Loading...
09.a.General Plan Amendment Bicyle and Trails (3) � aR�°ro o �.� � �NcoA�oAASEO pZ _ V T � ru�r �v. ��w� ,� cq �P MEM�RANDIJM ��FoRN T�: �ITY ��IJN�IL FR�M: TERESA M�CL�SH, C�MMUNITY DEUEL�PMENT DIR�CT�R BY: RYAN F�STER, ASS�CIATE PLANNER SUBJE�T: ��N5IDERATI�N �F GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1�-��� �BI�Y�LE AND TRAILS MASTER PLAN� DATE: JUL�f 1�, ��1� RE��MMENDATI�N: Staff r�comm�nds that th� �ity �ouncil: �} r��i�w th� attach�d Draft Bicycl� and Trails Mast�r Plan �Draft P�an}, �} adopt th� attach�d Res�lution appro�ing G�n�ral Plan Am�ndment 1�-���, ado�ting the ��1� B�c�cle and Tra�ls Mast�r Plan and am�nding th� �irculation and Parks and R�cr�ation El�m�nts of the G�neral Plan, and 3} instruct th� �ity �lerk to file a Notice of D�t�rmination. 1MPA�T �N FINAN�IAL AND PERS�NNEL SERVI�ES: lmpl�mentation of th� Draft Plan will r�sult in incr�ased costs r�lat�d to str�ping, signag� and pQtential raad widening. Estimated �onstru�tion �osts �p�r mife� for �arious bicycl� faciliti�s ar� shown in th� tabl� b�low. Generali2ed Unit Costs for Bikewa Facili Construction Facili T e Estimated Cast er Mile �lass I Multi-use Path: 1�-ft. wide, w!2-ft. shou�ders �dves not include land costs, or +!-$fi41,�n� amen�t�es such as landsca in , li htin irri ation etc. Grave� Sased I�lulti-use Path: �Q-ft. wide graded gravel f evee rvad with directional +� ��,��� si na e Class II Bike Lane: 5tri in , rnarkin ,and si na e onl +f-$1$,��� Class II Bike Lane: 5i nin , markin , si na e and a�ement widentn +1-2'17��Q �lass I II 8ike Rvute: Si nin �nl +1-$�,B�Q Class III Bike Route: S'r nin and a�ement widenin +1- $112 4�� �lass Ill Bike Route: Si nin and Shared F�oadwa 5harrows markin s +1-$4,��� -fhe Draft Plan also contains ten ���} "priority" impl�m�ntation pr���cts, with �st�mated costs summariz�d b�low. It should be not�d that adopt�on of th� Draft Plan does nvt comp�l th� �ity ta complet� �ach of th�s� pro��cts; th�y ar� includ�d to identify existing d�fici�nci�s and pro�id� guidanc� in addr�ssing thos� d�fici�n�i�s. Prv'ect# Descri tion Cost Estimate � �lass II� hike boulevar�l $3 DDD 2 Class II bike lane $���Q�� 3 C1ass III hike r�ute $2,�Q� 4 Class III bike route �1 �Q� 5 �lass II I bik�route,future�lass II bike route feasibilit stud $2,n�n 1$��,�Qa Agenda Item 9.a. Page 1 c�-�r cvun�c�� C�N�IDERATI�N �F GPA 'f 2-DDZ J u LY 'f D, �D'I 2 PA�E � � �lass II bike lane �za�o���300,000 7 �lass III bike route and bike bvulevard $2 2�� 8 Class II bike lanes 1 r�undabout feasibilit stud $fi4,0�� 9 �lass I muiti-use ath 1 US 1�1 avercrossin feasibilit stud $150,OD� 1� Wa in�in si n s stem �55,�001�30�,��0 lt sh�uld also be noted that same of the estimated costs in the above tables may be deferred through grant funding and de�elopment projects. Ad�ption and implementation of the Draft Plan will further strain staff resources, requiring additional staff time to pursue grant funding opportunities, administer specific projects and coord inate impro�ements. 8AC KGR�l�ND: The �ity �ouncil ad�pted Resolut��n No. 3975 on Novernber 28, 2���, approving �eneral Plan Arnendment D6-DD2 and ad�pting the Bike and SidewalklPedestrian Enhancement Plan. This was the first bicycle plan ado�ted by the �ity; h�wever, it does n�t meet eligi�ility criteria set f�rth by �altrans f�r Bicycle Transp�rtati�n Acc�unt �BTA} funding. ^fherefore, the �ity �s n�t elig�b�e to receive State funds f�r pr�jects that im�rove safety and c�nvenience f�r bicycle c�mmuters. ^fhe ��ty received a grant thro�agh the San Luis �bis�� �ouncil �f ��vernments �SL����} in the amount of $15,DD�D for �reparatior� of a new bicycle and trails master plan. Qn Novem�er 29, �D11, the City awarded the contract to pre�are th� new plan t� �mni-Means. A kick-vff rneeting was held with vari�us stakeholders and interested pers�ns �n Decernber 15, 2�D11 and a �ublic warkshap was held on February 9, 2�12. ANALY�I� �F I��I�E�; BTA Eli_Qibii�ty The Draft Plan has been written t� meet Bicycle Transp�rtati�n Account �BTA} requ�rements a-k. These requirements are addressed in �arious sections �f th� Draft Plan �refer to page 8}. �nce a plan that meets BTA requirements is adopted, it must be re�isited e�ery fi�e years in �rder to determine if the direction identified by the plan is still justified or needs t� be revi�ed t� m��t new criteria or directi�n to maintain BTA funding erigibility. ��als and �b'ectives The Draft Plan sets forth the fot��wing goals and �bjectives to guide development �f b�cycle and pedestrian facilit�es �mprovements: • pro�r`de safe and conveni�nt bicycle and ped�strian access; • Bec�me a "bicycle friendly" city; • Max�mize bicycle and pedestrian impr�vement funding opp�rtunities; • Demonstrate ��mmitment t� bicyc�e and pede�trian irr�provements Agenda Item 9.a. Page 2 CITY C��JNCIL C�NSIDERA��I�N �F �PA '1�-��� J�J LY '1�, ��'1� PA�E 3 These goals and o��ecti�es form the foundatian for the proposed �icy�le and trail network �refer to pag� 31}. This network identi�es bicycle and pedestrian routes through the City, ident�fies nodes that connect to regional routes and classi�es each route. Citywide improvements to further these goals inclu�e the use of bicycle detecting traffic signals, "bike boxes" �phys�cal separatron �f �]IC]ICI15t5 from motor vehicles at signalized intersections}, adequate bicycle parking and a wayfinding program. The network identifies several iiProposed C1ass li" routes, some of which w�ll requ�re narrowing travel �anes, narrowing parking lanes, removing on-street parkirrg, acquiring additional right of way or some combination thereof in order to meet minimum Class II bike lane wrdth requirements. "fhese �rrclude some existing bike lanes, such as those on Fair �aks Avenue between South Halcyon Road and South Elm Street, which are less than the minimum required width for Class !I bike lanes. Priori Proiects The Draft Plan identi�es ten �1�} specific projects for future improvements to the City's bicycle and trail network. These priorities are intended to guide funding and planning mechan isms to ensu re that the priorities that a r� ra nked h ig her a re gi�ren precealence. Each project includes a brief discuss�on of exist�ng cond�tions, praposed improvements and cost estimates. Projects are conceptual in nature and may require more detailed d�sign to determine overall feasibility; however, it is important to identify various opportunities to meet the plan's goals and objectives. Fundin � ortunities The Draft Plan includes a comprehensiv� d�scussivn vf pot�ntial funding opportunities for future projects, includEng both Federal and State sources in addition to IocaE funding sources such as impact fees and sales tax revenues �refer to Section 5}. Safet� and Education In order to qualify as a "b�cycl� friendly" community �a goal of the Draft Plan}, the City must establish an educational program targeted at both bicyclists and motorists. The Draft Plan in�ludes the required objectives of the educat�onal program and Rdenti�es existing programs and agen�ies that may be utilized in the creation of a Iocal educational program. Im�lementation "fhe following table summarizes the ten priority projects identi�ed in the Draft Plan: Priori 5e mentlLo�at�vn Pro osal Method s 1 East Branch from Traffic W�y Class III bike boulevard New signage&street markings to Le Point Terrace � East Branch from Le Point Class II bike lane Road widening & rel��ation of � Terrace to Pauldin Schvol existin retainin wall 3 INest Branch�r�m Traffic�ay ��ass�!I bike rvute New signage 8�re-s�riping fa� to EI Camino Real line 4 Fair�aks from Traffie Wa to Class INI bik�route New si na e Agenda Item 9.a. Page 3 ci�r �ouruci� C�NSIDERATI�N �F GPA 1 Z-aa2 .�u�Y �a, zo�z PAG E 4 �rchard 5 Fair�aks from�rchard to Class III bike route,future Class New signage$�re-striping; Valley II bike route acquisition of additional right of wa futu re 6 �ak Park Boulevard Class II bike lane New s�gnage$�street markings, right of way acquisition 1 roadway re�anfi urat;on ? Ta�ly Ho from Printz to East Class III b�ke lane and boulevard New signage$�street markings Branch 8 R�undabout—East Branch, Class II bike lanes New roundabout Huasna 8� Corbett Can vn 9 Bicyclelpedestrian crossing Class I multi-use path New bridge crossing US 1 Q1 aver US 1�1 1� Cit ide Wa indin si n s stem New si na e Below are br�ef discussions of priority projects that would require more than minor impro�ements �signage, striping, etc} in order to implement: Prrorrty Project#� This project would provide a safer cvnnection for bicyclists, including students, between the Village and Paulding Middle School. It would require the acquisit�on of additional right vf way on the north side of East Branch Street, which would impact the existing stone retaining wall, sections of which are currently in a state of d isrepair. Priority Project# 5 This project could ultimately provide an extension of the existing Class II bike lan�s on Fair Daks A�enue from Valley Road to Drchard A�enue along Arroyo �rande High Schaol frontage. -fhe provision of Class II bik� lanes would likely requir� the acquisition of right of way from the high school andlor adjacent a�ricultural property. "fhis would requir� a d�tailed study to d�termine feas�bility. Priority Project#8 Th�s proj�ct would creat� a roundabQUt at the thr��-wa� inters��tion of East Branch �tre�t, Huasna Road and Corbett Canyon �State Rout� �27}. It would requir� a detail�d study and clos� coordination with �altrans ta determin� its feasibility. Priority Project# � ^fhis project could provide a Class I multi-use path for both bicyclists and pedestrians that spans ov�r US Highway 'lD'l. It would r�quire a detailed study and clos� coordination with Caltrans to det�rmine �ts feas�bilit�. Advisory Review The I�raft Plan has b�en re�i�wed by the City's Parks and Recreation Comm�ss�on �Attachment 3}, Pianning Commission �Attachment 4} and Traffic Commission Agenda Item 9.a. Page 4 �i�r �ouru�i� ��NSIDERATI�N �F �PA '1�-��� J U LY '1�, ��'1� PA�E 5 �Attachment 5}. Each �ommission recommended approval of th� Draft Plan, with the following commentslrecommendations: • Parks and Recreation �ommission o Merge Priorrty#4 and Priority #5 �Fair �aks} and make it a higher priority; o Investigate the feasibility of a "road diet" �reduction in travel lane width andl�r number of lanes} on Fairs �aks in-�ieu of acquiring additional right of way. • Planning �ommission o Agreed with the priorities identified in the Draft Plan; o Maps should be larger and fold-out of the document. • Traffic Commission o Not in favor of road diet on Fair �aks; o Express�d resenrations regarding prapased raundabout and ov�rcrossin� ofUS1�1. Response to Comments The public review and comment period for the Draft Plan was �Ilay 1�, ��12 through June ��, ��1�. Staff collected and forwarded all comments received through June ��, ��1� to the consultant. The consultant responded to th�se comments �Attachment �} and mad� seueral r�visions t� th� Draft Plan based on these cvmments. The most significant revision involved Priority Project #�, which was originally �lass II bike lanes and a bike boulevard on Elm Street from Ash Street to Linda Drive. Priority #� Es now �lass II bike lanes on �ak Park Boulevard. Additional�y, Priarity Projects #7 �Tally Ho Road} and ##9 �LJS 1�1 overpass} switched places. ENVIR�NMENTAL REVIEW: Staff has prepared an Initi�l Study and Draft Mit�gated Negative Declaration �Attachment �} for the Draft Plan. PUBLI� N�TI�E AND ��MMENT: ►at notice �f public hearing was published in the Tr�bune �n Frida}�, June �9, ��1�. As of J uly 5, ��1�, staff has received two �2} letters in add ition to those �dd ressed in Attachment � regarding the Draft Plan �Attachments 7 & 8}. ADVANTA�ES: Adoption of the Draft Plan will build upon the ���� Plan and provide direction for the future development of bicycle �nd pedestrian fa�ilities, consistent with existing General Plan goa�s, objectives and poli�ies. Adoption af the Draft Plan will also satisfy �li���ifity requirements for BTA funding opportunities, which are lacking in the ���� Plan. Agenda Item 9.a. Page 5 CITY C�I�N�IL C�NSIDERATI�N �F �PA '12-002 J I�LY '1�, ��'1� PA�E 6 DISADVANTA�ES: Ad�pti�n and implementati�n �f the araft Plan will result in substantial upfr�nt c�sts, increased maintenance c�sts and further strain staff res�urces and in s�me �nstances, may negativefy impact vehicular parkin� and traffic f��w. ALTERNATIVES: 1} Ad�pt the attached Res�lut��n, recamrnendin� that the �ity ���incil ad�pt the Bicy�le and Trails Master Plan and integrate it int� the �irculati�n and Parks and Recreati�n Elements �f the General Plan; �� aire�t staff t� make changes t� the Draft Plan; 3� a� n�t ad�pt the atta�hed Res�luti�n; �r 4� Pr�vide directi�n t� �taff. ATTACHMENTS 1 . araft Bicycle and Trails Master Plan �. araft M itigated N eg ative De�1a rati�n 3. June 13, ��1� Parks and Re�reati�n minutes 4. June 1�, ��1� Planning ��mmissi�n m�nutes 5. July �, ��1� Traffi� ��mrnissi�n minute� �. Resp�nse t� c�mments received tr�r�ugh June ��, ��1� 7. Letter fr�rn SL� ��unty Bi�y�re ��aliti�n 8. Letter fr�rn Mr. Bru�e H�It�n Agenda Item 9.a. Page 6 RES�LUTI�N N�. A RES�LU'I'I�N �F THE �ITY ��UN�IL �F THE �ITY �F ARR�Y� �R�tNDE APPR�VIN� �ENERAL PLAN ►�tMENDMENT '��-���, AD�P'�ING THE Z�'1 Z BI�Y�LE AND TRAILS IUTASTER PLAN AND AMENDING THE �IR�I�LAT��N AND PARKS AND RE�REATI�N ELEMENTS �F THE GENERAL PLAN VIIHEREAS, the �ity has awarded a contract f�r preparation of a bicycle and trails master plan to �mni-Means; and VIIHEREAS, �mni-Means has prepared a draft bicycle and trails master plan based on existing conditions, State funding requirements and feedback from various stakeholders; and VIIHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation �ommissi�n of the ��ty of Arroyo �rande held a duly noticed public hearing on June �3, �D12 and unanimQUSly recomm�nd�d approval of �eneral Plan Amendment 12-DD2; and VIIHEREAS, the Planning �ommission of the �ity of Arroyo �rande h�ld a duly noticed public hearing on ,1une 19, 2D12 and unanimously recommended approval of �eneral Plan Amendment 1�-DD�; and WHEREAS, the Traffic �ommission of the �ity of Arroyo Grande held a duly noticed p�iblic hearing on July 2, 2D12 and unanimously recommended approval of �eneral Plan ►�tmendment 12-DD�; and VIIHEREAS, the �ity �ouncil of the City of Arroyo �rande has reviewed this project in compliance with the �alifornia Environmental C�uality Act ��EC�A}, the State �EC�A �uidelin�s, and the Arroyo �rande Rules and Procedures for Implementation of �EQA and has reviewed the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project; and VIIHEREAS, the �ity �ouncil of the �ity of Arroy� �rande has reviewed the project at a duly noticed public hearir�g on July 'I D, �D12; and WHEREAS, the �ity �ouncil finds, after due study, deliberation and public hearing, the following circumstances exist: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, policies and programs of the �eneral Plan and will not result in any intern�l inconsistencies within the Plan. The praposed amendment is cansistent wit�r t�re gaals, abjectives, palicies and programs af t�re G�rr�ral Plarr, sp�ci�ca!!� �T3-�.�, �T3-3.�, �T3.3, C T3-3.4, L U5-9, PJ44-1.�, PJ44-1.3, PJ44-�.4 and �/�S�-�.4. T�re propased amendment will not result in any intemal inconsistencies wit�r the General Plan. Agenda Item 9.a. Page 7 RES�LUTI�N N�. PAGE Z �. The pr�p�sed amendment will n�t ad�ersely affect the public health, safety and welfa re. The proposed arx��ndm�nt wi1! n�t ad�ersely affect the �u�1ic health, safety or welfare — the promotion of �icycling and walking as altemati�es ta dri�ing wi11 positi�ely affect the pu�lic health, safety and welfare. 3. The p�tential en�ir�nmental impacts �f the pr�pased amendment are insignifican# �r can b� mitigated t� an insigntficant IeWel, �r there are �verriding c�nsiderati�ns that �utweigh the p�tential impacts. The potential en�ironmental impacts of �he proposed amendment can �e mitigated to an insignificant le�e1 with adoption of the draf� mitigated negati�e declarafion prepared for�eneral P1an �4mendmenf 7�-44� and implementation of the mitigation measures contair�ed therein. N�W, THEREF�RE, BE IT RES�LVED that the City C�uncil of the City�f Arr�y� �rande hereby appro�es General Plan Amendment 1�-��� with the ab��e f ndings and integrates the 2�12 B�cycle and Trails Master Plan int� the Circulati�n and Parks and Recreati�n Elements as sh�wn in Exhib�ts A1 and AZ attached heret�. �n motion by C�uncil Member , sec�nded by C�uncil Member , and by the f�llowi ng r�11 ca 11 uot�, to wit: AYES: N�ES: ABSENT: the f�reg�ing Res�lut��n was ad�pted th�s 1�th day �f July ��1�. Agenda Item 9.a. Page 8 RES�LUTI�N N�. PAGE 3 T�NY FERRARA, MAY�R ATTEST: KELLY iI11ETIVI�RE, �ITY�LERK APPR�VED AS T� C�NTENT: STEVEN ADAMS, CITY IUTANAGER APPR�VED AS T� F�R11A: 1'I M�THY J. CARM E L, C ITY ATT�RN EY Agenda Item 9.a. Page 9 RES�LUTI�N N�, PAG E 4 E�HIBIT A7 Cir�ulat�an Element 'I. Policy �T3-3.3 shall be re�ised to read: "lJpdate the �ity's Bicycle and Trials Master Plan e�ery fi�e years to meet Bicy�le Transportation Account �BTA} funding el'rgibility requirements." �. The Bicycle and Trails Network Plan �Exhibit A�} shall be inserted into the �ity's �irculation Element as "Map �" and supersede bicycle routes and trail �ocations as shown on Map 3. Parks and Recreation Element 1. Policy PR-4 shall be re�ise� to read: "�ra�ls sho��ld �e Iocated generally as shown in the Bicycle and Trails Network Plan �Map 5}". �. The Bicycle and Trails Network P1an �Exhibit A�} shall be inserted into the ��ty's Parks and Recreation Element as "Map �" and supersede bicycle routes and trail Iocat�ons as shown on Map 4. Agenda Item 9.a. Page 10 �Counry Class II Connection �°�e��a CConnection�SLO COUIICy B I C YC L E & T RA 1 L N ETWD R K P LA N � SLO County 1� � � '�r/ � ���a Cit of Arro o Grande o , y y �o��ry��ass��� , Connec1ion Counry Class II B I C Y C L E & T R A I L S M A S T E R P L A N \Ja / , � Connection SLD County �� Qa �- �a� I 227 S�o�oUnty , U pdate 2012 J �� � �a� �a� F����e � � Po[en[ial , O �'� Recreation �� � �pportunity ` Ufli �/�� �ay L � GITY OF New Hope �aUestc�^n a`' / �� O,QO �cnw� �e5�7 / A,.%h� V�,l� � � � � r • • _ ` � �a � �,a 1 City of / �1c Pismo Beach / �o• � SLO Caunty �,� Grantle / Park ,Future PerLBike Britlge 0���. / �a OrorPark / � ��� a'�G`� ✓d�e ��-� �conn��eon�� ��l � e��, s�ay / � �. �:� CALIFORNIA ,�,,� 101 � �"- �-��'���r_ C�'�aG �°� � � Y 9 1� °' c.s.aass u V� o co��e�eo� O�. D 227 m Five Ci[ies O Cen[er OC�e '� m� Shomer `,�� Fi� ■ p- ,� � Park � a�,� � .� � /�,�j FuturePeNBike � '�m Hua aRd� � c�c�ass��� "�(j� Bridge '� Sn FuturePed/Bike� Co nection , ' � �` Bridge � ' � ' ' \\\s�. � � � � Future Petl/Bike ' N SL Patrick's eritlge �� � a �es�er s�nooi ` G�° � ��Q— G.6.Class II I co��e���o� � Newport Ave� ah� � r Branch St. � �1` _ �_ �� �Rd Li6rary ` �"' Paulding ' � �G � `/) The Nliddle School `� a I ValleyView Villaq� � � �Academy C m �Ocean View Future �a,'(��'r� ' 1 ry �a � Future PerLBike L E G E N D � �menta O Z Policel.c. Women's 227 �,� ge� Bridge G vina ' �,� • �Club � O ' ' ` S c, � �O� ��� ` EXISTING BIKE BOULEVARD � SCHOOL DESTINATION G.e.Class II Z � ' O � Pos� ' c���eC���� �E.Grand A�e. � � ' � o�'��e ,l, ■ POINTS OF INTEREST � �� F"e■ �, � EXISTWG CLASS III � � r Q� s�a��o� Branch Mill �S � �/ � ! ��t}*—, • �e� Rd. °r�jS � EXISTING BIKE PARKING Grover eeach • �"y w— Gca�d PJe Fu�urePe�LBike �'�' Gre��P , 'br,;� EXISTING CLASS II staeon �. � gridge � �' �' ( `9�p� � EXISTING PARK&RIDE I � � � � � EXISTING CLASS I 0 EXISTING TRANSIT STOP � � � / � (bikes allowed) Q�,e� EXISTING DECOMPOSED GRANITE PATH Y Be�N W I �.5 .*. PUBLIC RESTROOMS � Gardens � � Qa a Park ' �a�� � ���� PROPOSED BIKE BOULEVARD '� ' � RETAIL/EMPLOYMENT � •ce��e'"'"g`�`s SLO County G.B.Classll � ���L PROPOSED CLASS III CENTERS Connection i ���� Ash St. ' •y � Pa�rf;Cc• , REGIONAL CONNECTIONS � E� e � `�'� ArroyoGrande ch"s"a°s`h°°� / PROPOSED CLASS II � SotoSports�Park � 'N4, HighSchool c°"'P1e% comm��� � Lighthouse PROPOSED CLASS I-PAVED ,� PROPOSED ROUNDABOUT J ��� comm��;ry Christian5chool ���� �� INTERSECTION Fair Oaks Ave. „osP;�a, ' � ' . I �l PROPOSED DECOMPOSED GRANITE PATH M.Harloe � 101 G.B.Class II I F81'CO��,qVB. E�ementary Connec[ion � ' D `� � � v � m W � � SLO County � L �j o Q � l• Q Woodland� rn � � North Oceano ��ar� �/ Q Elementary „ T,_,, —_�g��ass�� NORTH co��e���o� - , The Pike � W � � a � � j� 0 1600 3200 4800 feet D j� N Oceano T.r. Park SCALE:1"=1600' SLO County THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Agenda Item 9.a. Page 12 ���Y� G F�,q�D P E � � �L�'?r'�L '�Ji'�f�'��$.�7��� �� �, . � . � ��� � � � � � � rr r n � . - . . • . ' � - i i iiv Nu��. i�.i� ii i«.i i�ivi iuiiy �iui ir�. Agenda Item 9.a. Page 14 ' .� / � - � This plan was paid for with a grant from San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (www.slocog.org) P re a red B : p y ����������� ' C�.�����:�i�:��� � 1� G i FL � � �� � R � l� �1 hl � R S 943 Reserve Drive Roseville, California 95678 (916) 782-8688 Agenda Item 9.a. Page 15 i i iiv Nu��. i�.i� ii i«.i i�ivi iuiiy �iui ir�. Agenda Item 9.a. Page 16 D ° 0 a e o on en s t � � � � � Section Page , 1. Introduction 7 � 1.1. Purpose and Need 1.2. Setting 1.3. Plan Process 1.4 Estimated Bicycle Commuters 1.5 Bicycle Collision Data 1.6 Consistency & Coordination with Other Plans 1.7. Bikeway Classifications 2. Existing Conditions 17 2.1 Land Use, Physical Barriers � 2.2 Existing Bicycle &Trails Facilities 3. Pedestrian & Bikeway Network Plan 3.1 Goals and Objectives 27 3.2 Bicycle Master Plan 3.3 Specific Bikeway Improvements 3.4 Specific Pedestrian Improvements 4. Implementation 41 4.1 Past Expenditures 4.2 Cost Esti m ates 4.3 Suggested Priorities 5. Funding Opportunities 5.1 Federal 55 5.2 State 5.3 Local / Regional 6. Safety and Education 1 6.1 Safet Enforcement 6 y 6.2 Education Programs Appendix A 65 Full Text of California Streets and Highways Code Appendix B Design Guidelines 71 Appendix C 85 Caltrans Policy Directive 09-06 Appendix D Basis for Cost Estimation 95 Appendix E 97 Survey Results Appendix F 101 Existing Conditions Plan - 11 x 17 Enlargement Bicyc/e & Trail Network P/an - 11 x 17 En/argement Agenda Item 9.a. City of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 17 5 � r � �.. �1 '� ' I � •i , � }� • � � �•- � � ' r- . � � - � � � � 1� ' � � . I , �� : � i y � � S T 1 ■� rL�' • � �f+ � k• • � • 7 ■ . � r 1 � • � � i. �. �r1 �* �1 '�'�'.. j ' - - ' �, :� 4■.� '_ � - � . � ' � . y' � ' +_ . � �' 1 � � � r �� �' "�� , - f � '� � � - � • � � � 1'f..�'_ J I I • � r � ,•' i - '-- - - — — � �' r . � � ��_ � � ��� y I •• � 'l� �- ; • �� _ � ` � �T 1 I � � • �� � •�, _ _' _ � � � • 1 r �' � , S 7•. L•�� . � ■ � yF - � � - � ~� � . �� _, • �� r' ' • .� � �r � .� F a r �• .,, ff .r . ' � r ' • � � � � .� . � • �� �� � -i ti ' _� ti . _.s � � . � , �� �� � � . . �� �t �f.� . �� , � � . •�� �� 1 L � ���� � ��. . ���:�. . �� � � ��_, � � � �',-T•V � ` I � � '� •,' �_� . �f y � f� �■ . � J T - � s1 � � � ��- � rr� . _ '��7�� � �� � _ ����R�a� � �� _ � � . f � � �� ; . � � • ' � • �� . - � ..-.. ' ,����_ �_�' • � � �� i r� . _ , � �- � � • •_.��� . . ' ' • ���� i� � Y��������-- ' ' • 'r ���-r�� � - -• - - r--��'; _ - � � - � - _.. ��!!TT ` ' �'• • � r � 1 f �. . � � �, � , � � � �+' _�+ �Y�� -i" r i � F � f-_ ' '.� :. '' •��r� r •i r� r•f� f +' ' �r�r t ' • `_ ��r�r� f. �•ir����' � '-■ � r'• ' _ - . ��� ' . . � �� �� � ' � ' r r � � ' , •�� �' • - , � �-•,jr � _' � .�.• • 1, ' ,■ ��� ��• _ r � _� y 1� �r1:•ti' � _i_'a I� - +�.� � �, � �-. � .� . . .�T . �r� ' ti '.� ■� �� • ' r � � •�� �_• �' •+ � + ••ir� � �-�+� �r. y'a� •i _ __. . . _,•�' . r' '�' T. ��,' .• � �_ '' � ■ �a '. + • �. - � ' �r ! .�•�: �-�; 'r� � '• � ���-�J�L_�� •'• •���� ' • • � . . . • ,� .J�•��f � � r , �FFf�-������a �T�J � � �f f; ����f+ ���`��� 1 + �� ' �' � ' 'r ' . . . • , J = - - - T'.•+ 1�•��� 1 � �J r�.+ i�r�J •�r� -� '� + � �� � • �J i:�_-. .. _4.�_, '���.;,������,��T��.-=�����;�.����,.���. Agenda Item 9.a. - � -� � - .,�- {f !��,�� ��k���r,_!-��� _r_ . , � � Pa e 18 � - -�r: _ �� �;� � �. ��.�ti � �; .���.,- _ ; _ _ _ - g -d � _ _ - � _ -- • LF � J f r �_ f . ��r� �� � T _ ■� • � � �_ • '� • � ' _ � � � �r •F�� . .. . � 1R • _. . _ . . r• �� � . � '. .- � � � �� �- - _ ' � ��i •1 +•■ � ��� � � 2 1 D ° 0 , � .� � . � 1.1 PU rpose and Need A Guideline for Direction - Not a The purpose of the Bicycle &Trails Master Rigid Standard or Legal Ordinance Plan is to improve and encourage bicycle It should be noted that this document is a and off-street pedestrian transportation Master Plan, that, like a General Plan within the City of Arroyo Grande. It is an document, provides guidance for the City effort by the City to develop a as the ability to build new bicycle facilities comprehensive system of bikeways and becomes available. In accordance with the trails facilities. This is Arroyo Grande's Bicycle Transportation Account(if bicycle second adopted Bicycle Plan and it builds grants or funding is requested from the upon the work completed/ recommended State), the City is required to revisit the by the 2006 Bicycle Plan. plan every five years in order to determine if the direction identified by the plan is still Bicycling and Walking In Arroyo Grande justified or needs to be revised to meet With rising concerns regarding air new criteria or direction. pollution, fuel prices, and sedentary lifestyles, bicycling and walking offer Complementing this plan, the 2012 Update clean, economic, and healthy modes of to the Circulation Element of the General transportation. Arroyo Grande, with its Plan will address additional pedestrian mild climate, community-oriented lifestyle, facilities improvements, including compact form, convenient location, and suggestions proposed in the LTAP gentle terrain, is ideally suited for bicycling Pedestrian Safety Review prepared and walking. Through implementation of December 2010. this plan, Arroyo Grande residents and visitors will have access to a safe and well Bicycle Transportation Account -maintained network of bikeways and Requirements trails, linking important destinations The Arroyo Grande Bicycle and Pedestrian throughout the City and region. Master Plan conforms to requirements of Agenda Item 9.a. City of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 19 7 � . n ro uc ion the California Bicycle Transportation Act (Streets and Highways Code Section 890-894.2). Section 891.2 of the California Streets and Highways Code specifies the elements required in a bicycle transportation plan as follows: 891.2 A city or county may prepare a bicycle (a) The estimated number of existing bicycle commuters in the plan area and the estimated increase in the number of bicycle commuters resulting from implementation of the plan. (Sections 1.4 Existing and 3.7— Future) (b) A map and description of existing and proposed land use and settlement patterns which shall include, but not be limited to, locations of residential neighborhoods, schools, shopping centers, public buildings and major employment centers. (Section 2.1) (c) A map and description of existing and proposed bikeways. (Section 2.2) (d) A map and description of existing and proposed end-of-trip bicycle parking facilities. These shall include, but not be limited to, parking at schools, shopping centers, public buildings and major employment centers. (Section 2.2) (e) A map and description of existing and proposed bicycle transport and parking facilities for connections with and use of other transportation modes. These shall include, but not be limited to, parking facilities at transit stops, rail and transit terminals, ferry docks and landings, park and ride lots, and provisions for transporting bicyclists and bicycles on transit vehicles or ferry vessels. (Section 2.2) (f) A map and description of existing and proposed facilities for changing and storing clothes and equipment. These shall include, but not be limited to, locker, restroom and shower facilities near bicycle parking facilities. (Section 2.2) (g) A description of bicycle safety and education programs conducted in the area included within the plan, efforts by the law enforcement agency having primary traffic law enforcement responsibility in the area to enforce provisions of the Vehicle Code pertaining to bicycle operation and the resulting effect on accidents involving bicyclists. (Section 6.1) (h) A description of the extent of citizen and community involvement in development of the plan, including, but not limited to, letters of support. (Section 1.3 and Appendix D) (i) A description of how the bicycle transportation plan has been coordinated and is consistent with other local or regional transportation, air quality, or energy conservation plans, including, but not limited to, programs that provide incentives for bicycle commuting. (Section 1.6) (j) A description of the projects proposed in the plan and a listing of their priorities for implementation. (Section 3 and Section 4.3) (k) A description of past expenditures for bicycle facilities and future financial needs for projects that improve safety and convenience for bicycle commuters in the plan area. (Section 4.1) ( ) — Denotes section of the plan where the requirement can be found. Agenda Item 9.a. 8 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 20 � . n ro uc ion transportation plan, which shall include, but not be limited to, the following elements: 1 .2 Sett i n g The City of Arroyo Grande is located in the southern portion of San Luis Obispo County between Los Angeles and San Francisco. The City is immediately adjacent to the cities of Pismo Beach and Grover Beach, and the unincorporated communities of Oceano and Halcyon. Nestled in the Arroyo Grande Valley and situated between the Santa Lucia Mountain Range and the Pacific Ocean, Arroyo Grande's natural surroundings have attracted thousands of people in search of an outdoor living quality found in very few other regions. � c�T�r oF ��_ ► • � ` • . ► � ��� �- ,,v�,� , ��� � �,= CA L IFORN IA ,� t '� �� �9 i � �i��,�. `0 City of Arroyo Grande ��� . � � � Agenda Item 9.a. Page 21 Fi ure 1 : Re ional Location Ma 9 g g p � . n ro uc ion The City contains 5.5 square miles and has a population of approximately 17,252 A public participation workshop, and (2010 Census). Tourism, retail sales, survey handed out at the workshop (see services, and agriculture form the core of Appendix E), were used to gather the local economy. With its favorable information about potential bikeways, climate, relatively flat to gentle hill terrain, identify end-user issues and establish family-oriented lifestyle, compact form, and prioritization. convenient location to many recreational activities, Arroyo Grande is an excellent . . environment for bicycling and walking. 1 .4 Est�mated B�cycle Commuters Commuting patterns and the City's 1.3 Plan Process The rocess for develo ment of this lan transportation choices offer insight into p p p how residents currently travel to work. As involved reviewing the past plan, noted in the 2010 U.S. Census "Modal identifying new improvements (since ' 2006), identifying existing issues, and Split" refers to the form of transportation a revisitin the oals ob�ectives and person chooses, such as walking, g g ' � ' bicycling, taking the bus, or driving. As policies of the past plan. As a part of the data collection process, the existing and noted in the following tables, commuters in major proposed bikeways were explored the City of Arroyo Grande are near the via bic cle and b car. Statewide average in using transportation y y modes other than auto/public transit. �� � � � ��F- �'��� � ��r t� �� - � �� �` `� � �`' ��� � . r��� ��; . .� �� f �r � � . � ., .� � �. . � �•' •� I ' �� ' ��c���� -.- R'�� y' ; , . � ' � � t � u � �' xF .� r �{ � �N . ■ �} �• �'�k'• ! � � � ti � - � � } - �� k� � � 4 � _ y'' �� � . � � � hk � � ��" _ ,� �� � '�� �4 I r � Arroyo Grande's -' - ��� .����� .a�� ���--���-_��i ti�i� � Iia r�. �_ � -,I ; � . , y���� ti. � � � ; "Village"area is an � � .�'i��. ' ��� � � � - � 4� . � _ attractive destination for ' _ - �i ��. � . both bic clists and e- ��� .�� � � � � � �--�� � y � ��3 � � � , ' . - r destrians. -�._' � - . II_�+ y . { '� . � � '� � -. �. �l� i' �4 . 'ti � t . '� r � ��• � . . . ����� �.-• r .- � - • . � �� F .4L� '�• ti .� . . . a • � •r �� �• � �r ti� r ti � ■ � i p� ' •f�{ • r����7� i.�. 3��i � 'RT` - r_�• '�~�ry y�i� F�� � • � _ �. �•-7. r . _.�,�* ".k � � _� �« : }� �� � •- r'r'�+ • - �l k�r ��i� �r � � r''' . ` .�- ' .�� 1'� . f� � �1 � � a .. . 'T�.� � ��. . . � -� �� ' . . �.{ {� � � -� � - . � ~L I � _ -.� �, . •= 4 � . Z i • � .F � �} � �� .r 5C'�ti"-`"r�. • � � • - t - s Agenda Item 9.a. 10 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 22 � . n ro uc ion Table 1.1: Modal Split 2010 Mode of Arroyo Grande, CA California United States Transportation to Work Car, Truck, Van to Work 6,606 88.29% 13,776,039 85.63% 125,034,525 87.32% Public Transportation to 13 0.17% 777,658 4.83% 6,356,526 4.44% Wo rk Other Transportation to 333 4.45% 749,874 4.66% 5,727,496 4.00% Wo rk Work at Home 530 7.08% 784,085 4.87% 6,068,117 4.24% Table 1.2: Travel Time to Work 2010 Travel Time to Work Arroyo Grande, CA California United States Travel Time Less than 15 2,515 36.18% 3,332,914 21.78% 34,641,939 25.26% Min Travel Ti me 15-29 M i n 2,986 42.95% 5,334,056 34.85% 49,562,476 36.15% Travel Ti me 30-59 M i n 1,057 15.20% 4,829,192 31.56% 40,350,740 29.43% Travel Time 60+ Min 394 5.67% 1,807,409 11.81% 12,563,392 9.16% However, since the 2000 Census, the 1 .5 Bicycle Collision Data number of non-auto related transit has Collision data involving bicycles and increased only a small amount. pedestrians was collected from local police records for a period covering 2005 through This reflects a need to provide adequate 2011 (6-year s an). The data noted the and safe facilities for bic cle travel. p y following incidents: Travel time to work is shown in Table 1.2. As in 2006, these numbers are important . 42 Auto/Pedestrian Personal In�ur iini h nilnm r � > > y because t d cates t e pote t a u be Accidents of new bicycle commuters. As indicated in , 2 Auto/Pedestrian Accidents resultin the table 36% of Arro o Grande residents � � g ' y in a Fatality have a commute of 15-minutes or less. This percentage represents residents that • (59) Auto/Bicycle Personal Injury live close to work. For many of these Accidents commuters, riding or walking may be a • (20) Auto/Bicycle Property Damage reasonable method of travel. Accidents • (0) Auto/Bicycle Accidents resulting in a Fatality Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 23 11 � . n ro uc ion 1.6 Co n s i ste n cy a n d lc�j�es and bikeways should be established for Coo rd i n at i o n w i t h Ot h e r iise by local residents and visitors to the Arroyo Cit / Re ional Plans G��n`�e v�lle''. v g General Plan Consistency Policv PR4-1 Trails should be located The City's General Plan refers to bicycles generally as shown in Figure PR-2. in various elements contained in the plan, including the following policies: Im�lementation Measure PR4-1.1 Review development proposals for consistency with this Circulation/Transportation Element element and require easements, dedications, CT3-3 Promote non-motorized bicycle and and improvements when necessary. pedestrian circulation facilities to serve all areas of the City and linking with regional Im�lementation Measure PR4-1.2 A regional systems, with priority coordination with school, recreational trail should be established along park, transit and major public facilities. the Arroyo Grande Creek greenbelt from Strother Park to the ocean. CT3-3.1 Improve bike lanes and sidewalks serving all school,parks, and selected transit Im�lementation Measure PR4-1.3 Proposed and community facilities as priority system, trails, especially bicycle lanes which serve as including neighborhood connections in connections to schools and recreation facilities, addition to conventional streets. shall be given high priority in implementation. CT3-3.3 Update City Bikeway Plan to meet Im�lementation Measure PR4-1.4 All State guidelines to seek increase regional and established trails shall be identified by signage state funding assistance. for identification and access. CT3-4.4 Plan and prioriti.ze greenway trail Im�lementation Measure PR4-1.5 Safe street network along Arroyo Grande, Tally Ho and crossing provisions shall be incorporated into Meadow Creeks and linking with other open any trails/routes crossing major streets. space or recreational trails within the City and region. County- Bikeways Plan Efforts have been made to ensure that the CT 4 Ensure Compatibility and City's 2006 Bicycle Plan compliments the complementary relationships between the San Luis Obispo County Bikeways Plan circulation/transportation system and existing (2010 Update) adopted by the San Luis and planned land uses,promoting Obispo County Board of Supervisors. environmental objectives such as safe and un- Regional bikeway connectivity is an congested neighborhoods, energy conservation, important aspect of this Plan and linking reduction of air and noise pollution, transit, with county routes is key to providing bicycle and pedestrian friendly characteristics. access to important regional destinations. Parks and Recreation Element County- Clean Air Plan Ob�ective PR4 In order to maintain State compliance of air A network o recreational trails, bic cle quality Standards, the San Luis ObispO Air f y Agenda Item 9.a. 12 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 24 � . n ro uc ion Pollution Control District encourages the Plan must identify the ways in which the use of bicycling as an alternative to the region will meet the greenhouse gas automobile. The Clean Air Plan (2001) emissions targets outlined by the California encourages municipalities to improve Air Resources Board. One of the ways to bicycle facilities and promote bicycling. meet the greenhouse gas emissions This Bicycle Plan supports the policies of targets is to increase the bicycle mode the Clean Air Plan (2001). share. SLOCOG - Regional Transportation Plan California AB 1358—Complete Streets The San Luis Obispo Council of 2008 Governments (SLOCOG) is responsible for California Assembly Bill (AB) 1358 is preparing the Regional Transportation Plan known as the Complete Streets Bill. (RTP), a major transportation planning Effective in 2011, the bill requires revisions document for the region. This Plan to a County or City's Circulation Element to supports the policies of the RTP's Non include provisions for the accommodation Motorized Transportation Program. of all roadway users including bicyclists and pedestrians. Accommodations include California SB 375—Sustainable bikeways, sidewalks, crosswalks, and curb Communities (2009) extensions. California Senate Bill (SB) 375 requires SLOCOG to create a Sustainable California AB 32 Communities Strategy (SCS) as part of the The Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, Regional Transportation Plan. The SCS sets the 2020 greenhouse gas emissions reduction goal into law. It directs the California Air Resources Board (ARB or Board) to begin developing discrete early ' r#� 'f�. � .� •� . � .� �._r a,,,� �ti �•j�r�4 {- � ~� The pleasant year round �: �.�. � . �. _ , �'+• � t' :�•:_ -.� �� � .t,t- r �' � � � ti ' - � �~ +�-�����ti T��� ��r climate and stunning i.•'� •.� + � i '� � . � ' �' - + - � ' � ��-��� .r:�'�_� -� scenery surrounding I e� F� 1 ���J• . •__ - •� ' s ;• :� ti�' � � i4 4. �. ' � � . � �� ��'-- � ��w� ` �''���� � ��� �. ~-- . ��f� Arroyo Grande attracts - r�',rf .� �����' .. � � ' � ' �~ .�'- �`, .��'tf � ' * ,� .�,' ' - ~ }_ _ - + , � ��,r�, ��r+` T x�. �� ��-- - . many bicycle riders to � � ��r r�i 4 •... ' . ' '' r � � '.��- �''Y � �� .. ��� . _�� . J _ � _ " . � _ _ �� - _ .. -: � ��. �,�,���, ,{--� the area. •7ti � -. - _.i�`F�-�� �, 1 .�' r�. , •y � �i • _ ' f�.�Y���� �_ _ •�_._' � _ .y � .,,. F r ' ` � .'.� �f � _ ��' ������ • . ��1 1 •1 T r ■'- T '.�S r .��r�.� 1� •�J f.t��' _ ti y,�� • •4._+ N �r �` .,���� .���~• �y 'Jr�l �• ;,�` •' i� ti�.� �� }•�� r- 1 Yl� •{• � _ .� �� � .' •.h � - � •� •�� '' ~}. ` •ti �• Id t +�•��� �� �••' _ �'*•{ '�' f. •� � r '- •�� .� ~ti � y � '. J � _' -� ��. • � .�•• L 1 T� � L��� � � ti � T ••,p.'� .�� 1 � � � _ •f� '� 1 .�_ •J _ ..• . . '•'.���-� � . ' f ��� J ` � � � � �� ��� � � . � � {� • r*1} � - � � �+�-■��. � �ti _ � , '" � � �t ti {f�� , .�. ,' � � - ,• • - • � � � 6 - � � {� ' � � .•�7 � i. i � - � ■ � ' . � �� � z _ _ •l� - � • , • .� � � .-�� ,� � ■ r . � ��f } � �. 1 � •kr��..� -� .f ��� �� � 'i. � ' r' a -� � � . ��5�� n� � .■. ' ' _ i�� ' 1 � ` ' .� ��'' .� r . � �, '� .� r. �L ' ti � � � � � � � � � •� �ti ' •' �-� ti' � r�� a ■ V• .s � v�■ � � � ��-� _ �� � i Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 25 13 � . n ro uc ion ..�� ��� � - actions to reduce greenhouse gases while � �� _ � h ��{f� also preparing a scoping plan to identify , � ~ ' � � ' how best to reach the 2020 limit. . � r ; . ��_ • CLASS I Bikeway pro- `� �� �.: ..w��R� ;�� , ti:� 'i'� . � � vide sa e o -road o - � •� r � • � � - - - - f � � 1 .7. B�kewa Class�f�cat�ons � _ a�� ��_ � � � v portunities for bicycle _ � - . � riders of all ages. � ��� � �_� _ � '� � The following are annotated definitions for _ �� . - Bikeway Classifications as identified in the -- - .ti � - -� � � � - � Chapter 1000 of the 2012 California � � �� Highway Design Manual. :, � . _- ■ � ■� i • � • Shared Roadway (No Bikeway Designation) —A roadway that permits bicycle use but is not officially designated as a b i keway. • Class I Bikeway (Bike Path) — Provides a completely separated right-of- �" . #�=�� '�'�'.��.�� way designated for the exclusive use of � '�' ��� f ��: _ r �`�'�'.'��r � " �s+ � .�;�'� •'` s � . . . . �-� �u.r����� ���`'- bicycles and pedestrians with minimized � ��� -4. On-road, CLASS II � � cross-flows by motorists. Bikeway provide -� ��� � + �:. - �� . ,�{ _ �_. designated space for � � - --� , �� Class II Bikeway (Bike Lane) — the bic cle rider alon � ���r-����� - � ��- � y g �. medium volume/me- �� � -� Provides a restriCted right-of-way s designated for the exclusive or semi- dium traffic speed �'� � �� ��' exclusive use of bicycles with through roadways. - � -. travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited, but with vehicle parking and cross-flows by pedestrians and motorists permitted. For example, a marked lane for one-way bicycle travel on a street or highway. • Class III Bikeway (Bike Route) — Provides a right-of-way designated by On-road, CLASS III � signs or permanent markings and shared t , Bikeways do not -�;; _ with pedestrians or motorists. Non- rovide a desi nated ��' ��� � -}R ' motorized Traffic— Bicycle and � g . M space for the bicycle � �`� � -} �-•���. pedestrian component of traffic. t• i}k• � c i �, } ��y M1 - rider. Instead Class # . �:� ;� Y gJ � �`� + ��4..��• .�* { I� � . III Bikeways expect � � --:�'�����' = See Chapter 1000 of the 2012 Californ�a ,. � � . the bic cle and auto- �-��;.�� �� f ���� .. ���5�� Highway Design Manual for more detailed y �� . � � ,;. mobile to "share the � - u � �� definitions and specific design criteria. .�r � road". - - .� . - � �n�.. . Agenda Item 9.a. 14 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 26 1 I IIJ `.JQIJ.G IGI l IJIQI If\ Agenda Item 9.a. Page 27 r'�- �'� � t, •• F a . � �- . - ���. '� � • � � � . • � ��. . �� . � � � . � . : � � L _ �~ � ` '. ' 7 . '■ � � ■ ■ ■ _ � ■� ■ ' ■ ■ - y � 4 • � � � . . � . � �L ` J � 1 f 1� � � � + 1 ��. + .' C � ■� ■ ■ -�� � - �- ti . . � '• , , . _ _- r . . . . . ■ J � r ■ � ' 1 �� � , ' � ■ r ■ 1■ ■ ■ � - � ' �1 � ' 1 . � '_�■ ■ � Z � , ■ �'i ■ � ' ' 1�'����� 1�■■ � �� � � � ' ■ .� ' � . � �� � J ' � ■ �. .. � • � � � ��� �� .�� ■ �� ` : � �_■ ■� ■ti_�} tir� ' L � _ - .� 'r � . � . - �� . � � � ��r� � � ■ � ■ ■ ■■� � ■ � - '� 7 � � � I � - � . ■ ' ■ -■= �� - � - ! ■ � � � 1 ■' . ■ ■ ■ ■ _ � � ■�� '� . � •-� ■ �■ � ,�■ ' ' ■ ��� ■■ rti ■ ■ �i �r � � � r - . ` - , , •. r . �' � � t' . _ . ..J . ',�' • ' � � �' . �-' " 1� ' � T� , . � • - • r _ � ' � � �� .� . ti�� � � . r � •. _ � � � t - � - � , �� �, �. � . i , _ . ,� . � . � � �. _ . - - � � � , . , , � r � �- ._ . . � _ � __ . � . � . . - < < . w � - ■ � - �i ~ . . . . J ~ 1 . - ■ ■ � r 7 . � � ., � F - � . . . � - i � � . � • J � � � - -�� �� 1 � � • � � � � ■ • � : 1 D ° 0 . . . . . � �-, Residential areas are varied throughout the 2.1 Land Use / Physical city, and range from small lot home sites . laid out in a grid pattern (primarily in the Barriers western area of the city) to large suburban lots with streets located on sloping hillsides Land Use (primarily in the north east area of the Arroyo Grande's "rural heritage" and City). These two very different conditions "small town" character has fostered a present challenges to biking and walking managed growth philosophy where because of either narrow streets (limited citizens are encouraged to participate in opportunity for bike lanes) and/or steep various levels of government. Mixed-use streets in hillside areas. development is encouraged throughout the city with several mixed-use zoning As illustrated on Figure 2, Existing designations and specific plans. Unique General Plan Land Use, the City is city resources, such as the historic located on either side of US Highway 101 Village, Community Hospital, and has limited crossing points. neighborhood schools, Rancho Grande Park, Strother Park, and the Soto Sports Street Conditions Complex provide bicycle and walking From a biking point of view, the physical opportunities to shopping and recreation condition of streets in the city is adequate. destinations. In addition, the City's The City has a pavement management employment centers on East Grand program and regularly makes repairs as Avenue, West Branch Street, and needed. Halcyon Road provide employment, shopping, and service destinations within pn streets designated as bike lanes and walking and biking distance of many bike routes it was noted that some lane residents. markings are narrower than CA MUTCD standards (primarily a factor of limited right Agenda Item 9.a. City of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 page 2g �7 � � � � . xis i n on i ions -of-way or pavement area), and regular there are opportunities for improvement. markings/signage could be improved. The ITS study focused on key intersections throughout the City and suggested Pavement narrowness appeared to be the recommendations that could improve the biggest obstacle to improving streets with pedestrian safety crossing large streets Class II Bike Lanes and may only be with many lanes of traffic. As mentioned accomplished through narrowing travel earlier in this document, the 2012 Update lanes/parking lanes, or eliminating to the Circulation Element is expected to parking. It should be noted that as of the address pedestrian issues in more detail. writing of this Master Plan, the City was embarking on an update of the Circulation Physical Barriers Element that will include identification of Since the first preparation of the Bicycle roadways that might be reduced in lane Master Plan in 2006 the City has not width and made more "Complete" as a physically changed a great deal. And, street for pedestrians and bicycles. although there have been some improvements to bicycle/ pedestrian Sidewalks are also adequate for facilities, the City still faces many pedestrians in most parts of the city. challenges. However, as noted in a Pedestrian Safety Review conducted by ITS Berkeley in Two of the biggest obstacles to 2010, and from comments received by pedestrians and bicyclists are how to residents who live near the Village area, safely cross US Highway 101 and/or Y�r �. 'h 1 �• �.. � ' ..ri � �- �� I . ,' r ti �� '�. I� ~ ' r � • .1•I• � I .j 1 . �� �� . � � ��i ti , � �4y. Limited roadway � �. � ��. � � �r �� ti - - CYOSSl12gS Of US � _ _ _ • - r. .�., � r ' . Highway 101 are � � � �' ���� ��� ,+�+�}� . .f� + ,. � r •� `.F vr _ � . _ � . . �� r }' ���.L �. .r r� J,.� 1 z.•r '�.4 f.• �� challenging to I �• • ` � 1'� ■� 1 ��+•J r���1 r•_�`••r-+,•�"��J�1 � •.'R.'. �� � � �r•�lF • r �i' �• ���' . _ .. . _ ..::��� ���'�� Z pedestrians and �� �: -i� � J - � ��{ - r_. �� . .= �r ��� �:a rti �� _ �_ -��''�. '��. L��I wr ' � -',. bicyclists who must _ �� _ ,�� _ ,�.� - �� � •���1Ti.V_� � �. ��-�.. ,� •L .�S_++'�, �++ � r _ ... share narrow lanes or ��� � � �- W� -—-" . � J�� . . ��� limited sidewalk access. �-� -�–- , . . . �� �� . Agenda Item 9.a. 18 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 30 CITI� aF + + # ■ � � � � �����I...J Y}�r��y �� CALIFDRNIA ,� � � ��'� �:+.. ��f ; ,.� — � .;�, �:� .., _. .. ::�;�;.��.�_ ��;r']�. ' �� ' .•#:�,., .Y ..� "a� :.�'_, r�� �,� ��:, .. .�.=. ��. �. � '�:'�'.�. ;��. ��i�'f . • :. '. . ",.. M,� �.' t ';;� ..`� ,+a' r",�; '^� l,��:.,:_;;��: ��r�.. . �� `�•f q�. . '-'�f; ,�;�:��a� :�����,,.' , , ,�.... �e . ' �-�: • �. �r, ]�r .•. _'f'• ..._.- . ,�. ,�, y 'd ? ,r� +,1 � � P ' :� !yi. `'� �L'• ,�;1.�''''l.,. .. ' � �. . p `:�•`�bt° ."�.'+.� �f;,�� ':.�;�''.'��:hv�'&.�y''r"`$..'��jy���.:•�y�..... ?:�'�J•�'. ;�. Y ,�. . - " , , d ' '�Y:J a v���'� f�•e �.'� ,'p'�� � � - • `,.F .. . , i, r ..M1'•.;: ,. ri,��-��:'.�,'.�,'�.� .�..,�5;. �k.s� ' :�.. �•.'�' . . ���'� ����. I �'.�.. '��.i,�� , pf��F.��'.• '.1� „r ��• �F.fE�N' I"f�•. � .'.]��!"� .4�. y' _3. y.,���''���' 3 .7U-, ��� , �. , r-:.:•.� . �h_ . . I�.�A'�v.�u•• . ��. ,i . �•�.,�.^• � � ,'� `'ti. I.�K;'v � �. � _ .�. ��, :�.�.;.� *F. . . . �:�...:_.r'��:�x�:•.. �{��• ■ � ���.j.'�.'t, �'�i f �,^'"'�.°�,�. . '..'�.b �. b,�y ..�� ..-• ' N . �y 0.r�.r.