429 12/O1/00 080808 SOUTH SLO COUNTY SANIT 10-1 SAN.DIST-203 N.RENA 98429 12/O1/00 080808 SOUTH SLO COUNTY SANIT 10-1 SAN DIST-ASH R/RM 98430 12/O1/00 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY LAMp 98431 12/O1/00 082328 STERLING COhIIKUNICATIONS RADIO INSTALLED 98432 12/O1/00 082640 STRP.DLING,YOCCA,CARLSON PROF.LEGAL SVCS-9/00 96433 12/O1/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-RDA 98434 12/O1/00 089700 VILLAGE ART FRAME VINTAGE PICTURE 98435 12/O1/00 090480 WAYNE'S TIRE REPR.FLAT 98435 12/O1/00 090480 WAYNE'S TIRE REPR.FLAT 98436 12/Ol/00 100431 WILLARD PAPER CO PAPER 98436 12f01/00 100431 WILLARD PAPER CO PAPER 98436 12/O1/00 100431 WILLARD PAPER CO PAPER 98437_ 12/Ol/00 092430 JAMES WILLIAMS CHILD ABUSE-WILLIAMS 4 TOTAL CHECKS ACCOUNT NUMBER 010.4145.5551 010.4145.5551 010.4145.5551 010.4145.5551 010.4145.5551 760.0000.2304 760.0000.2305 010.4145.5401 010.4145.5401 640.4712.5601 010.4420.5601 284.4103.5303 284.4103.5403 010.4120.5201 010.4305.5601 010.4305.5601 010.4102.5255 010.4102.5255 010.4102.5255 010.4201.5501 ITEM AMOUNT 307.04 42.00 315.42 7.42 25.98 61,111.11 36,000.00 13.47 13.47 6.18 336.81 88.97 43.42 22.42 20.00 14.00 241.31 337.10 363.36 218.00 CHECK AMOUNT 730.86 97,138.05 6.18 336.81 88.97 43.42 22.42 34.00 941.77 218.00 147,160.03 0 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 4 11/29/00 11:17 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 FUND TITLE O10 GENERAL FUND 220 STREETS FUND 284 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUND 612 SEWER FUND 640 WATER FUND 760 SANITATION DISTRIBUTION FUND TOTAL AMOUNT 8,649.62 46�.98 132.39 2,452.44 38,346.49 97,111.11 147,160.03 _ _ _ _ -- - . _. � ATTACHMENT 3 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DEPARTMENTAL LABOR DISTRIBUTION PAY PERIOD 11/10 TO 11/23/00 12/01/00 FUND 010 FUND 220 FUND 284 FUND 612 FUND 640 237,049.04 10,975.97 4, 713.80 4,132.08 10, 788.93 267,659.82 Salaries Full time Salaries Part-Time Salaries Over-Time Holiday Pay Sick Pay Annual Leave Pay Vacation Buyback Vacation Pay Comp Pay Annual Leave Pay PERS Retirement Social Security PARS Retirement State Disability Ins. Health Insurance Dental Insurance Vision Insurance Life Insurance Long Term Disability Uniform Allowance Car Allowance Council Expense Employee Assistance Uniform Allowance Motor Pay Total: 142, 361.52 19,036.55 9,198.19 11,222.30 5,023.66 6,475.00 5,011.11 6,998.09 3,248.64 15,947.47 14,744.55 215.80 456.98 21,812.82 3,693.42 796.22 542.50 400.00 375.00 100.00 267,659.82 ATTACHMENT 4 FUND 010 FUND 220 FUND 284 FUND 612 FUND 640 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DEPARTMENTAL LABOR DISTRIBUTION SICK LEAVE CHECKS 12/07/00 8,580.16 Sick Leave Buy Back 672.39 Social Security - SDI 1,227.96 10,480.51 TOTAL: 9, 703.62 74229 34.60 10,480.51 ATTACHMENT 5 VOUCHRE2 12/06/00 08:42 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK \7ENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE N(IhIDER NAME 324 12/O1/00 009008 BANKCARD C£NTER 324 12/O1/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER 324 12/Ol/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER 324 12/O1/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER 324 12/O1/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER 324 12/O1/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER 324 12/O1/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER 324 12/O1/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER 324 12/O1/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER 324 12/O1/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER 324 12/O1/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER 324 12/O1/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER 324 12/O1/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER 324 12/O1/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER 324 12/O1/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER 324 12/O1/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER 324 12/Ol/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER 324 12/O1/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER 324 12/O1/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER 324 12/O1/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER 324 12/O1/00 009008 BANKCARD CENTER CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUNIDER OFFZCE SUPPLIES 010.4101.5201 OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4101.5201 MP.RRIOTT HOTEL-CONF 010.4120.5501 VEHICLE/BRIDGE ACCIDENT SPLY 010.4211.5324 HALLOWEEN SUPPLIES 010.4001.5504 OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4101.5201 OFFICE SUPPLIES 284.4103.5201 REGIS FEE 284.4103.5501 RENT A CAR 010.4211.5501 HOTEL SAN DIEGO-HAGLUND 010.4211.5501 HOTEL SAN DIEGO-FIBICH 010.4211.5501 AMTRACK 010.4211.5501 SKILLPATH COMPUMASTER 010.4211.5501 CALENDAR CLUB 010.4211.5201 ORIENTAL TRADING CO 010.4424.5252 CABLE FOR COMPUTER 010.4301.5255 CELL SITES BOOK 010.4130.5503 OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4130.5201 GASOLINE-ED£N CONF 010.4120.5501 GASOLINE-EDEN CONF 010.4120.5501 HOTEL-EDEN CONF 010.4120.5501 98449 12/08/00 000234 A& R WELDING SUPPLY EXTENSION/WASHERS/SLZCE COLLET 010.4211.5603 98450 12/08/00 000468 A T& T-L/DIST SVC. L/DZST.FAX LINE 010.4211.5403 98451 12/OB/00 000858 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES LEVEL 11 VESTS 010.4201.6201 98452 12/08/00 003042 AMERICAAI EQUIPMENT SVCS DUMP BIN 010.4213.5303 98453 12/08/00 003120 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUP UNZVERSAL KNEE BRACE 98453 12/08/00 003120 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUP PVC/LATEX GLOVES 98454 12/OB/00 100897 AMERICAN TEMPS E.BEAVER SVCS-11/11 98454 12/08/00 100897 AMERICAN TEMPS RHINEHP.RT SVCS-11/18 98454 12/08/00 100897 AMERICAN TEMPS RHINEHART SVCS-11/25 98455 12/OB/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE HALLOWEEN SUPPLIES 98455 12/08/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ZONE 3 MTG SUPPLIES 98455 12/08/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE CITY MANAGERS MTG 98455 12/08/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ELECTION NIGHT SUPPLIES 98455 12/08/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE FZLM/BATTERIES 98455 12/08/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE APWA MTG 98455 12/OB/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ASCE MTG 98455 12/08/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE REINID.PRE-EMP FINGERPRINTS 98455 12/08/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE X-MAS LIGHTS 98455 12/08/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE OFFICE EXPENSE 98455 12/08/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE CZTY CLERK QTRLY MTG 98455 12/OB/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE FILM PROCESSING 98455 12/08/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE MTG.EXP 98455 12/OB/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE FILM PROCESSING 010.4420.5255 612.4610.5255 010.4212.5303 220.4303.5303 220.4303.5303 010.4001.5504 010.4001.5504 010.4101.5501 010.4001.5504 010.4301.5255 010.4301.5503 010.4301.5503 010.4301.5315 010.4420.5605 010.4301.5201 010.4002.5501 010.4301.5255 010.4301.5201 010.4301.5255 ITEM AMOUNT 6.48 31.28 219.86 45.00 89.41 164.03 23.59 225.00 98.23 140.89 281.79 68.00 199.00 42.45 516.35 30.63 16.00 18.23 10.00 22.52 303.92 158.14 26.71 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 2,552.65 158.14 26.71 20,730.91 20,730.91 1,250.00 1,250.00 12.17 89.83 102.00 409.60 648.26 421.92 1,479.78 8.17 16.32 10.00 24.26 21.81 14.00 15.00 12.00 12.87 16.65 25.00 14.99 17.00 8.89 i -_ .__ _ _ __. . _ i VOUCHItE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 12/06/00 08:42 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ZTEM ACCOUNT NfJMBER DATE NUhIDER NAME DESCRIP.TION NUhIDER 98455 12/OB/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4101.5201 98455 12/08/00 101044 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE OFFICE SUPPLIES/POSTAGE 010.4101.5201 98456 12/08/00 101617 AUTO GLASS CENTRAL R& I BACKGLASS/MOULDING 010.4201.5601 98456 12/OB/00 101617 ALTfO GLASS CENTRAL URETHANE KIT 010.4201.5601 98457 12/08/00 102050 AVAYA,INC. MERLZN PFiONE SERVICE AGREEMENT 010.4145.5403 98458 12/OB/00 009750 BRENDA BARROW CRAFT SUPPLIES-WINTER BREAK 010.4422.5256 98458 12/OB/00 009750 BRENDA BARROW REIhID.SNACIC SIIPPLIES-BARROW 010.4425.5259 98459 12/08/00 100069 MARY BASSETT REINID.CC RECEPTION/SUPPLIES 010.4001.5201 98460 12/OB/00 011426 BLUEPRZNT EXPRESS REDUCED MAPS-BRISCO ROAD 350.5615.7301 98461 12/08/00 101782 BOB'S EXPRESS WASH CAR WASH 010.4201.5601 98461 12/08/00 101782 BOB'S EXPRESS WASH CAR WASH 612.4610.5601 98461 12/08/00 101782 BOH'S EXPRESS WASH CAR WASH 640.4712.5601 98461 12/08/00 101782 BOB'S EXPRESS WASH CAR WASH 612.4610.5603 98461 12/OB/00 101782 BOB'S EXPRESS WASH CAR WASH 640.4712.5603 98462 12/OB/00 102033 BOND BLACKTOP,INC. RETENTION-SPRZNG 2000 PAVEMENT 350.5627.7001 98463 12/08/00 012754 BREZDEN PEST CONTROL QTRLY PEST CONTROL-CITY HALL 010.4213.5303 98463 12/08/00 012754 BREZDEN PEST CONTROL QTLY PEST CONTROL-C/B 010.4213.5303 984.64 12/OB/00 013026 BRISCO MILL & LUMBER DRILL BITS/FIXTURE 010.4213.5604 98464 12/OB/00 013026 BRISCO MILL & LUMBER BITS/BUNGIE CORDS 612.4610.5603 98464 12/08/00 013026 BRISCO MILL & LUMBER SPRAY PAINT/DRILL BITS 010.4420.5605 98464 12/08/00 013026 BRISCO MZLL & LUNIDER WIREWHEELS 640.4712.5610 98464 12/08/00 013026 BRISCO MILL � LUNIDER OIL 640.4712.5610 98464 12/08/00 013026 BRISCO MILL & LUhIDER PIPE PLUGS 640.4712.5610 98464 12/08/00 013026 BRISCO MILL & LUMBER WASHERS 640.4712.5610 98464 12/08/00 013026 BRISCO MILL & LUNBER SCREWS/GLIDES 010.4420.5605 98464 12/OB/00 013026 BRISCO MILL & LUhIDER SHELF BRACKETS.SPRAY PAINT 010.4213.5604 98465 12/08/00 102111 KAY BYRD REF.PARK DEPOSIT-BYRD 010.0000.4354 98466 12/OB/00 018642 CA.ST.DEPT.SOCIAL SERVI ANNTJAL LIC-FAC#401711736 010.4425.5255 98467 12/08/00 016146 CALIF.HWY PRODUCTS & SI 2 WAY REFLECTIVE MP.RKERS 220.4303.5613 98467 12/08/00 016146 CALIF.HWY PRODUCTS & SI 2 WAY REFLECTIVE MARKERS 220.4303.5613 98467 12/OB/00 016146 CALIF.HWY PRODUCTS & SI 2 WAY REFLECTIVE MARKERS 220.4303.5255 98468 12/08/00 016692 CALIF.PEAC£ OFFZCER'S A REGIS-C.HENDRICKS/D.SANCHEZ 010.4201.5501 98469 12/OB/00 101283 CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC SUP CIR HPS LAMPS 010.4201.5604 98470 12/OB/00 023322 CHRISTIANSON CHEVROLET ANTENNA ADAPTOR 010.4420.5601 98470 12/OB/00 023322 CFII2ISTIANSON CHEVROLET SPSTEV BRACKET 010.4201.5601 ITEM AMOUNT 6.43 16.02 110.39 259.86 26.16 100.00 7.73 100.90 7.19 24.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 10,041.96 89.00 136.00 189.92 19.71 13.26 6.41 2.35 2.30 1.20 21.69 41.60 25.00 500.00 315.17 321.26 71.00 102.00 51.48 10.56 36.39 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 239.41 370.25 28.16 107.73 100.90 7.19 124.00 10,041.96 225.00 298.44 25.00 500.00 707.43 102.00 51.48 46.95 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 12/06/00 08:42 � VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUNIDER DATE NUhffiER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 98471 12/OS/00 023634 CLASSIC TEES & SIGNS S/BALL LEAGUE-AWARDS TEE'S 010.4424.5257 98472 12/08/00 100701 COPWARE SOURCEBOOK-PENAL/�JEH.CODES 010.4201.5255 98473 12/08/00 102107 WENDY CUNNINGHAM REF:PARK DEPOSIT-CUNNZNGHAM 010.0000.4354 98474 12/08/00 029250 J.B. DEWAR,INC. OIL 612.4610.5603 98474 12/08/00 029250 J.B. DEWAR,INC. OZL 220.4303.5601 98474 12/08/00 029250 J.B. DEWAR,INC. OIL 010.4201.5601 98474 12/08/00 029250 J.B. DEWAR,INC. OIL 010.4420.5601 98475 12/08/00 102106 JANNELLE DI FRONZO REF:PARK DEPOSIT-DI FRONZO 010.0000.4354 98476 12/08/00 102109 LZZBETH DZAZ REF.PARK DEPOSIT-DIAZ 010.0000.4354 98477 12/08/00 029484 DIESELRO ZNC. BIT INSPECTZON-PW41 220.4303.5601 98477 12/08/00 029484 DIESELRO INC. BIT INSPECTION-PW19 220.4303.5601 98477 12/OB/00 029484 DIESELRO INC. BIT INSPECTION-PW 50 220.4303.5601 98477 12/OB/00 029484 DIESELRO INC. BIT INSPECTION-PW 50 612.4610.5601 98477 12/08/00 029484 DIESELRO INC. BIT INSPECTION-PW 50 640.4712.5601 98477 12/08/00 029484 DIESELRO INC. SAFETY ZNSPECTION-P31 010.4420.5601 98477 12/OS/00 029484 DIESELRO INC. BIT INSPECTION-PW27 220.4303.5601 98477 12/08/00 029484 DIESELRO INC. SAFETY INSPECTION-PW32 640.4712.5601 98477 12/OB/00 029484 DIESELRO INC. SAFETY INSPECTION-PW51 612.4fi10.5601 98478 12/08/00 029562 DISCOUNT SCFIOOL SUPPLY TOYS/SUPPLIES-CHILDREN MOTION 010.4425.5255 98479 12/OB/00 102110 GABRIEL DONALD REII•ID.EMSA/EMT/FINGERPRINTS 010.4211.5501 98480 12/08/00 101379 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,IN VALVE HANDWHEELS 612.4610.5610 98480 12/08/00 101379 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,IN FLOW INDICATOR 640.4712.5611 98480 12/08/00 101379 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,IN AIR/VACUUM VALVE 640.4712.5610 98480 12/08/00 101379 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,IN BALLCORPS 640.4712.5610 98480 12/08/00 101379 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,IN CR:BALLCORPS 640.4712.5610 98481 12/08/00 100137 FIVE CITIES YOUTH FOOTB REF.PARK DEPOSIT-5 CITIES YOUT 010.0000.4354 98482 12/08/00 100691 FINE CITIES-TIMES LEGAL 79581 010.4002.5301 98482 12/08/00 100691 FIVE CITIES-TIMES LEGAL 79582 010.4002.5301 98482 12/08/00 100691 FIVE CITZES-TIMES LEGAL 79585 010.4002.5301 98482 12/08/00 100691 FIVE CITIES-TIMES LEGAL $1373 010.4002.5301 98482 12/OB/00 100691 FIVE CSTIES-TIMES LEGAL 81397 010.4002.5301 98482 12/08/00 100691 FIVE CITIES-TIMES LEGAL 81405 010.4002.5301 98483 12/08/00 102108 AMANDA FLORES REF:PARK DEPOSIT-FLORES 010.0000.4354 98484 12/08/00 035802 FRANK'S LOCK & KEY INC REPR.LOCK 010.4420.5605 98484 12/08/00 035802 FRANK'S LOCK & KEY 2NC DUP.KEYS/ID TAGS 010.4420.5605 98484 12/08/00 035802 FRANK'S LOCK & KEY INC DUP.KEYS/LOCKS 010.4420.5605 98484 12/08/00 035802 FRANK'S LOCK & KEY INC DUP.KEYS 010.4420.5605 99484 12/OB/00 035802 FRANK'S LOCK fi KEY INC MASTERLOCK 010.4201.5601 ITEM AMOUNT 2,869.29 378.38 53.00 23.42 23.42 23.42 23.43 25.00 25.00 48.00 48.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 48.00 48.00 48.00 48.00 23.92 364.00 64.35 1,064.87 261.69 163.61 163.61- 25.00 178.75 31.50 49.50 88.50 64.50 28.50 25.00 45.00 7.78 91.38 34.27 S.5'8 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 2,889.29 378.38 53.00 93.69 25.00 25.00 336.00 23.92 364.00 1,390.91 25.00 44i.25 25.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 12/06/00 08:42 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 VOUCfiER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUNIDER DATE NUNIDER NAME DESCRIPTION NUhIDER 98484 12/08/00 035802 FRANK'S LOCK & KEY INC DUP.KEYS/SCREW DRIVER 010.4420.5605 98484 12/08/00 035602 FRANK'S LOCK & KEY INC REMOVE BROKEN KEY 010.4201.5601 98485 12/08/00 100700 G& M MOHILE SERVICE TUNE-UP/SVC-PS 010.4430.5601 98485 12/08/00 100700 G& M MOBZLE SERVICE R/R REAR BRAKE SHOES 010.4430.5601 98485 12/08/00 100700 G& M MOBILE SERVICE LUBE/OIL/FILTER/SERVICE 010.4430.5601 98486 12/08/00 036738 GALL'S INC SAFETY HEADSET BOOM MIC SET 010.4201.5606 98487 12%08/00 101103 GARVEY EQIIIPMENT COMPAN HAND GUARD KIT 220.4303.5603 98487 12/08/00 101103 GARVEY EQUIPMENT COMPAN BRUSH BLADES 220.4303.5603 98487 12/08/00 101103 GARVEY EQUIPMENT COMPAN LINE & AIR FILTERS 220.4303.5603 98488 12/08/00 100099 HAYWARD LUhIDER GUARDRAIL POSTS 220.4303.5613 98489 12/08/00 102083 ICMA DISTRIBUTZON CENTE FREIGHT FOR BEYOND DATA 010.4201.5201 98490 12/OB/00 044304 IMPULSE MFG. HARDFACE BACKFIOE BUCKET 640.4712.5603 98490 12/OB/00 044304 IMPULSE MFG. HARDFACE BACKHOE BUCKET 612.4610.5603 98491 12/08/00 101848 3NVENSYS METERING SYSTE WATER REGISTER/HOUSING ASSEMB 640.4712.5207 98492 12/08/00 046410 J.W.ENTERPRISES TOILET RENTAL 220.4303.5552 98493 12/08/00 046'722 JERRY'S SPORT CENTER, I BLACKHAWK TFiERMOBAK 700Z 010.4201.5255 96494 12/08/00 101604 BARBIE JONES REIhffi.SNACK SUPPLIES-JONES 010.4425.5259 98494 12/OS/00 101604 BARBIE JONES REIhffi.SUPPLIES-JONES 010.4425.5255 98494 12/08/00 101604 BARBIE JONES REIMB.MILEAGE-JONES 010.4425.5303 98495 12/08/00 047814 KAUTZ TOWING TOWING & STORAGE-IMPOUND VEH 010.4201.5324 98496 12/08/00 100889 KELLEY DISPLAY,INC. HOLIDAY LIGHT BUI,BS 010.4420.5605 98497 12/OB/00 100869 KIS COMMUNICATIONS,INC JUL/AUG/SEPT-INTERNET/E-MAZL 010..4140.5303 98498 12/08/00 050894 LAWSON PRODUCTS,INC. DRILL BITS/CLOTH TAPE/SCREWS 010.4211.5601 98498 12/OS/00 050894 LAWSON PRODUCTS,INC. SEVEN CON CABLE 010.4211.5601 98499 12/OS/00 053118 LUCIA MAR UN.SCH.DIST. GYM CHARGES-VOLLEYHALL CLASSES 010.4424.5251 98500 12/OB/00 054494 CATHY MALLORY REINID.PRE-SCHOOL SUPPLIES 010.4423.5253 98501 12/08/00 101252 MCI WORLDCOM CALLING CARD SVC 010.4211.5403 98502 12/08/00 056628 MID STATE BANK-MASTERCA GASOLINE 010.4201.5608 98502 12/08/00 056628 MID STATE BANK-MASTERCA TRAINING EXPENSES 010.4201.5501 98502 12/OS/00 056628 MID STATE BANK-MASTERCA BATTERY FOR LAPTOP 010.4140.5607 96502 12/08/00 056628 MID STATE BANK-MASTERCA PRINTER CARTRIDGES 010.4201.5201 98502 12/08/00 056628 MID STATE BANK-MASTERCA PUBL2CATIONS 010.4201.5255 98502 12/08/00 056628 MID STATE BANK-MASTERCA RED RZBBON ACTIVITY 010.4201.5504 ITEM AMOUNT 19.73 15.00 152.15 193.73 234.68 92.60 29.83 432.03 229.23 232.09 2.54 181.19 181.19 2,142.43 91.73 302.85 6.16 52.32 60.46 64.00 100.51 359.70 483.59 202.30 432.00 67.49 2.47 120.69 94.47 161.50 47.17 76.54 46.24 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 218.74 580.56 92.60 691.09 232.09 2.54 362.38 2,142.43 91.73 302.85 118.96 64.00 100.51 359.70 685.89 432.00 67.49 2.47 546.61 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 12/06/00 08:42 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUhIDER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUhIDER 98503 12/OB/00 056394 MIDAS MUFFLER & BRAKE COOLER LZNE/LUBE/OIL/FILTER 010.4201.5601 98503 12/08/00 056394 MIDAS MUFFLER & BRAKE LUBE/OIL/FILTER/OIL COOLER LIN 010.4201.5601 98504 12/08/00 056940 MIER BROS. TOP SOIL/FOREST BLEND 010.4430.5605 98506 12/08/00 057096 MZNER'S ACE HARDWARE ELECT.SUPPLIES/DELTA KIT 010.4213.5604 98506 12/08/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE DUCK TAPE/BULBS 010.4424.5252 98506 12/08/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE CLIPS/BATTERIES 010.4211.5272 98506 12/08/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE RANGE SUPPLZES 010.4201.5605 98506 12/08/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE KNEE PAD 640.4712.5255 98506 12/08/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE PHILLIPS FLAT HEADS 220.4303.5613 98506 12/08/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE NUTS/BOLTS 220.4303.5613 98506 12/08/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE PVC NIPPLES 010.4420.5605 98506 12/08/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE SPRAY PAINT 010.4420.5605 98506 12/08/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE PIPE 010.4211.5603 98506 12/08/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HP,RDWARE HOOKS/LAP LINK 220.4303.5613 98506 12/08/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HP,RDWARE DRILL BITS 220.4303.5613 98506 12/08/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE HOSE WASHERS 640.4712.5610 98506 12/08/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 010.4420.5605 98506 12/08/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE ELECT.TAPE 010.4420.5605 98506 12/08/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE MISC HARDWARE 220.4303.5613 98506 12/08/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE DUCT TAPE/SCREWDRIVER/LIGHTS 010.4420.�605 98506 12/08/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE PIPE TEE/NIPPLES 640.4712.5610 98506 12/08/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE BULBS 010.4420.5605 98506 12/OB/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE MISC.HARDWARE 612.4610.5610 98507 12/08/00 057174 MZSSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 98507 12/OB/00 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 98507 12/08/00 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 98508 12/08/00 053428 MPH INDUSTRIES,INC. REPR.RADAR UNITS 98509 12/08/00 059124 MUSTANG TREE CARE REMOVAL TREE-LEPOINT 98510 12/08/00 100202 NAT'L VOLUNTEER FIRE CO NVFC ANN[JAL MEMBERSHIP DUES 98511 12/08/00 062712 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE DRILL 98511 12/OB/00 062712 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE WASHERS 220.4303.5201 612.4610.5201 220.4303.5201 010.4201.5603 220.4303.5303 010.4211.5503 220.4303.5273 220.4303.5613 98512 12/08/00 063882 PACIFIC APPAREL & SPORT YOUTH H/BALL REFEREE SUPPLIES 010.4426.6201 98513 12/08/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL PHONE 489-2345 010.4145.5}03 98513 12/08/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL MIS DATA LINE 473-0379 010.4140.5303 98513 12/08/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL PHONE 489-2174 010.4201.5403 98513 12/08/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL PHONE 473-2198 010.4145.5403 98513 12/08/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL PHONE 473-5100 010.4145.5403 98513 12/08/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL PHONE 473-5141 010.4145.5403 98513 12/OB/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL PHONE 481-6944 010.4201.5403 98514 12/OB/00 064194 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRIC 010.4304.5402 98514 12/08/00 064194 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRZC 640.4712.5402 PAGE .5 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 202.38 194.99 397.37 8.96 8.96 23.03 7.58 28.36 33.98 13.93 29.42 60.53 9.22 8.56 11.04 15.37 83.85 2.86 12.70 .95 5.31 73.35 18.17 4.28 .62 7.61 78.35 14.47 420.34 325.00 50.00 144.99 11.67 296.71 33.95 91.54 34.14 66.88 1,170.45 230.83 135.53 976.72 195.71 443.11 100.43 420.34 325.00 50.00 156.66 296.71 1,763.32 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 12/06/00 08:42 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK �IENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NU[•IDER DATE NONffiER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 98514 12/08/00 064194 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRIC 640.4711.5402 98514 12/08/00 064194 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRZC 612.4610.5402 98514 12/08/00 064194 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRIC 010.4145.5401 98514 12/08/00 064194 PACIFZC GAS & ELECTRZC ELECTT2IC 217.4460.5355 98514 12/08/00 064194 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRIC 010.4304.5402 98514 12/08/00 064194 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ELECTRIC 010.4304.5402 98515 12/08/00 066320 PIONEER EQUIPMENT C0. SVC.BACKFiOE 010.4420.5603 98515 12/08/00 066320 PIONEER EQUIPMENT C0. BACKHOE SVC 220.4303.5603 98516 12/OB/00 101046 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPP CLEANING SUPPLIES 010.4213.5604 98517 12/08/00 069576 RADIO SHACK ADAPTER FOR CHIEF'S COMPUTER 010.4201.5255 98517 12/08/00 069576 RADIO SHACK ADAPTER PACK 010.4201.5255 98518 12/OB/00 100066 RICKER MACHIiVERY CO ASPHALT DIAMOND BLP.DES 220.4303.5255 98518 12/OB/00 100066 RICKER MACHINERY CO ASPHALT DIAMOND BLADES 640.4�12.5610 98519 12/08/00 072638 S& L SAFETY PRODUCTS WYPALL SHOP TOWELS 010.4420.5605 98520 12/08/00 078156 SEBASTZAN OIL DISTRIB. GASOLINE/DIESEL FUEL 010.4211.5608 98520 12/08/00 078156 SEBASTIAN OIL DISTRIB. GASOLINE 010.4201.5608 98521 12/OB/00 101556 DIANE SHEELEY REINID.TRAVEL CONCORD 284.4103.5501 98522 12/08/00 101510 ANITA SHOCK REF.PARK DEPOSIT-SHOCK 010.0000.4354 98523 12/08/00 100304 SMITH PZPE & SUPPLY SHAWTOWN DEEP ROOT PLANTERS 010.4420.5605 98524 12/08/00 081120 SO CALIF MUNI ATHL FED SCMAF DUES-PERRIN 010.4424.5257 98525 12/08/00 060886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY FLOOR MATS 010.4301.5601 98525 12/08/00 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY CR:PLASTIC CONTAINERS O/PAY 010.4305.5255 98526 12/08/00 083226 SUNSET NORTH CAR WASH CAR WASHES 640.4712.5601 98526 12/OB/00 083226 SUNSET NORTH CAR WASH CAR WASHES 220.4303.5601 98526 12/08/00 083226 SUNSET NORTH CAR WASH CAR WASHES 010.4301.5601 98526 12/OB/00 083226 SUNSET NORTH CAR WASA CAR WASHES 010.4201.5601 98526 12/08/00 083226 SUNSET NORTFI CAR WASH CR:CAR WASH 010.4201.5601 98526 12/OB/00 083226 SUNSET NORTH CAR WASH CR:CAR WASH 612.4610.5601 98526 12/OB/00 083226 SUNSET NORTH CAR WASH CR:CAR WASH 010.4301.5601 98526 12/OB/00 083226 SUNSET NORTH CAR WASH CR:CAR WASH 220.4303.5601 98526 12/08/00 083226 SUNSET NORTH CAR WASH CR:CAR WASH 010.4305.5601 98526 12/08/00 083226 SUNSET NORTH CAR WASH CR:CAR WASH 010.4420.5601 98527 12/08/00 084084 TAYLOR'S TUNE-UP SHOP TUNE-UP 010.4420.5601 98528 12/OB/00 085644 TOSTE GRADING & PAVZNG TACK OIL 220.4303.5613 98529 12/OB/00 086034 TRI-CITY DISPOSAL SERVI DISPOSAL SERVICES 010.4213.5303 98529 12/08/00 086034 TRI-CITY DZSPOSAL SERVI DISPOSAL SERVICES 010.4213.5303 ITEM AMOUNT 2,509.79 698.15 5,339.47 7.29 44.70 11,907.18 1,063.26 595.15 48.99 5.35 10.71 23'7 . 98 237.99 75.02 284.80 1,298.74 13.50 25.00 466.61 25.00 18.22 4.28- 71.95 11.66 45.77 153.45 121.00- 45.00- 6.00- 15.00- 8.50- 7.50- 204.61 112.50 380.21 145.96 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 21,679.01 1,678.41 48.99 16.06 475.97 75.02 1,583.54 13.50 25.00 466.61 25.00 13.94 79.83 204.61 112.50 526.17 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 12/06/00 08:42 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK �1ENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUNBER DATE NUhIDER NAME DESCRIPTION NUhIDER 98530 12/OS/00 086346 TROESH READY MIX CONCRETE/ASPHALT WASTE 220.4303.5307 98531 12/OB/00 086384 TROXELL ENTERPRISES ACTIVATION OF PHONE JACK-ER 010.4211.5324 98532 12/08/00 087242 UI,TRA-CHEM, INC REMOVES-ALL WIPES 010.4213.5604 98533 12/OB/00 088084 UNITED GRE£N MARK,INC. RAINBIRD NO22LES 010.4420.5605 98533 12/OB/00 088084 UNITED GREEN MARK,INC. SPRINKLER PARTS 010.4420.5605 98534 12/08/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-CIP INSPECTOR 350.5630.7301 98534 12/08/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-CIP ZNSPECTOR 350.5631.7301 98534 12/08/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-FIRE CHIEF 010.4211.5403 98534 12/08/00 102007 VERZZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-ENG. 6695 010.4211.5403 98534 12/OB/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONES-PD PATROL CARS 010.4201.5403 98535 12/08/00 101866 VERIZON WZRELESS MESSAG FIRE PAGERS 010.4211.5403 98535 12/08/00 101866 VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAG MIS PAGER 010.4140.5303 98536 12/08/00 101111 ANTHONY VIOLA REF.L/SCAPE BOND-750 AGUZLAS Ol0.OQ00.2210 98537 12/OB/00 090480 WAYNE'S TIRE RIH TIRES 010.4420.5603 98538 12/08/00 091026 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. CA CODES-CD ROM SUBSCRIPTION 010.4003.5503 98539 12/08/00 092586 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC COM OCT.SIGNAL MAINT 010.4304.5303 98540 12/08/00 094146 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES STREET NAME 3IGN BLANKS 220.4303.5613 TOTAL CHECKS ITEM AMOUNT 51.66 130.00 235.03 4.42 11.53 29.61 29.61 31.52 21.76 304.56 153.48 10.61 1,200.00 34.07 141.57 1,212.75 498.07 PAGE � CHECK AMOUNT 51.66 130.00 235.03 15.95 417.06 164.09 1,200.00 34.07 141.57 1,212.75 498.07 87,527.48 _J VOIICEII2E2 12/06/00 08:42 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 PAGE 8 FUND TITLE O10 GENERAL FUND 217 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 220 STREETS FUND 284 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUND 350 CAPITAL ZMPROVEMENT FUND 612 SEWER FUND 640 WATER FUND AMOUNT 63,932.10 7.29 5,166.18 262.08 10,108.37 1,224.62 6,826.84 TOTAL 87,527.48 ATTACHMENT 6 VOUCHRE2 ' CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 12/13/00 09:17 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUNIDER DATE NUhIDER NAME DESCRIPTION NUNffiER 325 12/OS/00 101589 CALPERS CITY AEALTH 12/00 011.0000.2109 326 12/O5/00 098340 DELTA DENTAL CITY DENTAL ADJ-12/00 011.0000.2110 327 12/07/00 005616 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE G.A.REIMB.11-30-00 P/R 011.0000.1015 328 12/07/00 098350 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT SIT 12-07-00 SICK LVE CKS 011.0000.2108 328 12/07/00 098350 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT SDI 12-07-00 SICK LVE CKS 011.0000.2111 90129 12/07/00 098535 MID STATE BANK FIT 12-07 SICK LVE CKS 011.0000.2104 90129 12/07/00 098535 MID STATE BANK FICA 12-07 SICK L�JE CKS 011.0000.2105 98540 12/15/00 000234 A& R WELDING SUPPLY OXY & ACETYLENE GASES 010.4305.5303 96541 12/15/00 102127 A.G.P.D.DARE SUPPLIES-BICYCLE RODEO 010.4201.5504 96542 12/15/00 100897 AMERICAN TEMPS RHINEHART SVCS-12/2 220.4303.5303 98543 12/1S/00 100064 ARROYO DRUG C0. ASPRIN 010.4301.5201 98544 12/15/00 006006 ARROYO GRANDE FLOWER SH FLOWERS-ALLEN/WILLIAMS G10.4201.5504 98545 12/15/00 007176 ATCO INTERNATIONAL DEGREASER 010.4305.5255 98546 12/15/00 009906 RITCHIE BARRETT FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98547 12/15/00 009750 BRENDA BARROW PRESCAOOL DOLLS 010.4423.5253 98548 12/15/00 102112 ERIK BASKIN FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98549 12/15/00 101758 JOIIN BOVA FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98550 12/15/00 012090 JO BOYD BRIDGE CLASSES-BOYD 010.4424.5351 98550 12/15/00 012090 JO BOYD BRIDGE CLASSES-BOYD 010.4424.5351 98551 12/15/00 101117 BRANCA STREET DELI LUNCH SUPPLIES-MANAGEMENT TEAM 010.4101.5201 98552 12/15/00 012480 CARL BRANDT FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98553 12/15/00 102121 JANET BRASFIELD REF.PARK DEPOSIT-BRASFIELD 010.0000.4354 98554 12/15/00 100196 PETER BRINKERHOFF FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/.DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98555 12/15/00 100921 JOSEPH E BUTTERS FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98556 12/15/00 021940 C.COAST TAXI CAB SERVIC TAXI SVCS-NOV.15-30 225.4553.5507 98557 12/15/00 018330 CA.ST.DEPT.OF JUSTICE FINGERPRINTS-COOPER/HP,RRIS/BEJ 010.4201.5324 98557 12/15/00 018330 CA.ST.DEPT.OF JUSTICE F2NGERPRINTS-PRUITT 010.4301.5315 98557 12/15/00 018330 CA.ST.DEPT.OF JUSTICE FINGERPRINTS-BEARD 010.4425.5315 98557 12/15/00 018330 CA.ST.DEPT.OF JUSTICE MAINT-OUTSIDE BLDG.LIGHTS 010.4201.5604 ITEM AMOUNT 39,314.42 362.10 10,634.67 57.36 34.60 200.23 1,730.70 14.00 322.26 703.20 9.53 91.16 329.85 10.00 37.53 15.00 15.00 42.00 21.00 87.95 30.00 25.00 30.00 30.00 1,407.00 164.00 56.00 81.00 162.33 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 39,314.42 362.10 10,634.67 91.96 1,930.93 14.00 322.2E 703.20 9.53 91.16 329.85 10.00 37.53 15.00 15.00 63.00 87.95 30.00 25.00 30.00 30.00 1,407.00 483.33 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 12/13/00 09:17 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION . NUh1BER 98558 12/15/00 101464 CELSOC PUBLICATIONS 010.4130.5503 98559 12/15/00 021918 CENTRAL COAST SUPPLY P.TOWELS/T.PAPER/LINERS 010.4213.5604 98559 12/15/00 021918 CENTRAL COAST SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 010.4213.5604 98559 12/15/00 021918 CENTRAL COAST SUPPLY LINERS 220.4303.5255 98560 12/15/00 023088 CHERRY LANE NURSERY TREES 010.4420.5308 98560 12/15/00 023088 CHERRY LANE NURSERY TREE/SANDERS BOX 010.4420.5605 98560 12/15/00 023088 CHERRY LANE NURSERY POINTSETTIAS 010.4420.5605 98561 12/15/00 023322 CHRISTIANSON CHEVROLET SMOG INSPECT-PW14 010.4301.5601 98562 12/15/00 024492 COLD CANYON LAND FILL DISP.EMPTY PESTICIDE CONTAINER 010.4420.5307 98563 12/15/00 026598 JOHN CROTTY FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98564 12/15/00 026754 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C BOTTLED WATER 010.4001.5201 98565 12/15/.00 026832 CUESTA EQUIPMENT CO STEEL TOE BOOTS/FUNNELS 010.4420.5605 98565 12/15/00 026832 CUESTA EQUIPMENT CO METAL HOLE SAW 612.4610.5273 98565 12/15/00 026832 CUESTA EQUIPMENT CO DRILL BITS 6�2.4610.5273 98565 12/15/00 026832 CUESTA EQUIPMENT CO HANDLE/SORBENT 010.4420.5605 98565 12/15/00 026832 CUESTA EQUIPMENT CO CUT OFF SAW BLADES 640.4712.5255 98565 12/15/00 026832 CUESTA EQUIPMENT CO RUBBER BOOTS/GLASSES 640.4712.5255 98566 12/15/00 027534 D.G.REPAIR R/R STARTER & BATTERY 010.4420.5601 98567 12/15/00 028548 DAYSTAR INDUSTRIES STREET SWEEPING 612.4610.5303 98568 12/15/00 101969 DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIA COPIER LEASE-#93791 010.4421.5303 98569 12/15/00 100197 JEREMY DENTON FIRE MILEAGE-JL7LY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98570 12/15/00 102113 NICHOLAS DEPEW FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98571 12/15/00 102110 GABRIEL DONALD FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98572 12/15/00 102114 WAYNE DOOLEY FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98573 12/15/00 033072 FARM SUPPLY CO. SPRINKLERS 010.4420.5605 98574 12/15/00 101924 J.A. FISCHER,INC. GASOLINE 010.0000.1202 98575 12/15/00 100691 FIVE CITIES-TIMES LEGAL 81326 010.4130.5301 98575 12/15/00 100691 FI\7E CITIES-TIMES LEGAL 81327 010.4130.5301 98575 12/15/00 100691 FIVE CITIES-TIMES LEGAL 81328 010.4130.5301 98576 12/15/00 035802 FRANK'S LOCK & KEY INC REPR.DOOR LOCK 010.4301.5601 98576 12/15/00 035802 FRANK'S LOCK & ICEY INC DUP.KEYS/RINGS/TAGS 010.4305.5255 98577 12/15/00 100524 FREDERICK PTJMP CO. PUMP SEALS/GASKETS 640.4712.5610 ITEM AMOUNT 112.96 478.98 90.22 135.14 462.19 52.39 16.06 41.25 12.00 30.00 15.00 47.85 56.84 36.63 49.50 32.60 28.05 108.67 5,176.33 141.25 30.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 69.63 13,694.54 54.00 52.50 51.00 40.00 7.56 519.73 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 112.96 704.34 530.64 41.25 12.00 30.00 15.00 251.47 108.67 5,176.33 141.25 30.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 69.63 13,694.54 157.50 47.56 519.73 � I ! VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 12/13/00 09:17 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 VOUCH�R/ ' CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUNIDER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NU[+ffiER 96578 12/15/00 036786 GAR BAR LIMITED DRAINAGE REIMB-7/00 010.0000.2220 98579 12/15/00 102115 DAVE GOSSMAN FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98580 12/15/00 039390 GROVER TOOL RENTAL RENTAL-LOG SPLITTER 220.4303.5552 98581 12/15/00 100913 SEAN F HAGERTY FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98582 12/15/00 102123 FLOYD HALFERTY REF.L/SCAPE BOND-740 ARABZAN 010.0000.2210 98583 12/15/00 101088 HANSON AGGREGATES ASPHALT 220.4303.5613 98584 12/15/00 041184 HEACOCK WELDING NORTH STEEL TUBING 010.4430.5605 98585 12/15/00 100914 CASEY L. HIDLE FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98586 12/15/00 042174 HIGGINS ASSOCIATE, INC UPDATE PLAN ELEMENT POLICIES 010.4130.5318 . 98587 12/15/00 042302 HINDERLITER,DE LLAMAS SALES TAX REPORT 2Q 00/O1 010.4120.5303 98587 12/15/00 042302 HINDERLITER,DE LLAMAS SALES TAX RECOVERED CONTRACT 010.4120.5303 98588 12/15/00 102129 HOUSE OF ANOTHER TYME LODGING-MANAGEMENT TEAM-THOM 010.4101.5501 98589 12/15/00 043758 ICMA MEMBER SVCS. ICMA DUES-ADAMS 010.4101.5503 98590 12/15/00 044772 INT'L ASSN.CHIEFS OF PO IACP DUES-TERBORCH 010.4201.5503 98591 12/15/00 100915 PATRICK J. IREY FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98592 12/15/00 046098 J C LANDSCAPING LANDSCAPE MAINT. 010.4420.5303 98592 12/15/00 046098 J C LANDSCAPING LANDSCAPE MAINT. 217.4460.5356 98593 12/15/00 046176 J J'S FOOD COMPANY SUPPLIES-MANAGEMENT TEAM 010.4101.5201 98593 12/15/00 046176 J J'S FOOD COMPANY CMC SUPPLIES 220.4303.5613 98593 12/15/00 046176 J J'S FOOD COMPANY CC REORGANIZATION SUPPLIES 010.4001.5201 96594 12/15/00 046332 J P TOOL REPAIR SAW PARTS 220.4303.5603 98595 12/15/00 100087 HOLLY JARRATT JAZZERCISE CLASSES 010.4424.5351 96596 12/15/00 102122 CAROLYN JOHNSON REF.PARK DEPOSIT-JOHNSON 010.0000.4354 98597 12/15/00 047736 JERRY KAUFMAN FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98598 12/15/00 048360 LINDA KEY REINffi.SUPPLIES-KEY 010.4423.5253 98599 12/15/00 100922 MICHAEL R KING FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98600 12/15/00 100916 GREG KLOSINSKI FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98601 12/15/00 102116 ROBERT KRUSE FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 ITEM AMOUNT 4,240.00 15.00 75.00 15.00 1,200.00 34.01 35.18 30.00 5,286.50 975.00 71.55 106.00 720.00 100.00 30.00 380.00 120.00 58.33 49.25 15.80 48.69 372.76 25.00 30.00 56.03 30.00 30.00 15.00 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 4,240.00 15.00 75.00 15.00 1,200.00 34.01 35.18 30.00 5,286.50 1,046.55 106,00 720.00 100.00 30.00 500.00 123.38 48.69 372.76 25.00 30.00 56.03 30.00 30.00 15.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 12/13/00 09:17 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUNIDER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NU[vIDER 98602 12/15/00 051168 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CI EMPLOYEE RELATIONS CONFERENCE 010.4101.5501 98603 12/15/00 102126 STACIA LYNCH REF.PARKING CITE#D10423 010.0000.4203 98604 12/15/00 053274 LYON & CARMEL PROF.LEGAL SVCS-NOV 010.4003.5304 98605 12/15/00 100917 RYAN S. MALONEY FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98606 12/15/00 054678 MANKINS FAMILY RENTALS REIMB.PROP.TAX 007-192-067 751.4555.5551 98607 12/15/00 100918 CHRISTOPHER L. MARSHALL FIRE MILEAGE-Ji7LY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98608 12/15/00 056394 MIDAS MUFFLER & BRAKE LUBE/OIL/FILTER/SAFETY INSP 010.4301.5601 98608 12/15/00 056394 MIDAS MUFFLER & BRAKE CATALYTIC CONVERTER/TIE RODS 220.4303.5601 98608 12/15/00 056394 MIDAS MUFFLER & BRAKE REPL.MASTER CYCLINDER 220.4303.5601 98608 12/15/00 056394 MIDAS MUFFLER & BRAKE SERVICE/BATTERY 640.4712.5601 98609 12/15/00 056940 MIER BROS. CONCRETE 612.4610.5610 98611 12/15/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE MAKE A GASKET 612.4610.5610 98611 12/15/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE BULBS/POLY FILM/WD 40 010.4430.5605 98611 12/15/OC 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE BLASTING SAND 010.4430.5605 98611 12/15/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE BLASTING SAND 010.4430.5605 98611 12/15/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE BLASTING SAND 010.4430.5605 98611 12/15/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE PLUNGER 010.4420.5605 98611 12/15/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE 9V BATTERY 640.4712.5255 98611 12/15/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE BLASTING SAND 010.4430.5605 98611 12/15/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE EPDXY/SPRAY PAINT 640.4712.5610 98611 12/15/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE KNEE PAD 640.4712.5255 98611 12/15/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HP,RDWARE NIPPLE 640.4712.5610 98611 12/15/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE NIPPLE 640.4712.5610 98611 12/15/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE BOLTS/NUTS/WASHERS/DRILL BIT 640.4712.5604 98611 12/15/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE BOLTS/NUTS/WASHERS/DRILL BIT 640.4712.5610 98611 12/15/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE BUBBLER 010.4420.5605 98611 12/15/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HP,RDWARE PAINT/SUPPLIES 640.4712.5609 98611 12/15/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE BROOM/DUSTPAN/EXT.CORD 010.4420.5605 98611 12/15/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE SPRAYER/SIMPLE GREEN 640.4712.5610 98611 12/15/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE WIRE CONNECTOR/NIPPLE 640.4712.5610 98611 12/15/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE FILM 640.4712.5255 98611 12/15/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE SPRINKLERS/COUPLERS/NIPPLES 010.4420.5605 98611 12/15/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE BOLTS/WASHERS 640.4712.5610 98612 12/15/00 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4130.5201 98612 12/15/00 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4421.5201 98612 12/15/00 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 010.4130.5201 98612 12/15/00 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 612.4610.5201 98613 12/15/00 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS 010.4213.5303 98613 12/15/00, 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS 010.4213.5303 98613 12/15/00 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS 220.4303.5143 98613 12/15/00 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS 640.4710.5143 ITEM AMOUNT 195.00 250.00 11,740.91 30.00 2,551.16 25.00 26.32 784.97 284.95 122.05 57.92 5.35 70.77 46.49 46.49 46.49 23.55 3.21 61.99 � 17.12 13.93 3.74 2.99 9.63 18.84 7.50 27.42 23.44 20.99 11.56 26.80 40.64 9.12 8.57- 10.55 40.54 50.31 107.85 83.76 134.25 64.24 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 195.00 250.00 11,740.91 30.00 2,551.16 25.00 1,216.29 57.92 538.06 92.83 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 12/13/00 09:17 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUNIDER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION N[JMBER 98613 12/15/00 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS 640.4712.5143 98613 12/15/00 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS 612.4610.5143 98613 12/15/00 057252 MZSSION UNIFORM SERVICE LTNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS 010.4420.5143 98613 12/15/00 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS 010.4305.5143 98613 12/15/00 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS 010.4213.5303 98613 12/15/00 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS 010.4102.5255 98613 12/15/00 057252 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS 010.4213.5303 98614 12/15/00 102128 MULLAHEY FORD REF.C/B.DEPOSIT-MULLAHEY FORD 010.0000.2206 96615 12/15/00 059436 DAVID NACCARATI FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98616 12/15/00 061814 NOBLE SAW,INC. FILTER/GREASE/SPRING 220.4303.5603 98616 12/15/00 061814 NOBLE SAW,INC. REPR.CUT OFF SAW 640.4712.5603 98616 12/15/00 061814 NOBLE SAW,INC. FILTERS/BAR/THROTTLE WIRE 220.4303.5603 98616 12/15/00 061814 NOBLE SAW,INC. RAPID LOADER-WEED TRINA7ER 220.4303.5603 98616 12/15/00 061814 NOBLE SAW,INC. BARS/CHAINS 220.4303.5603 98616 12/15/00 061814 NOBLE SAW,INC. CR:SPRING 220.4303.5603 96616 12/15/00 061814 NOBLE SAW,INC. PRO BAR 220.4303.5603 98616 12/15/00 061814 NOBLE SAW,INC. SPARK PLUGS 220.4303.5603 98617 12/15/00 101665 ONEMAIN.COM INTERNET SVC-ONEMAIN TO 12/20 010.4140.5607 98618 12/15/00 100919 MATTHEW M OSBORNE FIRE MILAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98619 12/15/00 063258 RANDY OUIMETTE FIRE MILEAGE-JUI,Y/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98620 12/15/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL L/DIST FAX 473-0386 010.4145.5403 98621 12/15/00 064038 PACIFIC COAST SEED,INC. 600 LBS SEED 010.4430.5605 98622 12/15/00 064258 PAGING NETWORK OF LA PAGING SERVICES-NOV 010.4421.5602 98623 12/15/00 100920 MATTHEW J PALM FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98624 12/15/00 066690 PITNEY BOWES SOFTGUARD AGREEMENT/PLAN 010.4101.5602 98624 12/15/00 066690 PITNEY BOWES POSTAGE METER RENTAL-3/31/O1 010.4101.5602 98625 12/15/00 100198 MATTHEW POLKOW FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98626 12/15/00 067548 POOR RICHARD'S PRESS CR:INVOICE 285366 010.4102.5306 98626 12/15/00 067548 POOR RICHP.RD'S PRESS BUSINESS CARDS REVISIONS 010.4102.5306 98626 12/15/00 067546 POOR RICHARD'S PRESS BUSINESS CARDS SETUP 010.4102.5306 98626 12/15/00 067548 POOR RICHARD'S PRESS BUSINESS CARDS PRINTED 010.4102.5306 98626 12/15/00 067548 POOR RICHARD'S PRESS COLOR COPIES-MISSING PERSON 010.4201.5201 r 98627 12/15/00 067782 DENNIS PORTE PUPPY PLAY SCHOOL CLASSES 010.4424.5351 96628 12/15/00 068874 PAUL QUINLAN FIRE MZLEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98629 12/15/00 102125 ROBERT REA REF.PARK DEPOSIT-REA 010.0000.4354 ITEM AMOUNT 80.00 42.25 90.00 56.70 26.50 5.80 39.34 250.00 30.00 121.94 97.99 209.10 58.97 367.97 9.44- 35.36 14.77 46.90 30.00 30.00 79.05 875.63 110.23 30.00 . 292.00 311.61 30.00 10.73- 50.94 19.94 163.40 46.89 535.50 30.00 25.00 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 730.69 250.00 30.00 896.66 46.90 30.00 30.00 79.05 875.63 110.23 30.00 603.61 30.00 270.34 535.50 30.00 25.00 i I VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 12/13/00 09:17 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUhIDER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 98630 12/15/00 102117 JESSE RIVERA FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98631 12/15/00 071292 LARRY D. RODKEY FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98632 12/15/00 072638 S& L SAFETY PRODUCTS TOWELS 010.4430.5605 98633 12/15/00 100192 SAN LUIS MAILING SVC UTILITY BILL MAILING 640.4710.5201 96634 12/15/00 075660 SAN LUIS PAINTS FIELD MARKING PAINT 010.4430.5605 98635 12/15/00 076740 SANTA MARIA TZMES LEGAL-78553 010.4130.5301 98635 12/15/00 076740 SANTA MARIA TIMES LEGAL-81706 010.4130.5301 98636 12/15/00 076848 LENNY DE LOS SANTOS TENNIS CLASSES-DE LOS $ANTOS 010.4424.5351 98636 12/15/00 076848 LENNY DE LOS SANTOS TENNIS CLASSES-DE LOS SANTOS 010.4424.5351 98637 12/15/00 077142 JOYCE SARLTWATARI REIMB.SUPPLIES 010.4423.5253 98638 12/15/00 102118 JEROME SCHULTZ FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98639 12/15/00 078156 SEBASTIAN OIL DISTRIB. GASOLINE 010.4201.5608 98640 12/15/00 102124 SHIRLEY SETU REF.PARK DEPOSIT-SETU 010.0000.4354 98641 12/15/00 079560 JEFF SILVA FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98642 12/15/00 079638 JOE SILVA FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 010:4211.5145 98643 12/15/00 073866 SLO CNTY AIR POLLUTION FUEL PERM#510-1(A-1055-P-1) 010.4305.5303 98644 12/15/00 074490 SLO CNTY DEPT.HEALTH CROSS CONNECTION FEE-SEPT/OCT 640.4710.5303 98645 12/15/00 080340 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP MISC.TOOLS 010.4305.5255 98646 12/15/00 100780 SOLTfH COUNTY QUILT GUIL REF.C/B.DEPOSIT-S.CNTY.QUILT 010.0000.2206 98647 12/15/00 080808 SOUTH SLO COUNTY SANIT SEWER HOOKUPS-11/00 760.0000.2305 98647 12/15/00 080808 SOUTH SLO COUNTY SANIT SEWER SVC COLL-11/00 760.0000.2304 98647 12/15/00 080808 SOUTH SLO COUNTY SANIT 11-1 SAN.DIST-214 E.BRANCA 010.4145.5401 98647 12/15/00 080808 SOUTH SLO COUNTY SANIT 11-1 SAN.DIST-215 E.BRANCH 010.4145.5401 98647 12/15/00 080808 SOUTH SLO COUNTY SANIT 11-1 SAN.DIST-208 E.BRANCH 010.4145.5401 98647 12/15/00 080808 SOUTH SLO COUNTY SANIT 11-1 SAN.DIST-211 VERNON 010.4145.5401 96647 12/15/00 080808 SOUTH SLO COUNTY SANIT 11-1 SAN.DIST-140 TRAF.WAY 010.4145.5401 96647 12/15/00 080808 SOUTH SLO COUNTY SANIT 11-1 SAN.DIST-STROTHER R/R 010.4145.5401 98648 12/15/00 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY FITTINGS 220.4303.5603 98648 12/15/00 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY SPOTLIGHT BULB 612.4610.5603 98648 12/15/00 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY SOCKET HOLI?ER 640.4712.5273 98648 12/15/00 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY UTILITY KNIFE/SPEAKER WIRE 640.4712.5273 98648 12/15/00 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY UTILITY KNIFE/SPEAKER WIRE 640.4712.5603 98648 12/15/00 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY TIRE CLEANER/PAD 640.4712.5603 ITEM AMOUNT 15.00 30.00 134.06 951.13 179.54 235.13 235.13 154.70 35.00 60.26 30.00 1,229.70 25.00 30.00 30.00 259.44 1,214.80 194.19 250.00 26,000.00 39,705.69 19.63 13.47 13.47 13.47 13.47 13.47 15.98 9.03 10.68 6.95 100.04 14.41 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 15.00 30.00 134.06 951.13 179.54 470.26 189.70 60.26 30.00 1,229.70 25.00 30.00 30.00 259.44 1,214.80 194.19 250.00 65,792.67 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 12/13/00 09:17 VOUCFIER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 VOUCHER/ CAECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NqMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION � 98648 12/15/00 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY BATTERIES 98648 12/15/00 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY MINI LAMP 98649 12/15/00 080964 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS GAS SERVICES 98649 12/15/00 060964 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS GAS SERVICES 98649 12/15/00 080964 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS GAS SERVICES 98649 12/15/00 080964 SOVfHERN CALIFORNIA GAS GAS SERVICES 98649 12/15/00 080964 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS GAS SERVICES 98649 12/15/00 080964 SOUTHERN CALI_FORNIA GAS GAS SERVICES 98649 12/15/00 080964 SOUT'HERN CALIFORNIA GAS GAS SERVICES 98649 12/15/00 080964 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS GAS SERVICES 98649 12/15/00 080964 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS GAS SERVICES 98650 12/15/00 081200 JEFF SOUZA DARE OFF.TRAINING-SOUZA 98651 12/15/00 102119 ANDREW SOWELL FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 98652 12/15/00 081978 STANLEY MOTORS SEAT BELTS 98653 12/15/00 082328 STERLING CONIl`�I[JNICATIONS SERVICE AGREEMENT 98653 12/15/00 082328 STERLING COhII�7UNICATIONS REPR.RADIO/BATTERY 98653 12/15/00 082328 STERLING COMMUNICA'PIONS REPR.RP,DAR TRAILER 98654 12/15/00 082486 STEWARD CO PRINTING SUPPLIES 98655 12/15/00 082992 GREGORY STUMPA FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 98656 12/15/00 102120 MITCH STUMPI-I FIRE MILEAGE-JLJLY/DEC.2000 98657 12/15/00 084162 ERIN TAYLOR MILEAGE REIMB-TAYLOR 98657 12/15/00 084162 ERIN TAYLOR DARE OFFICE TRAINING-TAYLOR 98658 12/15/00 100511 JASON TENYENHUIS FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000N 96659 12/15/00 086892 WINTON TULLIS FIRE MILEAGE-JULY/DEC.2000 98660 12/15/00 088424 URBAN FUTURES INC. PROFESSIONAL SVCS-RDA 98661 12/15/00 088826 PEGGY VALKO ART CLASSES-VALKO 98662 12/15/00 088842 VALLEY AUTO SERVICE BREAKMOUNT TIRE 98663 12/15/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-PKS SUPER 98663 12/15/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-PKS DIRECTOR 96663 12/15/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-PD 98663 12/15/00 102007 VERZZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-PD 98663 12/15/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-PD 98663 12/15/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-PD 98663 12/15/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PAONE-PD 98663 12/15/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-PD 98663 12/15/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-PD ACCOUNT NUMBER 010.4305.5255 220.4303.5601 010.4145.5401 010.4145.5401 010.4145.5401 010.4145.5401 010.4145.5401 010.4145.5401 010.4145.5401 010.4145.5401 010.4145.5401 010.4201.5501 010.4211.5145 220.4303.5601 010.4201.5606 220.4303.5603 010.4201.5601 010.4102.5255 010.4211.5145 010.4211.5145 010.4201.5606 010.4201.5501 010.4211.5145 010.4211.5145 284.4103.5303 010.4424.5351 010.4420.5603 010.4421.5602 010.4421.5602 010.4201.5403 010.4201.5403 010.4201.5403 010.4201.5403 010.4201.5403 010.4201.5403 010.4201.5403 ITEM AMOUNT 16.95 3.43 414.91 386.72 10.85 157.81 326.76 44.41 153.48 99.06 144.32 1,506.00 15.00 251.59 995.00 234.66 38.00 94.74 30.00 15.00 200.96 1,506.00 30.00 30.00 300..00 475.20 7.00 15.55 18.28 86.17 21.54 15.99 19.04 15.99 26.56 20.99 PAGE 7 CHECK AMOUNT 177.47 1,738.32 1,506.00 15.00 251.59 1,267.66 94.74 30.00 15.00 1,706.96 30.00 30.00 300.00 475.20 7.