08.d. Citywide Concrete Repair ProjectMEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DOUG PERRIN, DIRECTOR OF RECREATION AND MAINTENANCE
SERVICES
BY: MIKE LINN, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER r?L
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF THE CITYWIDE CONCRETE
REPAIR PROJECT, PW 201 1-08
DATE: MARCH 27,2012
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council:
1. Accept the improvements as constructed by Brough Construction, Inc. for the
Citywide Concrete Repair Project; and
2. Direct staff to file a Notice of Completion; and
3. Authorize release of retention, thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion
has been recorded, if no liens have been filed.
IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES:
The Capital Improvement Program budget includes $14,219 from the Annual Concrete
Replacement Program and $91,356 from Miscellaneous Striping, Crosswalks,
Sidewalks, and ADA Ramps. The actual total construction projects cost, including
authorized construction changes, is $66,891. The estimated total cost of the project;
including all design, construction, construction administration and Recreation &
Maintenance Services construction costs, is $76,000. The recommendation will not
result in any significant additional impact on staff resources.
BACKGROUND:
On November 8, 201 1, Council awarded a construction contract to perform the Citywide
Concrete Repair Project to Brough Construction, Inc. for $69,126 and authorized the
City Manager to approve change orders in the amount of $6,913. The project scope of
work involved the replacement of concrete sidewalk, curb and gutter, and driveway
approach segments for twenty-eight separate locations throughout the City that have
Agenda Item 8.d.
Page 1
CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF THE CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIR
PROJECT, PW 201 1-08
MARCH 27,2012
PAGE 2
experienced damage from adjacent trees. All asphalt pavement patching was
performed by City crews following the concrete placement.
ANALYSIS OF ISSUES:
The contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications. There are no outstanding issues.
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration:
1. Approve staffs recommendation;
2. Do not accept the project;
3. Accept the project but do not authorize release of retention; or
4. Provide direction to staff.
ADVANTAGES:
The project is complete. Accepting the improvements will allow staff to close out the
project and return any remaining funds to the fund balance.
DISADVANTAGES:
The disadvantage of accepting the improvements would be if subsequent deficiencies in
the work are identified. However, the contract documents include a one-year warranty
period for the contractor to address any construction defects that may arise.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Guidelines Section
15301 (c).
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:
The agenda was posted on Thursday, March 22, 2012. The agenda and staff report
was posted on the City's website on Friday, March 23, 2012. No public comments were
received as of the time of preparation of this report.
Attachment:
1. Notice of Completion
Agenda Item 8.d.
Page 2
RECORDmG REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
300 EAST BRANCH STREET
ARROYO GRANDE, CA 93420
ATTACHMENT 1
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
I. The undersigned is owner or agent of owner of the interest or estate or the property hereinafter described as stated below.
2. The FULL NAME of the OWNER is: The Cifv ofArrovo Grande
3. The FULL ADDRESS of the OWNER is: 300 East Branch Street. Arrovo Grande. California 93420
4. 'The NATURE OF THE INTEREST or ESTATE of the undersigned is: in fie
5. THE FULL NAME and FULL ADDRESS of ALL PERSONS, if any, who hold such interest or estate with the undersigned as JOINT
TENANTS or as TENANTS lN COMMON are:
NAMES ADDRESSES
None
6. THE FULL NAMES and FULL ADDRESSES of the PREDECESSOR'S in interest of the undersigned if the property was transferred
subsequent to the commencement of the work of improvements herein referred to:
NAMES ADDRESSES
None
7. All work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was COMPLETED March 9. 2012
8. The NAME OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACTOR, if any, for such work of improvement is:
Brounh Construction. Inc.
9. The street address of said property is: None
10. 'The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Arroyo Grande, County of San Luis Obispo, State
of California, and is described as follows: Cimide Concrete Re~air Proiect. PW2011-08
Verification of NON-INDIVIDUAL owner: I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California
that I am the Community Development Director of the aforesaid interest or estate in the property described in the above notice; that I have
read the said notice, that 1 know and understand the contents thereof, and the facts stated therein are true and correct.
Doug Perrin, Director of Recreation and Maintenance Services
March 28,20 12, Arroyo Grande, California
-- END OF DOCUMENT --
Agenda Item 8.d.
Page 3
THIS PAGE INTENTIO NALLY LEFT BLANK
Agenda Item 8.d.
Page 4