-�'; . � .. � �'�°r>�'an�.�'..�• :d,�.:�'�� FS..; '� .i . ,�. 9�- � ���i'��h;;- .�'a �r a' . ��.:: ��.��t t � .., .L� �• �• � :i', . '�u� ay �Ja�:.,''`a '�:-i�.. t�.. . �i�A�.ai�.*'''Y . .. �•.�jp:�}� "�?R�;_ . a�±)��•'�. �.;N tit�. � � �a � � .:���'. '�,�"�` r .F:,n} �� r�, ��3�>���'�'����• °'�;�...,��: . y��. �.r�� � A • a �" "�� : . . p.•;.�.r� ;��sw -� �r€ � �;R' ��'� �,fi��' ' . �.. .'..''�'� . -... �, •.� ��y��� a�•.3 ��'�`'�... , .;� � �r•.�.. .,�s y._��i ,i� .-.�';:� � d.,.;�; ,.. '+x v�:�.� , .. ; ,V . � . :�'•��- . . :r�::. . �� . . �.'3...�`�, e � k•. . �� 1:. _ , ,,, , s. �• v p' , ,� ,-r--. � • +.'� 'y�' '� - � a 1��. .,=�;�(� �=.s�, ' . ,,�•, d� .•"�;� . '.3::I , , �, �:' �'� 'F,r i�r. !•�fiF'r�', � . � � •� s �:.� �� I.� � + a� . � ..� + '1��.��;'�'.r,:.,: ,.�• � '"'� � , �. �1 _....._ ,- , ;;;�,;��'::,;,�a r ea � ��I�� i a�'� � .''�''"'���. :: r3,,, « � , s`-. I . 't. � '�� . . . _ • /�'�� ,�� •s . yh�+ .�] '�e ' . �� - �'/ � •.►. 5� � � �?,�'.��i';ii 4:.. 0 . , ' • �.•`.-� ..�}�`r s:��`�,'r .. � � . .. . , r'.s.i- ':��.?� ► ��� t I� . �. ?� ".• ..�r � . � � ���; a1:' . :._. _ . ._ � .4'. `r' 7 '. a �.' ..l � , .'.� � -i�'•'�� ?��. .. c; _ ,r ,:.., ; . �• w � � + .+�µyry..:�- ''• .:��i3���.".�.1�,'.��r•��� . - ���'.:�.V�� ��,�.. � .. ..' . . t�:�.:��. . .. _ � {..y�:-.T�r�` ��� . .. .. � �� .,... . ,ti .�.. _ •J`R�a�a ,�`n� e•Y �e .. .-"..���y� .. -, ,� �.�}:ty, '�:y�' � , ..,..�.w � y�- ^, � � :1- y �Y\` ', �'` '� i � 3 t �\ay„p �J..,�: � � �� `1 � t � � ��. ;. a ��{, � �.' .f ■ . '.,��- , , . , -�.} ti,-y. F�'�L.Y. � �� ��. ,��� . � .. ...s,. - A rk�v1�R,.�gr� .�-2.t � r^i..'��" . Ya:. -.j';��:i�:�i; � .r�. � �� � �"��� �� �a �'..%a` �.� -. �e �e'�i;'�=i�� .. - �..�� +�,� .. ;'r ! ' . �'l S � �'���.' :e,. .� Yr � �� ��h ,.7.�r�� ■ -." � F S�, "� �•�:. f !,/. - , 7 � + - ,r+ v. � � b. .� `_��.. _ �� F•: _ - _ _�Y��.:•��l_� � , _ �:. � h �C�'�`��� . _�'���.�: ~ ::;R w o; �:. . � r.�.3 1 �� '�.��. . �._ni o�i,c�b ' � 'v:. , . � _ . ��S y l.� -`f•� � �� �� ��' ':4': �� �•'- ��' � _.... � ;_._�- � �_ --,; � "±� � + J .�- �• • p4� "'k' _ /' , �r • � ` .;� ��' � � k� . , . !1'�V� ' �'� 4 � i• e. ' � '''J .�7�F.1 • sr ' + . ,^ -a��`�`.`.F• "ti' •n�'y _ _;. �. � . ti�rF ,� wr.`:..;..,w... ,� . „ .. � .`�• � �.. {� FA� .� , _. �` . ' -., �' �y'.'..',. J � �s � �...:� '� l^;�� '• / ...�. ' ' ..�`'- ; F.�•i 'if. � T•: , .�,.. ;��... ^�Lj � �:� o,��.. .:, � ;�:, � �� '� -� ' `��..,. ..1 r` . .w...� ,�x.. ;,� � �� ��F:sy'"; • ...__.� ..( .. . „r•-'�-t..:t�•.i�_ .�.. ��f�'�' . + �i. .�i�'�I:'i�.... fr?,w 1 _'�1 _�,=�:..�:�� / a !r.�!;;�•,�y �� `�r'.E� a `r� � . . � . r` �' �e'. '� �} ■, � � �� '�I. ���l-:T.• ` �---- .n: '•i� �`r a -.�. ��"'+;' 'J�� •_:,. '-`"� � � r� _ '-�. -.� '����-' 1 � � � ._..� !�� ' �� i� �` - _ -;' � ��,ti,...��{ �1� �- � r� •� . .._._ '€ �.-tt- „-." "*' " - . : :.� .�"� �"��'=�r`t � '3. .,• .. _ - � L. � . ��•Y�.. �.�{�yYr��'. . . . � �r�� }�' .�r a �:` �� :��r- �•:.� '�.�h. . • � .F4��.''. �. .r. . "'��...�,�"�� ..�•_., r . •• . ..- ■■ . �.:tl ..,.h.. . �' +�' 1 04� , fi.. ���3'��' ..� .':.t:�� _ a`��' � �. •���. ��.. �::;� •- � e. .. :� �.� �r�-::. - . c • ,y . / . '�y't��r��'_` ,.' ..: j P z , y f �� =,..m}_,._n,[��;� � � . .. .• ..5':.�i�}.::.��•��� ' .,c3... "•tn....�� '�� E d ..� . . �'� ..• . �� .:fi.� � � ��i'3,r:�1�1�'_,�,•.L.:µ''' ,i yR .: - - . �"'ti. � � • - ..9�.ra, ..._.�.._ �� . -�.;� . ? � ,�'�: • •�; � . . � . ,:.,....�, � - --}'- \. � �r _ -..... }s �� �.~ •� � f � '°�� a� �._.._ , � .-M:__ � ' �-� �•�1�� �. r - F � ``'` .` � � .�_+ r` ,` � , : _ . .` �n � - ..,� �,�_ _ �-� �4-'_� 1 � � � :,� �, '.j - , , _ . . ,. - :, �•. k ,�y. . .. ' . + .� ,�..; ■ , �•• 'h •.._.. 1����� . • ..m.... �. ' ' - �._., •�������� .��� .,-� =��■ �01� .,"'�'a_�° � � x�: • . .� �' � ��..4 �� :;,;�' . ..n � � .. . , �.� •�� F � � � � � � .��J.` 'r'` �:..." ■�ti_.__ r ..._. � 'r *� ,� .�... � ',r��rr� ._ .. ��i�;�r, , / � ��.'f' ' i� , �: x N c y_,� ? �..� r -y:��• • r �'�� �g!ir� ....-, `�� «;,�� 'tr' � �, , � ... ;�� � ... �� - r���� -1.:,'y . '^,;...� :y�:.�'ki�.`.v � f'L - -� ;a.'�' ,• . - --- 1 J _..._ # . � .re�',,��±.r'���'.. ,.•�:.• _ :� , � :7: ' �: 1 �' .� � ,• ;�� �»�. �; .}._ � ,-:,a:. + �.,� . �; ♦ •„ "':^`' 1r� �i�. �y t�w:y'. ' � � s•sr:!Rr�r'rd... . ..._.-. �r���� � �`+��■ � f l�`1:b�.�.p�� y�f !�p�:d��;':. 1' � - '.,��.�a��': . _ _.�~�...... -�f s� ti r� �AA �_ �,. L $... � � ... : .�' =.'�i`�_x zs, 1 . . `.. ��'.•:k, . � P�'�� f • '�: ! r �`' . �k�'•�"`!�� ,,.. �:�_;;%k.��: 1 ......,.... _� : �' � ' ..... i' _.�„:,. s ..��" ■■ r:�� �'.P •:�` � �� .�r.s;u�.� z �r����r�� '.. Y-- � ":. . �r� . rd Y ,. , .�,... ...._ .. ��, ...�'.�:.:='.' . �'►■ °�,-.�'+'_�, . . + .� . � �'�5�.; .� �.� H" 's::�'... � � �''r ,��'.�."_ _ � M.__ .._.. ,... --�' :'.:��' i's':. � i �a •i;�` • •w �' ,`�� n �-...�-:�,�„. ■ � oi' � "'� ....__ �'/ . �7y���:� �l � �h! ' 'r �...._.- 'r. . ._.-'�Y�',:i.'""i,'�--:,a�i. ' •.�m_'''-A�•'. .. . .� '�7r . � � _F . . ..' I ^ ._... . - ',� �i:':'.:+i�.�.>'�yz�':.+�^,.�r.V .� n _ �y�:�!S%75�:�:'..�;3;�r�x°.� � � � I'+1'•� �...., ..._._._ w.'��a$.�.:'i.i.:�.��,���c; . e.c ' '�;s:..:•.,}.�y, H°?`� .w...- . T.��-i:•.+.��••;:':�::'� . r,. . . �.� -�.�.:,. �,,, ; '�. r��r;•,:'*•s:�:i.�:•i•., r. - .� ,._... . -`�, ...J�;�.�r`t�,C?::'�?._.i"y c.�i.�.�l!i'.�''�}.�r s`���,� 4�. r_'�'f� :.'�in!i5�:�"'{':?;�y i .. �.y'';„�. 'r ts� S _ - .. -•. ...�.,� ~�'i ......� ' '�:'-.'. � �.'' � .. ����;.- -'a'A��" � �.v': : ,.�+_ . .L' ��'•y . . 1... _...._ . s � -.`��� . r��' ;�"s -::':��. ;��ti. ..: ��t�:.. _ �,• m,. �`,��,s. •�.,, ....- ..- ,i:�(. I � .: ,'.�=c,� �,��,•�� � .'�+�ii�{5e�...�. .....�. .. � 1.ew-.. �J .. ����* d� p�_. .: a-�,., ..� Land Use Gategories 0 5FR Very Low Density � IUIFR IUledium-High❑ensity�Village Core Land Use���rlays -Agriculture u 5FR Law Density - MFR High Density �Office Professianal �_Conservatianl0pen Space -Canservatian[7pen Space u 5FR Law-IIlledium Density- IUIFR Very High aensity -Regional Cammercial�Specific plan �Community Facilities �5FR 1111edium❑ensity � IUlixed-LJse �Neighborhood Plan �Planned❑evelapment �Planned De�elopme�t(C1�5} � . 11. '1 r 1�' �f� N Figure 2: General Plan Land Use Patterns Agenda Item 9.a. Page 31 � � � � . xis i n on i ions Arroyo Grande Creek. Currently, the only crossings of US 101 are at: Unfortunately, widening of these bridges/ under crossings for bicycles and • Oak Park Boulevard (bridge) pedestrians is cost prohibitive unless • Brisco Road (under crossing) driven by a needed to correct an auto- • East Grand Ave./East Branch St. centric issue. Consequently, an exclusive (bridge) bicycle/ pedestrian crossing may be the • Fair Oaks Ave. (bridge) only answer to provide a safe crossing of Highway 101. Similarly, the only crossings of Arroyo Grande creek are bridges at: 2.2 Existing Bicycle and • Mason street Trai Is Faci I ities • Bridge Street The current bicycle and trail network • Traffic Way consists mainly of on-street facilities that • Fair Oaks Avenue are identified as Class II and Class III bikeways. These facilities are identified in In each of the crossings the age of the Figure 3, Existing Bicycle and Trail facility is indicative of a structure that was Facilities. constructed when traffic volumes were less and street standards were different. . +: .� �� � _� ,. � �� � �r • �� �•#� '� � •� r . .' r ', . 1� �' * •} r r ti ti +� ' r r.� � . � �� � • � ; r '� -� . F � .'r r � •��i',' i . •� •�• F�� .�� y�� ��' .,�• i ,� ��� �r •— . 5 ' •r• � -r � � � � �� � �,_ '' � F .�.. ' { S4! � r. �. } �� � �x�'����C��� ' - # �• ���'• • " �� r r . �i . 1 � yR.• � • _ • • '�• �� �• •� -r � • � � � r ��� t -�`�r. � .t , � �,��i� r.�w� �r � .. •'s�'4� �N �' ti•'_•���,• �_ —,r•� - r�•:� � ��� � + .� �f . �� • r •� Most of the existing -�� � � �; �� ... � ����� � -•� . � __�� _ � � =Y ��{' �� � _ � � r _ �' '�,T ___ ___ '_ bic cle acilities in the � � '�`��" _ - � � � ' � '��� � _ .`���� � � � � J' f �_ �� . ..� , .� � � - � r , � • �� � I� ■ �� �•� r�i R. r.• �• �� ��.�' n •.� � � ' �• ,_ •�� �� city consist of Class II "� � 1 ����,�. � 1 ��k �� ` p• . 1 �•'� �r 5 • F .. . � � � '• .,' �� Bike Lanes. �' � •- • ' J �''� �+ ��� ' • � •����� �-� . �;- � - � ,.� . • ,.�i , ■ �� y . � , • �r���� . _.r _ � -�� s��s 3r£a��i,�r� � i�.,.����� . , • �1_ �.. � . �.• •r'�1��_ ��5���' ��1-.� 4 � � �4 � �� � �• �� ` � ' �' � �f ri' . r . . �r: -_ - �� - __ . _ • T � - T � � � . ' ' �� � � � � �� ��r ' . � j � -' �' ' • � � � 1 � �� � . . �� � � j r• � ' � - - f � _' � �•• • �' '• • � + �r _ _ �j T� • L � T•� • �� ' f S •� '� �. ' r i� � r.r� �_ __..�• - � �, � � � ..� ..�� . � � - � - �r _�.����Y r■ — Agenda Item 9.a. 20 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 32 � � � � . xis in on i ions ' _�J„Sr • :r +' .���, '' r. a�� ;.ti Jf Y {•f�N�� • �r' '' *• I�� ' � ��y� _ �_ •�' � . .� �'��'.�..'��,��f.,'-.�.�P`;� . ' . Y � �•, � ti �}F •ti '�' r�. r� .�■ � �1���•'ti••• •� h �q ti � L ti ��� • i ��ti�� �r- '' �i' �• '.���� �+}�`� .�.• ? i� .r �*.� r T•r, "��-•'- a� �� _ f � • '�• ��}.- ���� �ti f� , �• , �•� L�- t � . .� �l.�.r ti;,�J' ��r • . •�. �,� .;� � �� . , •. '���,. 1.: +�.. + .'� �_ '� fi '�y' }'�ti . , 5{�� � . �' r .�:.��u�•� , � . � •�4 = �� � .�� � � .i� _ �' 5 ''��� � ����.., '�.i' tiv •,r'7'r�r �� �{�_ �,t. .-'1: �`� . i•��;� ��• - r . ti._ , r: �•� 1 •r� 1�� -r• = •.! '� � ��i'.�y. •r r�. }. _ _ti � r• Ir ' �� I�._ � �, �f' �•- �, �r 1 � ti_ ` r rr .•. J '}r �r� 'i r. -�:5f ,,,ti. � v _� .�. '�- : •'i I •r�{T �4' , +�}'����• ,f� �4 r• �� � - r -�� 4 .�• ���� j�il � � ' { r � �.�� +•�' �� i r • ' � .�1 1 � � 1�. F�` : • .Y.',. �;i :r�: � �ti �• •�d:• 1•, 4�, � � � .�+� _ r•�• •;A •I � - � �••1�•y �r� �� •i �� � + .1 �4 1 �•�r �+ •J •,5�L i�7 • ��� ���� • �� . _� �l ...•#: .r' .� .� . �' i L: 1. � � �' � • � L� • _ •�.f� � � J.�L -•��' •J y �.��� ., i� � ti� ':r �����"�s ,�� � .ti ��r�-r.. '-' 'r r��.r� ,��-���A �f �-� ,. Deferred maintenance .} � .�. • � � � � '.h�� '� �„�� a• •4a�' � � ti �1 ��,���I . � y. � :}� - �:� � � �,{� � ' �'� _ �, ���� v r. ' � _ was observed along �Tti 7 h �.} '1 '� - �- ��+�•. ��ti1�,.,• � � -F—� 4. +• ; � _ e� L `4 _ � ��• '���` ' � open space trails �• + I~ ��• �' • -��•� �'�� � �■� .4 +�_�� •�� ���- * -�.����;��;��*. �'.,..;�:.�� �:�=�-�;����y� - �..��� � �� ��.`�-- located throughout the � � ��� �. '�y.�ti�4�-��. .'T�: ''�, . :ti� �'� • �� � •ti � ti � 1r • i L �fT'�+� ;Y_ • _.� ��� •-•k 1s � r � ��.� . .�-0 ' �+ �) �•.� •a ��� •` i'*I• •a •��,' y • � '-���- 1_ ' ��•�� i_ �- � li�I�V• .• � .� �_� r� ✓ � .�'ri.• �,�� � +7'ti• • � r j. �{' .,r 7 ��_ _ R�� � . .� _ �w •� '-r=.��. •• � � .• .�L .'�� 1,. 1. ' '1 �. r ���l�,i . ��_ . .— � { � •'} •tr '+ ��.�y.' r Y�:� �.r �� �y• •'�ti 1� •T� • •�• u � ' � :i � � ,T'•~_ •�• _ �'�_�- L~• _�r•�' � ` a -�. r� ���� ��5 ��� � � '-''��. . _ � i ��7i�•�` �r• � f .. � -' Y�r�•��.+ . .•-•- a_ r, - �� .. ' .. _ r� ` •L � �� 1� ' �r r��� — _ � • • �•� ` ' • � '' '. � �- � F���� , •�{.�:�. _ �,,•���..f �'tir'�5:�±{� � . _.. .� .�� 7�.���y��-. � �• ��r 7 �, • r 1�+�ry _ ��' • , �r-�:'�ti vl� 1 }�,��{ - 'r�r�4i ��T`S �n,y�_� .1. � . . � .�. 1 •. �� . �� '� �5'•�. .� �� 1 1��� T . � •1� �• � •a.��{— •� �r �. �•�L�'. _!1 • ._�,Z�������=i.� � �1* . i� ti y■� � •Y `� , •�• 7 Y• .i 1 � '� Z! .�� .'..� . �. �`ti �J�r.}��.• '�• � - J 1 r� •.� , ' •'�F'Ir���~•t. •�•�• � •• �*•���•' � -• — � -r. `.�i` 1 y .�_�'.�.T�� �ry.. _� �ti��� a.��' 'r. ' �'•�T`� ]�. .�� i . ti 4 . � �� �• - y �- �J a}ti=�y��y� +�Z . � � . • �• . �' � .•_. . }�.' 1� �..� '•�� �`' ,'�� 7 1 ..Y r r��t . • � — .r.Y? �'' • �; r• . • '�,�4. � — - • ,� .•. _-,�.1r. y ti. � � � i + • — - �ti. ����� t� • �������•�. 1- . 1�`k, � = •��1 5� ��� il� ; i . . . .�L]{��'•y', �L�.�'� •�■ � T�-� r- _' •�I��• , �, r , � •� � '_.. _ �� 5�_.� _: -_ , . ., r �� - .. ` ' � • � ���' '' � �...�. Ly .� �• � - - �1� �j f � i�. Y �,�-� � - � - • ' _�• � --�,,�; �• - - ti � S•• � �. .. , _ r �-� •ti. �1. L 4• •i. '•+ �,'�_ • -��._�� •� r••��-�tiL � ��{ r- � � a _ , a— � ti .' a�?'�'�r���'��}� F� ~' T � � r 'r'-_ � - _� • � ti• � �'� y�r-�� � � �. • � •' ..�{xa�•4.���••� �. 1�. r� . r •• �� � - +� �•t L t � - T . . �� •L� � _� � ��. . a�r - � � � {... 1 i r �y' 1 ` r �y • :. ti� '���. { —� Y _ �a��t r �'� �_� ' , � �:`�j'{_�• i�l-..���'3d[ a,��.}'ti �i.;�� ES�,r �_ �����-�,•.i _ �� ; ''�- Bicycle Facilities Circulation Element will include studying Since the preparation of the 1 st Bicycle the opportunity to reduce traffic and/or Master Plan in 2006, the City has funded parking lanes in order to increase, and/or specific improvements as recommended add bike lanes per CA MUTCD standards. by the priorities set in that Plan.Although these improvements helped to fill gaps in Off-Street Trails the system, the existing bikeway network is As illustrated on Figure 3, Existing Bicycle still somewhat disjointed and inadequately and Trails Facilities Plan, the city has short signed /striped in most of the city. It should segments of off-street trails typically also be noted that many of the identified consisting of soft surface (decomposed Class II bikeways are "non-standard" per granite) materials. The trails are typically the CA MUTCD. In most cases the striped/ situated in open space along a creek marked area is narrower (4-ft. vs. 5-ft.) tributary. The two exceptions are trails than required per standard. It is our located along Equestrian Way and Grace understanding that the City's intent was to Lane which are decomposed granite paths improve the awareness to motorists of located behind the curb. bicyclists sharing the road, and that providing a narrower stripped area The trails associated with the open space designated as a bike lane would provide an are in various states of disrepair and show added level of safety in the roadway for the signs of deferred maintenance. bicyclist.As noted earlier, the update of the Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 33 21 � � � � . xis i n on i ions ���.� � n�� �_-�.-=bz��r��s��x n .''.�1m-.e.�F.... '. � .. O��¢� � 5L0 Cvunty CoLMy Class III �—._Cuii�iedlon `~� � 5L�County �� 7 � pn' �7 � �Ra � • � p County Claes III Curn�w�u�� County Class II �a� � Conneccon $���'OGI1t}I �� ♦ Q`� I Qa`� 227 SLa Caurrty r � rW�� � �a. Posent�al D Ro��ro� �� i� appoAunity �ra �rpC~ ����yay m �m..� p�,S' C S N�„H�a Eq'� �,,l�`� °' C�o �moei �V4 �� A�i� �0 � �a� ��a � city of Pismo Seoch Ra�ho* � 5LQ Caunty ` ���aa PaN; k� �� Tena de p��y� � oro Per� � � '�� CouMy Class II �— �,4�� ��@S. $� Co��necl�an — ��1 � �� ��y � � c.s.aas�u � Ca�4G � '� L_� ca,�e���� j ;, � —�� � � 227 � �' Frve cnies C ta� � � ,w,�R� Swmer F/ � C'- .r r� Pe� , i � ��I`°Ra � �� Nuasna Rd � courny cises ni . ��nn nedion � II� �/j! 5t.Pau�xs S1L��i1,��= �.a �-°Sp� scnooi ['it4 : �.e.ciass u fVe rd�h ch St• � c�,�a�b� wPQrt Ave. �h R E.gran ,� q�unray Pa�mi�a CG � TMo uiddla Schaal {'� � Vaiiey Viaw V���g��� � e� ncaoemy m �o�a�w� F�t�� (��'� Y Flemen}a �o„«,�m�. ca ry �a ih'omors G�� v��age� � � [�5�`O � � ■�I.ih 227 � �rean � � _ a ,� � 101 � � ' G�9�Claes I� � � p P� c�,��b� �E.Grand Ave. � o"�� ,�, F ie� @ Sfation q � � * y�. r���h Mrl��qa �s G❑er Beoch � ���� � Gta�a Pv� # �� Grgi�� ��b��g �• �y �" Ra �r'i � � � � yg mGardens � .�a�y. �� QP��, �a.t x I p .Performing Arts ♦ 5L0 Counh� Center `r �.a.ci�88 ii E± �L �. + °°^^e�°^ �`'�. Ash 5t. s � d� � Pa�r�c�� ■ @ Chrisuan Schod EYn Slreat � '�A Arroyo Grantle .� 1 Solo Spals Pa�k f'� Hgh ScMed r Cvmplax ��om � Lighthousa � Co�lw� � cnrietian schooi �81�da{CS AV�. c::ommuniry . HaS0i121 � *� �� • M.Harloe 1�� 6.B.CIass I �arroll A�e. E'�"1e11a" Connedion ����� cy N • -� � m � a m w •c �* SLa Caunty Y ui ° • � a �� Q wuWiu��� +� � Y Nn�fh Ornwnn Park �� � Elamenlary — ti.�.�J�zz n �� co��adb� - The Pike —�«���`� 1 NQRTH 1 ❑ soo i�oo imo iea� Qceano ,.T. LE�E N D SCALE:1"=6pp �� Psrtt Ex15TING BIKE BQULEVAR� i SCNQQL DESTINATIQN 5L0 County ■ P�INTS�F INTEREST � EXISTING CLAS5111 � EXISTING�BIKE PAR4CING E?CISTING CLASS II � EXISTING PARK&RI�E EXISTING CLASS I ❑ EXISTING TRAN5IT STDP (bikes allowed} EXISTING DEG�MPflSEO GRANITE PATH .: CITY aF � PLIBLIC RESTRQQMS -- - -� �ity of A ayo �r�nde . � � ' �L E & T RA I LS MA�T E R P LA N REGIONAL CONNECTIaNS ,��,�� �`� �4.�+fCALIF�RNIA W��' Uqdate �012 ` `�'=.- - "� `"' -- ' ---_____ �.--�- Agenda Item 9.a. Figure 3: Existing Bicycle and Trail Facilities Page 34 � � � � . xis in on i ions Table 2.1: Existing Bicycle Way Facilities Street From To Class The Pike City Limit South Halcyon II Oak Park Boulevard Pike Road Blackberry Avenue. II Oak Park Boulevard Newport Avenue Atlantic City Avenue II Fair Oaks Ave South Elm Valley Road II East Grand Ave Oak Park Boulevard EI Camino Real II * EI Camino Real Oak Park Boulevard Cornwall Avenue II West Branch Street Oak Park Boulevard Vernon Street II Farroll Ave. Oak Park South Elm II James Way Oak Park Boulevard Tally Ho Road II Rancho Parkway James Way West Branch Street II Camino Mercado Rancho Parkway West Branch Street III Traffic Way West Branch Street East Cherry Avenue II Bridge Street East Branch Street Traffic Way III Valley Road Fair Oaks End of High School II Valley Road End of High School Sunrise Terrace III Valley Road Sunrise Terrace City Limit II Orchard Road Pilgrim Way Castillo Del Mar II High School Property Castillo Del Mar Valley Road I Husana Road Corbett Canyon Road Strother Park II �Note:East Grande Avenue is currently signed/marked as a Class ll bike Lane. However, the width of the existing lanes do not meet current CA Highway Design Manual Standards. r ��� f � � � �� � • � � y•r �� . { �, Many heavily trafficked � 4 � � _,. � ; streets in the city are � �,, narrow and do not .�.. . �� �'.� � �a � rovide ade uate s ace � � � .� , - � q � . �� �r • , . ,�, ,.. ; for bike lanes. � ; � , . � -��, � r��..�'�� � �, � ��� - _ } �:� �� ,, � � , � t �� r ti ,�'�+� � � k�. -F :' � * • � � � 1� •� � �'. :'+.� � "��� a ■� � �� •� . � �� �`• „ 7Y.��r�•������•� � � � ' ' � � ��� _ ' r _ �- _ ��� _ � � ___ _ �� _ �, � . , --- � �'. ,, ��� + _ -- .� � - - � - _ �ti. _ �• '� � � • � f���1 • • � � , _ ,� � . . ; �f; �ti. ��, , ' �S _ _ �t• •�. �•rs •r -- -_- -- ��� - -- � ti � ' *� i I Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 35 23 � � � � . xis i n on i ions Bicycle Parking Bus Transit Existing bicycle parking is located Bus service in Arroyo Grande is provided throughout the city at retail centers, parks, by the Regional Transit Authority (RTA), schools, most employment centers, and and serves destinations throughout San scattered throughout the Village area. Luis Obispo County and Santa Maria. The RTA has three bus stop locations in the Park and Ride Lots City: Currently, there are two park and ride facilities located in Arroyo Grande. One is • EI Camino Road near North Halcyon located on EI Camino Real near North Road Halcyon Road and is associated with a • East Grand and South Elm regional bus stop. The other lot shares the • East Branch Street at Mason Wal-Mart parking lot where 26-spaces are designated for park and ride use. Each of Only the EI Camino Real stop provides these facilities is located along a Class II bicycle parking or bicycle lockers. bicycle facility. However, neither facility However, all RTA buses can accommodate provides bicycle parking or bicycle lockers. transportation for six (6) bicycles on a first come, first serve basis. Several South County Area Transit (SCAT) routes connect local destinations. It was also noted that the bus stop on East Branch in front of City Hall is not HC accessible from the curb. The curb is painted for loading and unloading, but there is not sufficient room for a bus to ��''�� '� �:t ,� �; 1 4;x.- � . -� _; � � .r•� -� �� � ' -ti �� , � . J - � ' . � _ '� r� � � �• ' � f,�' � •1� . � 'r� • 4 _ � � �. Y � _ � ti. . r rti �� � �i ' • . ��- . �� .r'� �; _ � �.zti � '� �i' 7'�'�• F- � r • '�-1�_� � �� �T{ ' ti . � r� fr ' ' ■' �" �� �ti. 1 �.�� . ,- � �. � 1 �rf �� � � �� • �� �" y �' 1 The County RTA service — ��' ' . . •� Arroyo Grande with _ . i � buses that can _ . �. � j ` .� �C'�r;;:, :�� � accommodate bicycles. � . , • , _ ' , � - - � ��y:' � Y' � � . V •� ��L � � 1 �� �ti� � �� �� 1 J� • .� �� •� �� � � � � � -- — �r}"'''r��_f�F� - - . - . _ . . - . .� ��� ��� �1�.i. ' � � Agenda Item 9.a. 24 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 36 F- -+�- -�•- �� � - � �F �v-�+ - - -�'T �� _ -- � � �. �a � ~ � � � �' �� � � � ,• i��'� � �� 7 � 4' 'J 1 i ■ - � � . • ' � 7 •Y �• ■ _ • 'r ' 1 y�, . • •• ' � ti J , _�y +�� • .. _.. ! �� , y ��.��__■, � _ _• � 1� f � T,.� �.�����,.� ' .� ` x - ' '�. .i .�1 � T �� ��r � r ' � � � � � �' ' q ' ■ . • � � � ' � ��+ �ti,� x� �.y �� �,' ��, � �� . _ ��� � ti. �+� .+� ��f� ti ti!' �'���, � � � � � � � � . � � r ■ �� � �a � ■ �r , r � r# � � �~ � ��,� Bike clubs from around M . �•�'' � '� L ti 1 � � ' r �� �� ' � ��`f�� � � � ��� ' � . � ` the region regularly � � k � � �. � . . . � ,. — � . _�� { ��ti�� organize rides that �-� ��� . . . � _: � transit through Arroyo � �� ��t � _ �� � � Grande. ;I� � _ , � '� �� , f � . � � � , f � � �f�� . .��y. ' � r � 'f r - �. . � � ' � `■ L * -F�*� �R }F+ •`� � � ~ 1 7 r _ � � L ' � 5" � •� • � •+ • ' �. � �� � � ` � � � � � , I , �� �1 F j I 1� I � �- � - ti � - � � y . � . �� ' . � � � , � , � �� � ' y �� y i • � T � � ! � � .+ =�� � �� � � � � � � � ' � _ . � � . w� � � T �' . - . ' , ti°�� �; . _.-. ._ Td .� .. . * � •`� l . • • � r ' ''� _ '_���,r _ _ ��i� � �� .ti �• - - -� �_--�. maneuver close enough to lower its Bike Club Routes automated ramp to the sidewalk. There are many bike clubs throughout San Luis Obispo County that regularly organize Related Bikeway Master Plans bicycle rides, including routes that transit The County of San Luis Obispo completed streets in Arroyo Grande. Many of these an update of their Bike Master Plan in rides consist of large numbers of bicyclists November 2010. The City of Grover Beach riding in close proximity to one another - completed their Bicycle Master Plan in the peloton. January 2011. The City of Pismo Beach completed their Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan in June 2010. All three plans identify bicycle facility connections to Arroyo Grande. These connections are illustrated on Figure 3, Existing Bicycle and Trails Facilities. Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 37 25 ���` �'��'�� a F ��� ~ � �{ �� -�� _ , � F. .� i _ . , ��'�.� - � � ,�, � � �. - . : . ,�i .. �- � `°e� � ! if�'� , �f r �S ' - I r F l . ' "� r+ . - �� '� � 1 r � � , .55 � y���# � ��,I� } , � ' . _ " � �' S, ; ��-_ _ + � ' � ��* ` ."� � -��. �' .� .r A , ti �+ .� �- � .* �� �� - I - I� . i�� - I �� ���� �.�. { �� N -� ' { �Y .�y �' � - ��.�� �y .� .�,�.f r � �.�� �5,� �.� ��,� ; � ` i �+ �� �� i� � wM r�••�% --.� .� � �'��, ���� 4 - 4 -� � ``���� ,r,��," � �� � ♦'♦ - 1� - �,� s �� I� + � F � ��'T� '� ;� � �A�. �3�+ _ � W � � �i � �� � �, 4 y�•� � � � 4 � ' 4 r ��T * ' � ���. �s��ry . � � - � �l- � ��J' �{ y '�� ' � - ' � }�����fF �f� `� � W •�/ � ,� +� � ��} �� � L� .�• � ' �+��� ���_ � # � �� ` #.� � � _ ��� � � _ � r � ��'� �' �� , � � � _ �tt��, } t' � � �� ���� ti ' '��F+ #��. � ' II ' - �i'��ti���` '- ,'^�� � � a - �-s � � � '` - ti� �'-�y r !"''' ' � �i � . ��� ,� '�� % � .�y� � _ .� '• '�:y}��#` L f � ` 5f.� • . .� � [ � � �� �� -� �r���—� y�.��}�7 A'Fi� � f t�� ��f _ � . � � "-���, r � � � ` � _' 4 � ����� ` ! _ J *a � � � ��R��_ +� *f ��'� � � `� l •� ' � .. ,11� _ t F 4.'S �� � � `y�;_�i .,�� � 7 � � ; �� ti. � � �� ' �'# .��F _ � M! � � � r _ .Y t.,,#F'�. � .�_x� �F`y�+�� r. � 4'�ti � �; � �•�i��. . � l � -� T �+' •���* + `� ��� f� �r � , }��� r 4 i - .� r--f y F � _ �f■ - � �•41i y�f� � �F'�,� �'c�W . ` �� i ; . ' �z ` � " { • . ;�� �� �r ��' �'���:i � '�` l� ' i f ��'}{ ` _- :�� �'_ +� 4 �'- �{ '.,±.�i �*�� . 'Y� - � {s� � ��3 �� �.F ��' '�� .y� ��' ` � '��!.�+,�'L��.� ! ' ' . ' x� 'a - .�'J.f i ' � _� *5 .� - .� �+� +�.�, � � ;`�k,. •,*'*�•'�Y�������; ' '` '� � k '" � t� �� #F '� � �•� y , rti'�' ti�*'}� y���+�� f ' � _ -1 -i�,� ' ' *' �, �i � - �.#"'��� .����, �� � � i ' � .•, � � > -�y , � '�� _ ;�� *�` _ r ti ��•+k' ,� _ r � } [�+ - '�y�.� �,. � �� � y 1 '�. "+-•,i. ,'1.#�"��',,,��-'� ; � +-, �iy'' . .1- r� � �. �� �.�`��{� r � ' . f�J�Yi��'�-� � I � # . �- �� �.� � �' ,, ''��°'� '�'��..�, _ �� .',,��� y � � _ ��� i�-""yT�' _� . 'o� }�,� '�`� � . ' r ' 4 'Y.�� � ��'� 'ti � T'� I � 1 f � M1��} ��`__a {� .' "ir�����`'� � � 1 � �##y � ''y:.' I,i- a + M . ���� i ' ?���+� ' �� .i�,i Y�� ' , F t+�� i.=',i�, �''� r�. ��t - ,.~� - , - ' � ' ! � 5 ��. . � 1 +�1 k a- ��' � . l �w� 4 , 'Y r i ��~ t M Y�� � �5�.�� + � � �� .. '� r � w � � L� '�M..��� ��_�' � + � 'i'',�"•,��-j 'i� - ,� � � �,�Fe �,� � � �. .�� ;�,• � ! � � , . � � .� +4 . ;'},�.,T�;I'.�'- ���, . �±:##= '�r'��'.i.±�:`,��-.� 1 � � `� , `'� �'� + G� �' 4 ` �a ��5 ; i � � �� � 'tt I .�t �. ,�!�{,, •y I � ; �' , ''��[�`��+ ' � ' � � :� _ , . �I i i . � �f � , i � 1 � � � � � r � ;#��,�' I Y �� - ���r.� ' � � / �.' �' � �. � i��.���� �. , � � �, . � � �- � � , �, � �� � �: ' YlY'..�'a�- . ��L�- I}I �� IL � � .'4__�.i� ' "'f�.. r '��'M'�'�rt�..,*- � ' � }'1— ��� t '�"�'}.��'"i��� � � } ���}4` ; �' � `�` � � � ti ._ �� ,� •�•. � �� . y��*���� .' �� � �� ' . I ����� �I'� � + - - ' - - �� �+� + ��y 4�r- '�,����..�� � k ��' : �' �`�{��,,�'+ '�"y � �,r, � `- �� � � - . -- � F ��`�`� � . � � � .;.' �� � �,._ " +���~'� -��-_ � _ . •+�. . � �� � .4t � �� � - ���� � �. � � { ti � � '� °�.*� ; � ���,�� , � � -# , ' ! ., ,� _ � � � ' �. �� � � j � � � ,. � � ' `' - P � �. i � � � a a w 4 '�� � �� . . � - • _ � - __ � � 5 I � � s:'� 4� � -= � � �, f � �s � � , _ � '' � � i �• � ; � `,'b. � k 1 .��Y � i �f .a� � 1 � � .��� ��F. ' ��.�a��`i �. l ��� � I � � 1 D ° 0 . . . � ��, 3.1 Goals and Objectives The following Goals and Objectives are intended to provide the City with specific direction for improving the Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities within the City. It should be noted that these Goals and Objectives specifically support and are consistent with the General Plan Goals related to non-motorized mobility (reference Section 1.6). For the purposes of this document the Goals are statements that describe a desired condition or outcome. Objectives(bulleted items) state the rationale/approach for achieving a goal. It is the responsibility of City officials and Department directors to review the Bicycle& Trails Master Plan -2012 document periodically, and direct the staff as to priority of implementation (based on feasibility to implement and available funding). It should also be noted that the goals and objectives identified in this document are not finite, nor organized in any particular order of priority. Goal 1:Safe, Convenient Bicvcle and Pedestrian Access • Provide safe and convenient bicycle access to all parts of the community through a signed network of on and off-street facilities, low-speed streets, and secure bicycle parking. Local cyclists should be involved in identifying maintenance needs and ongoing improvements. • Promote land use development that enhances pedestrian and bicycle connectivity for com m uting and recreation use. • Coordinate bike lane and bike route improvements with road pavement overlay or widening projects whenever feasible. • Provide additional shoulder pavement on all proposed Class III Bike Routes roadways where physically feasible and cost efficient, when implementing roadway improvements. • Provide sidewalks along all roadways where right-of-way and physical conditions allow. Agenda Item 9.a. City of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 39 27 � � . �c ce ra� s e wor an � Develop and implement a regular maintenance program to keep existing bicycle facilities and sidewalks clean and in good repair. • Improve bicycle and pedestrian access across major roads through the use of pedestrian signalization and bicycle signal detectors (AB 1581) where none currently exists. • Evaluate signal timing at wide intersections to make sure there is sufficient time for pedestrians and bicycles to clear the intersection. • Coordinate with Caltrans to install pedestrian crossing signals and bike/motor cycle detector loops at signalized intersections. • Provide pedestrian/bicycle bridges across US Highway 101 and Arroyo Grande Creek. • Install signs where Class II Bike Lanes transition to Class III Bike Routes to inform motorists that bicycles will be sharing the road. • Pedestrian and Bicycle circulation should be included as part of the development review process to assure that bikeways are included as a major component of the circulation system. • Continue work with Lucia Mar Unified School District (LMUSD) to develop "Safe Routes to Schools" programs. Goal 2:A "Bicvcle Friendlv Communitv" (The Bicycle Friendly Community Program(BFC)is a national program that provides incentives, hands-on assistance, and award recognition for communities that actively support bicycling. Specific requirements must be met to be identified as a "Bicycle Friendly Community".) • Establish a Citywide, multi-disciplinary Pedestrian-Bicycle Advisory committee whose sole purpose is to make recommendations regarding related improvements, and provide a regular evaluation /action plan for completing the items toward the goal of "Bicycle Friendly Community". This committee may be a component of the Traffic/Transportation Commission. • Establish information programs to promote bicycling for all purposes, and to communicate the many benefits of bicycling to residents and businesses (with bicycle maps, public relations campaigns, neighborhood rides, etc.) • Make the City a model employer by encouraging bicycle use among its employees (IE by providing bicycle parking, showers and lockers). • Provide bicycle parking facilities at park and ride lots to encourage the use of mass transit and car pooling. • Require bicycle parking facilities at all new major activity centers including, but not limited to, employer sites, shopping/office areas, Arroyo Grande Community Hospital, multi-family residential, schools, parks, and recreational facilities. • Ensure all City policies, plans, codes, and programs are updated and implemented to take advantage of every opportunity to create a more bicycle-friendly community. Staff in all departments should be offered training to better enable them to complete this task. • Develop/coordinate educational programs with local law enforcement and the Agenda Item 9.a. 28 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 40 � � . �c ce ra� s e wor an school district that promote safe riding techniques. • Enforce traffic laws to improve the safety and comfort of all road users, with a particular focus on behaviors and attitudes that cause motor vehicle/bicycle crashes. • Promote the beneficial aspects of bicycling through Bike Month, Spare the Air, and other programs. • Promote intermodal travel between public transport and bicycles. • Establish exclusive (no motor-vehicle access) paths for bicycles and pedestrians along creek corridors. Goal 3:Maximize Bicvcle and Pedestrian Improvement Fundinp Opportunities • Emphasize the regional commuting and safety aspects of the improvements to increase funding chances. • Where feasible, collaborate on grant proposals with Caltrans, San Luis Obispo County, the City of Pismo Beach and the City of Grover Beach in order to promote the benefits of connectivity. IE. Pismo Beach supports upgrades on the adjoining North Oak Park Boulevard to support the creation of a Class 2 Bike Lane in both Pismo Beach and Arroyo Grande. Consider support of adjoining agency bike lane efforts where cost effective and feasible for the City. • Include bicycle facility improvements into all related roadway improvement projects associated with non-bicycle funding related grant proposals. • Assure that new development projects pay their fair share of bicycle facility improvements associated with their development. • Where appropriate, partner bicycle paths with flood control projects, utilities access, air quality improvements and open space/stream restoration projects. • Utilize the priority list of improvements identified in this document in order to act quickly to apply for funding grants through Federal, State, and regional/ local sources. Goal 4:Demonstrate Citv Commitment to Bicvcle and Pedestrian Improvements • Prepare a"Recommended Bicycle/Trails Route" map that can be distributed on the City's website, to local and regional bicycle shops, schools and major employers. • Coordinate with local private health organizations to promote walking and bicycling in City of Arroyo Grande. • Provide education programs targeted to adults and children that explain safe bicycle riding techniques and other safety related issues. • Join national bicycle related promotional organizations (IE League of American Bicyclists, USA Cycling, etc.) • Co-sponsor private bicycle related events (May is National Bike Month, etc.) • Provide a City staff representative to meet regularly with regional bicycle groups/ clubs to stay up to date on end user concerns. • Prepare and distribute a yearly survey to solicit input regarding pedestrian routes, bicycle use, recommended improvements, etc. • Pedestrian-Bicycle Advisory Committee to document progress results in a bi-annual report made to the City Council. Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 41 29 � � . �c ce ra� s e wor an 3.2 Bicycle & Trail Network existing/proposed bikeways, and consideration of public input. Specific ROUTE SELECTION CRITERIA parameters included access to parks and The development of the proposed system schools, links to beaches (through other of trails and bikeways takes into account communities), public facilities, employment the broader goals for paths and bikeway centers, transit routes, residential and non- development as described earlier in residential land uses; population and section 3.1. In particular, the plan employment densities; known bike routes emphasizes a comfortable, convenient, used by regional bicycle clubs; and and well-connected network system that roadway conditions, including number of meets the commuter transportation and lanes, capacity, and speed. recreational needs of existing and future non-motorists. Factors considered during Anticipated Utilization—Priority bicycle develo ment of the ro osed network and multi-use path facilities in the p p p ro osed s stem reflect use levels that are include: p p y commensurate with the level of investment Needs Assessment—The needs required for construction and assessment conducted by the roject team maintenance of the facilities. p included a review of existing /adjacent city Connectivity—The proposed network plans and studies, a field survey of provides connections between existing ; : ��'��� �� � . �„��� � ' - - -T -M�.�� �- • ,'.��• � � ��.�� � ti �~ . � � . -'. t�' � �� •f ��R:•�'�� � � ��■_ -zr 1�'i� . 4 �� y ��L 1'1� � 1 � �� _ •` � •��'Ir ��� .■ ' 7 } � T . . �l� �f' � � �r I R�� � ����� � - � � ' � ■ � � ��� � � � ��� ��� • _ . � � � �- -�_ � � _� � �� � r� � +- "#_� T � �� �� �_ I� �.� � •i �' �_�� � � i� �� �� � . � � �.�__ _ ��_ T F � � '� �. `.-�� �+ � _ •.L � ; � ���• � ��� � � _ � '� . � ��T� � ��I..r���•r-, � ���"� �� ti Z �� ��� �, � �. ' � ,� 1 1� •1 � ��� i �JT� V r � 7i1�� ` � , �� L~ ` � � �.�, y���-* �� � -�b � ♦� # ; �- .. �• - �� � � �r . �f � �,ti _,��r � � �• �f �• � � � • � _ ,� •� ti �`'� � r - f � � .�'�� �,,� . ���' , 4 . � _ � .. i� .ti♦ � �. . � 4�"��.. - . , Bike and trail facilities ��� ti r� ' � ' � �� t ' i . '' .�� ' •r . F �� �� i�• i • -� should provide for all � - ' _ ' • .- 1 � ,'- � levels and ages of users. T._ ' `� ' '� � � � � , �. -__ _ � - .����, �#: � �• _ _ - _ _' , . � f�' �r � �p � � - � . } i �.� �- �� �' � ' ' •� � , ��� 'ti ' � � r � �� , r• '�� � � �,• � � y� ��" � _ � ' � � . f � � #� '. �� � � �� � F i . f _�'ri���d � � �' �' ' � ti �. � •J '� ` • i '� �� • �- 1-� � - - . ��'"�'��'�� � -�. 6 ti� � ��� s � � _ ' . -�* i!� � � � � ' . . � � � ' � ;_ � _ �-i _ � �,� - � . � F� � � - � . � . . � � � � . � � � � •� T� i .■ J Agenda Item 9.a. 30 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 42 � � . �c ce ra� s e wor an z�'„ ��Cvunly Class II + Connedion sO��g�� \ .J�.�COl117�1 c:nurty Class 111 `_!�._C�nnedion �. SLQ[�{1[���1 �. Z3J j ' �• �� �� A�. a ♦ s �n�R � �y � q m � r �� co��ri ciass iu �`�a ' : Connactan C Co ry�la�ss II szo coU�,ry � r � .' � � Q� � oa`� � +� zz7 _ ; - sta caunty _� i ��v�� ,•�+� ~'►. �� 4a. � .a. � �� Future � g potenhel D �, � i 1�Recreai�on �� -� I r� ��uvaa���y �rp Gra�` ��� f �yay . � � ��� i���,* Eques�ian �� r,�� . A � �q� i �a�'ey� �.�° � �`'�,Q [�" � ► � � Gty of � � � . Fismo 8earh �� f y Rancha "� • 5L�County � r r� Granue � r���� � , Park , F�wie Ped+Sike � � Q' Tarta da Bndge f. �_,y. * ,� � OioPark P�yo� ; `��,►� �,a�G�� Ja�es `� �c�� cc�c��s u � � �r�� ■� e�{� �'a�J, j � � � aG � - c � o`'� �a G.6.Clas�I� � r � � U Conre�[u il r Qt �a' � ZZ7 p� � Five CiFes ep + �I C�rfer ['� ♦+�`� •f � � Parkmer ■ �� � � ;�� . � �Ih�(� FLIJB�Bike � ��� / ■ sna�¢• � co� Clasaln 'r�. �n�fre � � • � Nua �FUWre Pedl6ke nTY ■ g�gB �ecton � ] � � � ��■ �� �� � � • •,/ ■ r r �■� �t. ■■ ♦ � � � � � Fuw�red�s�� �► ��1� � �� �� I � [� si.Pat�d�'s � a�aye�■ p.�i� � ♦ � ¢a' �,t ■ +�; i �ti� `� � �'Sj�r s�,,00� t 1 St. �■ �.a.c�ass�� ■ anc `'. � �c'fi co��ee�o� ■���r■ �;i f i AV�����~���*� �R�Lihrary �� s■ �r.6ranch Pauldcig � ; . � ► � �� Middla School y rb ■ 'y ma� � ` �{ � ■ r Aa�� ��r�� � m � � m` i����e�y G��d• � P����. women's 2 27 ���I���arege■M �♦�•• ►�� f�B e�Ped�sike � (L t � ��. �S • � �cwt �� ■ 1 ■ ■ Y � ■ �+ � _ � � �� ��►* �M� �� o ■ ; '� ,� 101 � ,•' • c.a.ciass ii � � � r o r��. �ji � � � nrr�R ':,� N co��aa�o� E.GraRd A�e. � t� ♦� r����a* � F��d■ 0 � ��►��! � ��►y � '.._�--- � s�at�, � R�� f 8�ar�ch Mil�F�d. �SO`�y City af �4 ■ p,ye- � „ e�ty �r S',b Grover BeQCh � ���wn �r E�ta�a �.�w��T ia��a'� �� r�.Gr � ��� i ■ J Bndge � � (� 9 d . � i t ; . � � j . • , . � _ � � .� �s' ' 1 s` c��s� � i ,`� pa'�'�� � .� r+ � Pe� , : �,• Fa.t i t�*. �..�s� �a � a � 1 � �Cenf�rmingArts . .*�" ��• 1 Jr���Oflfity/ G.B.Clase II r • � � �. ' Conne�ton ■�■ � � � ASII.S'f. ■ + � � pacd�cCoae[ i r�■■�`■■-+�a*�+1 ■ ! � Chr6han SCn001 �� EYn SIreSt � t Artnyo C'irantlB SobSpata� t Park �� j � �4, Hgh School .� C�p�% �ComRkln � � Lighthouaa � � Cenler� CommunAy ■� Christian Srnool . ^- � Fair Oaks A�e. „osP;�, ■ ,,. � r---- , � : , *y- : .- � M.HaM'e �• I�� Elementary �.a.��a�s�� � arroll A�e. Connepion r ����� � GJ * �y � • � � v ■ � � ap � � � r-� 5L0 Covnty x vi Q � �I ♦ a � �• � Wood��d; .. x Park � {p Horth Qceano r�����+� � ElemenFary - _L'yB.Class II s� con'nQaion The PIkB ��������� � � NpRTH � o soa izao +eoo�e� DCeQl7O T.T. L E G E N D 5CkLE:1'-6pp' �� Perk ExISTING BIKE B�ULEVAR� � SCHDOL�ESTINATI�N SLD Courrty • PDINT5 DF INTEREST ESCISTING CLASS III * EXISTING BIKE PARKING � EXISTING CLASS II � Ex15TING PARK&RIDE EXISTING CLASS I � E7(ISTING TRAN5IT STQP �__ ���ln:��!�1.:���?; EXISTING�ECOMPDSED GRANITE PATH CITY �F �. PUBLIC RESTR�OMS ������w��� PRQPpSE�BIKE BQULEVAR� -. . �ity �f A oy� �ra n d� � RETAIL 1 EMPL�YMENT PRQP�SED CLASS III CENTERS �� � REGIQNAL CQNNECTIQNS '�'' �L E & T RA I LS III�AST E R �LA N �•�� PROP�SE�CLASS 11 � �� ■■�■■■■��■ PROPOSED CLASS I-PAVED ♦� PROPflSED ROLJNDABOLlT ��'-.�,s CA L IFORN I A y�'i �� INTERSECTIQN �' Si.�Y_9 i��.-'��� u����� ���� - LS OQ(7Q(1CCIl IIC�`�1�AOr1CCl-t(^_OAAIITC OdTLJ Figure 6: Bicycle and Trail Network Plan Agenda Item 9.a. Page 43 � � . �c ce ra� s e wor an bicycle facilities, adjacent communities, be noted that this system reflects the trails schools, parks, recreation areas, and plan proposed in the Parks and Recreation employment centers, with an emphasis on Element of the General Plan. However, in connections to major activity centers and order to implement this plan, easements or multimodal transfer locations in Arroyo land donations will be needed to cross Grande. many private properties. 3.2.1 Class I Bikeway Overview Freeway Crossing As of this writing there is only one actual One important element of this plan is to Class I Bikeway in the City (as defined by create a safe and convenient bicycle/ the CA MUTCD). This bikeway is located pedestrian crossing of US Highway 101. along the south boundary of Arroyo The existing four roadway crossings are Grande High school. Other off-street paths associated with narrow, congested bridge do exist in the City, however, they do not or under crossings, and are not bicycle or meet the criteria associated with a CA pedestrian friendly. MUTCD Class I Bikeway. In these cases the path is com posed of decom posed The proposed bicycle/ pedestrian bridge granite, is not all-weather, or striped. crossing is located to have the largest impact on connectivity between residential As noted on Figure 6, Bicycle &Trail areas and commercial / recreation Network Plan, opportunities for both opportunities to the north and south of the pedestrian trails and Class I Bikeways freeway. This crossing would also place have been identified. In most cases the the bicycle/ pedestrian commuter near a trail and bicycle paths are associated with regional bus access point along EI Camino the same corridor. Where shared paths are Road. Crossing the freeway is not without proposed, it is recommended that the its challenges and would first require study facility provide a minimum 10-ft. wide all- to determine feasibility and potential cost. weather surface with a yellow center line striping, and at least 2-ft. of soft 3.2.2 Class II Bikeway Overview (decomposed granite) shoulder on each As mentioned in the Existing Conditions side. This section provides for safe section of this plan, the existing Class II bicycling and walking, with comfortable bikeways are disjointed with many gaps passing between bicycles and pedestrians. along the same route. However, those The 2-ft. shoulder allows for a safety facilities that do exist, connect between recovery area and a walking/standing area schools, parks and residential areas and for pedestrians should they need to leave provide some direct routes to employment the hard surface. centers. The objective of the Class I Bikeway Proposed Class II Bikeways, as illustrated system is to provide long continuous runs on the Bicycle &Trail Network Plan, fill the that get bicyclists and pedestrians off of the gaps and provide more opportunity along streets. Typically, the proposed paths streets considered connective routes follow creek tributaries and run east and between key points throughout the city. west (relatively) across the city. It should However, many of these routes can only Agenda Item 9.a. 32 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 44 � � . �c ce ra� s e wor an accommodate a CA MUTCD standard Bike The exception to these rules is the Lane if the street is modified by narrowing identification of East Branch Street through travel lanes, narrowing parking lanes, the Village area where traffic volumes are removing parking, or widening the right-of- relatively high. In this case the authors way. Implementing any of these solutions believe special street markings (IE will provide a more "complete" street that Sharrows) and better shared roadway will better accommodate bicycle, autos and awareness is important to make this street pedestrians. It is recommended that the more friendly to bicyclists. Circulation Element Update 2012 include a study to determine what streets can feasibly be modified to accommodate bike 3.3 Bicycle Detection lanes. In 2009, Caltrans issued a Policy Directive (see Appendix C) requiring that bicycle and 3.2.3 Class III Bikeway Overview motorcycle detection be provided on all Class III bikeways provide the remaining new and modified approaches to actuated connective routes and are located along traffic siqnals in California. According to the routes that are either: directive, each lane of an intersection shall • In less demand by cyclists be provided with a limit line detection zone • Are along very narrow roads with little either when a new intersection is opportunity for widening constructed or when more than 50-percent • Provide secondary connectivity of the limit line detectors need to be • Fewer conflicts with motorists replaced at an existing intersection. Additionally, the directive requires Two types of Class III bikeways are minimum green times to accommodate proposed in the plan: bicyclists. • Standard Bike routes that identify a street that shares the road with Detection for motor vehicles and bicycles is bicycles, and.... usually provided via metal-detecting "loop • Bicycle Boulevards. A Bicycle detectors," which trigger a green light when Boulevard, sometimes called a bicycle they sense a change in their magnetic field priority street, is a street where all because of inetal nearby. types of vehicles are allowed, but the roadway is modified as needed to The following recommendations expand enhance bicycle safety and typical loop detector efforts to include convenience. Typically these bicycles along designated routes and at modifications will also calm traffic and key intersections by providing improve pedestrian safety. improvements such as calibration of existing detectors and installation of This plan has identified Bicycle Boulevards stencils. In addition, these in more urban situations where traffic recommendations should be incorporated volumes are low, street parking is present, into new development requirements where and the opportunity exists to add special signalized intersections are proposed. markings and signage to make the motorist aware of sharing the road with bicycles. Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 45 33 � � . �c ce ra� s e wor an Type of Detector deep to allow for bicycle positioning. On Not all traffic signal detector loops are two-lane roadways, bike boxes can also equally capable of detecting bicycles. facilitate left turn movements for bicyclists Research has indicated that the Type D by making it easier for them to position detector (per CA MUTCD) is most effective themselves appropriately (in conjunction for detecting bicycles. These detectors are with advanced signaling). especially sensitive in their center (compared to other detector types that are Bike boxes are used throughout the U.S. most sensitive at their edges), so bicyclists and the world. If accepted by Arroyo can be detected while positioned in the Grande, they are recommended along East middle of the detection zone. The City Grand Avenue and West Branch Road at should update its design standards to all signalized intersections. designate the Type D detector as the default detector of choice for limit line 3.5 Bicycle Parking locations. Bic cle Parkin y g Secure and convenient bicycle parking is Push Button Options critical in the effort to encoura e bic clin As an alternative, s ecific bic cle ush g y g p y p to employment centers and destination buttons can be used at intersections where oints where riders mi ht ark or leave the bic clist can ush the button without p g p y p their bicycles unattended for a period of leaving the bicycle lane; placement of time. bicycle push buttons should never require qs a art of the site develo ment rocess, bic clists cross a turn lane to activate p p p y bicycle racks should be provided at new them. Video and radar detection systems commercial, employment sites, and multi- can also be used to detect bicycles. famil residential ro�ects. Bic cle arkin Y p J Y p g can be broadly defined as either short-term App/y Pavement Stenciling Above All or long-term: When feasible, the City Bicyc%Loop Detectors Since most bicyclists, as well as motorists, r , _ � � , � � do not know how loop detectors work, a pavement stencil that shows bicyclists - where to stop to activate a loop should - _ mark all detectors expected to be used by bicyclists. � . � �;, ,r. : 3.4 Bike Boxes ���. �''' ' ' � � - � Bike boxes can be applied at signalized intersections in conjunction with restricted i ' �. , . . � right turns for motor vehicles. The � � � treatment basically requires motorists at a red light to stop a few feet behind the crosswalk so that bicyclists can position themselves in front of the queue. The ,,,., , .„ • , ••� •• , ,, , , , recommendation is that bike boxes be 14' � ' Agenda Item 9.a. 34 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 46 � � . �c ce ra� s e wor an should encourage the use of the rack the Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals design (includes a City graphic Image) Bicycle Parking Guidelines, 2nd Edition, is currently used in the Village area. a useful reference guide. www.apb�q/? paqe=Publications. Short-term Bicycle Parkin_q Meant to accommodate visitors, Y f. . g customers, messengers, and others 3.6 a In In expected to depart within two hours; Arroyo Grande streets have many twists requires approved standard rack and and turns that follow sometimes appropriate location and placement. challenging topography or drainage corridors bisecting the city. Consequently, L�q-term Bicycle Parkin_q it can be difficult to visualize where a route Meant to accommodate employees, might go, and how far to the next students, residents, commuters, and others connection route or destination. With this expected to park more than two hours. factor in mind, one of the primary This parking should be provided in a improvements for all facilities (including secure, weather-protected manner and bike routes) is the implementation of a location (usually lockers or closets). Wayfinding Sign System to inform and provide guidance to the both bicyclists and Reference Guidelines motorists alike. See Appendix B Design Guidelines, and when developing new facilities, a review of q Well-planned and attractive system of �. � .�.._ � � , �� � s� f � � �� � � � � * � ti �� � •�• , _ ��r .�kl �� � S� �� � t � •�� . � � �� �1 1 :� � F y�r ••� �.