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 12/13/00 09:17 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUhIDER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NOI�ER 98663 12/15/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-PD JCTLY 2001 010.4201.5403 98663 12/15/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-CM 010.4101.5403 96663 12/15/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-CHAVEZ 010.4430.5605 98664 12/15/00 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. CREEKSIDE PATA 350.5607.7301 98664 12/15/00 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. OAK PARK HLVD.WIDENING 350.5609.7301 98664 12/15/00 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 350.5613.7701 98664 12/15/00 090246 JOIIN WALLACE & ASSOC. BRISCO/101 INTERCHANGE ALTS 350.5615.7301 98664 12/15/00 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. EL CAMPO/101 INTERCHANGE ALTS 350.5616.7301 98664 12/15/00 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. SPRING/00 PAVEMENT MAINT 350.5627.7301 98664 12/15/00 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. ROUTE 227 RELINQUISHMENT STUDY 350.5628.7701 98664 12/15/00 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. FAIR OAKS RECON/VALLEY TO TRAF 350.5630.7301 98664 12/15/00 090246 JOFIN WALLACE & ASSOC. TALLY HO RECON/227 TO LE POINT 350.5631.7001 96664 12/15/00 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. TALLY HO RECON/227 TO LE POINT 350.5631.7301 98664 12/15/00 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. TALLY HO RECON/227 TO LE POINT 350.5631.7502 98664 12/15/00 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. FAIR OAKS/VALLEY RD TRAFFIC SI 350.5636.7501 98664 12/15/00 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. DISASTER SVCS-1998 (DR-1203) 350.5755.7301 98664 12/15/00 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. RESERVOIR # 1 DESIGN 350.5903.7501 98664 12/15/00 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. RESERVOIR #1 DESIGN 350.5903.7501 98664 12/15/00 090246 JOHN WALLACE & ASSOC. GENERAL CONSULTING SVCS-OCT 010.4301.5303 98665 12/15/00 100431 WILLARD PAPER CO ENVELOPES 010.4102.5255 98665 12/15/00 100431 WILLARD PAPER CO PAPER 010.4102.5255 98665 12/15/00 100431 WILLARD PAPER CO PAPER 010.4102.5255 98665 12/15/00 100431 WILLARD PAPER CO PAPER/NCR 010.4102.5255 98665 12/15/00 100431 WILLARD PAPER CO PAPER 010.4102.5255 98666 12/15/00 092586 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC COM NOV.SIGNAL MAINT 010.4304.5303 98667 12/15/00 092864 SCOTT WIRZ FIRE MILEAGE-JLJLY/DEC.2000 010.4211.5145 98668 12/15/00 092976 WITMER-TYSON IMPORTS K-9 MAINT.TRAINING & SUPPLIES 010.4201.5322 98669 12/15/00 093912 ZAP MFG,INC SIGN LETTERS & NUMBERS 220.4303.5613 TOTAL CAECKS ITEM AMOUNT 180.60 32.98 24.69 4,780.48 16.25 605.70 113.75 65.00 243.75 211.25 2,739.67 415.00 5,543.48 332.50 68.75 101.25 5,801.38 112.50 10,001.44 308.38 281.53 267.70 353.39 402.19 1,212.75 30.00 454.61 183.79 PAGE 8 CHECK AMOUNT 478.38 31,152.15 1,613.19 1,212.75 30.00 454.61 183.79 227,048.20 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 9 12/13/00 09:17 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 F[JND O10 O11 217 220 225 264 350 612 640 751 760 TITLE GENERAL FUND PAYROLL CLEARING FUND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT STREETS FUND TRANSPORTATION FUND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND SEWER FUND WATER FUND DOWNTOWN PARKING SANITATION DISTRIBUTION FUND TOTAL • uG�'C�IiI� Y 70,899.30 52,334.08 120.00 3,737.58 1,407.00 300.00 21,150.71 5,434.66 3,408.02 2,551.16 65,705.69 227,048.20 ATTACHMENT 7 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DEPARTMENTAL LABOR DISTRIBUTION PAY PERIOD 11/24 TO 12/07/00 12/15/00 FUND 010 FUND 220 FUND 284 FUND 612 FUND 640 226, 529.58 10,925.50 4,762.36 4,085.35 10,703.36 257, 006.15 Salaries Full time Salaries Part-Time Salaries Over-Time Holiday Pay Sick Pay Annual Leave Pay Vacation Buyback Vacation Pay Comp Pay Annual Leave Pay PERS Retirement Social Security PARS Retirement State Disability Ins. Health Insurance Dental Insurance Vision Insurance Life Insurance Long Term Disability Uniform Allowance Car Allowance Council Expense Employee Assistance Uniform Allowance Motor Pay Total: 153,344.44 26,675.61 12,648.92 411.76 2, 864.66 3,860.64 1,591.36 753.65 14,728.21 13,849.08 215.93 445.70 19,450.36 3,403.74 725.09 542.50 759.72 400.00 234.78 100.00 257,006.15 ATTACHMENT 8 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 12/19/00 09:50 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUNIDER DATE N[JMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 329 12/14/00 005616 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE G.A.REIMB.12-00-00 P/R 011.0000.1015 330 12/14/00 102043 MID-STATE BANK FAIR OAKS/VALLEY/TALLY HO 350.5630.7001 330 12/14/00 102043 MID-STATE BANK FAIR OAKS/VALLEY/TALLY HO 350.5631.7001 331 12/1'4/00 101499 R. BURKE CORPORATION FAIR OAKS/VALLEY/TALLY HO 350.5630.7001 331 12/14/00 101499 R. BURKE CORPORATION FAIR OAKS/VALLEY/TALLY HO 350.5631.7001 332 12/14/00 102133 LEIGH KAPLAN M[JSICAL ENTERTAINMENT-XMAS 010.4001.5504 98689 12/22/00 000468 A T& T-L/DIST SVC. MIS L/DIST-473-0379 010.4140.5303 98690 12/22/00 101454 ADLESON,HESS & KELLY PROF.LEGAL SVCS 010.0000.2011 98691 12/22/00 101345 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT, ELKHIDE GLOVES/KEVLAR WRISTLET 010.4211.5272 98692 12/22/00 003120 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUP NON ASPIRIN/SORE THROAT 010.4420.5255 98693 12/22/00 003296 AMERICAN LAW ENFORCEMEN EVIDENCE KIT 010.4201.5255 98694 12/22/00 005772 ARROYO GRANDE COhII�7. HOS HAZ MAT PRE-EMP PHYSICALS 010.4211.5315 98695 12/22/00 006552 ARROYO MEDICAL GROUP IN PRE-EMPLOY.PHYSICAL-V.JOHNSON 010.4201.5315 98696 12/22/00 010296 BEACH FRONT AUTO SERVIC SMOG INSPECTION-PW 42 640.4712.5601 98697 12/22/00 011426 BLUEPRINT EXPRESS 5 SETS OF PLANS-VALLEY ROAD 350.5636.7301 98698 12/22/00 101465 BOOK PUBLISHING COMPANY MUNICIPAL CODE SUPPLEMENT 010.4002.5303 98696 12/22/00 101465 BOOK PUBLISHING COMPANY MUNICIPAL CODE SUPPLEMENT 010.4003.5503 98699 12/22/00 102140 BRAD BOWDEY REF.YOUTH B/BALL-BOWDEY 010.0000.4605 98700 12/22/00 013572 BRUMIT DIESEL,INC CANNISTER KIT 010.4211.5601 98701 12/22/00 018330 CA.ST.DEPT.OF JUSTICE FINGERPRINT-COOPER/HP.RRIS/BEJA 010.4201.5324 98701 12/22/00 018330 CA.ST.DEPT.OF JUSTICE FINGERPRINT-PRUITT 010.4301.5315 96701 12/22/00 018330 CA.ST.DEPT.OF JUSTICE FINGERPRINT-BEARD 010.4425.5315 98702 12/22/00 101283 CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC SUP 150W QUAD-VOLT 010.4201.5604 98703 12/22/00 021918 CENTRAL COAST SUPPLY LINERS 010.4213.5604 98703 12/22/00 021918 CENTRAL COAST SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES/P.TOWELS 010.4213.5604 96704 12/22/00 022632 CHP,PARRAL COPIER MAINTENANCE/USEAGE 010.4421.5303 98705 12/22/00 101856 CHARTER COIVA�IUNICATIONS CABLE MODEM 010.4140.5303 98706 12/22/00 023322 CHRISTIANSON CHEVROLET VALVE JOB 010.4212.5601 98707 12/22/00 023946 CLINICAL LP.B.OF SAN BER WATER SAMPLES 640.4710.5310 ITEM AMOUNT 193,091.51 19,909.05 10,040.79 104,613.86 191,934.25 100.00 157.54 12,439.69 340.22 189.58 200.00 546.00 88.00 28.75 21.29 500.00 1,002.14 35.00 155.68 164.00 56.00 81.00 182.33 206.07 379.88 152.98 12.08 80.97 182.00 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 193,091.51 29,949.84 296,548.11 100.00 157.54 12,439.69 340.22 189.56 200.00 546.00 88.00 28.75 21.29 1,502.14 35.00 155.68 301.00 182.33 587.95 152.98 12.08 80.97 182.00 k VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 12/19/00 09:50 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NDMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUNIDER 98708 12/22/00 024870 COMPUSERVE INC. USER FEES THRU 11/25 COMPUSERV 010.4140.5607 98709 12/22/00 101624 PAUL CONWAY SHIELDS PINS/ORNAMENTS/SHIELD 010.4211.5272 98709 12/22/00 101624 PAUL CONWAY SHIELDS SHIELDS/ORNAMENTS 010.4211.5272 98709 12/22/00 101624 PAUL CONWAY SHIELDS PINS & ORNAMENTS 010.4211.5272 98710 12/22/00 026286 CREEK ENVIRONMENTAL LAB WATER SAMPLES 640.4710.5310 98711 12/22/00 026754 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C BOTTLED WATER 010.4421.5201 98711 12/22/00 026754 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C BOTTLED WATER 010.4130.5201 96711 12/22/00 026754 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C BOTTLED WATER 010.4101.5201 98711 12/22/00 026754 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C BOTTLED WATER 010.4120.5201 98711 12/22/00 026754 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C BOTTLED WATER 010.4212.5201 98712 12/22/00 029484 DIESELRO INC. BOLTS/THERMOSTAT 010.4211.5601 98712 12/22/00 029484 DIESELRO INC. LLTBE/OIL/FILTERS 010.4420.5601 98713. 12/22/00 033462 JOHN FERDOLAGE EXECUTIVE DEVELOP-FERDOLAGE 010.4201.5501 98714 12/22/00 101379 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,IN WIRE WHEELS/CUPS 640.4712.5255 98714 12/22/00 101379 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,IN VALVE BOX/LIDS 640.4712.5610 98714 12/22/00 101379 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,IN CR:WIRE WHEELS/CUPS 640.4712.5255 98715 12/22/00 033702 TERENCE FIHICH REIMB.PARKING FEES-FIBICH 010.4211.5501 98716 12/22/00 102079 FIRE PROTECTION PUBLICA PUMPINGDRIVER/OPERATOR BOOK 010.4211.5501 98717 12/22/00 102084 FIRE SERVICE SPECIFICAT FIRE HOSE 010.4211.6201 98718 12/22/00 100862 CHERI FLEMING REF:YOUTH B/BALL-FLEMING 010.0000.4605 98719 12/22/00 035490 FOX LAMINATING COMPANY LAMINATING SHEETS 010.4211.5201 98720 12/22/00 102141 JUDY GABRIEL REF.YOUTH B/BALL-GABRIEL 010.0000.4605 98721 12/22/00 101088 HANSON AGGREGATES ASPHALT 220.4303.5613 98722 12/22/00 102138 HARCOURT,INC. VIDEO BOOKS/LESSON PLANS 010.4211.5501 98723 12/22/00 042862 HONEYWELL,INC. MECHANICAL MAINT TO 3/31/Ol 010.4213.5303 98724 12/22/00 044496 INFORMATION SERVICES DP ON LINE TRANS-NOV 010.4201.5606 98725 12/22/00 045162 INTL CONF OF BUILDING O ICBO CLASS A DUES-SCHMIDT 010.4212.5503 98726 12/22/00 101848 INVENSYS METERING SYSTE STRAINER GASKETS 640.4712.5611 98726 12/22/00 101848 INVENSYS METERING SYSTE TIIRBO METERS/CHAhIDERS/GASKETS 640.4712.5207 98727 12/22/00 047190 JOHNSON ENGINEERING BEARING/SEALS/HOLDER ASSY 010.4201.5601 98728 12/22/00 102131 KNECHT'S PLUNffiING REPL.AC UNIT AT CITY HALL 010.4213.6201 ITEM AMOUNT 31.75 225.00 47.00 124.00 120.00 45.00 21.67 21.66 21.67 10.00 256.81 128.35 588.60 116.51 521.24 143.12- 12.00 228.00 1,447.83 55.00 86.00 45.00 398.08 875.08 6,861.75 81.90 195.00 5.28 1,119.25 134.86 6,493.00 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 31.75 396.00 120.00 120.00 385.16 588.60 494.63 12.00 228.00 1,447.83 55.00 86.00 45.00 398.08 875.08 6,861.75 81.90 195.00 1,124.53 134.86 6,493.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 12/19/00 09:50 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 98729 12/22/00 101173 LONGS DRUG STORE PHOTO PROCESSING-NOV 2000 98729 12/22/00 101173 LONGS DRUG STORE VIDEO TAPES 98730 12/22/00 101252 MCI WORLDCOM L/DIST.PHONE 98731 12/22/00 102142 DANIEL MEEHAN REF.PARK DEPOSIT-MEEHAN 98732 12/22/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE SOAP/SIMPLE GREEN 98732 12/22/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE DUP KEYS 98732 12/22/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE BATTERIES 98732 12/22/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE TARP/PAIL/MIS.BLDG SUPPLIES 98732 12/22/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE RANGE REPAIR SUPPLIES 98732 12/22/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE TRASH BAGS/DUCT TAPE 98732 12/22/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HP.RDWARE FLAG TAPE 98732 12/22/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE CLOROX 98732 12/22/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HP,RDWARE PVC PIPE/ELBOW 98732 12/22/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWAF2E FENCE REPAIR PARTS 98732 12/22/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE PAINTING SUPPLIES 98732 12/22/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE X-MAS LIGFITS/HOSE ADAPTER 98732 12/22/00 057096 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE PLANTS 98733 12/22/00 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 98733 12/22/00 057174 MISSION OFFICE PLUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 96734 12/22/00 101829 N.AMERICAN WILDFIRE,LTD N.WILDFIRE SUBSCRIP-WHITNEY 98735 12/22/00 060450 NAT'L FIRE PROTECTION A RENEWAL-NATL FIRE CODES 98736 12/22/00 062032 OFFICE MART OFFICE SUPPLIES 98736 12/22/00 062032 OFFICE MP,RT OFFICE SUPPLIES 98737 12/22/00 062322 ONE HOUR PFi0T0 PLUS PHOTO PROCESSING-NOV 98738 12/22/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL RP.DIO 451-0183 98738 12/22/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL ALARM 841-3953 98738 12/22/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL ALARM 841-3956 98738 12/22/00 063960 PACIF2C BELL ALP.RM 841-3959 98738 12/22/00 063960 PACIFIC BELL ALARM 841-3960 98739 12/22/00 068200 PNgC EMS JACKETS & BLANKETS 98740 12/22/00 067890 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION,IN OXYGEN 98741 12/22/00 070590 RICHETTI WATER CONDITIO WATER COND.SVCS-NOV/DEC 98742 12/22/00 100200 RRM DESIGN GROUP PROF.SVCS-R.G.PARK PLAN 98743 12/22/00 072638 S& L SAFETY PRODUCTS SHOP TOWELS 98743 12/22/00 072638 S& L SAFETY PRODUCTS SHOP TOWELS 98743 12/22/00 072638 S& L SAFETY PRODUCTS SHOP TOWELS ACCOUNT NUMBER 010.4201.5255 010.4201.5255 010.4145.5403 010.0000.4354 010.4213.5604 010.4211.5255 010.4211.5603 010.4201.5605 010.4201.5605 010.4211.5255 010.4211.5255 640.4712.5274 010.4420.5605 010.4420.5605 010.4420.5605 010.4420.5605 010.4211.5255 612.4610.5201 220.4303.5201 010.4211.5503 010.4211.5503 010.4211.5201 010.4211.5201 010.4201.5255 010.4211.5403 010.4211.5403 220.4303.5403 640.4710.5403 010.4211.5403 010.4211.5206 010.4211.5206 010.4201.5604 350.5512.7501 220.4303.5255 612.4610.5255 640.4712.5255 ITEM AMOUNT 39.22 106.18 228.75 2s.00 20.98 2.12 15.42 34.68 29.06 10.70 4.27 1.92 5.77 3.52 41.76 61.00 9.56 136.10 37.81 34.95 635.00 42.09 19.28 4.92 184.13 31.54 31.54 31.54 31.54 172.51 16.74 30.00 10,101.30 50.02 50.01 50.01 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 145.40 228.75 zs.00 240.76 173.91 34.95 635.00 61.37 4.92 310.29 172.51 16.74 30.00 10,101.30 150.04 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 12/19/00 09:50 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUNIDER DATE NUhIDER NAME DESCRIPTION NUNffiER 98744 12/22/00 075130 SAN LUIS OBISPO CNTY.NE PRINTING-WINTER/SPRING GUIDES 010.4421.5504 98745 12/22/00 076830 SANTA MARIA TIRE INC. TIRES-STOCK 010.4201.5601 98746 12/22/00 102134 JAMES SCURI REF.WATER DEP-550 CROWN HILL 640.0000.2302 96746 12/22/00 102134 JAMES SCURI CLOSING BILL-550 CROWN HILL 640.0000.4751 98747 Y2/22/00 078156 SEBASTIAN OIL DISTRIB. GASOLINE/DIESEL FUEL 010.4211.5608 98748 12/22/00 100157 C.A. SINGER & ASSOCIATE ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT-PHASE 1 640.4712.5303' 98749 12/22/00 074684 SLO CNTY FIRE CHIEFS AS RESV.INSTALLATION DINNER-4 010.4211.5501 98750 12/22/00 080106 SMITH AND LOVELESS,INC BULKHEAD FITTINGS 612.4610.5610 98751 12/22/00 102135 SNYDER PUBLISHING CO CCAC PtJBLICATION-ART OF MINUTE 010.4002.5201 98752 12/22/00 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY LIGHTHOUSE SWITCH 010.4211.5601 98752 12/22/00 080886 SOUTHERN AUTO SUPPLY BED LINER PAINT 010.4420.5601 98753 12/22/00 083226 SUNSET NORTH CAR WASH CAR WASHES 010.4201.5601 98753 12/22/00 083226 SIINSET NORTH CAR WASH CAR WASHES 220.4303.5601 98753 12/22/00 083226 SUNSET NORTH CAR WASH CAR WASHES 612.4610.5601 96753 12/22/00 083226 SUNSET NORTA CAR WASH CAR WASHES 010.4301.5601 98753 12/22/00 083226 SUNSET NORTH CAR WASH CAR WASHES 010.4305.5601 98753 12/22/00 083226 SIINSET NORTH CAR WASA CAR WASHES 010.4201.5601 96754 12/22/00 083382 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIER COPIER MAINT TO 2/4/02 284.4103.5602 98755 12/22/00 086346 TROESH READY MIX CONCRETE & ASPHALT WASTE 220.4303.5307 98756 12/22/00 068084 UNITED GREEN MARK,INC. VALVE BOX 010.4420.5605 98756 12/22/00 088084 UNITED GREEN MP.RK,INC. SPRINKLER PARTS 010.4420.5605 98757 12/22/00 087672 UNITED RENTALS RENTAL-TRACTOR 010.4430.5605 98757 12/22/00 087672 UNITED RENTALS RENTAL PRESSURE WASHER 010.4430.5605 98758 12/22/00 087580 US FILTER DISTRIBUTION FLEX COUPLINGS 640.4712.5610 98759 12/22/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-DIV.CHIEF 010.4211.5403 98759 12/22/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-FIRE CHIEF 010.4211.5403 98759 12/22/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-NOV 010.4305.5403 98759 12/22/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-NOV 010.4301.5403 98759 12/22/00 102007 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONE-NOV 640.4710.5403 98760 12/22/00 101866 VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAG GOV.PAGERS TO 1/14/O1 010.4213.5303 98761 12/22/00 102139 RANDALL VOSS REF.PLAN CHECK DEP-200 STATION 010.0000.4505 98761 12/22/00 102139 RANDALL VOSS REF.BLDG.PERM-200 STATION 010.0000.4181 98761 12/22/00 102139 RANDALL VOSS REF.SMIP-200 STATION 010.0000.2208 ITEM AMOUNT 2,236.51 1,026.46 180.00 117.51- 263.42 450.00 140.00 25.07 25.00 184.34 9.48 175.45 19.95 32.90 45.85 21.95 29.61- 300.00 252.29 30.77 11.77 465.30 236.66 250.26 17.47 20.14 43.47 43.46 43.44 21.21 114.00 175.00 6.00 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 2,236.51 1,026.46 62.49 263.42 450.00 140.00 25.07 25.00 193.82 266.49 300.00 252.29 42.54 701.96 250.26 167.98 21.21 295.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 5 12/19/00 09:50 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 VOUCHER/ CAECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NiIMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 98762 12/22/00 091026 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. CA CODES CD-ROM SUBSCRIPTION 010.4003.5503 98763 12/22/00 100431 WILLARD PAPER CO ENVELOPES/PAPERS 010.4102.5255 98764 12/22/00 092430 JAMES WILLIAMS REIMB.GAS-WILLIAMS 010.4201.5608 98765 12/22/00 094146 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES CROSS PIECE-STREET NAME SIGNS 220.4303.5613 ITEM AMOUNT 141.57 336.64 22.00 185.01 CHECK AMOUNT 141.57 336.64 22.00 185.01 TOTAL CHECKS 576,803.49 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PAGE 6 12/19/00 09:50 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 FUND TITLE O10 GENERAL FUND O11 PAYROLL CLEARING FUND 220 STREETS FUND 284 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUND 350 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 612 SEWER FUND 640 WATER FUND TOTAL AMOUNT 42,733.09 193,091.51 974.70 300.00 336,620.54 244.08 2,839.57 576,803.49 0 ATTACHMENT 9 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DEPARTMENTAL LABOR DISTRIBUTION PAY PERIOD 12/08 TO 12/21/00 12/29/00 FUND 010 FUND 220 FUND 284 FUND 612 FUND 640 199,700.36 9,784.85 4,258.12 3,555.37 8,793.12 226,091.82 Salaries Full time Salaries Part-Time Salaries Over-Time Holiday Pay Sick Pay Annual Leave Pay Vacation Buyback Vacation Pay Comp Pay Annual Leave Pay PERS Retirement Social Security PARS Retirement State Disability Ins. Health Insurance Dental Insurance Vision Insurance Life Insurance Long Term Disability Uniform Allowance Car Ailowance Council Expense Employee Assistance Uniform Allowance Motor Pay Total: 144,054.21 21,421.17 12,476.90 565.13 3,960.11 191.59 6,106.04 3,158.33 5,880.93 14,632.29 12,a52.07 247.46 420.5g 125.00 226,091.82 ATTACHMENT 10 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE O1/02/O1 18:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUbIDER DATE N[JMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 333 12/20/00 102145 KELLY SMZTH REIMB COIVA�I'L DRIVE TEST-SMITH 220.4303.5501 334 12/20/00 088218 UNITED STATES POSTMASTE MAIL SVC-GEN'L PLAN 010.4130.5318 335 12/22/00 101604 BARBIE JONES REIMB SNACK SUPPLIES-JONES 010.4425.5259 335 12/22/00 101604 BARBIE JONES REIMB AM/PM SUPPLIES-JONES 010.4425.5255 336 12/29/00 074412 SLO CNTY DEPT.ENGINEERS 98/99 SLO CTY CREDIT 641.4750.5612 336 12/29/00 074412 SLO CNTY DEPT.ENGINEERS PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 641.4750.5801 336 12/29/00 074412 SLO CNTY DEPT.ENGINEERS INTEREST PAYMENT 641.4750.5802 336 12/29/00 074412 SLO CNTY DEPT.ENGINEERS WATER PURCHASES 641.4750.5612 336 12/29/00 074412 SLO CNTY DEPT.ENGINEERS PROP.TAX COLLECTED BY CTY 641.0000.4001 337 12/29/00 050154 LA SALLE NAT'L BANK SAFE WATER LOAN-INTEREST 640.4710.5802 337 12/29/00 050154 LA SALLE NAT'L BANK SAFE WATER LOAN PAYABLE-PRIN. 640.4710.5801 338 12/29/00 005616 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE G.A.REIMB 12-21-00 P/R 011.0000.1015 TOTAL CHECKS ITEM AMOUNT 64.00 175.56 146.45 108.21 1,962.00- 132,228.75 22,347.85 412,124.00 37,815.60- 23,462.15 34,911.51 202,641.52 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 64.00 175.58 254.66 526,923.00 58,373.66 202,641.52 788,432.42 _J VOUCHRE2 O1/02/O1 18:32 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 19 PAGE 2 FUND TITLE O10 GENERAL FUND O11 PAYROLL CLEARING FUND 220 STREETS FUND 640 WATER FUND 641 LOPEZ FUND TOTAL AMOUNT 430.24 202,641.52 64.00 58,373.66 526,923.00 788,432.42 8.b. /pRROYO\ �� C � � INCORPOAATEO � � o T * JULY /0, 1911 * c4 ��FORN� P TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: DATE: CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM LYNDA K. SNODGRASS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCIAL SERVICES�.�� JANET M. HUWALDT, ACCOUNTING SUPERVISOR �G� STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT DEPOSITS January 9, 2001 Attached please find a report listing the current investment deposits of the City of Arroyo Grande, as of December 31, 2000, as required by Government Code Section 53646 (b). CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE MONTHLY INVESTMENT REPORT As of December 31, 2000 January 9, 2001 This report presents the City's investments as of December 31, 2000. It` includes all investments managed by the City, the investment institution, type of investment, maturity date, and rate of interest. As of December 31, 2000, the investment portfolio was in compliance with all State laws and the City's investment policy. � Current Investments: The City is currently investing all short-term excess cash in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) administered by the State Treasurer. This is a very high quality investment in terms of safety, liquidity, and yield. The City may readily transfer the LAIF funds to the City's checking account when funds are needed. At this time, the City does not hold any other investments. The following is a comparison of investments based on book values as of December 31, 2000 compared with the prior month and the prior year. Date: Amount: Interest Rate: December 2000 $8,550,000 6.47% November 2000 8,135,000 6.47% December 1999 7,850,000 5.39% _� 8.c. /pRRO�\ ��` c c �� INCORPOFATED 9 2 � v m # �u�v �o. �ei� , c4 ��FORN� P MEMORANDUM TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: KERRY McCANTS COMMUNITY DEVE OPMENT DIRECTOR SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING MAXIMUM BUILDING SIZE FOR COMMERCIAL USES DATE: JANUARY 9, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council: 1. Adopt the ordinance entitled, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande Amending Portions of Title 9 of the Municipal Code to Establish Maximum Building Size for Commercial Uses"; and 2. Direct the Director of Administrative Services to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Recorder. FUNDING: No fiscal impact. DISCUSSION: The City Council at its meeting of December 12, 2000, introduced for first reading without modification an ordinance amending Title 9 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code establishing a maximum building size for commercial uses. It is recommended the City Council adopt the ordinance. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are presented for Council consideration: — Approve the Ordinance; — Modify and approve the Ordinance; — Reject the Ordinance; — Provide direction to staff. ORDINANCE NO. C.S. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AMENDING PORTIONS OF TITLE 9 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH MAXIMUM BUILDING SIZE FOR COMMERCIAL USES WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the City of Arroyo Grande Development `Code, which became effective June 13, 1991, and indicated that modifications to the Development Code may occur to refine the document; and WHEREAS, the City of Arroyo Grande ("City") has a responsibility to consider available fiscal and environmental resources of the City and the impact large retail stores have on these resources; and WHEREAS, the City's Economic Development Strategy establishes the need for protection and promotion of the overall commercial service and retail business sectors of the local economy; and WHEREAS, the City has a responsibility to assure adherence to the General Plan in meeting the needs and desires of the residents and the community; and WHEREAS, the Land Use Element of the General Plan of the City adopted on May 22, 1990, establishes the need to ensure the protection of the components of "rural atmosphere" and "small town lifestyle" which include the scale and intensity of development; and WHEREAS, the Land Use Element of the General Plan of the City further lists objectives limiting the scale of buildings to low-profile, horizontal forms that are compatible with Arroyo Grande's rural, small town atmosphere; and WHEREAS, the City has conducted environmental review for adoption of an ordinance establishing limits on commercial building size, and has found that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed requirements will have an effect on the environment and therefore this project is exempt from the provisions of CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3); and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the information in the proposed document and staff report, as well as public testimony presented at the hearing and make the following findings of fact: A. The proposed limits on commercial building size are consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, and programs of the General Plan, and are necessary and desirable to implement the provisions of the General Plan. ORDINANCE NO. C.S. PAGE 2 B. The proposed limits on commercial building size are necessary because retail stores or businesses in excess of the proposed limits tend to cause an unfair economic advantage over smaller retail stores and businesses and will adversely impact smaller retail stores and businesses and the local economy overall. C. The proposed limits on commercial building size are necessary to reduce the visual impacts associated with large commercial buildings and to sustain and encourage development of small commercial buildings that are more compatible with Arroyo Grande's rural, small town atmosphere. D. The proposed limits on commercial building size will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare. E. The proposed limits on commercial building size are consistent with the purpose and intent of Title 9. F. The potential environmental impacts of the proposed limits on commercial building size are insignificant. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Section 9-07.040 is amended as follows: Section 9-07.040 Commercial Site Develo�ment Standards The following property development standards shall apply to all land and buildings constructed within their respective commercial Districts. A. General Requirements 1. On lots of record, existing as of the, date of adopti.on of this Title, parcels having less than the minimum required depths need not provide a front building setback or landscape area greater than 15% of the depth of the property (excluding right-of-way area). 2. The creation of new lots within commercial districts following the date of adoption of this Title shall conform to the minimum dimensions, except in the case of condominium lots or individual lots within a shopping center, in which case no minimums are established except at the boundary of the shopping center or commercial development. Parcels created within shopping centers are exempt from the site development standards stated herein, as they relate to minimum site areas, and minimum lot width and depth, as long as the following conditions are met: ORDINANCE NO. C.S. PAGE 3 a. A conceptual development plan for the entire center has been developed and approved pursuant to the provisions of this Title; b. Appropriate easements for reciprocal access, parking and maintenance are recorded, and maintained; and c. All applicable setbacks adjacent to the exterior boundaries of the shopping center or commercial development are met. 3. Table 9-07.040-A sets forth minimum Site Development Standards for Commercial development within Commercial Districts. � Table 9-07.040-A Commercial Site Development Standards s _ , �- � ,� � � � � � � � z � . � � � -�' ..�,..•; a�,T �.: ,e F � � � ;� .. � i ti , r ./��£ . •' , ��,��"`,, .��\��,`�� r�,. �, . ;; .,.��'� 1. Lot area, in square feet 10,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 2. Lot width 80' S0' 80' 80' 3. Lot depth 100' 80' 100' 100' 4. Front building setback, measured 15' 0' 15' 15' from property line 5. Interior side building setback 0' 0' 0'e 0 ,8 6. Street side building setback 15' 0' 15' 15' 7. Rear building setback 0' 0' 0'° 0'e 8. Maximum lot coverage 45% 100% 45°r6 45% 9. Maximum floor area ratio 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 10. Maximum 6uilding height 30' or 2 30' or 2 30' or 2 30' or 2 stories stories stories stories whichever whichever whichever whichever is less is less is less is less 11. Maximum building size, in square 102,500 30,000 b 102,500 b 1 Q2,500 b feet Notes to Table 9-07.040-A: a Larger setbacks may be required based on special requirements listed in Section 9-07.040 B., surrounding development, or building code regulations. b No new structure, expansion of an existing structure to an adjacent structure or modification of an existing structure shall be permitted nor shall any business license or other permit be issued or renewed, that would allow the creation of a retail store or business with a total space occupying more than 102,500 square feet in the GC, HC, and OP districts and 30, 000 square feet in the VC district. ORDINANCE NO. C.S. PAGE 4 B. Special Requirements 1. Wherever a lot in any commercial District abuts a lot in any residential District, a minimum building setback of 20 feet measured from the property line shall be required. A minimum of 10 feet of this setback area shall be landscaped; the remaining area may be used for required off-street parking. 2. In any commercial District, a two-story addition closer than 50 feet to an existing single family residence shall require Plot Plan Review by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. Where off-street parking areas are situated such that they are visible from any street, an earthen berm, wall, or combination wall/berm three feet in height shall be erected within the required landscape area and the parking area to adequately screen said parking areas. 4. In all Commercial Districts other than the VC District, required front and street side building setback areas shall be landscaped. Said landscaping shall consist predominantly of plant materials except for necessary walks and drives. Where off-street parking is located within such building setback areas, a minimum landscaped area 10 feet in depth, shall be provided between the property line and the off-street parking area, with an additional minimum landscaped area 10 feet in depth required between the parking area and the building. 5. Except as otherwise permitted, a street side building setback area shall be used only for landscaping, pedestrian walkways, driveways, or off-street parking. 6. Except as otherwise permitted, required rear and interior side building setback areas shall be used only for landscaping, pedestrian walkways, driveways, off-street parking or loading, recreational activities or facilities, and similar accessory activities. SECTION 2: Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Section 9-09.010 is amended as follows: Section 9-09.010 Planned Develonment (P-D) District A. Purpose and Intent Planned Development (P-D) districts have been established more flexible than those contained elsewhere in Title 9. The purpose of establishing these districts has been to grant or require diversification in the location of structures and other site elements which were believed to be appropriately compatible, while ensuring adequate standards relating to the public health, safety, welfare, comfort, and convenience. ORDINANCE NO. C.S. PAGE 5 B. Applicability The Planned Development District shall apply to existing planned developments of record (listed below) and pending applications complete as of the effective date of this Title. No new Planned Development Districts shall be created subsequent to the effective date of this Title. All ordinances approving or amending a planned development, along with relevant zoning information, shall be included in Appendix 1, and a copy kept in the Community Development Department and City Clerk's offices. P-D-1.1 P-D-1.2 P-D-1.3 P-D-1.4 P-D-1.5 = Oak Park Acres Planned Development = Rancho Grande Planned Development = Royal Oaks Planned Development = Wildwood Ranch Planned Development = Okui Planned Development C. Adoption and Amendment of Plans Adoption and amendment of Planned Development Ordinances shall occur in the manner set forth in this Title for Amendments to Zoning Districts (Section 9- 03.040). Amendments to a general or specific development plan relating to an approved Planned Development shall occur in the manner set forth for Condi�ional Use Permits (Section 9-03.050). Specific development plans shall be required of the developer as part of an application to amend or change zoning to the Planned Development (P-D) district � Development Plans and Amendments 1. Specific development plans shall be presented, considered, and approved as part of the rezoning application process. If a subdivision is required, the development plans and the tentative subdivision map shall be submitted simultaneously. 2. The development plans shall include any or all or the following items where applicable: -- _ ORDINANCE NO. C.S. PAGE 6 a. A detailed statement of all uses proposed to be established and an indication of the areas to be occupied by each use, as well as the resulting population and building intensities. The statement shall also include the proposed disposition and use of all areas indicated by the plan as common areas, open spaces, recreation or park areas, school sites, and other such private or public facilities; b. The total development plan, showing the dimensions and locations of proposed structures, buildings, streets, parking, yards, playgrounds, school sites, recreational areas, open spaces, and other public or private facilities; c. Detailed engineering site plans, including the proposed finished grades and drainage facilities; d. Landscaping plans, in detail, excepting typical single family lot residential areas of 10,000 square feet and over. The street tree planting requirements of the city may be waived, provided that the development plan or covenants provide adequate alternatives to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission and City Council; e. Architectural drawings demonstrating the design and character of the proposed structures, buildings, uses, and facilities, and the physical relationship of all elements; f. Detailed engineering plans for the provision of public utilities for the development, including, but not limited to, water, sewer, drainage, street lighting, and fire hydrants; g. Other pertinent information as may be deemed necessary by the Community Development Director, Planning Commission, and/or City Council to determine that the contemplated arrangement of uses make it desirable to apply regulations and requirements differing from those ordinarily applicable pursuant to the provisions of this Title; h. A development schedule , indicating the time when the commencement and completion of the construction will occur under the approved development plan; and A statement requesting modification of regulations and requirements differing from those ordinarily . applicable pursuant to the provisions of this Title. __ ORDINANCE NO. C.S. PAGE 7 4. The development plan shall meet or exceed the minimum requirements set forth in other portions of this Title for land uses corresponding to the land uses proposed. 5. Density transfers shall be permitted subject to Planning Commission and City Council approval. E. Permitted Uses The following uses shall be permitted in the Planned Development (P-D) District pursuant to approval by the City Council of the Planned Development ordinance for the area in question: 1. Single family dwellings, duplexes, and multiple family residential structures, including clusters, condominiums, townhouses, and similar concepts; 2. Commercial uses and commercial residential uses compatible with the total development plan, including, but not limited to, mobile home parks, restaurants, specialty shops, motels, and convention facilities; 3. Accessory buildings and uses as shown on the development plan, to be constructed with, or subsequent to, the construction of the main building; 4. Accessory buildings, such as garages, guest houses, or cabanas, subject to the lot coverage requirements set forth in Section 9-09.010 H; and 5. Public and private park and/or recreation facilities, public and private schools, and public utility buildings and structures and uses, not including service, corporation, or storage yards. F. Maximum Allowable Building Size and Height 1. No new structure, expansion of an existing structure to an adjacent structure or modification of an existing structure shall be permitted nor shall any business license or other permit be issued or renewed, that would allow the creation of a retail store or business with a total space occupying more than 102,500 square feet. 2. The maximum allowable height for a building or structure within the P-D District shall be as shown on the development plan for the P-D District or as recommended by the Planning Commission. In no case shall any ORDINANCE NO. C.S. PAGE 8 structure be of such height or location as to obscure any view due to elevation differential of building sites. 3. Accessory buildings within the P-D District shall not exceed one story and fourteen feet (14') in height. G. Minimum Building Site and Lot Width 1. Minimum building site and minimum lot width for any permitted use other than single family residences shall be as shown on the development plan, or shall conform to minimum requirements as set forth in other sections of this Title v�rith relation to land use. 2. Minimum lot sizes may be reduced by two thirds (2/3), providing the area of reduction is devoted to common area, open space, green belt, or other recreational uses. H. Maximum Building Site Coverage by Buildings and Structures 1. The maximum coverage of a building site by all structures including accessory buildings permitted in the P-D District, but not including uncovered patios or swimming pools, shall not exceed thirty (30) percent for the P-D District, or as shown on the development plan. 2. Where lot sizes have been reduced as provided for in Section 9-09.010 G, the maximum building coverage may be increased directly in ratib to the reduction of lot size. Minimum Yards Required The front, side, and rear yard shall be shown on the development plan or as recommended by the Planning Commission. If front, side, and rear yards are not represented on the development plan, then yard requirements shall conform to the minimum requirements as set forth in other sections of this Title. J. Fences, Walls, And Access Fences and walls may be shown on the development plan and approved or required by the Planning Commission in the P-D District. If such fences and walls are not shown, the following shall apply: 1. Fences, hedges, and walls not to exceed six feet (6') in height may occupy any side or rear yard, provided: a. That such fences, hedges, and walls do not extend into any required front yard setback, and in the case of a corner lot, such fence does not extend into the required side yard setback ORDINANCE NO. C.S. PAGE 9 adjacent to the street. Such fences, hedges, and walls shall not exceed three feet (3') in height in aforementioned required setbacks. '.;� b. That if there is over one foot (1') difference in elevation between contiguous buildings sites, the six foot (6') maximum height shall be a combination of the difference in elevation plus the height of the fence, providing that regardless of any difference in elevation, a fence not to exceed forty inches (40") may be built in such areas, and further providing that if written approval of the adjoining property owner is obtained, and a permit is obtained from the City Community Development Department, such fence may be built to a maximum of six feet (6') above the finished grade. � 2. Fences exceeding six feet (6') in height to enclose a court area, tennis court, or similar area, may be erected subject to obtaining a Conditional Use Permit, if such fence is constructed of open mesh wire and is on the rear one-half (1/2) of a lot. 3. A six foot (6') fence shall be required surrounding a swimming pool. Upon securing a Conditional Use Permit, any such fence may be erected exceeding the required height in this paragraph. 4. Access to any parking area, ponding area, or public street shall be shown on the development plan. Required Minimum Off-street Parking 1. 3. All residential uses shall have a minimum of two (2) garage spaces. All other uses shall have off street parking provided as required by the provisions of Chapter 9-12 of this Title. L. Utilities 1. Utility lines in the P-D district, including, but not limited to electric, communications, street lighting, and cable television, shall be required to be placed underground except that electric utility lines shall be required to be placed underground only to the extent required for so- called streamline installation. Where streamline installation is used, the service lines running from the transmission lines to each residence or other service unit shall be placed underground, and only the transmission lines may be above ground, on streamline poles which contain transformers. Transmission lines may be placed underground at the option of the developer or utility with the concurrence of the Planning Commission. Where transmission lines are placed ORDINANCE NO. C.S. PAGE 10 underground, appurtenances and associated equipment such as, but not limited to, surface mounted transformers, pedestal mounted terminal boxes and meter cabinets, and concealed ducts may be placed above ground provided such appurtenances are landscaped to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission. 2. The developer or builder shall be responsible for complying with the requirements of this subsection, and he shall make the necessary arrangements with the utility companies for the installation of such facilities. 3. Utility lines that do not provide service to the areas being developed, but which pass through or alongside such areas, may be placed above ground only after plans for such installation have been submitted to and approved by the Planning Commission. M. Variation from Minimum Requirements Variations from minimum requirements referred to in subsection D.2 of Section 9-09.010 (Development Plan) of this Title may be permitted in the Planned Development (P-D) District. The approval of any plan that requires such variations shall be approved by not less than a majority vote of the total membership of the Planning Commission upon a finding that such variations will produce any one or more of the following results: 1. Reduce the area and unsightliness of cut and fill banks; or 2. Reduce the danger of erosion; or 3. Create a better community environment through the dedication of public areas, rearrangement of lot sizes, or reforestation of barren areas; or 4. Create other improvements or permit the use of techniques which will produce a more desirable and livable community than can be obtained by strict compliance with such minimum requirements. N. Grading No construction or grading shall be done until both development plans and subdivision plans have been adopted as set forth in this Title; provided, however, minor grading which is necessary for the enjoyment or safety of the existing use shall be allowed as a matter of right and subject only to City laws pertaining to grading. ORDINANCE NO. C.S. PAGE 11 O. Subdivision In the P-D District, where from the nature of the size, location, shape, or topography of the parcel of land, or where from the nature of the improvements of development shown on the development plan, or any combination of these factors, it appears to the Community Development Director that a future division of ownership or subdivision of said parcel would be required for orderly development, the Community Development Director may require the filing of a tentative subdivision map, as provided in the land division provisions of this Title, and the performing of any other acts required in such regulation. Where any requirement of the land division provisions requires any specific act of the land owner or subdivider, the approval of any development plan shall not become effective until compliance has been made with such subdivision provisions. P. Reversionary Clause Any land classified as a P-D District shall revert to its former classification in the event that any portion of the development is not commenced within one (1) year from the effective date of the ordinance classifying said land into a P-D district. If rezoning is initiated by the Planning Commission or City Council, such reversion shall not take effect. SECTION 3: Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Section 9-18.030 -R- is amended as follows: Regulatory Floodway: The channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas that must be reserved in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than one foot. Restricted Parking: Situation where no on-street parking is permitted along the street frontage, or where on-street parking is prohibited during specified hours every day. Room (Habitable): Room meeting the requirements of this Title for sleeping, living, cooking or dining purposes, excluding such enclosed places as closets, pantries, bath or toilet rooms, service rooms, connecting corridors, laundries, unfinished attics, foyers, storage spaces, cellars, utility rooms and similar spaces. Recyclable Material: Reusable material, including, but not limited to metals, glass, plastic and paper, which are intended for reuse, remanufacture, or constitution for the purpose of using the altered form. Recyclable material does not include refuse or hazardous materials. ORDINANCE NO. C.S. PAGE 12 Recycling Facility: "Recycling Facility" shall mean a center for the collection and/or processing of recyclable materials. A Certified Recycling Facility or Certified Processor means a Recycling Facility certified by the California Department of Conservation as meeting the requirements of the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act of 1986. A Recycling Facility does not include storage containers or processing activity located on the premises of a residential, commercial, or manufacturing use and used solely for the recycling of material generated by that residential property, business or manufacturer. Recyclable Material: Reusabfe material, including, but not limited to metals, glass, plastic and paper, which are intended for reuse, remanufacture, or constitution for the purpose of using the altered form. Recyclable material does not include refuse or hazardous materials. Recycling Facility: "Recycling Facility" shall mean a center for the collection and/or processing of recyclable materials. A Certified Recycling Facility or Certified Processor means a Recycling Facility certified by the California Department of Conservation as meeting the requirements of the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act of 1986. A Recycling Facility does not include storage containers or processing activity located on the premises of a residential, commercial, or manufacturing use and used solely for the recycling of material generated by the residential property, business or manufacturer. Religious Institutions: Any buildings which are used primarily for religious worship and related religious activities. Research and Development: A use engaged in study, testing, design, analysis, and experimental development of products, processes, or services, including incidental manufacturing of products or provision of services to others. Residential Care Facility: Any family home, group care facility, or similar facility for 24-hour non-medical care of persons in need of personal services, supervision, or assistance essential for sustaining the activities of daily living or for the protection of th� individual. Residential Use: Any building which is lawfully used for living or dwelling purposes. Residential Zoning District: Means property in the RE, RH, RR, RS, SF, VR, MF, MFA, SR, MHP, and PD districts. Restaurant: A use providing preparation and .retail sale of food and beverages, including cafes, coffee shops, sandwich shops, ice cream parlors, and similar uses, and including licensed "on-sale" provision of wine and beer for consumption on the premises when accessory to such food service. Retail Store: Any building or structure in which one or more articles or merchandise or services are sold or provided at retail, including department stores. ORDINANCE NO. C.S. PAGE 13 Right-of-Way: A strip of land acquired by reservation, dedication, forced dedication, prescription, or condemnation and intended to be occupied or occupied by a road, crosswalk, railroad, electric transmission lines, oil or gas pipeline, water line, sanitary storm sewer, and other similar uses. Reverse Vending Machine(s): Automated mechanical device which accepts at least one or more types of empty beverage containers including, but not limited to aluminum cans, glass and plastic bottles, and issues a cash refund or a redeemable credit slip with a value not less than the container's redemption value as determined by the State. A Reverse Vending Machine may sort and process containers mechanically provided that the entire process is enclosed within the machine. In order to accept and temporarily store all three container types in a proportion commensurate with their relative redemption rates, and to meet the requirements of certification as a recycling facility, multiple grouping of Reverse Vending Machines may be necessary. A Bulk Reverse Vending Machine refers to a Reverse Vending Machine that is larger than 50 square feet; is designed to accept more than one container at a time; and will pay by weight instead of by container. Roof Line: Intersection of the plane of an exterior building wall and the primary roof plan of the building. Run with the Land: A covenant restriction to the use of land contained in a deed and binding on the present and all future owners of the property. SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unlawful, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrases be declared unlawful. SECTION 5: A summary of this Ordinance shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in the City of Arroyo Grande at least five (5) days prior to the City Council meeting at which the proposed Ordinance is to be adopted. A certified copy of the full text of the proposed Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the Director of Administrative Services/Deputy City Clerk. Within fifteen (15) days after adoption of the Ordinance, the summary with the names of those City Council Members voting for and against the Ordinance shall be published again, and the Director of Administrative Services/Deputy City Clerk shall post a certified copy of the full text of such adopted Ordinance. SECTION 6: This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption. ORDINANCE NO. C.S. PAGE 14 On motion of Council Member Council Member to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: the foregoing Ordinance was adopted this 2001. , seconded by and on the following roll call vote, day of , ORDINANCE NO. C.S. PAGE 15 MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR ATTEST: KELLY WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/ DEPUTY CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER APPROVED AS TO FORM: TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY ��'� MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2000 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 215 E. BRANCH STREET ARROYO GRANDE, CALIFORNIA 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Lady called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 7:36 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL City Council: Council Members Runels, Dickens, Lubin, Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara, and Mayor Lady were present. City Staff Present: City Manager Adams; City Attorney Carmel; Director of Administrative Services Wetmore; Chief of Police TerBorch; Director of Building and Fire Fibich; Director of Financial Services Snodgrass; Director of Parks, Recreation, and Facilities Hernandez; Acting Community Development Director Heffernon; Assistant Planner McClish; Public Works Supervisor Taylor; and Director of Public Works Spagnolo. 3. FLAG SALUTE Members of the Cub Scout, Webolos, Den 9, Pack 13 led the Flag Salute. 4. INVOCATION Pastor Paul Jones delivered the invocation. 5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS None. 6. AGENDA REVIEW None. 6.a. Resolutions and Ordinances Read in Title Only Council Member Dickens moved, Council Member Runels seconded, and the motion passed unanimously that all resolutions and ordinances presented at the meeting shall be read in title only and all further reading be waived. 7. CITIZENS' INPUT, COMMENTS, AND SUGGESTIONS Chuck Fellows, Chairman of Preserve the Village (PN), explained that PN was founded on October 30, 2000 by seventeen members of the community who are alarmed about the changes taking place in the Village. He said PTV now has over one hundred members who are very concemed that the Village is being irreparably CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 12, 2000 PAGE 2 changed. He referenced the 1999 General Plan Survey in which 87% of the respondents want the Village to be maintained as it is; and quoted from the City's Design Guidelines for Historic Districts regarding the protection of historic districts, homes, and businesses in the Village. He said the mission of the PN is to enhance and presenre the Village and that among six main goals, its primary goal is the preservation of historic structures. He expressed concern over the existing project at the west-end of the Village and the proposed project at the east-end of the Village. He stated the PN was opposed to the destruction or moving of the historic structures locafied at the east-end of the Village. Mr. Fellows submitted a petition for the record entitled "Save the E.C. Loomis Building" with approximately 543 signatures. Scott Walkenheim, PN Vice President, spoke of the significance of Maude's House and the E.C. Loomis building and the potential loss of history if they are moved or destroyed. He requested the Council join the efforts of the PTV. Lynn Parks, Arroyo Grande resident, spoke in favor of preserving the Village and supported the efforts of the PTV. Virginia Rogers, Brasil's Jewelers, spoke on behalf of "Garnet", an art sculpture in front of the new Village Centre, and explained that the sculpture would only be displayed for six months. She submitted a petition for the record in favor of the sculpture with approximately 24 signatures. Terry Payne, 212 Miller Way, stated she was personally offended by the art. She asked the following questions: 1. Is there a sign permit?; 2) Did it go to the Architectural Review Committee to be approved?; and 3) At the end of six months, will it go back to the Architectural Review Committee to be reviewed and approved? She stated that this was not historic art, and she would appreciate a response to her questions. City Manager Adams responded that the art was placed on private property and the City did not review the statue itself. He explained there was approval, under the sign permit regulations, for a rotating art project, however, since the project was on private property, the City was somewhat restricted due to freedom of speech issues. He stated the City had met with the developer to discuss the issue, and he would be required to submit a program for approval on how art would be selected in the future. He explained that City staff was currently working with County staff to set up an art program for the City and would bring back recommendations to the Council in January. Richard DeBlauw spoke and stated he was one of the owners of the Loomis property. He responded to comments made by the PTV group and asked them not to pre judge the project. He said he had plans to redevelop the property. He stated he would be holding workshops on the site and was asking for a fair review and evaluation of his project during the public hearings. ___-- ---- - _ -- -__ _� CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 12, 2000 PAGE 3 Sandra Loomis Kobasi, PN member, gave a family history of the Loomis house. She said she was familiar with the condition of the house; however, it could be saved. She suggested that it would make a good Bed and Breakfast Inn. She spoke in favor of preserving the Loomis house due to its historical significance. Nancy Loomis, 220 Miller Circle, spoke in favor of preserving the Village. 8. CONSENT AGENDA Council Member Dickens requested that Item 8.1. be pulled for discussion. Council Member Lubin requested that Item 8.j. be pulled for discussion. Council Member Runels requested that Item 8.g. be pulled for a separate roll-call vote. Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara moved and Council Member Lubin seconded the motion to approve Consent Agenda Items 8.a. through 8.k., with the exception of Items 8.g. and 8.j., with the recommended courses of action: � 8.a 8.b. 8.c. 8.d. 8.e. 8.f. 8.h. 8.i. Cash Disbursement Ratification. Action: Approved listing of cash disbursements for the period November 16, 2000 through November 30, 2000. Statement of Investment Deposits. Action: Received and filed the report of current investment deposits as of November 30, 2000. Annual Financial Report - Fiscal Year 1999-00 Receipt and Use of Water and Sewer Development Fees/Charges. Action: Accepted and filed the annual report in compliance with Government Code Section 66013. Minutes of the City Council Meeting of November 28, 2000 and Special City Council Reorganization meeting of December 4, 2000. Action: Approved a� submitted: Rejection of Claim Against City - V. Moon. Action: Rejected claim. Cancellation of December 26, 2000 City Council Meeting. Action: Approved cancellation of ineeting. Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 3, Title 10 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code — Community Tree Program. Action: Adopted Ordinance No. 521 amending Chapter 3, Title 10, of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code — Community Tree Program. Fair Oaks Avenue/Tally Ho Road Overlay Project, Project No. PW-2000-3, Progress Payment No. 4. Action: Authorized Progress Payment No. 4 in the amount of $269,548.56 to R. Burke Corporation for the Fair Oaks Avenue/Tally Ho Road Overlay capital improvement project. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 12, 2000 PAGE 4 8.k. Disadvantaged Enterprises Program (DBE) for FFY 2000/01 Action: Approved the submittal of the City's FFY 2000/01 DBE Program with "established" overall annual DBE goals to Caltrans. AYES: Ferrara, Lubin, Runels, Dickens, Lady NOES: None ABSENT: None There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed. 8.1. Reclassification of Office Assistant II to Building Permit Technician Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution reclassifying the O�ce Assistant II assigned to the Division of Building and Life Safety to Building Permit Technician. Council Member Dickens proposed modification of the recommendation to approve the reclassification of the position as a conditional appointment for one year or until the current employee obtains the ICBO Building Permit Technician certification. Following Council and staff discussion, Council Member Dickens moved to adopt a Resolution reclassifying the Office Assistant II to Building Permit Technician with the modification that it be a conditional appointment for up to one year or until the employee in the position acquires the proper certification, and further establish the salary range for the position at Range 22, SEIU. Council Member Runels seconded the motion. There was further discussion and clarification regarding the certification requirements, timing issues, and the potential implications for the incumbent employee. On the following roll-call vote, to wit: AYES: Dickens, Runels, Lubin, Ferrara, Lady NOES: None ABSENT: None There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed. 8.g. Appointment to Planning Commission Recommended Action: Approve Mayor Lady's recommendation to appoint Jim Guthrie to the Planning Commission, replacing Nanci Parker. Mayor Lady moved to appoint Jim Guthrie to the Planning Commission, replacing Nanci Parker. Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara seconded the motion, and on the following roll-call vote, to wit: CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 12, 2000 PAGE 5 AYES: Lady, Ferrara, Dic{cens, Lubin NOES: Runels ABSENT: None There being 4 AYES and 1 NO, the motion is hereby declared to be passed. 8.j. Award of Contract for the Fair Oaks Avenue/Valley Road Traffic Signal, Project No. PW-2000-7 Recommended Action: 1) Award contract for the Fair Oaks Avenue/Valley Road Traffic Signal project to Lee Wilson in the amount of $108,652.50; 2) Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed a contingency amount of $10,865 for use only if needed for unanticipated costs during the construction phase of the project; 3) Direct staff to issue the Notice of Award and Notice to Proceed; and 4) Appropriate $12,112 from the Traffic Signalization Fund. Council Member Lubin asked questions relating to the bid process; how many bid packets were distributed; and if there were any competing firms that could have bid the project. Director of Public Works Spagnolo explained the bid process for Public Works construction projects, which complietl with the Public Works Contracts Code. He explained that for this project, there was only one firm that picked up plans for the project. Director Spagnolo further explained that there was only one local firm that provided this type of work, and competing firms were located outside of the area. He stated that the bid for this project was reviewed and found to be acceptable. Council Member Lubin moved to approve staff s recommendations. Council Member Dickens seconded the motion, and on the following roll-call vote, to wit: AYES: Lubin, Dickens, Runels, Ferrara, Lady NOES: None ABSENT: None There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9.a. Proposed Ordinance Establishing Maximum Building Size for Commercial Uses. Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara made the following statement regarding conflict of interest. He stated the southwest curbline of Rancho Parkway is 282 feet away from his residence and he is closest to the Marshall's store. He said that this issue has become focused on Wal-Mart and his home is 1,721 feet from Wal-Mart and out of his viewshed. He said CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 12, 2000 PAGE 6 based on this, the proposed expansion of Wal-Mart would have no material impact on his home. He offered the statement as an indirect matter for the record as the item before Council applies to the City at-large. He further stated that he has written documentation from the Fair Political Practices Commission establishing a precedence for actions in which he participated regarding Five Cities Center which determined that ministerial decisions do not constitute a conflict of interest. He said that the decision he renders on this item would be consistent with the City's General Plan, Development Code, specific to size, scale, and intensity of use, as well as the provisions requiring pleasing transitions. Based upon the above and the content of his statement, Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara said it was his intention to fully participate in the consideration of this item. Assistant Planner McClish presented the staff report. She explained that the proposed ordinance sets a maximum building size limit of 102,500 square feet applicable only to retail stores or businesses in the General Commercial, Office, and Highway Commercial Districts, and a building size limit of 30,000 square feet in the Village Commercial District. Staff recommended the Council introduce an Ordinance amending portions of Title 9 of the Municipal Code to Establish Maximum Building Size for Commercial Uses. Mayor Lady opened the public hearing. Colin Johnstone, Wal-Mart Manager, spoke in opposition to the proposed ordinance. He stated that 1) There have been no studies or findings of fact offered to support this particular square foot limitation; 2) How can it be fairly translated to prove the ordinance will enhance the safety and welfare of the community in a way that land-use policies are supposed to; 3) The proposed ordinance would directly and adversely affect the ability of Wal-Mart to provide its customers with the goods and services they need and request; 4) Asked what the difference was befinreen a sangle commercial building of 102,500 square feet and multiple buildings separated by common walls; 5) The proposed ordinance may discourage owners from remodeling and enhancing their buildings; 6) Stated that Wal-Mart does not have sufficient space for a garden center or nursery, which restricts their ability to offer broader product selections; 7) Has received an enormous number of requests from customers for an expansion of the garden center which is proposed not in building pad A-2, but in approximately 4,000 square feet on tlie north side of the building adjacent to the loading docks; and 8) Spoke about the community involvement and donations from Wal-Mart Associates to various causes and organizations. Joy Brehm, Arroyo. Grande resident and Wal-Mart Associate, spoke about her involvement in community and youth activities and fundraising efforts. She supported Wal-Mart and spoke in opposition to the proposed ordinance limiting commercial building square footage to a maximum of 102,500 square feet. Mayor Lady clarified that the proposed ordinance has no effect on Wal-Mart because there was a condition already in effect on Wal-Mart and the Five Cities Center CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 12, 2000 PAGE 7 eliminating any growth in excess of 102,500 square feet. He explained that the proposed ordinance would be implemented City-wide. Gerald Craig, Wal-Mart Associate, supported Mr. Johnstone's comments and spoke in opposition to the proposed ordinance. Mary Dominguez, Wal-Mart Personnel Manager, spoke in opposition to the proposed ordinance. Ross Kongable, Arroyo Grande resident, responded to comments made by the public and spoke in opposition to the proposed ordinance. Kathy Hughes, Arroyo Grande resident, stated that this was not a Wal-Mart issue, it was related to the development of the City. She stated that the focus should be on what the people have said they wish to see in the community. She spoke in opposition to the proposed ordinance. Todd Kent, San Luis Obispo County resident, spoke in opposition to the proposed ordinance and stated that ordinances in San Luis Obispo County limit what's available to the consumer and people have to travel to Santa Maria to shop. He stated this results in a loss of tax dollars to the City. Mary Hughes, 1160 Dolliver, Pismo Beach, spoke in opposition to the proposed ordinance. Richard DeBlauw spoke in favor of the proposed ordinance. Ray Abdener, Arroyo Grande resident, spoke in favor of the proposed ordinance. Roger Moss, Pacific Bridge Commercial Real Estate, represents the ownership of the Five Cities Center. He acknowledged that the issue of expanding the Wal-Mart store was not before Council tonight. However, he clarified that Wal-Mart does not have ownership interest of the land and occupies the space under a long-term lease. He stated the lease allows them the right, subject to the City's approval, to expand the store. He spoke further about issues related to the retail market, and as a retail real estate � practicitioner, explained the reasons that he and the owners of the Five Cities Center opposed the proposed ordinance. Terry Payne, 212 Miller Way, asked what the current maximum square footage was for commercial buildings. Acting Director Heffernon responded there was currently no maximum size regulations for commercial buildings. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 12, 2000 PAGE 8 Terry Payne asked about the development review process and asked why projects couldn't be considered on a case-by-case basis as it has been done in the past. Gerald Craig spoke again in opposition of establishing maximum square footage for commercial buildings. Jan Scott, Arroyo Grande resident, spoke about preserving the small town character of the City and stated she was in favor of the proposed ordinance. Hearing no further public comments, Mayor Lady closed the public hearing. Council Member Dickens stated the proposed ordinance would help guide the future of the City and maintain the assets of the community. After responding to some of the public comments, Council Member Dickens said he agreed with the findings in the ordinance, specifically, #2 and #5, and stated he would support the ordinance. Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara responded to public comments and stated he would base his decision on the City's policy documents that were in place such as the General Plan, Development Plan, and Economic Development Strategy. He stated he would support the ordinance based on the existing laws and policies of the City in order to maintain the character of the City. Council Membe dealerships and offices. • Runels asked how the proposed ordinance would affect the car lumber yards that are within the City should they wish to expand their Assistant Planner McClish responded that the ordinance would not affect these businesses unless they built a building that exceeded 102,500 square feet. She said the ordinance addresses the maximum size of buildings and structures. Council Member Lubin asked questions of staff regarding pad A-1 and A-2 in the Five Cities Center. He stated that the proposed ordinance would affect an expansion of Wal- Mart and any future building projects in the City. He spoke in support of the proposed ordinance stating that the size of commercial buildings in Arroyo Grande should be restricted. Mayor Lady commented that small town character is very important to Arroyo Grande. He clarified that there was a condition already in place restricting the size of buildings in. the Five Cities Center to 102,500 square feet. He stated the proposed ordinance was not intended to be site or tenant specific and it would apply City-wide. He spoke in support of the ordinance. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 12, 2000 PAGE 9 Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara moved to introduce an Ordinance amending portions of Title 9 of the Municipal Code to Establish Maximum Building Size for Commercial Uses. Council Member Lubin seconded the motion, and on the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Ferrara, Lubin, Dickens, Lady NOES: Runels � ABSENT: None There being 4 AYES and 1 NO, the motion is hereby declared to be passed. 9.b. Public Hearing Concerning Use of Federal 2000 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Funds. Chief of Police TerBorch presented the staff report. He explained the program and recommended allocating $�5,000 to the South County Youth Coalition for Crime Prevention Services; $7,000 for seven (7) Radio Alert Transmitters; and $1,691 for Supplies for Volunteer Programs. Staff recommended after conducting a public hearing and making any modifications, the City Council approve the expenditure of $13,691 as authorized by the Federal 2000 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) Program. Council Members asked questions regarding the radio transmitters, and also the program's funding methods. Chief TerBorch explained that Arroyo Grande would be the second agency in California to install radio transmitters in patrol units. He stated that the media has been contacted to encourage public education about the transmitters and how they work. Chief TerBorch further explained that the City's required funding match of $1;369 was included in this year's budget. Mayor Lady opened the public hearing. Upon hearing no comments, Mayor Lady closed the public hearing. Council Member Runels moved to approve an expenditure of $13,691 as authorized by the Federal 2000 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) Program. Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara seconded the motion, and on the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Runels, Ferrara, Dickens, Lubin, Lady NOES: None ABSENT: None There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 12, 2000 PAGE 10 9.c. Approval of the Draft Urban Water Management Plan Update. Director of Public Works Spagnolo presented the staff report. Staff recommended the Council adopt the resolution approving the draft Urban Water Management Plan Update. Public Works Supervisor Taylor was available to answer questions. Council Member Lubin referred to page 8 of the Urban Water Management Plan and asked for clarification that there is an expected annual growth rate in population of approximately 0.9%. Director Spagnolo responded that was correct. Council Member Lubin referred to footnote #2 on page 10 and asked for clarification. Supervisor Taylor explained the charts on page 10 depicting past water use for years 1975-1995, and current and projected water use for years 2000-2015, stating that water production was lower in 1995 due to the EI Nino storms. Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara referred to page 8 and asked for clarification on the build-out population figure of 18,500 projected to be reached in 2015. Director Spagnolo responded that the population data was based on the City's Long Range Planning Report dated November 1995. Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara stated tha# the City currently has a population of between 16,000 and 17,000. He stated there were three housing projects currently underway and once they were developed and occupied, it appeared that the City would be very close to the build-out population of 18,500. He asked how this would affect the projections in the report. Director Spagnolo explained that the report projects that the City should have adequate water supplies to meet the community's needs through 2015. He stated that the Urban Water Management Plan is updated every five years in order to analyze the projected numbers. He commented that it was more important to update the Water Master Plan as the population changes. Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara suggested the report be based on more accurate population figures and asked if staff could go back and look at occupancy projections for the housing projects in progress and update the projections in the Plan. Director Spagnolo stated staff could do that. He stated that the City was required to submit the Urban Water Management Plan to the State Department of Water Resources by December 31S He suggested that staff could update the Plan again in one year when more accurate population projections were available. He said once updated, the Plan could then be resubmitted to the State. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 12, 2000 PAGE 11 Further discussion included submitting the Plan to the Department of Water Resources as a draft document, having staff estimate revised population figures based on new development projects, updating the Plan, and coming back to the Council in 90 days to approve a Final Plan. Council Member Dickens asked if the Urban Water Management Plan was synonymous with the Water Master Plan. Director Spagnolo responded that was correct. Council Member Dickens requested bringing back both documents to Council to ensure consistency. Mayor Lady opened the public hearing. Upon hearing no comments, Mayor Lady closed the public hearing. Council Member Runels moved to approve the Urban Water Management Plan in draft form for submittal to the California Department of Water Resources, direct staff to update the current population, projected population, and growth rates, and bring the Plan back to the Council in 90 days with updated data for final approval. Council Member Lubin seconded the motion, and on the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Runels, Lubin, Dickens, Ferrara, Lady NOES: None ABSENT: None There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby decl�red to be passed. 10. CONTINUED BUSINESS 10.a. East Grand Avenue Master Plan Public Participation Format. City Manager Adams presented the staff report. Staff recommended the Council provide direction and feedback on the proposed agenda format for the East Grand Avenue Master Plan public workshop and process. Council and staff discussion included how to facilitate the process; potential location of the workshops; encouraging the direct involvement of Council Members to work in conjunction with staff, the Chamber of Commerce, and the community on each workshop issue; methods on how to conduct the workshops; who would facilitate the workshops, and involving the Planning and Traffic Commission Members. Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara proposed that he and Council Member Dickens could assist with facilitating the issues relating to the information gathered in the community surveys; Council Member Lubin could assist with the issues dealing with the business climate on CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 12, 2000 PAGE 12 East Grand Avenue due to his business background; and that the Community Development Department could take the lead to facilitate the discussion on the Master Plan Overlay Segments. Council Member Runels encouraged the participation and involvement of all the business owners on Grande Avenue. Heather Jensen, Executive Director, proposed that the Council consider conducting an early morning workshop in order to accommodate the business owners. Following discussion, staff was directed to schedule finro workshops, one in the morning to accommodate business owners and one in the evening to be held at the Woman's Club Community Center or the South County Regional Center. There was consensus that Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara would serve as the facilitator/presenter for the first topic, which will focus on better defining responses to the General Plan survey; Council Member Lubin would serve as the facilitator/presenter for the second topic, which will address businesses and uses the community feels would be successful, unsuccessful, and desirable to meet their need.s; and staff would facilitate the third topic, which will address the Master Plan Overlay Segments. 11. NEW BUSINESS 11.a. Appointment of Council Members to Various Boards, Commissions, and Committees. City Manager Adams presented the staff report. Staff recommended the Council make appointments to those Boards, Commissions, and Committees with Council representation. The following appointments were made: AGENCY PRIMARY SECONDARY South County Area Transit (SCAT) Staff Representative: City Manager Council of Governments/ Regional Transit Authority (SLOCOG/SLORTA) Staff Representative: Public Works Direetor/ Community Development Director Sandy Lubin Jim Dickens Mike Lady Tony M. Ferrara City Selection Committee (Mayors') Mike Lady Tony M. Ferrara Staff Representative: Not Applicable CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 12, 2000 PAGE 13 AGENCY PRIMARY SECONDARY South San Luis Obispo County Mike Lady Thomas A. Runels Sanitation District (SSLOCSD) Staff Representative: Not Applicable Integrated Waste Management Tony M. Ferrara Thomas A. Runels Authority Board (IWMA) Staff Representative: Community Development Director Zone 3 Water Advisory Board Staff Representative: Pubiic Works Director Thomas A. Runels Jim Dickens County Water Resources Advisory Committee (WRAC) Staff Representative: Public Works Director Economic Vitality Corporation (EVC) Staff Representative: City Manager/ Economic Development Director Air Pollution Control District Board (APCD) Staff Representative: Not Applicable Economic Opportunity Commission (EOC) Staff Representative: Not Applicable South County Youth Coalition Staff Representative: Chief of Police/ Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities Long Range Planning Committee Staff Representative: Community Development Director Community Recreation Center Subcommittee Staff Representative: Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities Thomas A. Runels Jim Dickens Sandy Lubin Jim Dickens Tony M. Ferrara Jim Dickens Jim Dickens Tony M. Ferrara Jim Dickens Thomas A. Runels Tony M. Ferrara Sandy Lubin Not Applicable Not Applicable 11.b. Process for City Council to Appeal Planning Commission Decisions Pursuant to Section 1-4.05 of the Municipal Code. Acting Community Development Director Heffernon presented the staff report. Staff recommended the Council direct staff to implement the appeal process pursuant to CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 12, 2000 PAGE 14 Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Section 1-4.05, et.seq., which states that the City Council may appeal any decision made by a City Commission. City Manager Adams clarified that this provision was currently in place and could be used in the interim until staff could develop alternatives for Council consideration of which types of development projects are to be designated for Council final review and approval. Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara reviewed the discussion that took place at the last Council. meeting regarding this issue. He stated the Council should be reviewing major projects that have the potential for significant impacts to the community. He stated that the current provision allows the Council the opportunity to look at significant projects on a case-by-case basis through an appeal process. Council Member Runels commented that in the proposed process, a hearing would be set within 60 days of the City Council appeal. He said this was too long and further delays projects. Council Member Lubin commented that with his experience on the Planning Commission, he was not convinced that further Council hearings would have changed the outcome of certain projects. He expressed concerns about mi�ro-managing, taking away authority from the Planning Commission, and increasing the Council's workload. He supported the use of the current provision for appealing decisions made by the Planning Commission and was concerned about amending the Development Code to add specific projects for Council review and approvaL Council Member Dickens responded that the difference was that the Council has the accountability if it approves a project. He was in favor of the appeal process and stated it would be worthwhile to look at amending the Development Code to require Council review and approval of certain projects. Mayor Lady opened up the discussion for public comment. Nan Fowler, 630 Cerro Vista Circle, expressed concerns about the time involved and that adding layers to government adds to the cost of any project. She said if the Council was not going to utilize the five Commissioners that it has appointed, why even have a Planning Commission. She said the Council has the appeal process available. John Keen, Pfanning Commissioner, was in favor of approving the process outlined for implementing the appeal provision. He said the Council and the Planning Commission were not aware of the current provision and it has been made clearer. He stated if the Council begins to hear projects, it will impact the time of staff, the applicant, and the Council because testimony will have to be heard again. He suggested creating a schedule to appoint a rotating Council Member to attend Planning Commission meetings and give a report at the next Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 12, 2000 PAGE 15 There was further discussion about the development review process. Acting Director Heffernon suggested that the development application could be amended to include the potential appeal of Planning Commission decisions by the City Council on major projects, thereby giving applicants clear notice of this process. Mayor Lady stated he was not supportive of taking away approval authority from the Planning Commission. Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara asked if there were any limitations on the use of the provision. City Attorney Carmel replied that the provision could be used at the Council's discretion at any time. Bill Tappan, Arroyo Grande resident, commented there was a period of time several years back when the process was drawn out and the Council at that time decided the City needed to be more business-friendly and streamlined the development approval process. He was in favor of amending the development application checklist. City Attorney Carmel suggested it might be helpful for the Council to see how other cities in the County are handling these issues and at what level Planning Commission final decision making authority commonly exists and then revisit the issue. There was consensus to implement the process for appealing Planning Commission decisions, to direct staff to revise the development application checklist to include the potential appeal of Planning Commission decisions by the City Council on development projects, and to direct staff to report back to the Council on what level of final approval authority Planning Commissions have in other San Luis Obispo County cities. 11.c. Proposed Contract with County of San Luis Obispo for Automation Support. � City Manager Adams presented the staff report. Staff recommended the Council approve and authorize the City Manager to execute the Service Level Agreement with the County of San Luis Obispo for automation support. It was further proposed the City's existing computer technician position remain vacant and be eliminated in next fiscal year's proposed budget. John Wade, Director of Information Services Division for San Luis Obispo County, stated the County provides service to several public service organizations. He gave an overview of his department and explained the Service Level Agreement. Following discussion, Council Member Runels moved to approve an Agreement with the County of San Luis Obispo for automation support. Council Member Dickens seconded the motion, and on the following roll call vote, to wit: CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 12, 2000 PAGE 16 AYES: Runels, Dickens, Lubin, Ferrara, Lady NOES: None ABSENT: None There being 5 AYES and 0 NOES, the motion is hereby declared to be passed. 12. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS Council Member Runels stated he had received a comment from a citizen that the podium blocks the view of the Council from the audience. He proposed moving the podium off to the side. 13. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS City Manager Adams reported the following: — Gave an update on the situation with the electricity shortage and reported on efforts the City was undertaking to encourage the community to conserve energy; — Reported on the General Plan Update; and — Announced that the City's Holiday Luncheon was being held on Friday, December 15 and encouraged Council Members to attend. 14. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Lady adjourned the meeting at 11:43 p.m. to the next Regular City Council meeting of January 9, 2001. Michael A. Lady, Mayor ATTEST: Kelly Wetmore, Director of Administrative Services/ Deputy City Clerk ��■ /PR YO � O INCORPORATEO Z � ° MEMORANDUM � �� ,o. ,s„ ,� c ��FORN� P TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: KERRY McCANTS, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR.� SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO CLOSE CITY STREETS AND USE CITY PROPERTY FOR THE FOLLOWING EVENTS: • ANNUAL EASTER IN THE VILLAGE, SATURDAY, APRIL 7, 2001; • ANNUAL STRAWBERRY FESTIVAL, SATURDAY AND SUNDAY, MAY 26 & 27, 2001; • ANNUAL FOURTH OF JULY, WEDNESDAY, JULY 4, 2001 DATE: JANUARY 9, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the closure of City streets and use of City property. FUNDING: There is no direct funding impact as a result of these events. Event organizers are �equired to reimburse the City for the costs of police, fire, public works, and other City services used to conduct these events. DISCUSSION: On November 2, 2000 the Arroyo Grande Village Improvement Association (AGVIA) submitted applications for temporary use permits for Easter in the Village, Saturday, April 7, 2001; annual Strawberry Festival, Saturday and Sunday, May 26 and 27, 2001; and 4` of July in the Village Celebration, Wednesday, July 4, 2001. The descriptions of the areas to be used are as follows: Easter in the Village — Saturday, April 7, 2001 1. The use of the parking lots in Olohan Alley between Mason St. and Bridge St. from 6:00 p.m. Friday, April 6 to 6:00 p.m. Saturday, April 7. 2. The use of Short St. between Olohan Alley and Branch St. from 6:00 p.m. Friday, April 6 to 6:00 p.m. Saturday, April 7. 3. The use of the Nelson St. lawn between Mason St. and Short St. for an Easter Egg Hunt. Strawberry Festival — Saturday & Sunday, May 26 & 27, 2001 1. The closure of Branch St. from Traffic Way to Mason St. from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturday, May 26 and Sunday, May 27. (The Police Department will have to apply to CalTrans for street closure authorizationl. Page 2 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. The closure of Short St. from Branch St. to Olohan Alley from 6:00 p.m. Friday, May 25 to 6:00 p.m. Sunday, May 27. The closure of Bridge St. from Branch St. to McLintock's Saloon parking lot from 6:00 a.m. Saturday, May 26 to 6:00 p.m. Sunday, May 27. The closure of Bridge St. from McLintock's driveway to Nelson St. from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, May 26 & 27. The closure of Bridge St. from Nelson St. to Traffic Way from 6:00 a.m. Saturday, May 26 to 6:00 p.m. Sunday, May 27. The use of the parking lots along Olohan Alley from Mason St. to Bridge St. from 6:00 p.m. Friday, May 25 to 6:00 p.m. Sunday, May 27. The use of the Car Corral from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturday, May 26 and Sunday, May 27. Use of the Nelson St. lawn between Short St. and Mason St. from 6:00 p.m. Friday, May 25 to 6:00 p.m. Sunday, May 27. The use of Hart-Collett Park between Bridge St. and Traffic Way from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturday, May 26 and Sunday, May 27. The use of the five-acre lot on West Branch St. next to the Woman's Club/Community Center for shuttle bus parking on Saturday, May 26 and Sunday, May 27. 4"' of July in the Village — Wednesday, July 4, 2001 1. The use of the parking lots on Olohan Alley between Mason St. from 6 p.m. Tuesday, July 3` to 6 p.m. Wednesday, July 4tn 2. The use of Short St. between Olohan Alley and Branch St. Tuesday, July 3` to 6 p.m. Wednesday, July 4tn and Bridge St. from 6 p.m. On November 21, 2000, Mr. Bob Lund and the late Mr. John Clark, representing the Arroyo Grande Village Improvement Association, met with the Staff Advisory Committee to discuss the requirements for the events. They discussed issues related to parking, coordinating Police and Fire support, standby ambulance service, and cost reimbursement. These items are addressed in the conditions of approval for each temporary use permit (Exhibit "A" of the attached Resolution). Temporary use permits will only be issued upon the approval by the City Council of the request for street closures and use of City property. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration: -adopt the attached resolution; -modify and adopt the attached resolution; -reject the attached resolution; =provide direction to staff. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AUTHORIZING THE CLOSURE OF CITY STREETS AND USE OF CITY PROPERTY FOR THE ANNUAL EASTER IN THE VILLAGE, SATURDAY, APRIL 7, 2001; ANNUAL STRAWBERRY FESTIVAL, SATURDAY AND SUNDAY, MAY 26 & 27, 2001; AND ANNUAL FOURTH OF JULY IN THE VILLAGE, WEDNESDAY, JULY 4, 2001 WHEREAS, the Arroyo Grande Village Improvement Association (AGVIA), organizers of the annual Easter in the Village, Strawberry Festival, and 4�' of July in the Village, have requested closure of certain City streets and the use of City property as outlined below, for the purpose of craft exhibits, displays, food booths and entertainment, and similar activities; and WHEREAS, members of the AGVIA will be responsible for traffic control, cleanup, and payment of all related fees and costs for use of City property and City employee time related to the event. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande as follows: 1. That the Arroyo Grande Village Improvement Association is hereby granted the use of certain City streets and property as follows: Easter in the Village — Saturday, April 7, 2001 A. The use of the parking lots in Olohan Alley befinreen Mason St. and Bridge St. from 6:00 p.m. Friday, April 6 to 6:00 p.m. Saturday, April 7. B. The use of Short St. between Olohan Alley and Branch St. from 6:00 p.m. Friday, April 6 to 6:00 p.m. Saturday, April 7. C. The use of the Nelson St. lawn befinreen Mason St. and Short St. for Easter Egg Hunt. Strawberry Festival — Saturday & Sunday, May 26 & 27, 2001 A. The closure of Branch St. from Traffic Way to Mason St. from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturday, May 26 and Sunday, May 27. (The Police Department will have to apply to CalTrans for street closure authorization). B. The closure of Short St. from Branch St. to Olohan Alley from 6:00 p.m. Friday, May 25 to 6:00 p.m. Sunday, May 27. C. The closure of Bridge St. from Branch St. to McLintock's Saloon parking lot from 6:00 a.m. Saturday, May 26 to 6:00 p.m. Sunday, May 27. D. The closure of Bridge St. from McLintock's driveway to Nelson St. from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, May 26 & 27. E. The closure of Bridge St. from Nelson St. to Traffic Way from 6:00 a.m. Saturday, May 26 to 6:00 p.m. Sunday, May 27. F. The use of the parking lots along Olohan Alley from Mason St. to Bridge St. from 6:00 p.m. Friday, May 25 to 6:00 p.m. Sunday, May 27. Resolution No. Page 2 G. The use of the Car Corral from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturday, May 26 and Sunday, May 27. H. Use of the Nelson St. lawn befinreen Short and Mason St. from 6:00 p.m. Friday, May 25 to 6:00 p.m. Sunday, May 27. I. The use of Hart-Collett Park between Bridge St. and Traffic Way from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturday, May 26 and Sunday, May 27. J. The use of the five-acre lot on West Branch St. next to the Woman's Club/Community Center for shuttle bus parking on Saturday, May 26 and Sunday, May 27: 4 of July in the Village — Wednesday, July 4, 2001 A.The use of the parkin� lots on Olohan Alley befinreen Mason St. and Bridge St. from 6 p.m. Tuesday, July 3 to 6 p.m. Wednesday, July 4"'. B. The use of Short St. between Olohan Alley and Branch St. from 6 p.m. Tuesday, July 3`� to 6 p.m. Wednesday, July 4"'. 2. That the AGVIA will adhere to all requirements and conditions of approval as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference for each of the above events issued by the City. On motion of Council Member on the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: , seconded by Council Member , and The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day of , 2001. Resolution No. Page 3 MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR ATTEST: KELLY WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/ DEPUTY CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER APPROVED AS TO FORM: TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TEMPORARY USE PERMITS NOS. 01-001, 01-002, & 01-003 EASTER IN THE VILLAGE (April 7, 2001) General Conditions 1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all State, County and City requirements as are applicable to this project. 2. The event shall occur in substantial conformance with the application and plans on file in the Community Development Department office. 3. The event organizers shall comply with all the conditions of the City Council Resolution adopted on January 9, 2001 (reference attachment). 4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of said approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his/her obligations under this condition. Parks and Recreation Department Conditions 5. The event organizers shall notify the Parks and Recreation Department of the number and placement of waste containers and barricades prior to April 1, 2001. 6. The AGVIA is responsible for providing trashbags and restroom supplies for the festival. Any supplies the Parks and Recreation Department may need to provide will need to be reimbursed by the AGVIA. 7. The event organizers shall have an individual designated to periodically inspect the restrooms and areas around the food vendors and waste containers. That individual shall be responsible for maintaining these areas in a clean manner and to gather and dispose of all debris. 8. The event organizers shall reimburse the City for electrical costs associated with special events. Specifically, for the outlets by the gazebo, Bridge St., and behind City hall. 9. The event organizers shall reimburse the City for the costs of any Parks and Recreation City services required for this event. Pub'lic Works Deaartment Conditions 10. Restroom facilities, barricades, signing and detour routes shall be provided as required by applicant. 1 1. The event organizers shall place an advertisement in the April 4, 2001 edition of the Five Cities Times-Press Recorder advising residents of street closures. 12. The event organizers shall provide a S 1,000,000 insurance policy naming the City as additional insured. 13. The event organizers shall reimburse the City for the costs of Fire, Public Works, and any other City services required for this event. Conditions of Approval Page 2 14. The event organizers shall contact the Public Works Department 72 hours prior to the event to check on the status of street maintenance/construction activities. The Public Works Department may require the event organizers to provide temporary construction (orange plastic) fencing around areas designated as potentially hazardous. : Buildinq and Fire Department Conditions 15. All food booths (cooking) must comply with the Fire Department guidelines. 16. All electrical must be inspected by the Building and Life Safety Division, prior to the event opening. 17. Emergency access must be maintained to the satisfaction of the Director of Building and Fire. 18. The use of generators must be reviewed and approved by the Director of Building and Fire. Police Department Conditions 19. The event organizers shall pay Police Department costs for officers assigned to the event. � Special Conditions 20. The AGVIA shall distribute to all vendors State Board of Equalization forms to report the sales tax collected during the festival, and notify the vendors that a listing of vendors will be supplied to the City to verify payment of sales tax. 21. The AGVIA shall provide to the City's Financial Services Department a listing of all vendors participating in the festival. The listing wiil be used to verify that sales tax was collected and reported as earned in Arroyo Grande. STRAWBERRY FESTIVAL (May 26 & 27, 2001) General Conditions 1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all State, County and City requirements as are applicable to this project. 2. The event shall occur in substantial conformance with the application and plans on file in the Community Development Department office. 3. The event organizers shall comply with all the conditions of the City Council Resolution adopted on January 9, 2001 (reference attachment). 4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of said approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his/her obligations under this condition. Conditions of Approval Page 3 Parks and Recreation Department Conditions 5. The event organizers shall notify the Parks and Recreation Department of the number and placement of waste containers and barricades prior to May 26, 2001. 6. The AGVIA is responsible for providing trashbags and restroom supplies for the festival. Any supplies the Parks and Recreation Department may need to provide will need to be reimbursed by the AGVIA. 7. The event organizers shall have an individual designated to periodically inspect the restrooms and areas around the food vendors and waste containers. That individual shall be responsible for maintaining these areas in a clean manner and to gather and dispose of all debris. 8. The event organizers shall reimburse the City for electrical costs associated with special events. Specifically, for the outlets by the gazebo, Bridge St., and behind City hall. 9. The event organizers shall reimburse the City for the costs of any Parks and Recreation City services required for this event Public Works Department Conditions 10. Restroom facilities, barricades, signing and detour routes shall be provided as required by applicant. 1 1. The event organizers shall place an advertisement in the May 21, 2001 edition of the Five Cities Times-Press Recorder advising residents of street closures. 12. The event organizers shall provide a$1,000,000 insurance policy naming the City as additional insured. 13. The event organizers shall reimburse the City for the costs of Public Works and any other City services required for this event. 14. The event organizers shall contact the Public Works Department 72 hours prior to the event to check on the status of street maintenance/construction activities. The Public Works Department may require the event organizers to provide temporary construction (orange plastic) fencing around areas designated as potentially hazardous. Buildin4 and Fire Department Conditions 15. All food booths (cooking) must comply with the Fire Department guidelines, and must have County Health Department approval. AGVIA will inform booth applicants of Fire Department guidelines, and will ensure total compliance of booth operators. AGVIA will not allow non-compliant booths to operate. 16. The project shall comply with the most recent edition of the California State Fire and Building Codes and the Uniform Building and Fire Codes as adopted by the City of Arroyo Grande. Specifically, all temporary-wiring provisions of the N.E.C. must be met. 17. The Building and Fire Department must inspect all food booths, generators and temporary electrical service prior to the opening of the event. In lieu of requiring a building permit for temporary electrical service, AGVIA will collect a fee of S 15 per every booth utilizing an electrical connection. This fee will be itemized by Conditions of Approval Page 4 booth number and submitted to the Department of Building and Fire within 15 days of the end of the Festival. 18. Emergency access must be maintained to the satisfaction of the Di�ector of the Building and Fire Department. A detailed chart or map will be provided to the Department of Building and Fire for approval prior to the event, showing placement of all booths, to include actual dimensions of access pathways for fire apparatus and emergency vehicles. 19. Per the approval of the Fire Chief, there will be ambulance service dedicated to the event. 20. The use of generators must be reviewed and approved by the Director of the Building and Fire Department. 21. All fire lanes must be posted and enforced in accordance with Police and Fire Department guidelines. Fire lanes and access must be approved by the Fire Chief. 22. The applicant shall identify an individual to act as liaison with the Fire Department for the purpose of maintaining propec life and safety. 23. Prior to opening the event, the fire access road shall be posted. The applicant shall provide continuous enforcement of the fire access road during the event. 24. AGVIA will coordinate, and be responsible for costs associated with Five Cities Ambulance, to provide standby personnel and equipment for Bike Medic and golf cart transport for entire duration of Festival. 25. AGVIA shall pay Department of Building and Fire costs for members and equipment assigned to the event. Police Department Conditions 26. The event organizers shall pay Police Department costs for officers assigned to the event. 27. All temporary "no parking" signs shall be posted a minimum of 24 hours prior to event setup (by 6:00 a.m., Friday, May 25, 2001). 28. A minimum of four (4) private "licensed" security will be provided by AGVIA. The AGVIA will present to the Arroyo Grande Police Department two (2) weeks prior to the event: a. The name of the security agency b. A schedule of security coverage c. Location and hours of security assignments d. Minimal security locations will be one (1) officer stationed at Nelson & Bridge St. Two (2) officers assigned to the swinging bridge. One (1) officer for patrol throughout the nighttime hours on Saturday, May 26, 2001. 29. Failure to provide private licensed security will result in AGPD Officers being assigned with billing made to the AGVIA. Special Conditions 30. All streets subject to closure must be posted a minimum of 24 hours prior to closure, stating the dates and times of closures. _ _ . _ _ --- - - , Conditions of Approval Page 5 31. The AGVIA shall distribute to all vendors State Board of Equalization forms to report the sales tax collected during the festival, and notify the vendors that a listing of vendors will be supplied to the City to verify payment of sales tax. 32. The AGVIA shall provide to the City's Financial Services Department a listing of all vendors participating in the festival. The listing will be used to verify that sales tax was collected and reported as earned in Arroyo Grande. 4 OF JULY IN THE VILLAGE (July 4, 2001) General Conditions 1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all State, County and City requirements as are applicable to this project. 2. The event shall occur in substantial conformance with the application and plans on file in the Community Development Department office. 3. The event organizers shall comply with all the conditions of the City Council Resolution adopted on January 9, 2001 (reference attachment). 4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action brough# against the City, its agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of said approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his/her obligations under this condition. Parks and Recreation Department Conditions 5. The event organizers shall notify the Parks and Recreation Department of the number and placement of waste containers and barricades prior to July 4, 2001. 6. The AGVIA is responsible for providing trashbags and restroom supplies for the festival. Any supplies the Parks and Recreation Department may need to provide will need to be reimbursed by the AGVIA. 7. The event organizers shall have an individual designated to periodically inspect the restrooms and areas around the food vendors and waste containers. That individual shall be responsible for maintaining these areas in a clean manner and to gather and dispose of all debris. 8. The event organizers shall reimburse the City for electrical costs associated with special events. Specifically, for the outlets by the gazebo, Bridge St., and behind City hall. 9. The event organizers shall reimburse the City for the costs of any Parks and Recreation City services required for this event Public Works Deaartment Conditions 10. Restroom facilities, barricades, signing and d.etour routes shall be provided as required by applicant. 1 1. The event organizers shall place an advertisement in the June 28, 2001 edition of the Five Cities Times-Press Recorder advising residents of street closures. Conditions of Approval Page 6 12. The event organizers shall provide a S 1,000,000 insurance policy naming the City as additional insured. 13. The event organizers shall reimburse the City for the costs of Fire, Public Works, and any other City services required for this event. 14. The event organizers shall contact the Public Works Department 72 hours prior to the event to check on the status of street maintenance/construction activities. The Public Works Department may require the event organizers to provide temporary construction (orange plastic) fencing around areas designated as potentially hazardous. Buildinq and Fire Department Conditions 15. All food booths (cooking) must comply with the Fire Department guidelines, and must have County Health Department approval. Non-compliant booths will not be permitted to operate. 16. The project shall comply with the most recent edition of the California State Fire and Building Codes and the Uniform Building and Fire Codes as adopted by the City of Arroyo Grande. Specifically, all temporary-wiring provisions of the N.EC. must be met. 17. The Building and Fire Department must inspect all food booths, generators and temporary electrical service prior to the opening of the event. A building permit is required for temporary electrical service. The fee is 530.00. 18. Emergency access must be maintained to the satisfaction of the Director of the Building and Fire Department. 19. The use of generators must be reviewed and approved by the Director of the Building and Fire Department. 20. All fire lanes must be posted and enforced in accordance with Police and Fire Department guidelines. Fire lanes and access must be approved by the Fire Chief. 21. The applicant shall identify an individual to act as liaison with the Fire Department for the purpose of maintaining proper life and safety. 22. Prior to opening the event, the fire access road shall be posted. The applicant shall provide continuous enforcement of the fire access road during the event. Police Department Conditions 23. The event organizers shall pay Police Department costs for officers assigned to the event. Special Conditions 24. The Building and Fire Department must approve booth layout and food booth locations prior to the event. 25. All streets subject to closure must be posted a minimum of 24 hours prior to closure, stating the dates and times of closures. 26. The AGVIA shall distribute to all vendors State Board of Equalization forms to report the sales tax collected during the festival, and notify the vendors that a listing of vendors will be supplied to the City to verify payment of sales tax. Conditions of Approval Page 7 27. The AGVIA shall provide to the City's Financial Services Department a listing of all vendors participating in the festival. The listing will be used to verify that sales tax was collected and reported as earned in Arroyo Grande. � pRROy�\ � INCOFPOqA7ED Z v O � * .Nxr �o. �ai� ,F c4 ��FORN� P TO: FROM: CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM 8.f. DANIEL C. HERNANDEZ, DIRECTOR OF PARKS, RECREATION, AND � FACILITIES SUBJECT: CITY HALL RE-ROOFING PROJECT, PROGRESS PAYMENT NO. 1 AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION DATE: JANUARY 9, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council: /� : C authorize Progress Payment No. 1 in the amount of $37,716.15 to Quaglino Roofing for work completed on the Re-Roofing of City Hall Project. direct staff to file a Notice of Completion; and authorize release of the retention of $4,190.68, thirty-five (35) days after Notice of Completion has been recorded, if no liens have been filed. FUNDING: On November 14, 2000, the City Council approved $41,495 for the City Hall Re-Roofing project ($37,695 for the construction contract +$3,800 for construction contingencies). Due to additional damage that was uncovered during construction the current project costs are $412.00 over the originally approved budget amount. A budget amendment transfer from the Government Buildings contractual services budget was made to address the additional cost. Sufficient funds are available in the contractual services budget to provide for this amendment. DISCUSSION: The City received an application for Progress Payment No. 1 from Quaglino Roofing for work completed befinreen November 22, 2000 and December 4, 2000. Staff has reviewed the application and has determined that the amount requested is in conformance with the quantity of work completed as of December 4, 20�0. Progress Payment No. 1 is in the amount of $41,906.83 of which $4,190.68 will be held in retention until the project is completed in accordance with the project specifications. The project included replacement of the existing roof with a new waterproof roofing material. Staff is recommending the release of the 10% retention ($4,190.68) to Quaglino Roofing thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded, if no liens are filed. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are presented for the Council's consideration: - Approve staff's recommendations; - Do not approve staff's recommendations; - Modify as appropriate and approve staff's recommendations; or - Provide direction to staff. Attachments: 1. Application for Progress Payment No. 1 2. Application for Retention Payment 3. Notice of Completion jep:232.0001(19)\city.hall.rerooflprogress.pay.city.hall.reroof.doc Citv of AppllcaBon fw Progress Payment Contract Name: The Re-Roofing of City Hell 'C��'b�: Quegilino Roofrng Prograss PaymeM No: 1(finel) City A�cotu�t No: 010-4213-640! 537, 716.15 PaYment Dabe: 01N9N1 Bid Estimate Amended Eatimate �p p� � UnR Unit UrWt % Mem UnR De�xi fon Price Amourd Prics Amourd Prios MiouM Com 1 LS Remow and rsplaos axistlny 1 = 37.695.00 = 37,685.00 1 i37.885.00 i 37,885.00 1 i37,895.00 i37,�85.00 100% buik-up root psr spec�ficadons d 214 East Braneh Strest CC0�1 LS Replaq Ms exbtlnp scuppers 1 = 2,299.00 t 2,299.00 1 S 2,299.00 S 2,299.00 1 S 2,299.00 i 2,299.00 100% aod replaes thros overllow �+PP� CC0�2 LS One bsar-0B ahinpls roofinp 1 S 1,912.83 S 1.812.83 1 S 1,912.83 S 1,912.83 1 S 1,912.83 i 1.912.83 100% and re-shest roof area at Arroyo Grande City Hall � � � ; .