�' �_-�i��'� - . � f _ . - �, ��� a � � .�� r r � � ti � .ti � 1 � �• •� � � � F � k � - � � � i � �' - ,,, � � � . ; , -" �� _ _ ��, . � I � �� � . , . _ �ti �� . � � , - - �� ,���� -� r�i ti�i,, � � -. ti-` .,� �:•, -#~Y��a�� '� � '� i I �5•.•''�J�'_i�-1. � • � ' • � �� � ���I ��t � �� � � �'��-� ~ �'��� . .��,,�i �,��� � � � � � . The City currently ��� . � � , _ � ;� F ���� �� � �j �� provides themed - � � ; �� - '� i � - _ � - �--� customized bicycle .� , . � . ' ' � �- 4 � racks in the Villa e ��, �� � g . r � •r •`•� � , ��� � area. 4 _ � -� 1 _ ` `� � ti • _ . . � � r '� • 1��1.. •_ ..� 7 � +r . 1 ;.•�r .� �� � � i� 5 �' -. . � �,,�� J� t� .�i ti_ ����. � � . �l• { � ,� . �4 F� '�{ 1i � �� � •�} a } r � • 7 ^ra��� • � �•� � ti�r" . ;` F ����.t - �-��. �r � I � y • �., ' ,� � r� - . . 1'�• . . �_� ��f � � r � . i �y � + ti � 4 1'� { l • . � � �� • I :T � 1 L. • - � � �s x �•'� � ' � Z a ,1 _� - � �� ��¢"',-� . , • �} , � . .� . 7T � � � • r • r ' r zr Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 47 35 � � . �c ce ra� s e wor an wayfinding signs, route maps, and markers 3 blocks along bicycle facilities, unless can greatly enhance bikeway facilities, another type of sign is used (e.g., within streets and pedestrian connectivity. By 150-ft. of a turn or decision sign). leading people to locations and Should be placed soon after turns to connections to transit, effective signage confirm route to destinations. Pavement can encourage more people to bicycle or markings can also act as confirmation walk. that a bicyclist is on a preferred route. Types of Signs 2. Turn Siqns Signs are typically placed at decision Purpose:Indicate where a bikeway points—typically at the intersection of two turns from one street onto another or more routes, and at other key locations street. Can be used with pavement leading to and along proposed connectivity markings. routes. Information:Include destinations and Generally there are three basic types of arrows. wayfinding signs: Placement:Near-side of intersections 1. Confirmation Siqns where bike routes turn (e.g., where the Purpose:Indicate to bicyclists and street ceases to be a bike route or does motorists that they are on a designated not go through). bikeway. Information:Can include destinations 3. Decision Siqns and distance to the destination. Do not Purpose:Mark the junction of two or include arrows. more bikeways. Inform bicyclists of the designated bike route to access key Placement:Every 1/4 to 1/2 mile on off- destinations. street facilities, and every 2 to Information:Destinations and arrows, distances, and travel times are optional but recommended. P/acement:Near-side of intersections in advance of a junction with another bike route. Along a route to indicate a nearby destination. Sign Implementation The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices(CA MUTCD) provides minimum standards related to bicycle wayfinding signage when used independently from other wayfinding signs. Agenda Item 9.a. 36 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 48 � � . �c ce ra� s e wor an Bicycle Facility Wayfinding Examples Used throughout the Nation .a � :���� • � � � - -- - _ � �� . � �_ ��- . � � • � � � � � � � .� � � ,. � � 1 ' : ' : i i .� ��] � � * � ��rl��l��a �,� �F�i����� I L ��I���r��a �� Example Confirmation Signs r� .k ���,. ���� � ��r�� � � i f � � � . . ��r� a� � ' � .f I 1 � r ��r����� �I�i����� I L �1�T�� Example Turn Signs Wayfinding is instrumental in r �. providing a bikeway ��� � � �" ��� system that everyone � � J� � can be comfortable �� i � � ��' using without fear of -. � getting lost. . - �, , �' i � I � �� �.t � � . f � ��J�1�r��a �� ��n���t ��r�l�r��l�+I��r��iti��a�F� Example Decision Signs �,. . T���,��'w�'�'''c�s 3� ■ �� �t,�cYc � - �Det#sion �,:�Sign . � � � .�.. . . •� . _ � � �,�, -�,.,Yw .. ��.=:i� f� .,;:�.,._, i�-:_x. ,��r-��,:,� , I �%rShY,,' 't�13 � � . � h�--+ � � ��or�firrir�ation � � � �i�� cf' � � � �'1.�t�aiS7�� � � f � ��� �� , b� � � L� � �ia=. � �} �7urn�ig� �� �� C ? 5 ,��� �� �� I f,����.�������� Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 49 37 � � . �c ce ra� s e wor an Signage using these standards include the importance to users throughout the area) bike route sign (D11-1), bicycle guide sign for inclusion on the signs. A particular (D1-1 b), and street name sign (D1-1 c). destination's ranking in the hierarchy can be used to determine the physical distance Combined Wayfinding from which the locations are signed. An alternative to "bicycle only"wayfinding Final design of any bikeway facility or is to develop a wayfinding system that signage should be conducted by a licensed provides directions for all roadway users professional using sound engineering and is unique to the City of Arroyo Grande. judgment and applicable standards and guidelines. Wayfinding can be described as the process of using spatial and environmental information to find our way in the built environment. Wa findin should not be 3.7 Future Commuters Y g considered a separate or different activity Other than anecdotal comments received from traditional "signage design", but rather during the preparation of this document, no a broader, more inclusive way of assessing official studies/surveys have been all the environmental issues which affect conducted in Arroyo Grande to identify the our ability to "find our way". specific barriers to cycling and how they may be reduced with inclusion of additional As noted in the examples on this page, the facilities and education campaigns. wayfinding system can be hierarchal in However, a few years back the City of San nature and provide a consistent theme Luis Obispo, conducted a survey of tying the system together. existing and future residents which showed that 54%of non-bike commuters would The Design Process consider bicycling if the City implemented Prior to developing the wayfinding signage, various components of their City's bike a classification list of destinations should plan. The population base is somewhat be prepared (based on the relative different in San Luis Obispo than in Arroyo -, � _ Illustrated for example only - _ �, Develo�i�g a � � - � Wayfinding systey�2 �` N - -- �� � that is unique to � _ Arroyo Grande can �"` __ _ - -- 'I be a unifying elemej�t =- _ � that will aid botl2 � r ,� _ . -_ visitors and residents. -_ � � � __- ' `� ---L� li -. r" � i� - - �� -- I �r' _ _-� --��� � ,. � ,- � - - ' _ - - _-- �_�_- _ Agenda Item 9.a. 38 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 50 � � . �c ce ra� s e wor an Grande, nonetheless, this is the most the non-working population which makes current study completed in the region, and up a majority of the population may provide insight for Arroyo Grande (extrapolating between the 2010 population residents. and the 2010 Modal Split information of the population as a whole. At present there is The 2010 census population estimate for no data on transportation mode split for the City of Arroyo Grande is 17,252 with an non-work trips. In an effort to gain better estimate Modal Split for work being data, the City may choose to consider approximately 333 people choosing an doing a statistically significant resident alternative other than auto/ bus for survey prior to the next update of The commuting. Note that the increase and Bicycle Master Plan. total bicycle commuters in San Luis Obispo is based on 54% of all non-bicycling commuters being enticed to ride a bike due to bicycle facility improvements. Transferring this assumption to Arroyo Grande one can extrapolate that an additional 180-people might be enticed to bicycle, assuming the population remains about the same, and the riding culture is similar to San Luis Obispo. Note too, that the calculation does not take into account �. � . ■ . ��. - • �'f� r ..r r �. � •��'� ti' .. ,y .•�'�e.� a .�.���' 9 - +-• � -- - - 74 . -- ��-- �r r• 1 . �=.� . . _ � f� i. - � - + � �. •: � � .�� � _.� ��� ��� � �. V � �: � � �y� '�, J � d r �� •� ��� .. � .� •1 y • �� ��r ' � ' 'r� � � ' ' r 'S ����. �� ti'� ' � ,� • � � r,��• ' . _•• ' � �r �afi r�� a r � ' '�_ � � '_� . . ' ' '� �� �� � ~ i �- � �� � .r � ti• ,�i' � t ti L y� � � �•r S � '� � � � }•� n • .C •S � f F'� I •.. �••�• � ' r � �.� � �. ... � � � • ��• 4 • •' �� � • . ' ' ��� �'� �- ` � � �.� ` . .f� � • �•• -7 � r• � 1 �- _• � • � '� �;^ � . �� . t4 y � y � - _• • • _ _ -� � � 1• � . _ �� � � +:y �i ` _ ■ ■ ' ' � �•- ti- i __r.- , �: �„��� � ��,� - - �..� .��� 1 _ �' 1 � . ' .. ,. ��� T� �.Y , � �* ' } -- � r F' � ti � � - � -��' . �+ �� � � ' 4 .�� - -�� ` • . �� � �. 1 2� � � 3ti � 5 11 '� ' 1 � i � P i� * . � ,t a � � I ti � � f � � ' r .��� ' �� - '� � ' .' .r' i` •L� �� - ' {i . ti . y,: � _ � s � i` � � �� •�� � �� ' �. Agenda Item 9.a. Page 51 � � , ; � 5 , '� �_ ..... ._ � k 'f� �I. � � j�. � � ' �� ;t����. � � ;}�,t � i �� �� ' " � � r I 4t• F II. � .i �i {�� 1 ' , ',� 1I I '( � ,� � ► � � � � '��i �.�T,��. � �� " � �f ; ����� ��t;:.r,. .S`. . ' , ,�� ��R�'�. s•Y � ��e'. . . I } ; � � � � ��: • � � r ��kr � � •Z ,;*���, ,; �.� ,� .�,: ,,, ���}.� ,..;.,,� eA,� 4 � �y I 1r�'Rf � � ��,� { 4 �ti.i �, + �• ��� , ,y: � i .�, � �� � .� � �, � ,� �, , i 1� � ' ;..�1��"�;i+T r+ f ti ' 'I"��' � �i 1 � �•'��" , � � ` "i! + ' � n� � �� �` � � i i� �� � _��� �� .i ;��� '}� �i. r4 ����� � `�. 4b'; A i �.�'�� ���! '� a �} ���,` ,� � ��,•�{'�1�' � ?"� � `��,1 t ,� � '•`� �� �� � ,� :�3 1 ��4 1 � `� r � � � ,.�.�, , ' , �� f��: ;i� w+ , ��. , , �,',s�,���y�, r , ��. ,}, ��� �� `,t! � � I '. , � I��` y� �� +�i #� ,� �� � � � � �'' � F '1 � � ' +'F. ;`�li'` r� y � '�� �� � �� � � ,•���;, M`''�„r� �'j,,� � , �� � , ,��+ i +������� �,���''S� � �w � �� ,:,,''i,r� � .' ��� � f *,�' ��; � r�j� '� F r I '' � � s�{y� �� � �` 'ti[•`•V'� 7 �� ' . i �'� �' s '�� ,� r � �' k".r� �`��t �.,j� '�t��'�+ �r,�' ' � � r ; ? �r it•� ''�� � �,}• � � l.�^ ri� � 4�� �� `� 4 i+y r� r � � + � y ,' �i t � �r�r� � , �'� � �� � ��'F'i ���� � � -� �� � r * � r , ��',;� t � ' r � � i '� ` ��� �1 1�� + 1 1* �� `� .' I'L'Y y.�1 r 1 i 'wy 4 �I��1 � 1 ��, � � I r rJ � I� y, '� ,a � ` ' ' ,`, t � ���, . � �.t` �'�� 't��, ��� . ��a i�( U + "r , a 1+N' f �, ` `+'� �1� �it � � ' °T �^ i� �r ', . �� �� 1' • �'� { � �R � f I�� �i � ��1!i 7. f ��� . r �{� ,}�� �'• ,�fry� y' ' f '-�t � ,� � �"'��•�"k '� , 'r ;1_ ��. '"�, � � �� + � � ' +� � �} +.�{ � ,` ' � h � t � f ` i �1 � . � 1 ,� � � ��.i' , '� �� y '� y�,- � ,`� � ' ' 4� , f .1 �� � 'F i , � i',� Y 't�., a,ti i 4�R ,'� �� # w �` I h� � , � �� �r� `•�it ' '�. .,1 i` � �� . ' � � r■ � I ` I � A � 1� t �� �f�F '� ,f ` � �� ��� 1 �rrw • � �! k� 7��1"�� +{ � �� , � � � , 'ti , � � �;�4i�.w, 4 �5F , i`J; + ���� �4 � `•�� �� � ������ ;- ,� ,;• . �. � !+ ��� , 1 �wi�+�`'.���" °•t�+. �' , ,}; � ��i'�4..i�'�� � D ° 0 4 . . � � 4.1 Past Expend itu res Since the last update of the Bicycle Master Plan, the City of City of Arroyo Grande has leveraged funding to improve some bicycle facilities. The following identifies the improvements. Elm Street and Fair Oaks A venue • Elm Street - Class II Bicycle Lanes: Ash Street to Farroll Avenue • Fair Oaks - Class II Bicycle Lanes: South Elm Street to South Halcyon Road • Completion date: January 2011 • Cost: Bicycle Facilities portion estimated at $40,000 E/Camino Real • Class II Bicycle Lanes: Oak Park Boulevard to East Grand Avenue (small area of Class III required around Brisco Road) • Completion date: Currently Under Construction • Cost: Bicycle Facilities portion estimated at$92,000 Castillo Del Mar • Class I Bicycle Path: From west of Orchard Road to east of Valley Road at AG High School Rear Parking Lot • Completion date: April 2012 • Cost: Esti m ated at$110,400 Agenda Item 9.a. City of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 53 41 � . m emen a ion 4.2 Cost Estimation 4.3 Suggested The following table provides conceptual Improvements cost estimates for the construction of This section outlines ten riorities for future bikewa facilities. These cost estimates are p y bicycle improvements. These priorities are based on "recent" costs experienced in intended to uide fundin and lannin other California communities. These cost g g p g mechanisms to ensure that the priorities estimates should be used only to develop are ranked hi her are iven recedence. eneralized construction cost estimates g g p g The plan on the next page illustrates the and project prioritization. More detailed locations of the ten riorit ro�ects. This estimates should be develo ed after a p y p � p plan is followed by a discussion about each feasibility analysis of preliminary riorit engineering plans. A more detailed outline p Y of improvements is located in Appendix D. - - . - • • • : - . . • • Facility Type Estimated Cost Per Mile Class I Multi-use Path • 10-ft. wide, w/2-ft. shoulders (does note include land costs, or amenities $641,000 +/- such as landscaping, lighting, irrigation, etc.) Gravel Based Multi-use Path • 10-ft. wide graded gravel levee road $5,000 +/- with directional signage Class II Bike Lane • Stri in markin and si na e onl �18�000 +/- p J� J� J J Y Class II Bike Lane • Signing, marking, signage and $217,000 +/- pavement widening Class III Bike Route • Si nin Onl $1,800 +/- J J Y Class III Bike Route • Si nin and avement widenin $112,000 +/- 9 J p J Class III Bike Route • Signing and Shared Roadway $4,000 +/- (Sharrows) markings Agenda Item 9.a. 42 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 54 � . m emen a ion z�'„ ��Cvunly Class II + Connedion sO��g�� \ .J�.�COl117�1 c:nurty Class 111 `_!�._C�nnedion �. SLQ[�{1[���1 �. Z3J j ' �• �� �� A�. a ♦ s �n�R � �y � q m � r �� co��ri ciass iu �`�a ' : Connactan C Co ry�la�ss II szo coU�,ry � r � .' � 4� � 10 o�� ; � zz7 ; - sta caunty _� i ��v�� ,•�+� ~'►. �� 4a. � a. � �� Future � potenhel D �, � i 1�Recreai�on �� -� I r� ��uvaa���y �rp Gra�` J �i�l ' 1 ` �` • • • 'S��a��,* Eques��an ay �a� r,�i . A �� �q�m� • � r ey s � n�i m ■ � ,a� �� Ce � �7 ► .� RQ' 6 _ � _ r �` f y R�a� �� 5L�County 1 r� Granue � � � ,r"'��� Park , . F�wiePed+Sike � • [��� O Park Bnd9e . _y. I f p�yo� , D r �`__.� �r° �d : �� �o���$s�� , Q,at� �hes . � �a����, �1 �� �fi �� ' .� � e .1� � � ��aG �� Vo`� � 7 � ° (. I U S �ep� �o a' � 227 p� S/� [- ;.�` •f � � � Parkmer \"� . ��Ih� F� PedBike � ��� / ■ �y sna�¢• � Co� ClasaPl �Q� RndrP � • � ilua �FUWrePedl97[e nTY � �■ �8ndga ��Co�recton � � .� � �,. � I �� • ► ► 1 /��■ .��' � •� � �t� � � � � �d�s�� �► �,i1� r � � �� j � Iy si.Pat�d�'s � e�aye�■ p.�y{� f ♦ � ¢a' �� � �'st s�,00� � �t � i� , ti� s , � � �.a.��ass�� � ra,�� -.� �7 � �� co��ee�o� ■���r■ �;i f�Ave. �������*� �R�Lihrary �� _�+ �.C+CanG��Paulding s ; ,�� a • �� � Middle School M rb The � � t � Villag�� � � ! 3 �� m ���Ocean Viaw � Fut�re ra(1�'� ►� �F�,wre PedlSike L # Elemenlary ��• C � . W Bnd (L i � S�'� Z � P�i�w��we 227 �G�\/ �i�+age /�� ! � �` ■ � Y � r �• ��' _ '*'� ► � ' 1 o ■ ; '►,► ,� ° 101 � ; �s��ass�� � � . . o �� 4 co��aa�o� �E.GraRd AVe. � � � �M nrr�� � ♦� r����a* rnd■ 0 0 � ��►��! a ��►y � '�_�—��,�.,� s�at�, i � R�� f ��ar�ch Mil�F�d. �SO`�y City af � �4 ■ d�,ve• „� e�ty �r S',p�. Grover BeQCh i �',`�� �. E.Gi�� 9 IBike�� � r � `�9-np � d : � : 5 �, � i 4 � -� � �, , � ■ �s. � c m�s� vi � f�• O,A�.S A / � . � Pe� ■ ,• a � + • r � i Suggested Ten Pr�ority a � � � �PerformingArts ` : Center G.B.Clase II r � � �. � Conne�ton ■�■ � � As�st. . � � � pacd�cCoae[ mprovements see o owing i r�■■�`■■-+�a*�+1 ■ ! � Chr6han SCn001 � � EYn SIreSt � t Artnyo C'irantlB Sob Spata t Park �� j � �4, Hgh School C�p�% �ComRkln � � Lighthouaa p a g e s f o r m o r e d e t a i I) � � Cenler� CommunAy ■� Christian Srnool � Fair Oaks A�e. „osP;�, ■ � r---- , , *y- : .- � M.HaM'e �• ��� Elementary �.a.��a�s�� � arroll A�e. Connepion ■ ����� � GJ * �y � • � � v ■ � � ap � � � r-� 5L0 Covnty x vi Q � �I ♦ a � �• � Wood��d; .. x Park � {p Horth Qceano r�����+� � ElemenFary - _L'yB.Class II s� con'nQaion The PIkB ��������� � � NpRTH � o soa izao +eoo�e� DCeQl7O T.T. L E G E N D 5CkLE:1'-6pp' �� Perk ExISTING BIKE B�ULEVAR� � SCHDOL�ESTINATI�N SLD Courrty • PDINT5 DF INTEREST ESCISTING CLASS III * EXISTING BIKE PARKING � EXISTING CLASS II � Ex15TING PARK&RIDE EXISTING CLASS I � E7(ISTING TRAN5IT STQP �__ ���ln:��!�1.:���?; EXISTING�ECOMPDSED GRANITE PATH CITY �F �. PUBLIC RESTR�OMS ������w��� PRQPpSE�BIKE BQULEVAR� -. . �ity �f A oy� �ra n d� � RETAIL 1 EMPL�YMENT PRQP�SED CLASS III CENTERS �� � REGIQNAL CQNNECTIQNS '�'' �L E & T RA I LS III�AST E R �LA N �•�� PROP�SE�CLASS 11 � �� ■■�■■■■��■ PROPOSED CLASS I-PAVED ♦� PROPflSED ROLJNDABOLlT ��'-.�,s CA L IFORN I A y�'i �� INTERSECTIQN �' Si.�Y_9 i��.-'��� u����� ���� - LS OQ(7Q(1CCIl IIC�`�1�AOr1CCl-t(^_OAAIITC OdTLJ Figure 7: Bicycle and Trail Network Priority Plan Agenda Item 9.a. Page 55 � . m emen a ion . . . . : . . . . . - . . - . . . Existing Condition Overview/ Need East Branch Street is a main thoroughfare through the Village Area and it is on the main east - west connector (SR 227). The roadway is narrow through the Village Area with a section that consists of two traffic lanes, a central turn / loading lane and parking on both sides. Delivery trucks often "double park" in the street to unload goods. This route is heavily traveled by motor vehicles, bicyclists (including club rides) and pedestrians. There are currently no markings or signage identifying this as a bike route. Proposed Bikeway Type: Class lll Bicycle Boulevard Given the restricted pavement opportunity, this route can not be formalized as a Class II Bike Lane. In an effort to provide better awareness to motorists that bicycles may be present, special markings and signage are proposed to remind motorists to share the road. Improvements • Bicycle Boulevard signs • Share the Road signs • Sharrow markings on roadway Cost Estimate $3,000 . . �.r Existing Condition �' �r.•. , � . � ' � � � �;� � �. •I .T. 5� '� �� , .� _r ��� ��' . e �` ��' � — �^4 —�_ ,� �}� � '�. *�� j � —-������ _ .�+ � � � _ � � ; �'. � _ � � , ��1� - _, �����I � +;} ' " �� �� — THE � ��AD _ _:. . - -�:Y..� :•r.'`:;;� �; ..�r;���. � ��- ,::} :'� + � . . .'L •. `� .� � ,�f I I T. '� � � •L��.I �J � I _ f. � f � .. �..� ' F' � � .�. �.�� � L 1. .I 5 � . � •1 j�•I�:—� �1 �• � V •'I •ti . �� � ti '�. 1 �L , •' ��� y��JV� .�. �•„, '�� f • I . r � �` •� -� �i ' � y�}�J��• �+� • _ • �' I`;f� ��� �.� F.. ,, �� 'r:fl . � {� �_ � . . � ` � � , ,�.�_•+,� ..� j����� � �t�r _j� •� ' ��.7• �1 � r�' � �f�� . ti � .�, � . �,�- :• f . ' -�- �., :�, � - �� ti -T • .+�� -,�'- y 1 � �� �F'. . �.� �� 1 r ■ .�� _ � � • � � � • � • Agenda Item 9.a. 44 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 56 � . m emen a ion ' - • - . : . . - . . . . . - . . . ' • . ' • . • Existing Condition Overview/ Need East Branch Street is a main thoroughfare through the Village Area and it is on the main east - west connector (SR 227). This road connects to Pauling Middle School. In this area the roadway is narrow. To widen this route sufficient right of way appears to exist, but some retaining walls will be necessary. This route is heavily traveled by motor vehicles, bicyclists (including club rides) and pedestrians (including students). There are currently no markings or signage identifying this as a bikeway. Proposed Bikeway Type: Class ll Bike Lane Widening the road appears feasible on the north side of the street only. Widening and restriping would allow for bike lanes in both directions. Improvements • Road Widening/ Paving • Small Retaining Wall • Bike Lane Signs • Bike Lane Striping and Marking • Archeological Study for Existing Wall . ` ��� � _. T � �+-; ; Cost Estimate � � � $100,000 ; � � � � , � . �' � � _� � �.�, 1 ` ' �.-� 1 �• I I ��..�' �-�� ' . � Y���� � s�'����. �•. 1� �5; ' 2 �' •f. � :� ��, �. 4 T v i! � [ � f i` - •� • �t��3 � � � � � �' � y � - �� �, `� � ~ � ' `��,� . � �� „��� - f�•st -'Ss � � w.��,-�. ry - ` � . � � '�4` . �,. �� , ,1 y.- � �z-. ' .,u.�,,y �~` �r�. �� + n~ •~"� � -'1�" . , �.,t. ' " ' ' �`'•� ��i�; :� :--s� _ , . • _ r- .���_ r c I • � !. ...�. 4f, '' J�t - �� ` _ .'���h- � `'�. y+� t� "` .+1 "• :.'l�" .hf�. n,a-.. -- ��r -v ,�,y�r�, •, "� r••• '�?. �'S•.i I�,w�' � '±"�T_-T�'r. . .. �`+' _ .�` ' . " • .. ! :"'�'a. . �t-"3,w- '� ,f' .�.-...��,... r '�±" �� `' �-+�"S.,��a�!. 4 _ _. .•t* •. -—�.•--: . � • ���`' �. '��y ,.' �—�`��'��""� �� �� '1 ..- _� �. .,• '�. ,, - � "� �' w.�.. i ~ y• i �a•x+�' - `' r•.�' 1�, ;t.' '� -�, , �r�� �� � �. q `�� -��.. " a ' 4. �'x �. . �.�4 �' �.�. � " •A �l� �3�- r � , r„ -'�,_�'" `• ,-.(I� i� .` ' � '�y� _ � � .� i,r r .. "��~�i�U• ■��� �� \A!�� �+�\ .. �.��.�•����� .�ry `' R �.�}1F . l•�' .. •.�..� e.�.r...�r•� w�h�1F f � -- . L 1 i I►*��Z ��� �� l l+-�►ti1�•, +��'�i s� _�i l ��� "��i,..� ..'�,��`i.r a � t�Iti '�'S.i/�x '_��1�"� � � �� � � � .��y 1�• �.L�. „�� t r.' . �l ►"� _:�.. . _-'� , �-,�. - ` � ���� tiT. .�. .. ` �' �'��ti.-�• - '.y� �� . -��_rr�����i . `^3��'' � 4i� ���F 'f C.. �y ``�2` . �r :r� ►:�� ,.r�. .''•. � r r_ �= .Y.{ ; J.i _ '.��� �•�r� z t � - T�^� � 4�• � �. :• -� �+�y'�i�� �'.1; "�� f��-. %+},1 r _��,�r°���i'�4�'L'��$��'���.�� - - Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 57 45 � . m emen a ion . . . : . . . . . . . - - . Existing Condition Overview/ Need Before crossing US 101, West Branch Street becomes East Grand Avenue. Bike lanes begin west of EI Camino Real on East Grand Avenue. However, in this stretch of road between Traffic Way and EI Camino Real there is not enough pavement width to accommodate bike lanes. This route is heavily traveled by motor vehicles, bicyclists (including club rides) and pedestrians. There are currently no markings or signage identifying this as a bike route. Proposed Bikeway Type: Class lll Bike Route In an effort to provide better awareness to motorists that bicycles may be present, "Share the Road"signage is proposed to remind motorists to share the road with bicyclists. Improvements • Bike Route signs • Share the Road signs Cost Estimate $2,000 (Bicycle/pedestrian bridge TBD by feasibility study) , . � , - � �HA�E ■ � THE ■ � ���D � � . _ 2 • �•• •V � ��� � -s� - � � �� � � � �� � � �� � ��� }�� — �— • � , � •r.�j�t �r'" � Y "�P ,,'�r _ � ... ry,4� �,~ ���'-t,� -' � .. -� . �' _ � � �.��;�2 4�R�� r rr i�ti_� � .�` .s��`:. ' ;,`}� ����a-'���• .�-� � •�.._; � r�� �{�� -t � � ,r. �,..}�.' � ,�.. ; ��'�'�s' R� r�'�`�*'= a �Y. i--- � :� '� r �`YII! �j ,�.}.'�. -it' .�+'�* �.-. R�F ,qF s.' { � � 4�� �4 '.��� . F�J ._ ��`F �:.7�-�?3.� � A ',r. - - Z-���a .}y- .i. � 'I, � :._�.a4�,_�.,:5� ��� }'1 "•r ■ iI�' '� .r'7�� ��, _`-.AIF . ' �Y l'-. ■ .rti._t� �` _ � _�r".�� :p � n �►+ ��.,,`�; � "►� ..J��s K'� r•:�c5�'. '� ��..� ��• **,. ' `'�i� �� �_�� ' -��`s.� �' � ' • ���"w��i-~�J- .. , �~r�' �,� . I'��r � �"'� `'7'..+ -.�''r "�' 4 ti �'��� . � iF .�' .1z -r� i*�• � ;�r?'�i� ° ;�+�s �i+' ,,,,,�,,,� ��r Y � .. : }i,i, ��C"�.,�� c� ��_ Lt, ��,� '� r�^ � � ��r .r•� �- �' �,� •,��. - • ,�.iS�, .rM�- '��► '� �j� � - -f - �'.�Jllt. ���� . � � - ` •�s ,�a�r!��F•..�,.� , }" � L � � � "" � � .�/ n �'��'�,^���' a 7 '1,1� �� • . ,,� �f' •�����.r��� ;rw� ti...�` � 1 ' , _ti!= �R`':,,. ■�; '� , i'k:. �:?�� "f��� I� �`� �� � ��y � _ r- .�,. �,�'�`'S-Rr��" ��... ' � •��. � + „ • �-:- !� r�:• � , 'i..- � �'�id�.ti, �„�'��4'� � � _- _ Y �:J .s ��.. ;x�y .j;�:•. • �? ��s.�' ,_ ,T"' ���._� . __:..._ ..�� x: �;,� }.. � �':t -.,�����%�•" �`�• �� t . �'..�• �,¢T�•_�A,- - �.w. .._ �Y� ' �k `` a.l- �,��'1 � :•r' \ _ j / �.;. �. �Yy���=_ . \ `e�*�� �` . . ,,�1"y " y,�•..�3.y. �i?7;�� � . .. � \ .. ._ _ ?. � .��sL-. Agenda Item 9.a. 46 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 58 � . m emen a ion . • • , . • . � • . . • • . • � Existing Condition Overview/ Need In this area, Fair Oaks Avenue is a minor arterial street. This road segment connects areas east of US 101 to Arroyo Grande High School, Arroyo Grande Community Hospital and the Soto Sports Complex. This route is heavily traveled by motor vehicles, bicyclists (assumed students) and pedestrians. The street consists of two lanes in both directions with no parking allowed. There is no turn lane. Pavement limitations neqate the opportunity to stripe a Class I I Bike Lane. Travel lanes appear to be 11-ft. wide including gutter pan. Proposed Bikeway Type: Class lll Bike Route In an effort to provide better awareness to motorists that bicycles may be present, "Share the Road" signage is proposed to remind motorists to share the road with bicyclists. Depending upon traffic study analysis, consider future road diet to three lanes, with center turn lane and bike lanes on both sides of the street. Improvements • Bike Route signs • Share the Road signs Cost Estimate $1,000 , . � , - , �HARE ■ � THE ■ � ���� � � � � Narrow travel lanes negate opportunities to create a striped bike route area. �,� , ��, ; - � . .� - __ _ � .��-- � � � 1.T '��, Jr+,� '�'_ ■���Ef���. � � • � � a1�I�� '� � �- .r^_ ��i� �� �3��' �'�1T�;' ��..���•�� — �t---• _ .a ��;ir:' f�.' f � .. � �� .i'� '' 'YfV� ��r �-� . R - � �` � • ._^ � . � � - � �`�� .�`'�"� '� �-`�.�=�� --� �� Y�_-�,n_- _ � �.� �` . r� . 1 . .-�,. , . r�`` I��.' , -�.-,'"rw<-�-- - , L � � 4� n " , �, � � - - r� � ��.5 � �. � � � � � ��. }� - t��' - ' q ' _ ^+�}_ ��lr• _.M I.1! ^.9 � �� — -�� r — _ � �,, �- - , � �. " ��"�~� �'�Ill ��. ��� a Y �.� � r -- -- � . �E � �� - ', '' rJ ��,�N'-_. � �'�i� - • • r'�Y� { _".���'-- Y '�� �.� r� � � � �� _ - �^� � i t � ��� r. � �� .'r" ,. �'".� �. � _ 'r _ -� ,w�'�i-_ , .. •::y'..-_•'.... .�� ��' • r _ _ _ - -5:..::^ - _ � � �,�- ',� �. I ���._ :4"_��,. _ - ___:,� � - ,� +�t � , r r �r - � ky � ! _._ �..:^..5�...�1 � � � .. � Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 59 47 � . m emen a ion ' - • - . • . � . • . . � . . - . . . Existing Condition Overview/ Need In this area, Fair Oaks Avenue is bordered by the high school on the south and agriculture fields on the north. This street is a minor arterial street. This road segment connects areas east and west of US 101 to Arroyo Grande High School. This route is heavily traveled by both vehicles, bicyclists (assumed students) and pedestrians. The street consists of two lanes in both direction with no parking allowed. There is no turn lane. Pavement limitations ne ate the opportunity to stripe a Class II Bike Lane. However, there may be the opportunity to widen the street on the northerly side, providing adequate pavement to accommodate bike lanes. Proposed Bikeway Type: Class lll Bike Route- Class ll Bike Lane(ultimate) The existing pavement may allow the re-striping of the right lane to 11-ft. This would allow 3- 4 ft. of bike area. However, in order to accommodate Class II Bike Lanes additional right-of- way will need to acquired. It is suggested that the City study the feasibility/cost of acquiring right-of-way from the north side of the road in an effort to widen the road enough to accommodate bike lanes. In the mean time "Share the Road" signage is proposed to remind motorists to share the road with bicyclists. Improvements , � , . Bike Route signs • Share the Road signs • No Parking signs � • Stripe the right lane to 11-ft. to provide a dedicated bike area • Study feasibility of road widening to accommodate Class II � � � Bike Lanes `�- � Cost Estimate $2,000 (Bike route signs only) $12,000 (Feasibility study for Class II, determine ROW acquire issues) , � City should study the feasibility of widening the roadway to �����E � accommodate Class II bike lanes THE � . ���4� � �,� . . - ---__ � y�F:� � � - - � . ... .-,,.���"�� � -- _ __ � � . -- -- } .., — r.i ���;-��_ . �! � � .� �� "��►3`+G�. '- -i�$c�, �..:.� � ` '�;��..3�i�r � z T �, � *"`.�,.,°�`�c��'�i�i��� ��;,�;�+ �� r'.��i:�_ ' :n,^��s����r ' .. �.,,7.`` ,r;�ir +':,;' �•'�..,° �`�''�• �"__ ��,�,��� . �! a � � � � _ -— � �'��� �� 1i..�:?�f~ ���"�'�fr"��":�„ �'1.-.��, '� •� � M��-�'_ �a. . . �,__f''�� � s%.". .v/./�-�� _ _ .. .�' A -__ � y��� ,� "° a �___�_A.... �-- - - _. .:�.�G�':- - . �F I� + ��ia� �. - Y ..-. . � ����1�,� � f M�j� . _��-" _�+�- - - �--�--:..� ��+'�. /' '�,�� � �3 �'�����._ �rl - _ -_- � . ' - � �„�,� � � � __ � :�� 1� , +`el� i• .: ��r��' �� . � '"�' y �� _ 4�, i. Z � - 11�� r w� � �� - - _ .S, �4y' �� ��9� � Agenda Item 9.a. 48 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 60 � . m emen a ion - - • - . • . - . : . . . . . • . Existing Condition Overview/ Need The existing street is a split ROW between Grover Beach, Pismo Beach and SLO County. Each surrounding jurisdiction identifies this part of the route as a proposed Class II Bike Lane. However, existing ROW and pavement opportunities restrict striping bike lanes. Proposed Bikeway Type: Class ll Bike Lanes In order to accommodate approximately 3,700 LF of Class II Bike Lanes, auto travel lanes will require narrowing /elimination via a road diet approach or road widening (ROW purchase). As of this writing a 2012 Update of the Arroyo Grande Circulation Element was underway that would be looking at this stretch of road to determine the opportunities to meet bike, pedestrian, and automobile needs. Coordination between jurisdictions is required to provide bike lanes in both directions. Improvements • Bike Lane signs • Bike Lane Striping and Markings • Restripe of Roadway, or • Right-of way addition / roadway reconfiguration Cost Estimate $20,000 (restripe/signs only) to $300,000 (road widening, ;l ��� � striping and signage) �-� ,t�.r... , � "� - ,�. �• �^J � - _ �.. _ J .;:. + ��r�.. �_�a., , � �,� �4. ' �� S. - '+� r .� ��.{`. �71� . ' . ' a : �11 . ,"� '.s.►.,s . �,�`+„�,-:,. .t, �-°�; `�' a� y� � f� sr�f ! s #:� ,�*.`,j�m'�'- , ��,s �����', � M , ``� � :r,,.-. ,.� z: ;� t � , �i ' �,�. ,�� � � :,#_ • ���`k'�'°'w - � i'�. .'�`• 7 �� e� �— �`���� �t�� �"�' :�.+::.� ..,.�.�� . 4 � • � � - _ - +�r.*ic�,�. � ^� : r �,... �'� -. --1'a,�_�31`'� 7►.�� ,p " '� _, _T„_.._. � . , �. � r.,..A� �. �� �:.�� _? � .�� ' I ��.� ` I'`.',�' ..y..9,M.s+ �_�� �i� �� �' , � •�'i' W . _ _ .. .� - - .- - ,�'+�" � �: . '�r '.:' 1 .r�� _,z ° T'�� '` ►r�,,��'� ��'. �� � _ '� , t�' :. �.sr►s...��� " �"'�.`„'-* � :+7�.. � �} ��� -�� --_ � '`�!'.� -;,,, f��'' `��, �4, �� .-�A r�'� `' . �'�,- - , . 4 --�� f���'�� '` ��k� ,� -r:� ` ;,;.� j� �.'�t._, t- �"'�:, �, -- "'��� "' �"� � �` " .._ , _ .�.. _ , .� . . �, �. - _ , --. .. . , , � J=1;5 p".1� 3�1� � � . � _� y. _�,.. ...-� , L,� •�_ �� - ` s,�';.L��r� '�'i1'�"t', -� � �• (� .�� � o L�'-�t �1�-�'h=7rCo) , r, '�'�:.,s r �;`•�.�t '"�.� - ���a���� .� - , =k� 4'�-�.-r ��¢ �'ti- � " , _ - - � ,�T ,,,'� "� V"(!E- � 1 "�*'q �' '�. �;�,_T _ -. ' .` '-''- ., . .. . . ��S4 rs1 � a�jip��TE:�. . /x' '!� Y h'+J,. ;.,�Hk ._'�.. ����.^4i . . ,.�� f, `r�- 'R� �}. �',� _i.. `- .i r�JY[.�. V i�'x ��., —� �r. +�i37�1P.��"_"�S°.�"-a � � - ��,���c. .�' � Y���t����' 'lt FC�t-� �-� � .. .zc. .• `-� . . � „ . ...�.__.r�.�.�. � ,t�4��y�� . tL^ t� ..�y A�� � �"�i-��' ' - . �i r� �~ � i�� �.� L�L ' ..-���,{� ��,. 4�r�+�'r�.. �L. `— �� '{,1 V ,�._�"�'`•'` �^ � � ��...�r� ' � �;;F+ti � � �.•.. . � .1- - 'U �'. �:�/�11.��°L1�f.°�V�'-klvl � - - . - � BlKE LANE � _ � Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 61 49 � . m emen a ion . . . . . . - - . . . . . : . Existing Condition Overview/ Need This local residential street provides a connection to Route 227 and the Village area from James Way(bike lane connection). The street section consists of one travel lane in each direction with parking defined along parts of the street. There are many driveway connections that provide access to residential lots. Although relatively flat, the street west of James Way does wind around a sharp curve. Proposed Bikeway Type: Class lll Bike Route and Bicycle Boulevard Given the restricted pavement opportunity, this route cannot be formalized as a Class II Bike Lane unless on-street parking Is eliminated on the northwest side. Therefore, this route is proposed as a Class III Bike Route. The typical Bike Route signage is proposed east of James Way. However, upon crossing the James Way intersection, special markings and signage are proposed to remind motorists to share the road. Improvements • Bike Route signs • Share the Road signs • Sharrow markings west of James Way Cost Estimate $2,200 � ; _ "zi. � ■ ■ F5H�4RE � � s � THE ,,, � Rq�4 a ���� _ �. , � �� . �"--� � -- �� r•# y � � ,� y ;;,� .,� �:��� �. �� � ' ��, .�"`� - '' .y.� ' � F��� , ��p{�-. + � � y �-�. -• � 1Lc�t � . .. .. � ��a1C .*��-��r .� x.. :r�M- �i._�. ��,.�,.�:�'_ _-�Y� . a�.� � . -''[ � ' �1:.T-.. � _.• r ;s�+ . � .�. � 7.,�. .w. ��� �w_ - , .�r �� �-�-- .�^ , �� �� � � �'^ �t._�[ .,. ./.. +�_ . ' ,'�� +�°�' � �� �y�~ti�+.'�,- . � l. ���t .. ^�'i�''' �`�r � _i�i� � 'y� - -� `r ri �ti"'�..�N3.{r�'r':�,,,������f. ' ' `;-z���._ . ~y��'. �� i. r }J_'' �.. ` +� _-�. ?` . k Sk�T_;j � � ;.�. ?�, .ir� � . �'� y `�rP... r�. �� ''� �� k - ,;ti""�v'�_'K"� �ti+'R ` "_ •� _ �� �}�.y��-'S�✓- - •� ���� � 4'-�—��M ic .� �:. " I '"_ �.' ,',�y;'....' �.,.x:�rvw•s�:'a!� — `�_f �.•L T-, ,�� �i+' —.,.. .-�-''r . 1 ' �- ' -~~� ��B-_--- . ; _,_ _. _ �..-�-. : .-%� '-I,R';,� - ��" - '4 •.�, :r ,;��... .._ 't�� _ � �:;.��. - . � �_-. � � . �•.:_" �F�^�j'� , . 1_ � .." � �� ��.� . ��: _ . _ �� . . . . � -- :.� .. r' �i _' -.J��l _ � �; �.- - _ _ ' __ �.'.. ��, �� -'� -�•• - .. -1 c '`! _ - � � _ _.— � ` �r � Agenda Item 9.a. 50 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 62 � . m emen a ion ' - • - : - . . . . . . : . . . - . . . . . - . . Existing Condition Overview/ Need This intersection involves five streets each coming together at different angles. The various street angles provide challenging crossing scenarios for pedestrian and bicyclists. Route 227 connects through this area and it is heavily traveled by motor vehicles, bicyclists (including club rides) and pedestrians, including Paulding Middle School students. Two schools are located adjacent to the intersection. There are currently no markings or signage identifying this as a bike route, but lanes exist on Huasna Road. Proposed Bikeway Type: Class ll Bike Lane In order to safely accommodate bike lanes through this intersection, the intersection would need to be designed to solve road width and traffic flow problems. A roundabout design (if feasible) would solve auto traffic flow issues, reduce air pollution, improve pedestrian and bicycle safety, and provide a gateway entry point on the east side of the city. Improvements • Prepare a study to determine feasibility and cost to build a roundabout at this location Cost Estimate $60,000 (Feasibility Study Only) $1.5 - $2.0 million (Improvement Cost) Single Lane Roundabout Example �r .�'��j, ��I � •� a � ��� # �r- �.-� �'� '� •�. � ti � � . T� � ■■ � � � � � �� .�� . � ' 1 •. �•-� � � � �� � �• � � � � � �� .�• � � , , � � � �_� � ' ' � � � . . �- � � ��� , � � �r . � �,+• r � � . � ., �� � � ��� � � ��� �� - � �' 'r f � � .� � y � � ! Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 63 51 � . m emen a ion ' - • - • . - . . - . : - - . - . • . . . 1 Existing Condition Overview/ Need The freeway currently bisects the city and provides only four crossing points. Each crossing point is not pedestrian or bicycle friendly. Having a safe non-motorized crossing could encourage more bicycle and walking between residential areas and commercial areas located on opposite sides of the freeway. Proposed Bikeway Type: Class 1 Multi-use Path/Bridge Overcrossing There are many challenges to designing a bicycle/ pedestrian bridge across a major freeway. Therefore, the City is encouraged to seek funding for a feasibility study to determine the best location, type of bridge, opportunities/constraints, process expectations, and cost. Study • Prepare a study to determine crossing feasibility and cost Cost Estimate $150,000 (Feasibility Study Cost Only) $8-14 Million (Improvement Cost) � � � - � �. _ � - ��� � .�� _ ��� �.� # �� t t �T ~� � ���—_ � �� �� � + � . � � �`. �__ � ,� . ,- � �� � � � a '��;� � ,,� � -y� F } !' ''- - � t � - _ �" - ,� f� �� f: � L # _ � rf � f���,� � � -^ —� :�� `' .. � � � . _ _.��!_ ° -��� � . � � .. ' d �� - - -..`'�.�� _'�`r.�,.. ,�R _ �� �� Y t�y''- __� � ���. �`�s�_�I rr '�a � _ .- „ri - .� _ -._ _ j`.��:�- _ _ �T�. F' � �� .. : �^s SL-,T c �-� ���.'...1 '�_ ~�� _- '-' y - - '" ,7^ - _ +�� .�'. �� ". '�� i_ C�� ��3 Y ~"�� ,l'�•� �_ �s s.� � ��� .x • �� • �r � �a_ .•�� ".Y� �� -i �� � _��.�a �:.: i-,-,,..."K����-....� •' - � J�'�. . �� . • ^ ��aa�•.�L�' y,�•--���'.�-T i��-{� �1 �. . ��"� !� f�\:�F r- a!°.+�.� -� 1 -.,� �', .,� 8" - ,_ -' �• � � y� � _�,�� •� ` � ' ° �- '- .__ � .� �� '., .. � � �' � ■_. ._. �� `� - � �+��',�� � . � �� i-'� �'�*" � ,_.w � �-�+ - �,_ � ' � „_, �.:.v . _- '.� . � � � �. ' !� _ _ . . ) �,. - f r , •� �,��s ._ �� � � f .�. �-,t� �� •�� ^� � l�T .� A / I /_ .. . `. ry�!�y��?��� � � _ . ~ • � '� �1� • �,y� - � � � � ,�;`x: ��- _� �� P n i I r i n I i n? - �'' �:�! � :::� �` _.�''� �_ __ _ -� � ote t a c oss g ocat o -� _.� ,� 1 s-���-� k' - � __ - '. �� A �- 7 :9 � • �_ _ ' _ '� � - � �. � r .�. ' '� �R Za� = �: "'��' �qj� � � 1 ."7 `.�- ' _ - �!- '7 (. �� L.a�.,.�'. _ � 1 .�'Sa � ' __ ' ' 1 � � __ . � ! .� �. ; �i' - _.. �\.��y ��.�3 1} � �. ���ti � �1�r T• � �a� !'�� _i��1� Z � �� � • . � �� �� ' � •� �rR �r' � � - ���1 � � � y '�"+ 4: r :�.� .� l�7"„ • t+� =:y �" �"- - � ��,J..7.� _ #.� � � �: 3 r ��'` �- J ��, � ���R�.�'-.•-x":r„ �c C � . _;� � . �'i. �, � - -t� � � . .� �f r � � � � ;.�-�:- -"- .� _�-- �.,:� �y - `''� � � : �- fi. �.vb� �a. �� T .��� - ' i � �� �.._ ��;�-Ic. �,� _ �._ ��`r�� i%�'� ,� _ " ` � � ,� w � ~ � � � L. ...�� �� �.- �1 _ _ . �' -"� '� � r / ` `� i � � � ..- 1 � �, � +��_ � �,� a. #—���_ . �. .*+ Vh _� ,��. � �,� `* � .�' ' .. T. �� � ���C:�� 7' �+ .-�� . .� '�� .'� ~�,ti� • �r ���� -- �'� '�` - -�. �* -_�%�� � � ��� � - ''' '� ' .���" t,� � � _ ,�:7 ' _ 'r �'�w `�'� �� .�ti'.�ti• ;. / ' � .- - , �"�ri-. ,� Agenda Item 9.a. 52 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 64 � . m emen a ion ' - • - 1 . . . . Existing Condition Overview/ Need Curving streets, topographical changes, limited creek and freeway crossings create challenges to finding one's way around Arroyo Grande. Although the bike network provides connectivity between various points it is not clear what routes to follow where. Proposed Bikeway Type: Directional Sign System A themed wayfinding sign system can provide visitors and residents with a unifying element that serves both the motorist and bicycle rider. Although, the California MUTCD provides minimum standards for bike signage, a specifically designed wayfinding system would expand upon recent efforts made in the Village Area. By expanding these efforts throughout the community, the wayfinding system can help unify a currently segmented (by the freeway) city while providing much needed directional assistance to bicycle riders and motorists Improvements ��#,�,�#} � ��'`� - �.� t . • Wayfinding Design �:r,F�; �:: r-�. - Y ' Cost Estimate � i $65,000 (Design Wayfinding Master Plan) � $300,000 (Manufacture/ Implement Wayfinding) � � � � � � � � i i � K � � � � � � � � � � � Themed Community Wayfinding Example #� � �NF���T��N�I � � � � ---�____ _�, ._ �.� .:� _ ����- -� ! . ,�. 4� ��� �. � � r ��:�� � . v�� ' � � � � I _ � � • --� M� L s �� i ,* "••* �+� swii .i -�. �^i 1 * -{5 � � '.� ����� � �t � -�- r„c:, � � _.. ._. 4�t _ _ + i � _ � � � � ��r _ t, � ... . . . �_.. t. �; ��- �� , �. ,.;., .� * � � �= �,� � - ��'� — '' �_�� w �,. � +xa t�C °�_ �• . �� - ,. _-_.� ----..,--- G. C-i t ¢+I' cc� �IM�MI�IOV�LAl'�LJT T{}{T�,�.��{h'�} 7 I, 5.^.�=''-��-0'- - 5[:+1"��"=1'•0' wx EbA�i�l�i]ilhfaANa.���FNT C�,Clk6 v�x ������ta�I�FQ�I��ti�n} �,�s�,��---� � �r�s�a�. FM5 1�3 �. e. �, �EH-���I�N N�.�I� k,+�r a�, �:z� �. �`i �#LTE R N}�T I��B c�r� �:ta c:i�� ,rrn. � � u:� �-;} e:3n a. e--- F�i� ���� 1��I I��� F�������������.��_�a��� .�. A FS`�'iAKii I�pi�+'{'�'4=$$s�+l�wdF.�i7{.'V#�$27��'$� C�t+ 4pr1e�pro-af[f7 or e,tich Hgn Ilustrsirg Kordk k�o-,odar,ond • IA�I �� ���r�r-r��r�t� ��ur�t�, ��lif�rni� t �ti�'�� �,�'��'fe�ns�4��'l'R��;,�t7 �::.. hrss��c{3;r.�T�l�rc4c-rr.hefonc 11��ctisior is m�c ��rL Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 65 53 �y. . • � � . � � � � w, � � . �� •1 � � � �� , � • •'+ � '�_�'� � • \ � �1 � .f � � 7 � ' � - ' . Y � � � { � ' ��a � i '+.� . , � � ' J� � � `� � � r � �, � '. r � *� � i� � , ��� • � � � �1 4 � � '• r . � � ; � ��� � � ' � �F' ti � � � �� � . � _ . :: � �* , . � . � � . � , � . � �°,� - � *� -� .�..� � ��� .� ,���1� �i� �� �� �r � � - �' � M�T ��� � � y � � . � � . � ty� � � � - � I J � , '� I I'� � .' ..� �f �. - � ,y��� � ! - . ,F' � ��� ,. : ��� �' i . I � r . � � .r � , ,- . �- - �. � � ti : , �� i � . � � i �. ' �� � ' �Y � +1 �� � � � � �� � �� � . , �� � � � �-�� �� �-.� � *_�rt �� � � . � r ��i��7 . . �r � � .J � �. . . . � ..a..L-- _..- _ � � � r� •�,� � . + ���' 1 — - -• � 4 � • �,^ Y+ D ° 0 . . . . � �� There are a variety of potential funding provides matching grants of 80 to 90 sources that can be used for bicycle percent. Applicable SAFETEA-LU projects, programs and plans from all programs include: levels of government. This section covers federal, state, regional and local sources of Federal Lands Highway Funds funding, as well as some non-traditional Federal Lands Highway Funds may be funding sources that may be used for used to build bicycle and pedestrian bicycle projects. facilities in conjunction with roads and parkways at the discretion of the 5.1 Federal Fu nd i n SOU I'CeS department charged with administration of g the funds. The ro�ects must be Federal funding through the SAFETEA-LU p � (Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Effective transportation-related and tied to a plan Transportation Equity Act— Legacy for adopted by the State and Metropolitan Users) could provide the bulk of non-local Planning Organization. Federal Lands funding. Highway Funds may be used for planning and construction and is managed by the SAFETEA-LU funding is administered United States Department of through the state and regional Transportation. governments. Most of the funding Trans ortation Communit and S stem ro rams are trans ortation versus p ' y y p g p Preservation Program recreation oriented, with an emphasis on The Transportation, Community and (a) reducing auto trips and (b) providing System Preservation Program provides inter-modal connections. Funding criteria federal funding for transit oriented includes quantification of the costs and development, traffic calming and other benefits of the system, proof of public projects that improve the efficiency of the involvement and support, environmental transportation system, reduce the impact compliance, and commitment of local on the environment, and provide efficient resources. In most cases, SAFETEA-LU access to jobs, services and trade centers. Agenda Item 9.a. City of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 67 55 � � � . un in o uni ies The program is intended to provide (RSTP) funding is distributed based on communities with the resources to explore population, among the urbanized and non- the integration of their transportation urbanized areas of the State through system with community preservation and Metropolitan Planning Organizations environmental activities. The Program (MPOs) and Regional Transportation funds require a 20% match and can be Planning Agencies (RTPAs). Bicycle applied to planning, design and facilities are eligible for funding through this construction and is administered through federally administered program. the Federal Highway Administration. Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Land and Water Conservation Fund Eligible projects fall under the category of The Land and Water Conservation Fund is infrastructure (capital improvements), or a federally funded program that provides non-infrastructure (education, grants for planning and acquiring outdoor encouragement, enforcement). recreation areas and facilities. The Fund is Infrastructure projects must be located administered by the National Parks Service within a two mile radius of a grade school and the California Department of Parks or middle school. Local Caltrans and Recreation and has been reauthorized representatives serve as the administrative until 2015. Cities, counties and districts authority on SRTS projects (IE East authorized to acquire, develop, operate Branch Street retaining wall, bike plans and maintain park and recreation facilities and sidewalk adjoining Paulding Middle are eligible to apply. The application School). deadline is in May, and applicants must fund the entire ro�ect, and will be Transportation Enhancements (TE) p � Federal Transportat�on Enhancement reimbursed for 50% of costs. Property funds are to be used for trans ortation- ac uired or develo ed under the ro ram p a p p g related capital improvement projects that must be retained in perpetuity for public enhance ualit -of-life, in or around recreational use. a y transportation facilities. Facilities that qualify for TE funds include bicycle safety, Highway Safety Improvement Program education and facility projects. (HSIP) Transportation Enhancements projects are The Highway Safety Improvement Program managed locally by Caltrans. is managed locally by Caltrans. For a project to be eligible for HSIP funds, the project must be on any public road, publicly , , owned bic cle edestrian athwa or trail. 5.2 Statew�de Fu nd�ng Y � p p Y� Projects must identify a specific safety SOUI'CeS problem that can be corrected or be The State of California uses both federal improved substantially (IE East Grand sources and its own budget to fund bicycle Avenue bike/pedestrian bridge at US projects and programs. 101). Bicycle Transportation Account Regional Surface Transportation The Bicycle Transportation Account Program (RSTP) provides state funding for local projects Regional Surface Transportation Program that improve the safety and convenience of Agenda Item 9.a. 56 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 68 � � � . un in o uni ies bicycling for transportation. Because of its School Bill focus on transportation, Bicycle This bill redefines transportation safety in Transportation Account projects must California by investing $20 million per year provide a demonstrable level of utility for in bike lanes, bicycle and walking trails, transportation purposes. For example, all new sidewalks and traffic-calming projects in-City on-street and paved bikeways near California schools. Several rounds of would be good candidates for funding. solicitation and funding have been Funds are available for both planning and completed. It is anticipated that this construction. Bicycle Transportation program will continue for future years. Up Account funding is administered by to 10 percent of the project's cost can fund Caltrans, and cities and counties must a non infrastructure component that have an adopted Bicycle Transportation supports the infrastructure project. Only Plan in order to be eligible. The maximum cities and counties are eligible to compete amount available through the Bicycle for funds. Transportation Account is $1.2 million dollars, cities and counties are eligible to State Transportation Improvement a I . All ro�ects must be desi ned to the Program (STIP) pp y p � g All STIP projects must be capital projects standards outlined in Chapter 1000 of the includin ro�ect develo ment costs � gp J p ) H�ghway Des�gn Manual. The appl�cat�on needed to im rove trans ortation. Eli ible deadline is in the End of A ril. p p g p projects include bicycle facility Communit Based Trans ortation improvements and improved access to Y p Planning Demonstration Grant Program transit and are administered by Caltrans. This fund, administered by Caltrans, provides funding for projects that exemplify Transportation Development Act livable communit conce ts includin Transportation Development Act Article 3 y p g funds are state block rants awarded bicycle improvement projects. Eligible g applicants include local governments, monthly to local jurisdictions for transit, metropolitan planning organizations and bicycle and pedestrian projects in re ional trans ortation lannin a encies. California by Caltrans. Funds for g p p g g A 20% local match is re uired and ro�ects pedestrian projects originate from the Local a p � Trans ortation Fund which is derived from must demonstrate a transportation p ' component or objective. There is $3 million a 1/4 cent of the general state sales tax. available annuall statewide. The Local Transportation Funds are returned to y a lication deadline is in October. each City based on sales tax revenues. pp Article 3 of the Trans ortation Environmental Enhancement and p Miti ation Pro ram EEM Development Act sets aside 2% of the J J ( ) Bicycle projects can qualify for EEM funds �ocal Transportation Funds for bicycle and if the meet the ro ram's re uirements. pedestrian projects. Eligible pedestrian and Y p g q An non- rofit or anization can s onsor bicycle projects include: construction and Y p g p ro�ects, which are submitted to the State engineering for capital projects; p � maintenance of bikewa s� bic cle safet Resources Agency for evaluation in June/ y ' y y July of each year. education programs (up to 5% of funds); and development of comprehensive bicycle Assembl Bill 1475—Safe Routes to or pedestrian facilities plans. A City or v Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 69 57 � � � . un in o uni ies County may use these funds to update Assessment Districts their bicycle and pedestrian plan not more Different types of assessment districts can than once every five years. These funds be used to fund the construction and may be used to meet local match maintenance of bikeway facilities. requirements for federal funding sources. Examples include Infrastructure Financing Application deadlines vary within City Districts (SB 308), Open Space Districts, or transportation agencies. Lighting and Landscape Districts. These types of districts have specific requirements relating to their establishment 5.3 Local and Regional and use of funds. Funding Sources A variety of local sources may be available Potential for Local Ballot Measure for funding bikeway and pedestrian The state legislature has given local facilities. However, their use is often jurisdictions the ability to increase the retail dependent on political support. transaction use tax, or sales tax, up to 1 percent, which can be earmarked for New Construction specific purposes. A super- majority (2/3) Future road widening and construction vote is required on such an increase. A projects are one means of providing on- number of California counties, including street bikeways. To ensure that roadway Sacramento, San Francisco, Contra Costa, construction projects provide these Santa Clara, and Santa Cruz Counties and facilities where needed, roadway design others, have voted an increase in the sales standards need to include minimum cross- tax to finance specific transportation sections that have sufficient pavement for improvements. on-street bikeways and the review process for new development should include input pertaining to consistency with the proposed See the following Funding Summary Table system. for more specific funding information. Impact Fees Another potential local source of funding is development impact fees. There are several different impact fees which may be used for bikeway development. Traffic mitigation fees are typically tied to trip generation rates and traffic impacts produced by the proposed development, and are often used to install Class II bike lanes during road widening projects but are not used for Class I facilities. Bicycle trail development fees are often used in new specific plan areas as a way to finance construction of Class I trails. Agenda Item 9.a. 58 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 70 a� o � Program � ° � ca Application Funds Matching � �' � � Grant Source Deadline Agency Available Requirement Eligible Applicants � � � � Comments C� oc cn w Federal Funding RSTP funds may be exchanged for local funds for non- Regional Surface Transportation Varies by RTPA RTPAs,Caltrans $320 million 11.47%non- cities,counties,transit operators, X X federally certified local agencies;no match may be Program(RSTP) federal match Caltrans,and MPOs required if project improves safety Transportation Enhancement Activitities Varies by RTPA RTPAs,Caltrans $60 million 11.47%non- federally certified jurisdictions X X Funds are dispersed through the four shares listed TEA federal match below federal,state,or local depending on Regional Share Varies by RTPA RTPAs,Caltrans $45 million Varies X X Funding share to RTPAs. category Caltrans Share Varies by RTPA Caltrans $6.6 million Varies Caltrans X X Funding share to Caltrans.Available only if regional TEA funds are not used Statewide Transportation Enhancement federal,state(except Caltrans), Funding share for all 12 TEA categories except Share Varies by RTPA State DPR $20-30 million Varies regional and local agencies with a X X conservation lands. state artner Caltrans,State RTPAs,counties,cities,school Funding share for conservation lands category- Conservation Lands Share Varies by RTPA Resources Agency �11 million Varies districts,and non-profits X X acquisitions of scenic lands with high habitat n conservation value. +: `c RTPAs,counties,cities,school � $68 million over Projects that improve system efficiency,reduce �, Federal Safe Routes to School TBD Caltrans None districts,non-profits,Native X � 5 years statewide American Tribes environmental impacts of transportation,etc. � o Jurisdiction with special districts, O Recreational Trails Program(RTP) October 1 State DPR $3 million 20%Match non profits with management X For recreational trails to benefit bicyclists,pedestrians, � responsibilities over the land and other users. � Transportation and Community and $25 million Projects that improve system efficiency,reduce � System Preservation Pilot Program Pending FHWA nationwide ' state,local,MPOs - ' - environmental impacts of transportation,etc. � $7.7 million 50%includin in- federal,state,cit ,count eli ible Federall funded.Pro ects that ac uire and develo �� Land&Water Conservation Fund May 1 State DPR g y y' g X y � q p n statewide kind districts outdoor recreation areas and faciilties. D � State Funding � Safe Routes to School(SB 10) May 31 Caltrans $18 million 11.5%minimum city,county Primarily construction program to enhance safety of � pedestrian and bicycle facilities. — �' minimum 10% � Bicycle Transportation Account December Caltrans $7.2 million local match on city,county State-funded.Projects that improve safety and ,�,. construction convenience of bicycle commuters. cD � Part of State Transportation Improvement Program � Re ional Trans ortation Im rovement December 15,odd cit ,count transit o erators, STIP,the main state ro ram for trans ortation � 9 P P RTPA - - Y Y, P � ) P 9 P � Program(RTIP) years Caltrans project funding.For"improving transportation within N the region."RTPA must program funds. 0 —� Patroleum Violation Escrow Account city,county,transit operators, Bicycle and trail facilities have been funded with this N Ongoing State Legislature $5 million - - - - (PVEA) Caltrans program. � Community Based Transportation � November Caltrans $3 million 20%Local MPO,RTPA,city,county X Projects that exemplify livable community concepts. �D Planning Demonstration Grant Program � � Office of Traffic Bicycle and pedestrian projects have been funded � Office of Traffic Safety Grants January 31 Safety - ' state,city,county X through this program. � � � �D (� � �D � � � � Notes: Resources: . � AQMD-Air Quality Management District FHWA-Federal Highway Administration FHWA SAFETEA-LU Web site:www.fhwa.dot.gov/safetealu Caltrans-California Department of Transportation RTPA-Regional Transportation Planning Agency CMAQ-Congestion Management and Air Quality State DPR-California Department of Parks and Recreation(under the State Resources Agency) CTC-California Transportation Commission TEA-Transportation Enhancement Activities ,� �. � .�5 ' ' f`r ,-F�r'_' � ■ ' `r u�� 2 r", ��f y _, 'Fy-' y . . • �i�, r { . i5 t ti;:{�.` •�. .4.. X y * � � � ��TI���� ��S�L�i ��7y � • �,��r' l: �1.�* •�•� .� � � -�.{,� {' ` :�a� ��• _ ' f. 7 �h.��-���r� 'Yi �' �!�y-4f��?�. - 'i.;}i-'����" �y,,'h�'r'�'I•'��'r4w_�!,•�'�,�;i�`�GY��T�r'���•.y�7�:yri .�i�,'• '� ', t� �.{w� � `���,�'•-� {���r4 �; ,L�•• •�_k'�,� � �, ,,�?�4 �.��' - ���1r�.�a:'ti'a..�.�•1�;L'41.:�_. .i,y�,�4�s� i r{. 7'-�.t.',r '1'����}i' '+ �f�+. ,�..f r� A�j,� - -.r. i I �r'+ �y ����'� �X �� � `•IR•�Lr r"a I- �i"� .i �� r{L+ 5 �': .:'�+�' � _ ,k� �+ �i r. 4 'S �Y �r �• _ } ni�r�F�'J. �{!-`• �-r a■ r ti,l�. �~`' '�_ �r��ti� 1.F - _3 r�'�1 .�1' - ���� .. . ��}� � -'�� .ti{ .d . i unti� I F,�7�.�:� s-,i 7l,F.. .',-�t 5 � •.l'.t. �'r1 �'�'.��'�'v� ��:. � �ti` , ':,'r a _ti�r_' . � '� � - � - �1 v,. r 1� � �ri '_� . 'r 3� i' r T. _i 5;� i F h' .F L Y�fti.: '����t.'y' _ �• �;, 1'_-" I'' ' ' 'iw a'�^S� . , � .S•r_.ry.;. �yl'�F''� i •%'rYJ� �- y ���t��f••�� '•Y5 Y J ��� •C. �4'. ���I'Y �1. /'YI�� ���'.� �. .■�' � 'r4 y� . �I � •F . ,i }}�x f��L���•.�L5�{r�r �-h.T-.k�'�',�1�•'S.i.��;� ,titi7'�y�',��'i.��•r•i�� _� r .y�.�. •.4i��-•...5.x.`�'ii�;K i'i'''_'�:t'.���"- �'i,.z.::,,��_���'y,'�+,�.:i'`' Y rr +1.� ' -�.A` .' -S�- , - 1'�' . : �L , ��a'.1�.�'. - . �G"�#+ ._71�i..r4 5 �T 4�'4�`* •�I�I, I� i �'-`I .�' �{.' ',Y't`,.�4� .�� .�. t� ' .i `� �t-' 'S,'. , ''ti;:' ..i } � •[,}• .} .. � -' _ 31 `� ' . �'S L� �.��}� �I� K��� .L'1'...'���a 'F�1}z F _ . r .. . 4 _ � •��F . �1'k- �.��1.rr� - I- . - • I. - 4L . •C�. - - �S`' ' •��.'+.F � � •}r'. L ��.�Sr-�.�a a•��� �I_ � ,.� J• ''1••�1f�!_ �. _ _ . '�~ •��� I 1` .. I1• -,'�"�•1�� '��. ' � �a ' . ��� F'ai �. aN{ .J' 'Iv - � z _ ' � � � �'S�'Iv - � a . , .� �� �lr�'�, -. . � 1. - '�1 -. � ,.� �';.'�, -_ - t �' ,r' - �'i.�` , , •� � ,`,Y+ i . , ' 't- �f�`'�._ �' ' . -. . . i�' Ir ��}M1. 4^=:r .:.s:..'�-' 'r.�'�4.� ._ .' �.i _�� ' ,- • _ • , . - .'ti . ' ._. • 5. - ' . . . . . .. _ 'i � . i.' ��f� , ry:�Yf,_ '�._*'�i- - ' � r' . � .. '•t� - . . _'. . . . ..... . ' � ' • 4 . . .` . .ti.._ . � . .. .. • . . • � � • .M1.. � • -� �.� � �� ..+, ,�� ' , . ' - ' � ' ,_ h. . ., -. _ , _,_, . _ . .. �'. ., .. _ . .' . : ' ' ' . . ' " . . : . . , .. . � - . .., ' � . __ - ' . _. . . .. -ti .. .. . �_ .. �• ' ' . . . .. ' ` ' . . ' � .. . , •• . ' . � . . . i . . .. , , •• i . , . . . . • ' , . . L , , . . � - � � ti•�y � � . � '�'��f.��� ' • µ n �, '.s -•r � . ` . ��y + � I �: I r - , t I I >` � .�' t ��. 7 � k� � �F � �� 5 � . � ��� �� '�, .� r�' � �.{��r � �• . l�1� ��� � � � � :r ' � .- � � �.. �� .' . c. �- �•*�s} � � � � ' . �' �* . •_ i �� � ' � � `�' • � �F � � ~� � � L '}.• � ry �'V� # Y~ * rli�� + � 1k' + � � �.� M - .�7a'� � d� i�!_ �• • 1.4'• �. � • I �,. ' ;�':���, � . . +F�� �`� ` �y + . • * � f { %� • �r' *� `� }� �+ f '�,.,,.4_ '� .����` �, f. r•+;k� ilh �� z �+ } . �. � ���} iI' Y k�'T �{ +�,' � � . , � �' 'r f � � . .y �� � •. }�F ` ��. a � M1i�1 �yy� { � �� � ` R� '+�'" .s_ � ++ � ' '' ��*���l�F��.i �f - { '� �c lr.i �'£ . I � � �. � � � � � � � _� + ' �{� '� .• , ± �• ' � �4 � ' ��� ... .. _. � � _:;�, .� � ._ .��; . �' . � . � � � ..__.__TT__._,� � �.�µ� ' � I J r . ��}��� �� R•' -- 'a,��� L � � �}}wi#i/1 � y# �� • •� F'` .�L 4 .� F}r���� i i � � � �� •S 3 � r� ' 'P�-°i `�w",•��•�• _ ' �� � , ,J+ 4� � v��'� �j#'' i• k• � � � �� ' i � � � �� 5 '� .� ' ' � - J �•� �. �. _! � �F� � '__ �-� � { • � � �r' � 1 � - � - • _ i y,r, � . j ���! It.1 .. �' 1� � h� �' � ��. '_ � ' • �} *� ' � .. - .J . -,! � � . _- .. y��i� . r • I ' .l� �_ -y _ ��' � .� 1 G � �� � �_,. .. . • � R� � -.t. i k t`t �.. _ � _;� . , . ' � � . . � ��� _ � � I i� � ; � _ .� � '; � � __�- _ �: � � � � .s��� � ��� ��y ���� ;' l' .: �r- � � � � 1� � T� �� � � , �.,� _ b'° � k ! • {� F ` . a � L _ "R`�'L4 �F ,� _ - _ #+ �� � L+ ''' , ��t� r ti r� ...,.J '� N 4 f �, ; " 't 5,5 � ��� �- ��� t •``�" rr � � - s , � _ � d �F �• - � 1 ��'��� .� � � - - - - '� •� � ���. � � � �� � � � � `� � �* - - i f • +� � F' �� ` � `...ri+.�Y �'---� -' '� `� �' �4 .�� ;� � �� 1.- ... � . - -' . - . •- ' . . � i •_ �e. .� � � � J • � . � � .� I°� W t �� f � �r, i:, � ���_ �,;. . .# � , � ; r� . 1 �� ��; . .� .� � � , ._. ,.. . � -- � . . ., . �. .. - � �� �+ ' fi. I >. � � _ ' � � F ��f'� � _ t + � 5 � . � . { �� •4 • ! 1� � 1 5 r .� _ i � y - Agenda Item 9.a. . .�� �� � � . : � • � - � Page 72 . r� � } . .��� � �� : .�t . �, r f. � D ° 0 . . � �-, 6.1 Existing Bicycle are designed to determine the amount of education there �s available for both Education Program cyclists and motorists. Education includes As of the approval of this document, the teaching cyclists of all ages how to ride City of City of Arroyo Grande does not safely on multi-use paths and congested have a formal bicycle education program. city streets as well as teaching motorists In the past, the Police Department did how to share the road safely with cyclists. coordinate a"Bike Rodeo"to educate Some things that Bicycle Friendly children on the safet as ects of ridin Community reviewers look at are the y p g availability of cycling education for adults bikes. However, this program was and children, the number of Lea ue discontinued. g Cycling Instructors in the community, and ways that safety information is distributed If requested by civic groups or schools, the to both cyclists and motorists in the Police will present a safety program community including bike maps and tip regarding bicycle rules of the road. sheets. However, no formal education program exists, although the SLO County Bicycle In order to comply with the education Coalition will provide educational sessions requirements of a Bicycle Friendly upon request. Community, education efforts should be focused to accomplish the following . objectives: 6.2 Planned B�cycle Education Program • Create a coordinated and In order to qualify for recognition as a comprehensive bicycle safety "Bicycle Friendly Community" (a goal of education program that provides this plan) an education program should be bicycle education annually to all school established that can answer the minimum age children between the ages of 4- questions in the education category of the 10. program. The questions in this category . Create a coordinated and Agenda Item 9.a. City of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 73 61 � . a e an uca �on . P.�� . �. � .� ,,. :�,-� .-:�� ..• ��; �";. .. ,..,. �. - ':� _ "�R'' ;�, Y ... •� ���,.- .1� .� �'��:y� ��S � � Y�� ��� ... � 9'r� .+i�F�, � � � r �. + P 1 � � ♦- ��• 4 ������T � ,y .'� f� ° + r.r� .,�.+.-.� ••f r� 7 -.�' i•;•� � �F.� r,°� 't ' �F. � ��..,i.� .�. �• '•�'��• ��. , i * F �-�, 'n ;� (' :�1,p'' ,�l•.��� y +: � 'f- �''�i� w r1��k� .� ' � "�3- - �� * r '� ,�i � i .f� ; ..y " - :� _ �. � �,�� ��.... ti4:�;� k�'�� y �,: ,v�,.��b!� ,�,; � .�y �'d�' c �•��. �'�• " •��y v., ,.� ���iiit'�� .v7� ����iR.Y . , -y'. '�"k� • i� + �Ir' b� ;�,� � yr .•.�..,......i � :��. i. �--- � ---�. . -+����*�.,�_...•^�nr�.'�'t ._"""""'."...'_ ' r ... . .... __ .... .� . . - ,'y7 i•tr•��' r.��b' :f-: t"'4V�7r1'" y i ��a --�.� .�P_�t�� .� *�� _.�.S .:�i' � ....� ... - � ... -.-. . - 1� '�l�� 111:� _ . � F'�j�.�,.` i�'i'�g� �'i �e����`�' _ �`� ��.i'c..:.. �" -�� ■• ,i � :.1.� .1. ,� .����4 i'F:�'.3 .���•��.�i�ii7�*:.;�}i�i�::��• :��•',y.,�!:��:I:!![ i i�� .'..,�:.t•�•r��J;�i�l�'.�1ti•� . �.*..""' �';' .. ;s;1+�.�` �'� � rs ' • 0�::'�. i�; •;r,..r,,.�,�....,,.r e •.�,•.;'..-��"f'���'' ,F' •���� � �� �"" ��; : -ti�. ':a �� ,.�� r:.:i�y•;..'� , •� .. �'� �t y:°o:a, r�'v•.'.•', ,.r� , a.. _ �I � P��' . �L . .:��:ti,e�,,;:�:.. . ��° .•r.= . .,, °: t i'i•S:,L::::, �...° 'v,.Q � �F:..--44._.. '.'A.'�err. �P��. �d�� ti��:�::a \,r.*��.•• *� � � ::1€ds: `�. �!. 'S �:::":�'•'�',�4��'� '. � � ';Lf�-"�?',9�'J�.�_�� �;.yt•..:�..5�:- _f : ~��" a- `y� •R: '5.�.�N`.ri �- � �, Y,�. :'y.,� •"�eY .�� �a �w' 34L�.S.gav.:t.'. q4y. ��Li��•�M. ��.. � .! ►�,5' �� 4 � �. .. r��='-'... �..� }.'...�.�. Y�"" � '_ :9P. _ _..�_M�.. � ��y , � s:'� ___ ----�_� � .. ...::�.,.� � __�_�. .._� '�.��',..� . x -�1�t , � �. ,.._ .. •� _..y__:- - r{ �:<`�-". +.: '`=;"'°�:s-;-' �- .. .z �� ._ •.;� '�,�.. (- � .J � .. .. �.. I �� __.-_ y� ..� .�� ,�, :s_ �%.. � '"_ i ._ � ...... 'k:..-.- �� � ti � �- ` `�� � f � �� � � '�.: ;' + : f l � f' .. •, ��•..� s� W r Q` � � r �� _ �_ � � � / - comprehensive bicycle education 6.3 Combined Efforts program targeted to motorists and Combinin efforts with a surroundin bic clists in multi le lan ua es with g g y p g g community (IE the City of Grover Beach or information regarding bike rider rights San Luis Obis o Count ) can reduce the and res onsibilities alon with ro er p y p g p p duplication of effort for a small population. bike riding techniques. • Support a helmet promotion program. R/DESHARE • Create a public education campaign Rideshare is a division of the San Luis targeting motorists that provides Obispo Council of Governments information on the rights and (SLOCOG) which values providing responsibilities of bicyclists. Work with transportation options and promoting the Sheriff and Police Department to programs which conserve fuel, reduce air identify opportunities for incorporating pollution and make it easier/safer for bicycle safety curriculum into motorist commuters to move around. The following education and training. bike related services are currently part of • Utilize existing education materials the programs managed by SLO Rideshare: (e.g. handouts, videos) available for presentation to media, schools, . Transportation Choices Program: neighborhood groups, businesses and Rideshare manages this free program other groups that promote bicycle which offers businesses and safety. organizations to equip employers with • Promote "May is Bike Month" and Bike tools to encourage their employees to to Work Day annually. develop sustainable transportation habits and integrates all commute modes. This program is guided by Agenda Item 9.a. 62 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 74 � . a e an uca �on input from a Steering Committee that � School Pool and Safe Routes to includes large, mid, and small School: This program allows parents employers, the Regional Transit to coordinate carpooling opportunities Authority, Ride-On Transportation, to get their children to and from school Caltrans, Calpoly, Morris & Garritano through the Traffic Solutions Online Associates, and the San Luis Obispo Program. Safe Routes to School is a Bike Coalition. nationally recognized program offered through Rideshare that encourages • Bike Challenges and Bike Month: students to walk and bike to school Rideshare and Traffic Solutions instead of having parents drive them. provide organized activities and programs to promote bicycle • Rideshare Month: This annual commuting. Although, the City of program provides incentives and Arroyo Grande does not organize bike events to commuters using alternative activities, the County of San Luis transportation in San Luis Obispo Obispo does organize commuter bike County during the month of October. challenges and offer other services to bicyclists. "Rideshare"frequently organizes bike kitchens, bike valet, and bike breakfasts during May Bike Month. • Incentive Program and Employer Trip Reduction Tracking: Available to the citizens of Arroyo Grande are iRideShare Rewards (Rideshare's online incentive program), used to reward participants for not driving alone to work. The program is administered by Rideshare and funded by participating employers. Once users sign up for iRideShare.org online, they , can record the days they ride the bus, � T � :��},� vanpool, carpool, ride a bike, walk to �� � � work, or work from home in a personal � � - r- � online commute calendar. Each day � ��� . � they do not drive alone earns them � , t .Y "iRideShare Rewards"that can be ���:;,� ���':. _ +- . . �,�f. redeemed for movie tickets, gift � �r a. certificates to local businesses, and � .�� '�� � � . � donations to local charities. � ��-��: � � , . i -�-� �4��c�L1�!=-:a"{:7-� � � 7 ' - �' • ' - ����� � . � � . � � � � , • n I - � . Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 75 63 � I� _ ��.�� • �� � � F ! . � � � � � � � � � � � � � j�'� - �� { ' •�� � ��i' -� � ' � � �� , � .� + k � y � � � I . � � � � .� � +� - . � � } F � � ~ - � 1"r=�. i _�� � � - � � : _ _ • � � . - - '� � _ � � �� ti �. .f ��r r� � � � � � � • � ' � � � � - _ � � � ' � � � �z � �r -• � �� � � . �_� �-� ,�� ,� � _ � - - - , _�. -� J � � � 4 .r � 1 - ` � .- i � • � � I I � r' � , �,� +• • ' . � ;- r f r _- - I� ■ � - 1 f r ' ■` T • = r � . _ '. _ . �� � T 1 r � _ � I I �' _ ___ - _ - � � . • ,• , � � - �' •' _ � .� . - _ - _ - � , � . - - � . I , - - _ � � . a ■ � 7" � T J � . . L 1 I T * ■ ■ 7 I R � - - t - • r , Agenda Item 9.a. . • - • • •-• • . •- • • Page 76 + . . . . _' -_'. • . . _ _ . ..i .-. _ . • . _ �. - - D ° 0 . . . . � � � . _ . _ � 890.3. As used in this article, "bicycle FULL TEXT OF STREETS commuter" means a person making a trip by bicycle primarily for transportation AND HIGHWAYS CODE, purposes, �nclud�ng, but not I�m�ted to, SECTION 890-894.2 trave� to work, schoo�, shopping, or other destination that is a center of activity, and 890. It is the intent of the Legislature, in does not include a trip by bicycle primarily enacting this article, to establish a bicycle for physical exercise or recreation transportation system. It is the further without such a destination. intent of the Legislature that this transportation system shall be designed 890.4. As used in this article, "bikeway" and developed to achieve the functional means all facilities that provide primarily for commuting needs of the employee, bicycle travel. For purposes of this article, student, business person, and shopper as bikeways shall be categorized as follows: the foremost consideration in route (a) Class I bikeways, such as a "bike selection, to have the physical safety of the path,"which provide a completely bicyclist and bicyclist's property as a major separated right-of-way designated for the planning component, and to have the City exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians or County to accommodate bicyclists of all with cross flows by motorists minimized. ages and skills. (b) Class II bikeways, such as a "bike lane,"which provide a restricted right-of- 890.2. As used in this chapter, "bicycle" way designated for the exclusive or semi- means a device upon which any person exclusive use of bicycles with through may ride, propelled exclusively by human travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians power through a belt, chain, or gears, and prohibited, but with vehicle parking and having either two or three wheels in a cross flows by pedestrians and motorists tandem or tricycle arrangement. permitted. (c) Class III bikeways, such as an on- Agenda Item 9.a. City of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 77 65 � � e n �x : a e � wa o e street or off-street "bike route," which bicycle commuters in the plan area and the provide a right-of-way designated by signs estimated increase in the number of or permanent markings and shared with bicycle commuters resulting from pedestrians or motorists. implementation of the plan. (b) A map and description of existing and 890.6. The department, in cooperation proposed land use and settlement patterns with City and City governments, shall which shall include, but not be limited to, establish minimum safety design criteria for locations of residential neighborhoods, the planning and construction of bikeways schools, shopping centers, public and roadways where bicycle travel is buildings, and major employment centers. permitted. The criteria shall include, but (c) A map and description of existing and not be limited to, the design speed of the proposed bikeways. facility, minimum widths and clearances, (d) A map and description of existing and grade, radius of curvature, pavement proposed end-of-trip bicycle parking surface, actuation of automatic traffic facilities. These shall include, but not be control devices, drainage, and general limited to, parking at schools, shopping safety. The criteria shall be updated centers, public buildings, and major biennially, or more often, as needed. employment centers. (e) A map and description of existing and 890.8. The department shall establish proposed bicycle transport and parking uniform specifications and symbols for facilities for connections with and use of signs, markers, and traffic control devices other transportation modes. These shall to designate bikeways, regulate traffic, include, but not be limited to, parking improve safety and convenience for facilities at transit stops, rail and transit bicyclists, and alert pedestrians and terminals, ferry docks and landings, park motorists of the presence of bicyclists on and ride lots, and provisions for bikeways and on roadways where bicycle transporting bicyclists and bicycles on travel is permitted. transit or rail vehicles or ferry vessels. (f) A map and description of existing and 891. All City, City, regional, and other local proposed facilities for changing and storing agencies responsible for the development clothes and equipment. These shall or operation of bikeways or roadways include, but not be limited to, locker, where bicycle travel is permitted shall restroom, and shower facilities near utilize all minimum safety design criteria bicycle parking facilities. and uniform specifications and symbols for (g) A description of bicycle safety and signs, markers, and traffic control devices education programs conducted in the area established pursuant to Sections included within the plan, efforts by the law 890.6 and 890.8. enforcement agency having primary traffic law enforcement responsibility in the area 891.2. A City or County may prepare a to enforce provisions of the Vehicle Code bicycle transportation plan, which shall pertaining to bicycle operation, and the include, but not be limited to, the following resulting effect on accidents involving elements: bicyclists. (a) The estimated number of existing (h) A description of the extent of citizen Agenda Item 9.a. 66 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 78 � � en �x : a e � wa o e and community involvement in 891.5. The Sacramento Area Council of development of the plan, including, but not Governments, pursuant to subdivision (d) limited to, letters of support. of Section 2551, may purchase, operate, (i) A description of how the bicycle and maintain call boxes on Class I transportation plan has been coordinated bikeways. and is consistent with other local or regional transportation, air quality, or 891.8. The governing body of a City, City, energy conservation plans, including, but or local agency may do all of the following: not limited to, programs that provide (a) Establish bikeways. incentives for bicycle commuting. (b) Acquire, by gift, purchase, or (j) A description of the projects proposed condemnation, land, real property, in the plan and a listing of their priorities for easements, or rights-of-way to establish implementation. bikeways. (k) A description of past expenditures for (c) Establish bikeways pursuant to bicycle facilities and future financial needs Section 21207 of the Vehicle Code. for projects that improve safety and convenience for bicycle commuters in the 892. (a) Rights-of-way established for plan area. other purposes by cities, counties, or local agencies shall not be abandoned unless 891.4. (a) A City or County that has the governing body determines that the prepared a bicycle transportation plan rights-of-way or parts thereof are not useful pursuant to Section 891.2 may submit the as a non-motorized transportation facility. plan to the City transportation commission (b) No state highway right-of-way shall or transportation planning agency for be abandoned until the department first approval. The City or County may submit consults with the local agencies having an approved plan to the department in jurisdiction over the areas concerned to connection with an application for funds for determine whether the right-of-way or bikeways and related facilities which will part thereof could be developed as a non- implement the plan. If the bicycle motorized transportation facility. If an transportation plan is prepared, and the affirmative determination is made, before facilities are proposed to be constructed, abandoning the right-of-way, the by a local agency other than a City or department shall first make the property County, the City or County apply for funds available to local agencies for development on behalf of that local agency. as non-motorized transportation facilities in (b) The department may grant funds accordance with Sections 104.15 and applied for pursuant to subdivision (a) on a 887.6 of this code and Section 14012 of matching basis which provides for the the Government Code. applicant's furnishing of funding for 10 percent of the total cost of constructing the 892.2. (a) The Bicycle Transportation proposed bikeways and related facilities. Account is continued in existence in the The funds may be used, where feasible, to State Transportation Fund, and, apply for and match federal grants or notwithstanding Section 13340 of the loans. Government Code, the money in the Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 79 67 � � e n �x : a e � wa o e account is continuously appropriated to the Account pursuant to Section 891.4 for department for expenditure for the projects that improve the safety and purposes specified in Section 892.4. convenience of bicycle commuters, Unexpended moneys shall be retained in including, the account for use in subsequent fiscal but not limited to, any of the following: years. (a) New bikeways serving major (b) Any reference in law or regulation to transportation corridors. the Bicycle Lane Account is a reference to (b) New bikeways removing travel the Bicycle Transportation Account. barriers to potential bicycle commuters. (c) Secure bicycle parking at employment 892.4. The department shall allocate and centers, park-and-ride lots, rail and transit disburse moneys from the Bicycle terminals, and ferry docks and landings. Transportation Account according to the (d) Bicycle-carrying facilities on public following priorities: transit vehicles. (a) To the department, the amounts (e) Installation of traffic control devices to necessary to administer this article, not to improve the safety and efficiency of bicycle exceed 1 percent of the funds expended travel. per year. (f) Elimination of hazardous conditions on (b) To counties and cities, for bikeways existing bikeways. and related facilities, planning, safety and (g) Planning. education, in accordance with Section (h) Improvement and maintenance of 891.4. bikeways. 892.5. The Bikeway Account, created in In recommending projects to be funded, the State Transportation Fund by Chapter due consideration shall be given to the 1235 of the Statutes of 1975, is continued relative cost effectiveness of proposed in effect, and, notwithstanding Section projects. 13340 of the Government Code, money in the account is hereby continuously 893.2. The department shall not finance appropriated to the department for projects with the money in accounts expenditure for the purposes specified in continued in existence pursuant to this this chapter. Unexpended money shall be article which could be financed retained in the account for use in appropriately pursuant to Article 2 subsequent fiscal years. (commencing with Section 887), or fully financed with federal financial assistance. 892.6. The Legislature finds and declares that the construction of bikeways pursuant 893.4. If available funds are insufficient to to this article constitutes a highway finance completely any project whose purpose under Article XIX of the California eligibility is established pursuant to Section Constitution and justifies the expenditure of 893, the project shall retain its priority for highway funds therefore. allocations in subsequent fiscal years. 893. The department shall disburse the 893.6. The department shall make a money from the Bicycle Transportation reasonable effort to disburse funds in Agenda Item 9.a. 68 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 80 � � en �x : a e � wa o e general proportion to population. However, no applicant shall receive more than 25 percent of the total amounts transferred to the Bicycle Transportation Account in a single fiscal year. 894. The department may enter into an agreement with any City or County concerning the handling and accounting of the money disbursed pursuant to this article, including, but not limited to, procedures to permit prompt payment for the work accomplished. 894.2. The department, in cooperation with City and County governments, shall adopt the necessary guidelines for implementing this article. Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 81 69 ` r � t .. �' - n � • _ y , � e .� + x � �' � f � �+� � ' � # .Y � 4 ' � � � � _ �� � � � `� . Z� ; � t � + � # � • I � � �� � f - � ` _ �. -� �� * � f +� . + _ � '` ' '� - ' y � �� � �_ � � * �. a +�' � ��*�t �_i �� R _ � � � ' �* � � W� � � � � � �. i � 1� - �� . � 7 � * �.h ��� � �� � � �_- I�� �.-� � . � , � _ ' � �� � � * i 4 � � � �� --, � � . � � � ' � � - - • � � , �-- � � � � � '" � � �� +�` - - .�� � . � � � � ..�:�_�� - # `� � � - � � � . . � � �� _ � .. F � '� __ � � 4� � - � ____ � , � �Y*. � � '�. � � +'� . �_ _.. � i � . # . , ' h # �� L .' . � �i r _ #* _ , � - ,F � �+I' �i � ��,Y�* � Fi4 � _ x, _ � _ + _ � .� ' r+' T ' .#i . �. ��** ��r+�' � � � + + � _ � � , � + � � � � . ' � # _ i-. .- � '� y `. ' "- r� .�t 4 .' a#� ~ � � ' '' � #. +_�',' `.f• M1 �-' i��. +• � . • •�. � � ` ` � ' � y • � , ' . F ;4 � '`�� � � T +' � i ' " T ' _ 1 � —T +��' #�' ".; f- .'t.''. i• - fi` `i�`tM1'� ' * . . .� �4 i'"' • �' �, . . ` � � �� �+�, , �1• '�I i 1� �� �y� "r•3c_'�� a . � i. �� �#r �r* ..�'�k'�'�_w f da��� f�." ' . . ' � �' �- `+ k�-. � -�,�+.•�+ ti� .����#F �' . `_�'�#'F. ,�s.� `���� s��K 4 � . ' � 'F 4���� �t-����,.,��"���*` �il�� � i� : }� �"F' TT � ;` , - f' ' ��.�,�F •�rr+�����;t�� �r 3�-�#� �i��� �+l�.� �� 4� �'�+�� +'� '� ' � ' . � •- . • � ��,* � � ' •��1 3� � 'T �} �_ � �� . • . � . - �f'•* � f i , i ' j � '- '�ti -' - + ' - f . .. '� � � .� � . 4= , �4� - r . � � •_ . �� . � . . * . � � � - � ° �. . �, �*_ - . a. - � � � •{ �� �� �. '� � • .5'` ! . ' ` ' ;.'4 r�� l� ' � . ', � . � . '�� * �� �� � �� k 1 t � ' ' ' ,�. ' � � � � � - ' .-, . .. 1 �" _ + . ' � i + 1 f.�- i � ' - .� � �-� �� _ ���1., . �- . � � -; _ . . -: r , , r.� r x,' •� - 's __ � �r � - - •{- .ti. - ' � �, t . _ . :_ _� . . _ ti __ ._ �_ � _� ' � i M � � �. . . � � r � Agenda Item 9.a. , � _ � � .,.- ;� _ : . �� • -� �; . - 4 #_ � ����� � Page 82 . �" a{`rt�' . � �Fi�'f' •y f+� ' F#' * �� . - -�e+� +-.- . � `_ ����'Yl�i/ ±i��� �t c� .yF.•�.�`, _ . • 1� _ �5 � +�� � .r�i V� ' ` ► ' _ _ . ' — + '� _ �� . , - - _ -�'#��`y�� {*���� '-'F '�-� � '' .�} � D ° 0 . . . . . . � � � G U I DANCE ❑ Caltrans Highway Design Manual. This section provides a BASIC OVERVIEW (http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/oppd/ for developing this bikeway system and hdm/hdmtoc.htm) support facilities. S ecific State and ❑ Caltrans Design Information Federal accepted standards/guideline Bulletins. )http://www.dot.ca.gov/ documents can be located in the latest: hq/oppd/dib/dibprg.htm), including: • California Manual of Uniform Traffic - D I B 80-01 Rou ndabouts Control Devices (http:// - DIB 82-03 Desi n Information www.dot.ca. ov/h /traffo s/si ntech/ g g a p g Bulletin 82-03 "Pedestrian mutcdsupp/ca_mutcd2010.htm Accessibilit Guidelines for Caltrans Hi hwa Desi n Manual y � g y g Highway Projects" Chapter 1000 "Bikeway Planning and Caltrans Standard Plans. htt :// „ ' � p Design guidelines. (http:// WWW.dot.ca. ov/h /esc/oe/ www.dot.ca. ov/h /o d/hdm/ g a g a pp project_plans/ hdmtoc.htm) HTM/06 lans disclaim US.htm • Caltrans Policies and Directives. —p — — ) • ADA Accessibility Guidelines for (http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/traffops/ Buildin s and Facilities ADAAG . g � ) signtech/signdel/policy.htm), including: htt ://www.accessboard. ov/adaa / � p g g ❑ Traffic Operations Policy Directive html/adaag.htm) 09-06 "Provide Bicycle and • Revised Draft Guidelines for Motorcycle Detection on all new Accessible Public Rights-of-Way, and modified approaches to traffic- Access Board. (http:// actuated signals in the state of www.accessboard.gov/prowac/ California." draft.htm) ❑ Caltrans Deputy Directive DD-64 " Complete Streets— Integrating the Transportation System." Agenda Item 9.a. City of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 83 71 � � � � en �x : es� n u� e �nes ..� � Guidelines for the Development of � =r t � � Bicycle Facilities, AASHTO. Guidelines �� � �{:. .� � � � � - �� for the Planning, Design, and � � � : �. . =r � Operations of Pedestrian Facilities, �`_ � ,��rR�� � ,��� � _ , AASHTO. (https:/ . �� '� � r'`� �': � ' . - =a � �— � � � bookstore.trans ortation.or / ,-ti � -� p g �` � ,� 1 ,, _ � �� � home.aspx) r • A Policy on Geometric Designs of ��� -� - �S . � . � 1'� � � Highways, AASHTO. (https:// , _ .. bookstore.transportation.org/ �� � - __ _��� ■ � . `� L � . 1 Item_deta�ls.aspx.�d=110) CLASS 1 BIKEWAY This appendix is not intended to replace existing state or national mandatory or advisory standards, nor the exercise of engineering judgment by licensed professionals. �� � �- 4 w � �� � '� '� '1-t}�� +� .; ' ?�,, • r�� �x �'� a� �F :�,t� � __ ' �s '�k r�'� ..r .° As always, all facility designs are subject to �.�� � , �-' . , ...,?.v �..; Public Works engineering design review � � _ -- '� . � and approval. � ; � . ,Ilf '-- � ,I � Bikewa Facilit -� ~ � -� v v .� .r Classifications �� �-���-;a. -� � . � i. According to Caltrans, the term "bikeway" �����1>- � -� .� encompasses all facilities that provide primarily for bicycle travel. Caltrans has CLASS II BIKEWAY defined three types of bikeways in Chapter 1000 of the Highway Design Manual: • Class I Bikeway (or Shared-use Paths) • Class II Bikeway (Bike Lanes) • Class III Bikeway(Bike Routes) + �.� � . ,� .� �� -.�, ,.r�' ..- t ��� :�. i.k•' . �_�� ' . � `+� .�. � r • �. �:-' � � �', ' f �r-� � ' � ' 1�`.;�•' �� . ,.� +�. .�� , � . �_ F � ,� '} a — . .�*� � • � • •'�� �`.. ..���.. � - '�. •� .:'�� '� � � i � . . ��•a �� � •�f.� • ;_ �f i+Y � � v w' " a——' '— CLASS III BIKEWAY Agenda Item 9.a. 72 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 84 � � � � en �x : es� n u� e �nes : . � - , ' � - - . , - . ' . - . A shared use path (Class I Bikeway) allows for two-way, off-street bicycle use, and may also be used by pedestrians, skaters, wheelchair users,joggers and other non-motorized users. State of California Class I facility design standards require that the surface be paved, and can also include amenities such as lighting, signage, and fencing (where appropriate). Minimum Standards The recommended minimum width of a shared use path is dependent upon anticipated usage: • 8-feet is the minimum paved width for Class I facilities, typically used for short neighborhood connector paths (generally less than one mile in length) • 10-feet paved width is the recommended minimum for a typical two-way bicycle path. Ten-foot wide paved paths are recommended for accommodating all uses, and allow for long-term maintenance and emergency vehicle access. In order to better accommodate maintenance vehicles adequate edge support should be provided. Edge support can be either in the form of stabilized shoulders, a concrete "ribbon curb" along one or more edges of the path, or constructing additional pavement width or thickness. • 12-feet is the preferred minimum width if more than 300 users per peak hour are anticipated, and/or if there is heavy mixed bicycle-pedestrian use. • In all cases a minimum 2-feet wide graded area must be provided adjacent to the path to provide clearance from trees, poles, walls, guardrails, etc. • On facilities with expected heavy use, a yellow centerline stripe is recommended to separate travel in opposite directions on paths 10-feet or wider. • If trees are adjacent to the path, a root barrier should be installed along the path to avoid root uplift. ��� ty. ��.,, . .�. �. - � - , -��� � - _�.-� , � � �` - �� _ � �� -. x . #�. - � +� . - , �v . �� +� �� f� �� � ;, t �� -.-..-x- - �, - •�'�, �y_ .� -�•_� . � _ � ; � —� ._ . � � _ ti ,- . - ,� . �� �+ _-. �.t *— _� ± � , �fi .. —� . € Yx . , � �'+ �" -�- -# � ��� - - ��� �E E P � `� :�. .�r. � - � - , '��- • _ '- " �EFT RIGH� �� � � �� •�� �. �I�'F�E��N�N��NDED#otal v�+idth ;� r � : '� �► for��a�s I shared us�pa�h � � �� . - �� � �'�rninir-nurn��vid�pa�red su�fa�e. `�'� : �'gra�r�l�hould�r�r��ornrr��nc��d_�+��� ;. . . . � . t',�'�,�I�{r,��� ��. �Y �ti��',IS,���;i��.�4.� ��r � ,���I ,�. . _I ii . � I �y�' i ' �f,� ' ' xs.,Ibi���� '.�.��' �if. '�����I Y. ���ryi�� � i . ��1,�r •...k 5 '�',f4 iirii ��.' ,��,'4i1 .`�4� �i' i` '. f 7 � �+� - S - 5 '��;r .�,iti` k �+�.�' I � �.s� 5.r `N 5�. : .. ;�° t �, � r�;'�. � ,` � _ �r, .�''�'` '� •' S x- �.� �- w� ' ?�. �� , .. . •,. . .f.a�. � �:��. . :{R":�ry���S� _�� �t..r v 4ix .r.3. .. . . 4�.i '�..+�l���� � ;rT:.}i�'' ' }.�I}' Y�' +i' il `�i,".�i� i�li��vl� V �"wide��Ilow 12�n��ep�r2ttior�strip�r��ornr��nd�d Examp/e of Class 1 Bikeway/Mu/ti-use Path ��p����-,��t is�I�-�t,v�ide or gre��er. Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 85 73 � � � � en �x : es� n u� e �nes : . . - • - . - - . • - . Un-paved Trail Construction Unpaved multi-use trails are common throughout the state and are cheaper to construct than paved trails. In many communities unpaved trails serve equestrians in addition to bicyclists and pedestrians. Unpaved trails are more difficult to traverse when wet, (especially with road bikes) and can be dusty when dry. Maintained unpaved trails are ideal for mountain bikes, comfort bikes, BMX-bicycles, or cyclocross bikes, most children's bikes. The surface conditions typically require slower riding. It is recommended that a 10-12-foot wide decomposed granite surface be maintained wherever possible and that vegetation within 2 feet of each side of the trail be mowed or trimmed as needed. A common unpaved trail would be constructed with at least 4-inches of compacted decomposed granite and would be crowned to allow for proper drainage. Paved Shared Use Trail Construction As trail use increases, and funding is available, unpaved trails within the City should be considered for inclusion into the 5-year CIP to be paved to meet Class 1 Standards. Note: unpaved trails do not meet the CA MUTCD Class I Bike Path Standard. The following exhibit illustrates a minimum standards for a combined paved and unpaved shared use path concept that would meet Ca MUTCD standards. �'���� `� � � , `� �� / �� � � �,�E � � . �-�, � �``�� �'�� � � � � � E� �—' � — � l °� '� �� �_ � � � � 4i � 't� ( i i � � � �t � � �� � X ��� f ?—_"---., � f /` � iJ `;�j � t �j �/�� �� ;� � �°4 /� Q �t �� `, � �. � f � tr � � ��� �� � ` 6 �� � � � � ' �4 . . j . �� � ����[ ��� J� � � ���.�� � '� `"—' � � `4 � "`��t � �� k � � � � � �`j� i � g � �� � `� `� � �.�. ." `� \`� �t� ` �i , � G --� � � �` `� { ( .a --� '�' �, ��s �'�;! � � � � � t h t f . � �---""` � E � f, � � � �� � k --�� � �' �� v' k t i � ^—c � � � � y.� � �����$ ""'_._ �`-aa� �,� � � ��) �`Z—ft.C��Bf � � � et � � y-- ✓-\��`�`\�\� �."" � { t � i � ��ov�rhang�ng �``���� ; ���`�` �j�L/f ����'`�� -��' � �J � �t ! � <7�- --�--� ve,�etation � �-` � _- ,� �m.a _---, � \ ��( 1a� � � � r/ `'.--'' � �--' � � � � �/� �' � _ ° '{� J I�-'��r� ` -� � -�_ G � '✓ � �:'� <' --.y Post and cable fence �, � � �.� �. � J �s�- � de-mar9cing firaid - !,,���, �� �� ..�'' .0.�� easement edge(at o ha�. � '., f `���� ° __� � minimum) `�}`�- �! � �"���� '�� �,,� ��� � �,! �,= Y'-4;�r,, ' j,r��( ��k '� � �'`aS�- -y.�,,�� f � t i cJ•° F F=t f k`�"�` ,i r ?`��' 'f" �`.§ � ��� ��[ Gy �t � .� �y�v �_ h�zs^ � �3,. -� ;. �... �V �`� � '�,r�r��, S-ft.buffer area �2-ft. �-� g_ft.mfnimum paved 2-ft 2-ft. � �:: clear p� shared wa{k f bike path DG clear ` � creek are� ��,y� �.r v��. ��9� with lane stripe edge veg. Ripariar�edge along 15—�,tt�24—�.EAS�MENT C�e����o�tr,����5� Agenda Item 9.a. 74 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 86 � � � � en �x : es� n u� e �nes : . - � - . . . . . • . . Trail Enhancements Trail enhancements are not critical to the movement of people, but do enhance the experience. Trail enhancements may include kiosks, public art, trees, plantings, benches, gateways, drinking fountains, public toilets, decorative fencing, memorials, pavers, trash receptacles, and air pumps. Trail enhancements may be funded as part of a trail project but may also be funded with private dollars. Bicycle racks and identification/wayfinding signage are especially important enhancements that should be considered with all bicycle projects. Trailheads Trailheads are public places to enter and exit a trail facility. Trailheads often include informational kiosks with trail maps, identification and wayfinding signage, trash receptacles, and bicycle parking. Some trailheads should offer parking for visitors and include treatments to keep motor vehicles from entering the trail. If trails are not policed on a regular basis physical devices like bollards or curbs should be considered at trailheads to control motorized vehicle access. All trail entries should include "No Motor Vehicle"signage and violators should be issued tickets by law enforcement officers. Trailheads should be spaced to reflect the density of land use and should contain consistent design elements throughout the system. ,.��.'�ti.:. �� �� "���- : y � � � �����+� � t ;: .}- � � - , �� �� � u.�r's�{ ti . � �? �,'.'�"f { ' + ' �.:. -x� � � 3�s. �' { S ;.'�. .' 1 � " "��� '�` ��f i�¢� �� {�i'"- ' I '�l' .r ry�'.lj ,k�� � ���.�''�'�y�:+'�,� ���,_��. rt� k�;�,'`, ',ti, .��,,,x�. ,.•r— �° i� . .;�� � .�. ��� 1 ,�:. �� � ��. ,:{. � , ���1�R_ ��. ; �,�.:�. �r� ', ����,� � . s� �'��:.f �� �����;- r�,.i� �2��f1�1�5Qf1 ��'�4��s� 5�,r.��' M1�;<— �f�l���C�(�kl� t\, ��•M1.f�. r . '.! ,'ir �.�.� �t M1t�y' �� ,I'. ��� � �,�� -�.*y�.;; : ���:. � — r r * ��'�� ���'_� �:`"'�:`; «;��t����.����� y 5��Y. ..'�� �J ��� ' ��k q7wl'{s.5�.l'_ � x�i �' . ' '' " K'� #F _.�.�.��;.}'3a,. . ��' � 1 . .. F i { �'�. ��..�:� — .'��{i. �. I � , * *4.��xi .'�1 � * ��..: � '�' E `���="">:�'r,��;.-,,�.���, ' '' � ��, , -'` >5����t+��". ',�„*.'_ . . ��' �. �y��'•� - s�"�� aw . _f .T�Fw,.v.� �:.y�� ry. w�;�,,*�tr�•� * .._�.* '*_k� .,�.fi r .r.' �. ���.�r��ec�..,' .. ��:.;,�,'��<•:i' �;';�.�:�-.��i wr,.'�+'^''�`#� ��" ,,�. -^�.:���#°".��_.�Y"•1.`',��',!�4'}+ k��,�}.���....���t .r ' -_ -�''���.}'�YA�h'y."y' n �'. 'x.r �_=�":S +.�`� :�:.p .'f ti.'�+ ��'t . �' � �� � � ��4 . . � � 1 �• � J ~�1 � 'y� 1 • •�,• '��� . �1 � � ' ' 1 F � -.� ' � ' -' � � � � � �� t � �'� ' !y ' �� ri + •r �. '�' �1 1 �' -� �,�� � �}�,+ � a� •�r z � ��.•r{ �r� � . , - �� . '� - �• ���f .' • �r� �f � a * ..�5� � 'r � I� ��� �� .i � r -- R 1�' �sY � 'ti'� �� . .' _- + ' � � � - ...� . . .��.�. L� p ■� • r ■� �� � ' f �� � �� � � �. rl�� � •.i��ti ■�� i ' ����ti � ■ � _� �� _�'L�,� ti�u��5.- �, •� � - � r • � • - .,4��' � �. � , � � ' r � �� � . ' _ � r ■ ` . i � . � � r �. � r ' f� � . i r �_ �� }''� - � r��. ���• i � � t Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 87 75 � � � � en �x : es� n u� e �nes : , • - � • • • . . - - . . . . . At—Grade Intersection When shared-use paths cross streets or railroad tracks, proper design should be developed on the pathway as well as on the roadway to alert bicyclists and motorists of the crossing. Sometimes on larger streets, at mid-block pathway crossing locations, an actuated signal is necessary. A signal allows bicyclists a clear crossing of a multi-lane roadway. If a signal is or is not needed, appropriate signage and pavement markings should be installed, including stop signs and bike crossing pavement markings. The following diagram from the California MUTCD depicts examples of signing and markings associated with shared path crossings. Fr'�rcrr���-� ��r�rr��1�s���i�r�ir��r�rr�A��r1��r��s ��r��ar��-�1s�Pa��rs �r����va�k�lin�� �arie�-����e�ti�n�8.17 2�s nee��d ��m�1Q�ft� E ��� � 2.4 r'r'� �.�rn 2.�rr� � ��TO� W11-1lV�f16-�p D11�1�'1�117�� (8 ft) ���ft� ��ft) � R1-1 � ��N�{��� !'�_ � � R�-� �f �.. �V 11-�1 � .� � � � ��t���� � _ •� � . � s R oad�+ay ��-� Ir�#�r���;ti�r�tr�#fi���ntr�l�i�vi�����v�+�rr�r�t�d 531�IH3h � �' a��ow on eith�r f��ilit�r d�p�ndin�on�ond�fi�n� ��r ��m{��ft} �s���e�ti�n�B_��� !��-1 '!� � ��,2 m(�ft� i.5 m��ft� �f,�m��ft� � � � � 4.��n(1��t� W�-1 ��ared-U��Pa�h �i�no�top,�i��d.or i� '�"�����`' sigr��!�or�#rvl o�p�th� ����.����f�15-1 15m{��ft� �� :� � h . � � � ��r�g oi lane 1�m{��f�� �h�red-U��Path i R R 1+V1�-1 Agenda Item 9.a. 76 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 88 � � � � en �x : es� n u� e �nes - - - , - _ . . . . . . Standard Variations Often referred to as a"bike lane," a Class II bikeway provides a striped and stenciled lane for one-way travel on either side of a street or highway. To provide bike lanes along corridors where insufficient space is currently available, extra room can be provided by removing a traffic lane, narrowing traffic lanes, or prohibiting parking. The width of the bike lanes vary according to parking and street conditions. The following eneral guidelines/ standards are extracted from the California MUTCD, and where indicated, define the figure illustration number. Road Lane Markings: Longitudinal pavement markings should be used to define bicycle lanes. Pavement markings designate that portion of the roadway for preferential use by bicyclists. Markings inform all road users of the restricted nature of the bicycle lane. Examples of bicycle lane markings at right-turn lanes are viewed in the CA MUTCD Figures 9C-1, 9C-3, and 9C-4. Examples of pavement markings for bicycle lanes on a two-way street are shown in Figure 9C-5. Pavement symbols and markings for bicycle lanes are shown in Figure 9C-6. Standard: If used, the bicycle lane symbol marking (see Figure 9C-6) shall be placed immediately after an intersection and at other locations as needed. The bicycle lane symbol marking shall be white. If the bicycle lane symbol marking is used in conjunction with other word or symbol messages, it shall precede them. If the word or symbol pavement markings shown in Figure 9C-6 are used, Bicycle Lane signs (see Section 9B.04) shall also be used, but the signs need not be adjacent to every symbol to avoid overuse of the signs. On the following pages, illustrations depict typical bike lane configurations and dimensional sta n d a rd s. Figure 9C-6(CA).Example of Optional Word and Symbo!Pavemenf Markings for Bicycle tanes 6.53 m � (21 in]� � L . ~ 1.52 m(5 R} . � � �150 mm{6 in) 15Q mm(6 in)Grid 140 mm 81KE LANE ARitOW �� {4 in) 50 mm 1.02 m i2 inJ �[40 in)�1 4 D 5 : '�. . � 1.95 m(6.5 ft) 100 mm „ (4 in) 50 mm ��� �� (2in� 100 mm(4 in}Grid NOT TO SCALE BIKE LANE SYMBOL Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 89 77 � � � � en �x : es� n u� e �nes : , , . . . . • . • - . When Curb, Gutter and Parking Present • 5-feet minimum width from curb face; or 3-feet more measured than gutter pan width, if gutter pan is greater than 2-feet • 6-feet recommended where right-of-way allows • 5-feet minimum width when parking stalls are marked • 12-feet minimum width for shared parking/bike lane adjacent to a curb face • 11-feet minimum width for a shared bike/parking lane where parking is permitted but not marked on streets or without curbs See CA MUTCD for marking and signing standards. '� •.