`t�� '�. _ l �'� - � ,� _ � ' .� � ,, _ .r `� '/ , /i��L�/� i .i �/i r c�y M.�w� _ Sv►d Pavmont to: Quaglino Roofi�g 81 �B Fiero Lane Sa� Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (� � Np�2.000��tarcny n.� r«ooa�yppt.cny.iwfarootxs � � /Z Z7-v� �� !- 3•6/ Date 41 �Y � � 541,908.83 Rstsntlon :4,190.88 �� r�+�� io.00 This Payment 37 716.15 Contract SiaR D�ts: Nowmbsr 22� 2000 ori�ind Contraet D�ys: 30 ndju�ea conaau o.ys: 0 � Adjusted Contrad End Deb: Decembsr 21. 2000 City of Arroyo G ra r �PP�caBon for Prog.ess Paymenr Cantract Name: The Re-Roofing of City He/l C�'��: QuegVino Roofing Proyress Payment No: Retention Cihr Accour�t No: 010-4213-6401 a4,190.68 Payrt�ent Dabe: 01N9N1 Bid Estimate Amended Estimate � p� � Unit Unit lMit % Item Unit Descri ' Prk:e Amount Price AmouM Prbs AmouM Com 1 LS Ramova and nplaee a�dstlnp 1 S 37.695.00 t 37,695.00 1 t37,695.00 i 37.6'95.00 1 537,895.00 537,895.00 100% builwup root per spaeNkatlons at 214 East Bnnch Street ' CCOE1 LS Replece fiw sxistlnp scuppers 1 S 2,299.00 i 2,289.00 1 = 2,299.00 i 2,299.00 1 S 2,299.00 = 2,299.00 100% and rrplace three oveAl�ow � seuppers CCOl2 LS Onstear-0tfshinpleroofinp 1 s 1,912.83 s 1,912.83 1 S 1,912.83 S 1.812.83 1 s 1,912.83 S 1,912.83 100% and reshaet taof v� at Arroyo Gtande Cily Hall � _�!� � �� v '� / , ,�. � ��./, . ,i � / /iyl�� i % . � � �� Swwl Pavmant to: Quaglino RooBng 815-B Fiero Lane San Luis Obtapo, CA 93401 �� pp�a2000��apd�y n.� r.roonr�teny.n.�reroaxs �,2 �2�' (a!/ o� /Z-Z?-cn� Date /- 3- D/ Date 41 �ym o.a sat,sos.as R�bntlon ' i0.00 Previous Payments 537.716.15 This PaymeM 190.68 Contract Start D�b: Nowmbsr 22. 2000 Oripinal Crntrae! Days: 30 ndJusc.d contraet o.ys: 0 oace naju�ed cormract ena o.te: o.cem� 2t, z000 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND VVI�N RECORDED RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CTTY OF ARROYO GRANDE P.O. BOX 550 ARROYO GRANDE, CA 93421 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: The undersigned is owner or agent of owner of the interest or estate stated below the property hereinafter describe. 2. The FULL NAME of the OWNER is: _ The Citv ofArrovo Grcmde 3. The FCTLL ADDRESS of the OWNER is: _ 214 East Branch Street. Arrovo Gr�ade California 93420 4. The NATURE OF TI� INTEREST or ESTATE of the undersigned is: in fee 5• TI� FULL NAME and FLTLL ADDRESS of ALL PERSONS, if any, who hold such interest or estate with the undersigned as 70INT TENANTS or as TENANf S IN COMMON are: NAMES ADDRESSES . None � 6. THE FLTLL NAMES and FULL ADDRESSES of the PREDECESSOR'S in interest of the undersigned if the property was transferred subsequent to the commencement of the work of improvements herein referred to: NAMES ADDRES SES None 7. All work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was COMPLETED December 4. 2000 8. The NAME OF TI� ORIGINAL CONTRACTOR, if any, for such work of improvement is: aglino RooftnQ 81 S B Fiero Lane San Luis Obispo California 93401 9. The street address of said property is: 214 East Branch Street Arrovo Grcmde Citv Hatl 10. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Arroyo Grande, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, and is described as follows: The Re RoofinQ of Citv Hall Verification of NON-INDNIDUAL owner: I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I am the Public Works Director of the aforesaid interest or estate in the property described in the above notice; that I have read the said notice, that I know and understand the conterns thereof, and the facts stated therein are true and correct. 7anua, r� 9, 2001 Don Spagnolo, PE, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Date o � PRROr�c �.g. � � INCOiipORATEO 9 2 u ° MEMORANDUM # ,Rxr ,o. ,a,� , f c ��FORN� P TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: DON SPAGNOLO, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: FAIR OAKS AVENUE/TALLY HO ROAD OVERLAY PROJECT, � PROJECT NO. PW-2000-3, PROGRESS PAYMENT NO. 5 DATE: JANUARY 9, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council authorize Progress Payment No. 5 in the amount of $14,650.88 to R. Burke Corporation for work completed on the Fair Oaks Avenue/Tally Ho Road Overlay capital improvement project. FUNDING: On June 27, 2000, the Council awarded a construction contract for the Fair Oaks Avenue/Tally Ho Road Overlay Project to R. Burke Corporation in the amount of $599,559 and authorized a contingency of $142,591 to be used for unanticipated costs during the construction phase of the project ($742,150 total available funding). DISCUSSION: The City received an application for Progress Payment No. 5 from R. Burke Corporation for work completed between November 7, 2000 and December 6, 2000. Staff has reviewed the application and has determined that the amount requested is in conformance with the quantity of work completed as of December 6, 2000. Progress Payment No. 5 is in the amount of $14,650.88 of which $1,627.87 will be held in retention until the project is completed in accordance with the project specifications. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are presented for the Council's consideration: - Approve staff's recommendation; - Do not approve staff's recommendation; - Modify as appropriate and approve staff's recommendation; or - Provide direction to staff. Attachments: 1. Application for Progress Payment No. 5 jep:232.5630\5631\contract admin\payments\progress.pay.5.doc c�ty o f � ��v �� w��/ Public Worb Departmmt Applfcation forP�ogress PaymetttNo. 5 Contra�t Name: Fmr Oaka Anenue, Vapey Road snA TaQy Ho Rad Contrect Na Zppap2 City Account Na 350.58067001 = SI4,65Q88 Payment Datc �5/lppp SUBTOTAL &D-PHASE■ CONSTRUCTION COST - PHASE 1.113 III ContraM are rellecteE in above Items - See CCO No. �� In this CCO. See CCO No. 2; Plus hvo (2) G M ris CCO.: PAU Nne f91 worldra devs Bid Item No. TOTAL CCO CO - PNA I,tl 3 I II TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST - PNASE I,116111 �w-1 � -o 0 Date �•�� ` o O Pay to Date S 725,390.50 . _ � Relmtlon S 72,53�105 Date Previoos PaymeMS $ 638,155.58 Pixvioos RetmHon S 70,906.18 � /� �� O ihis Payment S 14,6SO.b8 / 7Lis Reteelion S 1,627.E! Date ContractStutDatc 7/13/00 . ONgltul Contract Dayc 75 Adjusted Contract Days: 106 Date Adjusted Coneract End Dste 11/30/00 SendPrymmt to: R Baeke Cmpmatlrn PO Bm� 957 Saa LaL Obi.po. CA 93406 City Menaga 8.h. o � pRR01►� � � INCOHPOqATED 9 2 � ° MEMORANDUM � ,iu�r �o, �e» ,� c4 ��FORN� P TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: DON SPAGNOLO, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER � SUBJECT: PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE SCENIC CREEKSIDE WALK THROUGH THE HISTORIC VILLAGE OF ARROYO GRANDE, PHASEIIPROJECT DATE: JANUARY 9, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the Council: A. adopt the attached resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute Program Supplement Agreement No. M005, Rev. 1; and, B. direct the Director of Administrative Services to submit Program Supplement Agreement No. M005, Rev. 1 and authorizing resolution to Caltrans. FUNDING: The City was successful in securing $250,000 of Federal Transportation Enhancement Activity (TEA) and $62,500 of Urban State Highway Account (USHA) funds for the Scenic Creekside Pedestrian Walk, Phase II capital improvement project. DISCUSSION: On August 24, 1999, the City Council directed staff to distribute options for Phase II of the Scenic Creekside Walk project for public comment. On October 26, 1999, staff presented a summary of the public comments to the Council and the Council prioritized the options for Phase II. The design of Phase II was developed through meetings with the Public Works and Parks Departments, the Arroyo Grande Village Improvement Association, the South County Historical Society, and the Consultant. Phase II consists of the construction of a bluff top walkway and overlook along the south bank of Arroyo Grande Creek befinreen Mason Street and Short Street. Phase II also includes the construction of the lower portion of the stairway on the north side of the creek near the swinging bridge from the stairway constructed during Phase I to an �area adjacent to the creek. � Construction began at the end of December and the contract provides 90 calendar days for completion of the work. Before the City can begin invoicing for reimbursement of the work performed on any phase of a Federal-aid project, a Program Supplement Agreement must be executed befinreen the City and the State. A Program Supplement Agreement is a project-specific agreement that is incorporated into the general Master Agreement already entered into by the City and State in 1979 and again in 1997. It formalizes the financial responsibilities and provisions for a specific Federal-aid or State funded project. It identifies the reimbursable phase(s) of work in addition to the types and amounts of Federal, State and local funds used to finance the locally sponsored project. It is the contractual basis for the State to pay the local agency for work done. A resolution that clearly identifies the official authorized to execute the Program Supplement Agreement must be attached to each Program Supplement Agreement in order to be fully executed. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are presented for the Council's consideration: - Approve staff's recommendations; - Do not approve staff's recommendations; - Modify as appropriate and approve staff's recommendations; or - Provide direction to staff. Attachments: 1. Resolution 2. Program Supplement Agreement No. M005, Rev. 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT NO. M005, REV. 1 TO AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECT NO. 05-5199 FOR THE CREEKSIDE PEDESTRIAN WALK, PHASE II PROJECT WHEREAS, the City and the State have entered into Local Agency-State Agreement for Federal-Aid Project No. 05-5199 on February 18,1979 and again on May 15, 1997; and WHEREAS, Program Supplement No. M005, Rev. 1 to the Local Agency-State Agreement for Federal-Aid Project No. 05-5199 designates the Federal funds requested and the matching funds to be provided by the City of Arroyo Grande for all phases of the Scenic Creekside Walk, Phase II capital improvement project; WHEREAS, the City of Arroyo Grande is eligible to receive Transportation Enhancement Activity (TEA) funds for this project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande hereby: � '� Approves Exhibit "A" attached, entitled "Program Supplement No. M005, Rev. 1 to Administering Agency-State Agreement for Federal-Aid Project No. 05-5199" Appoints the Mayor as the official representative authorized to execute Program Supplement Agreement No. M005, Rev. 1. On motion of Council Member and on the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: , seconded by Council Member the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this day of 2001. RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR ATTEST: KELLY WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/ DEPUTY CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: STEV N ADAMS, CITY MANAGER APPROVED AS TO FORM: TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY Exhibit A PROGRAM SIIPPLSr�SNT NO. M005 Rav. 1 Date:December 06, 2000 to Location: OS-SLO-O-ARGD ADMIIIISTSRING AGSNCY-STATL AGRBEbiSNT prpjgCt Nuatbex' :STPLER-5199(014) FOR F$DSRAL-AID PROJECTS.NO. 05-5199 S.A. Number :05-927166 This Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the Agency-State Agreement for Federal Aid wtuch was entered into between the Agency and the State on OS/15/97 and is subject to all the terms and condirions thereof. This Program Supplement is adopted in accordance with Article I of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. , approved by the Agency on (See copy attached). The Agency fiuther stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with the covenants or remazks setforth on the following pages. PROJSCT LOCATION: IN THE CTTY OF ARROYO GRANDE @ ARROYO GRANDE CREEK (CREEKSIDE WALK PROJECT) TYPE OF �ORIC: pEDESTRIANACCESS LENGTBs p(MILSS) PROJSCT CLA33IFICATION OR PHASB(S) OF WORR [X] Preliminary Engineering [X] Construction Engineering Bstimated Cost BTA $282,390.00 B � CITY OF ARROYO GRANDB Sy Date Attest $17,883.00 $232,117.00 [X] Construction Matching Funds LOCAL OTHER $32,390.00 $0.00 $0.00 STATB OF CALIFOItNIA Department of Tranaportation By Chief, Office of Local Programs Projact Implemeatation Date Title I hereby certify upon my peraonal knowledge that budgeted funda are available for thia encumbraaces Accounting Offi Chapter � Statutes Item I Year 50 1999 2660-101-890 Date 1 � -6 • � � ! Progr�m ) I BC I Category ! C / 2030.010.827 C 262042 Program Supplement 05-5199-M005-R1 ISTEA [ ] Right-Of-Way Faderal Funds Fund Source 892-F $250,000.00 AMOUNT 250,000.00 Page 1 of 2 0� ;,'LC�7-0-�.RGD STPLER-5199(014) SPECIAL COVENAN'PS OR REMARKS 12/06/2000 l. The Local Agency will advertise, award and administer this project in accordance with the current Local Assistance Procedures Manual. 2. All maintenance, involving the physical condition and the operation of the improvements, referred to in Article III MAINTENANCE of the aforementioned Master Agreement will be the responsibility of the Local Agency and shall be performed at regular intervals or as required for efficient operation of the completed improvements. 3. This agreement supplements the Local Agency-State Master Agreement Federal-Aid projects, with the understanding that all provisions Transportation Equity Act (TEA-21) apply. 4. The Local Agency agrees that payment of Federal fuads will be limited to the amounts approved by the Federal Highway Administration in the Federal-Aid Project Authorization/Agreement or Amendment/Modification (E-76) and accepts any increases in Local Agency Funds as shown on the Finance or Bid letter or its modification as prepared by the Office of Local Programs Project Implementation. 5. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY is required to have an audi.t in accordance with the Single Audit Act and OMB A-133, if it receives $300,000 or more in federal funds in a single fiscal year. The federal funds received under this project are a part of the Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) 20.205, Highway Planning and Research. OMB A-133 superceded OMB A-128 in 1996. Reference to OMB A-128 in Master Agreement (if any) is superceded by this covenant. Program Supplement 05-5199-M005-R1 ISTEA � Page 2 of 2 ;� _—�-1 8.i. o � pRROy� � INCONPONATED Z u ° MEMORANDUM � ,NJLY /0. 1911 * c ��FQRN� P TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: DON SPAGNOLO, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER� SUBJECT: PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE TRAFFIC WAY BRIDGE RAIL REPLACEMENT PROJECT DATE: JANUARY 9, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the Council: A. adopt the attached resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute Program Supplement Agreement No. M006; and, B. direct the Director of Administrative Services to submit Program Supplement Agreement No. M006 and authorizing resolution to Caltrans. FUNDING: The City was successful in securing $117,612 of Federal Bridge Barrier Rail Replacement funds for the Tra�c Way Bridge Rail Replacement project. These funds require an 11.47% (or $15,238) local match. On November 14, 2000, the Council allocated $15,238 for the local match through savings from the Traffic Way curb, gutter and sidewalk project ($12,304), Los Olivos sidewalk project ($1,490) and the Branch Mill Road guardrail project ($1,444). DISCUSSION: Before the City can begin invoicing for reimbursement of the work performed on any phase of a Federal-aid project, a Program Supplement Agreement must be executed befinreen the City and the State. A Program Supplement Agreement is a project-specific agreement that is incorporated into the general Master Agreement already entered into by the City and State in 1979 and again in 1997. It formalizes the financial responsibilities and provisions for a specific Federal-aid or State funded project. It identifies the reimbursable phase(s) of work in addition to the types and amounts of Federal, State and local funds used to finance the locally sponsored project. It is the contractual basis for the State to pay the local agency for work done. A resolution that clearly identifies the official authorized to execute the Program Supplement Agreement must be attached to each Program Supplement Agreement in order to be fully executed. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are presented for the Council's consideration: - Approve staff's recommendations; - Do not approve staff's recommendations; - Modify as appropriate and approve staff's recommendations; or - Provide direction to staff. Attachments: 1. Resolution 2. Program Supplement Agreement No. M006 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT NO. M006 TO AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECT NO. 05-5199 FOR THE TRAFFIC WAY BRIDGE RAIL REPLACEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the City and the State have entered into Local Agency-State Agreement for Federal-Aid Project No. 05-5199 on February 18,1979 and again on May 15, 1997; and WHEREAS, Program Supplement No. M006 to the Local Agency-State Agreement for Federal-Aid Project No. 05-5199 designates the Federal funds requested and the matching funds to be provided by the City of Arroyo Grande for preliminary engineering of the Traffic Way Bridge Rail Replacement project; WHEREAS, the City of Arroyo Grande is eligible to receive Federal Bridge Barrier Rail Replacement funds for this project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City ofArroyo Grande hereby: A. Approves Exhibit "A" attached, entitled "Program Supplement No. M006 to Administering Agency-State Agreement for Federal-Aid Project No. 05-5199" B. Appoints the Mayor as the official representative authorized to execute Program Supplement Agreement No. M006. On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and on the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this day of 2001. RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR ATTEST: KELLY WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/ DEPUTY CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: STEVEN ADAMS, CITI( MANAGER APPROVED AS TO FORM: TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY PROGRAM SIIPPLSMENT NO. M006 to ADMINISTSRING AGSNCY-STATE AGREBMSNT FOR FBDERAL-AID PROJSCTS NO. 05-5199 Exhibit A Date:December 05,2000 Loc ati on : OS-SLO-O-ARGD Project Number:STPLX-5199(O15) S.A. Numbar:05-927209 Ttris Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the Agency-State Agreement for Federal Aid which was entered into between the Agency and the State on OS/15/97 and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This Program Supplement is adopted in accordance with Article I of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. , approved by the Agency on (See copy attached). The Agency further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with the covenants or remazks setforth on the following pages. PROJSCT LOCATION: In the City of Arroyo Grande on Traffic Way over Arroyo Grande Creek Brd No. 49C-318 TYPS OF WORK: Bridge Rail LBNGTii: 0.1 (MILBS) PROJECT CLASSIFICATION OR PHASE(S) OF WORR [� Preliminary Engineering [ ] Construction Engineering Bstimatad Cost BRL $22,750.00 CITY OF ARROYO GRAND$ BY [ ] Right-Of-Way Federal Funds $20,141.00 Date Attest Title [ ] Construcrion Matchiag Funds LOCAL OTHSR $2,609.00 $0.00 $0.00 STATl3 OF CALSIFORNIA Departmant of Transportation By Chief, Office of Local Programs Project Implementation Date I hereby certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for thia encumbranca:, Accounting Offic`rf� /!'� ��"�/�' ' ` ��' r�� Date l � • (j ' C� � $20,141.00 Chapter � Statutea � Item � Year 50 1999 2660-101-890 BC � Category � Fund 3ource � AMOUNT C 228040 892-F 20,141.00 Program Supplement 05-5199-M006- ISTEA Page 1 of 2 OS-SLO-O-ARGD STPLX-5199(O 15) i2iosi2000 SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS 1. The Local Agency agrees that payment of Federal funds will be limited to the amounts approved by the Federal Highway Administration in the Federal-Aid Project Authorization/Agreement or Amendment/Modification (E-76) and accepts any increases in Local Agency Funds as shown on the Finance or Bid letter or its modification as prepared by the Office of Local Programs Project Implementation. 2. The Local Agency will advertise, award and administer this project in accordance with the current Local Assistance Procedures Manual. 3. This agreement supplements the Local Agency-State Master Agreement Federal-Aid projects, with the understanding that all provisions Transportation Equity Act (TEA-21) apply. 4. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY is required to have an audit in accordance with the Single Audit Act and OMB A-133, if it receives $300,000 or more in federal funds in a si�gle fiscal year. The federal funds received under this project are a part of the Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) 20.205, Highway Planning and Research. OMB A-133 superceded OMB A-128 in 1996. Reference to OMB A-128 in Master Agreement (if any) is superceded by this covenant. 5. This Program Supplement will be revised at a later date to include other phases of work. 6. Al1 main.tenance, involving the physical condition and the operation of the improvements, referred to in Article III MAINTENANCE of the aforementioned Master Agreement will be the responsibility of the Local Agency and shall be performed at regular intervals or as required for efficient operation o� the completed improvements. Program Supplemant05-5199-M006- ISTBA Page 2 of 2 i.�. �PRROr o� � � � 1NCOHGOAA7E0 9 2 V T �c ,R1lY t0. 1911 * c4 ��FOR�'� P MEMORANDUM TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGEF��- BY: KAREN SISKO, HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER� SUBJECT: IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW STATE MINIMUM WAGE DATE: JANUARY 9, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to increase wages for those part-time positions that fall below the new State minimum wage. FUNDING: The fiscal impact would be approximately $157.00, which can be absorbed in the departments' budgets. DISCUSSION: The current rate of pay for a Police Cadet is $6.08 per hour, Recreation Leader II is $5.92 per hour, and the Assistant III is $5.92 per hour. The new State minimum wage is going up to $6.25 effective January 1, 2001. The City currently utilizes fourteen hours of Cadet services per week. The Recreation Leader II and the Assistant III do not commence employment until the summer programs begin in June, 2001. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration: 1. Approve staff's recommendation; 2. Do not approve staff's recommendation; 3. Modify as appropriate and approve staff's recommendation; or 4. Provide direction to staff. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ADOPTING THE NEW STATE MINIMUM WAGE FOR PART- TIME POSITIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande ("City") deems it in the best interest of the City to increase wages for part-time employees whose wages fall below the new State minimum wage and be implemented as hereinafter provided. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande that: 1. Part-time employees shall receive the wages as designated below. POSITION HOURLY RATE START 1 YEAR 2 YEARS 3 YEARS(+) PAY SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE Police Cadet $6.25 - Recreation Leader I I, High School $6.25 AM/PM Assistant III, High School $6.25 $6.42 $6.42 $6.74 $6.74 $7.07 $7.07 2. This rate of pay shall become effective January 1, 2001. On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and on the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this day of , 2001. RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 MICHAEL LADY. MAYOR ATTEST: KELLY WETMORE, DIFtECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/ DEPUTY CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: TE E ADAMS, CITY MANAGER APPROVED TO AS FORM: TIMOTHY CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY /pRROy\ p� G` � �+coRVOA�rE Z t) T � ,xxr �o, ie» „� c4 ��FOR�� P TO: FROM: CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM 8.k. DON SPAGNOLO, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER� SUBJECT: PARK-AND-RIDE LEASE AGREEMENT WITH CALTRANS DATE: JANUARY 9, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the Council approve the Park-and-Ride Lease Agreement with the California State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement. FUNDING: This agreement has no fiscal impact. DISCUSSION: The City and the California State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) entered into an agreement on_March 1, 1995 forthe use and maintenance o#the park-and-ride lot on the east side of EI Camino Real across from the Country Kitchen Restaurant. The agreement allowed Caltrans to operate and maintain the 31-space park-and-ride lot as a staging area for interested persons participating in carpools, vanpools, and other ridesharing vehicles. This agreement had a term of finro years and expired on March 1, 1997. Caltrans is requesting that the City enter into a new agreement for the operation and maintenance of the park-and-ride lot. The new agreement has two notable changes. The term of the agreement has been increased to three years, with an expiration date of November 1, 2003 and the public liability and property damage insurance has been increased from $3,000,000 to $5,000,000. The agreement provides for the same provisions including use of the property, access, maintenance, governmental charges and limited sfate responsibility for property damage. The Public Works Department has received two requests to modify the existing lot. The proposed modifications include increasing the number of spaces and providing landscape enhancements to beautify the area. Staff is evaluating these requests which will involve the Traffic Commission and Caltrans. Changes or modifications to the existing lot that may be approved by the City can be addressed as an amendment to the agreement in the future. Staff is recommending the Council approve the agreement with Caltrans to operate and maintain the park-and-ride lot on EI Camino Real so that liability and property damage insurance will be provided. dw:U:�2001\City CouncilUanuary�Park.and.Ride.doc ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration: - Approve staff's recommendation; - Do not approve staff's recommendation; - Modify as appropriate and approve staff's recommendation; or - Provide direction to staff. Attachments: 1. Park and Ride Lease Agreement 2. Prior Park and Ride Lease Agreement dw:U:�2001\City CouncilUanuary�Park.and.Ride.doc PARK-AND-RIDE LEASE AGREEMENT Agreemeat Number: _05-SLO-08_ Extension Date: November 1, 2000 County: _SLO Property Address: 775 El Camino Real Arroyo Grande _California, 93420 District: _05 Number of Parkiag Stalls: 31 Date Lot was first established: September 14, 1982 - 10 parking stalls THIS AGREEMENT, DATED November 1, 2000 IS BETWEEN THE CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "CALTRANS," AND the City of Arroyo Grande, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "OWNER." I. PURPOSE The purpose of Agreement is to provide a portion of the Owner's premises as a staging area for persons interested in participating in carpools, vanpools, or other ridesharing vehicles. . II. PREMISES Owner hereby licenses CALTRANS to use that portion of Owner's premises marked "Park-and-Ride" on attached map, marked "E�chibit A," and made an express part of this Agreement. T'hese spaces are available for use upon commencement of the agreement. III. TERM The term of this Agreement shall be for a term of 3 years, commencing from the beginning date hereof and terminating on November 1, 2003. Either party may, however, terminate this Agreement by giving 30 days written notice to the other party of its intent to terminate. At the expiration of the term of this agreement CALTRANS and OWNER may review the terms of the agreement. With the mutual consent of CALTRANS and OWNER, the term of this agreement may be extended, or another agreement initiated, to continue use of the designated area for pazk and ride pnrposes. IV. USE OF THE PROPERTY Persons traveling in carpools or other rideshazing vehiGles may use the specified "Park-and-Ride" staging area as a parking lot. CALTRANS will, at its own expense, place painted signs, with the Owner's advance approval, to designate the specified staging area. V. ACCESS CALTRANS may use the Owner's property surrounding the premises for vehicle and pedestrian access and circulation for persons in carpools. Page 2 VI, MAINTENANCE CALTRANS will provide reasonable maintenance for the desi gated staging area Ownn a�'oT dama t e even CALTRANS promptly of defects in parking azeas, which could ive, rise to third arty � jw'Y g� though CALTRANS may make periodic inspections of the premises. VII. GOVERNMENTAL CHARGES CALTRANS will have no obligation to pay any taxes, assessments or governmental charges against the premises. VIII. INSURANCE CALTRANS will at all times during the term of this Agreement, take out and keep in force at its own expense, (a) public liability insurance to protect CALTRANS and Owner, their officers, agents and em erson caused by or liability to the public, incident to the use of, or resulting from, injury to, or death of, any p resulting from the installation, maintenance or use of said "Park-and-Ride" area in the amount of not less than $5,000,000 to indemnify against the claim of one person and in the amount of not less than $5,000,000 against the claims resulting from any one occurrence; (b) property damage liability insurance to protect CALTRANS and Owner, their officers, agents and employees against any liabiliry for damage to property, caused by or resulting from the installation, maintenance, or use of said "Pazk-and-Ride" area in the amount of not less than $5,000,000 for each occurrence. IX. STATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ASSETS OF OWNER CALTRANS assumes responsibility to correct any losses or damage to property of Owner caused (or resulting) from installation, maintenance, or use of Owner's property as a"Park-and-Ride" area to a limit of $10,000 but not to exceed the amount to replace damaged property and materials with those of a like kind and quality. OWNER - Approved by: Mayor City of Arroyo Grande STATE - Approved by: A. Gregg Albright, Division Chief Planning and Programming State Department of Transportation District 5 Cc: Mike Gray, HQ Padc and Ride Lot Coordinator Regional Planner, San Luis Obispo Counry Bruce Ward, Caltrans Maintenance Superintendent SLO County Rideshare EXHIBI T "A " z 5 �( . 3 � v� W � m � � O � h W � /� ti� 6- y � O � � � � Z � � .��o ° � Z �� /�y N N o� � �N � PARK AND RIDE LOT AGREEMENT Agreement Number: OS-SLO-�8 Oate: March 1, 1995 County: ean Luis obispo District: OS THIS AGREEMENT, DATED March 1.1995 IS BETWEEN THE CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "CALTRANS" , AND THE City of Arroyo Grande HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "OWNER". I. PURPOSE The purpose of the Agreement is to provide a portion of. Owner's premises as a staginq area for persons interested in participating in carpools, vanpools, or other ridesharing vehicles. II. PREMI8E8 Owner hereby licenses CALTRANS to use that portion of Owner's premises marked "Park and Ride" on auach�d map, marked "Exhibit A", and made an express part of this Agreement. � � III. TERM The term of this Agreement shall be from the beqinning date hereof and terminate on MARCH 1. 1997. Either party may, however, terminate this Agreement by giving 3odays written notice to the other party of its intent to terminate. IV. USE OF THE PROPERTY The specified "Park and Ride" staging area may be used as a parking lot by persons traveling in'carpools or other ridesharing vehicles. CALTRANS will, at its own expense, place signs and painted stripes, with the Owner's advance approval, to designate the specified staging area. Upon termination of this agreemerit, CALTRANS will remove the signs and obliterate the stripes. __ ________ 05-SLO-#8 Page 2 V. ACCE88 vi. vii. CALTRANS may use the Owner's property surrounding the premises for vehicle and pedestrian access and circulation for persons in carpools. MAINTENANCE CALTRANS will provide reasonable maintenance for the designated staging area and improvements thereon. Owner. agrees to notify CALTRANS promptly of defects in parking areas which could give rise to third party injury or damage, even through CALTRANS may make periodic inspections of the premises. GOVERNMENTAL CIIARGES CALTRANS will have no obligation to pay any assessments, or governmental charges against pIII. INSURANCE taxes, the premises. CALTRANS will at all times during the term of this agreement, take out and keep in force at its own expense, (a) public liability insurance to protect CALTRANS and Owner, their officer, agents and employees against any liability to the public, incident to the use of, or resulting from, injury to, or death of, any person caused by or resulting from the installation, maintenance or use of said "Park and Ride" area in the amount of not less than $3,000,000 to indemnify against the claim of one person and in the amount of not less than $3,000,000 against the claims of more than one person resulting from any one occurrence; (b) property damage liability insurance to pratect CALTRANS and Owner, their officers, agents and employees against any liability for damage to property, caused by or resulting from the installation, maintenance, or use of said "Park and Ride" area in the amount of not less than $3,000,000 for each occurrence. I%. BTATE RESPONBIBII,ITY FOR PROPERTY D�'IAGE TO A83ET8 OF OWNER CALTRANS assumes responsibility to correct any losses or damaqes to property of Owner caused (or resulting) from installation, maintenance, or sue of owner's property as a "Park and Ride" area to a limit of $10,000 but not to exceed the amount to replace damaged property and materials with those of like kind and quality. _- ___ 05-SLO-#8 Page 3 %. APPROVALS OWNER � Approved: � N�►n,�g A. K. "Pete" Dougall ' Mayor l �� DATB � Property Address: 775 E1 Camino Real Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 Number of Parkinq Stalls: 31 Date Lot was established: Beptember id, 1982 (10 stalls) CALTRANS Approval Recommended: im � � �� ,� � Senbc Tnmpotwlon Pl�r�ec PubNe Teaapanda+ Diwia 3 Approved: .ri- - � - - .- � � � � �� „�,� �c T�,� . su� ot c.rr«,r. AGx6meet ce Tom Pulluu M&e G�a�. HQ Tnllk Opaitbm Fie � �6 � S � - 6-5- gS OS.Od9SDHC � .. � — . � 1 ' � . �� , � � , � � � c � . , � I .. _ � � ' C .QI r � � v _' � _ �' —� � o = I � ■ ■ ( < •' l � �- I .. � � � ! 1 tn .�.: - I �� I � � K `� � y� L f . �_% %� . y ,. � �. ' , �✓ � � , i � .` . \\` � � W \ � / \ . � ( 1 �'i�- � i � � '�� \`` �' � � �� \ �•• u � \ �{ � � ( i .�..• , � �I I �� , . � � � '� � �� I `\ ��: , _ : �) `. � .y � i.. , ' �- -'' �I . , ;• �j,%�'i� I � , ,.� ; � ; r= ' ; �� i �I ;- . . . .. .� .j � �� ' �I � � � � � . .� �;� � � ;I ! I� H i I C V � � 3 II W a i� i V �a u • z I� N � �..� V • Y � � � � � I�p '� � ' u: _ � Y s I f V � �� i ;, . f i I ~ I � � <' ,� / Z_ • '�i O � ! �' / � i i� -� ,% � �` � i � �• o i c- Y .� 1 I 11 x Y i � � I � I J � r : -',' I '� � ;i I �j � _ � I r i � � o .: �� -- . � r �� . (' U , J � � I � I .i ot o : = � i � �- �J _ , � �, , z � N . ; � x , � �- '� W � . i 1 r�s c:S / ' ��, _� � a � � W � � � y Z � � � � k � � U � J j W � V W � L .� a �.; ��—' .. ^� v ' „ � � ... - _� �..___�_- ,.�....w.�...Y......._,_ 9�� CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande will hold a Public Hearing on the following project: CASE NO. APPLICANT: LOCATION: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: REPRESENTATIVE: Conditional Use Permit 00-015 Horizon Senior Housing 579 Camino Mercado Mitigated Negative Declaration Steven Puglisi, AIA The City Council will consider a Conditional Use Permit to construct an 84-room assisted care facility on a 3.98-acre parcel. � In compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the Community Development Department has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration on the above project. The Mitigated Negative Declaration is available for review in the Community Development Department. If the City Council does not feel that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate, project approval will not be considered. Any person affected or concerned by this application may submit written comments to the Administrative Services Department before the City Council hearing, or appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the project and the environmental impacts at the time of hearing. Any person interested in the proposals can contact the Administrative Services Department at 214 E. Branch Street, Arroyo Grande, California, during normal business hours (8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M.�. IF YOU CHALLENGE AN ITEM IN COURT, YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY THOSE ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING DESCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AT, OR PRIOR T0, THE PUBLIC HEARING. FAILURE OF ANY PERSON TO RECEIVE THE NOTICE SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE GROUNDS FOR ANY COURT TO INVALIDATE THE ACTION OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY FOR WHICH THE NOTICE WAS GIVEN. Date and Time of Hearing: Place of Hearing: 1�1X�.�i�Oh�---- Kelly et re, Director of Administrative Services/ Deputy City Clerk Tuesday, January 9, 2001 at 7:00 P.M. Arroyo Grande City Council Chambers 215 E. Branch Street Arroyo Grande, California 93420 Publish 1 T, December 27, 2000 � pRROYO ° �p � INCORPORATED � � v T * JUIY 10, 1611 * c�9��FORN`P MEMORANDUM TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: KERRY McCANTS �""` COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR BY: �,�• KELLY HEFFERNON ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 00-015; HORIZON SENIOR HOUSING; 579 CAMINO MERCADO DATE: JANUARY 9, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit Case No. 99-015 subject to the conditions of approval. FUNDING: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission, Architectural Review Committee (ARC) and Staff Advisory Committee (SAC) reviewed the proposed project as both a pre-application and Conditional Use Permit (reference Attachments 4 thru 9 for meeting minutes and notes). During the December 5, 2000 Planning Commission meeting, commissioners expressed concerns about handicapped access from the street to the facility, building height, landscaping, and traffic. In response to Planning Commission concerns, Conditions of Approval No. 18(dl(6) and 19 were added regarding landscaping and intermittent stopping areas along the pedest�ian pathway adjacent to the access road. Project Description The project site is located within the Professional Commercial District (P-C) of the Oak Park Acres Planned Development (PD 1.1) and is approximately 3.97 acres in size. Surrounding the site is vacant land to the west (approved for office development), single-family residences to the east (buffered by an 80-foot wide City Council January 9, 2001 CUP 00-015; Arroyo Crest Page 2 of 5 strip of open spacel, the Oak Park Professional Center to the south, and designated open space property to the north between the project site and James Way. The applicant is proposing to construct a two and three-story, 84-room assisted care facility totaling approximately 100,000 square feet with 27 covered and 23 open parking spaces. An access driveway extends up from Camino Mercado at a 15 % slope to the parking area and facility entrance. The project would include a common dining area, chapel, gym, laundry facility, activity room, and numerous other amenities (reference Attachment 2). The facility can accommodate up to 99 individuals in five guest room designs, including a studio, 1-bedroom, deluxe 1- bedroom, 2-bedroom, and deluxe 2-bedroom. The definition of an assisted care facility, or "senior congregate care housing facility", is found in "The Zoning Dictionary" (Lehman & Associates) which states the following (a definition is not provided in the Development Code): "A structure(s) years of age recreational, e quarters." providing residence for a group of senior citizens (60 or more) with central or private kitchen, dining, c. facilities with separate bedrooms and/or living Ordinance No. 316 C.S. was adopted in 1984 to specifically allow this type of use in the Oak Park Acres Planned Development (reference Attachment 3►. Pre-Application Review The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed project as a pre-application on August 1, 2000 and discussed issues of facility operations, massing of the building, building height, access, traffic, and landscaping. The applicant revised the project plans to show an additional tower element on the southeast corner of the building and a bridge connecting the activity area to the walkway located at the rear of the project. The applicant also submitted perspective drawings for the north and south elevations, and an exhibit showing the relationship between the five-foot high retaining wall for the proposed project and the two retaining walls approved for the adjacent office project (reference Attachment 10). DISCUSSION: The proposed project is subject to both the Development Code standards for parking and landscaping, and to the specific standards outlined in the P-C District of PD 1.1. As shown in the table below, the project meets all relevant site development requirements. � ..ti..». ..._. Clty COUIICI� January 9, 2001 CUP 00-015; Arroyo Crest Page 3 of 5 Pa_ rkinq For an assisted care facility, the Development Code requires 1 uncovered space for every 3 beds, and 1 space per employee on the largest work shift. With a total of 99 beds, and a maximum of 13 employees at any one time, the required number of parking spaces is 46. The proposed project exceeds this amount by 4 spaces. The 27 covered parking spaces will be subject to the parking requirements specified in Development Code Section 9-12.140 regarding "parking structures". These requirements are included in the Conditions of Approval. Buildinq Hei�ht The Development Code allows a maximum building height in the P-C District of either two (2) stories or thirty feet (30'), whichever is less. Building height is defined as the vertical distance between the average finished grade and the highest point of the roof (excluding mechanical equipment, chimneys, etc.). A portion of the proposed project is three stories tall. The applicant interprets the above height definition to include a three-story building, as long as the average height does not exceed thirty feet (30'). As previously directed by the Planning Commission, staff discussed the height issue with the City Attorney, who concurred with the applicant's interpretation. Traffic Imqacts A trip generation analysis was p�epared for the project (reference Attachment B of the Initial Study), which estimates that the development would generate fourteen (14) p.m. peak hour trips. Since this is less than the twenty (201-peak hour trip threshold established by the City, no additional mitigation above payment of the City's traffic and signalization impact fees is required. SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS � � City Council January 9, 2001 CUP 00-015; Arroyo Crest Page 4 of 5 Biological Impacts There are three populations of Pismo Clarkia on the site, a plant species federally listed as an endangered species and classified as a State Rare Plant. Per the biological survey prepared for the project (reference Attachment C of the Initial Study), these plant populations will be protected by a twenty-five (25) foot buffer area around them (see mitigation measures No. 13 and 14). Approximately 12 mature Coast Live Oak trees exist on the site. No oak trees will be removed as a result of this project, and the project is conditioned to implement tree protection measures during construction. The project is also conditioned to replace the twelve (12) proposed 15-gallon Cork Oak trees shown on the landscape plan with the same number and size of Coast Live Oak trees. This will help mitigate the unknown number of oak trees removed in 1987 when building pads were cut into the hill for an approved 180-room skilled nursing facility. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has reviewed this project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines and the City of Arroyo Grande Rules and Procedures for Implementation of CEQA. Based on this review, a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared and noticed for public review. No comments have been received on the Draft Negative Declaration and a Final Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for the City Council to review and adopt. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are presented for Council consideration: - Approve staff's recommendation; - Do not approve staff's recommendation; - Modify as appropriate and approve staff's recommendation; - Provide direction to staff. Attachments: Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 00-015 Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval Exhibits B1 — B6: Project Plans 1. Location Map 2. Project Statistics 3. Uses Permitted in the "P-C" District of the Oak Park Acres Planned Development 4. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of December 5, 2000 5. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of August 1, 2000 6. SAC Meeting Notes of October 3, 2000 City Council January 9, 2001 CUP 00-015; Arroyo Crest Page 5 of 5 7. SAC Meeting Notes of June 20, 2000 8. ARC Meeting Notes of October 2, 2000 9. ARC Meeting Notes of July 10, 2000 10. Cross Section of Retaining Walls 1 1. Initial Study Attachment A: APCD Referral Response Attachment B: Trip Generation Analysis Attachment C: Biological Survey 12. Notice of Determination __ T --- _.. RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, INSTRUCTING THE DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TO FILE A NOTICE OF DETERMINATION, AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 00-015, LOCATED AT 597 CAMINO MERCADO, APPLIED FOR BY HORIZON SENIOR HOUSING WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande has considered Conditional Use Permit Case No. 00-015, filed by Horizon Senior Housing, for construction of a two and three-story, 84-room assisted care facility; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing on this application in accordance with the City Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council has found that this project is consistent with the General Plan and the environmental documents associated therewith; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed this project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the Arroyo Grande Rules and Procedures for Implementation of CEQA and has determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration can be adopted; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds, after due study, deliberation and public hearing, the following circumstances exist: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL Conditional Use Permit Findings: 1. The proposed use is permitted within the Professional Commercial (P-C) District of the Oak Park Acres Planned Development (PD 1.1) pursuant to Section 9-03.050 of the Development Code, and complies with all applicable provisions of the Development Code, the goals and objectives of the Arroyo Grande General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the City. 2. The proposed use will not impair the integrity and character of the district in which it is to be established or located. 3. The site is suitable for the type and intensity of use or development that is \ proposed because all the necessary easements, circulation, parking and setbacks would be provided. 4. There are adequate provisions for water, sanitation, and public utilities and services to ensure the public health and safety. 5. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties and improvements in the vicinity because the proposed project would not create adverse environmental impacts. RESOLUTION N0. PAGE 2 Architectural Review Findings: 1. The proposal is consistent with the General Architectural Review Guidelines for the City of Arroyo Grande. 2. The proposal is consistent with the text and maps of the Arroyo Grande General Plan, and the City of Arroyo Grande Development Code. 3. The proposal will not be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed project. 4. The general appearance of the proposed building is consistent with the character of the neighborhood because the structure will follow the existing site contours and the building materials colors will be muted and derived f�om the surrounding environment. 5. The proposal is not detrimental to the orderly and harmonious development of the City. 6. The proposal will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood. Department of Fish and Game Required Findings of Exemption: 1. The City of Arroyo Grande has prepared an initial study pursuant to Section 15063 of the Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), for Conditional Use Permit Case No. 00-015. 2. Based on the initial study, a Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures was prepared for public review. 3. After holding a public hearing pursuant to State and City Codes, and considering the record as a whole, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the mitigated negative declaration and found that there is no substantial evidence of any significant adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively on wildlife resources as defined by Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code or on the habitat upon which the wildlife depends as a result of development of this project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande hereby adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration, instructs the Director of Administrative Services to file a Notice of Determination, and approves Conditional Use Permit Case No. 00-015, with the above findings and subject to the conditions as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this refe�ence. RESOLUTION N0. PAGE 3 On motion by Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 9 day of January 2001. _ � _ _ __ RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 4 MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR ATTEST: KELLY WETMORE, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR/ DEPUTY CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER APPROVED AS TO FORM: TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY _ ____ ___ � _ _ __ RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 5 EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 00-015 Horizon Senior Housing 597 Camino Mercado COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GENERAL CONDITIONS This approval authorizes the construction of a two and three-story, 84-room assisted care facility. 1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all Federal, State, County and City requirements as are applicable to this prpject. 2. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit Case No. 00-015. 3. This application shall automatically expire on January 9, 2003 untess a building permit is issued. Thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the approval, the applicant may apply for an extension of one (1) year from the original date of expiration. 4. Development shall occur in substantial conformance with the plans presented to the City Council at the meeting of January 9, 2001 and marked Exhibits "B1 — B6". Setbacks, lot coverage, and floor area ratios shall be as shown on the development plans, except as specifically modified by these conditions. 5. The applicant shall agree to defend at his/her sole expense any action brought against the City, its present or former agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of said approval, or in anyway relating to the implementation thereof, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fee's which the City, its agents, officers or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his/her obligations under this condition. DEVELOPMENT CODE 6. Development shall conform to the Professional Commercial (P-C) zoning requirements of the Oak Parks Planned Development (PD 1.1) except as otherwise approved. _ -.-.--.�..�......_._...._. RESOLUTION N0. PAGE 6 7. Signage shall be subject to the requirements of Development Code Chapter 9- 13. 8. Setbacks, lot coverage, and floor area ratios shall be as shown on the development plans except as specificall.y modified by these conditions. NOISE 9. Construction shall be limited to between the hours of 7 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday thru Friday and between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. on Saturday or Sunday. WATER 10. All new construction shall utilize fixtures and designs that minimize water usage. Such fixtures shall include, but are not limited to, low flow showerheads, water saving toilets, instant water heaters and hot water recirculating systems. Water conserving designs and fixtures shall be installed prior to final occupancy. SOLID WASTE 11. Per Development Code Section 9-10.120(c), trash enclosures shall be screened from public view with landscaping or other appropriate screening materials, shall be made of masonry or concrete with an exterior finish that complements the architectural features of the main building. The trash enclosure area shall accommodate recycling container(s). 12. Trash enclosures shall be reserved exclusively for dumpster and recycling container storage. Miscellaneous tires, auto parts, boxes, bins, racks, etc., will not be allowed within the enclosure. PRIOR TO ISSUING A BUILDING PERMIT: 13. The Community Development Director shall approve plans for the trash enclosures. 14. The applicant shall submit a solid waste recycling plan for recycling discarded materials, such as concrete, sheetrock, wood, and metals, from the proposed construction. The plan must be submitted to the Community Development Director for approval. 15. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 514 C.S. regarding affordable housing. 16. The development plans shall comply with Development Code, Chapter 9-12, "Parking and Loading Requirements". Specifically, the covered parking shall comply with Development Code Section 9-12.140, "Off-Street Parking Structures". RESOLUTION N0. PAGE 7 17. The applicant shall submit details of all proposed retaining walls. Any fence, wall, or combination thereof exceeding six (6) feet in height, but less than eight (8) feet, shall require a Minor Exception approved by the Community Development Director. Any fence or wall greater than eight (8) feet in height shall require a Variance approved by the Planning Commission. 