}.� '' -- �- •�._ '� � � � r� -� �,. ,"�'� ��` ..."�• ��}�.�. Y_� � �.t , _x '�*'" �� -�' ;.` ,� � � -- Examp/e of Class ll Bikeway- Gutter/with Parking .{. -# - - �• � �� -:.`- _-,�. �;,�,� � . :� - - ,�-� r . ) x � -* �` � . �� # - � -�� =F�l _ ._ ; _ � . � � �°minir�ur�r�strip�d and r�r�ark�d ' r�``� � bi��I�n�r��xt t�p�r�iny , ;. .i* *y � #*ti; �� I�^•J ' -- ��--���? �� ~ M1k� � ;,.''� i'i ��� { . I f -- � �I' I_J � � • .. �,i � ', __. . . .�. �r•I�`�I � I� .{ t r f'�_ _a . • ,.�r -- , � . , ,,� � + + f�I �I �� III'}I �, �� � ��kti�'�,'k�'�. y'� ! w��� � ' — �_.:,��}'�I � ��i ��+ +I � � � ---- ` :. �_�-_= �f � .`� �;�'?'; . �. .� � i �I �+��� ,� �. ".t'_ . r�xly YckiVi 4'r�i�\_�4L' c7�L �''�.+'Y..:^'i} u:�'� y'}f;. - �#� ����� }�F��t � h Examp/e of Class ll Bikeway- Gutter and No Parking --+ r t �. �. _ - �'p��r�d�min�rr�urn st�i��d a�nd J�-� - �- ��. rr��rl��d bi4c�I�n��vh�n gutt�� �- 4. � � � ` - pr�s�nt � BI�C� L�I�E � . �� � - . � -- ��.. � ��. -�k� /� ����, �� � � ��� � _- ,'I 5 +� ' 4 _ �. ,� .�� ���' : ��, � � . �. ,_ , , � . .. _ � � ��� �,iL� i i i �-�t� .. �y� i '� i � ��...i .{ � , � ��� . .x . '��'rtr +� . � + �r� r ����.ti'�, .k :' --� ��{+ �.x. #�,-�'. .. �� - Y d*,.�#'r ✓ '.�?��+}si.r.7• �+ w•,�`r�� .�-r ,'x;a-r .-S?>.+..�.FYrr� Agenda Item 9.a. 78 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 90 � � � � en �x : es� n u� e �nes - - - , - � � . � � . When No Gutter Present (rural roads) • 4-feet minimum width from fog line (no gutters) • 6-feet preferred where right of way allows See CA MUTCD for marking and signing standards. - ...� . �� '�� " " " i� Examp/e of C/ass ll Bikeway- No Gutter/No Parking -- .� .�., . , . ,w� .�.� -_ . _ .�� � � �'�vRdth for�la��s�I Bik�Lan� ��'�� `F � � ;. wh�n N�g�tter pr�s�rrt � �� . �"wi�fe s�riping and la�ne rnar�C�rs BI�E ��41�E � required , #- � .� �. �� �� � , ,� �� � t r. '��.�i�.! , � �� . � � � �''� ��;��.� ��#�+. ,-�- - -�-� �--�-... ���r �'7�=�'��,x•�-,�:4�;3� ��ir;� 1 .lt��'r .7 �t rt►y'i i7��.r :.Fa�,. �rr��:�_t_,�t_� ►.��_g:�r���¢��.,L:�,=r��s' Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 91 79 � � � � en �x : es� n u� e �nes : , , . . . . . , . - , - Class II Bikeway Intersection Design-Signalized Intersections Intersections represent a primary collision point for bicyclists. Small intersections with few lanes are relatively easy to manage. However, large, multi-lane intersections are more difficult for bicyclists to travel through than smaller, two-lane intersections. Challenges and potential solutions for bicyclists' at large signalized intersections include: • Signals may not be timed to allow slower-moving bicyclists to travel across the intersection. Solution: Bicycle adaptive signal timing. • Loop detectors or video detection that is used to actuate the signal may not be calibrated to detect bicyclists. Solution: Design standard of bike loop use. • Bicyclists may not know how to actuate the signal using loop detectors, even if it is calibrated. Solution: Use of bike loop detector symbol. • Bicyclists who are traveling straight may have to merge across motor vehicle traffic that is turning right from a right-turn lane. Solution: Bike lane pockets at intersections, between through and right turn lanes. Design treatments can help bicyclists travel through intersections and alert motorists of bicyclists' presence. Good intersection design alerts motorist to bicyclists, indicates to motorists and bicyclists where bicyclists may ride, and guides bicyclists through intersections. This treatment provides a design for where a roadway with Class II bike lanes intersects with a road at a signalized intersection. Bicycle Actuated Signals & Adaptive Signal Timing (see also Appendix C) Making intersections more "friendly"to bicyclists, involves modifying how they operate. Improved signal timing, calibrating loop detectors to detect bicyclists, and camera detection makes intersections easier for bicyclists to cross intersections. Loop detectors are installed within the roadway to allow the metal of a motor vehicle to trigger a change in the traffic signal. Many standard motor vehicle loop detectors can be calibrated to detect bicycles. This allows the bicyclist to stay within the lane of travel and avoid maneuvering to the side of the road to trigger a push button. Signals can be configured so that if a bicycle is detected, an extended green time can be provided. Right-Turn Only Lanes Right-turn only lanes can present challenges for bicyclists traveling through an intersection. Bicyclists must merge to the left to position themselves in the through travel lane. Jurisdictions will sometimes stripe bike lanes on the right-side of right-turn only lanes, which places the through-cyclist in direct conflict with a right-turning vehicle. The appropriate treatment for right-turn only lanes is to either drop the bike lane entirely approaching the right-turn lane, or to place a bike lane pocket between the right-turn lane and the right-most through lane. Agenda Item 9.a. 80 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 92 � � � � en �x : es� n u� e �nes - - - , - - � ' � . � ' • ' Class III Bikeway Design Generally referred to as a"bike route," a Class III bikeway provides routes through areas not served by Class I, where frequency of riders do not justify bike lanes, or where right-of-way is not available to include Class II facilities. Class III facilities are shared with motorists on roadways and are identified in most cases only by signing. There are no recommended minimum widths for Class III facilities, but when encouraging bicyclists to travel along selected routes, traffic speed and volume, parking, traffic control devices, and surface quality should be acceptable for bicycle travel. Although it is not a requirement, a wide outside traffic lane (14 feet) is typically preferable to enable cars to safely pass bicyclists without crossing the centerline. Caltrans Highway Design Manual Chapter 1000 provides details regarding the design requirements for placement and spacing of bike route signage. Share the Road signs are recommended along Class III Bike Ways with narrow paving / lack of shoulder to remind motorists and bicyclists to be aware of one another. See CAMUTCD for marking and signing standards. ���4�� T�I E � s � ���4� r _-�._ �� i -� . �� - ������������������ ������ ��, Examp/e of C/ass lll Bike Route wid�pa�rin� �pr�f�rr��} � ���� � . .�i �' � I .�� I . ' •r5 I ''..1��'.�r'�II� ��7�.�f L � ��� ,. . ��,�S9�' f, � �,i �x��}' . ,I.� �. � � s x�. ���I ��,� .. . � � k��. �.���#� _ .;:. _ ` �I � +� �, �� ��ry �*�.{����. Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 93 81 � � � � en �x : es� n u� e �nes - - - , - - � � . � � • � Shared Roadway Bicycle Marking Recently, Shared Lane Marking (SLM) stencils have been introduced for use in California as an additional treatment for Class III facilities, and are currently approved in conjunction with on-street parking. The stencil can serve a number of purposes, such as making motorists aware of bicycles potentially in their lane, showing bicyclists the direction of travel, and, with proper placement, reminding bicyclists to bike further from parked cars to prevent"dooring" collisions. The 2010 CA MUTCD specifies that shared lane markings only be used on roadways with parallel parking, but the forthcoming 2011 edition is expected to allow greater discretion in placing "Sharrow" markings on roadways with or without parking. SLM's are recommended to be placed 11.5-feet from a curb where parking is present. Where there are two or more lanes per direction, if the outside lane is less than 14-feet, or where there is high parking turnover, a SLM may be placed in the middle of the outside travel lane. 1 'i I , • , .F J • � -.` + �� � � ��,.� -.�+ , i _.-�..� L .�•, .�.. � F • � r� I � �� - .f .� � � � , t • � .i.,I �,_•-•-. !� . �� � ' 1. --�� i ��� -- � �� ' � � • - ,��•��!� �f' � �.. , .� _f � ��.� �' � _ r� � L������ �•- ��� '�� � �-�}- �• �' _� •. . � � � � ,�.••�.�� .5.:�.. �•�. � .�+ +�' _ � 4�.� � u"� : . - I�ti' � _ � r - � . � .�� � � r F�ti � ��� f �. + �' 1 ti,1�� �a� '� - - . • � '�r . • •� .1 � ti ��� . 1 � � � - -' �� _ � � _ � � Agenda Item 9.a. 82 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 94 � � � � en �x : es� n u� e �nes : . : - � - . . . . . - . - Short Term Bicycle Parking Bicycle racks provide support for the bicycle but do not have locking mechanisms. Racks are relatively low-cost devices that typically hold between two and eight bicycles, allow bicyclists to securely lock their frames and wheels, are secured to the ground, and should be located in highly visible areas, preferably at the front of a building. • Bicycle racks should be a design that is intuitive and easy to use. � ,y�i� 3. ti...� . . ,. �.,• `�� 5 �. . • �cyc e rac s s ou e secure y anc ore to a sur ace or structure. � ,��R� � _{� .��, ,.F�,�� .� � �. �.� • The rack element (part of the rack that supports the bicycle) should keep the L. F .,. ,� � {� �.� . �� � . , � bicycle upright by supporting the frame �n two places without the bicycle . � �}� � � � ���r�. . ;�� .•�.�, frame touching the rack. The rack should allow one or both wheels to be � �� —� ��. � r��� ������' � . .' ���. � secured. �� �� r ���a� �� �r� �� �� � • Avoid use of multi le-ca acit "wave" st le racks. Users commonl �� :� � � ,� �� p p y y Y � � ,� .� � misunderstand how to correctly park at wave racks, placing their bikes '-��4 ''�� ���! r - 'r;��� parallel to the rack and limiting capacity to 1 or 2 bikes. � �� • Position racks so there is enough room between parked bicycles. Racks should be (Example only) situated on 36" minimum centers. • A five-foot aisle for bicycle maneuvering should be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle racks. • Empty racks should not pose a tripping hazard for visually impaired pedestrians. Position racks out of the walkway's clear zone. • For sidewalks with heavy pedestrian traffic, at least seven feet of unobstructed right-of- way is req u i red. • Racks should be located close to a main building entrance, in a lighted, high-visibility area protected from the elements. Long Term Bicycle Parking Long-term bicycle parking facilities accommodate employees, students, residents, commuters, and others that typically expect to park for more than two hours. These �-- - - parking facilities should be provided in a secure, weather protected manner and location. , � , • Long-term parking should always be protected and in a secure area. � ;� , . • Bicycle lockers should be a design that is intuitive and easy to use. J� '� _ . � B�cycle lockers should be securely anchored to a surface or structure. � I .,� � . •, . • Bicycle lockers should be constructed to provide protection from theft, vandalism and �� � � � � - , weather. F � I ' -� �! • A five-foot aisle for bicycle maneuvering should be provided and maintained beside � ����� . r � . - : ,�, or between each row of bicycle lockers. *� � Lockers should be located close to a main buildin entrance, in a li hted, hi h- `i��� . � • g g g � �i � ,,. � visibility area protected from the elements. � � � • Long-term parking should always be protected from the weather. A recommended reference guide is the Pedestrian and Bicyc/e Professiona/s Bic� (Example only) Pa�q Guidelines 1 st and 2nd edition, (http//www.apbp.org/?page=Publications) Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 95 83 I �� r�r�� � ir����� � I �� r��r�� � ir����� � ��� r��r� �� ir��l��� �� r��r�� � ir����� I �� rr�r�� � ir����� � Agenda Item 9.a. Page 96 � � � � en �x : a rans o �c �rec �ve - .} ��������.����.������������������������� �'����� �I�E�'I`I�� 7'�-��11���91����� I�L]�IrI���: �'���: '�'���'�� ���1��I��� ��.�.��� ����TI�� �9��� 1 �f � �o�����o���� } �����x������� ��rr�rs�u��: �������r���r�: �- -�-�--.�.� �.-�_ _.- �-� Au�st�?,���� ��p��mb�� 1�, ���� � .����': ����'��u�`���v ��r���c���i���l� ��c���������1� ����c.ti�� �x� ��.�x��v� , . . ��1�Dis�r��t I��r��t�r� ���mod.��ec� ����oa�h�s �c�tra�fic�actuat�� ��g�.��� � ��� ����� �����l���ll�. ��11�D��t�ty Dis#��t 7]�re�to��� Tra.f���erati�n� �A1��]��uty]D�st�-�ct�����t���- ll�ai�tenan�� ��1�D�p�t�r I3�����t�]ir��t��s- ��n�tru�t�c�r� �Alj�e�uty I�����t D�r�et�r�- L�cs�gn ��►.!I 17���aty�]��tri�t D�r��tc�rs- '�'ran����t�t�on�lannin� ��l�i��,�i�i�i�n�f�n��r��erin���zvi.��s ���i�f��ur�s�1,��ga�����i���n �Fub��ca���or�s��a��for�n�a.1V��J'7'C��e�s�te� �w�r.d�t.�a.���l�.c��t�-�a�`�����i��t���.l�utc�d su�pl�a��nu t�d.htrn � Hea�c�x�art���Di���i�n�����s��r: D���T�I��]�IR��T`�V�AFFE��'���L�������� Y�'���,1�E��R��E .�v��r����a�����vrr�? ���� ❑�� �rrY�nci����p�er��3�#'�h���.1if�r�i�.M�JT�D �II�L T�II��IR��TI��BE INC;��P��A�'��]� ��'���,]��5���� �,���ALIF�RNIA M��JAL��I LJI�IF��M T�'�'����I��'1���D�VI��� ���5 [��� �1�a.pt�r 4D-�ec�i���I�.���,��a�t�r�A—��ctio��A.�����A.�, �i ur���]��11 �� �ac�d�'abl�4�-��� �A� ������� ����u��t�� �h� ������i� �r�.���c��� ��x� �������x��a��p���xx��x��f T�-�n���r��►�i�n (��p��rt��n�� ir� ������n �1��� �r�cl�1��� �f��� ������rn�a.��l���l� ���� �����, ����i�n� �A.��, ��.1�� ��A� ��� �i��xr� ��-�1� ���� shall �� �r���s�c� ��c� ����v��������1�9 ��A� ��cl���� �h� �������-x�i��a��x�l �n ��i��r��'r��f�� ���►��r�� ��vi��� ���T��� cl���cl �����m�����, �������r�vi���i���l� ��d�1V����r���1���������� �� �� ��������i�� �� �r�ffi�:���r���ec� s������ i��h� ����� �f���if�r�ia.. '��i� �ir���i��i� eff���i�� �����rr�b�r 1�����9. Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 97 85 � � � � en �x : a rans o �c �rec �ve - �������������� In t�i�s���ior�� f�r��oses a��la�i��, ���i�ethra����e�t�s u��d to c��r��te�e��in�.h���liforr����I'�L�t�at is be��a�de�eted ar�c�i�alx�t���i�����t�c��r����t��t t�a�����a��r����c���t�t���a��i���i�1V�TJT��.�1��t�.e���rrnat�ir��a.�c��r�1���ur�d��t�� ��#��ni��ons ���t��n�f't��P�1����]xr���������ti11 a���������. �'�������v�ir����a��b�in��rp��a�����n�����l�f��r�i��VIL�'���J: � ��c������A.�������t��x�������in���I�ii�l���y'I���f�i��i����� . 15.�����tor�a�e�x�.e��e��or c�ete�rr�inin�t��pre�ence or��s��g����e��c��� �an��ud���r�o�������1���l��c����s or ������ri�n�. ���f. �in�i��ir��1�������������—c����f��-�r���d���,y����.��������s���c�����t��e���c� �;f��c���x�e�i���a��ac��L,��i����c���� �irr��i�����, ce�����d ei����i� �����r����d�h�ar�����f�l�e�a��i�mo�e��Za� .��,,f��uide, c���e�er��f�i f�a� ��te�e,f��a�e�i�e. .�'���c��c���f��f���g������� t��rr������� �.f��c�f�u��ac�s�l�u�����x,L�`����t�e��������������t��n����, SD�f, �e;fe���ce�i�yc����der-�a�n��i�u� 4 f�tu���e��so�, �v��g��n��n����ar�� �D��, �id���o�a� u�modi ��d���t��ttu� .I��-�r�c�t �v�iee����y������t�to��fe�r��a����i��f`�a��,�o�:f`e��-o�na,��et�'c fo�-�a�d c�acr�ks, a�u���urr� �i��,��ai��e�����e� s�po�e�, a�d�eaa��i���. . � . �� . � . - - , • , . . .. � � . . . . . . . �5�����r� ��,.������� �i�,���������r�,y���JJ����t�'�� �'�a�da�-d: ����e���rr�������a���e��o�����a��at�o�s a�d�o�� �ca�io�s�o��e ex�st�`���irni��'i��a�e�ect�'o� o�a.pr�����o���iva���oad ��d��ve�v�,�r����r����i���������r�a������`e��io� ��.�3,f'��d�f����o�.s�s�ia���������r���id�a L��.�������]e�e���o����e �� �v����������``��-��t�����,����-�������a�������cl����,��ac��a��r�����nac�������ac����fi��c�c��'��o�e��xt`i��.���f���� �T�� �.�45�.S. �4���e�c�nd�oa�� �ed��J�e��c�� app�oac��s�o ac�ig��c�i.�e�ir�����s��tian�s�����e ec�r��ppe��v��h������a���i�L��e l�e����io�,�o�e o�a�i�,���is��u�s��ut`�o�, o�e��e���p�as�e�s���-v�����e b��e�a����a�����v�a��d or��e��ane�t�e�a�!o� ��xe��i�ne o�e�-a�io�..� �i�yc�i�t�u�s��but�o�, �f u�•�c�,s�a�������a�e�o� t�����1����a��of�he b���pa��a�d���������c� b� r��x���d�f'�o��1��b����r���. �`���S'������ ��.���`������y�����g������r�����. ���e�u�si��a��,�ed�r��e��s�ec�ion�s�o��v��� ��e adva�ce����c��o� ���e����e��aeed a�e�is���g��g�a��,�e�i��e�se��i�r�s, ���cs����v����c��u���a������i�� �r��,���a����������c�����e��a�����������, �'u��o�-�.• �'����qu������t��cl�����������f������e������e��ic����� ������ni������e����io�����a�s �e������g�-�e���ac�. ���ion: ���c�e����io������r�� ��ke �c����nc�����ac�����e���.c�� �f�. �'e��`��u�e��--,�,����'�4�, �4��c�r���.���������'�y�����c��y be���c�. �'���'���i�����.��c��d 5���.5. �i����r���s� ush�u��o���y��used�o su�p�e�ner�t�he�equi�ea��irni��ine c�e�e���o�. Agenda Item 9.a. 86 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 98 � � � � en �x : a rans o �c �rec �ve - I��������.�'���N ��or�ti���cl� �'uppo�t: �'�e�`�c�i��9,�.,���'o�bic�c�e�e�u�a�o�y�ig�s. �uid�n��.* � �o����acn ,��°�a ��e�i�ni��i��c�e�ee���,s�n�ec��o���-e �ac�d at a�� a���ed i�te������on �����h�enti�e i��e�se�+�io� ��aou�c��e�c���ac�e�so��a������ane hcxs c�.�a�it.�i��D������o��or�e_ .�'l�������-���ie,�i�;�����-��c�e�c��-����c��u��cx����s'��������,�����c.�������ai�������������� �r��e����. ���o�vi���s�t�uu����.s�,. �. �4 �a�����e��i��a�s�.���n���,s��e� i��s������r��• �� �. �h�de�ec�io��on���-a��o�hc�.s been�.ac�i,�e�! �'������: �Y���`e���c�����D��a� �eq���e��rcyc������s���a�e���g "c��a sp��c��'e,s�s���� t���o��c�����ed oi f��c�+ffi�"�o�id� "��c}�ose as� ��a����a��e�a t�e�igh�-han��u��o�ed�e of�he roadway"v�i�h�x���a�ia��s�, ��c��c�������n �he��c�rc��.��i�s "�����c�ch��g� �a�ac�w�a��-e a�i����u����a����to����c�." ��s e�cc���ron�vas��n��r�d�d�o��ov�de��e bi�yc�i�s�t�he f�ex������y ��a�oi��avi�g�`o ��a�e���in�sT��he�ight ha�c�c���a�edg�e o������ad whe��a po�en�i���Fo�fli����Tc����b�c�ea�ed v4r��� a�ig��������g�no�o����. . ������.�ir�e.�J��������������-�vi��s�fc�����c�����������f���� b�c�����s c��d�v������s�, �����c�����z���r-��yc:���s. ���c�c�n��,• ���e ac�in�a��ine����c�i�n�on�t�c��d�te�������e e�e�ce�ic ��e-�ic�e���,��een �ovic�ec� rr����rr�urr��� c�e�i�nin ,�����c���p���i�ec�c��s.f������sY: � �o�c�����c��s4�.s;, ��e,s���of���rr�ar�i�u�t �� �e�,��us����e��v�v��a����nt��ua�,���c�s a����d��ea�a��e��.�en�a�s�o��d�ae �s��c �������������v c��aa� ��a�s���c�i� c��a� ��� � ���� �����c������c������ ���ir� �c���c�t c��s ���c� 1�.� ������ ��.�c�� c�c�c������zc��� �������s������ �a���o �,s�����a��s c���c����� �h� ������ C��� + ��- ��r����-� ��s:�� � (�+����} ��.7����.���, ���r�� ���� _��� �1�� �i�i��� �e��a i����-va� �s•�� �=�������r�I�r�������vc���s�e�� �r����L����h o��e����a�c�nc��e i�te�a���s��� �=�����u��� ��r���r�n�������� c��s��c��� ��xs'��.3�� I����� ���� � �'uppa��.• � .�ic���i������.sing������c��e�s���v� ir� �'cx�����-�����`�}. ���.����c��_f��.�_f�l.��������.���������fi�a���-����������c�c��c� ����ff���ive�s�a��-�c���r�n�of���c�nds���a����nts������ne�ns���r��ac���g tr� �h��re��a ��gh�a�ad��e� a�.�ce���-ati���oif'u�� .s�eed. ���i��.� �. �i�ni��ine c�et���ion�y��e�n��a�cc��c�is��i�ina�e�e�w+�en�icyc�r'�s��s a��ve�ic�es�a��e�����o exte�d t�e���g�� o_f ��e�i�i���n����. Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 99 87 � � � � en �x : a rans o �c �rec �ve - ���������� � � ���.�v�cl������x��.���a.�t���.t�r�r���r����c�ur�d�r�h.i���1���. �������U�TI� ��a����rpc��������ii�c�ir��tiv�i���irr��l���nt A� 1�$1 �ull�r�,�v�i����.� �i��d�}r�k��C���at�.��r�a���������, 2���, �d ����.�a�X�.�u�n Ja.r��a.ry ��2���. ��.�c�c������ti��21�5�.� �.�th��a.l�f��i�.���i�����c����.� ��11�v��; �a}A tra��#"x�—�.���1�.��CC�S��'1�.�1��.11���1�1�.����.�������1��`�1���1�.�,a.� ������'��d xa����txc�����,t�a�d���������� �r�n�r�c�f��s ��ii��.ti�ns ir�r����r���t�t���������������f�`i��1��������b�r�����������-i��al, �l��tri�a�l,�r�t��r�n��.rY�. ��� ���r�t�� �ir�������rr��r������r����-������.ed�i��1���e�����r��r�������1����1��.������������fi��a��a���d.�����,��i� traf'�i�-��tu�t�d sxgn�������,t�����t�����a������������r���r�a�.����t��r���s����al t���f���r���r���rir����a���i��, b� ��.�ta.�1�d�d rr�a�ir�t�.ir�������to��t��t 1���u1�����1��r rr����r���1��r���"i��r�t�����c�vc���. {�� �iti��, ��ur�����,a.x�d������ ��d��un���� sha.�l r��t b�r����r�c�����rr�p��v��������r�vi���x�s���a�a���a�c������di�����n �����ti1 t�����artm�r��c�f�ra�s���t�.t��r�, 11`����1���������1�1��1��1�����1�1����, ha��s�a�li�h�c���iform��ar�c�ar��, ����i�'��a.������ ax���id��ir��� f��t��c������i�r��#`�����1�� ar�c�.�n������������t��f fi�-a�t�at�c��i�a.ls a.��r���t���i�n�l tir�i��- �d}rl,�� s���.i�r�s��l r���ir��n�f���t��I�r�t��.�ar�� �, ����, �n�as���l�at��t�i�����al�c�,u�l��s a l�t�r������� ����ut�, �h��i��r�����d����r�Jar�x�� 1, ����, ��1�t������t�r�d�t�at c�at�. T`�����ar�m��t,��r�t��.r������� ����i�r��.����� ITII�����IIC�����1���1��7��.�'��'l�S�7����'�1���Il�'�V1����I���I1��'���� ��r��.r�1 d�vi����1i����.�T�l����1��ITll�T�'��������]��'����VI��� ���I71`I71���� ��T�D�� 1���1�����I�S�C��� ���1�����71� ��c��i�����t. C��a�a��ary��, 2��S,��e��'���dx��c�ec���a��]���t�c���� �o�m a�A� 1.�81 �ub�orr�i�tee to d��elo� r���r�rr��r�c�a�ti�r�� f��-ur�i����t��c��.�c��, s�����"���.tic���, ax�c��ic��lir���f�r t��d���������f`�������� a.r�d rr�c�t�r���l��b�t�ra.��'�� ��������1�1��5�T�.C��`�����C��1�1�1�1T�]1I�����'��1���1���`111�N�L�T��.�1��� ����. ��b��xa�xx�.�t��, ����r t�.���u.�����`��v�r�1 �����r���, ��r����t���a���r�s���in���ti��ti�n�t�rr��t�r�����ar���i���1���������r���e��t�x�z��-� ��`���:11�a.� ��, ����, a��r�t��. pa.���t: ��ttp:��u��w.d��.�a.�����c����r�.�`�������������.I�������ala����c�a1A�g���1���1��9��er�c��c�.�c���. �n��� �.�, ����,���AB 1��1 ����c��rrYitt�������r�i�t�c���.�r���m��nd��i�r��.c������`�;C��.�`�.���.���� �c��pt�c��. �a�t��n��f�r�arc�t�� �����r,��x�ui����'��r���n�xn�r�c�a.ti��t�t��I]��artrr��r�t�i��i r�vi���r��,a.�r�fl����d ir��h�Im�a��rr��n������. ����i�r���thi�c���ur�ne�t. T��p�r���n���� s�����x��'�����c��t�����n�f`rn�t����r�l���.nd�i���1�� ��t�������y-r����r�l ir��rc��r�t��.���rrir���t��.�� ��rer�t as�e���.s f�tur�d�te�tio�t��hr�olo����. �`����r�orrnar���st���rd�s��b����.�s a��� d��`x�xt�o�s for�t�����`�re��e �3���r���-��c���r a��a�t�i�L�rr�it�i����t��ti����r��, �1����L�1�����1��c��1�11��1�]�I��������������3�����XC��(�11`����1�.�'���� ��1�����Il���T��C�1�1����'c���1����������1�'1�.1. ���������1��r�11��d������c��v��r�v��r t�.����'���x����������-1����r�� [�������C�. ���� ���1��������Ll��[�1��1�I7���1�1�1�'���7�.��.�3�C������1�1�����ll]����T�������1�����1�11��1C����I1C��'C�. A��ir�t L���������.i�r��o�� i�r�c��ir�d ir�����t�a�v���an���������i���l����a�-����n�����aril�r r�c�����d�.�ric���s #`�r�� ���ri�'i����r���i���l�. ��T��,1������ ��a.��s t�aa.�������1���������i����a.�a.����d���s t�.a.�.t��r����.� ����c���t�r�f�i��m��ir�� �r�t�.� �a.��d��r��ti��at t��t�ir����a�l ri�����1�������a��.��a����t�����i���,har��l������������'���r��.��v������t�r��id�� ��v�r�1�����ti�r��, 1r����di����������i���1�st is"a.��r��.��r����1�.��v���r�a.ri��it t�r�n is�ut�i�ri���i.'��'�i���.x.��������i�� �s pr���d�d�or bik�Ia�es in�V�����5, �.d o��o�se,r�oto���c��s�s��ec�to b�d������c�xa���.c��arav�����r��arc�less. T`��A�3 �.��� �����r�ni�.t��c����rr�������t������t�r���r���i��m����d o�`����-i�lin���im�t�����t��������x��i��1�e d�a.��r��.�c�uad.r���l�i�c����xv�1��p, ��1����.�1������'�'�11��1 1��l����� I����5�� ���.11C��C��I�1��-���. ����.�r��ar������� ���c�uad.ra�ir���, �.�����.ir���.1�A1t�anc������t�i�r��1����i���ti��. T�1���i���n�l��nc�����r��f a�di�����.���a.d�x��1�1��� �r�vid��h�r�z�r�������a�r��r��t�t��rr�ag���i��`i���i��r�ry���r�v�i��ir��h�1���,�1�i����r����s�a�y t���t���t����r�i�a.1 r.�.�ta���ns o�a����rc�e. T`h�A� 1 S�1 �r�b�oarr�rr�ittee als�dete�-�ni���d�.�a�.�id�o detecti�n�ni��it also��e a prac�i��l me�.hc�d of�rov�dir����e �e�f�rr�a������d.�.�rd. ����r���s��r������ur�c���.��ti�n���1��1��i��th�.t�n��t t1����r���rnan����.ar�da�d.�r��.���a.����t����. �'`�ie c�ara��eri�����o�`��.e�e�ere��e�icycle��ic���v�ere se�eete�.to e�sure 1�����1�r�ost l��c�cl�s and ric���s��r���cluded �31��������������.��]��1�V��C����`�.��C�������.�����1�������'�ll�!].�"�C���.���1������1����1��. Agenda Item 9.a. 88 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 100 � � � � en �x : a rans o �c �rec �ve - �i��i�na��irr�ir���i��r�����.�i��.11����1�����i�p��.��tr�������.�tirr�i���x�c�a�.��������x�n��,�� ��`t���a1i���i2� �-[J��"��, A��ui��tl��������r�ar��r���ir���i����c�a���,�i����i�t-�r���in�tirr�������t�a.x��������������d r���a���c�a��. ������1���€.�r��� v��r�rx��d i�d�t�rrr�i��������rn�x��f���h�ti��tha�v��11 all������1�i���l�st����x�����.x��x.����-����i�r��� ��1V�1��7U1C���, �r��1�di��t�� 1��� ��t�i����'th� ����'�f��'��������������c��c��c���, ����rt.�����`�gnac��'��c���x��� ���.i�g f�� �i�����4�� fr��m t1�� 1�9� IT�E J��rn�l,�����xx�x���S`����c�r����s���i��y�����c��, �.r��i�r��r����������a�����r����fi l��ir���o�r�c�r�rY�t� �`��������r.�.������'.A.�I,���'�z��.��s���r�c�va.����'ra�r�s��r��.ti���c��������r� ��T T�����.����, �3���c���.�������ux���,��.� ����1��1���1����1� �1I1�������11������C����'��1�C���1��1��T�����1� ��1�1�����.�7 �������d����c�c�����r���tirr�����c��� �`��a. �t�d�r���tart��� ���_ ��1�'l���]1���I�l����'��L����1�1 I�II���`�7111117���]���1����.�����.#���`����'I11'Il��]��L����,��t���PAT`I-������r��t�a�#`�u.r�d ���.t��.���acre�.s�d rr�i�im�rr��re��t�rne��o�ld�a�e a��ixx�.a����ect or�t�a#��'�c�o��e�ti�n b��aus�durin��eriods of �C������1C��1��1� 51������������1���1����L1SLl�.����C3I1�����1c�.I1�.��I�11I]1I]�Li1I1����]�ll71�S ��'1��.�.A1s���1���i�����c����� s��� ���es��a�c��.11s�as�m��h�i���r ir�pa�t or��o���st���.. �t������.���'��� �a�co����rne�abau�.t��n��ati��e impact t�ie ��������i��.1�i�r�ir���.i��.n���v��1���������i�ti���i�.a����r�t��r�, ��x�r�����r�d��t�i����i�;�uic�a����nly�p�l�t� x���v�d m�c�ifi�c�traf����t����d���.a��v�ith rr��r���an��°���f t�i�lix�i�1x��d�������r���1���-�������1. �I'h��'��e�ra��x��v�ay Adrr�ir�s�ratior��as r��-i���d t�i��ropo��d modi�icat��r�s to��e�al�fo��a 1VI��T�'��ar�c��ia� d.ete�n��ed����t�ey�.�re�r��u��tar��ia.1 con�`or�an�e v�r�t�i���1VIi,.JT�D. ��11�C�1�"���1V�V►�1�����`��1�'����.�.�.��1� 1�1�£}����.��C�.1I���1��1�����'4���1��1����1��c�11�U�I1���LTT��. �����Y����� �h�r����c�i�thi�Tra���� ��e�r��i�r�s �'�l���r I�i��������������#������ 1�����i����.� ���1��v�: 1� ���nd�r�l—a��t���rr������r�t��.i��d, �a.�����r��� ��O��i�`���11�r�r��i��t�c��r�a.�ti��. A11 �ta��.arc�s t��� �p����� ir���It� t��, �'��ver� ��i���is��i��������c�. ��c�I7C��.�'C�� �.�'� ���17��1�1���1'1�C�1�1����T��J�1��1�. �� �L��C������-�-� �����1'�1�11����'����1�1��1��C�, ��.1�I10��1�.IlC������, ���.��.1��1�1��1��� ���.11��lO�IS, �V1� cl���a��i�r�� �11���d�������.��x�ix��j�c��n�n����r��in���rir�g�tu.c���r��i�a.�.�� t�����x��������� �ppr��priat�. A�� ��i���� �t�t���r��s t�a�t a�p���..r� �r�ur�c��r�i��ty��. 'Th����� ����lc� i� �y�i�a�1�u��cl. Cu1da��� sta��m��t� are som�.�t��e�n�di�ie����p�io�s. �� ��i�r��a.sta.t�rr����.�����.�����t�aa�t x� ����a������ ���.d��x�a�a ��d ��r�i��r�� r�c��i����r���r� . r����axx��r�da.�i�r�, ���i��������r���.ir��11���.���rr��c�ifi��ti�r�� �� a. �tax�da�rd ����i�a.r���. A1� �p�i�r� �ta��e��r�ts t�xt�.p��ar� �n n�rmal t�p�. ��e ver� �.a��s t�px�������ed. �� ����or�t�ar��n�'�rmatlona� stat�rn�r�t tk�at doe��ao� co�.ve���ay de�ee of mar�date, r�co�m�d�.�ior�� ����1�T1���1��1������.���1�I7, ��`�]���`������ ���1C�1�1C�Il. �Ll���� ���.�����1�� �����.��)��.�� 1�1 11��1�� �.�]�. �`he ve�r�� s�a�1, sh��xld a��.n����r�not��ed in �upport �ta�er�ner�ts. Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 101 89 � � � � en �x : a rans o �c �rec �ve - A'�TA�����'�'� ���n�inuet�� � Fi��rr� ��-��1��A� ��c���l�� �� D����ti��r ���t��� �����t � �f �� � -I n�er���ti�� v�rith � d -�r�t�r�����on �th � ��I�e ���� ��r������ ���� �.���r�r�pp�d t�� i n��������n ��f�r� �r��,�r��t��� �� � � � � �. i � . 2 _ . # '���y Y��Y F�F�4 �. . * 1��1•���V F• ' ' ' �1/� " ' ��li• ' ,�Y����L.FY..■ ��i���4.I�� �"" ' '"___1 �____1 � I`. y '....y �•___� �.� • i t i i i I � •r . i i � . . . . . , I�������� . . . . . , i�����C�� : ; ; ; : : ����n�� ; ; : : : : ���.io��� � � � : : : � : � : : : : : : : : ; ; I : : : : � ; ..�. . . .-- -, --�: :-- -} �-- -; 1 � �� � � 2 r�. � �� - -� ......�-.��.r . --..�----- :_...; :----� i�l���� ����� �----: :---.: 1. �'��i��l t�ch�o�o��r-���tr�� �������r������c�������tx���. ���t��r���.1������. �. �y�i����r�s����detect�a��o�ati��� S��e���� ��_��3{�A�_ �. �]l�]1����C�V�fI��C�����l�f�������. �. A b��y���st.��s���.,�t�€��ay�€�s�d t�a������ra�fi���������uppl�r�r��tl��r�q�,ir���ir���1��� C����L�[��1.l�l�Ll��l����J����C� ��0����St�i����D�'111�?fl'I�;fl���l.l���������l��S. �����.��� °.��,1�����J��y����e�l.,�����ry�����. Agenda Item 9.a. 90 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 102 � � � � en �x : a rans o �c �rec �ve - A�'��������� ��o�ti��e�� F i���e��--'#'�'����� _F__��r��f�� ������t��� �s��r�n� ��h�t ��f �� �-i r�t�r��c�t�r���ri�� � b��C� f-- I r�t�r-�ec��i�n r�itl� � I�n�, ��f��r�d ri�htl��r���l� �h�r�n�l���d ric�ht��urn I�r�� ��r����c� ���r�n�Ei�i n� ��I�n� � � � � �-• y ���---� t----� � �--- � �----� �----y F F . . � . � ! 1 I � � � � i � ! + 1 { ` � , i • . . • * , , � � . , � � � : : ; ; : : � � : ; : : : : Y i � � � � I � � i � � � i i i . � � � � �Y���Y�V� i I 1 1 1 ��l�h■ �AI��� + • • � � � I I � ��� � i r ' �V•} : : . � : : �������,.i��� : � � . . : �REE�I LI�H� ,-- -- �-- -- �- • �� �-- ._ . .. . I � �.,� I F���� ���� �6�� ��C.A� �]�#E�r��� I ��ti�n�l � -� � � � � � � �_...: :.._�� I���t�a��al� �----= �-.--: '�. ��pi��l t��#��������-r���tral li r-�nit I i n�d�#���ian ��c��i���. S�e����n ��.'I����►�- �. T�pir�l pr���n�cf�t�t�� I�c�ti�r�� ������t�a�r��.'I�����- �. T��i����i��n�e d�t��tr�� I���t��r�� �. �bi�yc�i�t pu��#��tt�n r�a�����ed t���t�r����t�r�������n�l t��u�����rr�r�t#�r�r�qu�r�cl lirt��t lin� d�t��:t��r�.�4�u�ht�tt���#���tl�i �Ic��at�d �i� i���n���i�nt t� us�b��i�:y�li�ts. ������ti�r� ��.�i��ar bi���l�r��l�t�r��i�r��. Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 103 91 � � � � en �x : a rans o �c �rec �ve - ��"'�'A����1��'� �ox�ti�u�� ���le 4�������,�� �i�r��1 ��er�r�ior�� � �11ir�i�urr� �i��r�le 7�ir�irr�r ��r��1i�i� �1����� �mRn��+ ��lear����,'�� �1N�-�������.������� V�f�7��'� ��,t�� L���t� �f rnir�irnur'r'� ����� in#���r�[ ����� '�� L�n��h �f�r�lla�r i�r#�r�r�l ����� F������= L��g�l� �f r�� �I��r�n�� �r�t�rv�l ����� 1l1f = DF�ta�n��fr�r�r7 lir�i�lin�t�f�r��d�,�f I��t��nfl���ir�� ��n� �f�} �i�ta��e fr�r� �ir�n�t I���t� I��nir�n�r�n p���e ����tf� f�r�i�l� ������ ��nfli���r�� �rr�ir��r�ur�n �r��r� plu� ��n� �ell�v�r p�us r��i �r��r����� �ee� �e��n�� 4� ��� � 5� � �.�� . �� ��.� 7� ��.� �� 'f�.� �� ��.� 'I�� '1��.� 'I�fi� '��.� ��� �4�.� ��� ��.� 'I�� 'I�.� ��� '��.� ��0� 1��� �7� 18.� 'I�� 1�.� Agenda Item 9.a. 92 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 104 ������1�� ���1�1��� �- �- - � P��� I��t��t�� �I�I�����r ���t�� I��t���i�� ����I��t���i�� ��r�� ri rr7= ���� �t�� ri rr�� _��� �r��rr��r��� ���tri��� �l�r���+ �;r�i��rrr7� �� �� �� ���1... T'���E T'���+� � � � �ir��l�r ����r� Bicycle detection at L��� L��� ��i��l�� ��i����� . intersections can � `- � provide a substantial r�� ;�: ;��: � ����: safety improvement 7�p� �L��� ���rr �����i�r������ ��������� •- � for bicyclists and ��� "������������ ��������I�� motorists. ������������ ��������� � � � � 1�rt��i iri����ii7� 1���ri�1��li�� � Typical bike detector pavement marking and signage. � �7C�C�rr���7�,��R�} 5 Q mr-ri��i�� � � 1��}+Il�l�rlti IIti� � Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 105 93 .k,_�� `!. �,��}..�y.i M1 �� , Fw i�1 . 5_'�`_1i'{ , ����' �}�'��' ,'�t �" .�}� ��r /y,�f� �- � +, �, , . � F `+i'+� �'.�\�� I� ��G 'b* � __� i-� 5rl `� ��� '�N� � . �t�IYI 11 , ,{� 1• . .�, R* � *�� .. 4x'.��,..-��7�.+ �.t �'��Ir '�'�F + ��i {�5 }�� ��aJ } �� i-y'�.4 L(,�:�f•{_�y i :� . �-M1 *,.5 ' . . .' . . '%..',Mi���. M1��r h ��.� � � ',� -�: �k � ���r 5�2Y��t;;YF,��, +�*�'.. , 'i F+•5�i. � . #ry�� 4'�� S"' �, � . � ,-sO�M'' , � � �.�*.��5 -J�` ,����'{c.��'�t�'��1 5 ',ti {� �s �� ft;�+L'�� ti_��1.'�}` x i `���'Miy�. ti '-. �i��5 ���;k�k. .��- '#`�'� ��' i �.�f±'� �.��� �. '�� •� '}I 5 F � i � � ' 4 . i..�,. ' -'����?.et.4 '. �t' .y.�� -.. i �.i F�:Ny� r i� .9 '}�' �.tJ��.'. ' �kl ��`Lf, . Y '#*� .f. ��Y :.���. � � 'i} � �� �� �+�'���'�Ir'� X'i'3F'� �I,y ���' ' ;. ' .i'}��� ����5, f '.��F ' �FS��� ' "�y'.����ar��' �{�:Y��•r.�'�..������' xs41,k�� ��,� ].�� •�:� t t � , . C �J', . .tk� � . �f y} '� ,,�" . „ f'.X� r r� +4,� 1�` ;}t''• ��,7, �.. �'3�Fi�. t. �'.'.a.t� w ` 4.� ' �,�.]� . �r il� k��:�. -�� j� �� , .�� �f _ �i�` .{'�� h. ' �.'�iYl t�� Y . ,!i�, ti�' ��"''} i� ',� � ��*. '� .,'��- .i�, %. a�a;'.��'y .�i,,;��4:'.'�;`!�':�-�•�'� ��{�" '. '*k ,. �.�..r �:.;J�F{, � y*� � `� .4'��\. . '� ��~''�'' `}� 'i 5 �}'�'���S, �!�' ats� � ,�i'.� �� `,�x:j.. �4� �'. 'if�� {,� . ,�� . "'4� 'F.� } . l� ��.�y. .T�^ i�,�.-} �n,aw-' 4�' �� .?,�.f+.� r. �,�'�IL, �._.�'�.�: �r. 'n�. , '��' ry ;���.� -=f� � .�� � y �s�F�' ''� ;r: ,���1w�.� '�,`��:.�-�;+��e.��.-,.� ��;1''ai��': -'� L,�,�'+��. "' . y r. r , . . � . ' k{ y 'x,-� '`�'ti.� �� ',a� � '� r4'�{y=�t-� � __' F.�'.'��!°i.�4r: t� - 1. 1'. 3' + s�� .�t i F •. * 4 S 1"�� �"�"F y� F.�� ���_r ��4 '� ��'� �`+ , �'�i• � ' ' L '" ��sr..' 1yk ��,�. � �5� F+�'i�''�,�'" � ��� .y.- iY+3 'i r f�'.'r• - �,4r.x' -s '��' �° ��.X`• • y�Jti,; 'r} -3.+ �','�' ���, �* �7� . ���r . y� , .. 'F. },�'�L< Y .�t� �� „�:�k+{�• y . i- -,�k'4 , . . -r`'.�{.��. � ..�'��f .f �{r..,�+� 'r. r . 'a�. .'' . x fi,.l� � . `' � �� '�I 'Xr�. �j 1. �� F�.�;�'•. l„ �.,�t,� �`�., � L 4 � �.�r' * � -• � .. 1 . '�5�. l�. . '�. .'.� ` ��� �. � 4' ����� w. '�S �I r�f,}'1' �... ._ d"�([.� . +�".' . '�.i 1'� l�� _ *:�+'��I� �t*'ks -� ,�15''� x -ti':` .�1�' "�� �.%� y; .} +� { '.�{� �+�, '�". �� �� '�' ��s .� � ' • � �.�r � . �} y:�. f w �'�;..; �'.��1��,�+ r' � ,4 SY `i+ i.at�.��'i�'��F'.R�': y�' 1\.I '�_ : . -i ri ai� � �?�' ��' w 5� �'PO*'�', - _ '+Y,'}7�-7y,f.�;rr�.. + +� ' . +'i 4 i ; h5•.�►. �.,. .� - �'_{�..�. '3 �{�� �r:.;t�'i.��. w *f�r� 'r , � +y ',. �; . ti• i• - ".. � ,k �•' � �,�,.[�.. � .� i� .$,� 4.' . . � � ��. � �'�`�� . �_ ._. i � }" �. � ��+ T" ` ` ' • .'�' . Ri. ��''`F+ '��'�. }a�' �#��� �� f � �!!'��' �. f*'I �. /�� //� . _ +} '�� ' ',•,'s� � ..4'�� .. ■� 5 �M1':�5 .�. ��`,xw �'�+�'�y.l. 'f Y .�, ��-.+�.'_;x,#, �4 4�'- �y 4 ��/ �/ `� s .i.4� {�' � ,F� I . iI:'F}.'' ��.� 'i }.ti 'x�,l':�,�i. `��'k.�... �"'-�!y�j�� 1'�� -�.���°'�..F� � ■ � 1. '� M3 IG l�r��� �[i4 . '* •". '��##�a� O • �� M ,� �' . . 'f. ', �� .+'.'i' '�-. ��','�?-�''r�Y }-.fF�,�y�,����� yi +�'+.y.,��" �+ ;,J�,',-t�-�� ��5 � �+ - r�YJ.��" �-�'�:r1+� � �rr4 �,, -.1 .+� !` -F �r -x ] ,' �4,-'F' f��,:l/•4 ?wr r���r�.'. �t�.���'.;l� �.�!� }�,.• ; i ti � ` ,+#. k . � � a 1 �*•�.y�i i '�.7'' ]F�� 1' � � . ;'r� ..{S.'��}'� � i� ti� ���'� ` .•1. �F� � �� y ,5�'i . . � ..ry 'Sr `�,5 �`..� r,,5;y�.����j'; y�,' ��'� •���i++f�� ;'.�� rf " ` �." {• �� �i.�'� 3�✓ � fw�I"y �1 * . �. - k� �+'.� ' � .,"�� `. ��S ' '1 ?4i hry �F"'} f 1 F�r_ • `l' ��'�ty x.�'F ,Aw 1F �$�y`/�f�-'���+.' ' M ;��'�+� + 4�. . Y- # ` 1-s+i` �t,� , '�' - ��ti' ' F�` y:�;.�f,.,i]�',{4ry,y�"��J.�f'of:;S�r� ��� �a�. ta�.1.*��' +�;=��. li�'.r''; ' A' .. ' �i�. � 4:X�+}~...�' `Lf� �;��'F�P , ^ V,��'��' i+ .�4�i ��+' A� �+ �� '' } M1 ' 4 ��'L�s ' � � ' � � .���„+�� •. ..1! ;} � r��L. �;'1 k.��;s_, 'y��: t4� rI � .��„ � � ' 'a- ,�'�i�' .'� 'rh.�� ' ' y .. .�� Y��'"��•�-�:. - � ��..�.�`�Y,,µy� .?' +�?�.•, �� . r 5' �, F �'� �1�S' � •'ti � 1. � �.f 11� c' � . �4 '{ �F�"� � '� � }'k � 'y 'y' .I� . �. # Y � `t I .i� + #:'r.{K �•'�����. .�����:�+. - � �r'_s' .'�.y ���. .�� . , 1�� k �It #,'��rk y t� .rr.�i�� '��(„ ��.°.`�'1� � �.t _ *. �Y.�i F I _' F .{�{ � �r v. ��'.% � K' 'S ���� � '?.'r�F!3 ,._:NT.1 + �1 '4. '�I' ,�' ��. y � 1y � y "Fh` "�K.� i'r r�_'.'�'.,�: i '� ��.. �5 F'.1.'� i�i�.` . I� 1� �� �,�{��1 .� I{ �F `� �}'s' hi � , 1�_ . . :i '���1 �F . ' r! � Ir. �..; � J�{t�����Yil� �yyxi'��� %F S'�•. �'C�"�};�� �' i � ' �� � . ,�.r{} ' ~.� ��y"��� �y y �r ; ��i J� � .',���!i.�:`-.;*.i '�;��.�+s � .�� �'. '. � 'i"�'�'1' y`w' .� �'-�'n '�. {}- '1 '.T�• �'r��• '`,�������'�:.a�`� � ' � II . '' * �'�� �.'r�\ i � �." _ � �ci';' + �� '+i� `� }+*i ����'a'4 - F Y .. ' �- _ ; .I . .y '_ y t +` '1 -'�'_.. "F_�i'' �1 i�`�?�f }�� � ' � 'y, 4 ��tt 'df' r}� 't ..;,-�x ��.�,}� �.�ir.- r.{'.,��'1, Vl 4 � ti � �. �*4 '�'. ", . �. �. . �'}-,,.,`, �1 • �..� : �k l� � s. • M,� � '� .. � �-'y� ,�� • '�� � � �}i'j1`y)� . ^x.1.4�++�' ,*� �i•�''�3r'?. :��;� Q - r�,, � '�S: x �. 1 ��,';'��' -•. +5 4�i{ � ` . . ,i. . .. � �- � ,k4F'rF�ty��' �L��'��•*�;�' k'�- 3'��{.�h1' �.r':r,`�M1���� � I � �■�'. ` I . �l I. �.F y�; .�I� _* +�i�•_J� ti�/'_'.�i .� ~!�+r���� i-L,1ri'�'�i ''1��-.�5�4/*'T. 1� _ T�i.r i . ►�. . �i S � � Y�L .�' ♦."'�.'.'}� '�}4� t' n�{ _�x Y R i�� �5�," s-:' � �}.�r.* y �I r s����} � � ' F � ?������ �•i-�*'$�'�#� s. ,`F� 4'+.�+'w �*�" a . k�ri� 7 *`4.'_�y a'_ . 1, '�� � 4.�4� •4`�� � �' 1 . �.{��� }1!��� �";� 5.� {�� -.F-�. ' ti 'e-�' � � �l' : i ' '. I � � -'+i4.'':},� s#.k'k���tiM�-T` a%fka�'��yt'�...�.,. .�x, 7',. '4�-�r�� '��-`4 7���,�.+^-..l";-�, .ry' k �}- '� �,1�-fiY"��'� r� 2 � �� . . ~f , '+ x. ,�� � .l` ���►f.4�R�[ :k ti`{� � ti�� �'ti��-"�'CiF-# ' r � �i 4�,� �r R ``t, i1.�R��"r ,- 5� . �4�-t�5 .y}�.�i'r� . 5 '} ..s�`�y, F ��" �i'� �1.s1 - ; • � ' � {''� •~� r~ ` '4 !-y� ��.�,it �}::�ky'M(.�:~�•i F�1r�'.'` -4'R{.-.1-�".- '# � ry�- .{���JsJ`�}'4'�•�._L`ar��}+'" ,_ _t. '. �,. . � '�- �� .� t i . �_'i'�`� ,�,.;y���::+�F��,' �'��c�,l4r�'y''�,s �;���..� �� '1,�a`�"� `_#�±.'-;:��.',�����,�1 ' . .� . ' ' ��f..i`_M. =-' �'�' .} . * - . ., � *•r •. , � : '�+��.'.�;.} � ` . ��� +� f _.t.YJ��-� �.�':.N���.'K� ��i*5��tit`:, �.'.',�}� � -' ���y 5' ' , �` .i� . � .�," 'Y� ����-���{�x�i��+y��{�}��r� #7�*�'�.�.�'.i�M1F��.' ' ` '. �..{r� �#�X;.y�y#�'7#}�f`'ti �� i• [ �{ ' :� . i�� �' 1. �,*,"�S �' ��#'Y,i-. #'l�.�f�� ' �+' �+����}��'�;���; � � - �� �ya' i' � ���'� `� � ..~'}{y��L '� (`�a :�A+;3F}:��i'�,y '+, '��' . x. �''+4 y�,S'�p �ti'.`R��}r�'�.�� _ , �'i! # . . . � . 'y. � �L r_ y�-' ' ., { `�'�����. .f. . t L} r ��� � �� y `' i'r�-'� {+}..:'..� ,�f}.�;�i��r , _`�;'���'{1 '�' � �. ' '� .-� . �7��' � '";,i� -`'#�-�. . , . .• '.�. . ;���.;-�.+�}, r� i l}'W 1rK'�L V.'Y, � 'i,yk •.�r' y7'ti� � � } ,� _-�• �y�_-'.� �a- . { t .,�.'�, , .=��..�_.,,` "��j �. .� , � � . . '.' *;''. ' � �4�-..� �,'Sr';..'. ,'y����} ,;�. . :�,� �, y.1'.,��s �� � - � � ''y� . "� il�y ' .� + ���;"1���\�!���•. *��^+JI�,5�y�'�'�� ���} 4.� '1��.�''�1',�i.`F � r,i , •� ', x,#,. ; ' - , � . . • .'�`,.� - '. r,.,,,', ,;,_s .�'-�(f��. ti.,�,•�� .`,� . t- � , . �1�}; ''��� �..,;� � .~F.� � y y}t :1���'IJ� -L� � ' I '4'* - ''i.� {�� _ �' �.--�� '�ry�. . , �F�,��4� �i�'� ., ���.�{'�� '*1'#� �y _ ,1��- �4��-� ,'�' :':y•T�,y�l.�t `�� ' � � .�. . . .4� .t � }' .. "�'�' .+ � .��`.i'"f�' .. �i�,��fJ •*'i k 1 �-�.� ��'f��."�''�,' - "` � h� `��� �`F�ll-: ,... �• ��. # { �v"' �s#��t �t'i-!�,�,'�.�`•-?- ;�'':�'t��`'{,{s"��.4� =.�:�r{4-{i�=��:.1:;T�t�s � �'} �' ,y ' ' ' _�.,[`}��.}{�t?•�a %��':'; .4} �t]k..k'. � ' ,.7v,r�`�t.,K•,��-. ,� '- ' S ��a�' �� '' �K't' . '�{�f°��i �l�'*ir`'r�:-��#;-�' �{�l�v_. t .'.�JS��r.'F1._ ' ���Y 3 �+�''��F'fry� .-�:� � 1 , � {1. iil � y` � �`` *' ��y�µ'{ r, ''} ,`•��, .�'- .:�x �'..+,/rl" ��. S'}y-' i ' . .�" � �°'�`• " ��'' '.''�„�y^�.-,�s. �-�♦.�.,�f,'�}}J}`F���,;+-3- :�ti4[} �,� y � "r-� ,}��x�:���tti`1nY.� � � � 4� � RR_ �'~4{f ' - �}-.J� }i�� � ���1.��"•,.,t.� ��,j..*'}� t�!�1 a�}.�* _ {�4 . .;.}� r �a�w_?.�,�' . ..� '- . '��� �.��,��i �- }+y � `� . • • .�� +��jti-�� . .��..- �...:.-a.4 '� L� ,..� . �f ' �S � `y. + .+�^�. Y� � . d. �'_�k�i � - .�� -5 I '�-.i��• . 5{�� �•" , ��.1 ��,1!''l �� ' w }��#�'�-. � "��` ���' - � ' �++�' �`. t''1. `��k �F"M1' '4�� *k+` �k� �•r'�'!1'.�4��: �1 '�r�y.'� � 't�' :;� .�. Y� F.. � r S.�!..F L'� "..'.�•*_�1 } t �.;15'#.�`��.�•ti.� �' . + � 1 �, _. �{j'�� y �.�:.4;F.i W��+_.._'.r j���'��'i.''` :ri�}.r' ��`,���` �1�4ti.�,�a���;��` . .�. . -- , �. .' , J' . i;',v ., =r. ,1ti,..j"f���=" ,��� µ;r��:. . �'.. f 'r�'.y,�}`; .w�-. y � rr x i �js�. x ."1 *• � ,f } 5 •:���:','� ,:�'� '�:,';�_w:'�, 1����- ,' f _`��'i i'����--��'� '' �.�` '� � � � - . �-,.�..'�����, t;� � . . {• i "J-'`�kk -��.�:,ti.:k..4 .4�.�.4�rr:' �+.�x� • �+��f•��k+-',��' ;x}. ���f� � ., -:�rr G•��' �,a'.�, •'J4 t .�� ��.` *'T*,. - _I��-•;v..�.�"��� o-#��}{,�... i }��.41� �.' � � '��'��:�h,k ���'�+� ±'��A��.� �•' �t�+�.' .'�.I�.;i.4�_�.. ` �_�4'�5 f�iY,�.I. }�J Y� �r'{� � i} ��1., v��. � r'`'.YI. _ - ' i" y � �r.} � '.q�� � �.+'' � .'�'"J-��i'+rk}�. y�,'� *t���`��.X`�i5�..�i_',"-�- .'�}'����,�,�.'- � Y ! - J- # ' � � � `��4 i�.s1��Y}�4µ'. �ti�F�. '}�,�14\T����S�s�x �. "'' ?'i 1���� ', • f ii � ' .{ �ti fi r�x w' ��� ��{� ��q�tii.l� � �'' �'y,x`+- ��.�. r� ,��]� { *I� , . s �. }AC��" rti.��;;�_e'�i�4r��.�;IF �`�r'��. . �'=�l- +� .r 1F�r �f��y.S. �� - + _��_:i' { 'k` i + J•.�r7'.���y� '�i _qx':i�.+.i-y�.L�. ;-��.F ' ,��+ .� . ''''4���:kY���[1y�1��. t -. '- �! tr� - , ��k+ak� ��� .� 1�.�-+h�w'-=.'j-'.G��f�Y4*.. �.�4-.�S"i '� ..y!`{'�L,�.1� > �i�..±�'..;� �. w . `t'�`� }. y . � ���it;��'R".1k��L���'�. ,� F'*�fi - ~��-� 4 ar"' d'k '� s4� 4_ r} ',�+�'� . . � . ��`F 4�� - . . S}i �'�f�'.Y�.��..--4 ��'y j;�i':x`i�+e�w i�r#'' K�;-.+ ..4 Y . .������5'.#'4� �?4 - '�4-,� � y�'�. {x *k�ir1�'. #�:*ti� � ' 'S.�'��} �� �'{ r�k:la����• '--�.-.L��-�-_�1�' \�``i�y_{rry,:,'-t�,f��*�`�' „c'�[�;�'7.y`�� �tif �tY�2���'rT�`.•.�� �i�.�'��+��?�:��4 '� � 'v �i� �� �R} } '�'-� r �� ,�1f� . . . �. .. +�.� '"�'="`�+��-:r ' :d� �* ��` '!'�- ����:�k1�r�;k 4�- �.• y�,� ` � �; f � � , i- � � �,ri�-'�1R�r*s '{: - ' ' { 4;'� •� . . . ��' ��'#i +y.�.•�l�} ��'�RS~ � �L'T��4Yy�'y, !4` `��{ � ��'�'}'��`.` �'��� � �{"� -Ir'r�`'�' � �• ' � � � { ��� ' 4� �2�Yx� � f•'L,{+ f ���,� `�k�*1 �,�� � t h' .f.�{ T . 3'L' . �' � ': + ,i -1 .. � + 4rT ._ , - � � ;. , i.l� � ti��' �F 5`yr}=_v +F1 ,li ''�,�yY.�+�.4.���� ��+ T�� F4�\�, ��,�Y��S i��..�� ''I F }. r� i t � � ' `'. . I � � ."C-� �� ''�=:'�r� .. S� $.�,� ,���'4k��M1�'`k� ��'�5 � 4 � •- � �- . ,-•F' ,='',-- #_ ��. � . r '.��:��_ .F•'� �.kt.+�,y �{.':#r;.-i-..'���:{';.t� +',:.ti�.}�'���,�4'! ����4 � ' , _ ��3 - I' h ' . '`. . ' � �;. * .R'��, -�'� �'�'". �'.. GrT.�',. .s ;y" �' '� �t' .'��. ' . . � '� .. 'Sy �� . .1��.�� � �. A{�yr�� �+'.'.xa���y� �'��� � x�` �F�!R' ' ��� ` •�4*_� } � L _ ' "t.+ • . � , {5 � ��� , ' �F •'� ��'�}-J•,�� •����y'{Yr�].Y lx s I+;� }*�.���`4 �/ `��*5 �L.f*f��.h�`M15 y� i'S f�. ` .,�'_ , �; . , . �a��r. '� f �1++4-� � "tiF I# � "f�l �S�� 1 .��~. 5� . � a � '\` .. . ti . ' �+ ��l'L _ � .1 . ��F' `~�_i.. ,5;°� '� , i� � �i�F`' •��- ' `�~��{�.•I�`S.+`r� ��y�-".�� •5"f�;"�f'�.1. �' .$'.'�fi� 4k'`i''��y"�tI_��,3�- . '��` iL { �• '�=7�t,i �� � �•�" {. � �, i ti�� , _ .�� } ti * � i_� . . �, ' 's;, � ,' �`�*}�.�,� i � �'} ~A:{�' �` ��,�w'k��"�L;.' �t`r M1•���'J+�i���'� t '1 . i�{i � . ��. � � �� .. � ..� �� . . .� X �� I' �1i��4�%���.��5' f� �L„~�,;�k'.'�F'[ry ',Y{. .� `�. �.' �'� �'?"�Y?i' ' � _ `i� ' •+�'. . �_ '-�. � rr ' .Fa ` „y � � t.�, I5'' '•4. �� .`�i�f��� S .r`�. +� }��}rtL�., ��,s,t5�.'� •s' _ � '. .. ' . � 4 ' . . . i i 1: r Y'� .� ��' •'��y�„ • �� �J,_.�.�. - - -. i � � _ .' ` ' .� . y .; ,s� *- ' . -.w..F.. �ti*3�+�+'•��'�'_ ��:��}�~ '� � .`y}j;�4���E�;�f����`=l"��y „'S�A' i � � �� i ' r �+ i��*.I - � .{ � � .. � �� �'F � •^�^' 4 i �I �� k�' � ���,. �� {`� {'4+.4 \ . • ��„" � - i F ! � i`' � � �;1 • *��'"' .��'* ��L•;�.�r,t �L''hi.-.x'f:�'�Sti�.�;��t�.k'�_ � 41� i�F .�r ! ' .1.,�J ,' � . 1 �',r��s�'� �� _ 4� � �,'.��,_X�F'�►t1 '.,�i_ � � ' ' 1' � 5 +lF . . . k+'v'�� ��� �� ..},,�,�}l., . + '� 1.�{ �T.'- �� i - ' : a �1. . �', ��� '"� ,� . i-� ti S r ��r-_,�,.���n � �r �"�' 'x.�" ` � `� '., �R F, ' `r'� i� �`s�'� � ��,y �:����'���'•''� ? ���`- , �+ + } 4 � � �5; ' - i�?��15 ���• ' ��..." '.�' �"3 � � -, {.r. •{�± . {:� ` .��"5.� I t t y'�L.�"'f�i�a1'�'1� i' �, r-r 4 .� - . . �, ' ,, - . � ; � -' ,* z��' ,�F3��i.;1; �,}t ��rt 4�� � '� .� �' � �'�� � s .�.�. � �..�t� } f; . . , , ^'w �1f� '�4 ;'�a'\i,+'�t��A�, if�� . .I �, �� �� �� ' • - �� �. " � . .. -,� `�C"�_�� ���x r,*' -�� •;,��� *�� �;'y. .�.' . �'��• . '�� �.�� -� . � � _s ' � I,� ' ��k� 1�•k +I` ,�' •: ;�'� _F�n'� � ,���+��}���y,q�J,�.,.�'i. '�- t�, '``�a# � � ' ;. ,�.�' � �af�' � r�f �r + � f ,� �' ��~:. � �;;' "y{�} ' . i5 ,�4 "�k`�'�F.+�'? �ir ' 'L� ' � r��s..�����i � � � i F._'.S.{ ' �5' r��i� '���';_�� 4"'��. G�4�"�,r� k fh w+{�~� � . � , • '� , � ti'� t'i� Fr 7�R�. _ , .ai'.-�i., .�,f. �t�;+. V., r�s.��,+ ,4_ ,:ti 1. -�� a � . . � _ti '-r.�� 1�,'�� e.F, .� ' � � J � ���� t q�,tis ��{ .��� �� }"� . i�_4'� 4��'�,�.Y'�.y� �{� ��� � ' S'�4�� -+�"f . `� .r.� *� i/ 1�? L �L.n Sti S.*�7��..�,��-�4a � �4"'. ' � .� . }' ��Cy i' � !` .�'��"�1� _ a � � �y . � �' ' " � 1!� }M1 f 5 t� 1;'-S�` }"+.�}� 1 � ' �1 " ���'' �f 5� ' � •� L �' . Y���'h'. .w. s� �� r 4��f "'i�� � Y' ��' ��� w���. - - �' :�� 'L w � ti�.�r.''. I�}���.•`,('r,�4�''��q` ,t k �'�'� �' `� •� ' 1 �� ' . '�'--$� �'���..1 ' �,' •���y��- .�a#'il� '��� t�*'r' � .�'-'�{�-�;'�,;'�+'��;�.�'C�.,►��?�.`�•1'i. .���'j y(k� � , 5��61��;'.�` } ' �r' �t. %.��.� ��1..�i"1� •�F �'�.� ������P .y��y;-�'�,i�.. .ti ti��r�'l. 3� � •*. •'�. 1'�, .� 4 � .���.',.. *',�'�' i •i!, +. 4: .••`', t"L, �cc y� '�-� '{ .' f.,q � �� W ', '�•�����y t ' . 4.w' _5.i;yl+.,.�, .•...�.T..�„.��, -�,. �'�.R� � �,1�;d-�r��r'�t"-�:� ��`� � �•f �3k;� "=; -- � ' .s'f�-�r' - �f'#. fi'w' '�.yL��:��,'�j'����'°r.� .�. �:� ,.r'�! I ,�� �i r�� ��� '��k�'�tik.� :�� ���,�i`4 �� _ +'i� . �� e f. '.+�I�':.+� .��4w.�y�a� h�� T \`'..a j'��: ,� �r�' � <a.: � i ' S�E� . *, �'��' . �+Y�7'7���_��.#-�N{��. , �t"t a : �}����{'1= .-�'; . ��Ti'. � s, �+Y 4 � � 4 ���1:� �-.� �� 4�R� � i'Ey �. F�' t.�' k,. ,l - . ��1� ��� � � ' '�} F � a �� ' r�•tiJ�A"� '.5��±��y` . I�a"�` �5��� ��1'-*„'r. •�1 �,�+�'ti -.' rx: .s`..`��?:���.^ '� �����. . - F �*t ti . '� '��K�� ����. ��5 . .yY�-7.,}_� �':� „���,i. 1 �tit�(y�.5.��}�l � '�1'S*���.�Fr.i��=� RL,�.Si 'F�'. � � �t � Y '�• �}'��"_J�. 'ry�5Y:`}��.1 '7.�'��+���j, �� TM��75f�.:'.���;�'� �r�.�*�4�'':�''�r , _ � * . �'y��. � � i '# *i', �4�{��� �� �4�. �y 'i: of�'qi � �.i���G .+�'.�l;�n� � �+1�y 'ti� F , ���X�:•�' '�� S-{#4. �-r.t ���r 4� -- � r � i�l �' f' .�,� .: �*'�.� � y� *ti�P' .1,1 5i t�� Y . ��. i 5`F s �{, �'�'f���� �. �s4. .��5�f 'Fl� # �i".;.k' R..�}�'.� t�.'�� \ �i *:���+k�k�f r4 'Er�, ;�},�[ ,.�, '��� w���•.��+` ti r _ , r rty.a�; �'' ��•�L'ti��� S� '�1•.'�..�V � 'x � � � ` ' '�' ���i ��-� �:k � �,� { „ 'j .�}. �.� � � -�� '� ;�� t• � � ti � `{ � �'�.{.\.'�1�'�f M1-4 }��Y ` �. � T, _�.� .���..��' ' �5'' ��• +���i�f� ��`' ��..� ti�� Yy '� } '4' •��7.'�� '� . . ,�; . . 3. y� } ''��,��r 1 ` ti�' � 5':� ��l*,��; � '�,y��Y■��l. � *- ��� ���rt4i+`y.>�=4 �S�i--I�`,s�'' .��.4`. 4.�,,;,�',. 'rr���Y��t �{�(5��}•.��- I tii'.�. � � `����4'�f 'l.f:'`���-i�� � l�-.�f� ����L ���T � ' Y� � �#�� '4�,� }k y . "�: . l ry . . , � ��:�''���y_�M1_ rr'�`,' ���'r � �*'wy��}�'��� ' ��{ r,����Ft�-.� : �}��f�� ^k�;�� ,I. �'!k �`�� _�; 1- + �'� .-4. ;�, �?�/�• � � + t�'y' �y�, .� �'�\` �.It� ` y 'y�, �� .�`~�*��� � � .��r.a .f#wtk, , +k" ,-ti r.I 4 p !� ` ��'' "�� � �' x�� 3 'y '��i5'�+�\ � �`� �!�� � '�',f� 1`�1�+����}}y+��J � �}�i'���# "4��' ! '1��r}''3��4 M1'��.f:l�' i� �� 'Y5 4 � ' f � !, {5�� f�� '. w �� :�4 �,2F7`���•-! 7���`�y���'k.4�i-��i�' �r'}�. �:'�-.�� i .,. ` �y;..� ' '. f '�k '���,'.�r`'-�� �4�� 1�� - ��5.t��h;k�'��'}�'��.� ,� ',s.��iy� �Xti+v�'x - �,'��'�����iF' � � ��� 9 { ��i. � J���F � �� t ��_T L�: y_l M1S; "'`1'a.h�'� Y'�� ,'S't� }� �4�� 4. ���tf. �7 , ,T�.,�4 y � 7 4`. . �,�.�'#, j.r�_ '`3�� � �� �.'' � .��}:5;�,�_ 'i w., , . �.!l'r 4��.; ,� '� - --V }'e+ ~:$'t� � � � l � ,i x� �4 _. '�����`��:�1�:� �'1`.-_�' �c � �' - �r.�. `. r -ti. �;... . - � *. * ,��)44. *�.�'_� `Y+, 1 ,4'!� . � . ,.�.• ti �;.��;:�4°L,�y's��:li:F,k`� � .r�. ti'-5'� ,� ;�';ti�,�# t�i:���• � fi'�. !k7�h � _� .'�`� �f�`,."�`-�1"r�-!1��;�, �4�r �� } � ' * ��.-��a. � � '�•..��ti� 4� �{•" �4.�,'A�}�.�-����� ���i�x�it�. .,v,�, - 1� i�i'�' :�1-Y i{Y� �';' ,i]� }l' S� k �1���`5}},: . �y�*' �}��1"5k �1.��• M1 �.���r■ '.1.. {�. I i• ,,�+'s� .�4}.�•f.�i;�rli � p4.�:Ri r� '- � , �.��� �� �.tir.'!.3��fi�S'"���}.a'� r}try�,f.';� r 1� ,$� .►..1,•�'�`{`' ri'�4.�:��i�+'�':y.� ��'� 1." 2''`r �Y''''�:�.."��.'r^�,`�:-*�� c.'�.'.,'�`'� -x.. C-k 11h,..b k'.� � ,� f ��,�.'�'',, .'y�� 5* LL . . "{ -; �F �., ''t..Y. 'i'1 �'�`F�'�,s� 5 � '� t y,'j '�'.��]�x��Y{� i�#���'." . �t fi#Lk. {' �. � .J 4}�v. : 1 ,k �}{ , �.' F_.r�¢'4�����'r.�s�'#��3(i�yi p 4�ii4' {�4 ,R.S ��' y�}�:"�i?�;#{�* i7`��' 't+ ���"`1�4� �r7. '�r. T 4 K1�4/ Y��. L}4rf��4����f I Iy i w�4 k'. ."� 1 '. Y �rti'}�'Jrv'- 4{L�_'IF���.F{�'f 5'Y�+��€ti� *��#.� � � -�fi :��{�n 5 ��. .5�.�"�•"�'�� ti '[ x��' Y _ L. � .•�i � f . . � _ �+7�'�.;*}`. f . '��.7�'."�����.�Pa�:i�s � �.� �� �i . �.i r..��+i:l"� �!�.� hi Y'� . � � � � en �x : as�s or ons ruc �on os s �ma es :. . : . . . Type of Facility Typical Work Unit Unit Cost Quantity Total Cost Notes Per Mile � �� � �r r r Clearin and Grubbin SF $0.75 12'x 5280'=63,360 SF $47,520 assumes earth excavation of one foot below 12 foot Earth/Excavation CY $20 5280 ft x 12 ft x 1 ft/27 cu ft/c =21,120 c $46,933 wide area 0.2'thick assumes 10 foot wide As halt Concrete Pavement SF $7 5280'x 10'=63,360 SF $369,600 paved area assumes one foot paved 10'paved width;2'shoulders shoulder on either side of Decom osed Granite Shoulders SF $3 5280'x 2'=10,560 SF $42,240 athwa Bike Path Si nin Mi $1,500 1 $1,500 Stri e LF $1 5280 LF $5,280 � , . . , � , : - . - . Bike Lane Stri e LF $2 5280' $10,560 Pavement Markin s each $50 20 er mile $1,000 Traffic Si nin mile $2,000 1 $2,000 Traffic Control mile $500.00 $500 � , . . ,� � �.� = - . - . • •- •- • Bike Lane Stri e LF $2 5280' $10,560 Pavement Markin s each $50 20 er mile $1,000 Traffic Si nin mile $1,500 1 $1,500 Traffic Control mile $500.00 $500 assumes two feet additional Earth/Excavation CY $15 782 $11,730 asphalt on each side assumes two feet additional As halt Concrete Pavement SF $7.00 5280 $147,840 asphalt on each side � , . . � � � : - '• - . Traffic Si nin mi $1,500 1 $1,500 � , . . ,� �� = - '• - - • -• '••• • = - • � Traffic Si nin mile $2,000 1 $2,000 Traffic Control mile $500.00 1 $500 Pavement Markin s each $50 20 er mile $1,000 � , . . ,, �� : - '• - . ' . '•.• •. - � • • Traffic Si nin mile $1,500 1 $1,500 Periodic shoulder avin /re air Traffic Control mile $500.00 $500 assumes average two feet additional asphalt on each side,periodically equal to Earth/Excavation CY $15 391 $5,865 50%of total roadwa len th assumes average two feet additional asphalt on each side,periodically equal to As halt Concrete Pavement SF $7.00 2640 $73,920 50%of total roadway length � , . . ,. . �. . : - '• - . ' . '•.. .. - � • .