18. A landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect subject to review and approval by the Community Development and Parks and Recreation Departments. The plan shall be consistent with the requirements of Development Code Section 9-12.130, "Landscaping for Off Street Parking Facilities". The landscape plan shall include the following: a. Tree staking, soil preparation and planting detail; b. The use of landscaping to screen ground-mounted utility and mechanical equipment; c. No significant trees to be removed. d. The required landscaping and improvements. This includes: 1. Deep root planters shall be included in areas where trees are within five feet (5') of asphalt or concrete surfaces and curbs; 2. Water conservation practices including the use of tow flow heads, drip irrigation, mulch, gravel, drought tolerant plants and mulches shall be incorporated into the landscaping plan; 3. An automated irrigation system. 4. Pampas grass shall be permanently removed from the project site. 5. All Cork oak trees (Quercus suber) shown on the preliminary landscape plan shall be replaced with Coast live oak trees (Quercus agrifolia). 6. Manzanita ("Sunset" and "Carmel Sur") shall replace the Baccharis pilularis ("Pigeon Point") as a front slope ground cover. 19. The applicant shall submit new drawings showing stops with benches and/or a handrail along the walkway adjacent to the access drive. PRIOR TO ISSUING THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: 20. Development shall comply with Development Code Sections 9-10.070, "Fences, Walls and Hedges"; 9-10.080, "Lighting"; 9-10.110, "Performance Standards"; and 9-10.120 "Screening Requirements". 21. The applicant shall paint a test patch on the building including all colors. The remainder of the building may r�ot be painted until inspected by the Community Development Department or Building and Fire Department to verify that colors are consistent with the approved color board. A 48-hour notice is required for this inspection. —,-- - _ _ RESOLUTION N0. PAGE 8 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 22. Any change to the roof color or material that was presented to the Architectural Review Committee on October 2, 2000 shall require additional ARC review. 23. All ducts, meters, air conditioning equipment, and other mechanical equipment, whether on the ground, on the structure or elsewhere, shall be screened from public view with materials architecturally compatible with the main structure. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 24. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance 431 C.S., the Community Tree Ordinance. 25. Linear root barriers shall be used at the front of the project to protect the sidewalks. 26. All street front trees shall be 24-inch box. POLICE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUING A BUILDING PERMIT: 27. The applicant shall submit an exterior lighting plan for Police Department approval. PRIOR TO ISSUING THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: 28. The applicant shall post designated fire lanes, per Section 22500.1 of the California Vehicle Code. 29. The applicant shall post handicapped parking, per Police Department requirements. BUILDING AND FIRE DEPARTMENT 30. The project shall comply with the most recent editions of the California State Fire and Building Codes and the Uniform Building and Fire Codes as adopted by the City of Arroyo Grande. 31. The project shall have a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute for a duration of three hours. 32. The project shall be compliant with current state and federal disabled access lav�rs (ADA). RESOLUTION N0. PAGE 9 33. The project shall comply with California State amended building codes. PRIOR TO ISSUING A BUILDING PERMIT: 34. The applicant shall show proof of properly abandoning all non-conforming items such as septic tanks, wells, underground piping and other undesirable conditions. 35. The applicant shall obtain County Health Department approval for the kitchen and dining room. 36. Any review costs generated by outside consultants, shall be paid by the applicant. 37. Provide a soils report for the existing grading. PRIOR TO ISSUING THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: 38. Two (2) onsite and one (1) offsite fire hydrants shall be installed per Fire Department and Public Works Department standards. 39. All fire lanes must be posted and enforced, per Police Department and Fire Department guidelines. 40. The applicant must provide an approved "security key vault" per Building and Fire Department guidelines. 41. The building must be fully sprinklered per Building and Fire Department guidelines. 42. The applicant shall install a Fire Department approved fire alarm system per National Fire Protection Association Standards. 43. Consistent with Mitigation Measure No. 17, the applicant shall provide a Vegetation Management Plan for a portion of the open space property located adjacent to and north of the project site. The Plan shall include an a�ea having a depth of 200' along the northern project boundary. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT GENERAL IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 44. Site Maintenance - The developer shall be responsible during construction for cleaning city streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks of dirt tracked from the project site. The flushing of dirt or ctebris to storm drain or sanitary sewer facilities shall not be permitted. The cleaning shall be done after each day's work or as directed by the Director of Public Works or the Community Development Director. RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 10 45. Encroachment Permit - The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining an encroachment permit for all work within a public right of way. 46. Grading - All grading shall be done in accordance with the City Grading Ordinance. 47. Fees - The applicant shall pay all applicable City fees at the time they are due. (For your information, the "Procedure for Protesting Fees, Dedications, Reservations or Exactions" is provided below). PROCEDURE FOR PROTESTING FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR EXACTIONS: (A) Any party may protest the imposition of any fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions imposed on a development project, for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public facilities re�ated to the development project by meeting both of the following requirements: (1) Tendering any required payment in full or providing satisfactory evidence of arrangements to pay the fee when due or ensure performance of the conditions necessary to meet the requirements of the imposition. ' (21 Serving written notice on the City Council, which notice shall contain all of the following information: (a) A statement that the required payment is tendered or will be tendered when due, or that any conditions which have been imposed are provided for or satisfied, under protest. (b) A statement informing the City Council of the factual elements of the dispute and the legal theory forming the basis for the protest. (B) A protest filed pursuant to subdivision (A) shall be filed at the time of the approval or conditional approval of the development or within 90 days after the date of the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions to be imposed on a development project. (C) Any party who files a protest pursuant to subdivision (A) may file an action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the imposition of the fees, dedications reservations, or other exactions imposed on a development project by a local agency within 180 days after the delivery of the notice. RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 11 (D) Approval or conditional approval of a development occurs, for the purposes of this section, when the tentative map, tentative parcel map, or parcel map is approved or conditionally approved or when the parcel map is recorded if a tentative map or tentative parcel map is not required. (E) The imposition of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions occurs, for the purposes of this section, when they are imposed or levied on a specific development. PRIOR TO ISSUING A BUILDING PERMIT: 48. Improvements required - All project improvements shall be designed in accordance with the City of Arroyo Grande Standard Drawings and Specifications, except as may be modified by these conditions of approval. The following improvement plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Public Works Department: a. Grading, drainage and erosion control b. Curb, gutter and sidewalk. c. Public utilities. d. Water and sewer. 49. Site Plan Requirements - The site plan shall include the following: a. The location and size of all water, sewer and storm water facilities within the project site and abutting streets or alleys. b. Location, quantity and size of all sewer laterals. c. The location, size and orientation of all trash enclosures. d. All parcel lines and easements related to the property. e. The location and dimension of all paved areas. f. The location of all public or private utilities. g. The location of all existing improvements such as retaining walls. 50. All project improvements shall be constructed prior to occupancy, except for non-essential improvements, which may be guaranteed by an agreement and financial securities as provided for in Section 9-15.070 of the Development Code. 51. Drainage design - All drainage facilities shall be designed to accommodate a 100-year storm flow. 52. Parking lot design — The cross slope on parking lot driving lanes shall not exceed 5 percent. RESOLUTION N0. PAGE 12 53. Entrance design — The driveway entrance shall be designed with curb returns having a minimum radius of 15 feet. 54. Improvement agreement - Prior to approval of any improvement plans, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for inspection of the required improvements. 55. Soils report - A preliminary soils report shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and supported by adequate test borings. All earthwork design and grading shall be performed in accordance with the approved soils report. 56. Adjacent structures - The grading plan design shall include measures to protect the adjacent structures from damage due to the construction. 57. Landscape approvals - Landscape and irrigation plans are required within the public right of way, and shall be approved by the Community Development, Parks and Recreation, and Public Works Departments. 58. Utility company review - All public improvement plans shall be submitted to the public utility companies for review and comment. Utility comments shall be forwarded to the Director of Public Works for approval. 59. Plan submittals - Upon approval of the improvement plans, the applicant shall provide a reproducible mylar set and 3 sets of prints of the improvements for inspection purposes. Prior to acceptance of the improvements, the applicant shall provide reproducible mylars, and 2 sets of prints of the approved record drawings (as builts). 60. Recorded documents - All easements, abandonments, or similar documents to be recorded as a document separate from a map, shall be prepared by the applicant on 8'/z" x 11" City standard forms, and shall include legal descriptions, sketches, closure calculations, and a current preliminary title report. The applicant shall be responsible for all required fees, including any additional required City processing fees. PRIOR TO ISSUING A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: 61. Water Neutralization Program — Consistent with Mitigation Measure No. 1, the applicant shall complete measures to neutralize the estimated increase in water demand created by the project by either: Implement an individual water program consisting of retrofitting existing high-flow plumbing fixtures with low flow devices. The calculations shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for review and approval. The proposed individual water program shall be submitted to the City Council for approval prior to implementation; or, RESOLUTION N0. PAGE 13 Pay an in lieu fee of $2,200 per equivalent residential unit water usage. 62. Street Widening — Camino Mercado shall be widened along the property frontage. The widening shall provide a width 22 feet from centerline to the curb (matching the existing curb to the east). The pavement structural section shall be based on a Traffic Index (TI) of 6.0. 63. Curb and sidewalk — A concrete curb, gutter and 6-foot wide concrete sidewalk shall be constructed along the property frontage. 64. Parking lot striping — The parking lot spaces shall utilize double line striping. 65. Site Drainage — Roof drainage and parking lot drainage shall be collected in a storm drain system. The public storm drain in Camino Mercado approximately 100 feet west of the project boundary shall be extended to connect to the project drainage system. 66. Storm Drains - The onsite storm drain system shall be private. The storm drain in Camino Mercado shall be public. 67. Site Grading — All existing cut slopes shall be graded to a safe condition. 68. Relocate Water Facilities - The existing water air release valve and the existing fire hydrant shall be relocated as necessary to accommodate the new improvements, as required by the Director of Public Works. 69. Onsite private fire lines - Private onsite fire sprinkler lines shall be connected to the public water system with a backflow prevention assembly. The backflow assembly shall be painted green. Fire department connections shall be located per the Fire Department requirements. � 70. Onsite public fire lines — A 15-foot wide easement shall be provided for public waterlines serving onsite fire, as required by the Director of Public Works. 71. Water Storage - Pay a fee of 544,000 to provide for adequate water storage facilities to serve the project. 72. Water-sewer crossings - All sewer mains or laterals crossing or parallel to public water facilities shall be constructed in accordance with California State H�alth Agency standards. 73. Water meters - Water meters shall be located in the public sidewalk or as approved by the Director of Public Works. Separate meters may be used for irrigation. RESOLUTION N0. PAGE 14 74. Sewer Connection — The onsite sewer system shall be private and shall connect to the public sewer system in a single location. Sewer laterals larger than 4 inches shall connect to the public system at a manhole. 75. Existing Services - Existing water and sewer services not used by the project shall be abandoned per the requirements of the Director of Public Works. 76. Underground new utilities - All new public utilities shall be installed as underground facilities except as noted. 77. Utilities operational - Prior to approving any building permit within the project for occupancy, all public utilities shall be operational. RESOLUTION N0. PAGE 15 MITIGATION MEASURES A negative declaration with mitigation measures has been adopted for this project. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented as conditions of approval and shall be monitored by the appropriate City department or responsible agency. The applicant shall be responsible for verification in writing that the mitigation measures have been implemented. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall complete measures to neutralize the estimated increase in water demand created by the project by either: Implement an individual water program that utilizes fixtures and designs that minimize water usage. The calculations shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for review and approval. The proposed individual water program shall be submitted to the City for approval prior to implementation; or, pay an in lieu fee. Monitoring: Review of individual water program or payment of the in lieu fee Responsible Department: Public Works Department Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit 2. All new construction shall utilize fixtures and designs that minimize water usage. Such fixtures shall include, but are not limited to, water saving toilets, instant water heaters and hot water recirculating systems. Water conserving designs and fixtures shall be installed prior to final occupancy. Monitoring: Review of building plans Responsible Department: Building and Fire Department Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit 3. All landscaping shall be consistent wi#h water conservation practices including the use of drought tolerant landscaping, drip irrigation, and mulch. To the greatest extent possible, lawn areas and areas requiring spray irrigation shall be minimized. Monitoring: Review of landscaping and irrigation plans Responsible Department: Parks & Recreation Department Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit 4. The applicant shall provide detailed drainage calculations indicating that increased run-off can be accommodated by existing facilities and/or provide on-site retention basins to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. �.�.. .�._ �, . .�.�-r____ RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 16 Monitoring: Review of grading plans Responsible Department: Public Works Department Timeframe: Prior to issuance of a grading permit 5. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day and whenever wind exeeeds 15 miles per hour. 6. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. 7. Permanent dust control measures identified in the revegetation and landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. 8. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with fast-germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation is established. 9. All vehicles hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other� loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114. (This measure has the potential to reduce PM, emissions from this source by 7 - 14%). . 10. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or wash off trucks and equipment leaving the site. (This measu�e has the potential to reduce PM, emissions from this source by 40 - 70%). 11. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where feasible. (This measure has the potential to reduce PM, emissions from this source by 25 - 60%). For Mitigation Measures No. 5- 11: Monitoring: Responsible Department: Timeframe: Review of grading and building plans and site inspections Public Works and Building & Fire Departments shall inspect plans and spot check in the field Prior to issuance of a grading permit and during construction 12. The applicant shall pay the City's Traffic and Signalization Impact fees prior to issuance of building permit. RESOLUTION N0. PAGE 17 Monitoring: The applicant shall pay the fees Responsible Department: Public Works Department Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit 13. Site development plans shall specify that, grading and other types of disturbance be precluded from a 25-foot buffer zone around the Pismo Clarkia populations to minimize impacts. A fence and appropriate signage shall be placed around the buffer zone to preclude impacts to Pismo Clarkia during construction. Monitoring: The applicant shall submit plans showing these protection measures. Responsible Department: Community Development Department Timeframe: Prior to issuance of grading permit 14. The site development plans identifying protection areas around the Pismo Clarkia shall be submitted to the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) at least 10 days prior to the start of site work. Monitoring: The applicant shall submit the plans to CDFG Responsible Department: Community Development Department Timeframe: Prior to issuance of grading permit 15. Protective fencing shall be installed around each tree at the dripline. The fencing shall be installed prior to any site clearing, grading, or demolition activities, and shall remain in place until construction is complete, including landscaping. Weatherproof signs shall be permanently posted on the fences, stating the following: Tree Protection Zone No personnel, equipment, materials, or vehicles are allowed Do Not move or remove this fence [Name of arborist or consultant] [Name and phone number of developer or general contractor] Monitoring: Field inspection Responsible Departments: Parks & Recreation and Community Development Departments Timeframe: Prior to issuance of grading permit RESOLUTION N0. PAGE 18 16. The final landscape and irrigation plan shall show twelve (12), 15-gallon Coast live oak trees in place of the Cork oak trees. Monitoring: The applicant shall submit the final landscape and irrigation plan showing this change Responsible Departments: Parks & Recreation and Community Development Departments Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit 17. The applicant shall submit a Vegetation Management Plan for a portion of the open space property located adjacent to and north of the project site. The plan shall include an area having a depth of 200' along the northern project boundary. Monitoring: The applicant shall submit the plan Responsible Department: Building & Fire Department Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit 18. All construction equipment shall be provided with well-maintained, functional mufflers to limit noise. 19. All construction activities shall comply with the time limits specified by the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code. 20. To the greatest extent possible, grading and/or excavation operations at portions of the site bordering developed areas should occur during the middle of the day to minimize the potential for disturbance of neighboring noise sensitive uses. For Mitigation Measures No. 18 — 20: Monitoring: Notes shall be placed on the construction plans referencing the above measures. Responsible Department: Public Works Department Timeframe: During construction 21. The following note shall be placed on the grading and improvement plans for the project: "In the event that during grading, construction or development of the project, archeological resources are uncovered, all work shall be halted until the significance of the resources are determined. If human remains (burials) are encountered, the County Coroner (781-4513) shall be contacted immediately. The applicant may be required to provide archaeological studies and/or additional mitigation measures as required by the California Environmental Quality Act if archaeological resources are found on the site." . RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 19 Monitoring: Review of grading plans and site visits by the Public Works Inspector Responsible Departments: Public Works and Building & Fire Departments Timeframe: Prior to issuance of a grading permit and during site grading 22. The applicant shall pay all applicable park development fees to the City. Monitoring: The applicant shall pay the park development fees Responsible Department: Parks & Recreation Department Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit __ �o � � EXHIBIT B1 � � L. �.� Z � � � r ,�N V rT7 . h•+�� ^+.`.� G� � � 1 ;, ; �� ,� s� F: p U � 'I F d � ..r g� � i r, � � � � p�. �� I I i � �� . ; � :� � a w a 0 zz �w j ° �o W � o � � � V Qo � LL � N � Z � U � � O U � �� r ' � �; u � a� o° k� �. ' �. . - - _ ,_'� . h.. ,- = �.' y � . z .,�� . . � . . . . . .. , . ., . � .' . �.. .`�. . .,, . . . . .. •.�, . . ... EXHIBIT B2 ;� Q � �. �„ ;o� � �` �� ; ss� � � . � y � Y "'� �i . N O w � � �� o � � � ��~ �� .�°� �� _° �ll ,f� �� - , � ..� , , � o , ,� . -- e -� _ � � � � ��_ � � � < �; � :,� � � � 0 , < � 1` W � �; y � ` - � . � ; .z :^ � Y � � � O � $ � i� � �� N n � � s � � W o � " + c� �t a , °� � U `� �: T � � (� - � � u �V �.� / � v "�� ° � ' � � W � � _ � � � ; � t` �� / � '� ; � ;.��; �� ' . . � � 1 . . . � .�� . � _. . . . i a � p ' "' � , '� �� S �� I = �` ; . .� � �� o . . Yy # . . - - � � � x o � • ,I — # i:` �� S � o a � +� � � � � f �, � '�_ , ^ � . .�+ Su r . . . . � � �y �. _ � � � s � � � . a s . i �� — ' � � " � � � � _ `.� �� l � _Y� - � m � � �, I �� -�--� � � � < ' . � - i � . r _. O . . � � - .. . ♦ � _ !, - o ' � � . � � . � � . r '�µ�, .. � � � � . . . . � � . ^ � � �` ,". -- I' � � � . �. ' u - � ' ' .., . - . R � <' . _ �` , . . �� \� �' .. �rc3�'� �y � ..�__ �� . . . . r � '�� -... � �,.� � �� ^ . - . lJ � � � � � �. ��:� �. `��a ` � � ,� . gj .F�,¢ 1�� _ ._ A '� . . � � �� c��ldE � t' d�d �G�� 6E75� ��f��s'��7�i�� .. � .�y.I : � �{ . . . � . � i . . . . . . � �� rt . I . . .. .� ' ..,..�.— .,ua�"., ....,., ' ' � �...'� � tQ N � � . I I . � . . . . ... . � . � . �i�l�F - B . b..81i� ��. . . ' I (9 � �1 . . _ ' . . _ � aaaAa$a; aaaaaaaaaaa�a aaa aaaa �' �� aaa_�a_a_a_�� . � � �� ------� -�-� --- ---- � � -j. � � j � k ��3 � !� � � � 3� � �� - d �� , �� t �� '� Ii. ��- � a1 i �� . �_ �� ; � �� ; �� . � � � � � �� l� �� E�� i i� �� g . � � � � � � � �a�� ;� �� -� � . e �,.,,�� Q �:��: °c.� o- . ' � � � � : � n � , :s. . , �� v c��; d` . . ..., . . . - . . . . .. . . a . �-` ' ; ,;, : � ;' ':q ,3`; ,c - . . . .. - � ' � �' ti ; y {f �� st � . . T a� r � y �. ,y,��;;,� -„ ' r�. �...._..�.�,...,�.._. _. � . . .. � . � .ti.,�,.....�-a�. .'. R . „ :. ,. s.�w�... . i�.�� .a.`� �,.�. . . .. _. __..__... ... . . .. . . .. . _ EXHIBIT B3 r `� — x � � 0 0 � � �� o � , t � O � 0 0 — 1 .� a � � q O � a N � H � � � 0 a a 0 0 ; ! � � I, � i � I� O r N J � Q � �y b � A Q � � N � � � O m � ay N m b y > �j . TI : � � I � i � _A O X J b - � � m- l� B O P ti O� �� e ... =� r; �� oc � �� .. �, � < m ` u � � � D� Q � K a , k� ,�'a p � , , � �r�, N ��i Q � � /�� V l � � � � � `,�/ � fl � J •1 I �' � O „ � � � J, N . � � � , � Ti - il � �, i A i . w .. _. _. . ..... . . .. . . : �o �� J � pp ,, J ,� 4 b p / / �� V J \� ^ � / \ f � �\ � v �(� a' � � �a4 A � ,�' � � � � 4 � �,� p � .`� ��q � �� . 0 �_� , � � �_ � �� EXHIBIT B4 �� t � Q ' � � � A ;�� ; �' I v �. � � !. i � � ; .�! ''� j u �� ..�\ � ;� ' �� p�,� � E.,.� . �� u � � , � � � o i w � � � ,, a ;° � � � , ; ! � ', Q� . , �� ` �� e �+ " � � � � 0 � "'� �� '' � a �� -� Q _ � o � � � o �, o � _ . . � o � a O q n o' �I U .� :� `S� � y �a �� /1 :A �� _ EXHIBIT B5 Q � � � O V w � � � � � � 8' - U 3� I ; o � i4 N 4 � a Y � � � I � a � � i � � - o' �a .� �� :., �a -�� ... _� � �W � , , , � t 1 ♦ �, � \ C ( I I I S I � � I '� H M W 6 I 6 I o I � l � � � � a I i � . I� _ _ I ia , �✓ � � � o x� �� ° �d , ... �� : � r� '� ,� � �a' �� :� EXHIBIT B6 � � .:�: • . � : . . /�` �....� . . �. � ; . C : . , • .. • ; ,.; • : � . • 9 t�'�•: ��- `' . � ' ATTACHMENT I ,, .� • ';::. .,: � :.�•:�:: ,��.4R�(. • R . ; . � ' � . .• .�..'. .2. '.� ' .. �..f•:;:.' .. ::; v�'�'VGGR,� ...��..�•• ��... �r . J \. .'�. - • . . , �'!•�: •�' . . ;: '1 �- , o•�: : a .�• • : ' ' ' : �; .•�.'.: ..: .•; ' �. ': .� • '�' ' :l�P� / • ' .~ . �� . `, . ,,,: .� • '':!•. ' ' +'�� •� J � ' �� :: • • . • ' . • • • . \�' . . � � • f.Q . . . . . .�� . . . . . . . . . . � C' - `.•. 4� . . � . ` . ' . . . •• � • • . •. • � . • ' • ' • , ' •.��. ,SS • ' • � � ' ' . ' � .,��' . . . • . ; .., ' , �.'�. .p. �. , �. , , • •' ., '. ,. .t .� • .. . • ��• • � .. • ' � • . ' '' ' �� .` ��✓' • • � . ��• '. � '� • . • 'i . .'� .. •• • : : , ' �.�.. '.. . �.' . • • ,��,:.,.•...•:':':::: :::.:: . • ; . , • � . . �*�' • ... • , • :�. • • . : ; • . . • . � � • •��•' '' •. . • '1. . , • , . . �. • ' ' ' ' • • ,'1,�'' ' '. . . . . .�...: : . .�. •: : ,': .�: .: ; �. ''J"b , • , ' :•.;�--� ' • ' , . : '• :�i• ; . .. ;.;. �.�Y:��.�. , � . �.: ; :�.;�:�.�. . . . . . � .. , .,. . : w�.�: � ��.�. , . t . ' : ' ��$ .o � � , • . ; . ' : : • • ' �. . , � .. . : •;�' : : � � .'f; . . .: • : ��a�oR.•.. '•: ;�: OPEN SPACE • � . . . '."<'• • •� ' • . . .' • • ' : �. : , � ..:��yg}►bU5£• �o¢:• , '.Py ; •, . . • .. • ' : �' . � • . . ■ �'r ' .�- • �; • '�N'• ' �'• •'' �.�•� •'•' . • . � �' . • . . � ��_ ■ • ' �. , . E , . : �� • , . ..`�; , . . ; • • �' '• �'��' .;/•' • ' • �•. . ' • ' ' .' �' . '��. . . � � . � • • �. . � � �' : . .�: . ., ■ • �� .. . . • . • • � � . � ��' •: '�\;'. ; . , � . . . �.' : .. ' ' ... ' • • , �}�: ,;,.= '�a� .�� ' ' � � ' � PROJECT SITE�: � � , � . • �� ' ��. . • • � • � '�' ' . � ' � ':(:. . .�.,. . ■ • � ' . . , � : ' • . � . .;.��.�:. . � � . . . . ' : `.�.' ' ' �.'': ■ , : �;':' • . , . .!: . : ' •: - ,: : , • . � :..... •:- •-- : .••••::.� . • ..'.. '• . .'.�..•:\�:. .. ti .��.. ■ . \ ■ •�:::•"::;•'•'''•:•'•'�".'.,•"''•• • . • • t;. ' . • '�•�:' •" • 'L'_;��• . . ., . . . �'c^�' /• �';. '�:. . 1 . . :i .... � • �:,: . • •.. :.j:: : :•.�.�: -'.�. . � �y� � � �• • : : .t::.1: �:�.�.�:: :� , �. •� ' � . �,.. �. � .;� . •.�.�•�.� •�: :,. . • �'�" � • • �; �• ' �" " • �.': : � _./._��-' . - ' . �,.••'. ••":.• ..-••" INO':::. • ';� '•i• T ` � �:. . . . � ' r. y :�.�. • •: : : • •'• '.'.'.'. ••:; ,': : • .•- • '. : .'; . � •.': . • . 1,., . .. . .•••'..• .•••' . ••" .•••" .•� �-'�. ��j �. �..I�'t�l T�� • ' ./. . . ��,�;•:''.�.•••..-;••;':.•...•'..•�•_.':..�:.:,.;::.:�.•...•::'.'.:_.•'• _''— ==—ya i — �� / ;e � v �, : J• � •�•:: .'.': -...•. . ,•.. . . ' . ' ' , ' . . i --______, , —_ _ � �r;� c�;.' : " • :.::,`:.'.:,::::..• •. . , . •;�.: : . � j � ~_�� i��..�s ;. : , . • •• ;..,:::. • : I a r �' `�� :: : •.. . . : • .i: ' • . . �. . 'i . ��J � ' � • ' . • . •. • .{. ' . ' ' . ; �.� . i� • .,•�' ; ..'� . . �/ . . . , . • � •� • ••; . , • , . ' •, • ----� . • .��,`:.: .: . . :. : : ..: . .,. � � , =E �.,� � � .F \� � � � . � . . . -: :��:. f � ' � �.• c•. � \ �\ �,' � . . ('� :\``��, , , . •� �.` . r • C RAldy O `\\�� \\ �..�( . Q . • . L•!� ' ! - , : . �' ( '' i � 1 %' • \ � , r �.{ •Cl�' . .t� ' ■ �=- 'I:� I + '�f , ' , �� " . •'' . / I . �[,`! � '�. .% •'' ��•. \� '%: � � � h i : t.� � / '`�l/ / ' � •� .. . ,��.. \ STq � . . l.� • i � .; • �, � . _ !!. . i ;�� . . � �,` i ,'� •r T� . �. �,..\/�y • ! � ( � ' ' ..< �. '� G , =` / � qY _10J /. �� l i i • .�� j' /. „- _ � � � \\ I � t' - � . � �a ct� -, �: . , �j : ,' '.'. ,:. . , . \ i � S�c f \ �': ' , I',' � f J ' . i • R� ' • % �iJ . u � ' . - - � � . '* ::�� ' /.�., - _oR, /y` .:r' � .' ` :'.1- , . � j ��\ I i : J ; ti�� - . .f �. ;.`� ; .I.�. . • � . � , . � \�; I i r J� - � �.f � � . ; I . \ I r � T' !� i ' �/ / �� '� . , R Fq< � � � � ^�.. � / / 's : f ; �� '� �` . � �' .� , � ��. � \ i ' ' . f' ; ;; r * i ' �' % . ' � . .� .�. . ■ i ' •u 1 E - ' � � � �- ' � , .,. �' � - �I� .� t. � ! �.�. � �: �.' i - ' � i � • . I . _. .. . .... ,. • \ �-.. �� ATTACHMENT 2 GUEST ROOM STATISTICS STUDIO 1 BDRM 2 BDRM DELUXE 2 BDRM TOTAL LEVEL ONE 3 LEVEL TWO 3 LEVEL THREE 3 13 16 16 4 5 6 4 5 6 24 29 31 TOTALS 9 45 15 15 E��l 10 FOYER 11 LIVING ROOM 12 ACTIVITY ROOM 13 DINING ROOM 14 DlNING ALCOVE 15 KITCHEN 16 HOUSEKEEPING / LAUNDRY 17 SHOP 18 JANITOR 19 MEN 20 WOMEN 21 MARKETING 22 BUSINESS OFFICE 23 DIRECTOR 24 MANAGER 25 RECEPTION 26 GALLERY 27 EMPLOYEE LOUNGE 28 SEATING ALCOVE 29 CHAPEL 30 BEAUTY SHOP 31 GYM 32 TERRACE 33 LIBRARY 34 WELLNESS OFFICE 35 MAI L 36 MAI D 37 GUEST LAUNDRY 38 GUEST KITCHEN GUEST ROOMS G-1 STUDIO G-2 1 BEDROOM G-3 1 BEDROOM DELUXE G-4 2 BEDROOM A G-5 2 BEDROOM B G-6 2 BEDROOM DELUXE ATTACHMENT 3 ORDIHANCE H0, 3�b ��5 �N ORD i NANCE OF T}{E [►�'y COUHC I l OF �E c rn oF ARROYO GRANOE AMENDIHG ORDINANCE H0. 140 C.S. 70 ALLOti/ USEi PERMITTED IN THE PROFESSIONAI COMMERCIAI ("P-C") 20HE ON PARCEL 3. TRACT 604, OAK PARK ACRES. THE CITY COUNCI� OF t}{_r �(Ty OF ARROYO GRANDE DOES ORDAIH AS FOLIOWS: SECTION 1; 7hat por[ion of Subseccion (C) in Section 4 of Ordinance Ho, 140 C.S. relating to Parcel tio. 3�� her�by amee+ded to vrovidc t►wt the Darticvlar uses in Parcei No. 3 shall be limited and controlled as foila.s: PerCtl /3 (Zoned P-C) For .Kdical and den[al offices and clinics, professional offices, and hespitals, rest homes and sanitariums, but not including � mental institutions. No density is Drescribed, but coveraoe of the area shall not exceed tht a�rounts authorized by the Ci[y Zoning Codes. SECTION Z; Thic Ordinance shall be in f�tl force and effect ehir�y (30) days af��r its eassage, and within f;f «�n ( days after its passagc� it sh�+�1 be published once together with the names of the Council Members voting thereon, in a ne of general circulation•within the Lity. On mot�on by Louncil Member 6allagher, sec8nded by Louncil Hember Vandeveer, and on the followi�g rol) cal� w«, to wit:� AYrS' �o�^cilmen Gallaqher, Mitlis, Yandeveer and Mayor Smich NOES; None ABSEHT: Councilman Hooan che foregoing Ordlnance was passed and adopted on [he 1st day of Oc[ober 1984. l.J I �� • , . MAYOR ATTEST: • � �D�.D TY C 1 TT CLERK � �. V�r9inia L. Culp, Oeflu[y Citv Clerk of the City of Arroyo Grande, County of San Luis Obispe, State of California, do hereby certlfy �hat the foreoe;nQ Qrdinance No. 316 C.S. is a true, f�11 and corr�� copy of said Urdinance pasced and adooted at a regular meecing of said Council on the lst day of October i984 VITNESS my hand and [he Seal of the City of ArroyoGrande affized this 3rd day of October 1984, •• � • L �� •� .�,� / : EP c i rr c�Rx ATTACHMENT 4 ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT MINUTES DECEMBER 5, 2000 PAGE 6 II. C CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00-015; LOCATION — 579 CAMINO MERCADO; APPLICANT — HORIZON SENIOR HOUSING; REPRESENTATIVE — STEVEN PUGLISI AIA Chair Greene called a 5 minute recess of the meeting to allow the Planning Commission time to review materials received at the time of the meeting concerning the Horizon Senior Housing project. Chair Greene reconvened the meeting at 7:55 p.m. Associate Planner, Kelly Heffernon, presented the staff report stating the following: The project site is located on Camino Mercado, adjacent to vacant property to the west approved for office use and residential development to the east. The proposed 84-room assisted care facility is approximately 100,000 square feet in size and wouid be built into the side of the hill where a large building pad was previously graded. Beginning near the middle of the site, the facility steps up from one to three levels. The perspective drawings submitted with the application show that with the existing topography and vegetation, only one level is completely visible from the north, east, and west. The project will be highly visible, however, from the south across the Highway 101 corridor. The project includes a total of 50 parking spaces, 27 of which would be in a covered parking structure. The project plans incorporate suggestions from both the Planning Commission and the Architectural Review Committee when this project was reviewed as a pre-application last summer. Specifically, the plans show an additional tower element on the southeast corner of the building, and a bridge connecting the activity area to the walkway at the rear of the project. In addition, the applicant submitted a detailed landscape plan, and perspective drawings for the north side of the building facing James Way and from across Highway 101 on Hillcrest Drive. The issue of building height was also discussed at the previous Planning Commission meeting. The Development Code allows a maximum buitding height of either 2 stories, or 30 feet, whichever is less, and a portion of the project is 3 stories tall. The applicant interpreted the method for calculating building height described in the Development Code as determining the average grade located under the proposed structure, and measuring up from that point to the top of the building. As long as the height at this point does not exceed 30 feet or 2 stories, then the project is in compliance with the Development Code. As the Commission directed, staff discussed this issue with the City Attorney, who agreed with this interpretation. The proposed project is subject to the development standards of the Professional Commercial District of the Oak Park Acres Planned Development, and to certain development standards of the Development Code. The project meets all relevant requirements for setbacks, lot coverage, parking and landscaping. There are no density requirements in the Professional Commercial District; however, the proposed 21 dwelling ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT MINUTES DECEMBER 5, 2000 PAGE 7 units per acre is less than the maximum of 25 dwelling units per acre required in the Senior Housing District, which seems an appropriate land use category to compa�e the project with. The structure meets all disabled access requirements, and also disabled access from the "path of travel" between Camino Mercado and the structure. The memo distributed earlier from Larry Schmidt of the Building Department explains this issue in more detail. Basically, the project will provide van transportation from the street to the entrance, which satisfies ADA requirements. Consistency with the Economic Development Strategy is addressed in the memo from the Economic Development Director distributed earlier this evening. The Strategy does not specifically address senior housing projects, except with regard to taking advantage of land for affordable housing in accordance with the General Plan. During the environmental review process, 3 populations of Pismo Clarkia were identified and evaluated on the project site, which is a federally listed endangered plant species and classified as a State Rare Plant. As explained in the Initial Study, a biological survey was prepared for the project. To mitigate potential impacts to these plants, a 25-foot buffer area is required, which is identified on the project plans. � As mentioned in the report, none of the existing oak trees will be removed as a result of this project, and the proposed project is conditioned to implement tree protection measures during construction. The project is also conditioned to replace the Cork Oak trees shown on the landscape plan with Coast Live Oak trees. This will help mitigate the unknown number of native oaks removed when the site was previously graded. In response to the public hearing notice, staff has received one written comment regarding this project, which was distributed earlier tonight. There has also been one inquiry at the front counter. Both expressed concerns regarding increased traffic. As part of the environmental review process, a trip generation analysis was prepared, which indicates that 14 additional p.m. peak hour trips would result. This number is less than the 20 peak hour trips necessary to require a full traffic study. As conditioned, the applicant will be required to pay the City's Traffic and Signalization Impact fees. Also distributed earlier was the correct numbering for the mitigation measures, and a memo from the Public Works Department regarding modifications to the conditions of approval. Under condition no. 46, the words "and constructed" should be deleted, and a new condition no. 48 should be added specifying that project improvements shall be constructed prior to occupancy. The exact wording is shown in the memo. Since all projects within an approved Planned Development must be approved by the City Council, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution recommending that the City Council approve Conditional Use Permit Case No. 00-015 subject to the Conditions of Approval, as amended and re-numbered. ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT MINUTES DECEMBER 5, 2000 PAGE 8 Commissioner Keen stated that Condition of Approval No. 41 referenced a 200-foot area that the owner will be required to maintain in the open space area. Mr. Keen asked who owned the open space? Ms. Heffernon stated that this open space area was granted to the City from the Rancho Grande project. Commissioner London asked what the number of employees would be at that site? He also asked if there had been any discussion about their working hours as a possible mitigation to the traffic? Ms. Heffernon stated that she believed that it was thirteen employees at any one time and that the working hours of the employees was not taken into consideration with regard to the traffic. Vice-Chair Parker and Ms. Heffernon discussed the mitigation measures with regards to the Pismo Clarkia and the Oak Trees. They also discussed the walkway around the back of the building. Commissioner Costello stated that he was still confused about the average height of the building with relationship to the hill. Ms. Heffernon and Mr. Costello discussed this issue. Mr. Costello asked, if this interpretation of the Development Code was used, what would keep someone from building a five-story building in the future where the same interpretation could be applied? Ms. Heffernon stated that the circumstances would have to be looked into at the time of the application of such a project. Mr. Costello reiterated that he was very concerned about this interpretation. He asked if the plans the Commission had received were drawn to scale? He stated that when he measured the building, it was thirty-five to forty feet high. Commissioner Costello discussed the ADA accessibility of the project. He stated that he had done some research on this subject and asked Ms. Heffernon if the building was ADA compliant. Ms. Heffernon explained how Mr. Schmidt of the Building Department had interpreted the language to determine that the project was ADA accessible. Mr. Costello stated the he was concerned that the City was opening itself for some type of liability. Mr. McCants stated that he could ask the City Attorney about this issue. ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT MINUTES DECEMBER 5, 2000 PAGE 9 Mr. Costeilo asked what the LOS was at the intersection of Camino Mercado and West Branch? Ms. Heffernon stated that the intersection was a LOS of C. Chair Greene wanted to state for the record the changes in the numbering Qf the mitigation measures. He stated that the original numbers started at eighteen and the corrected numbers start with one. Secondly, the Planning Commission had been asked to modify Condition of Approval No. 46 and to create a new Condition No. 48. Ms. Greene asked if the current Condition No. 48 was being deleted? Mr. Olds replied that a new Condition No. 48 was being added and the rest of the Conditions would be renumbered. Steve Puglisi, 226 Encanto Ave, Shell Beach, had the following comments: • With regards to the building height, Mr. Puglisi stated that the 30-foot height rule, as with the two story rule would apply measured from the average height under the building not at the base. • With regards to the questions about the ADA appliance, the building is compliant from its parking lot. The applicant does not believe that they need to be ADA compliant from the street up to the building. If streets were required to be ADA compliant, there would not be any streets designed in excess of 8%. Commissioner Costello stated that he was not in agreement with the interpretation of the height regulations. He was also concerned about the ADA compliance and felt that there was a possibility that the City would be liable if a resident were injured walking on the walkway from the building to the street. Mr. Puglisi stated that as soon as anyone leaves City property, i.e. Camino Mercado, they would be on private property and the City would not be responsible for any injuries. Vice-Chair Parker and Mr. Puglisi discussed the "nature trail" in the back. She asked if there would be a railing on the sidewalk going down the 15% walkway to the street? Mr. Puglisi stated that this had not been planned on but it could be considered as well as resting places for people to stop and sit. Commissioner London stated that he liked this idea and felt that this should be included. Chair Greene stated that the proposal for the front slope landscaping was a combination of plants using Baccarus. Mr. Greene said that this species was chosen for the hillsides around the Five Cities Center and it has not performed well. He would like to propose a change to the front slope planting area and make it a part of the approval process. Mr. Greene would like to propose a change by deleting. the Baccarus and substituting Manzanita Sunset, and/or Carmel Sur. ARROYO 6RANDE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT MINUTES DECEMBER 5, 2000 PAGE 10 Commissioner Costello asked Mr. Puglisi for further explanation of the height issue. Mr. Puglisi explained that on the west view of the drawings, there is a note that reads, "maximum building height elevation 280, thirty feet above average finished grade". Mr. Costello stated that there was nothing on the plans that showed what the average finished grade was. Mr. Puglisi referred to another page on the plans and stated that for this section of the building, which is what is called the rooms component, the rooms component starts at a lower elevation of 240, the upper finished floor is elevation 260, the average finished grade is 250. So, thirty feet above that is 280 and there is where the number comes from. Mr. Costello stated that the definition in the Development Code is the "highest point under the building". He does not see a clear diagram showing the highest point under the building. Mr. Puglisi stated that on the site plan the building "moves" through 3 different elevations. The lowest point is at finished and existing grade of elevation 240. As you move up the sides of the building, the natural and finished grade is both 250 and, at the top, 260. They are siting the building on all three of the different levels. That is why the applicant, as well as the City Attorney, is convinced this conforms to the ordinance. Chris Skiff, 475 Marsh Street, San Luis Obispo, stated that they were retaining the 15% slope to the driveway so it would minimize the grading and not disturb any more of the habitat or environment than absolutely necessary. Mr. Skiff said that benches are in the plans for the walkway and it was very important to him that the "seniors" would be able to get up and down the slope as carefully as possible. They would also put in a railing if the Planning Commission wanted it done. Mr. Skiff said that if Mr. Greene wanted to change the plants in the landscaping plan, they would be happy to do it. Commissioner London asked how many employees there would be and what the hours the shifts would start and finish? Mr. Skiff stated that the work shifts typically would change at 6:00 a.m., 2:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. Ron Livingston, 560 and 580 Dos Cerros spoke to the Planning Commission and expressed his concerns about traffic on Camino Mercado. Chris Skiff spoke to Mr. Livingston's concerns about the traffic. Chair Greene closed the Public Hearing. ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT MINUTES DECEMBER 5, 2000 PAGE 11 Commissioner London stated that he felt this was a good project. He felt that a railing and rest stops on the walkway were definitely needed. Commissioner Keen stated that he was very impressed with the project. He feels that it fits the use, the area, and as the traffic in this area is becoming more congested, this project would have less of an impact. Vice-Chair Parker stated that she also liked the project and appreciated the fact that the applicant had gone beyond what was necessary to address the environmental concerns at the project site. The applicant is addressing senior needs and they have listened to the Planning Commission comments and have added them to the project. She also agreed that the handrails and resting-places are necessary on the walkway. . Commissioner Costello stated that he had asked some tough questions and the applicant had provided the answers that show an interpretation that meets the �standards. He said that he supports the project. He feels that this is a good project. Chair Greene stated that regarding the ADA compliance, and the concerns raised by Commissioner Costello, it would be a good idea that when this goes before the City Council the City Attorney be ready to render an opinion and guidance to them on this point. He agrees with the rest of the Commission that this is a good project. With respect to the Conditions of Approval, the Planning Commission recommends the following changes: • Condition No. 18, subsection d, changed, adding a number 6, which reads, "Acraspophlis sunset and Carmel Sur are substituted in lieu of Bacarrus as a front slope groundcover. • Condition No. 46 be modified. • A new Condition No. 48, be added. • Current Conditions Nos. 48 through 74, be renumbered as Conditions Nos. 49 through 75. • Add a new Condition #19 and number forward from this point. The Condition would require hand railings, benches and/or rest stops along the walkway. • Condition No. 67, the word "hydrant" should be added to the second line. Commissioner Keen moved that the Planning Commission adopt: RESOLUTION N0. 00-1772 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, INSTRUCT THE SECRETARY TO FILE A NOTICE Of DETERMINATION, AND APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 00-015, LOCATED AT 597 CAMINO MERCADO, APPLIED FOR BY HORIZON SENIOR HOUSING ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DECEMBER 5, 2000 PAGE 12 DRAFT with the changes to Exhibit A, including Exhibits B1-B6. Commissioner London seconded the motion. The motion was approved with the following roll call vote: ROLL CALL VOTE YES Commissioner Costello YES Commissioner Keen YES Commissioner London YES Vice-Chair Parker YES Chair Greene LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 00-004; LOCATION — 419 LE POINT STREET; APPLICANT- HILLEL AND RACHEL JANAI Assistan Planner, Teresa McClish, presented the staff report as follows: The site is located at 19 Le Point, and consists of two parcels that are 18,293 square feet and 31,134 squa feet in size, one of which is an abandoned railroad right-of-way property, and the other i adjacent to Corbett Canyon Creek. The property is developed with a single-family resi ce and a detached garage, both of which are located across the existing lot line dividi the two properties. The intent of the lot line adjustment is to place the two structures on e parcel and to create a lot that could be developed with another single-family residence. The site lies within the Public cilities zoning district. On October 3, 2000 the Planning Commission made a Developme Code interpretation to allow a single-family use in the Public Facility zone for this particula roperty. The proposed Lot Line Adjustment mee or exceeds site development standards for the adjacent residential zoning districts, which a considered applicable for this site. This lot line adjustment shall be recorded with Certificate of Compliance for Lot Line Adjustments as required by Development Code Se ion 9-04.140. Additionally, Condition of Approval No. 15, requires an additional twenty-fi foot setback from the top of bank for Corbett Canyon Creek. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the att hed Resolution approving Lot Line Adjustment Case No. 00-004, subject to the conditions of a roval. " The Planning Commission briefly discussed the project. Chair Greene ked that the wording of Condition of Approval No. 4 be changed from "Exhibit B-1 " to "Exhibi =1 ". Chair Greene opened the Public Hearing. Leonard Leniger, representing the applicant stated that he was available to questions from the Planning Commission. Chair Greene closed the Public Hearing. Vice-Chair Parker moved that the Planning Commission adopt: r any ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 1, 2000 PAGE 9 � ATTACHMENT 5 Richard DeBlauw, applicant, spoke briefly to the Planning Commission and thanked them for taking their time to look at the project and for their favorable comments. III. B. PRE-APPLICATION 00-006; LOCATION — CAMINO MERCADO; APPLICANT — HORIZON SR. HOUSING; REPRESENTATIVE — STEVEN PUGLISI Teresa McClish, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report to the Planning Commission and stated that the project site was located within the Professional Commercial Dist{ict ("P-C") of the Oak Park Acres Planned Development (PD 1.1) and is approximately four (4) acres in size. Surrounding the site is vacant land recently approved for office development, single-family residences, the Oak Park Professional Center, and open spac�e. The proposed project is to construct an 84-room assisted care facility with a range of amenities, including a dining area, chapel, exercise room and library. The P-C District specifically allows this type of use. A similar project was approved in 1986 for a 180-room skilled nursing facility but it was never built. The Staff Advisory Committee discussed issues including: • Slope of the proposed driveway and adherence to ADA standards. • Fire protection fuel modification. • Grading and drainage. • T�affic impacts and parking requirements. . • Landscaping. � Lighting. • Water storage. Ms. McClish explained that during the ARC meeting, suggestions included adding more architectural variation to the right side of the building and screen the parking for the views of residences on Hillcrest Drive. Ms. McClish informed the Planning Commission that the Development Code parking requirements for an assisted care facility are 1 uncovered space for every 3 beds, and 1 space per employee on the largest work shift for a project total of 41 spaces. The applicant is proposing a total of 50 parking spaces, 27 of which would be covered, which exceeds City parking requirements. With regards to the height of the project, the Development Code allows a maximum building height in the P-C District of either two (2) siories or thirty feet (30'), whichever is less. The building height is defined as shown. A portion of the proposed project is three stories tall. Ms. McClish explained that the applicant interprets the above height definition to include a three- story building, as long as the average height does not exceed thirty feet (30'). The applicant requests Planning Commission comment on this issue. Ms. McClish stated that staff recommends the Planning Commission review the project and provide direction and comments to the applicant. Commissioner London asked if this type of facility was considered a commercial enterprise or a residential building? ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 1, 2000 PAGE 10 Ms. McClish stated that it was considered an assisted care residential facility. Commissioner Costello stated that the Professional Commercial zoning was part of Ordinance 316, however Mr. Costello stated that when he looked in the Development Code the Professional Commercial zoning did not exist. So, if the Planning Commission is going to evaluate a Professional Commercial project, what standards should they apply? Ms. McClish stated that the Professional Commercial zoning was part of the Planned Development 1.1 zoning for the whole area and this parcel was designated as Professional Commercial. There are some specific development standards in this zoning, but because this is a senior housing project, staff will be applying senior housing criteria that is located in the residential section of the Development Code. Commissioner Costello asked what the exact definition was in the Development Code for two stories, 30 feet, or whatever is less? Ms. McClish presented the diagram and the definition that is in the Development Code. She said that the applicant had stated that only 1 story of the structure would be seen from any one perspective. Vice-Chair Parker and Ms. McClish discussed how much "greenbelt" is between the buildings on the rear of the property, the height of the building, and the 15% slope to the driveway. Chair Greene asked what section of the Development Code addressed the height issue? Ms. McClish stated that it was addressed in both the PD 1.1 section and in the development criteria #or residential structures. Chair Greene opened the Public Hearing. Steve Puglisi, architect for the project, spoke to the Planning Commission, addressing the following topics: ■ A significant amount of grading and tree removal took place in 1986 when a previous project was approved and started at this site. ■ The applicant and the architect have carefully studied the City's ordinances and codes and have designed a project that would meet all requirements. They are not asking for any variances. ■ They wanted to present a project to the Planning Commission and the City Council that would meet all requirements and not require any "largesse" from the City. ■ They wanted to create. a facility that would be a home with these 86 rooms for approximately 99 people to live. ■ This project is geared for the convenience and comfort of the residents of this facility. ■ There will be 86 rooms. ■ There will be up to 99 residents living in this facility. ■ There will be 50 parking spaces although only 46 are required. ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 1, 2000 PAGE 11 ■ The project as far as its location on the site wili be taking advantage of the grading that has already been done. ■ The development is built along the lines of a luxury hotel. ■ The ordinance that deals with the height of the building is very clear. It says two stories or thirty feet, which ever is less. It is also very specific about how the height should be measured. Mr. Puglisi explained how the applicant has figured the measurements for the height. . Cornmissioner London asked if the units were rented by the month and if there were kitchens in the rooms? Mr. London also asked what the mental and physical capability of the residents would be? Mr. Puglisi stated that the units would not be rented on a month to month basis. There would � be a small kitchen area in each room; however, there would not be a stove, only a microwave. Mr. Puglisi did not know what the criteria was to be a resident at this facility, but he did say it was not an intensive care facility. Mr. London stated that he felt this was a project that would be well suited to this area. Commissioner Keen asked Mr. Puglisi if he had Sheet #4 of the plans that the Planning Commission had be given so he and Mr. Puglisi could discuss the height issue? Mr. Keen asked Mr. Puglisi if he had referred to the "finished floor" in figuring the allowable height for this building? He and Mr. Puglisi discussed the fact that the average is not "finished floor" but "finished grade". Mr. Keen stated that one of the problems he has with this project is that the building looks "massive" #rom Camino Mercado. He was afraid that when a third story is put on the building, it would be overwhelming. Mr. Puglisi stated that the building would not be seen the way Mr. Keen was looking at it from Camino Mercado. Mr. Keen stated that other than the visual impact, he likes the project. Mr. Puglisi wanted the Planning Commission to know that this project is being designed for the comfort and well being of the residents. When the project is increased by one level, the applicant can effectively cut the number of feet in the horizontal walking distance of the residents' movements each day. This walking distance is from their rooms to the public areas where they would gather. Mr. Puglisi stated that this was a very critical issue with senior housing. Mr. Keen asked if there was ever any consideration to putting an access to the north side of the building? Had there been any consideration of putting a fire road around this side? Mr. Puglisi stated that there had been some discussion about this with the Fire Chief. It was decided that, because of the precipitous nature of this site, bringing a vehicle around the side would be impossible. The Fire Chief had requested two things; 1. A fire safety zone with ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 1, 2000 PAGE 12 landscape, fire retardant materials, and paving sections. 2. Remove the extreme eves on the backside of the buildings and install fire sprinklers on the balconies. Mr. Puglisi explained about the open space surrounding the project site. Vice-Chair Parker asked why the applicant had chosen to reduce the number of rooms in this project from the original number of 180? Mr. Puglisi stated that in the applicant's experience that large one bedroom and a number of two bedrooms rooms is what the market will support. Vice-Chair Parker asked if there were balconies outside of each room and how large they were? Mr. Puglisi stated that all the rooms have a balcony or a patio and they were approximately 8 by 12 feet. Vice-Chair Parker asked how much of the open space was "common area" open space? Ms. Parker also asked if there would be a picnic area, or place for the residents to walk? Mr. Puglisi stated that the entire north side of the project would have an extensive terrace that abuts the slope bank. This would be a"controlled" outdoor space. On the front of the building, or to the south, would be an "uncontrolled" outdoor space. Mr. Puglisi also stated that there would be a trail way along the top of the property that would be a combination of gardens and passive recreation areas. Ms. Parker stated that this area needs more of this type of facility and she is very glad to see this project. Commissioner Costello stated that he feels this is a very sound idea. He likes the looks of the project and only has one question. This deals with the interpretation concerning the height issue. Allowing this would set a precedent and he feels this needs to be worked out by the City Council as the policy maker for this type of decision. Chair Greene stated that there would need to be a traffic study done to determine the impacts of the project on the intersection of Camino Mercado and Branch Street. He also stated that the applicant would be required to demonstrate that this project wouldn't have any negative impacts on the Brisco underpass. Mr. Greene further stated that landscaping is a critical issue for the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission would like to see native landscaping used because not only is it "habituated" to the area it would look like the open space which will surround the project. The Pampas Grass should be completely eliminated. Chair Greene stated that he agreed with Commissioner Keen that the colors and design looks great. He was not sure about how he interprets the height issue. He felt that the City Attorney should review this issue because the Planning Commission was not in the position to make this type of decision. ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 1, 2000 PAGE 13 Commissioner London asked if any of the neighbors to the south of the project have been approached and what, if any, response did they have? Mr. Puglisi stated that there had been no formal announcement about the project. Vice-Chair Parker asked what the roofing material was going to be made of? Mr. Puglisi stated that it would be either a high-grade composition or a flat concrete tile. Ms. Parker asked if this were to go to the City Attorney and there was a question about the height, could this then come to the Planning Commission for a Variance? Mr. McCants replied that if the City Attorney indicates that the three (3) stories is the deciding factor, and that three (3) stories is not measured based on the calculations that the applicant has used then some kind of modification would have to be made. This would be either be an amendment to the text of the ordinance or some kind of exception granted through the Variance process. Mr. McCants stated that he felt it would be very difficult to make the Variance findings. ITEM. IV. None ITEM. V. None ITEM. VI. None DISCUSSION ITEMS PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS AND COMMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR COMMENTS AND FOLLOW-UP REPORTS ITEM. VII. ADJOURNMENT On motion of Commissioner Keen, seconded by Commissioner Costello the meeting was adjourned at 9:15 a.m. to the next scheduled meeting on August 15, 2000. Kathleen Fryer, Commission Clerk AS TO CONTENT: Laurence Greene, Chair Kerry McCants Community Development Director SAC Meeting Notes October 3, 2000 Page 3 install the antennas, they had decided to just build the cabinet. ATTACHMENT 6 The applicant stated that they would like to install a s er within the next year and they would be willing to cooperate with the City in allowing t elter to be used for a repeater site. Mr. McCants and Mr. Fibich agreed t this would be discussed within the text of the Staff report for the Planning Commissio . Mr. Fibich asked what�ecurity was going to be and how it would be handled? Mr. Taylor s d that this was taken care of in the lease. He also stated that the road is not City owned owever the City has an easement there to access the water tanks. He wanted the a cant to be aware that the City does not maintain this road. B. 1. Applicant: 2. Representative: 3. Case Number: 4. Proposal: 5. Location: 6. Staff Contact: Horizon Senior Housing Chris Skiff Conditional Use Permit 00-015 The applicant is requesting a Conditional construct an 84-unit Senior Housing facility. Camino Mercado Kelly Heffernon Use Permit to Kelly Heffernon, Community Development Department, stated that the SAC, ARC and the Planning Commission had reviewed the plans as a Pre-application. The changes that were made to the plans were mostly architectural in nature. Ms. Heffernon explained that the issues raised at the SAC were mainly about ADA access and traffic. A trip generation study was done that determined the project would produce fewer than 20 peak hour trips. Craig Campbell, Public Works Department, and the applicant discussed the retaining wall on the access drive. The applicant stated that they needed to be able to provide access to delivery trucks and service vehicles on the west end of the building. The applicant explained that he wanted to keep the retaining wall low, both for looks and cost, but he needed to have it high enough to accommodate the slope of the driveway and parking area. Ms. Heffernon asked that the applicant provide an elevation so that staff could see what this wo�ld look like. Mr. Campbell reminded the applicant that the City had a 15% maximum driveway slope and to consider the transition at the driveway and take into account the rollover at the curb. Mr. Campbell had the following issues and concerns: ■ On plan view, show the extent of each of the three base.floor elevations. ■ Install curb, gutter, and sidewalks matching the width of the existing sidewalk. In answer to the applicant's question about the materials to be used, Mr. Campbell stated that concrete must be installed instead of the decomposed granite shown on the plans. ■ The site drainage should be collected into a pipe system and connect to the public storm drain. ■ Mr. Campbell will check on Condition Number 19. If it is on your property and conflicts with the sidewalk, the applicant will have to move it. ■ The applicant witl pay a fee of S41,000 to upgrade the water storage in this area. SAC Meeting Notes October 3, 2000 Page 4 ■ The sewer shall be connected to a manhole because of the size. ■ Condition Number 26 will be deleted by Mr. Campbell because there are no existing overhead utilities. Mr. Campbell and Mr. Skiff discussed the water neutralization program. Mr. Schmidt asked if the fee for the neutralization program would be tied to the building permit or the occupancy permit? Mr. Campbell stated that he would check on how it was done in the past and let the applicant and Mr. Schmidt know. Mr. Campbell will check on one of the easements to see exactly where it runs through the property and if it was abandoned or not. Mr. McCants, Mr. Campbell and the applicant discussed the height of the retaining wall. It was decided that the exposed portion of the wall would not be more than six (6) feet. Mr. Campbell suggested that the applicant check to see what grading is being done on the Kolbo project to make sure it is compatible with theirs. Larry Schmidt, Building Department, discussed the occupancy with the applicant. He had the following issues and concerns: ■ One hour fire sprinklers. ■ Define occupancy separations. ■ Fire lanes should be posted. ■ Fire flow should be 15 gal per minute for three (3) hours. ■ There should be a Fire Department Connection at the street. ■ There should be two fire hydrants on the property and possibly one at the street. Mr. Campbell stated that there would have to be a fire line maintenance easement for any onsite fire improvements. There was a discussion concerning the resolution of a"dead-end" water line on the property. Staff suggested that the applicant install two water meters; one for regular water use and one for landscaping. ■ The applicant will need to install a Knox Box. ■ The building will need to meet all ADA and building codes. � ■ There was discussion on whether the access drive must be ADA compliant as well. Terry Fibich, Fire Department, explained that the City owned the open space behind the building. The City would be asking that there be a vegetation management plan for a two hundred foot distance down the slope across the rear of the property. II. Written Communications/Staff Comments - None IV. Adjournment — 11:30 p.m. � SAC Meeting Notes June 20, 2000 Page 4 � 1. Applicant: 2. Representative: 3. Case Number: 4. Proposal: 5. Location: 6. Staff Contact: ATTACHMENT 7 Horizon Senior Housing Chris Skiff Pre-Application Review 00-006 The applicant is proposing the construction of a 3- story, 84-room, assisted care facility. 579 Camino Mercado Kelly Heffernon Kelly Heffernon explained the proposed facility to the SAC. She stated that there was a project submitted and approved in 1986 for a 180-room facility, but it was never built. What is proposed at this time is an 84 room assisted care facility that is 3 levels. This is a pre-application so staff is looking for comment and direction for the applicant. Mr. Skiff stated that he had developed Wyndham Development on S. Elm Street. He has discovered that there is more of a need in the City for assisted senior housing. He went on to say that because this was an approved project the pad is already cut. They are trying to use what has already been done on the site. There will be no trees removed and the building has been "pulled back" from the rock outcrop. Mr. Skiff stated that when the "pad" was cut there is actually a depression. The result will be that with the 3-story building, no one will see more than 1 story. Ms. Heffernon and Mr. Skiff discussed the Development Code, requirements for height and the different ways of ineasuring the height of a building. Mr. Skiff stated that he could eliminate 1 story and spread the building out more over the site, however; it is preferable for seniors to have a more compact area so they do not have to walk as far. Mr. Campbell asked how the seniors would access the street? Would there be a walkway? Mr. Skiff said that there would be a walkway but the slope is 15% so it would be very steep. Mr. Campbell stated that he like to see a pathway. Mr. Fibich stated that it is possible that this path would have to be ADA accessible. Larry Schmidt, Building Department stated that: ■ The design should include an ADA approved walkway to facilitate getting people from the building to a place of refuge, which could be the parking lot in this instance. Terry Fibich, Fire Department, stated that: ■ There will be a fire accessibility problem on the back of this building which looks down on James Way. The only way to access the rooms on the back of the building will be through the center hall. The sprinkler system that will be installed will help. Mr. Fibich stated that if there is a fire on that slope, it could become an "up-slope" fire. He said that one of the conditions would have to be a regular fuel modification program for at least 100 feet from the building. There was a discussion about who owned this property and who would be responsible for the fuel modification program. After a brief discussion it was decided that this land belonged to the Ranch Grande Homeowners Assn. Mr. Fibich explained what the program would entail. n� SAC Meeting Notes June 20, 2000 Page 5 Mr. Skiff stated that the other thing that would be very helpful would be to install external sprinklers under the eves. Craig Campbell, Public Works Department, had the following issues, suggestions, and concerns: • This area is part of a pressure zone that currently does not have adequate fire storage. Other projects in this area, in lieu of building their own storage, have been contributing towards the City's plan to update the water storage. There will be a fee charged to this. Mr. Campbell explained to Mr. Skiff how the fees for this were determined. Mr. Campbell will figure out the amount that will have to be paid. • They will be asked to connect to the storm drain system. There is a private drainage easement that they will be able to use. � There is a City water easement on the property that the City is not using. If the applicant would like to ask the City Council to eliminate the easement, that would be appropriate. • The project will need a traffic study done based on the number of trips per day. Craig will look at the ITE to see what needs to be done. • Curb returns. • Show the "Kolbo" driveway on the plans. • There are no utility poles or overhead wires to worry about. Mr. McCants reminded that the applicant that the landscaping and the lighting would be very important. Ms. Heffernon stated that the parking was fine with the project being "over-parked". Mr. Campbell suggested that the applicant re-label the plans to read "private cafeteria" rather than "restaurant". E. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Applicant: Arroyo Village Inn Bed & Breakfast Representative: Gina Glass Case Number: Plot Plan Review 00-009 Proposal: The applicant is proposing to relocate the existing parking lot and entrance from EI Camino Real to Oak Street. ation: 407 EI Camino Real Staf ontact: Teresa McClish Teresa McClish explained that the app ' nt is asking for a Plot Plan Review to change the parking lot. Currently the parking is accessed fro EI Camino and the applicant would like to have the entrance from Oak Street. Craig Campbell stated that the drawings Ms. Glass h submitted were not adequate and new plans need to be submitted with more detail. He also state at: • The turn around is not adequate. • There needs to be a handicapped parking spot. • There needs to be pedestrian access from the parking lot to the Bed d Breakfast. • The parking spaces need to be striped. • There needs to be two parking spaces for the manager's unit and one for h room. There also needs to be a space wide enough for a handicapped van. • The parking lot light standards are not adequate. 11. Written Communications/Staff Comments - None ` Notes ARC Meeting October 2, 2000 Page 4 of 1 1 With the following roll call vote: AYES 5 NOES: 0 PRESENT: 5 ATTACHMENT 8 B. HOR/ZON SEN/OR HOUS/NG, COND/T/ONAL USE PERM/T 00-015, 579 CAMINO MERCADO Kelly Heffernon said the ARC had seen this project as a Pre-application and the applicant had since made the revisions recommended by the ARC. To add more architectural detail, a tower element has been added to the southeast corner of the building. The applicant is now showing perspectives from James Way including the screening of the parking from Hillcrest Drive, and have also submitted a color and materials board (this was passed around the Committee). Steve Puglisi, the architect, said the Planning Commission had asked for clarification on how the building heights were calculated. The City Attorney had agreed with their interpretation of the Development Code. The building is on a slope, so the measurement began from the average height of the slope (calculated by using the lowest and highest point of the slope). The building height was measured from the average slope of the surface to the rooftop of the building, which is less than 30 feet and no more than 2 stories tall. He went on to describe all of the changes they had made saying they were showing the Committee as much of the project as they possibly could at this time. He pointed out that there was also a perspective of the whole of the skyline, exactly as it looks. Warren Hoaq asked if the trees on the perspective actually did exist now? Steve Puqlisi said they did. Chet Kielan asked about the ADA compliance? Steve Puglisi said as long as the building is in ADA compliance, the driveway does not have to be. There is a sidewalk all the way to Camino Mercado. They are proposing to have a bridge from the activity area to the walkway at the rear of the project. Chuck Fellows asked if the landscaping was away from the Oak trees so the irrigation would not interfere with them. Chris Skiff said only native drought tolerant plants would be planted under the. trees. Notes ARC Meeting October 2, 2000 Page 5 of 1 1 Warren Hoaq commented that he thought it was an ideal design for the site and that this project would be an asset to the community. He commented that he particularly liked the green cement tile roof. He asked the applicant to come back to the Committee if they proposed to make any changes in the colors or materials. Joe Taylor made a motion, seconded by Jamie Ohler, to recommend approval to the Planning Commission of the revised plans as submitted, and if any changes are made in the color or materials the ARC would like to review these changes before the building permit is issued. With the following roll call vote: AYES 5 NOES: 0 PRESENT: 5 CREEKS/DE CENTER, PRE-APPL/CA T/ON REV/EW 00-003, 414 E. BRANCH K Heffernon said that this project had already been to the Planning Com ' sion a couple of times as a Pre-application. There are five commercial buildings at are a mix of office and retail with some residential. The exact mix is not know at this time. They have some positive elements to work with such as the creek, 'ch runs adjacent to the property and they have some challenges such as the circu ion and floodway issues. The project is located where the Loomis building curre y is. The Planning Commission has expressed concerns about preserving this bui 'ng, but this issue will be looked into further when the formal application is submit and the environmental review takes place. The applicant has tried to put toge er a design that really fits in with the historic flavor of the Village. The revisi s that the Planning Commission had were basically to show the parking behind th buildings on Branch Street. Warren Hoaq thanked the applicant for comin?,�to the ARC with their project. Joe Boud, the architect, described the first design at they had come up with. He informed the Committee of the � constraining elem ts onsite and how they had tried to work around them. The first design had fo sed on the buildings taking advantage of the creek and the parking up front. One f the concerns of the Planning Commission was the parking area facing Branch St t. He showed the Committee a perspective of the redesign and pointe out the parking element behind the foreground structures, a tower element for si age, Notes ARC Meeting July 10, 2000 Page 5 of 9 ATTACHMENT 9 /// D. HOR/ZON SEN/OR HOUS/NG, PRE-APPL/CAT/ON REV/EW 00-006, LOCATED AT 579 CAM/NO MECADO Kellv Heffernon said this site was approved in the 1980's for a much larger facility. It was a 180 room skilled nursing facility and it is now a much-reduced version of what was previously approved. Proposed is an 84 unit, assisted care facility, with additional amenities such as a dining area and beauty shop. There is some uncovered parking, and some covered parking underneath the �estaurant and administration rooms. There is no proposed tree removal. The project is proposed as a 3-level facility, adjacent to the Kolbo Office project. Chris Skiff, President of Horizon Senior Housing, said three years ago he had come to the ARC for the approval of the Wyndam Residence on Elm Street, which is full now. There is definitely a need for more senior housing in the City, and the need that came out of the Wyndam Residence was the need for some larger units and some one and two bedroom units. This project is dominantly one and two bedroom units. In 1999 the Wyndam Residence was nominated one of the four finest assisted living projects in the 14 Western United States. Steve Pu. Iq ishi, Project Architect, said extensive grading work was done on this parcel many years ago for a similar type project, and he believed there was only one practical way to develop this site. The design concept for this project was incorporated into the grading program already onsite. He then pointed out the two existing retaining walls on the property and an Oak tree that will remain. He said every tree is located (on the plans) exactly as they are onsite, and in the elevation drawings the trees are correct in location, canopy spread, and their height. He said a boom truck was used to go up into the tree canopies and measure the exact height of each of the trees. Using the tree canopies to help screen portions of the buildings from the neighbors and keeping the building tucked down onto the site is the most appropriate way to develop the site. Warren Hoaq asked the architect if they intend to use the rough grading the way it is, and if the administration/restaurant building was on the lower level and the main housing on the upper level? Steve Puglisi, (Displaying a rendering) walked the ARC through the building design in detail, answering questions from the ARC as he went along. Some of the comments were as follows: 1. There will be a van on the property for transportation as most "guests" (residents are called guests) will not have their own cars. 2. The guests will have all of the facilities of a home and will also have all the facilities of a good hotel. Notes ARC Meeting July 10, 2000 Page 6 of 9 3. The project meets all of the City standards, parking etc. 4. There will be a central circulation over to the dining areas, with an elevator in the right hand tower. 5. The rooflines will be clean; the only potential roof top equipment, or ducting, would be out of the dining room, kitchen, and taundry room and these can be easily screened. Heating will be through all units, but at this time we are not sure this project will need air conditioning. 6. All residences will have private outside space. There will be patios on floor level and balconies on upper level. 7. ARC would like to see a perspective from the North. 8. There will be fire separation walls and the building will be sprinkled. 9. The landscape architect, David Foote, will do the Pismo Clarkia Replacement/Preservation Plan, yard lighting and paving plan, and there will also be a Botany Report done. 10. ARC would like the Pampas grass removed and emphasized that Oak tree preservation is of great concern. 1 1. ARC said they would like to see a palette of colors and materials that are to be used. 12. The architect said they plan to take the colors (greens, grays, and browns) for the project from the surrounding oak woodlands. 13. There will be ocean vi.ews from the front and panoramic views from the back of the building. 14. ARC thought there was a lot of architectural interest on the left side of the building. However, the right side looked more like an inexpensive hotel. They would like to see more �ariation on the right side. They suggested using river rock rather than flat brick on the rock tower articulation. 15. ARC suggested that the parking be screened for the views from Hillcrest Drive (across the freeway), and the pedestrian landscaping needs to be addressed. 16. The driveway is too steep (15% — 8%) to make it ADA. To do this the driveway would have to be extremely zigzag and some Oaks would have to be taken out. 17. The rents will be lower than Wyndam Residence because services will be provided on an "a le Carte" basis. . The ARC commented that the project looked upscale and that they were most impressed by the articulate presentation from the architect and the applicant. At this time Joe Taylor had to leave the meeting. 0 � Q Q; � �"'�tf i nn � �c u� 0� �� qZ �� ,� � �, a � � o� �� .� �� W� � o� �� °" �� '� �I � � �� • � � �� Z� k1� . � � ,• �� , �� , r ,� � 2 �� N � ATTACHMENT 10 �u�� ; � � ; ; � , ATTACHMENT 11 C�1 INCORPORA v to. tei� * P �FORN� CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE " INITIAL STUDY " 1. Project Title: 2. Lead Agency Name & Address: 3. Contact Person & Phone #: 4. Project Location: 5. Project Sponsor's Name & Address: 6. General Plan Designation: 7. Zoning: Conditional Use Permit Case No. 00-015 City of Arroyo Grande P.O. Box 550/214 E. Branch Street Arroyo Grande, CA 93421 Kelly Heffernon (805) 473-5420 597 Camino Mercado Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 Horizon Senior Housing 475 Marsh Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Oak Park Acres Planned Development (PD 1.1) Oak Park Acres Planned Development (PD 1.1) 8. Description of Project: (Describe the who% action invo/ved, inc/uding but not /imited to /atei phases of the pioject, and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary foi its imp/ementation. Attach additiona/ sheets if necessary.l The proposed project is to construct a two and three-story, 84-room assisted care facility on a 3.97-acre site. The property was partially graded in 1987 and is currently vacant. Utility construction and minor street improvements are required to serve the project. Because of the previous grading activities, minimal grading will be required and no trees will be removed. 9. Other agencies whose approval is required (and permits needed): None 1 _- __ __ J DETERMINATION. On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. � I find that the proposal MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets if the � effect is a"potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated". An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addre sed. , -- ///y/�� Signatur Date ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT" or "POTENTIALLY IS SIGNIFICANT UNLESS MITIGATED", as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Land Use and Planning 0 Population and Housing 0 Geophysical ■ Water ❑ Air Quality O Transportation/Circulation ■ Biological Resources ❑ Energy and Mineral Resources ❑ Hazards ❑ Noise ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance O Public Services 0 Utilities and Service Systems ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Cultural Resources � Recreation EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief exp/anation is requi�ed for a// answers except "No /mpact" answers that are adequate/y supported by the infonnation sources a/ead agency cites in the pareniheses fol%wing each question. A"No Impact" question is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one invoNed (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A"No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysisl. 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project- level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operations impacts. 3. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if an effect is significant or potentially significant, or is the lead agency lacks information to make a finding of insignificance. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentia�ly Significant Impact" to a"Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses", may be cross referencedJ 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 150631c11311D►. Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinancesl. A Source List should be attached and other sources used or individuals should be cited in the discussion. 7 P�otentieay Potentia//y Sfgn"if"icsnf Less Than Issues (�d Supporting Information Sources): Sign�cant Un/ess ST9n�ilicant No /mpact Mitigated /mpact /mpacf I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Wou/d the pioposa/.- a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (source #Is): 1,2,3,4) X b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or poficies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over tfie project? (source #Is1: 1,6,7) X c) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land usesl? (source #Is1: 9, 111 X d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority communityl? (source #Is): 2,4,11) X II. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Wou/d the proposa/.- a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? (source #Is1: 1,5,9) X b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure�? X (source #Is►: 9,101 c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? (source #�s►: 9,10,11) x III. GEOPHYSICAL: Wou/d the proposa/ resu/t in or expose peop/e to potentia/ impacts invo/ving: a) Seismicity: fault rupture? (source #Is1: 5,6) X b) Seismicity: ground shaking or liquefaction? (source #Is►: 5,6) X c1 Seismicity: seiche or tsunami? (source #Is1: 5,6) X d) Landslides or mudslides? (source #Is1: 5,6) X e) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soils conditions from excavation, grading or fill? Isource #Is1: 101 X f) Subsidence of land? (source #Is): 5,6) X g) Expansive soils? (source #Is): 5,6) X h) Unique geologic or physical features? (source #Is►: 5, 6,10,11) X IV. WATER: Wou/d fhe proposa/ resu/t in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the � rate and amount of surface runoff? (source #Is1: 10) X b) Exposure to people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? (source #(s1: 8) x c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (source #Is►: 9) X 3 Potentia�y Potentia//y Significant Less Than Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Significant UMess Sfenificant No /mpact Mitigated �mPsct /mpacf d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? (source #Is1: 9, 10) X e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? (source #Is1: 9, 10) X f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? (source #Isl: 9, 10) X g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (source #Is1: 9, 10) X h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (source #�s1: 9,10) X i) Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? (source #(sl: 6) X V. AIR QUALITY: Wou/d the pioposa/.• a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (source #Is1: 7, 13) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (source #Is1: 10, 11) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? (source #(s►: 9) d) Create objectionable odors? (source #Is1: 9,10) VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) (ncreased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (source #(s1: 13) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipmentl? Isource #Is1: 9, 10) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby sites? (source #Isl: 9, 10) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (source #Is1: 3, 9, 10) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (source #Is1: 9, 10) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks►? (source #Is1: 9, 10) VII. BIOtOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal resu/t in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? (source #(s►: 6) b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees►? (source #�s): 10, 11) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., oak forest, coastal habitatl? (source #�s1: 10, 11) X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and vernal pooll? (source #Is): 9, 11) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (source #Is): 11) VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would ihe proposal.• a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? (source #(s1: 1, 6) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? (source #�s1: 9, 10) IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation? (source #Is1: 9) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (source #Is1: 9, 10) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? (source #�s1: 9, 10) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? (source #(s►: 9,10,11) e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? (source #(s►: 10, 11) X. NOISE. Wou/d the p�oposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? (source #(s1: 1, 9) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (source #(s►: 9, 10) XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposa/ have an effect upon, or result in a need for new o� altered government services in any of the fol%wing areas: a) Fire Protection? (source #Isl: 6► b) Police Protection? �source #Is1: 6) c) Schools? (source #Is1: 61 d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (source #Is►: 6) e) Other governmental services? (source #Is1: 6) XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Wou/d the proposal iesu/t in a need fo� new systems, or substantia/ a/terations fo the folJowing utilities: a) Power or natural ges? (source #Is►: 9, 10) b) Communications systems? (source #�s1: 9, 10) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? Isource #Is1: 6) d) Storm water drainage? (source #Is1: 6) e) Solid waste disposal? (source #Is►: 6) XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? (source #Is►: 1, 10, 11 � S X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X i i � X b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? (source #(s1: 9, 10, 11) c) Create light or glare? (source #Is1: 9,10) XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal.• a) Disturb paleontological resources? (source #�s1: 6, 11) b) Disturb archaeological resources (source #�s1: 6, 11) c) Affect historical resources? (source #�s): 6, 11) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (source #Is►: 11) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? (source #Is►: 10, 11) XV. RECREATION. Wou/d the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? (source #Is): 1, 3) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (source #(s1: 1, 5) XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projectsJ d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X X X X X X X. X X X X X 1/ XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 150631c1(311D►. In this case, a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed by earlier documents. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "potentially significant" or "potentially significant unless mitigated", describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. �� SOURCE LIST: 1. City of Arroyo Grande General Plan 2. City of Arroyo Grande General Plan Land Use Map 3. City of Arroyo Grande Development Code 4. City of Arroyo Grande Zoning Map 5. City of Arroyo Grande Existing Setting and Community Issues Report 6. City of Arroyo Grande General Plan EIR 7. Air Pollution Control District Clean Air Plan 8. FEMA - Flood Insurance Rate Map 9. Project Description 10. Project Plans 11. Site Inspection 12. Ordinance 431 C. S: 13. Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: The project site is approximately 3.97 acres in size and is located on Camino Mercado in the Professional Commercial District (P-C) of the Oak Park Acres Planned Development (PD 1.1). Surrounding the site is vacant land to the west (approved for office development), single-family residences to the east, the Oak Park Professional Center to the south, and open space property to the north. The site slopes steeply up from Camino Mercado and then becomes relatively flat where a building pad was graded in 1987. The property is highly visible from Highway 101 and from the properties west of Highway 101 along EI Camino Real, Chilton Street and Hillcrest Drive. The property is currently vacant and contains numerous mature Coast Live Oak trees. No trees will be removed as a result of this project. Pismo Clarkia, a federally designated endangered plant species and a State Rare Plant, has been identified in three areas along the western property boundary. The project site is not located near a known cultural resource area. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project evaluated by this initial study is to construct a two and three-story, 84-room assisted care facility totaling approximately 100,000 square feet with 27 covered and 23 open parking spaces. On-site drainage will be accomplished by a drainage system that will convey runoff from both on-site and off-site sources. The project will be served by a public water system, and thus will have no direct or indirect impact on groundwater resources. EXPLANATIONS TO INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST: I. LAND USE AND PLANNING The property is located in the Oak Park Acres Planned Development (PD 1.1), and is subject to the site development standards for the Professional Commercial zoning designation of PD 1.1, and other ordinances of the City of Arroyo Grande. Construction of an assisted care facility is consistent with the General Plan and zoning for the site, and no impacts in land use and planning would result. The proposed project does not pose conflicts with existing environmental plans and/or policies. There are no agricultural operations in the vicinity of the project site. The project is adjacent to existing residential development, an approved office development and open space. Given these diverse existing land uses, the proposed project would not disrupt or divide an established community. Analysis of Significance: No impact II. POPULATION & HOUSING Occupancy of the project upon completion would increase the population of the area above current levels, but not above levels anticipated by the General Plan. As stated above, the project is consistent with the General Plan and zoning for the site. Analysis of Significance: Less than significant impact 7 � GEOPHYSICAL In 1986, a 180-room skilled nursing facility was approved for this site. Construction for that project began in 1987, but ceased in early 1988 after several building pads were cut and retaining walls installed. As a result, minimal additional grading is required for the proposed project. As conditioned, the applicant must submit a soils report discussing existing site conditions, and measures to reduce potential soils-related impacts. Standard erosion control measures would address on-site construction period erosion by wind or water. Long- term erosion potential would be addressed through installation of landscaping and storm drainage facilities, both of which would be designed to meet applicable regulations. Based on the General Plan and review of the Alquist-Priolo Zone Fault maps, the proposed project is not located on a known earthquake fault subject to rupture. The proposed project will be subject to the effects of periodic seismic events in the region, including ground shaking. However, exposure of people to these events can generally be mitigated to an acceptable level of risk by following Uniform Building Code development standards. Analysis of Significance: Less than significant impact IV. WATER/DRAINAGE Water. Development of the proposed project would require water for both domestic use and landscape irrigation. Projected water demand is approximately 8.4 acre-feet of water per year. The water consumption by this project would further reduce the City's supply of availa6le water. This impact could be mitigated using water-conserving designs, fixtures and landscaping. Analysis of Significance: Potentially significant unless mitigated. Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall complete measures to neutralize the estimated increase in water demand created by the project by either: Implement an individual water program that utilizes fixtures and designs that minimize water usage. The calculations shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for review and approval. The proposed individual water program shall be submitted to the City for approval prior to implementation; or, Pay an in lieu fee. Monitoring: Review of individual water program or payment of the in lieu fee Responsible Department: Public Works Department Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit 2. All new construction shall utilize fixtures and designs that minimize water usage. Such fixtures shall include, but are not limited to, water saving toilets, instant water heaters and hot water recirculating systems. Water conserving designs and fixtures shall be installed prio� to final occupancy. Monitoring: Responsible Department: Timeframe: Review of building plans Building and Fire Department Prior to issuance of building permit : 3. All landscaping shall be consistent with water conservation practices including the use of drought tolerant landscaping, drip irrigation, and mulch. To the greatest extent possible, lawn areas and areas requiring spray irrigation shall be minimized. Monitoring: Review of landscaping and irrigation plans Responsible Department: Parks and Recreation Department Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit Drainas�e. Development of the site will increase impervious surfaces, which in turn will change absorption rates and increase the amount of runoff. The site would drain onto Camino Mercado and existing drainage facilities would accommodate the increased flows. Detailed drainage calculations would be reviewed as part of the plan check process. Analysis of Significance: Mitigation Measure: Potentially significant unless mitigated. 4. The applicant shall provide detailed drainage calculations indicating that increased run-off can be accommodated by existing facilities and/or provide on-site retention basins to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. Monitoring: Review of grading plans Responsible Department: Pub�ic Works Department Timeframe: Prior to issuance of a grading permit V. AIR aUALITY Construction activities would generate dust, which could cause potentially significant environmental impacts. Operation of the project would also generate approximately 181 new daily vehicle trips. Emissions from the trips generated would produce less than 10 Ibs./day of emissions. Based on the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLO APCD) emission thresholds, the proposed project would not have a significant adverse impact on air quality (reference Attachment A for APCD referral response). Analysis of Significance: Less than significant impact Although air quality impacts will fall below APCD thresholds for significance, the project will contribute emissions to the air basin, which is already a non-attainment area for the State ozone standard. Emissions generated by this project, together with emissions generated by reasonably foreseeable new development, will result in a cumulative adverse impact on air quality unless all reasonably available mitigations are included in the design of the project. ` Analysis of Significance: Less than significant impact Development of the site will involve grading and other activities that will produce emissions for which the APCD has established impact thresholds. Grading of four (4) acres will generate emissions that will potentially exceed the District's threshold for respirable particulate matter (PM, Thus, construction activities will result in temporary, short-term adverse impacts that must be mitigated. Dust generated by the development activities shall be kept to a minimum with a goal of retaining dust on the site. The dust control measures listed below shall be followed during construction of the project, and shall be shown on grading and building plans. In addition, the contractor should designate a person or persons to monitor the dust control program and to order increased watering, as necessary, to prevent transport of dust offsite. The name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to the APCD prior to issuance of grading permit. L'� Analysis of Significance: Less than significant impact Mitigation Measures: 5. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. 6. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. 7. Permanent dust control measures identified in the revegetation and landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. 8. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with fast-germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation is established. 9. All vehicles hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114. (This measure has the potential to reduce PM, emissions from this source by 7— 14%). 10. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or wash off trucks and equipment leaving the site. (This measure has the potential to reduce PM, emissions from this source by 40 — 70%). 11. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where feasible. (This measure has the potential to reduce PM, emissions from this source by 25 — 60%). Monitoring: Review of grading and building plans and site inspections Responsible Departments: The Public Works and Building and Fire Departments shall inspect plans and spot check in the field • Timeframe: Prior to issuance of grading permit and during construction VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION Access to the project site is from Camino Mercado, a collector street with a 56-foot right-of-way. Based on the trip generation analysis prepared for the project (Higgins Associates dated 8/29/001, the development is estimated to generate 181 new daily trips, with 5 trips during the AM peak hour and 14 trips during the PM peak hour. Since the assisted care facility will generate below the 20 peak hour trip threshold established by the City, and will not significantly impact traffic operations in the vicinity of the project, the analysis concludes that no project specific mitigations are required (reference Attachment B for trip generation analysis). � However, the project traffic would contribute to the cumulative negative impact on the backbone circulation system. The City's Standard Condition requiring payment of the City's Traffic Impact can mitigate these long- range traffic impacts and Signalization Fees as adopted by the City Council. Analysis of Significance: Less than significant impact Mitigation Measure: 10 12. The applicant shall pay the City's Traffic and Signalization Impact fees prior to issuanc� of building permit. VII Monitoring: Responsible Department: Timeframe: BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES The applicant shall pay the fees Building & Fire Department Prior to issuance of building permit A rare plant survey was conducted on May 28, 1999 by Dames & Moore, which identified three Pismo Clarkia (Clarkia speciosa ssp. immaculate) populations along the western parcel boundary (reference Attachment C for biological survey). Pismo Clarkia is listed as endangered by the federal government and is a State Rare Plant. The populations found varied in size from 25 to 50 individuals each, for a total of 75 to 150 plants onsite. The report by Dames & Moore concluded that the presence of Pismo Clarkia along the site boundary does not preclude further development of the site and recommended that the following measures be implemented to protect the existing plant populations. Analysis of Significance: Potentially significant unless mitigated Mitigation Measures: 13. Site development plans shall specify that grading and other types of disturbance be precluded from a 25-#oot buffer zone around the Pismo Clarkia populations to minimize impacts. A fence and appropriate signage shall be placed around the buffer zone to preclude impacts to Pismo Clarkia during construction. Monitoring: The applicant shall submit plans showing these protection measures. Responsible Department: Community Development Department Timeframe: Prior to issuance of grading permit 14. The site development plans identifying protection areas around the Pismo Clarkia shall be submitted to the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) at least 10 days prior to the start of site work. Monitoring: The applicant shall submit the plans to CDFG Responsible Department: Community Development Department Timeframe: Prior to issuance of grading permit Approximately 12 mature oak trees exist on the property, all of which are proposed to remain. Tree protection measures must .be in place during construction per Ordinance 431 C.S., the Community Tree Ordinance. Analysis of Significance: Less than significant Mitigation Measure: 15. Protective fencing shall be installed around each tree at the dripline. The fencing shall be installed prior to any site clearing, �rading, or demolition activities, and shall remain in place until construction is complete, including landscaping. Weatherproof signs shall be permanently posted on the fences, stating the following: 11 Tree Protection Zone - No personnel, equipment, materials, or vehicles are allowed Do Not move or remove this fence [Name of arborist or consultantl [Name and phone number of developer or general contractor) Monitoring: Field inspection Responsible Departments: Parks & Recreation, Community Development Departments Timefrarne: Prior to issuance of grading permit An unknown number of Coast live oak trees were removed during grading activities in 1987. The preliminary landscape plan shows Cork oak trees, which are non-native ta this area. These trees should be replaced with native Coast live oak trees. Analysis of Significance: Less than significant Mitigation Measure: 16. The final landscape and irrigation plan shall show twelve (12), 15-gallon Coast live oak trees (Quercus agrifolia) in place of the Cork oak trees (Quercus suber►. Monitoring: The applicant shall submit the final landscape and irrigation plan showing this change. Responsible Departments: Parks and Recreation and Community Development Depts. Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit Development of the site with an assisted care facility wilt not conflict with adopted energy conservation plans or result in the wasteful use of non-renewable resources. • Analysis of Significance: Less than significant impact VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES IX. HAZARDS The project does not pose an undue risk to project occupants or occupants of surrounding properties. The applicant will be responsible for maintaining the open space area north of the project site for fire protection purposes. Analysis of Significance: Less.than significant impact Mitigation Measure: 17. The applicant shall submit a Vegetation Management Plan for a portion of the open space property located adjacent to and north of the project site. The plan shall include an area having a depth of 200' along the northern project boundary. 