• Traffic Si nin mile $1,500 1 $1,500 .- .. . .- .- . . .. .. .. . ..- Traffic Control mile $500.00 $500 assumes average two feet additional asphalt on each side,periodically equal to Earth/Excavation CY $25 587 $14,663 75%of total roadwa len th assumes average two feet additional asphalt on each side,periodically equal to As halt Concrete Pavement SF $7.00 3960 $110,880 75%of total roadway length � , . . , , . -• • • . Type of Facility • . •- - • Bare Cost Survey/Design(10%) contingency � a� 5-10% Admin 5/0 Class I ',.� � $513,073 $51,307.30 $51,307 $25,654 Class II ', $14,060 $1,406.00 $1,406 $703 Class III ', :�� $1,500 $150.00 $75 $75 Sharrows ',� $3,500 $350.00 $350 $175 Class II with widenin ', . � $173,130 $17,313.00 $17,313 $8,657 RR Im Minor ', � $81,785 $8,178.50 $8,179 $4,089 RR Im Ma'or ', •- : $127,543 $12,754.30 $12,754 $6,377 Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 107 95 � �� � Agenda Item 9.a. Page 108 D ° 0 . . . . � � � A public work shop was held on February the meeting. 9, 2012 to review the existing Bicycle/Trail conditions and solicit input regarding A summary result of the survey is exhibited issues/future improvements. Signed on the following pages. attendance equaled 15-people and included people from Arroyo Grande, San Luis Obispo County, Grover Beach, and Avila Beach. The workshop included a presentation of existing conditions, the 2006 Bicycle Plan Network, priority considerations, a comment/discussion period, and a collection of a survey handed out before � � � � .� , � � �� . . Agenda Item 9.a. City of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 109 97 � en �x : urve esu s - - . . - !� - . 1. Where do you live? 1 West of Freeway/South of Grand Avenue 2 West of Freeway/ North of Grand Avenue 2 East of Freeway/South of Branch Street 4 East of Freeway/ North of Branch Street 1 I live in the unincorporated County 1 I live in Grover Beach 0 I live in Pismo Beach 1 Other (Avila Beach) 2. How would you rank the current bicvcle facilities in the City? 0 Excellent 2 Adequate 5 Minimally adequate 4 Poor 3. How would you rank the walkin_q facilities within the City? 1 Excellent 5 Adequate 6 Minimally adequate 0 Poor 4. What is your purpose for riding a bic cle? 10 Pleasure/ recreation /fitness 1 I belong to a cycling club 1 Commute to school (including your children) 4 Commute to work 0 Commute to transit 5 Shopping /errands 2 I do not ride a bike 5. What is your purpose for walkin ? 10 Pleasure/ recreation /fitness 2 Walk to school (including your children) 0 Walk to work 1 Walk to transit 6 Walk to shopping /errands 2 I rarely walk on city streets Agenda Item 9.a. 98 Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle� Trails Master Plan-2012 Page 110 � en �x : urve esu s - - . . - !� - . 6. What prevents you from bicvclinp more in the City? 7 Poor road/ bikeway conditions 4 Too many cars/cars drive too fast 2 Destinations too far from my home 3 I travel with small children 1 Insufficient lighting for nighttime travel 0 I need daily access to a car for work 1 Weather 0 Other 7. What prevents you from walkin more in the City? 3 Time it takes to walk/too far to destinations 3 Poor walkway conditions 4 Difficult street crossings 0 Disabled accessibility not adequate 0 Personal safety 2 Insufficient lighting for nighttime walking 1 Weather 0 Other 8. Specifically, what bike and/or walkwav facilities in the City would you like to see created or improved?(Please be specific) (Annotated answers) � More bike lanes • Map of bike routes similar to bus route maps • Better east west connections • Connections between parks, library and school • Overcrossing of Highway 101 is a great idea (3-responses) • Add sidewalks on Branch Street near Crown Terrace • Finish all sidewalks in the Village • Improve bike facilities on Oak Park and Grand Avenue • Use Sharrows • Better bike, walkway connectivity between schools, parks and neighborhoods • Close the gaps in the sidewalk system • Improve the Meadow Creek path to a Class 1 Bike Path • Provide a continuous path along Arroyo Grande Creek • Traffic calming needed on Tally Ho - cars go very fast • More long recreational off-street bike paths and trails • Improve Grand Avenue to accommodate bike lanes throughout • Improve bike lanes on Oak Park from Grand Avenue to the Freeway • Reduce lane auto lane widths where feasible to allow for Standard bike lanes or more space for bike riders • Better directional signage for visitors Agenda Item 9.a. Cify of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 111 99 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Agenda Item 9.a. Page 112 D ° 0 . . . . . � ��, The following pages contain 11 x 17 enlargements of the Existing Conditions Plan and the Bicycle Network Plan found earlier in this document in a smaller format. Agenda Item 9.a. City of Arroyo Grande Bicycle& Trails Masfer Plan-2012 Page 113 101 i i iiv Nu��. i�.i� ii i«.i i�ivi iuiiy �iui ir�. Agenda Item 9.a. Page 114 V County Class II Connection �°�e��a ��onnection�SLO COU/lCJ/ EXISTI N G C�N D ITI Q NS P LA N � SLO County � � A/'i � ���a Cit of Arro o Grande � �o���Y��ass��� y y Connec1ion Counry Class II B I C Y C L E & T R A I L S M A S T E R P L A N \Ja � Connection SLO County �� Qm �a� LL I SLO County U p d a te 2412 �a �a. Future Opportonity \ m° a°� G I T Y o F Recreation �.� � � Nl a`J � \ i' � `New HoPe �a�estc�an a7 �� ��� + • _ � ��,` � �chool v`+ ` A. Q � � � Jac�`ey r/�� Um � '�'a city of �„� Pismo Beach ►� / �o� SLO County � - Grande / Park Z?� Terra de P��' Q� Oro Park V�,f�y O �S T / ,�c�` `�a� ,C� co��ry aass u 1:i C A L I F O R N-I A/,�;�� �rd @S fp Connection -��` ( 10'' � `��� �'a .� � � �" 7 s�� ��—�;,�_ G0 J� ¢� G.6.Class II � G�a Vo m Connection O�, � F��e c�c�es o a• 227 cenrer �ae � m� sc,ome, �� ` � � � � Park �a���o . • �\ Rd �� �Qa Huasna co��ry,c�ass��� . c e�no� � N\\�5� � lti sc.Pac���ks �dr � a es�e s�noo� Gro �\� G.B.Class II� NeWport Ave. ra�c gran�h St. � Connec[ion � �a Liqrary E' Paultling �G ■ The Mitltlle School `!a �0� � ; �a��eY��ew ����a5 � m �Hcadercry r � L E G E N D Ocean View Future ��' Y Elementary 2d� • PolicelRec. Women's O �Ca' Villa�ge� d � ��SG°� Z � ��cwn 227 �'., � � � 101 • �• �e� EXISTING BIKE BOULEVARD � � � SCHOOL DESTINATION G.B.Class II�Z • � Pos c���eC���� �E.Grand qve. 3 off"e ,L ■ POINTS OF INTEREST F1fe■ P i EXISTING CLASS III A 5�a��o� Branch Mill �s 0 � Q � • � P,�e� Rd. �rhs � EXISTING BIKE PARKING Grove�eeach • �,��on � �Gtard P�e' , ��,� �G,�e�c'� pr��9� EXISTWG CLASS II o, � EXISTING PARK&RIDE � d EXISTING CLASS I 0 EXISTING TRANSIT STOP ° � � (bikes allowed) m w p,,e� EXISTING DECOMPOSED GRANITE PATH Y Ga�de s � Oa�.s � PUBLIC RESTROOMS aPa�k �a�� � Y � RETAIL/EMPLOYMENT O �CerntemingArts SLO County CENTERS G.B.Class II co��e���o� �L �� � Ash St. y� � Pa�n��coasc � � REGIONAL CONNECTIONS cnr�sea�s�nooi \ Elm Sheet � `�' Arroyo Grantle \ So�o Sports• Park �a High School Complex �Communiry ■ � Lighihouse J Centef• Community ChrislianSchool Fair Oaks Ave. „osP;�a, � •� M.Harloe 101 c.s.aass u�\ Fal"COII AVB. E�ementary Connection I / V � vi � � E m m W o SLO County Y Cn � N D � j• Q ��ood�a�d Y North Ocean Park � NORTH � Q Elementary .B.Class II � co��e���o� The Pike �� 0 1600 3200 4800 feet � � —� ca c� c� � j co Oceano T.T. SCALE:1"—1600' �� Park - • � � SLO County , �Counry Class II Connection �°�e��a CConnection�SLO COUIICy B I C YC L E & T RA 1 L N ETWD R K P LA N � SLO County 1� � � '�r/ � ���a Cit of Arro o Grande o , y y �o��ry��ass��� , Connec1ion Counry Class II B I C Y C L E & T R A I L S M A S T E R P L A N \Ja / , � Connection SLD County �� Qa �- �a� I 227 S�o�oUnty , U pdate 2012 J �� � �a� �a� F����e � � Po[en[ial , O �'� Recreation �� � �pportunity ` Ufli �/�� �ay L � GITY OF New Hope �aUestc�^n a`' / �� O,QO �cnw� �e5�7 / A,.%h� V�,l� � � � � r • • _ ` � �a � �,a 1 City of / �1c Pismo Beach / �o• � SLO Caunty �,� Grantle / Park ,Future PerLBike Britlge 0���. / �a OrorPark / � ��� a'�G`� ✓d�e ��-� �conn��eon�� ��l � e��, s�ay / � �. �:� CALIFORNIA ,�,,� 101 � �"- �-��'���r_ C�'�aG �°� � � Y 9 1� °' c.s.aass u V� o co��e�eo� O�. D 227 m Five Ci[ies O Cen[er OC�e '� m� Shomer `,�� Fi� ■ p- ,� � Park � a�,� � .� � /�,�j FuturePeNBike � '�m Hua aRd� � c�c�ass��� "�(j� Bridge '� Sn FuturePed/Bike� Co nection , ' � �` Bridge � ' � ' ' \\\s�. � � � � Future Petl/Bike ' N SL Patrick's eritlge �� � a �es�er s�nooi ` G�° � ��Q— G.6.Class II I co��e���o� � Newport Ave� ah� � r Branch St. � �1` _ �_ �� �Rd Li6rary ` �"' Paulding ' � �G � `/) The Nliddle School `� a I ValleyView Villaq� � � �Academy C m �Ocean View Future �a,'(��'r� ' 1 ry �a � Future PerLBike L E G E N D � �menta O Z Policel.c. Women's 227 �,� ge� Bridge G vina ' �,� • �Club � O ' ' ` S c, � �O� ��� ` EXISTING BIKE BOULEVARD � SCHOOL DESTINATION G.e.Class II Z � ' O � Pos� ' c���eC���� �E.Grand A�e. � � ' � o�'��e ,l, ■ POINTS OF INTEREST � �� F"e■ �, � EXISTWG CLASS III � � r Q� s�a��o� Branch Mill �S � �/ � ! ��t}*–, • �e� Rd. °r�jS � EXISTING BIKE PARKING Grover eeach • �"y w– Gca�d PJe Fu�urePe�LBike �'�' Gre��P , 'br,;� EXISTING CLASS II staeon �. � gridge � �' �' ( `9�p� � EXISTING PARK&RIDE I � � � � � EXISTING CLASS I 0 EXISTING TRANSIT STOP � � � / � (bikes allowed) Q�,e� EXISTING DECOMPOSED GRANITE PATH Y Be�N W I �.5 .*. PUBLIC RESTROOMS � Gardens � � Qa a Park ' �a�� � ���� PROPOSED BIKE BOULEVARD '� ' � RETAIL/EMPLOYMENT � •ce��e'"'"g`�`s SLO County G.B.Classll � ���L PROPOSED CLASS III CENTERS Connection i ���� Ash St. ' •y � Pa�rf;Cc• , REGIONAL CONNECTIONS � E� e � `�'� ArroyoGrande ch"s"a°s`h°°� / PROPOSED CLASS II � SotoSports�Park � 'N4, HighSchool c°"'P1e% comm��� � Lighthouse PROPOSED CLASS I-PAVED ,� PROPOSED ROUNDABOUT J ��� comm��;ry Christian5chool ���� �� INTERSECTION Fair Oaks Ave. „osP;�a, ' � ' . I �l PROPOSED DECOMPOSED GRANITE PATH M.Harloe � 101 G.B.Class II I F81'CO��,qVB. E�ementary Connec[ion � ' D `� � � v � m W � � SLO County � L �j o /1 � �• Q Woodland` Lf �� � North Oceano —=ark � �(7 Elementary G.B.Class II�\ � � Connection� i — , The Pike � � � V , _ NORTH j� 0 1600 3200 4800 feet rn� Oceano T.r. Park SCALE:1"=1600' SLO County i i iiv Nu��. i�.i� ii i«.i i�ivi iuiiy �iui ir�. Agenda Item 9.a. Page 117 Prepared by .� �l���1��'� ` �'�����'��:�.I��� � �� � � � � �� • � � �► r� r� � �� 943 Reserve Drive Roseville, CA 95678 (916) 782-8688 Agenda Item 9.a. R1565/1565RPT001.PUB Page 118 � aRRD yo � �� ATTA�HMENT Z � tNcoAPoAAr�a �� _ � � rn c�rr oF aRROyo��ruoE * `"'�Y 'a, ��" * N�TICE�F INTENT T�AD�PT A �'�[� N�� M ITI�ATED N E�ATIVE DECLARATIQN �oa PR�JE�T DESCRIPTI�N: General Plan Amendment 12-OD2 �B�cycle and Trails Master Plan�. The Bicycle and Trails Master Plan is a document that, �ike a General Pfan element, pro�ides guidance for the City as the ability to build new bicycle and pedestrian facilities becomes a�ailable. "rhe Plan sets forth the following goa�s and objecti�es to guide de�elopment of these facilities: � Pro�ide safe and con�enient bicycle and pedestrian access; • Become a "bicycle frtendly" eity; • Maximize bicycle and pedestrian impro�ement funding appartunities; • Demonstrate eommitment to bieyele and pedestrian impra�ements These goals and objeetives form the foundation for the proposed b'seycle and tra�� network, which ident�fies bicycfe and pedestrian routes through the City, identifies nodes that eonneet to reg�onal routes and classifies each route. Citywide impro�ements to further these goals include the use of bicycle detecting traffic signals, "bike boxes" �physieal separatian of b�eyelists from motor�ehieles at signalized intersections�, adequate bicycle parking and a wayfinding program. PROaE�-r�ocAT�oN: Citywide APPI.ICANT: City of Arroyo�rande REPRESENTATIVE: Ryan Foster,Associate Planner REVIEW PERI�D: June 15, 2�12—July 5, 2�12 PURP�SE�F REVIEW: The purpose of this re�iew is to allow public agencies and interested members of the publie the opportunity to share expertise, disclose agency analysis, check for accuracy, detect omission, disco�er publie eoneerns and solieit eounter proposais pursuant to CE�►Seetian 152�fl�Purpvses of Review�. WHERE T�SEND C�MMENTS AND WHERE D�CUMENTS ARE AVAILABLE F�R REVIEW: • Post: City of Arroyo�rande Email: rfosterC�arroyo�rande.or� planning Diuision 30D East Branch Street 1Nebsite: http:llwww.arroVo�rande.or� Arroyo Grande, CA 9342� PUBLIC HEARlN�S SCHEDULED: At this time, hearings are scheduled before the Planning Commission on June 19, 2012 and the City Council on Juiy 10, 2�12. For more information, contact the City of Arroyo Grande's Planning Di�ision at �8D5}473-542D during regular business hours or consult the City's website. Agenda Item 9.a. Page 119 ��u����TY QF ��-� INITIAL STL�DY � . . .. . _ . r i `i ��`� ■�■I�I �� � � .� GA D E A IV . � E ='' :1 f f �° �,t'� =r � � �;. CALIPaRN1A �-E�LARATI�N .�.,��r -,..-. �� � il !- r � � Y � _ . General Plan Arnendrnent 1��D� �Birycle and Tra�ls Master Pian� June�ai� Agenda Item 9.a. � Page 1�0 . . � THIS PA IN� � . ALLY BLANK .� .� : �• � . - . � � . Agenda Item 9.a. . Page 121 iNm.►�sruoy nnrn�rEO nrE��rvE oE�.a��rflN �uNE zaiz GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1�-�D��SICYCLE AND TRAILS MaSTER PLAN� �ro�ezt; �enerai Plan Arnendment 1�-0���Bicyc�e and Trails Master Plan� � �ead J4�ency; [�ty of Arroyo�rande Docurnerrt A�ra�ilability: • [ity of Arroy��rande [ommunity De�el�pment Department 3�East Branth Street Arroy��rande,CA 934�� • http:l/www.arnoYO�rande.or� Rro je�t D�tri pt�on: ' The��cycle and Tra�ls Master Plan �s a document that, like a�eneral Plan element,pro�ides guidance for the[ity as the ability t�buiEd new b�cyc�e and pedes�trian fac�lities becomes a�a��able. The Plan sets f�rth the f�llowin��oals and obje�ti�es t��uide development af these fac�l�ties: • Pro�ide safe and con�enient bicycle and pedestrian access; ■ �ecome a "bicycle fr�en�l�'city; • Max�mize b�cyc�e and pedestrian impro�ernent fundEng opportunities; • Dem�nstrate tommitment to bicytle and pedestrian impr�vements These �oals and objettiaes form the foundation f�r the prop�sed bicycle and trail netwo�ic, which ident�fies bicycle and pedestrian routes through the [ity, identi�es n�des that connect t� regional routes and classifes each route. [itywide impro�ements to further these g�als inc�ude the use �f bicy��e dete�ting traffi� s�gnals, "bike boxe�' �physiCal separation of bicy�lists from motor�ehitles at signalized intersettions�,adequate bicycle parking and a wayfinding program. Surnrn�ry Do�urnent Prepara�tion: Pursuant to Se�tion �1���.1 of the[alifornia En�r�ronmental �uality Att,the[ity of Arr�y��rande �the �[ity� has independently re�r�ewed and anaiyzed the Initial Study and Mitigated Ne�ati�re De�laration fvr the pr��os�d proje�t and finds that these documents ref�ett the independent judgment of the�ity. The City,as lead agenty.also t�nfrms that the projett m�tigation measures detailed in these do�urnent�are feasi��e and wifl �e implemented as stated in the Mitigat�d NegatNe �eclaration. Page 3 of 4� Agenda Item 9.a. Page 122 � INITIAL STUDY MIT�CATED NECATIVE DECLARATiaN - JUNE Z�1� CENERAL PLAN AMENDMEIV�1�-0�� BICYCLE AN D TRAILS MASTER PLAN� � � � � � 'Teresa McCl�sh,A�P . Date Community Deve opm�nt Dir�ctor . �� fJi� ���- Rya n Fost�r . aa t e Assoc�ate Planner � � y • . Page.4 af 4� Agenda Item 9.a. Page 123 INITiAL STUDY AA�II�ATED NE�ATNE DEtLARATi�N lUNE ZOl.� �ENE�AL PLAN AE11lENDAAENT 12-0�� B�CYCI.E AND TRAlLS AA1�5TER PLAN Tab��af Corrlents: Intr�d ucti�n...................................................................................................................................................7 �ntr�dueti�n and Regufat�ry�uidan�e.....................................................................................................7 Lead►Agenty.......................:......................................................................................................................7 . Purp�se and D�acument�rganizat��n.......................................................................................................7 Summary�f�indin�s.................................................................................................................................8 Project Qescr�ptinn..........................................................................................................................:.............9 Int r�d uct��n...............................................................................................................................................9 L�tati�n.....................................................................................................................................................9 Bac kgr�u nd a nd Need f�r Pr�ject.............................................................................................................9 Pr��ect Des�ripti�n..........................:.........................................................................................................9 �ther Required Publtt►4gency ApprovaEs.................................................................................................9 RelatedPrnje�ts............................................................................................,....,......................................9 En�ironmental�hetklist..............................................................................................................................i� PrQje�t Inf�rmatiQn.....................................................................................,..............................,....,..,...,iD En�ironm�ntal Fa�t�rs Potentially Af#��t�d...........................................................................................11 . Qet�rm�nat»n.....................................................,...................................................................................11 E�aluat��n of En�inonm�ntal Impatts.....................................................................................................1� En�ironm�ntal Issu�s..................................................................................................................................13 1.A�sthet��:.s................................................................................................,.,..........................................13 II.Agritultur�and Forestry R�s�urt�s...........................................................................,........................14 I�I.Air Qual�ty...........................................................................................................................................15 IV. Bi�l�grcal R�saurces.......................................................................................................................,...18 V.�ulturai R�sources..............................................................................................................................�1 V�. ��vlagy and S�ils...............................................................................................................................�� VII. Cr��nh�us�Cas Emissi�ns...............................................................................................................�4 V�I� Ha�ards and Hazard�us Mat�rials....................................................................................................�5 IXHydrol�gy and Vllat�r Quality........................................:.....................................................................�5 ]C. Land Us�and Pianning........................................................................................................................�8 ]C�. Mineral R�s�urt�s.....................................................................................................,........................�8 XII. N�is�......................................,...,.........,.................,..,,...,....,,,.,.............,......,...,,...,...,...,..,.................�9 . XIII. Populatl�n an Hous�n�................................................................................................................... 9 X�V.Pub�ic Services..................................................................................................................................3� XV. R��r�ati�n.........................................................................................................................................31 Page 5 0��� Agenda Item 9.a. Page 124 INITiAL STUDY MITIGATE�NEGATtVE DECLARATI�N • �UNE��1� GENERAL PLAN AMEN�MENT 1�-Q���B�CYCLE AND TRAILS MASTER PLAN� . .. XVI.Transportation/Traff c..............:.......................................................................................................31 . XVII. Utilities and Serr►��e Systems.......................................-..................................................................33 Ma ndatary Fi ndi ngs❑f Significa nce............................................................................................................34 Sum mary of Mitigatian Measu res...............................................................................................................35 Referen�es...................................................................................................................................................4Z . Dacuments&Maps..................................................................................................:..............................4Z �ansultatians...........................................................................................................................................4Z �,. . . Page 6 of 4� . - Agenda rtem 9.a. . . Page125 1NiTiAL STLJDY MtT�GATED NEGATIVE DE�LARAT��N " JUNE Z�1� GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1�-4�� BICY�LE AND TRAIlS MASTER Pl.AN In�roduction � lntraduc�an and Re�uiat�ry�uidance The �ni#ia� Study/Mitigated Negati�e Declaration �!5/MNDy has been prepared �y �he City of Arroy� Grande �th� C�ty� t� e�aluate the pot�ntial enyironmental �f#ects of the propos�ed project. T`his document has�een prepared in accordance with the California En��ronmental�uality Act�CEQA�, Public Resources Code §210� e�seq., and the State �EQA Guidelines, Caiifornia Code of R�gulat�ons �CCR� §15�DD e�s�q. An tnitiai Study is conducted by a lead ag�ncy to determine if a project may ha��a s�gnificant effect on the�n�ironment[CE�A Gutde�ines §15�63�a�]. If there�s su�stant;ai e�rdence that a proJect rnay ha�e a s�gnifitant effett on the environment, an Enyironmental �mpatt Report �E�R] must be prepared, in acc�rdance with CEQA Gu�delin�s §15D54�a�. Howe�er, if the lead agency determines that re�isions �n the project p�ans�r proposals mad�k�y or agreed to by the applrcant mitigate the potent�ally s�gnifiCant effects to a less-than-signifcant lew�l, a Mitigated Nega#i�e Declaration may be prepared instead of an EIR [CEQA Guidelines§1,5�?���}]. The lead agen�y pr�epares a written statement descri��ng t�e reasons a proposed pr�ject w�uld not ha�� a s��nificant eff�ct on the en��ronment and, therefore, why an E1R need n�t be prepar�d. This ISJMND conforms t� the content requirements under CE�A Gu�delines §15D?1. Lead Agency The lead agen�y is th� public agency with primary appr�vai authority o�er the proposed proje�t. In accordance wtth CEC�A Cu�delines §15�51��]�1�, "th� lead agen�y will normally he an agency with gen�ral g�uernmental pawers, suth as a �ity or�ounty, rather than an agency with a single or I�r�ited purpos�." The tead agency for the proposed project u the City of Arroyo Grande.The contact person for � the lead ag�ncy is: � . Ryan Foster,Ass�Gate Planner City of Arroy�Grande 3�East Bran�h Stre�t � Arr�yo G ra nde,CA 93�2� 4gos�a7�-s4za Purpase and D��u.ment�rganizatian The purpose of th�s document is t� eWaluat� the potentiai en�ironmentai effects of the proposed pr�j�ct. M�tigation measures ha�e b�en identifi�d and incorporated into the project to eliminate any potentially significant impa�ts or reduce them to a less-than-significant leuel. This document�s organi�ed as follows: • Introduction Th�s chapter pro�ides an introduction t�the project and describes the purpose and organ��ation of this documen�. • Project Des�ription This chapter descri�es the reas�ns f�r the pr�ject,scope�f the pro�ect,and project o�jecti►�es. Page?of 4Z Agenda Item 9.a. - � Page 126 . INIT�AL STUnY M�GATED NE�ATIVE DECLARATiDN �UNE�Q1.� GENERAL PLAN AMEN�MENT 1.����BlCY�LE AN�TR►41L5 MaSTER�LAN� • Environmen#,�I Setting, Potentiaf Impaets and M�tigat�on Measures This chapt�r �dentifi�s the s�gni�Canc� of potentiai en�ironm�ntai impaets, explains th� environrn�ntal sett�ng fivr �a�h �n�tronmental issu�, and evaluates the pot�nt�al impacts ident�fied in th� �EQA En��ronm�nta� �Inrtia! Studyj �he�klist. Mitigation m�asures ar� incorporat�d, wh�re appropriat�, to reduc� potentiaily sign�fiCant irnpaCts to a I�ss-than- s�gnifcant r���l. • Mandatory Findings of 5�gnifi�ance This �hapter id�ntifies and summariies th� ov�ral� signifCance of any potentiaf impa�ts to natural and �ultural resour�es, cumulatn►e irnpa�ts, and impact to humans, as �dent�fed sn th� In iti�I Study. • S�mrnary of Mitigation Measur�s This chapt�r summarizes th�mitigation m�asures in�arporat�d�nto the project as a r�suft of the rnitiai Study. • Ref ere nces This chapter id�ntifi�s the r�feren�es and sauroes used in the preparation of this IS/MND. It alsa pro�ides a list of those in�oh�ed in the preparation of tfiis do�ument. Sumrnary of Fi.ndiags Se�tion 3 of this do�ument �ontains th� Environm�ntal �Inrtial Study� �h��clist that identifies th� potentia�en�ironm�ntal impa�ts{by�n�ironmenta!issu��and a brief discussion of each impa�~t resulting from implem�ntation of the proposed pro��t�t, In a�cordance wrth §i5�G4�fi� of the �EQA Guidelin�s, a Mit�gate�d Negativ� Qe�larat�on shall b� prepared �f the proposed pro�ect will not ha�e a s�gnifiCant effett on the environm�nt after th�inclusion of m�tsgat�on rneasures in the pro�ett. Based on the available project informat�on and th� en�ironmentaf analysis pr�sent�d in this docum�nt, ther� i5 no substa�tial eviden�e tfiat, after the - in�arporatron of mrtigation m�asures, th� propas�d pro�e�t wou�d have a �ign�fi�ant eff+ect on th� en�ironment. It �s propased that a Mitigated Negati�e Declarati�n be adapted in accordance with the �EQ,�Guide�ines. - Pa ge S of 4� � Agenda Item 9.a. - Page 127 � 1NmAL STUDY AAIT�GATED NE�ATIVE QE�LARATI�N JUNE Z�lZ G E AI E RAL PLAN AM EN D IVl ENT 1�-�Z�B I t`Y�LE AN Q TRA.I LS Nl�STER P LAN} Prv���t D�scriptivn � l ntrodu�ion T�is In itia l 5tudy/M itigated Negat�vae Dec�a ration {i5/M N D� has been prepa red by the C#ty of Arnvyo Grande{thQ City}t�evaluate the potent�al en��ranmental effeets�f the pr�p�sed prajeet. The Crty contair�s 5.5 s�uare m�es and has a populati�n of apprax�mat�� 17,252 {Z�1� �ensus�. Tour�sm, retail sales. services. and agr�culture f+�rm the core of the Io�al e�onomy. With ;ts fayorabl� ctimat�, relatNery fiat t� gent�� hil� terra�n. famiiy�riented I�festyle. c�mpaCt fiarrn, and conv�n�ent Io�at�on to many recreationa� actir��t��s, Arr�y� Grande is an �xtellent �nvironment fvr bitycling and walking. L.a�a�an T`�� City of Arroyo Grand� is I�cat�d in th� s�uthem porti�n �f San Luis �bispo �aunty betw�en Los Angel�s and 5an Franristo. Th� �ity is �mmediate�► adja�ent t� the cities of Pismo Beach and Grover B�ath.and the unir�torporated�ommun�t�es of�cean�and Haley�n. Backgrauaad and Need far Pra�ect Th� purpose �f the Bityt�e & Trai�s Master Plan is t� impro�� and �ntourage b�tytle and ped�strian transportatron with�n th� City of Arr�yo Grande. It is an effort by the City to de�elop a tompreh�nsN� syst�m�f bikeways and ped�strian fatiiit�es.This is Arroyo Grande's second adopted Bieyc�e Plan and it builds upon the work completed/retommended by th�2�6 Bitytl�Plan. Proj��t D�s�rip�ian Th�Bitytle and Trails Mast�r Plan is a dotument that, lik�a Gen�ral Plan element,pr��ides guidar�t�for th�City as the ability to build new bi�ytl�ar�d p�destrian fa�ilities betomes a�aiiab��. Th�Plan sets�arth the follow�ng g�als and obje�t���s t�gu�d�de��lopment of th�s�fat�lit��s: • Pra�ide safe and con�enient bitytle and pedestrtan attess; • Become a«bitycle fr�endl�'tity; • Maxtr�nize b�eytle and p�destrian impr���ment funding opportunities; ■ D�monstrate�omm�tm�nt to bityt�e and pedestriar� impro�em�nts These g�a�s and obje�ti�es form the foundation f�r the pr�pos�d b�ty�le and trai� network, whiCh id�nt�f�es bicytl� and p�destrian rout�s thr�ugh the ��ty, i�entifies nodes that tonnect t� reg�onal routes and class�fes eath route. �itywide improvements t� further these goals intlude the us� of b�tytle det�Ct�ng traffit signals. °'bike boxes" �phys�cal s�paration of b�ey�lists from mot�r v�hitfes at signaiized interseCtions�,adequate b�cycle parking and a wayfinding pr�gram. �ther Requ�red Pub�ic Ag�ncy Approva�s N/A Re�ated Proje�cts � Cir�ulatton El�ment updat�{in progresss� � Page 9 of 42 Agenda Item 9.a. Page 1�8 INITiAL STUDY M1TI�A1`ED NE�ATIVE DE�LARATIQN JUNE I�12 GENERat Pi�1Ai�M�NDMENT t�-�� ���YG,.�ANa TftAlLS IVEASTER RL�tN Envu"onm�ntal �be�klist Projett lnforma�on � Prv�ect Title: General Plan Amerrdment i��� ' �Bi�yc�e and Trai�s A�aster Plan} lead A�en�y Name&Addres5: City�f Arr�y�Grande 3�� East Bra�h 5tr�et Arroyo Grande,�A 934�� Contact Person&Te�ephone Number. Ryan Foster.Assoriate Planner �8�5�473-54�0 Pro�ect location: Citywide.Arroyo Grande.�A Pro�ett 5pon5or Name&Address; C�ty�f Arr�y�Grande 30a East Branch 5treet � Arr�y�G ra nde,�A 9342� G�nerai P�an Designati�n: NJA �oning: NJA Description of Pro�e�t: Refer t�page 9 � 5urr�unding Land Uses&5etting: The City.of Arroyo Grande i5 surrounded �y the cities , �f Pism� Beach and Gro�er Beach to the west. the � unincorporated communit-ies of Hal�yon and �ceano � to the 5outhwest and unin��rp�rated areas of hvth r�s�d�nt�al and agricult�ral �s�s t� th� north, �ast � and south. Appr��al R�quired fr�m�ther Public Agencies: None . � Pa�e 10 of 42 Agenda Item 9.a. - Pa e 129 , INR`�AL ST1JaY MTTIGATED NE�ATIVE DEC.LARATION 1UNE Z�1� GENERAL RLAN AME�VDMENT l���Z BICYtLE AND TRAILS MASrER PtAN} Envir�nmental Factors Potent�ally Affected The en�ironmental fa�tnrs che�.ke� belowr would be pntent�ally af�e�ted by this pr+ajett, �n�ohring at least one �mpatt that �s a "Potentiatty Signifieant Impatt", as indieated by the�he�kl�st on the fo!low�ng pages: ❑Aesthet�r.s ❑Agr�cu�tura�Resourc�s ❑Air�uality ❑��o�ag�cal R�sourc�s ❑Culturai Resoun� ❑Geolagy/5o�ls ❑�ceenh�use Gas Emtssi�r�s ❑Ha�ards&Ha�ardaus Nlaterlals ❑Hyd«Eagy/Wate�4uafity ❑�and use�Planning ❑Mlneral Resvur�es ❑N�ise , ❑Roputat�an/H�u.�ng ❑Publ�c S�erv�ces ❑Retr�at�on ❑Transportat�onrTraff�c ❑Utilftles/5enrke Systerns ❑Mandatory�ndings af�igniflcan�e ���tt�'11l�atl�I� �n the basis of this init�al e�aluation: ❑ 1 find that the proposed projett CQULD N�T ha�e a signif�ant effe�t�n the en�ir�anrnent and a NE�ATIVE DE�I.ARATI�N will be prepar�e�. � I find that, although tfie original stop� of the proposed proje�t C�LILp har►e had a signifipnt eff�t`t on the�n�ironm�nt,th�r�V'IiILL N�T b�a sign�fieant effe�t�u�e r�►�sions/mitigations to th� proje�t ha�e be�n mad� by or agreed #o by the applir.ant. A M�GATE� NE�ATiII� �ECtARAT1�N wrill b�pr�par�d. ' ❑ � find that the prop�vs�d praj�et MAY ha�e a signifitant eff��t on th� en�ironment and an ENVIRQNMENTAL IMPA�.'T REP�RT or its funtt�onal equ�►�al�nt w�ill b� prepared. ❑ I find that th� prnpQSed proj�et MAY ha�� a "p�t�ntra�ly signifieant �mpaet" or "potentially significant un��ss mitigat�d impact" on th� en�ironment. Howre�er, at least one impact has b�en adequate�y analyzed in an earl�er dv�ment, pursuant to applicabl� legai standards, and has be�n addr+ess�d by m�tigat�on rneasures bas�d on the �arlier analys�s, as d�s�ribe� in th� report's atta�hments. An E�VVIR�NMENTAL IMPA�T REP�RT �s requ�r�d, but it must analyz� ; , only th�impatts not suffieient�y addr�ss�d in pre�ious do�um�nts. ❑ I find that, although th� proposed pr�ject could hav� had a significant effect on the �nvironm�nt, be�ause all p�ten#ially signifi�ant �ff�cts haW� been adequate�y analyzed �n an �ar�ier EiR or Negati�e De�laration, pursuant to appl�cable standards,and ha�e been a�aided�r mitigat�ci� pursuant to an ear�i�r EIR, in�luding re�isi�ns or m�tigation measures that are • impos�d upon th� proposed proje�t, all impa�ts ha�e been a�oide� or m�t�gated to a 1e55-than- significant le��l and no furth�r action is requined. 13 June I01� Ryan Foster Date Assvciate Pia n ner . Page 11�f 4� � Agenda Item 9.a. Page 130 INI'T�A1 STUDY MI'T�GATED NEGATIVE DEG.ARATIDN 1UAIE 2a1� GENERAL PLAN AMEMDMENT l.�-0a��BI�YCLE AND TRAILS M.ASTER PL.A�I� E�aluati an vf En�ir�nment�l Impacts 1. A bnef explanatian is requ�red for a[I answers� ex�ept "No Irnpact", that are adequate�y supparted by the �nfoRnatian sourtes cited. A "Na Impact'� answer is adequately supparted if th� referented infaRnat�an saurces shaw that the impact daes not apply to the project being e�aluated ��.g..the pro�ec#falls outsid� a fault rupture zane�. A "No Impact" answer shau�d be explained where it ;s bas�d an genera! or praject-spec��c factars �e.g., the projett w�il not expase sensiti�e reteptars ta pailutants,based an a project-speci�c streen�ng analys�s�. �. All an�n►ers must tonsider the whale af the proje�t-related effects, bath direct and �ndirect. inc�uding aff-site,curnulative,tanstruct�an,and aperatiana�impatts. . " . 3. �nce the lead agenGy has deteRnined that a particular phy5�cal impact may ac�ur+the thetklist answQrs must fndicate whether that irnpact is patentia#ly signif�ant. tess than significant w�th mitigatian, ar less than sign�fican�. r'Patentially Significant lmpact" is apprapriate when there �s suffittent eWidente that a substantia�ar patentialfy substantial ad�erse thange may atcur in any af the phy5ical eanditians within the area affe�ted by the praject that cannat be mitigated belaw a le��l af significante. If there are�ne ar mare"Patentially S�gnificant Impact"entries,an En�iranmenta� Impact Repvrt{ElR�i5 required. 4. A "Mitigated Negative ❑eclaratian" �Negati�e De�laratian: Less Than �igni�cant with Mitigat;on Intarparated� appiies where the intar�aratian af mitigatian measures, priar ta deelaratian af pro�ect appra►ra�, has reduced an effe�t frarn "Patential�y Signifieant Impact`! ta a "LesS Than • Sign�tant Impact with Mitigatian."The lead agen�y must deseribe the mitigatian measur�s and bri�fly�xplain how they redue�t�►e effe�t to a�ess than signif�cant le�e�. 5. Earl�er anatyses may be used where. pursuant ta the tiering, program EIR, or other �E�A praee5s. an eff+ect has been adequate�y anaiyzed in an ear�ier E1R �intfuding a �enera� Plan� ar . Negati�e Detlaratian [C�R, �uideline5 for the Implem�ntatian af �E�A, § 15��3{e��3�{D��. � Referen�es ta an earlier ana�y5is 5hauid: ' a� Identify the eariier analysis and state where it is available far review. � b� Ind�cate whieh effett.s fr+am the en�ironmental thecklist were ade�uately analy�e� in the earlier daeument, pursuant ta appEicable IQgal standards, and whether these effetts were adequate�y addressed by mitigatian measures�ntluded in that analysis. t� ❑escribe the mitigatian measures in th�s datument that were incarparated ar re�n�d fram _the earlier dacument and indicate ta what extent they address 5ite-spetifit tanditians far this pra�ect. �. Lead agencies are en�auraged t� in�arpvrate referenc�s ta infarmatian s�ur�es far patent�al imparts inta the �he�klist ar append�x {e.g., general plans. zaning ardinan�es, bialogical assessm�nts�. Referen�e t� a pre�iaus�y prepared ar vutsid� dacument shauld in�lude an indication�f the page ar pages where the statement�s substantiated. 7. A sauree list 5hauld be app�nd�d ta this dotum�nt. �uree5 use� or ind'nriduals c�ntacted shauld be�isted in the saurte tist and cited in the distuss�an, 8. Expianatian�s�af ea�h issue shauld�dentify; a� the eriteria ar thre5hald, if any, used.ta evaluat�the 5ignificance af the impact addressed by each questian and - b� the mitigati�n measures, if any, pres�r�bed ta redure the impact be�aw the leve� af s�gni�can��. - _ Page 1�of 4� Agenda Item 9.a. Page 131 tNI11AL ST'UDY M�TICATED NECATIVE DE�LA.RATIDN 1UNE�D1� CENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1�-�t�81CY�LE AND TRAILS MASTER PLAN� � __ En�ir�n m�nt�.l Issues � I.Aesthetic� Enviranmental Sett3ng The City is mostly built-out, with distinct residential, tommer��al and a�ricultural distr�cts and s�y�ral mixed-use areas. T�e�ity also tontains portEons of thr�creeks and several open spac.+e areas. The�ty has been retogni�ed as a'"I'r�e��t�'f�r eath of the last 3�years. ' Potent�a I[y l.�s Than �Than S#gn�fltant 5��� Slgniflcaen �[o�mpa�t Rmpa� wrth !m� Wa��d the pra�ec� IvIF�c�o� a� Ha�e a substant�a�a��erse effect on a s�enic v�sta? ❑ ❑ [] � b� 5ubstant�ally damage scenic resourtes, intluding� but not I�mited to, trees, ro�k outtroppings, and ❑ ❑ � ❑ historit build�ngs within a state stenic h�ghway� t�5ubstantially degrade the exist�ng�isual character or � � � � qual�ty of the site and its surroun�ings� �� �reate a new sour�e of substantial light or g�are whith woul�a�vers�ely affert�ay or n�ghttime�iews in ❑ � ❑ ❑ the area� D[seuss�on � a; No�m art � • b: The P�an �ves not i�entity any bike lanes or trails that would �mpart any sten�t trees or rotk outtroppings, an� there are no offitially �esignated 5tate s�en�t highway�s within the �Ity. All new bi�.yc�e an� pe�estrian fa�itities wou�d be sub�ert to the pro�isions of Nlunicipal �ade 5ertion 1�.15. aC�MMUNITY TREE �R��RAN1" and any tre�.s that would be remo�e� far the purpos�of tonstrutt�ng suth fatilities w�u�� be replated per�ity standar�s.�Less than si n� if�cant�maart t: The Plan would result in tfie tonstrurt�on of new b��.ytle an�pedestrian facilities,�ntluding bike lanes, trails and signage. Bike lanes would generaily tons�st of at-grade* surFace�-�e�e!tmpro�ements and trails wou�� �eneral�y foiiow ex�sting tontours. Howe�er* some off-street impra�ements may require a��it�onal�ra��ng and/or retainin$walL�v�hich could substantially degra�e the existin�Wisual character or qua[ity of the site or its surroun��n�s. 5ignage woul� tonform to al� app��cable 5tate and City standards regarding s�ie and platement. less than si�nifitant w�th miti�ation MM !-1: All off-street impro�ements shall be designe� to min�m�ae the amount of tut and f�l�� conform to existing topagraphy and min�m�ie �ertica! he;ght of cut/f�l sfopes to less than i� feet. Att graded areas shall be re�egetated with site appropriate native p�ant s�ecies. N�N� �-t: Retaining r�alls shail be limited to three f+eet,with a max.imum slope rat�o of�:1 un�ess , a supplemental study�s compiete�. , � Page 13 of 4� , Agenda Item 9.a. Page 132 INITiAL STUDY M!TlGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIQN lUNE 2Q12 . GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1�-0Q� BICYCLE AND TRAILS MASTER PLAN d: Street or tra�! fight�ng may be included with 5ome impro�ements identifed in the P�an. less than 5i�nifcant with miti�ation _ MsVI I-3: lighting of bicyc�e and pedestrian facilitie5 5hall be limited to that required for 5afety. Lighting 5hall be directed down onto the facility itself and shall not 5pill o�er onto adjacent pro pe rt�e5. Re�erences:I,�,4, IO � II.Agriculture and Farest Resources Enviranmenta�S�iting � The City of Arrvyv Grande contain5 apprvximately 46�acres vf aGti�e farmland, most vf which i5 Prime Farmland�vns�st�ng vf Class I and CIasS II 5oi15. There are nv farest resvurce5 loeated within the City. Pote n#ia i fy ���n less Tha n $�gn��� Signifitant ��n��nt Nv Impact . Impact ,wrth fmpact Wvuld the prvject: . Mitigat�vn a� Cvn�ert Prime Farmland, Un�que Farmland, or Farmlar�d vf Statewide tmpvrtance {Farrnland�, as shvwn vn the maps prepared pursuant tv the ❑ � ❑ � ❑ Farmland Mapping and Monitaring Prvgram vf the California Resour�e5 Agency�tv nvnagri�ultural use? b�Cvnflict with existing zoning fvr agr�cu�tura� u5e�or a � � � � INill�am�on AGt cvntract? c] Conflict with existing z�ning f�r� �r �ause rez�ning of, forest land �as defined in Public Re��urces Code sectian 1�22��g��, timberland �a� defined by Public � � � � Res�ur�es C�de se�ti�n 45�6�, �r timberiand zoned Timberland Pr�ducti�n �as defned by G��ernment Code 5ecti�n 511�4�g��? d� ReSUIt in the I�sS �f fvrest land �r con�ersi�n �f � � � � f�rest land to non-f�rest u5e? � e� In��l�e other change5 in the existing en�ir�nment which, due t� their location �r nature� couid result in � � � � can�er5i�n �f Farmland� t� n�n-agricu�tural u�e �r� . can�er5��n�f forest land t� n�n-f�rest use? - �In determrning whether Jmpacts tn agr�cultur+�al resnurres ore sJgnifrcant en�ironmental e�Fects,lead ogencres may re�er tn the CalJfnrn�a �lgriculturol �and F�aluatron and 5rte �sses5ment Mndel (1997�, prepQred 6y the Califamta Department nf Cvnservatron as an optronal modef for.use rn as5es5rng rmpacts'on agricuftural and formland. In determJnrng whether Impacts to fnrest resourres,rntludrng trm6erland,are srgnr�cant en�rranmental e�Feets,lead agencres may refer tn�nformatlon comprled 6y the Caltfarnra Department n�Farestry and itre Pro�ection regord�ng the state's Jn�entnry nf fnrest land,tncludr'ng the Fnrest and Range a4�se��ment ProJect and the Fnrest Lega�y A�sesSment pro�ect; and fnrest carbon mea�urement methodology prnvided ln Forest Pro tocols adnp ted 6y the CalJfornra�lrr Resources Bnard. • D�5C11SS70II ' . a. b: The P�an ident�fies new bike and pedestrian fac��ities adjacent t� and thr�ugh acti�e farmland �between East Grand A�enue and Fair�ak5 A�enue,we5t�f US 1�1�. Any new fa�ilitie�5h�uld minimize any impacts t�agr�cultural u5es t�the greatest extent feasib�e. le�s than si�nificant with mtt��ati�n - Pag�14 of 4� Agenda Item 9.a. _ � . Page 133 , INITIAL STUDY MIT�GATED HEGATII�E DECL.ARATIQN JL1NE 101Z GE�ERAL PLAN AMENDMENT lZ-OQ� B�CYCLE AWD TRAILS MaSTER PLAN MM II-�: �nat bicycle and pedestrian r�ute al�gnments shall aW�id r.vnflicts with acti�e agriculturat lands tv the greatest extent fea�ible hy l�cati�rg them w�thin ex�ting right-�f-ways, and/�r �n r+oad� �r �ther disturbed land�. Sh�uld a r�ute be I�cated within an activ�e agricu�tural parcel, then further studies wi�l be c�mpleted t� address impacts t� agricu�tura� land. The study w�uld include r.vnsultati�n with pr�perty�wners,the Farm Bureau,and the 5an Luis ab�sp�C�unty Agritulturat C�mm�ssi�ners�ffite,and include: 1} Meth�ds f�r minimiifng trespas�ing and Wandaiism�y trai!users. �} Pr�tedures fvr minim�iing pestitide exp��ure �spr�ying restri�ti�r�s, n�tifitati�n, pathway c�v�ure etc.� 3} Design guidelines far pathway e�emer�ts intended tv preWent land use canflitt�. MM II-Z: Pri�r tv final design and canstru�tian af faciiity impra�ements, the City sha�l cvordinate with affected agricultural land owners�the Farm Bureau,the 5an Luis�bispa C�unty Agri�ultural Cammissianers�ffi��� and members af the bi�ytlir�g�ammunity ta design fa�ilit�e� that minimize agr��uftural �anflicts with the use af�mpra�ements, intluding but nat ��mited ta: signage.fenting,str�ping and ballards. MM I�-�: Where bicycle and pedestrian facilities intersect agricultural raad�, the tntersectian� shall be designed ta aczammadat�agricu�t�ral e�uipment. MM I1-,4: Infarmativn shall be pra�ided at trailheads that wvuld reduce agricu�tural land use cvnfli�ts including signage tv infvrm users nat ta: �1} trespass anta agricultural lands, ��} �itter, �3} pick faad ar handle the crvps,ar�4y fieed ar tnterfere with farm anima�s. In addition�signage regarding the �it�s Right-ta-Farm �rdinance� wh��h pravides pratectian f+ar farmers against agricultural vperat�an nu�sance camplaints,shall alsa be displayed. c-e: Na impatt Re�erenees:1, 3, 7, 1� t i I.Air�ual�ty En�iranmental Setting San�uis�bispa Cvunty is in nan-attainment status fvr vlane (�3�, respireable particu�ate matter�PMl�y . and �inyl chlaride under the Califiarnia A#r Resaur�e Baard ��ARB} �tandards. The Caunty is in attainment status fvr all ather applicab�e�ARB standards. Qage 15 ofi 4Z Agenda Item 9.a. Page 134 IN�T�AL ST�laY MITIGATED NE�AT�VE�ECIARAT�QN lLJNE Z�l.Z GENERAL PLAN AMEN�MENT 1Z-0OZ BICYCLE AND TRAILS MaSTER PLAN ' Rotentfal ly Less Than �Than Signifi�ar�R �ificant 5��� No Impact tmpatt .� fmpaci wo�rd�e�j�t; , ���� � . a� �vnf���t w�th or abstru�t implementatian of the � � � � applieable air quality p�an? . b� V�vlate any air quaiity standard vr eontribute substantia�ly to an exist�ng or pro�ected a�r qua�ity ❑ � ❑ ❑ vio latia n� � e� Resuft in a �umu�at's�e�y evns�derabie net increase of any er�ter�a pvlrutant�fvr whieh the pro�ert region is non-attainment under an applieable federal vr state � � � � ambient air qua��ty standard ��nefuding releasing em�ss�ons which exceed quantitati�e threshoids far oivne pretursors�� d� Expose sensiti�e receptvrs to substantial pvllutant � � � � eontentrativns� e� �reate ob�ert�onab�e odors affe�t�ng a substa ntia i � � � � number vf people� •Where awilable.the sign�car�re rriteria estab!lshed by the oppllrable or'r quallt�y mar�agemer�t or a!r paflui�orr c�vncroJ dlstrrct rrray be relied on ta make tf�ese determirradans. D�s�uss�an a: By impro�ing bicye[e and pedestr�an faci�ities in the�'rty,the Bjryele and Trails A�aster Plan�ntends to �nerease vppvrtunities for biking and walkin� and deerease motor vehicle traffie and assoe�ate� air emissivns,and could be�onsidered to ha�e a benefic�al air quality impa�t. No impart b-�: Som� n�w birycl� and p�d�strian fae�'ilities id�ntifl�d by the Plan are near sensiti�� r�eeptors ��x�sting sehooi an� resid�ne�s�, th�r�fore, mit�gativn m�asur�s that iimit di�sel �m�ssion imp��ts to th�s� r�c�ptors are nec�ssary. In addition, standard mit�gation m�asur�s to addr�ss F�d�ral, Stat� and Iocal air qual�ty requir�m�nts ar� als� re�uir�d during evnstruttivn of th�se fa�ilit��s. l.�ss than si�n�fi�ant with mit��ativn MM �I!-1: �onstruttivn atti�ities can g�n�rat� fugitiv� dust, wh�ch cvufd b� a nu�sanc� to Ioca� r�sid�nts and busin�ss�s in elos� proxim�ty to th� pnoposed �anstru�tivn sit�. Dust evrnplaints eould resu�t in a vivlat�on vf th� A��D's 4�� "Nuisane�" Rule. AEi construction an��emoliti�n lans shall list the fQIlQwin re iatiflns: i� R�duce th�amount af th�disturbed area wh�r�pass�b��, �� use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient�uantit�es to p�event a�rborne dust from I�a�ing th� s�t�. Increased watering fr�qu�ncyrwouid b� required wh�n��er wind speeds exc��d 1� mph. Rec�aim�d �nvn-potabl�� wat�r should be us�d when���r possible, 3� A�I dirt stvek pil�ar�as shvuld be spray�d daily as n��ded, � 4� ��rmanent dust eontrol measur�s id�ntifi�d in th� apprv��d prvj�tt rew�g�tat�vn and �ands�ape plans should be impl�m�nt�d as svvn as pvssible foltvwing eompletlan vf any soil disturb�n�attiv�ti�s, Page 15 vf�Z Agenda Item 9.a. Pa e 13 I�IITiAL STUDY MITiGATED NEGATiVE DE�LARATiaN •. 1UNE�Ql� GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1��� BICYCLE AND TAAILS MaSTER PLAM 5� Expvsed grvurnd areas that are planned tv be rewvrket#at dates greater than vne mvnth . after initial grad�ng shvuld be svwn with a fast gerrn�nat�ng natn►e gras5 seed and . wate r�d unti��egetat�on is esta b I ished, 5� All disturrbed svii areas nvt sub�e�t tv re�egetativn should be stabil�ze�# �sing appro�ed �hem�cal sail binders,jute netting,vr vther methads approyed in ad►rante by the APCD, 7� All roadways, dr�veways, sidewalks. etc. tv be pa�ed shvu�d be evmpleted as svvn as poss�ble. In addition. building pads shvuld be iaid as svon as pvssi�re after gradjng un�ess seeding vr soti binders are used, . 8� Vehicle speed fvr all cvnstru�tivn �eh�cles shail not exteed 15 mph vn any unpaved surfate at the cvnstruction site, 9� All trutks hauling dirt, sand� s��i, or other Ivos� materials are to be cv�ered vr shou�d maintain at leas#two feet of freeboard �m�nimum�ert��al distance between top of Ioad and top vf trai�ery in accvrdante with�11C 5e�t�on�3ii4, i�y Install wheel washers where�eh�tles enter and exit unpa�ed roads onto streets,vr wash off trudcs and equipment lea��ng the site.and 11� 5weep streets at the end of eath day �f ��sible svil material is carried vnto adjacent pa�ed roads. Water sweepers with retlaimed water shvuld be used where feasible. �IAAA I11-�: Idling r�strict�ons near �ensiti�e reteptors fvr both on and off-road equ�pment will int�urde the fvllow�ng: . 1� 5taging and queuing areas shall not be t�ated within 1,��fieet af sensitNe r+eteptars; �� Diese!idling wrthin 1.�D�feet vf sensit�ve re�eptvrs�s not perrnitted; 3� Use of aiternati�re fueled�qufpment }s recvmmended whene�er possible;and, 4� 5igns that spec�fy the nv id��ng requ�rements must �e pasted and enfor+ced at the tvnstruction srte. �IA�IA ���-3; Portable equipment. 5� harsepvwer �hpy or greater. us�ed during cvnstru�t�an activit�es wlll require �alifvrnia statewide partab�e equipment registratfan {issued by the �a�iforn�a Air Resvurtes 8oard� or an APCD perrnit. The foi�ow�ng �ist is pro�ided as a guide to equ{pment and vperat�vns that may haye permitting requ�rements, but shvuld not�e�iewed as exdus��e. Far a more deta��ed listing, refier to the District's CE�A Handbavk. • Power streens.cvn�eyars,d�es�el eng�nes.and/vr�rushers; • Partab�e generatars and equipment w�th engines that are 5�hp or greater. • �nternal Combustivn eng�nes; • Uncvnfined abrasn►e blasting operation�; • �oncrete batch plants; • R�tk and pa�rement trushin�; • Tu�grinders;and • Trvmmel streens. To minimize tential dela s, pr�vr tv the start vf the prv'ect. �iease cvnta�t the APCD En ineerin Di��Sivn at 8�5 781-59i� fvr s e�ifit informa �vn re ardin erm�ttin re uirements. Page 1�a�4� . Agenda Item 9.a. Page 136 INITIAL STLIDY M�TiGATED NEGATiVE DECLARAT�DN �UNE�01� �ENER�t�PLretN�tMENOMEfYT�.�-QQ� 81�.11CLE AN�TRAr�S M�4StEf�RLr4rV} d: The majority of new bicycle and pedestrian facilities id�nt�fi�d by th� P�an are loc.ated a�ong existing str�ets,some of whi�h ar�us�d by di�sel tru�ks,which are a s�ur�e of diesel particulate matter—a tox�� air�ontaminant�TAC�whi�h poses human hea�th risks. This�ould potentia�ly expos�se�sit�ve receptors in�tuding children, s�niors and people with impaired iung fun�tions to pol�utant �on�entrat�ons. Howe�er, �t is ant�cipated that 5tate-wEde rontrols and programs desfgn�d to reduce di�sel particulate emisstons from �rrnoad �ehtc��s will dramaticaily reduce these em�ssions in th� future. less than si�nif:�ant�mpa�t �: N��rnaa . References: �,8,9, I� I�.Bialag3cal Resaur��s - Environmenta�S�tting Alth�ugh m�stly built-�ut, th� Cfty c�nta�ns p�rti�ns�f thr�e creeks and se��ral �p�n space areas that pr��ide habitat t�a�ari�#y�f fi�ra and fauna. ' Patentially lress Than Less Than S�gn�f#c�nt S�gnif�carrt S�gnif�eant No Impact Impadt W� Impact Wauld the pro�ect: �Itlgatlon a� Ha�e a substantfal ad��rse effe�t, e�ti�er dire�t�y�r thr�ugh habitat m�difcati�ns, �n any spe�i�s identified as a �andidate, s�nsit���, �r spe�ia! statu� � � � s �cies in I��al �r re i�nal lans �liaes �r � P g P • p • regulations, �r by the California Departm�nt �f Fish and Gam��r U.5.F�sh and vl��ldlife Serv�c�� by Ha�e a substantia� ad��rse �ffect �n any ripar�an habitat�r�ther sensit���natural��mmunity ident�f�ed in i��al�r regi�nal plan�. p�lic�es, r�gulati�ns�r by th� ❑ � [] ❑ Calif�rnia Departm�nt�f Fish and Game�r U5 Fish and 1�ildl�fe 5ervi�e� cy HaWQ a substant�a� adU�rs� effert �n federal�y pr�te�ted wetlands a� dQf nQd by 5ect��n 4�4 �f the Clean vl�ater A�t �including, but n�t limited to, marsh, ❑ � ❑ ❑ �ernal p��l, c�asta�, �tc.� through dire�t rem��al, fllin�, hydr�l�gical interrupti�n,�r�ther m�an�� d� I nterfere substa ntia lly with the m��erx�ent �f a ny nati�e resident �r migrat�ry f�sh �r wild�if� spec��s�r with �stablished nati�e resid�nt �r migrat�ry wildlife ❑ � ❑ ❑ ��rrid�rs, �r impede th� use �f nati�e �nriidfif� nursery � sites� ey C�nflttt with any t��ai p�li�i�s �r �rdinan�es � pr�tecting bi�logica! rQS�urc�s, such as a tre� � � ❑ ❑ preservati�n p�li�y�r�rdinan�e� � Page 18 of 4� Agenda Item 9.a. Pa e 137 INi'T1AL 5TLl�Y hAIT1GA'TE�ME�ATIVE DECIAAATI�N * J�INE ZaZZ GENERAL PLAN AhAENDAAENT 1�-Q���81C31CLE AN�TRAILS M�LSTER Pi.AN) f� Cvnfliet with the pr�visi�n� �f an ad�pt�d Habitat Conservat�on Plan, Natural Cvmmun�ty Cvns��vatEVn PEan �r�ther a roved toca� re �on I r t h ' � � � � , pp , g a ,o sta � a bitat cvns�rvat�vn plan� D�scuss�an a-�: Th�Plan id�nt�fes s�v�ral n�w bicycte and ped�strian faciliti�s Ivcat�d within�p�n space areas and adjac�nt ta cr��ks, bath of which hay� the p�t�nt�al tv pr��td� habitat fvr "sp�cial statusR' f�vra and fauna s�e���s. L+e�s than s��ni�cant with miti�at�vn MN� IV-1: A!I n�w bicyc�e and pedestrian fae�1'rti�s shall b� d�s�gn�d tv min�mii� Empa�t5 t� - bivlvg��al resvure�s. Prvj��ts with�n vr adjar�ent t� sens�tive bivlvgieal ar�as and natural areas, ineluding all tre�ks and w�tlands,that cvuid su�pvrt sp�e�a� status speci�s shall inevrpvrat�th� fv�l�wing d�sign f�atures: � � � Th� prv��et area shai! b� assess�d by a qualif�ed b�v�vgist pr�vr tv d�s�gn tv det�rmine if - addit�anal bi�lvg�eal f��ld �nvestigativns, intluding habitat sun��ys,sp�elai 5tatus sp�eies surv�ys,and tr�Q surv�ys, ar� ne�d�d. If s�,th� apprvpr�at� studies shall b�evnduct�d by QuaEif�ed Bivlvgists. The Bsvlvgist R��ort sha�! �n�lude additivnal m�t�gat��n measures, such as preevnstrueti�n su�ve�ys, use vf exelusivn feneing, t.+vnstruetivn w�rk�r b�vlvg�tai resvur�� s�nsitivity tra�ning, vnsit� bivivgical mvn�tvr�ng, and pr�parativn and �mplementativn af Habitat�V'litigat�vn&�V'Ivn�tvring Plans. i Existing trails shall b� us�d and impnav�d wh�ne�er p�ssibl�, and b=cyele fa�ility al�gnm�nts shall b� d�s�gned tv ay�id and minimiz� impacts tv �s�nsitiv� habitat evm m u nit��s. AI ignm�nt a nd d�si$n mvd ifieat���s may b� ide�nt�ed d u ring th� �ng�n��rin� d�sign phas� t� furth�r avvid and minimii� eff��ts vn s�ns�tiv� b�olagica! r�svurces and sp��Eal status sp��i�s. R�duetivn in path wrdth shall b� �vns�der�d �n sensitnr� biv�vg�r.al resvur�e ar�as, ta th� extent that trai�saf�ty r.an b� maintained. A�i prv;�cts ad�ac�nt t� �r��ks, w�tland�, and natural ar�a,s shall b� des�gned, in evnsuttati�n with th� Caiif�rnia D�partment vf Fish and Cam� �CDF��, t� av��d and minimir�impa�ts tv list�d and c'.andidat�s�nsitiv�vr speeia�status�pe�i�s. i ��cycle faalities shall be design�d to avaid impacts to wildlife movement eorridors��,g., n� f�neing that pr�elud�s wildlif� mv��m�nt shaE� b� us�d in natural ar�as, paths shaf� nvt bis�ct eriti�al wild�if� mvv�m�nt�vrrid�rs,�te�. i Us� vf stabil�z�d d��vmpvs�d granit� vr equi�al�nt p�rvivus trail surfa�e shall be cvns�d�r�d wh�r� apprvpriat�, wh�r� Class I trail facil�ti�s ar� ��cated in �r n�ar • �ens�ti�►� bivlvgi�al habitat. i Nv nighttim� light�ng shall b� used in s�ns�ti�� bi�lvgi�.a�r�sourrre ar�as. MNt IV-Z: Fvr �vnstruetivn acts�iti�s n�ar tr��s that prvr��d� suitable n�sting bird habitat, and that mi�ht veeur du�ng th� bird n�sting s�asvn �F�bruary 1 thrvu�h Au�ust 31�, a qualified bivlvgist shall evnduct n�sting bird surv�ys nv mvre than vn� w�Qk p�vr tv tr�� prun�ng, tr�� r�mor�al,ground disturbing aetiviti�s,vr eonstruetian acti��ti�s t��v�ate n�sts an or imm�diat�ly adjac�nt tv th� pra3ect sit��s�. �f nest�ng birds ar� id�nt�fied at vr n�ar prv3�ct sites, th� Ivr.ativns �f aetive n�sts shall be mapp�d and prvte�tive m�asur�s impl�ment�d. Pr�tect�e mQasur�s shal� in�lud� �stablishm�nt �f e��arty delineat�d �i.�. �vlvr�d t.+vnstruct�vn f�neing� �x�lusivn zvn��arvund�a�h n�st s�t�.Ea�h��c�lusivn�vn�shall hav�a 3�-fvat radius�ent�r�d on the nest tree for rapt�r nests and a 50-f��t radEUS �entered �n the nest for othQr birds. Pag��9 of 4� Agenda Item 9.a. • Page 138 �N�TIAL STUDY MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIQN - � 3UNE�a1� GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1�-0���BICY�LE AND TRAILS MASTER PLAN} , � . ,_--,_, .�. Acti�e nest sites shall be monitore� perio�ically throughout the nesting season to identify any sign of�iisturbance. These protection measures shall remain in effect unti!the young ha�e left the nest an� are foraging in�epen�ently,or the nest becomes inactive. Exclusion iones may be re�uce� in size if, in consultation with CDF�, a sma�ler exc�usion zone is �etermine� to a�equate�y protect the acti�e nest. Upon completion of construction activit�es, a report �� �ietailing the results of the preconstruction surveys an� monitoring shall be prepare�. The report shall be submitte� to CDF� by No�ember 30 of the year followtng completion of construction. . � MM �V-3: For constru�t�on act��ities near trees that pro�ide suitabie bat roost�ng F�abitat, a qual�fie� biologist shali con�uct bat surveys no more than three�ays prior to tree pruning,tree remo�al, groun� �iisturb�ng activities,- or construction a�ti�ities to Iocate roosts on or irnme�iately a��acent to the construction site�s�. If bats are��isco�ered �uring the surveys, an exclusion zone of iflfl to 15fl feet ra�ic�s centere�on the roost shall be estahlishe�. A�ti�e roost sites shal! be monitored perio�ically throughvut the construct�on perio�to r�ent�fy any sign of �isturbance an� shall remain��n effe�t unless the roost becomes inactive. Exclusion iones may be re�uce� in s�ze if, in consultation w�th CDF�, a sma�rer exclusion zone is �etermine� to a�equateiy protect the active roost. Upon completion of construction acti�ities, a report �ietail�ng the results of the preconstruction surveys and�monitoring shail be prepare�. The report sha�l be subm�tte� to CDF� by NoWember 3fl of the year follawing comp�etion of construction. � MM IV-4: All construction acti�ities imme��ately a�i�acent to creeks an� wetlan�s shall take place outsi�e af the salmoni� migration perio� �December 1-March 3fl�. Shoul� the project �emonstrate a nee� tv con�c�ct activities outsi�e this time perio�, the pro�e�t may request a��ttional authoriiation for work outs��ie of this perio� by obtaining appro�al from N�AA Fisheries a n�C D F�. MM IV-5: If loss of r�parian habitat elements �i.e. native trees an� shrubs� cannot be a�oi�e�, impacte�i elements shall be replace� in like kin� an� amount, or as require� hy regulatory agencies,such that there is no net loss of the habitat e�ement. � MM IV-5: To m ini mize the e�pa ns+on of exotic pla nts into wetla n�s an� the ri paria n corri�or a�jacent to bicycle facilit�es, only nati�e plant species shall be used for reseeding and re- r planting. Lan�iscaping using nati�e plant species near appropriate buffer areas shoul� he implemente� in �accor�ance with wet�an�s mitigation an�i management p�ans, and in accordance w�th appliCable permit requirements. MM iV-7: Ali fueling an� maintenance of�ehic�es and other equipment, an� staging areas, shall � be Iocate� at least lflfl feet from creeks. Prior to the onset of work,the City wifl prepare a plan for the prompt an� effe�tir►e response to any acci�ental sp�lls into the creek �A Spill Control an� Countermeasures Plan�. All workers shall be informe� of the importance of pre�enting spills an� the appropriate measures to take shoul� an acci�iental spiEl occur: In the e�ent of a spill,the appropriate Iocal. Emergency Response_ Un�t an� the CDF�'s �ffice_ of Spill Pre�ention an� Response sha�l be notifie� �mme�iately. . MM �V-8: Best�management practices �BMPs� shall be implemente� �uring all construction acti�ities to control erosion an� se�iment into creeks an� to pre�ent the spi�l of contaminants � P a ge�a of 4� - Agenda Item 9.a. � . _ Pa e 139 iNIT�AL STUDY MITIGAT�D NE�ATlVE D�CL�RAT�ON JUNE Z�lZ �ENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1.�-�� B1CY�1,�AND TRAlLS M�LSTEa PLAN� around tr��ks. Thes� BMPs shall be des�rrbQd�in a StormwatQr Pollution Prev�ention Plan �51NPPPy that shalt b� prQpar�d and submitt�d to San Luis 4bfspo R�g�onai Wat�r Quatity �ontrol Board a�ong r�rith a Noti�e of�nt�nt ��I���, and an Erosion�antrol Pfan in ord�r to obta�n a National Pollut�on D�stharg�s Eliminati�n Syst�m �WPDES� �en�ral P�rmit for �anstruction Ac;ti�ities. . MM �Y�9: Signi�i�ant 1�mb�ng, thinning, or remo�a� of trees for the purpose of bi�y�le �nd pedestria n faci I�ty �o nstructton sha�M be m i n�r�n ized to the greatQSt extent p ractica b IQ. Any tree that must be remo�ed shall be rep�acQd accorad�ng to appticable pol�cies. MM IY-1�:The�ity shall obtain all ne�essary permits and/or authorizations under S�ct��ns 4�1 and 4D4 of the Federa� C�ean Wat�r Act� and S�ct�an 16D� �f the Ca�if�rn�a Department �f F�sh and�ame��de. NIM �Y-ii: ConStruction acti��ties shal� be t�med to a�oid impact to sensit��e biological � resources and protect v+rater quality. To the extent possible� construction activit;es shall take place du�ng the dry season, between April 15 and �ctober 31, or as otherw�se determ�ned by permitting agenc�es,and in�ompl�an�e v+rith S�ction 4D1 of the Federal�lean 1Nater Act. f: No Em paCt - Re�ererrces:I,�, I� �.�ul tural R�,s�u rc�,s �nvironn��nt�l S�tt�ng Pre��ous in�estigat�ons ha�e indicated the presence of PVatj�e Americans w'rthin the present-�ay �ity Vmits during prehistori�tim�s. There are a handfu� of designated histori�a� r�sour�es v+rithin the �ity, in�luding tl�e ���F Hail,the Pauling Hou3e and the Bndge Street Bridge. Patent�al�y ��an Less Than 5�gnrfltant Signif�tant �� 51gnff�cant No lmpad Wauld the�ro�e�t: `r"�� Mr"t�'gation �m� ay �ause a substantial adverse change �n the signi�i�an�e of a histori�al r�sour�e as de�in�d in § ❑ � ❑ ❑ 15�64.5? b� �ause a substant�al ad�erse change in the signi��ance af an archaevlogi�a� resource pursuant to ❑ � ❑ ❑ , § 15�D64.5? t� D�rectfy or indirect�y destroy a unique paleontolog;cal r�source or site or unique gealo�ic ❑ ❑ ❑ � feature? d� Disturb any human rema�ns, in�luding those � � � � interred outside of formal�emeteries? Discuss�on a, b: Some of the new bi�y��� and pedestrian facilities identi�ed by the Plan would r�quir� grad�ng �r ground disturban�e, wht�h may ha�e an impact on histo�i�al or archaevlogi�al resources. Page�i of 4Z Agenda Item 9.a. Page 140 !NlT1AL STUDY M1TI�ATED NE�ATIVE DE�LARATIQN JUNE�Ql� �'aENERAL PLAN AMENQMENT 1�-QQ� BI�Y�LE AND T�AILS MASTER PLAN Imp�ementation of the P1an would impact the Crown Hill Rubble Masonry Reta�ning Wall, located on the north side of East Branch Street ad�acent to Paulding Middle School. This wall was evaluated as part of the State Route z27 relinquishment pracess. The evaluation determined that "...lacking both significance and integrity, the wall does not qualify for listing on the NRHP [Nat�onal Register of Historic Places] and does not constitute a histor�cal resource for the purposes of�Ei�4". Less than s+�ni�cant with miti�at�on MM V-i: Ef a potent�al�y significant cult�ral resaurce is encountered dur�ng subsurface earthwork act��ities, all canstruction acti�ities with�n a 1��-foot rad�us of the fnd shall cease untii a qualified archaeoiogist determines whether the unco�ered resaurce requires further study. A standard inad►►ertent disco�ery clause shall be included in eWery constru�tion contra�t to �nfarm contra�tors of this requirement. Any previously undiscoWered resaurces found during �� construction shall be recorded on appropriate California �epartment of Parks and Recreation ��PR� farms and e�aluated for s�gnifcance in terms of California En��ronmental C�uai�ty A�t criteria by a quaiified archaeologist. PotentiaEly s�gnifcant culturai resources consist of but are n�t �imited to stone, bone, glass, ceramic, wood, or sheil artifa�ts; fossils; or features including hearths, structurai remains, �r historic dumpsites. If the resource is determined significant under CE�A, the qualified archae��ogist shail prepare and implement a research des�gn and archaeological data reco�ery plan that will capture those categories of data for wh�ch the site is significant. The archaeologist shall also perf�rm appropriate technical analyses, prepare a comprehensi�e report and file it with the appropriate Information Center, and pro�ide for the permanent curation of the reco�ered materials. c: No Imqact � d: S�me of the new bicycle and pedestrian facilities identified by the Plan w�uld require grading or gr�und disturbance,whtch may disturb human remain5, including those that have been interned outside af fo rma I cem ete ries. LesS tha n si�n if ca nt with m iti�at�o n MM V-�: lf human remains are encountered during earth-disturbing acti�itres, a!I work in the ad3acent area shall st�p immed�ately and the San Luis �b�spo �ounty Cor�ners office shall be not�fied immediately. If the rema�ns are determined to be NatiWe American in�rigin, the Nati►►e Arnerican Heritage Commission shall be n�tified and will identify the M�st Likely �es�endent, wh�w�il be c�nsulted f�r rec�mmendati�ns for treatment of the disco�ered remains. Re�eren�es:4,�n,�� VI. �eolagy and Sails � Environm�ntal Setting There are tv+►o faults within city I�mits.the Pismo Fauit and the 1N�Imar A�enue Fault. The Pismo Fault is an ina�ti�e fault, and presents a lov+► r�sk to Arr�yo Grande. The Wilmar A►►enue fault is a p�tentially a�ti►►e fault that runs through the City.generally paralle�t� L15 1�1. Approximately half of the city is at moderate risk f�r liquefa�tion caused by strong seismic ground shaking during an earthquake. These areas are primarily located s�uth of L151�1 and in the eastern part �f the City. Page��af 4� Agenda Item 9.a. Pa e 141� iNIT�AL STUDY AAP�GATED NE�AT�VE�ECLARAT��N 1UWE Z�l� G E�V ERAL PLAN AAA E[V�M ENT 1.�-0�� BI CYCLE AND T'RAI L5 AA�LSTER PLAN The ma�ority of the City is at ro�rr risk for landslides. The areas at greatest risk are hillsides where greater slopes are located. The potent�al for slope stability ha�arads in�al�ey areas is[ow ta�ery latinr. The areas at greatest risk far landsl�de are�ust north of U5 1�1 in the hills�des and in the eastern partions of the C�ty. Pate nt��y Less Than L.esS Than 5�gniflrant ���ifl�� 5ignifleart# Na Impa� Impad .with �m� Vlfou�d th�e prof est: M�tigat�an a� Expose people or stru�tures to �tent�ai substantia� ad�erse effects� �ncluding the risk of loss, in�ury, or death in�ol�ing: 1} Rupture of a known earthquake f�ult, as delineated on the most re�ent Alquist-Rriolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map, issued �y the 5tate Geologist for the area,or bas�ed on other � � � � substantial e��dente of a kno�nrn fau�t� �Refer ta Di�is�on of Mines and Geology 5peti�l Publicatson 4Z.� Z� 5trang se��mit ground shakin�� 3� Sersrnit-related ground failure, intluding E�que�act�on� 4� landslides? � b� Result in substant4al sail ero�ion ar the loss of � � � � ta pso i�? c� Be iocated on a geolog�c�nit or soil that is unstable, ar that wauld betome unstab�e as a result af the pro�ect, and patentially result in on- ar off-s�te ❑ ❑ � ❑ landslide,tatera�spreading,subsidence, iiquefa�on ar coltapse? d� Be lacated on expans��e so�i, as defined tn Tab�e 18-- 1-B of the Uniform Building Code �1994�, treating ❑ ❑ � ❑ �ubstantial r�ks to life or prope�ty? e� Ha�e sa��� incapable of adequately support�ing the use of sept�c tanks or alternati�e►�aste�nrater disposal � � � � systems where sewers are not a�ailable for the disposa�of waste water? Dis�ussf�n a: The INi�mar A�enue Fault is a patentially act��e fau�t. and could trigger an earthquak�,causing strong seismit graund shaking and graund fa�lure due ta liquefa�t;on. Hawe�er,all new bi�ycle and pedestrian faci�ities wauld be constructed in accordance with a�1 appl�cabfe �eismic standards and would not inc-�ease the exposure of users to se�smic hazarads. Le�s than si�nif�cant irnpact b: �round disturbance associate� w�th construction of new bicycle and pedestrian faci�it�es outside- ex�sting pa�ed rights of ways could cause soil erosian and lo�s of tapsoil, and pa�tng surfaces wsth irnpermeab�e materials tautd intrease the rat�of starrnwater.runoff, also causing sail erasian anc� lass af topsail. Hawever, all new fatilities would be subject ta the pro�isians of Munitipal Cod� 5ection � Page�.3 0��� Agenda Item 9.a. . Page 142 1��11A1 STUDY AAITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATI�N JUNE Z�l.Z GENERAL PLAN ANIENQNlEMT 1�-�D�z�BfCYCLE ANQ TRAILS MaSTER PLANy .,_. 13.24, '�E]C�AVATIDN, GRADtNG, ERDSIDN AND SEDIN9ENT CDNTRDL'° and therefore w�uld not resu�t in suhstantial sotl eros�on or the ios�of tops�il. Less than si�ni��ant impact �, d; The majority of new bicy�le and pedestrian fa�ilities ident�fied hy the Plan withfn the exist�ng roadway network and wou�d not�nvoh�e sutistantia�cvnstruc#ion in undeve�oped areas that wauld pose geotogi� hatards. Pro�ided that al! new fa�i�it�es �onform to lo�al eng�neering and se�sm�e standards, the Plan would not expose users to any geolog�� hazar�d5 ne�ated to unstable andjor expansi�re svils. less th�n si�n�fieant im�a�t e: No�m pa�t References:�,4,1� �Il,�reenhause�as Em�ss�ans Envir�nmental Se#ting . The City of Arroyo Grande emitted approximately 9G,549 metri� tons of �araon di�x�de �quiWa�ent �CDze� �n the baseline year Z��5. The transportat��n sector was by far the lar��st �ontr�butor to ern�s.sions �5a.a9��, produ�ing approximateEy 55,�3� metri� tons of C�e in Z�a5. Em�ss�ans from the ressdentia� se�tor were the next largest �ontrihutor �24.596�, �rodu�ing approximately �3,775 metri� tons of CDze. The �ommer�aal and indu�trial sectors a��ounted for a c�mhined 12.39� of the total. Emissions fiam solid waste �omprised 5.�9� of the total, and emi�sions firom other sourc�es su�h as agrituitural equipment�ompri�ed�.19�. The majority of emiss�ons from the transportat=on sector were the result of gasoline tonsumpt�on in pri�ate �ehi�les tra�eling on lo�al roads. US 1�1, and state highways. Greenhous� gas �GHG� f�gures from the waste sec#or are the estimated future emis.sions that wfll result firom the decvmp�sition of waste generated by �ity residents and businesses in the base year ��5, with a weighted a�erage methane eapture factor of Ga.�9'o. � Patent#��ty Less Than �s Than �g���� S�gnff�tant 5f�nifitant N�Impac� tmpact w� �rnpar�t V�auld the prajer� Mit#g��n a� Generate greenh�use gas emissions, e�ther direc#fy or indire�tly, that may ha�e a signifi�.ant effe�t on the ❑ ❑ � ❑ en�ironment? b�Confi�ct with an applir�ahle �lan, poiicy ar regulation adopted for the purpose of redu��ng the emiss��ns �f ❑ ❑ � ❑ greenhouse gases? t�Resuft in the exposure of�ocal res�dents to hazards � � � � as.so��ated with tlimate thange� Dis�uss�on a-t: None of the new �icycle and pedestrian #�acilitles�dentified hy the Plan�onfltct wrth any appl�cabie plan, policy or regulation ado�ted for the purpose of reducing the emis,sion of greenhouse gases. The use of�eh:t�es and equ�pment for the tonstruction of new fatilit�es would temporarily intreas�reWels of carbon d�oxide �a greenhouse gas� during the tonstructian period. Dnce t�nstructed, the fac�lities are Page�4 vf 42 Agenda Item 9.a. Pa e 143 in�mAr.svaY nnir��A�a n��A�vE v����an� �ur�E z�iz GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1.�-0� BICYCIE ANa TRAlLS MaSTER PLAN antic�pated to redure greenhouse gases by increasing opportun�ties for bik�ng and waik�ng. less than. si ni�i nt im act R�f�renC�S: 8,9� �� �In Hazar€�.s and Hazard�us Materials � �nvironmental Setting There are no knawn hazardous materials s'rtes in t�e�ty, nor are there any airports w�thin the�it�n�ty vf the�fty. Poteritfally l�ess Than Le�s Than � S�gnifir.ant 51gn�tant S�gnifitaRt No�mpact lmpact �h lmpatt Wvuld the proJec� Mittgat�on a} Create a s�gnificant ha�ard to the pub��c or the - en�irvnment through �e �vutine transport, use, or ❑ ❑ ❑ � d isposa I of haza r�ous materials? b} Create a significant hazard to the publ�c or the en�iraonment through r+ea�onably foreseeable ups�t � � � an� accident conditsons in�ol�i� the release of � � hazardaus materials inta the environment� c} Emit hazar�ous em�ssions ar handle haiardous ar acut�ly hazardous materia�s, substances, ar waste � � � � withtn one-qua rt�r mi�e of a� existing or propose� sc hoal? �3 Be �atate� on a s�te whith is �ntluded an a I�st af harar�ous materials sites �ompiled pursuant tv �o��rnment Cnde Se�tion �59��.5 an�, as a resu�t, ❑ ❑ ❑ � would it create a s�gn�f cant harard to the pub�ic or the en��ranment� e} For a pro�ect located within an airport �and use p[an or` where such a plan has not been adopted, within t�ro mi�es of a public airport or publ�c use airport, ❑ ❑ ❑ � wou�d the pro�e�t result in a safety ha�ard for people residing ar wark�ng�n the pra�ect area� f� For a proje�t w�thin t�e�icinity of a pri�ate airstrip, would the pro�ect result in a safety hazard f�r people ❑ ❑ ❑ � residing or warlcing�n the pro�e�t area� g) �mpa�r �mplementatian af ar physitally �nterf�re w�th an a�opt�� emergency response plan or ❑ ❑ ❑ � emergency evacuat�on plan� . h3 Expose people or structures to a signi�cant risk of loss, in�ury ar death in�al�i�g wild�an� �res, in�[uding � � � � where wildlands are ad�atent to urbanized areas or where res�dences are interrn�xe�with w�I��an�s? D�s�us�on a-g- No impact Page I5 of 4� � Agenda Item 9.a. � Page 144 ,Mm�sruar�nm��►rEa NE�a-nvE aFa��n�� �uNE ioi.z GENEHA�PLAN�IMENQMENT 1.�-0�DZ BiLYL1F AND TRA.�tS AAASTER PLAN h: The P�an tdent�fie5 new bicyc�e and pedestrian fac��itie5 that would be tocated in high fire ri5k ha�ard area5. Less than 5i ni�icant wi h miti ation MM VII�-1:Trailhead 5i�na�e for fac�iit�es in high fire ri5k hazard ar�as shall praW�de �nformat�an regarding hazards and risks and ind�cate that no 5moking or use of open flames �i.e, carnpfr+es� wil�be al�owed,e�cept in sp�ci�caily de.s�gnated aneas. Re�erences:4,30 I�Hydro�ogy and�Vater Qu.ality En�#ronmental Setting The City of Arroyo Grande draws Ets water 5upply from a combination of the Lapez Resenroir and groundwater wells. Wastewater is proWided�by the South San Luis �bispo County Sanit�t�on �istrict. The City adopted inter�m !ow-�mpact dewelopment �L1D�guidelines to address stormwater runoff issues in��3. Potentia l�y ��n l,ess Tha n Sign�ta�tt S{��� 51gni�cant N��mpatt Rmpad .with �m�R WoLld the pro�etit: IV��t��at�vn ay V�olate any water .quality s�andards or waste d isch a r r u� me nts? � � � � ge eq re b� Substant�ally deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a iower�ng of the Iocal groundwater ta�le I�ve! �e.g., the � � � roduttEOn rate of reexist�n nearb wells would dro � P P � Y P to a level wh��h would not sup�ort existing land us�s or planned use5 for wh�eh permits haWe been gra nted�? �� Substantially a�ter the existing dra inage patte rn of the 5ite or ar�a, �ncluding through the alt�ration of the �ours f a stream or rnrer in a manner wh��h wouid � � � � eo , result in 5ubstant�al eros�on or S�Itation on-or off-s�te? d� Suhstantially alter the exist�ng drainage pattern of the site or area, ineluding through the alteration of the course of a stneam or r�verr or subs�ant�ally increase ❑ ❑ � ❑ the ratQ or amount of surFaee runof� in a manner . which would re�ult in flooding on-or off-s�te? e� Create or eontrihute runoff water whieh wouid e�ceed the capae�ty of e�isting or planned stormwater � draina e stems or rovide 5ubstantial additional � � � B �1 P 5our�es of polluted runoff? f��therwise 5uhstant�ally degrade water quality? ❑ ❑ ❑ � Page Z�o�41 Agenda Item 9.a. Page 145 INfTiAL STUDY AAITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARaT1�N JUNE��1� G�MERAL PLAIV AMEMDMENT 1�-0� B�CYCI:E AND TRAiLS MASTER PLAN . g� Pl��e h�using within a ���year fla�od hatard area as mapped on a fer�eral F�oad Harard Boundary or �Iood Insuran�e Rate Ma �r vther fl�od hazard d �ineat�vn � � � � P � ma p? h� P�a�e within a 1��-year flvvd hazard area stru�tures whi�h w�uid im de vr redire�t flvod f�vws? � � � � � Dis�vssian � a. b: N� im act t-f: Grvund disturban�e ass�tiated with ��nstructi�n vf new bity��e and p�e�estrian fa���ities vutside ex�sting pa�ed rights vf ways tvuld puse erosivn and sedimentativn intv watenn►ays, and paving surfates with impermeable materials tvuld intrease the rate vf runvff, a�s� tausing erosivn. and sedirnentation, potentral�y �ontributing t+v the wio�ation �f water �uality standards. Improper�y mvdified street 5t�rmdrain systems, su�h as �urb inlets, and/vr rn�difi�ati�ns ass��iated with s�dewalk buib-�uts�vuld reduce st�rmdrain ppa�ity and �ause the street drainage�stem tv n�t fun�tivn as we�! as under existing��nditivns. �ess than si�nificant with miti�at��n MM 17�-1: Proposed imprv�ements shall be de5igned t�minirnize impa�ts�n surface and grvund water �ua�ity, in�fuding ma�ntaining existing runvff �vnditivns. Stvrmwater management measures, �n�fuding but nvt lirnited tv the use �f permeable paWement and st�rmwater treatment te�hn��ues su�h as bivswales and bivretenti�n struc#ures, 5hall be inc�rp�rated intv . cvnstru�tivn pfans where practica�and fieas�b�e, in �rder t� rnaintain the pre-prvje�t hydro��gi� ��nditivns and treat s��rmwater runvff. MM I�-Z: The ��ty shall review eath pr�p�5�d impr�r►ement prvje�t privr t� cvnstruttivn and determ�ne if the project requires the preparati�n �f a Stvrmwater Pv�lut�vn Pre�ention Plan �SVIIPPPj, Based�n this reWiew, the City shal� prepare a SINPPP that inciudes best management practites�BM�sy to pre�ent or min�mize stormwater pollution during�onstr�ction actiWities,and pvst cvnstructivn use. A�� prvje�ts alvng cree�, waterways, and wetlands that in�►�hre substantial ground disturbance shall be required t� prepare an Ervsivn ��ntro� and Re�egetati�n Plan, and a 5pill �vntr�l and ��untermeasures Plan, regardless �f whether a 5WPPP is needed�r nvt. , g: N� impact h: The Plan identifies three �3� new bi�y�le/p�destrian bridges that wvuld crvss`►ari�us treeks. These bridges may be within FEMA designated i�year �afldplains. Uniess pr�perly designed and engineered, these f�cilities ha�e the p�atential t� blotk fl��d flows �nd/vr divert flvvdwaters vut �f creeks and waterway�hannels. Less than si�nificant with mit��ativn MM Ix-3: Pri�r t� final desi�n �f any facility, such as a bridge vr �ther structure that is plated within vr ��er the flvw line �f a treek vr waterway, �r crvsses ��er a r.reek, and where the p��p�sed faci�ity has the p�tent�al t� b�vck vr impede flv�d flvw5 and alter hydr���gi� cvnditi�ns, thQ �ity will cvmpletQ a detailed hydrau�ic analysis vf the 5ite and facility. The vbjefiti�e vf the analysis is tv �erify that the projefit is �n �vmpliante' w�th flvvdplain management regu�ativns and related GQnera�-P�an pviicies regar�ing ��vd prvte�tivn and pr�tefiti�n vf�ree k resvu rtes, a nd tv determ ine the pr�pvsed sizing, gQVmQtry a nd e levati�ns . Page�7 0�4� � Agenda Item 9.a. Page 146 � �NlT1AL STU�Y MITiGATE�NE�ATiVE DECI.ARATIQN JUNE I�1� GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1�-0���81�11�LE AND TRA�LS WIASTER PLAN � of the structures sa as ta nat impact creek hydrology and flood flow�anditions. The hydraulic ana�ys�s and design re�ommendatians will requ�re review and approvals af the City Engine�r. R���lel]CpS:4,S, �,�� X. Land Use and Plan.t�ing Env�ronmental 5ettf ag The City entampasses appraximately 5.5 square-miles and�s bisetted nar�h/sau#h by US H��hway 101. There are se�eral distin�t land use categaries and zaning distri�far r�s�dential,tammert�al,industria�, agricultural and mixed uses. The City is adjoined by the c�t�es af Pisma Beach and Gra��r Beach ta the w�st and unincarparated areas af San luis�bispo Caunty ta the narth�east and sauth. P�te n#�a lly ���a n less Tha n ' Slgnlflpnt ��gniflcant ��gniflcant No�mpatt Impatt w�th �m�� Wou�d the pro�ect; Mitlgatbn a� Phys�calRy di��de an establ�sh�d t�mmunity? ❑ ❑ ❑ � b� Canfl�ct with the applitable land use plan, pali�y, ar re�ulatian �f any ag�n�y with �urisdictian a��r th� pr�jett �includ�ng, but not limited to� a g�neral plan� � � � ifi lan lacal coastal ro ram ar zanin � spec c p . P g ► g ord�nanc�� adapted for the purpase af a�o�ding �r mitigating an enW�ranmental effect? c� Conflirt w�th any appl�cab�� habitat canservat�an � � � � plan ar natural tammunity tansenratian plan? D�s�u.ss�o n a�� Na im pact . Re�ererr tes:�,4, �� Xl,Minerai Resources En�ronmental Se#ting There are na known m�neral resour�es in the City af Array�Grande. Potentiafly ��rnan Le�Than S;gnif�cant ���nffl�ant S�gn�fleant No Impatt Impact w�h Impatt Would the pro�ect: M�tigat}on a� Result in the I�ss af a�railabi��ty af a knawn m�nerat r�saur�e that is ar wauld be af�alue ta the re�ion and ❑ ❑ ❑ � the res�dents af the state? b� Result i� th� lass af a�a�lability af a lacal�y impartant mineral resaurte reta��ry s�te delineated � . � � � on a Io�al g�n�ral plan. specific plan� or ather land use pla n? _ D�scuss�on a-b: Na impa�t Page�8 of 4Z . Agenda Item 9.a. [NIT1A15lUDY M�TI�ATED NEGAT111E DECLARATI�N �uruE�oiz GENE�tAL PLAN AMENDA�IENT 1�-0� BICYCLE AND TRA1L5 AAASTER PLAN ReferenGes:� XI I. N aise Env�ir�nm�nta�S�t�il�g � N�ise exposure throughout the City is primari�y caused hy aut�mohife traff�c on surface streets and l�5 Highway iDi,with intermittent noise generated by agricultural operat�ons and construct�on acti�ities. Pat��ti,aily Less Than �Than S�gnif�cant ��'���� S��n�cant Na Irnpact �mpact w� Impact Would t�re pro�e� M1Ngation • a� Generate or expose people to no�se lev�ls in excess of standards estaht�shed in a �oca! genera� pfan or � � � � noi�e ordinance, or in other applica�le lo�al. state, or federai sta nda rds? h� Generate or expase peopie to excess��e ❑ ❑ �I ❑ ground�orne�ibrat;�ns or groundborne noise le�els? cy �reate a substantiai permanent increase in amb�ent no�se levels in th� �itinity of t#�e pro;e�t �a�o�� le�el� ❑ ❑ ❑ � without the pro;�t�? da Create a suhstantial t�emp�vrar� or per�odic �ncrease in am�ient naise le�e#s in the�icinity of the proje�t, in ❑ ❑ �I ❑ extess of noise le�e�s existing withaut the pro�ect? ey Be lo�ated within an airport land us� plan or, where such a plar� has not b�en adopted,within two miles of a puhlrc a�rport or puhlic use airport7 If s�v, wauld t#Ye ❑ ❑ ❑ � proje�t expose peop�e res�ding or wvr�cing in the proj�ct ar�a to eactessi�e noise le�els? f� Be in the �ianity of a private airstrip? if s�v, would th� projett expose p�vp�e residing or wor�cing in the ❑ ❑ ❑ � pro;ect a rea tv extess i�e no ise le�e Is? �15�115,5'��D a, b,d: During tonstruction of new �icytle and pedestrian fatilities,the use of tonstruction�ehicl�s and equipment has t�e potential to g�nerate excessive le�e�s �f nais�; hawever, this is onl� a temporar� increas�. Bicyclists and pedestrians may b� expose� to nois� from �ehicles on streets and roads and also fram agr�tultura! equipment use� on ad;atent agritu�turai fields. How�ver. t#�ese noise le�els wou�d be temparary and intermittent, an� all tonstruction a�ti�it�es wili tompty with app�itahEe City � po�iaes rega nd ing noise. �.ess t ha n s� ni��ant im Qact �,e,f: No im act Re�eren�es:I, �, I� J�]II. Papulation an�i Hausing Env�ron.ln�nta!S�tdng Arroyo Gran�e has a papu�ation of 17,�5����1��ensus�with an av�rage househo�d s��e of�.4 pers�ns. Page�9 af Q� Agenda Item 9.a. Page 148 IN�TIAISTU�Y M1TiC�ATEa NEGATIYE DECLARATION �VNE ZDl� C�ENERAL PLA.�V AMENaMENT�.3-0�D� BtC�CLE AN�TAAILS MASTER PLANj Pote nti.a I ty �s Tha n Less Tha n Signifir.ant ���ni��ant Cr�ni�ant Na Imp�tt 1mpaR �h �mpaR Wau�d the project: Mitigat�an aj Induce substantiai populat�on gr�wth in an area, either dire�tly ;f�r exa�ple, by pr�posing new h��es � � � � and bus�nesses� ar indir�tEy ;f�r exa�p�e, thr�augh extens��n af raads ar ather infrastru�ture�? bj Displace substantial numbers of existing hausing. n�cessitating the cans#ru�ti�n af replacement hausing ❑ ❑ ❑ � elsewhere? �j D�splace substantiai' numbers af peap�e, ne�ess�tat�ng the �anstru�tian af repla�ement h�us�ng ❑ ❑ ❑ � elsewhere? D�.scuss�vn a-c: No impa�t Re�erenres:1,4, 1� Xl�.Public 5�rvic�s Envir+vnmenta.l Sett�ng The City of ArrQya Grande adm�nisters �ts awn pa�i�e department and parks and recreation faciftties. F�re prat�tsan is pra��ded by the Fi�e C�t�es Ftre Autharity thraugh a faint pawers agreement;JPAj. The lu��a N�ar Unified S�ha�l District;LMUSDj pr��des K-i�educatianal fa�ilities. Poter��ally Le.ss Than Less Than 51gn�fltartt ���n��ant �ign�tar�t No lmpact lmpa�t .��h Impa�t Would the pro� Mrdgatlon aj Resu�t En s�gn�f�cant en�iranmental �mpaets fram �onstru�t�on ass��iateti with the pro�i�an af new or phys��ally altered ga�ernmental fa�ilities, ar the need for new or physically altered g�yernmental fa�ilities,t� ❑ ❑ � ❑ mainta�n a��eptable servr�e ratias, response t�mes, ar ather perf�rman�e ab��ctnres fvr any af the publ�� s�rvi�es: Fire protection? ❑ ❑ � ❑ Rali�e pr�ate�t�an: ❑ ❑ � ❑ Schaals� ❑ ❑ � ❑ Pa rks� ❑ ❑ � ❑ Dther publ�c fa�il�ties? [] ❑ � [] D�scvss�vn a: The new biry�le and pedestri�n f���i�ties ident'rfied by the Plan w�uld �reate netiv publ�� ac�ess apportun�ties t� apen space areas n�t preyiausly a��essible ta the publ�� and will �reate recreational appartunities that did nat previaus�y exist. A�cess ta existing park and apen spa�e fa�ili#ies will be irnpra�ed as a resu�t�f Empl�ment�ng the Pfan. Less than 5i�nificant impatt � Page 3D of 47 ., Agenda Item 9.a. Pa e 149 INIT�AL STUDY lN�T[�AT�D NEGAT�VE DECLARAT1pN JUNE�Ui� GEN E RAL PLAN AM ENDM�NT 1�-�OZ�BI�lICLE AND TRA1L5 MASTER P LAN�__ R����n���:�,4,�o, X�,Re�reation - En�rironmenta!Set�fng The Re�reat�on and Nlaintenante Servites Department o�ersees retreational a�ti�it�es throughout the City and manages the C'�s various parks�nd open spates. . Pot�nt�af�y ��an L�ss Than 5�gn�flcant �g���� 5ign�fitant Nv Impact Impaet w�th �mpact would the proj�ct: Miti�ativn a� Intrease the use of existing neighbarhood and regianal parks or oth�r re�xeatiana�fatitities, suth that � � � � substantia� physiral deteriorat�on of the fatilrty would ottur or be atcelerat�d? b� Include r�e�creativnal fac�lities or re�uire the r tonstru�t;on or expansion of retreat�onal faci[it�es that � � � � might ha�e an ad�erse physical eff�e�t on the en�ironrnent� . � D�scussf an a-b: The new bieycle and pedestrian fat�lit�es identifed by the PEan will increase the use of park.s and other ne�reat�ona!fatilities betause they wi�l pro�ide impro��d ac�.ess to those facilities. Howe►►er,this impact is not considered to be significan�. The intrease in usage is not ant�cipated to signifi�antiy atcelerate or cause the phys�cal deterioratifln of thos� parks and facilities such t��t repair or expansion would be rje�uired. l.ess than s��nif r.ant im�a�t Re�erenc�s:�,4,�4 �VI.Tra�sportation/Traffi� En�ironmental�etting The City's street network �ansists of a hierarchy of street typ�s wh�ch s�rve different functions. These intlude freeways,arteriais,co��e�tors, �ocal streets and alleyways. Freeways route traffit through the commun�ty and are charaeterire� by iarge traffic�olumes an� high- speed trave�. Arterials iink residential and tommertia� distri�ts and serve shorter through traffit nee�s. Due to the hea�ier traffit on arteriais, ad jacent land uses are intende�to be a mix of tvmmertial and multi-famijy residential. Col�e�tor streets link neighborh�ads to arteria�s and are not intended for th rough traffic but a re nonethe less i nte nded to mo�e traffit in an eff cie nt ma nner. Loca i streets a re designed to serve on�y adjatent land uses and are lntended to prote�t residents from through traffit im pacts. Pa�e 310�4� Agenda Item 9.a. Page 150 �N�a�s'r�QY n�i��rEQ NE�d�vE�Ea.a��n�n� �u�vE��� �ENERAL PLAN AMENQME�+dT 1�-00� BICYCLE AND TRA.lLS MASTER PlAN Pot�ent�C�y ��n Less Than S�gnificasrt �gnrf'i�.an# ���rtican# No Impa�t Impa�t ,w�h �mpacE I�Vvu�d the pro�� M�t�gauon a�Confl�ct w�#h an app[icable pian+ ordinance or po�i�y estab��shing measures of ef�ectnreness fvr the �rformance of the tirrulation system, taking into accoun# a�l modes of transportat�on inc�uding mass - trans�t and non-motor�zed trav�l and r+el�vant ❑ ❑ � ❑ cornpon�nts of the cirru�ation syst�m, �nclud�ng b�t not limit�d to �nters��tion5, streets, highways and fr+eeways, p�d�strian and bicycl� paths, and ma�s transit? �� �onfl��t with an applitable cong�stion manag�ment prograrn, in�luding♦ but not �frnit�d to l�v�l of 5�rv��� standard5 and trav�l demand m�a5unes♦ or oth�r � � � � standards establish�d by th� county cong�stion manag�r�nent agency fvr de5ignat�d road5 or highways? c� ReSUIt in a chang� in air traff�c patt�ms, including �ither an intrea5� in traffi� I��els or a �hang� in ❑ ❑ ❑ � location that resu�ts in substantia�saf�ty r�sks? d� Substantiaily increas� haiard5 du� to a de5�gn f�ature ��.g., sharp �urv�5 or dang�rou5 int�rs�tion5� ❑ ❑ � ❑ ar intompatibl�us�5��.g.,farm�quipm�nt�� ��R�.sult in inad�quat�ernergenty atte55? ❑ ❑ ❑ � f� �onflict w�th adopt�d palici�.s. plan5� or programs r�garding publit transit, biry�l�l ar p�d�xtrian � � � � fac��it��s, or ath�rwis� de�rrease th� p�rfornnanc� or saf+ety of su�h facEliti�s? �iscussion a, b: Th� Plan identif�5 se��ral n�w bi�ytl� fa�ilitie5 within �xist�ng roadway r�ght of way. tn som� instanc�s, eith�r th�acqu�sition of additional right of way,th�loss of on-stre�t parking or the narrowing af e�ist�ng travel lane width5 may b� requir�d in ord�r to accommodat� th�se n�w faciliti�s. The narrowing af existing trav�l lane width5 may affett I�velS of serv�ce �LoS�; how���r, th� narrowing af tra�el lane w�dth5 is a poi�cy deci5ion that i5 outsid�the sc�a�a�th� P�an and would b�addr�ss�d in a future update of th���s�ir�ulat�on Ei�m�nt. Less than si�nifitant irn�a�t C: No im pa[t d: lmpl�rnentation of th� Pian will in�fud� th� addition of signag�. helping to r�u�� haiard5 and irnpro��o��rall bi�ytl� and p�d�str�an safety. This si$nage will impr��►�wayfinding for b�rytlists, al�rt dri��rs to the presen�e�f bieyc�ist�, and he�p noadway u5�rs more �f�ectiv��y shar�th� public r�ght-�f- way. Less than s� nif�ant impa�t e,f: No impact Page 3�af 4� Agenda Item 9.a. � Pa e 151 �N�TIAL STUDY AATTlGATED NFGAT111E D�CLARATi�N JUNE�D1.2 GEN�RAL PLAN AINENDMIENT 1.�-0�� BICYCLE ANDT'RAlLS AAASTER PLAN Re�ere�ces:�,3 a� 3Z - �Ilr UL7j1t1�S a.II€��I'Vf���S`C�I�IS E�v�raam�nt��ett[ng Water and sew�r ut�lities are pro�ided by the �ity�f Arr�y� Grande and the C�t�s st�rmwater drainage system is di��ded into three (3�dra�nage i�nes. . Patertt�a�ty ��n Less Than ��i��� Sign�ficant 5�gniflt�ant Na Impact �mpatt ►+++rth �mpatt Waurd the pro�ect: AA�gatlon a� Exceed wastewater treatment restricti�ns �r standards �f the applicab�e Reg��na� Water Quality ❑ ❑ ❑ � ��ntroi 8�a rd? b� Require �r re5ult in the c�nstructi�n �f new water � �r wastewat�r treatment fac��ities �r expans��n �f ❑ ❑ ❑ � ex�sting fa�ilit�es? IN�uld the �onstructi�n �f thes� fac�i�ties cause si n�fiicant env�r�nmenta�eff�cts? � � � � � c� Requir� �r �esult in the ��nstrutt��n �rt new st�rm water drainag� faciiities �r expansi�n �f existing ❑ ❑ ❑ � facilities? d� Ha�e suff�cient water supplies a�aiia�fe t�senre the pr�j�t fr�m �xist�ng entitlements and resaurees �r ❑ ❑ ❑ � are new�r expanded�ntitlem�nts needed? e� ResuEt in a determinati�n, �y the wastewater treatment pr�vider that se�ves �r may senre the pr��e�t, that it has adequate capacity t� service the ❑ ❑ ❑ � pr��ect's ant�cipated d�rnand, in additi�n t� the pr��ide�s exist�ng��mmitments� f� 8� served by a landfill with suffi��ent permitted capacity t� accommodate the proje�t's s�lid waste ❑ ❑ ❑ � disp�sal ne�ds? g� ��mpfy with �ederal, state, and l�cal statute� and � � � � regulati�ns as they relate t�salid waste? D�s�uss�vn a-g: N4 irnpa�t Re�ereraces:4,5, 3a Page 33 of 4� � Agenda Item 9.a. Page 152 �NITIAL STUDY MITI�ATED NE�ATIVE DE�LARATI�N 3UNE�01� �ENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1�-00��BICYCLE AND TRAILS MASTER P�AN� N�anda�ory Find�ngs of 5�griii�cance . Patentla I�y Less Tha n Less Tha n � Significarrt `���i��ant CignifKant • Na Impa�t , Impatt wrth Impatt Wouid the projeet: Mit�gatian a� Does th� pro je�t have the potentia� to degrade the quality of the en��ronment, substantially redu�e the habitat of a fsh or w�ldlife species, cause a fish or wiidlife population to drop below self-sustaining leve�s, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal communtty,� � ❑ ❑ � ❑ reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or . endangered plant �r animal or eliminate imp�rtant examples �f the maj�r peri�ds of Caiif�rnia hist�ry�r prehist�ry? _ b� Dfles the pro�e�t ha�e impa�ts that are �ndividually iimited, but �umu�ati�ely�onsiderabie? �"Cumulati�e�y considerable" means that the in�rementai effe�ts of a pr�je�t are �onsiderable when �iewed �n conne�tian ❑ ❑ � ❑ with the effe�ts �f past proje�ts, the effe�ts �f �ther current pr�je�ts, and the effects �f pr�bable future pr�je�ts�? cy Does the pr�je�t ha�e enyir�nmental effe�ts which will cause substant�al ad�erse effe�s on human ❑ ❑ � ❑ beings,either directly or indire�tly? D�scussion a: Implementat��n �f the Plan in accflrdance with applicable z�ning standards and buEld�ng c�des and the mitigation measures identified in th�s d��ument, will n�t degrade the qua�ity �f the enWir�nment, substantia�ly redu�e the hab�tat �f a fish �r wildlife spe��es, cause a fish �r w�ldlife p�puiation to drap belaw se[f-sustaining le�els, threaten to eliminate a plant �r animal c�mmunity, reduce the number�r restri�t the range�f a rare or endangered plant�r animal or elEminate imp�rtant examples of th� major peri�ds�f Californ�a hist�ry�r prehistory. b: The majarity �f new bicy��e and pedestrian facilities identified by the Plan w�uld be I�cated �n existing pa�ed streets, whi�h already c�ntain traffic signals and s�gns, striping and markings,�rosswalks, et�. Implementati�n �f new fac�lities w�u�d ha�e a beneficial impact �n air quaiity, water quality and traffc congesti�n and w�uld not cumulatNely ad�ersely impa�t the enr�ir�nment. Less than s;�nificant �m act c: The majority�f new b�cy��e and pedestrian fa�ilit�es identified by the P�an are Iocated along existing streets,s�me�f which are used by dies�l trucics,whi�h are a sour�e�f diesel part��ulate matt�r--a toxic air c�ntaminant �TAC�which p�ses human heaFth rislcs. This c�uld p�tent�ally expose sensiti�e r�c�pt�r� inc�uding children, seniors and people with impaired lung fun�tions to po�lutant Con�entrations. H�we�er, �t is anticipated that Stat�-wid� ��ntr�ls and pr�grams design�d t� reduce diesel particulate emissi�ns fr�m �n-road �ehi�les wi�l dramatically redu�e these emissi�ns in the futur�. C�nsequent�y, Page 34 of 4� Agenda Item 9.a. Page 153 I N iTi�L 5TU DY NI ITI�ATED N EGAT111E DFCLARATI�N a UN E��1� GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1Z-0���B�CYCLE AND TR�LS MASTER PLA1V� oWerall, the proje�t wouid not cause any substant�al ad�erse effetts on human health, e�ther dire�tiy�r indire�tly,and fmpa�ts vvould b� �ess than sign�ficant l�ss than s��nifi�ant impa�t Page 35 a�4� Agenda Item 9.a. Page 154 lNITIAL STUDY MITi�ATE�NE�ATIVE❑ECLARAT��N � lUNE�D1� �ENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1�-0D2 BICYCLE AND TRAILS MASTER PLAN� Summary��Mitigati�n Measures � MM I-i: All off-street improvements shall be designed to minimize the amount af cut and fill, conform to existing topography and minimize �ert�cal height af cut/fill slopes to less than 1� � feet. All gra�ed areas shall be revegetated with site apprapriate nati�e plant speties. MM I-Z: Retaining walls shali be limited to three feet. with a max�mum slope ratio of�:1 unless a supple�mental study is tompleted. MM I-3: Lighting of bi�ytle and pedestrian facilities shall be I�mited to that required for safety. �ighting sha�l be directed down onto the faciiity itself and shail not spii! o�er onto ad�acent properties. MM �I-i: Finat bicyc�e and ped�strian route alignments shall a�oid conflicts w�th active agri��ltural lands to the greatest extent feasibie by Iocating them with�n ex�sting right-af-ways, and/or on roads or other disturbed lands. Should a raute be located w�thin an active � agricultural parcel. then furth�r studies will be completed to address impacts to agricuiturai land. The study wo�,ld�nclude consultatian with property ovrrners.the Farm Bureau, and the San Luis�bispo County Agri�ulturat Commiss�oner's�ffice.and�nciu�e: 1� Methods for minimizing trespassing and �andalism by trail users. 2� Procedures for minimizing pesticide exposure �spraying restrictions. natif�cation, pathway closure etc.� ' 3� Des�gn guidelines for pathway elements intended to pre►►ent land use conflicts. + � . MM II-�: Prior to final design and canstruction of fac�lity impro�ements, the City shall �vordinate with affected agricultural land awners. the Farm Bureau.the San Luis�bispo County Agricultural CommEssioner's Dffi�e. and members of the bi�y�ling community ta design fac�lities � that minimize agricultural confltcts with the use af impro�ements. intluding but not limited to: signage, fen��ng,striping and bollards. MM II-3: Where bi�ycle and pedestrian facilities intersect agriculturai roads. the intersections shall be des�gned to atcommodate agritultural equipment. MM 1[-4: Information shall be pro�ided at trailheads that wouid.redute agriculturai land use canflicts �n��uding signage to inform users not to: �1} trespass onta agricultura� Eands, ��} litter. �3� p��k food or handle the crops,or�4�feed or�nterfere with farm animals. In addition,signage regarding the City's Right-to-Farm Drdinant�. whith pro►►�des protection for farmers against agricultural aperation nuisance complaints.shall also be displayed. MM fll-i: �onstruction act��ities can generate fugitir�e dust, which could be a nuisan�e to loca! residents and businesses in t�ose proximity to the proposed construction site. Dust complaints could result in a �iolat�on of the APCD's 4�� "Nuisante�' Rule. A!I construction and demol�tion plans shall list the followin�re�ulatians: 1} �teduce the amount of the disturbed area where possi�le� �Page 36 of�2 Agenda Item 9.a. Page 155 INITIAL STUDY MIT�GATED NE�ATIVE DE��RATI�N �UNE Z�1� GENERAL P�AN AMENDMENT l.�-4�Z BI{.1f�LE AIV�TRAILS MaSTER PLAN 2� Use of water tru�ks or spr�nk�er system�in su�ffi�ient qu.antit�es to pr�v�nt airborne dust from I�aving the �it�. Intr�a��d wat�ring fr+equ�nry would �e r�quired when���r wind � sp��d� exc��d 15 mph. R�claim�d tno�p�tab��� water should �e us�d wh�n��er possibl�, 3� All dirt stock p���ar�a��h�utd b��pray�d dai�y as n��d�d, . 4� P�rmanent dust �ontr�l m�a�ur�� �d�ntified in th� approved pro���t r���g�tati�n and land��ap�p�ans�hould �� �mpl�m�nt�d a��oon a� po��ible following��mpl�ti�n�f any soii d�sturbing a�ti�ities, 5� Exposed ground ar�a�that ar�planned to �e reworked at date�gr�ater than on�month ait�r init�a! grading �hould b� sown with a fa�t g�rminat�ng nat�ve gra�� ���d and wat�red unti!��g�tati�n i�esta blish�d, F� All dis#ur�ed soii ar�a� not sub�ect ta re�egetat�on should �e sta��l�zed u�ing appro�ed �h�m}�a!s��l bind�rs,�ute n�tting,or oth�r m�thods appro�ed in advanve by th�APCD, ?