12 Monitoring: The applicant shall submit the plan Responsible Department: Building & Fire Department Timeframe: Prior to issuance of building permit X. NOISE Existing noise levels would be increased temporarily during the construction phase of this project. Noise resulting from construction activities will be short-term, and is subject to the City's Noise Ordinance. Therefore, the impact will be less than significant. Analysis of Significance: Less than significant impact Mitigation Measures: 18 19. All construction equipment shall be provided with well-maintained, functional mufflers to limit noise. All construction activities shall comply with the time limits specified by the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code. 20. To the greatest extent possible, grading and/or excavation operations at portions of the site bordering developed areas should occur during the middle of the day to minimize the potential for disturbance of neighboring noise sensitive uses. Monitoring: Notes shall be placed on the construction plans referencing the above measu�es. Responsible Department: Public Works Department Timeframe: During construction XI. PUBLIC SERVICES Development of the site with an assisted living facility would increase demand for fire and police protection services, but not beyond levels anticipated by the General Plan for City buildout. Analysis of Significance: Less than significant XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS The proposed project will not create a significant demand for new or altered power, gas, communication systems, water treatment capacity or solid waste disposal. The project can tie into the existing infrastructure for these systems to serve the site. The project is within the expected demand for these systems based on the growth rate established in the General Plan. Analysls of Significance: Less than significant XIII. AESTHETICS The proposed facility will be placed into the side of the ridge above Camino Mercado where a building pad was previously graded and will be highly visible from the Highway 101 corridor. To reduce visual impacts, the colors and materials of the architecture were selected to blend with the surrounding environment. The landscape plan shows a variety of large evergreen trees along the front portion of the project, which will also help obscure the structure from the south. The open space areas located north and east of the project site containing an established oak woodland will screen the structure when viewed f�om James Way and adjacent Rancho Grande residences. Analysis of Significance: Less than significant 13 XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES Archaeologist Robert Gibson conducted a phase one archaeological surface survey on the site, and no significant historic or prehistoric archaeological materials were found. Based on the survey, the proposed project would not have a significant adverse impact on any known cultural resources. If during construction excavation, any buried or isolated prehistoric cultural materials or historic features are unearthed, work in that area shall halt until a qualified archaeologist can examine them and appropriate recommendations made as outlined in CEQA. In such an event, Robert Gibson or the Community Development Department of the City of Arroyo Grande should be contacted. Analysis of Significance: Less than significant impact Mitigation Measure: 21. The following note shall be placed on the grading and improvement plans for the project: XV. RECREATION "In the event that during grading, construction or development of the project, and archeological resources are uncovered, all work shall be halted until the City has reviewed the resources for their significance. If human remains (burials) are encountered, the County Coroner (781-4513) shall be contacted immediately. The applicant may be required to provide archaeological studies and/or mitigation measures." Monitoring: Construction plans shall be reviewed prior to issuance of a grading permit to ensure the note is in place. Responsible Department: Public Works Department Timeframe: Prior to issuance of grading permit The proposed project would increase demand for City park and recreational facilities. In this case, the Parks and Recreation Director has indicated that this impact would be mitigated by the City's Standard Condition requiring payment of the park development fee. Analysis of Significance: Less than significant impact Mitigation Measure: 22. The applicant shall pay all applicable park development fees to the City. Monitoring: Responsible Department Timeframe: The applicant shall pay the park development fees to the City. Parks and Recreation Department Prior to issuance of building permit 14 � AIR POLLUTION ATTACHMENT A � �.�� M1 �- CONTROL DI T �'*� COUNTY OF SAN LUISOBI T .aw v T grv: ?i'� November 14, 2000 ,��; �-:�: a:�� ' Kelly Heffernon, Associate Planner N��./ 1 d �nQO City of Arroyo Grande Community Development CITY OF f;i�ROYU GRANDE 214 East Branch Street ��'_''�"-�'�:��' Y'�cVELOPME�` i�=?T. Arroyo Grande, CA 93421 SUBJECT: Project Review: Arroyo Crest; Conditional Use Permit #00-015 Thank you for including the APCD in the conditional use permit review process. We have completed our review of the application for the �assisted care facility to be located on Camino Mercado in Arroyo Grande, and have the following comments regarding the proposal. COMMENDATIONS We would first like to commend the applicant on a few elements of the project design. 1. The project provides in-fill development located within the URL, �vhere growth has been planned for and expected. 2. The landscaping includes numerous shade trees, which helps reduce surface temperatures and evaporative emissions from automobiles. Additionally, trees reduce levels of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS The District assesses air pollution impacts from both the construction phase and operational phase of a project, with separate significance thresholds for each. A grading plan for the site was not included in the project review packet, however initial District staff assessment of the air quality impacts from the construction phase indicates that the project has the potential to exceed our threshold for grading of 4.0 acres of continuously worked area. The District feels that with proper management during the construction process, these emissions can be mitigated to less than significant. Construction: Fugitive dust emissions reduce visibility and can cause a nuisance problem for nearby properties. Include ALL of the follo�ving Fugitive Dust mitigation measures. • Reduce the amount of disturbed area where possible. • LJse water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Increased �vatering frequency would be required �vhenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (nonpotable) water should be used �vhenever possible. • All dirt stockpile areas should be sprayed daily as needed. • Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved project revegetation and landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible follo�ving completion of any soil disturbing activities • Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with fast-germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation is established. • All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. to be paved should be completed as soon as possible. In addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. • Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not e:cceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site. 3433 Roberto Court • San Luis Obispo, CA 9340 I• 805-78 I-59 I 2• FAX: 805-78 I- I 002 cleanair@sloapcd.dst.ca.us :• wti��.vsioapcd.dst.ca.us �- -- hr:n'=�f or .�^_�!Pd r. �. All vehicles hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose matenals are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114. This measure has the potential to reduce PM10 (particulate matter) emissions from this source hy 7— 14%. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or wash off trucks and equipment leaving the site. This measure has the potential to reduce PM10 emissions from this source by 40 — 70%. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where feasible. This measure has the potential to reduce PM, emissions from this source by 25 — 60%. All PM mitigation measures required should be shown on grading and building plans. In addition, the contractor or builder should designate a person or persons to monitor the dust control program and to order increased watering, as necessary, to prevent transport of dust offsite. Their duties shall include holidays and weekend periods when work may not be in progress. The name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to the APCD prior io lancl use clearance. O,perational: District staff assessment of the air quality impacts from the operational phase indicates that emissions generated by mobile sources at the development will not exceed our operational phase significance threshold. At the discretion of the developer however, site design and energy efficiency measures could be included to reduce potential impacts to an even greater extent. The District recommends inclusion of the following elements, where feasible: • Increase wall and attic insulation beyond Title 24 requirements. • Use built-in energy efficient appliances, where applicable • Use double-paned windows • Use sodium parking lot and street lights • Use energy efficient interior lighting • Provide on-site eating, refrigeration and food vending facilities to reduce employee lunchtime and dinner trips • Provide preferential carpool parking • Provide on-site bicycle parking at a ratio of one bike parking space for every 10 car parking spaces • Provide incentives to employees to carpool/vanpool or take public transportation • Provide on-site banking (ATM) and postal services Again, we appreciate the opportunity to review the project. If you have any questions or comments please me at 781-5912. Sincerely, � Heather Tomley Air Quality Specialist HAT/lmg \�3090A�DATA\OIS�PL.AN�RESPONSE�2183. tWT. doc HIGGINS ASSOCIATES ATTACHMENT B ��JOI� & �R��OC� C��nI�OM�CR� 1335 First SVeet, Suite A, Gilroy, CA 95020 • 408 848-3122 • fax 408 848-2202 • e-mail info@kbhiggins.com August 29, 2000 Mr. Christopher E. Skiff, President Horizon Senior Housing, LLC 539 Marsh Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 RE: Horizon Senior Housing, Arroyo Grande, California Dear Mr. Skiff, This letter documents.the trip generation associated with the development of an 84=room assisted care facility located on Camino Mercado in Arroyo Grande, California. The project trip generation table is shown on Exhibit l. An 84-room assisted care facility will generate 181 new daily trips, with 5 trips during the AM peak hour and 14 trips during the PM peak hour, based upon trip generation rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 6`� Edition. Attachment A identi.fies Land Use 252; Congregate Care Facility. The City of Arroyo Grande Public Works policy states that "mitigation measures shall be required for developments generating twenty (20) peak hour trips (PHT) or more which impact any roadway facility now operating or forecast to operate below LOS C. Since the assisted care facility will generate below the 20 PHT, and will not significantly impact traffic operations in the vicinity of the project, no project speci.fic mitigations are required. Thank you for the opportunity to assist you with this project. If you have any questions regazding this information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sin erel yours, Keith B. Higgins, kbh:llb enclosures A00-184Report.wpd Z � � r � �"' m W = Z x W wa � � � � � Z 2 Y F- � � �a a Q Y j Oa� F- _ F- � O � � O Z _ Y F- � � �a Q Q Y � p�0 H = �a o� F- � N �� w � W � ~ Z � g " rn ti v 0 � ti 11') O � o � � � v o � � N � 0 r- c� u� 0 � o M M m � 0 0 � � � � N � � 0 � N t1) N A = 'v � � m � m U � N . N Q a �U � � W LL' � � m U Z m O @ � � m c Z U w � a � f- T �U m � m � cB U a�i N . N Q T �U R LL a> c`a U a� m � c 0 U N � d C .� C W C O .� r 0 a y C fC H w 0 a� � . c ^ � � � � y O .O � d W L y.� � � c � c o � o '� c @ a� 'a> c a�i p rn n a a •� � ..��'� � m � N 0 Z R c (� n z v m 8 < Land �Use: 252 Congregate Care Facility Description Congregate care facilities typically consist of one or more multiunit buildings designed for elderly living. They may also contain dining rooms, medical facilities, and recreational facilities. Additional Data Vehicle ownership levels, in general, are very low at congregate care facilities. The sites were surveyed in 1981 in Portland, Oregon. Source Number 155 Trip Generation, 6th Edition 456 Institute of Transportation Engineers Con�regate Care Facility (252) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Occupied Dwel(ing Units " On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 2 Avg. Num. of Occupied Dwelling Units: 183 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per Occupied Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 2.15 _ 2.12 - 2.15 � ' �,,,.:,,., _� i�o ca�Pf�,uv - small Samcle Slze Data Plot and Equation � �oo eoo N C �� ll.l G �. F m U d �Q � N � (d d > Q II gp( H 20 1C 0 X Actuat Data Points Fitted Curve Equation: Not given ------ Average Rate R 2 _ ,,.. Trip Generation, 6th Edition 457 Institute of Transportation Engineers 100 200 X= Number of Occupied Dwelling Units �ongregate Care Faci�.cy (252) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Occupied Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, ' Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Number of Studies: 2 Avg. Num. of Occupied Dweiling Units: 183 Directional Distribution: 61 % entering, 39% exiting Trip Generation per Occupied Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation � �. i T�ip Generation, 6th Edition 458 Institute of Transportation Engineers Co� _�regate Care Facility (252) . Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Occupied Dwelling Units - On a: Weekday, — � Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 2 Avg. Num. of Occupied Dwelling Units: 183 Directional Distribution: 56% enfering, 44% exiting Trip Generation per Occupied Dweliing Unit Averaae Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.16 - 0.21 40 � �-- ^- -s..n.. �....,n �� ..�e c;�e Data Pibt and Equat�on 50 N � C W a t`— m U L m > m m � m Q I H 30 2C . „a.....,.. .,.... ........_.., _..._.. -----, . • ,� . • . : � ,'� x . : . : � ,' . : �. : . . ; ...�� ...••-•--..... ............................•....-- �.. . • i� ; ,�: . �, . . , • , . . � • .......�i _.. _.'. _....."-.....•........... ..•--••-._...._..-•-• ................. . �. . : ,� • . , • �� : : �. . . , ; ......................• • �' - ;....__........• ; ,' , X. : ; / . • 0 100 200 300 ------ Averege Rate R 2_"" Institute of Transportation Engineers X= Number of Occupied Dwelling Units X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Equation: Not given Trip Generation, 6th Edition 459 r'E6-09-0� 15:12 From:�ANOR CARE LEGAL 301-979-40QT DA & MO A DAME.i d MOORE GROtJF COMPA.Ny .4u�;ust 11, 1999 ken Gelfarb, Esq. ManorCare Health Services, Inc. 7361 Calhoun Place, Suite 3U0 Rockvill�. ��ID 3U85� Rr: Piymo Clarl:ia Survey Arroyo Grande, Catifarnia p&lYt No. 42495-OUZ•155 D�ar Mr. Gclfal�b: ATTACHMENT C 7101 Ww:cracia AvcnuC. $uicc 700 B«h�.sda. Masyrlu�d 20A14-4$70 301 652 23I5 Tel 3U1 �+56 80S9 F•ar. This letter repoits th� results of the rai•e plant survey you requested un the 3.9$-acrc property in �Z�oyo Gr�nde, California_ Daines and Moorc botanist Jim Rocks conduct�d a survey of the property on May 28, l 999. T'he property is located immediately north of highway 101, nor[h of Cdllltll0 M�TC3(�O lIl the City of Anoyo Grande. The surroundine land use is commerci3l aiid r�sidccitial d�vrlopmetit. The 6ite has been graded and iecT3ced resultins iii mostly dist�.u�bed and noi�-native grassland habitat with coast ]ive oaks (Quertur agrifolia} scattered around t�ie periyhery of tha site (Figurc 1). The disturbcd patch of coasta! sagz scrub ou the south slope of the pi�operty con�ists of Califomia sa�ebn�sli (Ar�re»risicr cul:fo�•nica) and deerweed (Lori�s scopa� with non-native grasses sucli as wild oa[ (�ivena sp.), red brouie (B�•omus madrtre�uls y�P. 1�r.c�JCTt.S) azid darn�l (L OIIII�7I IG'))IU��I2I�lli7�. Tfle tOt31 CO� of co:�tal sage scnib spccies does not exceed l5°�0, Thc sit�� ilSO COIli�1115 tW0 areas rhat SLI�pOT[ WztllTlt� vzgetation (Figure 1). No water was pres�i�t in thcse dreas durin� the survey. However, tlze presence of l�igh water marks and dry, crackcd soil su�bescs water w;is rzcentIy presant. The area supports the wetland species rush iJuucus spp.), bultush (Sciryus sp.) and spikzrush (Eleocharis sp.). A second, smallcr area locatecl on tlie t�rrace to che north also supports tliese species, as well as� brass buttons (C'ot�tlu co��ortopif but this plant cover is less d�i�se. The local hydrologic i�ow pattern that created thes� wctland areas is artificially derived. Gradin� activities havz produced sl�pe �end slSelf topography across the site allowing water to p�ol an the sh�lves creatitig a11 artttlet�l enviroiuiient sufficienrly suitablz to support these hydrophytic species. No sn•eambeds or natural 11Y:11Tli.tE�'C Cllc'1I1f1C�S w�G'CC CVl(�Cllt OI1S1j� Zherelore, thc sita docs uoi suppoit jutisdictional wetl�nds duc t� thz lack of appropriaie natural hydrology and hydric soil�. Pisrno Clarkia (CIa�•1da xpeciosa ssp. �»��culuru) was found iu thr�e populations along the we�t�m parcel boundary. This spccies is listed as eiidangered by the fedcral govemmeiit and is a St:�tc Rare Plant. The California Narive Plant Sociccy has includcd this'spacies oi� its Lisc 1B, w•hicl� che California Depuunent of Fish and Game (CDFG) infoniially uses as its candi�iate list for futurC listings uiider thc C�lifon�ia Endar�gered Sp�cies Act (CESA). The populations were in sat�dy soil, in relatively open areas within non-native grassland. Pupulations varied in size fium 25 t�� SU individusls each, fur a total of 75 to 150 plant, oi�site. o�ces w«leWiae =EE-09-00 15:1Z From:�ANOR CARE LEGpL 301-9T9-4�0T T-559 P.O7/12 Job-Tel �� ;� ..a r � DAMES & MOORE � , ^•.;�`� q DqNtES g MOOR£ GROUP COMPaNy ManurCnrc Hrulth �zrvicas , Augusr 1l, 19.')9 Pa�r 3 S�ction 9 of cl�a F�deral Endan�ered Speci�s Act (FESA) prohibits thc renioval and reduetion to po;session (i.e. �:ollcction) of eiidaugered and thrcatcn�d plants from lands undesr Fedaral juiisdictioii. Tt h�rth�r prohibits thc rrmoval, cutting, dig�ing, damage, or destructioa of listed planrs on any other area in knowing violation of a stat� law or regulation. Plarits, however, ao i�ot cnjoy tlie full protection accorded animals under ttiis section a�ainst "take" (i.e., hsrass, harm [��hich includcs sienificanc habitat rnodification or dzgradation], pursue, hunt, shout, wound, kill, trap, capn�re, or 3itempi to z1��ge in �ny such coTlduci). Unlilcc list�d animal species, fzdaral li�ted plant species locatzd on private property are not re�ulated under the FESA: FF_,SA SEC. 9(ct)(7) Exc�pt as provid�d in sections 6(g)(2) and 10 of this Act, with respect to any endangerecl spzci�s of plants listed pursuant to �ection 4 of this Act, it is unlawfi�l for any person subj�ct to the jurisdiction of the United States to- (A) impoit any such specics into, or export any such specizs frora, the United 5tates; �B) rcmove c�ud rediice to possession aiiy such species front ��r�n.e u,cder Faderul Jurtsdic�ro»; maliciuusly damage or destroy any sucli species on ar�y such area; or removc, cut, dig up, or damag� or destroy any such spcciCS on any otiizr araa in knowing violation of any law or regulation of a�iy statc or in the coursc; of any violation of a stdce cri�uinal trespass law; (C) dclivcr, r�cziva, carry, transport, or ship in interstate or foreign Camine[ce, by ai�y mcans whatso�ver and in tlie course of a commercial activity, any such species; (D) sell or offer fur sale in interstate or forzign commerce any such spccies; ar �E) violate any regulation pertaining to such species or to any tlueatened species of plants listed pursuant co scction �i of this Act r�id promulgated by the Secretary pursuan[ to authori�y pruvidzd by ttus Act. Plaiit speci�s designstcd by CDFG as State Rare are iioc r�gulated undcr th� CESA; howzvar, landowners int�nding to niodify their property are required to notify CDFG at least 10 days ui advance to allow for salvag� of the rare plant resource: Fish a�xd Gan e Code 1913(c� Notwithstanding the provisio��s of subdivisions (a) :jnd (b) of this section, where the ow��zr of land has bz - rn nocified by the department pursuant co Section 1903.5 that a rare or endaiigered native plant is growing on such land, the owner shall notif}► the deparnnent at least 10 �iuys in advaiice of changing the land use to allow foT Salvage of St1ch pl�ini. The failtire by the departiiiant to salva�e such plant within 10 days of iiotificatiou shall �iici[le the owner of chz land to procecd wi�hout reeard, to this chapccr. Thc local I311(1 use permitting agency, acting as the Lead Agency uuder the Califomia Environmcucz�l Quality Act (CEQA), can determii�e that unavoidable impacts io species o(fi:r w«�d..tc:r FE6-09-00 15:12 Fram:�ANOR CARE '�GAL 301-9T9-4007 T-559 P.�B/12 Jo6-7B1 i:b,...._i . �' '�� DAMES & MOORE -, _ . ?'tiJ :`:�� A DAMfS a MOORF GROLIY CuMI'nNy :.lunorCara Health Services . .�uKusc I l, 1999 l':sga 3 rccu�niz�d as "sensiti�e" hy the state or fedeTal resource agencies can be consider�d si�niticant and require nutigatioii. This cssentially treats seiisitive species, regardless of ttieir listing status, tl►e s�.mc as focmally listed specics and a initigation program raquued as part of tlie land use parmitting process. Daiiies & Moore's inquiries with tlie City of Arroyo Grande Planning Dcpartm�nt indicated that tliis jurisdiction has no fonnal policy Oc guideliile5 dlCiatlug their treatinent of scnsitive species. Ttiey resolve this issue on a case-by-case basis. In su►i2ii�ary, ihc presencc of Pismo Clarkia alvnb tlic sitc boundary does not preclude further d�velo�ment uf the site. No resource agcncy (i.e., USFWS, CDFG) has jtuisdietion ov�r this specific rare plant spccies on private land; tlie City uf Arroyo Grandc wi]1 dictate und�r CEQA tiow this issua w�ould be addressed. Due to the rare status and the federal listing of the Pismo Clarkia, Danies & Moore recommends the fo}lowing: • Site dev�lopment plaiis should specify that grading and other types of disturbance be przcluded froin a 25 foot buffer zone around the Pismo Clarl.za populations to ininimize im.paccs. A fencz and appropriate si�nag� slwuld be placed around th� buffer zoue to prcclude impacTS to Pismo Clarkia during construction. • Thc sicc dcvrlopmznt pla.n spzcifying the above plan should be submittcd ro tl�c CDFG ac lcast 1 U day� in advar►cr ot' clia starc of sit� work. • Tt a 2� foo� buffer z�ne is uot feasible based on pTOposed site developmeut, the Ciry of Arroyo Orandc Plaruiin� Department, undar CEeA, could require the purchase of habitat offsite supporting a comparabl� population uf Pismo Clarkia. Please call either of tlie undersigned if y ou bave any questions or if Dames �. Moorc can be of ruRhcr a5si5ia��c. Sincer�ly, D�M�:s & Niou�e P�;� ��,�,�,, Patrick J. Mock, Ph.D. Senior Biologist Biology Group I4iana er MiclYa�l J. Wolf Associatc Artachmcnts JfF,ca Wor!d�� FE6-09-00 15:13 From:MANOR CARE LEGAL 301-9T9-4U07 T-559 P.U9/1Z Job-Tel DAMES & MOORE n po.MES S MOORE GROUP COMPaNy ManorCare Haaltl� Ser�ices Augusc 1 1, 1999 Pagc 4 �rroyo Graude Property Plant Species List j es� ANGIOSPF.Rh13 (FLOWEI2iNG PLAriT'S) M ONQC01'YLEDON�A.E CYTERAC�.AE - Scdgt Fotitily 6leocharis sp. - �pikerwh �clrpus sp. - bulru�h IRIDACEAE - lrix Fumily S'isyrir.chiun� ballum - blur-eyed gr�ss JLTNCACEA E - Rush �amily Juncus sp. - rush POACE_4E - Gr`s� Femily s�l ve►r,r bar6�tn - slcndcr w11d uat `9rom�u u�annrius �Bro»tus cliwttl��s - TipguC b[o]11e '`B, �nadritrnsis ssp. ruber�� - foxtail chc5s 'Curtud�no sp_-pamp�s grass 'Loliut�i �eneulantum - dnniel Nussalla c•�r>►un DI�EDONE�E AI'lOACE�E - Fig-Marisold F:�mily CarpoGrocus e dulis - fig-marigold ANACARDI.aCEl.E - Sumac Family Tc�xicudendrort diverstloburn - poison oak ASTERACFAE - Suntlower Fanuly .�rtemisict cul Jornlca - Cslifornia sagcbru�h Buccharis pilulal•is - coyote bnssh +Cer<<crurea solstr�inlu - yrl{ow srarthis�le 'C.ir�tum vulgurd - bull thistic 'Con�la coronoplfolia - bras� buaone Gnr�pf�alium thermale var. canescens Ha:ardra squarrosu vnr. squm - aaw-toochad gol3enbuslt •Svnchus ult7ac�u; lnraxaee�m uJ�cincle-.:orrvnon dandolion cACTwcE��: - c:�«5 F�ty Opunriv /itwralis - cuaital prickly pc�u .I(KC Wer�GwidC FEB-09-00 15:13 From:�ANOR CARE IEGAI 301- T-559 P.10/12 Job-T81 � � '�� DAnnES & MooRE M � ---. -- - _ . . . _... l;:e? :':5 r: A D�aMES d MOORE G11011P COMPANy ManorCarc Hralth Srtvices August 11, 1999 Pagc � EUPHORBIACEA� - Spurgr Family t�-rmoca>pus seiigarur - Nrkey muilein FaB 4CEAE - Pea Family Lorus pun�hianru Lurtrs srupa, - drerwecd G��pinu� sp. 4'icia �nnaric.ana FAGACEwE - Oak Family Quercns ag►•ifolia - coasi livc osk GER4lVIACEa►E - Geranium Fsmily ''E�odium cieucarium - red-stem filarze L�Iv1JAC�AE -1�4inc Family . Sulvia spathac•cu YAPAVER�ICEAE - Poppy Family �i�chol:ia calijornica - California poppy PLAl�iTAGINACEAE - P(snrain Family Pl�rr►u�go sp. YOLEMOri1�CEAE - Phlox Fanuly Ni�i�arretia sp. POL�'GONACEAF - Buckwheat ramily Pulygonum Sp. POR"tUL�1CACE AE - Pursl3ar Fan�ily �Tayt�r►ict sp. PRTMULACEAE - Primrose Family +.�nagalJis aiti �ensrs - �carle[ pimpernrl RUBIACEAE - Madder Fa�nily Gitliuin apa+inE - bedstiraw SCROPHIJI.ARI.�CEAE - Figwo�t Famity Mir�rulus aurantiuc�rs - ied bush monkey flower tili�n��lus sp. t'eronica arvensis - sperdwcll SOLANACEAE - Nighuhadz Family �ulmrurn cloi�glasii ---------.. �------------- _--------------- ' I3omcncl�turc from Hicl:man (1993) and Beauchamp (1986). ` Nol�-n1[ivz SpeCies OfC�s wod�twide , FEB-09-00 15:13 From:�ANOR CARE LEGAL 301- T-559 P.II/12 Job-7B1 ,� �` � DAMES & MOORE 1 •cTl�� j n OnMES R MOORE GROtIf tOMPaNy ManorCare Healt�i Scrvices Aug►�st 11, 1999 Pagc 6 REFERENCFS Beauchainp, R.M. 1986. A flora of San Diego County. Sweetwat�r River Press. 241 pp. Hiclanan, J. C. 1993. Tlie Jepson manual: higher plants of California. University of CaIifornia Press, Berkeley, Califonua. 14UU pp. oK«s wo:+a��id� FEB-09-�0 15:13 From:MANOR CARE LEGAL 301-9T9-4U07 T-559 P.12/1Z Job-T81 � = d S L � �.. y ? v�i � � 7 n — ,- s " r ? : i � t �iJ' %s .. l�� s :. � � '_ � � � M � . . � � �—�..� � � ; L � �`�\ ;� U � �� :� �� N �� ;��e' �._ � � 3�� .� r �, � � i . a'!�"� ' � fy ',f' ��'; � ti � , � t ��-,s t;/�1./. � , G . ! ��! i ; � � .{ �� K n � p, �.� } ry '� � .'D � v ` ^� � t� �-. o^ ry � � - : . o � ; �` � ' ' ` : y � • w � � �C � �. < < , � � rj O •-!� �„� j� �\� � � � A �' � � � � � � r �n � . M G � � � c� a i � x � r� c � . : a L � �� r+ . � �) �,s- �.�. �r f .�r v�i �•`. �� rPvCE�t� s �� . . .•� (� � � � j \ i 1 Wt�� j � �s�e�+fi�+► t � ; . �� C � �, :�� /• -�.. �� ,• f� :� Jf w �• `,, ��, .' '� o iy • .� . ` t , ,,�� : �; r r \ 4 ;° Cg t � ��z . ?i _. i a Y . <e .� . ., ci %a ' � � S° �� c :. . . � 0 �' � � � _ + �� - �' � �.,�� . _ :' ` — J y � 4C �� , . j � `y `�� r �:.•::% `/ J ; .: � � y ,. �f ?' j ` : � s � ��% .. ;�� :/ i � ' .,,`% ;�` •�� Z r;' ��! � S =�`� � ,: o� - t^ ^ � sr;�° ��r�� a ";l�: � � c tv � `J _ �rn ��° ,, � ;�t� V,, a :�?� U a n E�� {€ ;�: i .. "�� "- � Fy' �� `': �, -'I .. �--, _+� �. i `'� r = ��• T.' 3! ` ��a �� `:I � _ � �� . � ,; ::` ° � '� n / ` '�� `� t ;� �n. :� T =c � � m � �• ^ t � �F� � �-' ` � ooR. • rJ ?� 2 • � �� i >>a c � � . i i „ �L �� : � �,i � � = � ° : � � J t- . . �: . _ ! : : 4�t .�.�ZL�f� �a = ' � t . �r � 7,:.t`�..,,� _ ' � � �' � �: E � °� � : : 'h � ;` s -... :.�; ., � s� � .:, -. � j' �! � + o�.`; ai ` • � � F � � e ---- ."��' v . � � a � t S i ",...-•• -�•^ � -,.. . :— � ,% E ; � ° � ca ti7 i�o a . `: "' �' ` ' ; � � c E, f � ✓''•-:,-_ : ,�, ; � , K •. I. � ... , .. . o z .--�T : a ,`',� �,_ �, .o �� , � ,� . ,t �, :; ;�, ��sE� �. za�� `„ j - ��: � ^; - �•; � PRRO YO � �� INCORPORATEO 9 2 C) T * JULV 10, 1911 * c4 ��FORN� P NOTICE OF DETERMINATION To: ❑ Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 or ATTACHMENT 12 From: City Of Arroyo Grande P.O. Box 550 Arroyo Grande, CA 93421 � County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors County of San Luis Obispo 1 144 Monterey Street, Suite C San Luis Obispo, CA 93408 : ❑■ A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions for CEQA. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions for CEQA. Mitigation measures � were _ were not made a condition of project approval. The project, in its approved form, _will � will not have a significant effect on the environment. A statement of overriding considerations _ was � was not adopted for this project. A copy of the Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report, and a record of the project approval may be examined at the City of Arroyo Grande, 214 East Branch Street, Arroyo Grande, CA 93420. SIGNATURE: TITLE: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: DATE RECEIVED FOR FILING: This is to advise that the City of Arroyo Grande City Council approved the above described project on January 9, 2001 and made the following determinations: 9.b. CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE CITY COUNCIL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande will hold a Public Hearing on the following item: CASE NO. APPLICANT: LOCATION: PROPOSAL: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: REPRESENTATIVE: N/A City of Arroyo Grande Citywide , Amendment to Title 9 of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code by eliminating mini-storage as an allowable use in all Commercial zoning districts. Exempt Per CCR Section 15061(b)(3) Kerry McCants, Community Development Director In compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), it has been determined pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment. Any person affected or concerned by this issue may submit written comments to the Director of Administrative Services before the City Council hearing, or appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the project. Any person interested in the proposal can contact the Community Development Department at 214 E. Branch Street, Arroyo Grande, California, during normal business hours (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.). The proposed Ordinance will be available for public inspection at the above address. IF YOU CHALLENGE AN ITEM IN COURT, YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY THOSE ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING DESCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AT, OR PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC HEARING. �AILURE OF ANY PERSON TO RECEIVE THE NOTICE SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE GROUNDS FOR ANY COURT TO INVALIDATE THE ACTION OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY FOR WHICH THE NOTICE WAS GIVEN. Date and Time of Hearing: Place of Hearing: Tuesday, January 9, 2001 at 7:00 P.M. Arroyo Grande City Council Chambers 215 E. Branch Street Arroyo Grande, California 93420 ( � ' � � �'i�fQ��- Kelly etm re, Director of Administrative Services/ Deputy City Clerk Publish 1/8 page, 1 time only, December 27, 2000 /�, PRROrO ° �� INCORPORATED � V T * JULY 10. 1911 * c4 ��FOaN� P MEMORANDUM TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: KERRY McCANTS 0'Nr'►'6 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR BY: � �', KELLY HEFFERNON ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING PORTIONS OF TITLE 9 OF THE ARROYO GRANDE MUNICIPAL CODE ELIMINATING MINI-STORAGE AS AN ALLOWABLE USE IN ALL COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS DATE: JANUARY 9, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council introduce for first reading by title only the proposed ordinance entitled, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande Amending Title 9, Chapter 7 of the Municipal Code to Eliminate Mini-Storage as an Allowable Use in All Commercial Districts" (reference Attachment 1). FUNDING: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Recent actions of the Planning Commission and City Council have indicated that mini- storage use, specifically along the East Grand Avenue corridor, is undesirable. On June 21, 2000, the Planning Commission expressed concerns about this issue when reviewing a pre-application for a combined mini-storage and commercial proj�ct located on the northwest corner of Courtland Street and East Grand Avenue (reference Attachment 3 for meeting minutes). It appears that in this particular case, the topographical site constraints and the ability to access the proposed mini-storage from Courtland Street instead of from East Grand Avenue added some validity to the proposal. Commissioners responded favorably to the redesign of the commercial/retail component of the project, but recommended that the applicant revise the plans to reduce the amount of proposed mini-stor•age. City Council January 9, 2001 Ordinance Regarding Mini-Storage Page 2 of 4 On August 1, 2000 the Planning Commission took a stronger position on the issue by denying a proposal to expand an existing mini-storage facility and construct an office/retail building based primarily on its inconsistency with the City's Economic Development Strategy (reference Attachments 4 and 5). On appeal, the City Council upheld the decision of the Planning Commission and denied the project based on the following findings (note that the findings shown in italics are derived from inconsistencies of the project with the City's Economic Development Strategy; City Council meeting minutes are included as Attachment 6): , 1. The proposed use will impair the integrity and character of the neighborhood because the proposed commercial use is not consistent with Section 9-07.040.B of the Development Code which requires the front building setback area to be landscaped, and the proposed mini-storage use is out of character with the surrounding retail, restaurant and office uses. 2. The site is not suitable for the proposed intensity of development because the site is already dense with mini-storage units and adding more storage units will worsen the situation. 3. . A variance cannot be granted to deviate from Section 9-07.040.A of the Development Code requiring a fifteen foot (15') front setback because there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties classified in the same zone. 4. The proposed project is not consistent with Objective 6.0 of the Land Use Element because the metal siding of the proposed mini-storage expansion is not architecturally harmonious with the rural, small town character of Arroyo Grande and is not consistent with other commercial buildings in the vicinity. 5. The proposed project will impair the City's economic enhancement policy to increase the retail utilization of the Grand Avenue Corridor because the p�oposed mini-storageexpansion willdisplaceanypotentialretailuseattheprojectlocation. 6. The proposed mini-storage expansion is not consistent with the City's Economic Deve%pment Strategy because it does not promote local patronage or strong performance in satisfying local demand forgoods and services and the creation of additiona/ jobs. City Council January 9, 2001 Ordinance Regarding Mini-Storage Page 3 of 4 The position of the City Council was confirmed on November 14, 2000 when a decision was made to proceed with the "East Grand Avenue Corridor Design Overlay" project. Because mini-storage� was specifically identified as not being appropriate for the General Commercial district, direction was given to eliminate this use from the GC district as the first strategy for proceeding with the overlay project. DISCUSSION: As written, the proposed ordinance will cause the following three (3) existing mini- storage establishments to become nonconforming uses: Arroyo Grande Mini-Storage, Crockers Lockers, and Grand Avenue Self Storage. Section 9-10.100 of the Development Code, entitled "Nonconforming Uses, Structures and Lots':, states the following with regard to the modification or expansion of nonconforming uses: "Except for service stations that dispense gasoline, which are existing legal nonconforming uses or use made nonconforming by adoption of this Title, a non-conforming use shall not be enlarged or extended in such a way as to occupy any part of the structure or site, or any other structure on site that it did not occupy at the time it became a non-conforming use, or in such a way as to displace any conforming use occupying a structure or site, except as permitted in this Section, unless a Variance request is reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission, pursuant to Section 9-03.110 of this Title. Service stations that dispense gasoline, which are existing legal nonconforming uses or uses made nonconforming by adoption of this Title, may apply for a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 9-03.050, to allow enlargement or expansion of the facility." Accordingly, the existing mini-storage businesses located on East Grand Avenue would not be permitted to expand their facilities without a Variance approved by the Planning Commission. Mini-storage facilities would continue to be allowed in the Industrial (I) zoning district, in which one currently exists (A&G Self Storage). The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed ordinance on November 21, 2000. A motion was made and defeated to adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance. A motion was then made and approved on a 3- 1 vote to "direct staff to draft language that would take into consideration compliance with the economic overlay; expansion of the language in 9-11.150 regarding self- storage warehouses; consider further regulating the use in commercial zones; and put this in a resolution to take to the City Council" (reference Attachment 2 for Planning Commission meeting minutes). If directed by the City Council, staff will return with City Council January 9, 2001 Ordinance Regarding Mini-Storage Page 4 of 4 draft language to amend the Development Code to include specific development standards for "Mini-Storage Uses" instead of eliminating mini-storage in all commercial districts. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are presented for Council consideration: — Introduce the Ordinance; — Modify and introduce the Ordinance; — Reject the Ordinance; — Provide direction to staff. Attachments: 1. Proposed Ordinance in legislative format 2. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of November 21, 2000 3. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 21, 2000 4. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 18, 2000 5. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of August 1, 2000 6. City Council Meeting Minutes of September 26, 2000 7. Letter from RRM Design Group regarding the Courtland and Grand self-storage project ATTACHMENT 1 ORDINANCE NO. C.S. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AMENDING TITLE 9, CHAPTER 7 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ELIMINATE MINI- STORAGE AS AN ALLOWABLE USE IN ALL COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS WHEREAS, Section 9-07.030 of the Municipal Code lists mini-storage as an allowable use in the General Commercial and Highway Commercial zoning districts; and WHEREAS, the City � of Arroyo Grande has conducted an environmental review for adoption of an ordinance eliminating mini-storage as an allowable use in all commercial districts within the City of Arroyo Grande and has found that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment to Section 9-07.030 of the Municipal Code will have an effect on the environment and therefore is exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande has reviewed and considered the information in the proposed document and staff report, as well as public testimony presented at the hearing and has made the following findings of fact: A. The proposed amendment to Section 9-07.030 of the Municipal Code is consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, and programs of the General Plan, and is desirable in order to implement the provisions of the General Plan. B. The proposed amendment to Section 9-7.030 of the Municipal Code will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare. C. The proposed amendment to Section 9-7.030 of the Municipal Code is consistent with the purpose and intent of Title 9. D. There is no possibility that the proposed amendment to Section 9-7.030 of the Municipal Code will have an effect on the environment and therefore is exempt from the provisions of CEQA. ORDINANCE NO. C.S. PAGE 2 of 4 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Table 9-07-030-A is amended to eliminate mini-storage as an allowable use in all commercial districts as follows: Table 9-07.030-A Uses Permitted Within Commercial Districts K. Unclassified uses 1. Athletic and health clubs P/PP/C NP P/PP/C NP 2. CommerciaJ recreation facilities P/PP/C NP P/PP/C P/PP/C (indoor) 3. Commercial recreation facilities P/PP/C NP NP P/PP/C (outdoor) * * 4. Mortuaries and cemeteries P/PP/C NP P/PP/C NP #�RR�G � -P�1� �RR�6 �. Surface Parking facilities PP PP PP PP (commercial) * * �. Recreational vehicle park NP NP NP P/PP/C g. Theaters, including both motion P/PP/C P/PP/C NP P/PP/C picture and live performing arts : 8. Transportation facilities P/PP/C P/PP/C P/PP/C P/PP/C ** See related standards in Chapter 9-11. ORDINANCE N0. C.S. PAGE3of4 SECTION 2: If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unlawful, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrases be declared unlawful. SECTION 3: A summary of this Ordinance shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in the City of Arroyo Grande at least five (5) days prior to the City Council meeting at which the proposed Ordinance is to be adopted. A certified copy of the full text of the proposed Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the Director of Administrative Services/Deputy City Clerk. Within fifteen (15) days after adoption of the Ordinance, the summary with the names of those City Council Members voting for and against the Ordinance shall be published again, and the Director of Administrative Services/Deputy City Clerk shall post a certified copy of the full text of such adopted Ordinance. SECTION 4: This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption. On motion of Council Member Council Member to-wit: , seconded by and on the following roll call vote, AYES: NOES: ABSENT: the foregoing Ordinance was adopted this 2001. day of ORDINANCE NO. C.S. PAGE 4 of 4 MICHAEL A. LADY, MAYOR ATTEST: KELLY WETMORE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/ DEPUTY CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER APPROVED AS TO FORM: TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTACHMENT 2 MINUTES NOVEMBER 21, 2000 PAGE 5 ROLL CALL VOTE YES Commissioner Costello YES Commissioner Keen YES Commissioner London YES Vice-Chair Parker ABSENT Chair Greene II.A.DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT CASE NO. 00-001; LOCATION — CITY WIDE; SUBJECT — ELIMINATING MINI-STORAGE AS AN ALLOWABLE USE IN ALL COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Associate Planner, Kelly Heffernon, presented the staff report and stated the following: Last June, the Planning Commission expressed concerns about allowing mini-storage along the Grand Avenue corridor when reviewing a second pre-application for a combined mini-storage and commercial project located on the corner of Courtland and Grand. Commissi�iners responded favorably to the redesign of the commercial/retail component of the project, but recommended that the applicant revise the plans to reduce the amount of proposed mini-storage. On August 1 of this year, the Planning Commission took a stronger position on the issue by denying a proposal to expand an existing mini-storage facility based primarily on its inconsistency with the City's Economic Development Strategy. On appeal, the City Council upheld the decision of the Planning Commission and denied the project. The position of the City Council was confirmed on November 14 when a decision was made to proceed with the "East Grand Avenue Corridor Design Overlay" project. Because mini-storage was specifically identified as not being appropriate for the General Commercial district, direction was given to eliminate this use from all commercial districts. As written, the proposed ordinance will cause 3 existing mini-storage establishments to become nonconforming uses. These include the Arroyo Grande Mini-Storage, Crocker's Lockers, and Grand Avenue Self-Storage. Per the Devetopment Code, these existing mini-storage businesses would not be permitted to expand their facilities without a Variance approved by the Planning Commission. Mini-storage facilities would continue to be allowed in the Industrial zoning district. As an alternative to eliminating mini-storage as an allowed use in all commercial districts, the Planning Commission may wish to consider adding a section to Chapter 11 of the Development Code to include specific development standards for "Mini-Storage Uses". Criteria for the placement, access and design standards of mini-storage facilities may resolve some of the issues that have been discussed during previous Planning Commission meetings. Ms. Heffernon stated that if it were the desire of the Planning Commission to pursue an alternative, staff would return with a draft ordinance based on Planning Commission comments. For tonight's meeting staff has prepared a draft ordinance entitled, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande Amending Title 9, Chapter 7 of the Municipal Code to Eliminate Mini-Storage as an Allowable Use in All Commercial Districts" for the Planning Commission's consideration. Commissioner Costello asked when staff talked about a potential alternative to the adoption of the Ordinance, was staff talking about "expanding the language" in Chapter 9-11 concerning mini-storage? � ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 21, 2000 PAGE 6 Ms. Heffernon replied that there was currently no specific language regarding mini-storage, so there would have to be a section added that would describe any detailed requirements that are unique to this use. Commissioner Costello stated that there was Section 9-11.150 that talks about self-storage warehouses. Ms. Heffernon stated that this was correct and the language in this section could be expanded upon. Commissioner London asked what the difference was between Highway Commercial and General Commercial and why mini-storage was being "banned" from all commercial districts? Ms. Heffernon stated that the reason staff was suggesting all commercial districts was because all these districts are along East Grand Avenue and that East Grand Avenue was the concern of the Council. Commissioner Keen asked if mini-storage would still be permitted in industrial districts? Ms. Heffernon replied that it would be. Acting-Chair Parker asked that if mini-storage was not allowed in any commercial districts and a project proposing mini-storage was submitted, would it come before the Planning Commission as a Conditional Use Permit or would a zoning change actually be required to build mini-storage in commercial areas? Ms. Heffernon stated that mini-storage would not be allowed in any commercial district. Ms. Parker stated that in looking at the alternative language proposed by staff it appeared to her that mini-storage could go into any commercial spot as long as the Development Code criteria was followed. She asked if there would be any way that the Planning Commission could make a decision that mini-storage would be inappropriate in a commeraial area? Ms. Heffernon stated that in this case it would require a Conditional Use Permit, just as it does now, to build mini-storage. Ms. Parker asked if the Conditional Use Permit could be turned down based on the fact that the Planning Commission felt that it was an inappropriate use for an area? Ms. Heffernon stated that the Planning Commission would have to make the findings in order to deny a Conditional Use Permit. Acting-Chair Parker opened the public hearing. Ted Moore, 123 Fairview Road, Ojai spoke to the Planning Commission and stated that, with regards to his proposed project, there is a small piece of property, about one-half acre on the site, that he does not know what to do with. He stated that he felt that in certain instances, ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 21, 2000 PAGE 7 mini-storage or self-storage is appropriate. He said that he believes that his property is a good example because he has a small area Perhaps the City could provide an exception where a part of a larger acceptable project could have a small amount of self-storage where it made sense to work for the immediate neighborhood as well as the retail/office project. The City could impose restrictions, such as insuring that the storage area was not visible from East Grand Avenue, it is a certain distance from the street, it is not more than 20% of the square footage of the project, if it has access that is not off the main street, etc. Mr. Moore stated that he felt there would be ways it could be "molded" so it might be a complementary part of certain projects. He also said that he had talked to mini-storage developers that told him the most successful projects are those that are close to office/retail as well as residential. Erik Justesen, RRM Design Group, spoke to the Planning Commission about the idea of a complete prohibition of certain uses in the Community. Mr. Justesen presented a zoning map and stated that there were certain parcels within the General Commercial zoning that would be appropriate for this type of use. There are 3 mini-storage facilities along Grand Avenue now that would become non-conforming therefore, if they wanted to upgrade their facility, "beautify" it, or improve it to some degree, they would be subject to review by the Planning Commission and Council. The Industrial district is so close to the freeway and EI Camino Real that it would be highly visible and, Mr. Justesen stated that there might be higher and better uses that the City would want to attract to the Industrial districts. Mr. Justesen stated that disallowing this use forces it into other communities, where the idea of simply applying some performance standards to the use might be the best way to handle the situation. Mr. Justesen stated that the project being proposed at the corner of Courtland and Grand has approximately 23,000 square feet on the frontage, in a project design that is essentially upholds the City's goals for the beautification and revitalization of East Grand Avenue. Mr. Justesen stated that the revitalization of East Grand Avenue is an excellent goal and should be worked on. This project is an extremely well designed project that would go towards achieving the City's goal. This project also comes with a compromise and that is that a small portion of the back lot would be developed as a self-storage facility. This would be the funding source to allow the front portion of the project to be developed in the retail/office facilities. The back portion of the lot is not visible from Grand Avenue, and therefore not desirable for office space or retail. That is why they are proposing the self-storage for this area. Mr. Justesen suggested that the City put off this decision until the issue can be discussed within the context of the design overlay for the East Grand Avenue corridor. Mr. Justesen discussed what types of development would go along the East Grand Avenue corridor and further discussed the merits of his proposed project. Acting-Chair Parker closed the public hearing. Commissioner Costello stated that there were several key elements/issues to address as follows: • First the Economic Overlay and the changes proposed for the East Grand Avenue corridor. • The definitions of Commercial Districts in the Development Code, mini-storage is not addressed as to whether it is a commercial use or not. ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 21, 2000 PAGE 8 • Section 9-11.150 of the Development Code that does address self-storage warehouses, the intent is very specific for protecting existing uses from the impacts of these projects. � • There are some very compelling arguments that indicate there may be a need for mini-storage that are closer to residential developments. Mr. Costello stated that when all of this is put together, it creates some questions in his mind about what to do. Should the City eliminate the use of mini-storage in commercial districts and restrict them to industrial areas. With the General Plan Update going on there might be some opportunity to rezone certain areas and expand the industrial zoning, although Mr. Costello did not think this was the best idea. He stated that he sees that there might be some merit to expanding Section 9-11.150 with some very specific restrictions and requirements for permitting mini-storage in commercial zones. He felt that this would require more study and he felt that this issue might be too complex to decide at tonight's meeting. Commissioner London stated that he had some concerns about this ordinance. The project that Mr. Justesen talked about at the Corner of Courtland and East Grand that has come before the Planning Commission is, overall, a good project and that it would have a positive impact on this area of East Grand Avenue. The Planning Commission has heard several times that the piece of property that is proposed for the mini-storage is not useful to many people because of its location. When the project first came before the Planning Commission as a pre-application the Commission made several suggestions for changes. The applicant redesigned the project and given what the City is trying to accomplish in this area and with the small amount of mini- storage behind it the project makes sense. Mr. London stated that another issue was the project Mr. White brought before the Commission for the expansion of an existing mini-storage with an office building proposed on Grand Avenue. Mr. London felt that this would have gone a long way to eliminate some blight in this area, plus put a"face lift" on the existing storage and therefore this would have been a good project. Mr. London stated that he felt the City should look at this type of project on a case by case basis on their individual merits and not always overrule this type of project is a commercial area. If it is designed properly and if it is shown that there is a need. He does not feel that it is appropriate to not permit them in commercial areas. Commissioner Keen asked Mr. McCants if, in the proposed General Plan update, the Highway Commercial districts were going to be expanded? Mr. McCants stated that the draft Land Use Elements indicated that existing areas that are Highway Commercial would be mixed use types of areas. It is not far enough into the process to determine yet what the zoning will be. There is a possibility it will be a new zoning category for some of these areas that will allow for a mix of uses. Mr. Keen stated that one of the things the Commission needed to look was that they had been making decisions on a project case basis and not doing a lot of long range planning about the concept of how the City should look. Mr. Keen said that one of the things about the Design Overlay was that it would give the City a chance to come up with a vision of what the City would look like. If the Commission only looks at individual projects, they would . have a "patchwork" like there is now. He would like to see the Commission not approve any projects when it is not sure it would meet the perimeters of the proposed Design Overlay. ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - NOVEMBER 21, 2000 PAGE 9 Mr. Keen stated that, from the perspective of the Economic Development Strategy that the City has adopted, mini=storage does nothing for the City as far as employment, income or revitalizing impacts on the area. Commissioner Keen stated that, looking at. all these reasons, he would like to see mini-storage limited only to the Highway Commercial zones. He is not in favor of have mini-storage along East Grand Avenue or commercial areas because he does not believe they meet the goal of consistency, especiatly along Grand Avenue. Acting-Chair Parker stated that she agrees with the concept that the City needs to meet the requirements of the Economic Development Strategy especially in the overlay area of East Grand Avenue. Ms. Parker stated that if language was added to the alternatives presented by staff to make the restrictions stronger, for instance that any project should meet the criteria of the Economic Development Strategy, and that the storage unit would be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood uses. In closing the door on this use in commercial districts it makes it very difficult for the Planning Commission to make overall, good judgements for neighborhoods. The Planning Commission would be stuck with one parcel at a time and, especially when you are trying to revitalize an area, it would be impossible to "get ahead of the game". However, she does not believe that eliminating this use altogether is right. The restrictions should be tightened rather than an overall "no" to this use in all commercial areas. Mr. Costello stated the following: • The Planning Commission recommends that staff examine the options. • Language in Section 9-11.150 regarding self-serve warehouses is expanded to include provisions consistent with the Economic Overlay. • Examine potentials for placing mini-storage use as a permitted function in appropriate commercial areas. (needs study) • Look at definitions in the commercial uses (Section 9-07.20) to see if mini-storage is � consistent with those definitions and for example, change the language to accommodate the needs of residential areas nearby to provide mini-storage if it is needed. Commissioner London asked if it would be possible to research the initiative process and see if the City could impose a tax on these types of storage facilities. After all, the City does offer services to these structures and does not receive much in return other than the property tax. Acting Chair Parker stated that she agreed with Commissioner Costello's proposals and asked staff if a motion was needed to take these recommendations to Council. Commissioner Costello moved that the Planning Commission direct staff to draft language that would take into consideration compliance with the economic overlay; expansion of the language in 9-1 1.150 regarding self-storage warehouses; consider further regulating the use in commercial zones; and put this in a resolution to take to the City Council. Commissioner London seconded the motion. ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 21, 2000 PAGE 10 Commissioner Keen stated that he thinks this motion too complicated and, after hearing the discussions at City Council he felt that staff had presented exactly what the City Council had asked staff to present to the Planning Commission. Commissioner Costello asked where the alternatives had come from? Mr. McCants stated that staff had constructed them as examples of possible alternatives of what the Commission might choose to pursue. Mr. Costello stated that he was withdrawing the motion he had just proposed. Commissioner Keen moved that the Planning Commission adopt: RESOLUTION NO. 00-1770 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND TITLE 9, CHAPTER 7 OF THE ARROYO GRANDE MUNICIPAL CODE BY ELIMINATING MINI-STORAGE AS AN ALLOWABLE USE IN ALL COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS Commissioner London seconded the motion. The motion was defeated by the following roll call vote: ROLL CALL VOTE NO Commissioner Costello YES Commissioner Keen NO Commissioner London NO Vice-Chair Parker ABSENT Chair Greene Commissioner Costello restated the motion that he had previously made as follows: Commissioner Costello moved that the Planning Commission direct staff to draft language that would take into consideration compliance with the economic overlay; expansion of the language in 9-1 1.150 regarding self-storage warehouses; consider further regulating the use in commercial zones; and put this in a resolution to take to the City Council. Commissioner London seconded the motion. The motion was adopted by the following roll call vote: ROLL CALL VOTE YES Commissioner Costello NO Commissioner Keen YES Commissioner London YES Vice-Chair Parker ABSENT Chair Greene ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ATTACHMENT 3 JUNE 21, 2000 PAGE 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT CASE NO. 00- 002 FOR TWO (2) LOTS, LOCATED AT 1180 MAPLE STREET, APPLIED FOR BY MOLLY AND ERNEST SANTA CRUZ including Exhibit A. Commissioner London seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the following roll call vote: ROLL CALL VOTE YES Commissioner Costello YES Commissioner Keen YES Commissioner London YES Acting Chair Parker YES Chair Greene III. NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS c',� III. A. PRE-APPLICATION CASE NO. 00-005; LOCATION — COURTLAND AND GRAND AVENUE; APPLICANT — KEVIN WING Kelly Heffernon, Associate Planner, explained to the Planning Commission that the proposed project was to construct a combined personal storage facility and commercial retail/office complex on a 5-acre vacant site located on the northwest corner of Courtland Street and Grand Avenue. The Planning Commission had reviewed a similar project as a pre-application in December 1999. Ms. Heffernon stated that per the Commission's comments, the project had been revised to decrease the amount of self-storage space relative to commercial retail space, and to provide a greater pedestrian orientation. Ms. Heffernon stated that the buildings had been designed with a historic village theme, and the walkways along Grand Avenue and Courtland Street had been enhanced with patio areas and sidewalk seating. The parking area was located behind the commercial buildings, away from Grand Avenue, and would be accessed from either a shared driveway on Grand or from Courtland Street. The proposed number of parking spaces exceeded the amount required per the Development Code by approximately 27 spaces. The applicant was proposing to retain the one large oak tree located on the east side of the property. Given the amount of compaction and paving around the root zone of the tree necessary to construct the project as proposed, it would be uncertain how well the tree would survive. Details on how exactly this would be accomplished will be required when the formal application is submitted. The Staff Advisory Committee considered this project last month and commented on issues regarding fire protection, road improvements, location of existing easements, and clarification of property lines. During the Architectural Review Committee meeting on June 5` members suggested that the storage facility include more articulation on the east elevation, the landscape plan have a variety ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 21, 2000 PAGE 8 of tree species including large box oak trees to replace the ones previously removed, and the walkways be textured or include some kind of an ornamental feature. In general, the cotisensus was that the design of the storefronts and parking layout is a considerable improvement from the previous submittal. Finally, Ms. Heffernon stated that since this was a pre-application, staff recommended that the Planning Commission review the project and provide direction and comments to the applicant. Eric Justesen, RRM Design Group, spoke to the Commission and gave an overview of the project. Pat Blote, architect for the project, spoke to the Commission and gave an overview of the architectural design of the project. Commissioner Keen had the following questions: � What type of m�terials/construction will the buildings be made of? ■ What would the project look like with regards to the elevation? ■ Would the back access gate have a turn around or would this be an exit only gate? ■ Would the lots remain as two separate lots? Commissioner London had the following questions and comments: ■ Because the roofs of the storage units will be seen from the street, what will the roof be made of? ■ With regard to the exit, for security reasons he would suggest that this be a turn around area and not an exit. ■ There needs to be trash enclosures somewhere on the property. ■ What type of fence would be put around the property? Vice-Chair Parker had the following questions and comments: ■ She had a concern about security at this type of facility. ■ Will there be access to the storage units from the driveways? ■ Likes that the parking is in the middle of the project. ■ Will there be an elevator installed in the units that have two stories? ■ There should be a restroom somewhere in the facility. ■ What type of retaining wall would be installed on the northwest corner of the property? Ms. Parker stated that when the previous pre-application for this project had come before the Planning Commission she had suggested that the developer should talk to someone from the Economic Development Committee. She wondered if this had been done? Mr. Justesen stated that they had met with Diane Sheeley and had had a general discussion concerning the type of development that would be relevant to this site, the City's economic goals, and developing a project for this site. The rear portion of the property is a very difficult piece to develop with regards to what types of users would be successful there. He felt that this project was a good balance with the mini-storage being a"good neighbor" and the commercial development in the front. ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES � JUNE 21, 2000 PAGE 9 Ms. Parker stated that one of the main concerns in the economic development strategy was the development of businesses that would create jobs in this area. The Citizens' Survey that was done in conjunction with the General Plan Update also stated that the priority was to develop jobs, promote tourism and promote retail businesses. Another priority goal of the economic strategy in Arroyo Grande was to "continue to enhance and increase the retail utilization of the Grand Avenue corridor". Ms. Parker stated that she felt that a mini-storage unit was "dead space". It did not offer any jobs and very little in the way of revenue for the City. Further, it does not meet the goals of the General Plan, nor does it meet the Economic Development Strategy Goals. Ms. Parker did feel that the mini-storage would be a good buffer between the commercial area in the front and the residential area behind the property. But, she felt that developing 65% of the property with mini-storage was tbo much. In answer to Mr. Costello's questions about the manager's residence and if the storage area would have a controlled entrance, Mr. Justesen replied that the residence was a combination of a residence, office and storage facility for supplies. There will be a garage for the manager of the facility to use. The facility would have a controlled entrance. Mr. Costello stated that he was in agreement with Commissioner London and would not like to see an exit.on the rear of the property. He felt that a turn around would be more secure. He also did not know if 24 feet would be wide enough for the access ways. Chair Greene stated that he felt the following changes would be appropriate: ■ That building #4 should only be one story. It would relieve the overall impact of the project's appearance from Courtland. This would also reduce the square footage of the mini-storage by approximately 10,000-12,000 square feet. ■ He would like to see the parking spaces for the retail/commercial area reduced. There are 27 spaces above the threshold currently set by the Development Code. He would like to see fewer parking spaces and more landscaping instead. Mr. Greene felt that the redesign of the project is excellent. The proposal for a"village" architectural look is exactly what he was hoping to see on Grand Avenue. He is concerned about giving up space that could otherwise be use for revenue generating commercial/retail and using the space for businesses that do not create jobs or revenue. Mr. Greene stated however, that he knew this parcel had been vacant for at least 10 years and he wondered if the applicants would explain why they felt that no other office/business would work here. Kevin Wing and Ty Martin, applicants for the project, spoke to the Planning Commission and explained that they had evaluated all the uses and what would work best in this area. They had looked into assisted living housing, office space, and commercial/retail space. Nothing seemed to work in this space except for the storage facility. ITEM. IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS None ITEM. V. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS AND COMMENT ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION ATTACHMENT 4 MINUTES . JULY 18, 2000 PAGE 5 b II. C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00-005, VARIANCE 00-002, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 00- 003; LOCATION - 1375 GRAND AVENUE; APPLICANT - ZADDIE BUNKER TRUST, GARY WHITE � Kelly Heffernon, Associate Planner, explained that the Planning Commission considered this project on July 5 and discussed issues regarding the upgrade of the existing mini-storage facility, the adequacy of landscaping, undergrounding of overhead utilities, and conformance of the project with the City's new Economic Development Strategy. The public hearing was continued and the applicant was directed to meet with the Economic Development Director regarding how the proposed project fits with the Economic Development Strategy. Ms. Heffernon noted that the summary of their meeting was provided in the attached Memorandum from the Economic Development Director to the Planning Commission. Ms. Heffernon advised the Planning Commission that the applicant has not revised the project since the previous public hearing and requests that the Planning Commission make a decision this evening. Finally, Ms. Heffernon stated that staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider the additional information provided by the Economic Development Director. If the Commission determines that the project can be approved as submitted, the appropriate resolutions have been included in the staff report, with a condition added requiring the applicant to install a wall along the rear property line to separate the mini-storage use from the residential use, as discussed at the July 5` meeting. If the Planning Commission determines that the findings cannot be made to approve the project, staff will return to the next meeting with a resolution for denial. Commissioner Costello noted for the record that he had listened to the tapes from the Planning Commission meeting of July 5, 2000 from which he was absent. Chair Greene opened the Public Hearing. Diane Sheelev, Economic Development Director, spoke briefly to the Planning Commission and asked them if they had any questions concerning the Memo she had written as a follow-up to her meeting with the applicant's representative, Gary White, which was included in the staff report for this project? Vice-Chair Parker asked for clarification on certain points of Ms. Sheeley's Memo to the Planning Commission. Ms. Parker asked if it was in Ms. Sheeley's position to give recommendations on projects or just state the facts of what would happen if it were to be different? . Ms. Sheeley stated that the objective of her Memo was to state the facts of how this project fits in with the Economic Development Strategy and not to recommend one way or the other. In Ms. Sheeley's opinion this is a land use issue that the Planning Commissioners will need to make a decision on. Her interpretation of one of the goals of the economic development program is that the City would like to see the expansion and retention of local businesses that create employment opportunities and generate revenue for the City. Vice-Chair Parker asked Ms. Sheeley what her understanding was of her (Ms. Sheeley's) position? ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 18, 2000 PAGE 6 Ms. Sheeley stated that currently there is an Economic Development Strategy. The Economic Development Director's role is to implement both the Economic Development Strategy and the Redevelopment Plan Implementation Strategy. She reminded the Commission that as of this date the Economic Development Strategy has not yet been incorporated as an Economic Element in the General Plan. Therefore, this is simply a policy document. She went on to say that her understanding of the direction of the Economic Development Strategy and how it fits in, is that it is to complement the General Plan, and to complement the redevelopment strategy, not to add another component on land use. Vice-Chair Parker asked what the need for commercial/office buildings along Grand Avenue is? Ms. Sheeley stated that from her perspective only, people periodically contact her office and request information for office space and retail space. There is same difficulty tracking how serious these calls are. For instance, it could be a Cal Poly student simply asking questions for a class or it may be someone with a business in a neighboring community that would like to relocate into Arroyo Grande. Also, the Chamber of Commerce gets these calls and although she communicates with them, it is still difficult to get a feel for what the "market" can hold and what is actually needed. She stated that she relies on the developers somewhat for this information because they are the ones in the "market" everyday, trying to find out if there are tenants for the spaces they have or would like to build. � Chair Greene invited the applicant's representative, Gary White, to speak to the Planning Commission. Mr. White explained that he had met with Ms. Sheeley and Mr. McCants, as the Planning Commission had requested, to attempt to get some direction about his project. Mr. White stated that he does not feel that the Economic Development Strategy provides clear direction to as to how to address some of the issues that have been raised concerning his project. Mr. White pointed out that when he first came before the Planning Commission on February 1, 2000, none of these issues were present. Mr. White stated that it makes it difficult to address the current issues because the project had already been designed. Mr. White discussed the issues that had been brought up at the previous meeting and how these had been addressed. ■ Commissioners London and Parker had discussed the walls surrounding the project. The applicant was willing to make the changes that had been discussed. ■ The undergrounding of the utilities is another major issue. At the previous meeting the Commission had stated that cost should not be a factor in deciding which poles and lines need to be placed underground. Mr. White pointed out that this is a major issue for the developer because if the project is not economically feasible, it cannot be built. ■ Mr. White discussed the possibility of a"joint effort" between several different developers in this area with regards to the undergrounding of the utilities. ■ With regards to Commissioner Keen's remarks about the metal buildings, and his wish to see stucco instead, Mr. White explained that they are proposing "faux" stucco walls on the buildings. The only portion of the metal buildings that will be seen is in the interior property. ■ With the regards to the issue raised about joining with the developer that is considering the Long's project adjacent to this property, they have not spoken to them for several different reasons, which Mr. White explained. ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 18, 2000 PAGE 7 Commissioner Costello and Mr. White discussed the undergrounding of the utilities and which poles Mr. White was objecting to undergrounding. Commissioner Keen stated that, although Mr. White had answered some of his questions about the metal buildings, they (the metal buildings) were still his main objection to the project. Chair Greene closed the Public Hearing. Vice-Chair Parker stated that she believed very strongly that the Planning Commission should follow the General Plan and the Development Code as they interpret it when making decisions on projects. She had the following issues and concerns: ■ The Development Code clearly states that metal used in construction in commercial buildings, roofs and walls, is to be discouraged. She felt that especially on Grand Avenue, it would look inappropriate. ■ She does not have a problem with the project; but she does have a problem with the information the Commission gets that there is not enough commercial/retail space in Arroyo Grande. She also feels that the City wants to develop the Grand Avenue corridor and make it economically sound, as well as making it more appealing. ■ It is important to encourage growth along the Grand Avenue corridor. ■ She would like to encourage anyone who still has parcels along Grand Avenue to follow the City's Economic Development Strategy. Ms. Parker stated that she realized this is only a guideline, but it should be considered because the City needs more commercial/retail. ■ The City needs to follow the General Plan and Development Code guidelines. She believes very strongly that the City recognizes the property rights. She believes that Mr. White has the right to build on his property what is allowed by the Development Code and General Plan. She would like to see a larger portion of his development for commercial/retail if that is what is needed. She believes Mr. White has the right to build a storage facility on his property and because of this she stated that she is looking only at the project that is presented. Because of this she feels that the project, as presented, is a nice one and will look good on Grand Avenue. ■ She is glad that Mr. White will be putting stucco over the metal buildings on the front and she hopes the stucco over the metal in the middle of the project does make it look more presentable. ■ Regarding the overhead utilities, she feels that staff has come up with an excellent compromise and the developer needs to stick to this compromise. Commissioner Keen did not have any further comments about the project. Commissioner London stated that the comments he had made at the last meeting still stood and that he had nothing further to add. Commissioner Costello stated that he believed that the Planning Commission does not make policy. It merely serves as an advisory panel to the City Council. This is how he was going to base his decision on this project. ■ The Planning Commission has heard repeatedly that there is not enough space available for retail/commercial business. That it is difficult to utilize retail space physically removed from Grand Avenue. He believes that there is validity to the fact that the further away from Grand the business is, and if it has no facing on Grand the dingier, the stores look. He sees three specific questions regarding this project as follows: ■ The first issue is the Economic Development Strategy. The Strategy states that "continue to enhance and increase the utilization of the Grand Avenue corridor". The Planning Commission ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 18, 2000 PAGE 8 needs more guidance from the City Council on what this is. Ultimately, if the Planning Commission turns down the project, the applicant can go to the City Council and ask them what the Economic Development Strategy says about this. There are mixed benefits to the project in terms of the economic development. The letter from Ms. Sheeley shows that with the retail structure in the front there will be some benefit to the City through property taxes. This commercial/retail will also provide some new jobs, so there is a scale that is balancing in this situation and he was not sure which way it would "tip"? The second issue is the one of the undergrounding of the utilities. This issue has been coming up before the Planning Commission for a year now. What the General Plan says is fairly specific. Maybe the General Plan needs to be revised, or the policy maker's need to provide more guidance to the Planning Commission. The language is not clear enough and he does not believe it (the language in the Development Code) is particularly fair at this point. The last issue is in the City's General Plan Land Use Element, objective 6.11, which states that uCommercial centers should be developed in a manner that is architecturally harmonious with the defined theme, consistent with the rural, small town character of Arroyo Grande". In Paragraph H it states that, "the following architectural elements should be discouraged in conjunction with construction of commercial buildings such as metal or plastic siding or metal roofs". Commissioner Costello stated that it seemed clear to him that if the Planning Commission followed the guidance that they have in the General Plan and the policy that the Economic Development Strategy shows, than he has some problems with the project. Finally, Mr. Costello stated that "taken in a vacuum" the project looks good to him, but when he applies the three specific issues to it he cannot support the project. Chair Greene stated that his position has not changed since the previous Planning Commission meeting and he had informed Mr. White of his position. His concerns with the project are as follows: He does not believe that the Planning Commission can make the necessary architectural review findings. Mr. Keen and Mr. Costello have both pointed out that the metal buildings are inappropriate. Regarding the Economic Development Strategy, Mr. Greene stated that this document took a year to create. He does not believe that this document is just a statement, but as close to City policy as it can get without it actually being a part of the General Plan. He believes that in a relatively short period of time it will be part of the General Plan. He stated thai he interprets the Economic Development Strategy the same way as Commissioner Costello does, which is that the City has developed a strategy and a policy to stimulate the growth of retail and commercial development along Grand Avenue. Mr. Greene said, that as he had pointed out at the previous meeting, this kind of project that calls for "massing" of mini-storage space on the property and a relatively small amount of commercial/retail space is inconsistent with the directives of the Economic Development Strategy. The solution to the issue that is before the Planning Commission is best answered by going to the City Council and asking them. Mr. Green told Mr. White that the timing of this is somewhat unfortunate because the Economic Development Strategy was developed after he began the formulation of hls project. The Planning Commission is not a policy making body, rather it interprets existing policy. This is a Conditional Use Permit and the Planning Commission has to make a finding that the proposed use is consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the City. In his judgement, the Economic Development Strategy is a policy standard and he is interpreting it to mean that this type of development, where a great ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 18, 2000 PAGE 9 portion of a parcel is devoted to non-sales tax revenue-producing, (a situation where few jobs are produced), is inconsistent with City's goals. He disagrees with Ms. Parker's position that as long as the property is zoned for this a project can be built. He does not believe this to be the case. Finally, one of the other findings that they have to make is that the site is suitable for the type of intensity of use or development that is proposed. In his opinion the proposed development would be a gross under-utilization of the property. By developing the property in the manner that has been suggested, there will not be the opportunity and ability to landscape the property in a fashion, which is consistent, with how the City envisions the growth of Grand Avenue, is lost. The project will not produce any sales-tax revenue, and few jobs. Mr. Greene stated that he did not see the undergrounding of the utilities as a big issue. The Development Code is clear, it is unambiguous about this issue. It may be harsh or unfair, although he is not suggesting that it is, but the remedy is not to ask the Planning Commission to make compromises without having any basis in fact for knowing how much things are going to cost. The remedy would be for the applicant to go to the City Council and ask them to change the law. He feels uncomfortable entering into a compromise such as the one the applicant is proposing. Vice-Chair Parker stated that Chair Greene had brought up a good point in that this is a Conditional Use Permit and she had forgotten that this was the case. She stated that if you look up under the findings for a Conditional Use Permit in the Development Code, the number one finding is that the proposed use is permitted within the subject district pursuant to the provisions of this section provided that it complies with all applicable provisions of ordinance, goals and objectives of the General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the City. It also goes on to say that the proposed use would not impair in any way, the integrity or character of the district in which it is to be established and located and that the site is suitable for the development that is proposed. If there is a misunderstanding of the Development Code or General Plan it needs to go to the City Council for a decision. She further stated that she has had a problem with this project because of the recently adopted Economic Development Strategy. In reading the findings that should be made for the Conditional Use Permit she feels that it needs to be considered. The Planning Commission asked staff how they should proceed? Kelly stated that, if it is the decision of the Planning Commission to deny the project, specific findings needed to be made for the denial. Staff could then bring the resolutions for denial back to the next meeting for the Planning Commission to vote on. Mr. McCants suggested that if the Planning Commission intended to make the findings"�or denial, they focus on the General Plan and Development Code issues versus the Economic Development Strategy issue. Commissioner Costello moved that the Planning Commission vote, as a tentative action, to deny the resolutions as presented and direct staff to prepare resalutions to be brought back to the August 1, 2000 Planning Commission meeting, which are consistent with the concerns raised by the Commission during their discussions at the present meeting. Specifically including, but not limited to the principles of the Land Use Element objective 6.0, as well as the other concerns of the Commissioners. Vice-Chair Parker seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the following roll call vote: ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 18, 2000 PAGE 10 ROLL CALL VOTE YES Commissioner Costello YES Commissioner Keen NO Commissioner London YES Vice-Chair Parker YES Chair Greene D. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2328, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 99-001; LOCATION — 90 EL CAMINO REAL; APPLICANT — S& S HOMES (CONTINUED FROM JUNE 6, 2000) Kelly ffernon, Associate Planner, stated that the applicant had submitted revised plans for the Planning ommission's review based on comments and concerns expressed during the June 6` Planning C mission meeting. Specifically, the following revisions had been made: 1. The ilding footprints have been reduced by an average of 15%. 2. The gro minimum lot size is 6,000 square feet. Although the net lot size when the private ro is removed from the calculation decreases to 4,000 and 5,000 square feet for som lots. 3. Except for lot each lot has two guest parking spaces, increasing the overall guest parking from 25 t 51 spaces. 4. Private open space i creased from an average of 20% to 59% per lot. 5. A public shared area o 3,750 square feet has been added to the back of lot 10. 6. A net total of 6 additiona oak trees have been saved due to the project redesign. 7. Side yard setbacks are a mi 'mum of 5 feet, with a minimum of 10 feet between any two residences. 8. A four-foot wide pedestrian and 'ke lane has been added on the interior road. 9. The traffic analysis has also been dated to better explain the methods used in determining the traffic distribution an effects on the level of service resulting from the proposed project. Ms. Heffernon told the Commission that the Conditions f Approval have been modified to reflect the revised project, such as requiring CC&R's for the co on areas; a maintenance and access agreement for the private driveway, the common parking eas and pedestrian access; and a revised "Figure A" for the undergrounding of utilities based o Planning Commission comments during the June 6` meeting. The applicant is also requesting that the street located within the evelopment be officially named "Stonecrest Drive" as part of the project approval. Ms. Heff on explained that the proposed street name was reviewed by the Department of Building an ire to make sure it would not be confused with other street names within San Luis Obisp or Santa Barbara Counties during an emergency response situation. The Fire Chief has in 'cated that the proposed street name would not cause any confusion With regard to public comments prior to this hearing, staff did receive a letter from th adjacent property owner who manages the Hilltop Trailer Park. His comments focused on three 'ssues, including: ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 1, 2000 PAGE 1 ATTACHMENT 5 ALL TO ORDER Chair Greene cailed the �egular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL X X X X X Commissioner Costello Commissioner Keen Commissioner London Vice-Chair Parker Chair Greene APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of May 30, 2000 were continued to the next Planning Commission meeting for corrections and further review. ITEM I. I.A. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None 1.B. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None ITEM II. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS b II.A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00-005, VARIANCE 00-002, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 00- 003; LOCATION — 1375 GRAND AVENUE; APPLICANT — ZADDIE BUNKER TRUST; REPRESENTATIVE — GARY WHITE (CONTINUED FROM JULY 18, 2000) This item had been continued from the July 18, 2000 Planning Commission meeting. Chair Greene stated that the Public Hearing for this item would not be reopened. He further stated that the Planning Commission would discuss and vote on the resolution that had been prepared by staff for this project. Commissioner Costello stated that the language in the resolution prepared by staff was adequate. Vice-Chair Parker stated that this resolution was very well done. However, in the section that listed the findings, should sections Section 9-03-050 A and D in the Development Code that dealt with this, be specifically named in the resolution? Mr. McCants stated that if Ms. Parker wanted to specify the sections of the Development Code in the resolution, staff would be happy to do this. Commissioner London stated that the language adequately reflected the Planning Commissions' comments, but he was not in agreement with these comments. Chair Greene asked that Page 1 of the resolution under Number 1, where the paragraph talks about "the project does not comply with applicable provisions of the Development Code etc." should be amended to state "including but not limited to 9-03.050 A and D". ARROYO GRANDE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 1, 2000 PAGE 2 Vice-Chair Parker moved that the Planning Commission adopt: RESOLUTION NO. 00-1750 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 00-005, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT CASE NO. 00-003, AND VARIANCE CASE NO. 00-002, LOCATED AT 1375 GRAND AVENUE, APPtIED FOR BY ZADDIE R. BUNKER TRUST with the language added to Page 1, Number 1 which reads "including but not Iimited to Section 9- 03.050 A and D". Commissioner Costello seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the following roll call vote: - ROLL CALL VOTE YES Commissioner Costello YES Commissioner Keen NO Commissioner London YES Vice-Chair Parker YES Chair Greene B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00-006; LOCATION - 244 OAK PARK BLVD.; APPLICANT - \ PEACE WTHERAN CHURCH; REPRESENTATIVE - HERB HART Teresa Mc ish, Assistant Planner, stated that Peace Lutheran Church was proposing to expand their church ting hall, add new handicapped accessible restrooms and a storage room. The total addition pro ed was 1,588 square feet. Ms. McClish explained t in addition to the Church, the property included three (3) educational buildings used for the Peace ristian Pre-school, a playground area, and the parsonage. The ARC reviewed the project on 8, 2000 and per their request, the applicant had proposed 4 additional windows on the south side m ting hall wall. The SAC reviewed the project on May 2, 20 The SAC request for the widening of Oak Park Blvd. and the undergrounding of the utilities were ing addressed by the Oak Park Blvd. widening capital improvement project. The other conditions inc ed two fire hydrants and a firewall. Ms. McClish stated that a 76-space parking lot exists. Parki required for the church includes 39 spaces for the fellowship hall and 37 spaces for the meetin all area including the proposed addition. The applicant has stated that the fellowship hall and the eting area are not used at the same time and typically the meeting area is used after church service nd in the evenings. The required parking for the pre-school is 14 spaces. This does not effect the verall parking however because the pre-school is not in operation when the meeting hall or fellowship II are being used. Ms. McClish informed the Planning Commission that the proposed project t all other Development Code requirements including setbacks, lot coverage, and floor area ratio. ased on CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES ATTACHMENT 6 SEPTEMBER 26, 2000 There being 4 AYES, 0 NOES, and 1 ABSENT the motion is hereby deciared to be passed. �J 7.b. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00-005. VARIANCE 00-002 AND LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 00-003: 1375 GRAND AVENUE Associate Planner Heffernon highlighted the staff report and gave a brief overview of the project which includes expansion of an existing mini-storage facility with a manager's apartment, and construction of an office/retail commercial building. She explained that the Planning Commission denied the appiication based on the inability to make the necessary Conditional Use Permit and Variance findings and also based on the inconsistency of the proposed project with the City's recently adopted Economic Development Strategy. Council Member Dickens asked for clarifcation on the variance for the required fifteen foot setback. Associate Planner Heffernon replied that the Development Code requires a front yard setback of fifteen feet from the property line and the project as proposed was located ten feet from the property line along Grand Avenue. Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara asked for clarification regarding finding #3 in the resolution and asked what type of exceptional circumstances or conditions would be required in order to grant a variance. Associate Planner Heffernon responded that there were no topographic or other physical conditions such that the applicant could not move the building back another five feet to meet the setback requirement. Mayor Lady opened the Public Hearing. Gary White, representing the applicant, gave a timeline review of the application process for the project which began in January 1998. He explained that over the course of a year and a half, he had revised the project several times in order to meet the concerns and comments of the Staff Advisory Committee, Architectural Review Committee, and the Planning Commission. He stated that during the process, the issue of Level of Service came up and modifications were made to the project in order to reduce potential traffic. He said at this time no mention was made of the proposed use. He commented that at some time during the progress of the project, the Economic Development Strategy was approved and published; however, he was not notified about any potential conflict between the Economic Development Strategy and the proposed use of the project. He stated that after the Architectural Review Committee approved the project in June 2000, the project went to the Planning Commission where he heard for the first time that a mini-storage was an inappropriate use on Grand Avenue and the Economic Development Strategy issue became the basis for denial of the project. He further explained that he got a copy of the Economic Development Strategy, met �? CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES SEPTEMBER 26, 2000 with staff and came away not knowing what direction to take. He said that he met the Level of Service concerns by increasing the storage and reducing the scope of the commercial building, and then the rules changed and the Economic Development Strategy became the issue. He stated that the project is a benefit to the City and the property owner and that the mini-storage is listed as a permitted use in the Development Code. He stated that the Economic Development Strategy reflects the goals of the project such as being business friendly, having a balanced economic image, providing base level jobs versus support level jobs, enhancing business retention and expansion, as well as being a less visual impact than what is currentiy located on the property. He asked that the Council consider approval of the project as an improvement to the existing business. Hearing no further public comments, Mayor Lady closed the Public Hearing. Council Members acknowledged the concerns of the applicant on how the project moved through the review process. Council Member Runels stated that the project.does not meet the goals of the Economic Development Strategy and agreed with finding #5 in the proposed resolution that states the project will impair the City's economic enhancement policy to increase the retail utilization of the Grand Avenue Cor�idor because the proposed mini-storage expansion will displace any potentiai retail use at the project location. He stated he would uphold the Planning Commission's decision. Council Member Dickens commented that he questioned the project's proposed use. He stated he had a different vision for the Grand Avenue corridor and questioned whether it was in the City's best interest to expand that use or should the City be looking at alternatives that have additional benefits. He spoke about the need for balance between economic factors and infrastructure/circulation issues. He stated that he would uphold the Planning Commission's decision. Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara commented that the City has been in transition. He stated that it was a year and a half ago when surveys were distributed to the community asking what the City's vision should be. He said based on survey feedback, steps were taken to define what the City's economic goals should be which resulted in the adoption of the Economic Development Strategy. Following further comments regarding the intent of the Economic Development Strategy, he concluded by referring to the setback issue, the inconsistency with objective 6.0 of the Land Use Element, use incompatibility, and findings #5 and #6 in the resolution, and stated he would uphold the decision of the Planning Commission. Mayor Pro Tem Ferrara moved to adopt a Resolutiot� upholding the decision� of the Planning Commission to deny Conditional Use Permit 00-005, Variance 00- 002, and Lot Line Adjustment 00-003, located at 1375 Grand Avenue, applied for by Zaddie R. Bunker Trust. Council Member Dickens seconded the motion. 4 CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES SEPTEMBER 26, 2000 p_�_Lady p�e Ferrara p�y_e____Runels Absent Tolley q_��e___Dickens There being 4 AYES, 0 NOES, and 1 ABSENT the motion is hereby declared to be passed. � � i a�Mart n, � 226 �Miller spoke regarding the outdoor live music being pla d at the Branch Street Deli on the weekends. She stated she lived in ciose proxi ity to the Deli and expressed concern with the volume and frequency of the mu 'c being played. She stated she had contacted the .City, the Police Departme and the manager of the Deli to issue a complaint on the volume of the music. e said she did not understand why the music had to be so loud and that she was n w turning to the Council for support and guidance in resoiving the issue. Mayor Lady requeste that staff research the noise levels, whether there were any existing permit require ents, and to coordinate efforts with the Deli to -address the issue. 9. CONSENT AGENDA Council Member Runels move and Council Member Dickens seconded the motion to approve Consent A enda Items 9.a. through 9.h., with the recommended courses of action. a, Cash Disbursement Ratification. A roved. b. Minutes of the City Council/Redevelo ent Agency Meeting of September 12, 2000. Approved. C d Review Adopte esolution No. 3482. c. d. e. f. 9• h. Conflict of Interest o e . Purchase of Replacement Baliistic Vests. Ap oved. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) rogram Approved. Spring 2000 Pavement Management Project No. 20 -5, No.1. Approved. Fair Oaks AvenuelTally Ho Overlay Project No. 2000-3, No.2. Approved. Solicitation of Bids for the City Hall Re-Roofing Project. Voice Vote X Roll Call Vote 5 for FFY 2000-01. Progress Payment Payment �� ATTACHMENT 7 REC�II�ED �! i 1` C� �',�;�� C`i.��'��"� R R M D E S I G N G R O U P �� J��1 -2 Pr� 4 � � g December 29, 2000 �r Mike Lady and City Council Members � � i y o�Arroyb`Grande Community Development Department P.O. Box 550 Arroyo Grande, CA 93421 Re: Grand and Courtland Self-Storage Dear Mayor Lady and City Council Members: Moving the Goalposts: As you are aware, RRM has submitted Use PermiE and Variance applications for a commercial site at the intersection of Grand Avenue and Courtland Street. The application request includes 23,200 s.f. of commercial buildings and 102,0$0 s.f. of seif-storage buildings. The variance proposal includes a reduction in the self-storage area to 93,672 s.f. The use permit application has been determined to be complete prior to the City Council amending the ordinance to prohibit or restrict Self-Storage. Amending the City's ordinance after an application has been submitted is unfair since it changes the rules of the game while the game is in process. RRM requests that this application be specifically exempted from the new ordinance provisions. ARC and Planning Commission Support: RRM has previously been before �oth the ARC and the Planning Commission regarding the application. Design changes were made to the proposed development as requested by these two bodies. Key design features include a parkway treatment along Grand Avenue, a pedestrian plaza between the two retail buildings, building facades oriented toward the street, full stucco treatment of the Self-Storage buildings, and awnings and other architectural features to create a look of multiple tenants. RRM asks that the City Council support the d�cisions of the ARC and Planning Commission. Site Suitability and Impacts: Self-Storage facilities have a minor impact on most government services. Compared to commercial or residential uses, Self-Storage has minimal to no impact on water, sewer, schools, traffic, noise, police, and fire services. Due to low traffic and noise impacts, Self-Storage is an ideal neighbor to existing residential uses. RRM believes that Self-Storage is an ideal use for the Grand and Courtland location. Proposed Amendments: Should the City Council amend the City�'s ordinance restricting Self-StoragP, RRM has prepared an amendment proposal (attached). The proposed amendment will provide adequate restrictions on Self- Storage to regulate the location and design of new Self-Storage facilities. Revenue Generallon: Development of the Grand and Courtland site will generate revenue that benefits the City of Arroyo Grande. The 23,000 square foot retail portion will generate sales tax revenue. Since the entire site is located in the Redevelopment Area, the �ncrease in property value will also generate tax increment revenue for the City's redevelopment projects. Based on County Assessor's records, the current assessed ��„ I.,ii> Ui�iy • t��!:�i�ri� -��i ti��uth i�i;.��.� �i��.�_� .`�.in I�.i��>C)bi.E�,. (�:ililoini,i,�:.��i I'I �..='+;.ry.�• I�us:4o5.j43-�}609 .I � ' �.�., ,-. � � . . . �_ . . .. .1� �:.' :,�...� . . .. . . ., � . . -,...-,. .' l��rl f.rl k��J1 �� ,' Mayor Mike Lady and City Council Members Page 2 December 29, 2000 value of the entire site is $2.8 million. Based on full development of tfie site with both retail and Self- Storage, the estimated value is approximately $12.8 million. For comparison purposes, if the rear portion of the site was developed with office instead of Self-Storage, the valuation of the entire site would be reduced by $53 million from $12.8 million to $7.5 million (Please refer to the attached memo to Diane Sheeley for information on how value was estimated.). Compared to an office development, the development of the Self-Storage facility would have a significant positive impact on the City's Redevelopment funds. AddiNonal Revenue Informallon: Diane Sheeley is preparing a more detailed analysis of the revenue generated from the proposed development. This information will be included in your packet or will be submitted at the City Council meeting on January 9, 2001. Please contact me at 543-1794 if I can be of fiirther assistance. Sincerely, RRM DESIGN GROUP .� __r Jo ight Principal Planner Enclosures: Proposed Amendment to the Arroyo Grande Development Code December 27, 2000 Valuation Memo to Diane Sheeley cc: Kerry McCants, City of Arroyo Grande Kelly Heffernon, City of Arroyo Grande Tai Martin, Prime Commercial Real Estate Kevin Wing, Property Development Associates Pat Blote, RRM Design Group Erik Justesen, RRM Design Group n/1400002/Client/jk-DevelopmentCodeComments12-9-00 Council Proposed Amendment to the Arroyo Grande Development Code Additions are shown in italics and bo/d. . Section 9-11.150 Self-Storaqe Warehouses A. Purpose and Intent The purpose of this Section is to ensure that self-storage warehouse operations, commonly known as "mini-warehouses," do no result in an adverse impact on adjacent properties by reason of parking demand, traffic generation, fire, or safety hazard, visual blight, or use indirectly supportive of illegal or criminal activity. The special conditions contained in this Section are intended to serve to differentiate self-service storage warehousing uses from more intensive wholesale or general warehousing uses, especially in regard to the differing parking requirements for these uses. B. Applicability All self-storage warehouses shall comply with the property development standards for the District in which it is to be located and with the special standards listed below. The provisions of this Section shall apply to all new self-storage warehouse uses and to all existing facilities at such a time as the storage area of the existing business is expanded. C. Minimum Development Standards 1. Business Activity No business activity shall be conducted other than the rental of storage spaces for inactive storage use. A maximum of one (1) caretaker unit may be operated on the site. 2. Enclosure All storage shall be fully enclosed within a building or buildings. �� : r_rErr_ n�rs ; r, � e� � 5�8: 4. Location There shall be a minimum of 200' of separation between the nearest Se/f-Storage unit and the edge of a right-of-way of a major arterial. 5. Residential Buffer A minimum ten (10') foot wide /andscaped buffer shall be provided on the site where the property line of a Self-Storage development is adjacent to any residentially zoned /ot. This buffer shall inc/ude a combination of trees and evergreen shrubs. The evergreen shrubs shal/ be designed to attain a solid screen, eight (8') foot high in three (3) years. 6. Access No direct access shall be provided from a major arterial to a Self- Storage deve/opment. Indirect access is permitted to a major arteria/ where the Se/f-Storage use shares a driveway with another use that fronts a major arterial. 7. Design The Design ot Self-Storage units shall be consistent with the rural, small town character of Arroyo Grande. Metal siding is prohibited on any e/evation immediately fronting a public street. 8. Security and Safety Ful/ and adequate lighting shall be provided. Fencing shall be provided for the entire Se/f-Storage area. Access shall be restricted to the site via a key-code or card lock system. Hours of public access shall be restricted to 6 a.m, to 10 p.m, when a site is within % mile of a residentia/ zoning district. No flammable or otherwise hazardous materia/s shall be stored on-site. 9. Deve/opment Area No more than 75% of the site area of a new development may be devoted to Se/f-Storage Warehouses. The remainder ot the site sha/l be deve/oped concurrent/y or in a phased manor fo include retail, office, or other permitted uses in the underlying Zoning District. 10. Coverage/FAR Coverage shall not exceed 55%. The maximum allowed Floor Area Ratio shall be 0.75. \\Plan-sr�Planning�2000\1400002 Grand & Courtland\Government\Code Amendment Language.doc R R M D E S I G N G R O U P Architecture • Planning • Engineering • Surveying • Interiors • Landscape Architecture CREATING ENVIRONMENTS THAT PEOPLE ENJOY MEMORANDUM Date: December 27, 2000 To: Diane Sheeley From: john Knigl� Title: Principal Planner job Name: Re: D1aYle, Grand & Courtland Commercial Project Valuation Company: City of Arroyo Grande Location: ■ San Luis Obispo Office O Oakdale Office Job No. 1400002 I have the following information that you requested regarding the project valuation. The valuation and cap rate information came from Tai Martin, the Broker for the project. Assumptions: Cap Rate: 0.09 Vacancy Rate: 90% Retail Income: $1.20/s.f. /month Self Storage Income: $0.85/s.f./month Office Income: $1.00/s.f./month (alternate proposal for Self- Storage) Retail Area: 23,000 s.f. Self-Storage Area: 93,672 s.f.. Office Alternate: 34,500 s.f. (assumes 0.25 FAR for office substituted for the Self-Storage use) Retail Site Area: 77,453 s.f. Self-Storage Area: 138,147 s.f. 3701 South Higuera Street • San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 • Phone: 805/543-1794 • FAX: 805/543-4609 131 South Second Ave. • Oakdale, CA 95361 • Phone: 209/847-1794 • FAX: 209/847-2511 A CaliJornia Carpnmtion / Victor Montgomery, Architect - License NurnM C011090 /Jmy Michael, RCE J136895 - LS N6276 / JeA'Ferber, U N28l4 Retail Valuation: 23,000 s.f. x$1.20/s.f. x 12 months x 90% vacancy/0.09 cap rate = $3,312,000 Approximate Value Self-Storage Valuation: 93,672 s.f. x$0.85/s.f. x 12 months x 90% vacancy/0.09 cap rate = $9,554,544 Approximate Value Office Alternative for Self-Storage Area: 34,500 s.f. x$1/s.f. x 12 months x 90% vacancy/0.09 cap rate = $4,140,000 Approximate Value Please call me at 543-1794 or Tai Martin at 928-9282 (m-878-3100) if you have any additional questions. cc: Tai Martin — Prime Commercial Real Estate Erik justesen - RRM 3701 South Higuera Street • San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 • Phone: 805/543-1794 • FAX: 805/543-4609 131 South Second Ave. • Oakdale, CA 95361 • Phone: 209/847-1794 • FAX: 209/847-2511 A Cal�ntia Corynmtion /Victor Mantgomery, Architecf - License Number C011090 / Jmy Michael, RCE M36895 - LS N6276 /Jed'Ferber, LA N28l4