� A�I r�adway�, dri�eway�, sid�walks, �tc. to �� pa�ed �hould �� �ompleted as so�n as po�s��le. �n addition, �uilding pads �hould �� laid a� �oon as po���b�e aft�r grading • unl�����eding or�oii bind�r�are used, 8� V�h�tle �p��d for ail �onstruct�on ��h�tl�s shall n�t �x��ed 15 mph �n any unpa��d �urFa�e at the�anstruct�on site, 9� All truck� hauling d�rt. �and, �oil, or other loose mater�al� ar� to b� t���r�d or�hould maintain at I�ast two feet of fr��board{min�murn��rtir_a�distan�� bet�v�en top of load and top of trail�r��n atoordance with�.11C S�tion 23114, � 1�� Install wheel wa�hers wh�r���hitl�s�nt�r and�xit unpa��d r�ad�ontn str��ts,nr wash off trucks and�quipment��a�ing th��it�,and 11� Sw��p str�et� at th� �nd of �ach day if �i�ibl� �oil mat�rial 1� �arr��d onto ad�atent pa�ed road�.INat�r�we�p�rs with recla�med wat�r�houtd �e used wh�r�f�a�ibt�. �VIM 11i-�: Id�ing r�striction� n�ar sensiti�� receptor� for both on and off-road equipm�nt wil� �nclude th�fol�aw�ng: 1� Staging and qu�u�ng ar�as shall not be fo�at�d within 1,D��fe�t of��nsiti�� r�t�ptor�; �� Di���l idling within 1,�Q f��t�f�n�it�ve r�t�pt�rs is not permitted; 3� Us�of alt�rnativ�fu�l�d�quipm�nt i�re��mm�nd�d wh�ne��r p����ble;and, 4� Signs that specify th� no idling requirem�nts mu�t �e post�d and �nfor�ed at th� tanstruction site. �VI�VI iii-3: Portable �quipm�nt, 5� hors�pow�r {hp} or gr�at�r, u��d during �onstruct�on acti�iti�� will r�qu�r� California statew�d� portabE� equipment reg�stration tissu�d by th� Caiifornia Ajr Resour��s Board� or an APCD permit. �Th� following li�t i� pro�id�d as a guid� to � �quipment and op�rati�ns that may ha�� p�rmitting r�qu�r�ments, �ut shauld not �e vi�w�d as �xtlusi��. For a more detail�d �isting, refer to the Distritt'�CE�A Handbook. ■ Pow�r�creen�,con��yors,d����l engin��,andlor�rushers; ■ Portable generators and�qu�pm�nt w�th engine�that are 5�hp or gr�ater; ■ Internal Cornbu�tion�r�g�ne�; ■ Untanfined abrasi�e blasting operations; ■ Contrete bat�h plant�; ■ Ro�k and pa��ment�ru�h�ng; Page 37 af 4� Agenda Item 9.a. Page 156 INIII.AL STU�Y MIT]GATED HECATfVE DE�I.ARAT�DN JUHE�0].Z GENERAI PLAN AME�I�MENT 1�-0�Z B�CYCLE AN�TRAILS MaSTER RLAN • Tub grinders;and • Trvmmel�treen�. Ta minimfze otent�al delavs. Drior to the start of the prviect. Alease tontact the APCD En�ineer�n� Di�i��an at �8�5 781-5917 for �pet�ft infvmnatian re�ard�n� permittin� reQuirements. MM IV-1: A.�� new bEc.y�le an� pe�estrian fa�ilitie� �ha�� be de�igned ta minimize impacts ta � biologi�al r+esouree�. Pn�je�ts within ar adjatent ta sen��ti�e bialogit�al area�and natural area�, in��uding all�reeks and wet�and�,that could�uppart�pe�ial statu��pe�ie�shal� incorporate the fa I lawing de��gn fieatu re�: • The prvje�t area�hafl be a�se�sed by a qual�fed bio�ogist priar ta des�gn ta�etermine if additianal bialogi�al field in�est�gatian�, �n�luding habitat�urvey�,spet�al status�pe�ie� �urvey�, and tree�urveys,are nee�ed. If�a,the apprvpriate stud�e�shall be�onducted by.Qual�fied Bialogists. The Bialagist Repvrt �hall in�lude add�tianal rnit�gatian mea�ur+e�, �uch a� pre�on�tructian �urveys, u�e af ex�lu��an fen�in�, �anstru�tian warker bio�ogit�al re5vurte sensit��ity trainEng, onsite bia�og�cal manitaring, and preparatian and implementat�on af Habitat M�tigatEOn&Mon�taring Plan�. • Existing trail� shail be use� and irnpra�e� whene��r passibte, and b��y�le faa�ity alignments shall b� des�gned ta ayaid and rninimiie impatts ta sensitive habitat �ammunities. ►4.�ignment and de��gn mad'rfiratian� may be identified �d�ring th� engineering de��gn phase ta further a�vi� and minlmize effe�ts an sen�iti�e bia�ag��al re�our�e� and �pe��al sta#us spe�ie�. Redu�t�an in path wi�th shall be �an��dere� in �en��ti�e b�olag��ai resaur�e area�,ta the extent that trail�afety c.an be maintaine�. A�� prv�eet.s ad�a�ent ta �reeks, wetland�, and natural area� �hall be de��gne�, in eonsultatian with the �afifornia Departrnent af F�sh an� �ame �CDF��, ta a�vid and min�miz��mpacts ta liste�and�andidate sen�iti�re or�pe�ia�status speeie�. • Bic.y�le fadlitie��hall be d��igne� ta a�a�d impacts ta wildl�fe ma�ement corridars��.g., na fen�ing that pr���udes wildlif� ma��m�nt shall be u��d in natural ar�a�, paths shall - nat bis�t�ritital wildlife rna��m�nt�arridars,�t��. • U�� af stab�l�ze� de�ompa��d granste or equi�al�nt p�rvivu5 tra�l �urfa�� �hall b� tons�d�re� wh�re appropriate, wh�r� C�a�s 1 trail fa��liti�� ar� lo�ated in ar near s�nsiti�e bialogi�al hab�tat. • Na nighttime fight�ng shall be used in sens�ti�re b�alogi�a�resaurace ar�a�. MM IV-Z: Far tanstruction actN�ti�� near trees that pra�i�� �u�table n�sting bird hab�tat, ar�d that might a��ur �uring th� bird n�sting seas�n �February 1 thraugh August 31�, a qua�ifie� b�alag�st shall �andu�t n�sting brrd surv�ys no mor�than an�w�ek prior to tr�e prun�ng, tre� rema�al,graund disturb�ng actN�ties,or�onstructian acti�ities to �o�ate n�sts an or imme��at�ly ad�atent ta the pcvje�t �it���y. If nesting bird� are identified at ar near prvject s�tes, the Iocativns vf actNe nests �hall be mapp�d and prvt�tn►e mea5ure� irnplemented. Prvtectn►e rnea�ur�� shall in��ude establi�hm�nt af �learfy �e�in�ated �i.e. �olvred �onstructian fen�ing� �x�lu�ion ivne�arvund�a�h n�st s�t�. Ea�h�x�lusion ivne�hall ha�r�a 3�fvvt radiu��entere� vn the nest tre� fvr raptvr n��ts and a S�fvv# radiu� �ent�re� �n th� n�5t fvr vth�r birds. Act�We nest site� shall �e rnvnitvre� periodi�aily thrvughvut th� n�sting ��asvn tv identify any �ign vf disturban�e. Thes� prvte�tion m�asure� �hal1 r�main in�ffe�t unt�l th�yvung hav� !�ft Page 38 of�Z Agenda Item 9.a. Page 157 iNITiAI STUDY M�T`�GATED NEGATIVE DECLARAT3QN JUNE��1� GENE�tA.L PLAN AMENDMENT 1�-0�Z BlCYCLE ANDTRAIl3 MASTER PLAN� _ the nest and are faraging independer�tly.ar the nest betames ina�ti�e. Exclusivn ivnes may be reduced in siie if. in cansu�tatian with COF�. a sma�ler excius�vn zane �s determined ta adequately prote�t the a�ti�e nest, Upan c�mplet�an af cvnstruct�vn act�v+ties. a re�rt detailing the results af the precanstructian surveys and manitaring shall �e prepared. The repart sha�l be subm�tted ta C�F� by Na�ember 3� af the year fv��owing camp�etian af canstructian. , MM IV-3: Far tanstruttian atti��ties near trees that pro�ide suitable bat roasting habitat, a qua�if:ed b�a�ag�st shail tvndu�t bat surveys no more th�r�thr�� days pr�ar ta tree prun�ng, tree remat►al, graund disturbing atti�ities, ar Canstru�tian atti�itEes ta latat� raasts an ar immediately adjacent ta the tans�tr�uctian s�te�sy. If bats are dista�ered during the sun�eys, an extlusian zane�f I��t� I50 feet radius tentered an thQ raast shall bQ established. Activ�roast s�tes shall be m�nit�red pe�adically thraughvut the canstn�ctian peri�d ta �dent�fy any sign af disturbante and shall remain in effett un�ess the ra�st betames inac:tn►e. Ext�usian Ian�s may be reduced in siz� �f, in tansultataan w�th CDF�! a smaller ex�lus�an iane �s determ�ned ta adequately pratect the a��e rvast. Upan tampletian af tanstructian act��ities. a report detailing the resu�t,� af the pretanstru�t��n sun�►eys and manitaring shall be prepared. The r�p�rt shall be submitted t� C�F� by Na�ember 3� af the year f�llowing campletian vf tanstru�t�an. M{VI N-4: A�I c�nstructi�n actir�ities immediately adjacent ta cre�ks and ►�et�ands shail take plate �utside �f the sa�m�nid migrata�n periad ��etember I-ManC.h 3��. �hauld the pra�e�t d�manstrate a need ta t�ndu�t act�vitaes vutside this t�me periad. the pra�ect may r�quest additianal autharizatian far wafic outside �f this p�riad by abtain�ng appr��a� fram N�AA Fisheries and��F{a. MM IV-5: If lass af riparian habitat �lements �i.e. nat��� tr��s and shru�s� tann�t �� ��oid�d� impatted e�em�nts shall be rep�ated in like kind and amaunt, ar as rQquired by regu�atary ag�nraes.such that ther�is na net I�ss�f the habitat element. MNI �V-6: Ta minimizQ the expansian vf exatic plants inta ►�+vetlands and the ripar�an carridar adjatent t� bicytl� fatil�ties, anly nati�e plant speties shall be used f�vr rese�ding and re- planting, Landscaping using native plant speties near apprapriate buffer areas shau�d b� implemented in �att�rdance with w�t�ands mitigatian and management p�ans, and in attordante with applicable p�rmit requirements. IV�N1 �V-?: All fueling and maintenance af�ehi�les and ather equ�pment.and staging areas. shall be lacated at least 1��fee�fr�m cree�CS. Priar ta the anset�f►�ark,the�ity►�+v�i� prepare a plan far the prampt and �f�ettive respans�e ta any attidenta� spills int�the treek�A Spill Contral and Caunt�rm�asures Plan�. All work�rs shall be inf�rmed af th� �mpvrtanc� of pr���nting spil�s and the appropriate measur�s to tak�shauid an acridental spill attur.�n the eWent�f a spilt,the apprap�at� lacal Emergenty Response Unit and th� C�F�'s �ffite af Spill Pr�ventaan and Res�ons�e shall b� notified immQdiate#y. {VIM N-S: Best management practites �BMPs� shall be impleranented during al� tonstru�tion attivities ta tontrol erosian and sedim�nt inta treek,s and ta pre��nt the spil! of tantaminant,� araund �reeks. '�he� BMPs shall be destribed in a Starmwater Pa�lutian Pre�ention Plan �SVIIPPP� that sha�l be prepared and submitted ta San �uis �bispa Reg�onal 11Vater Qua�ity Page 39 vf 4� Agenda Item 9.a. Page 158 INI�'�AL S�JDY Mf�i�ATE.D NE�AT�V'E DE�IARAT�QN � lUNE��1.Z GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT l.Z-OaDZ BICYCLE AND TRAILS M1�5TER PL.AN� Control Board a�ong w�th a Notice of Intent{NDI�.a.nd an Erosion Cantro�P1an in-onder to obtain a National Po��ut�on Discharges Elim�nation 5ystem {NPDES� Generai Perm�t for Ganstrurtion Atti►�ities. MM �V-9: 5tgnifcant limbing, thinn�n�, or remo�al of trees far the purpos� of bic�cle and pedestr�an facility tonstrutt�on sha�l be min�mized to the greatest ex#ent pratt�cable. Any tree that must t�e remo�ed shafl be rep�aced at�ording to appl�c,able poi�cies. MM N-i�:�te C�ty shall obtain a�l necessary permits and/or authorizations under S�ctions 4�1 a nd 4�4 of the Fede ra I Clean Wate r A�t, a nd Settion 15�of the�al iforn�a Depa rtme nt of F�sh and Game Code. MM IV-ii: Construction activit�es shall be timed to avoid impact to sensitive biological resources and prote�t water quai�t}r. To the extent possible, constructio� attivities sha�l take place during the dry'season, between April 15 and Dctober 31, or as otherwise determ�ne� by permitt�ng agencies,and in�vmp��ance w�th S�ction 4�1 of the�dera�C�ean Water A�t. MM V-1: If a potentially significant cuttura! resourc.Q �s encountered dur�ng subsurfate earthwork attiv�ties, a!I canstruct�on activ�ties w�thin a iq�-faot radius of the find shall �ase until a quaiifed archaeologist determines whether the unco�ered resource requires further study. A standard inadvertent discvvery clause shal� be included in every construct�on contract t�tnform contr�ttors of this requ�rement. Any previously undis�o�ered resourtes found during construttion shall be recorded on appropriate California Department of Parks and Recreatjon {DpR� forms and eYaluated for signi�cante in terms of California Enyir�nmental C�uaEity Att triteria by a qual�fied arthaeolog��t. Potentially signifcant �uEtural resourtes tonsist of but are not �im�t�d t�stone, bone, glass, ceramit, wood, or shelf art�facts; fassi�s; or fieatures inciuding hearths, struttural remaEns, or historic dumpsites. If the res�urte �s determin�d s�gn�ftant under CEi7A, the qualifi�d archaeo�og�st shai� prepare and �mplement a research design and a rc hae��ogica I d ata rec�very plan that wi II ca ptu re those categories�f data for wh tch the s�te �s s�gnifi�an� The archaeologi�t shall also perform appr�priate technica� analyses, prepare a tomprehensive re�ort and flle it with the appropr�ate Informat�on Center! and pro�ide for the permanent turation of the recovered materiais. MM V-Z: �f human remains are encountered during earth-distur�ing a�tivities, all w�r�c in the • ad�atent area shall st�p immediately and the San Luis Db�spo C�unt}r Coroners office shall be notified immed�ately. If the remains are determined to be h�at��e Ameritan in�rigin,the Native American F�eritage Commission shall be notified and will identify the Most Likely Des�ende�t, wh�wii[be cansulted for ret�mmendat��ns for treatment of the d�stovered remains. MM VIII-1:Trailhead signage for facifities in high fire risk haiard areas shall prov�de information regarding hazards and risks and indicate that no smoking or use of open flames {i.e. tampfires� w�11 be allowed,except in specifically designated areas. AAM Ix-1: Proposed impr�vements shal�be des��ned to mEnim�ie impacts on surfate and ground water qualit}r, int�uding maintaining existing runoff condEt�ons. 5tormwater management measures, �ncluding but n�t limited to the use of permeable pavement and stormv�rater treatment ter.hniques suth as bi�swa�es and bioretention struttures, sha�� k�e�n�orporated int� - P�ge 4Q of 42 Agenda Item 9.a. Pa e 159 INl�T1AL STUDY�IA�T�GATED NEGATIVE DECLARATI�N JUNE��1.� GE�VERAL PLA�V AAAE�VDAAE�IT 12-���B�CIICLE AND TRA1L5 M�LSTFR�IAN� tonstruct�nn plans wh�re praet��al and fe�sibt�, in nrd�r tn ma�ntain th� pre-prn��tt hydro�nglc cnnditinns and tr�at stnrmwat�r runnff. AAAI� IX-7: The �ity shall reWiew e�ch prnpnsed imprnv�ment prnjett prinr tn cnnstruet�nn and determine if the project requires the preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Pre�►ent�on Pl�n �SWPPP�. 8ased�n this re�iew. the �ity shal! prepare a SVIIPPP th�t includes best mana�ement pr��tices�gNiPs�t�pre�ent nr minimi�e stnrmwater pnllutinn dur�ng cnnstruet��n aeti�ities,and pnst cnnstruetinn use. All prnje�ts �I�n� creeks, w�terw�ys, and wetlands th�t in�nlve substanti�l ground distur��nce sh�ll be requir�d tn prepar� �n Erosinn Control �nd Re�e�etatinn Pl�n, �nd a Spill �nntrnl and �ount�rm�asures Pl�n, re��rdless of wh�ther � SWPPP is n�eded or nnt. AAAA Ix-3: Prior to �nal design af�ny facility. such �s� brid�e nr nther strueture that is pl�ced within o� n�er th� flnw line of � ereek or wat�rw�y, or crnsses o�er a cr��k, and where the prnpnsed facility has the pntenti�l to binck or impede flnnd flows and alter hydroingic cnnditinns, the City will complete � detafled hydraulic �n�lysis nf the s�te and facility. The nbjeeti�e nf th� �nalysis is to �erify th�t the prnjeet is in tompliance with fln�dpl�in management re�ul�tions �nd ►elated ��neral Plan policies reg�rdin� flnod prnteetion �nd p�nteCtinn of cr��k re5nurtes. and tn det�rmine the prnpnsQd sizing, gevmetry and ele�rations � nf the stru�tur�s sn as tn n�t imp�tt creek hyd�oingy and flnnd flnw cnnditinns. The hydraul�c �n�lysis and d�s�gn rec�mmendatinns will��quire r�e�i�w�nd�pprnva�s nf th�City Eng�n�er. Page 41 of 4Z Agenda Item 9.a. � Page160 INITiAL STUDY MIT�GATED NEGATIVE DECLARATI�N JUNE��1� GENERAL PLAN AMENDME�VT 1�-�U� BICYCLE AND TRA�LS M►�STER PLAN} � ��� References Documents&Maps _ 1. Arroyo Grand�G�n�ral Plan , 2. Arroyo Grand�Mun�cipai�od� 3. Arroyo G ra nd�Zvning Map- 4. Arroyo G ra nd� Ex�sti ng S�tti ngs R�port&D raft Arrayo Gra nd� Ex�sti ng Setti ngs Re pa rt��D1 D� 5. Arroyo Grande Urban Wat�r Manag�m�n�Plan - 5. Arroyo Grand�St�rmwat�r Manag�m�nt Plan . 7. San Luis��isp� Irnportant Farmland Map��alifornia D�partrn�nt of�ons�n►ation, zDDS� 8. �EQ,A&�lirnat��hang�Wh�te Paper��'AP��A,ZDDBy 9. Air Quaiity Handbook�SL�APCQ,�QQ9y 1�. Draft Z�lZ Bicycie and T'ra�ls Master Plan��mni-Means, ��lZ� 11. Historicai R�sourc�s Evaluation Repart�Carr& MacDonald,z�DB� Pag�4Z of�z Agenda Item 9.a. . � Page 161 . r' � '�`, �r"�{ ■�4 •(1 i � -1 �l . D raft—To be ` l N r `� .a � approved at the s� � �� ���r �_ I R • +`_ ,�RA hl D E ATTAC H M E N T 3 July��1� f p '���+�1;'� �rf�[ .� I � N C�MMISSI�N �ommiss�or� mtg. , ti♦. , ► r ��� ����� �.�� 1 .ir1. � ' � - � �JNCIL CHAMBERS �t ;... ��5 E. BRANCH STREET �ARR�Y� �RAN DE, CALI F�RN IA '1. CALL T� �RDER Ch�ir King presided and called the Arroyo �rande Parks and Recreation Commission meeting to order at �:3� p.m. 2. FLAG SALUTE Chairperson King led those present in the Flag Salute. 3. R�LL CALL C�mmi�sioner Marcy Betita, Commissioner Roxanne Shankiand, and Chair �reg KRng were present at ro�l call. Commissioner Julie �achrich and Vice Chair Shawn Blethen were absent. Attending staff included Recreation and Maintenance Services Director Doug Perrin, Administrative Se�retary Alison fVeff and Assoc�ate Planner Ryan Foster. 4. C�MMUNITY G�MMENTS AND SUGGESTI�NS None. 5. C�NSENT AGENDA 5.a. C�nsiderati�n �f Appr��al �f Minutes Acti�n: �n m�tionlsecond by Commissioners BetitalShankland, the minutes of the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of May 9, ��1� were unanimously approved. �. C�N'�INUED BUSINESS None. l. NE�IV BUSINESS l.a. Reuiew �f General Plan Amendment '1�-0�� �Bicycle and Trails Master Plan� Director Perrin reviewed background information regarding the Bicycle and Trails Master Plan and introduced Ryan Foster, Associate Planner, Community Development Department. Mr. Foster addressed the Commission and review�d the staff report, including a PowerPoint presentation. Jim DeCecco, of Pismo Bea�h, addressed the Commission. He shared a photo with the Commission showing children riding their b��ycles along Fa�r �aks Avenue en route from �ceano to Doc Burnsteins in the Village. Mr. DeCecco stated that he feels priorities 4 and 5 in the Plan should be combined and given a high level of priority. Mr. DeCecco sugg�sted a road diet on Fair �aks Avenue and explained that would mean one lane of traffic in each directiQn with a center turning lane allowing for bike lanes on each side of the road. Mr. DeCecco also mentioned that being a bicycle friendly city can lead to bicycle event organizers planning events in your area, bringing in tourist dollars. Agenda Item 9.a. Page 162 PARKS AND RECREATI�N C�MMfSSI�N MINU'�ES JUNE 'f 3, ��'f� P�t�E Z Director Perrin mentioned that are a Iot of challenges in implementtng the B�cycle and Trails Master Plan including some streets that can't b� widened and a need for public ed ucatio n. Commissioner King stated that Mr. DeCecco had some great po�nts and agrees that priorities 4 and 5 should be combined and made a high priority. Commiss�oner Shankland agreed that Mr. DeCecco had a great idea with the road diet on Fair �aks A�enue. Commissroner King also stated that he likes the idea of pathsltrails connecting parks and sees this as a marketing tool to reach out ta the bicycling community. He suggested ha�ing a booth at the Harvest Festi�al showing the plan for more lanesltrails in our community and sharing it with other communities. Acti�n: Commissioner Shankland mo�ed to recommend that the City Council, combine priorities 4 and 5, making it priority 1, incorporate comments of Mr. DeCecco and the Commission, and approye the Bicycle and Trails Master Plan. The motion was seconded by C�mmissi�ner Betita and unanim�usly appro�ed. Direct�r Perrin als� thanked Mr. DeCecc� f�r all �f his efF�rts with B�ke V1leek. ?.b. Re�iew vf Lvcativns and Design fvr the Placement and Cvnstructi�n �f a New Public Restr��m: Heritage Square Park Direct�r Perrin re��ewed the staff report including the Historical Res�urces Committee and Archite�tural Re�iew ��mmittee's recommendati�ns. C�mmissioner Betita asked if pe�ple at weddings held in the Heritage H�use Rose �arden haW� a��ess t� a restr��m. Director Perrin answered that Rub�'s House does ha�e a r��m that is used as a dressing r��m with a smal� restr�om f�r the bride but that guests d� not ha�e access t� a bathr��m. He explained that the parties rent p�rtable restr��ms that are set up in the gra�el park�ng Iot. Chairpers�n King stated that he would suggest m��ing the restrooms as far west as possible to m��e it out �f view of the R�tary Bandstand. Chairperson King also stated that he is in fa�or of the board and batten design option t� fac�l�tate as much blending with surr�und�ng build�ngs as p�ssible. Activn: Commissi�ner Shankland moved to appr��ed the design and placement f�r new public restr��ms at Heritage Square Park in I�cati�n alternati�e 1, mo�ing the building t� the west with the b�ard and �atten des�gn. Commissioner Betita sec�nded and the motion passed unanim�usly. S. C�MMISSI�N C�MMUNICAT��NS N�ne. Agenda Item 9.a. Page 163 PLANNIhIC C�IVIIVIISSI�N �,��� IVIINUT �"'� ATTA�HMENT 4 ES ��,,�.�� -. , r JU N E 'I 9, Z�'I Z �� .: . . �. Mitchell VIlallace, property� ,� n� I�#� � ,.�pr sented the prapased praject, taok nate af su �stions fram the �v��i rrissio �es �nded to uestians fram the CammESSian. 9� , r��.� P q .�,.�;��3 •,r- ti Y��.�� Cammissianers Ruth and een stated the attended the June 4 ��'I� Architectural Review Y � Committee �ARC} meeting and prav�ded camments fram the ARC. Chair Ruth apened the pub�ic hearing. There were na comments received and the public hearing was clased. The CammEssian expressed �he fallowing cancerns far th� praject: the driveway tacatian, the front yard setback cansidering the twa stary building mass; the numberllacativn af trees that wauld pravide screening, the propased building wauld sit claser ta the street than the hause south of the praje�t, and felt findings cannat be made. AGtion: Cammiss�aner Ruth maved ta cantinue to a date certain af July 3, ��1�VarianGe No. 12- ��1 and Viewshed Re�iew 12-��1 to allow the de�iation from front and side yard setback requirements for the construction of a three car garage and second story dwelting unit. �ommissioner 8arneich secvnded, and the matian passed an the fallawing rall ca11 vote: AYES: Ruth, 6arneich, Keen, Martin, N�ES: Nane ABSENT: Sperow 8.c. Consideratian af Ceneral Plan Amendment Na. 'I�-��� �Bicycle and Trails Master Plan�; Applicant—City af Arroya Grande; Lacatian -Citywide Associate Planner Foster presented the staff report recammending that the Planning �ommission review the ��1� Draft Bicycle and Trails Master Plan, its goals and ob�ectives and priority pro�ects and make a recammendation to the �ity Council regarding its adoptian and integration into the �ity's General Ptan. Associate Planner Foster and �ommunity Development Director Mc�lish responded to questivns fram the �ommission regarding the proposed plan. Chair Ruth opened the public hearing. �fhere were no comments received and the public hearing was closed. The Planning �ommission supparted the �01� Draft Bicycle and Trails Master Plan and made the fallowing suggestions: that the map be en larged to a fotd out for easy read ing, liked the priorities and thanked all who participated in preparing th� plan. Action: Cammissianer Ruth maved to adapt a Resalutian entitled: «A RES�LUTI�IV �F THE PLAIVIVIIVG G�IVIIVIlSS��IV�F THE GITY�F�4RR��� GR�[IVDE REG�IVfIVfEIVDlIIIG Tf-�I�4 T THE G1TY C�[JIVGIL APPR�VE �EIVERAL PLAIV ANlEIVDNlEIVT T�-���, AD�PTIIVG THE ��T� B�G YGL E A IVD TR�4�L S N!A S TER PLA IV A IVD 11V TEGR�4 T�NG 1 T �N T� THE G�R G[JLA T1�IV AIVD pAR�CS AIVD RECREA T1�N ELENlEIVTS �F THE CEIVER�4L PLAIV". C�mmissioner Martin secanded, and the motion passed on the following rall cal! vate: AYES: Ruth, Martin, 6arneich, Keen Agenda Item 9.a. Page 164 PLANNING C�l1Al1AI5SI�N PAGE 4 MINUTES J U N E 'I 9, 2�'I 2 N�ES: None ABSENT: Sperow 9. N�N-PUBLIC HEARING ITEIIA None. '��. N�TICE �F ADI�IINISTRATlVE QECISI�NS S�NCE JU NE 5 ��'��: �ase No. A licant Address D�scri tion Actian Planner MEX12-va2 Everett Simmons 15�Tally Ho Reduction of side setback from A A�IN 1�'to 9'for new construc#ion due ta fi re TL]P 12-D14 Bruce Ku�izik 1139 E. Benefit BBQ at KK's Bundt A MD Grand Ave. Cakes MEX 12-00� Laughton E1 Camino 7' retaining wall A RF Real Associate Planner Foster reported on an add�tional administrative item, wh�ch is MEX 1�-��1 listed abave. Community Development Director McClish responded to questions from the Commission regarding MEX 1�-���. '1'1. C�MIIAISSI�N CC711AlIAUN1CATI�NS I n response to Commissioner Keen's question, Community Development Director McClish . indicated the dirt where the prapased police statian site was Game from the EI Camina R�al proj�ct. .. '1�. STAFF C�MMUNICATI�NS Community Development Director McClish reported on the status of the Bridge Street Bridge project and stated the Commission would be updated at future Commission meetings. '�3. �DJ�URNMENT �n motion by Commissioner Keen, seconded by Commissioner Barneich and unanimously carried, the meeting adjourned at 8:�3 p.m. ATf EST: DEBBIE VIIEICHlNGER ELl�IBETH S. RUTH,CHAIR SECRETARY T�THE PLANNING C�MMISSl�N AS T� C�NTENT: TERESA M�CLISH, C�1IVIIVII�INITY DEVEL�PIVIENT DIRECT�R �Appra►�ed at PC Mtg Agenda Item 9.a. Page165 1e����1�� � r MINUYES: YRAFFIC ��MMISSI�N IVIEE `N�•��""�� -- � � � , M�N DAY, J L1 LY�, ��1� .r�o^"� .c,, •., ATTACH M E NT 5 Commissioners spoke i }�`� th t. Th ���ommissioners �. shvuld only move forwar� .; �hr r � afFected re�idents. , A C T I�N: Commissioner� o n v - .e��mmen d t he a ro�a l o f t he ro ose d ro'ec t . p p p p p J t o c o n s t r u c t i n f i l l s i d e w a l k s �n � � e�n o r t h s i d e o f M o n t e g o S t r e e t. C o m m i s s i o n e r C a r s o n secon de d, and the motion�p .�vrr'the following roll call �ote: AYES: 6rownlee, Carson and Ross N�ES: None AB�ENT: Borda and Hal� �.b. Consideration of Ceneral Plan Amendment 12-0�2 �Bicycle and Trails Master Planj Associate PJanner Ryan FQSter presented the stafF report and responded to Commissioners' questions. Chair Hall opened the item to public comment. Aaron Henkel, South Alpine Street, spoke against the proposed pedestrian bridge o�er US 1�1 and road-diet for Fair �aks A�enue. Gina Vriend, Monte�o Stre�t, and Jim Sweeney, Allen Street, spoke about the dangers of cycling on Fair �aks A�enue. There were no further comments r�cei��d, and the public comment period was closed. Commissioners spoke against a road-diet for Fair �aks a�enue, and expressed reser�ations regarding the propos�d roundabout and ped�strian bridge. AC1'I�N: Commission�r 6rownlee mo�ed to recomm�nd the appro�al of the Genera! Plan Amendm�nt, including Commissioners' comments. Commissioner Carson second�d, and the motion pass�d on the following roll ca11 �ot�: AYES: 6rovvnlee, Carson and Ross N�ES: None ABSENT: 6orda and Hall �.c. Cor�sideration of R�quest from South County area Transit ta Relocate the City Counc�l Chambers Bus Stop Assistant City Engineer Micha�l Linn presented the stafF report and respond�d to Comm�ss�oners' questions. Vice Chair Ross opened the item to public camment. �eofF �traw, Executive Dire�tor, San Lu�s �bispo Regional Transit Authority, spoke about the request to mo�e the bus stap. Aaron Henkel, South Alpine Street, stated that the city should not use public funds to relocate th� bus stop. Th�re wer� no further comments recei�ed, and the public comment period was clos�d. Commission discussion ensu�d, and it was agr�ed that the cost to the city was appropriate as a public saf�ty measur�. AC'I'I�N: Commission�r Carson mo�ed to recommend the appro�al of the request by South �aunty Area Transit to relacate the ��t}� Council Chamb�rs bus stop. Commissioner 6rownlee seconded, and the motion passed on the following roll call �ote: AYES: Carson, Brownl�e and F�oss NC�ES: None ABSENT: 6orda and Hall Agenda Item 9.a. Page 166 o ATTA�HMENT 5 ��`�� ' ����� E N G i N E E R 5 � P L A N N � R 5 � � To: City of Arroyo Grande Date: 7-2-12 Attn: Ryan Foster P roject: B i ke and Pedestrian Master P I an From: SCOtt Robertson 1 Mart}�Inouye Update 2412 Re: Bike and Trails Master Plan �ob No.: 25-1275-19 Update 2412 Fi1e No.: R1565RSP441.D4C ��: The following is a summary of the response to specific comments colleCted by the City and deli�ered to 4mn i-Means for reyiew and Comment. Comment Res onses The .Plan identifies exi�tii�g and proposed bicycle facilities within the City jurisdiction on Ca�trans rig��t of way. Any work with in the State rigl�t-of-way wi I I require an encroachment permit issued from Caltrans. Detailed infor�nation may need to be submitted as part of the Informational Comment-No enCroacl�ment permit process including, but not limited response needed at this time to, complete plans, biological & cultural findings, hydra�i 1 ic stud ies, en�ironmenta l i•eports, traffic st�td ies, etc. Page 8,�a Itran s Bicycle Tran sportation Account (BTA} G rant. "C'he BTA stands for Bicycle Transportation All references corrected per "Account"not"ACt" comment Page 14, 21,32, 74, Definition of Bikeways �hen referencing bikeway Classifications, it is good practice ' ' Manual H DM , �eference to�HDM inCluded in to referen�e the �al ifornia H ighway Design � } text Bikeway classifications are found in �hapter 1�4�. The HDM was 'ust recentl u dated in Ma 2412. Page 34,B ike Box: �Ve ��vou ld recommend remo�ing the f i•st sentence regarding the bike box designatioi�. It doesn't seem tl�at the pl�n needs to go in to that leyel of specificity. �altrans I�as installed a bike box in Text correCted per comment tl�e �ity of San Lu is 4bispo at the comer of H igiiera Street and Madonna Road. . �C'h is is not a map-j ust a graph ic Page �6, Bike M ap on the title page. Graphic changed Tl�ere sho�1ld be a label and legend for this map to a�oid future confusion. 1 9�3 Ressrve Drive, Suite 1�D,Ross�ille, CA 95678 � �916}782-8688 fax�916�782-8s89 Agenda Item 9.21. Page 167 Arroyo Grande BikelTrails Master Plan 2�12: Response to Comments Page Z9, Goa� #3 Feel free to add Caltrans as a grant proposal caordii�ating Caltrans added to text as noted in agency. comment. Page 33, Bicycle Detection The Plan states "According to the directi�e, each lane of an intersection should be pro�ided with a limit line detection zone...." According to tt�e directi�e, Text corrected per comment. bicycle and motorcycle detection is no�v a mandate, tl�erefoi•e replace "sho�i Id" with "sha 1 l" Pa e 3 7, B ic c le Bou fe�ard S i n This sign is reference only to g � g illustrate different way finding The Bicycle Boule�ard sign +s not a standard sigz� in the �A � tions to define bike boule�ards. MUT�D. p Any reference to MUT�D remo�ed from head i n Page 46,Restripe �fog �ine} of Right Tra�el Lane: Restriping over the US 1�1 brsdge inust be according to the standards of tl�e CA MLrTCD ai�d HaM and would req�iire Caltrans appro�al. Addii�g a right edge line for the purposes of accommodating bicycle traf#ic is not a recommended action since it inay not gi�e enougl� room for bicyclists. A Recommendation to add fog lin� �lass II bike lane is the standard traffic control de�ice for remo�ed from text. delineating a right of way assigned to bicyclists. �f there is not sufficient space to constr�ict a C�ass li bik� lane, shared lane markit�gs �"shari•ows"} may be a better option, but would need further analysis by Caltrans. Page 5�,�lass 1��ercrassing of US 1�1 A �lass 1 o�ercrassing a f U S 1�1 wauld need appra�al by Caltrans and must alsa meet the standards af a Class 1 bikeway as defined i�� t��e H�M includ ing b�it not I imited ta , . . �nformation carr�ment.Na issues such as bikeway desi�n speed and si�ht distance res onse re uired. round curve which ina re uire Ion er curve radii and a p � a � �' q g larger faotprint on the bridge land ings than a pedestrian o�ercrossing. Page 51�Rau ndabou t �altrans I�as relinquished a partian af SR 2Z7 to the �ity of Arroyo Grai�de. The relinquisl�ment line is located Z5� feet north of tl�e intersection of Branch Street and �nfarmation camment.Na Huasna Raad. Any raadway madificat+ons assaciated respanse required. witl� the planned roundabo�it that extend beyand the rel���q���shment I�ne v►�au�d rec�u�re �a�trans a��ro�al. Page 56,�MA� Funding �MA� fui�ding is only a�ailable ta air quafity �MA� funding reference deleted nan-attain�nent areas. We suggest canfirming fram text with the SL� Air Po1l�itian �ontral District 2 943 Resen►e Drive, Suite 1��, Roseville, �A 95fi?S � �915}?82-Sfi88 fax �9�fi}?82-8s8� A enda Item 9.a. g Page 168 Arroyo�rande BikelTrails Master Plan����: Response to Comments whetlzer SL� County is currently in attainment. The Pismo Beach Bike Plan proposed Class�designation and It is the authors contention that the A� ��1� Master Plan Class 3 designation for�ak Park there is h sicall not enou h Road from Hwy 1�l to the Pismo Beach City l imits. It wou Id p � y g . current pa�ement width or right-- be optima� for either: of-wa �due to slope and 1} a modification of the A� Plan to show a proposed C1ass� � ' ' n f r i area or deyelopment constrarnts}to designatio o th s accommodate the bike lanes i n the ' of he A P lan o I ic ies notin area of road in q uestion without �}an obaecti�e written into one , t. . � P g ma or cost. Howe�er, lan ua e CI�55� U rades on roadwa s ad oining Arroyo �rande � g g pg �' -� simrlar to option #�was added to wou Id be supported. �r something to that effect. the ol ic to reference P Y ' ' rtunities- if one of these o tions �°°�dination with Pismo Beach to �oal is optimize funding oppo � p reso��e this issue if bike lanes are was written into the A� Plan, it would be helpful for Pismo ��5ired. Beach when a 1 in for BTA funds. The authors concur with this finding regarding markings. However, the pa�ed area along this �Vest�rand A�enue between Elm Street and Ha�coyn Road street is not sufficient to stripe a 5- does not qualify for�lass� bikeway which is not supported foot wide bike lane with�ut by the proper paWement markings and signs and needs to reducing already narrow trayel marked as a proposed class� in the bicycle and trails master lanes in vwidth. In order to stripe p lan. and mark these lanes appropriately the�ity�ircu lation Update wi I I need to study lane reductionlnarrowin alternati�es1 I find it�ery difficult to bike around Arroyo�rande with 'C'he curb in front of�ity Hall is Class � bikeways disappearing and re-appearing on a single painted for loading and unloading road and e�en to get on and off the SCAT buses in Arroyo only, and is also where the bus �rande. I think Arroyo�rande needs to make ways to 5tOP5. Howe�er, there is no curb increase easy use of bicyclist, pedestrians, and peop�e with ramp for ADA access from the disabilities. �t is currently difficult for buses to pull to the curb curb to the bus.Narrati�e added to at the bus stop at Arroyo�rande �ity Hall because there is no existing conditions regarding desi ated red curbs and no arkin si s. transit. The authors considered this so I ution but deterrn ined that the I think downtown Arroyo�ran�e should eliminate the center center lane is needed to reduce lane an East Branch Street and make it a road with a Class� congestion at intersections and bikevway.The current setup of the road is a waste of space to pr��ide a temporary stopping area ha�e a center turn lane to go nowhere, for deli�ery trucks(this solution has been pre�iously considered and re'ected b the Ci . �bel ie�e it would be in the best interest for the City of Arroyo �rande to update or help update, with help of Caltrans,to u pdate all traffic 1 ights in the City of Arroyo�rande with To be addressed in the��1� updated.pedestrians signals that are ADA c�mpl iant and �irculation Element U date. traffic si als need to be updated to detect p � m�torcyc leslt�icyc les using a Type D loop detector as referenced in 3 943 Reserve Drive, Suite 1��,RflseWiEle, GA 95�78 -- �91�}782-8�88 fax�91��782-8s89Agenda Item 9.a. Page 169 Arroyo Grande B ikelTrai ls Master Plan 24 I2: Response to Comments h ttp:llw��rw.d o t.c a.go�l h q ltra ffop sls u r�eylp e d estr i a nITR_M A Y44�5. df The County l ibrary on Branch Street is �ery d ifficu It to access for AI]A people getting�n and off the SCAT bus with ha�ing no sidewalks a�ong the road in front of the �ocation, and no T� ��addressed in the 2412 possible location to drop off wheelchairs at the bus stop. This �lrculation Element U date. also difficult for people with ADA to get on and off the bus at p the bus stop at City Hall since there are no designated no arkin si n5 andlor markin 5. Include better bike rack desi ns... ie. " eak racks". The W��� The�rnage �s just an examp�e. Text g P �' added below picture to say as better than in�erted U racks. much. Look at�AK PAR�BL`JD! o ride down that hi I I and o�er �e agree. Howe�er, existing g pa�ement widths and restricted the freeway w ith your kid there f Scary� That section is 1 isted R��V o tions ne ate widen in to in your p[an as c[ass III� It real[y needs to be Class II. Pismo p g g has their ortion of�AK PAR� BL`!D as e�entuall accommodate bike lanes without p � reducing lane widths or propert}� becoming c1a55 II. So should you guys. takes. Priorities#4 and #5 should be combined and a higher priority; r['his option was considered. Fair�aks needs to be safer�see photo�--maybe a "road diet" Howe�er, it was determined that like South Street in SL�. the reduction of lanes would create more congestion on th is road. Street section options being considered in the Circu�ation Plan u d ate. Traffic lights on Brisco, Halcyon and �ak Park�all at E1 Text added in policy discussion Cam ino Real}need to be set for cyc I i sts;cyc I ists ha�e to wait that the City shou ld coord inate for car or run red light. with Caltrans to e�aluate signal t i m ing and i mpro�ements to make crossings more pedestrian and bike friendt . It looks I ike we stil l ha�e some right of way or easement at the end of James way an google earth . If we do this seems like a better alternati�e than the mid street crossing off Talley ho. If you are on a bicycle you vvould ha�e to make a blind Comment not clear. More left turn to get a�ross. The connection back tv Paseo St ti�s information�c�arit}�requ2red to in with the bike conne�tion planed there and would pro�ide respond adequately. better access to Pau ld ing. It wou Id be more contro�ersial but cou Id be listed as an alternati�e. I seem to remember th�re►�as a eonnection betti►reen Laura and Grand thou�h a condo project, it is not on this Comment noted; map to be map. updated. I like the new path from �cean�ievW to el �amino Do Issues to he w�rked out between we ov�rn the land it is dravWn on? And could we depend �; and School. . ,� �' on the school to remain o en.. I doubt we ha�e ro�m for a bike lane etc on hillcrest. No Class II bike lanes are `]Ve ha�e not been able to fit a side walk in the past. p�osed for Hillcrest 4 943 Reserve Drive, �uite 1��, Roseville, CA 95678 �- �916}78�-8688 fax�916}78�-8689 Agenda Item 9.a. Page 170 Arroyo Grande BikelTrai ls Master Plan ��1�: Response to Comments The}�also seem duplicative .Ma}�be we would use �cyc I ists on bi ke bou 1e�ards the right of wa}�for the Mankins fire lane as a share the road with autos} conr�ection. [ ha�e always doubted the creek path from Fair�aks to 2!��, it�s on the resident�al side of the creek. How wou Id This is a Iong range goal of the we e�er get the right of way. Is it just a place holder in City to make this connection. case the AG e�er conwerts? [s the whole� block portion of Elm from Ash to Farrol going No. This section designated as an to be a bike �I�d? existing or proposed bike lane. 1.� "bic}�c��ng an� wa�k�ng off`er cIean, econom�c, �q u�et],and No chan e made to document health modes..." g 1.4 How are the nu rnber of bikelpedestrian estimates deri�ed Statistics deri�ed 1 extrapolated i.e. what methodolo ? from ��]�Census data Fi ure 3: "Existin Decom ose d Granite" S ellin re�ised er cornment �.� I read with great interest about the incenti�e program and T4 be determine b Ci -staffin em Io er tri reduction trackin . �Vou�d there be an wa to . . .� � g p �' p g � � and funding priorities to be track this for the short hops that ha�e gone from walking 1 determined. bikin to motorin in a few short ears? Perhaps more emphasis p laced upon "correct" cyc I i ng so as not to interfere with pedestrian tra�el e.g. no biking on Acknowled ed. Plan includes an sidewalks or addressing the rovt cause of a"need" to bike on g sidewalks due to fear oor�isibili dan er from motorists educatianat cvmpvnent. � P tY� g � etc. The crosswalk on Traffic �Vay near Nelson St. is useless since Acknowledged.No response many people don't stop and thus there is no way to get from required. To be addressed as part Miner's to Downtown with a strol ler without going in the of the��1� Circulation Element street. �J date. Crossing Fair�aks from North side of street is�ery scary. Acknovwledged.No response �nce you run across, the exits from the HS ha�e poor required. To be ad.dressed as part �isibility. of the 2�1� Circulation Element Update. Confusing bike signs near the bridge on Valley Road�that . ma be out of AG Ci Nvt �n ��ty. Is there a loop detector for making a left onto S. Mason from No loo detectors are installed in �V. Branch?I ha�e stood through a Iight cycle or two and P � r ot the reen arrow and es I know how the work . Arroyo�rande as of 2�1�. nc � � y , y Num bered b ike routes�as in SF}are�ery he Ipfu I to cyc I ists new tv the area. Ah, I just saw the Decision Signs in 3.� and I No response required. like them e�en more. Vl�hile l support the recommended priorities from 1 to� and the basic impro�ements to the prior plan, I disagree with the ranks from 7-]�. I also disagree with some of the constraints comments such as pre�enting class 2 lanes where it req�xires reduction of parking. �e.g. Tally Hv} I suggest that privr��y 1�, Comm�nt nated. No spec�f c �Vayfinding signs, be priority 7 and that priority 9,Tally Ho response or changes made. bike lanes, becornes priority 8. �hile the long range plan may include a 1�l highway bike bridge and a Huasna Road roundabout, studies are not as important as getting the basic connections done so eo le can ride rn�re safel and often. 5 943 Resenre Drive, Suite 100, Rvseville,CA 95�78 �- �91 G}782-8G88 fax�91 G}782-SS89 Agenda Item 9.a. Page 171 Arrayo Grande B i kelTrai ls Master P lan 2D 12: Respanse ta�amments VWe need ADA access ta the past office and Miners fram Ta be addressed as part af the Traffic VWa . 2D 12 �ircu latian Element L! date. tt is imperati�e that items a-k fram the streets and highways code sectian 891.2 be fully addressed, p�ease�erify the language used in the table on page 8 is complete, and includes Annatated language in table references to existing and fufure�proposed conditions. re�ised to exact�anguage per code. SL���G will hold off on the certification process until this ha ens. Pedestrran Plannrng tt is nated an Page i S that a Pedestrian Safety Re�iew was conducted by ITS Berkeley and that�illage residents noted ��mment note�. Stu� w2�� be impro�ements, but these are not I isted or addressed anywhere � else in the lan. SL�C�G Baard a ro�ed fundin for a �ncorparated by reference inta the p pp g p lan to pro�ide gu idance far future bicycle and pedestrian master plan, incorporating trails into edestrian im ro�ements. Plan this plan is great, and we appreciated the farward thinking of p p the Ci in this re ard but the edestrian cam onent wil I need �'"i I1 alsa be used in 2D 12 �' g ' � P �irculatian Element Update. to be addressed as�vell. P�ease dascuss the Pedestraan Safe�y Re�iew in more detail and include infarmatian abaut pedestrian cond itions and po I icieslprajects ta address them. �antile�ered access considered. �uercrassrn I�rscussran Howe�er,this salutian is � cons idered a low probabi 1 ity�ia Page 2D notes that widening of any of the US 1�i andlor �altrans and in�ol�es other Arroya Grande�reek bridges is "cost prohibiti�e unless Gannectian issues that make this d ri�en by a needed to correct an auto-centric issue".Note that S�lutian rob lematic. The location a bicyclelpedestrian feature cau Id be canti le�ered off a bridge p as a lawer cast alternati�e ta a bikel ed anl brid e. This �f this crassing alsa does nat serve p y g a central i zed approach that a wauld need ta be explored in the preliminary phase should s ecific bikel edestrian crassin that praject be a city priori�y. A1so, please inc�ud�dis�uss�on p p g af construction costs far all ro'ects. The o�ercrossin ro'ect W°u�d sol�e. Additional cast p � g p � estimates included. It should be cast is shaw to be far lawer than it would actually cost nated that the BTA is nat the onl because the fgure on ly represents the next step(prel iminary y anal sis . see camments below on fun�in , source for funding, with specific y } ( g} studies re uirin fundin fram a � g ather s�urces. Prrorrty Praject Lrst Be aware that BTA funds are anly for construction and the Additional cost estimates included. purpase af de�elaping a priori�y list is far BTA eligibility. priorities re�ised ta include N. Some af the priority projects an the list are nat BTA eligible. pak Parkwa and mo�e The�ity wil� need ta use local funds for the preliminary wark y on an ro'ec� in �he riori list. Fur�hermore for a�ercrossing ta Priority 9. It y p � p �' ' shou Id be noted that the BTA is consistency, please include comparable cost estimates across not the onl source for fundin projects: show all projects' construction cost in addition to y g' ro'ect de�elo ment costs. Presentl the �an shows ro'ect With specific studies requiring p � p y p p � funding from other sources. de�elapment costs instead of constructian costs an mare ex ensi�e ro'ects;this is sli htl misleadin . Fundrng: The discussian on SAFETEA-LU is only partially Language regarding Plan appra�al carrect. The bicyc le�lan is nat a requ irement far SAFETEA- and SAFETY-LU fund ing LL! funding. It is a requirement for Bicycle Transportation remo�ed. Account(BTA}funding. BTA funds come from local sales taxes, not federal �egislation. SL���G does not award or Llnclear re ag rding confusian af 1 st � 943 f�eserve Drive, 5uite 1��, Rosevil�e, CA 95�78 � �91�}782-8�88 �ax�91�}782-ssss Agenda Item 9.a. Page 172 Arraya�rande BikelTrails Master Plan 2�12: Respanse ta Camments administer BTA funds. That is dane thraugh the State Bicycle paragraph. Da nat knaw where Faci I ities Unit. SL�C�� is required ta re�iew and appra�e "BTA fund is descri�ed �icycle plans far the cities and caunty in aur regian. ��erall, erraneausly under Federal, the�aragraph befare the descriptians af the federal fund saurces is canfus i ng and nat accurate,thaugh it appears that Ta�le carrected ta rema�e CMAQ the infarmatian fallawing is �arrect�e.g. the BTA fund is funding reference. carrectly I isted under"State"e�en thaugh the descriptian af haw that funding warks is descri�ed �er-raneausly} under iiFederal?'. It wauld be ni�e if�the�table an page 5� �as specif c ta Arraya�rande and aur regian. Far example, histarically we ha�e nat had access ta CMA fund s. 7 943 Reserve Drive, Suite 1��, Roseville, CA 95s18 -- �91 S} 182-8�88 fax�91 S} 782-SS89 A enda Item 9.a. g Page 173 ATTA�HMENT 7 � � i � � � i i ' . ' i ■ Arroyo Grande Traffic �ommission �ity Council �hambers �i 5 East Branch 5treet Arroya Grande, CA 934�� . July�, ��i2 Dear Traffic Commissioners, Qn behal�o�the San Luis �k�ispo County Bicycle Coalition's fi�D members coun#ywide I would Iike to ask ��r your support f�r the Bicycle and Trails Master Plan�or the �ity o�Arroyo Grande.The bike plan is a formal document tF�at w�rks in coopera�ion with y�ur General Plan's�ir�ulati�n, �and use, and safety e�ements. It pro�ides the guidance necessary t� c�ntrnue de�el�pment in a manner that directly impro�es the ec�nomic, physical, and en�ironmental health ❑�y�ur c�mmunity. Most imp�rtantly, a comprehensi�e and appro�ed bike plan will drastically impr��e y�ur access t� ma��r state and federal in�rastructure and pr�gramming grants. The San Luis �bispo C�unty Bicycle Coaliti�n is comm�tted t� ass+sting e�ery city through�ut the C�unty with th� d���lopment and appr��al of their own bike plan. Qur eiforts ha�e c�ntributed to the appr��al �� bik� plans in San Luis�bispo City, Pasa Robles,Atascadero, Morro Bay, Gro�er Beach, Pismo Beach and San Luis C3b�spo C�unty. Up�n r��i�w �f y�ur General Plan, we belie�e that Arroya Grande exhibits th��alu�s n�c�ssary t� mak� th� Crty a strong candidate f�r funding �pp�rtuniti�s. �ur past experienc� expl�ring such opp�rtunities has assist�d in accessing milli�ns of dollars in �unding for bike and p�d�strian pro���ts locaily. Th�C�unty, City��San Luis�bispo, and City��Pismo S�ach haWe all rece��ed �apital improuement grants v�►ithin th�las��ive years. Please know that the Sicycl�Cvaliti�n is s�riously committed to collaborati�n on grant applicati�ns and w�ll submit I�tters�f supp�rt whene��r F]�551 k]I�. �ur bvard and staff are cammitted to strengthenin+g our pr�s�nc� in southem San Luis�bisp�C�unty. Qu�SUCC�SSfu� BrCyCIB V�I�f, Bicycle Kitchen, and 8icycl�C�nfdenc�Pragrams hav�alr�ady mad� app�aranc�s in S�uth County and conn�ct d�r�ctly t� th�safety and �ncourag�m�nt�E�ments included in your bike plan. We strongly encourage your C�uncil to k��p th�Sike Coaliti�n in mind when lvoking��r entities to assist with �dministration of th�s�elements. Enc�uraging acti��transp�rtati�n and recreati�n �n�ourages econ�m ic�itality.As cycling bec�m�s incr�asingly popular thr�ughout the C�untry, an appra�ed bike plan will dem�nstrate t�tourists, �isit�rs and r�sid�nts that y�ur city is th�best healthy acti�e family�ri�ndly d�st�nat�on�or them. Pl�as�ad�is�th�City C�uncil to appro��th� Bicycle and Trails Master Plan. Thank you �ery much �or your tim�and�ons�derati�n. Sin��r�1y, r _ . + Dan Ri�oir�, Exect��rve Drrector San Lurs �bisp�C�unty Bicycle C�ali�ion $6�Pacific St,5uite ��5 � 5an Luis�bispo,�A 934�� � �8�5� 54? ��55 Agenda Item 9.a. Page 174 � +! ,� _ __ �TTACHN�ENT 8 R a n Fost�r , From: Bru�� Hi1t�n S�nt: Tuesday, Ju , : 9 To: Rya n Foster Cc: Tony Fe��ara; Tim Brown; Joe Costello; Jim Guthrie; Caren Ray Subj�ct: Arroyo G�ande Bike Plan Review Dear Mr. �oster and memb�rs of the Council, I ha�e re�iewed the Arroyo �irar�de Bike Plan Draft and would like to make one comment regarding the plan in the Meadow Creek area. I belie�e that the proposed multi-use trail should e�t�nd further East along Meadow creek in order to connect w�th the Equestrian�ay trail ar�d to also e�tend through future de�elopment on the large parcels East �f Equestriar��ay. Please c�nsider e�tending this trail in�rder t�pr��ide for c�nnecti�it}� with e�isting trails and future de�el�pment. I would al�� like t� ��ice my supp�rt f�r the appr�ach the Cit}� has taken in pro�iding dec�mposed granite rnult-use trails. These are a l�wer c�st alternati�e that can be enj�yed by all trail users including equestrians wh� use the trai 1 s in the Eastern area o f the �ity. Best regards� Bruce Hilt�n 1 Agenda Item 9.a. Page175 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Agenda Item 9.a. Page 176